Comparative effects of valsartan versus amlodipine on left ventricular mass and reactive oxygen species formation by monocytes in hypertensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy

Sex-based differences in left ventricular mass reduction across angiotensin II receptor blockers in patients with heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction

Although angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are more effective in women for either reduction of blood pressure or heart failure (HF), the gender disparities and the impact of class/drug effects on ARBs in relation to cardiac hypertrophy and HF remain unclear. We aimed to investigate the sex-based and drug-specific differences in left ventricular (LV) mass reduction with ARBs. We employed the cohort of 193 hypertensive patients with HF and an LV ejection fraction of ≥ 45% treated with azilsartan or candesartan once daily for 48 weeks as a sub-analysis of the J-TASTE trial. After exclusion of patients without LV mass data nor the drugs, 170 patients were finally enrolled (azilsartan: male, n = 43, female, n = 39 and candesartan: male, n = 52; female, n = 36). We investigated the sex-based differences of the primary endpoint of the change in LV mass as assessed by echocardiography from baseline to the end of the study (48 weeks), and the secondary endpoint of the incidence of the composite cardiovascular endpoint (death from cardiovascular disease or hospitalization for heart failure). In the male stratum, the ratio of patients with > 10% LV mass reduction at 48 weeks was higher in the azilsartan group than candesartan group (40 vs. 19%, p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in LV mass reduction between two groups in the female stratum. There were no differences of the onset of the secondary endpoints between male and female groups, and azilsartan and candesartan groups. The event-free survival rate of the composite cardiovascular endpoints tended to be lower in patients with ≤ 10% than > 10% LV mass reduction (95.3 vs. 100% at 48 weeks, log-rank p = 0.11). In patients with HF, the effectiveness of either azilsartan or candesartan in achieving > 10% LV mass reduction depends on sex. Male is more sensitive to azilsartan than candesartan to achieve cardiac hypertrophy in HF patients.

Regression of cardiac hypertrophy in health and disease: mechanisms and therapeutic potential

Left ventricular hypertrophy is a leading risk factor for cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although reverse ventricular remodelling was long thought to be irreversible, evidence from the past three decades indicates that this process is possible with many existing heart disease therapies. The regression of pathological hypertrophy is associated with improved cardiac function, quality of life and long-term health outcomes. However, less than 50% of patients respond favourably to most therapies, and the reversibility of remodelling is influenced by many factors, including age, sex, BMI and disease aetiology. Cardiac hypertrophy also occurs in physiological settings, including pregnancy and exercise, although in these cases, hypertrophy is associated with normal or improved ventricular function and is completely reversible postpartum or with cessation of training. Studies over the past decade have identified the molecular features of hypertrophy regression in health and disease settings, which include modulation of protein synthesis, microRNAs, metabolism and protein degradation pathways. In this Review, we summarize the evidence for hypertrophy regression in patients with current first-line pharmacological and surgical interventions. We further discuss the molecular features of reverse remodelling identified in cell and animal models, highlighting remaining knowledge gaps and the essential questions for future investigation towards the goal of designing specific therapies to promote regression of pathological hypertrophy.

Novel Oxidative Stress Biomarkers with Risk Prognosis Values in Heart Failure

Oxidative stress (OS) is mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS), which in cardiovascular and other disease states, damage DNA, lipids, proteins, other cellular and extra-cellular components. OS is both initiated by, and triggers inflammation, cardiomyocyte apoptosis, matrix remodeling, myocardial fibrosis, and neurohumoral activation. These have been linked to the development of heart failure (HF). Circulating biomarkers generated by OS offer potential utility in patient management and therapeutic targeting. Novel OS-related biomarkers such as NADPH oxidases (sNox2-dp, Nrf2), advanced glycation end-products (AGE), and myeloperoxidase (MPO), are signaling molecules reflecting pathobiological changes in HF. This review aims to evaluate current OS-related biomarkers and their associations with clinical outcomes and to highlight those with greatest promise in diagnosis, risk stratification and therapeutic targeting in HF.

Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging Nanomedicine for the Treatment of Ischemic Heart Disease

Ischemic heart disease (IHD) is the leading cause of disability and mortality worldwide. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) have been shown to play key roles in the progression of diabetes, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia, which are independent risk factors that lead to atherosclerosis and the development of IHD. Engineered biomaterial-based nanomedicines are under extensive investigation and exploration, serving as smart and multifunctional nanocarriers for synergistic therapeutic effect. Capitalizing on cell/molecule-targeting drug delivery, nanomedicines present enhanced specificity and safety with favorable pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. Herein, the roles of ROS in both IHD and its risk factors are discussed, highlighting cardiovascular medications that have antioxidant properties, and summarizing the advantages, properties, and recent achievements of nanomedicines that have ROS scavenging capacity for the treatment of diabetes, hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerosis, ischemia/reperfusion, and myocardial infarction. Finally, the current challenges of nanomedicines for ROS-scavenging treatment of IHD and possible future directions are discussed from a clinical perspective.

Renin Angiotensin Blockers and Cardiac Protection: From Basis to Clinical Trials

Despite a similar beneficial effect on blood pressure lowering observed with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blocker (ARBs), several clinical trials and meta-analyses have reported higher cardiovascular mortality and lower protection against myocardial infarction with ARBs when compared with ACEIs. The European guidelines for the management of coronary syndromes and European guidelines on diabetes recommend using ARBs in patients who are intolerant to ACEIs. We reviewed the main pharmacological differences between ACEIs and ARBs, which could provide insights into the differences in the cardiac protection offered by these 2 drug classes. The effect of ACEIs on the tissue and plasma levels of bradykinin and on nitric oxide production and bioavailability is specific to the mechanism of action of ACEIs; it could account for the different effects of ACEIs and ARBs on endothelial function, atherogenesis, and fibrinolysis. Moreover, chronic blockade of AT1 receptors by ARBs induces a significant and permanent increase in plasma angiotensin II and an overstimulation of its still available receptors. In animal models, AT4 receptors have vasoconstrictive, proliferative, and inflammatory effects. Moreover, in models with kidney damage, atherosclerosis, and/or senescence, activation of AT2 receptors could have deleterious fibrotic, vasoconstrictive, and hypertrophic effects and seems prudent and reasonable to reserve the use of ARBs for patients who have presented intolerance to ACE inhibitors.

Direct Actions of AT1 (Type 1 Angiotensin) Receptors in Cardiomyocytes Do Not Contribute to Cardiac Hypertrophy

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Activation of AT₁ (type 1 Ang) receptors stimulates cardiomyocyte hypertrophy in vitro. Accordingly, it has been suggested that regression of cardiac hypertrophy associated with renin-Ang system blockade is due to inhibition of cellular actions of Ang II in the heart, above and beyond their effects to reduce pressure overload. We generated 2 distinct mouse lines with cell-specific deletion of AT_1A receptors, from cardiomyocytes. In the first line (C-SMKO), elimination of AT_1A receptors was achieved using a heterologous Cre recombinase transgene under control of the Sm22 promoter, which expresses in cells of smooth muscle lineage including cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells of conduit but not resistance vessels. The second line (R-SMKO) utilized a Cre transgene knocked-in to the Sm22 locus, which drives expression in cardiac myocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells in both conduit and resistance arteries. Thus, although both groups lack AT₁ receptors in the cardiomyocytes, they are distinguished by presence (C-SMKO) or absence (R-SMKO) of peripheral vascular responses to Ang II. Similar to wild-types, chronic Ang II infusion caused hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy in C-SMKO mice, whereas both hypertension and cardiac hypertrophy were reduced in R-SMKOs. Thus, despite the absence of AT_1A receptors in cardiomyocytes, C-SMKOs develop robust cardiac hypertrophy. By contrast, R-SMKOs developed identical levels of hypertrophy in response to pressure overload–induced by transverse aortic banding. Our findings suggest that direct activation of AT₁ receptors in cardiac myocytes has minimal influence on cardiac hypertrophy induced by renin-Ang system activation or pressure overload.

Regression of the Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Essential Hypertension on Standard Drug Therapy

 PURPOSE: The American College of Cardiology/ American Heart Association 2017 and European Society of Cardiology/European Society of Hypertension 2018 guidelines were a paradigm shift in hypertension management in contemporary medicine. Lowering of blood pressure to less than 130 (systolic) and 80 (diastolic) mm of Hg irrespective of cardiovascular risk is recommended. While intensive blood pressure control is commonly achievable with rational pharmacotherapy, the magnitude of left ventricular hypertrophy regression is an independent factor in improvement in cardiovascular health. The regression of left ventricular hypertrophy has been adjudged as a clinically useful surrogate marker that reflects the efficacy of hypertension treatment. Though angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/ angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEI/ARB) are the preferred initial drug for greater regression of left ventricular mass, the choice of add-on therapy, if required, is still debatable. Therefore, in our observational study, we sought to compare the reduction in left ventricular mass index in hypertensives with left ventricular hypertrophy on standard ACEI/ARB based drug therapy.  MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort (n=217) comprised of patients with uncontrolled hypertension (blood pressure>140/90 mm of Hg) and left ventricular hypertrophy (left ventricular mass index>115 and 95 gram/square meter in males and females respectively). The add-on drug in ACEI/ARB therapy was either thiazide diuretics (TD) or calcium channel blockers (CCB). Four sub-cohorts were constituted: mono-therapy - group A (n=70, ACEI/ARB), dual-therapy - group B (n=48, ACEI/ARB+TD) and  group C (n=51, ACEI/ ARB+CCB), triple therapy - group D (n=48, ACEI/ ARB+TD+CCB). Left ventricular mass index was determined using echocardiography at baseline and after 24 weeks of therapy.  RESULTS: There was no significant difference in baseline clinical or demographic variables between group B and group C. Baseline blood pressure and duration of hypertension was greater in group D compared to group A (P<0.001). The reduction in left ventricular mass index (mean ±SD) in the four groups (A to D) was 16.7±18.7, 21.0±20.8, 20.5±15.5  and 29.1±21.5 g/m2  respectively (D>A, P=0.011, B versus C, P=1.00). The corresponding change in blood pressure (systolic/diastolic) was 18.5±13.6/8.9±11.2, 27.5±19.2/12.2±9.3, 23.4±16.7/ 5.4±10.1, 26.6±19.5/10.7±12.8 mm of Hg respectively (systolic, B>A, P=0.027, D>A, P=0.048) (diastolic, B>C, P=0.013).  CONCLUSION: Anti-hypertensive treatment with angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers-based therapy produced graded regression of left ventricular hypertrophy with monotherapy, dual therapy and triple therapy.  In dual therapy, add-on of either thiazide diuretics or calcium channel blockers to angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers showed equal efficacy in regression of left ventricular hypertrophy independent of blood pressure reduction.

Angiotensin II and leukocyte trafficking: New insights for an old vascular mediator. Role of redox-signaling pathways

Inflammation and activation of the immune system are key molecular and cellular events in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases, including atherosclerosis, hypertension-induced target-organ damage, and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Angiotensin II (Ang-II) is the main effector peptide hormone of the renin-angiotensin system. Beyond its role as a potent vasoconstrictor and regulator of blood pressure and fluid homeostasis, Ang-II is intimately involved in the development of vascular lesions in cardiovascular diseases through the activation of different immune cells. The migration of leukocytes from circulation to the arterial subendothelial space is a crucial immune response in lesion development that is mediated through a sequential and coordinated cascade of leukocyte-endothelial cell adhesive interactions involving an array of cell adhesion molecules present on target leukocytes and endothelial cells and the generation and release of chemoattractants that activate and guide leukocytes to sites of emigration. In this review, we outline the key events of Ang-II participation in the leukocyte recruitment cascade, the underlying mechanisms implicated, and the corresponding redox-signaling pathways. We also address the use of inhibitor drugs targeting the effects of Ang-II in the context of leukocyte infiltration in these cardiovascular pathologies, and examine the clinical data supporting the relevance of blocking Ang-II-induced vascular inflammation.

Tandospirone enhances the anti-myocardial fibrosis effect of valsartan in spontaneously hypertensive rats

PURPOSE

Myocardial fibrosis (MF) is an unavoidable complication in patients with hypertensive heart disease. Valsartan, a widely used antihypertensive drug, was reported to inhibit MF. Deficiency in the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT, serotonin) transporter gene has been proven to cause MF. Long-term sympathetic nerve excitability activates renin angiotensin aldosterone system leading to MF. Tandospirone, a partial agonist of the 5-HT1A receptor, has been commonly used to relieve psychiatric symptoms. However, there is limited evidence on the combination of valsartan and tandospirone for the treatment of MF. Therefore, we investigated the synergistic effect of tandospirone on the anti-MF activity of valsartan in spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRs).

METHODS

Systolic blood pressure (SBP) of SHRs (12-week-old) was measured weekly using the tail-cuff method for eight weeks; the left ventricular was collected and weighted for calculation of the left ventricular mass index (LVMI). The myocardial histopathology of left ventricle was evaluated in rats by hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) and Mason's trichrome staining assays. The mRNA and protein expressions of transforming growth factor β (TGF-β1), Sma- and Mad-related protein 3 (Smad3), and fibronectin (Fn) were investigated by real time PCR, immunohistochemistry, and Western blotting analysis, respectively.

RESULTS

Tandospirone (40 mg/kg) could significantly improve the effect of valsartan (30 mg/kg) in decreasing the SBP of SHRs and lower the ratio of the LVMI in SHRs, compared to that of rats treated with valsartan or tandospirone alone. Tandospirone could also enhance the valsartan-induced reduction in collagen deposition in the myocardial tissues of SHRs. Furthermore, tandospirone could enhance the effect of valsartan on downregulating the expression levels of TGF-β1, Smad3, and Fn at both mRNA and protein levels.

CONCLUSION

We report for the first time that tandospirone could improve the anti-MF efficacy of valsartan via the TGF-β1/Smad3 signaling pathway in SHRs. Our findings may provide valuable insight into the scientific rationale for combining tandospirone and valsartan in the treatment of MF clinically.

Effect of Different Classes of Antihypertensive Drugs on Endothelial Function and Inflammation

Hypertension is characterized by structural and functional changes in blood vessels that travel with increased arterial stiffness, vascular inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction. Some antihypertensive drugs have been shown to improve endothelial function and reduce levels of inflammatory markers regardless of the effect of blood pressure lowering. Third-generation β-blockers, such as nebivolol and carvedilol, because they have additional properties, have been shown to improve endothelial function in patients with hypertension. Calcium channel antagonists, because they have antioxidant effects, may improve endothelial function and vascular inflammation.The Angiotensin Receptor Blocker (ARBs) are able to improve endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation in patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases. Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have shown beneficial effects on endothelial function in patients with hypertension and other cardiovascular diseases, however there are few studies evaluating the effect of treatment with this class on the reduction of C-reactive protein (CRP) levels. Further studies are needed to assess whether treatment of endothelial dysfunction and vascular inflammation may improve the prognosis of patients with essential hypertension.

Effects of allisartan isoproxil on blood pressure and target organ injury in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension

Evidence has shown that angiotensin II type 1 receptor antagonists have lower blood pressure and have target organ protective effects, but this is not the case for the drug allisartan isoproxil. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of allisartan isoproxil on blood pressure and target organ injury in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.In total, 80 essential hypertensive participants were randomly divided into an allisartan group and a nifedipine group (n = 40 per group), and their blood pressure was measured once per month for 6 months. A 2-dimensional echocardiogram was performed at baseline and at the end of the study. The serum levels of renal injury indexes, endothelial function markers, inflammatory factors, blood biochemical assays and urinary measurements were determined at baseline and at 6 months.At the end of the study, both systolic and diastolic blood pressure were significantly decreased in the allisartan group compared with baseline and showed the same antihypertensive effect as the nifedipine group. Meanwhile, the left ventricular remodeling, 24-hours levels of urinary microalbumin, endothelial dysfunction, and arterial stiffness were all significantly improved compared with that of the baseline and the nifedipine group (all P < .05).The present study showed that allisartan isoproxil had favorable blood pressure lowering and heart, renal, and endothelial protective effects in patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension.

Elevated Plasma Transforming Growth Factor β1 Levels Predict the Development of Hypertension in Normotensives: The 14-Year Follow-Up Study

BACKGROUND

Transforming growth factor β1 (TGF-β1) is a multifunctional cytokine. There is growing evidence that TGF-β1 is involved in the pathogenesis of hypertension and the development of target organ damage in hypertensives. Although several studies have shown that TGF-β1 induced vascular hypertrophy and remodelling in various vascular diseases, there are no longitudinal data on hypertension in the epidemiological studies. The present study tested the hypothesis whether elevated TGF-β1 levels can predict the development of hypertension.

METHODS

In 2002-2004, 528 subjects received health examinations in Uku town, southwestern Japan. We examined blood pressure (BP), body mass index, and blood test. Data on fasting plasma TGF-β1 were obtained from 528 individuals. Of these, 149 normotensives (BP <140/90 mm Hg without antihypertensive medications) at baseline were followed-up for 14 years.

RESULTS

The receiver-operating characteristic curve was used and the calculated cutoff value was 8.9 ng/ml. Of 149 normotensives at baseline, 59 subjects developed hypertension. Plasma TGF-β1 levels were significantly associated with the development of hypertension after adjustment for confounding factors. To further examine the association between them, we performed logistic regression analysis. We divided the baseline plasma TGF-β1 levels into 2 groups using a cutoff value. The significant high odds ratio [3.582 (95% confidence interval, 1.025-12.525)] for the development of hypertension was found in the highest group of TGF-β1 level vs. the lowest group after adjustment for confounders.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report demonstrating the causal relationship between them. Elevated plasma TGF-β1 levels predicted the development of hypertension in normotensives in a population of community-dwelling Japanese.

Effects of valsartan and amlodipine on oxidative stress in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension: a randomized, multicenter study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Oxidative stress plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of diabetic complications and antagonists of renin-angiotensin system and amlodipine have been reported previously to reduce oxidative stress. In this study, we compared the changes in oxidative stress markers after valsartan and amlodipine treatment in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension and compared the changes in metabolic parameters.

METHODS

Type 2 diabetic subjects with hypertension 30 to 80 years of age who were not taking antihypertensive drugs were randomized into either valsartan (n = 33) or amlodipine (n = 35) groups and treated for 24 weeks. We measured serum nitrotyrosine levels as an oxidative stress marker. Metabolic parameters including serum glucose, insulin, lipid profile, and urine albumin and creatinine were also measured.

RESULTS

After 24 weeks of valsartan or amlodipine treatment, systolic and diastolic blood pressure decreased, with no significant difference between the groups. Both groups showed a decrease in serum nitrotyrosine (7.74 ± 7.30 nmol/L vs. 3.95 ± 4.07 nmol/L in the valsartan group and 8.37 ± 8.75 nmol/L vs. 2.68 ± 2.23 nmol/L in the amlodipine group) with no significant difference between the groups. Other parameters including glucose, lipid profile, albumin-to-creatinine ratio, and homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance showed no significant differences before and after treatment in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Valsartan and amlodipine reduced the oxidative stress marker in type 2 diabetic patients with hypertension.

Cardiac CT assessment of left ventricular mass in mid-diastasis and its prognostic value

AIMS

To determine the influence of cardiac motion on measurements of left ventricular (LV) mass obtained with 64-slice computed tomography (CT) and to elucidate the prognostic value of LV mass on major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and all-cause mortality. Increased LV mass has been linked with MACE. Although Cardiac CT allows measurement of LV anatomy, it is susceptible to motion artefacts often requiring image acquisition during diastasis. There is a need to understand variability in LV mass measurements across phases of the cardiac cycle, and whether mid-diastolic measurements have prognostic value.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The study comprised two equally sized cohorts of patients that had undergone retrospectively gated cardiac CT: patients who had MACE and/or all-cause death at follow-up and a matched (age, sex, and risk factors) event-free cohort. LV mass was measured at mid-diastole, end-diastole, and end-systole. Correlation and agreement between phases were determined. The incremental value of mid-diastolic hypertrophy (LVH) over the National Cholesterol Education Programme (NCEP) risk was performed for LV mass indices normalized to body surface area (LVMI_BSA) or weight (LVMI_Weight). Of 166 patients, 31.3% experienced MACE and 28.9% died of any cause (follow-up 22.9 ± 13.4 months). LV mass at all cardiac phases were strongly correlated (r > 0.94). Mean mid-diastolic LVMI_BSA was higher in the cohort with events (93.7 vs. 80.7 g/m², P= 0.008) as was LVMI_Weight (2.26 vs. 1.88 g/kg, P = 0.001). LVMI_BSA and LVMI_Weight had prognostic value incremental to NCEP with 1.85 and 2.47 hazard ratios, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Measurement of LV mass can be obtained by cardiac CT images obtained at mid-diastasis. LV mass measurements obtained at mid-diastasis have prognostic value.

Independent influence of overweight and obesity on the regression of left ventricular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients: a meta-analysis

Overweight and obesity are associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes. However, the role of overweight and obesity in left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) of hypertensive patients is controversial. The aim of the current meta-analysis was to evaluate the influence of overweight and obesity on LVH regression in the hypertensive population.Twenty-eight randomized controlled trials comprising 2403 hypertensive patients (mean age range: 43.8-66.7 years) were identified. Three groups were divided according to body mass index: normal weight, overweight, and obesity groups.Compared with the normal-weight group, LVH regression in the overweight and obesity groups was more obvious with less reduction of systolic blood pressure after antihypertensive therapies (P < 0.001). The renin-angiotensin system inhibitor was the most effective in regressing LVH in overweight and obese hypertensive patients (19.27 g/m, 95% confidence interval [15.25, 23.29], P < 0.001), followed by β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and diuretics. In the stratified analysis based on blood pressure measurement methods and age, more significant LVH regression was found in 24-h ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) group and in relatively young patients (40-60 years' old) group (P < 0.01).Overweight and obesity are independent risk factors for LVH in hypertensive patients. Intervention at an early age and monitoring by ABPM may facilitate therapy-induced LVH regression in overweight and obese hypertensive patients.

Combined therapeutic benefit of mitochondria-targeted antioxidant, MitoQ10, and angiotensin receptor blocker, losartan, on cardiovascular function

OBJECTIVE

Mitochondria-derived reactive oxygen species (ROS) play important roles in the development of cardiovascular disease highlighting the need for novel targeted therapies. This study assessed the potential therapeutic benefit of combining the mitochondria-specific antioxidant, MitoQ10, with the low-dose angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), losartan, on attenuation of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy. In parallel, we investigated the impact of MitoQ10 on cardiac hypertrophy in a neonatal cardiomyocyte cell line.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eight-week-old male stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHRSPs, n=8-11) were treated with low-dose losartan (2.5 mg/kg per day); MitoQ10 (500 μmol/l); a combination of MitoQ10 and losartan (M+L); or vehicle for 8 weeks. Systolic pressure and pulse pressure were significantly lower in M+L rats (167.1 ± 2.9 mmHg; 50.2 ± 2.05 mmHg) than in untreated SHRSP (206.6 ± 9 mmHg, P<0.001; 63.7 ± 2.7 mmHg, P=0.001) and demonstrated greater improvement than MitoQ10 or low-dose losartan alone, as measured by radiotelemetry. Left ventricular mass index was significantly reduced from 22.8 ± 0.74 to 20.1 ± 0.61 mg/mm in the combination group (P<0.05). Picrosirius red staining showed significantly reduced cardiac fibrosis in M+L rats (0.82 ± 0.22 A.U.) compared with control (5.94 ± 1.35 A.U., P<0.01). In H9c2 neonatal rat cardiomyocytes, MitoQ10 significantly inhibited angiotensin II mediated hypertrophy in a dose-dependent manner (500  nmol/l MitoQ10 153.7 ± 3.1 microns vs. angiotensin II 200.1 ± 3.6 microns, P<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Combining MitoQ10 and low-dose losartan provides additive therapeutic benefit, significantly attenuating development of hypertension and reducing left ventricular hypertrophy. In addition, MitoQ10 mediates a direct antihypertrophic effect on rat cardiomyocytes in vitro. MitoQ10 has potential as a novel therapeutic intervention in conjunction with current antihypertensive drugs.

Assessment and management of left ventricular hypertrophy in Type 2 diabetes patients with high blood pressure

Diabetes is associated with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH). This article reviews the assessment and management of LVH in Type 2 diabetic patients and the available evidence on blood-pressure management in these patients in order to reduce LVH. The best treatment of LVH starts with early identification and rapid implementation of adequate treatment, especially in populations at higher risk. Angiotensin II receptor antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors should be the first-line therapy, because they are proven to be the most effective in reducing LVH in Type 2 diabetic patients. In patients where angiotensin II receptor antagonists and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are contraindicated or not tolerated, calcium-channel blockers should be the second option.

Association of phagocytic NADPH oxidase activity with hypertensive heart disease: a role for cardiotrophin-1?

Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) is an independent marker of mortality in hypertension. Although the mechanisms contributing to LVH are complex, inflammation and oxidative stress may favor its development. We analyzed the association of the phagocytic NADPH oxidase-mediated superoxide anion release and LVH in patients with essential hypertension and the role of cardiotrophin-1 (CT-1) and interleukin-6 (IL-6), cytokines implicated in cardiac growth. Blood pressure, echocardiography data, and serum CT-1 and IL-6 levels were obtained in 140 subjects: 18 normotensives without LVH, 42 hypertensives without LVH, and 80 hypertensives with LVH. The NADPH oxidase-dependent superoxide production was assessed by chemiluminescence in peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells were stimulated with CT-1 in vitro. Superoxide anion production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells associated with LVH and correlated with the left ventricular mass index. Serum CT-1 and IL-6 levels, which associated with the left ventricular mass index, correlated with superoxide production. Serum CT-1 and IL-6 levels were correlated. CT-1 stimulated NADPH oxidase superoxide production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells, which resulted in an increased release of IL-6. Our results show that superoxide anion production by the phagocytic NADPH oxidase associates with hypertensive heart disease, being significantly enhanced in hypertensive patients with LVH. This may be attributable to the activation of the NADPH oxidase by CT-1 and the subsequent release of IL-6. The phagocytic NADPH oxidase may be a therapeutic target in hypertensive heart disease.

Effect of aliskiren and valsartan combination versus aliskiren monotherapy on hemostatic biomarkers in hypertensive diabetics: Aliskiren and Valsartan Impact in Diabetics pilot trial

Valsartan is known to inhibit platelet activity in both in vitro and ex vivo clinical setting, whereas aliskiren in vitro modulates antithrombin-III in plasma. The authors tested how aliskiren and valsartan combination versus aliskiren monotherapy will affect hemostatic biomarkers in mild-to-moderate hypertensive diabetics in the frame of the Aliskiren and Valsartan Impact in Diabetics (AVID) trial. A total of 52 patients with type 2 diabetes and mild-to-moderate hypertension were equally randomized to aliskiren (150-300 mg/d) and valsartan (160 mg/d) versus aliskiren (150-300 mg/d) alone for 4 weeks. A total of 25 biomarkers were serially measured, of which 16 are related to platelet function, 6 to coagulation, and 3 to fibrinolysis. Aliskiren monotherapy has no significant impact on any of the assessed biomarkers. In contrast, valsartan on top of aliskiren provided significant inhibition of ADP-induced platelet aggregation (P=0.032), decreased shear-induced activation measured with PFA-100 analyzer (P=0.041), and diminished expression of GP IIb/IIIa activity (P=0.027) measured by PAC-1 antibody, GP Ib (CD42b, P=0.033), vitronectin receptor (CD51/61, P=0.046), P-selectin (CD62p, P=0.026), lysosome-associated membrane protein (CD107a, P=0.042), and CD40-ligand (CD154, P=0.048). In AVID trial, valsartan in combination with aliskiren mildly but significantly inhibited platelets, confirming previous observations. In contrast, aliskiren monotherapy does not enhance antithrombin activity, suggesting that previous data probably represent a laboratory artifact. Importantly, these randomized data were generated on top of low-dose daily aspirin, supporting extra benefit for combination use of angiotensin receptor blockers and renin inhibitors in high-risk diabetic population.

AT1 blockade abolishes left ventricular hypertrophy in heterozygous cMyBP-C null mice: role of FHL1

This research investigated the impact of angiotensin AT1 receptor (Agtr1) blockade on left ventricular (LV) hypertrophy in a mouse model of human hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM), which carries one functional allele of Mybpc3 gene coding cardiac myosin-binding protein C (cMyBP-C). Five-month-old heterozygous cMyBP-C knockout (Het-KO) and wild-type mice were treated with irbesartan (50 mg/kg/day) or vehicle for 8 weeks. Arterial blood pressure was measured by tail cuff plethysmography. LV dimension and function were accessed by echocardiography. Myocardial gene expression was evaluated using RT-qPCR. Compared with wild-type littermates, Het-KO mice had greater LV/body weight ratio (4.0 ± 0.1 vs. 3.3 ± 0.1 mg/g, P < 0.001), thicker interventricular septal wall (0.70 ± 0.02 vs. 0.65 ± 0.01 mm, P < 0.02), lower Mybpc3 mRNA level (-43%, P < 0.02), higher four-and-a-half LIM domains 1 (Fhl1, +110%, P < 0.01), and angiotensin-converting enzyme 1 (Ace1, +67%, P < 0.05), but unchanged Agtr1 mRNA levels in the septum. Treatment with irbesartan had no effect in wild-type mice but abolished septum-predominant LV hypertrophy and Fhl1 upregulation without changes in Ace1 but with an increased Agtr1 (+42%) in Het-KO mice. Thus, septum-predominant LV hypertrophy in Het-KO mice is combined with higher Fhl1 expression, which can be abolished by AT1 receptor blockade, indicating a role of the renin-angiotensin system and Fhl1 in cMyBP-C-related HCM.

Inflammation in high blood pressure: a clinician perspective

Hypertension is one of the most important contributors to atherosclerosis. A possible link between inflammation and elevated blood pressure has been suggested by several cross-sectional and longitudinal studies. Possible mechanisms include an imbalance between vasoconstrictors and vasodilators, amplified thrombogenesis and platelet activation, and perhaps a direct effect of inflammatory mediators. C-reactive protein (CRP), an inflammatory cytokine, may play an essential role in vascular inflammation and can directly decrease the production of nitric oxide, a vasocodilator. Angiotensin II (Ang II) up-regulates several inflammatory cytokines, leukocyte adhesion molecules, and chemokines through the activation of the nuclear factor-kappa B leading to a decrease in the bioavailability of vasodilators. The increase in oxidative stress and endothelin-1 production through Ang II may further contribute to vasoconstriction. Adipose tissue can add to the production of CRP and creates a prothrombotic state. The presence of low-grade inflammation, especially elevations of CRP, can help predict the risk of future cardiovascular events and is associated with target organ damage in hypertensive individuals. Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, beta-adrenoreceptor antagonists, and, to a lesser degree calcium channel antagonists, have shown efficacy in reducing CRP. Lifestyle changes such as exercise, weight loss, and tobacco cessation have also shown a similar efficacy. Whether targeting inflammation in the treatment of uncomplicated hypertension can alter the natural history of the disease or lead to improved outcome has yet to be determined.

Effect of erythropoietin-stimulating agent on uremic inflammation

BACKGROUND

The goal of the present study was to explore the effect of medications that are commonly prescribed for CKD patients on uremic state.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study. From January 2006 to October 2009, 1,623 patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) commenced hemodialysis (HD) at the 9 participating hospitals. The criteria for exclusion from the database were 1) serum C-reactive protein (CRP) > 3 mg/dL, 2) WBC count > 9,000/mm3 or <4,000/mm3, and 3) patients with cancer, immune complex disease, or vasculitis. A total of 900 patients were entered into the final database. We explored the association of serum CRP just before the first HD session with clinical characteristics, laboratory data, and medications for CKD in the predialysis period.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, age, CTR, eGFR, and WBC were significantly correlated with CRP. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure, serum albumin, LDL-C, HDL-C, Hb, Cr, and Ca were inversely associated with CRP. Use of erythropoietin-stimulating agents (ESA) using (r = -0.111, p = 0.0015), renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (r = -0.083, p = 0.0154), and calcium channel blockers (r = -0.1, p = 0.0039) was also negatively correlated with CRP. However, only use of ESA showed a significant negative correlation with CRP that was independent of other clinical factors and CKD medications on multiple regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

ESA may strongly reduce uremic inflammation in addition to improving anemia. To confirm this potential effect, a large-scale longitudinal study would be required.

Oxidative stress in hypertensive children before and after 1 year of antihypertensive therapy

BACKGROUND

The relation between primary hypertension (PH), target organ damage (TOD) and oxidative stress (SOX) is not known.

METHODS

We assessed SOX in 86 children with PH before and after 12 months of standard non-pharmacological and pharmacological therapy based on renin-angiotensin system blockade.

RESULTS

Patients with left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and with carotid intima-media thickness (cIMT) >2SDS had higher thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) concentrations in comparison to patients without LVH or with normal cIMT. Patients with metabolic syndrome (MS) had lower activity of gluthatione peroxidase, higher asymmetric dimethyloarginine (ADMA) and oxidized LDL cholesterol (oxyLDL) in comparison to patients without MS. TBARS correlated with left ventricular concentric hypertrophy, cIMT, albuminuria and SBP/24 h. ADMA and oxyLDL correlated with CRP and TG/HDL ratio. After 1 year of antihypertensive treatment blood pressure, TOD and prevalence of MS decreased. TBARS decreased and glutathione concentrations increased. The decrease of TBARS concentration correlated with the decrease of body mass index (BMI). Decrease of oxyLDL and ADMA correlated with increased insulin sensitivity, however markers of SOX did not correlate with BP decrease.

CONCLUSION

SOX in children with PH correlates with TOD, metabolic abnormalities, changes in fat amount and improvement of insulin sensitivity, but not with BP decrease.

Losartan and amlodipine on myocardial structure and function: a prospective, randomized, clinical trial

AIMS

To compare the effects of losartan and amlodipine on myocardial structure and function in hypertensive patients with Type 2 diabetes and left ventricular hypertrophy.

METHODS

After a 4-week placebo period, patients were randomized to losartan 50 mg (n = 90) or amlodipine 5 mg (n = 91) for 12 months, with a doubling of the dose in patients who did not respond after 4 weeks. Blood pressure was measured in the clinic every month, while conventional echocardiography and acoustic densitometry (integrated backscatter analysis) were performed at the end of the placebo period and after 12 months of treatment.

RESULTS

Both drugs reduced systolic/diastolic blood pressure to a comparable extent. Losartan significantly reduced left ventricular mass index (-19%, P < 0.001), interventricular septal thickness (-16.6%, P < 0.01) and left ventricular posterior wall thickness in diastole (-13.7%, P < 0.01). Amlodipine also decreased such measurements (-10%, P < 0.01 for left ventricular mass index, -9.3%, P < 0.05 for interventricular septal thickness in diastole and -10.1%, P < 0.05 for posterior wall thickness in diastole), but to a lesser extent than losartan. Both drugs significantly increased the ratio of peak filling velocity at early diastole to that at atrial contraction (E/A ratio) and decreased isovolumetric relaxation time: +13.7% and -8.5% with losartan,(both P < 0.01), and +7.9% and -4.9%, with amlopidine (both P < 0.05). Losartan, but not amlodipine, significantly reduced the relative integrated backscatter compared to baseline of the intraventricular septum (-10%, P < 0.01), and of the left ventricular posterior wall (-12%, P < 0.01), while increasing the cyclic variation of integrated backscatter of both the intraventricular septum (+35%, P < 0.001) and the left ventricular posterior wall (+32%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Losartan provided a greater attenuation of left ventricular hypertrophy than amlodipine, seemingly as a result of a greater reduction of myocardial fibrosis.

Differential effects of strict blood pressure lowering by losartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy and high-dose amlodipine monotherapy on microalbuminuria: the ALPHABET study

We investigated the effects of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) fixed combination therapy and high-dose amlodipine monotherapy on BP measurements and target organ protection. In this open-label multicenter trial, hypertensive patients were randomly allocated to receive losartan 50 mg or amlodipine 5 mg for 4 weeks, and the treatments were changed to combination of losartan 50 mg/HCTZ 12.5 mg or amlodipine 10 mg for a further 4 weeks. A total of 91 hypertensive patients (age 63.6 years), 47 in the losartan/HCTZ group and 44 in amlodipine group, were enrolled. After 8 weeks, the clinic BP, home BP, and 24-hour ambulatory BP were successfully controlled to the same level in both treatment groups (P < .001). Furthermore, both groups showed the same degree of BP reduction in the 24-hour, daytime, and nighttime (P < .001). B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) also significantly decreased to the same level in both groups, whereas the reduction of urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (UACR) was greater in the losartan/HCTZ group than in the high-dose amlodipine group (-47.6% vs 2.4%, P < .001). Losartan/HCTZ combination and high-dose amlodipine have similar effects on clinic, home, and ambulatory BP control and BNP reduction, whereas losartan/HCTZ has superior effect on UACR reduction when compared with high-dose amlodipine.

Role of plasma aldosterone concentration in regression of left-ventricular mass following antihypertensive medication

BACKGROUND

Aldosterone is known to bring about damage to various organs; however, it is unclear how important the changes in plasma aldosterone concentration (PAC) are as contributors to regression of left-ventricular (LV) mass in hypertensive patients following long-term treatment with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) or angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs).

OBJECTIVE

To assess the importance of changes in PAC during antihypertensive treatment.

METHODS

Forty-four untreated hypertensive patients were randomly assigned to either CCB (amlodipine) group or ARB (losartan) group. In addition to PAC measurements LV geometry was echocardiographically assessed with LV mass index (LVMI) and relative wall thickness (RWT) before and 6 and 12 months after treatment.

RESULTS

Reduction of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in 12 months was greater in the CCB group than in the ARB group (-19 ± 8 vs. -11 ± 15%, P < 0.05 as percentage reduction from the values before treatment). PAC decreased in 12 months in the ARB group but not in the CCB group (-31 ± 31 vs. 17 ± 53%, P < 0.01 as percentage reduction from the values before treatment). Larger percentage drop in PAC was associated with larger percentage reduction of LVMI (r = 0.45, P < 0.01 for all). Multiple step-wise regression analysis showed that the percentage reduction of LVMI is related to the percentage changes in SBP and the percentage changes in PAC (r = 0.46, P < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Regression of LV mass was the larger in patients with the greater decrease in PAC associated with antihypertensive medication regardless of CCB or ARB. Changes in PAC and SBP may be key determinants of regression of LV mass in hypertensive patients regardless of the medication selected.

The effect of aspirin on C-reactive protein in hypertensive patients

High level of C-reactive protein (CRP), most popular inflammatory marker, increases the risk of thrombotic cardiovascular events. Aspirin, which has both anti-inflammatory and anti-thrombotic effects, has the potential to influence CRP release. Several studies have been reported investigating clinical effects of aspirin on CRP levels. Some studies have reported aspirin reduced CRP levels, but other studies did not. This study was designed to assess the effect of low-dose aspirin on CRP levels in controlled hypertensive patients who had low inflammatory burden. Two hundred twenty-five patients with controlled hypertension were randomly divided into two groups; aspirin group (n = 122, 100 mg of aspirin) and the control group (n = 134). Patients with a CRP level >1 mg/dL (10 mg/L) were excluded because these high levels suggest infection. C-reactive protein level and lipid profiles were measured before therapy and 3 months after therapy. There were no differences in baseline clinical characteristics between the two groups. Low-dose aspirin showed no significant influence on CRP levels over 3 months (from 0.10 ± 0.0099 to 0.12 ± 0.0097 mg/dL, p = 0.12). Statin therapy did not influence CRP levels. Aspirin-resistance also had no influence on CRP levels. We conclude that low-dose aspirin has no significant effect on decreasing CRP levels in the patients with controlled hypertension which had low inflammatory burden. The anti-inflammatory mechanism may not play an important role in the cardioprotective effect of aspirin in the population with low inflammatory burden such as controlled hypertensive patients.

High-sensitivity C-reactive protein: an independent risk factor for left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with lupus nephritis

Objective. To determine the prevalence of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and its associated risk factors in lupus nephritis (LN) patients. Methods. 287 LN patients (age: 38.54 ± 13.31, 262 female) were recruited. Echocardiography and serum high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) were measured. Their relationship was evaluated by univariate correlation analysis and multivariate regression analysis. Results. The prevalence of LVH in this cohort was 21.25% (n = 61). Serum hs-CRP level was significantly elevated in patients with LVH compared to those without (8.03 (3.22–30.95) versus 3.93 (1.48–9.48) mg/L, P < .01), and correlated with left ventricular mass index (LVMI) (r = 0.314, P = .001). Multivariate regression analysis further confirmed that hs-CRP was an independent risk factor (β = 0.338, P = .002) for LVH in patients with LN. Conclusions. Our findings demonstrated that serum hs-CRP level is independently correlated with LVMI and suggested that measurement of hs-CRP may provide important clinical information to investigate LVH in LN patients.

Association between transforming growth factor-beta(1) and left ventricular mass and diameter in hypertensive patients

Angiotensin II influences development of left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) by stimulating cardiomyocyte hypertrophy, fibroblast proliferation, and collagen synthesis. Because pro-fibrotic actions of angiotensin may be mediated by increased production of transforming growth factor-beta(1) (TGF-beta(1)), we assessed whether serum TGF-beta(1) levels might reflect involvement in LVH development. We analyzed relationships between left ventricular mass and levels of renin, aldosterone, and TGF-beta(1) in 67 hypertensive subjects (mean age 64 +/- 11.3 years) with electrocardiographic evidence of LVH. Levels were obtained after a 2-week washout of antihypertensive medications; two-dimensional echocardiography was subsequently performed. Linear regression analysis showed a correlation between TGF-beta(1) and LV mass (r = 0.36, P = .002). This was apparently explained by the correlation between TGF-beta(1) and left ventricular diastolic internal diameter (r = 0.42, P < .001), because no correlation between TGF-beta(1) levels and LV wall thickness was found. In multivariate analysis, the correlation between TGF-beta(1) and internal diameter remained significant (r = 0.39, P = .0014). There were no racial differences in levels of TGF-beta(1) or left ventricular geometry, and no correlations between age, blood pressure, renin, aldosterone, and left ventricular mass or dimensions. These findings indicate that serum TGF-beta(1) levels are related to left ventricular structure in hypertensive subjects, suggesting its possible involvement in the process of hypertensive left ventricular remodeling.

Comparing angiotensin II receptor blockers on benefits beyond blood pressure

The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) is one of the main regulators of blood pressure, renal hemodynamics, and volume homeostasis in normal physiology, and contributes to the development of renal and cardiovascular (CV) diseases. Therefore, pharmacologic blockade of RAAS constitutes an attractive strategy in preventing the progression of renal and CV diseases. This concept has been supported by clinical trials involving patients with hypertension, diabetic nephropathy, and heart failure, and those after myocardial infarction. The use of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) in clinical practice has increased over the last decade. Since their introduction in 1995, seven ARBs have been made available, with approved indications for hypertension and some with additional indications beyond blood pressure reduction. Considering that ARBs share a similar mechanism of action and exhibit similar tolerability profiles, it is assumed that a class effect exists and that they can be used interchangeably. However, pharmacologic and dosing differences exist among the various ARBs, and these differences can potentially influence their individual effectiveness. Understanding these differences has important implications when choosing an ARB for any particular condition in an individual patient, such as heart failure, stroke, and CV risk reduction (prevention of myocardial infarction). A review of the literature for existing randomized controlled trials across various ARBs clearly indicates differences within this class of agents. Ongoing clinical trials are evaluating the role of ARBs in the prevention and reduction of CV rates of morbidity and mortality in high-risk patients.

Aliskiren/valsartan combination for the treatment of cardiovascular and renal diseases

Chronic activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) plays a key role in the development of hypertension, and cardiac and renal diseases. RAAS inhibitors, such as angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), improve cardiovascular and renal outcomes. However, studies have shown that residual morbidity and mortality remains high, despite current optimal treatment. More comprehensive control of the RAAS might provide additional reductions in morbidity and mortality. Direct renin inhibitors offer the potential for enhanced RAAS control as they target the system at the point of activation, thereby reducing plasma renin activity (PRA); by contrast, ARBs and ACE inhibitors increase PRA. Elevated PRA is independently associated with cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. A single-pill combination of the direct renin inhibitor, aliskiren, and the ARB, valsartan, at once-daily doses of 150/160 mg and 300/320 mg, has recently been approved by the US FDA for the treatment of hypertension in patients not adequately controlled on aliskiren or ARB monotherapy, and as initial therapy in patients likely to need multiple drugs to achieve their blood pressure goals. This article examines the efficacy, safety and tolerability of aliskiren/valsartan combination therapy, and considers the evidence for the potential organ-protection benefits of this treatment.

Regression of Left Ventricular Mass by Antihypertensive Treatment

Blood pressure–lowering therapy reduces left ventricular mass, but the question of whether differences exist among drug classes has not been fully resolved. Our aim was to compare the effects of diuretics, β-blockers, calcium channel blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, and angiotensin receptor blockers on left ventricular mass regression in patients with hypertension on the basis of prospective, randomized comparative studies. We performed meta-analyses, involving pooled pairwise comparisons of the drug classes and of each class versus other classes statistically combined, and meta-regression analyses to identify the determinants of the regression. The 75 relevant publications involved 84 pairwise comparisons and 6001 patients. Regression of left ventricular mass was significantly less ( P =0.01) with β-blockers (9.8%) than with angiotensin receptor blockers (12.5%), but none of the other analyzable pairwise comparisons between drug classes revealed significant differences ( P >0.10). In addition, β-blockers showed less regression than the other 4 classes statistically combined ( P <0.01), and regression was more pronounced with angiotensin receptor blockers versus the others ( P <0.01). In multivariable meta-regression analysis on all of the treatment arms, β-blocker treatment was a significant and negative predictor of the regression (−3.6%; P <0.01), but this was not the case for the other drug classes, including angiotensin receptor blockers. In conclusion, β-blockers show less regression of left ventricular mass, whereas angiotensin receptor blockers may induce larger regression. The inferiority of β-blockers appears to be more convincing than the superiority of angiotensin receptor blockers.

Combination therapy for treatment or prevention of atherosclerosis: focus on the lipid-RAAS interaction

Large clinical trials demonstrate that control of blood pressure or hyperlipidemia reduces risk for cardiovascular events by approximately 30%. Factors that may further reduce remaining risk are not definitively established. One potential target is atherosclerosis, a crucial feature in the pathogenesis of cardiovascular diseases whose development is determined by multiple mechanism including complex interactions between endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance. Reciprocal relationships between endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance as well as cross-talk between hyperlipidemia and the rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system may contribute to development of atherosclerosis. Therefore, one appealing strategy for prevention or treatment of atherosclerosis may be to simultaneously address several risk factors with combination therapies that target multiple pathogenic mechanisms. Combination therapy with statins, peroxisome proliferators-activated receptor agonists, and rennin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockers demonstrate additive beneficial effects on endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance when compared with monotherapies in patients with cardiovascular risk factors. Additive beneficial effects of combined therapy are mediated by both distinct and interrelated mechanisms, consistent with both pre-clinical and clinical investigations. Thus, combination therapy may be an important concept in developing more effective strategies to treat and prevent atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, and co-morbid metabolic disorders characterized by endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance.

Effects of valsartan on morbidity and mortality in uncontrolled hypertensive patients with high cardiovascular risks: KYOTO HEART Study

AIMS

The objective was to assess the add-on effect of valsartan on top of the conventional treatment for high-risk hypertension in terms of the morbidity and mortality.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The KYOTO HEART Study was of a multicentre, Prospective Randomised Open Blinded Endpoint (PROBE) design, and the primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal cardiovascular events (clintrials.gov NCT00149227). A total of 3031 Japanese patients (43% female, mean 66 years) with uncontrolled hypertension were randomized to either valsartan add-on or non-ARB treatment. Median follow-up period was 3.27 years. In both groups, blood pressure at baseline was 157/88 and 133/76 mmHg at the end of study. Compared with non-ARB arm, valsartan add-on arm had fewer primary endpoints (83 vs. 155; HR 0.55, 95% CI 0.42-0.72, P = 0.00001).

CONCLUSION

Valsartan add-on treatment to improve blood pressure control prevented more cardiovascular events than conventional non-ARB treatment in high-risk hypertensive patients in Japan. These benefits cannot be entirely explained by a difference in blood pressure control.

Predictors of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

The aim of the present study is to determine the prevalence and predictors of left ventricular hypertrophy in patients with stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease. Thirty-four patients were included. In addition to hematological and biochemical evaluations, echocardiography and ambulatory blood pressure monitoring were performed both at the beginning and at the end of the first year. Echocardiographic left ventricular mass was calculated and indexed to body surface area to calculate left ventricular mass index (LVMI). Left ventricular hypertrophy was diagnosed if LVMI >131 g/m(2) in male and >100 g/m(2) in female patients. During the follow-up period, estimated glomerular filtration rate decreased from 36.6+/-11.7 to 31.0+/-14.0 mL/min (p = 0.03), while LVMI increased from 130.2+/-35.6 to 140.5+/-30.5 g/m(2) (p = 0.055). Left ventricular hypertrophy was detected in 67.6% of the patients at the baseline and in 89.7% at the end of the study (p = 0.011). The independent predictors of the final LVMI were age (p = 0.035), baseline day-time systolic blood pressure (p = 0.01), baseline C-reactive protein (p = 0.001), and the decrease in glomerular filtration rate during the follow-up (p = 0.002). Left ventricular hypertrophy is quite frequent among patients with stage 3 or 4 chronic kidney disease, and its prevalence increases while glomerular filtration rate decreases during the follow-up. The early detection of left ventricular hypertrophy and both prevention of the deterioration of renal function and aggressive blood pressure control may help to achieve a decrease in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in these patients.

Safety and efficacy of antihypertensive therapy with add-on angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker after successful coronary stent implantation

This study was performed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of additional antihypertensive therapy with angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB; olmesartan or valsartan) after successful stent implantation in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Fifty patients with CAD after successful stent implantation were included in this study. They were divided into an ARB group, which initially received olmesartan (n=20, 14+/-8 mg day(-1)) or valsartan (n=20, 60+/-23 mg day(-1)) immediately after stent implantation, and a non-ARB group (n=10) according to their blood pressure (BP). Follow-up coronary angiography, measurement of BP and blood sampling were performed before (at baseline) and 6-8 months after stent implantation (at follow-up). There were no significant differences in the baseline characteristics between the groups, except for BP. Although there were no changes in % diameter restenosis between the groups, the BP level in the ARB group at follow-up showed a significant reduction (125+/-12/69+/-9 mm Hg) and reached the target BP. There were no critical adverse effects in the ARB group throughout the study period. In addition, serum high-sensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and pentraxin 3 were significantly decreased in the ARB group but not in the non-ARB group. Although olmesartan and valsartan induced similar BP-lowering effects, olmesartan but not valsartan induced a significant decrease in hs-CRP, but did not increase serum uric acid. In conclusion, antihypertensive therapy with add-on low-dose ARB after stent implantation was safe and achieved the target BP. In particular, olmesartan had an anti-inflammatory effect.

Vascular and metabolic effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers

Angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are widely used in patients with hypertension, heart failure and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Several large clinical trials have demonstrated that these agents are effective in reducing cardiovascular mortality and morbidity. These benefits are partly independent of the degree of blood pressure reduction and most likely related to ARBs' anti-inflammatory, metabolic and vascular effects. Clinical studies showed that the anti-inflammatory effect of ARBs could be related to the dosage and/or the length of the treatment. In large clinical trials, ARBs have inconsistently reduced the risk of new-onset T2DM. Among ARBs, only losartan significantly reduced serum uric acid levels. Moreover, it has been demonstrated that ARBs improve endothelial dysfunction in patients with hypertension and/or coronary artery disease (CAD), while all but one of the studies proved that these agents could usually, after 6-12 months of therapy, induce regression of vascular hypertrophy in hypertensive patients. These positive effects could be relevant to vascular protection and, together with the blood pressure reduction, constitute the background of the improved outcome observed in clinical studies on mortality and/or morbidity in hypertensive, high-risk and CAD patients. The clinical significance of the different potency of ARBs needs to be investigated further in specific and adequately powered trials.

The effect of angiotensin receptor blockers on C-reactive protein and other circulating inflammatory indices in man

Anti-inflammatory properties may contribute to the pharmacological effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), a leading therapeutic class in the management of hypertension and related cardiovascular and renal diseases. That possibility, supported by consistent evidence from in-vitro and animal studies showing pro-inflammatory properties of angiotensin II, has been evaluated clinically by measuring the effect of ARBs on C-reactive protein and other circulating indices of inflammation (e-selectin, adhesion molecules, interleukin-6, tissue necrosis factor-alpha, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) of potential clinical relevance, a body of evidence that this paper aims to review.

Does reversal of oxidative stress and inflammation provide vascular protection?

Chronic inflammation is a pathogenic feature of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease mediated by substances including angiotensin II, proinflammatory cytokines, and free fatty acids. This promotes generation of reactive oxygen species in vascular endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, which mediate injury through several mechanisms. Reciprocal relationships between endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance as well as cross-talk between hyperlipidaemia and the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) at multiple levels contribute importantly to a variety of risk factors. Therefore, combination therapy that simultaneously addresses multiple mechanisms for the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis is an attractive emerging concept for slowing progression of atherosclerosis. Combined therapy with statins, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors, and RAAS blockade demonstrates additive beneficial effects on endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance when compared with monotherapies in patients with cardiovascular risk factors due to both distinct and interrelated mechanisms. These additive beneficial effects of combined therapies are consistent with laboratory and recent clinical studies. Thus, combination therapy may be an important paradigm for treating and slowing progression of atherosclerosis, coronary heart disease, and co-morbid metabolic disorders characterized by endothelial dysfunction and insulin resistance.

Evidence for benefits of angiotensin receptor blockade beyond blood pressure control

Elevated levels of angiotensin II result in oxidative stress and endothelial dysfunction, which initiate atherogenic pathologic processes that are important in cardiovascular disease development. Angiotensin II induces its deleterious effects primarily through the type 1 receptor; these effects are inhibited by angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) directly at the receptor level. Angiotensin II may potentiate protective mechanisms through stimulation of the type 2 receptor, which is not blocked by ARBs. Accumulating data suggest that blockade of angiotensin II production or activity provides vascular and cardioprotective benefits, such as reduction of atrial fibrillation, acute myocardial infarction, and heart failure events. Moreover, blockade of the renin-angiotensin system has been shown to offer renal protection in subjects with and without diabetes mellitus and to reduce the risk of new-onset diabetes.