Evaluation, Management, and Outcomes of Patients Poorly Responsive to Cardiac Resynchronization Device Therapy

Association Between use of an Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Algorithm and Healthcare Utilization and Cost

OBJECTIVES

To assess the association between use of adaptive pacing on clinical and economic outcomes of CRT recipients in a real-world analysis.

BACKGROUND

The AdaptivCRTTM algorithm was shown in prior subgroup analyses of prospective trials to achieve clinical benefits, but a large prospective trial showed nonsignificant changes in the endpoint of mortality or heart failure hospitalizations.

METHODS

CRT-implanted patients from the Optum Clinformatics® database with ≥90 days of follow-up were included. Remote monitoring data was used to classify patients based on CRT setting - adaptive biventricular and left ventricular pacing (aCRT) vs. standard biventricular pacing (Standard CRT). Inverse probability of treatment weighting was used to adjust for baseline differences between groups. Mortality, 30-day readmissions, healthcare utilization, and payer and patient costs were evaluated post-implantation.

RESULTS

This study included 2,412 aCRT and 1,638 Standard CRT patients (mean follow-up: 2.4 ± 1.4 years), with balanced baseline characteristics after adjustment. The aCRT group was associated with lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio = 0.88 [95% confidence interval (CI):0.80, 0.96]), fewer all-cause 30-day readmissions (adjusted incidence rate ratio = 0.87 [CI:0.81, 0.94]), and fewer all-cause and HF-related inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department (ED) visits. The aCRT cohort was also associated with lower all-cause outpatient payer-paid amounts and lower all-cause and HF-related inpatient and ED patient-paid amounts.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective analysis of a large real-world cohort, use of an adaptive CRT algorithm was associated with lower mortality, reduced healthcare resource utilization, and lower payer and patient costs.

LAY SUMMARY

While cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) improves quality of life and clinical outcomes for certain heart failure patients, some patients do not respond to this therapy. Adaptive CRT algorithms (aCRT), such as AdaptivCRTTM, have been developed with the goal of improving effectiveness of CRT, and consequently, clinical and economic outcomes. This research study used a large database of administrative claims data - which contains information on patient demographics, diagnoses, healthcare services received, mortality, and cost data - to compare clinical and economic outcomes between CRT patients with the aCRT algorithm turned on (aCRT group) and CRT patients with the aCRT algorithm turned off (standard CRT group). Statistical methods were used to adjust for baseline differences between the aCRT group and standard CRT groups. Ultimately, the aCRT group was found to have a lower risk of all-cause mortality, fewer all-cause 30-day readmissions, fewer hospital visits (including inpatient, outpatient, and emergency department visits), and lower costs to payers and patients for specific types of costs.

Heart Size Difference Drives Sex-Specific Response to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: A Post Hoc Analysis of the MORE-MPP CRT Trial

BACKGROUND

Studies have reported that female sex predicts superior cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. One theory is that this association is related to smaller female heart size, thus increased relative dyssynchrony at a given QRS duration (QRSd). Our objective was to investigate the mechanisms of sex-specific CRT response relating to heart size, relative dyssynchrony, cardiomyopathy type, QRS morphology, and other patient characteristics.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This is a post hoc analysis of the MORE-CRT MPP (More Response on Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with Multipoint Pacing)  trial (n=3739, 28% women), with a subgroup analysis of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy and left bundle-branch block (n=1308, 41% women) to control for confounding characteristics. A multivariable analysis examined predictors of response to 6 months of conventional CRT, including sex and relative dyssynchrony, measured by QRSd/left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV). Women had a higher CRT response rate than men (70.1% versus 56.8%, P<0.0001). In subgroup analysis, regression analysis of the nonischemic cardiomyopathy left bundle-branch block subgroup identified QRSd/LVEDV, but not sex, as a modifier of CRT response (P<0.0039). QRSd/LVEDV was significantly higher in women (0.919) versus men (0.708, P<0.001). CRT response was 78% for female patients with QRSd/LVEDV greater than the median value, compared with 68% with QRSd/LVEDV less than the median value (P=0.012). The association between CRT response and QRSd/LVEDV was strongest at QRSd <150 ms.

CONCLUSIONS

In the nonischemic cardiomyopathy left bundle-branch block population, increased relative dyssynchrony in women, who have smaller heart sizes than their male counterparts, is a driver of sex-specific CRT response, particularly at QRSd <150 ms. Women may benefit from CRT at a QRSd <130 ms, opening the debate on whether sex-specific QRSd cutoffs or QRS/LVEDV measurement should be incorporated into clinical guidelines.

R-R' interval in the left bundle branch block predicts long-term outcomes after cardiac resynchronization therapy by estimating greater mechanical dyssynchrony and viable myocardium

BACKGROUND

Typical left bundle branch block (LBBB) shows 2 peaks of the R wave, which reflect activation reaching the interventricular septum (R) and posterolateral wall (R') sequentially.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship among R-R' interval (RR'), mechanical dyssynchrony, extent of viable myocardium, and long-term outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates.

METHODS

The study enrolled 49 patients (34 men; mean age: 69 ± 11 years) with LBBB who received CRT. The LBBB definition used requires the presence of mid-QRS notching in leads V1, V2, V5, V6, I, and aVL. Baseline evaluations were QRS duration (QRSd) and RR' measured from the 12-lead electrocardiogram; eyeball dyssynchrony (apical rocking and septal flash) and opposing-wall delay by speckle tracking from echocardiography, and extent of viable myocardium assessed by thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography. Primary outcomes included the combination of all-cause death and heart failure-related hospitalization.

RESULTS

RR' predicted volumetric response better than QRSd (area under the curve 0.73 vs 0.67, respectively). The long RR' group (≥48 ms) revealed more frequent eyeball dyssynchrony and significantly greater radial (SL) and circumferential dyssynchrony (AP and SL) and %viable segment than the short RR' group. In multivariate regression analysis, only RR' ≥48 ms was independently associated with higher event-free survival rates following CRT (hazard ratio 0.21; P = .014).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that RR' in complete LBBB was associated with mechanical dyssynchrony, extent of viable myocardium, and long-term outcomes following CRT.

Add-on Sacubitril/Valsartan Therapy Induces Left Ventricular Remodeling in Non-responders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy to a Similar Extent as in Heart Failure Patients Without Resynchronization

INTRODUCTION

Non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-NR) have poor prognosis. Sacubitril/valsartan (SV) treatment improved the outcome of patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (HFrEF) in randomized trials with no data on the specific cohort of CRT-NRs. The aim of this study was to compare the echocardiographic and biomarker changes in CRT-NR patients treated with versus without SV, and in patients with HFrEF on SV therapy.

METHODS

CRT-NR patients initiated on SV (group I), CRT-NR patients on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers (ACEi/ARB) (group II), and patients with HFrEF (without CRT) initiated on SV (group III) were identified in our heart failure (HF) registry. CRT-NR was defined as < 10% improvement in left ventricular ejection fraction (LV EF) 6 months after the implantation. Echocardiographic parameters and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) levels at baseline and at the end of follow-up were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 275 patients (group I, 70; group II, 70; and group III, 135) were included. After a follow-up of 7.54 ± 1.8 months (mean ± standard deviation [SD]), LV EF (%) increased in group I (25.2 ± 5.7 versus 29.4% ± 6.7; p < 0.001) and in group III (26.6 ± 6.4 versus 29.9 ± 6.7; p < 0.001). LV end-systolic diameters (mm) decreased in group I (56.6 ± 9.0 versus 54.3 ± 8.7; p = 0.004) and in group III (55.9 ± 9.9 versus 54.3 ± 11.2; p = 0.021). The levels of NT-proBNP (pg/mL) decreased in group I (2058.86 [1041.07-4502.51] versus 1121.55 [545-2541]; p < 0.001) and in group III (2223.35 [1233.03-4795.96] versus 1123.09 [500.38-2651.27]; p < 0.001). The extent of improvement was similar in groups I and III (p > 0.05). No significant changes were detected in group II.

CONCLUSION

SV therapy induced similar improvements in echocardiographic parameters and in NT-proBNP levels in CRT-NR patients and in patients with HFrEF without resynchronization.

[History of cardiac resynchronization therapy : 30 years of electrotherapeutic management for heart failure]

The first permanent biventricular pacing system was implanted more than 30 years ago. In this article, the historical development of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), starting with the pathophysiological concept, followed by the initial "proof of concept" studies and finally the large prospective-randomized studies that led to the implementation of CRT in heart failure guidelines, is outlined. Since the establishment of CRT, both an expansion of indications, e.g., for patients with mild heart failure and atrial fibrillation, but also the return to patients with broad QRS complex and left bundle branch block who benefit most of CRT has evolved. New techniques such as conduction system pacing will have major influence on pacemaker therapy in heart failure, both as an alternative or adjunct to CRT.

LBBB and heart failure-Relationships among QRS amplitude, duration, height, LV mass, and sex

BACKGROUND

Height, left ventricular (LV) size, and sex were proposed as additional criteria for patient selection for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) but their connections with the QRS complex in left bundle branch block (LBBB) are little investigated. We evaluated these.

METHODS

Among patients with "true" LBBB, QRS duration (QRSd) and amplitude, and LV hypertrophy indices, were correlated with patient's height and LV mass, and compared between sexes.

RESULTS

In this study cohort (n = 220; 60 ± 12 years; left ventricular ejection fraction [LVEF] 21 ± 7%; mostly New York Heart Association II-III, QRSd 165 ± 19 ms; 57% female; 70% responders [LVEF increased ≥5%]), LV mass was increased in all patients. QRS amplitude did not correlate with LV mass or height in any individual lead or with Sokolow-Lyon or Cornell-Lyon indices. QRSd did not correlate with height. In contrast, QRSd correlated strongly with LV mass (r = .51). CRT response rate was greater in women versus men (84% vs. 58%, p < .001) despite shorter QRSd [7% shorter (p < .0001)]. QRSd normalized for height resulted in a 2.7% and for LV mass 24% greater index in women.

CONCLUSION

True LBBB criteria do not exclude HF patients with increased LV mass. QRS amplitudes do not correlate with height or LV mass. Height does not affect QRSd. However, QRSd correlates with LV size. QRSd normalized for LV mass results in 24% greater value in women in the direction of sex-specific responses. LV mass may be a significant nonelectrical modifier of QRSd for CRT.

Imaging in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices: part 1-imaging before and during device implantation. A clinical consensus statement of the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC

More than 500 000 cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are implanted in the European Society of Cardiology countries each year. The role of cardiovascular imaging in patients being considered for CIED is distinctly different from imaging in CIED recipients. In the former group, imaging can help identify specific or potentially reversible causes of heart block, the underlying tissue characteristics associated with malignant arrhythmias, and the mechanical consequences of conduction delays and can also aid challenging lead placements. On the other hand, cardiovascular imaging is required in CIED recipients for standard indications and to assess the response to device implantation, to diagnose immediate and delayed complications after implantation, and to guide device optimization. The present clinical consensus statement (Part 1) from the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association, provides comprehensive, up-to-date, and evidence-based guidance to cardiologists, cardiac imagers, and pacing specialists regarding the use of imaging in patients undergoing implantation of conventional pacemakers, cardioverter defibrillators, and resynchronization therapy devices. The document summarizes the existing evidence regarding the use of imaging in patient selection and during the implantation procedure and also underlines gaps in evidence in the field. The role of imaging after CIED implantation is discussed in the second document (Part 2).

Heart size disparity drives sex-specific response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: a post-hoc analysis of the MORE-MPP CRT trial

Background

Studies have reported that female sex predicts superior cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. One theory is that this association is related to smaller female heart size, thus increased "relative dyssynchrony" at given QRS durations (QRSd).

Objective

To investigate the mechanisms of sex-specific CRT response relating to heart size, relative dyssynchrony, cardiomyopathy type, QRS morphology, and other patient characteristics.

Methods

A post-hoc analysis of the MORE-CRT MPP trial (n=3739, 28% female), with a sub-group analysis of patients with non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) and left bundle branch block (LBBB) (n=1308, 41% female) to control for confounding characteristics. A multivariable analysis examined predictors of response to 6 months of conventional CRT, including sex and relative dyssynchrony, measured by QRSd/LVEDV (left ventricular end-diastolic volume).

Results

Females had a higher CRT response rate than males (70.1% vs. 56.8%, p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis: Regression analysis of the NICM LBBB subgroup identified QRSd/LVEDV, but not sex, as a modifier of CRT response (p<0.0039). QRSd/LVEDV was significantly higher in females (0.919) versus males (0.708, p<0.001). CRT response was 78% for female patients with QRSd/LVEDV>median value, compared to 68% < median value (p=0.012). Association between CRT response and QRSd/LVEDV was strongest at QRSd<150ms.

Conclusions

In the NICM LBBB population, increased relative dyssynchrony in females, who have smaller heart sizes than their male counterparts, is a driver of sex-specific CRT response, particularly at QRSd <150ms. Females may benefit from CRT at a QRSd <130ms, opening the debate on whether sex-specific QRSd cut-offs or QRS/LVEDV measurement should be incorporated into clinical guidelines.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Adaptive versus conventional cardiac resynchronisation therapy in patients with heart failure (AdaptResponse): a global, prospective, randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Continuous automatic optimisation of cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT), stimulating only the left ventricle to fuse with intrinsic right bundle conduction (synchronised left ventricular stimulation), might offer better outcomes than conventional CRT in patients with heart failure, left bundle branch block, and normal atrioventricular conduction. This study aimed to compare clinical outcomes of adaptive CRT versus conventional CRT in patients with heart failure with intact atrioventricular conduction and left bundle branch block.

METHODS

This global, prospective, randomised controlled trial was done in 227 hospitals in 27 countries across Asia, Australia, Europe, and North America. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with class 2-4 heart failure, an ejection fraction of 35% or less, left bundle branch block with QRS duration of 140 ms or more (male patients) or 130 ms or more (female patients), and a baseline PR interval 200 ms or less. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) via block permutation to adaptive CRT (an algorithm providing synchronised left ventricular stimulation) or conventional biventricular CRT using a device programmer. All patients received device programming but were masked until procedures were completed. Site staff were not masked to group assignment. The primary outcome was a composite of all-cause death or intervention for heart failure decompensation and was assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety events were collected and reported in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02205359, and is closed to accrual.

FINDINGS

Between Aug 5, 2014, and Jan 31, 2019, of 3797 patients enrolled, 3617 (95·3%) were randomly assigned (1810 to adaptive CRT and 1807 to conventional CRT). The futility boundary was crossed at the third interim analysis on June 23, 2022, when the decision was made to stop the trial early. 1568 (43·4%) of 3617 patients were female and 2049 (56·6%) were male. Median follow-up was 59·0 months (IQR 45-72). A primary outcome event occurred in 430 of 1810 patients (Kaplan-Meier occurrence rate 23·5% [95% CI 21·3-25·5] at 60 months) in the adaptive CRT group and in 470 of 1807 patients (25·7% [23·5-27·8] at 60 months) in the conventional CRT group (hazard ratio 0·89, 95% CI 0·78-1·01; p=0·077). System-related adverse events were reported in 452 (25·0%) of 1810 patients in the adaptive CRT group and 440 (24·3%) of 1807 patients in the conventional CRT group.

INTERPRETATION

Compared with conventional CRT, adaptive CRT did not significantly reduce the incidence of all-cause death or intervention for heart failure decompensation in the included population of patients with heart failure, left bundle branch block, and intact AV conduction. Death and heart failure decompensation rates were low with both CRT therapies, suggesting a greater response to CRT occurred in this population than in patients in previous trials.

FUNDING

Medtronic.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Significance of effective cardiac resynchronization therapy pacing for clinical responses: An analysis based on the effective cardiac resynchronization therapy algorithm

BACKGROUND

High percent ventricular pacing maximizes cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response. An effective CRT algorithm classifies each left ventricular (LV) pace as effective or ineffective on the basis of the detection of QS or QS-r morphology on the electrogram; however, the relationship between percent effective CRT pacing (%e-CRT) and responses is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to clarify the association between %e-CRT and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

Of the 136 consecutive CRT patients, 49 using the adaptive and effective CRT algorithm with percent ventricular pacing > 90% were evaluated. The primary and secondary outcomes were heart failure (HF) hospitalization and prevalence of CRT responders, defined as patients with an improvement in LV ejection fraction of ≥10% or a reduction in LV end-systolic volume of ≥15% after CRT device implantation, respectively.

RESULTS

We divided the patients into the effective group (n = 25) and the less effective group (n = 24) by the median value of %e-CRT (97.4% [93.7%-98.3%]). During the median follow-up period of 507 days (interquartile range 335-730 days), the effective group had a significantly lower risk of HF hospitalization than the less effective group as revealed by Kaplan-Meier analysis (log-rank, P = .016). Univariate analysis revealed %e-CRT ≥ 97.4% (hazard ratio 0.12; 95% confidence interval 0.01-0.95; P = .045) as a predictor of HF hospitalization. The effective group had a higher prevalence of CRT responders than the less effective group (23 [92%] vs 9 [38%]; P < .001). Univariate analysis revealed that %e-CRT ≥ 97.4% (odds ratio 19.20; 95% confidence interval 3.63-101.00; P < .001) was a predictor of CRT response.

CONCLUSION

High %e-CRT is associated with high CRT responder prevalence and low HF hospitalization risk.

Comparison of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing and Biventricular Pacing in Candidates for Resynchronization Therapy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well established therapy in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), heart failure, and wide QRS or expected frequent ventricular pacing. Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has recently been shown to be a safe alternative to BVP.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between BVP and LBBAP among patients undergoing CRT.

METHODS

This observational study included patients with LVEF ≤35% who underwent BVP or LBBAP for the first time for Class I or II indications for CRT from January 2018 to June 2022 at 15 international centers. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of time to death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Secondary outcomes included endpoints of death, HFH, and echocardiographic changes.

RESULTS

A total of 1,778 patients met inclusion criteria: 981 BVP, 797 LBBAP. The mean age was 69 ± 12 years, 32% were female, 48% had coronary artery disease, and mean LVEF was 27% ± 6%. Paced QRS duration in LBBAP was significantly narrower than baseline (128 ± 19 ms vs 161 ± 28 ms; P < 0.001) and significantly narrower compared to BVP (144 ± 23 ms; P < 0.001). Following CRT, LVEF improved from 27% ± 6% to 41% ± 13% (P < 0.001) with LBBAP compared with an increase from 27% ± 7% to 37% ± 12% (P < 0.001) with BVP, with significantly greater change from baseline with LBBAP (13% ± 12% vs 10% ± 12%; P < 0.001). On multivariable regression analysis, the primary outcome was significantly reduced with LBBAP compared with BVP (20.8% vs 28%; HR: 1.495; 95% CI: 1.213-1.842; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP improved clinical outcomes compared with BVP in patients with CRT indications and may be a reasonable alternative to BVP.

Localization of the ventricular pacing site from BSPM and standard 12-lead ECG: a comparison study

Inverse ECG imaging methods typically require 32-250 leads to create body surface potential maps (BSPM), limiting their routine clinical use. This study evaluated the accuracy of PaceView inverse ECG method to localize the left or right ventricular (LV and RV, respectively) pacing leads using either a 99-lead BSPM or the 12-lead ECG. A 99-lead BSPM was recorded in patients with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) during sinus rhythm and sequential LV/RV pacing. The non-contrast CT was performed to localize precisely both ECG electrodes and CRT leads. From a BSPM, nine signals were selected to obtain the 12-lead ECG. Both BSPM and 12-lead ECG were used to localize the RV and LV lead, and the localization error was calculated. Consecutive patients with dilated cardiomyopathy, previously implanted with a CRT device, were enrolled (n = 19). The localization error for the RV/LV lead was 9.0 [IQR 4.8-13.6] / 7.7 [IQR 0.0-10.3] mm using the 12-lead ECG and 9.1 [IQR 5.4-15.7] / 9.8 [IQR 8.6-13.1] mm for the BSPM. Thus, the noninvasive lead localization using the 12-lead ECG was accurate enough and comparable to 99-lead BSPM, potentially increasing the capability of 12-lead ECG for the optimization of the LV/RV pacing sites during CRT implant or for the most favorable programming.

Prognostic impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy guided by phase analysis: a CZT study

Aims

To evaluate whether phase analysis imaging may predict treatment response and long-term prognosis after cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT).

Methods and results

Sixty-nine patients underwent myocardial perfusion imaging followed by CRT. Patients with ischaemic heart disease and non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy (NICM) were identified. Left ventricular (LV) mechanical dyssynchrony (LVMD) was assessed at phase analysis and the region of the latest mechanical activation was identified. LV pacing lead position was considered 'concordant' when located in the region of the latest mechanical activation, and 'discordant' otherwise. The '6 months post-CRT'/'baseline' ratio of LV ejection fraction was computed as a measure of CRT response. LVMD was revealed in 47/69 patients, 27 of whom (57%) had a concordant LV lead implantation. Only concordant pacing was associated with LV functional improvement (ejection fraction ratio: 1.28 ± 0.25 vs. 1.11 ± 0.32 in discordant stimulation, P = 0.028). However, this relationship persisted only in patients with NICM (P < 0.001), while it disappeared in those with ischaemic heart disease (P = NS). Twenty-eight events occurred during 30 ± 21 months follow-up. While discordant LV lead location was the major predictor of unfavourable prognosis (hazard ratio 3.29, 95% confidence interval 1.25-8.72; P = 0.016), this relationship was confirmed only in patients with NICM.

Conclusions

Phase analysis of myocardial perfusion imaging may guide CRT implantation, identifying patients who would most likely benefit from this procedure.

Paradigm Shifts in Cardiac Pacing: Where Have We Been and What Lies Ahead?

The history of cardiac pacing dates back to the 1930s with externalized pacing and has evolved to incorporate transvenous, multi-lead, or even leadless devices. Annual implantation rates of cardiac implantable electronic devices have increased since the introduction of the implantable system, likely related to expanding indications, and increasing global life expectancy and aging demographics. Here, we summarize the relevant literature on cardiac pacing to demonstrate the enormous impact it has had within the field of cardiology. Further, we look forward to the future of cardiac pacing, including conduction system pacing and leadless pacing strategies.

Left bundle branch pacing versus biventricular pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalization and all-cause mortality in HF patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Biventricular pacing (BVP) is the gold standard for achieving CRT, but about 30%-40% of patients do not respond to BVP-CRT. Recent studies showed that left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) provided remarkable results in CRT. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis aiming to compare LBBP-CRT versus BVP-CRT in HF patients.

METHODS

We systematically searched the electronic databases for studies published from inception to December 29, 2022 and focusing on LBBP-CRT versus BVP-CRT in HF patients. The primary endpoint was HF hospitalization. The effect size was estimated using a random-effect model as Risk Ratio (RR) and mean difference (MD).

RESULTS

Ten studies enrolling 1063 patients met the inclusion criteria. Compared to BVP-CRT, LBBP-CRT led to significant reduction in HF hospitalization [7.9% vs.14.5%; RR: 0.60 (95%CI: 0.39-0.93); p = .02], QRSd [MD: 30.26 ms (95%CI: 26.68-33.84); p < .00001] and pacing threshold [MD: -0.60 (95%CI: -0.71 to -0.48); p < .00001] at follow up. Furthermore, LBBP-CRT improved LVEF [MD: 5.78% (95%CI: 4.78-6.77); p < .00001], the rate of responder [88.5% vs.72.5%; RR: 1.19 (95%CI: 1.07-1.32); p = .002] and super-responder [60.8% vs. 36.5%; RR: 1.56 (95%CI: 1.27-1.91); p < .0001] patients and the NYHA class [MD: -0.42 (95%CI: -0.71 to -0.14); p < .00001] compared to BVP-CRT.

CONCLUSION

In HF patients, LBBP-CRT was superior to BVP-CRT in reducing HF hospitalization. Further significant benefits occurred within the LBBP-CRT group in terms of QRSd, LVEF, pacing thresholds, NYHA class and the rate of responder and super-responder patients.

Long-term outcomes in nonprogressors to cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Among patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), patients with a minimal change in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) have recently been defined as "nonprogressors" rather than as "nonresponders." Little is known regarding long-term outcomes of nonprogressors.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to evaluate outcomes in patients undergoing CRT on the basis of echocardiographically determined response status.

METHODS

We reviewed the medical charts of patients with an LVEF of ≤35% and a QRS duration of ≥120 ms undergoing CRT at the Cleveland Clinic, Johns Hopkins Hospital, and Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center between 2003 and 2014. Response to CRT was defined on the basis of LVEF change as follows: super-responders ≥20%, responders 6%-19%, nonprogressors 0%-5%, and progressors <0%. Survival free of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) implantation and heart transplantation was compared on the basis of response classification.

RESULTS

A total of 1058 patients were included and had a mean follow-up 8.7 ± 5.4 years, over which time there were 606 end points (37 LVAD implants, 32 heart transplants, and 537 deaths). Survival free of LVAD and heart transplant differed significantly between response groups after CRT both in the mid-term (4 years) and in the long-term (8.7 ± 5.4 years), with super-responders achieving the best outcomes and progressors the worst (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, nonprogressors had superior outcomes to progressors (P = .02) at 4 years of follow-up. Over the duration of follow-up (8.7 ± 5.4 years), there was no significant difference in survival between those 2 groups (P = .18).

CONCLUSION

Nonprogressors to CRT have superior medium-term outcomes but similar long-term outcomes to progressors and inferior outcomes to responders and super-responders.

Conduction system pacing for cardiac resynchronization therapy: State of the art, current controversies, and future perspectives

Biventricular pacing (BVP) is the established treatment to perform cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in patients with heart failure (HF) and left bundle branch block (LBBB). However, BVP is an unnatural pacing modality still conditioned by the high percentage of non-responders and coronary sinus anatomy. Conduction system pacing (CSP)-His bundle pacing (HBP) and Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP)- upcomes as the physiological alternative to BVP in the quest for the optimal CRT. CSP showed promising results in terms of better electro-mechanical ventricular synchronization compared to BVP. However, only a few randomized control trials are currently available, and technical challenges, along with the lack of information on long-term clinical outcomes, limit the establishment of a primary role for CSP over conventional BVP in CRT candidates. This review provides a comprehensive literature revision of potential applications of CSP for CRT in diverse clinical scenarios, underlining the current controversies and prospects of this technique.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization in nonresponders and incomplete responders using electrical dyssynchrony mapping

BACKGROUND

Nonresponse to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) occurs in ∼30%-50% of patients. There are no well-accepted clinical approaches for optimizing CRT in nonresponders.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the effect of CRT optimization using electrical dyssynchrony mapping on left ventricular (LV) function, size, and dyssynchrony in selected patients with nonresponse/incomplete response to CRT.

METHODS

We studied 39 patients with underlying left bundle branch block or interventricular conduction delay who had an LV ejection fraction of ≤40% after receiving CRT and had significant electrical dyssynchrony. Electrical dyssynchrony was measured at multiple atrioventricular delays and interventricular delays. The QRS area between combinations of 9 anterior and 9 posterior electrograms (QRS area under the curve) was calculated, and cardiac resynchronization index (CRI) was defined as the percent change in QRS area under the curve compared to native conduction. Electrical dyssynchrony maps depicted CRI over the wide range of settings tested. Patients were programmed to an optimal device setting, and echocardiograms were recorded 5.9 ± 3.7 months postoptimization.

RESULTS

CRI increased from 49.4% ± 24.0% to 90.8% ± 10.5%. CRT optimization significantly improved LV ejection fraction from 31.8% ± 4.7% to 36.3% ± 5.9% (P < .001) and LV end-systolic volume from 108.5 ± 37.6 to 98.0 ± 37.5 mL (P = .009). Speckle-tracking measures of LV strain significantly improved by 2.4% ± 4.5% (transverse; P = .002) and 1.0% ± 2.6% (longitudinal; P = .017). Aortic to pulmonic valve opening time, a measure of interventricular dyssynchrony, significantly (P = .040) decreased by 14.9 ± 39.4 ms.

CONCLUSION

CRT optimization of electrical dyssynchrony using a novel electrical dyssynchrony mapping technology significantly improves LV systolic function, LV end-systolic volume, and mechanical dyssynchrony. This methodology offers a noninvasive, practical clinical approach to treating nonresponders and incomplete responders to CRT.

Dyssynchronous Heart Failure: A Clinical Review

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Dyssynchrony occurs when portions of the cardiac chambers contract in an uncoordinated fashion. Ventricular dyssynchrony primarily impacts the left ventricle and may result in heart failure. This entity is recognized as a major contributor to the development and progression of heart failure. A hallmark of dyssynchronous heart failure (HF_d) is left ventricular recovery after dyssynchrony is corrected. This review discusses the current understanding of pathophysiology of HF_d and provides clinical examples and current techniques for treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Data show that HF_d responds poorly to medical therapy. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in the form of conventional biventricular pacing (BVP) is of proven benefit in HF_d, but is limited by a significant non-responder rate. Recently, conduction system pacing (His bundle or left bundle branch area pacing) has also shown promise in correcting HF_d. HF_d should be recognized as a distinct etiology of heart failure; HF_d responds best to CRT.

Real-world clinical burden among patients with and without heart failure worsening after cardiac resynchronization therapy

OBJECTIVE

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve cardiac function in patients with heart failure (HF); however, in some patients, HF worsens despite CRT. This study characterized the long-term clinical burden of patients with and without HF worsening (HFW) within 6 months post CRT implantation.

METHODS

A claims database (2007-2018) was used to identify two cohorts of adults: those with HFW within 180 days post-CRT and those with no HFW (NHFW). The evaluated clinical outcomes were cardiovascular events/complications, HF-related interventions, hospice enrollment, and all-cause mortality. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to adjust for confounders; adjusted comparisons were assessed using weighted Cox proportional hazard ratios (HRs).

RESULTS

Among the 12,753 adults analyzed (HFW: N = 4,785; NHFW: N = 7,968), the mean age was 72 years and the mean duration of follow-up was approximately 2 years. The clinical burden was greater for HFW than for NHFW in terms of all-cause mortality (19.7% vs. 12.1%) and occurrence of atrial fibrillation (57.4% vs. 51.2%). In the IPTW-adjusted Cox proportional hazard analyses, patients with HFW had a 54% higher average hazard of experiencing all-cause mortality compared to NHFW (adjusted average HR = 1.54, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.41-1.70; p < .001). Of the clinical events experienced by ≥5% of patients, the greatest differences in average hazard were for HF decompensation (adjusted average HR = 1.83, 95% CI: 1.60-2.09) and HF decompensation or death (HR = 1.63, 95%CI: 1.50-1.77).

CONCLUSION

Patients with early HFW post-CRT experienced a significantly higher clinical burden than those without HFW. Vigilance for signs of worsening HF in the first 6 months post-CRT is warranted.

Clinical outcomes of conduction system pacing compared to biventricular pacing in patients requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with biventricular pacing (BVP) is well-established therapy in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and bundle branch block or indication for pacing. Conduction system pacing (CSP) using His-bundle pacing (HBP) or left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) has been shown to be a safe and more physiological alternative to BVP.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes between CSP and BVP among patients undergoing CRT.

METHODS

This observational study included consecutive patients with LVEF ≤35% and class I or II indications for CRT who underwent successful BVP or CSP at 2 major health care systems. The primary outcome was the composite endpoint of time to death or heart failure hospitalization (HFH). Secondary outcomes included subgroup analysis in left bundle branch block as well as individual endpoints of death and HFH.

RESULTS

A total of 477 patients (32% female) met inclusion criteria (BVP 219; CSP 258 [HBP 87, LBBAP 171]). Mean age was 72 ± 12 years, and mean LVEF was 26% ± 6%. Comorbidities included hypertension 70%, diabetes mellitus 45%, and coronary artery disease 52%. Paced QRS duration in CSP was significantly narrower than BVP (133 ± 21 ms vs 153 ± 24 ms; P <.001). LVEF improved in both groups during mean follow-up of 27 ± 12 months and was greater after CSP compared to BVP (39.7% ± 13% vs 33.1% ± 12%; P <.001). Primary outcome of death or HFH was significantly lower with CSP vs BVP (28.3% vs 38.4%; hazard ratio 1.52; 95% confidence interval 1.082-2.087; P = .013).

CONCLUSION

CSP improved clinical outcomes compared to BVP in this large cohort of patients with indications for CRT.

Impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy optimization inside a heart failure programme: a real-world experience

AIMS

This study sought to describe and evaluate the impact of a routine in-hospital cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) programme, including comprehensive heart failure (HF) evaluation and systematic echo-guided CRT optimization.

METHODS AND RESULTS

CRT implanted patients were referred for optimization programme at 3 to 12 months from implantation. The program included clinical and biological status, standardized screening for potential cause of CRT non-response and systematic echo-guided atrioventricular and interventricular delays (AVd and VVd) optimization. Initial CRT-response and improvement at 6 months post-optimization were assessed with a clinical composite score (CCS). Major HF events were tracked during 1 year after optimization. A total of 227 patients were referred for CRT optimization and enrolled (71 ± 11 years old, 77% male, LVEF 30.6 ± 7.9%), of whom 111 (48.9%) were classified as initial non-responders. Left ventricular lead dislodgement was noted in 4 patients (1.8%), and loss or ≤90% biventricular capture in 22 (9.7%), mostly due to arrhythmias. Of the 196 patients (86%) who could undergo echo-guided CRT optimization, 71 (36.2%) required VVd modification and 50/144 (34.7%) AVd modification. At 6 months post-optimization, 34.3% of the initial non-responders were improved according to the CCS, but neither AVd nor VVd echo-guided modification was significantly associated with CCS-improvement. After one-year follow-up, initial non-responders maintained a higher rate of major HF events than initial responders, with no significant difference between AVd/VVd modified or not.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study supports the necessity of a close, comprehensive and multidisciplinary follow-up of CRT patients, without arguing for routine use of echo-guided CRT optimization.

What Have We Learned in the Last 20 Years About CRT Non-Responders?

Although cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) has become well established in the treatment of heart failure, the management of patients who do not respond after CRT remains a key challenge. This review will summarize what we have learned about non-responders over the last 20 years and discuss methods for optimizing response, including the introduction of novel therapies.

Programming Algorithms for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Current cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) implant guidelines emphasize the presence of electrical dyssynchrony (left bundle branch block (LBBB) and QRS > 150 ms) yet have modest predictive value for response and have not reduced the 30% nonresponse rate. Optimized programming to optimize CRT delivery has promised much but to date has largely been ineffective. What is missing is the understanding of LV paced effects (which are unpredictable) and optimal paced AV interval (that can be conserved during physiologic variations) that then can be incorporated into an individualized programming prescription. Automatic device-based algorithms that deliver electrical optimization and maintain this during ambulatory fluctuations in AV interval are discussed.

Case Studies of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy "Nonresponders"

Outcomes following cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vary widely, with some patients experiencing normalization of left ventricular function to some who seem to be harmed by biventricular pacing. The care of CRT patients postoperatively is complex and requires input from physicians specializing in electrophysiology, heart failure, and often cardiac imaging. In this section, cases of apparent CRT suboptimal response from a dedicated CRT optimization clinic are presented.

Glycation of ryanodine receptor in circulating lymphocytes predicts the response to cardiac resynchronization therapy

Finding reliable parameters to identify patients with heart failure (HF) that will respond to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) represents a major challenge. We and others have observed post-translational modifications of Ryanodine Receptor (RyR) in several tissues (including skeletal muscle and circulating lymphocytes) of patients with advanced HF. We designed a prospective study to test the hypothesis that RyR1 glycation in circulating lymphocytes could predict CRT responsiveness in patients with non-ischemic HF. We enrolled 94 patients who underwent CRT and 30 individuals without HF, examining RyR1 glycation in peripheral lymphocytes at enrollment and after 1 year. We found that baseline RyR1 glycation independently predicts CRT response at 1 year after adjusting for age, diabetes, QRS duration and morphology, echocardiographic dyssynchrony, and hypertension. Moreover, RyR1 glycation in circulating lymphocytes significantly correlated with pathologic intracellular calcium leak. Taken together, our data show for the first time that RyR1 glycation in circulating lymphocytes represents a novel biomarker to predict CRT responsiveness.

Add-on Therapy With Sacubitril/Valsartan and Clinical Outcomes in CRT-D Nonresponder Patients

ABSTRACT

No data on the add-on sacubitril/valsartan (S/V) therapy among cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) nonresponder patients are currently available in literature. We conducted a prospective observational study including 190 CRT-D nonresponder patients with symptomatic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction despite the optimal medical therapy from at least 1 year. The primary endpoint was the rate of additional responders (left ventricular end-systolic volume reduction >15%) at 12 months from the introduction of S/V therapy. At the end of the 12 months follow-up, 37 patients (19.5%) were deemed as "additional responders" to the combination use of CRT + S/V therapy. The only clinical predictor of additional response was a lower left ventricular ejection fraction [OR 0.881 (0.815-0.953), P = 0.002] at baseline. At 12 months follow-up, there were significant improvements in heart failure (HF) symptoms and functional status [New York Heart Association 2 (2-3) vs. 1 (1-2), P < 0.001; physical activity duration/day: 10 (8-12) vs. 13 (10-18) hours, P < 0.001]. Compared with the 12 months preceding S/V introduction, there were significant reductions in the rate of HF rehospitalization (35.5% vs. 19.5%, P < 0.001), in atrial tachycardia/atrial fibrillation burden [6.0 (5.0-8.0) % vs. 0 (0-2.0) %, P < 0.001] and in the proportions of patients experiencing ventricular arrhythmias (21.6% vs. 6.3%; P < 0.001). Our results indicate that S/V add-on therapy in CRT-D nonresponder patients is associated with 19.5% of additional responders, a reduction in HF symptoms and rehospitalizations, AF burden, and ventricular arrhythmias.

Usefulness of Multisite Ventricular Pacing in Nonresponders to Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established treatment for heart failure patients with myocardial dysfunction and delayed ventricular activation, but approximately 25% to 40% of patients do not respond to CRT. Left ventricular (LV) multisite pacing (MSP) has been proposed as a tool to improve CRT response. The goal of this study is to examine the safety and efficacy of LV MSP in CRT nonresponders. Between January 2018, and September 2019, the Strategic Management to Improve CRT Using Multi-Site Pacing trial prospectively enrolled 584 CRT-defibrillator recipients for established indications at 52 sites across the United States and evaluated their response at 6 months using the clinical composite score (CCS). Of the nonresponders, 102 patients had the LV MSP feature turned on and 78 patients completed the 12-month CCS evaluation. The LV MSP feature-related complication-free rate was 99.0% with a lower 95% confidence interval limit of 94.9%, which was higher than the performance goal of 90%. The proportion of nonresponders with an improved CCS from 6 to 12 months was 51.3% with a lower 95% confidence interval limit of 41.4%, which was higher than the performance goal of 5%. The estimated mean reduction in battery longevity with the LV MSP feature was about 3.6 months (estimated battery longevity of 8.87 ± 2.08 years at 6 months and 8.07 ± 2.23 years at 12 months). In conclusion, in CRT nonresponders, the use of the LV MSP feature is safe and associated with a ∼50% conversion rate with a small projected reduction in CRT-defibrillator battery longevity. LV MSP should be considered in the management of CRT nonresponders.

QRS area as a predictor of cardiac resynchronization therapy response: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

QRS area, a three-dimensional QRS complex, is a novel vectorcardiography method of measuring the magnitude of electrical forces in the heart. Hypothetically, a greater QRS area denotes higher dyssynchrony and indicates potential benefits from cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Previous studies suggest a positive correlation between QRS area and the degree of response to CRT, but its clinical use remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of the relationship between QRS area and survival benefit following CRT.

METHODS

We comprehensively searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases from inception to August 2021. We included studies with prospective and retrospective cohort designs that reported QRS area before CRT and total mortality. Data from each study were analyzed using a random-effects model. The results were reported as a hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Five observational studies including 4,931 patients were identified. The cut-off values between large and small QRS areas ranged from 102-116 μVs. Our analysis showed a larger QRS area was statistically associated with increased 5-year survival in patients implanted with CRT (HR pooled 0.48, 95% CI 0.46-0.51, I² = 54%, P < 0.0001). Greater QRS area reduction (pre- and post-implantation) were associated with a lower total mortality rate (HR pooled 0.45, 95% CI 0.38-0.52, I² = 0%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Larger pre-implantation QRS area was associated with increased survival after CRT. QRS area reduction following CRT implantation was also associated with lower mortality. QRS area may potentially become an additional selection criterion for CRT implantations. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

OUP accepted manuscript

Electrical disturbances, such as atrial fibrillation (AF), dyssynchrony, tachycardia, and premature ventricular contractions (PVCs), are present in most patients with heart failure (HF). While these disturbances may be the consequence of HF, increasing evidence suggests that they may also cause or aggravate HF. Animal studies show that longer-lasting left bundle branch block, tachycardia, AF, and PVCs lead to functional derangements at the organ, cellular, and molecular level. Conversely, electrical treatment may reverse or mitigate HF. Clinical studies have shown the superiority of atrial and pulmonary vein ablation for rhythm control and AV nodal ablation for rate control in AF patients when compared with medical treatment. Ablation of PVCs can also improve left ventricular function. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is an established adjunct therapy currently undergoing several interesting innovations. The current guideline recommendations reflect the safety and efficacy of these ablation therapies and CRT, but currently, these therapies are heavily underutilized. This review focuses on the electrical treatment of HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We believe that the team of specialists treating an HF patient should incorporate an electrophysiologist in order to achieve a more widespread use of electrical therapies in the management of HFrEF and should also include individual conditions of the patient, such as body size and gender in therapy fine-tuning.

Heart failure treatment in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: Opportunity for improvement

BACKGROUND

Heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is the predominant indication for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation. The care gap and opportunity to optimize guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) is unclear.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to define uptake, eligibility, dose, and adherence to GDMT in patients with CRT/ICD and HFrEF.

METHODS

MEDLINE was searched from 2000 to July 2021 for major randomized trials, registries, and cohort studies evaluating GDMT in this population. Thirty-eight studies focused on medical therapy in patients with CRT/ICD devices (CRT = 23, ICD = 11, and both = 4).

RESULTS

In the pivotal device trials, ACEI/ARB and beta-blocker use was high (mean 94%, range 41%-99%; and 83%, range 27%-97%, respectively), but mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists were modest (mean 45%, range 32%-61%), in keeping with guidelines of that era. Similar results were found in observational registries. CRT was associated with beta-blocker uptitration, while the effects on ACEI/ARB were less consistent. For beta blockers, 57%-68% of patients were uptitrated, increasing the mean percent of target dose achieved by 24% from baseline to follow-up. In one study, adherence increased, for ACEI/ARB from 37% to 55% and beta blockers 34% to 58%. Only 1 study assessed potential eligibility at implant for sacubitril-valsartan (72%) or ivabradine (28%), and no study examined sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors. Increased uptake, titration, and dose was associated with reduced mortality, hospitalization, and device therapies.

CONCLUSION

Patients with HFrEF and ICD/CRT are undertreated with respect to GDMT, and there is opportunity to optimize therapy to improve morbidity and mortality.

The importance of early evaluation after cardiac resynchronization therapy to redefine response: Pooled individual patient analysis from 5 prospective studies

BACKGROUND

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces mortality and improves outcomes in appropriately selected patients with heart failure (HF); however, response may vary.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to correlate 6-month CRT response assessed by clinical composite score (CCS) and left ventricular end-systolic volume index (LVESVi) with longer-term mortality and HF hospitalizations.

METHODS

Individual patient data from 5 prospective CRT studies-MIRACLE, MIRACLE ICD, InSync III Marquis, PROSPECT, and Adaptive CRT-were pooled. Classification of CRT response status using CCS and LVESVi were made at 6 months. Kaplan-Meier analyses were used to assess time to mortality. Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to compute hazard ratios (HRs) for the 3 levels of CRT response: improved, stabilized, and worsened. Adjusted models controlled for baseline factors known to influence both CRT response and mortality. HF-related hospitalization was compared between CRT response categories using incidence rate ratios.

RESULTS

Among a total of 1603 patients, 1426 and 1165 were evaluated in the CCS and LVESVi outcome assessments, respectively. Mortality was significantly lower for patients in the improved (CCS: HR 0.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.31; LVESVi: HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.27-0.60) and stabilized (CCS: HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.24-0.61; LVESVi: HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.25-0.68) groups than in the worsened group for both measures after adjusting for potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a worsened CRT response status have a high mortality rate and HF hospitalizations. Stabilized patients have a more favorable prognosis than do worsened patients and thus should not be considered CRT nonresponders.

CRT Efficacy in "Mid-Range" QRS Duration Among Asians Contrasted to Non-Asians, and Influence of Height

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to test the hypotheses that cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) efficacy differed among Asians compared with non-Asian populations, differed between QRS duration (QRSd) ranges 120-149 and ≥150 ms, and was influenced by height in the multinational ADVANCE CRT trial.

BACKGROUND

CRT guidelines, derived from trials among U.S./European patients, assign weaker recommendations to those with midrange QRSd (QRSd <150 ms). Patient height may modulate CRT efficacy. Together, these may affect CRT prescription and efficacy in Asia.

METHODS

CRT response was assessed using the Clinical Composite Score 6 months postimplant (n = 934). Heart failure events and cardiac deaths were reported until 12 months. Asian and non-Asian patients were compared overall, by QRSd <150 ms (Asian n = 71 vs non-Asian n = 248), and QRSd ≥150 ms (Asian n = 180 vs non-Asian n = 435) and by height.

RESULTS

Asians comprised 27% (251 of 934) of the primary study population. More Asians had QRSd ≥150 ms (72% [180 of 251] vs 64% [435 of 683] in non-Asian patients; P = 0.022). Overall CRT response was better in Asians vs non-Asians (Clinical Composite Score 85% vs 65%; P <0.001), and following QRSd dichotomization (QRSd <150 ms: 80% vs 59%; P <0.001; QRS ≥150 ms: 86% vs 69%; P < 0.001). HF events and cardiac deaths were fewer in Asians irrespective of QRSd (P < 0.001). Stepwise multivariable analysis indicated that in group QRSd <150 ms, nonischemic cardiomyopathy, number of other comorbidities (0-1 vs ≥4), and atrial fibrillation influenced CRT response. The trend favoring Asian race (OR: 1.46; 95% CI: 0.72-2.95) was eliminated (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.47-2.11) when height or QRSd/height were included (QRSd/height P = 0.006; OR: 1.64; 95% CI: 1.15-2.35). In QRSd <150 ms, probability of CRT response diminished as height increased, but increased with QRSd/height, in both Asians and non-Asians. In QRSd ≥150 ms, height or QRSd/height had minimal effect in Asians or non-Asians.

CONCLUSIONS

Height modulates CRT efficacy among patients with QRSd <150 ms and contributes to high probability of benefit from CRT among Asians. CRT should be encouraged among Asian patients with midrange QRSd. (Advance Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy [CRT] Registry; NCT01805154).

Right ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction and relationship to QRS duration in patients with left bundle branch block and cardiomyopathy

BACKGROUND

Marked QRS widening in patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) may reduce efficacy of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). We hypothesized that extreme QRS prolongation may accompany right ventricular (RV) dilatation/systolic dysfunction (RVD/RVsD) as well as left ventricular dilatation/systolic dysfunction (LVD/LVsD).

METHODS

We assessed rates of both ventricular dilatation and systolic dysfunction according to widening of QRS duration (QRSd) in 100 consecutive cardiomyopathy patients with true LBBB (QRSd ≥ 130 ms in female or ≥140 ms in male, QS or rS in leads V1/V2, and mid-QRS notching/slurring in ≥2 contiguous leads of I, aVL, and V1/V2/V5/V6). Ventricular dimensions and function were measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.

RESULTS

There was a trend toward an increase in the prevalence of LVD (13%, 20%, and 90%), LVsD (67%, 77%, and 90%), RVD (23%, 27%, and 50%), RVsD (27%, 27%, and 40%), RVD plus RVsD (13%, 17%, and 40%), or RVD/RVsD (37%, 37%, and 50%) according to the degree of QRS prolongation (<150 ms, n = 30; 150-180 ms, n = 60; and ≥180 ms, n = 10). Similarly, patients in the highest quartile of QRSd (QRSd ≥ 168 ms, n = 26) showed greater rates of RVD (23% vs. 44%, p = .069), RVsD (22% vs. 48%, p = .032), RVD plus RVsD (10% vs. 30%, p = .040), or RVD/RVsD (33% vs. 57%, p = .050) compared to those in the remaining quartiles (n = 74). QRSd ≥ 180 ms was identified as an independent predictor for the presence of RVD plus RVsD.

CONCLUSION

The rates of RVD and/or RVsD increased with QRS widening, particularly when QRSd exceeded 180 ms. This may diminish anticipated CRT response rates in cardiomyopathy patients with LBBB.

Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two-thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post-implantation follow-up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three European Society of Cardiology Associations, Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post-procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains: (i) overcoming CRT under-utilization, (ii) better understanding of pre-implant characteristics, (iii) abandoning the term 'non-response' and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (iv) implementing a dedicated post-implant CRT care pathway.

Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing for CRT upgrades in previously failed and high-risk patients in comparison with coronary sinus CRT upgrades

AIMS

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) upgrades may be less likely to improve following intervention. Leadless left ventricular (LV) endocardial pacing has been used for patients with previously failed CRT or high-risk upgrades. We compared procedural and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing coronary sinus (CS) CRT upgrades with high-risk and previously failed CRT upgrades undergoing LV endocardial upgrades.

METHOD AND RESULTS

Prospective consecutive CS upgrades between 2015 and 2019 were compared with those undergoing WiSE-CRT implantation. Cardiac resynchronization therapy response at 6 months was defined as improvement in clinical composite score (CCS) and a reduction in LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) ≥15%. A total of 225 patients were analysed; 121 CS and 104 endocardial upgrades. Patients receiving WiSE-CRT tended to have more comorbidities and were more likely to have previous cardiac surgery (30.9% vs. 16.5%; P = 0.012), hypertension (59.2% vs. 34.7%; P < 0.001), chronic obstructive airways disease (19.4% vs. 9.9%; P = 0.046), and chronic kidney disease (46.4% vs. 21.5%; P < 0.01) but similar LV ejection fraction (30.0 ± 8.3% vs. 29.5 ± 8.6%; P = 0.678). WiSE-CRT upgrades were successful in 97.1% with procedure-related mortality in 1.9%. Coronary sinus upgrades were successful in 97.5% of cases with a 2.5% rate of CS dissection and 5.6% lead malfunction/displacement. At 6 months, 91 WiSE-CRT upgrades and 107 CS upgrades had similar improvements in CCS (76.3% vs. 68.5%; P = 0.210) and reduction in LVESV ≥15% (54.2% vs. 56.3%; P = 0.835).

CONCLUSION

Despite prior failed upgrades and high-risk patients with more comorbidities, WiSE-CRT upgrades had high rates of procedural success and similar improvements in CCS and LV remodelling with CS upgrades.

The cost of non-response to cardiac resynchronization therapy: characterizing heart failure events following cardiac resynchronization therapy

AIMS

The aim of this study is to quantify healthcare resource utilization among non-responders to cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT-NR) by heart failure (HF) events and influence of comorbidities.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ADVANCE CRT registry (2013-2015) prospectively identified responders/CRT-NRs 6 months post-implant using the clinical composite score. Heart failure event rates and associated cost, both overall and separated for inpatient hospitalizations, office visits, emergency room visits, and observational stays, were quantified. Costs of events were imputed from payments for similar real-world encounters in subjects with CRT-D/P devices in the MarketScan™ commercial and Medicare Supplemental insurance claims databases. Effects of patient demographics and comorbidities on event rates and cost were evaluated. Of 879 US patients (age 69 ± 11 years, 29% female, ischaemic disease 52%), 310 (35%) were CRT-NR. Among CRT-NRs vs. responders, more patients developed HF (41% vs. 11%, P < 0.001), HF event rate was higher (67.0 ± 21.7 vs. 11.4 ± 3.7/100 pt-year, P < 0.001), and HF readmission within 30 days was more common [hazard ratio 7.06, 95% confidence interval (2.1-43.7)]. Inpatient hospitalization was the most common and most expensive event type in CRT-NR. Comorbid HF was increased by diabetes, hypertension, and pulmonary disorders. Over 2 years, compared to CRT responders, each CRT-NR resulted in excess cost of $6388 ($3859-$10 483) to Medicare (P = 0.015) or $10 197 ($6161-$17 394) to private insurances (P = 0.014).

CONCLUSION

Healthcare expenditures associated with contemporary CRT non-response management are among the highest for any HF patient group. This illustrates an unmet need for interventions to improve HF outcomes and reduce costs among some CRT recipients.

Comparing the Modified Frailty Index with conventional scores for prediction of cardiac resynchronization therapy response in patients with heart failure

Objective:

The aim of the study was to compare, Modified Frailty Index (mFI), EAARN (LVEF <22%, Atrial Fibrillation, Age ≥70 years, Renal function (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73m²), NYHA class IV), and ScREEN (female Sex, Renal function (eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73m²), LVEF ≥25%, ECG (QRS duration ≥150 ms) and NYHA class ≤III) score for predicting cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) response and all-cause mortality.

Methods:

In this prospective, non-randomized, single-center, observational study we enrolled 93 patients receiving CRT from August 2016 to August 2019. Pre-implant scores were calculated, and patients were followed for six months. Performance of each score for prediction of CRT response (defined as ≥15% reduction in left ventricular end-systolic volume [LVESV]) and all-cause mortality was compared.

Results:

Optimal CRT response was seen in seventy patients with nine deaths. All the three scores exhibited modest performance for prediction of CRT response and all-cause mortality with AUC ranging from 0.608 to 0.701. mFI has an additional benefit for prediction of prolonged post-procedure stay and 30-day rehospitalization events.

Conclusion:

mFI, ScREEN and EAARN score can be used reliably for predicting all-cause mortality and response to CRT.

Optimized implementation of cardiac resynchronization therapy: a call for action for referral and optimization of care: A joint position statement from the Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI) of the European Society of Cardiology

Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is one of the most effective therapies for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and leads to improved quality of life, reductions in heart failure hospitalization rates and all-cause mortality. Nevertheless, up to two-thirds of eligible patients are not referred for CRT. Furthermore, post-implantation follow-up is often fragmented and suboptimal, hampering the potential maximal treatment effect. This joint position statement from three European Society of Cardiology Associations, Heart Failure Association (HFA), European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI), focuses on optimized implementation of CRT. We offer theoretical and practical strategies to achieve more comprehensive CRT referral and post-procedural care by focusing on four actionable domains: (i) overcoming CRT under-utilization, (ii) better understanding of pre-implant characteristics, (iii) abandoning the term 'non-response' and replacing this by the concept of disease modification, and (iv) implementing a dedicated post-implant CRT care pathway.

Gain in real-world cardiac resynchronization therapy efficacy with SyncAV dynamic optimization: Heart failure hospitalizations and costs

BACKGROUND

SyncAV, a device-based cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) algorithm, promotes electrical optimization by dynamically adjusting atrioventricular intervals.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of SyncAV on heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) and related costs in a real-world CRT cohort.

METHODS

Patients with SyncAV-capable CRT devices followed by remote monitoring and enrolled in Medicare fee-for-service for at least 1 year preimplant and up to 2 years postimplant were studied. Patients with SyncAV OFF were 4:1 matched to those with SyncAV ON on preimplant HFH rate, demographics, comorbidities, disease etiology, and left bundle branch block. HFHs were determined from the primary diagnosis of inpatient hospitalizations, and the cost for each event was the sum of Medicare, supplemental insurance, and patient payment.

RESULTS

After 4:1 propensity score matching, 3630 patients were studied (mean age 75 ± 8 years; 1386 [38%] female), including 726 (25%) patients with SyncAV ON. The pre-CRT HFH rate was 0.338 HFH events per patient-year. Overall, CRT diminished the HFH rate to 0.204 events per patient-year (P < .001). SyncAV elicited a larger reduction in HFH rate (SyncAV ON: hazard ratio [HR] 0.52; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.66; P < .001 and SyncAV OFF: HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.59-0.77; P < .001). After 2 years, the HFH rate was lower in the SyncAV ON group than in the SyncAV OFF group (0.143 HFHs per patient-year vs 0.193 HFHs per patient-year; HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.55-0.89; P = .003) and fewer HFHs were followed by 30-day HFH readmissions (4.41% vs 7.68%; P = .003) and 30-day all-cause hospital readmissions (7.04% vs 10.01%; P = .010). The total 2-year HFH-associated costs per patient were lower with SyncAV ON (difference $1135; 90% CI $93-$2109; P = .038).

CONCLUSION

This large, real-world, propensity score-matched study demonstrates that SyncAV CRT is associated with significantly reduced HFHs and associated costs, incremental to standard CRT.

Acute Hemodynamic Effects of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Versus Alternative Pacing Strategies in Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Background

The hemodynamic effects of cardiac resynchronization therapy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) are uncharacterized. We aimed to quantify the hemodynamic effects of different ventricular pacing configurations in patients with LVADs, focusing on short‐term changes in load‐independent right ventricular (RV) contractility.

Methods and Results

Patients with LVADs underwent right heart catheterization during spontaneous respiration without sedation and with pressures recorded at end expiration. Right heart catheterization was performed at different pacemaker configurations (biventricular pacing, left ventricular pacing, RV pacing, and unpaced conduction) in a randomly generated sequence with >3 minutes between configuration change and hemodynamic assessment. The right heart catheterization operator was blinded to the sequence. RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure was calculated from digitized hemodynamic waveforms, consistent with a previously validated protocol. Fifteen patients with LVADs who were in sinus rhythm were included. Load‐independent RV contractility, as assessed by RV maximal change in pressure over time normalized to instantaneous pressure, was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (15.7±7.6 versus 11.0±4.0 s⁻¹; P=0.003). Thermodilution cardiac output was higher in biventricular pacing compared with unpaced conduction (4.48±0.7 versus 4.38±0.8 L/min; P=0.05). There were no significant differences in heart rate, ventricular filling pressures, or atrioventricular valvular regurgitation across all pacing configurations.

Conclusions

Biventricular pacing acutely improves load‐independent RV contractility in patients with LVADs. Even in these patients with mechanical left ventricular unloading via LVAD who were relative pacing nonresponders (required LVAD support despite cardiac resynchronization therapy), biventricular pacing was acutely beneficial to RV contractility.