Financial Toxicity of Medical Management of Heart Failure: JACC Review Topic of the Week

National survey of patient perspectives on cost discussions among recipients of copay assistance

BACKGROUND

Individuals with cancer and other medical conditions often experience financial concerns from high costs-of-care and may utilize copay assistance programs (CAP). We sought to describe CAP recipients' experiences/preferences for cost discussions with clinicians.

METHODS

We conducted a national, cross-sectional electronic-survey from 10/2022 to 11/2022 of CAP recipients with cancer or autoimmune conditions to assess patient perspectives on cost discussions. We used multivariable logistic regression models to explore associations of patient perspectives on cost discussions with patient characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (eg, financial toxicity, depression/anxiety, and health literacy).

RESULTS

Among 1,566 participants, 71% had cancer and 29% had autoimmune conditions. Although 62% of respondents desired cost discussions, only 32% reported discussions took place. Additionally, 52% of respondents wanted their doctor to consider out-of-pocket costs when deciding the best treatment, and 61% of respondents felt doctors should ensure patients can afford treatment prescribed. Participants with depression symptoms were more likely to want doctors to consider out-of-pocket costs (OR = 1.54, P = .005) and to believe doctors should ensure patients can afford treatment (OR = 1.60, P = .005). Those with severe financial toxicity were more likely to desire cost discussions (OR = 1.65, P < .001) and want doctors to consider out-of-pocket costs (OR = 1.52, P = .001). Participants with marginal/inadequate health literacy were more likely to desire cost discussions (OR = 1.37, P = .01) and believe doctors should ensure patients can afford treatment (OR = 1.30, P = .036).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large sample of CAP recipients with cancer and autoimmune conditions, most reported a desire for cost discussions, but under one-third reported such discussions took place.

Efficacy and Safety of Kuoxin Formula in the Treatment of Dilated Cardiomyopathy-Related Heart Failure: Study Protocol of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Center Clinical Trial

Background

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a severe heterogeneous cardiomyopathy characterized by cardiac enlargement and declining heart function, often leading to refractory heart failure and life-threatening outcomes, particularly prevalent in China. The challenge lies in the scarcity of targeted therapies with substantial efficacy for DCM. Additionally, traditional anti-heart failure drugs are constrained due to hypotension propensity or limited symptom improvement. Kuoxin Formula (KXF), internally endorsed at Longhua Hospital, demonstrates clear biological evidence for enhancing cardiac function and myocardial remodeling. Previous clinical studies suggest its potential to enhance patients' quality of life. This trial aims to further evaluate KXF's safety and efficacy in managing DCM-related heart failure.

Methods

This prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial aims to recruit 230 DCM patients from five centers. Participants will be randomly assigned to either KXF or placebo for 12 weeks, with careful monitoring of key indicators and adverse events. The primary outcome measures the proportion of patients with NT-proBNP reduction exceeding 30%. Secondary outcomes include New York Heart Association functional classification, Traditional Chinese Medicine syndrome scores, 6-minute walk test, Lee's heart failure score, and Minnesota Heart Failure Quality of Life Scale score. Ventricular remodeling will be assessed using cardiac ultrasound and ELISA. Safety metrics and adverse events will be meticulously recorded.

Discussion

This study will be the first multicentered research conducted in China that utilizes a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled design to investigate the use of TCM in the treatment of DCM. It seeks to develop new theoretical frameworks and provide solid clinical data to support the integration of TCM and modern medicine in treating heart failure in DCM patients.

Trial Registration

China Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2300068937. Registered on March 1, 2023. https://www.chictr.org.cn/bin/project/edit?pid=190926.

The Wallet Biopsy: Medical Crowdfunding for Heart Transplantation

Financial considerations continue to impact access to heart transplantation. Transplant recipients face various costs, including, but not limited to, the index hospitalization, immunosuppressive medications, and lodging and travel to appointments. In this study, we sought to describe the state of crowdfunding for individuals being evaluated for heart transplantation. Using the search term heart transplant, 1000 GoFundMe campaigns were reviewed. After exclusions, 634 (63.4%) campaigns were included. Most campaigns were in support of white individuals (57.8%), males (63.1%) and adults (76.7%). Approximately 15% of campaigns had not raised any funds. The remaining campaigns fundraised a median of $53.24 dollars per day. Of the patients, 44% were admitted at the time of the fundraising. Within the campaigns in the United States, the greatest proportions were in the Southeast United States in non-Medicaid expansion states. These findings highlight the significant financial toxicities associated with heart transplantation and the need for advocacy at the governmental and payer levels to improve equitable access and coverage for all.

Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors and Mycotic Genital or Urinary Tract Infections in Heart Failure

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) improve clinical outcomes in persons with heart failure (HF). This class of agents has been consistently associated with an increased risk of mycotic genital infections (MGIs), and in some, but not all, trials, urinary tract infections (UTIs). Other medications widely used for cardiac conditions do not cause MGIs and UTIs, so cardiologists and their supporting teams will be encountering clinical questions that they previously did not have to address. This review provides clinicians with practical recommendations about SGLT2i use in individuals with HF as related to the associated MGI and possible UTI risks. Overall, given the benefit of SGLT2is in clinical outcomes, the threshold for not initiating or discontinuing SGLT2is due to concerns for MGIs or UTIs should be high for persons with HF. Likewise, when SGLT2is are discontinued for such concerns, the threshold for reinitiation should be low.

Integrating Cost into Shared Decision-Making for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (POCKET-COST-HF): A Trial Providing Out-of-Pocket Costs for Heart Failure Medications during Clinical Encounters

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based medical therapy for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) often entails substantial out-of-pocket costs that can vary appreciably between patients. This has raised concerns regarding financial toxicity, equity, and adherence to medical therapy. In spite of these concerns, cost discussions in the HFrEF population appear to be rare, partly because out-of-pocket costs are generally unavailable during clinical encounters. In this trial, out-of-pocket cost information is given to patients and clinicians during outpatient encounters with the aim to assess the impact of providing this information on medication discussions and decisions.

HYPOTHESIS

Cost-informed decision-making will be facilitated by providing access to patient-specific out-of-pocket cost estimates at the time of clinical encounter.

DESIGN

Integrating Cost into Shared Decision-Making for Heart Failure with Reduced Ejection Fraction (POCKET-COST-HF) is a multicenter trial based at Emory Healthcare and University of Colorado Health. Adapting an existing patient activation tool from the EPIC-HF trial, patients and clinicians are presented a checklist with medications approved for treatment of HFrEF with or without patient-specific out-of-pocket costs (obtained from a financial navigation firm). Clinical encounters are audio-recorded, and patients are surveyed about their experience. The trial utilizes a stepped-wedge cluster randomized design, allowing for each site to enroll control and intervention group patients while minimizing contamination of the control arm.

DISCUSSION

This trial will elucidate the potential impact of robust cost disclosure efforts and key information regarding patient and clinician perspectives related to cost and cost communication. It also will reveal important challenges associated with providing out-of-pocket costs for medications during clinical encounters. Acquiring medication costs for this trial requires an involved process and outsourcing of work. In addition, costs may change throughout the year, raising questions regarding what specific information is most valuable. These data will represent an important step towards understanding the role of integrating cost discussions into heart failure care.

CLINICALTRIALS

GOV IDENTIFIER

NCT04793880.

Costs of care and financial hardship among patients with heart failure

With the implementation of new therapies, more patients are living with heart failure (HF) as a chronic condition. Alongside these advances, out-of-pocket (OOP) medical costs have increased, and patients experience significant financial burden. Despite increasing interest in understanding and mitigating financial burdens, there is a relative paucity of data specific to HF. Here, we explore financial hardship in HF from the patient perspective, including estimated OOP costs for guideline-directed medical therapy for HF with reduced ejection fraction, hospitalizations, and total direct medical costs, as well as the consequences of high OOP costs. Studies estimate that high OOP costs are common in HF, and a large proportion are related to prescription drugs. Subsequently, the effects on patients can lead to worsening adherence, delayed care, and poor outcomes, leading to a financial toxicity spiral. Further, we summarize patients' cost preferences and outline future research that is needed to develop evidence-based solutions to reduce costs in HF.

Financial Well-Being Among US Adults with Vascular Conditions: Differential Impacts Among Blacks and Hispanics

Background

The ability to meet current and ongoing financial obligations, known as financial well-being (FWB), is not only associated with the likelihood of adverse health events but is also affected by unexpected health care expenditures. However, the relationship between FWB and common health outcomes is not well understood. Using data available in the Financial Well-Being Scale from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, we evaluated the impact of four vascular conditions-cardiovascular disease (CVD), stroke, high blood pressure (BP), and high cholesterol-on FWB and how these impacts varied between racial and ethnic groups.

Methods

Using the Understanding America Survey-a nationally representative, longitudinal panel-we identified adults with self-reported diagnoses between 2014 and 2020 of high cholesterol, high BP, stroke, and CVD. We used stratified, longitudinal mixed regression models to assess the association between these diagnoses and FWB. Each condition was modeled separately and included sex, age, marital status, household size, income, education, race/ethnicity, insurance, body mass index, and an indicator of the condition. Racial and ethnic differentials were captured using group-condition interactions.

Results

On average, Whites had the highest FWB Scale score (69.0, SD=21.8), followed by other races (66.7, SD=21.0), Hispanics (59.3, SD=21.6), and Blacks (56.2, SD=21.4). In general, FWB of individuals with vascular conditions was lower than that of those without, but the impact varied between racial and ethnic groups. Compared with Whites (the reference group), Blacks with CVD (-7.4, SD=1.0), stroke (-8.1, SD=1.5), high cholesterol (-5.7, SD=0.7), and high BP (6.1, SD=0.7) had lower FWB. Similarly, Hispanics with high BP (-3.0, SD=0.6) and CVD (-6.3, SD=1.3) had lower FWB. Income, education, insurance, and marital status were also correlated with FWB.

Conclusions

These results indicated differences in the financial ramifications of vascular conditions among racial and ethnic groups. Findings suggest the need for interventions targeting FWB of individuals with vascular conditions, particularly those from minority groups.

Achieving Health Equity in the Care of Patients with Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss the prevailing racial and ethnic disparities in heart failure (HF) care by identifying barriers to equitable care and proposing solutions for achieving equitable outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Throughout the entire spectrum of HF care, from prevention to implementation of guideline-directed medical therapy and advanced interventions, racial and ethnic disparities exist. Factors such as differential distribution of risk factors, poor access to care, inadequate representation in clinical trials, and discrimination from healthcare clinicians, among others, contribute to these disparities. Recent data suggests that despite improvements, disparities prevail in several aspects of HF care, hindering our progress towards equity in HF care. This review highlights the urgent need to address racial and ethnic disparities in HF care, emphasizing the importance of a multifaceted approach involving policy changes, quality improvement strategies, targeted interventions, and intentional community engagement. Our proposed framework was derived from existing research and emphasizes integrating equity into routine quality improvement efforts, tailoring interventions to specific populations, and advocating for policy transformation. By acknowledging these disparities, implementing evidence-based strategies, and fostering collaborative efforts, the HF community can strive to reduce disparities and achieve equity in HF care.