Permissive Cardiotoxicity

Screening for coronary artery disease among cancer survivors: rationale and design of the REDEEM-CAD study

BACKGROUND

Cancer survivors are reported to be at a heightened risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) due to shared risk factors, potentially cardiotoxic cancer treatments and premature aging in survivors. Early identification of those who are at greater risk, followed by protective treatment, can prevent CAD progression. However, to date there was a relative paucity of prospective data to optimally guide management of atherosclerotic coronary risk among cancer survivors.

METHODS

The REDEEM-CAD (Risk-guidEd DisEasE Management plan to prevent CAD in patients with previous cancer) study is a prospective cohort study conducted in Victoria and Tasmania, Australia aiming to evaluate the efficacy of a comprehensive CAD screening strategy. Cancer survivors aged ≥ 40 years with cancer treatment ≥ 5 years prior are eligible for the study. Consented participants will be stratified into low, intermediate or high risk of major atherosclerotic adverse events based on clinical assessment and biochemistry tests. Subsequently, those within the intermediate risk will be referred for coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring, with computed tomography coronary angiography (CTCA) completed where CAC > 0 and < 400. Participants with high risk or CAC > 400 will be informed about strategies (including lipid-lowering therapy) to manage asymptomatic CAD. Those with low clinical risk or CAC = 0 will conclude their participation while those with CTCA imaged at baseline will be referred for a follow-up CTCA 2-year post-baseline. The primary endpoint is to identify the prevalence of CAD, identified via CAC scoring, among cancer survivors classified as intermediate risk. Secondary endpoint includes the absolute change in total coronary plaque volume over 24 months among those imaged at baseline and follow-up. The REDEEM-CAD study will be the first study to systematically evaluate risk of CAD in cancer survivors, and subsequent responsiveness to coronary risk reduction. This will offer valuable insights into the efficacy of the CAD screening strategies among cancer survivors and the impact of treatment on managing plaque progression.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT05366153.

Cardio-oncology: chances and challenges

Cardio-oncology is an emerging field that aims to ensure optimal cancer treatment while minimising cardiovascular toxicity. The management of cardiovascular toxicity is critical because it can lead to premature discontinuation of treatment, increasing the risk of cancer recurrence and mortality. The 2022 European Society of Cardiology guidelines were a milestone in advocating a patient-centred, multidisciplinary approach. Key components include risk stratification and a standardised criterion for adverse events, incorporating definitions from the International Cardio-Oncology Society. Effective risk stratification, supported by imaging and biomarkers, helps to anticipate cardiovascular problems and implement preventive measures. Future research should focus on understanding mechanisms, developing preventive strategies and implementing personalised medicine. Education and reducing disparities in care are essential to advance cardio-oncology and improve patient outcomes.

Cardioprotection strategies for anthracycline cardiotoxicity

Thanks to the fantastic progress in cancer therapy options, there is a growing population of cancer survivors. This success has resulted in a need to focus much effort into improving the quality of life of this population. Cancer and cardiovascular disease share many common risk factors and have an interplay between them, with one condition mechanistically affecting the other and vice versa. Furthermore, widely prescribed cancer therapies have known toxic effects in the cardiovascular system. Anthracyclines are the paradigm of efficacious cancer therapy widely prescribed with a strong cardiotoxic potential. While some cancer therapies cardiovascular toxicities are transient, others are irreversible. There is a growing need to develop cardioprotective therapies that, when used in conjunction with cancer therapies, can prevent cardiovascular toxicity and thus improve long-term quality of life in survivors. The field has three main challenges: (i) identification of the ultimate mechanisms leading to cardiotoxicity to (ii) identify specific therapeutic targets, and (iii) more sensible diagnostic tools to early identify these conditions. In this review we will focus on the cardioprotective strategies tested and under investigation. We will focus this article into anthracycline cardiotoxicity since it is still the agent most widely prescribed, the one with higher toxic effects on the heart, and the most widely studied.

Anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy: risk prediction, prevention and treatment

Anthracyclines are the cornerstone of treatment for many malignancies. However, anthracycline cardiotoxicity is a considerable concern given that it can compromise the clinical effectiveness of the treatment and patient survival despite early discontinuation of therapy or dose reduction. Patients with cancer receiving anthracycline treatment can have a reduction in their quality of life and likelihood of survival due to cardiotoxicity, irrespective of their oncological prognosis. Increasing knowledge about anthracycline cardiotoxicity has enabled the identification of patients who are candidates for anthracycline regimens and those who might develop anthracycline-induced cardiomyopathy. Anthracycline cardiotoxicity is a unique and evolving phenomenon that begins with myocardial cell damage, progresses to reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, and culminates in symptomatic heart failure if it is not promptly detected and treated. Early risk stratification can be guided by imaging or biomarkers. In this Review, we present a comprehensive and clinically useful approach to cardiomyopathy related to anthracycline therapy, encompassing its epidemiology, definition, mechanisms, novel classifications, risk factors and patient risk stratification, diagnostic approaches (including imaging and biomarkers), treatment guidelines algorithms, and the role of new cardioprotective drugs that are used for the treatment of heart failure.

Cardiovascular health of patients with cancer: Challenges abound

Patients with cancer have elevated cardiovascular risks compared to those without cancer. As cancer incidence increases and cancer-related mortality decreases, cardiovascular diseases in patients with a history of cancer will become increasingly important. This in turn is reflected by the exponentially increasing amount of cardio-oncology research in recent years. This narrative review aims to summarize the key existing literature in several main areas of cardio-oncology, including the epidemiology, natural history, prevention, management, and determinants of the cardiovascular health of patients with cancer, and identify relevant gaps in evidence for further research.

Impact of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy and its discontinuation on cardiac function and mortality in patients with early-stage breast cancer: An analysis based on the Japanese Receipt Claim Database

Standard trastuzumab therapy can reduce the risk of early recurrence of HER2-positive breast cancer. However, trastuzumab-induced cardiac dysfunction may force the discontinuation of adjuvant trastuzumab therapy. Incidentally, there are still unclear whether or not trastuzumab treatment should be continued in the setting of reduced cardiac function. We aimed to investigate the association between trastuzumab discontinuation, the development of cardiac dysfunction during trastuzumab treatment, and all-cause mortality using the JMDC as the Japanese claims database. Between 2010 and 2019, 1779 women with early-stage breast cancer underwent surgery with adjuvant trastuzumab therapy (TZ). A 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching was conducted for patients who completed or discontinued TZ. The rates of cancer therapy-related-cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT) and mortality in the TZ completion and discontinuation groups were compared. After PS matching, the TZ completion group (CMP_PSM: n = 83) and discontinuation group (INT_PSM: n = 83) were included in the study. TZ was administered for 12 and 5 months in CMP_PSM and INT_PSM, respectively. The cumulative incidence of CTR-CVT was significantly higher in CMP_PSM than INT_PSM (log-rank test, P = .0096). The mortality rate was significantly higher in INT_PSM than in CMP_PSM. The all-cause mortality in INT_PSM tended to increase at a constant rate after treatment, even after discontinuation. Our findings suggest that discontinuation of trastuzumab treatment worsens patient prognosis due to insufficient treatment of breast cancer rather than due to the cardiovascular toxicity of the drug.

Atrial Fibrillation in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Literature Review

In addition to traditional risk factors, patients with breast cancer are at an increased risk of atrial fibrillation due to cancer itself and certain cancer therapies. Atrial fibrillation in these patients adds to their morbidity and mortality. The precise mechanisms leading to the increased atrial fibrillation in patients with breast cancer are not well understood. The main goal of atrial fibrillation management in this population is to facilitate uninterrupted cancer treatment while addressing the arrhythmia and other cardiovascular sequelae of cancer treatment. Rhythm control is often challenging to implement in patients with breast cancer during active antineoplastic therapy because of the need for uninterrupted anticoagulation, potential drug-drug interactions between cancer treatments and antiarrhythmic medications, and the increased likelihood of atrial fibrillation recurrence. Prevention of thromboembolism and anticoagulation can also be challenging in patients with breast cancer as a result of the increased risk of cancer-related procoagulant state and coagulopathies. The integration of a cardio-oncology team and a multidisciplinary approach are crucial for better outcomes. The therapeutic interventions should be tailored toward individual patients' profiles through a shared decision-making approach. The precise mechanisms leading to the increased atrial fibrillation in patients with breast cancer are not well understood, highlighting the gaps in our knowledge. More research is required to reduce these gaps, refine risk stratification, and optimize treatment strategies in these patients.

Changes in Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Cancer Survivors: A Nationwide Cohort Study

Background

Cancer survivors face an elevated risk of cardiovascular disease, with physical inactivity after cancer treatment potentially worsening this risk.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the association between physical activity before and after a cancer diagnosis and the risk for heart disease.

Methods

A nationwide cohort of 269,943 cancer survivors (mean age 56.3, 45.7% men) was evaluated for physical activity adherence 2 years before and after diagnosis. The primary outcomes were the incidence of myocardial infarction (MI), heart failure (HF), and atrial fibrillation. Subdistribution HRs (sHRs) and 95% CIs were calculated using Gray's method, accounting for death as a competing risk.

Results

Over a follow-up period of 1,111,329.28 person-years, compared with those who remained inactive, persistent physical activity was associated with a 20% reduction in MI risk (sHR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.70-0.91) and a 16% reduction risk in HF risk (sHR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.78-0.90). Initiating physical activity after a cancer diagnosis was linked to an 11% lower risk for MI (sHR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79-0.99) and a 13% lower risk for HF (sHR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.82-0.93). Being active only before diagnosis was associated with a 20% lower risk for MI (sHR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.71-0.91) and a 6% lower risk for HF (sHR: 0.94; 95% CI: 0.88-1.00). No association was observed between physical activity and atrial fibrillation risk. Associations varied by primary cancer site.

Conclusions

These findings underscore the importance of maintaining physical activity for cardiovascular health in cancer survivors and suggest that physical activity before a diagnosis may offer enduring protection against ischemic heart disease and cardiac dysfunction.

Cardiovascular Considerations During Cancer Therapy: Gaps in Evidence and JACC: CardioOncology Expert Panel Recommendations

The administration of certain cancer therapies can be associated with the development of cardiovascular toxicity or complications. This spectrum of toxicities is broad and requires nuanced approaches for prevention, identification, and management. This expert panel summarizes the consensus of opinions of diverse health care professionals in several key areas: 1) cardioprotection involves strategies aimed at the primary prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity; 2) surveillance entails monitoring for cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity during cancer therapy; 3) permissive cardiotoxicity is the informed continuation of cancer therapy in the presence of cardiovascular toxicity, along with the implementation of mitigating cardiovascular treatments; and 4) special considerations include the invasive management of severe cardiovascular disease in patients receiving treatments for advanced cancer and the exploration of drug-drug interactions in cardio-oncology. In this expert panel, we also highlight gaps in evidence in an effort to continue to advance science in the cardiovascular care of our patients undergoing cancer therapy.

Anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with early breast cancer carrying germline BRCA1/2 mutation: the BRCAN study

BACKGROUND

BRCA1/2 genes play a critical role in genome stability and DNA repair. In animal models, loss of cardiomyocyte-specific BRCA1/2 is associated with DNA damage, apoptosis, cardiac dysfunction, and mortality following anthracycline exposure. However, whether these preclinical findings translate to humans remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

Assess the impact of germline BRCA1/2 (gBRCA1/2) status on anthracyclines-induced cardiotoxicity (AIC) in patients with early breast cancer and no prior anti-HER2 therapy.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective/prospective cohort study focused on early breast cancer patients, treated with anthracycline-based chemotherapy in the neo/adjuvant setting, no prior anti-HER2 therapy, and known gBRCA1/2 status, normal baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and no previous cardiovascular disease. Follow-up assessments involved myocardial dysfunction blood biomarkers (MDBB), transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), and quality of life (QoL) questionnaires. The primary objective was LVEF changes comparing BRCA1/2 mutation carriers (gBRCA1/2m) vs non-carriers (gBRCA1/2wt). Secondary objectives included differences in MDBB and QoL.

RESULTS

A total of 137 patients were included (103 gBRCA1/2wt and 34 gBRCA1/2m). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups. Compared to baseline, LVEF% reduction was -4.7[-12.0, 0.0] vs -9.5[-18.0, -5.0] in gBRCA1/2wt vs gBRCA1/2m, (P = .027). After adjusting for confounders, the difference in reduction in LVEF remained statistically significant at -4.5 [95%CI, -8.6, -0.4; P = .032]. No differences between MDBB (C-reactive protein, hsTnI, NT-proBNP, D-Dimer, ST-2, or Galectine-3) or QoL (MLHFQ and EQ5-D index) were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

gBRCA1/2m patients could represent a higher-risk population for AIC. gBRCA1/2 status should be one of the factors to consider in deciding on adjuvant anthracycline necessity. This population could benefit from a cardio-oncology closer follow-up and cardioprotective strategies.

Significant Influence of Cardiac Radiation Dose on the Risk of Cardiotoxicity in Patients Receiving Adjuvant Trastuzumab and Radiation Therapy for Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

This study aimed to analyze the incidence of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTRCVT) and identify the radiation dosimetric and clinical risk factors for these events in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from 1378 patients who were treated with curative surgery and adjuvant trastuzumab for breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed. A total of 959 patients underwent postoperative radiation therapy (RT), whereas 419 patients were managed without RT (no-RT). CTRCVT were categorized according to the time of occurrence in relation to trastuzumab as follows: during trastuzumab cycles (CTRCVT-during T) or after completing trastuzumab (CTRCVT-after T). The cardiac radiation dose was extracted from the RT plan of each individual patient. The incidence of and contributing factors for CTRCVT-during T and -after T were evaluated.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 95.8 months (range, 4.3-181.1 months), 69 patients (5.0%) had experienced CTRCVT. CTRCVT-during T was detected in 41 patients (3.0%), and the 8-year rate of CTRCVT-after T was 2.2%. Of the patients developing CTRCVT-during T, 27 (2.0%) discontinued trastuzumab. The cardiac radiation doses were significantly associated with the risk of both CTRCVT-during T (odds ratio, 1.087; P = .001) and -after T (hazard ratio, 1.177; P < .001). The 8-year rates of CTRCVT-after T were not significantly different between the no-RT and RT groups (2.0% vs 2.4%, P = .956). However, the rate was significantly higher in patients with heart V25Gy ≥3% compared with those with heart V25Gy <3% (5.7% vs 1.5%, P = .019). Patients who received <17 cycles of trastuzumab had worse oncological outcomes than those who received ≥17 cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

Both CTRCVT-during T and -after T were associated with the cardiac radiation dose. Therefore, evaluation of the cardiac radiation dose is necessary to prevent early termination of trastuzumab treatment, which could lead to worse outcomes.

Breast cancer and cardiovascular health

Modern cancer therapies greatly improve clinical outcomes for both early and advanced breast cancer patients. However, these advances have raised concerns about potential short- and long-term toxicities, including cardiovascular toxicities. Therefore, understanding the common risk factors and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms contributing to cardiovascular toxicity is essential to ensure best breast cancer outcomes. While cardio-oncology has emerged as a sub-speciality to address these challenges, it is essential that all cardiologists recognize and understand the cardiovascular consequences of cancer therapy. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the potential adverse cardiovascular effects associated with modern breast cancer therapies. A preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic workflow to minimize the impact of cardiovascular toxicity on patient outcomes is presented. Key aspects of this workflow include regular monitoring of cardiovascular function, early detection and management of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicities, and optimization of cardiovascular risk factor control. By highlighting the gaps in knowledge in some areas, this review aims to emphasize the critical role of cardio-oncology research in ensuring the holistic well-being of patients with breast cancer.

Echoes of Concern-AI and Moral Agency in Medicine

This essay describes concerns that use of artificial intelligence (AI) as a replacement rather than a supplement in the provision of medical care may lead to loss of the art of medicine and the collaborative partnership between physician and patient.

Cardio-Oncology and Heart Failure: a Scientific Statement From the Heart Failure Society of America

Heart failure and cancer remain 2 of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, and the 2 disease entities are linked in a complex manner. Patients with cancer are at increased risk of cardiovascular complications related to the cancer therapies. The presence of cardiomyopathy or heart failure in a patient with new cancer diagnosis portends a high risk for adverse oncology and cardiovascular outcomes. With the rapid growth of cancer therapies, many of which interfere with cardiovascular homeostasis, heart failure practitioners need to be familiar with prevention, risk stratification, diagnosis, and management strategies in cardio-oncology. This Heart Failure Society of America statement addresses the complexities of heart failure care among patients with active cancer diagnoses and cancer survivors. Risk stratification, monitoring and management of cardiotoxicity are presented across stages A through D heart failure, with focused discussion on heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and special populations, such as survivors of childhood and young-adulthood cancers. We provide an overview of the shared risk factors between cancer and heart failure, highlighting heart failure as a form of cardiotoxicity associated with many different cancer therapeutics. Finally, we discuss disparities in the care of patients with cancer and cardiac disease and present a framework for a multidisciplinary-team approach and critical collaboration among heart failure, oncology, palliative care, pharmacy, and nursing teams in the management of these complex patients.

Primary Cardiac Aggressive B-Cell Lymphoma Affecting Right Ventricle and Acute Cardiovascular Events: Multidisciplinary Approach

Primary cardiac lymphoma (PCL) is extremely rare. A few reviews comprise the available evidence. We present the case of a 70-year-old man who was immunosuppressed as a result of a previous liver transplant and who presented with PCL. This case highlights the cardiovascular issues that clinicians may face in PCL management and the importance of a multidisciplinary team approach.

Cardiovascular Considerations Before Cancer Therapy: Gaps in Evidence and JACC: CardioOncology Expert Panel Recommendations

Baseline cardiovascular assessment before the initiation of potentially cardiotoxic cancer therapies is a key component of cardio-oncology, aiming to reduce cardiovascular complications and morbidity in patients and survivors. Recent clinical practice guidelines provide both general and cancer therapy-specific recommendations for baseline cardiovascular toxicity risk assessment and management, including the use of dedicated risk scores, cardiovascular imaging, and biomarker testing. However, the value of such interventions in altering disease trajectories has not been established, with many recommendations based on expert opinion or Level of Evidence: C, studies with a potential for high risk of bias. Advances in understanding underlying mechanisms of cardiotoxicity and the increased availability of genetic and immunologic profiling present new opportunities for personalized risk assessment. This paper evaluates the existing evidence on cardiovascular care of cancer patients before cardiotoxic cancer therapy and highlights gaps in evidence and priorities for future research.

How to utilize current guidelines to manage patients with cancer at high risk for heart failure

Heart failure (HF) in patients with cancer is associated with high morbidity and mortality. The success of cancer therapy has resulted in an exponential rise in the population of cancer survivors, however cardiovascular disease (CVD) is now a major life limiting condition more than 5 years after cancer diagnosis [Sturgeon, Deng, Bluethmann, et al 40(48):3889-3897, 2019]. Prevention and early detection of CVD, including cardiomyopathy (CM) and HF is of paramount importance. The European Society of Cardiology (ESC) published guidelines on Cardio-Oncology (CO) [Lyon, López-Fernández, Couch, et al 43(41):4229-4361, 2022] detailing cardiovascular (CV) risk stratification, prevention, monitoring, diagnosis, and treatment throughout the course and following completion of cancer therapy. Here we utilize a case to summarize aspects of the ESC guideline relevant to HF clinicians, with a focus on risk stratification, early detection, prevention of CM and HF, and the role for guideline directed medical therapy in patients with cancer.

Multiscale mapping of transcriptomic signatures for cardiotoxic drugs

Drug-induced gene expression profiles can identify potential mechanisms of toxicity. We focus on obtaining signatures for cardiotoxicity of FDA-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in human induced-pluripotent-stem-cell-derived cardiomyocytes, using bulk transcriptomic profiles. We use singular value decomposition to identify drug-selective patterns across cell lines obtained from multiple healthy human subjects. Cellular pathways affected by cardiotoxic TKIs include energy metabolism, contractile, and extracellular matrix dynamics. Projecting these pathways to published single cell expression profiles indicates that TKI responses can be evoked in both cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts. Integration of transcriptomic outlier analysis with whole genomic sequencing of our six cell lines enables us to correctly reidentify a genomic variant causally linked to anthracycline-induced cardiotoxicity and predict genomic variants potentially associated with TKI-induced cardiotoxicity. We conclude that mRNA expression profiles when integrated with publicly available genomic, pathway, and single cell transcriptomic datasets, provide multiscale signatures for cardiotoxicity that could be used for drug development and patient stratification.

Current use of echocardiography in cardio-oncology: nationwide real-world data from an ANMCO/SIECVI joint survey

Aims

The need for cardio-oncology competencies is constantly growing, and with the establishment of cardio-oncology services, cardiovascular imaging, particularly transthoracic echocardiography (TTE), has become pivotal in patients' management. However, care pathways for oncologic patients largely depend on local health structures' resources. This survey from Associazione Italiana Medici Cardiologi Ospedalieri and the Italian Society of Echocardiography and Cardiovascular Imaging aimed at investigating the use of echocardiography in cardio-oncology services and knowledge levels on cancer patients' care.

Methods and results

Data were obtained via an electronic survey based on a structured questionnaire uploaded to the promoting societies' websites. Responses came from 159 centres with echocardiography. According to one-third of participating centres, workload related to cancer patients represented >30% of the total requests. The most common TTE indication (85%) was left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) evaluation. Many centres (55%) still assessed LVEF solely by bidimensional method or visual estimation in case of inadequate acoustic windows. At the same time, almost 40% of centres reported routinely using global longitudinal strain when feasible. We further performed a sub-analysis according to the presence (33%) or absence (77%) of dedicated cardio-oncologists, revealing significant differences in cardiovascular surveillance strategies and cardiotoxicity management.

Conclusion

This survey on echocardiography practice for cancer patients reveals a significant gap between actual clinical practice and standards proposed by recommendations, underlying the need for stronger partnerships between cardiologists and oncologists and dedicated, well-structured cardio-oncology services.

Use of new and emerging cancer drugs: what the cardiologist needs to know

The last decade has witnessed a paradigm shift in cancer therapy, from non-specific cytotoxic chemotherapies to agents targeting specific molecular mechanisms. Nonetheless, cardiovascular toxicity of cancer therapies remains an important concern. This is particularly relevant given the significant improvement in survival of solid and haematological cancers achieved in the last decades. Cardio-oncology is a subspecialty of medicine focusing on the identification and prevention of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT). This review will examine the new definition of CTR-CVT and guiding principles for baseline cardiovascular assessment and risk stratification before cancer therapy, providing take-home messages for non-specialized cardiologists.

Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity: The quest for predictive biomarkers and improved risk stratification

Ibrutinib was the first Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). While producing durable responses and prolonging survival, roughly 20-25% of patients experience dose limiting side effects, mostly consisting of cardiovascular toxicities like severe hypertension and atrial fibrillation. While clinical predictors of BTK inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity have been proposed and may aid in risk stratification, there is no routine risk model used in clinical practice today to identify patients at highest risk. A recent study investigating genetic predictors of ibrutinib-related cardiotoxicity found that single nucleotide polymorphisms in KCNQ1 and GATA4 were significantly associated with cardiotoxic events. If replicated in larger studies, these biomarkers may improve risk stratification in combination with clinical factors. A clinicogenomic risk model may aid in identifying patients at highest risk of developing BTK inhibitor-related cardiotoxicity in which further risk mitigation strategies may be explored.

Breast Cancer and Therapy-Related Cardiovascular Toxicity

The global incidence of breast cancer is on the rise, a trend also observed in South Korea. However, thanks to the rapid advancements in anticancer therapies, survival rates are improving. Consequently, post-treatment health and quality of life for breast cancer survivors are emerging as significant concerns, particularly regarding treatment-related cardiotoxicity. In this review, we delve into the cardiovascular complications associated with breast cancer treatment, explore surveillance protocols for early detection and diagnosis of late complications, and discuss protective strategies against cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients undergoing anticancer therapy, drawing from multiple guidelines.

Real-world data of cardio-oncologic interventions for cardiovascular adverse events with oral oncolytics

BACKGROUND

Oral cancer therapy-related cardiovascular (CV) toxicity has a wide variety of presentations including arrhythmia, cardiomyopathy, and myocardial infarction, but clinical evidence related to its management is limited. The purpose of this IRB-approved, single-center, retrospective, cohort study was to characterize cardio-oncologic interventions for CV adverse events related to oral oncolytics.

METHODS

The cohort included 67 patients who were admitted to a multi-hospital health system between June 1, 2016 and July 31, 2021, had at least one medical record order of oral oncolytics considered to have cardiotoxic potential, and had an ICD10 code for a cardiotoxic event added to their electronic medical records after initiation of oral oncolytics.

RESULTS

The majority (97%) had pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD) or a CV risk factor. The three most common classes of oral oncolytics were aromatase inhibitors (36%), BCR-ABL inhibitors (16%), and VEGFR inhibitors (13%). New-onset or worsening heart failure (HF) (n = 31), which occurred after a median of 148 days (Interquartile range (IQR) 43-476 days) was the most common cardiotoxic event. The most frequent interventions were pharmacological treatment of the CV adverse event (n = 44) and treatment interruption (n = 18), but guideline-directed medication therapy for HF could be further optimized.

CONCLUSION

Pre-existing CVD or CV risk factors predispose oncology patients to CV adverse events. Real-world practice reveals that CV adverse events require temporary interruption of treatment and initiation of pharmacologic treatment. A multidisciplinary, patient-centered approach that includes discussion of risks/benefits of treatment continuation, and initiation of guideline-directed treatment is recommended until high-quality, drug-specific data for monitoring and treatment become available.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor-associated cardiovascular toxicities: A review

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionary effects on therapeutic strategies for multiple malignancies. Their efficacy depends on their ability to reactivate the host immune system to fight cancer cells. However, adverse reactions to ICIs are common and involve several organs, limiting their use in clinical practice. Although the incidence of cardiovascular toxicity is relatively low, it is associated with serious consequences and high mortality rates. The primary cardiovascular toxicities include myocarditis, pericarditis, Takotsubo syndrome, arrhythmia, vasculitis, acute coronary syndrome, and venous thromboembolism. Currently, the mechanism underlying ICI-associated cardiovascular toxicity remains unclear and underexplored. The diagnosis and monitoring of ICI-associated cardiovascular toxicities mainly include the following indicators: symptoms, signs, laboratory examination, electrocardiography, imaging, and pathology. Treatments are based on the grade of cardiovascular toxicity and mainly include drug withdrawal, corticosteroid therapy, immunosuppressants, and conventional cardiac treatment. This review focuses on the incidence, underlying mechanisms, clinical manifestations, diagnoses, and treatment strategies.

Management of Fluoropyrimidine-Induced Cardiac Adverse Outcomes Following Cancer Treatment

Advancements in cancer treatments have improved survival rates but have also led to increased cardiotoxicities, which can cause adverse cardiovascular events or worsen pre-existing conditions. Herein, cardiotoxicity is a severe adverse effect of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) therapy in cancer patients, with reported incidence rates ranging from 1 to 20%. Some studies have also suggested subclinical effects and there are reports which have documented instances of cardiac arrest or sudden death during 5-FU treatment, highlighting the importance of timely management of cardiovascular symptoms. However, despite being treated with conventional medical approaches for this cardiotoxicity, a subset of patients has demonstrated suboptimal or insufficient responses. The frequent use of 5-FU in chemotherapy and its association with significant morbidity and mortality indicates the need for a greater understanding of 5-FU-associated cardiotoxicity. It is essential to reduce the adverse effects of anti-tumor medications while preserving their efficacy, which can be achieved through drugs that mitigate toxicity associated with these drugs. Underpinning cardiotoxicity associated with 5-FU therapy also has the potential to offer valuable guidance in pinpointing pharmacological approaches that can be employed to prevent or ameliorate these effects. The present study provides an overview of management strategies for cardiac events induced by fluoropyrimidine-based cancer treatments. The review encompasses the underlying molecular and cellular mechanisms of cardiotoxicity, associated risk factors, and diagnostic methods. Additionally, we provide information on several available treatments and drug choices for angina resulting from 5-FU exposure, including nicorandil, ranolazine, trimetazidine, ivabradine, and sacubitril-valsartan, which have demonstrated potential in mitigating or protecting against chemotherapy-induced adverse cardiac effects.

Women's cardiovascular health - the cardio-oncologic jigsaw

Improvements in cancer care have led to an exponential increase in cancer survival. This is particularly the case for breast cancer, where 5-year survival in Australia exceeds 90%. Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has emerged as one of the competing causes of morbidity and mortality among cancer survivors, both as a complication of cancer therapies and because the risk factors for cancer are shared with those for CVD. In this review we cover the key aspects of cardiovascular care for women throughout their cancer journey: the need for baseline cardiovascular risk assessment and management, a crucial component of the cardiovascular care; the importance of long-term surveillance for ongoing maintenance of cardiovascular health; and strong evidence for the beneficial effects of physical exercise to improve both cancer and cardiovascular outcomes. There is general disparity in cardiovascular outcomes for women, which is further exacerbated when both CVD and cancer co-exist. Collaboration between oncology and cardiac services, with an emergence of the whole field of cardio-oncology, allows for expedited investigation and treatment for these patients. This collaboration as well as a holistic approach to patient care and key role of patients' general practitioners are essential to ensure long-term health of people living with, during and beyond cancer.

Effect of chemotherapy in tumor on coronary arteries: Mechanisms and management

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is an important contributor to the cardiovascular burden in cancer survivors. The development of coronary ischemia events, myocardial infarction, and heart failure has been associated with many conventional chemotherapeutic agents, new targeted therapies, and immunotherapy. The most frequent pathological manifestations of chemotherapy-mediated coronary damage include acute vasospasm, acute thrombosis, accelerated atherosclerosis development, and microvascular dysfunction. Potential screening techniques for CAD patients include baseline risk factor evaluation, polygenic risk factors, and coronary artery calcium scores. Determining the risk requires consideration of both the type of chemotherapy and the type of cancer being treated. Cardiology-oncology guidelines offer some suggestions for the care of coronary artery disease, which might involve medication, lifestyle changes, and coronary revascularization.

Endothelin-based markers for endothelial dysfunction in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity

Current cardiac biomarkers, troponins and brain natriuretic peptide, are primarily used to assist in the diagnosis or exclusion of myocardial damage and congestive heart failure, respectively. The use of these biomarkers in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity has been evaluated by various studies. However, neither biomarker provides early predictive value, leaving many cancer survivors with irreversible cardiac injury. Assessing endothelial dysfunction could be an effective measure of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity at the vascular level. Risk profiling and detection of vascular toxicities may offer predictive biomarkers to prevent chronic manifestation of irreversible cardiotoxicities. Emerging interest has developed in finding biomarkers that could ideally provide earlier prognostic value. Thus, the aim of this review is to give an overview of current blood-based cardiac biomarkers and discuss the potential of endothelin-1 (ET-1) and more stable peptide fragments of ET-1 synthesis as biomarkers of endothelial dysfunction. For instance, endothelin-like domain peptide (ELDP) and C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) demonstrated high-sensitivity and longer clearance rate than ET-1. Thus, investigating their biomarker role in chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity is important and could provide additional insights for identifying patients at risk. Also, additional research is required to fully understand ELDP-mediated vasoconstriction. This review will discuss the future development of ET-1, ELDP and CT-proET-1 as prospective predictive biomarkers.

Rationale and design of the Children's Oncology Group study AAML1831 integrated cardiac substudies in pediatric acute myeloid leukemia therapy

Background

Pediatric acute myeloid leukemia (AML) therapy is associated with substantial short- and long-term treatment-related cardiotoxicity mainly due to high-dose anthracycline exposure. Early left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) compromises anthracycline delivery and is associated with inferior event-free and overall survival in de novo pediatric AML. Thus, effective cardioprotective strategies and cardiotoxicity risk predictors are critical to optimize cancer therapy delivery and enable early interventions to prevent progressive LVSD. While dexrazoxane-based cardioprotection reduces short-term cardiotoxicity without compromising cancer survival, liposomal anthracycline formulations have the potential to mitigate cardiotoxicity while improving antitumor efficacy. This overview summarizes the rationale and methodology of cardiac substudies within AAML1831, a randomized Children's Oncology Group Phase 3 study of CPX-351, a liposomal formulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine, in comparison with standard daunorubicin/cytarabine with dexrazoxane in the treatment of de novo pediatric AML.

Methods/design

Children (age <22 years) with newly diagnosed AML were enrolled and randomized to CPX-351-containing induction 1 and 2 (Arm A) or standard daunorubicin and dexrazoxane-containing induction (Arm B). Embedded cardiac correlative studies aim to compare the efficacy of this liposomal anthracycline formulation to dexrazoxane for primary prevention of cardiotoxicity by detailed core lab analysis of standardized echocardiograms and serial cardiac biomarkers throughout AML therapy and in follow-up. In addition, AAML1831 will assess the ability of early changes in sensitive echo indices (e.g., global longitudinal strain) and cardiac biomarkers (e.g., troponin and natriuretic peptides) to predict subsequent LVSD. Finally, AAML1831 establishes expert consensus-based strategies in cardiac monitoring and anthracycline dose modification to balance the potentially competing priorities of cardiotoxicity reduction with optimal leukemia therapy.

Discussion

This study will inform diagnostic, prognostic, preventative, and treatment strategies regarding cardiotoxicity during pediatric AML therapy. Together, these measures have the potential to improve leukemia-free and overall survival and long-term cardiovascular health in children with AML. Clinical trial registration: https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier NCT04293562.

Recent Perspectives on Cardiovascular Toxicity Associated with Colorectal Cancer Drug Therapy

Cardiotoxicity is a well-known adverse effect of cancer-related therapy that has a significant influence on patient outcomes and quality of life. The use of antineoplastic drugs to treat colorectal cancers (CRCs) is associated with a number of undesirable side effects including cardiac complications. For both sexes, CRC ranks second and accounts for four out of every ten cancer deaths. According to the reports, almost 39% of patients with colorectal cancer who underwent first-line chemotherapy suffered cardiovascular impairment. Although 5-fluorouracil is still the backbone of chemotherapy regimen for colorectal, gastric, and breast cancers, cardiotoxicity caused by 5-fluorouracil might affect anywhere from 1.5% to 18% of patients. The precise mechanisms underlying cardiotoxicity associated with CRC treatment are complex and may involve the modulation of various signaling pathways crucial for maintaining cardiac health including TKI ErbB2 or NRG-1, VEGF, PDGF, BRAF/Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK, and the PI3/ERK/AMPK/mTOR pathway, resulting in oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, inflammation, and apoptosis, ultimately damaging cardiac tissue. Thus, the identification and management of cardiotoxicity associated with CRC drug therapy while minimizing the negative impact have become increasingly important. The purpose of this review is to catalog the potential cardiotoxicities caused by anticancer drugs and targeted therapy used to treat colorectal cancer as well as strategies focused on early diagnosing, prevention, and treatment of cardiotoxicity associated with anticancer drugs used in CRC therapy.

Early Increases in Blood Pressure and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma and Thyroid Cancer Treated With VEGFR TKIs

BACKGROUND

Although VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a preferred systemic treatment approach for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and thyroid carcinoma (TC), treatment-related cardiovascular (CV) toxicity is an important contributor to morbidity. However, the clinical risk assessment and impact of CV toxicities, including early significant hypertension, among real-world advanced cancer populations receiving VEGFR TKI therapies remain understudied.

METHODS

In a multicenter, retrospective cohort study across 3 large and diverse US health systems, we characterized baseline hypertension and CV comorbidity in patients with RCC and those with TC who are newly initiating VEGFR TKI therapy. We also evaluated baseline patient-, treatment-, and disease-related factors associated with the risk for treatment-related early hypertension (within 6 weeks of TKI initiation) and major adverse CV events (MACE), accounting for the competing risk of death in an advanced cancer population, after VEGFR TKI initiation.

RESULTS

Between 2008 and 2020, 987 patients (80.3% with RCC, 19.7% with TC) initiated VEGFR TKI therapy. The baseline prevalence of hypertension was high (61.5% and 53.6% in patients with RCC and TC, respectively). Adverse CV events, including heart failure and cerebrovascular accident, were common (occurring in 14.9% of patients) and frequently occurred early (46.3% occurred within 1 year of VEGFR TKI initiation). Baseline hypertension and Black race were the primary clinical factors associated with increased acute hypertensive risk within 6 weeks of VEGFR TKI initiation. However, early significant "on-treatment" hypertension was not associated with MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

These multicenter, real-world findings indicate that hypertensive and CV morbidities are highly prevalent among patients initiating VEGFR TKI therapies, and baseline hypertension and Black race represent the primary clinical factors associated with VEGFR TKI-related early significant hypertension. However, early on-treatment hypertension was not associated with MACE, and cancer-specific CV risk algorithms may be warranted for patients initiating VEGFR TKIs.

Baseline Troponin Level and Cardiac Toxicity in HER2-positive Early Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Trastuzumab

BACKGROUND/AIM

There is controversy around the use of high-sensitive troponin T (hs-TnT) as an early biomarker of cardiac toxicity in patients with breast cancer on trastuzumab (T).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients receiving adjuvant or neo-adjuvant T for early HER2-positive breast cancer were prospectively included. Transthoracic echocardiograms and matched hs-TnT before T and at 3, 6, and 9 months were performed on all patients. Congestive heart failure, cardiac death, a decline in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) of more than 10% from baseline even if it is still within the normal range, or a drop in LVEF below 55% were all considered signs of cardiac toxicity.

RESULTS

In total, 24 patients (median age: 57; range=39-79 years) were enrolled. Anthracyclines were administered to all patients but three as part of neo/adjuvant treatment before T. Cardiovascular toxicity was observed in 3 out of 24 (12.5%) patients: two non-symptomatic LVEF declines (8.3%) and one heart failure episode (4.2%). In the entire population, the mean baseline hs-TnT level was 10.1±8.8 pg/ml, and after 3, 6, and 12 months, no appreciable change was observed. Patients with cardiac toxicity had mean hs-TnT levels higher than those without (18.3±12.3 vs. 8.2±7.2 pg/ml; p=0.049). A definite trend was evident in the chi-square test (chi2=3.52; p=0.06).

CONCLUSION

In anthracycline-exposed patients with early breast cancer, hs-TnT may be able to identify those at risk of developing cardiac toxicity during neo/adjuvant T treatment.

Menopause hormone treatment after cancer

Regular improvement in survival of women after treatment for cancer has been reached in these last years. Menopause hormone therapy (MHT) remains the most efficient treatment to alleviate climacteric symptoms and improve quality of life in symptomatic women. The long-term effects of estrogen deficiency can be, at least partially, prevented by MHT. However, using MHT in an oncologic context can be associated with contraindications. Patients who have experienced breast cancer frequently face severe climacteric symptoms, but results from randomized trials are not in favor of using MHT in these women. Three randomized trials are available in women treated by MHT after ovarian cancer, and report better survival rates in the active group of treatment, suggesting that, at least in serous high-grade ovarian carcinoma, MHT could be allowed. No robust data are available for MHT after endometrial carcinoma. According to various guidelines, MHT could be possible in low grades with good prognosis. Progestogen, however, is not contraindicated and can help to alleviate climacteric symptoms. Squamous cell cervical carcinoma is not hormone-dependent and therefore patients can be treated with MHT without restrictions, whereas cervical adenocarcinoma is likely to be estrogen-dependent, despite lack of robust data, and thus only progesterone or progestin might be potentially used. It is possible that, in future, better molecular characterization of genomic profiles of various cancers may allow MHT to be used with some patients.

Radiation Treatment Mechanisms of Cardiotoxicity: A Systematic Review

Radiotherapy may be used alone or in combination with chemotherapy for cancer treatment. There are many mechanisms of radiation treatment exposure to toxicities. Our aim was to summarize the literature about known mechanisms of radiation-induced cardiac toxicities. We performed a systematic review of the literature on the PubMed database until October 2022 about cardiovascular toxicities and radiation therapy exposure. Only systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and reviews were selected. Out of 1429 publications screened, 43 papers met inclusion criteria and were selected for the umbrella review process. Microvascular and macrovascular complications could lead to adverse cardiac effects. Many radiotherapy-associated risk factors were responsible, such as the site of radiation treatment, beam proximity to heart tissues, total dosage, the number of radiotherapy sessions, adjuvant chemotherapeutic agents used, and patient traditional cardiovascular risk factors, patient age, and gender. Moreover, important dosage cutoff values could increase the incidence of cardiac toxicities. Finally, the time from radiation exposure to cardiac side effects was assessed. Our report highlighted mechanisms, radiation dosage values, and the timeline of cardiovascular toxicities after radiation therapy. All of the above may be used for the assessment of cardiovascular risk factors and the development of screening programs for cancer patients.