1
|
Narayan V, Liu T, Song Y, Mitchell J, Sicks J, Gareen I, Sun L, Denduluri S, Fisher C, Manikowski J, Wojtowicz M, Vadakara J, Haas N, Margulies KB, Ky B. Early Increases in Blood Pressure and Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Renal Cell Carcinoma and Thyroid Cancer Treated With VEGFR TKIs. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2023; 21:1039-1049.e10. [PMID: 37856199 PMCID: PMC10695474 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2023.7047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although VEGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are a preferred systemic treatment approach for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and thyroid carcinoma (TC), treatment-related cardiovascular (CV) toxicity is an important contributor to morbidity. However, the clinical risk assessment and impact of CV toxicities, including early significant hypertension, among real-world advanced cancer populations receiving VEGFR TKI therapies remain understudied. METHODS In a multicenter, retrospective cohort study across 3 large and diverse US health systems, we characterized baseline hypertension and CV comorbidity in patients with RCC and those with TC who are newly initiating VEGFR TKI therapy. We also evaluated baseline patient-, treatment-, and disease-related factors associated with the risk for treatment-related early hypertension (within 6 weeks of TKI initiation) and major adverse CV events (MACE), accounting for the competing risk of death in an advanced cancer population, after VEGFR TKI initiation. RESULTS Between 2008 and 2020, 987 patients (80.3% with RCC, 19.7% with TC) initiated VEGFR TKI therapy. The baseline prevalence of hypertension was high (61.5% and 53.6% in patients with RCC and TC, respectively). Adverse CV events, including heart failure and cerebrovascular accident, were common (occurring in 14.9% of patients) and frequently occurred early (46.3% occurred within 1 year of VEGFR TKI initiation). Baseline hypertension and Black race were the primary clinical factors associated with increased acute hypertensive risk within 6 weeks of VEGFR TKI initiation. However, early significant "on-treatment" hypertension was not associated with MACE. CONCLUSIONS These multicenter, real-world findings indicate that hypertensive and CV morbidities are highly prevalent among patients initiating VEGFR TKI therapies, and baseline hypertension and Black race represent the primary clinical factors associated with VEGFR TKI-related early significant hypertension. However, early on-treatment hypertension was not associated with MACE, and cancer-specific CV risk algorithms may be warranted for patients initiating VEGFR TKIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivek Narayan
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Tao Liu
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Yunjie Song
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Joshua Mitchell
- Cardiovascular Division, Cardio-Oncology Center of Excellence, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO
| | - JoRean Sicks
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Ilana Gareen
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Lova Sun
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Srinivas Denduluri
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ciaran Fisher
- Geisinger Cancer Institute, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA
| | - Jesse Manikowski
- Geisinger Cancer Institute, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA
| | - Mark Wojtowicz
- Geisinger Cancer Institute, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA
| | - Joseph Vadakara
- Geisinger Cancer Institute, Geisinger Medical Center, Danville, PA
| | - Naomi Haas
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kenneth B Margulies
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Bonnie Ky
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ghazal LV, Cole S, Salsman JM, Wagner L, Duan F, Gareen I, Lux L, Parsons SK, Cheung C, Loeb DM, Prasad P, Dinner S, Zebrack B. Social Genomics as a Framework for Understanding Health Disparities Among Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Survivors: A Commentary. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100462. [PMID: 35772048 PMCID: PMC9259142 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren V Ghazal
- Center for Improving Patient and Population Health, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Steve Cole
- David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - John M Salsman
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Lynne Wagner
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest University, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Fenghai Duan
- Department of Biostatistics, Brown University, Providence, RI
| | - Ilana Gareen
- Department of Epidemiology and the Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | - Lauren Lux
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Susan K Parsons
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Cancer Center, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Pinki Prasad
- Louisiana State University Health, New Orleans, LA
| | - Shira Dinner
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Brad Zebrack
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, School of Social Work, Rogel Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Carlos RC, Obeng-Gyasi S, Cole SW, Zebrack BJ, Pisano ED, Troester MA, Timsina L, Wagner LI, Steingrimsson JA, Gareen I, Lee CI, Adams AS, Wilkins CH. Linking Structural Racism and Discrimination and Breast Cancer Outcomes: A Social Genomics Approach. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1407-1413. [PMID: 35108027 PMCID: PMC9851699 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.02004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2021] [Revised: 12/03/2021] [Accepted: 01/10/2022] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
|
4
|
Sadigh G, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Yanez B, Garcia SF, Timsina LR, Obeng-Gyasi S, Gareen I, Sledge GW, Whelan TJ, Cella D, Wagner LI, Carlos RC. Assessment of Racial Disparity in Survival Outcomes for Early Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer After Adjusting for Insurance Status and Neighborhood Deprivation: A Post Hoc Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Oncol 2022; 8:579-586. [PMID: 35175284 PMCID: PMC8855314 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.7656] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Racial disparities in survival outcomes among Black women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer have been reported. However, the association between individual-level and neighborhood-level social determinants of health on such disparities has not been well studied. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the association between race and clinical outcomes (ie, relapse-free interval and overall survival) adjusting for individual insurance coverage and neighborhood deprivation index (NDI), measured using zip code of residence, in women with breast cancer. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a post hoc analysis of 9719 women with breast cancer in the Trial Assigning Individualized Options for Treatment, a randomized clinical trial conducted from April 7, 2006, to October 6, 2010. All participants received a diagnosis of hormone receptor-positive, ERBB2-negative, axillary node-negative breast cancer. The present data analysis was conducted from April 1 to October 22, 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES A multivariate model was developed to evaluate the association between race and relapse-free interval and overall survival adjusting for insurance and NDI level at study entry, early discontinuation of endocrine therapy 4 years after initiation, and clinicopathologic characteristics of cancer. Median follow-up for clinical outcomes was 96 months. RESULTS A total of 9719 women (4.2% [n = 405] Asian; 7.1% [n = 693] Black; 84.3% [n = 8189] White; 4.4% [n = 403] others/not specified) were included; 9.1% of included women [n = 889] were Hispanic or Latino. Median (SD) age was 56 (9.2) years. In multivariate models, Black race compared with White race was associated with statistically significant shorter relapse-free interval (hazard ratio [HR], 1.39; 95% CI, 1.05-1.84; P = .02) and overall survival (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.10-2.99; P = .009), adjusting for insurance and NDI level at study entry and other factors. Although uninsured status was not associated with clinical outcomes, patients with Medicare (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.01-1.68; P = .04) and Medicaid (HR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01-2.05; P = .05) had shorter overall survival compared with those with private insurance. Participants living in neighborhoods in the highest NDI quartile experienced shorter overall survival compared with those in the lowest quartile (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.01-1.77; P = .04), regardless of self-identified race. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The findings of this post hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial suggest that Black women with breast cancer have significantly shorter relapse-free interval and overall survival compared with White women. Early discontinuation of endocrine therapy, clinicopathologic characteristics, insurance coverage, and NDI do not fully explain the observed disparity. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00310180.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gelareh Sadigh
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Robert J. Gray
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York
| | - Betina Yanez
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sofia F. Garcia
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lava R. Timsina
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Ilana Gareen
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Timothy J. Whelan
- Canadian Cancer Trials Group, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Lynne I. Wagner
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Ruth C. Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Romanoff J, Khan SA, Carlos R, Solin LJ, Badve S, McCaskill-Stevens W, Corsetti RL, Rahbar H, Spell DW, Blankstein KB, Han LK, Sabol JL, Bumberry JR, Gareen I, Snyder BS, Wagner LI, Miller KD, Sparano JA, Comstock C. Association of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a 12-Gene Expression Assay With Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment. JAMA Oncol 2020; 5:1036-1042. [PMID: 30653209 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Importance Advanced diagnostics, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and gene expression profiles, are potentially useful to guide targeted treatment in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Objectives To examine the proportion of patients who converted to mastectomy after MRI and the reasons for those conversions and to measure patient adherence to radiotherapy guided by the 12-gene DCIS score. Design, Setting, and Participants Analysis of a prospective, cohort, nonrandomized clinical trial that enrolled women with DCIS on core biopsy who were candidates for wide local excision (WLE) from 75 institutions from March 25, 2015, to April 27, 2016, through the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network trial E4112. Interventions Participants underwent breast MRI before surgery, and subsequent management incorporated MRI findings for choice of surgery. The DCIS score was used to guide radiotherapy recommendations among women with DCIS who had WLE as the final procedure and had tumor-free excision margins of 2 mm or greater. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was to estimate the conversion rate to mastectomy and the reason for conversion. Results Of 339 evaluable women (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [10.1] years; 262 [77.3%] of European descent) eligible for WLE before MRI, 65 (19.2%; 95% CI, 15.3%-23.7%) converted to mastectomy. Of these 65 patients, conversion was based on MRI findings in 25 (38.5%), patient preference in 25 (38.5%), positive margins after attempted WLE in 10 (15.4%), positive genetic test results in 3 (4.6%), and contraindication to radiotherapy in 2 (3.1%). Among the 285 who had WLE performed after MRI as the first surgical procedure, 274 (96.1%) achieved successful breast conservation. Of 171 women eligible for radiotherapy guided by DCIS score (clear margins, absence of invasive disease, and score obtained), the score was low (<39) in 82 (48.0%; 95% CI, 40.6%-55.4%) and intermediate-high (≥39) in 89 (52.0%; 95% CI, 44.6%-59.4%). Of these 171 patients, 159 (93.0%) were adherent with recommendations. Conclusions and Relevance Among women with DCIS who were WLE candidates based on conventional imaging, multiple factors were associated with conversion to mastectomy. This study may provide useful preliminary information required for designing a planned randomized clinical trial to determine the effect of MRI and DCIS score on surgical management, radiotherapy, overall resource use, and clinical outcomes, with the ultimate goal of achieving greater therapeutic precision. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02352883.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constance D Lehman
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Constantine Gatsonis
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Justin Romanoff
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Seema A Khan
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ruth Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Lawrence J Solin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | | | - Ralph L Corsetti
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Habib Rahbar
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Derrick W Spell
- Gulf South National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Kenneth B Blankstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hunterdon Medical Center, Flemington, New Jersey
| | - Linda K Han
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Jennifer L Sabol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
| | - John R Bumberry
- Department of Surgery, Mercy Hospital, Springfield, Missouri
| | - Ilana Gareen
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Bradley S Snyder
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- Department of Social Science and Health Policy, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Kathy D Miller
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Christopher Comstock
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rabinovici GD, Gatsonis C, Apgar C, Chaudhary K, Gareen I, Hanna L, Hendrix J, Hillner BE, Olson C, Lesman-Segev OH, Romanoff J, Siegel BA, Whitmer RA, Carrillo MC. Association of Amyloid Positron Emission Tomography With Subsequent Change in Clinical Management Among Medicare Beneficiaries With Mild Cognitive Impairment or Dementia. JAMA 2019; 321:1286-1294. [PMID: 30938796 PMCID: PMC6450276 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.2000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 312] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Amyloid positron emission tomography (PET) detects amyloid plaques in the brain, a core neuropathological feature of Alzheimer disease. OBJECTIVE To determine if amyloid PET is associated with subsequent changes in the management of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia of uncertain etiology. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Imaging Dementia-Evidence for Amyloid Scanning (IDEAS) study was a single-group, multisite longitudinal study that assessed the association between amyloid PET and subsequent changes in clinical management for Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia. Participants were required to meet published appropriate use criteria stating that etiology of cognitive impairment was unknown, Alzheimer disease was a diagnostic consideration, and knowledge of PET results was expected to change diagnosis and management. A total of 946 dementia specialists at 595 US sites enrolled 16 008 patients between February 2016 and September 2017. Patients were followed up through January 2018. Dementia specialists documented their diagnosis and management plan before PET and again 90 (±30) days after PET. EXPOSURES Participants underwent amyloid PET at 343 imaging centers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary end point was change in management between the pre- and post-PET visits, as assessed by a composite outcome that included Alzheimer disease drug therapy, other drug therapy, and counseling about safety and future planning. The study was powered to detect a 30% or greater change in the MCI and dementia groups. One of 2 secondary end points is reported: the proportion of changes in diagnosis (from Alzheimer disease to non-Alzheimer disease and vice versa) between pre- and post-PET visits. RESULTS Among 16 008 registered participants, 11 409 (71.3%) completed study procedures and were included in the analysis (median age, 75 years [interquartile range, 71-80]; 50.9% women; 60.5% with MCI). Amyloid PET results were positive in 3817 patients with MCI (55.3%) and 3154 patients with dementia (70.1%). The composite end point changed in 4159 of 6905 patients with MCI (60.2% [95% CI, 59.1%-61.4%]) and 2859 of 4504 patients with dementia (63.5% [95% CI, 62.1%-64.9%]), significantly exceeding the 30% threshold in each group (P < .001, 1-sided). The etiologic diagnosis changed from Alzheimer disease to non-Alzheimer disease in 2860 of 11 409 patients (25.1% [95% CI, 24.3%-25.9%]) and from non-Alzheimer disease to Alzheimer disease in 1201 of 11 409 (10.5% [95% CI, 10.0%-11.1%]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Among Medicare beneficiaries with MCI or dementia of uncertain etiology evaluated by dementia specialists, the use of amyloid PET was associated with changes in clinical management within 90 days. Further research is needed to determine whether amyloid PET is associated with improved clinical outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02420756.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gil D. Rabinovici
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
- Associate Editor, JAMA Neurology
| | - Constantine Gatsonis
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
- Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Kiran Chaudhary
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Ilana Gareen
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
- Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Lucy Hanna
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | | | - Bruce E. Hillner
- Department of Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | | | - Orit H. Lesman-Segev
- Memory and Aging Center, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco
| | - Justin Romanoff
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Barry A. Siegel
- Edward Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Rachel A. Whitmer
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente, Oakland, California
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of California, Davis
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wagner LI, Gray RJ, Garcia S, Whelan TJ, Tevarweerk A, Yanez B, Carlos R, Gareen I, McCaskill-Stevens W, Cella D, Sparano JA, Sledge GW. Abstract GS6-03: Symptoms and health-related quality of life on endocrine therapy alone (E) versus chemoendocrine therapy (C+E): TAILORx patient-reported outcomes results. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-gs6-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: TAILORx patient-reported outcomes (PRO) quantify symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL) from C+E beyond E alone from the patient's perspective, thus can inform decision-making for women in the intermediate risk group for whom chemotherapy may still be considered.
Methods: TAILORx participants with OncoType DX Recurrence Scores 11-25 were randomly assigned to E or C+E. All TAILORx participants enrolled 1/2010-10/2010 (N=612) completed PROs measuring fatigue, endocrine symptoms, cognitive impairments (PCI), and fear of recurrence at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. HRQL was assessed at baseline, 12, and 36 months. Linear regression (LR) examined PRO scores among the per-protocol sample.
Results: Overall, participants reported significantly more fatigue, endocrine symptoms and PCI at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months compared to baseline and those randomized to C+E reported a greater magnitude of change baseline-3 months compared to those randomized to E alone (Table 1). Overall, by 12 months symptoms were comparable between groups. Pre-menopausal women had comparable symptoms at 24 and 36 months. Post-menopausal women randomized to C+E had greater endocrine symptoms at 24 and 36 months and greater fatigue at 6 and 24 months. Fear of recurrence was comparable between arms during treatment and follow-up. Multiple linear regression identified increased fatigue (LR slope β=0.67), endocrine symptoms (β =0.14), and PCI (β=0.11) as significant predictors of decreased HRQL across arms (p< 0.001). HRQL was comparable between E and C+E at 12- and 36-months.
Mean PRO change scores from baseline by treatment arm and menopausal status in per protocol population Months 36122436N=Overall454469458384343n=Pre-menopausal153151150118103n=Post-menopausal301318308266240FACIT-Fatigue Overall sample C+E-8.77-4.37-4.01-4.27-3.67E-2.48-1.97-2.14-1.49-1.83LMED-5.32***-1.55-1.01-1.76-0.90Pre-M C+E-8.01-3.26-2.99-2.45-1.60E-3.87-1.66-1.32-2.52-2.11LMED-3.11-0.82-1.121.021.46Post-M C+E-9.22-4.97-4.55-5.14-4.67E-1.87-2.10-2.52-1.09-1.71LMED-6.42***-1.99*-1.16-3.02*-2.01FACT-Endocrine Symptoms Overall sample C+E-5.56-5.63-6.96-6.81-7.14E-3.61-4.24-5.62-5.31-5.17LMED-1.62*-0.97-1.08-1.05-1.69Pre-M C+E-7.62-8.34-7.94-8.29-8.96E-5.96-6.19-8.95-10.39-10.84LMED-1.44-1.631.062.272.18Post-M C+E-4.39-4.19-6.45-6.10-6.28E-2.55-3.41-4.10-3.23-2.87LMED-1.49-0.45-2.04-2.39*-3.17**Significance between mean change scores *p<0.05;**p<0.01;***p<0.001. LMED=estimated tx difference using linear model regressing score on baseline value and tx
Conclusions: TAILORx is the first trial to examine patient-reported fatigue, endocrine symptoms, PCI and HRQL among breast cancer patients randomized to endocrine therapy alone vs chemoendocrine therapy, thus allowing us to quantify acute and long-term symptoms uniquely attributable to chemotherapy. As expected, chemotherapy is associated with greater fatigue, endocrine symptoms and PCI acutely during treatment, and for post-menopausal women with greater long-term endocrine symptoms. Increased symptoms were associated with poorer HRQL. Long-term HRQL was comparable between groups.
Citation Format: Wagner LI, Gray RJ, Garcia S, Whelan TJ, Tevarweerk A, Yanez B, Carlos R, Gareen I, McCaskill-Stevens W, Cella D, Sparano JA, Sledge, Jr. GW, On behalf of the TAILORx Study Team. Symptoms and health-related quality of life on endocrine therapy alone (E) versus chemoendocrine therapy (C+E): TAILORx patient-reported outcomes results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LI Wagner
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - RJ Gray
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - S Garcia
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - TJ Whelan
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - A Tevarweerk
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - B Yanez
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - R Carlos
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - I Gareen
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - W McCaskill-Stevens
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - D Cella
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - JA Sparano
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - GW Sledge
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Hillner BE, Hanna L, Makineni R, Duan F, Shields AF, Subramaniam RM, Gareen I, Siegel BA. Intended Versus Inferred Treatment After 18F-Fluoride PET Performed for Evaluation of Osseous Metastatic Disease in the National Oncologic PET Registry. J Nucl Med 2017; 59:421-426. [PMID: 29191854 DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.205047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We have previously reported that PET with 18F-fluoride (NaF PET) for assessment of osseous metastatic disease led to changes in intended management in a substantial fraction of patients with prostate or other types of cancer participating in the National Oncologic PET Registry. This study was performed to assess the concordance of intended patient management after NaF PET and inferred management based on analysis of Medicare claims. Methods: We analyzed linked post-NaF PET data of consenting National Oncologic PET Registry participants age 65 y or older from 2011 to 2014 and their corresponding Medicare claims. Post-NaF PET treatment plans, including combinations of 2 modes of therapy, were assessed for their concordance with clinical actions inferred from Medicare claims. NaF PET studies were stratified by indication (initial staging [IS] or suspected first osseous metastasis [FOM]) and cancer type (prostate, lung, or other cancers). Agreement was assessed between post-NaF PET intended management plans for treatment (surgery, radiotherapy, or systemic therapy) within 90 d for lung and 180 d for prostate or other cancers, and for watching (the absence of treatment claims for ≥60 d) as compared with claims-inferred care. Results: Actions after 9,898 scans were assessed. After NaF PET for IS, there was claims agreement for planned surgery in 76.0% (19/25) lung, 75.4% (98/130) other cancers, and 58.9% (298/506) prostate cancer. Claims confirmed chemotherapy plans after NaF PET done for IS or FOM in 81.0% and 73.5% for lung cancer (n = 148 and 136) and 69.4% and 67.5% for other cancers (n = 111 and 228). For radiotherapy plans, agreement ranged from 80.0% to 84.4% after IS and 68.4% to 74.0% for suspected FOM. Concordance was greatest for androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (86.0%, n = 308) alone or combined with radiotherapy in prostate cancer IS (80.8%, n = 517). In prostate FOM, the concordance across all treatment plans was lower if the patients had ADT claims within 180 d before NaF PET. Agreement with nontreatment plans was high for FOM (87.2% in other cancers and 78.6% if no prior ADT in prostate) and low after IS (40.7%-62.5%). Conclusion: Concordance of post-NaF PET plans and claims was substantial and higher overall for IS than for FOM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruce E Hillner
- Department of Internal Medicine and the Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia
| | - Lucy Hanna
- The Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Rajesh Makineni
- The Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Fenghai Duan
- The Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Biostatistics, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Anthony F Shields
- Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Department of Radiology, and Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Ilana Gareen
- The Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island.,Department of Epidemiology, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island; and
| | - Barry A Siegel
- Division of Nuclear Medicine, Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology and the Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Siewert B, Gareen I, Vanness D, Herman B, Johnson CD, Gatsonis C. ACRIN 6664: Patient acceptance and preferance of CT colonography compared to optical colonoscopy for colon cancer screening. J Clin Oncol 2009. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2009.27.15_suppl.4034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
4034 Background: Colorectal cancer screening must be repeated on a regular basis. Understanding patient perceptions and willingness to be rescreened will help to determine future compliance rates. The purpose of this study was to compare National CT Colonography Trial (NCTCT) screening participant experiences with CT colonography (CTC) and optical colonoscopy (OC), willingness to return for each procedure, and procedure preference. Methods: NCTCT participants underwent a single bowel preparation (BP). Participants were scheduled to receive CTC, followed by sedation and OC. Participants were asked to complete a questionnaire two weeks post-exam on physical discomfort and embarrassment during BP, CTC and OC and willingness to repeat CTC and OC (with or without BP) at different time intervals. McNemar's Test and logistic regression were used for statistical analysis. Results: 2310 of 2600 patients (89%) responded (1224 women, 1086 men). Mean age was 58.39 years (range 50–86). The participant population was 85% Caucasian, 11% African American and 4% other. Severe discomfort was reported by 7.1% participants with BP, 6.3% with CTC, and 2.2% with OC. Severe embarrassment was reported by 1.6% participants with BP, 1.3% with CTC, and 0.7% with OC. Forty-six percent of participants preferred CTC, 27.4% reported no preference, and 24.9% preferred OC (p<0.001). Repeat screening with CTC is currently recommended every 5 years and with OC every 10 years. 80.5% of the participants were willing to be screened again with CTC in 5 years and 97.5 % were willing to be screened again with OC in 10 years (p<0.001). If the screening interval for CTC were extended to ten years, 93.7% of participants were willing to return for screening (p<0.001). If BP were unnecessary, 91.0% were willing to be rescreened with CTC in 5 years and 97.5% were willing to be rescreened with OC in 10 years (p<0.001). Conclusions: NCTCT participants preferred CTC to OC, but their willingness to undergo repeat CTC was limited by the shorter interval between screenings currently recommended for CTC as opposed to OC. Improvements in technology that would eliminate the need for bowel preparation or extend the recommended screening interval would likely improve adherence to recommended repeat screening. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B. Siewert
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Brown University, Providence, RI; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - I. Gareen
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Brown University, Providence, RI; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - D. Vanness
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Brown University, Providence, RI; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - B. Herman
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Brown University, Providence, RI; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - C. D. Johnson
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Brown University, Providence, RI; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| | - C. Gatsonis
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA; Brown University, Providence, RI; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
A precise histologic and clinical delineation of infiltrating lobular carcinoma, including its variant forms, has been elusive. We studied 230 patients with stage I and II infiltrating lobular carcinoma treated by mastectomy and axillary lymph node dissection. Included were 176 patients with the "classical" or "Indian-file" pattern (IFL) of infiltrating lobular carcinoma, and 54 patients with variant (VAR) histology [solid (SOL), alveolar (ALV), and mixed (MIX) patterns]. IFL patients were younger than VAR patients (52 versus 57 years; p = 0.004), and IFL patients were more likely to be premenopausal (p = 0.013). Microscopic multifocality and intraepithelial ductular extension of LCIS were both more frequent in the IFL group (p = 0.008 and 0.03, respectively). There was no significant difference in tumor size (T1 versus T2), axillary lymph node status, or TNM stage at presentation. Median survival time and time to recurrence was similar in the two groups. Although it was not statistically significant, median survival for stage I and low-axillary lymph node positive stage II IFL patients was better than that of VAR patients. One hundred forty of our 176 IFL patients (80%) could be matched with infiltrating duct carcinoma (IFDC) patients of similar age at diagnosis, menstrual status, tumor size, and axillary lymph node involvement. When stratified by stage, stage I IFL patients had a significantly higher disease-free survival (p = 0.02) than comparable patients with IFDC. There was not a significant difference in disease-free survival when stage II IFL and IFDC patients were compared. The unmodified term "infiltrating lobular carcinoma" should be restricted to lesions exhibiting the classical or Indian-file (IFL) microscopic architectural pattern in approximately 85% of the tumor. Patients with VAR forms of IFL may have a less favorable prognosis and should be distinguished from those with classical IFL for further characterization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D DiCostanzo
- Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|