1
|
Charalel RA, Mushlin AI, Zheng X, Mao J, Carlos R, Brown RS, Fortune BE, Talenfeld AD, Madoff DC, Ibrahim S, Johnson MS, Sedrakyan A. Predictors for Early Liver Cancer Survival After Ablation and Surgical Resection: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare Study. J Am Coll Radiol 2024; 21:295-308. [PMID: 37922972 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2023.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/04/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify independent predictors of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality after ablation or surgical resection (SR) for small hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs), after adjusting for key confounders. METHODS Using Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program-Medicare, HCCs less than 5 cm treated with ablation or SR in 2009 to 2016 (n = 956) were identified. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression models for all-cause and cancer-specific mortality were performed including demographics, clinical factors (tumor size, medical comorbidities, and liver disease factors), social determinants of health, and treatment characteristics. We also determined the most influential predictors of survival using a random forest analysis. RESULTS Larger tumor size (3-5 cm) is predictive of all-cause (hazard ratio [HR] 1.31, P = .002) and cancer-specific mortality (HR 1.59, P < .001). Furthermore, chronic kidney disease is predictive of all-cause mortality (HR 1.43, P = .013), though it is not predictive of cancer-specific death. Multiple liver disease factors are predictive of all-cause and cancer-specific mortality including portal hypertension and esophageal varices (HRs > 1, P < .05). Though Asian race is protective in univariate models, in fully adjusted, multivariable models, Asian race is not a significant protective factor. Likewise, other social determinants of health are not significantly predictive of all-cause or cancer-specific mortality. Finally, treatment with SR, in later procedure years or at high-volume centers, is protective for all-cause and cancer-specific mortality. In machine learning models, year procedure was performed, ascites, portal hypertension, and treatment choice were the most influential factors. DISCUSSION Treatment characteristics, liver disease factors, and tumor size are more important predictors of all-cause and cancer-specific death than social determinants of health for small HCCs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Resmi A Charalel
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine; Member of American College of Radiology Interventional Radiology Expert Panel 2 and Economics Committee for Interventional Radiology, New York, New York.
| | - Alvin I Mushlin
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine; Member of American College of Radiology Interventional Radiology Expert Panel 2 and Economics Committee for Interventional Radiology, New York, New York; Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Xinyan Zheng
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine; Member of American College of Radiology Interventional Radiology Expert Panel 2 and Economics Committee for Interventional Radiology, New York, New York
| | - Jialin Mao
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine; Member of American College of Radiology Interventional Radiology Expert Panel 2 and Economics Committee for Interventional Radiology, New York, New York
| | - Ruth Carlos
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine; Editor in Chief, Journal of American College of Radiology, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Robert S Brown
- Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | - Adam D Talenfeld
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York
| | - David C Madoff
- Department of Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Said Ibrahim
- Department of Medicine, Northwell Health, Manhasset, New York
| | - Matthew S Johnson
- Department of Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Art Sedrakyan
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Weill Cornell Medicine; Member of American College of Radiology Interventional Radiology Expert Panel 2 and Economics Committee for Interventional Radiology, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wright JL, Rahbar H, Obeng-Gyasi S, Carlos R, Tjoe JA, Wolff A. Reply to I. Jatoi. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1595-1596. [PMID: 35245080 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Jean L Wright
- Jean L. Wright, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Habib Rahbar, MD, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Ruth Carlos, MD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Judy A. Tjoe, MD, Novant Health, Greensboro, NC; and Antonio Wolff, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Habib Rahbar
- Jean L. Wright, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Habib Rahbar, MD, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Ruth Carlos, MD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Judy A. Tjoe, MD, Novant Health, Greensboro, NC; and Antonio Wolff, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- Jean L. Wright, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Habib Rahbar, MD, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Ruth Carlos, MD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Judy A. Tjoe, MD, Novant Health, Greensboro, NC; and Antonio Wolff, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ruth Carlos
- Jean L. Wright, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Habib Rahbar, MD, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Ruth Carlos, MD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Judy A. Tjoe, MD, Novant Health, Greensboro, NC; and Antonio Wolff, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Judy A Tjoe
- Jean L. Wright, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Habib Rahbar, MD, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Ruth Carlos, MD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Judy A. Tjoe, MD, Novant Health, Greensboro, NC; and Antonio Wolff, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Antonio Wolff
- Jean L. Wright, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD; Habib Rahbar, MD, University of Washington, Seattle, WA; Samilia Obeng-Gyasi, MD, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH; Ruth Carlos, MD, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Judy A. Tjoe, MD, Novant Health, Greensboro, NC; and Antonio Wolff, MD, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fazeli S, Covarrubias Y, Bassirian S, Cuevas J, Fowler K, Vodkin I, Kono Y, Marks R, Loomba R, Taouli B, Sirlin C, Carlos R. Eliciting Patient Preferences for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:502-512. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
|
4
|
Lin R, Duszak R, Carlos R, Sadigh G. Relationship Between Hospital Compliance With Medicare’s Price Transparency Rule, Proposed Cash Prices, and Consumer Ratings for MRI Spine. J Am Coll Radiol 2022; 19:561-563. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2022.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
5
|
Wright JL, Rahbar H, Obeng-Gyasi S, Carlos R, Tjoe J, Wolff AC. Overcoming Barriers in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Management: From Overtreatment to Optimal Treatment. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:225-230. [PMID: 34813345 PMCID: PMC8760161 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2021] [Revised: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
|
6
|
Kircher S, Braccio N, Gallagher K, Carlos R, Wagner L, Smith ML, Balch A, Benson AB. Meeting Patients Where They Are: Policy Platform for Telehealth and Cancer Care Delivery. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:1470-1474. [PMID: 34902826 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2021.7111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
7
|
Chou SHS, Romanoff J, Lehman CD, Khan SA, Carlos R, Badve SS, Xiao J, Corsetti RL, Javid SH, Spell DW, Han LK, Sabol JL, Bumberry JR, Gareen IF, Snyder BS, Gatsonis C, Wagner LI, Wolff AC, Miller KD, Sparano JA, Comstock CE, Rahbar H. Preoperative Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Imaging Features and Performance in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial). Radiology 2021; 301:E381. [PMID: 34543146 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021219016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
|
8
|
Chou SHS, Romanoff J, Lehman CD, Khan SA, Carlos R, Badve SS, Xiao J, Corsetti RL, Javid SH, Spell DW, Han LK, Sabol JL, Bumberry JR, Gareen IF, Snyder BS, Gatsonis C, Wagner LI, Wolff AC, Miller KD, Sparano JA, Comstock CE, Rahbar H. Preoperative Breast MRI for Newly Diagnosed Ductal Carcinoma in Situ: Imaging Features and Performance in a Multicenter Setting (ECOG-ACRIN E4112 Trial). Radiology 2021; 301:66-77. [PMID: 34342501 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background There are limited data from clinical trials describing preoperative MRI features and performance in the evaluation of mammographically detected ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Purpose To report qualitative MRI features of DCIS, MRI performance in the identification of additional disease, and associations of imaging features with pathologic, genomic, and surgical outcomes from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ECOG-ACRIN) E4112 trial. Materials and Methods Secondary analyses of a multicenter prospective clinical trial from the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group included women with DCIS diagnosed with conventional imaging techniques (mammography and US), confirmed via core-needle biopsy (CNB), and enrolled between March 2015 and April 2016 who were candidates for wide local excision (WLE) based on conventional imaging and clinical examination results. DCIS MRI features and pathologic features from CNB and excision were recorded. Each woman without invasive upgrade of the index DCIS at WLE received a 12-gene DCIS score. MRI performance metrics were calculated. Associations of imaging features with invasive upgrade, dichotomized DCIS score (<39 vs ≥39), and single WLE success were estimated in uni- and multivariable analyses. Results Among 339 women (median age, 60 years; interquartile range, 51-66 years), most DCIS cases showed nonmass enhancement (NME) (195 of 339 [58%]) on MRI scans with larger median size than on mammograms (19 mm vs 12 mm; P < .001). Positive predictive value of MRI-prompted CNBs was 32% (21 of 66) (95% CI: 22, 44), yielding an additional cancer detection rate of 6.2% (21 of 339) (95% CI: 4.1, 9.3). MRI false-positive rate was 14.2% (45 of 318) (95% CI: 10.7, 18.4). No imaging features were associated with invasive upgrade or DCIS score (P = .05 to P = .95). Smaller size and focal NME distribution at MRI were linked to single WLE success (P < .001). Conclusion Preoperative MRI depicted ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) diagnosed with conventional imaging most commonly as nonmass enhancement, with larger median span than mammography, and additional cancer detection rate of 6.2%. MRI features of this subset of DCIS did not enable prediction of pathologic or genomic outcomes. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02352883 © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. See also the editorial by Kuhl in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shinn-Huey S Chou
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Justin Romanoff
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Constance D Lehman
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Seema A Khan
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Ruth Carlos
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Sunil S Badve
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Jennifer Xiao
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Ralph L Corsetti
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Sara H Javid
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Derrick W Spell
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Linda K Han
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Jennifer L Sabol
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - John R Bumberry
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Ilana F Gareen
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Bradley S Snyder
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Constantine Gatsonis
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Antonio C Wolff
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Kathy D Miller
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Christopher E Comstock
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| | - Habib Rahbar
- From the Dept of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hosp, 55 Fruit Street, WAC-240, Boston, MA 02114 (S.H.S.C., C.D.L.); Ctr for Statistical Sciences, Brown Univ School of Public Health, Providence, RI (J.R., I.F.G., B.S.S., C.G.); Dept of Medicine, Northwestern Univ Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Ill (S.A.K.); Dept of Radiology, Univ of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Mich (R.C.); Depts of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine (S.S.B.) and Medicine (K.D.M.), Indiana Univ School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Ind; Dept of Radiology (J.X., H.R.) and Surgery (S.H.J.), Univ of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Wash; Dept of Surgery, Tulane Univ School of Medicine, New Orleans, La (R.L.C.); Community Oncology Research Program, Gulf-South National Cancer Inst, New Orleans, La (D.W.S.); Dept of Surgery, Parkview Cancer Inst, Fort Wayne, Ind (L.K.H.); Dept of Surgery, Lankenau Medical Ctr, Wynnewood, Pa (J.L.S.); Dept of Surgery, Mercy Hosp Springfield, Springfield, Mo (J.R.B.); Depts of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC (L.I.W.); Dept of Oncology, Johns Hopkins Univ School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md (A.C.W.); Dept of Medicine (Oncology), Montefiore Medical Center-Weiler Hosp, Bronx, NY (J.A.S.); and Dept of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Ctr, New York, NY (C.E.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sadigh G, Switchenko J, Weaver KE, Elchoufi D, Meisel J, Bilen MA, Lawson D, Cella D, El-Rayes B, Carlos R. Correlates of financial toxicity in adult cancer patients and their informal caregivers. Support Care Cancer 2021; 30:217-225. [PMID: 34255179 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06424-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Financial toxicity is commonly reported by cancer patients, but few studies have assessed caregiver perceptions. We aimed to validate the modified Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) in cancer caregivers, identify factors associated with financial toxicity in both patients and caregivers, and assess the association of caregiver financial toxicity with patient and caregiver outcomes. METHODS Using a convenience sampling method, 100 dyads of adult cancer patients and a primary caregiver visiting outpatient oncology clinics (Jan-Sep 2019) were recruited. We assessed the internal consistency and convergent and divergent validity of the modified COST. Multivariable analyses identified correlates of financial toxicity. Association of financial toxicity with care non-adherence, lifestyle-altering behaviors (e.g., home refinance/sale, retirement/saving account withdrawal), and quality of life (QOL) was investigated. RESULTS Recruited patient vs. caregiver characteristics were as follows: mean age: 60.6 vs. 56.5; 34% vs. 46.4% female; 79% vs. 81.4% white. The caregiver COST measure demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.91). In patients, older age (B, 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.4]) and higher annual household income (B, 14.3 [95% CI, 9.3-19.4]) correlated with lower financial toxicity (P < 0.05). In caregivers, lower patient financial toxicity (B, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.2-0.6]) and cancer stages 1-3 (compared to stage 4) (B, 4.6 [95% CI, 0.4-8.8]) correlated with lower financial toxicity (P < 0.05). Increased caregiver financial toxicity correlated with higher care non-adherence in patients, increased lifestyle-altering behaviors, and lower QOL in patients and caregivers (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The COST measure can also be used to assess caregiver financial toxicity. Caregivers' financial toxicity was associated with negative outcomes for both dyad members.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gelareh Sadigh
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, 1364 Clifton Rd, Suite BG20, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Jeffrey Switchenko
- Department of Epidemiology, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
| | - Deema Elchoufi
- Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jane Meisel
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Mehmet Asim Bilen
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David Lawson
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - David Cella
- Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Bassel El-Rayes
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Ruth Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Said-Al-Naief N, Asadi H, Carlos R, Edwards P. SARCOIDOSIS OF THE HEAD AND NECK. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2021.03.148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
11
|
Obeng-Gyasi S, O'Neill AM, Miller K, Schneider BP, Partridge AH, Timsina LR, Sledge GW, Wagner LI, Carlos R. Social determinants of health, genetic ancestry, and mortality in ECOG-ACRIN E5103. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.6527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6527 Background: Social determinants of health (SDH) and genetic ancestry have been independently implicated in breast cancer presentation, treatment and mortality. However, little is known about the relationship between SDH and genetic ancestry on clinical trial outcomes. The objective of this study is to assess the association between SDH, genetic ancestry and clinical outcomes in patients enrolled in an adjuvant breast cancer clinical trial. Methods: ECOG-ACRIN (EA) 5103 randomized patients to receive AC + taxane + bevacizumab or placebo. SDH were operationalized as insurance status at trial registration (individual SES) and neighborhood socioeconomic status (nSES). Insurance categories included: (1) Private, 2) Medicare including private/Medicare, military, 3) Medicaid including Medicaid/Medicare, uninsured, 4) self-pay). The nSES index was calculated using zip codes linked to county level data on occupation, income, poverty, wealth, education and crowding. Genome-wide single-nucleotide polymorphism arrays were used to define African ancestry (AA), European ancestry (EA) and other (OA). Multivariable regression and Cox-Proportional Hazard models (odds ratios (OR) and hazard ratios (HR) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI)) were used to assess associations with chemotherapy completion and overall mortality. Estimates were adjusted for the following clinical covariates: age, tumor size, nodal status, hormone receptor status, and primary surgery at randomization. Results: The study cohort included 2453 EA (79.2%), 381 AA (12.2%) and 265 OA (8.6%). Medicaid patients (OR 0.76(0.59-0.99); ref private) and those with AA (OR 0.62(0.49-0.78); ref EA) were less likely to complete chemotherapy. Regarding overall mortality, Medicaid insurance (HR 1.42(1.05-1.92) was associated with a higher mortality than private insurance. Conversely, there was no significant difference in mortality by ancestry (AA HR 1.27 (0.97-1.66); OA HR 0.90 (0.63-1.29): ref EA). Neighborhood socioeconomic status did not appear to be associated with chemotherapy completion or mortality. Conclusions: SDH reflective of individual SES, such as insurance, appear to be stronger drivers of trial completion and mortality compared to nSES among patients enrolled in E5103. Moreover, study results suggest an interplay between ancestry and individual proxies for SDH in trial completion. Nevertheless, the relationship between ancestry and lower rates of chemotherapy completion do not appear to translate into higher mortality rates among patients of AA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Kathy Miller
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Obeng-Gyasi S, Graham N, Kumar S, Lee JW, Cella D, Zhao F, Ip E, O'Connell N, Hong F, Peipert J, Gareen IF, Gray RJ, Wagner LI, Carlos R. Association between allostatic load, symptom burden and mortality in E1A11 trial for myeloma. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.12102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
12102 Background: Allostatic load (AL) conceptualizes the effects of chronic psychosocial adversity on physiologic dysregulation. To date, studies have shown an association between elevated AL and higher disease-specific and overall mortality among cancer patients; however, none have focused on multiple myeloma (MM) patients. We aim to understand the relationship between baseline AL, symptom burden, and mortality among patients enrolled in the E1A11 therapeutic trial in MM. Methods: ECOG-ACRIN E1A11 was a phase III RCT comparing induction with Bortezomib (Arm A) versus Carfilzomib (Arm B) in conjunction with Lenalidomide +Dexamethasone. AL included 7 biomarkers: BMI, alkaline phosphatase, creatinine, C-reactive protein, white blood cell count, albumin and creatinine clearance. AL7 was a composite summary score with a point was assigned for each biomarker value in the highest quartile, except for albumin and creatinine clearance, where a point was assigned for values in the lowest quartile. Endpoints included symptom burden at baseline and ̃1 month, non-completion of induction therapy, and overall survival (OS). Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Multiple Myeloma (FACT-MM) items assessed patient-reported symptom burden, including fatigue (item HI7), pain (GP4), and bother by side effects of treatment (GP5) on a 5-point Likert scale. Multivariable logistic regressions assessed the effect of AL7 (ranging 0-7) on high-pain, -fatigue, and -bother (QOL score > = 3 vs < 3), and non-completion of induction therapy. The effect of AL7 on OS was assessed using multivariable Cox regression. Regression covariates included study arm, age, sex, race, ECOG performance status, and the target symptom burden score at baseline. Results: The study cohort included 1087 patients. Mean baseline AL7 was 1.8 (±1.4). In adjusted analysis, a unit increase in AL7 was associated with a greater odds of high pain (OR 1.15, 95%CI [1.04-1.27]) and high fatigue (OR 1.19, 95%CI [1.07-1.32]) at baseline, which did not persist at ̃1 month (pain OR 0.96, 95%CI [0.84-1.10]; fatigue OR 1.03, 95%CI [0.91-1.16]). There was no association between AL7 and high side effect bother at baseline (OR 1.06, 95% CI [0.83-1.35]) or at ̃1 month (OR 1.06, 95%CI [0.90-1.24]). There was no association between AL7 and induction non-completion (OR 1.07, 95%CI [0.96-1.18]). Notably, each unit increase in AL7 was associated with higher mortality (HR 1.26, 95%CI [1.14-1.39]). Conclusions: Despite its association with fatigue and pain at baseline, AL7 was not associated with these symptoms at ̃1 month nor induction non-completion. However, elevated baseline AL7 was associated with poorer OS. AL composite score at baseline, which we interpret as a measure of physiological dysregulation associated with adverse social factors, may have implications on clinical outcomes within clinical trials despite presumed equal treatment access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Ju-Whei Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - David Cella
- Robert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Edward Ip
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | | | - Fangxin Hong
- Biostatistical Core, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - John Peipert
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | - Robert James Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kircher SM, Duan F, Gareen IF, Underwood E, Sicks J, Suga JMM, Kehn H, Mehan PT, Acoba JD, Taylor MA, Wagner LI, Carlos R. Baseline and short-term financial burden (FB) in colorectal cancer (CRC) treated with curative intent: Early results of ECOG-ACRIN EAQ162CD. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.1518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
1518 Background: Cancer therapy costs continue to rise, resulting in FB. FB in CRC treated with curative intent remains unexplored, particularly in the community oncology setting. We assess baseline FB and 3-month change, including predictors. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed CRC treated with curative intent were enrolled through NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Community Sites in a longitudinal study and completed the validated FACIT Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (COST) instrument at baseline and 3 months. Higher COST score (range 0-44) indicates greater financial well-being. Pearson correlation compared baseline and 3-month measurements. Effects of patient demographics, clinical, self-efficacy variables (Table) and practice safety net affiliation were assessed using linear regression for baseline COST and COST difference at 3 months. F-tests identified covariates significantly predicting FB. Results: 450 and 296 participants completed the baseline and 3-month survey with a mean COST score 23.5 ± 11.9 and 24.6 ± 12.4, respectively (r=0.80, p<0.001), considered grade 1 or mild. Financial resource indicators such as income, insurance type, high-deductible insurance and savings, along with self-efficacy strongly predicted baseline FB (Table). No assessed covariates predicted COST difference. Safety-net affiliation (54/450, 12%) did not predict COST outcomes. Conclusions: Among those with CRC treated with curative intent in community settings, FB at treatment initiation and 3-month follow-up are highly correlated. Financial resources predict FB at treatment initiation. Self-efficacy to manage finances predicted FB, suggesting interventions such as financial counseling and navigation delivered early in the treatment course may minimize downstream FB. Clinical trial information: NCT03516942. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | | - Heather Kehn
- Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St. Louis Park, MN
| | | | | | | | | | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Fazeli S, Snyder B, Gareen IF, Lehman CD, Khan SA, Romanoff J, Gatsonis C, Corsetti RL, Rahbar H, Spell DW, Blankstein KB, Han LK, Sabol JL, Bumberry JR, Miller K, Sparano JA, Comstock C, Wagner LI, Carlos R. Predictors of surgery preference and quality of life in DCIS after breast MRI: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.6564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6564 Background: Management of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains variable, requiring an understanding of patient preferences and concerns to enhance the treatment decision-making process. Pre-operative MRI and surgeon recommendation can further inform surgery choice. Quality of life (QoL) is also an important consideration in treatment decision-making. The aims of this study were to assess patients’ treatment preferences before and after MRI and surgeon consultation, concordance between treatment preference and surgery received, and trends in health-related QoL (HRQL) among a prospective cohort of women newly diagnosed with DCIS. Methods: A prospective nonrandomized clinical trial by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group (E4112) enrolled women diagnosed with unilateral DCIS from 75 institutions between March 2015 and April 2016. Participants underwent either wide local excision (WLE) or mastectomy. Surveys queried patient-reported outcomes (PRO) including treatment preference and concerns, and HRQL before and after surgery. Logistic regression models were used to associate surgery preference and actual surgery received with demographic, clinical and PRO data. Change from baseline in HRQL was assessed using linear regression. Results: At study entry, age (OR 0.39, per 5-year increment, 95%CI, 0.21-0.75; p = 0.005) and treatment goals related to the importance of keeping one’s breast (OR 0.51, 95%CI 0.34-0.76; p = 0.001) and removal of the breast for peace of mind (OR 1.46, 95%CI 1.09-1.95; p = 0.01) drove surgery preference for mastectomy vs. WLE. After receipt of MRI and surgeon consultation, surgery preference was primarily mediated by MRI upstaging (OR 11.18, 95%CI 3.19-39.16; p < 0.001). Only 4% of women received a type of surgery that did not match their final treatment preference. The strongest predictors of actual surgery received were MRI upstaging (OR 15.80, 95%CI 4.85-51.46) and surgeon recommendation of mastectomy (OR 4.60, 95%CI 1.52-13.94). Receipt of a single surgery was associated with significantly improved mental health from baseline to one year after definitive surgery (p = 0.02 for mastectomy; p = 0.003 for single WLE). Self-reported Black race was an independent predictor of worsened mental (p = 0.001) and physical (p = 0.04) health at one year after definitive surgery, despite no significant racial differences in baseline HRQL. Conclusions: Our findings highlight the importance of communication between providers and patients regarding treatment preferences and goals, the clinical significance of MRI findings, and the benefits/risks of available treatment options. Future research to identify modifiable factors associated with declining mental and physical health is needed to inform targeted interventions to mitigate racial disparities and enhance HRQL in patients with DCIS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Soudabeh Fazeli
- University of California San Diego Medical Center, San Diego, CA
| | | | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | | | | | - Justin Romanoff
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI
| | | | | | - Habib Rahbar
- University of Washington Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kathy Miller
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | | | | | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Trosman JR, Sicks J, Weldon CB, Tsongalis GJ, Rapkin B, Weaver KE, Cohen GI, Lad TE, Dressler EVM, Stanfield B, Hopkins JO, Hancock J, Kehn H, Steen PD, Wagner LI, Carlos R. Biomarker testing in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): An assessment of current practices in precision oncology in the community setting—A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (EAQ161CD). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e18649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e18649 Background: Molecular biomarker testing is integral to NSCLC cancer care, but adoption and testing practices in the community are varied and often suboptimal. Testing practices, such as standard testing protocols and results turnaround time (TAT), impact timely treatment decisions. We examined adoption and testing practices for guideline recommended NSCLC biomarkers among National Cancer Institute Community Research Program (NCORP) sites. The study was conducted in collaboration with Wake Forest NCORP Research Base. Methods: An online survey was administered to onsite labs affiliated with NCORP sites April 2019 – June 2020. We assessed testing practices for 7 NCCN recommended biomarkers, including 3 with category 1 recommendation (EGFR, ALK, PD-L1) and 4 with category 2 recommendations (BRAF, ROS1, MET, RET). Guideline concordant result TAT was defined as return of EGFR and ALK results in ≤ 10 days (Lindeman 2018) (see Table for other outcomes). We used proportions, including two-sided Fischer exact tests, to compare outcomes by site characteristics (safety net, practice size). Results: The survey response rate was 69% (58/85). All responding labs offered testing for category 1 biomarkers (EGFR, ALK and PD-L1); only 10% conducted these tests in-house (Table). The majority of labs also tested for category 2 biomarkers (67%). TAT varied, with most labs returning results in ≤ 10 days for EGFR and ALK (69%, but only a minority meet this TAT for all biomarkers. Larger practice size (> 1400 new cancer cases a year) was associated with in-house testing of EGFR, ALK, PD-L1 (p=0.03) and having standard testing protocols (p<0.001). Safety net affiliation did not significantly impact practices. Conclusions: We found universal adoption of NCCN category 1 biomarkers among the labs affiliated with NCORP sites, with the majority meeting guideline concordant results TAT. There is opportunity for improvement in adoption of category 2 biomarkers and result TAT, for example, by using standard testing protocols. Reassuringly, no difference in testing practices was detected by safety net affiliation.[Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Gregory J. Tsongalis
- The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth and Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Judith O. Hopkins
- NSABP/NRG Oncology, and Novant Helath Forsyth Medical Center/Southeast Clinical Oncology Research Consortium, Winston Salem, NC
| | | | - Heather Kehn
- Metro-Minnesota Community Oncology Research Consortium, St. Louis Park, MN
| | | | | | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Weinberg D, Steingrimsson J, Zeh H, Carlos R, O'Dwyer PJ. Comparing the clinical impact of pancreatic cyst surveillance programs: A trial of the ECOG-ACRIN cancer research group (EA2185). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps10608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS10608 Background: The optimal surveillance strategy for pancreatic cysts, which occur in up to 20% of the adult population, is ill defined. Although risk of malignant degeneration of these cysts is low, pancreatic cancer mortality remains high. Two cyst surveillance guidelines, one proposed by an international consensus group (Fukuoka) and the other by the American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), are accepted standards. Both rely on radiographic and endoscopic ultrasonographic imaging. They differ in indications for, and intervals between, imaging tests, with the Fukuoka guideline advocating more intensive imaging. Clinical guidelines that provide discordant recommendations may undercut the quality and/or value of care, and have implications for societal health care costs. The primary objective of this prospective trial is to compare the clinical effectiveness and associated resource utilization of the Fukuoka and AGA guidelines for pancreatic cyst surveillance. Secondary objectives include a comparison of resource utilization and patient reported outcomes. We are also collecting and banking radiomics data and biospecimens to identify novel methods that might improve cancer risk stratification. Methods: 4606 asymptomatic patients with newly identified pancreatic cysts ≥1cm in diameter are being randomized 1:1 to high intensity (Fukuoka) or low intensity (AGA) surveillance. The primary endpoint is a composite of any pancreatic cancer without surgery, unresectable pancreatic cancer or cancer > T1a, N0 at surgery, and benign disease at surgery. This sample size will provide 90% power to identify a 30% relative difference in the primary outcome at 5 years between the two study arms. Study duration is 8 years in total, allowing for 2 years of cohort enrollment, 5 years of prospective follow-up, and six months reserved for study initiation and close out. Study participants must be ≥ 50 years and ≤ 75 years with an ECOG Performance Status 0-1 at baseline. Participants must have received a CT or MRI within 6 months of registration that identifies a new ≥1 cm pancreatic cyst. Patients with a prior diagnosis of a pancreatic cyst, pancreatic malignancy or a history of pancreatic resection are not eligible. Additional exclusion criteria include a history of acute or chronic pancreatitis, a family history of pancreatic adenocarcinoma in 1 or more first degree relatives, imaging findings or clinical signs that would prompt immediate surgical consideration (enhancing mural nodule, solid component in cyst, pancreatic duct > 10mm, cyst causing obstructive jaundice), a comorbid illness that precludes pancreatic cyst resection, pregnancy or current participation in an established surveillance program. As of February 4, 2021, thirty three (33) participants have been enrolled from two hundred (200) potential sites. Clinical trial information: NCT04239573 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Herbert Zeh
- Department of Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Peter J. O'Dwyer
- University of Pennsylvania, Pennsylvania Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Pisano E, Gatsonis C, Schnall MD, Yaffe M, Troester MA, Gareen IF, Collins LC, Curtis A, Cole E, Cormack J, Carlos R, Miller K, Comstock C. Engaging the radiology community in the National Clinical Trials Network: The ECOG-ACRIN TMIST experience. J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps10609] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS10609 Background: ECOG-ACRIN launched the Tomosynthesis Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial (TMIST) through the National Cancer Institute’s National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN)— a network of academic medical centers, community hospitals, and private clinical practices that are committed to participating in NCI-funded clinical trials. The NCI NCTN was developed to support rapid trial start-up of NCI-funded cancer control/prevention, cancer treatment, and non-therapeutic clinical trials that occur within the institution through centralized institutional administration and shared clinical resource allocation (personnel, lab services). TMIST is a randomized clinical trial assessing two breast cancer screening imaging modalities, tomosynthesis and digital mammography, in the population of women presenting for screening mammography and therefore requires active involvement of radiology. Methods: TMIST seeks to enroll 164,946 women, ages 45 to 74 years who present for screening mammography. Because the population under evaluation are women already scheduled for screening mammography, the mammography clinic is critical to successful recruitment as well as adherence to imaging randomization assignments over a 5-year period and therefore must be actively engaged in this trial with a breast imaging radiologist championing the trial within this service. To get active engagement of breast imaging radiologists, we needed to first make them aware of TMIST. Breast imaging radiologists that were already actively involved in the NCTN received notification of the trial through the NCTN email lists. So our goal was to come up with a strategy to reach out to breast imaging radiologists that were not active members in the NCTN. This was achieved through in-person informational sessions to introduce the trial at national and international breast imaging meetings, introduction of the trial and the workings of the NCTN network to the radiology community through articles placed in American College of Radiology (ACR) newsletters, ads promoting TMIST on ACR social media platforms, and direct email by the TMIST study chair to key radiology stakeholders. As of February 15, 2021, there are 115 sites open: 106 in the U.S. and 9 internationally with an additional 54 sites planning to open. A total of 39,366 women are enrolled in the trial with two-thirds also consenting to optional blood and/or buccal cell collection. Minority populations’ participation in the trial is over 20%. A significant drop in enrollment occurred in Spring 2020 coinciding with the suspension of mammography services globally due to COVID-19 beginning mid-March 2020. Enrollment and follow-up screening visits for TMIST restarted in May 2020 and gradually ramped back up to pre-COVID totals in September 2020. Our highest monthly accrual so far occurred in November 2020 with 2,148 subjects enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT03233191 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etta Pisano
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Martin Yaffe
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Ilana F. Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | - Laura C. Collins
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Elodia Cole
- American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Jean Cormack
- Brown University Center for Statistical Science, Providence, RI
| | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kathy Miller
- Indiana University Simon Cancer Center Indianapolis, Indianapolis, IN
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
McLouth LE, Nightingale CL, Dressler EV, Snavely AC, Hudson MF, Unger JM, Kazak AE, Lee SJC, Edward J, Carlos R, Kamen CS, Neuman HB, Weaver KE. Current Practices for Screening and Addressing Financial Hardship within the NCI Community Oncology Research Program. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2020; 30:669-675. [PMID: 33355237 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-1157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Revised: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 12/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer-related financial hardship is associated with poor care outcomes and reduced quality of life for patients and families. Scalable intervention development to address financial hardship requires knowledge of current screening practices and services within community cancer care. METHODS The NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) 2017 Landscape Assessment survey assessed financial screening and financial navigation practices within U.S. community oncology practices. Logistic models evaluated associations between financial hardship screening and availability of a cancer-specific financial navigator and practice group characteristics (e.g., safety-net designation, critical access hospital, proportion of racial and ethnic minority patients served). RESULTS Of 221 participating NCORP practice groups, 72% reported a financial screening process and 50% had a cancer-specific financial navigator. Practice groups with more than 10% of new patients with cancer enrolled in Medicaid (adjOR = 2.81, P = 0.02) and with less than 30% racial/ethnic minority cancer patient composition (adjOR = 3.91, P < 0.01) were more likely to screen for financial concerns. Practice groups with less than 30% racial/ethnic minority cancer patient composition (adjOR = 2.37, P < 0.01) were more likely to have a dedicated financial navigator or counselor for patients with cancer. CONCLUSIONS Most NCORP practice groups screen for financial concerns and half have a cancer-specific financial navigator. Practices serving more racial or ethnic minority patients are less likely to screen and have a designated financial navigator. IMPACT The effectiveness of financial screening and navigation for mitigating financial hardship could be tested within NCORP, along with specific interventions to address cancer care inequities.See related commentary by Yabroff et al., p. 593.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurie E McLouth
- Department of Behavioral Science, University of Kentucky, Markey Cancer Center, Center for Health Equity Transformation, Lexington, Kentucky.
| | - Chandylen L Nightingale
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Emily V Dressler
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Anna C Snavely
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Matthew F Hudson
- NCORP of the Carolinas, Prisma Health, Greenville, South Carolina
| | - Joseph M Unger
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, SWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Anne E Kazak
- Centers for Healthcare Delivery Service, Nemours Children's Health System, Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Simon J Craddock Lee
- Department of Population and Data Sciences, University of Texas-Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Jean Edward
- College of Nursing, University of Kentucky, Markey Cancer Center, UK Healthcare, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Ruth Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Heather B Neuman
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Soares CD, Hernandez-Guerrero JC, Andrade BA, Romañach MJ, Mosqueda-Taylor A, Carlos R, Macedo MR, Almeida OP, Jorge J. Comparative expression of cyclooxygenase 2 and Ki67 in amelanotic and conventional oral melanomas. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 2020; 25:e728-e731. [PMID: 32388516 PMCID: PMC7648925 DOI: 10.4317/medoral.23737] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral melanomas have some histopathological resemblance with its cutaneous counterpart; however, an aggressive behavior is more common in tumors that occur in the oral cavity. Several markers have been suggested as indicative of tumoral progression and aggressiveness, such as cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2) and Ki67. MATERIAL AND METHODS In this study, we have compared the expression of COX-2 and Ki67 in a series of amelanotic (n=7) and melanotic oral melanomas (n=22). The cases were selected from 4 pathology laboratories and submitted to the immunohistochemical (IHC) reactions. We analyzed the IHC staining based on a qualitative - using visual scores; and a computer-assisted method (quantitative) using scanned slides and software for digital analysis. RESULTS COX-2 was expressed in all oral melanomas; however, its intensity was significantly higher in the amelanotic ones (P<0.001). Similarly, a high Ki67-positivity index was observed in the amelanotic than melanotic ones (P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Based on these results, we suggest that amelanotic oral melanomas have marked pro-inflammatory and high-proliferative phenotype, justifying their more aggressive behavior compared with the melanotic ones.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C-D Soares
- Department of Oral Diagnosis Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas Avenida Limeira, 901, Areião 13414-903 Piracicaba/SP, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Williams GR, Weaver KE, Lesser GJ, Dressler E, Winkfield KM, Neuman HB, Kazak AE, Carlos R, Gansauer LJ, Kamen CS, Unger JM, Mohile SG, Klepin HD. Capacity to Provide Geriatric Specialty Care for Older Adults in Community Oncology Practices. Oncologist 2020; 25:1032-1038. [PMID: 32820842 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend that patients ≥65 years of age starting chemotherapy undergo a geriatric assessment (GA) to inform and guide management; however, little is known about resources available in community oncology practices to implement these guidelines and to facilitate geriatric oncology research. MATERIALS AND METHODS Oncology practices within the National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) were electronically surveyed in 2017 regarding the availability of specialty providers, supportive services, and practice characteristics, as part of a larger survey of cancer care delivery research capacity. RESULTS Of the 943 NCORP practices, 504 (54%) responded to the survey, representing 210 practice groups. The median new cancer cases per year ≥65 years of age was 457 (interquartile range 227-939). Of respondents, only 2.0% of practices had a fellowship-trained geriatric oncologist on staff. Geriatricians were available for consultation or comanagement at 37% of sites, and of those, only 13% had availability within the oncology clinic (5% of overall). Practice size of ≥1,000 new adult cancer cases (ages ≥18) per year was associated with higher odds (1.81, confidence interval 1.02-3.23) of geriatrician availability. Other multidisciplinary care professionals that could support GA were variably available onsite: social worker (84%), nurse navigator (81%), pharmacist (77%), dietician (71%), rehabilitative medicine (57%), psychologist (42%), and psychiatrist (37%). CONCLUSION Only a third of community oncology practices have access to a geriatrician within their group and only 5% of community sites have access within the oncology clinic. Use of primarily self-administered GA tools that direct referrals to available services may be an effective implementation strategy for guideline-based care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Only a minority of community oncology practices in the U.S. have access to geriatric specialty care. Developing models of care that use patient-reported measures and/or other geriatric screening tools to assess and guide interventions in older adults, rather than geriatric consultations, are likely the most practical methods to improve the care of this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grant R Williams
- O'Neal Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Glenn J Lesser
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Emily Dressler
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Biostatistics and Data Science, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Karen M Winkfield
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | - Heather B Neuman
- Division of Surgical Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Anne E Kazak
- Nemours Children's Health System, Wilmington, Delaware, USA
| | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Lucy J Gansauer
- Spartanburg Regional Medical Center, Spartanburg, South Carolina, USA
| | - Charles S Kamen
- James Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Joseph M Unger
- Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- James Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Heidi D Klepin
- Wake Forest Baptist Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pisano E, Gatsonis C, Yaffe M, Troester M, Gareen IF, Collins LC, Curtis A, Cole E, Carlos R, Miller K, Comstock C. ECOG-ACRIN tomosynthesis mammographic imaging screening trial (EA1151). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.tps1597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS1597 Background: This randomized trial is intended to determine whether tomosynthesis (TM) should replace the current standard for breast cancer (BC) screening, digital mammography (DM). It is hypothesized that the population of women assigned TM screening for 3-5 rounds will have fewer advanced cancers than the population assigned to DM screening. Methods: 164,946 women, ages 45 to 74 years who present for screening mammography and consent to participate will be enrolled across 150 sites in the US, Canada and abroad. Women will be randomized to TM or DM. The frequency and number of screening examinations over a five year period will vary based on menopausal status and whether they have specific risk factors, including - hormone use, family history of BC, deleterious genes, prior benign breast biopsy with diagnosis of LCIS or atypia any kind, or dense breasts. Blood and buccal cells will be collected from as many enrolled women as are willing to provide the samples. All breast biopsies during the trial will undergo gene expression analysis for the PAM50 and other progression pathways (PAM50-plus). All subjects enrolled will be followed long term for at least eight years. The primary endpoint is the proportion of participants who have an advanced breast cancer diagnosed at any time within 4.5 years of randomization in to the trial. Secondary endpoints include measures of diagnostic and predictive performance; rates of recall, biopsy, and interval cancers, prevalence of breast cancer subtypes, and tumor subtype based on PAM50-plus analysis. As of January 17th 2020, there are 104 sites open and 21,452 women enrolled in the trial. The DSMC last reviewed the trial in June 2019 and suggested that the trial continue as planned. Clinical trial information: NCT03233191.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etta Pisano
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Martin Yaffe
- Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Ilana F Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | - Laura C. Collins
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | | | - Elodia Cole
- American College of Radiology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Kathy Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Sadigh G, Gray RJ, Yanez B, Wagner LI, Garcia SF, Sparano JA, Cella D, Carlos R. Breast cancer patients’ insurance status correlates with their adherence to endocrine therapy: Analysis of ECOG-ACRIN TAILORx trial. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.7041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
7041 Background: Cancer patients spend substantial amounts on their healthcare services, and are at high risk for financial toxicity, a patient-reported outcome shown to be associated with care non-adherence. Even with insurance, cancer patients often face unpredictable or unmanageable costs. In women with breast cancer enrolled in TAILORx trial, we investigated the association between study entry insurance status and adherence to endocrine therapy (ET). Methods: Women with hormone-receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer enrolled in TAILORx clinical trial who started ET within a year of study entry were included. Early discontinuation was defined as stopping ET within 4 years of start for reasons other than distant recurrence or death, and the rate was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates. Cox proportional hazards model was used to analyze association between the patients’ insurance status at study entry and early discontinuation of ET incorporating patients’ treatment, age, race and Recurrence Score in the model. Results: A total of 9,475 patients were included (mean age: 55.6; 84% white; 9% Hispanic). A total of 58.0% had private insurance, while 11.7% had Medicare; 5.8% had Medicaid; 0.98% had military/VA insurance; 3.8% were self-pay, and 19.1% were patient recruited from international sites. The rates of 4-year early discontinuation were highest among self-pay (18.7%) and Medicaid patients (18%) and lowest among patients with military/VA insurance (8.6%) and international sites (9.8%). In multivariable analysis, compared to private insurance patients with Medicaid (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3-2.0) and self-pay (HR 1.6; 95% CI 1.3-2.1) had higher probability of discontinuing ET within 4 years of start and those at international sites had lower probability of early discontinuation (HR 0.8; 95% CI 0.7-0.9) (All p values < 0.05). Conclusions: Patients’ insurance status plays an important role in adherence to ET with uninsured and underinsured having a high rate of treatment non-adherence. Early identification of patients at risk and enrollment in insurance optimization programs may improve adherence to therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT00310180 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Robert James Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Betina Yanez
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Sofia F. Garcia
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Yanez B, Gray RJ, Sparano JA, Carlos R, Sadigh G, Garcia SF, Gareen IF, Whelan TJ, Sledge GW, Cella D, Wagner LI. Early discontinuation to adjuvant endocrine therapy in the ECOG-ACRIN TAILORx Trial. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.7004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
7004 Background: The TAILORx study demonstrated women with an intermediate Oncotype DX score receive the same benefit with endocrine therapy (ET) compared to chemoendocrine therapy (CET). However, early discontinuation of adjuvant ET is problematic among breast cancer survivors, with previous studies suggesting that up to 50% of women do not adhere to the full 5 years of recommended ET treatment. The aim of this study was to identify patient-level risk factors associated with early discontinuation of ET in the TAILORx study. Methods: TAILORx was coordinated by the ECOG-ACRIN Cancer Research Group. Participants were a subgroup of 954 women who completed additional measures on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) including endocrine symptoms (ES) physical well-being (PWB) and social well-being (SWB) prior to initiating ET, which categorized into three groups by tertile for analysis. All participants were diagnosed with hormone-receptor–positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative, axillary node–negative breast cancer who started ET within a year of study entry. Early discontinuation of ET, defined as discontinuation less than 4 years from initiation for reasons other than death or recurrence, was assessed by clinician report. Rate of discontinuation was calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and Cox-proportional hazards joint models were used to analyze the association between rates of adherence to ET with patient-level factors. Results: In a joint model, receipt of CET therapy (vs receipt of ET only; HR = .59, 95% CI .38-.94, p = .02) and age above 40 (versus age < = 40; HR = .30, 95% CI .14-.66, p = .003) were associated with a lower probability of early discontinuation of ET. Adjusted for these factors, a history of depression compared to no history of depression (HR 1.82, 95% CI 1.19-2.77, p = 0.005), worse ES compared to better ES (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.06-2.74, p = 0.03), worse PWB compared to better PWB (HR 2.12, 95% CI 1.30-3.45,p = 0.003), and worse SWB compared to better SWB (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.20-3.13, p = 0.007) were individually and significantly associated with a higher probability of early discontinuation of ET, although none reached statistical significance when all were included in a joint model. Conclusions: Younger women are at risk for early discontinuation and modifiable characteristics such as HRQoL and history of depression are potential risk factors for early discontinuation of ET. These results support systematic screening for HRQoL and depressive symptoms to identify women at risk for discontinuation of ET. Clinical trial information: NCT00310180 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Betina Yanez
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert James Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Sofia F. Garcia
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Ilana F Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bradbury AR, Lee JW, Gaieski JB, Li S, Gareen IF, Flaherty K, Herman BA, DeMichele A, Domchek SM, Maxwell KN, Onitilo AA, Virani S, Park S, Faller BA, Grant SC, Ramaekers RC, Behrens RJ, Nambudiri GS, Carlos R, Wagner LI. Randomized trial of web-based genetic education versus usual care in advanced cancer patients undergoing tumor genetic testing: Results from the ECOG-ACRIN NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP; EAQ152) COMET trial. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.2008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
2008 Background: Enthusiasm for precision oncology may obscure the complex psychosocial and ethical considerations for tumor genetic testing. Low patient genetic knowledge has been documented and heightens the risk for adverse experiences. We developed a web-based intervention to increase genetic knowledge and decrease distress among advanced cancer patients undergoing tumor genetic testing. Methods: 594 patients (80% from NCORP Community Sites) were recruited and randomized to web-intervention (n = 293) or usual care (n = 301), prior to receipt of tumor genetic test results. Primary outcomes were genetic knowledge, anxiety, depression, and cancer-specific distress measured at T0 (prior to intervention), T1 (post-intervention), T2 (after receipt of tumor results) and T3 (3 months post receipt of tumor results). Secondary outcomes included satisfaction, regret and disappointment. The effect of web-intervention was evaluated using t-test, multiple linear regression and logistic regression, with an intent-to-treat approach. Results: Patients randomized to web-intervention had better knowledge improvement than those randomized to usual care (T1-T0, p < 0.0001; T2-T0, p = 0.003). No difference was observed in change scores for anxiety, depression or cancer-specific distress. To find the moderators of intervention effect (including sex, age, education, and literacy) two 2-way interactions were noted with statistical significance: higher depression among those in the intervention arm versus the control arm for patients with lower literacy (p = 0.03); and lower cancer-specific distress among women in the intervention arm than with usual care but no such effect noted in men (p = 0.01). 71% of patients reported receiving tumor test results and this did not differ by arm. Only 20% of patients reported regret and disappointment at T2, which was more likely for those without a mutation of interest (MOI) detected vs those with a MOI detected (OR = 2.08, 95% CI, 1.13 to 3.83, p = 0.02). Conclusions: Web-based education prior to receipt of tumor genetic test results increases patient understanding of tumor genetic testing. While the intervention did not significantly reduce distress, results suggest that women who received the intervention had lower cancer-specific distress than those with usual care. Future refinements to the web-intervention are needed to address low literacy groups, men and patients with no actionable results. Clinical trial information: NCT02823652.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | | - Shuli Li
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute – ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Ilana F Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | - Keith Flaherty
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute/Harvard Medical School/Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Angela DeMichele
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | - Sujung Park
- Medical Oncology Hematology Consultants PA, Newark, DE
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhao F, Peipert J, Lee JW, Hong F, Ip E, Gareen IF, O'Connell N, Carlos R, Mayer IA, Miller K, Partridge AH, Shanafelt TD, Stewart AK, Tarhini AA, Thomas ML, Weiss M, Sparano JA, Cella D, Gray RJ, Wagner LI. Predictive value of bother by side effects of treatment prior to protocol therapy for early treatment discontinuation in clinical trials. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e19132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e19132 Background: The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–General has an item about patient tolerability of treatment: “I am bothered by side effects of treatment” (GP5). We examined the predictive value of this single item for early treatment discontinuation in clinical trials. Methods: GP5 level prior to protocol therapy (rated using a 5-point Likert scale) and treatment start/end dates and off treatment reason data at each treatment phase were drawn from five phase III clinical trials conducted by ECOG-ACRIN. In the present analysis, GP5 was dichotomized as 0 = “Not at all”/“A little bit” and 1 = “Somewhat”/“Quite a bit”/“Very Much”. Early treatment discontinuation was defined either as receiving less than protocol specified cycles of treatment when maximum cycles specified in the protocol (E1A06 induction, E1912 induction, E1609 induction, E1105 induction, E5103 adjuvant), analyzed using logistic regression via odds ratio [OR]), or treatment cessation for reasons other than progressive disease or death when treatment continued until progression or intolerability (E1A06 maintenance, E1912 maintenance, E1609 maintenance, E1105 maintenance), analyzed using Cox proportional hazard model via hazard ratio [HR]. Results: GP5 prior to treatment was significantly associated with early discontinuation of E1A06 maintenance, E1609 maintenance, E1912 maintenance, and E1912 induction. No significant association was found for other therapies examined in the study. Conclusions: High GP5 level prior to treatment is associated with higher likelihood of early treatment discontinuation in patients who have received previous treatment. The limited predictive value of GP5 for treatment naïve patients is more limited, serial on-treatment assessment should be considered in this setting. Clinical trial information: NCT00602641 . [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Peipert
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | - Ju-Whei Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Biostatistical Core, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Edward Ip
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Ilana F Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | | | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | - Kathy Miller
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | | | | | - Ahmad A. Tarhini
- H. Lee Moffitt Comprehensive Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL
| | | | | | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Robert James Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Peipert J, Zhao F, Lee JW, Hong F, Ip E, Gareen IF, O'Connell N, Carlos R, Stewart AK, Weiss M, Sparano JA, Cella D, Gray RJ, Wagner LI. Increase in side effect bother was associated with early treatment discontinuation in a clinical trial among multiple myeloma patients. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e19136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e19136 Background: Patient reported side effect bother is needed to understand tolerability of cancer drugs. We examined whether increase in side effect bother from baseline to cycle 7 as measured by a single item (GP5) from the FACT-G, “I am bothered by side effects of treatment”, was associated with early treatment discontinuation (ETD) in a multiple myeloma (MM) trial. Methods: Data were drawn from the induction phase of ECOG ACRIN E1A06, a two arm, phase 3 trial conducted in patients with untreated MM. The induction phase occurred over twelve, 28-day cycles. GP5 was assessed at registration and cycle 7. ETD was defined as completion of less than 12 cycles of treatment. We tested whether increase in side effect bother on the GP5 from baseline to cycle 7 was associated with months to ETD in two ways. At each timepoint, GP5 was rated with these response options: “Not at all”, “A little bit”, “Somewhat”, “Quite a bit”, “Very Much”. First, we stratified Kaplan Meier curves by patients with versus without substantially increased side effect burden from registration to cycle 7 on the GP5, defined as an increase of > 2 response categories; Cox regression was used to calculate a hazard ratio. Second, we fit a joint model of the GP5 change trajectory on months to ETD that substituted the estimated slope of a longitudinal logistic regression model into the hazard function of a Cox model. In this model, GP5 was dichotomized as 0 = “Not at all/”A little bit”; 1 = “Somewhat”/ “Quite a bit”/ “Very Much”. Results: 159 patients were followed during induction for a median of 11 months (range: 0.2-16.0). 10 patients (6%) reported a substantial increase on GP5 from registration to cycle 7. After 16 months, these patients had a significantly higher hazard of ETD as estimated by Kaplan Meier methods: 40% experienced ETD vs. 24% of patients without substantial GP5 increase [hazard ratio (HR): 3.08 (95% CI: 1.18-8.02)]. In the joint model, the effect of GP5 on hazard of ETD was larger [HR: 9.56 (95% CI: 2.41-37.82)]. Conclusions: This study found initial evidence that increase in side effect bother as measured by the GP5 predicts ETD and may therefore reflect treatment intolerability in cancer drug trials. The effects found in this study will be tested for replication in additional ECOG-ACRIN trials with diverse designs, treatments, and cancer types. Clinical trial information: NCT00602641 .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John Peipert
- Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL
| | | | - Ju-Whei Lee
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Biostatistical Core, Harvard University, Boston, MA
| | - Edward Ip
- Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Ilana F Gareen
- Brown University–ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Providence, RI
| | | | - Ruth Carlos
- University of Michigan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | - Joseph A. Sparano
- Montefiore Medical Center/Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Albert Einstein Cancer Center, Bronx, NY
| | | | - Robert James Gray
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute-ECOG-ACRIN Biostatistics Center, Boston, MA
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Cronan J, Horný M, Duszak R, Newsome J, Carlos R, Hughes DR, Memula S, Kokabi N. Invasive Procedural Treatments for Symptomatic Uterine Fibroids: A Cost Analysis. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:1237-1244. [PMID: 32360526 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2019] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to evaluate the contemporary use of procedural interventions to treat symptomatic uterine fibroids and assess associated health care system costs. METHODS Using the IBM Watson MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters database for 2009 to 2015 and relevant International Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes, women aged 18 to 55 years with clinically significant uterine fibroids were identified. Using Current Procedural Terminology codes, relevant procedural interventions were identified (hysterectomy, endometrial ablation, myomectomy, and uterine fibroid embolization [UFE]). Costs were defined as total actual payments by insurers and patients (per procedure and per episode of care) and were adjusted and compared using generalized linear models. RESULTS Of 241,757 invasive procedures for fibroids, hysterectomy was most common (76.5%), followed by endometrial ablation (14.5%), myomectomy (4.7%), and UFE (4.3%). Hysterectomy was more common in older women and those in rural areas (65.2% of patients <40 years of age, 77.6% of those 40-49 years of age, and 83.6% of those 50-55 years of age; 83.9% of patients outside versus 75.3% within metropolitan statistical areas). Per procedure, adjusted mean costs were $3,188 (95% confidence interval [CI], $3,114-$3,264) for hysterectomy, $2,781 (95% CI, $2,695-$2,870) for ablation, $4,436 (95% CI, $4,256-$4,623) for myomectomy, and $6,161 (95% CI, $5,736-$6,617) for UFE. Adjusted mean costs for entire episodes of care were $14,676 (95% CI, $14,496-$14,858) for hysterectomy, $6,702 (95% CI, $6,534-$6,875) for endometrial ablation, $14,791 (95% CI, $14,465-$15,125) for myomectomy, and $13,873 (95% CI, $13,182-$14,599) for UFE. CONCLUSIONS Of invasive procedures for symptomatic uterine fibroids, hysterectomy was used more frequently than endometrial ablation, myomectomy, and UFE combined. Per procedure and per episode, ablation was least costly. Costs per episode were similar for hysterectomy, myomectomy, and UFE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julie Cronan
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michal Horný
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Health Policy and Management, Emory University Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Richard Duszak
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Janice Newsome
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Ruth Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Danny R Hughes
- Health Economics and Analytics Lab, School of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Savitha Memula
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nima Kokabi
- Department of Radiology and Imaging Sciences, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Eberth JM, Ersek JL, Terry LM, Bills SE, Chintanippu N, Carlos R, Hughes DR, Studts JL. Leveraging the Mammography Setting to Raise Awareness and Facilitate Referral to Lung Cancer Screening: A Qualitative Analysis. J Am Coll Radiol 2020; 17:960-969. [PMID: 32112723 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2020.02.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2019] [Revised: 01/31/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Despite compelling support for the benefits of low-dose CT (LDCT) screening for lung cancer among high-risk individuals, awareness of LDCT screening and uptake remain low. The aim of this project was to explore the perspectives of ACR mammography screening program directors (MPDs) regarding efforts to raise LDCT screening awareness and appropriate referrals by identifying high-risk individuals participating in routine mammography. METHODS MPDs were recruited from ACR-accredited mammography facilities to participate in semistructured interviews after the completion of an online survey. Interviews were conducted over the telephone, recorded, transcribed, and subsequently reviewed for accuracy. Twenty MPDs were interviewed, and 18 interviews were transcribed and included in the thematic analysis. A theme codebook was developed, and all interviews were coded using NVivo by two trained reviewers. RESULTS Key themes were organized into four broad domains: (1) general attitudes toward the integration of LDCT screening, (2) identifying mammography patients at high risk for lung cancer, (3) counseling about LDCT screening, and (4) strategies to identify high-risk women and increase awareness and knowledge of LDCT screening. Overall, MPDs recognized the benefits of integrating mammography and LDCT screening and were receptive to educating and referring women for LDCT screening. However, training and workflow changes are needed to ensure successful implementation. CONCLUSIONS Qualitative data suggest that MPDs are amenable to leveraging the mammography setting to engage women about LDCT screening; however, additional tools, training, and/or staffing may be necessary to leverage the full potential of reaching women at high risk for lung cancer within the context of mammographic screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan M Eberth
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina; Director, Rural and Minority Health Research Center, Arnold School of Public Health, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina.
| | | | - Leah M Terry
- Department of Behavioral Science, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Sarah E Bills
- Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina
| | | | - Ruth Carlos
- Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Danny R Hughes
- School of Economics, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia; Harvey L. Neiman Health Policy Institute, American College of Radiology, Reston, Virginia
| | - Jamie L Studts
- Professor, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Scientific Director, Behavioral Oncology, Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine; Interim Program Leader, Cancer Prevention and Control Program, University of Colorado Cancer, Denver, Colorado
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Lehman CD, Gatsonis C, Romanoff J, Khan SA, Carlos R, Solin LJ, Badve S, McCaskill-Stevens W, Corsetti RL, Rahbar H, Spell DW, Blankstein KB, Han LK, Sabol JL, Bumberry JR, Gareen I, Snyder BS, Wagner LI, Miller KD, Sparano JA, Comstock C. Association of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a 12-Gene Expression Assay With Breast Ductal Carcinoma In Situ Treatment. JAMA Oncol 2020; 5:1036-1042. [PMID: 30653209 DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.6269] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Importance Advanced diagnostics, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and gene expression profiles, are potentially useful to guide targeted treatment in patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Objectives To examine the proportion of patients who converted to mastectomy after MRI and the reasons for those conversions and to measure patient adherence to radiotherapy guided by the 12-gene DCIS score. Design, Setting, and Participants Analysis of a prospective, cohort, nonrandomized clinical trial that enrolled women with DCIS on core biopsy who were candidates for wide local excision (WLE) from 75 institutions from March 25, 2015, to April 27, 2016, through the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network trial E4112. Interventions Participants underwent breast MRI before surgery, and subsequent management incorporated MRI findings for choice of surgery. The DCIS score was used to guide radiotherapy recommendations among women with DCIS who had WLE as the final procedure and had tumor-free excision margins of 2 mm or greater. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was to estimate the conversion rate to mastectomy and the reason for conversion. Results Of 339 evaluable women (mean [SD] age, 59.1 [10.1] years; 262 [77.3%] of European descent) eligible for WLE before MRI, 65 (19.2%; 95% CI, 15.3%-23.7%) converted to mastectomy. Of these 65 patients, conversion was based on MRI findings in 25 (38.5%), patient preference in 25 (38.5%), positive margins after attempted WLE in 10 (15.4%), positive genetic test results in 3 (4.6%), and contraindication to radiotherapy in 2 (3.1%). Among the 285 who had WLE performed after MRI as the first surgical procedure, 274 (96.1%) achieved successful breast conservation. Of 171 women eligible for radiotherapy guided by DCIS score (clear margins, absence of invasive disease, and score obtained), the score was low (<39) in 82 (48.0%; 95% CI, 40.6%-55.4%) and intermediate-high (≥39) in 89 (52.0%; 95% CI, 44.6%-59.4%). Of these 171 patients, 159 (93.0%) were adherent with recommendations. Conclusions and Relevance Among women with DCIS who were WLE candidates based on conventional imaging, multiple factors were associated with conversion to mastectomy. This study may provide useful preliminary information required for designing a planned randomized clinical trial to determine the effect of MRI and DCIS score on surgical management, radiotherapy, overall resource use, and clinical outcomes, with the ultimate goal of achieving greater therapeutic precision. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02352883.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constance D Lehman
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Constantine Gatsonis
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Justin Romanoff
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Seema A Khan
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ruth Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - Lawrence J Solin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Albert Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Sunil Badve
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | | | - Ralph L Corsetti
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Ochsner Medical Center, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Habib Rahbar
- Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Derrick W Spell
- Gulf South National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program, New Orleans, Louisiana
| | - Kenneth B Blankstein
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hunterdon Medical Center, Flemington, New Jersey
| | - Linda K Han
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Jennifer L Sabol
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania
| | - John R Bumberry
- Department of Surgery, Mercy Hospital, Springfield, Missouri
| | - Ilana Gareen
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Bradley S Snyder
- Center for Statistical Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Lynne I Wagner
- Department of Social Science and Health Policy, Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston Salem, North Carolina
| | - Kathy D Miller
- Department of Pathology, Indiana University, Indianapolis
| | - Joseph A Sparano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York
| | - Christopher Comstock
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Williams GR, Weaver KE, Lesser GJ, Dressler EVM, Winkfield KM, Neuman HB, Kazak A, Carlos R, Gansauer LJ, Kamen CS, Unger JM, Mohile SG, Klepin HD. Capacity to provide specialized care for older adults in community oncology practices: Results of the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) Landscape survey. J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.6539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
6539 Background: American Society of Clinical Oncology guidelines recommend that patients ≥65 years of age starting chemotherapy undergo a geriatric assessment (GA) to inform and guide management; however, little is known about resources available in community oncology practices to facilitate geriatric specialty care and implement these guidelines. Methods: Community oncology practices were electronically surveyed in 2017 regarding the availability of various providers, supportive services, and practice characteristics, as part of a larger survey of cancer care delivery research (CCDR) capacity at NCORP sites. Designated CCDR leads provided information about their site. Descriptive statistics were used to report prevalence of resources available at each community practice. Results: Of the 925 NCORP practice locations, 504 (54%) responded to the survey, representing 227 practice groups. Of respondents, 58% included a free-standing clinic or private/group practice and 82% included inpatient services. The median number of new cancer cases per year ≥65 years of age was 443 (Interquartile range [IQR] 220-903). The median number of medical oncology providers was 5 (IQR 3-11). Only 1.8% of practices had a dual fellowship trained geriatric oncologist on staff. Geriatricians were available for consultation or co-management for 34% of sites, but only 13% of those had availability within the oncology clinic. Among those with access to geriatricians, consultations were primarily outpatient (90%) versus inpatient (54%). Ancillary services that could support GA were variably available onsite: social work (83%), nurse navigators (78%), pharmacist (77%), dietician (69%), supportive caregiver services (62%), rehabilitative medicine (57%), psychologist (41%), and psychiatrist (39%). Most sites utilized electronic health record systems (84%) and patient portals (89%). Conclusions: Availability of geriatric-trained providers is limited in community oncology practices. Use of primarily self-administered GA tools that direct referrals to available ancillary services may be an effective implementation strategy for guideline-based care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Anne Kazak
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Heidi D. Klepin
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, NC
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Horný M, Cronan J, Duszak R, Spies J, Newsome J, Carlos R, Hughes D, Xing M, Kokabi N, Cronan J. 03:18 PM Abstract No. 260 Comparison of direct procedural and episode of care cost for invasive therapies in management of uterine fibroid embolization and associated patient-incurred financial burden. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
|
32
|
Cronan J, Horný M, Spies J, Newsome J, Carlos R, Hughes D, Duszak R, Xing M, Kokabi N, Cronan J. 03:27 PM Abstract No. 261 National variation in management of symptomatic uterine fibroids in contemporary clinical practice. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2019. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2018.12.323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
|
33
|
Wagner LI, Gray RJ, Garcia S, Whelan TJ, Tevarweerk A, Yanez B, Carlos R, Gareen I, McCaskill-Stevens W, Cella D, Sparano JA, Sledge GW. Abstract GS6-03: Symptoms and health-related quality of life on endocrine therapy alone (E) versus chemoendocrine therapy (C+E): TAILORx patient-reported outcomes results. Cancer Res 2019. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.sabcs18-gs6-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
Background: TAILORx patient-reported outcomes (PRO) quantify symptoms and health-related quality of life (HRQL) from C+E beyond E alone from the patient's perspective, thus can inform decision-making for women in the intermediate risk group for whom chemotherapy may still be considered.
Methods: TAILORx participants with OncoType DX Recurrence Scores 11-25 were randomly assigned to E or C+E. All TAILORx participants enrolled 1/2010-10/2010 (N=612) completed PROs measuring fatigue, endocrine symptoms, cognitive impairments (PCI), and fear of recurrence at baseline, 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. HRQL was assessed at baseline, 12, and 36 months. Linear regression (LR) examined PRO scores among the per-protocol sample.
Results: Overall, participants reported significantly more fatigue, endocrine symptoms and PCI at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months compared to baseline and those randomized to C+E reported a greater magnitude of change baseline-3 months compared to those randomized to E alone (Table 1). Overall, by 12 months symptoms were comparable between groups. Pre-menopausal women had comparable symptoms at 24 and 36 months. Post-menopausal women randomized to C+E had greater endocrine symptoms at 24 and 36 months and greater fatigue at 6 and 24 months. Fear of recurrence was comparable between arms during treatment and follow-up. Multiple linear regression identified increased fatigue (LR slope β=0.67), endocrine symptoms (β =0.14), and PCI (β=0.11) as significant predictors of decreased HRQL across arms (p< 0.001). HRQL was comparable between E and C+E at 12- and 36-months.
Mean PRO change scores from baseline by treatment arm and menopausal status in per protocol population Months 36122436N=Overall454469458384343n=Pre-menopausal153151150118103n=Post-menopausal301318308266240FACIT-Fatigue Overall sample C+E-8.77-4.37-4.01-4.27-3.67E-2.48-1.97-2.14-1.49-1.83LMED-5.32***-1.55-1.01-1.76-0.90Pre-M C+E-8.01-3.26-2.99-2.45-1.60E-3.87-1.66-1.32-2.52-2.11LMED-3.11-0.82-1.121.021.46Post-M C+E-9.22-4.97-4.55-5.14-4.67E-1.87-2.10-2.52-1.09-1.71LMED-6.42***-1.99*-1.16-3.02*-2.01FACT-Endocrine Symptoms Overall sample C+E-5.56-5.63-6.96-6.81-7.14E-3.61-4.24-5.62-5.31-5.17LMED-1.62*-0.97-1.08-1.05-1.69Pre-M C+E-7.62-8.34-7.94-8.29-8.96E-5.96-6.19-8.95-10.39-10.84LMED-1.44-1.631.062.272.18Post-M C+E-4.39-4.19-6.45-6.10-6.28E-2.55-3.41-4.10-3.23-2.87LMED-1.49-0.45-2.04-2.39*-3.17**Significance between mean change scores *p<0.05;**p<0.01;***p<0.001. LMED=estimated tx difference using linear model regressing score on baseline value and tx
Conclusions: TAILORx is the first trial to examine patient-reported fatigue, endocrine symptoms, PCI and HRQL among breast cancer patients randomized to endocrine therapy alone vs chemoendocrine therapy, thus allowing us to quantify acute and long-term symptoms uniquely attributable to chemotherapy. As expected, chemotherapy is associated with greater fatigue, endocrine symptoms and PCI acutely during treatment, and for post-menopausal women with greater long-term endocrine symptoms. Increased symptoms were associated with poorer HRQL. Long-term HRQL was comparable between groups.
Citation Format: Wagner LI, Gray RJ, Garcia S, Whelan TJ, Tevarweerk A, Yanez B, Carlos R, Gareen I, McCaskill-Stevens W, Cella D, Sparano JA, Sledge, Jr. GW, On behalf of the TAILORx Study Team. Symptoms and health-related quality of life on endocrine therapy alone (E) versus chemoendocrine therapy (C+E): TAILORx patient-reported outcomes results [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2018 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2018 Dec 4-8; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2019;79(4 Suppl):Abstract nr GS6-03.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- LI Wagner
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - RJ Gray
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - S Garcia
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - TJ Whelan
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - A Tevarweerk
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - B Yanez
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - R Carlos
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - I Gareen
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - W McCaskill-Stevens
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - D Cella
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - JA Sparano
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | - GW Sledge
- Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston Salem, NC; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA; Northwestern University School of Medicine, Chicago, IL; McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI; Brown University, Providence, RI; National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD; Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY; Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cathcart-Rake EJ, Zemla T, Jatoi A, Weaver KE, Neuman H, Kazak AE, Carlos R, Gansauer L, Unger JM, Pajewski NM, Kamen C. Acquisition of sexual orientation and gender identity data among NCI Community Oncology Research Program practice groups. Cancer 2018; 125:1313-1318. [PMID: 30561776 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.31925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sexual and gender minority individuals face numerous cancer-related inequities, many of which appear to be underreported. However, to the best of the authors' knowledge, no one has assessed rates of acquisition of sexual orientation and gender identity (SOGI) data within community oncology settings. METHODS Community oncology practices that were part of the NCI Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) network were asked whether they routinely collected SOGI information and coded this information in their electronic medical records. The proportion of practice groups reporting routine collection of sexual and/or gender minority information was calculated. Potential associations between the collection of SOGI information and practice group-level and state-level characteristics (from Gallup poll data) were also provided. RESULTS Twenty-four percent of the responding NCORP practice groups reported routine collection of sexual orientation information, and 10% reported collection of gender identity information. Practices located in western regions of the United States, practices in states with higher proportions of sexual and gender minority-identifying individuals, and practices with lower proportions of non-Hispanic patients were more likely to ask patients about sexual orientation and/or gender identity. CONCLUSIONS US oncology practices that participate in research do not frequently collect SOGI information from patients with cancer. Educational initiatives should inform oncology staff and providers about the importance of collecting gender identity and sexual orientation information to improve existent disparities faced by sexual and gender minority patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Tyler Zemla
- Division of Biostatistics, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Aminah Jatoi
- Department of Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Kathryn E Weaver
- Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Heather Neuman
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Anne E Kazak
- Nemours Center for Healthcare Delivery Science, Nemours Children's Health System, Wilmington, Delaware
| | - Ruth Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Lucy Gansauer
- Spartanburg Medical Center, Spartanburg, South Carolina
| | - Joseph M Unger
- SWOG Statistical Center, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Nicholas M Pajewski
- Department of Biostatistical Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Charles Kamen
- Cancer Control Unit, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bologna-Molina R, Mikami T, Pereira-Prado V, Tapia-Repetto G, Pires FR, Carlos R, Mosqueda-Taylor A. Primordial odontogenic tumor: Subepithelial expression of Syndecan-1 and Ki-67 suggests origin during early odontogenesis. Oral Dis 2018; 24:72-77. [PMID: 29480622 DOI: 10.1111/odi.12733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2017] [Revised: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 08/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Primordial odontogenic tumor (POT) is composed of variably cellular myxoid connective tissue, surrounded by cuboidal to columnar odontogenic epithelium resembling the inner epithelium of the enamel organ, which often invaginates into the underlying connective tissue. The tumor is delimited at least partially by a thin fibrous capsule. It derives from the early stages of tooth development. Syndecan-1 is a heparan sulfate proteoglycan that has a physiological role in several cellular functions, including maintenance of the epithelial architecture, cell-to-cell adhesion and interaction of cells with extracellular matrix, and with diverse growth factors, stimulating cell proliferation. Ki-67 is considered the gold standard as a cell proliferation marker. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of Syndecan-1 and Ki-67 proliferation index in POT and normal tooth germs to better understand the biological behavior of this tumor. Results showed that Syndecan-1 was more intensely expressed in subepithelial mesenchymal areas of POT, in a pattern that resembles the early stages of tooth development. The cell proliferation index (4.1%) suggests that POT is a slow growing tumor. Syndecan-1 expression in tooth germs in late cap and early bell stages was similar to POT, showing immunopositivity in subepithelial mesenchymal condensed areas. The immunohistochemical findings showed a pattern in which the population of subepithelial mesenchymal cells exhibited greater proliferative activity than the central portion of the dental papilla.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Bologna-Molina
- Molecular Pathology Area, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - T Mikami
- Division of Anatomical and Cellular Pathology, Department of Pathology, Iwate Medical University, Iwate, Japan
| | - V Pereira-Prado
- Molecular Pathology Area, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - G Tapia-Repetto
- Histology Area, Faculty of Dentistry, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay
| | - F R Pires
- School of Dentistry, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - R Carlos
- Pathology Division, Centro Clínico de Cabeza y Cuello/Hospital Herrera-Llerandi, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - A Mosqueda-Taylor
- Health Care Department, Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana Xochimilco, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Machado RA, Pontes H, Pires FR, Silveira HM, Bufalino A, Carlos R, Tuji FM, Alves D, Santos-Silva AR, Lopes MA, Capistrano HM, Coletta RD, Fonseca FP. Clinical and genetic analysis of patients with cherubism. Oral Dis 2017. [PMID: 28644570 DOI: 10.1111/odi.12705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the clinical and genetic features of patients with cherubism. MATERIAL AND METHODS A descriptive analysis of 14 cases from nine different families was carried out. Clinicopathological, imaging, and follow-up data were retrieved from patients' medical files and correlated with the genetic profile of each patient. Genomic DNA isolated from buccal mucosa cells was subjected to direct sequencing analysis of the SH3BP2 gene. RESULTS Females were more affected than males (8:6), and the mean age at diagnosis was 8.6 years (range 3-30 years). Eleven patients exhibited simultaneous bilateral involvement of the maxilla and mandible. Two patients did not have a familial history of cherubism. Progressive growth pattern was found in six patients and stable lesions were observed in other seven patients, whereas in one patient, complete spontaneous remission was documented during the follow-up (31 years). Mutations were found in 13 cases and included the typical heterozygous missense mutations R415Q, P418T, and P418H at exon 9 of SH3BP2. No correlation between the mutations and the clinical manifestations was observed. CONCLUSION Three different point mutations in the SH3BP2 gene were detected with variable clinical involvement. Genotype-phenotype association studies in larger population with cherubism are necessary to provide important knowledge about molecular mechanisms related to the disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A Machado
- Department of Oral Diagnosis (Pathology and Semiology), Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - Har Pontes
- Service of Oral Pathology, João de Barros Barreto University Hospital, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil
| | - F R Pires
- Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - H M Silveira
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - A Bufalino
- Department of Diagnosis and Surgery, Araraquara Dental School, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, Brazil
| | - R Carlos
- Centro Clinico de Cabeza y Cuello, Guatemala City, Guatemala
| | - F M Tuji
- School of Dentistry, Federal University of Pará, Belém, Brazil
| | - Dbm Alves
- Instituto Esperança de Ensino Superior, Santarém, Brazil
| | - A R Santos-Silva
- Department of Oral Diagnosis (Pathology and Semiology), Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - M A Lopes
- Department of Oral Diagnosis (Pathology and Semiology), Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - H M Capistrano
- Department of Oral Pathology, School of Dentistry, Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - R D Coletta
- Department of Oral Diagnosis (Pathology and Semiology), Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, Brazil
| | - F P Fonseca
- Department of Oral Surgery and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Dalton V, Carlos R, Kolenic G, Kamdar N, Minadeo L, Kobernik E, Moniz M, Fendrick AM. Early impact of the Affordable Care Act: changes in cost sharing and women's use of preventive services. Contraception 2016. [DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2016.07.139] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
38
|
Ramchandren S, Shy M, Feldman E, Carlos R, Siskind C. Defining disability: development and validation of a mobility-Disability Severity Index (mDSI) in Charcot-Marie-tooth disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2015; 86:635-9. [PMID: 25157034 PMCID: PMC4920058 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2013-307390] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2013] [Accepted: 08/06/2014] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and validate a reliable patient-reported scale that grades the severity of disability in Charcot-Marie-tooth disease (CMT), from an in-depth analysis of patient and healthcare provider perspectives on what mobility changes constitutes mild, moderate and severe disability. DESIGN In this prospective, cross-sectional study, a 19-item Disability Questionnaire was developed following literature and expert review. Between 2011 and 2012, the Disability Questionnaire was provided to healthcare providers experienced in CMT attending national scientific meetings, and to patients self-registered with the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium--Rare Diseases Clinical Research Consortium on-line contact registry. Provider and patient responses were compared utilising a two-sided unpaired t test with Bonferroni correction. The questionnaire was then assessed for validity, reliability and unidimensionality. RESULTS We analysed 259 Disability Questionnaires (167 patients, 92 providers); these showed perfect agreement between patient and provider responses on qualitative descriptions of disability, but significant differences in quantitative responses on items corresponding to minimal or severe disability (p<0.001). Validity and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire was excellent (Cronbach's α=0.96; intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC)=0.977 (0.951 to 0.993). Exploratory factor analysis and the Mokken Scaling Procedure supported the unidimensionality of the mobility-Disability Severity Index. CONCLUSIONS The mobility-Disability Severity Index is a unique instrument, categorising disability from the patient's perspective, and will undergo further cross-validation studies in CMT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sindhu Ramchandren
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael Shy
- Department of Neurology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Eva Feldman
- Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Ruth Carlos
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Carly Siskind
- Department of Neurology, Stanford Hospital and Clinics, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Bhattacharya A, Fantasia J, Carlos R, Pires F, Miller R, Wright J. Primary mucous producing papillary adenocarcinoma of salivary gland origin. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.05.057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
40
|
Chiavaras MM, Jacobson JA, Carlos R, Maida E, Bentley T, Simunovic N, Swinton M, Bhandari M. IMpact of Platelet Rich plasma OVer alternative therapies in patients with lateral Epicondylitis (IMPROVE): protocol for a multicenter randomized controlled study: a multicenter, randomized trial comparing autologous platelet-rich plasma, autologous whole blood, dry needle tendon fenestration, and physical therapy exercises alone on pain and quality of life in patients with lateral epicondylitis. Acad Radiol 2014; 21:1144-55. [PMID: 25022762 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2014.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2013] [Revised: 02/19/2014] [Accepted: 05/04/2014] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Lateral epicondylitis, commonly known as tennis elbow, is the most common cause of lateral elbow pain and the second most frequently diagnosed musculoskeletal disorder in the neck and upper limb in a primary care setting. Many therapeutic options, including conservative, surgical, and minimally invasive procedures, have been advocated for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Although numerous small studies have been performed to assess the efficacy of various treatments, there are conflicting results with no clear consensus on the optimal treatment. In an economic environment with limited health care resources, it is paramount that optimal cost-effective therapies with favorable patient-important outcomes be identified. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a protocol paper which outlines a multicenter, multidisciplinary, single-blinded, four-arm randomized controlled trial, comparing platelet-rich plasma (PRP), whole blood injection, dry needle tendon fenestration, and sham injection with physical therapy alone for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis. Patients are screened based on pre-established eligibility criteria and randomized to one of the four study groups using an Internet-based system. The patients are followed at 6-week, 12-week, 24-week, and 52-week time points to assess the primary and secondary outcomes of the study. The primary outcome is pain. Secondary outcomes include health-related quality of life and ultrasound appearance of the common extensor tendon. Two university centers (McMaster University and the University of Michigan) are currently recruiting patients. We have planned a sample size of 100 patients (25 patients per arm) to ensure over 80% power to detect a three-point difference in pain scores at 52 weeks of follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study has ethics approval from the McMaster University Research Ethics Board (REB# 12-146) and the University of Michigan Institutional Review Board (IRB# HUM00067750). Successful completion of this proposed study will significantly impact clinical practice and enhance patients' lives. More broadly, this trial will develop a network of collaboration from which further high-quality trials in ultrasound-guided interventions will follow.
Collapse
|
41
|
Kim C, Harlow SD, Karvonen-Gutierrez CA, Randolph JF, Helmuth M, Kong S, Nan B, Carlos R. Racial/ethnic differences in hepatic steatosis in a population-based cohort of post-menopausal women: the Michigan Study of Women's Health Across the Nation. Diabet Med 2013; 30:1433-41. [PMID: 23659546 PMCID: PMC3786038 DOI: 10.1111/dme.12225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2012] [Revised: 04/11/2013] [Accepted: 05/07/2013] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The prevalence of hepatic steatosis may differ between post-menopausal African-American women and non-Hispanic white women and by sex hormone binding globulin level. We examined prevalence of hepatic steatosis by race/ethnicity and associations with sex hormone binding globulin. METHODS Participants included post-menopausal women who underwent hepatic ultrasound (n = 345) at the Michigan site of the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation, a population-based study. We examined hepatic steatosis prevalence by race/ethnicity and used logistic regression models to calculate the odds of hepatic steatosis with race/ethnicity and sex hormone binding globulin, after adjustment for age, alcohol use, waist circumference, high density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides, systolic blood pressure and use of medications reported to lower intrahepatic fat. RESULTS Fewer African-American women than non-Hispanic white women had hepatic steatosis (23 vs. 36%, P = 0.01). African-American women had lower triglyceride and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, but higher blood pressure and follicle-stimulating hormone levels (P < 0.05). In the optimal-fitting multivariable models, women in the highest tertile of sex hormone binding globulin (60.2-220.3 nmol/l) had a lower odds of hepatic steatosis (odds ratio 0.43, 95% CI 0.20-0.93) compared with women in the lowest tertile of sex hormone binding globulin (10.5-40.3 nmol/l). There was an interaction between race/ethnicity and medication use whereby non-Hispanic white women using medications had three times higher odds of hepatic steatosis compared with African-American women not using medications (odds ratio 3.36, 95% CI 1.07-10.58). Interactions between race/ethnicity and other variables, including sex hormone levels, were not significant. CONCLUSIONS Hepatic steatosis on ultrasound may be more common in post-menopausal non-Hispanic white women than African-American women and was associated with lower levels of sex hormone binding globulin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Kim
- Department of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
42
|
Martínez Martínez M, Mosqueda-Taylor A, Carlos R, Delgado-Azañero W, de Almeida OP. Malignant odontogenic tumors: a multicentric Latin American study of 25 cases. Oral Dis 2013; 20:380-5. [PMID: 23730931 DOI: 10.1111/odi.12130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2013] [Revised: 04/15/2013] [Accepted: 04/30/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to show the epidemiological features of 25 malignant odontogenic tumors (MOT) in Latin America. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrieved 25 cases of MOT out of 2142 odontogenic tumors, from four oral diagnostic centers in Latin America, and described the main clinical and pathological characteristics. RESULTS A total of 19 cases were carcinomas, including eight ameloblastic carcinomas, five primary intra-osseous squamous cell carcinomas, three clear cell odontogenic carcinomas and three ghost cell odontogenic carcinomas. All six sarcomas corresponded to ameloblastic fibrosarcoma. Thirteen cases occurred in men and 12 in women, age ranged from 7 to 77 years old, with a mean of 41.4 years. The average age of patients with carcinomas and sarcomas were 48.53 and 19 years old, respectively. CONCLUSION As malignant odontogenic tumors are very rare, this series helps to better clarify their relative frequency, predominant subtypes, and clinical characteristics in Latin America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Martínez Martínez
- Oral Pathology Section, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Piracicaba, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Romañach MJ, León JE, de Almeida OP, Carlos R. Soft tissue sarcomas of the head and neck. SADJ 2012; 67:582-584. [PMID: 23957101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/02/2023]
Abstract
This is a review of the main clinical and microscopical features of the most common sarcomas of the soft tissues of the head and neck.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M J Romañach
- Department of Oral Diagnosis and Pathology, School of Dentistry, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hansen N, Weadock W, Morani A, Carlos R. Liver lesions discovered incidentally on ultrasound: evaluation of reader ability to characterize lesions on MRI without intravenous contrast. Acad Radiol 2012; 19:1087-93. [PMID: 22877986 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2012.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2012] [Revised: 06/15/2012] [Accepted: 06/18/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES Liver lesions incidentally discovered on ultrasound (US) are often further evaluated with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the added effectiveness of contrast-enhanced MRI, compared to noncontrast MRI, to correctly guide management of liver lesions incidentally identified on ultrasound in patients with low pretest probability of malignancy. We conducted the evaluation using a multireader study. MATERIALS AND METHODS Liver MRI studies ordered to evaluate incidental liver US lesions were selected for analysis. Patients with no prior history of cancer or chronic liver disease who had 2 years of clinical follow-up (72 patients) were selected to ensure low pretest probability of malignancy and adequate follow-up to establish proof of diagnosis. Fifty of these studies were randomly selected and analyzed by two abdominal radiologists. In the initial interpretation session, only nonenhanced images were reviewed; after 6 weeks, the complete exam including the contrast enhanced images were viewed. Differences in interpretation between the noncontrast and contrast enhanced reading sessions were assessed. RESULTS Sixty-nine patients (95.8%) had no abnormalities, benign masses, or hepatic steatosis accounting for the ultrasound findings. One patient was newly diagnosed with hereditary hemochromatosis, and 2 patients were newly diagnosed with metastatic disease. The most likely diagnosis changed for 15 of the lesions described by reader A, and 16 by reader B. The majority of these changes (26/31 lesions, 84%) were from one benign entity to another. Five of 31 (16%) of the changes involved that of a benign entity to a malignant one. Reader A recommended additional contrast enhanced imaging in 13/50 (26%) patients; reader B, 9/50 (18%) patients. After viewing the nonenhanced images, both readers recommended that all patients with eventual malignancies return for contrast administration and/or biopsy. After viewing the contrast-enhanced imaging, both readers accurately diagnosed all malignancies. Patient-based analysis receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated no significant difference between the enhanced and noncontrast limbs of the study, and no significant difference between readers. CONCLUSION Most of the changes in lesion detection and characterization made after contrast administration were clinically insignificant. In the lesions in which clinically important differences were made, both radiologists recommended additional imaging or biopsy that would have eventually led to the correct diagnosis. None of the patients with malignancy was categorized as completely benign either on noncontrast or contrast-enhanced imaging. This supports the utility of initially performing a noncontrast examination in a population with a low pretest probability of malignancy, especially those in whom gadolinium administration is contraindicated.
Collapse
|
45
|
Duszak R, Haines GR, Van Duyn Wear V, Lexa FJ, Bashir M, D'Souza S, Carlos R, Chen JYY, King BF, Wald C. White paper from the ACR Task Force on Print Media in Radiology. J Am Coll Radiol 2011; 8:692-702. [PMID: 21962783 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.06.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2011] [Accepted: 06/13/2011] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
The rapidly changing technological and business environment in which scientific journals are published will necessitate ongoing reassessment of operations, goals, and priorities. In this white paper, the ACR Task Force on Print Media in Radiology reviews the history and role of print media in radiology; discusses current and anticipated societal, technological, and financial challenges; and explores a variety of strategies to help ensure the relevance of professional society publishing in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Duszak
- Mid-South Imaging and Therapeutics, Memphis, Tennessee 38120, USA.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
46
|
de Andrade BAB, León JE, Carlos R, Delgado-Azañero W, Mosqueda-Taylor A, Graner E, de Almeida OP. Expression of fatty acid synthase (FASN) in oral nevi and melanoma. Oral Dis 2011; 17:808-12. [PMID: 21819495 DOI: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2011.01841.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to determine the expression of fatty acid synthase (FASN) in oral nevi and melanomas, comparing the results with correspondent cutaneous lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS Expression of FASN was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 51 oral melanocytic lesions, including 38 intramucosal nevi and 13 primary oral melanomas, in 10 cutaneous nevi and in 14 melanomas. RESULTS Fatty acid synthase was strongly expressed only in melanomas, either of the oral mucosa or cutaneous. On the other hand, most oral and cutaneous nevi were negative, with a few oral cases showing focal and weak expression. CONCLUSION Fatty acid synthase is expressed in malignant melanocytes, and it can be a helpful marker to distinguish oral melanomas from oral melanocytic nevi.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B A B de Andrade
- Oral Pathology Section, Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Menees SB, Carlos R, Scheiman J, Elta GH, Fendrick AM. CT colonography: Friend or foe of practicing endoscopists. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2009; 1:51-5. [PMID: 21160651 PMCID: PMC2998846 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v1.i1.51] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2009] [Revised: 08/31/2009] [Accepted: 09/07/2009] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To investigate the perceived impact of computed tomographic colonography (CTC) on endoscopists' current and future practice. METHODS A 21-question survey was mailed to 1570 randomly chosen American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) members. Participants reported socio-demographics, colonoscopy volume, percentage of colonoscopies performed for screening, and likelihood of integration of CTC into their practice. RESULTS A total of 367 ASGE members (23%) returned the questionnaire. Respondents were predominantly male (> 90%) and white (83%) with an average age of 49 years. Most respondents (58%) had no plans to incorporate CTC into daily practice and only 7% had already incorporated CTC into daily practice. Private practice respondents were the least likely to incorporate this modality into their daily practice (P = 0.047). Forty-three percent of participants were willing to take courses on CTC reading, particularly those with the highest volume of colonoscopy (P = 0.049). Forty percent of participants were unsure of CTC's impact on future colonoscopy volume while 21% and 18% projected a decreased and increased volume, respectively. The estimated impact of CTC volume varied significantly by age (P = 0.002). Respondents > 60 years felt that CTC would increase colonoscopy, whereas those < 40 years thought CTC would ultimately decrease colonoscopy. CONCLUSION Practicing endoscopists are not enthusiastic about the incorporation of CTC into their daily practice and are unsure of its future impact on their practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy B Menees
- Stacy B Menees, James Scheiman, Grace H Elta, Division of Gastroenterology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, United States
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Malmbeck R, Apostolidis C, Carlos R, Glatz JP, Molinet R, Morgenstern A, Nicholl A, Pagliosa G, Römer K, Schädel M, Sätmark B, Trautmann N. Separation of248Cm from a252Cf neutron source for production of Cm targets. RADIOCHIM ACTA 2009. [DOI: 10.1524/ract.2001.89.9.543] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
The separation of milligram amounts of248Cm from252Cf is presented. Essentially isotopically pure248Cm was obtained from an "old"252Cf neutron source by acid leaching. Curium was separated from californium in a cation exchange column combining two different eluents: α-HMBA at pH 4.0 for Cf, and α-HIBA at pH 4.8 for Cm. The method was first tested using Sm and Gd as actinide analogues. Excellent separation was obtained, yielding 12.6 mg Cm (11.9 mg248Cm) free from Cf (250Cf < 1.3×10-2ng and252Cf < 4.2×10-3ng).
Collapse
|
49
|
|
50
|
Nandalur M, Nandalur K, Dwamena B, Reddy P, Carlos R. Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 2008. [DOI: 10.1016/j.carrev.2008.02.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|