The Development and Implementation of Adolescent and Young Adult Oncology Programs: Teen Cancer America's Strategy

Reflecting a growing recognition that adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer have unique needs that demand novel approaches to care delivery, AYA-specific cancer programs are emerging across the United States to better serve this population. However, the limited availability of health system funding to support such efforts, in combination with the dearth of guidance that exists to guide AYA program development and implementation, has hampered the effective development and implementation of AYA oncology programs. In this article, we describe Teen Cancer America's strategy for partnering with hospitals to address this gap and improve care and outcomes for AYAs with cancer.

Developing a Comprehensive Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Program: Lessons Learned from 7 Years of Growth and Progress

Purpose: Every year, nearly 100,000 adolescents and young adults (15-39 years, AYAs) are diagnosed with cancer in the United States and many have unmet physical, psychosocial, and practical needs during and after cancer treatment. In response to demands for improved cancer care delivery for this population, specialized AYA cancer programs have emerged across the country. However, cancer centers face multilevel barriers to developing and implementing AYA cancer programs and would benefit from more robust guidance on how to approach AYA program development. Methods: To contribute to this guidance, we describe the development of an AYA cancer program at the University of North Carolina (UNC) Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center. Results: We summarize the evolution of UNC's AYA Cancer Program since it was established in 2015, offering pragmatic strategies for developing, implementing, and sustaining AYA cancer programs. Conclusion: The development of the UNC AYA Cancer Program since 2015 has generated many lessons learned that we hope may be informative to other cancer centers seeking to build specialized services for AYAs.

Active Treatment to Survivorship Care: A Mixed-Methods Study Exploring Resource Needs and Preferences of Young Adult Cancer Survivors in Transition

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to identify resource needs and preferences of young adult cancer survivors (YAs) during the transition from active treatment to survivorship care to inform tailored care tools to support YAs during this period. Methods: A mixed methods study following a sequential explanatory approach was conducted among YAs between the ages of 15 and 39. Online surveys were distributed to assess participant information and resource needs, and responses were further explored during virtual focus group and interview discussions. Frequencies and proportions were calculated to identify quantitative resource needs, and a descriptive qualitative approach was used to gather and analyze qualitative data. Results: Thirty-one participants completed the online surveys, and 27 participated in qualitative data collection. The top resource needs identified in the surveys and discussed in focus groups and interviews were (1) fear of recurrence, (2) sleep and fatigue, (3) anxiety, (4) nutrition, (5) physical activity, and (6) finances. Emergent themes identified during transcript analyses included the need for (1) tailored, customizable resources, (2) connection with other survivors, (3) tools to guide conversations about cancer, (4) clarity in what to expect during treatment and survivorship, and (5) consistent and equitable care in YA oncology. Conclusions: Participants identified six important information needs in addition to an overarching need for tailored support and equitable distribution of resources while transitioning into early survivorship. Thus, tailored interventions are needed to enhance the distribution of YA-centered resources, improve equity in YA cancer care, and connect YAs with peer survivors.

The Adolescent and Young Adult Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB): A single-arm feasibility pilot study

PURPOSE

In this pilot study, we evaluated the feasibility of implementing the Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB)- an intervention to address the pervasive unmet needs of adolescents and young adults (AYAs) during cancer treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a mixed methods single-arm feasibility pilot study of NA-SB at the North Carolina Basnight Cancer Hospital. Eligible participants were AYAs ages 18-39 in active cancer treatment. After receiving NA-SB, participants completed a postintervention survey assessing their perceptions of NA-SB. We interviewed participating providers to assess their implementation experiences.

RESULTS

On average, AYA participants (n = 26) rated NA-SB's feasibility as 4.5/5, its acceptability as 4.5/5, and its appropriateness as 4.4/5. 77% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that their needs were met in the study period.

CONCLUSION

This pilot study generated preliminary evidence to establish NA-SB's feasibility as well as proof of concept for the intervention as a viable approach for identifying and addressing AYAs' unmet needs.

Guidance to Support the Implementation of Specialized Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Care: A Qualitative Analysis of Cancer Programs

PURPOSE

The nearly 90,000 adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer in the United States yearly have tended to occupy a no-man's land between medical and pediatric oncology, often reporting that existing models of care are misaligned with their needs and preferences. Although guidelines for optimal AYA cancer care are increasingly available, the implementation of such standards has been varied. This may be in part due to a lack of guidance for implementing specialized AYA care. In this study, we leveraged an implementation science framework to identify barriers and generate practical guidance to inform the implementation of specialized AYA cancer care.

METHODS

We conducted semistructured qualitative interviews, guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, with AYA care stakeholders (N = 32 from 14 cancer programs). Our multidisciplinary research team analyzed interview transcriptions using a template analysis approach and gleaned from interviews practical guidance for implementing specialized AYA care.

RESULTS

Participants reported barriers to implementing specialized AYA care across all five Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research domains: (1) intervention characteristics (eg, costs), (2) inner setting (eg, difficulties in collaborating between pediatric and medical oncology), (3) outer setting (eg, patient-level barriers to participating in AYA services), (4) individual characteristics (eg, attitudes about AYA oncology), and (5) process (eg, lack of metrics for program evaluation). They also shared practical guidance for addressing these barriers.

CONCLUSION

Emerging guidance on the core elements of AYA cancer care must be matched with guidance to support the implementation of specialized AYA care. This study contributes to the body of evidence available to inform future implementation efforts.

Improving care coordination for adolescents and young adults with cancer

TPS1598

Background: In the US, many of the 90,000 adolescents and young adults (AYAs) (i.e., individuals ages 15-39) diagnosed with cancer each year do not receive services to address the range of needs they experience during cancer treatment. AYAs’ unmet needs are associated with higher distress, poorer health-related quality of life, and higher physical symptom burden. However, AYAs often do not use services available to them through their cancer programs, even when they face no access issues (e.g., cost, insurance status, local service capacity). AYAs report barriers to service use including lack of awareness, challenges navigating large volumes of information and complex health systems, and hesitance to broach needs with providers without prompting. To facilitate a systematic and patient-centered approach to addressing AYAs' unmet needs, we leveraged user-centered design to develop the AYA Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB). NA-SB includes a patient-reported outcome measure assessing AYAs’ physical, psychosocial, and practical needs, and a collection of referral pathways for connecting AYAs to services based on the needs they report. In this feasibility pilot study, we are evaluating the implementation of NA-SB in the University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center (UNC) AYA Cancer Program. Methods: Eligible participants include AYAs ages 18-39 currently undergoing cancer treatment at UNC (n = 25-50). The needs assessment portion of NA-SB is administered electronically through REDCap during routine clinical encounters with the AYA team. After an AYA completes the needs assessment, an AYA provider (i.e., social worker/nurse practitioner) reviews their responses and initiates referral pathways. Six weeks following their completion of the needs assessment, AYAs complete a survey assessing their perceptions of (1) the usability of the NA-SB needs assessment, (2) the feasibility, acceptability, and appropriateness of implementing NA-SB, and (3) the extent to which their needs have been met. We are also assessing participating providers’ perceptions of NA-SB’s implementation through periodic check-in calls. Results: We will report descriptive statistics on participant demographics, needs reported, and quantitative outcomes. We will analyze data from provider check-in calls inductively to further elaborate on implementation experiences and determinants. Conclusion: By harnessing patient-reported data to facilitate care coordination for AYAs, NA-SB has the potential to improve processes of care and subsequent outcomes for AYAs, an underserved and understudied population. This pilot study represents a critical first step towards translating NA-SB into routine cancer care for AYAs. Clinical trial information: NCT04586127.

Health Insurance Payer Type and Ethnicity Are Associated with Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment Among Adolescents and Young Adults

Purpose: Adolescents and young adults (AYAs) have experienced inferior improvements in cancer survival outcomes. One potential explanation is the low rate of enrollment in cancer clinical trials. While the reasons behind this are multifactual, sociodemographic factors are probably contributory. We examined the impact of factors such as insurance type and race/ethnicity on clinical trial enrollment among AYAs treated for cancer at an academic medical center. Methods: We identified AYAs (ages 15-39 years) treated for cancer at the University of North Carolina between April 2014 and April 2019. Cancer registry data were linked to electronic health record data to associate treatment and sociodemographic factors with clinical trial enrollment. A multivariable log-binomial model was used to estimate adjusted risk ratios. Results: In a 5-year period, 1574 AYA patients were identified, 59% female, 21% non-Hispanic Black and 9% Hispanic. Overall, 37% of AYAs participated in any clinical trial and 14% enrolled on a therapeutic trial. When compared to publicly insured AYAs, those with private insurance [adjusted RR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.05-2.22] or with no insurance [adjusted RR: 2.12, 95% CI: 1.34-3.33] were more likely to enroll in a therapeutic clinical trial. Hispanic AYAs were less likely to enroll [adjusted RR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.27-0.93] when compared to non-Hispanic White patients. Conclusions: Rates of clinical trial enrollment among AYAs vary based on health insurance type and race/ethnicity, suggesting possible disparities in access. Attention to resource, cultural, and language barriers may improve trial enrollment and cancer outcomes among vulnerable AYA subpopulations.

Ethnography and user-centered design to inform context-driven implementation

Despite pervasive findings pointing to its inextricable role in intervention implementation, context remains poorly understood in implementation science. Existing approaches for describing context (e.g., surveys, interviews) may be narrow in scope or superficial in their elicitation of contextual data. Thus, in-depth and multilevel approaches are needed to meaningfully describe the contexts into which interventions will be implemented. Moreover, many studies assess context without subsequently using contextual information to enhance implementation. To be useful for improving implementation, though, methods are needed to apply contextual information during implementation. In the case example presented in this paper, we embedded an ethnographic assessment of context within a user-centered design approach to describe implementation context and apply that information to promote implementation. We developed a patient-reported outcome measure-based clinical intervention to assess and address the pervasive unmet needs of young adults with cancer: the Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB). In this paper, we describe the user-centered design process that we used to anticipate context modifications needed to deliver NA-SB and implementation strategies needed to facilitate its implementation. Our ethnographic contextual inquiry yielded a rich understanding of local implementation context and contextual variation across potential scale-up contexts. Other methods from user-centered design (i.e., translation tables and a design team prototyping workshop) allowed us to translate that information into specifications for NA-SB delivery and a plan for implementation. Embedding ethnographic methods within a user-centered design approach can help us to tailor interventions and implementation strategies to their contexts of use to promote implementation.

An actionable needs assessment for adolescents and young adults with cancer: the AYA Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB)

PURPOSE

In the USA, many of the nearly 90,000 adolescents and young adults (AYAs) diagnosed with cancer each year do not receive services to address the full scope of needs they experience during and after cancer treatment. To facilitate a systematic and patient-centered approach to delivering services to address the unmet needs of AYAs with cancer, we developed the AYA Needs Assessment & Service Bridge (NA-SB).

METHODS

To develop NA-SB, we leveraged user-centered design, an iterative process for intervention development based on prospective user (i.e., provider and AYA) engagement. Specifically, we conducted usability testing and concept mapping to refine an existing tool-the Cancer Needs Questionnaire-Young People-to promote its usability and usefulness in routine cancer practice.

RESULTS

Our user-centered design process yielded a need assessment which assesses AYAs' physical, psychosocial, and practical needs. Importantly, needs in the assessment are grouped by services expected to address them, creating an intuitive and actionable link between needs and services.

CONCLUSION

NA-SB has the potential to improve care coordination at the individual level by allowing cancer care programs to tailor service delivery and resource provision to the individual needs of AYAs they serve.

Social Media: Support for Survivors and Young Adults With Cancer

Social media use is ubiquitous among young adults. Young adults with cancer must make important decisions about where, what, and how to share information on social media. Oncology nurses are in a unique position to start conversations about the risks and benefits of social media use. This column aims to review a variety of social media platforms that may be used by young adults with cancer and provide guidance to nurses on initiating open dialogue with young adults about social media usage. 
.

Immediate-release and extended-release formulations of second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of major depressive disorder in adults

Introduction

Extended-release formulations of antidepressants have been marketed as a strategy to increase patient adherence. Changes in the formulation of drugs, however, could be related to changes in efficacy and tolerability. Among second-generation antidepressants, bupropion, fluoxetine, mirtazapine, paroxetine, and venlafaxine are available in immediate- and extended-release formulations.

Objectives

To compare the efficacy, tolerability, and adherence of immediate- versus extended-release formulations of second-generation antidepressants for the treatment of major depressive disorder (MDD) in adults.

Aim

To provide an evidence base for clinicians when choosing immediate- or extended-release formulations of antidepressants for the treatment of MDD.

Methods

We conducted a comparative effectiveness review for the U.S. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality searching PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and the International Pharmaceutical Abstracts up to May 2010. Two people independently reviewed the literature, abstracted data, and rated the risk of bias.

Results

Six RCTs and one observational study provided evidence about the comparative efficacy, tolerability, and adherence of bupropion SR (sustained release) versus bupropion XL (extended release), fluoxetine daily vs. fluoxetine weekly, paroxetine IR (immediate release) versus paroxetine CR (continuous release), and venlafaxine IR versus venlafaxine XR (extended release). Overall, no substantial differences in efficacy and safety could be detected. Open-label and observational evidence indicated better adherence for bupropion XL and fluoxetine weekly than for immediate-release medications. No differences in adherence could be detected between paroxetine IR and paroxetine CR.

Conclusions

Our findings indicate similar efficacy and tolerability between immediate- and extended-release formulations. Whether extended-release formulations lead to better adherence remains unclear.

[Pre- and postoperative results of spirography and blood gas analysis in patients with atrial septal defect or mitral stenosis]

In patients with atrial septum defect and mitral stenosis, respectively, the ventilation and blood gas parameters were compared before and after cardiac operation. In general postoperatively no reversibility of preoperatively proved pulmonary functional disturbances could be established. Only in individual cases a discrete improvement of some of the functional indicators could be observed. Therefore, the operative intervention on the heart should be performed possibly before the onset of irreversible pulmonary structural changes.