1
|
Heinl PV, Graulich E, Weigmann B, Wangorsch A, Ose R, Bellinghausen I, Khatri R, Raker VK, Scheurer S, Vieths S, Saloga J, Steinbrink K. IL-10-modulated dendritic cells from birch pollen- and hazelnut-allergic patients facilitate Treg-mediated allergen-specific and cross-reactive tolerance. Allergy 2024; 79:2826-2839. [PMID: 39073174 DOI: 10.1111/all.16255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2023] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 70% of individuals allergic to birch pollen (Bet v 1.01 [Bet]) develop a secondary food allergy (e.g., hazelnut: Cor a 1.04 [Cor]), due to allergen cross-reactivity. However, standard immunotherapy for type I allergies often does not improve the food allergy sufficiently. We analyzed the allergen-specific and cross-reactive suppressive capacity of primary human regulatory T cells (Treg) induced by autologous IL-10-modulated dendritic cells (IL-10 DC) in vitro and in vivo. METHODS CD4+ T cells of patients with birch pollen and associated hazelnut allergies were differentiated into Bet-specific or non-specific induced Treg (iTreg). After Bet- or Cor-specific restimulation the phenotype, proliferation, and suppressive capacity of iTreg subsets were analyzed. iTreg function was further investigated in humanized mouse models of airway and intestinal allergy, generated by engraftment of peripheral blood mononuclear cells from allergic donors into immunodeficient animals. RESULTS After IL-10 DC priming and allergen-specific restimulation (Bet or Cor), non-specific control iTreg remained anergic, whereas Bet-specific iTreg proliferated extensively and exhibited a regulatory phenotype (enhanced expression of CTLA-4, PD-1, TNFR2, IL-10). Accordingly, activated Bet-specific iTreg displayed a high capacity to suppress Bet- and Cor-induced responder Th2 cell responses in vitro, indicating induction of both allergen-specific (birch) and cross-reactive tolerance (hazelnut). In vivo, the beneficial effect of Bet-specific iTreg was verified in humanized mouse models of allergic airway and intestinal inflammation, resulting in reduced allergen-induced clinical symptoms, and immune responses. CONCLUSION Human IL-10 DC-induced iTreg facilitate allergen-specific and cross-reactive tolerance. Therefore, they are potential candidates for regulatory cell therapy in allergic and autoimmune diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patricia Vanessa Heinl
- Department of Dermatology, Division for Experimental and Translational Research, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Edith Graulich
- Department of Dermatology, Division for Experimental and Translational Research, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Benno Weigmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Erlangen, University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | - Robert Ose
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes, Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Iris Bellinghausen
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes, Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Rahul Khatri
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes, Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Verena K Raker
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Vieths
- Molecular Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institute, Langen, Germany
| | - Joachim Saloga
- Department of Dermatology, University Medical Center of the Johannes, Gutenberg-University, Mainz, Germany
| | - Kerstin Steinbrink
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Münster, University of Münster, Münster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pérez Montero A, Sanz-Rosa D, Carnés J. Retrospective, Real Life Study on the Effectiveness and Safety of a Depigmented-Polymerized Subcutaneous Vaccine Containing a Mixture of Grasses and Olea europaea. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2024:1-8. [PMID: 39089230 DOI: 10.1159/000540280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 06/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/03/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allergen immunotherapy is the only modifying treatment of the natural course of respiratory allergic diseases; however, the lack of evidence leads to little inconclusive results. Real life studies are on the rise and are becoming a valuable tool to confirm and complement findings from clinical trials. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a depigmented-polymerized undiluted subcutaneous extract of grass and olive pollen, under routine clinical practice conditions. METHODS This was an observational, retrospective, longitudinal, single-center study on the use of a 2-pollen (grass mix and Olea europaea) undiluted subcutaneous extract over at least 3 consecutive years. Data were collected from 76 patients (n = 44 female; median age: 12.5 years old) diagnosed with allergic rhinoconjunctivitis with/without allergic asthma due to sensitization to both grasses and O. europaea. Primary and secondary effectiveness endpoints were symptom severity, concomitant medication, and immunological profile before and after completing the immunotherapy. A 2-year follow-up of patients' symptoms and medication history after completing the subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) was performed. RESULTS There was a significant improvement of symptoms and medication consumption after 3 years of SCIT treatment, and a significant decrease in specific IgE levels for grasses and O. europaea was observed after finishing the treatment. CONCLUSION Three years treatment of allergic patients using an undiluted mixture of two allergen extracts was shown to be safe and effective for rhinitis and asthma, with efficacy maintained for at least 2 years after finishing SCIT. These results reinforce the importance of real life clinical data in addition to those from clinical trials, helping to individualize allergic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Pérez Montero
- Alergology Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Madrid, Spain
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedicine and Health, Universidad Europea Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - David Sanz-Rosa
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Biomedicine and Health, Universidad Europea Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jerónimo Carnés
- R&D Allery and Immunology Unit, LETI Pharma S.L, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gurgel RK, Baroody FM, Damask CC, Mims JW, Ishman SL, Baker DP, Contrera KJ, Farid FS, Fornadley JA, Gardner DD, Henry LR, Kim J, Levy JM, Reger CM, Ritz HJ, Stachler RJ, Valdez TA, Reyes J, Dhepyasuwan N. Clinical Practice Guideline: Immunotherapy for Inhalant Allergy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 170 Suppl 1:S1-S42. [PMID: 38408152 DOI: 10.1002/ohn.648] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 02/28/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the therapeutic exposure to an allergen or allergens selected by clinical assessment and allergy testing to decrease allergic symptoms and induce immunologic tolerance. Inhalant AIT is administered to millions of patients for allergic rhinitis (AR) and allergic asthma (AA) and is most commonly delivered as subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). Despite its widespread use, there is variability in the initiation and delivery of safe and effective immunotherapy, and there are opportunities for evidence-based recommendations for improved patient care. PURPOSE The purpose of this clinical practice guideline (CPG) is to identify quality improvement opportunities and provide clinicians trustworthy, evidence-based recommendations regarding the management of inhaled allergies with immunotherapy. Specific goals of the guideline are to optimize patient care, promote safe and effective therapy, reduce unjustified variations in care, and reduce the risk of harm. The target patients for the guideline are any individuals aged 5 years and older with AR, with or without AA, who are either candidates for immunotherapy or treated with immunotherapy for their inhalant allergies. The target audience is all clinicians involved in the administration of immunotherapy. This guideline is intended to focus on evidence-based quality improvement opportunities judged most important by the guideline development group (GDG). It is not intended to be a comprehensive, general guide regarding the management of inhaled allergies with immunotherapy. The statements in this guideline are not intended to limit or restrict care provided by clinicians based on their experience and assessment of individual patients. ACTION STATEMENTS The GDG made a strong recommendation that (Key Action Statement [KAS] 10) the clinician performing allergy skin testing or administering AIT must be able to diagnose and manage anaphylaxis. The GDG made recommendations for the following KASs: (KAS 1) Clinicians should offer or refer to a clinician who can offer immunotherapy for patients with AR with or without AA if their patients' symptoms are inadequately controlled with medical therapy, allergen avoidance, or both, or have a preference for immunomodulation. (KAS 2A) Clinicians should not initiate AIT for patients who are pregnant, have uncontrolled asthma, or are unable to tolerate injectable epinephrine. (KAS 3) Clinicians should evaluate the patient or refer the patient to a clinician who can evaluate for signs and symptoms of asthma before initiating AIT and for signs and symptoms of uncontrolled asthma before administering subsequent AIT. (KAS 4) Clinicians should educate patients who are immunotherapy candidates regarding the differences between SCIT and SLIT (aqueous and tablet) including risks, benefits, convenience, and costs. (KAS 5) Clinicians should educate patients about the potential benefits of AIT in (1) preventing new allergen sensitizations, (2) reducing the risk of developing AA, and (3) altering the natural history of the disease with continued benefit after discontinuation of therapy. (KAS 6) Clinicians who administer SLIT to patients with seasonal AR should offer pre- and co-seasonal immunotherapy. (KAS 7) Clinicians prescribing AIT should limit treatment to only those clinically relevant allergens that correlate with the patient's history and are confirmed by testing. (KAS 9) Clinicians administering AIT should continue escalation or maintenance dosing when patients have local reactions (LRs) to AIT. (KAS 11) Clinicians should avoid repeat allergy testing as an assessment of the efficacy of ongoing AIT unless there is a change in environmental exposures or a loss of control of symptoms. (KAS 12) For patients who are experiencing symptomatic control from AIT, clinicians should treat for a minimum duration of 3 years, with ongoing treatment duration based on patient response to treatment. The GDG offered the following KASs as options: (KAS 2B) Clinicians may choose not to initiate AIT for patients who use concomitant beta-blockers, have a history of anaphylaxis, have systemic immunosuppression, or have eosinophilic esophagitis (SLIT only). (KAS 8) Clinicians may treat polysensitized patients with a limited number of allergens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fuad M Baroody
- The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | | | - James Whit Mims
- Wake Forest Baptist Health, Winston Salem, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Dole P Baker
- Anderson ENT & Facial Plastics, Anderson, South Carolina, USA
| | | | | | - John A Fornadley
- Associated Otolaryngologists of PA, Inc, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | - Jean Kim
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Joshua M Levy
- National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Christine M Reger
- Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | | | | - Joe Reyes
- American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| | - Nui Dhepyasuwan
- American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Foundation, Alexandria, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Min JY, Jee HM, Lee HY, Kang SY, Kim K, Kim JH, Park KH, Park SY, Sung M, Lee Y, Yang EA, Ryu G, Ha EK, Lee SM, Lee YW, Chung EH, Choi SH, Koh YI, Kim ST, Nahm DH, Park JW, Shim JY, An YM, Han MY, Choi JH, Shin YS, Han DH. The KAAACI Guidelines for Sublingual Immunotherapy. ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2024; 16:9-21. [PMID: 38262388 PMCID: PMC10823141 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2024.16.1.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy is regarded as the only disease-modifying treatment option for various allergic conditions, including allergic rhinitis and asthma. Among the routes of administration of allergens, sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has gained clinical interest recently, and the prescription of SLIT is increasing among patients with allergies. After 30 years of SLIT use, numerous pieces of evidence supporting its efficacy, safety, and mechanism allows SLIT to be considered as an alternative option to subcutaneous immunotherapy. Based on the progressive development of SLIT, the current guideline from the Korean Academy of Asthma, Allergy, and Clinical Immunology aims to provide an expert opinion by allergy, pediatrics, and otorhinolaryngology specialists with an extensive literature review. This guideline addresses the use of SLIT, including 1) mechanisms of action, 2) appropriate patient selection for SLIT, 3) the currently available SLIT products in Korea, and 4) updated information on its efficacy and safety. This guideline will facilitate a better understanding of practical considerations for SLIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Young Min
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hye Mi Jee
- Department of Pediatrics, CHA University School of Medicine, CHA Bundang Medical Center, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Hwa Young Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Yoon Kang
- Division of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Kyunghoon Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Hee Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung Hee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - So-Young Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Gwangmyeong, Korea
| | - Myongsoon Sung
- Department of Pediatrics, Soonchunhyang University Gumi Hospital, Gumi, Korea
| | - Youngsoo Lee
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Eun-Ae Yang
- Department of Pediatrics, Daejeon St Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Gwanghui Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Kyo Ha
- Department of Pediatrics, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang Min Lee
- Division of Pulmonology and Allergy, Department of Internal Medicine, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Yong Won Lee
- Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Health Policy Research, International St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Eun Hee Chung
- Department of Pediatrics, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Sun Hee Choi
- Department of Pediatrics, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young-Il Koh
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seon Tae Kim
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Gil Medical Center, Gachon University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Dong-Ho Nahm
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Jung Won Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Yeon Shim
- Department of Pediatrics, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | | | - Man Yong Han
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Hee Choi
- Department of Pulmonology and Allergy, Hallym University Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hwaseong, Korea
| | - Yoo Seob Shin
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea.
| | - Doo Hee Han
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pfaar O, Portnoy J, Nolte H, Chaker AM, Luna-Pech JA, Patterson A, Pandya A, Larenas-Linnemann D. Future Directions of Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Experts' Perspective. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024; 12:32-44. [PMID: 37716529 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.08.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 09/18/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is broadly used all over the world as the only available disease-modifying treatment option. The aim of this experts' perspective is to address 7 important unmet needs for the further direction of AIT and to provide the readership with the authors' positions on these topics. An international group of experts in the field of AIT have formulated 7 important aspects for the future position of AIT, performed a current literature review, and proposed a consented position on these topics. The aspects discussed and consented by the authors include: (1) alternative routes of allergen application in AIT, (2) potential of recombinant vaccines, (3) the role of allergy diagnosis based on component-resolved diagnosis for AIT composition, (4) the impact of COVID-19 vaccination for further innovations in AIT, (5) potential of combining biologics to AIT, (6) future innovations in high-risk children/adolescents, and (7) the future regulatory position on AIT. Important unmet needs and topics for AIT have been addressed in this expert review. The authors' views and personal position on these 7 aspects have also been elaborated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Jay Portnoy
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Mo
| | | | - Adam M Chaker
- TUM School of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Center of Allergy and Environment, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Jorge A Luna-Pech
- Departamento de Disciplinas Filosófico, Metodológico e Instrumentales, Centro Universitario de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Mexico
| | - Amber Patterson
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Toledo College of Medicine, Toledo, Ohio; Auni Allergy, Findlay, Ohio
| | - Aarti Pandya
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, Pulmonary and Sleep Medicine, Children's Mercy Hospital and University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City, Mo
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Layhadi JA, Lalioti A, Palmer E, van Zelm MC, Wambre E, Shamji MH. Mechanisms and Predictive Biomarkers of Allergen Immunotherapy in the Clinic. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024; 12:59-66. [PMID: 37996041 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 11/15/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) remains to be the only disease-modifying treatment for IgE-mediated allergic diseases such as allergic rhinitis. It can provide long-term clinical benefits when given for 3 years or longer. Mechanisms of immune tolerance induction by AIT are underscored by the modulation of several compartments within the immune system. These include repair of disruption in epithelial barrier integrity, modulation of the innate immune compartment that includes regulatory dendritic cells and innate lymphoid cells, and adaptive immune compartments such as induction of regulatory T and B cells. Altogether, these are also associated with the dampening of allergen-specific TH2 and T follicular helper cell responses and subsequent generation of blocking antibodies. Although AIT is effective in modifying the immune response, there is a lack of validated and clinically relevant biomarkers that can be used to monitor desensitization, efficacy, and the likelihood of response, all of which can contribute to accelerating personalized medication and increasing patient care. Candidate biomarkers comprise humoral, cellular, metabolic, and in vivo biomarkers; however, these are primarily studied in small trials and require further validation. In this review, we evaluate the current candidates of biomarkers of AIT and how we can implement changes in future studies to help us identify clinically relevant biomarkers of safety, compliance, and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Janice A Layhadi
- Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Anastasia Lalioti
- Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elizabeth Palmer
- Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Menno C van Zelm
- Department of Immunology, Monash University and Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Immunology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Wambre
- Precision Immunology Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Šošić L, Paolucci M, Flory S, Jebbawi F, Kündig TM, Johansen P. Allergen immunotherapy: progress and future outlook. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2023:1-25. [PMID: 37122076 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2209319] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Allergy, the immunological hypersensitivity to innocuous environmental compounds, is a global health problem. The disease triggers, allergens, are mostly proteins contained in various natural sources such as plant pollen, animal dander, dust mites, foods, fungi and insect venoms. Allergies can manifest with a wide range of symptoms in various organs, and be anything from just tedious to life-threatening. A majority of all allergy patients are self-treated with symptom-relieving medicines, while allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only causative treatment option. AREAS COVERED This review will aim to give an overview of the state-of-the-art allergy management, including the use of new biologics and the application of biomarkers, and a special emphasis and discussion on current research trends in the field of AIT. EXPERT OPINION Conventional AIT has proven effective, but the years-long treatment compromises patient compliance. Moreover, AIT is typically not offered in food allergy. Hence, there is a need for new, effective and safe AIT methods. Novel routes of administration (e.g. oral and intralymphatic), hypoallergenic AIT products and more effective adjuvants holds great promise. Most recently, the development of allergen-specific monoclonal antibodies for passive immunotherapy may also allow treatment of patients currently not treated or treatable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lara Šošić
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marta Paolucci
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Stephan Flory
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Fadi Jebbawi
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Kündig
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pål Johansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Immune response modulation by allergen loaded into mesenchymal stem cell-derived exosomes as an effective carrier through sublingual immunotherapy. Immunobiology 2023; 228:152361. [PMID: 36870143 DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2023.152361] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen-specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) was considered an interesting needle-free alternative for subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT). Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC)-derived exosomes were introduced as potent nanoscale delivery systems with immunomodulatory potentials. The current study investigated the therapeutic efficacy of SLIT using ovalbumin (OVA)-enriched MSC-derived exosomes formulation in a murine model of allergic asthma. MATERIAL AND METHODS MSCs were harvested from mice adipose tissues. Then, exosomes were isolated, and OVA-loaded exosomes were prepared. Following sensitization, Balb/c mice received therapeutic formulation (10 μg/dose OVA-containing MSC-derived exosomes) twice a week for two months. Serum OVA-specific IgE levels as well as IFN-γ, IL-4, and TGF-β secretions by cultured splenocytes were measured by ELISA. Also, lung tissue underwent histopathologic analysis, and the numbers of inflammatory cells and eosinophils in nasopharyngeal lavage fluid (NALF) were examined. RESULTS SLIT using OVA-enriched exosomes significantly reduced IgE levels and IL-4 production, while the secretion of IFN-γ and TGF-β were significantly elevated. Also, a decrease was observed in the numbers of total cells and eosinophils in the NALF, and lower levels of perivascular and peribronchiolar inflammation and cellular infiltrations were observed in the lung tissue. CONCLUSION SLIT using OVA-loaded exosomes improved immunomodulatory responses and efficiently alleviated allergic inflammation.
Collapse
|
9
|
Tenero L, Vaia R, Ferrante G, Maule M, Venditto L, Piacentini G, Senna G, Caminati M. Diagnosis and Management of Allergic Rhinitis in Asthmatic Children. J Asthma Allergy 2023; 16:45-57. [PMID: 36636703 PMCID: PMC9829985 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s281439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is a common upper airways inflammatory condition especially in paediatric population; its burden potentially impacts on quality of life, quality of sleep and daily performance, which can be difficult to perceive but not less relevant in the middle-long term. The present review aims to provide an updated overview on AR epidemiology, diagnosis and with a special focus on its connections with bronchial asthma. In fact, when considering asthmatic pediatric population, AR is probably the most important risk factor for asthma onset and the most impactful extra-bronchial determinant of asthma control. Under this perspective, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) should always be considered in the light of a precision medicine approach. In fact, AIT does represent a unique opportunity to specifically interfere with AR immunological background, improve both AR and bronchial asthma control and prevent allergic disease evolution. Verifying the patient's eligibility to that option should be considered as a priority for every physician managing children suffering from AR, especially when associated with bronchial asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Tenero
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Pediatric Clinic, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Rachele Vaia
- Allergy Unit and Asthma Center, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Giuliana Ferrante
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Pediatric Clinic, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Matteo Maule
- Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Laura Venditto
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Pediatric Clinic, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Giorgio Piacentini
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics, Pediatric Clinic, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Gianenrico Senna
- Allergy Unit and Asthma Center, Verona University Hospital, Verona, Italy,Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Marco Caminati
- Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy,Correspondence: Marco Caminati, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Piazzala L.A. Scuro, 10, Verona, 37134, Italy, Email
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Rahman RS, Wesemann DR. Immunology of allergen immunotherapy. IMMUNOTHERAPY ADVANCES 2022; 2:ltac022. [PMID: 36530352 PMCID: PMC9749131 DOI: 10.1093/immadv/ltac022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is the only disease-modifying therapy for allergic disease. Through repeated inoculations of low doses of allergen-either as whole proteins or peptides-patients can achieve a homeostatic balance between inflammatory effectors induced and/or associated with allergen contact, and mediators of immunologic non-responsiveness, potentially leading to sustained clinical improvements. AIT for airborne/respiratory tract allergens and insect venoms have traditionally been supplied subcutaneously, but other routes and modalities of administration can also be effective. Despite differences of allergen administration, there are some similarities of immunologic responses across platforms, with a general theme involving the restructuring and polarization of adaptive and innate immune effector cells. Here we review the immunology of AIT across various delivery platforms, including subcutaneous, sublingual, epicutaneous, intradermal, and intralymphatic approaches, emphasizing shared mechanisms associated with achieving immunologic non-responsiveness to allergen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Duane R Wesemann
- Department of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Division of Genetics, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Ragon Institute of MGH, MIT, and Harvard, Boston, MA, USA
- Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Wang C, Bao Y, Chen J, Chen X, Cheng L, Guo YS, Hao C, Lai H, Li H, Li J, Liu C, Liu Y, Liu Z, Lou H, Lv W, Nong G, Qiu Q, Ren X, Shao J, Shen YH, Shi L, Song XC, Song Y, Tang S, Wang H, Wang X, Wang X, Wang Z, Wei Q, Xie H, Xing Z, Xu R, Xu Y, Yang Q, Yao H, Ye J, You Y, Yu H, Yu Y, Zhang H, Zhang G, Zhang Y, Zhi Y, Zhou W, Zhu L, Zhu X, Chai R, Chen D, Guan K, Huang Z, Huang Y, Ma T, Ma Y, Meng Y, Ren L, Wang J, Wang N, Xian M, Xiang R, Zheng M, Zhang L. Chinese Guideline on Allergen Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis: The 2022 Update. ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2022; 14:604-652. [PMID: 36426395 PMCID: PMC9709690 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2022.14.6.604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 10/23/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
In the last few decades, there has been a progressive increase in the prevalence of allergic rhinitis (AR) in China, where it now affects approximately 250 million people. AR prevention and treatment include allergen avoidance, pharmacotherapy, allergen immunotherapy (AIT), and patient education, among which AIT is the only curative intervention. AIT targets the disease etiology and may potentially modify the immune system as well as induce allergen-specific immune tolerance in patients with AR. In 2017, a team of experts from the Chinese Society of Allergy (CSA) and the Chinese Allergic Rhinitis Collaborative Research Group (C2AR2G) produced the first English version of Chinese AIT guidelines for AR. Since then, there has been considerable progress in basic research of and clinical practice for AIT, especially regarding the role of follicular regulatory T (TFR) cells in the pathogenesis of AR and the use of allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) in nasal secretions for the diagnosis of AR. Additionally, potential biomarkers, including TFR cells, sIgG4, and sIgE, have been used to monitor the incidence and progression of AR. Moreover, there has been a novel understanding of AIT during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Hence, there was an urgent need to update the AIT guideline for AR by a team of experts from CSA and C2AR2G. This document aims to serve as professional reference material on AIT for AR treatment in China, thus improving the development of AIT across the world.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chengshuo Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases and Beijing Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Beijing, China
- Research Unit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Nasal Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
- Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Jianjun Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science & Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaoyang Chen
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Second Affiliated Hospitial of Fujian Medical University, Respiratory Medicine Center of Fujian Province, Quanzhou, China
| | - Lei Cheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology & Clinical Allergy Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China
| | - Yin Shi Guo
- Department of Allergy & Immunology, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chuangli Hao
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, Children's Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - He Lai
- Department of Allergy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huabin Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Li
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Changshan Liu
- Department of Pediatrics, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Yun Liu
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hongfei Lou
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Research Unit of Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Nasal Diseases, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Lv
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guangmin Nong
- Department of Pediatrics, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University, Nanning, China
| | - Qianhui Qiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiumin Ren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Jie Shao
- Department of Pediatrics, Ruijin Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Yi-Hong Shen
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, The First Affiliated Hospital of College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Li Shi
- Department of Otolaryngology,The Second Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Xi-Cheng Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Yuxin Song
- Department of Allergy, Harbin Children's Hospital, Harbin, China
| | - Suping Tang
- Department of Allergy, Fuzhou Children's Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Hongtian Wang
- Department of Allergy, Beijing ShiJiTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangdong Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases and Beijing Laboratory of Allergic Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Beijing, China
| | - Xueyan Wang
- Department of Allergy, Beijing ShiJiTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhenlin Wang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xuanwu Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Qingyu Wei
- Department of Allergy, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Hua Xie
- Department of Allergy, Northern Theatre General Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Zhimin Xing
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Rui Xu
- Department of Allergy of Otorhinolaryngology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yu Xu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Qintai Yang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hongmei Yao
- Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China
| | - Jing Ye
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Yiwen You
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong, China
| | - Hongmeng Yu
- Department of Otolaryngology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yongmei Yu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University, Kunming, China
| | - Huanping Zhang
- Department of Allergy, Shanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy of Medical Sciences, Tongji Shanxi Hospital, Third Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, China
| | - Gehua Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuxiang Zhi
- Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Weikang Zhou
- Department of Allergy, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Li Zhu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, The Third Hospital of Peking University, Beijing, China
| | - Xinhua Zhu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Ruonan Chai
- Department of Allergy, Northern Theatre General Hospital, Shenyang, China
| | - Dehua Chen
- Department of Allergy of Otorhinolaryngology Hospital, The First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kai Guan
- Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zizhen Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yanran Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Tingting Ma
- Department of Allergy, Beijing ShiJiTan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuemei Ma
- Department of Allergy, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, China
| | - Yifan Meng
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Lei Ren
- Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Jianxing Wang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Nan Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Mo Xian
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Rong Xiang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China
| | - Ming Zheng
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
- Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Novak N, Worm M, Staubach P, Jutel M, Sager A, Pfaar O. Subcutaneous birch pollen allergen immunotherapy with a depigmented polymerized extract shows only sustained and long-term efficacy in a subgroup of monosensitized adults and adolescents with allergic rhinitis. Clin Transl Allergy 2022; 12:e12185. [PMID: 36225264 PMCID: PMC9533217 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12185] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is an approved treatment for seasonal respiratory allergic diseases. A depigmented polymerized birch pollen extract for subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy (SCIT) has been demonstrated to be efficacious and safe in patients allergic to birch pollen and its homologous group. Objective To determine whether SCIT with a birch pollen formulation (5000 depigmented polymerized (DPP) units/mL) shows sustained and long-term efficacy in adults and adolescents with birch-pollen induced allergic rhinitis with or without intermittent asthma. Methods A multicentre (n = 66), double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III clinical trial was performed in the Czech Republic, Finland, Germany, Latvia, Lithuania, Poland and Russia. Participants were randomized 2:1 to active treatment (birch 5000 DPP/ml) or placebo for three years of SCIT and followed up for two treatment-free years. The primary efficacy endpoint was the EAACI's combined symptom and medication score for rhinoconjunctivitis (CSMSEAACI). Results A total of 973 participants were screened and 649 were randomized (active treatment: n = 434; placebo: n = 215). The intention-to-treat analysis of the CSMSEAACI in the overall study population did not demonstrate statistically significant differences in years 1, 2 and 3. In a post-hoc analysis, among the subgroup of patients monosensitized to birch pollen allergen only (n = 200), we observed a statistically significant difference (active treatment vs. placebo) in the CSMSEAACI in year 2, 3 and 5. The AIT's safety profile was good. Conclusions SCIT with a depigmented polymerized birch pollen extract was safe. Sustained and long-term efficacy in years 2, 3 and 5 in monosensitized patients, but not in polysensitized patients was demonstrated.(EudraCT 2012-000414-11).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalija Novak
- Department of Dermatology and AllergologyUniversity of Bonn Medical CenterBonnGermany
| | - Margitta Worm
- Department of DermatologyAllergy and VenerologyDivision of Allergy and Immunology, CharitéUniversitätsmedizinBerlinGermany
| | - Petra Staubach
- Department of DermatologyUniversity Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University MainzMainzGermany
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical ImmunologyWroclaw Medical UniversityWroclawPoland
- ALL‐MED Medical Research InstituteWroclawPoland
| | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of OtorhinolaryngologyHead and Neck SurgerySection of Rhinology and AllergyUniversity Hospital MarburgPhilipps‐Universität MarburgMarburgGermany
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bumbacea RS, Boustani R, Panaitescu C, Haidar L, Buzan MR, Bumbacea D, Laculiceanu A, Cojanu C, Spanu D, Agache I. Mechanisms of allergen immunotherapy supporting its disease-modifying effect. Immunotherapy 2022; 14:627-638. [PMID: 35416072 DOI: 10.2217/imt-2021-0325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is considered the only disease-modifying treatment available at present for allergic disorders. Its main benefits include improvement of symptoms, decreased need for pharmacotherapy, prevention of new sensitizations and sustained effect after AIT completion. The key pillars of AIT-induced tolerance include a shift from Th2 to Th1 response, an increase of regulatory T and B cells, pro-inflammatory effector cell downregulation and IgE suppression, in addition to IgG4, IgA and IgD induction. AIT may also induce trained immunity, characterized by a durable decrease in group 2 of innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and increased ILC1 and ILC3s. Understanding the immune mechanisms of AIT is essential for validating biomarkers for the prediction of AIT response and for achieving AIT success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana Silvia Bumbacea
- Allergy Department, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Bucharest, 020021, Romania.,Allergy Department, Nephrology Hospital Dr. Carol Davila, Bucharest, 010731, Romania
| | - Rama Boustani
- Allergy Department, Nephrology Hospital Dr. Carol Davila, Bucharest, 010731, Romania
| | - Carmen Panaitescu
- Department of Functional Sciences, Physiology, Centre of Immuno-Physiology & Biotechnologies (CIFBIOTECH), "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Timișoara, 300041, Romania.,Centre for Gene & Cellular Therapies in The Treatment of Cancer - OncoGen, "Pius Brinzeu" Clinical Emergency Hospital, Timișoara, 300723, Romania
| | - Laura Haidar
- Department of Functional Sciences, Physiology, Centre of Immuno-Physiology & Biotechnologies (CIFBIOTECH), "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Timișoara, 300041, Romania
| | - Maria-Roxana Buzan
- Department of Functional Sciences, Physiology, Centre of Immuno-Physiology & Biotechnologies (CIFBIOTECH), "Victor Babeș" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Timișoara, 300041, Romania.,Centre for Gene & Cellular Therapies in The Treatment of Cancer - OncoGen, "Pius Brinzeu" Clinical Emergency Hospital, Timișoara, 300723, Romania
| | - Dragos Bumbacea
- Department of Pneumology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine & Pharmacy, Bucharest, 020021, Romania
| | | | - Catalina Cojanu
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, 500051 Romania
| | - Daniela Spanu
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, 500051 Romania
| | - Ioana Agache
- Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University, Brasov, 500051 Romania
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alternatives to Subcutaneous Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis. ALLERGIES 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/allergies2010003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Allergic rhinitis (AR) is an important public health issue worldwide due to its increasing prevalence and impact on quality of life, school performance, and work productivity. Subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) is used to treat AR and involves repeated injections of allergen extracts. SCIT is used for cases of severe AR with symptoms that are not adequately controlled by medication, when the side effects of medication limit treatment options, or where the aim is to cure rather than symptomatically treat. Although SCIT is effective, it is not necessarily curative. Furthermore, there is also a low but present risk of systemic allergic reactions, with systemic side effects occurring in less than 0–1% of treated patients. Sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has emerged as an effective and safe alternative to SCIT. SCIT and SLIT are the only immunotherapies currently available for AR. In addition to sublingual administration as an alternative to SCIT, other routes of antigen administration have been attempted with the goal of increasing safety while maintaining efficacy. This review discusses the efficacies of SCIT and SLIT, their mechanisms, the utility of intralymphatic immunotherapy (ILIT) as an alternative route of antigen administration, and the potential for immunotherapy using other routes of antigen administration.
Collapse
|
15
|
Pfaar O, Bousquet J, Durham SR, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Larché M, Roberts G, Shamji MH, Gerth van Wijk R. One hundred and ten years of Allergen Immunotherapy: A journey from empiric observation to evidence. Allergy 2022; 77:454-468. [PMID: 34315190 DOI: 10.1111/all.15023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
One hundred and ten years after Noon's first clinical report of the subcutaneous application of allergen extracts, allergen immunotherapy (AIT) has evolved as the most important pillar of the treatment of allergic patients. It is the only disease-modifying treatment option available and the evidence for its clinical efficacy and safety is broad and undisputed. Throughout recent decades, more insights into the underlying mechanisms, in particular the modulation of innate and adaptive immune responses, have been described. AIT is acknowledged by worldwide regulatory authorities, and following the regulatory guidelines for product development, AIT products are subject to a rigorous evaluation before obtaining market authorization. Knowledge and practice are anchored in international guidelines, such as the recently published series of the European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI). Innovative approaches continue to be further developed with the focus on clinical improvement by, for example, the usage of adjuvants, peptides, recombinants, modification of allergens, new routes of administration, and the concomitant use of biologicals. In addition, real-life data provide complementary and valuable information on the effectiveness and tolerability of this treatment option in the clinical routine. New mobile health technologies and big-data approaches will improve daily treatment convenience, adherence, and efficacy of AIT. However, the current coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has also had some implications for the feasibility and practicability of AIT. Taken together, AIT as the only disease-modifying therapy in allergic diseases has been broadly investigated over the past 110 years laying the path for innovations and further improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital Marburg, Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | - Jean Bousquet
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Comprehensive Allergy Center Berlin Germany
- University Hospital Montpellier Montpellier France
| | - Stephen R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma Imperial College NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute London UK
| | - Jörg Kleine‐Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend, Outpatient and Clinical Research Center Berlin Germany
| | - Mark Larché
- Department of Medicine McMaster University Hamilton ON Canada
- Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton ON Canada
| | - Graham Roberts
- Faculty of Medicine University of Southampton Southampton UK
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre St Mary's Hospital Isle of Wight UK
- NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust Southampton UK
| | - Mohamed H. Shamji
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma Imperial College NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, National Heart and Lung Institute London UK
| | - Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology and Clinical Immunology Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Shamji MH, Sharif H, Layhadi JA, Zhu R, Kishore U, Renz H. Diverse Immune Mechanisms of Allergen Immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis with and without asthma. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2022; 149:791-801. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
17
|
Arora K, Kulkarni A, Pankaj A, Desai N, Deshpande V. IgG4 Related Disease is characterized by the overexpression of Immunomodulatory proteins. Histopathology 2021; 81:486-495. [PMID: 34506637 DOI: 10.1111/his.14564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION IgG4 related disease (IgG4-RD) is a multisystem disease, characterized by tumefactive lesions and a swift response to immunosuppressive therapy. Although elevated serum and tissue IgG4 are characteristic, T-cells appear to be the primary driver of this immunologically mediated disease. The overarching goal was to examine the role of immunomodulatory cells in IgG4-RD. METHODS Biopsies from patients with IgG4-RD (n=39) and mimics of this disease (n=78) were evaluated for IgG4, IgG, CD8, PD-L1 and a subset (n=18) evaluated for CD4, PU.1, Foxp3, PD-L1, PD-1, IDO1 and LAG3. Data pertaining to demographics and laboratory findings at baseline evaluation was extracted from electronic medical records. RESULTS When compared to mimics, IgG4-RD showed increased numbers of PD-L1 (p=0.0001), PD-1 (p=0.001), IDO1 (p=0.03), LAG3 (p=0.04) and Foxp3 (p=0.04) positive immune cells. The PD-L1 positive cells were enriched within aggregates of CD4 and CD8 positive T-cells. 31 of 39 (80%) IgG4-RD cases showed greater than 5 PD-L1 positive cells per HPF, while 4 of 78 (5%) mimics of this disease exceeded this cut point. In IgG4-RD PD-L1 positive macrophages correlated with PD-1 (p=0.002), LAG3 (p=0.001) and IDO1 positive cells (p=0.001); a positive correlation was also noted between IgG4/IgG ratio and PD-L1, PD-1, and IDO1 positive cells. CONCLUSIONS IgG4-RD shows expansion of mechanisms that maintain peripheral tolerance. The spatial and temporal relationship between T-cells and the PD-L1-PD1 axis, and the upregulation of multiple immunomodulatory proteins suggests that these immunoregulatory mechanisms play a significant role in IgG4-RD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kshitij Arora
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02478, USA
| | - Anupriya Kulkarni
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02478, USA
| | - Amaya Pankaj
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02478, USA
| | - Niyati Desai
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02478, USA
| | - Vikram Deshpande
- Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, 02478, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ellis AK, DeVeaux M, Steacy L, Ramesh D, Suprun M, Langdon S, Wang CQ, Adams D, Thiele J, Walker T, Perlee LT, O'Brien MP. Environmental exposure unit simulates natural seasonal birch pollen exposures while maximizing change in allergic symptoms. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2021; 127:488-495.e5. [PMID: 34186172 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.06.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 06/07/2021] [Accepted: 06/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Birch pollen is a prevalent aeroallergen during the springtime allergy season. In field studies, variable allergen exposure and environmental factors can affect data quality while environmental exposure units (EEUs) deliver controlled, standardized, and reproducible allergen exposures. OBJECTIVE To inform study design for EEU trials evaluating antiallergic therapies. METHODS In this prospective study, 76 participants with birch allergy experienced 3 exposures to birch pollen: (1) an out-of-season EEU challenge (two 3-hour sessions on consecutive days); (2) a natural seasonal exposure; and (3) an in-season EEU challenge (3-hour exposure for 2 weeks after birch pollen season initiation). RESULTS The total nasal symptom score, total ocular symptom score, and total symptom score (TSS = total nasal symptom score plus total ocular symptom score) were assessed every 30 minutes and daily during EEU and natural exposures. A high association between TSSs and day 2 of the out-of-season and in-season EEU challenges was noted, with a good association between the maximum TSS during the natural and in-season EEU challenges, and natural season and day 2 of the out-of-season EEU challenge (P < .001 for all). Participants had higher maximum change from the baseline TSS during day 2 of the out-of-season EEU challenge (12.4) vs the following: (1) first day (9.8); (2) in-season EEU challenge (8.4); and (3) natural seasonal exposure (7.6) (P < .001 for all). CONCLUSION A strong association was seen between the presence of allergy symptoms and exposure to birch pollen in the EEU (maximum change in symptom scores during day 2) and in the field. A hybrid trial design may be useful to demonstrate the clinical efficacy of novel antiallergic therapies requiring fewer participants and shorter timelines and expediting treatment availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne K Ellis
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada; Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
| | | | - Lisa Steacy
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Divya Ramesh
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | - Maria Suprun
- Department of Pediatrics, Allergy, and Immunology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
| | - Shaun Langdon
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | - Claire Q Wang
- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Tarrytown, New York
| | - Daniel Adams
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jenny Thiele
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Medicine, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Terry Walker
- Allergy Research Unit, Kingston General Health Research Institute, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Wraith DC, Krishna MT. Peptide allergen-specific immunotherapy for allergic airway diseases-State of the art. Clin Exp Allergy 2021; 51:751-769. [PMID: 33529435 DOI: 10.1111/cea.13840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Revised: 01/24/2021] [Accepted: 01/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is the only means of altering the natural immunological course of allergic diseases and achieving long-term remission. Pharmacological measures are able to suppress the immune response and/or ameliorate the symptoms but there is a risk of relapse soon after these measures are withdrawn. Current AIT approaches depend on the administration of intact allergens, often comprising crude extracts of the allergen. We propose that the challenges arising from current approaches, including the risk of serious side-effects, burdensome duration of treatment, poor compliance and high cost, are overcome by application of peptides based on CD4+ T cell epitopes rather than whole allergens. Here we describe evolving approaches, summarize clinical trials involving peptide AIT in allergic rhinitis and asthma, discuss the putative mechanisms involved in their action, address gaps in evidence and propose future directions for research and clinical development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David C Wraith
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Mamidipudi T Krishna
- Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Schmid JM, Würtzen PA, Siddhuraj P, Jogdand P, Petersen CG, Dahl R, Erjefält JS, Hoffmann HJ. Basophil sensitivity reflects long-term clinical outcome of subcutaneous immunotherapy in grass pollen-allergic patients. Allergy 2021; 76:1528-1538. [PMID: 32145088 DOI: 10.1111/all.14264] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/23/2019] [Revised: 02/10/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis is a public health problem. Allergen Immunotherapy is an effective and safe treatment, that modifies the natural course of allergic disease and induces long-term tolerance. OBJECTIVE To correlate basophil and antibody biomarkers of subcutaneous immunotherapy to clinical outcomes and cellular changes in target tissue. METHODS Adults suffering from allergic rhinoconjunctivitis due to grass pollen allergy were randomized to receive subcutaneous immunotherapy (n = 18) or to an open control group (n = 6). Patients reported daily symptom and medication scores and weekly rhinitis related quality of life scores during four pollen seasons. Biomarkers were measured every 3 months for three years treatment and every 6 months in the follow-up year. Nasal and cutaneous allergen challenge tests were performed annually. Leukocyte subsets were assessed in nasal mucosa biopsies at baseline and after treatment. RESULTS Subcutaneous immunotherapy led to a 447-fold decrease in basophil sensitivity during the first treatment year. This remained 100-fold lower than baseline during the 3 year-treatment period and 10-fold lower during the follow-up year (n = 18, P = .03). Decrease in basophil sensitivity after three weeks of treatment predicted long-term improvement in seasonal combined symptom and medication scores (ῥ=-0.69, P = .0027) during three years of treatment. AUC of IgE-blocking factor correlated to nasal allergen challenge (ῥ = 0.63, P = .0012) and SPT (ῥ = 0.45, P = .03). Plasma cell numbers in the nasal mucosa increased during treatment (P = .02). CONCLUSION Decrease in basophil sensitivity after three weeks of subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy predicted the clinical outcome of this treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes M. Schmid
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Claus G. Petersen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
| | - Ronald Dahl
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
| | | | - Hans Jürgen Hoffmann
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University Aarhus Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Tie K, Miller C, Zanation AM, Ebert CS. Subcutaneous Versus Sublingual Immunotherapy for Adults with Allergic Rhinitis: A Systematic Review with Meta-Analyses. Laryngoscope 2021; 132:499-508. [PMID: 33929726 DOI: 10.1002/lary.29586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) or sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) better improves patient outcomes and quality of life for adults with allergic rhinitis or rhinoconjunctivitis (AR/C) with or without mild to moderate asthma. METHODS Systematic review methodology was based on the Cochrane Collaboration handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Four databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and Web of Science) were queried from inception to July 30, 2020. Two independent reviewers screened potentially relevant studies and assessed risk of bias. Outcomes of interest were symptom score (SS), medication score (MS), combined symptom medication score (CSMS), and Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ). Meta-analyses with an adjusted indirect comparison were conducted in RevMan 5.4.1. RESULTS Seven SCIT versus SLIT randomized controlled trials (RCTs) demonstrated no significant differences for any outcomes, but insufficient data precluded direct meta-analysis. For the adjusted indirect comparison, 46 RCTs over 39 studies were included for SCIT versus placebo (n = 13) and SLIT versus placebo (n = 33). Statistically significant results favoring SCIT were found for SS (standardized mean difference [SMD] = 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.31-0.49), MS (SMD = 0.26; 95% CI = 0.14-0.39), CSMS (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.17-0.67), and RQLQ (MD = 0.24; 95% CI = 0.04-0.44). Statistically significant results favoring SLIT were found for SS (SMD = 0.42; 95% CI = 0.32-0.53), MS (SMD = 0.40; 95% CI = 0.28-0.53), CSMS (SMD = 0.37; 95% CI = 0.29-0.45), and RQLQ (MD = 0.32; 95% CI = 0.20-0.43). No significant differences were found between SCIT and SLIT for SS (SMD = -0.02; 95% CI = -0.15 to 0.11), MS (SMD = -0.14; 95% CI = -0.31 to 0.03), CSMS (SMD = 0.05; 95% CI = -0.21 to 0.31), or RQLQ (MD = -0.08; 95% CI = -0.31 to 0.15). CONCLUSION SCIT and SLIT are comparably effective treatments for adults with AR/C. More RCTs analyzing SCIT versus SLIT are needed to directly compare the two. Laryngoscope, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Tie
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Craig Miller
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Adam M Zanation
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| | - Charles S Ebert
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Shamji MH, Layhadi JA, Sharif H, Penagos M, Durham SR. Immunological Responses and Biomarkers for Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy Against Inhaled Allergens. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2021; 9:1769-1778. [PMID: 33781958 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2021] [Revised: 03/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Long-term efficacy that occurs with allergen immunotherapy of proven value is associated with decreases in IgE-dependent activation of mast cells and tissue eosinophilia. This suppression of type 2 immunity is accompanied by early induction of regulatory T cells, immune deviation in favor of TH1 responses, and induction of local and systemic IgG, IgG4, and IgA antibodies. These "protective" antibodies can inhibit allergen-IgE complex formation and consequent mast cell triggering and IgE-facilitated TH2-cell activation. Recent studies have highlighted the importance of innate responses mediated by type 2 dendritic cells and innate lymphoid cells in allergic inflammation. These cell types are under the regulation of cytokines such as thymic stromal lymphopoietin and IL-33 derived from the respiratory epithelium. Novel subsets of regulatory cells induced by immunotherapy include IL-35-producing regulatory T cells, regulatory B cells, a subset of T follicular regulatory cells, and IL-10-producing group 2 innate lymphoid cells. These mechanisms point to biomarkers that require testing for their ability to predict clinical response to immunotherapy and to inform novel approaches for better efficacy, safety, and long-term tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| | - Janice A Layhadi
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Hanisah Sharif
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei
| | - Martin Penagos
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Pfaar O, Agache I, Bergmann K, Bindslev‐Jensen C, Bousquet J, Creticos PS, Devillier P, Durham SR, Hellings P, Kaul S, Kleine‐Tebbe J, Klimek L, Jacobsen L, Jutel M, Muraro A, Papadopoulos NG, Rief W, Scadding GK, Schedlowski M, Shamji MH, Sturm G, Ree R, Vidal C, Vieths S, Wedi B, Gerth van Wijk R, Frew AJ. Placebo effects in allergen immunotherapy-An EAACI Task Force Position Paper. Allergy 2021; 76:629-647. [PMID: 32324902 DOI: 10.1111/all.14331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/18/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The placebo (Latin "I will please") effect commonly occurs in clinical trials. The psychological and physiological factors associated with patients' expectations about a treatment's positive and negative effects have yet to be well characterized, although a functional prefrontal cortex and intense bidirectional communication between the central nervous system and the immune system appear to be prerequisites for a placebo effect. The use of placebo raises certain ethical issues, especially if patients in a placebo group are denied an effective treatment for a long period of time. The placebo effect appears to be relatively large (up to 77%, relative to pretreatment scores) in controlled clinical trials of allergen immunotherapy (AIT), such as the pivotal, double-blind, placebo-controlled (DBPC) randomized clinical trials currently required by regulatory authorities worldwide. The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) therefore initiated a Task Force, in order to better understand the placebo effect in AIT and its specific role in comorbidities, blinding issues, adherence, measurement time points, variability and the natural course of the disease. In this Position Paper, the EAACI Task Force highlights several important topics regarding the placebo effect in AIT such as a) regulatory aspects, b) neuroimmunological and psychological mechanisms, c) placebo effect sizes in AIT trials, d) methodological limitations in AIT trial design and e) potential solutions in future AIT trial design. In conclusion, this Position Paper aims to examine the methodological problem of placebo in AIT from different aspects and also to highlight unmet needs and possible solutions for future trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery Section of Rhinology and Allergy University Hospital Marburg Philipps‐Universität Marburg Marburg Germany
| | | | - Karl‐Christian Bergmann
- Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin Humboldt‐Universität zu Berlin Berlin Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health Allergy‐Centre‐Charité Berlin Germany
| | - Carsten Bindslev‐Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Centre Odense University Hospital Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA) Odense Denmark
| | - Jean Bousquet
- MACVIA‐France Montpellier France
- University Hospital Montpellier Montpellier France
| | - Peter S. Creticos
- Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA
- Creticos Research Group Crownsville MD USA
| | - Philippe Devillier
- Department of Airway Diseases, Exhalomics, Hôpital Foch Université Paris‐Saclay Suresnes France
| | - Stephen R. Durham
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
| | - Peter Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology University Hospitals of Leuven Leuven Belgium
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam Amsterdam The Netherlands
- Department of Neuroscience University of Ghent Ghent Belgium
| | - Susanne Kaul
- Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Langen Germany
| | - Jörg Kleine‐Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend Outpatient Clinic and Clinical Research Center Berlin Germany
| | - Ludger Klimek
- Center for Rhinology and Allergology Wiesbaden Germany
| | - Lars Jacobsen
- ALC, Allergy Learning and Consulting Copenhagen Denmark
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology Wroclaw Medical University Wroclaw Poland
- All‐Med Medical Research Institute Wroclaw Poland
| | - Antonella Muraro
- Food Allergy Referral Centre Padua University Hospital Padua Padua Italy
| | - Nikolaos G. Papadopoulos
- Division of Infection Immunity & Respiratory Medicine University of Manchester Manchester UK
- Allergy Department 2nd Pediatric Clinic University of Athens Athens Greece
| | - Winfried Rief
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy Philipps‐University of Marburg Marburg Germany
| | | | - Manfred Schedlowski
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology University Clinic Essen Essen Germany
| | - Mohamed H. Shamji
- National Heart and Lung Institute Imperial College London London UK
- NIHR Biomedical Research Centre Imperial College London London UK
| | - Gunter Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venereology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
- Allergy Outpatient Clinic Reumannplatz Vienna Austria
| | - Ronald Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of Otorhinolaryngology Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Carmen Vidal
- Department of Allergy and Faculty of Medicine University of Santiago de Compostela Santiago Spain
| | - Stefan Vieths
- Paul‐Ehrlich‐Institut Federal Institute for Vaccines and Biomedicines Langen Germany
| | - Bettina Wedi
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Hannover Medical School Comprehensive Allergy Center Hannover Germany
| | - Roy Gerth van Wijk
- Section of Allergology Department of Internal Medicine Erasmus MC Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - Anthony J. Frew
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Royal Sussex County Hospital University of Sussex and University of Brighton Brighton UK
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Cox L. Pharmacoeconomics of allergy immunotherapy versus pharmacotherapy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2021; 17:255-268. [PMID: 33645387 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2021.1886079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of allergy immunotherapy (AIT) in the treatment of allergic rhinitis, asthma, and other allergic conditions.Area covered: An extensive search of the PubMed and Medline database (January 1996 up to June of 2020) was conducted using the search terms allergy immunotherapy, pharmacoeconomics, cost-effectiveness, allergic rhinitis, and asthma. Studies were included if they included information on the economics of AIT in comparison to pharmacotherapy in the treatment of allergic rhinitis or asthma either as actual costs or based on theoretical models. Systematic reviews were included if they included information about the cost-effectiveness of AIT.Most clinical trials found significant cost-savings with AIT. The cost-effective time-point ranged from a few months to several years after treatment initiation.. Cost savings were demonstrated as early as 3 months after treatment initiation and were as great as 80% less than SDT in some studies.Expert opinion: There is strong evidence in the collective literature that AIT is cost-effective as compared to SDT alone. The magnitude of AIT's cost-effectiveness is likely underestimated because most of the studies considered during treatment costs and not AIT's long-term benefits or preventive/prophylactic effects or its impact on co-morbid conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Cox
- Department of Medicine, Associate Professor of Medicine Nova Southeastern University, Ft. Lauderdale, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jiang Z, Xiao H, Liu S, Meng J. Changes in Immunologic Indicators During Allergen-Specific Immunotherapy for Allergic Rhinitis and Determinants of Variability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Am J Rhinol Allergy 2021; 35:910-922. [PMID: 33631946 DOI: 10.1177/1945892421999649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To date, there are no generally recognized biomarkers for allergen immunotherapy (AIT) and even the changes in immunological indicators during AIT are inconsistent in different publications. OBJECTIVE This study was conducted to quantify the immunological changes that occur during AIT and identify the determinants of heterogeneity. METHODS Randomized controlled trials of AIT published in the past 10 years were searched in Medline, Embase and Cochrane CENTRAL. Data on immunological indicators were extracted, and the characteristics of the included studies were collected. Meta-analysis and meta-regression were conducted for each indicator. The study was registered on the PROSPERO website (CRD42020176127). RESULTS We reviewed 1898 studies. Forty-six studies met the inclusion criteria, and 31 studies were included in the quantitative analyses. Subset analyses by time demonstrated that serum allergen-specific IgE (sIgE) of AIT patients increased in the first 12 months, then decreased and became slightly lower than that of control patients. Allergen-specific IgG4 (sIgG4) was elevated in the AIT group during and after treatment. IgE-blocking factor (IgE-BF) was increased and IgE-facilitated allergen binding (IgE-FAB) was reduced in AIT patients. Both of them of the 2 factors were associated with clinical efficacy in the multivariate regression analysis. sIgE/sIgG4 decreased in AIT patients, while there was no change in total IgE. CONCLUSION The levels of serum sIgE and sIgG4 during AIT showed a time-dependent pattern. IgE-BF and IgE-FAB should be further investigated as biomarkers for predicting and monitoring AIT efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zihan Jiang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Hao Xiao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Shixi Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Juan Meng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Pierau M, Arra A, Brunner-Weinzierl MC. Preventing Atopic Diseases During Childhood - Early Exposure Matters. Front Immunol 2021; 12:617731. [PMID: 33717110 PMCID: PMC7946845 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.617731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Atopic diseases in childhood are a major burden worldwide and there is still a lack of knowledge about treatable causes. In industrialized countries such as Germany, almost every second child is sensitized to at least one common allergen. Recent studies show that although the predisposition to allergies is inherited, the adaptive immune system of neonates and infants follows a developmental trajectory and whether an allergy actually occurs depends also on timing of allergen exposure including diet as well as environmental factors. New recommendations are far from being rigid of allergen avoidance; it is rather moving toward conditions that stand for more biodiversity. The observation that introduction of peanuts or eggs early in life significantly reduced the development of a later allergy will change our recommendations for the introduction of complementary foods. This is consistent with the hygiene hypothesis that early provocation shapes the developing immune system so that it reacts appropriately. Therefore, promoting the development of tolerance is at the heart of sensible allergy prevention - and this begins with the last trimester of pregnancy. In light of this concept, actual recommendations are discussed.
Collapse
|
27
|
Hamada S, Kobayashi Y, Sakamoto D, Shimamura A, Kuroda K, Kawachi R, Kanda A, Asako M, Gotoh M, Okubo K, Tomoda K, Iwai H. Long-term sublingual immunotherapy provides better effects for patients with Japanese cedar pollinosis. Auris Nasus Larynx 2021; 48:646-652. [PMID: 33526319 DOI: 10.1016/j.anl.2021.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 11/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Japanese cedar pollinosis is an endemic disease affecting a large proportion of Japan's population. Five seasons have passed since sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for Japanese cedar pollinosis was included in the public insurance coverage in Japan. In this study, we evaluated the clinical effects of long-term SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis on upper respiratory symptoms primarily represented by nasal symptoms and inflammation of the respiratory tract in the 2019 season, in which considerable amount of cedar pollen was dispersed. METHODS This study involved 95 patients who were undergoing SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis after the initiation at some point between 2014 and 2018, and this group of patients was compared with a control group comprising 21 patients receiving preseasonal prophylactic treatment (with a second-generation antihistaminic drug). We evaluated the patients' nasal/eye symptoms, total nasal symptom and medication score (TNSMS), and quality of life according to relevant guidelines. In addition, the levels of peripheral blood eosinophils, serum total IgE, Japanese cedar antigen-specific IgE, Cryj1-specific IgG4, and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) were measured as objective indices. RESULTS From the fourth season (SLIT4), nasal discharge, sneezing, nasal obstruction symptoms, and TNSMS significantly decreased compared with those in the preseasonal prophylactic treatment and SLIT1 groups. In the patients suspected to have eosinophilic airway inflammation (with a baseline FENO ≥25 ppb), the interannual variability of FENO levels significantly reduced after 5 years of treatment. CONCLUSION The efficacy of SLIT was noted from the first year of treatment, even in a year when pollen profusely dispersed. Thus, long-term continuous treatment with SLIT may alleviate nasal symptoms as well as eosinophilic airway inflammation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoko Hamada
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan; Allergy Center, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
| | - Yoshiki Kobayashi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan; Allergy Center, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Daiki Sakamoto
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akihiro Shimamura
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazumichi Kuroda
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | - Risaki Kawachi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan; Allergy Center, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Kanda
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan; Allergy Center, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mikiya Asako
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan; Allergy Center, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Minoru Gotoh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Okubo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Koichi Tomoda
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Iwai
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Kansai Medical University, shinmachi 2-5-1, Hirakata, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Induction of IL-10-producing type 2 innate lymphoid cells by allergen immunotherapy is associated with clinical response. Immunity 2021; 54:291-307.e7. [PMID: 33450188 DOI: 10.1016/j.immuni.2020.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 135] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 12/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The role of innate immune cells in allergen immunotherapy that confers immune tolerance to the sensitizing allergen is unclear. Here, we report a role of interleukin-10-producing type 2 innate lymphoid cells (IL-10+ ILC2s) in modulating grass-pollen allergy. We demonstrate that KLRG1+ but not KLRG1- ILC2 produced IL-10 upon activation with IL-33 and retinoic acid. These cells attenuated Th responses and maintained epithelial cell integrity. IL-10+ KLRG1+ ILC2s were lower in patients with grass-pollen allergy when compared to healthy subjects. In a prospective, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, we demonstrated that the competence of ILC2 to produce IL-10 was restored in patients who received grass-pollen sublingual immunotherapy. The underpinning mechanisms were associated with the modification of retinol metabolic pathway, cytokine-cytokine receptor interaction, and JAK-STAT signaling pathways in the ILCs. Altogether, our findings underscore the contribution of IL-10+ ILC2s in the disease-modifying effect by allergen immunotherapy.
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy may modify the natural course of allergic diseases and induce remission. It includes subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT). For asthma, allergen immunotherapy using house dust mite (HDM) improves clinical symptoms and airway hyperresponsiveness and decreases drug requirements. Furthermore, it has been suggested that allergen immunotherapy also has the following effects: (1) the effect can be maintained for more than a year even if the treatment is terminated, (2) the remission rate of childhood asthma can be increased, (3) new allergen sensitization can be suppressed, and (4) asthma development can be prevented if allergen immunotherapy was performed in the case of pollinosis. Allergen immunotherapy differs from conventional drug therapy, in particular the effect of modifying the natural course of allergic diseases and the effect of controlling complicated allergic diseases such as rhinoconjunctivitis. The general indication for HDM-SCIT in asthma is HDM-sensitized atopic asthma with mild-to-moderate disease and normal respiratory function. HDM allergens should be involved in the pathogenesis of asthma, and a duration of illness of less than 10 years is desirable. HDM-SLIT is available for allergic rhinitis but not for asthma in Japan. However, as the efficacy of SLIT for asthma has been fully proven internationally, SLIT is also applied in asthmatics with complicated allergic rhinitis in Japan.
Collapse
|
30
|
Nelson HS. The evolution of allergy immunotherapy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2020; 126:357-366. [PMID: 33271297 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.11.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 11/23/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The objective of this review is to trace the evolution of the art and science of allergy immunotherapy (AIT). DATA SOURCES Original reports relating to the evolution of the concept of respiratory allergy and its specific treatment were identified by following references in journal articles, review articles, and allergy textbooks from the mid-20th century to the present. STUDY SELECTIONS Studies highlighting substantial milestones in the evolution of the practice of allergy immunotherapy were included. RESULTS The story of AIT begins with the recognition of hay fever as a distinct entity and subsequent studies that established grass pollen as one of the causes. This knowledge led several investigators, most notable Leonard Noon and John Freeman who worked at St. Mary's Hospital in London, to attempt to induce tolerance giving grass pollen extract by injection to their patients. After the publication of the work of Noon and Freeman in 1911, the practice of AIT spread rapidly and was applied to many other pollen allergens besides grass and for perennial rhinitis and asthma. The early studies were largely anecdotal, but over the past 60 to 70 years, studies of AIT have been conducted with increasingly sophisticated scientific methods. Nowadays, not only is the practice of AIT based on carefully conducted studies, but the underlying immunologic basis of allergy and the response to AIT have also been and still are being firmly established. CONCLUSION Both the art and the science behind the practice of AIT have been established by a solid base of clinical and immunologic studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harold S Nelson
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, Colorado.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Sharif H, Acharya S, Dhondalay GKR, Varricchi G, Krasner-Macleod S, Laisuan W, Switzer A, Lenormand M, Kashe E, Parkin RV, Yi Y, Koc M, Fedina O, Vilà-Nadal G, Marone G, Eifan A, Scadding GW, Fear DJ, Nadeau KC, Durham SR, Shamji MH. Altered chromatin landscape in circulating T follicular helper and regulatory cells following grass pollen subcutaneous and sublingual immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 147:663-676. [PMID: 33160969 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/28/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergen-specific immunotherapy is a disease-modifying treatment that induces long-term T-cell tolerance. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the role of circulating CXCR5+PD-1+ T follicular helper (cTFH) and T follicular regulatory (TFR) cells following grass pollen subcutaneous immunotherapy (SCIT) and sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) and the accompanying changes in their chromatin landscape. METHODS Phenotype and function of cTFH cells were initially evaluated in the grass pollen-allergic (GPA) group (n = 28) and nonatopic healthy controls (NAC, n = 13) by mathematical algorithms developed to manage high-dimensional data and cell culture, respectively. cTFH and TFR cells were further enumerated in NAC (n = 12), GPA (n = 14), SCIT- (n = 10), and SLIT- (n = 8) treated groups. Chromatin accessibility in cTFH and TFR cells was assessed by assay for transposase-accessible chromatin sequencing (ATAC-seq) to investigate epigenetic mechanisms underlying the differences between NAC, GPA, SCIT, and SLIT groups. RESULTS cTFH cells were shown to be distinct from TH2- and TH2A-cell subsets, capable of secreting IL-4 and IL-21. Both cytokines synergistically promoted B-cell class switching to IgE and plasma cell differentiation. Grass pollen allergen induced cTFH-cell proliferation in the GPA group but not in the NAC group (P < .05). cTFH cells were higher in the GPA group compared with the NAC group and were lower in the SCIT and SLIT groups (P < .01). Time-dependent induction of IL-4, IL-21, and IL-6 was observed in nasal mucosa following intranasal allergen challenge in the GPA group but not in SCIT and SLIT groups. TFR and IL-10+ cTFH cells were induced in SCIT and SLIT groups (all, P < .01). ATAC-seq analyses revealed differentially accessible chromatin regions in all groups. CONCLUSIONS For the first time, we showed dysregulation of cTFH cells in the GPA group compared to NAC, SCIT, and SLIT groups and induction of TFR and IL-10+ cTFH cells following SCIT and SLIT. Changes in the chromatin landscape were observed following allergen-specific immunotherapy in cTFH and TFR cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanisah Sharif
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom; PAPRSB Institute of Health Sciences, Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Gadong, Brunei Darussalam
| | - Swati Acharya
- Sean N. Parker Center for Asthma and Allergy Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Gopal Krishna R Dhondalay
- Sean N. Parker Center for Asthma and Allergy Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Gilda Varricchi
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Department of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Shoshanna Krasner-Macleod
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Wannada Laisuan
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Amy Switzer
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Madison Lenormand
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Elena Kashe
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca V Parkin
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yi Yi
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Merve Koc
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Oleksandra Fedina
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gemma Vilà-Nadal
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Gianni Marone
- Division of Clinical Immunology and Allergy, Center for Basic and Clinical Immunology Research (CISI), University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Aarif Eifan
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Guy W Scadding
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - David J Fear
- Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology & Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Asthma and Allergy Research, Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of National Heart and Lung Institute, London, United Kingdom; Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Allergen immunotherapy is the only treatment modality which alters the natural course of allergic diseases by restoring immune tolerance against allergens. Deeper understanding of tolerance mechanisms will lead to the development of new vaccines, which target immune responses and promote tolerance. RECENT FINDINGS Successful allergen immunotherapy (AIT) induces allergen-specific peripheral tolerance, characterized mainly by the generation of allergen-specific Treg cells and reduction of Th2 cells. At the early phase, AIT leads to a decrease in the activity and degranulation of mast cells and basophils and a decrease in inflammatory responses of eosinophils in inflamed tissues. Treg cells show their effects by secreting inhibitory cytokines including interleukin (IL)-10, transforming growth factor-β, interfering with cellular metabolisms, suppressing antigen presenting cells and innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) and by cytolysis. AIT induces the development of regulatory B cells producing IL-10 and B cells expressing allergen-specific IgG4. Recent investigations have demonstrated that AIT is also associated with the formation of ILC2reg and DCreg cells which contribute to tolerance induction. SUMMARY Research done so far, has shown that multiple molecular and cellular factors are dysregulated in allergic diseases and modified by AIT. Studies should now focus on finding the best target and ideal biomarkers to identify ideal candidates for AIT.
Collapse
|
33
|
Demoly P, Corren J, Creticos P, De Blay F, Gevaert P, Hellings P, Kowal K, Le Gall M, Nenasheva N, Passalacqua G, Pfaar O, Tortajada-Girbés M, Vidal C, Worm M, Casale TB. A 300 IR sublingual tablet is an effective, safe treatment for house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis: An international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase III clinical trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2020; 147:1020-1030.e10. [PMID: 32890575 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.07.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Allergic rhinitis induced by house dust mites (HDMs) is a highly prevalent but often underdiagnosed and undertreated/untreated chronic disease. It often has a negative impact on sleep, work, leisure activities, and health-related quality of life. Allergen immunotherapy is a proven, safe treatment for respiratory allergies. OBJECTIVE We sought to assess the efficacy and safety of a 300 index of reactivity (IR) sublingual tablet formulation of Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus:Dermatophagoides farinae 1:1 extract in adolescents (aged ≥12) and adults with moderate to severe HDM-induced allergic rhinitis. METHODS In a phase III, international, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial, participants received approximately 12 months of treatment with placebo or the 300 IR tablet. The primary end point was the average total combined score during 4 weeks at the end of the treatment period. RESULTS A total of 1607 participants were randomized, and 1476 (including 555 [37.6%] with concomitant mild controlled asthma at inclusion) comprised the full analysis set. Over the primary evaluation period, the least squares mean average total combined score in the 300 IR group (3.62) was significantly lower (P < .0001) than in the placebo group (4.35), with a relative least squares mean difference of -16.9% (95% CI, -24.0% to -9.2%). All prespecified secondary end points were consistently improved in the 300 IR group, relative to placebo. The 300 IR tablet was generally well tolerated. Treatment-related adverse events (mainly mild or moderate local reactions) were reported for 51.0% of the patients in the 300 IR group and 14.9% in the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS The 300 IR sublingual HDM tablet is an effective, safe treatment for HDM-induced allergic rhinitis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pascal Demoly
- Department of Pulmonology and Addictology, Arnaud de Villeneuve Hospital, Montpellier University, Montpellier, France; Sorbonne Université, UMR-S 1136 INSERM, IPLESP, EPAR Team, Paris, France.
| | - Jonathan Corren
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, David Geffen School of Medicine at the University of California, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Peter Creticos
- Division of Allergy & Clinical Immunology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, Md; Creticos Research Group with Charleston Allergy & Asthma, Charleston, SC
| | - Frédéric De Blay
- Allergy Division, Chest Diseases Department, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Philippe Gevaert
- Upper Airways Research Laboratory, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Peter Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Krzysztof Kowal
- Department of Experimental Allergology and Immunology, Medical University of Bialystok, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Martine Le Gall
- Global Clinical Development Department, Stallergenes Greer, Antony, France
| | - Natalia Nenasheva
- Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education of the Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation, Moscow, Russia
| | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico S. Martino, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Miguel Tortajada-Girbés
- Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Dr Peset University Hospital, Valencia, Spain; Department of Pediatrics, Obstetrics and Gynecology. University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain; IVI Foundation, Valencia, Spain
| | - Carmen Vidal
- Allergy Department, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago, Faculty of Medicine, University of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Margitta Worm
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Dermatology, Allergy and Venerology, Charité, Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas B Casale
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa, Fla
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Di Bona D, Bilancia M, Albanesi M, Caiaffa MF, Macchia L. Cost-effectiveness of grass pollen allergen immunotherapy in adults. Allergy 2020; 75:2319-2329. [PMID: 32096242 DOI: 10.1111/all.14246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2019] [Revised: 11/21/2019] [Accepted: 12/09/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Major scientific societies, such as the EAACI or the AAAAI, do not express any suggestion on which form of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) is to be preferred (subcutaneous immunotherapy, SCIT, vs sublingual immunotherapy, SLIT). This choice could depend on their relative pharmacoeconomic value. OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-effectiveness of AIT for grass pollen, administered as SCIT or SLIT. METHODS We created a Markovian Model, to evaluate, in a hypothetical cohort of adult patients suffering from moderate-to-severe rhino-conjunctivitis with or without allergic asthma, the cost-effectiveness of SLIT (tablets, Grazax® and Oralair® ) or SCIT (various currently available products, plus indirect nonmedical costs, such as travel and productivity costs) in addition to pharmacological therapy, assuming a 9-year horizon to capture AIT long-term effects. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated assuming pharmacological therapy as the reference comparator. RESULTS In the base case, SCIT was slightly more expensive, but more effective than SLIT, being the most cost-effective option (ICER for SCIT, €11 418; ICER for SLIT, €15 212). ICERs greater than €120 000 for both SCIT and SLIT were demonstrated in a scenario assuming that low treatment persistence rates, which are common in real-life, lead to absence of long-term AIT clinical benefit. Considering indirect nonmedical costs SLIT resulted more cost-effective than SCIT (ICER for SCIT, €17 318; ICER for SLIT, €15 212). CONCLUSION In daily practice, AIT for grass pollens may be a cost-effective option only in patients with low discontinuation rates. SCIT, which is less affected by this limitation than SLIT, seems the most cost-effective AIT form.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Di Bona
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation School and Chair of Allergology and Clinical Immunology University of Bari Aldo Moro Bari Italy
| | - Massimo Bilancia
- Ionic Department in Legal and Economic System of Mediterranean: Society, Environment, Culture University of Bari Aldo Moro Bari Italy
| | - Marcello Albanesi
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation School and Chair of Allergology and Clinical Immunology University of Bari Aldo Moro Bari Italy
| | | | - Luigi Macchia
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation School and Chair of Allergology and Clinical Immunology University of Bari Aldo Moro Bari Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Otsuka K, Otsuka H, Matsune S, Okubo K. Decreased numbers of metachromatic cells in nasal swabs in Japanese cedar pollinosis following sublingual immunotherapy. IMMUNITY INFLAMMATION AND DISEASE 2020; 8:333-341. [PMID: 32468704 PMCID: PMC7416035 DOI: 10.1002/iid3.314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 04/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/13/2020] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Background and Objective Nasal symptoms were reduced following allergen‐specific sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergic rhinitis. The mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis are poorly understood. We studied changes in the numbers of metachromatic cells, eosinophils, and neutrophils following SLIT for Japanese cedar pollinosis. Methods Nasal swabs were taken in the preseason (n = 32) and in pollinosis season (n = 49) from subjects given sublingual drop immunotherapy for an average duration of 1.5 years. The numbers of metachromatic cells (mast cells and basophils), eosinophils and neutrophils were determined and compared with those from untreated subjects in preseason (n = 65) and in season (n = 54). Results SLIT subjects had a significantly reduced frequency of moderate to most severe symptoms in comparison to untreated subjects in preseason (P < .001, the Mann‐Whitney U test), and (P < .00001) in season. Metachromatic cell counts in nasal swabs of SLIT subjects in preseason and in season were lower than those of untreated subjects (P = .014, the Mann‐Whitney U test) and (P = .00001) respectively. Eosinophil numbers in SLIT subjects were not significantly different than in untreated subjects in both preseason (P = .29) and in season (P = .09). However, when SLIT subjects in season were divided into those with greater than or equal to 1.5 years, or <1.5 years of SLIT duration, the degree of eosinophilia in those with SLIT greater than or equal to 1.5 years was significantly lower (P = .011) than in untreated patients, but not in those with SLIT less than 1.5 years (P = .9). There were no significant differences in neutrophil numbers in nasal swabs between untreated and SLIT subjects in preseason and in season. Conclusion One of mechanisms underlying the effectiveness of sublingual drop immunotherapy for Japanese cedar pollinosis is a reduction of the number of metachromatic cells in preseason and in season. Eosinophilia was also reduced in season in those given SLIT for greater than or equal to 1.5 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuninori Otsuka
- Otsuka ENT Clinic, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.,Otorhinolaryngology, Shin-yurigaoka General Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hirokuni Otsuka
- Otsuka ENT Clinic, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan.,Otorhinolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Musashikosugi Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shoji Matsune
- Otorhinolaryngology, Nippon Medical School, Musashikosugi Hospital, Kawasaki, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kimihiro Okubo
- Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Alvaro-Lozano M, Akdis CA, Akdis M, Alviani C, Angier E, Arasi S, Arzt-Gradwohl L, Barber D, Bazire R, Cavkaytar O, Comberiati P, Dramburg S, Durham SR, Eifan AO, Forchert L, Halken S, Kirtland M, Kucuksezer UC, Layhadi JA, Matricardi PM, Muraro A, Ozdemir C, Pajno GB, Pfaar O, Potapova E, Riggioni C, Roberts G, Rodríguez Del Río P, Shamji MH, Sturm GJ, Vazquez-Ortiz M. EAACI Allergen Immunotherapy User's Guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2020; 31 Suppl 25:1-101. [PMID: 32436290 PMCID: PMC7317851 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 146] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Allergen immunotherapy is a cornerstone in the treatment of allergic children. The clinical efficiency relies on a well-defined immunologic mechanism promoting regulatory T cells and downplaying the immune response induced by allergens. Clinical indications have been well documented for respiratory allergy in the presence of rhinitis and/or allergic asthma, to pollens and dust mites. Patients who have had an anaphylactic reaction to hymenoptera venom are also good candidates for allergen immunotherapy. Administration of allergen is currently mostly either by subcutaneous injections or by sublingual administration. Both methods have been extensively studied and have pros and cons. Specifically in children, the choice of the method of administration according to the patient's profile is important. Although allergen immunotherapy is widely used, there is a need for improvement. More particularly, biomarkers for prediction of the success of the treatments are needed. The strength and efficiency of the immune response may also be boosted by the use of better adjuvants. Finally, novel formulations might be more efficient and might improve the patient's adherence to the treatment. This user's guide reviews current knowledge and aims to provide clinical guidance to healthcare professionals taking care of children undergoing allergen immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Cezmi A Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland.,Christine Kühne-Center for Allergy Research and Education, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Mubeccel Akdis
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research (SIAF), University of Zurich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Cherry Alviani
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight, UK.,Clinical and Experimental Sciences and Human Development and Health, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.,NIHR Southampton Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK
| | - Elisabeth Angier
- Primary Care and Population Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Pediatric Allergology Unit, Department of Pediatric Medicine, Bambino Gesù Children's research Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Lisa Arzt-Gradwohl
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Domingo Barber
- School of Medicine, Institute for Applied Molecular Medicine (IMMA), Universidad CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain.,RETIC ARADYAL RD16/0006/0015, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raphaëlle Bazire
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Niño Jesús, ARADyAL RD16/0006/0026, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ozlem Cavkaytar
- Department of Paediatric Allergy and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Goztepe Training and Research Hospital, Istanbul Medeniyet University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pasquale Comberiati
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, Section of Paediatrics, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stephen R Durham
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,the MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - Aarif O Eifan
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London and Royal Brompton Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Leandra Forchert
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Susanne Halken
- Hans Christian Andersen Children's Hospital, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Max Kirtland
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Umut C Kucuksezer
- Aziz Sancar Institute of Experimental Medicine, Department of Immunology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Janice A Layhadi
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,the MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK.,Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Paolo Maria Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Antonella Muraro
- The Referral Centre for Food Allergy Diagnosis and Treatment Veneto Region, Department of Women and Child Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Cevdet Ozdemir
- Institute of Child Health, Department of Pediatric Basic Sciences, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Istanbul University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Oliver Pfaar
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Section of Rhinology and Allergy, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ekaterina Potapova
- Department of Pediatric Pneumology, Immunology and Intensive Care Medicine, Charité Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - Carmen Riggioni
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Service, Institut de Reserca Sant Joan de Deú, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Graham Roberts
- The David Hide Asthma and Allergy Research Centre, St Mary's Hospital, Newport, Isle of Wight, UK.,NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, UK.,Paediatric Allergy and Respiratory Medicine (MP803), Clinical & Experimental Sciences & Human Development in Health Academic Units University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine & University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | - Mohamed H Shamji
- Immunomodulation and Tolerance Group; Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Section of Inflammation, Repair and Development, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK.,the MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
| | - Gunter J Sturm
- Department of Dermatology and Venerology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Heeringa JJ, McKenzie CI, Varese N, Hew M, Bakx ATCM, Aui PM, Rolland JM, O’Hehir RE, Zelm MC. Induction of IgG 2 and IgG 4 B-cell memory following sublingual immunotherapy for ryegrass pollen allergy. Allergy 2020; 75:1121-1132. [PMID: 31587307 PMCID: PMC7317934 DOI: 10.1111/all.14073] [Citation(s) in RCA: 52] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2019] [Revised: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 08/29/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND While treatment for atopic rhinitis is aimed mostly to relieve symptoms, only allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) is targeted to modify the natural history of allergic diseases. This results in sustained clinical tolerance, even when treatment has stopped. The immunomodulatory effects of AIT are attributed mainly to increased regulatory T-cell function and increased allergen-specific IgG4 , yet little is known about the effect on the memory B-cell compartment. OBJECTIVE We aimed to examine the effects of AIT on the IgE- and IgG subclass-expressing memory B cells. METHODS We recruited 29 patients with atopic seasonal rhinoconjunctivitis and performed a longitudinal analysis of the peripheral immune compartment before, during, and after sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for allergy to temperate grass pollen, predominantly to ryegrass pollen (RGP; Lolium perenne). Using flow cytometry on peripheral blood mononuclear cells and serum immunoassays, we analyzed the effects of a 4 months preseasonal treatment regimen comprising two or three courses in consecutive years on circulating IgE+ and IgG+ memory B cells and allergen-specific Ig levels. RESULTS SLIT increased RGP-specific serum IgG2 and IgG4 , as well as the frequencies of IgG2 + and IgG4 + memory B cells, whereas no effect was observed on the IgE+ memory B-cell compartment. Furthermore, SLIT enhanced proportions of regulatory T cells specific to RGP. These changes were associated with clinical improvement. CONCLUSION Our data provide evidence for immunological effects of SLIT on B-cell memory. Skewing responses toward IgG2 and IgG4 subclasses might be a mechanism to suppress IgE-mediated allergic responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorn J. Heeringa
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Immunology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands
- Department of Pediatrics Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands
| | - Craig I. McKenzie
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Nirupama Varese
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Research) Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Hospital Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Mark Hew
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Research) Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Hospital Melbourne Vic. Australia
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Amy T. C. M. Bakx
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Pei M. Aui
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Jennifer M. Rolland
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Research) Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Hospital Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Robyn E. O’Hehir
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Research) Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Hospital Melbourne Vic. Australia
| | - Menno C. Zelm
- Department of Immunology and Pathology Central Clinical School Monash University Melbourne Vic. Australia
- Department of Respiratory Medicine Allergy and Clinical Immunology (Research) Central Clinical School Monash University, and Alfred Hospital Melbourne Vic. Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jin M, Zhang L, Zhou G, Zhang S, Li X, Hu S. The effect of the standard length of the first prescription on the adherence to sublingual immunotherapy for patients with allergic rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2020; 10:768-772. [PMID: 32223075 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2019] [Revised: 02/11/2020] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Poor adherence to sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) has become a major cause of unsatisfactory clinical efficacy for patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). This study was designed to identify the effect of different first prescription lengths on the adherence to SLIT. METHODS The clinical data of 306 patients with AR who started SLIT between January 2017 and June 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to the length of their first prescription (group A: less than 3 months, group B: 3 to 6 months, group C: more than 6 months). The numbers of adherent or nonadherent patients in each group and the main reasons of nonadherence were analyzed. RESULTS Groups A, B, and C included 102, 161, and 43 patients, respectively. The average lengths of the first prescription for group A, B, and C were 62.52 ± 17.63, 102.21 ± 9.22, and 189.07 ± 17.97 days. There were significance differences among the 3 groups (p < 0.05). There were 42 (41.18%), 112 (69.57%), and 37 (86.05%) adherent patients in group A, B, and C. There were 60 (58.82%), 49 (30.43%), and 6 (13.95%) nonadherent patients in group A, B, and C. There were significant differences in the proportions of adherent and nonadherent patients among the 3 groups (p < 0.05). The following reasons were cited for nonadherence to SLIT: the long course of SLIT; inconvenience of getting the prescription; ineffectiveness; side effects; and other reasons. CONCLUSION Under certain conditions, 6 months is recommended as the standard length for the first prescription, which can significantly improve adherence to SLIT in patients with AR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mao Jin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Lei Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Guojin Zhou
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shoude Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xuan Li
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Sunhong Hu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Medical College of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Moon HG, Kim SJ, Lee MK, Kang H, Choi HS, Harijith A, Ren J, Natarajan V, Christman JW, Ackerman SJ, Park GY. Colony-stimulating factor 1 and its receptor are new potential therapeutic targets for allergic asthma. Allergy 2020; 75:357-369. [PMID: 31385613 PMCID: PMC7002247 DOI: 10.1111/all.14011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2019] [Revised: 06/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A new approach targeting aeroallergen sensing in the early events of mucosal immunity could have greater benefit. The CSF1-CSF1R pathway has a critical role in trafficking allergens to regional lymph nodes through activating dendritic cells. Intervention in this pathway could prevent allergen sensitization and subsequent Th2 allergic inflammation. OBJECTIVE To examine the therapeutic effectiveness of CSF1 and CSF1R inhibition for blocking the dendritic cell function of sensing aeroallergens. METHODS We adopted a model of chronic asthma induced by a panel of three naturally occurring allergens and novel delivery system of CSF1R inhibitor encapsulated nanoprobe. RESULTS Selective depletion of CSF1 in airway epithelial cells abolished the production of allergen-reactive IgE, resulting in prevention of new asthma development as well as reversal of established allergic lung inflammation. CDPL-GW nanoprobe containing GW2580, a selective CSF1R inhibitor, showed favorable pharmacokinetics for inhalational treatment and intranasal insufflation delivery of CDPL-GW nanoprobe ameliorated asthma pathologies including allergen-specific serum IgE production, allergic lung and airway inflammation and airway hyper-responsiveness (AHR) with minimal pulmonary adverse reaction. CONCLUSION The inhibition of the CSF1-CSF1R signaling pathway effectively suppresses sensitization to aeroallergens and consequent allergic lung inflammation in a murine model of chronic asthma. CSF1R inhibition is a promising new target for the treatment of allergic asthma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyung-Geun Moon
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Seung-jae Kim
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Myoung Kyu Lee
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Homan Kang
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Hak Soo Choi
- Gordon Center for Medical Imaging, Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Anantha Harijith
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Jinhong Ren
- Center for Biomolecular Science, College of Pharmacy, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Viswanathan Natarajan
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Pharmacology, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - John W. Christman
- Section of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, the Ohio State University, Davis Heart and Lung Research Center, Columbus, Ohio, USA
| | - Steven J. Ackerman
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, and Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gye Young Park
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep and Allergy, Department of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Decision-making for pediatric allergy immunotherapy for aeroallergens: a narrative review. Eur J Pediatr 2019; 178:1801-1812. [PMID: 31414212 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-019-03444-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2019] [Revised: 06/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/06/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
There has been exciting progress in diagnosis and in the treatment of allergic patients. The objective of this review is to summarize the most relevant contributions in the past 10 years with a special focus on the pediatric population allergic to aeroallergens and provide the most relevant references and practical issues for the decision-making. Current guidelines on allergy diagnosis recommend a thorough clinical history as the first step, followed by allergen extract testing using an in vivo prick test and/or an in vitro specific IgE test. Molecular diagnosis is recommended when previous tests are inconclusive. In practice, the most important factors to decide the AIT treatment are the actual intensity and duration of the patient's symptoms and the availability of appropriate AIT products for the patient's sensitization profile at high allergen concentrations and with confirmed efficacy and safety from clinical trials. This document summarizes outstanding references for allergic immunotherapy decision-making and provides summary tables and figures analyzing the most important factors related to the decision for allergen immunotherapy and the safety risks related. The experts concluded that AIT is efficacious and safe for the treatment of allergic patients that is available for the most frequent aeroallergens.What is Known:• The prevalence of allergic asthma and rhinitis in children has increased in recent decades.• The efficacy and safety of allergen immunotherapy has been shown in multiple studies and systematic reviews.What is New:• This document summarizes outstanding references for allergic immunotherapy decision-making and provides summary tables and figures analyzing the most important factors related to the decision for allergen immunotherapy and the safety risks related. Recommendations of expert authors for the decision of the patients more suitable for allergen immunotherapy are included.
Collapse
|
41
|
Bacher P, Scheffold A. The effect of regulatory T cells on tolerance to airborne allergens and allergen immunotherapy. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 142:1697-1709. [PMID: 30527063 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2018.10.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Forkhead box P3-positive regulatory T (Treg) cells are essential mediators of tolerance against self-antigens and harmless exogenous antigens. Treg cell deficiencies result in multiple autoimmune and allergic syndromes in neonates. How Treg cells affect conventional allergies against aeroantigens, which are restricted to a few specific proteins released from inhaled particles, remains controversial. The hallmarks of antigen-specific loss of tolerance are allergen-specific TH2 cells and IgE. However, difficulties in identifying the rare allergen-specific Treg cells have obscured the cellular basis of tolerance to aeroallergens, which is also a major obstacle for the rational design of novel and more efficient allergen-specific immunotherapies. Recent technological progress allowing characterization of allergen-specific effectors and Treg cells with minimal in vitro manipulation revealed their detailed contribution to tolerance. The data identified inhaled particles as immunodominant Treg cell targets in healthy and allergic subjects. Conversely, the supposed immunodominant major allergens being rapidly released from inhaled particles apparently do not actively induce tolerance but are ignored by the immune system. Here, the partially contradictory data on various allergen-specific T-cell types in healthy subjects, allergic patients, and patients undergoing allergen-specific immunotherapy are discussed and integrated into one model, postulating Treg cell-dependent and Treg cell-independent checkpoints of tolerance and allergy development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra Bacher
- Institute for Immunology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Institute of Clinical Molecular Biology Christian-Albrechts Universität zu Kiel & Universitätsklinik Schleswig-Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Alexander Scheffold
- Institute for Immunology, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Canonica GW, Devillier P, Casale T, Demoly P, Bos C, Karagiannis E, Passalacqua G, Wahn U, Mascarell L. Clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy tablets for allergic rhinitis is unlikely to be derived from in vitro allergen-release data. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2019; 15:921-928. [PMID: 31403823 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2019.1649597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Allergen bioavailability underpins the efficacy and safety of SLIT tablets. Three product-related factors are likely to influence this: tablet potency, formulation and sublingual holding time. Areas covered: Tablet formulation determines the rate and extent of solubilized allergen release. Using validated in vitro dissolution assays, the two licensed grass pollen SLIT tablets are shown to release ≥85% of their total allergenic activity within several minutes. Sublingual holding time affects the contact duration between solubilized allergens and sublingual tissue. Maximal uptake of allergens by sublingual tissue requires ~5 minutes, with little uptake occurring within the first minute. A higher potency tablet with longer sublingual holding time would provide higher bioavailability, while faster rates of allergen release in vitro are unlikely to translate to a greater increase in bioavailability. Differences in dissolution times cannot serve as a surrogate of in vivo bioavailability, and are not related to differences in efficacy at the marketed tablet dosages. Rapid in vitro dissolution is likely not a key requirement for inducing a potent immune response. Expert opinion: In vitro dissolution cannot predict the clinical efficacy of SLIT tablets but could be important in immune tolerance and safety. In addition, a discontinuous administration regimen may have benefits for adherence and cost without compromising efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giorgio Walter Canonica
- Department of Internal Medicine, Humanitas University and Research Hospital ICH , Milan , Italy
| | - Philippe Devillier
- UPRES EA220, Foch Hospital, University Versailles Saint-Quentin, University Paris-Saclay , Suresnes , France
| | - Thomas Casale
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of South Florida , Tampa , FL , USA
| | - Pascal Demoly
- Division of Allergy, Department of Pulmonology, University Hospital of Montpellier, Montpellier and INSERM UMRS 1136, Equipe - EPAR - IPLESP, Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve , Paris , France
| | - Catherine Bos
- Department of Internal Medicine, Stallergenes Greer , Antony , France
| | | | - Giovanni Passalacqua
- Allergy and Respiratory Diseases, IRCCS Policlinico San Martino, University of Genoa , Genoa , Italy
| | - Ulrich Wahn
- Department of Paediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charité Medical University , Berlin , Germany
| | - Laurent Mascarell
- Department of Internal Medicine, Stallergenes Greer , Antony , France
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Zhao Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Y, Zhang L. HLA-II genes are associated with outcomes of specific immunotherapy for allergic rhinitis. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol 2019; 9:1311-1317. [PMID: 31299142 DOI: 10.1002/alr.22384] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2019] [Revised: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 06/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the precise mechanisms underlying the efficacy of allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) are not clear, some evidence suggests that this may be linked to polymorphisms in HLA-II gene. We aimed to investigate the correlation between HLA-II gene polymorphisms and house dust mite (HDM)-specific immunotherapy efficacy, and evaluate specific polymorphisms as potential biomarkers in allergic rhinitis (AR) patients who would benefit most from AIT. METHODS Fifty-one Han Chinese patients with AR receiving HDM AIT were recruited. Genomic DNA was extracted from venous blood samples and genotyped for HLA-DRB1 and HAL-DQB1 alleles using the polymerase chain reaction sequence-based genotyping method. Nasal and eye symptoms were investigated based on visual analogue scale and rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life. RESULTS Allele DRB1*04:06; DRB1*14:05 showed a positive correlation with improvements in nasal blockage, nasal itching, eye itching, and activities. Similarly, DQB1*03:02:01; DQB1*05:03: 01 was positively correlated with improvements in nose blocking, nasal itching, eye itching, behavioral problems, and nasal symptoms scores; and DRB1*03:01; DRB1*04:06 positively correlated with nasal symptoms scores. In contrast, DRB1*07:01:01; DRB1*11:01 was negatively correlated with non-pollen symptoms, behavioral problems, and nasal symptoms. CONCLUSION HLA-DRB1 and HLA-DQB1 gene polymorphism are associated with AIT efficacy in HDM-sensitive Chinese patients with AR, of which DRB1*03:01; DRB1*04:06 and DQB1*03:02:01; DQB1*05:03:01 may be useful biomarkers of AR patient candidacy for effective AIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yanming Zhao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Yali Zhao
- Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China
| | - Yuan Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China.,Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Luo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Beijing Key Laboratory of Nasal Diseases, Beijing Institute of Otolaryngology, Beijing, China.,Department of Allergy, Beijing TongRen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
[Costs of allergic diseases and saving potential by allergen-specific immunotherapy : A personal assessment]. HNO 2019; 65:801-810. [PMID: 28900663 DOI: 10.1007/s00106-017-0410-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The burden of allergic diseases is of particular relevance for the economy and the social welfare and health insurance framework. Allergic rhinitis (AR) has a life-time prevalence of approximately 30% and is one of the most common chronic diseases with considerable socioeconomic impact thus leading to substantial direct, indirect and intangible costs. This article explores the common hypothesis that allergen-specific immunotherapy (ASIT) saves national economic expenses in the long term in comparison to other standard symptomatic treatment or no therapy. METHODS We conducted a selective search and analysis of the literature in PubMed and Medline including otherwise listed publications in German. Using a predefined model and data extrapolation over 9 years for data from different sources and short-term clinical studies we further discuss the problems and difficulties in analyzing heterogeneous datasets. RESULTS Using a health-economic model with currently available and accepted variables ASIT proves to be cost-effective in comparison to symptomatic treatment in allergic rhinitis; however, numerous parameters from other models have to be controlled, such as adherence to therapy and therapy discontinuation, heterogeneous costs for different treatment modalities, effect sizes with respect to symptoms including cross-influences with symptomatic rescue medication, duration of efficacy after treatment discontinuation and asthma protection. DISCUSSION The personal appraisal of the authors demonstrates not only the current knowledge but also the problems in health economical evaluation of ASIT in allergic diseases.
Collapse
|
45
|
Wheatley LM, Wood R, Nadeau K, Liu A, Zoratti E, Bacharier L, Brittain E, Calderon M, Casale T, Chipps B, Cox L, Creticos PS, Desai M, Dreborg S, Durham S, Gergen PJ, Gruchalla R, Nelson H, O'Hehir RE, Plaut M, Schwaninger JM, Tilles S, Vickery B, Wittenberg KM, Togias A. Mind the gaps: Clinical trial concepts to address unanswered questions in aeroallergen immunotherapy-An NIAID/AHRQ Workshop. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2019; 143:1711-1726. [PMID: 30731123 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2019.01.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Revised: 01/08/2019] [Accepted: 01/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases organized a workshop to develop trial concepts that could improve the use and effectiveness of aeroallergen immunotherapy (AAIT). Expert groups were formed to accomplish the following tasks: (1) propose a study design to compare the effectiveness and safety of subcutaneous versus sublingual AAIT; (2) propose a study design to compare the effectiveness and safety of AAIT by using 1 or a few allergens versus all or most allergens to which a patient is sensitized; (3) propose a study design to determine whether AAIT can alter the progression of childhood allergic airways disease; and (4) propose a study design to determine the optimal dose and duration of AAIT to achieve maximal effectiveness with acceptable safety. Study designs were presented by the workgroups, extensively discussed at the workshop, and revised for this report. The proposed trials would be of long duration and require large highly characterized patient populations. Scientific caveats and feasibility matters are discussed. These concepts are intended to help the development of clinical trials that can address some of the major questions related to the practice of AAIT for the management and prevention of allergic airways disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lisa M Wheatley
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md.
| | | | | | - Andrew Liu
- Children's Hospital Colorado and University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | | | | | - Erica Brittain
- Biostatistics Research Branch, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| | | | | | - Bradley Chipps
- Capital Allergy and Respiratory Disease Center, Sacramento, Calif
| | - Linda Cox
- Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, Fla
| | | | - Manisha Desai
- Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | | | | | - Peter J Gergen
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| | | | | | - Robyn E O'Hehir
- Alfred Hospital and Monash University Medical School, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Marshall Plaut
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| | - Julie M Schwaninger
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| | | | - Brian Vickery
- North Carolina Children's Hospital, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Kim M Wittenberg
- Center for Evidence and Practice Improvement, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, Md
| | - Alkis Togias
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Transplantation, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Md
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Long-Term Efficacy and Dose-Finding Trial of Japanese Cedar Pollen Sublingual Immunotherapy Tablet. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY-IN PRACTICE 2019; 7:1287-1297.e8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2018.11.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2018] [Revised: 10/17/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
|
47
|
Langlois A, Graham F, Bégin P. Epicutaneous peanut patch device for the treatment of peanut allergy. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2019; 15:449-460. [DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2019.1593138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Langlois
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - François Graham
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Philippe Bégin
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Varona R, Ramos T, Escribese MM, Jimeno L, Galán A, Würtzen PA, Vega F, Marín A, Martín S, Carrera AC, Blanco C, Barber D. Persistent regulatory T-cell response 2 years after 3 years of grass tablet SLIT: Links to reduced eosinophil counts, sIgE levels, and clinical benefit. Allergy 2019; 74:349-360. [PMID: 30003552 PMCID: PMC6585999 DOI: 10.1111/all.13553] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2018] [Revised: 06/19/2018] [Accepted: 06/29/2018] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Background In the first 2 years of grass tablet sublingual immunotherapy treatment, we have previously demonstrated a progressive development of a regulatory T‐cell response, which was preceded by an early decrease in the frequency of both IL‐4+ cells and sIgE levels. A progressive increase in sIgG4 levels and FAB blockage were also found. Methods By monitoring immunological kinetics during 3 years of active treatment + 2 years of follow‐up, we aimed to identify key immunological parameters that could explain sustained clinical benefit of grass tablet sublingual immunotherapy. Results Thirty patients completed the 5‐year clinical trial protocol. Although individual responses were heterogeneous, reduction in both sIgE and circulating IL‐4+ cells compared to the initial 1‐ to 4‐month peak was maintained throughout the 3‐year treatment period and for 2 years after discontinuation. Meanwhile, after a 2‐year increase in sIgG4, the levels were stabilized during the third year and decreased post‐therapy. FAB inhibition remained significantly inhibited throughout the study compared to preimmunotherapy in 83% of patients. A sustained regulatory T‐cell response, after IT cessation, occurs in two‐thirds of the patients. There was a statistical association between this regulatory response, the maintenance of lower eosinophil counts during grass pollen seasons, and sIgE titers lower than before immunotherapy treatment, and the latter were significantly associated with clinical response. Conclusion Our results suggest that the immunological mechanisms underlying the sustained response after 2 years of cessation of immunotherapy (3‐year treatment period) are linked to the acquisition and maintenance of a regulatory T‐cell response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosa Varona
- Department of Immunology and Oncology; Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC); Madrid Spain
| | - Tania Ramos
- Servicio de Alergia; Hospital Universitario de La Princesa; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP); Madrid Spain
| | - Maria Marta Escribese
- School of Medicine; Institute for Applied Molecular Medicine; Universidad CEU San Pablo; Madrid Spain
- School of Medicine; Department of Basic Medical Sciences; Universidad CEU San Pablo; Madrid Spain
- RETIC ARADYAL RD16/0006/0015; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Madrid Spain
| | - Lucia Jimeno
- Departamento Médico e I+D; ALK-Abelló; Madrid Spain
| | | | | | - Francisco Vega
- Servicio de Alergia; Hospital Universitario de La Princesa; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP); Madrid Spain
| | - Alicia Marín
- Departamento Médico e I+D; ALK-Abelló; Madrid Spain
| | | | - Ana C. Carrera
- Department of Immunology and Oncology; Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB-CSIC); Madrid Spain
| | - Carlos Blanco
- Servicio de Alergia; Hospital Universitario de La Princesa; Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IP); Madrid Spain
- RETIC ARADYAL RD16/0006/0015; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Madrid Spain
| | - Domingo Barber
- School of Medicine; Institute for Applied Molecular Medicine; Universidad CEU San Pablo; Madrid Spain
- RETIC ARADYAL RD16/0006/0015; Instituto de Salud Carlos III; Madrid Spain
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Couroux P, Ipsen H, Stage BS, Damkjaer JT, Steffensen MA, Salapatek AM, Lund K, Würtzen PA. A birch sublingual allergy immunotherapy tablet reduces rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms when exposed to birch and oak and induces IgG 4 to allergens from all trees in the birch homologous group. Allergy 2019; 74:361-369. [PMID: 30229939 PMCID: PMC6588091 DOI: 10.1111/all.13606] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2018] [Accepted: 08/07/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This randomized, double-blind trial was conducted to determine the optimal dose for clinical efficacy of the SQ tree SLIT-tablet. An environmental exposure chamber (EEC) was used to reduce variability of allergen exposure and allow investigation of symptom reduction towards different species from the birch homologous group in separate EEC sessions. METHODS Eligible subjects (N = 219) were randomized to receive treatment with placebo or the SQ tree SLIT-tablet (2, 7, or 12 DU) for 24 weeks. EEC pollen challenges were conducted outside the birch pollen season and included four birch and two oak EEC sessions. The primary efficacy endpoint was the average allergic rhinoconjunctivitis (ARC) total symptom score (TSS) after 24 weeks of treatment. RESULTS There was a statistically significantly lower TSS during the 24-week birch EEC session for 7 DU and 12 DU compared to placebo with relative differences of 24% (P = 0.03) and 25% (P = 0.02). For the 24-week oak EEC session, there was a statistically significant difference for 12 DU (24%, P = 0.03). IgE and IgG4 measurements supported these findings and demonstrated cross-reactivity to all other species within the birch homologous group. Treatment was well-tolerated with the most frequently reported adverse reactions being the local reactions in the oral cavity of mild-to-moderate severity. CONCLUSION This trial demonstrates that the SQ tree SLIT-tablet reduce ARC symptoms triggered by birch or oak pollen. The optimal dose for further development was 12 DU. Clinical and immunological findings suggest that the tablet may be used to treat allergies to all species within the birch homologous group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Couroux
- Inflamax Research Limited; Mississauga Ontario Canada
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bozkurt G, Elhassan HA, Sözen E, Soytaş P, Erol ZN, Güvenç MG, Coşkun BU. Assessment of taste functions in allergic rhinitis patients undergoing allergen-specific immunotherapy. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 276:439-445. [PMID: 30515608 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-018-5236-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2018] [Accepted: 12/01/2018] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND We evaluated taste functions of patients with perennial allergic rhinitis (AR) before and after allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). METHODS The study was designed as a prospective clinical study in our tertiary care hospital. Patients (n = 21) who were diagnosed with perennial AR on the basis of physical examination, skin prick test of at least 3* for HDM allergen and treated with AIT were enrolled in this study. A control group (n = 21) was selected from patients who were given intranasal steroids (INS) for perennial AR. Both groups had self-reported hyposmia and subjective loss of the sense of taste before treatment. Taste strips (Burghart, Wedel, Germany) were used for the taste identification scores before and after 6 months treatment. RESULTS A total of 42 subjects were included, with a mean age of 24.1 ± 7.9 years (range 15-43 years). Overall, the AIT group showed more of an improvement of taste function, observed in the total average test scores, compared to the INS group (p < 0.05), but no change was detected between the groups before treatment. No difference was found for the bitter taste scores between the study groups (p = 0.053). CONCLUSION Subcutaneous allergen immunotherapy resulted in more of an improvement in taste function than intranasal steroids. Further studies are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gülpembe Bozkurt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Acıbadem University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | | | - Esra Sözen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Aydın University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Pınar Soytaş
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Nur Erol
- Department of Otolaryngology, Hopa State Hospital, Artvin, Turkey
| | - Melih Güven Güvenç
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, School of Medicine, Acibadem University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Berna Uslu Coşkun
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Education and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|