1
|
Mok JW, Oh YH, Magge D, Padmanabhan S. Racial disparities of gastric cancer in the USA: an overview of epidemiology, global screening guidelines, and targeted screening in a heterogeneous population. Gastric Cancer 2024; 27:426-438. [PMID: 38436760 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-024-01475-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 01/24/2024] [Indexed: 03/05/2024]
Abstract
Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer diagnosis and fourth leading cause of cancer-related death globally. The incidence of gastric cancer in the USA shows significant racial and ethnic disparities with gastric cancer incidence in Korean Americans being over five times higher than in non-Hispanic whites. Since gastric cancer is not common in the USA, there are no current screening guidelines. In countries with higher incidences of gastric cancer, screening guidelines have been implemented for early detection and intervention and this has been associated with a reduction in mortality. Immigrants from high incidence countries develop gastric cancer at lower rates once outside of their country of origin, but continue to be at higher risk for developing gastric cancer. This risk does seem to decrease with subsequent generations. With increasing availability of endoscopy, initiating gastric cancer screening guidelines for high-risk groups can have the potential to improve survival by diagnosing and treating gastric cancer at an earlier stage. This article aims to provide context to gastric cancer epidemiology globally, review risk factors for developing gastric cancer, highlight racial and ethnic disparities in gastric cancer burden in the USA, examine current guidelines that exist in high incidence countries, and suggest future studies examining the efficacy of additional screening in high-risk populations to reduce gastric cancer mortality and disparate burden on ethnic minorities in the USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Woo Mok
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - Yeong Ha Oh
- Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Deepa Magge
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sekhar Padmanabhan
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Endocrine Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Moss SF, Shah SC, Tan MC, El-Serag HB. Evolving Concepts in Helicobacter pylori Management. Gastroenterology 2024; 166:267-283. [PMID: 37806461 PMCID: PMC10843279 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2023.09.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2023] [Revised: 09/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori is the most common chronic bacterial infection worldwide and the most significant risk factor for gastric cancer, which remains a leading cause of cancer-related death globally. H pylori and gastric cancer continue to disproportionately impact racial and ethnic minority and immigrant groups in the United States. The approach to H pylori case-finding thus far has relied on opportunistic testing based on symptoms or high-risk indicators, such as racial or ethnic background and family history. However, this approach misses a substantial proportion of individuals infected with H pylori who remain at risk for gastric cancer because most infections remain clinically silent. Moreover, individuals with chronic H pylori infection are at risk for gastric preneoplastic lesions, which are also asymptomatic and only reliably diagnosed using endoscopy and biopsy. Thus, to make a significant impact in gastric cancer prevention, a systematic approach is needed to better identify individuals at highest risk of both H pylori infection and its complications, including gastric preneoplasia and cancer. The approach to H pylori eradication must also be optimized given sharply decreasing rates of successful eradication with commonly used therapies and increasing antimicrobial resistance. With growing acceptance that H pylori should be managed as an infectious disease and the increasing availability of susceptibility testing, we now have the momentum to abandon empirical therapies demonstrated to have inadequate eradication rates. Molecular-based susceptibility profiling facilitates selection of a personalized eradication regimen without necessitating an invasive procedure. An improved approach to H pylori eradication coupled with population-level programs for screening and treatment could be an effective and efficient strategy to prevent gastric cancer, especially in minority and potentially marginalized populations that bear the heaviest burden of H pylori infection and its complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven F Moss
- Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island; Providence VA Medical Center, Providence, Rhode Island
| | - Shailja C Shah
- University of California at San Diego, San Diego, California; VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
| | - Mimi C Tan
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Hashem B El-Serag
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yousefi M, Rezaei S, Khoshbaten M, Sarmasti M. Cost-effectiveness analysis of different screening strategies for helicobacter pylori infection in Iran: A model-based evaluation. Helicobacter 2023; 28:e13027. [PMID: 37839058 DOI: 10.1111/hel.13027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization recommends assessing screening for helicobacter pylori infection to lower gastric cancer (GC) rates. Therefore, we carried out a study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of different H. pylori screening approaches in Iran. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used a Markov model with a 50-year time horizon and health system perspective to compare four H. pylori screening strategies (endoscopy, serology, urea breath test [UBT], stool antigen test [SAT]) to no screening in the population aged 20 years and older in Iran. Model parameters were extracted from primary data and published studies. Cost data also came from medical records of 120 patients at different stages of GC. We calculated costs, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for each strategy. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) using Monte Carlo simulation tested the model's robustness. All analyses were done in TreeAge Pro 2020. RESULTS All screening strategies provided more QALYs compared to no screening. Base-case analysis found the UBT strategy was the most cost-effective, with an ICER of 101,106,261.5 Iranian rial (IRR) per QALY gained, despite being more costly. No screening and endoscopy were dominated strategies, meaning they had higher costs but provided fewer effectiveness compared to other options. PSA showed at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 316,112,349 IRR (Iran's GDP per capita) per QALY, UBT was the optimal strategy in 57.1% of iterations. CONCLUSION This cost-effectiveness analysis found that screening for H. pylori may be cost-effective in Iran. Among the 4 screening strategies examined, UBT was the most cost-effective approach. Further studies should do cost-effectiveness analyses for specific age groups to optimize the benefits achieved with limited resources.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmood Yousefi
- Department of Health Economics, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Satar Rezaei
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Manouchehr Khoshbaten
- Liver and Gastrointestinal Disease Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Maryam Sarmasti
- Department of Health Economics, School of Management and Medical Informatics, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Herrero R, Carvajal LJ, Camargo MC, Riquelme A, Porras C, Ortiz AP, Camargo LA, Fink V, van De Wyngard V, Lazcano-Ponce E, Canelo-Aybar C, Balbin-Ramon G, Feliu A, Espina C. Latin American and the Caribbean Code Against Cancer 1st edition: Infections and cancer. Cancer Epidemiol 2023; 86 Suppl 1:102435. [PMID: 37852729 DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2023.102435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023]
Abstract
About 13% of all cancers around the world are associated with infectious agents, particularly in low-resource settings. The main infectious agents associated with cancer are Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), that causes gastric cancer, human papillomavirus (HPV) that causes cervical, vulvar, vaginal, penile, anal, and oropharyngeal cancer, hepatitis B and C viruses that cause liver cancer, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), associated with cancers of the cervix, Kaposi sarcoma (KS) and non-Hodgkin´s lymphoma. In Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), about 150,000 cancer cases are caused annually by infections. The LAC Cancer Code Against Cancer consists of a set of 17 evidence-based and individual-level cancer prevention recommendations targeted to the general population, suited to the epidemiological, socioeconomic, and cultural conditions of the region, and tailored to the availability and accessibility of health-care systems. The recommendations with respect to infection-driven malignancies include testing and treating for H. pylori in the context of specific public health programs, vaccination against HPV and Hepatitis B Virus (HBV) and detection and treatment of chronic infections with HBV, Hepatitis C virus (HCV) and HIV, in addition to the promotion of safe sex and use of condoms to prevent sexually transmitted infections (STI). Countries, policy makers, health care systems and individuals should consider the adoption of these recommendations to help reduce the incidence and mortality of infection-related cancers in LAC, to improve quality of life of individuals and reduce the costs of cancer care in the region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rolando Herrero
- Agencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, Costa Rica.
| | - Loretto J Carvajal
- Agencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, Costa Rica
| | - M Constanza Camargo
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Arnoldo Riquelme
- Departamento de Gastroenterología, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Chile
| | - Carolina Porras
- Agencia Costarricense de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Fundación INCIENSA, Costa Rica
| | - Ana Patricia Ortiz
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, University of Puerto Rico Comprehensive Cancer Center, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | | | - Valeria Fink
- Research Department, Fundación Huésped, Pasaje Carlos Gianantonio 3932 (1202), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Vanessa van De Wyngard
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile. Advanced Center for Chronic Diseases (ACCDiS), FONDAP, Santiago, Chile
| | | | - Carlos Canelo-Aybar
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Graciela Balbin-Ramon
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health, Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute Sant Pau (IIB Sant Pau), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ariadna Feliu
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, 25 avenue Tony Garnier CS 90627, 69366 Lyon CEDEX 07, France
| | - Carolina Espina
- International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC/WHO), Environment and Lifestyle Epidemiology Branch, 25 avenue Tony Garnier CS 90627, 69366 Lyon CEDEX 07, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chiang TH, Cheng HC, Chuang SL, Chen YR, Hsu YH, Hsu TH, Lin LJ, Lin YW, Chu CH, Wu MS, Lee YC. Mass screening and eradication of Helicobacter pylori as the policy recommendations for gastric cancer prevention. J Formos Med Assoc 2022; 121:2378-2392. [PMID: 36085264 DOI: 10.1016/j.jfma.2022.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Gastric cancer is an inflammation-related cancer triggered by Helicobacter pylori infection. Understanding of the natural disease course has prompted the hypothesis that gastric cancer can be prevented by administering a short-course antibiotic treatment to eradicate the H. pylori infection and interrupt this carcinogenic cascade. Results from randomized controlled trials and cohort studies have repeatedly confirmed this concept, which has moved attention from individual management of H. pylori infection to population-wide implementation of screening programs. Such a paradigm shift follows a three-tier architecture. First, healthcare policy-makers determine the most feasible and applicable eligibility, invitation, testing, referral, treatment, and evaluation methods for an organized screening program to maximize the population benefits and cost-effectiveness. Second, provision of knowledge and effective feedback to frontline general practitioners, including choice of diagnostic tests, selection of eradication regimens, and the indication of endoscopic examination, ensures the quality of care and increases the likelihood of desired treatment responses. Third, initiatives to raise population awareness are designed regarding the impact of H. pylori infection and risky lifestyle habits on the stomach health. These programs, with increased accessibility and geographic coverage in progress, will accelerate the decline in morbidity, mortality, and associated costs of this preventable malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsung-Hsien Chiang
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Chi Cheng
- Department of Internal Medicine, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Institute of Molecular Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan, Taiwan; Department of Internal Medicine, Tainan Hospital, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Lin Chuang
- Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Ru Chen
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Hsin Hsu
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan
| | - Tsui-Hsia Hsu
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ju Lin
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Wen Lin
- Public Health Bureau, Taitung County, Taiwan
| | | | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan; Department of Medical Research, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Helicobacter pylori for Gastric Cancer Prevention: a Systematic Review. J Gastrointest Cancer 2021; 53:1093-1103. [PMID: 34694594 DOI: 10.1007/s12029-021-00726-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/03/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Globally, prevalence of Helicobacter pylori is around 50%, and it has a directly proportional relationship with gastric cancer. Screening and treatment of Helicobacter pylori could reduce gastric cancer by 35%. Drawing on the scarce resources, it is reasonable to use the most cost-effectiveness Helicobacter pylori screening procedure. The purpose of this study was to evaluate Helicobacter pylori screening techniques and to specify the efficient technique from a cost-effectiveness perspective. This systematic review was conducted via searching electronic databases including Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, and Cochrane Reviews. Our search retrieved 904 articles, of which, 606 full-text studies have been selected after duplicate removal. Next, the 25 articles were sorted based on eligibility criteria and quality appraisal; eventually, only eight studies have been included for analysis. We reported the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) screening compared to non-screening and different screening strategies. Eight studies were identified and retained for the final analysis. In this study, when screening techniques were compared to no-screening, serology screening techniques showed to be cost-effective. The lowest ICER calculated was US$$1230 cost per life-year gained (LYG) and US$1500 cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). However, determining the optimal strategy compared to other strategies was depended on parameters such as context-specific, type of cost, threshold, and perspective, and also, it influenced by the framework of the cost-effectiveness analysis.
Collapse
|
7
|
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Meester RGS, Laszkowska M, Escudero FA, Ward ZJ, Yeh JM. Cost-effectiveness of prevention and early detection of gastric cancer in Western countries. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2021; 50-51:101735. [PMID: 33975689 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2021.101735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer (GC) is a significant global health problem, with Helicobacter pylori infection estimated to be responsible for 89% of non-cardiac GC cases, or 78% of all GC cases. The International Agency for Research on Cancer has called for Helicobacter pylori test-and-treat strategies in countries with high rates of GC. However, for countries with low rates of GC, such as most Western countries, the balance between benefits, harms and costs of screening is less clear-cut. GC is a disease with a well-characterized precancerous process, providing the basis for primary and secondary prevention efforts. However, rigorous data assessing the impact of such interventions in Western countries are lacking. In the absence of clinical trials, modelling offers a unique approach to evaluate the potential impact of various screening and surveillance interventions. In this paper, we provide an overview of modelling studies evaluating the cost-effectiveness of GC screening and surveillance in Western countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Reinier G S Meester
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Monika Laszkowska
- Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition Service, Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Research Center New York, NY, USA.
| | | | - Zachary J Ward
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Jennifer M Yeh
- Boston Children's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ford AC, Yuan Y, Moayyedi P. Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy to prevent gastric cancer: systematic review and meta-analysis. Gut 2020; 69:2113-2121. [PMID: 32205420 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2020-320839] [Citation(s) in RCA: 217] [Impact Index Per Article: 54.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 02/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Gastric cancer is strongly associated with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). We conducted a previous systematic review and meta-analysis that suggested eradication therapy reduced future incidence of gastric cancer, but effect size was uncertain, and there was no reduction in gastric cancer-related mortality. We updated this meta-analysis, as more data has accumulated. We also evaluated impact of eradication therapy on future risk of gastric cancer in patients having endoscopic mucosal resection for gastric neoplasia. DESIGN We searched the medical literature through February 2020 to identify randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining effect of eradication therapy on subsequent occurrence of gastric cancer in healthy H. pylori-positive adults, and in H. pylori-positive patients with gastric neoplasia undergoing endoscopic mucosal resection. The control arm received placebo or no treatment. Follow-up was for ≥2 years. We estimated the relative risk (RR) number needed to treat (NNT), and evaluated the disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) gained from screening from the meta-analysis. RESULTS We identified 10 RCTs, seven recruited 8323 healthy individuals, and three randomised 1841 patients with gastric neoplasia. In healthy individuals, eradication therapy reduced incidence of gastric cancer (RR=0.54; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.72, NNT=72), and reduced mortality from gastric cancer (RR=0.61; 95% CI 0.40 to 0.92, NNT=135), but did not affect all-cause mortality. These data suggest that 8 743 815 DALYs (95% CI 5 646 173 to 11 847 456) would be gained if population screening and treatment was implemented globally. In patients with gastric neoplasia, eradication therapy also reduced incidence of future gastric cancer (RR=0.49; 95% CI 0.34 to 0.70, NNT=21). Adverse events were incompletely reported. CONCLUSION There is moderate evidence to suggest that H. pylori eradication therapy reduces the incidence of gastric cancer in healthy individuals and patients with gastric neoplasia in East Asian countries. There also appears to be a reduction in gastric cancer-related mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Charles Ford
- Leeds Gastroenterology Institute, St. James's University Hospital, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK .,Leeds Institute of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - Yuhong Yuan
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University Medical Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Paul Moayyedi
- Division of Gastroenterology, McMaster University Medical Center, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Wu Y, Su T, Zhou X, Lu N, Li Z, Du Y. Awareness and attitudes regarding Helicobacter pylori infection in Chinese physicians and public population: A national cross-sectional survey. Helicobacter 2020; 25:e12705. [PMID: 32476197 DOI: 10.1111/hel.12705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2020] [Revised: 05/03/2020] [Accepted: 05/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a lack of reports on the awareness of Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) prevention and treatment in the general Chinese population. And whether the knowledge level will affect their action toward screening was unknown. This study aimed to conduct a national survey on the knowledge, attitudes, and practice regarding H pylori infection in Chinese physicians and the public. METHODS This was an Internet-based survey of the general Chinese population and Chinese physicians from different specialties, carried out from January to February 2019. Both surveys (general population's and physicians') included questions to assess the knowledge and attitudes toward H pylori and its action. RESULTS A total of 3211 people and 546 physicians were enrolled. In the population, the proportion of subjects who answered correctly to all questions about H pylori's infectivity was only 16%, and that for H pylori's harmfulness and that for H pylori preventive measures were 35% and 43.6%, respectively. In general, physicians had a better understanding of H pylori's harmfulness (83.9%) than the other population. The vast majority of the surveyed population (87.0%) and physicians (82.2%) supported a national H pylori screening plan to prevent gastric cancer. The support ratio paralleled with the overall knowledge level. Unexpectedly, gastroenterologists tend to have a relatively low support rate for H pylori screening than non-gastroenterologists (58.2% vs 84.2%, P < .001), which may be related to consideration of heavy medical burden (67.3%). CONCLUSIONS The general population in China has relatively insufficient awareness of H pylori, which is incompatible with the highly infectious status. More works on health education are needed to improve the knowledge of this gastric pathogen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Tun Su
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianzhu Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Nonghua Lu
- Department of Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, China
| | - Zhaoshen Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yiqi Du
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Signal V, Gurney J, Inns S, McLeod M, Sika-Paotonu D, Sowerbutts S, Teng A, Sarfati D. Helicobacter pylori, stomach cancer and its prevention in New Zealand. J R Soc N Z 2019. [DOI: 10.1080/03036758.2019.1650081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia Signal
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Jason Gurney
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Stephen Inns
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Melissa McLeod
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Dianne Sika-Paotonu
- Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
- Dean’s Department, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
- Wesfarmers Centre for Vaccines & Infectious Diseases, Telethon Kids Institute, Perth, Australia
- Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Sam Sowerbutts
- Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Andrea Teng
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Diana Sarfati
- Cancer and Chronic Conditions (C3) Research Group, Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Matsuda A, Saika K, Tanaka R, Ito Y, Fukui K, Kamo KI. Simulation Models in Gastric Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19:3321-3334. [PMID: 30583337 PMCID: PMC6428531 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2018.19.12.3321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2017] [Accepted: 03/04/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Together with such high-quality approaches as randomized controlled trials and large-scale cohort studies, simulation models are often employed to evaluate the effect of cancer screening methods and decide on their appropriateness. This study aimed to evaluate all effects of gastric cancer screening that have been assessed using simulation models, including cost-effectiveness, mortality reduction, and early-stage detection. Methods: We performed a systematic review using PubMed and Web of Science. We evaluated the effect of screening related to cost, such as incremental cost-effectiveness and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios; we also separately assessed effects other than cost, such as quality-adjusted life-years, number of deaths prevented, life-years saved, relative risk of mortality from gastric cancer, life expectancy, and incidence reduction. The methods targeted for evaluation were Helicobacter pylori testing or endoscopy. Results: We identified 19 studies dealing with simulation models in gastric cancer screenings: 14 examined H. pylori screening and 7 focused on endoscopy. Among those studies, two assessed both H. pylori and endoscopy screening. Most of the studies adopted a Markov model, and all the studies evaluated cost-effectiveness. Of the 14 H. pylori screening studies, 13 demonstrated cost-effectiveness and 11 also showed good results other than cost-effectiveness, such as extension of life-years and increase in early-stage detection. In three of the five endoscopy studies, the target population was patients; all five studies obtained good results for cost-effectiveness and four observed good results other than for cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: In this study, we showed that the H. pylori screening test was cost-effective in terms of simulation model investigations. However, the H. pylori screening test should not ordinarily be recommended since there is insufficient evidence that it reduces gastric cancer mortality. In Japan, simulation modeling should be employed to plan for cancer control, and the appropriate use of simulation models should be examined for future use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayako Matsuda
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Higher risk of gastric cancer among immigrants to Ontario: a population-based matched cohort study with over 2 million individuals. Gastric Cancer 2018; 21:588-597. [PMID: 29285629 DOI: 10.1007/s10120-017-0790-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2017] [Accepted: 12/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The risk of gastric carcinoma (GC) varies around the world and between females and males. We aimed to compare the risk of GC among immigrants to Ontario, Canada, to the risk of GC in its general population. METHODS This was a retrospective population-based matched cohort study from 1991 to 2014. We identified immigrants who were first eligible for the Ontario Health Insurance Plan at age 40 years or older, and matched 5 controls by year of birth and sex. We calculated crude rates and relative rates of GC stratified by sex. We modeled GC hazard using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression, where a time-varying coefficient was incorporated to examine changes in the association of immigrant status with GC hazard over time. RESULTS Among females, 415 GC cases were identified among 209,843 immigrants and 1872 among 1,049,215 controls. Among males, 596 GC cases were identified among 191,792 immigrants and 2998 among 958,960 controls. Comparing immigrants from East Asia and Pacific with the controls, the crude relative rate of GC was 1.54 for females and 1.32 for males. The adjusted hazard ratio (HR) for GC among female immigrants was 1.29 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.12, 1.48] within 10 years and 1.19 (1.01, 1.40) beyond 10 years; for males, the HR was 1.17 (1.04, 1.31) within 10 years and 1.00 (0.87, 1.15) beyond 10 years. CONCLUSION The risk of GC among immigrants is elevated. Although high-risk immigrant populations in Ontario have been identified, further knowledge is required before a program of GC prevention that is targeted to them can be planned.
Collapse
|
13
|
Saito S, Azumi M, Muneoka Y, Nishino K, Ishikawa T, Sato Y, Terai S, Akazawa K. Cost-effectiveness of combined serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody and serum pepsinogen concentrations for screening for gastric cancer risk in Japan. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2018; 19:545-555. [PMID: 28550494 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-017-0901-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/17/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A combination of assays for the presence of serum anti-Helicobacter pylori IgG antibody (HPA) and serum pepsinogen (PG) concentrations can be used to screen for gastric cancer risk. In Japan, this "ABC method" is considered an effective means of stratifying gastric cancer risk. This study aimed to ascertain its cost-effectiveness for assessing gastric cancer risk. METHODS A Markov model was constructed to compare the cost-effectiveness of two strategies for gastric cancer-risk screening over a 30-year period: the ABC method, which uses a combination of assessing the presence of HPA and measuring serum PG concentrations and scheduling endoscopies accordingly, and annual endoscopic screening. Clinical and epidemiological data on variables in the model were obtained from published reports. Analyses were made from the perspective of the Japanese health care payer. RESULTS According to base-case analysis, the ABC method cost less than annual endoscopic screening (64,489 vs. 64,074 USD) and saved more lives (18.16 vs. 18.30 quality-adjusted life years). One-way analyses confirmed the robustness of the cost-effectiveness results. The probability that the ABC method is cost-effective in Japanese individuals aged 50 years was 0.997. CONCLUSIONS A combination of HPA and serum PG assays, plus scheduling endoscopy accordingly, is a cost-effective method of screening for gastric cancer risk in Japan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shota Saito
- Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan.
- Department of Health Informatics, Niigata University of Health and Welfare, Niigata, Japan.
- Department of Medical Informatics, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-754 Asahimachi, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8520, Japan.
| | - Motoi Azumi
- Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Yusuke Muneoka
- Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Nishino
- Department of Medical Informatics and Statistics, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Takashi Ishikawa
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
- Department of Medical Informatics, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-754 Asahimachi, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8520, Japan
| | - Yuichi Sato
- Division of Endoscopy, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, Niigata, Japan
| | - Shuji Terai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kouhei Akazawa
- Department of Medical Informatics, Niigata University Medical and Dental Hospital, 1-754 Asahimachi, Chuo-ku, Niigata, 951-8520, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mahachai V, Vilaichone RK, Pittayanon R, Rojborwonwitaya J, Leelakusolvong S, Maneerattanaporn M, Chotivitayatarakorn P, Treeprasertsuk S, Kositchaiwat C, Pisespongsa P, Mairiang P, Rani A, Leow A, Mya SM, Lee YC, Vannarath S, Rasachak B, Chakravuth O, Aung MM, Ang TL, Sollano JD, Trong Quach D, Sansak I, Wiwattanachang O, Harnsomburana P, Syam AF, Yamaoka Y, Fock KM, Goh KL, Sugano K, Graham D. Helicobacter pylori management in ASEAN: The Bangkok consensus report. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2018; 33:37-56. [PMID: 28762251 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13911] [Citation(s) in RCA: 90] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2017] [Revised: 07/11/2017] [Accepted: 07/21/2017] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection remains to be the major cause of important upper gastrointestinal diseases such as chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer, gastric adenocarcinoma, and mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma. H. pylori management in ASEAN: the Bangkok consensus report gathered key opinion leaders for the region to review and evaluate clinical aspects of H. pylori infection and to develop consensus statements, rationales, and grades of recommendation for the management of H. pylori infection in clinical practice in ASEAN countries. This ASEAN Consensus consisted of 34 international experts from 10 ASEAN countries, Japan, Taiwan, and the United States. The meeting mainly focused on four issues: (i) epidemiology and disease association; (ii) diagnostic tests; (iii) management; and (iv) follow-up after eradication. The final results of each workshop were presented for consensus voting by all participants. Statements, rationale, and recommendations were developed from the available current evidence to help clinicians in the diagnosis and treatment of H. pylori and its clinical diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varocha Mahachai
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.,National Gastric Cancer and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Bangkok, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Ratha-Korn Vilaichone
- Department of Medicine, Thammasat University Hospital, Khlong Luang, Pathumthani, Thailand.,National Gastric Cancer and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Bangkok, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Rapat Pittayanon
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand.,National Gastric Cancer and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Bangkok, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | | | | | - Monthira Maneerattanaporn
- Department of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.,National Gastric Cancer and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Bangkok, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Peranart Chotivitayatarakorn
- Department of Medicine, Thammasat University Hospital, Khlong Luang, Pathumthani, Thailand.,National Gastric Cancer and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Bangkok, Pathumthani, Thailand
| | - Sombat Treeprasertsuk
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University and King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Chomsri Kositchaiwat
- Department of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | | | - Pisaln Mairiang
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, KhonKaen University, Khon Kaen, Thailand
| | - Aziz Rani
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Jakarta, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Alex Leow
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Swe Mon Mya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yangon General Hospital, Yangon, Myanmar
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | | | - Oung Chakravuth
- Calmette Hospital, University of Health Science, Phnom Penh, Cambodia
| | - Moe Myint Aung
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yangon General Hospital, Yangon, Myanmar
| | - Tiing-Leong Ang
- Department of Gastroentrology and Hepatology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Jose D Sollano
- Section of Gastroenterology, University of Santo Tomas Hospital, Manila, Philippines
| | - Duc Trong Quach
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Hochiminh City, Vietnam
| | | | | | | | - Ari Fahrial Syam
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia, Depok, Indonesia
| | - Yoshio Yamaoka
- Department of Environmental and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Oita University, Yufu, Japan
| | - Kwong-Ming Fock
- Faculty of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Khean-Lee Goh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Kentaro Sugano
- Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - David Graham
- Department of Medicine, Gastroenterology Section, Baylor College of Medicine and Michael E. DeBakey VA Medicine Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
周 林, 赵 阳, 张 伟. 幽门螺杆菌根除治疗在胃癌预防中的现状及前景. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2017; 25:1327-1337. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v25.i15.1327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
幽门螺杆菌(Helicobacter pylori, H. pylori)与胃癌(gastric cancer, GC)发生发展密切相关, 根除H. pylori可降低GC发生率. 经济学分析表明, 在高危人群中根除治疗H. pylori作为预防GC的策略是成本效益较好的. 即使在GC低风险人群中, H. pylori筛查和治疗也能使上消化道其他非恶性疾病获益. 然而, 广泛开展H. pylori根除治疗可能带来其他问题, 包括抗生素耐药增加和与H. pylori负相关疾病(如胃食管反流病、Barrett食管、哮喘和肥胖等)的患病率升高. 本文将结合近年最新研究, 就上述问题展开论述, 进一步提出H. pylori根除治疗预防GC所面临的挑战以及将来可能的进展方向.
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Helicobacter pylori is an important human pathogen, associated with a substantial burden from both malignant and non-malignant diseases. The bacterium is classed as a human carcinogen, being strongly linked with gastric cancer, the third most common cause of cancer death worldwide and is also associated with common conditions such as dyspepsia and peptic ulcer. Eradication of H. pylori reduces the incidence of gastric cancer and peptic ulcer, as well as the prevalence and costs of managing dyspepsia. Economic analyses suggest that eradication of H. pylori as a means of controlling gastric cancer is cost-effective in high-risk populations. Even in populations at low risk of gastric cancer, there might be other benefits arising from screening and treatment, owing to the effects on non-malignant upper gastrointestinal diseases. However, public health authorities have been slow to consider the benefits of population-based screening and treatment as a means of reducing the morbidity and mortality associated with the infection. There are also concerns about widespread use of eradication therapy, including antimicrobial resistance and a rise in the prevalence of diseases that are negatively associated with H. pylori, such as GERD, Barrett oesophagus, asthma and obesity. This Review summarizes these issues.
Collapse
|
17
|
Teng AM, Kvizhinadze G, Nair N, McLeod M, Wilson N, Blakely T. A screening program to test and treat for Helicobacter pylori infection: Cost-utility analysis by age, sex and ethnicity. BMC Infect Dis 2017; 17:156. [PMID: 28219322 PMCID: PMC5319166 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-017-2259-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2016] [Accepted: 02/10/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The World Health Organization recommends all countries consider screening for H. pylori to prevent gastric cancer. We therefore aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of a H. pylori serology-based screening program in New Zealand, a country that includes population groups with relatively high gastric cancer rates. METHODS A Markov model was developed using life-tables and morbidity data from a national burden of disease study. The modelled screening program reduced the incidence of non-cardia gastric cancer attributable to H. pylori, if infection was identified by serology screening, and for the population expected to be reached by the screening program. A health system perspective was taken and detailed individual-level costing data was used. RESULTS For adults aged 25-69 years old, nation-wide screening for H. pylori was found to have an incremental cost of US$196 million (95% uncertainty interval [95% UI]: $182-$211 million) with health gains of 14,200 QALYs (95% UI: 5,100-26,300). Cost per QALY gained was US$16,500 ($7,600-$38,400) in the total population and 17% (6%-29%) of future gastric cancer cases could be averted with lifetime follow-up. A targeted screening program for Māori only (indigenous population), was more cost-effective at US$8,000 ($3,800-$18,500) per QALY. CONCLUSIONS This modeling study found that H. pylori screening was likely to be cost-effective in this high-income country, particularly for the indigenous population. While further research is needed to help clarify the precise benefits, costs and adverse effects of such screening programs, there seems a reasonable case for policy-makers to give pilot programs consideration, particularly for any population groups with relatively elevated rates of gastric cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea M. Teng
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Giorgi Kvizhinadze
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Nisha Nair
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Melissa McLeod
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Nick Wilson
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Tony Blakely
- Department of Public Health, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Lee YC, Chiang TH, Liou JM, Chen HH, Wu MS, Graham DY. Mass Eradication of Helicobacter pylorito Prevent Gastric Cancer: Theoretical and Practical Considerations. Gut Liver 2016; 10:12-26. [PMID: 26696028 PMCID: PMC4694730 DOI: 10.5009/gnl15091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Although the age-adjusted incidence of gastric cancer is declining, the absolute number of new cases of gastric cancer is increasing due to population growth and aging. An effective strategy is needed to prevent this deadly cancer. Among the available strategies, screen-and-treat for Helicobacter pylori infection appears to be the best approach to decrease cancer risk; however, implementation of this strategy on the population level requires a systematic approach. The program also must be integrated into national healthcare priorities to allow the limited resources to be most effectively allocated. Implementation will require adoption of an appropriate screening strategy, an efficient delivery system with a timely referral for a positive test, and standardized treatment regimens based on clinical efficacy, side effects, simplicity, duration, and cost. Within the population, there are subpopulations that vary in risk such that a "one size fits all" approach is unlikely to be ideal. Sensitivity analyses will be required to identify whether the programs can be utilized by heterogeneous populations and will likely require adjustments to accommodate the needs of subpopulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chia Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Tsung-Hsien Chiang
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Integrated Diagnostics and Therapeutics, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jyh-Ming Liou
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsiu-Hsi Chen
- Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Public Health, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - David Y Graham
- Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Schulz TR, McBryde ES, Leder K, Biggs BA. Using stool antigen to screen for Helicobacter pylori in immigrants and refugees from high prevalence countries is relatively cost effective in reducing the burden of gastric cancer and peptic ulceration. PLoS One 2014; 9:e108610. [PMID: 25268809 PMCID: PMC4182532 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2014] [Accepted: 08/21/2014] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Refugees and immigrants from developing countries settling in industrialised countries have a high prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori). Screening these groups for H. pylori and use of eradication therapy to reduce the future burden of gastric cancer and peptic ulcer disease is not currently recommended in most countries. We investigated whether a screening and eradication approach would be cost effective in high prevalence populations. METHODS Nine different screening and follow-up strategies for asymptomatic immigrants from high H. pylori prevalence areas were compared with the current approach of no screening. Cost effectiveness comparisons assumed population prevalence's of H. pylori of 25%, 50% or 75%. The main outcome measure was the net cost for each cancer prevented for each strategy. Total costs of each strategy and net costs including savings from reductions in ulcers and gastric cancer were also calculated. RESULTS Stool antigen testing with repeat testing after treatment was the most cost effective approach relative to others, for each prevalence value. The net cost per cancer prevented with this strategy was US$111,800 (assuming 75% prevalence), $132,300 (50%) and $193,900 (25%). A test and treat strategy using stool antigen remained relatively cost effective, even when the prevalence was 25%. CONCLUSIONS H. pylori screening and eradication can be an effective strategy for reducing rates of gastric cancer and peptic ulcers in high prevalence populations and our data suggest that use of stool antigen testing is the most cost effective approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas R. Schulz
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, at the Doherty Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Emma S. McBryde
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, at the Doherty Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Population Health, Burnet Institute Prahran, Victoria, Australia
| | - Karin Leder
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Victoria, Australia
| | - Beverley-Ann Biggs
- Victorian Infectious Diseases Service, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, at the Doherty Institute, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Satoh T, Bang YJ, Gotovkin EA, Hamamoto Y, Kang YK, Moiseyenko VM, Ohtsu A, Van Cutsem E, Al-Sakaff N, Urspruch A, Hill J, Weber HA, Chung HC. Quality of life in the trastuzumab for gastric cancer trial. Oncologist 2014; 19:712-9. [PMID: 24951609 DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Trastuzumab for Gastric Cancer phase III trial demonstrated that combining trastuzumab with chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival compared with chemotherapy alone in HER2-positive advanced gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer. We report health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and quality-adjusted time without symptoms of disease or toxicity (Q-TWiST) results from this trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS Patients were randomized to receive six cycles of chemotherapy given every 3 weeks (capecitabine or fluorouracil, plus cisplatin) either alone or combined with administration of trastuzumab every 3 weeks until disease progression. At each clinical visit, HRQoL was assessed using two European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaires, QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22. Q-TWiST methodology was applied retrospectively using the clinical data and utility coefficients. RESULTS Trastuzumab plus chemotherapy prolonged time to 10% definitive deterioration in all QLQ-C30 and QLQ-STO22 scores, including QLQ-C30 global health status versus chemotherapy alone, from 6.4 months to 10.2 months. In addition, trastuzumab plus chemotherapy extended Q-TWiST by 2.42 months compared with chemotherapy alone. CONCLUSION Compared with chemotherapy alone, trastuzumab plus chemotherapy prolongs time to deterioration of HRQoL and increases quality-adjusted survival in patients with HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Taroh Satoh
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yung-Jue Bang
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Evgeny A Gotovkin
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yasuo Hamamoto
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Yoon-Koo Kang
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Vladimir M Moiseyenko
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Atsushi Ohtsu
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Eric Van Cutsem
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Nedal Al-Sakaff
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Alexa Urspruch
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Julie Hill
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Harald A Weber
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun-Cheol Chung
- Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan; Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Ivanovo Regional Oncology Dispensary, Ivanovo, Russian Federation; Tochigi Cancer Center, Utsunomiya, Japan; Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea; Institute of Oncology, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation; National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Japan; University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium; F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland; Roche Products, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; Yonsei Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Research Institute, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhou HJ, Dan YY, Naidoo N, Li SC, Yeoh KG. A cost-effectiveness analysis evaluating endoscopic surveillance for gastric cancer for populations with low to intermediate risk. PLoS One 2013; 8:e83959. [PMID: 24386314 PMCID: PMC3873968 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2013] [Accepted: 11/10/2013] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer (GC) surveillance based on oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) appears to be a promising strategy for GC prevention. By evaluating the cost-effectiveness of endoscopic surveillance in Singaporean Chinese, this study aimed to inform the implementation of such a program in a population with a low to intermediate GC risk. METHODS USING A REFERENCE STRATEGY OF NO OGD INTERVENTION, WE EVALUATED FOUR STRATEGIES: 2-yearly OGD surveillance, annual OGD surveillance, 2-yearly OGD screening and 2-yearly screening plus annual surveillance in Singaporean Chinese aged 50-69 years. From a perspective of the healthcare system, Markov models were built to simulate the life experience of the target population. The models projected discounted lifetime costs ($), quality adjusted life year (QALY), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) indicating the cost-effectiveness of each strategy against a Singapore willingness-to-pay of $46,200/QALY. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to identify the influential variables and their associated thresholds, and to quantify the influence of parameter uncertainties respectively. RESULTS With an ICER of $44,098/QALY, the annual OGD surveillance was the optimal strategy while the 2-yearly surveillance was the most cost-effective strategy (ICER = $25,949/QALY). The screening-based strategies were either extendedly dominated or cost-ineffective. The cost-effectiveness heterogeneity of the four strategies was observed across age-gender subgroups. Eight influential parameters were identified each with their specific thresholds to define the choice of optimal strategy. Accounting for the model uncertainties, the probability that the annual surveillance is the optimal strategy in Singapore was 44.5%. CONCLUSION Endoscopic surveillance is potentially cost-effective in the prevention of GC for populations at low to intermediate risk. Regarding program implementation, a detailed analysis of influential factors and their associated thresholds is necessary. Multiple strategies should be considered in order to recommend the right strategy for the right population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui Jun Zhou
- School of Public Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Yock Young Dan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nasheen Naidoo
- School of Public Health, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Shu Chuen Li
- Discipline of Pharmacy & Experimental Pharmacology, School of Biomedical Sciences & Pharmacy, University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia
| | - Khay Guan Yeoh
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, Sharp L. Cost-effectiveness of screening and treating Helicobacter pylori for gastric cancer prevention. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2013; 27:933-47. [PMID: 24182612 PMCID: PMC3880867 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2013.09.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2013] [Accepted: 09/17/2013] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Gastric cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. A meta-analysis of seven randomized controlled trials concluded that Helicobacter pylori eradication reduces gastric cancer incidence by 35%. Current consensus is that H. pylori screening and treatment is cost-effective only in high-risk populations. This paper provides an up-to-date overview of the evidence for cost-effectiveness of H. pylori screening and treatment in different population settings and risk levels for H. pylori infection. Ten unique cost-effectiveness or cost-utility analyses were identified. All found that screening for H. pylori to prevent gastric cancer in the general population costs less than $50,000 per LYG. This finding was robust for differences in H. pylori prevalence, gender and ethnicity. Based on limited evidence, re-treatment (for treatment failure), repeated screening, limiting screening and treatment to those with the CagA phenotype, or universal treatment, does not appear to be cost-effective. However, most included studies failed to consider both the broader benefits as well as the adverse effects of widespread use of antibiotics for H. pylori.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Centre, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Areia M, Carvalho R, Cadime AT, Rocha Gonçalves F, Dinis-Ribeiro M. Screening for gastric cancer and surveillance of premalignant lesions: a systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies. Helicobacter 2013; 18:325-37. [PMID: 23566268 DOI: 10.1111/hel.12050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 89] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cost-effectiveness studies are highly dependent on the models, settings, and variables used and should be based on systematic reviews. We systematically reviewed cost-effectiveness studies that address screening for gastric cancer and/or surveillance of precancerous conditions and lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review of cost-effectiveness studies was performed by conducting a sensitive search in seven databases (PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Current Contents Connect, Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, Academic Search Complete, and CINAHL Plus), independently evaluated by two investigators. Articles were evaluated for type of study, perspective, model, intervention, incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, clinical or cost variables, and quality, according to published guidelines. RESULTS From 2395 abstracts, 23 articles were included: 19 concerning population screening and 4 on following up premalignant lesions. Studies on Helicobacter pylori screening concluded that serology was cost-effective, depending on cancer incidence and endoscopy cost (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: 6264-25,881), and eradication after endoscopic resection was also cost-effective (dominant) based on one study. Studies on imaging screening concluded that endoscopy was more cost-effective than no screening (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: 3376-26,836). Articles on follow-up of premalignant lesions reported conflicting results (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio: 1868-72,519 for intestinal metaplasia; 18,600-39,800 for dysplasia). Quality assessment revealed a unanimous lack of a detailed systematic review and fulfillment of a median number of 23 items (20-26) of 35 possible ones. CONCLUSIONS The available evidence shows that Helicobacter pylori serology or endoscopic population screening is cost-effective, while endoscopic surveillance of premalignant gastric lesions presents conflicting results. Better implementation of published guidelines and accomplishment of systematic detailed reviews are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Miguel Areia
- CINTESIS - Center for Research in Health Technologies and Information Systems, Faculty of Medicine, Porto University, Porto, Portugal.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|