1
|
Todoric K, Merrill S. Oral Immunotherapy: An Overview. Med Clin North Am 2024; 108:719-731. [PMID: 38816113 DOI: 10.1016/j.mcna.2023.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2024]
Abstract
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an alternative treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy that has been shown to increase tolerance threshold to many of the top food allergens, although this effect may be dependent on age, dose, frequency, and duration. OIT has been shown to be effective and safe in infants, and early initiation can improve rates of desensitization even for those foods whose natural history favors loss of allergy. Studies looking at protocol modification to improve OIT success are ongoing as is the evaluation of clinical tools to help monitor OIT effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Krista Todoric
- Medical Arts Allergy, 220 Wilson Street Suite 200, Carlisle, PA 17013, USA.
| | - Sarah Merrill
- Family Medicine Department, UC San Diego Health, 402 Dickinson Street, San Diego, CA 92103, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Anagnostou A, Yaworsky A, Brova M, Ibrahim N, Kakked S, Spite S, Duluc L, Shields AL, Lee T, Leonard S, Przywara K, Smith A. Evaluation and Modification of a Shared Decision-Making Tool for Peanut Allergy Management. Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2024; 24:303-315. [PMID: 38639896 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-024-01146-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Based on shared decision-making (SDM) principles, a decision aid was previously developed to help patients, their caregivers, and physicians decide which peanut allergy management approach best suits them. This study refined the decision aid's content to better reflect patients' and caregivers' lived experience. RECENT FINDINGS Current standard of care for peanut allergy is avoidance, although peanut oral immunotherapy has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration for use in patients 4-17 years old. An advisory board of allergy therapy experts (n = 3) and patient advocates (n = 3) informed modifications to the decision aid. The revised tool underwent cognitive debriefing interviews (CDIs) among adolescents (12-17 years old) with peanut allergy and caregivers of patients 4-17 years old with peanut allergy to evaluate its relevance, understandability, and usefulness. The 20 CDI participants understood the information presented in the SDM tool and reported it was important and relevant. Some revisions were made based on participant feedback. Results support content validity of the Peanut Allergy Treatment SDM Tool.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Yaworsky
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
| | - Monica Brova
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Nazifa Ibrahim
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Siddharth Kakked
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Sasha Spite
- California State University San Marcos, San Marcos, CA, USA
| | - Linette Duluc
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Alan L Shields
- Adelphi Values, One Lincoln Street, Suite 2400, Boston, MA, 02111, USA
| | - Tricia Lee
- Emory University School of Medicine, Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, GA, USA
- American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology, Arlington Heights, IL, USA
| | - Stephanie Leonard
- University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
- Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Kathy Przywara
- Asthma and Allergy Foundation of America, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Amelia Smith
- Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Connection Team, Liberty Twp, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Dinardo G, Cafarotti A, Fierro V, Artesani MC, Indolfi C, Miraglia Del Giudice M, Fiocchi A. Role of biologics in severe food allergy. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol 2024; 24:138-143. [PMID: 38538153 DOI: 10.1097/aci.0000000000000978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review examine the dynamic landscape of food allergy treatment within the context of emerging biologics. Our purpose is to comprehensively evaluate the potential benefits, challenges, and transformative impact associated with the utilization of biologics in comparison to conventional therapeutic modalities. RECENT FINDINGS This document synthesizes recent scientific investigations to various biologics, such as omalizumab, ligelizumab, dupilumab, and tezepelumab, providing a nuanced understanding of their roles in oral immunotherapy, rapid desensitization, and overall food allergy management. Recent studies and clinical trials highlight the impact of anti-IgE treatment on food allergies, revealing critical findings such as dose-related efficacy, facilitation of rapid desensitization in peanut allergies, and the sustained positive outcomes observed in individuals with multifood allergies. SUMMARY The use of biologics presents a groundbreaking approach in the treatment of food allergies. The multifaceted action of these agents, along with their potential to overcome the challenges associated with traditional therapies, marks a significant advancement. Despite the persisting challenges of economic constraints and the need for further safety studies, biologics offer a promising avenue for improving the quality of life for individuals with food allergies. Ongoing research and collaborative efforts are imperative to fully realize the transformative potential inherent in these emerging therapeutic frontiers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulio Dinardo
- Department of Women, Children, and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples
| | - Arianna Cafarotti
- Pediatric Allergology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Fierro
- Pediatric Allergology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Cristiana Indolfi
- Department of Women, Children, and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples
| | - Michele Miraglia Del Giudice
- Department of Women, Children, and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, Naples
| | - Alessandro Fiocchi
- Pediatric Allergology Unit, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gupta RS, Epstein E, Wood RA. The role of pediatricians in the diagnosis and management of IgE-mediated food allergy: a review. Front Pediatr 2024; 12:1373373. [PMID: 38873581 PMCID: PMC11169649 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2024.1373373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 05/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Food allergy can often cause a significant burden on patients, families, and healthcare systems. The complexity of food allergy management requires a multidisciplinary approach involving different types of healthcare providers, including allergists, dieticians, psychologists, nurses, family practitioners and, of particular relevance for this article, pediatric primary caretakers. Pediatricians may be the first-line healthcare providers for food allergy: strategies for management and guideline adherence have been highlighted. Observations This review article summarizes the up-to-date recommendations on the role of pediatricians in the diagnosis, management, and prevention of IgE-mediated food allergy. Early introduction of allergenic foods like peanut is known to be of importance to reduce the development of peanut allergy in infants, and pediatricians are essential for educating and supporting parents in this decision. In scenarios of limited allergist availability, as is often the case among rural, Medicaid and minority populations, pediatricians can assist in the evaluation and management of food allergy, and provide action plans, education and counselling for patients and families. Conclusions and relevance Pediatric primary caretakers play a key role in the diagnosis, management, and prevention of IgE-mediated food allergy. As more diagnostic tools and therapies in food allergy become available, the need for a multidisciplinary team is paramount to optimize patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruchi S. Gupta
- Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Center for Food Allergy & Asthma, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Ellen Epstein
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, United States
| | - Robert A. Wood
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Foti Randazzese S, Panasiti I, Caminiti L, Catamerò F, Landi M, De Filippo M, Votto M, Olcese R, Favuzza F, Giovannini M, Barberi S. Current state and advances in desensitization for peanut allergy in pediatric age. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2024; 35:e14127. [PMID: 38646959 DOI: 10.1111/pai.14127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2023] [Revised: 03/15/2024] [Accepted: 04/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Peanut allergy affects about 1%-3% of the pediatric population in the world, with an important increase in the last decades. Nowadays, international guidelines recommend the early introduction of peanuts in the infant diet, with poor information about the quantity and the frequency of the intake. Allergen immunotherapy may represent the only therapeutic strategy able to modify the natural history of peanut allergy. In particular, oral immunotherapy showed the most promising results in terms of efficacy, but with significant rates of adverse reactions, mostly gastrointestinal. In 2020, the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency approved Palforzia®, an oral drug for patients aged 4-17 years. Several studies are ongoing to improve the tolerability of oral immunotherapy and standardize the desensitization protocols. Sublingual immunotherapy permits to offer much lower doses than oral immunotherapy, but fewer adverse events are shown. Subcutaneous immunotherapy is associated with the greatest systemic adverse effects. Epicutaneous immunotherapy, for which Viaskin® patch was approved, has the highest safety profile. Innovative studies are evaluating the use of biological drugs, such as omalizumab or dupilumab, and probiotics, such as Lactobacillus rhamnosus, in monotherapy or associated with oral immunotherapy. Therapy for peanut allergy is constantly evolving, and new perspectives are ongoing to develop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simone Foti Randazzese
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ilenia Panasiti
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Lucia Caminiti
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Human Pathology in Adult and Developmental Age "Gaetano Barresi", University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Francesco Catamerò
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Massimo Landi
- Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology, Pediatric National Healthcare System, Turin, Italy
| | - Maria De Filippo
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Martina Votto
- Pediatric Unit, Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
- Pediatric Clinic, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Favuzza
- Pediatric Unit, Hospital Holy Family Fatebenefratelli Company, Erba, Italy
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Meyer Children's Hospital IRCCS, Florence, Italy
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rodríguez Del Río P, Álvaro-Lozano M, Arasi S, Bazire R, Escudero C, Patel N, Sandoval-Ruballos M, Vazquez-Ortiz M, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Blümchen K, Dunn Galvin A, Deschildre A, Greenhawt M, Schnadt S, Riggioni C, Remington BC, Turner P, Fernandez Rivas M. Evaluation of clinical outcomes of efficacy in food allergen immunotherapy trials, COFAITH EAACI task force. Allergy 2024; 79:793-822. [PMID: 38263695 DOI: 10.1111/all.16027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Revised: 12/14/2023] [Accepted: 01/04/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
Food allergy is a global public health problem that until recent years lacked any aetiological treatment supported by academy, industry and regulators. Food immunotherapy (AIT) is an evolving treatment option, supported by clinical practice and industry trial data. Recent AIT meta-analyses have highlighted the difficulty in pooling safety and efficacy data from AIT trials, due to secondary heterogeneity in the study. An EAACI task force (CO-FAITH) initiated by the Paediatric Section was created to focus on AIT efficacy outcomes for milk, egg and peanut allergy rather than in trial results. A systematic search and a narrative review of AIT controlled clinical trials and large case series was conducted. A total of 63 manuscripts met inclusion criteria, corresponding to 23, 21 and 22 studies of milk, egg and peanut AIT, respectively. The most common AIT efficacy outcome was desensitization, mostly defined as tolerating a maintenance phase dose, or reaching a particular dose upon successful exit oral food challenge (OFC). However, a large degree of heterogeneity was identified regarding the dose quantity defining this outcome. Sustained unresponsiveness and patient-reported outcomes (e.g. quality of life) were explored less frequently, and to date have been most rigorously described for peanut AIT versus other allergens. Change in allergen threshold assessed by OFC remains the most common efficacy measure, but OFC methods suffer from heterogeneity and methodological disparity. This review has identified multiple heterogeneous outcomes related to measuring the efficacy of AIT. Efforts to better standardize and harmonize which outcomes, and how to measure them must be carried out to help in the clinical development of safe and efficacious food allergy treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pablo Rodríguez Del Río
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
- FibHNJ, ARADyAL-RETICs RD16 /0006/0026 Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Montserrat Álvaro-Lozano
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
- Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
- Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Translational Research in Paediatric Specialities Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Raphaëlle Bazire
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
- FibHNJ, ARADyAL-RETICs RD16 /0006/0026 Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carmelo Escudero
- Allergy Department, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
- FibHNJ, ARADyAL-RETICs RD16 /0006/0026 Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- IIS La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nandinee Patel
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Monica Sandoval-Ruballos
- Pediatric Allergy and Clinical Immunology Department, Hospital Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Department of Pediatrics, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York City, New York, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Katharina Blümchen
- Division of Pneumology, Allergology and Cystic Fibrosis, Department of Paediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | | | - Antoine Deschildre
- Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy Department, CHU Lille, Univ. Lille, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurura, Colorado, USA
| | - Sabine Schnadt
- German Allergy and Asthma Association (DAAB), Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Carmen Riggioni
- Department of Paediatrics, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore City, Singapore
- Khoo Teck Puat-National University Children's Medical Institute, National University Hospital, National University Health System, Singapore City, Singapore
| | - Benjamin C Remington
- Food Allergy Research and Resource Program, Department of Food Science and Technology, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
- Remington Consulting Group B.V, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Paul Turner
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Montserrat Fernandez Rivas
- Allergy Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense (UCM), IdISSC, ARADyAL, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Laubach S, Kim EH, Greenhawt M, Bailey S, Anagnostou A. A Review of Shared Decision-Making, Published Protocols, and Post-desensitization Strategies in Oral Immunotherapy (OIT). Curr Allergy Asthma Rep 2024; 24:173-197. [PMID: 38441821 PMCID: PMC11008063 DOI: 10.1007/s11882-024-01132-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 04/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The aim of this review is to highlight key published oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocols and post-desensitization strategies for the major food allergens and to cover important concepts to consider when evaluating OIT for food-allergic patients. Shared decision-making should help identify patient and family values which will help influence the type of evidence-based protocol and maintenance strategy to use. RECENT FINDINGS With food OIT emerging as a treatment option, there is a pressing need for patients, physicians, and other providers to have a nuanced understanding of the management choices available to them. There are now randomized controlled trials (RCT) of OIT for peanut, egg, milk, and wheat, and reports of cohorts of patients who have undergone OIT for tree nuts and sesame clinically. The current published protocols contain significant diversity in terms of starting dose, build-up schedule, maintenance dose, and even the product used for desensitization. Emerging data can help direct the long-term maintenance strategy for patients on OIT. Based on patient and family values elicited through the shared decision-making process, an OIT protocol may be selected that balances the level of desensitization, potential side effects, frequency of clinic visits, and potential to induce sustained unresponsiveness, among other factors. Once maintenance dosing is reached, most patients will need to maintain regular exposure to the food allergen to remain desensitized. The option to transition to commercial food products with equivalent amounts of food protein as the OIT maintenance dose would simplify the dosing process and perhaps improve palatability as well. Less frequent or decreased OIT dosing can provide practical benefits but may affect the level of desensitization and safety for some patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Laubach
- Department of Pediatrics, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
- Division of Allergy, Immunology & Rheumatology, Rady Children's Hospital San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA.
| | - Edwin H Kim
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy and Immunology, Food Challenge and Research Unit, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Sally Bailey
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, USA
- Allergy Associates of Northern Virginia, Arlington, VA, USA
| | - Aikaterini Anagnostou
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Immunology, Allergy and Retrovirology, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
- Section of Allergy, Immunology & Retrovirology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Oriel RC, Elizur A, Sicherer SH. Comprehensive Diagnosis, Management, and Treatment of Sesame Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024; 12:590-597. [PMID: 37952774 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
Sesame allergy prevalence varies regionally and by age, in the range of 0.1% to 0.9%. Reactions can be severe and potentially fatal. Resolution rates are in the range of 20% to 50%. The diagnosis requires a careful history and the use of tests, such as skin prick tests and serum sesame-specific IgE. The availability of serum IgE testing for the sesame protein Ses i 1 has improved diagnostic accuracy. The emerging potential for sesame basophil activation tests and additional new tests will likely improve diagnosis in coming years, further reducing the need for diagnostic oral food challenges. Although sesame proteins share homology with those in many foods, clinically relevant cross-reactivity appears uncommon. Nevertheless, sesame is a prominent allergen for those with multiple food allergies. Management may include strict avoidance, but sesame products vary dramatically in protein content. Many people with sesame allergy tolerate forms that are low in protein, such as scattered seeds, rather than sesame paste that is protein-dense. Thus, options in the approach to avoidance are possible. Studies suggest that sesame oral immunotherapy may be safe and effective, and this and additional treatment options are emerging. Here, we review the current comprehensive diagnosis, management, and treatment for sesame allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxanne C Oriel
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Kravis Children's Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Arnon Elizur
- Institute of Allergy, Immunology, and Pediatric Pulmonology, Yitzhak Shamir Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Scott H Sicherer
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Kravis Children's Hospital, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sindher SB, Fiocchi A, Zuberbier T, Arasi S, Wood RA, Chinthrajah RS. The Role of Biologics in the Treatment of Food Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2024; 12:562-568. [PMID: 38013157 PMCID: PMC11104487 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023]
Abstract
The landscape of food allergy (FA) treatment is poised for a paradigm shift with the emergence of biologic therapies. The Food and Drug Administration approval of a standardized peanut powder for oral immunotherapy in 2020 marked a milestone, signaling a departure from allergen avoidance toward proactive treatment strategies. Although oral immunotherapy has been proven effective in desensitizing patients to specific allergens, there are several limitations such as lacking standardization, a long-time commitment to achieve maintenance, and adverse events. Biologics, including omalizumab, dupilumab, and antialarmins, have shown promise in treating various allergic diseases, including FA. These biologics target the underlying immunologic pathways driving allergic reactions, offering an antigen-agnostic approach. Omalizumab (anti-IgE) has been the most studied biologic in this space and can be used both as an adjunct therapy with oral immunotherapy and as monotherapy. Dupilumab targeting IL-4 and IL-13 also shows promise as an adjunct therapy. The emergence of antialarmins further broadens the spectrum of FA treatment possibilities. Biologics represent a transformative approach to FA treatment, directly addressing the underlying mechanisms. Future research should focus on patient selection criteria, personalized biomarker panels, optimal timing of intervention, and treatment durations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayantani B Sindher
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | | | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Fraunhofer Institute for Translational Medicine and Pharmacology ITMP, Allergology and Immunology, Berlin, Germany; Institute of Allergology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Allergy Unit - Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Robert A Wood
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - R Sharon Chinthrajah
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yang N, Srivastava K, Chen Y, Li H, Maskey A, Yoo P, Liu X, Tiwari RK, Geliebter J, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Zhan J, Li XM. Sustained silencing peanut allergy by xanthopurpurin is associated with suppression of peripheral and bone marrow IgE-producing B cell. Front Immunol 2024; 15:1299484. [PMID: 38380329 PMCID: PMC10876879 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2024.1299484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction Peanut allergy is an immunoglobulin E (IgE) mediated food allergy. Rubia cordifolia L. (R. cordifolia), a Chinese herbal medicine, protects against peanut-induced anaphylaxis by suppressing IgE production in vivo. This study aims to identify IgE-inhibitory compounds from the water extract of R. cordifolia and investigate the underlying mechanisms using in vitro and in vivo models. Methods Compounds were isolated from R. cordifolia water extract and their bioactivity on IgE production was assessed using a human myeloma U266 cell line. The purified active compound, xanthopurpurin (XPP), was identified by LC-MS and NMR. Peanut-allergic C3H/HeJ mice were orally administered with or without XPP at 200µg or 400µg per mouse per day for 4 weeks. Serum peanut-specific IgE levels, symptom scores, body temperatures, and plasma histamine levels were measured at challenge. Cytokines in splenocyte cultures were determined by ELISA, and IgE + B cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Acute and sub-chronic toxicity were evaluated. IL-4 promoter DNA methylation, RNA-Seq, and qPCR analysis were performed to determine the regulatory mechanisms of XPP. Results XPP significantly and dose-dependently suppressed the IgE production in U266 cells. XPP significantly reduced peanut-specific IgE (>80%, p <0.01), and plasma histamine levels and protected the mice against peanut-allergic reactions in both early and late treatment experiments (p < 0.05, n=9). XPP showed a strong protective effect even 5 weeks after discontinuing the treatment. XPP significantly reduced the IL-4 level without affecting IgG or IgA and IFN-γ production. Flow cytometry data showed that XPP reduced peripheral and bone marrow IgE + B cells compared to the untreated group. XPP increased IL-4 promoter methylation. RNA-Seq and RT-PCR experiments revealed that XPP regulated the gene expression of CCND1, DUSP4, SDC1, ETS1, PTPRC, and IL6R, which are related to plasma cell IgE production. All safety testing results were in the normal range. Conclusions XPP successfully protected peanut-allergic mice against peanut anaphylaxis by suppressing IgE production. XPP suppresses murine IgE-producing B cell numbers and inhibits IgE production and associated genes in human plasma cells. XPP may be a potential therapy for IgE-mediated food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Yang
- R & D Division, General Nutraceutical Technology, LLC, Elmsford, NY, United States
| | - Kamal Srivastava
- R & D Division, General Nutraceutical Technology, LLC, Elmsford, NY, United States
| | - Yujuan Chen
- School of Life Science and Technology, Changchun University of Science and Technology, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Hang Li
- Central Lab, Shenzhen Bao’an Chinese Medicine Hospital, Shenzhen, China
| | - Anish Maskey
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Patrick Yoo
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Xiaohong Liu
- Department of Respiratory, The First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Raj K. Tiwari
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Jan Geliebter
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Department of Pediatrics, Hassenfeld Children’s Hospital, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
| | - Jixun Zhan
- Department of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States
| | - Xiu-Min Li
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Voskamp AL, Khosa S, Phan T, DeBerg HA, Bingham J, Hew M, Smith W, Abramovitch J, Rolland JM, Moyle M, Nadeau KC, Lack G, Larché M, Wambre E, O'Hehir RE, Hickey P, Prickett SR. Phase 1 trial supports safety and mechanism of action of peptide immunotherapy for peanut allergy. Allergy 2024; 79:485-498. [PMID: 38112286 DOI: 10.1111/all.15966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2023] [Revised: 10/12/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food allergy is a leading cause of anaphylaxis worldwide. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is the only treatment shown to modify the natural history of allergic disease, but application to food allergy has been hindered by risk of severe allergic reactions and short-lived efficacy. Allergen-derived peptides could provide a solution. PVX108 comprises seven short peptides representing immunodominant T-cell epitopes of major peanut allergens for treatment of peanut allergy. METHODS Pre-clinical safety of PVX108 was assessed using ex vivo basophil activation tests (n = 185). Clinical safety and tolerability of single and repeat PVX108 doses were evaluated in a first-in-human, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial in peanut-allergic adults (46 active, 21 placebo). The repeat-dose cohort received six doses over 16 weeks with safety monitored to 21 weeks. Exploratory immunological analyses were performed at pre-dose, Week 21 and Month 18 after treatment. RESULTS PVX108 induced negligible activation of peanut-sensitised basophils. PVX108 was safe and well tolerated in peanut-allergic adults. There were no treatment-related hypersensitivity events or AEs of clinical concern. The only events occurring more frequently in active than placebo were mild injection site reactions. Exploratory immunological analyses revealed a decrease in the ratio of ST2+ Th2A:CCR6+ Th17-like cells within the peanut-reactive Th pool which strengthened following treatment. CONCLUSION This study supports the concept that PVX108 could provide a safe alternative to whole peanut immunotherapies and provides evidence of durable peanut-specific T-cell modulation. Translation of these findings to clinical efficacy in ongoing Phase 2 trials would provide important proof-of-concept for using peptides to treat food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Astrid L Voskamp
- Aravax Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- WhiteFox Science Consulting, Nelson, New Zealand
| | | | - Tracy Phan
- Aravax Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Judy Bingham
- Aravax Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Easington Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mark Hew
- Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Jodie Abramovitch
- Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | | | | | - Mark Larché
- Schroeder Allergy & Immunology Research Institute, Firestone Institute for Respiratory Health, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Erik Wambre
- Benaroya Research Institute, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Robyn E O'Hehir
- Aravax Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Sara R Prickett
- Aravax Pty Ltd, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Turkalj M, Miletić Gospić A, Višekruna Džidić I, Banić I. Food Allergen Immunotherapy in the Treatment of Patients with IgE-Mediated Food Allergy. MEDICINA (KAUNAS, LITHUANIA) 2024; 60:121. [PMID: 38256382 PMCID: PMC10820435 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010121] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 01/03/2024] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
The prevalence of allergic diseases, including food allergy, is increasing, especially in developed countries. Implementation of an elimination diet is not a sufficient therapeutic strategy in patients with food allergy, whose quality of life is significantly impaired. In recent years, new effective therapeutic strategies have been developed, such as the application of oral, sublingual, and epicutaneous immunotherapy. Oral immunotherapy is the most often applied strategy because of its effectiveness and ease of application, with an acceptable safety profile. The effectiveness of oral immunotherapy in patients with egg, cow's milk, and peanut allergy has been proven both in terms of raising of the threshold and the development of tolerance, and in some patients, the development of sustainable unresponsiveness. Although oral immunotherapy is an effective treatment for food allergy, several limitations, including a long duration and a significant rate of reported adverse events, reduces its success. Therefore, new therapeutic options, such as treatment with biologicals, either as combinations with food allergen immunotherapy or as monotherapy with the aim of improving the efficacy and safety of treatment, are being investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mirjana Turkalj
- Srebrnjak Children’s Hospital, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (M.T.); (I.V.D.); (I.B.)
- Faculty of Medicine, J.J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, HR-31000 Osijek, Croatia
- School of Medicine, Catholic University of Croatia, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | | - Ivana Banić
- Srebrnjak Children’s Hospital, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia; (M.T.); (I.V.D.); (I.B.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Nilsson C, Vereda A, Borres MP, Andersson M, Södergren E, Rudengren M, Smith A, Simon RJ, Ryan R, Fernández‐Rivas M, Adelman D, Vickery BP. Exploratory immunogenicity outcomes of peanut oral immunotherapy: Findings from the PALISADE trial. Clin Transl Allergy 2024; 14:e12326. [PMID: 38282192 PMCID: PMC10793676 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunoglobulin E (IgE) and immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) to peanut and its components may influence the clinical reactivity to peanut. Allergen-specific immunotherapy is known for modifying both IgE and IgG4. Peanut oral immunotherapy may influence these serological parameters. METHODS Exploratory analyses of serological data from participants receiving peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH) and placebo in the double-blind, randomized, phase 3 PALISADE trial were conducted to evaluate potential relationships between peanut-specific and peanut component-specific (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 6, Ara h 8, and Ara h 9) IgE and IgG4 levels and clinical outcomes. RESULTS A total of 269 participants (PTAH, n = 202; placebo, n = 67) were analyzed. No relationship was observed between specific IgE and IgG4 levels at screening and maximum tolerated peanut protein dose during screening or response status during exit double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). In PTAH-treated participants, no relationship was observed between IgE and IgG4 levels at screening and maximum symptom severity during exit DBPCFC. Postscreening ratios (ie, postscreening/screening) in the PTAH group were significant at the end of updosing and exit visit for most components. Postscreening changes in specific IgE levels were more pronounced with PTAH versus placebo for most components. CONCLUSIONS Specific IgE and IgG4 levels at screening are not correlated with screening or exit DBPCFC results, and are not predictive of clinical response to PTAH. Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp contains the relevant and immunodominant allergens, inducing immunological changes with the treatment. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02635776.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Nilsson
- Clinical Research and EducationKarolinska InstitutetSachs' Children and Youth HospitalStockholmSweden
| | - Andrea Vereda
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science CompanyLondonUK
| | - Magnus P. Borres
- Karolinska University HospitalStockholmSweden
- Thermo Fisher ScientificUppsalaSweden
| | | | | | | | - Alex Smith
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science CompanyBrisbaneCaliforniaUSA
| | | | - Robert Ryan
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science CompanyLondonUK
| | | | - Daniel Adelman
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science CompanyBrisbaneCaliforniaUSA
- Department of MedicineUniversity of California‐San FranciscoSan FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Kim EH, Bird JA, Keet CA, Virkud YV, Herlihy L, Ye P, Smeekens JM, Guo R, Yue X, Penumarti A, Qaqish B, Li Q, Kulis MD, Burks AW. Desensitization and remission after peanut sublingual immunotherapy in 1- to 4-year-old peanut-allergic children: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2024; 153:173-181.e10. [PMID: 37815782 PMCID: PMC10872748 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.08.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2023] [Revised: 08/05/2023] [Accepted: 08/25/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prior studies of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) have suggested a potential advantage with younger age at treatment initiation. OBJECTIVE We studied the safety and efficacy of SLIT for peanut allergy in 1- to 4-year-old children. METHODS Peanut-allergic 1- to 4-year-old children were randomized to receive 4 mg peanut SLIT versus placebo. Desensitization was assessed by double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC) after 36 months of treatment. Participants desensitized to at least 443 mg peanut protein discontinued therapy for 3 months and then underwent DBPCFC to assess for remission. Biomarkers were measured at baseline and longitudinally during treatment. RESULTS Fifty participants (25 peanut SLIT, 25 placebo) with a median age of 2.4 years were enrolled across 2 sites. The primary end point of desensitization was met with actively treated versus placebo participants having a significantly greater median cumulative tolerated dose (4443 mg vs 143 mg), higher likelihood of passing the month 36 DBPCFC (60% vs 0), and higher likelihood of demonstrating remission (48% vs 0). The highest rate of desensitization and remission was seen in 1- to 2-year-olds, followed by 2- to 3-year-olds and 3- to 4-year-olds. Longitudinal changes in peanut skin prick testing, peanut-specific IgG4, and peanut-specific IgG4/IgE ratio were seen in peanut SLIT but not placebo participants. Oropharyngeal itching was more commonly reported by peanut SLIT than placebo participants. Skin, gastrointestinal, upper respiratory, lower respiratory, and multisystem adverse events were similar between treatment groups. CONCLUSION Peanut SLIT safely induces desensitization and remission in 1- to 4-year-old children, with improved outcomes seen with younger age at initiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin H Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - J Andrew Bird
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex
| | - Corinne A Keet
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Yamini V Virkud
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Lauren Herlihy
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Ping Ye
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Johanna M Smeekens
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Rishu Guo
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Xiaohong Yue
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Anusha Penumarti
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Bahjat Qaqish
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Quefeng Li
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michael D Kulis
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - A Wesley Burks
- Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kulchar RJ, Singh R, Ding S, Alexander E, Leong KW, Daniell H. Delivery of biologics: Topical administration. Biomaterials 2023; 302:122312. [PMID: 37690380 PMCID: PMC10840840 DOI: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2023.122312] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/27/2023] [Accepted: 08/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/12/2023]
Abstract
Biologics are unaffordable to a large majority of the global population because of prohibitively expensive fermentation systems, purification and the requirement for cold chain for storage and transportation. Limitations of current production and delivery systems of biologics were evident during the recent pandemic when <2.5% of vaccines produced were available to low-income countries and ∼19 million doses were discarded in Africa due to lack of cold-chain infrastructure. Among FDA-approved biologics since 2015, >90% are delivered using invasive methods. While oral or topical drugs are highly preferred by patients because of their affordability and convenience, only two oral drugs have been approved by FDA since 2015. A newly launched oral biologic costs only ∼3% of the average cost of injectable biologics because of the simplified regulatory approval process by elimination of prohibitively expensive fermentation, purification, cold storage/transportation. In addition, the cost of developing a new biologic injectable product (∼$2.5 billion) has been dramatically reduced through oral or topical delivery. Topical delivery has the unique advantage of targeted delivery of high concentration protein drugs, without getting diluted in circulating blood. However, only very few topical drugs have been approved by the FDA. Therefore, this review highlights recent advances in oral or topical delivery of proteins at early or advanced stages of human clinical trials using chewing gums, patches or sprays, or nucleic acid drugs directly, or in combination with, nanoparticles and offers future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel J. Kulchar
- Department of Basic and Translational Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Rahul Singh
- Department of Basic and Translational Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| | - Suwan Ding
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City NY 10032, USA
| | - Elena Alexander
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City NY 10032, USA
| | - Kam W Leong
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Columbia University, New York City NY 10032, USA
| | - Henry Daniell
- Department of Basic and Translational Sciences, School of Dental Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia PA 19104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Johnson-Weaver BT. Preclinical evaluation of alternatives to oral immunotherapy for food allergies. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2023; 4:1275373. [PMID: 37859977 PMCID: PMC10584324 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2023.1275373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
The increasing food allergy incidence has led to significant interest in developing therapies for allergic diseases. Oral allergen-specific immunotherapy (OIT) is a recently FDA-approved therapeutic to treat peanut allergies. OIT utilizes daily allergen dosing to reduce allergic reactions to peanuts. However, there is diminished enthusiasm for daily OIT, potentially due to the strict regimen required to induce desensitization and the risks of severe adverse events. Thus, there remains a need for safe and effective food allergy treatments that are well-received by allergic individuals. Preclinical research studies investigate methods to induce allergen desensitization in animals and support clinical studies that address the limitations of current food allergy OIT. Because allergic reactions are triggered by allergen doses above an individual's activation threshold, immunotherapy regimens that induce allergen desensitization with lower allergen doses or without the requirement of daily administrations may expand the use of food allergy immunotherapy. Administering allergen immunotherapy by alternative routes is a strategy to induce desensitization using lower allergen doses than OIT. Several animal models have evaluated oral, sublingual, epicutaneous, and intranasal immunotherapy routes to treat food allergies. Each immunotherapy route may require different allergen doses, formulations, and treatment schedules to induce desensitization. This article will discuss scientific findings from food allergy immunotherapy animal studies that utilize various immunotherapy routes to induce allergen desensitization to support future clinical studies that enhance the safety and efficacy of allergen immunotherapy to treat food allergies.
Collapse
|
17
|
Hu A, Lloyd M, Loke P, Chebar Lozinsky A, O'Sullivan M, Quinn P, Gold M, Tang MLK. Association of Reaction Symptoms and Eliciting Dose With Health-Related Quality of Life in Children With Peanut Allergy. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:3195-3202.e4. [PMID: 37423341 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.06.063] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 06/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food allergy adversely affects the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients. It is unclear whether factors such as the reaction eliciting dose (ED) and the nature of allergic reaction symptoms affect HRQoL. OBJECTIVE To explore associations between reaction ED or the nature of allergic symptoms and HRQoL among children with peanut allergy. METHODS This study was a secondary analysis of baseline data from the PPOIT-003 randomized trial in 212 children aged 1 to 10 years with challenge-confirmed peanut allergy. Children's past reaction symptoms were collected by clinicians during screening. Associations between variables of interest and parent-reported child-proxy HRQoL were examined by univariable and multivariable linear regression. RESULTS Mean age of study participants was 5.9 years; 63.2% were male. Children with a low reaction ED of 80 mg peanut protein had significantly poorer HRQoL (β = -0.81; 95% CI, -1.61 to -0.00; P = .049) compared with children with a high ED of 2,500 mg peanut protein. Gastrointestinal symptoms (β = 0.45; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87; P = .037), lower airway symptoms (β = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.05-0.87; P = .030), multisystem involvement (β = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.25-1.16; P = .003), or anaphylaxis (β = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.04-0.87; P = .031) during a previous reaction were associated with worse HRQoL. CONCLUSIONS Peanut-allergic children with a lower allergen reaction threshold experienced a greater negative HRQoL impact compared with children with higher reaction thresholds. In addition, specific past allergic reaction symptoms were associated with comparatively worse HRQoL. Children experiencing these symptoms and those with lower reaction ED require increased clinical support to manage the food allergy and are likely to benefit from interventions that can improve HRQoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Hu
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; School of Population and Global Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Melanie Lloyd
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Centre for Medicine Use and Safety, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Paxton Loke
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, Monash University Clayton, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Michael O'Sullivan
- Immunology Department, Perth Children's Hospital, Nedlands, Western Australia, Australia; Paediatrics Division, Medical School, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Patrick Quinn
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Women's and Children's Health Network, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael Gold
- Discipline of Paediatrics, Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Women's and Children's Health Network, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mimi L K Tang
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia; Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wei Y, Peng J, Wang S, Ding Z, Chen G, Sun J. Probiotics and the Potential of Genetic Modification as a Possible Treatment for Food Allergy. Nutrients 2023; 15:4159. [PMID: 37836443 PMCID: PMC10574749 DOI: 10.3390/nu15194159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 10/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Food allergy is a common condition that affects millions of people worldwide. It is caused by an abnormal immune response to harmless food antigens, which is influenced by genetics and environmental factors. Modulating the gut microbiota and immune system with probiotics or genetically modified probiotics confers health benefits to the host and offers a novel strategy for preventing and treating food allergy. This systematic review aims to summarize the current proof of the role of probiotics in food allergy and propose a promising future research direction of using probiotics as a possible strategy of treatment for food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuqiu Wei
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Jing Peng
- College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China
| | - Siyu Wang
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Zheng Ding
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Guixi Chen
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100190, China
| | - Jiazeng Sun
- Key Laboratory of Precision Nutrition and Food Quality, Department of Nutrition and Health, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100190, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Locke A, Hung L, Upton JEM, O'Mahony L, Hoang J, Eiwegger T. An update on recent developments and highlights in food allergy. Allergy 2023; 78:2344-2360. [PMID: 37087637 DOI: 10.1111/all.15749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2023] [Revised: 04/06/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
While both the incidence and general awareness of food allergies is increasing, the variety and clinical availability of therapeutics remain limited. Therefore, investigations into the potential factors contributing to the development of food allergy (FA) and the mechanisms of natural tolerance or induced desensitization are required. In addition, a detailed understanding of the pathophysiology of food allergies is needed to generate compelling, enduring, and safe treatment options. New findings regarding the contribution of barrier function, the effect of emollient interventions, mechanisms of allergen recognition, and the contributions of specific immune cell subsets through rodent models and human clinical studies provide novel insights. With the first approved treatment for peanut allergy, the clinical management of FA is evolving toward less intensive, alternative approaches involving fixed doses, lower maintenance dose targets, coadministration of biologicals, adjuvants, and tolerance-inducing formulations. The ultimate goal is to improve immunotherapy and develop precision-based medicine via risk phenotyping allowing optimal treatment for each food-allergic patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arielle Locke
- School of Medicine, University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Lisa Hung
- Translational Medicine Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Immunology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Julia E M Upton
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, SickKids Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Paediatrics, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Liam O'Mahony
- Departments of Medicine and Microbiology, APC Microbiome Ireland, National University of Ireland, Cork, Ireland
| | - Jennifer Hoang
- Translational Medicine Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas Eiwegger
- Translational Medicine Program, Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Immunology, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems an der Donau, Austria
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital St. Pölten, St. Pölten, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Srivastava K, Cao M, Fidan O, Shi Y, Yang N, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Miao M, Zhan J, Sampson HA, Li XM. Berberine-containing natural-medicine with boiled peanut-OIT induces sustained peanut-tolerance associated with distinct microbiota signature. Front Immunol 2023; 14:1174907. [PMID: 37575233 PMCID: PMC10415201 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1174907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Gut microbiota influence food allergy. We showed that the natural compound berberine reduces IgE and others reported that BBR alters gut microbiota implying a potential role for microbiota changes in BBR function. Objective We sought to evaluate an oral Berberine-containing natural medicine with a boiled peanut oral immunotherapy (BNP) regimen as a treatment for food allergy using a murine model and to explore the correlation of treatment-induced changes in gut microbiota with therapeutic outcomes. Methods Peanut-allergic (PA) mice, orally sensitized with roasted peanut and cholera toxin, received oral BNP or control treatments. PA mice received periodic post-therapy roasted peanut exposures. Anaphylaxis was assessed by visualization of symptoms and measurement of body temperature. Histamine and serum peanut-specific IgE levels were measured by ELISA. Splenic IgE+B cells were assessed by flow cytometry. Fecal pellets were used for sequencing of bacterial 16S rDNA by Illumina MiSeq. Sequencing data were analyzed using built-in analysis platforms. Results BNP treatment regimen induced long-term tolerance to peanut accompanied by profound and sustained reduction of IgE, symptom scores, plasma histamine, body temperature, and number of IgE+ B cells (p <0.001 vs Sham for all). Significant differences were observed for Firmicutes/Bacteroidetes ratio across treatment groups. Bacterial genera positively correlated with post-challenge histamine and PN-IgE included Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Hydrogenanaerobacterium (all Firmicutes) while Verrucromicrobiacea. Caproiciproducens, Enterobacteriaceae, and Bacteroidales were negatively correlated. Conclusions BNP is a promising regimen for food allergy treatment and its benefits in a murine model are associated with a distinct microbiota signature.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamal Srivastava
- General Nutraceutical Technology, Elmsford, NY, United States
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Mingzhuo Cao
- Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ozkan Fidan
- Department of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States
- Department of Bioengineering, Abdullah Gul University, Kayseri, Türkiye
| | - Yanmei Shi
- Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Nan Yang
- General Nutraceutical Technology, Elmsford, NY, United States
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Hassenfeld Children’s Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, New York University (NYU) Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Mingsan Miao
- Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences, Henan University of Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jixun Zhan
- Department of Biological Engineering, Utah State University, Logan, UT, United States
| | - Hugh A. Sampson
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States
| | - Xiu-Min Li
- Department of Pathology, Microbiology and Immunology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
- Department of Otolaryngology, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sindher SB, Hillier C, Anderson B, Long A, Chinthrajah RS. Treatment of food allergy: Oral immunotherapy, biologics, and beyond. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2023; 131:29-36. [PMID: 37100276 PMCID: PMC10330596 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023]
Abstract
The prevalence of food allergy (FA) has been increasing globally and comes with a heavy burden not just economically, but also on quality of life. Although oral immunotherapy (OIT) is effective at inducing desensitization to food allergens, it has several limitations that weaken its success. Limitations include a long duration of build-up, especially when used for multiple allergens, and a high rate of reported adverse events. Furthermore, OIT may not be effective in all patients. Efforts are underway to identify additional treatment options, either as monotherapy or in combination, to treat FA or enhance the safety and efficacy of OIT. Biologics such as omalizumab and dupilumab, which already have US Food and Drug Administration approval for other atopic conditions have been the most studied, but additional biologics and novel strategies are emerging. In this review, we discuss therapeutic strategies including immunoglobulin E inhibitors, immunoglobulin E disruptors, interleukin-4 and interleukin-13 inhibitors, antialarmins, JAK1 and BTK inhibitors, and nanoparticles, and the data surrounding their application in FA and highlighting their potential.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayantani B Sindher
- Department of Medicine, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California.
| | - Claire Hillier
- Department of Medicine, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Brent Anderson
- Department of Medicine, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Andrew Long
- Department of Medicine, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - R Sharon Chinthrajah
- Department of Medicine, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lodge CJ, Waidyatillake N, Peters RL, Netting M, Dai X, Burgess J, Hornung CJ, Perrett KP, Tang MLK, Koplin JJ, Dharmage SC. Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy for peanut, cow's milk, and hen's egg allergy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Clin Transl Allergy 2023; 13:e12268. [PMID: 37488726 PMCID: PMC10314278 DOI: 10.1002/clt2.12268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 05/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is a promising treatment for food allergies; however, safety is a concern. We synthesized evidence from the best randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on efficacy/safety of OIT for desensitization (DS) and remission (sustained unresponsiveness (SU)) in IgE mediated allergy to peanut, hen's eggs, and cow's milk. BODY: We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases (Until Oct 22) identifying 16 eligible RCTs published in English measuring food allergy by food challenge at the beginning and at the end of the study. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool was used to assess study quality. We found 18 eligible studies. There was evidence of efficacy for DS for all allergens: peanut (RR 11.32; 95% CI 5.93, 21.60, I2 49%, 8 studies); hen's egg (RR 4.67; 2.66, 8.21, I2 0%, 5 studies); cow's milk (RR 13.98; 3.51, 55.65, I2 0%, 4 studies) and evidence for SU for peanut (RR 7.74; 2.90, 20.69, I2 0%, 3 studies) and hen's egg (RR 6.91; 1.67, 28.57, I2 0%, 2 studies). Allergic events were increased with intervention, and risk of adrenaline use increased for peanut RR 2.96; 1.63, 5.35, I2 0%, 8 studies; egg RR 1.71; 0.42, 6.92, I2 0%, 6 studies; and milk RR 8.45; 2.02, 35.27, I2 0%, 4 studies. CONCLUSION We found strong evidence that peanut, hen's egg, and cow's milk OIT can induce DS and some evidence for remission. There was a high risk of allergic reactions. Generalizability to the entire food allergic population is not known.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline J Lodge
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Nilakshi Waidyatillake
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - Rachel L Peters
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Merryn Netting
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Women and Kids Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute (SAHMRI), Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Discipline of Paediatrics, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Xin Dai
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
| | - John Burgess
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Catherine J Hornung
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Kirsten P Perrett
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Mimi L K Tang
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Allergy Immunology, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jennifer J Koplin
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Child Research Centre, University of Queensland, South Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Shyamali C Dharmage
- Allergy and Lung Health Unit, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, Australia
- Centre for Food and Allergy Research, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bjelac J, Shaker M, Greenhawt M, Kodish E. Viewing Pediatric Food Oral Immunotherapy Through an Ethical Lens-A Narrative Systematic Review. THE JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY. IN PRACTICE 2023; 11:1914-1925. [PMID: 36965706 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 03/11/2023] [Indexed: 03/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food allergy remains a common problem and a lifelong condition for many children. In recent years, food allergy management has increasingly involved conversations about food oral immunotherapy (OIT). Although ethical considerations of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice implicitly inform these conversations, applying these principles can be complex, particularly in young children. Families of young children assume a role of surrogate decision-maker and must balance immediate risks with the hope of longer-term benefits. OBJECTIVE To explore implementation of OIT in children through an ethical lens. METHODS To evaluate OIT through an ethical lens, we conducted a literature search to explore currently published frameworks in this area. RESULTS Evaluation of the harm principle, the basic interest principle, and the best interest principle of parental decision-making can be informative. Shared decision-making continues to be central to the process of engaging with patient-family units to individualize the best care, at the right time, and minimize decisional discord. Although OIT is well-positioned to promote health and well-being, challenges to equity, sustainability, and organizational support must be considered to improve access for appropriate patients. CONCLUSIONS Whereas approaches to food OIT may be tailored to the individual context of each patient-family unit, ethical principles must guide decisions to initiate and continue therapy. Traditional ethical principles of autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice remain cornerstones when considering the ethical context of OIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn Bjelac
- Food Allergy Center of Excellence, Center for Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio.
| | - Marcus Shaker
- Department of Pediatrics, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, NH; Section of Allergy and Immunology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Section of Allergy/Immunology, Food Challenge and Research Unit, Children's Hospital Colorado, Department of Pediatrics, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Eric Kodish
- Pediatric Hematology Oncology and Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Cleveland Clinic Children's and Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kim EH, Keet CA, Virkud YV, Chin S, Ye P, Penumarti A, Smeekens J, Guo R, Yue X, Li Q, Kosorok MR, Kulis MD, Burks AW. Open-label study of the efficacy, safety, and durability of peanut sublingual immunotherapy in peanut-allergic children. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023; 151:1558-1565.e6. [PMID: 36828080 PMCID: PMC10257751 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.01.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies on the efficacy of peanut sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) are limited. The durability of desensitization after SLIT has not been well described. OBJECTIVE We sought to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 4-mg peanut SLIT and persistence of desensitization after SLIT discontinuation. METHODS Challenge-proven peanut-allergic 1- to 11-year-old children were treated with open-label 4-mg peanut SLIT for 48 months. Desensitization after peanut SLIT was assessed by a 5000-mg double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). A novel randomly assigned avoidance period of 1 to 17 weeks was followed by the DBPCFC. Skin prick test results immunoglobulin levels, basophil activation test results, TH1, TH2, and IL-10 cytokines were measured longitudinally. Safety was assessed through patient-reported home diaries. RESULTS Fifty-four participants were enrolled and 47 (87%) completed peanut SLIT and the 48-month DBPCFC per protocol. The mean successfully consumed dose (SCD) during the DBPCFC increased from 48 to 2723 mg of peanut protein after SLIT (P < .0001), with 70% achieving clinically significant desensitization (SCD > 800 mg) and 36% achieving full desensitization (SCD = 5000 mg). Modeled median time to loss of clinically significant desensitization was 22 weeks. Peanut skin prick test; peanut-specific IgE, IgG4, and IgG4/IgE ratio; and peanut-stimulated basophil activation test, IL-4, IL-5, IL-13, IFN-γ, and IL-10 changed significantly compared with baseline, with changes seen as early as 6 months. Median rate of reaction per dose was 0.5%, with transient oropharyngeal itching being the most common, and there were no dosing symptoms requiring epinephrine. CONCLUSIONS In this open-label, prospective study, peanut SLIT was safe and induced clinically significant desensitization in most of the children, lasting more than 17 weeks after discontinuation of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edwin H Kim
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC.
| | - Corinne A Keet
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Yamini V Virkud
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Stacy Chin
- Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, United States Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, Md
| | - Ping Ye
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Anusha Penumarti
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Johanna Smeekens
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Rishu Guo
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Xiaohong Yue
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Quefeng Li
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michael R Kosorok
- Department of Biostatistics, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - Michael D Kulis
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - A Wesley Burks
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Sindher SB, Barshow S, Tirumalasetty J, Arasi S, Atkins D, Bauer M, Bégin P, Collins MH, Deschildre A, Doyle AD, Fiocchi A, Furuta GT, Garcia-Lloret M, Mennini M, Rothenberg ME, Spergel JM, Wang J, Wood RA, Wright BL, Zuberbier T, Chin AR, Long A, Nadeau KC, Chinthrajah RS. The role of biologics in pediatric food allergy and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023; 151:595-606. [PMID: 36872039 PMCID: PMC9993424 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2023.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 03/06/2023]
Abstract
Continuing insight into the molecular mechanisms of atopic disorders has enabled the development of biologics to precisely target these diseases. Food allergy (FA) and eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are driven by similar inflammatory molecular mechanisms and exist along the same atopic disease spectrum. Therefore, many of the same biologics are being investigated to target key drivers of mechanisms shared across the disease states. The enormous potential of biologics for the treatment of FA and EGIDs is highlighted by the significant increases in the number of ongoing clinical trials (more than 30) evaluating their use in these disease states, as well as by the recent US Food and Drug Administration approval of dupilumab for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis. Here we discuss past and current research into the use of biologics in FA and EGIDs and their potential role in improving treatment options in the future, with the need to have biologics widely clinically available.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sayantani B Sindher
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Suzanne Barshow
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Jyothi Tirumalasetty
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Translational Research in Paediatric Specialities Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Dan Atkins
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Immunology, Digestive Health Institute, Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Maureen Bauer
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Immunology, Digestive Health Institute, Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Philippe Bégin
- Department of Pediatrics, Service of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montréal; Department of Medicine, Service of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Margaret H Collins
- Division of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Antoine Deschildre
- CHU Lille, Université Lille, Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergy Department, Hôpital Jeanne de Flandre, Lille, France
| | - Alfred D Doyle
- Division of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz
| | - Alessandro Fiocchi
- Translational Research in Paediatric Specialities Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Glenn T Furuta
- Department of Pediatrics, Section of Allergy and Immunology, Digestive Health Institute, Gastrointestinal Eosinophilic Diseases Program, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colo
| | - Maria Garcia-Lloret
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Immunology, Allergy, and Rheumatology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, Calif
| | - Maurizio Mennini
- Translational Research in Paediatric Specialities Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital, IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Marc E Rothenberg
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center and University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jonathan M Spergel
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia and Department of Pediatrics, Perelman School of Medicine at University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pa
| | - Julie Wang
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai and the Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, New York, NY
| | - Robert A Wood
- Division of Pediatric Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Benjamin L Wright
- Division of Allergy, Asthma and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, Scottsdale, Ariz
| | - Torsten Zuberbier
- Dermatological Allergology, Allergie-Centrum-Charité, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany; Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrew R Chin
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Andrew Long
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - R Sharon Chinthrajah
- Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research at Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Casale TB, Irani AM. Peanut ( Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp for the mitigation of allergic reactions to peanuts in children and adolescents. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2023; 19:253-265. [PMID: 36524617 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2023.2159812] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Peanut allergy can result in severe, sometimes fatal hypersensitivity reactions that place a considerable burden on the lives of patients. This article reviews the first approved immunotherapy for the mitigation of allergic reactions following accidental peanut exposure, peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH; Palforzia®, Aimmune Therapeutics). AREAS COVERED This article highlights the unmet need for patients with peanut allergy, describes the therapeutic landscape, and reviews the development of and clinical data for PTAH. EXPERT OPINION PTAH offers a standardized preparation of peanut allergen, with a tolerability and efficacy profile clearly defined through its robust clinical development and trial program. In children 4-17 years old, PTAH provides a standardized, approved product that many clinicians sought prior to initiating oral immunotherapy. PTAH reduced the likelihood of more severe reactions following exposure to peanut protein; although peanut avoidance remains essential, PTAH will enable more individuals with peanut allergy to participate in activities of daily life with less anxiety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas B Casale
- Internal Medicine, Morsani College of Medicine, Division of Allergy and Immunology, University of South Florida, Tampa Florida, USA
| | - Anne-Marie Irani
- Medical Affairs, Aimmune Therapeutics Inc, Brisbane California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Özdemir PG, Sato S, Yanagida N, Ebisawa M. Oral Immunotherapy in Food Allergy: Where Are We Now? ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2023; 15:125-144. [PMID: 37021501 PMCID: PMC10079524 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2023.15.2.125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2023] [Revised: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy (FA) has become more prevalent and problematic in the last 2 decades, and it poses important individual, social, and economic burdens. Besides treating reactions induced by accidental exposure and periodic evaluation for acquiring natural tolerance, the primary management approach is still allergen avoidance as a global standard. However, an active therapeutic approach that can raise the reaction threshold or accelerate tolerance is needed. This review aimed to provide an overview and the latest evidence of oral immunotherapy (OIT), which has recently been used in the active treatment of FA. FA immunotherapy, particularly OIT, is gaining considerable interest, and substantial effort has been made to integrate this active treatment into clinical practice. Consequently, growing evidence has been obtained regarding the efficacy and safety of OIT, particularly for allergens such as peanuts, eggs, and milk. However, several issues need to be addressed regarding the availability, safety, and long-term effects of this intervention. In this review, we summarize currently available information regarding tolerance-inducing immune mechanisms of OIT, data on efficacy and safety, gaps in current evidence, and ongoing research to develop new therapeutic molecules in order to enhance safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pınar Gökmirza Özdemir
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Trakya University School of Medicine, Edirne, Turkey
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Sakura Sato
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Yanagida
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Portnoy J, Shroba J, Tilles S, Romdhani H, Donelson SM, Latremouille-Viau D, Bungay R, Chen K, McCann W. Real-world experience of pediatric patients treated with peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2023; 130:649-656.e4. [PMID: 36738781 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.01.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH) is the first oral immunotherapy indicated for children aged 4 to 17 years with peanut allergy. There are limited real-world data on patients treated with PTAH. OBJECTIVE To characterize pediatric patients treated with PTAH and associated treatment patterns in US clinical practice. METHODS US-based physicians with allergy and immunology training treating patients with peanut allergy aged 4 to 17 years with PTAH were recruited from an existing physician panel and completed an online case report form (October to December 2021) with data abstracted from patient medical charts. Physician practice circumstances, patient characteristics, and PTAH treatment patterns were reported. Time to reach the 300-mg dose and treatment persistence were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS A geographically balanced sample of 43 physicians contributed data for 118 demographically diverse pediatric patients. Patients had heterogeneous diagnostic test results, with a wide range of peanut-specific immunoglobulin E levels; 6.8% received an oral food challenge. During the updosing phase, there were no temporary interruptions and 5.1% of the patients required downdosing. Patients reached the 300-mg dose at a median of 21.3 weeks post-initiation. The rate of PTAH persistence at 24 weeks was 93.4%. Only 1 patient discontinued treatment because of treatment-related systemic allergic symptoms, and the remaining discontinuations were for reasons other than treatment-related symptoms. Prophylactic antihistamines were used by 33.9% of the patients to prevent PTAH adverse effects. CONCLUSION PTAH was prescribed in demographically diverse patients with a wide range of peanut-specific immunoglobulin E levels. Treatment persistence with PTAH was high in this study population, with a small number of patients experiencing treatment modification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stephen Tilles
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science Company, Brisbane, California
| | | | - Sarah M Donelson
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science Company, Brisbane, California
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) is an alternative treatment of IgE-mediated food allergy that has been shown to increase tolerance threshold to many of the top food allergens, although this effect may be dependent on age, dose, frequency, and duration. OIT has been shown to be effective and safe in infants, and early initiation can improve rates of desensitization even for those foods whose natural history favors loss of allergy. Studies looking at protocol modification to improve OIT success are ongoing as is the evaluation of clinical tools to help monitor OIT effects.
Collapse
|
30
|
Kronfel CM, Cheng H, McBride JK, Nesbit JB, Krouse R, Burns P, Cabanillas B, Crespo JF, Ryan R, Simon RJ, Maleki SJ, Hurlburt BK. IgE epitopes of Ara h 9, Jug r 3, and Pru p 3 in peanut-allergic individuals from Spain and the US. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2023; 3:1090114. [PMID: 36698378 PMCID: PMC9869384 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1090114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-specific lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are well studied allergens that can lead to severe reactions, but often cause oral allergy syndrome in the Mediterranean area and other European countries. However, studies focused on LTP reactivity in allergic individuals from the United States are lacking because they are not considered major allergens. The goal of this study is to determine if differences in immunoglobulin (Ig) E binding patterns to the peanut allergen Ara h 9 and two homologous LTPs (walnut Jug r 3 and peach Pru p 3) between the US and Spain contribute to differences observed in allergic reactivity. Synthetic overlapping 15-amino acid-long peptides offset by five amino acids from Ara h 9, Jug r 3, and Pru p 3 were synthesized, and the intact proteins were attached to microarray slides. Sera from 55 peanut-allergic individuals from the US were tested for IgE binding to the linear peptides and IgE binding to intact proteins using immunofluorescence. For comparison, sera from 17 peanut-allergic individuals from Spain were also tested. Similar IgE binding profiles for Ara h 9, Jug r 3, and Pru p 3 were identified between the US and Spain, with slight differences. Certain regions of the proteins, specifically helices 1 and 2 and the C-terminal coil, were recognized by the majority of the sera more often than other regions of the proteins. While serum IgE from peanut-allergic individuals in the US binds to peptides of Ara h 9 and its homologs, only IgE from the Spanish subjects bound to the intact LTPs. This study identifies Ara h 9, Jug r 3, and Pru p 3 linear epitopes that were previously unidentified using sera from peanut-allergic individuals from the US and Spain. Certain regions of the LTPs are recognized more often in US subjects, indicating that they represent conserved and possible cross-reactive regions. The location of the epitopes in 3D structure models of the LTPs may predict the location of potential conformational epitopes bound by a majority of the Spanish patient sera. These findings are potentially important for development of peptide or protein-targeting diagnostic and therapeutic tools for food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M. Kronfel
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Hsiaopo Cheng
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Jane K. McBride
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Jacqueline B. Nesbit
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | | | - Preston Burns
- Rho Federal Systems Division, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Beatriz Cabanillas
- Department of Allergy, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus F. Crespo
- Department of Allergy, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert Ryan
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science Company, Brisbane, CA, United States
| | - Reyna J. Simon
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science Company, Brisbane, CA, United States
| | - Soheila J. Maleki
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States,Correspondence: Soheila J. Maleki
| | - Barry K. Hurlburt
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Dantzer JA, Kim EH, Chinthrajah RS, Wood RA. Treatment for food allergy: Current status and unmet needs. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2023; 151:1-14. [PMID: 35998790 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2022.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2022] [Revised: 08/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of food allergy has traditionally relied on avoidance of the offending food(s) and use of emergency medications in the event of accidental exposures. However, this long-standing paradigm is beginning to shift, as a variety of treatment approaches have been and are being developed. This report provides an overview of the past, present, and future landscape of interventional clinical trials for the treatment of food allergy. It focuses on specific issues related to participant characteristics, protocol design, and study end points in the key clinical trials in the literature and examine how differences between studies may impact the clinical significance of the study results. Recommendations are provided for the optimization of future trial designs and focus on specific unmet needs in this rapidly evolving field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer A Dantzer
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md
| | - Edwin H Kim
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology and University of North Carolina Food Allergy Initiative, Department of Pediatrics, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC
| | - R Sharon Chinthrajah
- Department of Medicine, Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, and Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif
| | - Robert A Wood
- Division of Allergy, Immunology, and Rheumatology, Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Md.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rana J, Muñoz MM, Biswas M. Oral tolerance to prevent anti-drug antibody formation in protein replacement therapies. Cell Immunol 2022; 382:104641. [PMID: 36402002 PMCID: PMC9730862 DOI: 10.1016/j.cellimm.2022.104641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/07/2022] [Accepted: 11/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Protein based therapeutics have successfully improved the quality of life for patients of monogenic disorders like hemophilia, Pompe and Fabry disease. However, a significant proportion of patients develop immune responses towards intravenously infused therapeutic protein, which can complicate or neutralize treatment and compromise patient safety. Strategies aimed at circumventing immune responses following therapeutic protein infusion can greatly improve therapeutic efficacy. In recent years, antigen-based oral tolerance induction has shown promising results in the prevention and treatment of autoimmune diseases, food allergies and can prevent anti-drug antibody formation to protein replacement therapies. Oral tolerance exploits regulatory mechanisms that are initiated in the gut associated lymphoid tissue (GALT) to promote active suppression of orally ingested antigen. In this review, we outline general perceptions and current knowledge about the mechanisms of oral tolerance, including tissue specific sites of tolerance induction and the cells involved, with emphasis on antigen presenting cells and regulatory T cells. We define several factors, such as cytokines and metabolites that impact the stability and expansion potential of these immune modulatory cells. We highlight preclinical studies that have been performed to induce oral tolerance to therapeutic proteins or enzymes for single gene disorders, such as hemophilia or Pompe disease. These studies mainly utilize a transgenic plant-based system for oral delivery of antigen in conjugation with fusion protein technology that favors the prevention of antigen degradation in the stomach while enhancing uptake in the small intestine by antigen presenting cells and regulatory T cell induction, thereby promoting antigen specific systemic tolerance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jyoti Rana
- Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Maite Melero Muñoz
- Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Moanaro Biswas
- Herman B Wells Center for Pediatric Research, Department of Pediatrics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mack DP, Greenhawt M, Turner PJ, Wasserman RL, Hanna MA, Shaker M, Hughes SW, Del Río PR. Information needs of patients considering oral immunotherapy for food allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2022; 52:1391-1402. [PMID: 36083693 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
While the historic management of food allergy includes avoidance strategies and allergic reaction treatment, oral immunotherapy (OIT) approaches have become more commonly integrated into therapeutic approaches. International guidelines, phase 3 trials and real-world experience have supported the implementation of this procedure. However, OIT is an elective, rarely curative procedure with inherent risks that necessitates an increased degree of health literacy for the patients and families. Families assume the responsibility of amateur healthcare providers to ensure the daily safe administration of the allergenic food. As such, it is incumbent upon physicians to ensure that families are prepared for this role. A thorough educational and shared decision-making approach is necessary during the counselling and consent process to adequately inform the families. Educated discussion about the efficacy and patient-centred effectiveness, therapeutic alternatives and family goals is required to align physician and patient expectations. A frank discussion about the struggles, practical challenges, risks and contraindications can help to develop an understanding of the risk mitigation strategies employed to maintain safety. Physicians should develop a proactive approach to educate families about this, at times, burdensome procedure. This educational approach should encourage ongoing support starting prior to consent through the maintenance visits. By preparing families for their unique management role, physicians can help ensure the safe and successful integration of OIT into the therapeutic offering for the management of food allergies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Paul Mack
- Halton Pediatric Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew Greenhawt
- Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Paul J Turner
- National Heart & Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | | | - Mariam A Hanna
- Halton Pediatric Allergy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marcus Shaker
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center and Geisel School of Medicine, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Sarah W Hughes
- Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Geisel School of Medicine, Dartmouth, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Pablo Rodríguez Del Río
- Adjunto Especialista en Alergología, Hospital Infantil Universitario Niño Jesús, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Leonard SA, Ogawa Y, Jedrzejewski PT, Maleki SJ, Chapman MD, Tilles SA, Du Toit G, Mustafa SS, Vickery BP. Manufacturing processes of peanut ( Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:1004056. [PMID: 36304076 PMCID: PMC9592818 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1004056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Important components of drug safety, efficacy, and acceptability involve manufacturing and testing of the drug substance and drug product. Peanut flour sourcing/processing and manufacturing processes may affect final drug product allergen potency and contamination level, possibly impacting drug safety, quality, and efficacy. We describe key steps in the manufacturing processes of peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (PTAH; Palforzia®), a drug used in oral immunotherapy (OIT) for the treatment of peanut allergy. Methods Established criteria for source material must be met for manufacturing PTAH drug product. Degree of roasting was determined with a Hunter colorimeter. Protein/allergen content, identity, potency, safety, and quality of each batch of PTAH drug substance were assessed with a combustion analyzer, allergen-specific Western blot (immunoblotting), ELISA, and HPLC. Contaminants (ie, aflatoxin) were measured by UPLC. Results Roasting degree beyond "light roast" was associated with variable degrees of protein allergen degradation, or potentially aggregation. Relative potency and amounts of protein allergens showed variability due in part to seasonal/manufacturing variability. Proportion of lots not meeting aflatoxin limits has increased in recent years. Up to 60% of peanut flour source material failed to meet screening selection acceptance criteria for proceeding to drug substance testing, mostly because of failure to meet potency acceptance criteria. Other lots were rejected due to safety (ie, aflatoxin) and quality. Influence of potency variation, within specification parameters, on safety/tolerability observed in trials was considered low, in part due to stringent controls placed at each step of manufacturing. Conclusions Extensive variability in allergen potency is a critical issue during immunotherapy, particularly during OIT initial dose escalation and up-dosing, as it may result in lack of efficacy or avoidable adverse allergic reactions. Based on EU and US regulatory requirements, the production of PTAH includes manufacturing controls to ensure drug product safety, potency, and quality. For example, although PTAH contains all peanut allergens, each lot has met strict criteria ensuring consistent allergenic potency of Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6. The rigor of PTAH's manufacturing process ensures reliable dose consistency and stability throughout its shelf life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie A. Leonard
- Division of Pediatric Allergy / Immunology, University of California San Diego, Rady Children's Hospital, San Diego, CA, United States
| | - Yasushi Ogawa
- Medical Affairs, Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company, Brisbane, CA, United States
| | - Paul T. Jedrzejewski
- Medical Affairs, Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company, Brisbane, CA, United States
| | - Soheila J. Maleki
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Research Service, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | | | - Stephen A. Tilles
- Medical Affairs, Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science company, Brisbane, CA, United States,Correspondence: Stephen A. Tilles
| | - George Du Toit
- Department of Pediatrics, Guy's and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom
| | - S. Shahzad Mustafa
- Rochester Regional Health, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Brian P. Vickery
- Department of Pediatrics, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Lazizi S, Labrosse R, Graham F. Transitioning peanut oral immunotherapy to clinical practice. FRONTIERS IN ALLERGY 2022; 3:974250. [PMID: 36092278 PMCID: PMC9458956 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.974250] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Peanut allergy is on the rise in industrialized countries, affecting 1%–4.5% of children and generally persisting into adulthood. It is associated with a risk of severe anaphylaxis and is one of the major causes of food allergy-induced deaths. Health-related quality of life is significantly impaired for patients and affected families due to food restrictions attributable to omnipresent precautionary allergen labeling, constant risk of potentially life-threatening reactions, and limitation of social activities. Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged as a valid treatment option for patients with IgE-mediated peanut allergy, with randomized controlled trials and real-life studies showing a high rate of desensitization and a favorable safety profile, especially in young children. Ultimately, the decision to initiate peanut OIT relies on a multidisciplinary shared decision-making process, involving open, personalized and evidence-based discussions with patients and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Lazizi
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - R. Labrosse
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - F. Graham
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Medicine, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Correspondence: François Graham
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) protocols are not standardized, and a wide heterogeneity exists in the literature. OIT protocol variables include the initiation approach (fixed dose versus oral food challenge), buildup speed (slow versus fast), target maintenance dose (low versus high target dose), type of food used, and use of adjuvants among other variables. Most protocols start with an initial escalation day, which is a series of extremely low doses to safely identify the patients who are most allergic, followed by a buildup period over several months to years until the final target maintenance dose is achieved. Doses are generally increased every 1-2 weeks by a factor of 1.25 to 2 and are adapted based on the patient's symptoms. Protocols are increasingly favoring low-maintenance doses over traditional high maintenance doses, although this needs to be discussed and adapted based on the patient's preferences. Accelerated OIT schedules with using a short treatment of omalizumab can be considered in severe food allergy cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- François Graham
- From the Allergy and Clinical Immunology Division, Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; and
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Division, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-Justine, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Abstract
Standard criteria for ideal patient selection with food oral immunotherapy (OIT) have yet to be determined. Although there are a handful of contraindications to consider before recommending OIT, most patients with confirmed immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergies are appropriate candidates. Success rates of OIT can vary widely and be influenced by several factors. Choosing the most appropriate candidate for an OIT program can mitigate risks and provide the best chance for patients to be successful.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin Greiwe
- From the Bernstein Allergy Group Inc., Cincinnati, Ohio; and
- Division of Immunology/Allergy Section, Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Silva D, Rodríguez del Río P, Jong NW, Khaleva E, Singh C, Nowak‐Wegrzyn A, Muraro A, Begin P, Pajno G, Fiocchi A, Sanchez A, Jones C, Nilsson C, Bindslev‐Jensen C, Wong G, Sampson H, Beyer K, Marchisotto M, Fernandez Rivas M, Meyer R, Lau S, Nurmatov U, Roberts G. Allergen immunotherapy and/or biologicals for IgE-mediated food allergy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Allergy 2022; 77:1852-1862. [PMID: 35001400 PMCID: PMC9303769 DOI: 10.1111/all.15211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 12/07/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Background There is substantial interest in immunotherapy and biologicals in IgE‐mediated food allergy. Methods We searched six databases for randomized controlled trials about immunotherapy alone or with biologicals (to April 2021) or biological monotherapy (to September 2021) in food allergy confirmed by oral food challenge. We pooled the data using random‐effects meta‐analysis. Results We included 36 trials about immunotherapy with 2126 mainly child participants. Oral immunotherapy increased tolerance whilst on therapy for peanut (RR 9.9, 95% CI 4.5.–21.4, high certainty); cow's milk (RR 5.7, 1.9–16.7, moderate certainty) and hen's egg allergy (RR 8.9, 4.4–18, moderate certainty). The number needed to treat to increase tolerance to a single dose of 300 mg or 1000 mg peanut protein was 2. Oral immunotherapy did not increase adverse reactions (RR 1.1, 1.0–1.2, low certainty) or severe reactions in peanut allergy (RR 1,6, 0.7–3.5, low certainty), but may increase (mild) adverse reactions in cow's milk (RR 3.9, 2.1–7.5, low certainty) and hen's egg allergy (RR 7.0, 2.4–19.8, moderate certainty). Epicutaneous immunotherapy increased tolerance whilst on therapy for peanut (RR 2.6, 1.8–3.8, moderate certainty). Results were unclear for other allergies and administration routes. There were too few trials of biologicals alone (3) or with immunotherapy (1) to draw conclusions. Conclusions Oral immunotherapy improves tolerance whilst on therapy and is probably safe in peanut, cow's milk and hen's egg allergy. More research is needed about quality of life, cost and biologicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Giovanni Pajno
- Policlinico Hospital‐University of Messina Messina Italy
| | | | - Angel Sanchez
- AEPNAA Spanish Association for People with Food and Latex Allergy Madrid Spain
| | | | - Caroline Nilsson
- Karolinska Institutet and Sachs´ Children and Youth Hospital Stockholm Sweden
| | | | - Gary Wong
- Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong Hong Kong
| | - Hugh Sampson
- Mount Sinai School of Medicine New York New York USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Susanne Lau
- Charité ‐ Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Blümchen K, Fischl A, Eiwegger T, Hamelmann E, Klimek L, Lange L, Szepfalusi Z, Vogelberg C, Beyer K. White Paper Erdnussallergie - Teil 4: Management und Therapie der Erdnussallergie. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s15007-022-5005-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
40
|
Hsiao KC, Ponsonby AL, Ashley S, Lee CYY, Jindal L, Tang MLK. Longitudinal antibody responses to peanut following probiotic and peanut oral immunotherapy (PPOIT) in children with peanut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2022; 52:735-746. [PMID: 35403286 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Probiotic and Peanut Oral Immunotherapy (PPOIT) is effective at inducing sustained unresponsiveness (SU) at end-of-treatment and this effect persists up to four years post-treatment, referred to as persistent SU. We sought to evaluate (i) how PPOIT altered peanut-specific humoral immune indices, and (ii) how such longitudinal indices relate to persistent SU. METHODS Longitudinal serum/plasma levels of whole peanut- and peanut component- (Ara-h1, -h2, -h3, -h8, -h9) specific-IgE (sIgE) and specific-IgG4 (sIgG4) antibodies were measured by ImmunoCAP and salivary peanut-specific-IgA (sIgA) by ELISA in children (n=62) enrolled in the PPOIT-001 randomised trial from baseline (T0) to 4-years post-treatment (T5). Multivariate regression analyses of log-transformed values were used for point-in-time between group comparisons. Generalised estimating equations (GEE) were used for longitudinal comparisons between groups. RESULTS PPOIT was associated with changes in sIgE and sIgG4 over time. sIgE levels were significantly reduced post-treatment [T5, PPOIT v.s. Placebo ratio of geometric mean (GM): Ara-h1 0.07, p=0.008; Ara-h2 0.08, p=0.007; Ara-h3 0.15, p=0.021]. sIgG4 levels were significantly increased by end-of-treatment (T1, PPOIT v.s. Placebo ratio of GM: Ara-h1 3.77, p=0.011; Ara-h2 17.97, p<0.001; Ara-h3 10.42, p<0.001) but levels in PPOIT group decreased once treatment was stopped and returned to levels comparable with Placebo group by T5. Similarly, salivary peanut sIgA increased during treatment, as early as 4 months of treatment (PPOIT v.s. Placebo, ratio of GM: 2.04, p=0.014), then reduced post-treatment. CONCLUSION PPOIT was associated with broad reduction in peanut specific humoral responses which may mediate the clinical effects of SU that persists to 4-years post-treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kuang-Chih Hsiao
- Department of Immunology, Starship Children's Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
- Allergy Immunology Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Anne-Louise Ponsonby
- The Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sarah Ashley
- Allergy Immunology Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
| | | | | | - Mimi L K Tang
- Allergy Immunology Research, Murdoch Childrens Research Institute, Melbourne, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
- Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Bajzik V, DeBerg HA, Garabatos N, Rust BJ, Obrien KK, Nguyen Q, O’Rourke C, Smith A, Walker AH, Quinn C, Gersuk VH, Farrington M, Jeong D, Vickery BP, Adelman DC, Wambre E. Oral desensitization therapy for peanut allergy induces dynamic changes in peanut-specific immune responses. Allergy 2022; 77:2534-2548. [PMID: 35266148 PMCID: PMC9356972 DOI: 10.1111/all.15276] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Revised: 01/28/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The PALISADE study, an international, phase 3 trial of peanut oral immunotherapy (POIT) with AR101, resulted in desensitization in children and adolescents who were highly allergic to peanut. An improved understanding of the immune mechanism induced in response to food allergen immunotherapy would enable more informed and effective therapeutic strategies. Our main purpose was to examine the immunological changes in blood samples from a subset of peanut-allergic individuals undergoing oral desensitization immunotherapy with AR101. METHODS Blood samples obtained as part of enrollment screening and at multiple time points during PALISADE study were used to assess basophil and CD4+ T-cell reactivity to peanut. RESULTS The absence of clinical reactivity to the entry double-blinded placebo-controlled peanut challenge (DBPCFC) was accompanied by a significantly lower basophil sensitivity and T-cell reactivity to peanut compared with DBPCFC reactors. At baseline, peanut-reactive TH2A cells were observed in many but not all peanut-allergic patients and their level in peripheral blood correlates with T-cell reactivity to peanut and with serum peanut-specific IgE and IgG4 levels. POIT reshaped circulating peanut-reactive T-cell responses in a subset-dependent manner. Changes in basophil and T-cell responses to peanut closely paralleled clinical benefits to AR101 therapy and resemble responses in those with lower clinical sensitivity to peanut. However, no difference in peanut-reactive Treg cell frequency was observed between groups. CONCLUSION Oral desensitization therapy with AR101 leads to decreased basophil sensitivity to peanut and reshapes peanut-reactive T effector cell responses supporting its potential as an immunomodulatory therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Veronique Bajzik
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| | - Hannah A. DeBerg
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| | - Nahir Garabatos
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| | - Blake J. Rust
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| | | | - Quynh‐Anh Nguyen
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| | - Colin O’Rourke
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| | - Alex Smith
- Aimmune Therapeutics Brisbane California USA
| | - Alex H. Walker
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| | - Charlie Quinn
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| | - Vivian H. Gersuk
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| | | | - David Jeong
- Virginia Mason Medical Center Seattle Washington USA
| | | | | | - Erik Wambre
- Benaroya Research Institute at Virginia Mason Seattle Washington USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Jiao L, Su CW, Cao T, Zheng S, Walker WA, Shi HN. Maternal Influences and Intervention Strategies on the Development of Food Allergy in Offspring. Front Immunol 2022; 13:817062. [PMID: 35281070 PMCID: PMC8904425 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.817062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2021] [Accepted: 02/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Food allergies and other immune-mediated diseases have become serious health concerns amongst infants and children in developed and developing countries. The absence of available cures limits disease management to allergen avoidance and symptomatic treatments. Research has suggested that the presence of maternal food allergies may expose the offspring to genetic predisposition, making them more susceptible to allergen sensitization. The following review has focused on epidemiologic studies regarding maternal influences of proneness to develop food allergy in offspring. The search strategy was "food allergy OR maternal effects OR offspring OR prevention". A systematically search from PubMed/MEDLINE, Science Direct and Google Scholar was conducted. Specifically, it discussed the effects of maternal immunity, microbiota, breastfeeding, genotype and allergy exposure on the development of food allergy in offspring. In addition, several commonly utilized prenatal and postpartum strategies to reduce food allergy proneness were presented, including early diagnosis of high-risk infants and various dietary interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lefei Jiao
- School of Marine Sciences, Ningbo University, Ningbo, China
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Chien-Wen Su
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Tinglan Cao
- Laboratory for Lipid Medicine and Technology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Shasha Zheng
- Department of Nutrition, California Baptist University, Riverside, CA, United States
| | - W. Allan Walker
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| | - Hai Ning Shi
- Mucosal Immunology and Biology Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Jones SM, Kim EH, Nadeau KC, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Wood RA, Sampson HA, Scurlock AM, Chinthrajah S, Wang J, Pesek RD, Sindher SB, Kulis M, Johnson J, Spain K, Babineau DC, Chin H, Laurienzo-Panza J, Yan R, Larson D, Qin T, Whitehouse D, Sever ML, Sanda S, Plaut M, Wheatley LM, Burks AW. Efficacy and safety of oral immunotherapy in children aged 1-3 years with peanut allergy (the Immune Tolerance Network IMPACT trial): a randomised placebo-controlled study. Lancet 2022; 399:359-371. [PMID: 35065784 PMCID: PMC9119642 DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(21)02390-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 140] [Impact Index Per Article: 70.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For young children with peanut allergy, dietary avoidance is the current standard of care. We aimed to assess whether peanut oral immunotherapy can induce desensitisation (an increased allergic reaction threshold while on therapy) or remission (a state of non-responsiveness after discontinuation of immunotherapy) in this population. METHODS We did a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in five US academic medical centres. Eligible participants were children aged 12 to younger than 48 months who were reactive to 500 mg or less of peanut protein during a double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC). Participants were randomly assigned by use of a computer, in a 2:1 allocation ratio, to receive peanut oral immunotherapy or placebo for 134 weeks (2000 mg peanut protein per day) followed by 26 weeks of avoidance, with participants and study staff and investigators masked to group treatment assignment. The primary outcome was desensitisation at the end of treatment (week 134), and remission after avoidance (week 160), as the key secondary outcome, were assessed by DBPCFC to 5000 mg in the intention-to-treat population. Safety and immunological parameters were assessed in the same population. This trial is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03345160. FINDINGS Between Aug 13, 2013, and Oct 1, 2015, 146 children, with a median age of 39·3 months (IQR 30·8-44·7), were randomly assigned to receive peanut oral immunotherapy (96 participants) or placebo (50 participants). At week 134, 68 (71%, 95% CI 61-80) of 96 participants who received peanut oral immunotherapy compared with one (2%, 0·05-11) of 50 who received placebo met the primary outcome of desensitisation (risk difference [RD] 69%, 95% CI 59-79; p<0·0001). The median cumulative tolerated dose during the week 134 DBPCFC was 5005 mg (IQR 3755-5005) for peanut oral immunotherapy versus 5 mg (0-105) for placebo (p<0·0001). After avoidance, 20 (21%, 95% CI 13-30) of 96 participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy compared with one (2%, 0·05-11) of 50 receiving placebo met remission criteria (RD 19%, 95% CI 10-28; p=0·0021). The median cumulative tolerated dose during the week 160 DBPCFC was 755 mg (IQR 0-2755) for peanut oral immunotherapy and 0 mg (0-55) for placebo (p<0·0001). A significant proportion of participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy who passed the 5000 mg DBPCFC at week 134 could no longer tolerate 5000 mg at week 160 (p<0·001). The participant receiving placebo who was desensitised at week 134 also achieved remission at week 160. Compared with placebo, peanut oral immunotherapy decreased peanut-specific and Ara h2-specific IgE, skin prick test, and basophil activation, and increased peanut-specific and Ara h2-specific IgG4 at weeks 134 and 160. By use of multivariable regression analysis of participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy, younger age and lower baseline peanut-specific IgE was predictive of remission. Most participants (98% with peanut oral immunotherapy vs 80% with placebo) had at least one oral immunotherapy dosing reaction, predominantly mild to moderate and occurring more frequently in participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy. 35 oral immunotherapy dosing events with moderate symptoms were treated with epinephrine in 21 participants receiving peanut oral immunotherapy. INTERPRETATION In children with a peanut allergy, initiation of peanut oral immunotherapy before age 4 years was associated with an increase in both desensitisation and remission. Development of remission correlated with immunological biomarkers. The outcomes suggest a window of opportunity at a young age for intervention to induce remission of peanut allergy. FUNDING National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Disease, Immune Tolerance Network.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacie M Jones
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA.
| | - Edwin H Kim
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Kari C Nadeau
- Department of Pediatrics and Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA; Department of Pediatrics, New York University Langone Health, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert A Wood
- Department of Pediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Hugh A Sampson
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Amy M Scurlock
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sharon Chinthrajah
- Department of Pediatrics and Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Julie Wang
- Department of Pediatrics, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Robert D Pesek
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences and Arkansas Children's Hospital, Little Rock, AR, USA
| | - Sayantani B Sindher
- Department of Pediatrics and Sean N Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Mike Kulis
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Joy Laurienzo-Panza
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Rachel Yan
- The Immune Tolerance Network, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Tielin Qin
- The Immune Tolerance Network, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | | | | | - Srinath Sanda
- The Immune Tolerance Network, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Marshall Plaut
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Lisa M Wheatley
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - A Wesley Burks
- Departments of Medicine and Pediatrics, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Akarsu A, Brindisi G, Fiocchi A, Zicari AM, Arasi S. Oral Immunotherapy in Food Allergy: A Critical Pediatric Perspective. Front Pediatr 2022; 10:842196. [PMID: 35273931 PMCID: PMC8901728 DOI: 10.3389/fped.2022.842196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2021] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
There is evidence that in children with persistent IgE-mediated food allergy (FA) to cow's milk, hen's egg, and peanut, oral allergen-specific immunotherapy (OIT) may increase the reaction threshold to the culprit food allergen(s). OIT may protect patients from the occurrence of severe reactions in case of accidental ingestion of the culprit food during treatment. Notwithstanding, many gaps are still unsolved, including safety issues, identification of predictive biomarkers, and post-desensitization efficacy. In this perspective, the use of omalizumab (Anti-IgE monoclonal antibody) has been proposed as an adjunctive treatment to OIT in order to reduce the risk of allergic reactions related to OIT. This review aims to summarize the current evidence and unmet needs on OIT in children with FA to enhance the development of longitudinal, prospective, and well-designed studies able to fill the current gaps soon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aysegul Akarsu
- Division of Allergy and Asthma, Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Giulia Brindisi
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Fiocchi
- Translational Research in Pediatric Specialities Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Zicari
- Department of Maternal and Child Health and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Stefania Arasi
- Translational Research in Pediatric Specialities Area, Division of Allergy, Bambino Gesù Children's Hospital (IRCCS), Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea) allergen powder-dnfp (Palforzia™) in peanut allergy: a profile of its use. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/s40267-021-00868-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
46
|
Pulik K, Ruszczyński M, Krenke R. Oral immunotherapy in children with a food allergy-Where do we stand? - Review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol 2021; 49:191-201. [PMID: 34716938 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1681.13607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2020] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The number of hospitalisations due to an anaphylactic reaction to food is continuously increasing. Therefore, there is an urgent need to seek effective therapy. Currently, the only way to treat food allergies is to avoid allergens and to administer intramuscular adrenaline if an accidental allergen intake occurs. The only causal therapeutic strategy is specific oral immunotherapy. An increasing amount of data confirms this therapy's effectiveness and safety, but the results remain inconclusive due to the lack of long-term follow-up. In this state-of-the-art review, we briefly summarise the latest placebo-controlled randomised controlled trials on oral immunotherapy (OIT) to treat food allergy. During the paper's review, we asked the following questions: does the therapy permanently increase the amount of allergen consumed without symptoms? Does it significantly increase or decrease the occurrence of severe systemic reactions - requiring the administration of adrenaline or hospitalisation? Many authors describe outcomes such as an increase in the amount of allergen that can be safely ingested; however, significant clinical benefits such as decreased hospitalisations or anaphylaxis incidence are rarely included in the results. To date, there is no unified protocol of therapy, which makes comparisons between studies difficult because of significant differences in types, doses, and routes of administration of the allergen, timeline for up-dosing and maintenance, duration of the therapy, and primary outcomes of OIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaja Pulik
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marek Ruszczyński
- II Department of Pediatrics, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Rafał Krenke
- Department of Internal Medicine, Pulmonary Diseases and Allergy, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Mori F, Giovannini M, Barni S, Jiménez-Saiz R, Munblit D, Biagioni B, Liccioli G, Sarti L, Liotti L, Ricci S, Novembre E, Sahiner U, Baldo E, Caimmi D. Oral Immunotherapy for Food-Allergic Children: A Pro-Con Debate. Front Immunol 2021; 12:636612. [PMID: 34650547 PMCID: PMC8507468 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.636612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of food allergy has increased in recent years, especially in children. Allergen avoidance, and drugs in case of an allergic reaction, remains the standard of care in food allergy. Nevertheless, increasing attention has been given to the possibility to treat food allergy, through immunotherapy, particularly oral immunotherapy (OIT). Several OIT protocols and clinical trials have been published. Most of them focus on children allergic to milk, egg, or peanut, although recent studies developed protocols for other foods, such as wheat and different nuts. OIT efficacy in randomized controlled trials is usually evaluated as the possibility for patients to achieve desensitization through the consumption of an increasing amount of a food allergen, while the issue of a possible long-term sustained unresponsiveness has not been completely addressed. Here, we evaluated current pediatric OIT knowledge, focusing on the results of clinical trials and current guidelines. Specifically, we wanted to highlight what is known in terms of OIT efficacy and effectiveness, safety, and impact on quality of life. For each aspect, we reported the pros and the cons, inferable from published literature. In conclusion, even though many protocols, reviews and meta-analysis have been published on this topic, pediatric OIT remains a controversial therapy and no definitive generalized conclusion may be drawn so far. It should be an option provided by specialized teams, when both patients and their families are prone to adhere to the proposed protocol. Efficacy, long-term effectiveness, possible role of adjuvant therapies, risk of severe reactions including anaphylaxis or eosinophilic esophagitis, and impact on the quality of life of both children and caregivers are all aspects that should be discussed before starting OIT. Future studies are needed to provide firm clinical and scientific evidence, which should also consider patient reported outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesca Mori
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Simona Barni
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Rodrigo Jiménez-Saiz
- Department of Immunology, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (IIS-IP), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Immunology & Oncology, Centro Nacional de Biotecnología (CNB)-CSIC, Madrid, Spain.,Faculty of Experimental Sciences, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria (UFV), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Daniel Munblit
- Department of Paediatrics and Paediatric Infectious Diseases, Institute of Child's Health, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia.,Inflammation, Repair and Development Section, National Heart and Lung Institute, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.,Research and Clinical Center for Neuropsychiatry, Moscow, Russia
| | - Benedetta Biagioni
- Allergy Outpatient Clinic, Division of Internal Medicine, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giulia Liccioli
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucrezia Sarti
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Lucia Liotti
- Department of Pediatrics, Salesi Children's Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria (AOU) Ospedali Riuniti Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - Silvia Ricci
- Division of Immunology, Section of Pediatrics, Department of Health Sciences, University of Florence and Meyer Children's Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Elio Novembre
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Umit Sahiner
- Department of Pediatric Allergy, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ermanno Baldo
- "Giovan Battista Mattei" Research Institute, Stenico, Italy
| | - Davide Caimmi
- Allergy Unit, CHU de Montpellier, Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France.,IDESP, UA11, INSERM-Univ Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Srinivasan A, Herzog RW, Khan I, Sherman A, Bertolini T, Wynn T, Daniell H. Preclinical development of plant-based oral immune modulatory therapy for haemophilia B. PLANT BIOTECHNOLOGY JOURNAL 2021; 19:1952-1966. [PMID: 33949086 PMCID: PMC8486253 DOI: 10.1111/pbi.13608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2021] [Revised: 04/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 05/03/2023]
Abstract
Anti-drug antibody (ADA) formation is a major complication in treatment of the X-linked bleeding disorder haemophilia B (deficiency in coagulation factor IX, FIX). Current clinical immune tolerance protocols are often not effective due to complications such as anaphylactic reactions against FIX. Plant-based oral tolerance induction may address this problem, as illustrated by the recent first regulatory approval of orally delivered plant cells to treat peanut allergy. Our previous studies showed that oral delivery of plant cells expressing FIX fused to the transmucosal carrier CTB (cholera toxin subunit B) in chloroplasts suppressed ADA in animals with haemophilia B. We report here creation of the first lettuce transplastomic lines expressing a coagulation factor, in the absence of antibiotic resistance gene. Stable integration of the CTB-FIX gene and homoplasmy (transformation of ˜10 000 copies in each cell) were maintained in both T1 and T2 generation marker-free plants. CTB-FIX expression in lyophilized leaves of T1 and T2 marker-free plants was 1.0-1.5 mg/g dry weight, confirming that the marker excision did not affect antigen levels. Oral administration of CTB-FIX to Sprague Dawley rats at 0.25, 1 or 2.5 mg/kg did not produce overt adverse effects or toxicity. The no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) is at least 2.5 mg/kg for a single oral administration in rats. Oral administration of CTB-FIX at 0.3 or 1.47 mg/kg either mixed in food or as an oral suspension to Beagle dogs did not produce any observable toxicity. These toxicology studies should facilitate filing of regulatory approval documents and evaluation in haemophilia B patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aparajitha Srinivasan
- Department of Basic and Translational SciencesSchool of Dental MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Roland W. Herzog
- Department of PediatricsHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric ResearchIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisINUSA
| | - Imran Khan
- Department of Basic and Translational SciencesSchool of Dental MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| | - Alexandra Sherman
- Department of PediatricsHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric ResearchIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisINUSA
| | - Thais Bertolini
- Department of PediatricsHerman B Wells Center for Pediatric ResearchIndiana University School of MedicineIndianapolisINUSA
| | - Tung Wynn
- Department of PediatricsUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleFLUSA
| | - Henry Daniell
- Department of Basic and Translational SciencesSchool of Dental MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaPAUSA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Fuhrmann V, Huang HJ, Akarsu A, Shilovskiy I, Elisyutina O, Khaitov M, van Hage M, Linhart B, Focke-Tejkl M, Valenta R, Sekerel BE. From Allergen Molecules to Molecular Immunotherapy of Nut Allergy: A Hard Nut to Crack. Front Immunol 2021; 12:742732. [PMID: 34630424 PMCID: PMC8496898 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.742732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Peanuts and tree nuts are two of the most common elicitors of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy. Nut allergy is frequently associated with systemic reactions and can lead to potentially life-threatening respiratory and circulatory symptoms. Furthermore, nut allergy usually persists throughout life. Whether sensitized patients exhibit severe and life-threatening reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis), mild and/or local reactions (e.g., pollen-food allergy syndrome) or no relevant symptoms depends much on IgE recognition of digestion-resistant class I food allergens, IgE cross-reactivity of class II food allergens with respiratory allergens and clinically not relevant plant-derived carbohydrate epitopes, respectively. Accordingly, molecular allergy diagnosis based on the measurement of allergen-specific IgE levels to allergen molecules provides important information in addition to provocation testing in the diagnosis of food allergy. Molecular allergy diagnosis helps identifying the genuinely sensitizing nuts, it determines IgE sensitization to class I and II food allergen molecules and hence provides a basis for personalized forms of treatment such as precise prescription of diet and allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). Currently available forms of nut-specific AIT are based only on allergen extracts, have been mainly developed for peanut but not for other nuts and, unlike AIT for respiratory allergies which utilize often subcutaneous administration, are given preferentially by the oral route. Here we review prevalence of allergy to peanut and tree nuts in different populations of the world, summarize knowledge regarding the involved nut allergen molecules and current AIT approaches for nut allergy. We argue that nut-specific AIT may benefit from molecular subcutaneous AIT (SCIT) approaches but identify also possible hurdles for such an approach and explain why molecular SCIT may be a hard nut to crack.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Fuhrmann
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Huey-Jy Huang
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aysegul Akarsu
- Division of Allergy and Asthma, Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Igor Shilovskiy
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga Elisyutina
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Musa Khaitov
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marianne van Hage
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University, Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Birgit Linhart
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margarete Focke-Tejkl
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | - Rudolf Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
- Laboratory of Immunopathology, Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Bulent Enis Sekerel
- Division of Allergy and Asthma, Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Jeong HI, Lee B, Kim S, Kyung Y, Jung M, Kim M, Lee JY, Kim K, Ahn K, Kim J. Home-Based Up-Dosing in Build-Up Phase of Oral Immunotherapy of Egg Allergy Is Safe and Feasible in Real-World Practice. ALLERGY, ASTHMA & IMMUNOLOGY RESEARCH 2021; 13:791-798. [PMID: 34486262 PMCID: PMC8419648 DOI: 10.4168/aair.2021.13.5.791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2020] [Revised: 12/10/2020] [Accepted: 01/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Oral immunotherapy (OIT) has emerged to build sustained unresponsiveness or tolerance in patients with egg allergy. However, it is important to increase compliance and ensure safety because OIT requires an extended period of time and has a risk of side effects like anaphylaxis. We aimed to show the feasibility and safety of OIT during the build-up phase using a home-based, up-dosing method in children with egg allergy. Sixteen patients aged 4 to 12 years with egg allergy were enrolled. Patients increased the dose of boiled egg white (EW) by 5% per day at home and 25% per month at the hospital, with a target dose of 40 g of boiled EW (4.0 g of EW proteins). A historical control group (n = 16) was matched for age, sex, and clinical characteristics for comparisons with the OIT group. Oral food challenge (OFC) tests were performed after completing the build-up phase. In the OIT group, 93.8% (15/16) of patients achieved desensitization, with only 1 patient discontinuing OIT before the maintenance phase due to repeated allergic reactions. Mild allergic reactions and anaphylaxis occurred in 12 (75.0%) and 2 patients (12.5%), respectively. However, there were no significant adverse reactions such as serious anxiety or life-threatening events that required discontinuation of treatment. On the contrary, only 1 patient (6.3%) in the control group passed an OFC of 40 g of boiled EW during the same period (P < 0.001). Our results suggest that home-based up-dosing protocols using boiled eggs may be safe and feasible for the build-up phase of OIT in children with egg allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hye-In Jeong
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Environmental Health Center for Atopic Diseases, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Bora Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Environmental Health Center for Atopic Diseases, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sukyung Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Environmental Health Center for Atopic Diseases, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yechan Kyung
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Changwon, Korea
| | - Minyoung Jung
- Department of Pediatrics, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Minji Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Chungnam National University Sejong Hospital, Sejong, Korea
| | - Ji Young Lee
- Department of Pediatrics, Hallym University Hangang Sacred Heart Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kevin Kim
- School of Arts and Sciences, University of Richmond, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Kangmo Ahn
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Environmental Health Center for Atopic Diseases, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jihyun Kim
- Department of Pediatrics, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Environmental Health Center for Atopic Diseases, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|