1
|
Ye TW, Fu TW, Du CF, Yue RC, Jiang QT, Zhong ZH, Zhao Q, Zhang CW, Liu J, Liu JW, Luo ZY, Fan XM, Hong DF, Cheng J, Xiao ZQ. Comparison of percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition and portal vein embolization versus transarterial chemoembolization and portal vein embolization for planned hepatectomy with insufficient future liver remnant. BMC Cancer 2024; 24:985. [PMID: 39123182 PMCID: PMC11312699 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-024-12666-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Accepted: 07/21/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In China, both percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition plus portal vein embolization (PALPP) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus portal vein embolization (PVE) have been utilized in planned hepatectomy. However, there is a lack of comparative studies on the effectiveness of these two techniques for cases with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS Patients were categorized into either the PALPP group or the TACE + PVE group. Clinical data, including FLR growth rate, complications, secondary resection rate, and overall survival rate, were compared and analyzed for both groups retrospectively. RESULTS Between December 2014 and October 2021, a total of 29 patients underwent TACE + PVE (n = 12) and PALPP (n = 17). In the TACE + PVE group, 7 patients successfully underwent two-stage hepatectomy, while in the PALPP group, 13 patients underwent the procedure (two-stage resection rate: 58.3% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.42). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications of one-stage procedures (11.8% vs. 8.3%, P > 0.05) and second-stage resection complication (0% vs. 46.2%, P = 0.05) between the TACE + PVE and PALPP groups. However, the PALPP group demonstrated a shorter time to FLR volume growth for second-stage resection (18.5 days vs. 66 days, P = 0.001) and KGR (58.5 ml/week vs. 7.7 ml/week, P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Compared with TACE + PVE, PALPP results in a more significant increase in FLR volume and a higher rate of two-stage resection without increasing postoperative complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tai-Wei Ye
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China
| | - Tian-Wei Fu
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China
| | - Cheng-Fei Du
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, China
| | - Ru-Chi Yue
- Three Gorges University, Yichang, Hubei, 443000, China
| | - Qi-Tao Jiang
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Zhi-Hang Zhong
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Qin Zhao
- Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, 116000, China
| | - Cheng-Wu Zhang
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Jie Liu
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Jun-Wei Liu
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Zu-Yan Luo
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - Xiao-Ming Fan
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China
| | - De-Fei Hong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine(DeFei Hong), No.3 East Qingchun Road, Hangzhou, 310016, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jian Cheng
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| | - Zun-Qiang Xiao
- General Surgery, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Cancer Center, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, 310014, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li N, Schwantes IR, Mayo SC, Park B, Koethe Y. Safety and Effectiveness of Portal Vein Embolization after Hepatic Arterial Infusion Therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2024; 35:1209-1214. [PMID: 38704140 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvir.2024.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/21/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Portal vein embolization (PVE) is a tool potentially useful for inducing future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy in patients with advanced hepatic malignancies who are at high risk of hepatic insufficiency if treated with surgical resection. However, the safety and effectiveness of PVE in the context of patients who have undergone hepatic arterial infusion (HAI) are unknown. This retrospective, single-center study identified 9 patients who underwent PVE after HAI between January 2015 and December 2022. There were no major adverse events, including biliary injury or high-grade liver failure. Analysis showed an increase in standardized FLR from 21.1% (SEM ± 2.4) to 34.8% (SEM ± 2.1) over 9.8 weeks (SEM ± 1.2), with a mean kinetic growth rate of 1.9% (interquartile range, 0.9%-2.4%). Patients who have undergone HAI therapy should not be excluded from consideration of PVE as part of their operative clearance strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ningcheng Li
- Dotter Interventional Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, UMass Chan Medical School, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Issac R Schwantes
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Skye C Mayo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Brian Park
- Dotter Interventional Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Yilun Koethe
- Dotter Interventional Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon; TRG Imaging, Portland, Oregon.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bilhim T, Böning G, Guiu B, Luz JH, Denys A. CIRSE Standards of Practice on Portal Vein Embolization and Double Vein Embolization/Liver Venous Deprivation. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:1025-1036. [PMID: 38884781 PMCID: PMC11303578 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03743-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Abstract
This CIRSE Standards of Practice document is aimed at interventional radiologists and provides best practices for performing liver regeneration therapies prior to major hepatectomies, including portal vein embolization, double vein embolization and liver venous deprivation. It has been developed by an expert writing group under the guidance of the CIRSE Standards of Practice Committee. It encompasses all clinical and technical details required to perform liver regeneration therapies, revising the indications, contra-indications, outcome measures assessed, technique and expected outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tiago Bilhim
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Curry Cabral Hospital, Unidade Local de Saúde São José; Centro Clínico Académico de Lisboa, SAMS Hospital, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Georg Böning
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Germany
| | - Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - José Hugo Luz
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Brazilian National Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
| | - Alban Denys
- Department of Radiology and Interventional Radiology, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois CHUV, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yilmaz E, Torsello GF, Hosseini ASA, Zygmunt AC, Lorf T, Keck J, Schild-Suhren S, Wellge B, Oberhuber R, Kollmar O, Ghadimi M, Bösch F. Role of liver augmentation prior to hepatic resection - a survey on standards, procedures, and indications in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2024; 409:228. [PMID: 39066906 PMCID: PMC11283428 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-024-03418-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE For primary and secondary liver tumors oncological resection remains a chance of cure. Augmentation of functional liver tissue may be necessary to preserve sufficient future liver remnant (FLR). Clinical decision-making on liver augmentation techniques and indications may differ internationally. Thus, this study aims to identify standards of liver augmentation in hepato-pancreatico-biliary (HPB) centers in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria. METHODS Using a web-based survey, 48 hospitals in Germany, Switzerland, and Austria were invited to report their surgical indication, standard procedures, and results of liver augmentation. RESULTS Forty (83.3%) of the hospitals invited participated. Most of the hospitals were certified liver centers (55%), performing complex surgeries such as liver transplantation (57.5%) and ALPPS (80%). The standard liver augmentation technique in all countries was portal vein embolization (PVE; 56%), followed by ALPPS (32.1%) in Germany or PVE with hepatic vein embolization (33.3%) in Switzerland and Austria. Standard procedure for liver augmentation did not correlate with certification as liver center, performance of liver transplantation or ALPPS. Surgical indication for PVE varied depending on tumor entity. Most hospitals rated the importance of PVE before resection of cholangiocarcinoma or colorectal metastases as high, while PVE for hepatocellular carcinoma was rated as low. CONCLUSION The survey gives an overview of the clinical routine in HPB centers in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. PVE seems to dominate as standard technique to increase the FLR. However, there is a variety in the main indication for liver augmentation. Further studies are necessary evaluating the differing PVE techniques for liver augmentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elif Yilmaz
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Giovanni F Torsello
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Ali Seif Amir Hosseini
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Anne-Christine Zygmunt
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Lorf
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Jan Keck
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Stina Schild-Suhren
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Björn Wellge
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Rupert Oberhuber
- Department of Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Center for Operative Medicine, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Otto Kollmar
- Department of Visceral Surgery, University Center for Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, St. Clara Hospital and University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Michael Ghadimi
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany
| | - Florian Bösch
- Department of General, Visceral, and Pediatric Surgery, University Medical Center Göttingen (UMG), Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yang L, Yang M, Wang T, Qiu Y, Yang Y, Wang W. Comparison of liver venous deprivation with portal vein embolization alone in patients undergoing major liver resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2024:S1365-182X(24)02221-4. [PMID: 39054212 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.07.409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/27/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The clinical efficacy and safety between liver venous deprivation (LVD) and portal vein embolization (PVE) prior to major hepatectomy is still unclear. METHODS Studies comparing LVD and PVE were obtained by systemically searching PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library Central databases through 22 December 2023. RESULTS Ten studies including 588 patients were reviewed. Compared with PVE group, LVD group exhibited an increased liver resection rate (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.13-3.15; P = 0.01), a faster KGR (MD, 1.37; 95% CI, 0.31-2.42; P = 0.01), and a shorter time to hepatectomy (MD, -6.66; 95% CI, -8.03 to -5.30; P < 0.0001). The pooled results showed that post-embolization complications (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 0.66-2.74), overall postoperative complications (OR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.68-1.75), severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥ III) (OR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.43-1.14), and 90-day mortality (OR, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.13-1.09) were not significantly different in both groups. LVD group had significantly lower post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF) than PVE group (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.22-0.91; P = 0.03). CONCLUSION LVD outperforms PVE regarding liver resection rate and future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy and shows comparable safety to PVE. In addition, LVD allowed for major hepatectomy with lower incidence of PHLF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lingpeng Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Ming Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yiwen Qiu
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Yi Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Wentao Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kron P, Lodge P. New trends in surgery for colorectal liver metastasis. Ann Gastroenterol Surg 2024; 8:553-565. [PMID: 38957562 PMCID: PMC11216794 DOI: 10.1002/ags3.12810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/09/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
By presenting the most up-to-date findings and incorporating the latest evidence, this article seeks to present a comprehensive guide for navigating the complexities inherent in the management of colorectal liver metastasis. It aims to serve as a valuable resource offering clinicians and healthcare professionals an understanding of the diverse modalities and approaches available for treating this challenging and multifaceted disease. In an era of rapidly evolving medical knowledge, this article examines the latest insights to make informed decisions in the realm of colorectal liver metastasis management. The article does not only highlight the up-to-date knowledge but also provides the evidence for existing therapeutic strategies. This practical tool provides evidence-based recommendations to clinicians, thereby contributing to the ongoing advancement of effective treatment strategies for this challenging disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Kron
- Department for General and Transplantation SurgeryUniversity Hospital TuebingenTuebingenGermany
| | - Peter Lodge
- St. James's University Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS TrustLeedsUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Maki H, Nishioka Y, Haddad A, Lendoire M, Tran Cao HS, Chun YS, Tzeng CWD, Vauthey JN, Newhook TE. Reproducibility and efficiency of liver volumetry using manual method and liver analysis software. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:911-918. [PMID: 38632032 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2024.03.1157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 01/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/15/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For liver volumetry, manual tracing on computed tomography (CT) images is time-consuming and operator dependent. To overcome these disadvantages, several three-dimensional simulation software programs have been developed; however, their efficacy has not fully been evaluated. METHODS Three physicians performed liver volumetry on preoperative CT images on 30 patients who underwent formal right hepatectomy, using manual tracing volumetry and two simulation software programs, SYNAPSE and syngo.via. The future liver remnant (FLR) was calculated using each method of volumetry. The primary endpoint was reproducibility and secondary outcomes were calculation time and learning curve. RESULTS The mean FLR was significantly lower for manual volumetry than for SYNAPSE or syngo.via; there was no significant difference in mean FLR between the two software-based methods. Reproducibility was lower for the manual method than for the software-based methods. Mean calculation time was shortest for SYNAPSE. For the two physicians unfamiliar with the software, no obvious learning curve was observed for using SYNAPSE, whereas learning curves were observed for using syngo.via. CONCLUSIONS Liver volumetry was more reproducible and faster with three-dimensional simulation software, especially SYNAPSE software, than with the conventional manual tracing method. Software can help even inexperienced physicians learn quickly how to perform liver volumetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yujiro Nishioka
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hop S Tran Cao
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yun S Chun
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ching-Wei D Tzeng
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
O'Connell RM, Hoti E. Challenges and Opportunities for Precision Surgery for Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:2379. [PMID: 39001441 PMCID: PMC11240734 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16132379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2024] [Revised: 06/24/2024] [Accepted: 06/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/16/2024] Open
Abstract
The incidence of colorectal cancer and colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing globally due to an interaction of environmental and genetic factors. A minority of patients with CRLM have surgically resectable disease, but for those who have resection as part of multimodal therapy for their disease, long-term survival has been shown. Precision surgery-the idea of careful patient selection and targeting of surgical intervention, such that treatments shown to be proven to benefit on a population level are the optimal treatment for each individual patient-is the new paradigm of care. Key to this is the understanding of tumour molecular biology and clinically relevant mutations, such as KRAS, BRAF, and microsatellite instability (MSI), which can predict poorer overall outcomes and a poorer response to systemic therapy. The emergence of immunotherapy and hepatic artery infusion (HAI) pumps show potential to convert previously unresectable disease to resectable disease, in addition to established systemic and locoregional therapies, but the surgeon must be wary of poor-quality livers and the spectre of post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). Volume modulation, a cornerstone of hepatic surgery for a generation, has been given a shot in the arm with the advent of liver venous depletion (LVD) ensuring significantly more hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). The optimal timing of liver resection for those patients with synchronous disease is yet to be truly established, but evidence would suggest that those patients requiring complex colorectal surgery and major liver resection are best served with a staged approach. In the operating room, parenchyma-preserving minimally invasive surgery (MIS) can dramatically reduce the surgical insult to the patient and lead to better perioperative outcomes, with quicker return to function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Michael O'Connell
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Emir Hoti
- Department of Hepatopancreaticobiliary and Transplantation Surgery, Saint Vincent's University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Haddad A, Lendoire M, Maki H, Kang HC, Habibollahi P, Odisio BC, Huang SY, Vauthey JN. Liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions: history, rationale, and emerging tools. J Gastrointest Surg 2024; 28:766-775. [PMID: 38519362 DOI: 10.1016/j.gassur.2024.02.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative hepatic insufficiency (PHI) is the most feared complication after hepatectomy. Volume of the future liver remnant (FLR) is one objectively measurable indicator to identify patients at risk of PHI. In this review, we summarized the development and rationale for the use of liver volumetry and liver-regenerative interventions and highlighted emerging tools that could yield new advancements in liver volumetry. METHODS A review of MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was conducted to identify literature related to liver volumetry. The references of relevant articles were reviewed to identify additional publications. RESULTS Liver volumetry based on radiologic imaging was developed in the 1980s to identify patients at risk of PHI and later used in the 1990s to evaluate grafts for living donor living transplantation. The field evolved in the 2000s by the introduction of standardized FLR based on the hepatic metabolic demands and in the 2010s by the introduction of the degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate as measures of the FLR regenerative and functional capacity. Several liver-regenerative interventions, most notably portal vein embolization, are used to increase resectability and reduce the risk of PHI. In parallel with the increase in automation and machine assistance to physicians, many semi- and fully automated tools are being developed to facilitate liver volumetry. CONCLUSION Liver volumetry is the most reliable tool to detect patients at risk of PHI. Advances in imaging analysis technologies, newly developed functional measures, and liver-regenerative interventions have been improving our ability to perform safe hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antony Haddad
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Mateo Lendoire
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Harufumi Maki
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Hyunseon Christine Kang
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Peiman Habibollahi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Bruno C Odisio
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Steven Y Huang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Arntz PJW, Olthof PB, Korenblik R, Heil J, Kazemier G, van Delden OM, Bennink RJ, Damink SWMO, van Dam RM, Schadde E, Erdmann JI. Effect of Sarcopenia on the Increase in Liver Volume and Function After Portal Vein Embolization. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2024; 47:642-649. [PMID: 38416177 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-024-03676-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/28/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Sarcopenia is associated with a decreased kinetic growth rate (KGR) of the future liver remnant (FLR) after portal vein embolization (PVE). However, little is known on the increase in FLR function (FLRF) after PVE. This study evaluated the effect of sarcopenia on the functional growth rate (FGR) after PVE measured with hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS). METHODS All patients who underwent PVE at the Amsterdam UMC between January 2005 and August 2017 were analyzed. Functional imaging by HBS was used to determine FGR. Liver volumetry was performed using multiphase contrast computed tomography (CT). Muscle area measurement to determine sarcopenia was taken at the third lumbar level (L3). RESULTS Out of the 95 included patients, 9 were excluded due to unavailable data. 70/86 (81%) patients were sarcopenic. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, sarcopenia (p = 0.009) and FLR volume (FRLV) before PVE (p = 0.021) were the only factors correlated with KGR, while no correlation was found with FGR. 90-day mortality was similar across the sarcopenic and non-sarcopenic group (4/53 [8%] versus 1/11 [9%]; p = 1.000). The resection rates were also comparable (53/70 [75%] versus 11/16 [69%]; p = 0.542). CONCLUSION FGR after PVE as measured by HBS appears to be preserved in sarcopenic patients. This is in contrast to KGR after PVE as measured by liver volumetry which is decreased in sarcopenic patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level 3b, cohort and case control studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pieter J W Arntz
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Remon Korenblik
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt/Main, Germany
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Roelof J Bennink
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Joris I Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Korenblik R, Heil J, Smits J, James S, Olij B, Bechstein WO, Bemelmans MHA, Binkert CA, Breitenstein S, Williams M, Detry O, Dewulf MJL, Dili A, Grochola LF, Grote J, Heise D, Kalil JA, Metrakos P, Neumann UP, Pappas SG, Pennetta F, Schnitzbauer AA, Tasse JC, Winkens B, Olde Damink SWM, van der Leij C, Schadde E, van Dam RM. Liver regeneration after portal and hepatic vein embolization improves overall survival compared with portal vein embolization alone: mid-term survival analysis of the multicentre DRAGON 0 cohort. Br J Surg 2024; 111:znae087. [PMID: 38662462 PMCID: PMC11044894 DOI: 10.1093/bjs/znae087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2023] [Revised: 03/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/06/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The purpose of this study was to compare 3-year overall survival after simultaneous portal (PVE) and hepatic vein (HVE) embolization versus PVE alone in patients undergoing liver resection for primary and secondary cancers of the liver. METHODS In this multicentre retrospective study, all DRAGON 0 centres provided 3-year follow-up data for all patients who had PVE/HVE or PVE, and were included in DRAGON 0 between 2016 and 2019. Kaplan-Meier analysis was undertaken to assess 3-year overall and recurrence/progression-free survival. Factors affecting survival were evaluated using univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses. RESULTS In total, 199 patients were included from 7 centres, of whom 39 underwent PVE/HVE and 160 PVE alone. Groups differed in median age (P = 0.008). As reported previously, PVE/HVE resulted in a significantly higher resection rate than PVE alone (92 versus 68%; P = 0.007). Three-year overall survival was significantly higher in the PVE/HVE group (median survival not reached after 36 months versus 20 months after PVE; P = 0.004). Univariable and multivariable analyses identified PVE/HVE as an independent predictor of survival (univariable HR 0.46, 95% c.i. 0.27 to 0.76; P = 0.003). CONCLUSION Overall survival after PVE/HVE is substantially longer than that after PVE alone in patients with primary and secondary liver tumours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remon Korenblik
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jens Smits
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Sinead James
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Marc H A Bemelmans
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Christoph A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Stefan Breitenstein
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Michael Williams
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Olivier Detry
- Department of Abdominal Surgery and Transplantation, University of Liege, CHU Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Maxime J L Dewulf
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Alexandra Dili
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, CHU-UC Louvain-Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Lukasz F Grochola
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Jon Grote
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Daniel Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jennifer A Kalil
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepato-pancreatico-biliary Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Peter Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, Section of Hepato-pancreatico-biliary Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Sam G Pappas
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Francesca Pennetta
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Jordan C Tasse
- Department of Radiology, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Bjorn Winkens
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
- NUTRIM—School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Christiaan van der Leij
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
- Surgical Centre, Hirslanden Clinic Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Switzerland Surgical Centre, Hirslanden Clinic St Anna Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Ronald M van Dam
- GROW—School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Heil J, Augath M, Kurtcuoglu V, Hohmann J, Bechstein WO, Olthof P, Schnitzbauer AA, Seebeck P, Schiesser M, Schläpfer M, Beck-Schimmer B, Schadde E. Assessment of liver function by gadoxetic acid avidity in MRI in a model of rapid liver regeneration in rats. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:521-529. [PMID: 38185541 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2023] [Revised: 11/18/2023] [Accepted: 12/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This animal study investigates the hypothesis of an immature liver growth following ALPPS (associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy) by measuring liver volume and function using gadoxetic acid avidity in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in models of ALPPS, major liver resection (LR) and portal vein ligation (PVL). METHODS Wistar rats were randomly allocated to ALPPS, LR or PVL. In contrast-enhanced MRI scans with gadoxetic acid (Primovist®), liver volume and function of the right median lobe (=future liver remnant, FLR) and the deportalized lobes (DPL) were assessed until post-operative day (POD) 5. Liver functionFLR/DPL was defined as the inverse value of time from injection of gadoxetic acid to the blood pool-corrected maximum signal intensityFLR/DPL multiplied by the volumeFLR/DPL. RESULTS In ALPPS (n = 6), LR (n = 6) and PVL (n = 6), volumeFLR and functionFLR increased proportionally, except on POD 1. Thereafter, functionFLR exceeded volumeFLR increase in LR and ALPPS, but not in PVL. Total liver function was significantly reduced after LR until POD 3, but never undercuts 60% of its pre-operative value following ALPPS and PVL. DISCUSSION This study shows for the first time that functional increase is proportional to volume increase in ALPPS using gadoxetic acid avidity in MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Germany
| | - Mark Augath
- Institute for Biomedical Engineering, ETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Vartan Kurtcuoglu
- The Interface Group, Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Joachim Hohmann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland; Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Germany
| | - Pim Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Goethe University Frankfurt, University Hospital, Department of General, Visceral, Transplant and Thoracic Surgery, Germany
| | - Petra Seebeck
- Zurich Integrative Rodent Physiology (ZIRP), University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marc Schiesser
- Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ) Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | - Martin Schläpfer
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Beatrice Beck-Schimmer
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Institute of Anesthesiology, University Hospital of Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Chirurgisches Zentrum Zürich (CZZ), Klinik Hirslanden Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Chirurgie Zentrum Zentralschweiz (CZZ) Hirslanden St. Anna, Lucerne, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Rush University Medical Center Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zwirner S, Abu Rmilah AA, Klotz S, Pfaffenroth B, Kloevekorn P, Moschopoulou AA, Schuette S, Haag M, Selig R, Li K, Zhou W, Nelson E, Poso A, Chen H, Amiot B, Jia Y, Minshew A, Michalak G, Cui W, Rist E, Longerich T, Jung B, Felgendreff P, Trompak O, Premsrirut PK, Gries K, Muerdter TE, Heinkele G, Wuestefeld T, Shapiro D, Weissbach M, Koenigsrainer A, Sipos B, Ab E, Zacarias MO, Theisgen S, Gruenheit N, Biskup S, Schwab M, Albrecht W, Laufer S, Nyberg S, Zender L. First-in-class MKK4 inhibitors enhance liver regeneration and prevent liver failure. Cell 2024; 187:1666-1684.e26. [PMID: 38490194 PMCID: PMC11011246 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 11/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Diminished hepatocyte regeneration is a key feature of acute and chronic liver diseases and after extended liver resections, resulting in the inability to maintain or restore a sufficient functional liver mass. Therapies to restore hepatocyte regeneration are lacking, making liver transplantation the only curative option for end-stage liver disease. Here, we report on the structure-based development and characterization (nuclear magnetic resonance [NMR] spectroscopy) of first-in-class small molecule inhibitors of the dual-specificity kinase MKK4 (MKK4i). MKK4i increased liver regeneration upon hepatectomy in murine and porcine models, allowed for survival of pigs in a lethal 85% hepatectomy model, and showed antisteatotic and antifibrotic effects in liver disease mouse models. A first-in-human phase I trial (European Union Drug Regulating Authorities Clinical Trials [EudraCT] 2021-000193-28) with the clinical candidate HRX215 was conducted and revealed excellent safety and pharmacokinetics. Clinical trials to probe HRX215 for prevention/treatment of liver failure after extensive oncological liver resections or after transplantation of small grafts are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Zwirner
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; HepaRegeniX GmbH, Tübingen 72072, Germany
| | - Anan A Abu Rmilah
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Sabrina Klotz
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Bent Pfaffenroth
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Philip Kloevekorn
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Athina A Moschopoulou
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Svenja Schuette
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Mathias Haag
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart 70376, Germany
| | - Roland Selig
- HepaRegeniX GmbH, Tübingen 72072, Germany; Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Kewei Li
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Wei Zhou
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Erek Nelson
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Antti Poso
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; School of Pharmacy, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio 70211, Finland; iFIT Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image-guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Harvey Chen
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Bruce Amiot
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Yao Jia
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Anna Minshew
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Gregory Michalak
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Wei Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Elke Rist
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Thomas Longerich
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg 69120, Germany
| | | | - Philipp Felgendreff
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
| | - Omelyan Trompak
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | | | - Katharina Gries
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Thomas E Muerdter
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart 70376, Germany
| | - Georg Heinkele
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart 70376, Germany
| | - Torsten Wuestefeld
- Laboratory for In Vivo Genetics & Gene Therapy, Genome Institute of Singapore, Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A(∗)STAR), Singapore 138672, Singapore; School of Biological Sciences, Nanyang Technological University of Singapore, Singapore 637551, Singapore
| | | | | | - Alfred Koenigsrainer
- iFIT Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image-guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; German Cancer Research Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany; Department of General-, Visceral, and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Bence Sipos
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | - Eiso Ab
- ZoBio B.V., Leiden 2333 CH, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Matthias Schwab
- Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart 70376, Germany; iFIT Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image-guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Pharmacy and Biochemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
| | | | - Stefan Laufer
- Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; Tübingen Center for Academic Drug Discovery & Development (TüCAD(2)), Tübingen 72076, Germany.
| | - Scott Nyberg
- William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55905, USA.
| | - Lars Zender
- Department of Medical Oncology and Pneumology (Internal Medicine VIII), University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; iFIT Cluster of Excellence (EXC 2180) "Image-guided and Functionally Instructed Tumor Therapies", University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany; German Cancer Research Consortium (DKTK), German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg 69120, Germany; Tübingen Center for Academic Drug Discovery & Development (TüCAD(2)), Tübingen 72076, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chandra P, Sacks GD. Contemporary Surgical Management of Colorectal Liver Metastases. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:941. [PMID: 38473303 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16050941] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/19/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in the United States and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Approximately 20-30% of patients will develop hepatic metastasis in the form of synchronous or metachronous disease. The treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) has evolved into a multidisciplinary approach, with chemotherapy and a variety of locoregional treatments, such as ablation and portal vein embolization, playing a crucial role. However, resection remains a core tenet of management, serving as the gold standard for a curative-intent therapy. As such, the input of a dedicated hepatobiliary surgeon is paramount for appropriate patient selection and choice of surgical approach, as significant advances in the field have made management decisions extremely nuanced and complex. We herein aim to review the contemporary surgical management of colorectal liver metastasis with respect to both perioperative and operative considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratik Chandra
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - Greg D Sacks
- Department of Surgery, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY 10016, USA
- VA New York Harbor Healthcare System, New York, NY 10010, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Hayashi D, Mizuno T, Kawakatsu S, Baba T, Sando M, Yamaguchi J, Onoe S, Watanabe N, Sunagawa M, Ebata T. Liver remnant volume to body weight ratio of 0.65% as a lower limit in right hepatic trisectionectomy with bile duct resection. Surgery 2024; 175:404-412. [PMID: 37989634 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.09.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/23/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous studies have suggested the utility of an indocyanine green plasma clearance rate of the future liver remnant (FLR) (ICGK-F) ≥0.05 in hepatobiliary resection to reduce the surgical risk. The present study aimed to verify whether future liver remnant size rather than ICGK-F matters in extended hepatobiliary resection. METHODS Between 2004 and 2021, patients who underwent right hepatic trisectionectomy with bile duct resection were included. The effect of the FLR volume-to-body weight ratio (FLR/BW) and ICGK-F on posthepatectomy liver failure was evaluated along with other parameters. RESULTS Among 91 study patients, the median ICGK-F, FLR, and FLR/BW were 0.057 (range, 0.027-0.099), 392 mL (145-705), and 0.78% (0.40-1.37), respectively. Posthepatectomy liver failure occurred in 23 patients. The incidence was 10 (40%) in 25 patients with an ICGK-F <0.05 and 12 (18%) in 65 patients with an ICGK-F ≥0.05 (P = .053); 13 (52%) in 25 patients with a FLR/BW <0.65% and 10 (15%) in 66 patients with a FLR/BW ≥0.65% (P = .001). Multivariate analysis showed that a FLR/BW <0.65% (odds ratio, 11.7; P = .005), age ≥65 years (odds ratio, 31.7; P < .001), and blood loss ≥25 mL/kg (odds ratio, 22.1; P = .004) were independent predictors of posthepatectomy liver failure, but ICGK-F <0.05 was not (P = .499). According to the meeting number of 3 factors, posthepatectomy liver failure incidence was 0 of 22 (0%) in patients with 0 factors, 6 of 43 (14%) in patients with 1, and 17 of 26 (65%) in patients with 2 or 3 (P < .001). CONCLUSION A FLR/BW ≥0.65% may serve as a volumetric basis to reduce posthepatectomy liver failure after extended hepatobiliary resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Hayashi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Takashi Mizuno
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Shoji Kawakatsu
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Taisuke Baba
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Masanori Sando
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Junpei Yamaguchi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Onoe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Nobuyuki Watanabe
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Masaki Sunagawa
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan
| | - Tomoki Ebata
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu B, Huang X, Ren Z, Liu Y, Yang X, Wang Y, Chen Q, Dong J, Xiang C, Zhang Y. Comparing iodized oil with polyvinyl alcohol for portal vein embolization in promoting liver remnant increase before partial hepatectomy. Asian J Surg 2024; 47:874-879. [PMID: 38042652 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2023.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2023] [Revised: 10/09/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 12/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare the efficacy and safety of iodized oil versus polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) particles in portal vein embolization (PVE) before partial hepatectomy. METHODS From October 2016 to December 2021, 86 patients who planned to undergo hepatectomy after PVE were enrolled, including 61 patients post-PVE with PVA particles + coils and 25 patients post-PVE with iodized oil + coils. All patients underwent CT examination before and 2-3 weeks after PVE to evaluate the future liver remnant (FLR). The intercohort comparison included the degree of liver volume growth, changes in laboratory data, and adverse events. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the resection rate between the iodized oil group and the PVA particle group (68 % vs. 70 %, p = 0.822). In terms of the degree of hypertrophy (9.52 % ± 13.47 vs. 4.03 % ± 10.55, p = 0.047) and kinetic growth rate (4.07 % ± 5.4 vs. 1.55 % ± 4.63, p = 0.032), the iodized oil group was superior to the PVA group. The PVE operation time in the PVA particle group was shorter than that in the iodized oil group (121. 72 min ± 34.45 vs. 156. 2 min ± 71.58, p = 0.029). There was no significant difference in the degree of hypertrophy between the high bilirubin group and the control group (5.32 % ± 9.21 vs. 6.1 % ± 14.79, p = 0.764). Only 1 patient had a major complication. CONCLUSIONS Compared with PVA particles, iodized oil PVE can significantly increase liver volume and the degree of hypertrophy without any significant difference in safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boyang Wu
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; School of Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Huang
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Zhizhong Ren
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Ying Liu
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaowei Yang
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yaqin Wang
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | | | - Jiahong Dong
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; Key Laboratory of Digital Intelligence Hepatology (Ministry of Education), School of Clinical Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Canhong Xiang
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
| | - Yuewei Zhang
- Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Center Department, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dixon MEB, Pappas SG. Utilization of Multiorgan Radiomics to Predict Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy After Portal Vein Embolization: Another Tool for the Toolbox? Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:705-708. [PMID: 38062291 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14659-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2023] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew E B Dixon
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Sam G Pappas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chaouch MA, Mazzotta A, da Costa AC, Hussain MI, Gouader A, Krimi B, Panaro F, Guiu B, Soubrane O, Oweira H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of liver venous deprivation versus portal vein embolization before hepatectomy: future liver volume, postoperative outcomes, and oncological safety. Front Med (Lausanne) 2024; 10:1334661. [PMID: 38269320 PMCID: PMC10806199 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1334661] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/07/2023] [Accepted: 12/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Introduction This systematic review aimed to compare liver venous deprivation (LVD) with portal vein embolization (PVE) in terms of future liver volume, postoperative outcomes, and oncological safety before major hepatectomy. Methods We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis following the PRISMA guidelines 2020 and AMSTAR 2 guidelines. Comparative articles published before November 2022 were retained. Results The literature search identified nine eligible comparative studies. They included 557 patients, 207 in the LVD group and 350 in the PVE group. This systematic review and meta-analysis concluded that LVD was associated with higher future liver remnant (FLR) volume after embolization, percentage of FLR hypertrophy, lower failure of resection due to low FLR, faster kinetic growth, higher day 5 prothrombin time, and higher 3 years' disease-free survival. This study did not find any difference between the LVD and PVE groups in terms of complications related to embolization, FLR percentage of hypertrophy after embolization, failure of resection, 3-month mortality, overall morbidity, major complications, operative time, blood loss, bile leak, ascites, post hepatectomy liver failure, day 5 bilirubin level, hospital stay, and three years' overall survival. Conclusion LVD is as feasible and safe as PVE with encouraging results making some selected patients more suitable for surgery, even with a small FLR. Systematic review registration The review protocol was registered in PROSPERO before conducting the study (CRD42021287628).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed Ali Chaouch
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Fattouma Bourguiba Hospital, University of Monastir, Monastir, Tunisia
| | - Alessandro Mazzotta
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Institute Mutualist of Montsouris, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Adriano Carneiro da Costa
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Institute Mutualist of Montsouris, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Mohammad Iqbal Hussain
- Department of General Surgery, Great Western Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Swindon, United Kingdom
| | - Amine Gouader
- Department of Surgery, Perpignan Hospital Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Bassem Krimi
- Department of Surgery, Perpignan Hospital Center, Perpignan, France
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of HPB Surgery and Transplantation, St-Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Visceral and Digestive Surgery, Institute Mutualist of Montsouris, University of Paris, Paris, France
| | - Hani Oweira
- Department of Surgery, Universitäts Medizin Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Smet H, Martin D, Uldry E, Duran R, Girardet R, Schaefer N, Prior JO, Denys A, Halkic N, Demartines N, Melloul E. Tc-99m mebrofenin hepatobiliary scintigraphy to assess future liver remnant function before major liver surgery. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:1312-1319. [PMID: 37638473 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27426] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 08/12/2023] [Indexed: 08/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Assessment of liver function is paramount before hepatectomy. This study aimed to assess future liver remnant function (FLR-F) using hepatobiliary scintigraphy (HBS) and to compare it to FLR volume (FLR-V) in the prediction of posthepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). The impact of volume and function gains were also assessed in patients undergoing portal vein embolization (PVE) or liver venous deprivation (LVD). METHODS All consecutive patients undergoing major hepatectomy between 02/2018 and 09/2021 with preoperative HBS were included. FLR-V was expressed as percentage of total liver volume and analyzed using preoperative computed tomography. FLR-V and FLR-F gains after embolization were expressed in percentage. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to compare both methods in predicting PHLF. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were included. PVE and LVD were performed in 4 (11%) and 28 patients (78%), respectively. Overall, PHLF occurred in eight patients (22%). FLR-F gain after embolization showed significant ability to predict PHLF (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.789), with cut-off value of 150% showing a sensitivity of 1.00, a specificity of 0.42, and a negative predictive value of 1.00. CONCLUSION Preoperative HBS shows a high sensitivity to predict PHLF when HBS is performed twice to measure the function gain after venous embolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Héloïse Smet
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - David Martin
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emilie Uldry
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Rafaël Duran
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Raphael Girardet
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Niklaus Schaefer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - John O Prior
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Alban Denys
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nermin Halkic
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nicolas Demartines
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Emmanuel Melloul
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, Lausanne and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
de Mathelin P, Noblet V, Trog A, Paul C, Cusumano C, Faitot F, Bachellier P, Addeo P. Volumetric Remodeling of the Left Liver After Right Hepatectomy: Analysis of Factors Predicting Degree of Hypertrophy and Post-hepatectomy Liver Failure. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2752-2762. [PMID: 37884754 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05804-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/04/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study investigated the volumetric remodeling of the left liver after right hepatectomy looking for factors predicting the degree of hypertrophy and severe post-hepatectomy liver failure (PHLF). METHODS In a cohort of 121 right hepatectomies, we performed CT volumetrics study of the future left liver remnant (FLR) preoperatively and postoperatively. Factors influencing FLR degree of hypertrophy and severe PHLF were identified by multivariate analysis. RESULTS After right hepatectomy, the mean degree of hypertrophy and kinetic growth rate of the left liver remnant were 25% and 3%/day respectively. The mean liver volume recovery rate was 77%. Liver remodeling volume was distributed for 79% on segments 2 and 3 and 21% on the segment 4 (p<0.001). Women showed a greater hypertrophy of segments 2 and 3 compared with men (p=0.002). The degree of hypertrophy of segment 4 was lower in case of middle hepatic vein resection (p=0.004). Left liver remnant kinetic growth rate was associated with the standardized future liver remnant (sFLR) (p<0.001) and a two-stage hepatectomy (p=0.023). Severe PHLF were predicted by intraoperative transfusion (p=0.009), biliary tumors (p=0.013), and male gender (p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS Volumetric remodeling of the left liver after right hepatectomy is not uniform and is mainly influenced by gender and sacrifice of middle hepatic vein. Male gender, intraoperative transfusion, and biliary tumors increase the risk of postoperative liver failure after right hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre de Mathelin
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
- ICube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS UMR 7357, Illkirch, France
| | - Vincent Noblet
- ICube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS UMR 7357, Illkirch, France
| | - Arnaud Trog
- ICube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS UMR 7357, Illkirch, France
| | - Chloé Paul
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - Caterina Cusumano
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - François Faitot
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
- ICube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS UMR 7357, Illkirch, France
| | - Philippe Bachellier
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France
| | - Pietro Addeo
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Pôle des Pathologies Digestives, Hépatiques et de la Transplantation, Hôpital de Hautepierre-Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Université de Strasbourg, France 1, Avenue Moliere, 67098, Strasbourg, France.
- ICube, Université de Strasbourg, CNRS UMR 7357, Illkirch, France.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
White MJ, Jensen EH, Brauer DG. A Review of Resection and Surgical Ablation for Primary and Secondary Liver Cancers. Semin Intervent Radiol 2023; 40:536-543. [PMID: 38274223 PMCID: PMC10807965 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2024]
Abstract
The surgical management of primary and secondary liver tumors is constantly evolving. Patient selection, particularly with regard to determining resectability, is vital to the success of programs directed toward invasive treatments of liver tumors. Particular attention should be paid toward determining whether patients are best served with surgical resection or ablative therapies. A multidisciplinary approach is necessary to provide optimal care to patients with liver malignancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- McKenzie J. White
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - Eric H. Jensen
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| | - David G. Brauer
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
- Masonic Cancer Center, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Horkaew P, Chansangrat J, Keeratibharat N, Le DC. Recent advances in computerized imaging and its vital roles in liver disease diagnosis, preoperative planning, and interventional liver surgery: A review. World J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 15:2382-2397. [PMID: 38111769 PMCID: PMC10725533 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v15.i11.2382] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 08/30/2023] [Accepted: 09/27/2023] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
The earliest and most accurate detection of the pathological manifestations of hepatic diseases ensures effective treatments and thus positive prognostic outcomes. In clinical settings, screening and determining the extent of a pathology are prominent factors in preparing remedial agents and administering appropriate therapeutic procedures. Moreover, in a patient undergoing liver resection, a realistic preoperative simulation of the subject-specific anatomy and physiology also plays a vital part in conducting initial assessments, making surgical decisions during the procedure, and anticipating postoperative results. Conventionally, various medical imaging modalities, e.g., computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and positron emission tomography, have been employed to assist in these tasks. In fact, several standardized procedures, such as lesion detection and liver segmentation, are also incorporated into prominent commercial software packages. Thus far, most integrated software as a medical device typically involves tedious interactions from the physician, such as manual delineation and empirical adjustments, as per a given patient. With the rapid progress in digital health approaches, especially medical image analysis, a wide range of computer algorithms have been proposed to facilitate those procedures. They include pattern recognition of a liver, its periphery, and lesion, as well as pre- and postoperative simulations. Prior to clinical adoption, however, software must conform to regulatory requirements set by the governing agency, for instance, valid clinical association and analytical and clinical validation. Therefore, this paper provides a detailed account and discussion of the state-of-the-art methods for liver image analyses, visualization, and simulation in the literature. Emphasis is placed upon their concepts, algorithmic classifications, merits, limitations, clinical considerations, and future research trends.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paramate Horkaew
- School of Computer Engineering, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Jirapa Chansangrat
- School of Radiology, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Nattawut Keeratibharat
- School of Surgery, Institute of Medicine, Suranaree University of Technology, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand
| | - Doan Cong Le
- Faculty of Information Technology, An Giang University, Vietnam National University (Ho Chi Minh City), An Giang 90000, Vietnam
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kambakamba P, Schneider MA, Linecker M, Kirimker EO, Moeckli B, Graf R, Reiner CS, Nguyen-Kim TDL, Kologlu M, Karayalcin K, Clavien PA, Balci D, Petrowsky H. Early Postoperative Serum Phosphate Drop Predicts Sufficient Hypertrophy After Liver Surgery. Ann Surg 2023; 278:763-771. [PMID: 37465990 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to assess the impact of postoperative hypophosphatemia on liver regeneration after major liver surgery in the scenario of Associating Liver Partition with Portal vein ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS) and living liver donation (LLD). BACKGROUND Hypophosphatemia has been described to reflect the metabolic demands of regenerating hepatocytes. Both ALPPS and LLD are characterized by an exceptionally strong liver regeneration and may be of particular interest in the context of posthepatectomy hypophosphatemia. METHODS Serum phosphate changes within the first 7 postoperative days after ALPPS (n=61) and LLD (n=54) were prospectively assessed and correlated with standardized volumetry after 1 week. In a translational approach, postoperative phosphate changes were investigated in mice and in vitro . RESULTS After ALPPS stage 1 and LLD, serum phosphate levels significantly dropped from a preoperative median of 1.08 mmol/L [interquartile range (IQR) 0.92-1.23] and 1.07 mmol/L (IQR 0.91-1.21) to a postoperative median nadir of 0.68 and 0.52 mmol/L, respectively. A pronounced phosphate drop correlated well with increased liver hypertrophy ( P <0.001). Patients with a low drop of phosphate showed a higher incidence of posthepatectomy liver failure after ALPPS (7% vs 31%, P =0.041). Like in humans, phosphate drop correlated significantly with degree of hypertrophy in murine ALPPS and hepatectomy models ( P <0.001). Blocking phosphate transporter (Slc20a1) inhibited cellular phosphate uptake and hepatocyte proliferation in vitro. CONCLUSION Phosphate drop after hepatectomy is a direct surrogate marker for liver hypertrophy. Perioperative implementation of serum phosphate analysis has the potential to detect patients with insufficient regenerative capacity at an early stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patryk Kambakamba
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Hepatobiliary Group, St. Vincents's University Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
- Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Marcel A Schneider
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Linecker
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein, Kiel, Germany
| | - Elvan Onur Kirimker
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Beat Moeckli
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Rolf Graf
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Cäcilia S Reiner
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | | | - Meltem Kologlu
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Kaan Karayalcin
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Pierre-Alain Clavien
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Deniz Balci
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Ankara University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Surgery and Solid Organ Transplantation, Bahcesehir University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Henrik Petrowsky
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Björk D, Delle M, Holmquist F, Hasselgren K, Sandström P, Lindell G, Sparrelid E, Björnsson B. Portal vein embolization with N-butyl-cyanoacrylate improves liver hypertrophy compared to microparticles - A Swedish multicenter cohort study. Heliyon 2023; 9:e21210. [PMID: 37954304 PMCID: PMC10637931 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Revised: 10/02/2023] [Accepted: 10/18/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023] Open
Abstract
Background An adequate future liver remnant (FLR) is fundamental for major liver resections. To achieve sufficient FLR, portal vein embolization (PVE) may be used. The most effective material for PVE has yet to be determined. The aim of this study was to investigate the differences in FLR growth between n-butyl-cyanoacrylate glue (NBCA) and microparticles. Material/methodsa retrospective study was performed at three Swedish hepatobiliary centers and included patients who underwent PVE 2013-2021. Electronic medical records were reviewed, and procedure-related data were collected. Data were analyzed with respect to embolizing material. Results A total of 265 patients were included: 160 in the NBCA group and 105 in the microparticle group. The NBCA group had a higher degree of hypertrophy (12.1 vs. 9.4 % points, p = 0.003) and a higher resection rate (68 vs. 59 %, p = 0.01) than the microparticle group. Procedure-related data all indicated the superiority of NBCA. No difference in inducing hypertrophy was observed when comparing patients who received chemotherapy before PVE with those who received chemotherapy before and after PVE within the NBCA group. Discussion/conclusion This retrospective multicenter study supports the superiority of NBCA compared to microparticles in the setting of PVE. Chemotherapy after PVE does not seem to negatively affect hypertrophy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis Björk
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Martin Delle
- Department of Radiology, Karolinska Universitetssjukhuset, Huddinge and CLINTEC (Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology), Karolinska University, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Holmquist
- Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology, Skåne University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Kristina Hasselgren
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Per Sandström
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Gert Lindell
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery, Linköping University Hospital and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Vicente E, Quijano Y, Duran H, Diaz E, Fabra I, Malave L, Ruiz P, Pizzuti G, Naldini C, De Nobili G, Caruso R, Ferri V. Can 3D imaging modeling recognize functional tissue and predict liver failure? A retrospective study based on 3D modelling of the major hepatectomies after hepatic modulation. BMC Surg 2023; 23:316. [PMID: 37853412 PMCID: PMC10583474 DOI: 10.1186/s12893-023-02196-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/20/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thanks to the introduction of radiomics, 3d reconstruction can be able to analyse tissues and recognise true hypertrophy from non-functioning tissue in patients treated with major hepatectomies with hepatic modulation.The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of 3D Imaging Modelling in predict liver failure. METHODS Patients submitted to major hepatectomies after hepatic modulation at Sanchinarro University Hospital from May 2015 to October 2019 were analysed. Three-dimensional reconstruction was realised before and after surgical treatment. The volumetry of Future Liver Remnant was calculated, distinguishing in Functional Future Liver Remnant (FRFx) i.e. true hypertrophy tissue and Anatomic Future Liver Remnant (FRL) i.e. hypertrophy plus no functional tissue (oedema/congestion) These volumes were analysed in patients with and without post hepatic liver failure. RESULTS Twenty-four procedures were realised (11 ALPPS and 13 PVE followed by major hepatectomy). Post hepatic liver failure grade B and C occurred in 6 patients. The ROC curve showed a better AUC for FRFxV (74%) with respect to FRLV (54%) in prediction PHLF > B. The increase of anatomical FRL (iFRL) was superior in the ALPPS group (120%) with respect to the PVE group (73%) (p = 0,041), while the increase of functional FRFX (iFRFx) was 35% in the ALLPS group and 46% in the PVE group (p > 0,05), showing no difference in the two groups. CONCLUSION The 3D reconstruction model can allow optimal surgical planning, and through the use of specific algorithms, can contribute to differential functioning liver parenchyma of the FLR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilio Vicente
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Calle Oñaa 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Yolanda Quijano
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Calle Oñaa 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Hipolito Duran
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Calle Oñaa 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Eduardo Diaz
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Calle Oñaa 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Isabel Fabra
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Calle Oñaa 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Luis Malave
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Calle Oñaa 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pablo Ruiz
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Calle Oñaa 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Giovanni De Nobili
- Università Degli Studi Gabriele d'Annunzio Chieti Pescara, Pescara, Italy
| | - Riccardo Caruso
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Calle Oñaa 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain
| | - Valentina Ferri
- Division of General Surgery, Sanchinarro Hospital, San Pablo University, Calle Oñaa 10, 28050, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hallemeier CL, Sharma N, Anker C, Selfridge JE, Lee P, Jabbour S, Williams V, Liu D, Kennedy T, Jethwa KR, Kim E, Kumar R, Small W, Tchelebi L, Russo S. American Radium Society Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of liver-directed therapies for nonsurgical management of liver metastases: Systematic review and guidelines. Cancer 2023; 129:3193-3212. [PMID: 37409678 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34931] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2023] [Revised: 05/09/2023] [Accepted: 05/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
The liver is a common site of cancer metastases. Systemic therapy is widely accepted as the standard treatment for liver metastases (LM), although select patients with liver oligometastases may be candidates for potentially curative liver resection. Recent data support the role of nonsurgical local therapies such as ablation, external beam radiotherapy, embolization, and hepatic artery infusion therapy for management of LM. Additionally, for patients with advanced, symptomatic LM, local therapies may provide palliative benefit. The American Radium Society gastrointestinal expert panel, including members representing radiation oncology, interventional radiology, surgical oncology, and medical oncology, performed a systemic review and developed Appropriate Use Criteria for the use of nonsurgical local therapies for LM. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses methodology was used. These studies were used to inform the expert panel, which then rated the appropriateness of various treatments in seven representative clinical scenarios through a well-established consensus methodology (modified Delphi). A summary of recommendations is outlined to guide practitioners on the use of nonsurgical local therapies for patients with LM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Christopher Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - J Eva Selfridge
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Salma Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Vonetta Williams
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Liu
- Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Birth Columbia, Canada
| | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
| | - Krishan R Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, Illinois, USA
| | - Leila Tchelebi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, Ohio, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Nam NH, Yoh T, Hori Y, Morino K, Nishino H, Nishio T, Koyama Y, Ogiso S, Nagai K, Fukumitsu K, Uchida Y, Ito T, Ishii T, Seo S, Hata K, Taura K, Hatano E. Impact of liver volumetric regeneration on survival outcomes in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after major hepatectomy. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:193. [PMID: 37178235 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02908-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2022] [Accepted: 04/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Prognostic value of liver volumetric regeneration (LVR) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who undergo major hepatectomy remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of LVR on long-term outcomes in these patients. METHODS Data of 399 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent major hepatectomy between 2000 to 2018 were retrieved from a prospectively maintained institutional database. The LVR-index was defined as the relative increase in liver volume from 7 days to 3 months (RLV3m/RLV7d, where RLV3m and RLV7d is the remnant liver volume around 3 months and postoperative 7 days after surgery). The optimal cut-off value was determined using the median value of LVR-index. RESULTS A total of 131 patients were eligible in this study. The optimal cut off value of LVR-index was 1.194. The 1-, 3-, 5- and 10-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients in the high LVR-index group were significantly better compared to those in the low LVR-index group (95.5%, 84.8%, 75.4% and 49.1% vs. 95.4%, 70.2%, 56.4%, and 19.9%, p = 0.002). Meanwhile, there was no significant difference with regards to time to recurrence between the two groups (p = 0.607). Significance of LVR-index for OS was retained after adjusting for known prognostic factors (p = 0.002). CONCLUSION In patients with HCC undergoing major hepatectomy, LVR-index may serve as a prognostic indicator for OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nguyen Hai Nam
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Liver Tumor, Cancer Center, Cho Ray Hospital, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
| | - Tomoaki Yoh
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
| | - Yutaro Hori
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Koshiro Morino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroto Nishino
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takahiro Nishio
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yukinori Koyama
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoshi Ogiso
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Nagai
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Ken Fukumitsu
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Yoichiro Uchida
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Ito
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takamichi Ishii
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Satoru Seo
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Surgery, Kochi Medical School, Nankoku, Kochi, Japan
| | - Koichiro Hata
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Kojiro Taura
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery and Oncology, Kitano Hospital Medical Research Institute, Osaka, Japan
| | - Etsuro Hatano
- Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Ayabe RI, Vauthey JN, Newhook TE. Optimizing the future liver remnant: Portal vein embolization, hepatic venous deprivation, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Surgery 2023:S0039-6060(23)00120-4. [PMID: 37024339 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2023.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 02/24/2023] [Indexed: 04/07/2023]
Abstract
Preservation of an adequate future liver remnant is paramount when planning any major liver resection and is of particular concern in the setting of bilateral colorectal liver metastases. Procedures including portal vein embolization and hepatic venous deprivation for one- or two-stage hepatectomy, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy have been developed to enable curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases in patients with an initially insufficient future liver remnant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed I Ayabe
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX
| | - Jean-Nicolas Vauthey
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX
| | - Timothy E Newhook
- Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer, Houston, TX.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Tchelebi LT, Jethwa KR, Levy AT, Anker CJ, Kennedy T, Grodstein E, Hallemeier CL, Jabbour SK, Kim E, Kumar R, Lee P, Small W, Williams VM, Sharma N, Russo S. American Radium Society (ARS) Appropriate Use Criteria (AUC) for Extrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:73-84. [PMID: 36534388 PMCID: PMC9855763 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000000969] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
Although uncommon, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHCC) is a deadly malignancy, and the treatment approaches remain controversial. While surgery remains the only cure, few patients are candidates for resection up front, and there are high rates of both local and distant failure following resection. Herein, we systematically review the available evidence regarding treatment approaches for patients with EHCC, including surgery, radiation, and chemotherapy. The evidence regarding treatment outcomes was assessed using the Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome, and Study design (PICOS) framework. A summary of recommendations based on the available literature is outlined for specific clinical scenarios encountered by providers in the clinic to guide the management of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Krishan R. Jethwa
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN
| | | | - Christopher J. Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Larner College of Medicine, Burlington, VT
| | - Timothy Kennedy
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Elliot Grodstein
- Surgery, Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead
| | | | - Salma K. Jabbour
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Ed Kim
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Rachit Kumar
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Banner MD Anderson Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ
| | - Percy Lee
- Department of Radiation Oncology, City of Hope National Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - William Small
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Loyola University Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL
| | | | - Navesh Sharma
- Department of Radiation Oncology, WellSpan Cancer Center, York, PA
| | - Suzanne Russo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Cleveland, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Cassese G, Troisi RI, Khayat S, Benoudifa B, Quenet F, Guiu B, Panaro F. Liver Venous Deprivation Versus Portal Vein Embolization Before Major Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: A Retrospective Comparison of Short- and Medium-Term Outcomes. J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:296-305. [PMID: 36509901 PMCID: PMC9744374 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05551-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver venous deprivation (LVD) is a recent radiological technique performed to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. Medium-term results of major hepatectomy after LVD have never been compared with the actual standard of care, portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS We retrospectively compared data from 33 consecutive patients who had undergone LVD (n = 17) or PVE (n = 16) prior to a right hemi-hepatectomy or right extended hepatectomy indicated for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) between May 2015 and December 2019. RESULTS The 1-year and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates in the LVD group were 81.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72-90) and 54.7% (95% CI: 46-63), respectively, against 85% (95% CI: 69-101) and 77.4% (95% CI: 54-100) in the PVE group; the differences were not statistically significant (p = 0.64). The median disease-free survival (DFS) rate was also comparable: 6 months (95% CI: 4-7) in the LVD group and 12 months (95% CI: 1.5-13) in the PVE group (p = 0.29). The overall intra-operative and post-operative complication rates were similar between the two groups. The mean daily kinetic growth rate (KGR) was found to be higher after LVD than after PVE (0.2% vs. 0.1%, p = 0.05; 10 cc/day vs. 4.8 cc/day, p = 0.03), as was the mean increase in future liver remnant volume (FLR-V) (49% vs. 27%, p = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS The LVD technique is well tolerated in patients undergoing right hemi-hepatectomy or right extended hepatectomy for CRLM. When compared with the PVE technique, the LVD technique has similar peri-operative and medium-term outcomes, but higher KGR and FLR-V increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery and Transplantation Service, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery and Transplantation Service, University of Naples "Federico II", Naples, Italy
| | - Salah Khayat
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Bachir Benoudifa
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Francois Quenet
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Montpellier Oncologic Institute - ICM, Montpellier, France
| | - Boris Guiu
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Fabrizio Panaro
- Department of Digestive Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chang X, Korenblik R, Olij B, Knapen RRMM, van der Leij C, Heise D, den Dulk M, Neumann UP, Schaap FG, van Dam RM, Olde Damink SWM. Influence of cholestasis on portal vein embolization-induced hypertrophy of the future liver remnant. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:54. [PMID: 36680689 PMCID: PMC9867667 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02784-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In the pre-clinical setting, hepatocellular bile salt accumulation impairs liver regeneration following partial hepatectomy. Here, we study the impact of cholestasis on portal vein embolization (PVE)-induced hypertrophy of the future liver remnant (FLR). METHODS Patients were enrolled with perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) or colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) undergoing PVE before a (extended) right hemihepatectomy. Volume of segments II/III was considered FLR and assessed on pre-embolization and post-embolization CT scans. The degree of hypertrophy (DH, percentual increase) and kinetic growth rate (KGR, percentage/week) were used to assess PVE-induced hypertrophy. RESULTS A total of 50 patients (31 CRLM, 19 pCCA) were included. After PVE, the DH and KGR were similar in patients with CRLM and pCCA (5.2 [3.3-6.9] versus 5.7 [3.2-7.4] %, respectively, p = 0.960 for DH; 1.4 [0.9-2.5] versus 1.9 [1.0-2.4] %/week, respectively, p = 0.742 for KGR). Moreover, pCCA patients with or without hyperbilirubinemia had comparable DH (5.6 [3.0-7.5] versus 5.7 [2.4-7.0] %, respectively, p = 0.806) and KGR (1.7 [1.0-2.4] versus 1.9 [0.8-2.4] %/week, respectively, p = 1.000). For patients with pCCA, unilateral drainage in FLR induced a higher DH than bilateral drainage (6.7 [4.9-7.9] versus 2.7 [1.5-4.2] %, p = 0.012). C-reactive protein before PVE was negatively correlated with DH (ρ = - 0.539, p = 0.038) and KGR (ρ = - 0.532, p = 0.041) in patients with pCCA. CONCLUSIONS There was no influence of cholestasis on FLR hypertrophy in patients undergoing PVE. Bilateral drainage and inflammation appeared to be negatively associated with FLR hypertrophy. Further prospective studies with larger and more homogenous patient cohorts are desirable.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinwei Chang
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Breast Tumor Center, Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Remon Korenblik
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robrecht R. M. M. Knapen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christiaan van der Leij
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel Heise
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Marcel den Dulk
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ulf P. Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Frank G. Schaap
- Department of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Ronald M. van Dam
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Steven W. M. Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, NUTRIM School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Universiteitssingel 50, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Portal Vein Embolization: Rationale, Techniques, and Outcomes to Maximize Remnant Liver Hypertrophy with a Focus on Contemporary Strategies. Life (Basel) 2023; 13:life13020279. [PMID: 36836638 PMCID: PMC9959051 DOI: 10.3390/life13020279] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatectomy remains the gold standard for curative therapy for patients with limited primary or metastatic hepatic tumors as it offers the best survival rates. In recent years, the indication for partial hepatectomy has evolved away from what will be removed from the patient to the volume and function of the future liver remnant (FLR), i.e., what will remain. With this regard, liver regeneration strategies have become paramount in transforming patients who previously had poor prognoses into ones who, after major hepatic resection with negative margins, have had their risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure minimized. Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) via the purposeful occlusion of select portal vein branches to promote contralateral hepatic lobar hypertrophy has become the accepted standard for liver regeneration. Advances in embolic materials, selection of treatment approaches, and PVE with hepatic venous deprivation or concurrent transcatheter arterial embolization/radioembolization are all active areas of research. To date, the optimal combination of embolic material to maximize FLR growth is not yet known. Knowledge of hepatic segmentation and portal venous anatomy is essential before performing PVE. In addition, the indications for PVE, the methods for assessing hepatic lobar hypertrophy, and the possible complications of PVE need to be fully understood before undertaking the procedure. The goal of this article is to discuss the rationale, indications, techniques, and outcomes of PVE before major hepatectomy.
Collapse
|
33
|
Aykut B, Lidsky ME. Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Multimodal Therapy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:119-141. [PMID: 36410912 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2022.07.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Despite a steady decline in incidence and mortality rates, colorectal cancer (CRC) remains the second most common cancer diagnosis in women and the third most common in men worldwide. Notably, the liver is recognized as the most common site of CRC metastasis, and metastases to the liver remain the primary driver of disease-specific mortality for patients with CRC. Although hepatic resection is the backbone of curative-intent treatment, management of CRLM has become increasingly multimodal during the last decade and includes the use of downstaging chemotherapy, ablation techniques, and locoregional therapy, each of which are reviewed herein.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berk Aykut
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3966, 10 Bryan Searle Drive, 466G Seeley G. Mudd Building, Durham, NC 27710, USA. https://twitter.com/BerkAykutMD
| | - Michael E Lidsky
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3966, 10 Bryan Searle Drive, 466G Seeley G. Mudd Building, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Coskun N, Yildirim A, Yuksel AO, Canyigit M, Ozdemir E. The Radiation Dose Absorbed by Healthy Parenchyma Is a Predictor for the Rate of Contralateral Hypertrophy After Unilobar Radioembolization of the Right Liver. Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 56:291-298. [PMID: 36425272 PMCID: PMC9679057 DOI: 10.1007/s13139-022-00770-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2022] [Revised: 07/28/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the predictors of contralateral hypertrophy in patients treated with unilobar transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium-90-loaded resin microspheres due to unresectable right-liver tumors. Methods Patients who underwent right unilobar TARE with resin microspheres between May 2019 and September 2021 were screened retrospectively. Contralateral hypertrophy was evaluated by calculating the kinetic growth rate (KGR) in 8-10 weeks after TARE. The predictors of increased KGR were determined with linear regression analysis. Results A total of 24 patients (16 with primary and 8 with metastatic liver tumors) were included in the study. After right unilobar TARE, mean volume of the left lobe increased from 368.26 to 436.16 mL, while the mean volume of the right lobe decreased from 1576.22 to 1477.89 mL. The median KGR of the left lobe was 0.28% per week. The radiation dose absorbed by the healthy parenchyma of the right lobe was significantly higher in patients with increased KGR (31.62 vs. 18.78 Gy, p = 0.037). Linear regression analysis showed that the dose absorbed by healthy parenchyma was significantly associated with increased KGR (b = 0.014, p = 0.043). Conclusion Patients who received right unilobar TARE for liver malignancies could develop a substantial contralateral hypertrophy, and the radiation dose absorbed by the healthy parenchyma of the right lobe was significantly associated with increased KGR in the left lobe. TARE could have a role for inducing contralateral hypertrophy as it offers the advantage of concurrent local tumor control along with its hypertrophic effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nazim Coskun
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Aslihan Yildirim
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Murat Canyigit
- Department of Radiology, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Elif Ozdemir
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ankara Yildirim Beyazit University, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Korenblik R, van Zon JFJA, Olij B, Heil J, Dewulf MJL, Neumann UP, Olde Damink SWM, Binkert CA, Schadde E, van der Leij C, van Dam RM, van Baardewijk LJ, Barbier L, Binkert CA, Billingsley K, Björnsson B, Andorrà EC, Arslan B, Baclija I, Bemelmans MHA, Bent C, de Boer MT, Bokkers RPH, de Boo DW, Breen D, Breitenstein S, Bruners P, Cappelli A, Carling U, Robert MCI, Chan B, De Cobelli F, Choi J, Crawford M, Croagh D, van Dam RM, Deprez F, Detry O, Dewulf MJL, Díaz-Nieto R, Dili A, Erdmann JI, Font JC, Davis R, Delle M, Fernando R, Fisher O, Fouraschen SMG, Fretland ÅA, Fundora Y, Gelabert A, Gerard L, Gobardhan P, Gómez F, Guiliante F, Grünberger T, Grochola LF, Grünhagen DJ, Guitart J, Hagendoorn J, Heil J, Heise D, Herrero E, Hess G, Hilal MA, Hoffmann M, Iezzi R, Imani F, Inmutto N, James S, Borobia FJG, Jovine E, Kalil J, Kingham P, Kollmar O, Kleeff J, van der Leij C, Lopez-Ben S, Macdonald A, Meijerink M, Korenblik R, Lapisatepun W, Leclercq WKG, Lindsay R, Lucidi V, Madoff DC, Martel G, Mehrzad H, Menon K, Metrakos P, Modi S, Moelker A, Montanari N, Moragues JS, Navinés-López J, Neumann UP, Nguyen J, Peddu P, Primrose JN, Olde Damink SWM, Qu X, Raptis DA, Ratti F, Ryan S, Ridouani F, Rinkes IHMB, Rogan C, Ronellenfitsch U, Serenari M, Salik A, Sallemi C, Sandström P, Martin ES, Sarría L, Schadde E, Serrablo A, Settmacher U, Smits J, Smits MLJ, Snitzbauer A, Soonawalla Z, Sparrelid E, Spuentrup E, Stavrou GA, Sutcliffe R, Tancredi I, Tasse JC, Teichgräber U, Udupa V, Valenti DA, Vass D, Vogl TJ, Wang X, White S, De Wispelaere JF, Wohlgemuth WA, Yu D, Zijlstra IJAJ. Resectability of bilobar liver tumours after simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization versus portal vein embolization alone: meta-analysis. BJS Open 2022; 6:6844022. [PMID: 36437731 PMCID: PMC9702575 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac141] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Revised: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many patients with bi-lobar liver tumours are not eligible for liver resection due to an insufficient future liver remnant (FLR). To reduce the risk of posthepatectomy liver failure and the primary cause of death, regenerative procedures intent to increase the FLR before surgery. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the available literature and outcomes on the effectiveness of simultaneous portal and hepatic vein embolization (PVE/HVE) versus portal vein embolization (PVE) alone. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase up to September 2022. The primary outcome was resectability and the secondary outcome was the FLR volume increase. RESULTS Eight studies comparing PVE/HVE with PVE and six retrospective PVE/HVE case series were included. Pooled resectability within the comparative studies was 75 per cent in the PVE group (n = 252) versus 87 per cent in the PVE/HVE group (n = 166, OR 1.92 (95% c.i., 1.13-3.25)) favouring PVE/HVE (P = 0.015). After PVE, FLR hypertrophy between 12 per cent and 48 per cent (after a median of 21-30 days) was observed, whereas growth between 36 per cent and 67 per cent was reported after PVE/HVE (after a median of 17-31 days). In the comparative studies, 90-day primary cause of death was similar between groups (2.5 per cent after PVE versus 2.2 per cent after PVE/HVE), but a higher 90-day primary cause of death was reported in single-arm PVE/HVE cohort studies (6.9 per cent, 12 of 175 patients). CONCLUSION Based on moderate/weak evidence, PVE/HVE seems to increase resectability of bi-lobar liver tumours with a comparable safety profile. Additionally, PVE/HVE resulted in faster and more pronounced hypertrophy compared with PVE alone.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remon Korenblik
- Correspondence to: R. K., Universiteigssingel 50 (room 5.452) 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: ); R. M. v. D., Maastricht UMC+, Dept. of Surgery, Level 4, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | - Jasper F J A van Zon
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Bram Olij
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,GROW—Department of Surgery, School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Jan Heil
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Maxime J L Dewulf
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Ulf P Neumann
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Steven W M Olde Damink
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany,NUTRIM—Department of Surgery, School of Nutrition and Translational Research in Metabolism, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christoph A Binkert
- Department of Radiology, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Erik Schadde
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Klinik Hirslanden, Zurich, Switzerland,Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hirslanden Klink St. Anna Luzern, Luzern, Switzerland
| | | | - Ronald M van Dam
- Correspondence to: R. K., Universiteigssingel 50 (room 5.452) 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: ); R. M. v. D., Maastricht UMC+, Dept. of Surgery, Level 4, PO Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands (e-mail: )
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
36
|
Entezari P, Toskich BB, Kim E, Padia S, Christopher D, Sher A, Thornburg B, Hohlastos ES, Salem R, Collins JD, Lewandowski RJ. Promoting Surgical Resection through Future Liver Remnant Hypertrophy. Radiographics 2022; 42:2166-2183. [PMID: 36206182 DOI: 10.1148/rg.220050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
An inadequate future liver remnant (FLR) can preclude curative-intent surgical resection for patients with primary or secondary hepatic malignancies. For patients with normal baseline liver function and without risk factors, an FLR of 20% is needed to maintain postsurgical hepatic function. However, the FLR requirement is higher for patients who are exposed to systemic chemotherapy (FLR, >30%) or have cirrhosis (FLR, >40%). Interventional radiologic and surgical methods to achieve FLR hypertrophy are evolving, including portal vein ligation, portal vein embolization, radiation lobectomy, hepatic venous deprivation, and associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy. Each technique offers particular advantages and disadvantages. Knowledge of these procedures can help clinicians to choose the suitable technique for each patient. The authors review the techniques used to develop FLR hypertrophy, focusing on technical considerations, outcomes, and the advantages and disadvantages of each approach. Online supplemental material is available for this article. ©RSNA, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pouya Entezari
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Beau B Toskich
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Edward Kim
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Siddharth Padia
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Derrick Christopher
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Alex Sher
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Bartley Thornburg
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Elias S Hohlastos
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Riad Salem
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Jeremy D Collins
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- From the Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology (P.E., B.T., E.S.H., R.S., R.J.L.), and Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery (D.C.), Northwestern University, 676 N Saint Clair St, Chicago, IL 60611-2927; Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, Fla (B.B.T.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai University Hospitals, New York, NY (E.K., A.S.); Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, Calif (S.P.); and Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minn (J.D.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Vaz da Silva DG, Bredt LC, Diniz AL, Vieira VHR, Fernandes PHS, Ribeiro R, Ribeiro HC, Oliveira AF. Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology surgical standards for resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. J Surg Oncol 2022; 126:28-36. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.26879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Revised: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Diego G. Vaz da Silva
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Mário Covas State Hospital, Centro Universitário Faculdade de Medicina do ABC Santo André São Paulo Brazil
| | - Luis C. Bredt
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Universidade Estadual do Oeste do Paraná Cascavel Paraná Brazil
| | - Alessandro L. Diniz
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Upper GI and HPB Surgical Oncology AC Camargo Cancer Center São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
| | - Victor H. R. Vieira
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Rede D'Or São Luiz, Hospital Federal de Bonsucesso Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
| | - Paulo H. S. Fernandes
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Universidade Federal de Uberlândia Uberlândia Minas Gerais Brazil
| | - Reitan Ribeiro
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgical Oncology Erasto Gaertner Hospital Curitiba Paraná Brazil
| | - Héber S. C. Ribeiro
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Upper GI and HPB Surgical Oncology AC Camargo Cancer Center São Paulo São Paulo Brazil
| | - Alexandre F. Oliveira
- Commission on Hepatobiliary Cancer Brazilian Society of Surgical Oncology Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro Brazil
- Department of Surgery Universidade Federal de Juiz de Fora Juiz de Fora Minas Gerais Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Abstract
Liver resection is the standard curative treatment for liver cancer. Advances in surgical techniques over the last 30 years, including the preoperative assessment of the future liver remnant, have improved the safety of liver resection. In addition, advances in nonsurgical multidisciplinary treatment have increased the opportunities for tumor downstaging. Consequently, the indications for resection of more advanced liver cancer have expanded. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted liver resections have also gradually become more widespread. These techniques should be performed in stages, depending on the difficulty of the procedure. Advances in preoperative simulation and intraoperative navigation technology may have also lowered the threshold for their performance and may have promoted their widespread use. New insights and experiences gained from laparoscopic surgery may be applicable in open surgery. Liver transplantation, which is usually indicated for patients with poor liver function, has also become safer with advances in perioperative management. The indications for liver transplantation in liver cancer are also expanding. Although the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has forced the postponement of liver resection and transplantation procedures, liver surgeons should appropriately tailor the surgical plan to the individual patient as part of multidisciplinary treatment. This review may provide an entry point for future clinical research by identifying currently unresolved issues regarding liver cancer, and particularly hepatocellular carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harufumi Maki
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Winslow E. Invited Commentary: Issues at the Interface of Hepatic Imaging and Hepatic Surgery. Radiographics 2022; 42:E92-E93. [PMID: 35363555 DOI: 10.1148/rg.210222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Winslow
- From the Medstar Georgetown Transplant Institute and Center for Liver and Pancreas Surgery, MedStar Georgetown University Hospital, 3800 Reservoir Rd NW, 2nd Floor PHC Building, Washington, DC 20007
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Reese T, Galavics C, Schneider M, Brüning R, Oldhafer KJ. Sarcopenia influences the kinetic growth rate after ALPPS. Surgery 2022; 172:926-932. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.04.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2021] [Revised: 04/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/12/2022] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
41
|
Ellis RJ, Soares KC, Jarnagin WR. Preoperative Management of Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14092119. [PMID: 35565250 PMCID: PMC9104035 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14092119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma is a rare hepatobiliary malignancy that requires thoughtful, multidisciplinary evaluation in the preoperative setting to ensure optimal patient outcomes. Comprehensive preoperative imaging, including multiphase CT angiography and some form of cholangiographic assessment, is key to assessing resectability. While many staging systems exist, the Blumgart staging system provides the most useful combination of resectability assessment and prognostic information for use in the preoperative setting. Once resectability is confirmed, volumetric analysis should be performed. Upfront resection without biliary drainage or portal venous embolization may be considered in patients without cholangitis and an estimated functional liver remnant (FLR) > 40%. In patients with FLR < 40%, judicious use of biliary drainage is advised, with the goal of selective biliary drainage of the functional liver remnant. Percutaneous biliary drainage may avoid inadvertent contamination of the contralateral biliary tree and associated infectious complications, though the relative effectiveness of percutaneous and endoscopic techniques is an ongoing area of study and debate. Patients with low FLR also require intervention to induce hypertrophy, most commonly portal venous embolization, in an effort to reduce the rate of postoperative liver failure. Even with extensive preoperative workup, many patients will be found to have metastatic disease at exploration and diagnostic laparoscopy may reduce the rate of non-therapeutic laparotomy. Management of perihilar cholangiocarcinoma continues to evolve, with ongoing efforts to improve preoperative liver hypertrophy and to further define the role of transplantation in disease management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan J. Ellis
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (R.J.E.); (K.C.S.)
| | - Kevin C. Soares
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (R.J.E.); (K.C.S.)
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
| | - William R. Jarnagin
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA; (R.J.E.); (K.C.S.)
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY 10021, USA
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Newhook TE, Vauthey JN. Colorectal liver metastases: state-of-the-art management and surgical approaches. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2022; 407:1765-1778. [DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02496-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/10/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
43
|
Vaghiri S, Alaghmand Nejad S, Kasprowski L, Prassas D, Safi SA, Schimmöller L, Krieg A, Rehders A, Lehwald-Tywuschik N, Knoefel WT. A single center comparative retrospective study of in situ split plus portal vein ligation versus conventional two-stage hepatectomy for cholangiocellular carcinoma. Acta Chir Belg 2022:1-12. [PMID: 35317718 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2022.2056680] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCA) has a poor prognosis and the goldstandard even in locally advanced cases remains radical surgical resection. This approach however is limited by the future liver remnant volume (FLRV) after extensive parenchymal dissection leading to post-operative liver failure and high mortality rates. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of in situ liver transection with portal vein ligation (ISLT) procedure and conventional two-stage hepatectomy with portal vein embolization (PVE/TSH) in patients with CCA. METHODS All patients with CCA and insufficient FLR considered for either ISLT or PVE/TSH were analyzed for outcomes including post-operative morbidity, mortality, and overall survival rates (OS). RESULTS Sixteen patients received ISLT and eight patients underwent PVE/TSH. The completion rate of the second stage in the PVE/TSH group was 62% and 100% in the ISLT group (p = 0.027). The overall 90-day morbidity rates including severe complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3b) were comparable (PVE/TSH 40% vs. ISLT 69%, p = 0.262). The median OS (PVE/TSH 7 months vs. ISLT 3 months) and the 90-day mortality rates (PVE/TSH 0% vs. ISLT 50%) did not significantly differ between the two groups (p > 0.05). In multivariate analysis, biliary resection and reconstruction was the only risk factor independently associated with 90-day post-operative morbidity [HR = 20.0; 95%CI (1.68-238.63); p = 0.018]. CONCLUSION Our results demonstrate comparable outcomes in both groups in a rather prognostically unfavorable disease. The completion rate in the ISLT group was significantly higher than in the PVE/TSH cohort. This work encourages specialized hepato-biliary-pancreatic centers in applying the ISLT procedure in selected cases with CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sascha Vaghiri
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Laszlo Kasprowski
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Prassas
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Sami-Alexander Safi
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Lars Schimmöller
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Andreas Krieg
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | - Alexander Rehders
- Department of Surgery A, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
Hao S, Reis HL, Wercholuk AN, Snyder RA, Parikh AA. Prehabilitation for Older Adults Undergoing Liver Resection: Getting Patients and Surgeons Up to Speed. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2022; 23:547-554. [PMID: 35247359 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.01.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/19/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Morbidity rates following liver resection are high, especially among older adult patients. This review aims to evaluate the evidence surrounding prehabilitation in older patients anticipating liver resection and to describe how prehabilitation may be implemented. DESIGN Problem-based narrative review with case-based discussion. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS All older adults anticipating liver resection inclusive of benign and malignant etiologies in the United States. METHODS Literature search was performed using MeSH terms and keywords in MEDLINE via PubMed, followed by a manual second search for relevant references within selected articles. Articles were excluded if not available in the English language or did not include patients undergoing hepatectomy. RESULTS Prehabilitation includes a range of activities including exercise, nutrition/dietary changes, and psychosocial interventions that may occur from several weeks to days preceding a surgical operation. Older adult patients who participate in prehabilitation may experience improvement in preoperative candidacy as well as improved postoperative quality of life and faster return to baseline; however, evidence supporting a reduction in postoperative length of stay and perioperative morbidity and mortality is conflicting. A variety of modalities are available for prehabilitation but lack consensus and standardization. For a provider desiring to prescribe prehabilitation, multidisciplinary assessments including geriatric, cardiopulmonary, and future remnant liver function can help determine individual patient needs and select appropriate interventions. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS In the older adult patient undergoing liver resection, the current body of literature suggests promising benefits of prehabilitation programs inclusive of functional assessment as well as multimodal interventions. Additional research is needed to determine best practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scarlett Hao
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Heidi L Reis
- Health Sciences Library, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Ashley N Wercholuk
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Rebecca A Snyder
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA; Department of Public Health, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Alexander A Parikh
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Ghosn M, Kingham TP, Ridouani F, Santos E, Yarmohammadi H, Boas FE, Covey AM, Brody LA, Jarnagin WR, D'Angelica MI, Kemeny NE, Solomon SB, Camacho JC. Percutaneous liver venous deprivation: outcomes in heavily pretreated metastatic colorectal cancer patients. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:404-412. [PMID: 34452833 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.816] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2021] [Revised: 07/02/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate liver venous deprivation (LVD) outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) heavily pretreated with systemic and hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapies that had an anticipated insufficient future liver remnant (FLR) hypertrophy after portal vein embolization (PVE). METHODS PVE was performed with liquid embolics using a transsplenic or ipsilateral transhepatic approach. Simultaneously and via a trans-jugular approach, the right hepatic vein was embolized with vascular plugs. Liver volumetry was assessed on computed tomography before and 3-6 weeks after LVD. RESULTS Twelve consecutive CRLM patients that underwent LVD before right hepatectomy or trisectionectomy were included, all previously treated with systemic chemotherapy for a mean of 11.9 months. Six patients had additional HAIP. After embolization, FLR ratio increased from 28.7% ± 5.9 to 42.2% ± 9.0 (P < 0.01). Mean kinetic growth rate (KGR) was 3.56%/week ± 2.3, with a degree of hypertrophy (DH) of 13.8% ± 7.1. In the HAIP subgroup, mean KGR and DH were respectively 3.58%/week ± 2.8 and 14.3% ± 8.7. No severe complications occurred. Ten patients reached surgery after 39 days ± 7.5. CONCLUSION In heavily pretreated patients, LVD safely stimulated a rapid and effective FLR hypertrophy, with a resultant high rate of resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ghosn
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Fourat Ridouani
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Ernesto Santos
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Hooman Yarmohammadi
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Franz E Boas
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Anne M Covey
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Lynn A Brody
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - William R Jarnagin
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Michael I D'Angelica
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Nancy E Kemeny
- Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Stephen B Solomon
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States
| | - Juan C Camacho
- Interventional Radiology Service, Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Heil J, Heid F, Bechstein WO, Björnsson B, Brismar TB, Carling U, Erdmann J, Fretland ÅA, Grunhagen D, Hana RA, Hohmann J, Linke R, Meyer Y, Nawawi A, Olthof PB, Sandström P, Schnitzbauer AA, Sparrelid E, Verhoef C, Metrakos P, Schadde E. Sarcopenia predicts reduced liver growth and reduced resectability in patients undergoing portal vein embolization before liver resection - A DRAGON collaborative analysis of 306 patients. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:413-421. [PMID: 34526229 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2021.08.818] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND After portal vein embolization (PVE) 30% fail to achieve liver resection. Malnutrition is a modifiable risk factor and can be assessed by radiological indices. This study investigates, if sarcopenia affects resectability and kinetic growth rate (KGR) after PVE. METHODS A retrospective study was performed of the outcome of PVE at 8 centres of the DRAGON collaborative from 2010 to 2019. All malignant tumour types were included. Sarcopenia was defined using gender, body mass and skeletal muscle index. First imaging after PVE was used for liver volumetry. Primary and secondary endpoints were resectability and KGR. Risk factors impacting liver growth were assessed in a multivariable analysis. RESULTS Eight centres identified 368 patients undergoing PVE. 62 patients (17%) had to be excluded due to unavailability of data. Among the 306 included patients, 112 (37%) were non-sarcopenic and 194 (63%) were sarcopenic. Sarcopenic patients had a 21% lower resectability rate (87% vs. 66%, p < 0.001) and a 23% reduced KGR (p = 0.02) after PVE. In a multivariable model dichotomized for KGR ≥2.3% standardized FLR (sFLR)/week, only sarcopenia and sFLR before embolization correlated with KGR. CONCLUSION In this largest study of risk factors, sarcopenia was associated with reduced resectability and KGR in patients undergoing PVE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Heil
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Main, Germany
| | - Franziska Heid
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Wolf O Bechstein
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Main, Germany
| | - Bergthor Björnsson
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Torkel B Brismar
- Department of Clinical Science and Technology (CLINTEC), Radiology Unit, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulrik Carling
- Department of Radiology Rikshospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Joris Erdmann
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Åsmund A Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dirk Grunhagen
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Renato A Hana
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, McGill General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Joachim Hohmann
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland; Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Richard Linke
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Main, Germany
| | - Yannick Meyer
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Abrar Nawawi
- Department of Surgery, McGill Health Center Research Institute, Cancer Program, Montreal, Canada
| | - Pim B Olthof
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Per Sandström
- Department of Surgery in Linköping and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Andreas A Schnitzbauer
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Main, Germany
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Peter Metrakos
- Department of Surgery, McGill Health Center Research Institute, Cancer Program, Montreal, Canada
| | - Erik Schadde
- Institute of Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Cantonal Hospital Winterthur, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Surgery, Division of Transplant Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Hedrick TL, Zaydfudim VM. Management of Synchronous Colorectal Cancer Metastases. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2022; 31:265-278. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2021.11.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
48
|
Carling U, Røsok B, Berger S, Fretland ÅA, Dorenberg E. Portal Vein Embolization Using N-Butyl Cyanoacrylate-Glue: What Impact Does a Central Vascular Plug Have? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021; 45:450-458. [PMID: 34907454 PMCID: PMC8940786 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-03014-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To examine if the addition of a central vascular plug (CVP) to portal vein embolization (PVE) with N-butyl cyanoacrylate-glue (NBCA) increases future liver remnant (FLR) growth.
Material and Methods This is a single-center retrospective study of 115 consecutive patients with colorectal liver metastases undergoing PVE in 2013–2019. All patients were embolized with NBCA as the main embolic agent. In 2017–2019 NBCA was combined with a CVP in the central part of the right portal vein. Growth of the FLR and standardized FLR (sFLR) including degree of hypertrophy (DH) and kinetic growth rate (KGR) were analyzed, as well as procedure data such as use of cone-beam CT (CBCT), dose area product (DAP), fluoroscopy time and contrast dose. Results A total of 40 patients (35%) underwent PVE with a combination of CVP and NBCA. The DH was higher in these patients after 4 weeks, mean 13.6% (SD 7.8) vs. 10.5% (SD 6.4; p = 0.022), verified in multivariate analysis (coefficient 4.1, p = 0.015). A CVP did not significantly increase the resection rate (90% vs 82%, p = 0.4). Cone beam CT was used in 65 patients (57%). Use of CBCT did not affect FLR growth, and fluoroscopy time and contrast doses were not different in patients having a CBCT or not. Slightly lower DAP (median 3375 vs. 4499 cGy*cm2; p = 0.09) was seen in procedures where CBCT was used. Conclusion A CVP in addition to NBCA embolization was associated with increased growth of the FLR compared to NBCA alone. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00270-021-03014-w.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrik Carling
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Postbox 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Bård Røsok
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Sigurd Berger
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Postbox 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| | - Åsmund Avdem Fretland
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- The Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eric Dorenberg
- Department of Radiology, Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet, Postbox 4950 Nydalen, 0424 Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Del Basso C, Gaillard M, Lainas P, Zervaki S, Perlemuter G, Chagué P, Rocher L, Voican CS, Dagher I, Tranchart H. Current strategies to induce liver remnant hypertrophy before major liver resection. World J Hepatol 2021; 13:1629-1641. [PMID: 34904033 PMCID: PMC8637666 DOI: 10.4254/wjh.v13.i11.1629] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2021] [Revised: 06/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatic resection is the gold standard for patients affected by primary or metastatic liver tumors but is hampered by the risk of post-hepatectomy liver failure. Despite recent improvements, liver surgery still requires excellent clinical judgement in selecting patients for surgery and, above all, efficient pre-operative strategies to provide adequate future liver remnant. The aim of this article is to review the literature on the rational, the preliminary assessment, the advantages as well as the limits of each existing technique for preparing the liver for major hepatectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Celeste Del Basso
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Martin Gaillard
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Panagiotis Lainas
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Stella Zervaki
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Gabriel Perlemuter
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Pierre Chagué
- Department of Radiology, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Laurence Rocher
- Department of Radiology, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Cosmin Sebastian Voican
- Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Ibrahim Dagher
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| | - Hadrien Tranchart
- Department of Minimally Invasive Digestive Surgery, Antoine Béclère Hospital, Clamart 92140, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Moreno Berggren M, Isaksson B, Nyman R, Ebeling Barbier C. Portal vein embolization with n-butyl-cyanoacrylate before hepatectomy: a single-center retrospective analysis of 46 consecutive patients. Acta Radiol 2021; 62:1170-1177. [PMID: 32938223 DOI: 10.1177/0284185120953802] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative portal vein embolization (PVE) is performed to induce hypertrophy of the future liver remnant enabling major liver resection in patients with various types of liver tumors. PURPOSE To evaluate safety and effectiveness of PVE with n-butyl-cyanoacrylate (NBCA). MATERIAL AND METHODS All consecutive patients referred to our hospital for PVE between July 2006 and July 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Volumetry was performed on computed tomography images before and after PVE, segmenting the total liver volume and the future liver remnant (FLR), i.e. liver segments I-III. RESULTS PVE was performed in 46 patients (18 women, 28 men; mean age = 61 years) using local anesthesia. The ipsilateral technique was used in 45 patients. Adverse events were rare. The mean FLR volume increase was 56%, the degree of hypertrophy was 9.7%, and the kinetic growth rate was 2.1%/week. The median ± SD period between PVE and liver surgery was 7 ± 3 weeks. Forty-two patients (91%) had surgery; liver resection was performed in 37 (80%) patients. Three patients (7%) developed transient liver failure after surgery. There was no 90-day post-PVE or postoperative mortality. CONCLUSION PVE using NBCA through the ipsilateral approach in local anesthesia is safe and effective in inducing hypertrophy of the future liver remnant enabling surgery, and thereby increasing survival in patients with liver tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marijela Moreno Berggren
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Bengt Isaksson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Rickard Nyman
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Section of Radiology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|