1
|
Hoogteijling TJ, Abu Hilal M, Zimmitti G, Aghayan DL, Wu AGR, Cipriani F, Gruttadauria S, Scatton O, Long TCD, Herman P, Marino MV, Mazzaferro V, Chiow AKH, Sucandy I, Ivanecz A, Choi SH, Lee JH, Gastaca M, Vivarelli M, Giuliante F, Ruzzenente A, Yong CC, Yin M, Fondevila C, Efanov M, Morise Z, Di Benedetto F, Brustia R, Dalla Valle R, Boggi U, Geller D, Belli A, Memeo R, Mejia A, Park JO, Rotellar F, Choi GH, Robles-Campos R, Wang X, Sutcliffe RP, Pratschke J, Tang CN, Chong CCN, D'Hondt M, Monden K, Lopez-Ben S, Kingham TP, Ferrero A, Ettorre GM, Cherqui D, Liang X, Soubrane O, Wakabayashi G, Troisi RI, Han HS, Cheung TT, Sugioka A, Dokmak S, Chen KH, Liu R, Fuks D, Zhang W, Aldrighetti L, Edwin B, Goh BKP. Impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on short-term outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases: A propensity-score matched and coarsened exact matched study. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2024; 50:108309. [PMID: 38626588 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108309] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/23/2024] [Indexed: 04/18/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the last three decades, minimally invasive liver resection has been replacing conventional open approach in liver surgery. More recently, developments in neoadjuvant chemotherapy have led to increased multidisciplinary management of colorectal liver metastases with both medical and surgical treatment modalities. However, the impact of neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the surgical outcomes of minimally invasive liver resections remains poorly understood. METHODS A multicenter, international, database of 4998 minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases was used to compare surgical outcomes in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone. To correct for baseline imbalance, propensity score matching, coarsened exact matching and inverse probability treatment weighting were performed. RESULTS 2546 patients met the inclusion criteria. After propensity score matching there were 759 patients in both groups and 383 patients in both groups after coarsened exact matching. Baseline characteristics were equal after both matching strategies. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with statistically significant worse surgical outcomes of minimally invasive minor hepatectomy. CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant chemotherapy had no statistically significant impact on short-term surgical outcomes after simple and complex minimally invasive minor hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tijs J Hoogteijling
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy; Amsterdam UMC, location University of Amsterdam, Department of Surgery, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Mohammad Abu Hilal
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy; Department of Surgery, University Hospital Southampton, United Kingdom.
| | - Giuseppe Zimmitti
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione Poliambulanza Instituto Ospedaliero, Brescia, Italy
| | - Davit L Aghayan
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Andrew G R Wu
- Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| | - Federica Cipriani
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico-Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione (IRCCS-ISMETT), University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy, Palermo, Italy; Department of General Surgery and Medical Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Olivier Scatton
- Department of Digestive, HBP and Liver Transplantation, Hopital Pitie-Salpetriere, Sorbonne Universite, Paris, France
| | - Tran Cong Duy Long
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, University Medical Center, University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Ho Chi Minh City, Viet Nam
| | - Paulo Herman
- Liver Surgery Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, University of Sao Paulo School of Medicine, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - Marco V Marino
- General Surgery Department, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy; Oncologic Surgery Department, P. Giaccone University Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano and University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Adrian K H Chiow
- Hepatopancreatobiliary Unit, Department of Surgery, Changi General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Iswanto Sucandy
- Digestive Health Institute, AdventHealth Tampa, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Arpad Ivanecz
- Department of Abdominal and General Surgery, University Medical Center Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Sung Hoon Choi
- Department of General Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seongnam, South Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mikel Gastaca
- Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation Unit, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Cruces University Hospital, University of the Basque Country, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Marco Vivarelli
- HPB Surgery and Transplantation Unit, United Hospital of Ancona, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine Polytechnic University of Marche, Ancona, Italy
| | - Felice Giuliante
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, IRCCS, Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Andrea Ruzzenente
- General and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Gynecology and Pediatrics University of Verona, GB Rossi Hospital, Verona, Italy
| | - Chee Chien Yong
- Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, China
| | - Mengqiu Yin
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Jinhua Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Jinhua, China
| | - Constantino Fondevila
- General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz, IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain; General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Clinic, IDIBAPS, CIBERehd, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mikhail Efanov
- Department of Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Surgery, Moscow Clinical Scientific Center, Moscow, Russia
| | - Zenichi Morise
- Department of Surgery, Okazaki Medical Center, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Okazaki, Japan
| | - Fabrizio Di Benedetto
- HPB Surgery and Liver Transplant Unit, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, AP-HP, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Creteil, France
| | - Raffaele Dalla Valle
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Unit, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Ugo Boggi
- Division of General and Transplant Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - David Geller
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Andrea Belli
- Department of Abdominal Oncology, Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, National Cancer Center - IRCCS-G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Memeo
- Unit of Hepato-Pancreatc-Biliary Surgery, "F. Miulli" General Regional Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Alejandro Mejia
- The Liver Institute, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - James O Park
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, USA
| | - Fernando Rotellar
- HPB and Liver Transplant Unit, Department of General Surgery, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Institute of Health Research of Navarra (IdisNA), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Gi Hong Choi
- Division of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ricardo Robles-Campos
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Clinic and University Hospital Virgen de la Arrixaca, IMIB-ARRIXACA, El Palmar, Murcia, Spain
| | - Xiaoying Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery and Transplantation, Liver Cancer Institute, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Liver Transplant Surgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Campus Charité Mitte and Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité-Universitätsmedizin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Chung-Ngai Tang
- Department of Surgery, Pamela Youde Nethersole Eastern Hospital, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Charing C N Chong
- Department of Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Mathieu D'Hondt
- Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary/Pancreatic Surgery, Groeninge Hospital, Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Kazuteru Monden
- Department of Surgery, Fukuyama City Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan
| | - Santiago Lopez-Ben
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Dr. Josep Trueta Hospital, IdIBGi, Girona, Spain
| | - T Peter Kingham
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Alessandro Ferrero
- Department of General and Oncological Surgery. Mauriziano Hospital, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Maria Ettorre
- Division of General Surgery and Liver Transplantation, San Camillo Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniel Cherqui
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Paris, Centre Hepato-Biliaire, Paul-Brousse Hospital, Villejuif, France
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run-Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, China
| | - Olivier Soubrane
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Saitama, Japan
| | - Roberto I Troisi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - Ho Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital Bundang, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Tan To Cheung
- Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Atsushi Sugioka
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan
| | - Safi Dokmak
- Department of HPB Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Beaujon Hospital, Clichy, France
| | - Kuo Hsin Chen
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Rong Liu
- Faculty of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery, The First Medical Center of Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - David Fuks
- Department of Digestive, Oncologic and Metabolic Surgery, Institute Mutualiste Montsouris, Universite Paris Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Wanguang Zhang
- Hepatic Surgery Center and Hubei Key Laboratory of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Diseases, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Luca Aldrighetti
- Hepatobiliary Surgery Division, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Bjørn Edwin
- The Intervention Centre and Department of HPB Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital and National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore; Surgery Academic Clinical Programme, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fiorentini G, Zironda A, Calini G, Abdalla S, Nagorney DM, Warner SG, Smoot RL, Behm KT, Shawki SF, Mathis KL, Vierkant RA, Larson DW, Cleary SP. Minimally invasive vs. open approach to the simultaneous treatment of colorectal tumors with synchronous liver metastasis: a single center, propensity-score matched analysis from Mayo clinic. HPB (Oxford) 2023; 25:1337-1344. [PMID: 37626006 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.06.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Revised: 06/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Open combined resections of colorectal primary tumors and synchronous liver metastases have become common in selected cases. However, evidences favoring a minimally invasive (MIS) approach are still limited. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of MIS vs. open synchronous liver and colorectal resections. METHODS 384 cases of synchronous colorectal and liver resections performed at one institution were identified during the study period. MIS vs open approach were compared after a propensity score matching; surgical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS MIS cases featured longer operative time (399 vs 300 min, p < 0.001), fewer blood loss (200 vs 500 ml, p = 0.003), and shorter hospitalization (median LOS 4 vs 6 days, p = 0.001). No difference was observed between the two groups for use of Pringle maneuver (p = 0.083), intraoperative blood transfusion (p = 0.061), achievement of negative colorectal (p = 0.176) and liver margins (p = 1.000), postoperative complications (p = 1.000) and significant (Clavien-Dindo ≥ 3a) complications (p = 0.817), delay of adjuvant therapy due to complications (p = 0.555), 30- and 90-day mortality. CONCLUSION Synchronous colorectal and liver metastases resections via a minimally-invasive approach in high-volume centers with appropriate expertise result in significantly lower blood loss and length of stay despite longer operative time in comparison to open, with no oncological inferiority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guido Fiorentini
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Andrea Zironda
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Giacomo Calini
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | | | - David M Nagorney
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Susanne G Warner
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Rory L Smoot
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Kevin T Behm
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | | | | | - Robert A Vierkant
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - David W Larson
- Colorectal Surgery Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Sean P Cleary
- Hepatobiliary and Pancreas Surgery Division, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Collienne M, Neven A, Caballero C, Kataoka K, Carrion-Alvarez L, Nilsson H, Désolneux G, Rivoire M, Ruers T, Gruenberger T, Protic M, Troisi RI, Primavesi F, Staettner S, Rahbari N, Schnitzbauer A, Malik H, Swijnenburg RJ, Mauer M, Ducreux M, Evrard S. EORTC 1409 GITCG/ESSO 01 - A prospective colorectal liver metastasis database for borderline or initially unresectable diseases (CLIMB): Lessons learnt from real life. From paradigm to unmet need. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2023; 49:107081. [PMID: 37793303 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2023.107081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2023] [Revised: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023]
Abstract
AIM Multidisciplinary management of metastatic colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is still challenging. To assess postoperative complications in initially unresectable or borderline resectable CRLM, the prospective EORTC-1409 ESSO 01-CLIMB trial capturing 'real-life data' of European centres specialized in liver surgery was initiated. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 219 patients were registered between May 2015 and January 2019 from 15 centres in nine countries. Eligible patients had borderline or initially unresectable CRLM assessed by pre-operative multidisciplinary team discussion (MDT). Primary endpoints were postoperative complications, 30-day and 90-days mortality post-surgery, and quality indicators. We report the final results of the 151 eligible patients that underwent at least one liver surgery. RESULTS Perioperative chemotherapy with or without targeted treatment were administered in 100 patients (69.4%). One stage resection (OSR) was performed in 119 patients (78.8%). Two stage resections (TSR, incl. Associating Liver Partition and Portal Vein Ligation for Staged hepatectomy (ALPPS)) were completed in 24 out of 32 patients (75%). Postoperative complications were reported in 55.5% (95% CI: 46.1-64.6%), 64.0% (95% CI: 42.5-82%), and 100% (95% CI: 59-100%) of the patients in OSR, TSR and ALPPS, respectively. Post-hepatectomy liver failure occurred in 6.7%, 20.0%, and 28.6% in OSR, TSR, and ALPPS, respectively. In total, four patients (2.6%) died after surgery. CONCLUSION Across nine countries, OSR was more often performed than TSR and tended to result in less postoperative complications. Despite many efforts to register patients across Europe, it is still challenging to set up a prospective CRLM database.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maike Collienne
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium.
| | - Anouk Neven
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; Luxembourg Institute of Health, Competence Center for Methodology and Statistics, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | | | - Kozo Kataoka
- Division of Lower GI, Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, School of Medicine, Hyogo Medical University, Hyogo, Japan
| | | | - Henrik Nilsson
- Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences Danderyd, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | - Theo Ruers
- Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Thomas Gruenberger
- Clinic Favoriten, HPB Center, Health Network Vienna and Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mladjan Protic
- University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Medicine, Novi Sad, Serbia and Oncology Institute of Vojvodina, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Dept. of Human Structure and Repair, Ghent University, Belgium; Division of HPB, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, Renal Transplantation Service, Dept. of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Federico II University Hospital Naples, Italy
| | - Florian Primavesi
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum, Austria
| | - Stefan Staettner
- Department of Visceral, Transplantation and Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria; Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Salzkammergutklinikum, Austria
| | - Nuh Rahbari
- Department of Surgery, Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Andreas Schnitzbauer
- Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt Goethe-Universität Frankfurt Am Main Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hassan Malik
- Aintree University Hospital NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Murielle Mauer
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Ducreux
- Gustave Roussy, Université Paris Saclay, Inserm, U1279, France
| | - Serge Evrard
- Institut Bergonié, Université de Bordeaux, INSERM, U1312, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: A Potential Paradigm Shift in Treatment Sequencing. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:6304-6305. [PMID: 37493890 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13818-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 07/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Columbus, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mankarious MM, Portolese AC, Hoskins MA, Deutsch MJ, Jeganathan NA, Scow JS, Kulaylat AS. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy does not increase risk for anastomotic leak for simultaneous resection of primary colon cancer with synchronous liver metastasis: A NSQIP-colectomy analysis. J Surg Oncol 2023. [PMID: 36939016 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 02/15/2023] [Accepted: 03/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In patients with colon cancer with synchronous liver metastasis, treatment algorithms are complex and often require multidisciplinary evaluation. Neoadjuvant therapy is frequently utilized, but there is an unclear relationship with postoperative outcomes in patients with simultaneous resection. METHODS This is a retrospective cohort study from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program and Targeted Colectomy databases. All patients with stage IV colon cancer undergoing simultaneous colectomy with synchronous liver metastasis resection or ablation between 2015 and 2019 were identified and categorized into subgroups based on receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Multivariable logistic regression was utilized to assess for risk factors of anastomotic leaks and serious postoperative complications. RESULTS We identified 1006 patients who underwent simultaneous colectomy and liver operations. Of those, 418 (41.6%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy within 90 days of surgery, while 588 (58.4%) had simultaneous upfront surgery. On multivariable logistic regression, neoadjuvant therapy was not associated with postoperative anastomotic leaks (odds ratio [OR]: 1.30; p = 0.39) or serious complications (OR: 1.04; p = 0.82). CONCLUSION Neoadjuvant therapy does not increase postoperative complications in simultaneous colon and liver resections. These results may alleviate concerns regarding postoperative morbidity in the decision-making process of administering neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc M Mankarious
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Austin C Portolese
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Meloria A Hoskins
- College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Michael J Deutsch
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Nimalan A Jeganathan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Jeffrey S Scow
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Audrey S Kulaylat
- Department of Surgery, Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, College of Medicine, Pennsylvania State University, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Long-Term Outcome Following Liver Transplantation for Primary Hepatic Tumors-A Single Centre Observational Study over 40 Years. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2023; 10:children10020202. [PMID: 36832331 PMCID: PMC9954409 DOI: 10.3390/children10020202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of pediatric liver tumors in general has been rising over the last years and so is the number of children undergoing liver transplantation for this indication. To contribute to the ongoing improvement of pre- and post-transplant care, we aim to describe outcome and risk factors in our patient cohort. We have compared characteristics and outcome for patients transplanted for hepatoblastoma to other liver malignancies in our center between 1983 and 2022 and analysed influential factors on tumor recurrence and mortality using nominal logistic regression analysis. Of 39 children (16 f) who had transplants for liver malignancy, 31 were diagnosed with hepatoblastoma. The proportion of malignant tumors in the transplant cohort rose from 1.9% (1983-1992) to 9.1% in the current decade (p < 0.0001). Hepatoblastoma patients were transplanted at a younger age and were more likely to have tumor extent beyond the liver. Post-transplant bile flow impairment requiring intervention was significantly higher compared to our total cohort (48 vs. 24%, p > 0.0001). Hearing loss was a common side effect of ototoxic chemotherapy in hepatoblastoma patients (48%). The most common maintenance immunosuppression were mTor-inhibitors. Risk factors for tumor recurrence in patients with hepatoblastoma were higher AFP before transplant (AFPpre-LTX), a low ratio of AFPmax to AFPpre-LTX and salvage transplantation. Liver malignancies represent a rising number of indications for liver transplantation in childhood. Primary tumor resection can spare a liver transplant with all its long-term complications, but in case of tumor recurrence, transplantation might have inferior outcome. The rate of acute biopsy-proven rejections and biliary complications in comparison to our total transplant cohort needs further investigations.
Collapse
|
7
|
Chen FL, Wang YY, Liu W, Xing BC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival in resectable colorectal liver metastases patients with high clinical risk scores—— A retrospective, propensity score matching analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:973418. [PMID: 36132151 PMCID: PMC9483158 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.973418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) patients is controversial. High-risk patients are more likely to benefit from NAC despite its hepatotoxic effects. Since patients with a high tumor burden receive NAC more frequently, previous retrospective studies have imbalanced baseline characteristics. The results of randomized controlled trials are still pending. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of NAC in resectable CRLM patients with high clinical risk scores (CRS) proposed by Fong et al. after balancing baseline characteristics by propensity score matching (PSM). Methods Resectable CRLM patients with high CRS (3-5) undergoing hepatectomy between January 2003 and May 2021 were retrospectively studied. Patients were divided into the NAC and the upfront surgery group. Survival outcomes and surgical outcomes were compared after PSM. Results The current study included 322 patients with a median follow-up of 40 months. After one-to-two PSM, patients were matched into the upfront surgery group (n = 56) and the NAC group (n = 112). Baseline characteristics were balanced after matching. There was no difference in long-term progression-free survival (PFS), while overall survival (OS) from the initial diagnosis was improved in the NAC group (P = 0.048). Postoperative hospital stays were shorter in the NAC group (P = 0.020). Surgical outcomes were similar, including major hepatectomy rate, intraoperative ablation rate, blood loss, operative time, perioperative blood transfusion, positive surgical margin, and postoperative intensive care unit stay. In multivariable analysis, RAS mutation, maximum tumor diameter≥3cm, and no NAC were independent risk factors for OS. The 1-year PFS in the NAC group was improved, although it failed to reach a statistical difference (P = 0.064). Conclusions NAC could improve OS in resectable CRLM patients with high CRS (3-5) and have a shorter postoperative hospital stay.
Collapse
|
8
|
Choi WJ, Ivanics T, Claasen MPAW, Gallinger S, Hansen B, Sapisochin G. Is it safe to administer neoadjuvant chemotherapy to patients undergoing hepatectomy for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma? ACS-NSQIP propensity-matched analysis. HPB (Oxford) 2022; 24:1535-1542. [PMID: 35474005 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2022.03.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is increasing. The objective of this study was to compare the 30-day post-operative complications and length-of-stay (LOS) between patients undergoing hepatectomy for iCCA with and without NAC. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted using the ACS-NSQIP database queried from 2014 to 2018. Patients with NAC receipt were propensity-score matched into 1:3 ratio with controls using the greedy-matching algorithm and a caliper of 0.2. Logistic and Poisson regression models were used to estimate the effect sizes. RESULTS A total of 1508 patients who underwent hepatectomy for iCCA were included. 706 patients remained after matching and balance were achieved. The NAC group had 110 (60.1%) complications vs. 289 (55.3%) complications in the non-NAC group (p = 0.29). NAC was not associated with worse 30-day postoperative complications [OR 1.24, 95% CI: 0.87-1.76; p = 0.24]. Post-operative LOS in the NAC group was 8.56 days (mean, SD 7.4) vs. non-NAC group 9.27 days (mean, SD 8.41, p = 0.32). NAC was not associated with longer post-operative LOS [RR 0.93, 95% CI:0.80, 1.08; p = 0.32]. CONCLUSION NAC may be safely administered without increasing the risk of 30-day complications or post-operative hospital LOS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woo Jin Choi
- University of Toronto, Department of General Surgery, Toronto, Canada; University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Canada
| | - Tommy Ivanics
- University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Department of Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA; Department of Surgical Sciences, Akademiska Sjukhuset, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Marco P A W Claasen
- University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Canada; Department of Surgery, Division of HPB & Transplant Surgery, Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Steven Gallinger
- University of Toronto, Department of General Surgery, Toronto, Canada; University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Canada
| | - Bettina Hansen
- University Health Network, Center for Liver Disease, Toronto, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- University of Toronto, Department of General Surgery, Toronto, Canada; University Health Network, HPB Surgical Oncology, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Calamia S, Barbara M, Cipolla C, Grassi N, Pantuso G, Li Petri S, Pagano D, Gruttadauria S. Risk factors for bile leakage after liver resection for neoplastic disease. Updates Surg 2022; 74:1581-1587. [PMID: 35841529 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01326-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Biliary leakage (BL) remains the most frequent and feared complication after hepatoresective surgery. Placement of the abdominal drainage at the end of liver surgery remains controversial due to the delicate balance between risks and potential benefits in case of BL. The study was aimed to detect possible risk factors for BL occurrence after liver surgery. We enrolled all oncologic patients who underwent liver resection from June 2016 to March 2021. BL was diagnosed according to the ISGLS definition. We have examined demographic characteristics of the patients, type of neoplasia, presence of cirrhosis, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and type of intervention. Uni- and multivariable analyses were performed to assess the predictive value of potential predictor of BL. A total of 379 patients were enrolled in the study, 16 (4.2%) of which developed BL. Among others, at univariate analysis the occurrence of BL was found to be associated with bilio-digestive anastomosis (OR: 9.75, C.I. 2.7-34.7, p < 0.001) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (OR: 0.09, C.I 0.01,-0.88, p = 0.039). Multivariable analysis selected the body mass index (OR: 1.21, 95%C.I.: 1.04-1.41, p = 0.015), anatomical resection (OR: 8.35, 95% C.I.: 2.01-34.74, p = 0.004), and blood loss (OR: 1.09, 95%C.I.: 1.05-1.13, p < 0.001). Identification of patients at greater risk of BL can help in the choice of positioning the drainage at the end of liver surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergio Calamia
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), 90127, Palermo, Italy
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Marco Barbara
- Research Department, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), Palermo, Italy
| | - Calogero Cipolla
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Nello Grassi
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Gianni Pantuso
- Department of Surgical Oncological and Oral Sciences, University of Palermo, 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Sergio Li Petri
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Duilio Pagano
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), 90127, Palermo, Italy
| | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Diseases and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS-ISMETT (Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad alta specializzazione), UPMC (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center), 90127, Palermo, Italy.
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, 95123, Catania, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Konishi T, Fujiogi M, Sato A, Michihata N, Kumazawa R, Matsui H, Fushimi K, Tanabe M, Seto Y, Yasunaga H. Short-Term Outcomes Following Breast Cancer Surgery With and Without Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: A Nationwide Administrative Database Study in Japan. Ann Surg Oncol 2022; 29:3000-3010. [PMID: 34994909 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-11212-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2021] [Accepted: 11/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has become common for breast cancer, its impact on short-term surgical outcomes and the feasible chemotherapy-surgery interval remain unclear. Using a Japanese nationwide database, this study investigated the impact of NAC on short-term outcomes following breast cancer surgery. METHODS In this study of 11,722 patients with NAC and 120,538 patients without NAC who underwent surgery for stage 0-III breast cancer July 2010-March 2017, to cancel out site-specific effects, we generated a 1:4 matched-pair cohort matched for age, institution, and fiscal year of admission. We then conducted multivariable analyses adjusting for potential confounders to compare postoperative complications, duration of anesthesia, and total hospitalization costs. Additionally, we conducted three sensitivity analyses for patients with a short interval from NAC to surgery, patients receiving a particular NAC regimen, and patients undergoing a particular surgical procedure. RESULTS In total, the occurrence of postoperative complications was 6.0%, and the median interval from NAC to surgery was 31 (interquartile range, 24-39) days. The two groups did not differ significantly in terms of complications (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval, 0.88-1.04), including local and general complications. NAC was significantly associated with shorter duration of anesthesia and lower total hospitalization costs. The sensitivity analyses showed similar results. CONCLUSIONS Our matched-pair cohort analyses revealed no significant differences in postoperative complications between patients with and without NAC for breast cancer, regardless of the interval, regimen, and surgical procedure. Patients can safely receive surgery and NAC without a lengthened interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takaaki Konishi
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan. .,Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Michimasa Fujiogi
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ayaka Sato
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Nobuaki Michihata
- Department of Health Services Research, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Kumazawa
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hiroki Matsui
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kiyohide Fushimi
- Department of Health Policy and Informatics, Tokyo Medical and Dental University Graduate School, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masahiko Tanabe
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Seto
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hideo Yasunaga
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Economics, School of Public Health, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guo M, Jin N, Pawlik T, Cloyd JM. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal liver metastases: A contemporary review of the literature. World J Gastrointest Oncol 2021; 13:1043-1061. [PMID: 34616511 PMCID: PMC8465453 DOI: 10.4251/wjgo.v13.i9.1043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/06/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal carcinoma (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and up to 50% of patients with CRC develop colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). For these patients, surgical resection remains the only opportunity for cure and long-term survival. Over the past few decades, outcomes of patients with metastatic CRC have improved significantly due to advances in systemic therapy, as well as improvements in operative technique and perioperative care. Chemotherapy in the modern era of oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-containing regimens has been augmented by the introduction of targeted biologics and immunotherapeutic agents. The increasing efficacy of contemporary systemic therapies has led to an expansion in the proportion of patients eligible for curative-intent surgery. Consequently, the use of neoadjuvant strategies is becoming progressively more established. For patients with CRLM, the primary advantage of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) is the potential to down-stage metastatic disease in order to facilitate hepatic resection. On the other hand, the routine use of NCT for patients with resectable metastases remains controversial, especially given the potential risk of inducing chemotherapy-associated liver injury prior to hepatectomy. Current guidelines recommend upfront surgery in patients with initially resectable disease and low operative risk, reserving NCT for patients with borderline resectable or unresectable disease and high operative risk. Patients undergoing NCT require close monitoring for tumor response and conversion of CRLM to resectability. In light of the growing number of treatment options available to patients with metastatic CRC, it is generally agreed that these patients are best served at tertiary centers with an expert multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa Guo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Ning Jin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Timothy Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, Division of Surgical Oncology, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bolhuis K, Grosheide L, Wesdorp NJ, Komurcu A, Chapelle T, Dejong CHC, Gerhards MF, Grünhagen DJ, van Gulik TM, Huiskens J, De Jong KP, Kazemier G, Klaase JM, Liem MSL, Molenaar IQ, Patijn GA, Rijken AM, Ruers TM, Verhoef C, de Wilt JHW, Punt CJA, Swijnenburg RJ. Short-Term Outcomes of Secondary Liver Surgery for Initially Unresectable Colorectal Liver Metastases Following Modern Induction Systemic Therapy in the Dutch CAIRO5 Trial. ANNALS OF SURGERY OPEN 2021; 2:e081. [PMID: 37635815 PMCID: PMC10455233 DOI: 10.1097/as9.0000000000000081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 06/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To present short-term outcomes of liver surgery in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) downsized by chemotherapy plus targeted agents. Background The increase of complex hepatic resections of CRLM, technical innovations pushing boundaries of respectability, and use of intensified induction systemic regimens warrant for safety data in a homogeneous multicenter prospective cohort. Methods Patients with initially unresectable CRLM, who underwent complete resection after induction systemic regimens with doublet or triplet chemotherapy, both plus targeted therapy, were selected from the ongoing phase III CAIRO5 study (NCT02162563). Short-term outcomes and risk factors for severe postoperative morbidity (Clavien Dindo grade ≥ 3) were analyzed using logistic regression analysis. Results A total of 173 patients underwent resection of CRLM after induction systemic therapy. The median number of metastases was 9 and 161 (93%) patients had bilobar disease. Thirty-six (20.8%) 2-stage resections and 88 (51%) major resections (>3 liver segments) were performed. Severe postoperative morbidity and 90-day mortality was 15.6% and 2.9%, respectively. After multivariable analysis, blood transfusion (odds ratio [OR] 2.9 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1-6.4], P = 0.03), major resection (OR 2.9 [95% CI 1.1-7.5], P = 0.03), and triplet chemotherapy (OR 2.6 [95% CI 1.1-7.5], P = 0.03) were independently correlated with severe postoperative complications. No association was found between number of cycles of systemic therapy and severe complications (r = -0.038, P = 0.31). Conclusion In patients with initially unresectable CRLM undergoing modern induction systemic therapy and extensive liver surgery, severe postoperative morbidity and 90-day mortality were 15.6% and 2.7%, respectively. Triplet chemotherapy, blood transfusion, and major resections were associated with severe postoperative morbidity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Bolhuis
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lodi Grosheide
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nina J. Wesdorp
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aysun Komurcu
- The Netherlands Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Center, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Thiery Chapelle
- Department of Hepatobiliary, Transplantation, and Endocrine Surgery, University of Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Cornelis H. C. Dejong
- Maastricht University Medical Center, Department of Surgery, Maastricht, The Netherlands and Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | | | - Dirk J. Grünhagen
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas M. van Gulik
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Koert P. De Jong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - Geert Kazemier
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, VU University Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost M. Klaase
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Liver Transplantation, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen
| | - Mike S. L. Liem
- Department of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, the Netherlands
| | - I. Quintus Molenaar
- Regional Academic Cancer Center Utrecht, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht and St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | | | - Arjen M. Rijken
- Amphia hospital, Department of Surgery, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M. Ruers
- Amphia hospital, Department of Surgery, Breda, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Department of Surgery, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Cornelis J. A. Punt
- From the Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Department of Epidemiology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zhang Y, Ge L, Weng J, Tuo WY, Liu B, Ma SX, Yang KH, Cai H. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Clin Cases 2021; 9:6357-6379. [PMID: 34435001 PMCID: PMC8362587 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v9.i22.6357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/14/2021] [Accepted: 06/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In recent years, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been increasingly used in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases. However, the efficacy and safety of NAC in the treatment of resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) are still controversial.
AIM To assess the efficacy and application value of NAC in patients with resectable CRLM.
METHODS We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library from inception to December 2020 to collect clinical studies comparing NAC with non-NAC. Data processing and statistical analyses were performed using Stata V.15.0 and Review Manager 5.0 software.
RESULTS In total, 32 studies involving 11236 patients were included in this analysis. We divided the patients into two groups, the NAC group (that received neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and the non-NAC group (that received no neoadjuvant chemotherapy). The meta-analysis outcome showed a statistically significant difference in the 5-year overall survival and 5-year disease-free survival between the two groups. The hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were HR = 0.49, 95%CI: 0.39-0.61, P = 0.000 and HR = 0.48 95%CI: 0.36-0.63, P = 0.000. The duration of surgery in the NAC group was longer than that of the non-NAC group [standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.01-0.82, P = 0.044)]. The meta-analysis showed that the number of liver metastases in the NAC group was significantly higher than that in the non-NAC group (SMD = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.02-1.43, P = 0.043). The lymph node metastasis in the NAC group was significantly higher than that in the non-NAC group (SMD = 1.24, 95%CI: 1.07-1.43, P = 0.004).
CONCLUSION We found that NAC could improve the long-term prognosis of patients with resectable CRLM. At the same time, the NAC group did not increase the risk of any adverse event compared to the non-NAC group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yue Zhang
- General Surgery Clinical Medical Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Long Ge
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Jun Weng
- General Surgery Clinical Medical Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Wen-Yu Tuo
- General Surgery Clinical Medical Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Bin Liu
- General Surgery Clinical Medical Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Shi-Xun Ma
- General Surgery Clinical Medical Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Ke-Hu Yang
- Evidence Based Social Science Research Center, School of Public Health, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| | - Hui Cai
- General Surgery Clinical Medical Center, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730000, Gansu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Giustiniano E, Nisi F, Rocchi L, Zito PC, Ruggieri N, Cimino MM, Torzilli G, Cecconi M. Perioperative Management of Complex Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases: The Alliance between the Surgeon and the Anesthetist. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13092203. [PMID: 34063684 PMCID: PMC8125060 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13092203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 04/28/2021] [Accepted: 04/30/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Major high-risk surgery (HRS) exposes patients to potential perioperative adverse events. Hepatic resection of colorectal metastases can surely be included into the HRS class of operations. Limiting such risks is the main target of the perioperative medicine. In this context the collaboration between the anesthetist and the surgeon and the sharing of management protocols is of utmost importance and represents the key issue for a successful outcome. In our institution, we have been adopting consolidated protocols for patients undergoing this type of surgery for decades; this made our mixed team (surgeons and anesthetists) capable of achieving a safe outcome for the majority of our surgical population. In this narrative review, we report the most recent state of the art of perioperative management of hepatic resection of colorectal metastases along with our experience in this field, trying to point out the main issues. Abstract Hepatic resection has been widely accepted as the first choice for the treatment of colorectal metastases. Liver surgery has been recognized as a major abdominal procedure; it exposes patients to a high risk of perioperative adverse events. Decision sharing and the multimodal approach to the patients’ management are the two key items for a safe outcome, even in such a high-risk surgery. This review aims at addressing the main perioperative issues (preoperative evaluation; general anesthesia and intraoperative fluid management and hemodynamic monitoring; intraoperative metabolism; administration policy for blood-derivative products; postoperative pain control; postoperative complications), in particular, from the anesthetist’s point of view; however, only an alliance with the surgery team may be successful in case of adverse events to accomplish a good final outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enrico Giustiniano
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.R.); (P.C.Z.); (N.R.); (M.C.)
- Correspondence: (E.G.); (F.N.); Tel.: +39-02-8224-7459 (E.G.); +39-02-8224-4115 (F.N.); Fax: +39-02-8224-4190 (E.G. & F.N.)
| | - Fulvio Nisi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.R.); (P.C.Z.); (N.R.); (M.C.)
- Correspondence: (E.G.); (F.N.); Tel.: +39-02-8224-7459 (E.G.); +39-02-8224-4115 (F.N.); Fax: +39-02-8224-4190 (E.G. & F.N.)
| | - Laura Rocchi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.R.); (P.C.Z.); (N.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Paola C. Zito
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.R.); (P.C.Z.); (N.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Nadia Ruggieri
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.R.); (P.C.Z.); (N.R.); (M.C.)
| | - Matteo M. Cimino
- Hepato-Biliary & Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (M.M.C.); (G.T.)
| | - Guido Torzilli
- Hepato-Biliary & Pancreatic Surgery Unit, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (M.M.C.); (G.T.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cecconi
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Units, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Milan, Italy; (L.R.); (P.C.Z.); (N.R.); (M.C.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Fagenson AM, Gleeson EM, Nabi F, Lau KN, Pitt HA. When does a Pringle Maneuver cause harm? HPB (Oxford) 2021; 23:587-594. [PMID: 32933844 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2020.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2020] [Revised: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Pringle Maneuver (PM) is considered to be safe and effective. However, data regarding perioperative outcomes after a PM are conflicting. Therefore, the aim of this analysis is to compare the outcomes of patients who have and have not undergone a PM in North America. METHODS Patients undergoing major (≥3 segments) or partial hepatectomy (≤2 segments) were identified in the 2014-17 ACS-NSQIP hepatectomy database. Patients with and without a PM were compared. Propensity matching was utilized, and subgroup analyses by liver texture, hepatectomy extent and pathology were performed. RESULTS Prior to matching, 3706 (24%) of 15,748 hepatectomy patients underwent a PM. The PM was utilized in 1445 (27%) of major and 2261 (22%) of partial hepatectomies. After matching, 3295 patients with and 3295 without a PM were compared. Operative time was significantly increased for patients undergoing a PM (246 vs. 225 min, p < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed post-hepatectomy liver failure and septic shock to be significantly increased (both p < 0.05) for patients undergoing a PM during a partial hepatectomy or in patients with metastatic disease. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing a partial hepatectomy and those with metastatic disease have worse outcomes when a Pringle Maneuver is performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander M Fagenson
- Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3401 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA
| | - Elizabeth M Gleeson
- Department of Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, One Gustave L. Levy Place, Box 1259, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Fatima Nabi
- Department of Surgery, Crozier-Chester Medical Center, One Medical Center Blvd, Upland, PA, 19013, USA
| | - Kwan N Lau
- Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3401 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Department of Surgery, Lewis Katz School of Medicine at Temple University, 3401 N Broad Street, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA; Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, 675 Hoes Ln W, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Muaddi H, Silva S, Choi WJ, Coburn N, Hallet J, Law C, Cheung H, Karanicolas PJ. When is a Ghost Really Gone? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of the Accuracy of Imaging Modalities to Predict Complete Pathological Response of Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases After Chemotherapy. Ann Surg Oncol 2021; 28:6805-6813. [PMID: 33772391 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-021-09824-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Administration of chemotherapy to patients with colorectal liver metastases may result in disappearing liver metastases (DLM). This poses a therapeutic dilemma due to the uncertainty of true complete (pathological) response. OBJECTIVE We aimed to examine the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in detecting true complete response in patients with DLM after chemotherapy. METHODS We performed a systematic search for articles assessing the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities in evaluating DLM following chemotherapy. True complete response was defined as 1-year recurrence-free survival in non-resected patients or complete pathological response on histologic examination in resected patients. We calculated the negative predictive value (NPV) for detecting true complete response of each imaging modality using a random effects model. RESULTS Thirteen studies comprising 332 patients with at least one DLM were included. The number of DLMs after chemotherapy was 955 with computed tomography (CT), 104 with positron emission tomography (PET), 50 with intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS), 585 with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and 175 with contrast-enhanced IOUS (CEIOUS). Substantial variation in study design, patient characteristics, and imaging features was observed. Pooled NPV was 0.79 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.53-0.96), 0.73 (95% CI 0.58-0.85), 0.54 (95% CI 0.37-0.7), 0.47 (95% CI 0.34-0.61), and 0.22 (95% CI 0.11-0.39) for CEIOUS, MRI, IOUS, CT, and PET, respectively. CONCLUSION After chemotherapy, MRI or CEIOUS are the most accurate imaging modalities for assessment of DLM and should be used routinely in this context. Given the high NPV of these two modalities, surgical resection of visible CRLM is warranted if technically possible, even if DLM remain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hala Muaddi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Stephanie Silva
- Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Woo Jin Choi
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Natalie Coburn
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Julie Hallet
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Calvin Law
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.,Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Helen Cheung
- Department of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Paul J Karanicolas
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada. .,Department of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Li X, Tian D, Li W, Dong B, Wang H, Yuan J, Li B, Shi L, Lin X, Zhao L, Liu S. Artificial intelligence-assisted reduction in patients' waiting time for outpatient process: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Health Serv Res 2021; 21:237. [PMID: 33731096 PMCID: PMC7966905 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06248-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Many studies suggest that patient satisfaction is significantly negatively correlated with the waiting time. A well-designed healthcare system should not keep patients waiting too long for an appointment and consultation. However, in China, patients spend notable time waiting, and the actual time spent on diagnosis and treatment in the consulting room is comparatively less. Methods We developed an artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted module and name it XIAO YI. It could help outpatients automatically order imaging examinations or laboratory tests based on their chief complaints. Thus, outpatients could get examined or tested before they went to see the doctor. People who saw the doctor in the traditional way were allocated to the conventional group, and those who used XIAO YI were assigned to the AI-assisted group. We conducted a retrospective cohort study from August 1, 2019 to January 31, 2020. Propensity score matching was used to balance the confounding factor between the two groups. And waiting time was defined as the time from registration to preparation for laboratory tests or imaging examinations. The total cost included the registration fee, test fee, examination fee, and drug fee. We used Wilcoxon rank-sum test to compare the differences in time and cost. The statistical significance level was set at 0.05 for two sides. Results Twelve thousand and three hundred forty-two visits were recruited, consisting of 6171 visits in the conventional group and 6171 visits in the AI-assisted group. The median waiting time was 0.38 (interquartile range: 0.20, 1.33) hours for the AI-assisted group compared with 1.97 (0.76, 3.48) hours for the conventional group (p < 0.05). The total cost was 335.97 (interquartile range: 244.80, 437.60) CNY (Chinese Yuan) for the AI-assisted group and 364.58 (249.70, 497.76) CNY for the conventional group (p < 0.05). Conclusions Using XIAO YI can significantly reduce the waiting time of patients, and thus, improve the outpatient service process of hospitals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoqing Li
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.,Child Health Advocacy Institute, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Dan Tian
- Division of Hospital Management, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Weihua Li
- Division of Hospital Management, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China
| | - Bin Dong
- Division of Hospital Management, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Pediatric AI clinical Application and Research Center, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Intelligence Pediatrics (SERCIP), Shanghai, China.,Child Health Advocacy Institute, China Hospital Development Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Hansong Wang
- Division of Hospital Management, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Pediatric AI clinical Application and Research Center, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Intelligence Pediatrics (SERCIP), Shanghai, China.,Child Health Advocacy Institute, China Hospital Development Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jiajun Yuan
- Division of Hospital Management, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.,Pediatric AI clinical Application and Research Center, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China.,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Intelligence Pediatrics (SERCIP), Shanghai, China.,Child Health Advocacy Institute, China Hospital Development Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Biru Li
- Department of Pediatric Internal Medicine, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lei Shi
- Hangzhou YI TU Healthcare Technology CO. Ltd, Hangzhou, China
| | - Xulin Lin
- Hangzhou YI TU Healthcare Technology CO. Ltd, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liebin Zhao
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. .,Child Health Advocacy Institute, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China. .,Division of Hospital Management, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China. .,Pediatric AI clinical Application and Research Center, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai, China. .,Shanghai Engineering Research Center of Intelligence Pediatrics (SERCIP), Shanghai, China. .,Child Health Advocacy Institute, China Hospital Development Institute of Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China.
| | - Shijian Liu
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China. .,Child Health Advocacy Institute, Shanghai Children's Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai, 200127, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Fagenson AM, Pitt HA, Moten AS, Karhadkar SS, Di Carlo A, Lau KN. Fatty liver: The metabolic syndrome increases major hepatectomy mortality. Surgery 2020; 169:1054-1060. [PMID: 33358472 DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2020.11.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2020] [Revised: 11/01/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the obesity epidemic worsens, the prevalence of fatty liver disease has increased. However, minimal data exist on the impact of combined fatty liver and metabolic syndrome on hepatectomy outcomes. Therefore, the aim of this analysis is to measure the outcomes of patients who do and do not have a fatty liver undergoing hepatectomy in the presence and absence of the metabolic syndrome. METHODS Patients with fatty and normal livers undergoing major hepatectomy (≥3 segments) were identified in the 2014 to 2018 American College of Surgeon National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Patients undergoing partial hepatectomy and those with missing liver texture data were excluded. Propensity matching was used and adjusted for multiple variables. A subgroup analysis stratified by the metabolic syndrome (body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, hypertension and diabetes) was performed. Demographics and outcomes were compared by χ2 and Mann-Whitney tests. RESULTS Of 2,927 hepatectomies, 30% of patients (N = 863) had a fatty liver. The median body mass index was 28.6, and the metabolic syndrome was present in 6.3% of patients (N = 184). After propensity matching, 863 patients with fatty and 863 with normal livers were compared. Multiple outcomes were significantly worse in patients with fatty livers (P <.05), including serious morbidity (32% vs 24%), postoperative invasive biliary procedures (15% vs 10%), organ space infections (11% vs 7.8%), and pulmonary complications. Patients with fatty livers and the metabolic syndrome had significantly increased postoperative cardiac arrests, pulmonary embolisms, and mortality (P < .05). CONCLUSION Fatty liver disease is associated with significantly worse outcomes after major hepatectomy. The metabolic syndrome confers an increased risk of postoperative mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Henry A Pitt
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Ambria S Moten
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Antonio Di Carlo
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Kwan N Lau
- Department of Surgery, Temple University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
O'Leary C, Soulen MC, Shamimi-Noori S. Interventional Oncology Approach to Hepatic Metastases. Semin Intervent Radiol 2020; 37:484-491. [PMID: 33328704 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1719189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic liver disease is one of the major causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Locoregional therapies offered by interventional oncologists alleviate cancer-related morbidity and in some cases improve survival. Locoregional therapies are often palliative in nature but occasionally can be used with curative intent. This review will discuss important factors to consider prior to palliative and curative intent treatment of metastatic liver disease with locoregional therapy. These factors include those specific to the tumor, liver function, liver reserve, differences between treatment modalities, and patient-specific considerations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathal O'Leary
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael C Soulen
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan Shamimi-Noori
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Tai K, Komatsu S, Sofue K, Kido M, Tanaka M, Kuramitsu K, Awazu M, Gon H, Tsugawa D, Yanagimoto H, Toyama H, Murakami S, Murakami T, Fukumoto T. Total tumour volume as a prognostic factor in patients with resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. BJS Open 2020; 4:456-466. [PMID: 32277807 PMCID: PMC7260417 DOI: 10.1002/bjs5.50280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Although total tumour volume (TTV) may have prognostic value for hepatic resection in certain solid cancers, its importance in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains unexplored. This study investigated its prognostic value in patients with resectable
CRLM. Method This was a retrospective review of patients who underwent hepatic resection for CRLM between 2008 and 2017 in a single institution. TTV was measured from CT images using three‐dimensional construction software; cut‐off values were determined using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses. Potential prognostic factors, overall survival (OS) and recurrence‐free survival (RFS) were determined using multivariable and Kaplan–Meier analyses. Results Some 94 patients were included. TTV cut‐off values for OS and RFS were 100 and 10 ml respectively. Right colonic primary tumours, primary lymph node metastasis and bilobar liver metastasis were included in the multivariable analysis of OS; a TTV of 100 ml or above was independently associated with poorer OS (hazard ratio (HR) 6·34, 95 per cent c.i. 2·08 to 17·90; P = 0·002). Right colonic primary tumours and primary lymph node metastasis were included in the RFS analysis; a TTV of 10 ml or more independently predicted poorer RFS (HR 1·90, 1·12 to 3·57; P = 0·017). The 5‐year OS rate for a TTV of 100 ml or more was 41 per cent, compared with 67 per cent for a TTV below 100 ml (P = 0·006). Corresponding RFS rates with TTV of 10 ml or more, or less than 10 ml, were 14 and 58 per cent respectively (P = 0·009). A TTV of at least 100 ml conferred a higher rate of unresectable initial recurrences (12 of 15, 80 per cent) after initial hepatic resection. Conclusion TTV was associated with RFS and OS after initial hepatic resection for CRLM; TTV of 100 ml or above was associated with a higher rate of unresectable recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Tai
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - S Komatsu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - K Sofue
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - M Kido
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - M Tanaka
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - K Kuramitsu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - M Awazu
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - H Gon
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - D Tsugawa
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - H Yanagimoto
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - H Toyama
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - S Murakami
- Clinical and Translational Research Centre, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - T Murakami
- Department of Radiology, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| | - T Fukumoto
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Zhang C, Dai H, Chen Z. Impact of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy on Postoperative Outcomes for Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases Undergoing Liver Resection. J Am Coll Surg 2019; 229:436. [PMID: 31561799 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.04.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2019] [Accepted: 04/29/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|