Effects of obesity on noninvasive test results in patients with suspected cardiac ischemia: Insights from the PROMISE trial

Effect of Body Mass Index on Effectiveness of CT versus Invasive Coronary Angiography in Stable Chest Pain: The DISCHARGE Trial

Background Recent trials support the role of cardiac CT in the evaluation of symptomatic patients suspected of having coronary artery disease (CAD); however, body mass index (BMI) has been reported to negatively impact CT image quality. Purpose To compare initial use of CT versus invasive coronary angiography (ICA) on clinical outcomes in patients with stable chest pain stratified by BMI category. Materials and Methods This prospective study represents a prespecified BMI subgroup analysis of the multicenter Diagnostic Imaging Strategies for Patients with Stable Chest Pain and Intermediate Risk of Coronary Artery Disease (DISCHARGE) trial conducted between October 2015 and April 2019. Adult patients with stable chest pain and a CAD pretest probability of 10%-60% were randomly assigned to undergo initial CT or ICA. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or stroke. The secondary end point was an expanded MACE composite, including transient ischemic attack, and major procedure-related complications. Competing risk analyses were performed using the Fine and Gray subdistribution Cox proportional hazard model to assess the impact of the relationship between BMI and initial management with CT or ICA on the study outcomes, whereas noncardiovascular death and unknown causes of death were considered competing risk events. Results Among the 3457 participants included, 831 (24.0%), 1358 (39.3%), and 1268 (36.7%) had a BMI of less than 25, between 25 and 30, and greater than 30 kg/m2, respectively. No interaction was found between CT or ICA and BMI for MACE (P = .29), the expanded MACE composite (P = .38), or major procedure-related complications (P = .49). Across all BMI subgroups, expanded MACE composite events (CT, 10 of 409 [2.4%] to 23 of 697 [3.3%]; ICA, 26 of 661 [3.9%] to 21 of 422 [5.1%]) and major procedure-related complications during initial management (CT, one of 638 [0.2%] to five of 697 [0.7%]; ICA, nine of 630 [1.4%] to 12 of 422 [2.9%]) were less frequent in the CT versus ICA group. Participants with a BMI exceeding 30 kg/m² exhibited a higher nondiagnostic CT rate (7.1%, P = .044) compared to participants with lower BMI. Conclusion There was no evidence of a difference in outcomes between CT and ICA across the three BMI subgroups. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02400229 © RSNA, 2024 Supplemental material is available for this article.

Influence of Obesity on Coronary Artery Disease and Clinical Outcomes in the ADVANCE Registry

BACKGROUND

The relationship between body size and cardiovascular events is complex. This study utilized the ADVANCE (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Noninvasive FFR_CT in Coronary Care) Registry to investigate the association between body mass index (BMI), coronary artery disease (CAD), and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The ADVANCE registry enrolled patients undergoing evaluation for clinically suspected CAD who had >30% stenosis on cardiac computed tomography angiography. Patients were stratified by BMI: normal <25 kg/m², overweight 25-29.9 kg/m², and obese ≥30 kg/m². Baseline characteristics, cardiac computed tomography angiography and computed tomography fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT), were compared across BMI groups. Adjusted Cox proportional hazards models assessed the association between BMI and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 5014 patients, 2166 (43.2%) had a normal BMI, 1883 (37.6%) were overweight, and 965 (19.2%) were obese. Patients with obesity were younger and more likely to have comorbidities, including diabetes and hypertension (all P<0.001), but were less likely to have obstructive coronary stenosis (65.2% obese, 72.2% overweight, and 73.2% normal BMI; P<0.001). However, the rate of hemodynamic significance, as indicated by a positive FFR_CT, was similar across BMI categories (63.4% obese, 66.1% overweight, and 67.8% normal BMI; P=0.07). Additionally, patients with obesity had a lower coronary volume-to-myocardial mass ratio compared with patients who were overweight or had normal BMI (obese BMI, 23.7; overweight BMI, 24.8; and normal BMI, 26.3; P<0.001). After adjustment, the risk of major adverse cardiovascular events was similar regardless of BMI (all P>0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with obesity in the ADVANCE registry were less likely to have anatomically obstructive CAD by cardiac computed tomography angiography but had a similar degree of physiologically significant CAD by FFR_CT and similar rates of adverse events. An exclusively anatomic assessment of CAD in patients with obesity may underestimate the burden of physiologically significant disease that is potentially due to a significantly lower volume-to-myocardial mass ratio.

Association of Metabolic Phenotypes With Coronary Artery Disease and Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Stable Chest Pain

OBJECTIVE

Obesity and metabolic syndrome are associated with major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE). However, whether distinct metabolic phenotypes differ in risk for coronary artery disease (CAD) and MACE is unknown. We sought to determine the association of distinct metabolic phenotypes with CAD and MACE.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We included patients from the Prospective Multicenter Imaging Study for Evaluation of Chest Pain (PROMISE) who underwent coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography. Obesity was defined as a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 and metabolically healthy as less than or equal to one metabolic syndrome component except diabetes, distinguishing four metabolic phenotypes: metabolically healthy/unhealthy and nonobese/obese (MHN, MHO, MUN, and MUO). Differences in severe calcification (coronary artery calcification [CAC] ≥400), severe CAD (≥70% stenosis), high-risk plaque (HRP), and MACE were assessed using adjusted logistic and Cox regression models.

RESULTS

Of 4,381 patients (48.4% male, 60.5 ± 8.1 years of age), 49.4% were metabolically healthy (30.7% MHN and 18.7% MHO) and 50.6% unhealthy (22.3% MUN and 28.4% MUO). MHO had similar coronary CT findings as compared with MHN (severe CAC/CAD and HRP; P > 0.36 for all). Among metabolically unhealthy patients, those with obesity had similar CT findings as compared with nonobese (P > 0.10 for all). However, both MUN and MUO had unfavorable CAD characteristics as compared with MHN (P ≤ 0.017 for all). A total of 130 events occurred during follow-up (median 26 months). Compared with MHN, MUN (hazard ratio [HR] 1.61 [95% CI 1.02-2.53]) but not MHO (HR 1.06 [0.62-1.82]) or MUO (HR 1.06 [0.66-1.72]) had higher risk for MACE.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with stable chest pain, four metabolic phenotypes exhibit distinctly different CAD characteristics and risk for MACE. Individuals who are metabolically unhealthy despite not being obese were at highest risk in our cohort.

The obesity paradox in the stress echo lab: fat is better for hearts with ischemia or coronary microvascular dysfunction

BACKGROUND

Obesity is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease (CAD), but once CAD has developed it has been associated with improved survival ("obesity paradox").

AIM

To assess how obesity affects prognosis in patients with or without inducible ischemic regional wall motion abnormalities (RWMA) and/or abnormal coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) during stress echocardiography (SE).

METHODS

In an observational retrospective two- center study design, we analyzed 3249 consecutive patients (1907 men; age 66 ± 12 years; body mass index, BMI, 26.9 ± 4.1 kg/m²) with known (n = 1306) or suspected (n = 1943) CAD who underwent dipyridamole SE with simultaneous evaluation of RWMA and CFVR. All-cause death was the outcome end-point.

RESULTS

1075 patients were lean (BMI 18.5-24.9 kg/m²), 1523 overweight (BMI 25.0-29.9 kg/m²), and 651 obese (≥30.0 kg/m²). Ischemic test result for RWMA occurred in 28 (3%) lean, 69 (4%) overweight, and 28 (4%) obese patients (p = 0.03). An abnormal CFVR (≤2.0) was found in 281 (26%) lean, 402 (26%) overweight and 170 (26%) obese patients (p = 0.99). During 68 ± 44 months of follow-up, 496 (15%) patients died. At multivariable Cox analysis, BMI ≥ 30 was an independent predictor of reduced mortality in the 878 patients with stress-induced (≥2 segments) RWMA and/or CFVR abnormality (HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.40-0.84; p = 0.003), while showed no effect at univariate analysis in the 2371 patients with no RWMA and normal CFVR (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.74-1.46; p = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity exerts a "paradoxical" protective effect in patients with stress-induced ischemia and/ or coronary microvascular dysfunction, and shows a neutral effect in patients with normal CFVR and no stress-induced RWMA.

Echocardiography in the Era of Obesity

Patients with obesity are at increased risk for coronary artery disease and heart failure and often present with symptoms of dyspnea, fatigue, edema, or chest pain. Echocardiography is frequently used to help distinguish whether these symptoms are due to cardiac disease. Unfortunately, obesity has a significant impact on image quality because of signal attenuation. Ultrasound-enhancing agents may improve the detection of structural remodeling and subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in patients with obesity. Assessment of chamber sizes and cardiac remodeling in severely obese subjects must be interpreted with caution, however, as the current recommendations for indexing cardiac chamber sizes to body size may lead to false conclusions about chamber volumes or mass, particularly in settings in which weight is changing. As a result of increases in stroke volume and cardiac output, obesity may exacerbate hemodynamic compromise in obstructive structural or valvular disease. With regard to assessment of ischemic heart disease, stress echocardiography can effectively risk-stratify patients with obesity and may have advantages over other noninvasive modalities. In general, transesophageal echocardiography is safe in patients with obesity, although some precautions should be observed. Stress echocardiography using the transesophageal approach is an alternative for preoperative or ischemia evaluation in patients with suboptimal transthoracic views.