The Impact of Sex Differences on Fractional Flow Reserve–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

The role of gender in resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) guided coronary revascularization

BACKGROUND

Gender-based differences in clinical outcomes of patients undergoing fractional flow reserved (FFR) guided coronary revascularization is well documented. This study aimed to compare resting full-cycle ratio (RFR) values between men and women and whether this translated into difference in clinical outcomes in patients who underwent RFR-guided coronary revascularization.

METHODS

This was a retrospective single-centre study of consecutive patients who underwent RFR-guided revascularization for coronary lesions with intermediate degree of stenosis. The primary endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), unplanned revascularization, and unstable angina requiring hospital admission at one year.

RESULTS

In 373 consecutive patients (510 lesions, 26% women) there was no statistically significant difference in RFR value between men and women (0.90 ± 10 versus 0.90 ± 11, P = 0.95). There was no statistically significant difference between men and women in the primary endpoint, even after adjustment to the imbalance between the two groups [3.7% vs. 3.0%; HR 1.43, 95% CI (0.46 to 4.43), P = 0.54]; or its individual components of death (1.1% vs 0.8%, P = 0.76), MI (1.9% vs 0.8%, P = 0.38) or unplanned revascularization, including unstable angina admissions (2.6% vs 2.3%, P = 0.82). The comparable clinical outcomes were consistent across all different subgroups, including clinical presentation, diabetes status, left ventricle systolic function, kidney function, and the interrogated coronary artery.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests no significant gender-based difference in the value of RFR or 1-year clinical outcomes in patients undergoing resting physiology guided coronary revascularization.

Impact of Chronic Kidney Disease on the Coronary Revascularization Guided by Intracoronary Physiology: Results of the First Registry with Long-Term Follow-Up in a Latin American Population

The use of invasive physiology methods in patients with renal dysfunction is not well elucidated. Our objective was to evaluate the in-hospital and long-term results of using intracoronary physiology to guide revascularization in patients with chronic kidney disease. In this retrospective study, we evaluated 151 patients from January 2018 to January 2022, divided into 2 groups: CKD (81 patients [114 lesions]) and non-CKD (70 patients [117 lesions]). The mean age was higher (p < 0.001), body mass index was lower (p = 0.007), contrast volume used was lower (p = 0.02) and the number of ischemic lesions/patients was higher (p = 0.005) in the CKD group. The primary outcomes (rate of major adverse cardiac events during follow-up, defined as death, infarction, and need for new revascularization) in the CKD and non-CKD groups were 22.07% and 14.92%, respectively (p = 0.363). There was a significant difference in the target lesion revascularization (TLR) rate (11.68%, CKD group vs. 1.49%, non-CKD group, p = 0.02), this initial statistical difference was not significant after adjusting for variables in the logistic regression model. There was no difference between the rates of death from all causes (6.49%, CKD group vs. 1.49%, non-CKD group, p = 0.15), reinfarction (3.89%, CKD group vs. 1.49%, non-CKD group, p = 0.394), and need for new revascularization (11.68%, CKD group vs. 5.97%, non-CKD group, p = 0.297). As there was no difference in the endpoints between groups with long-term follow-up, this study demonstrated the safety of using intracoronary physiology to guide revascularization in patients with CKD.

Underrepresentation of Women in Revascularization Trials

This Viewpoint discusses the unequal representation of women in coronary revascularization trials in the US, its negative effects on the cardiovascular health of both sexes, and potential mechanisms to ensure appropriate representation of women moving forward.

Impact of sex on the assessment of the microvascular resistance reserve

BACKGROUND

The microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) is an innovative index to assess the vasodilatory capacity of the coronary circulation while accounting for the presence of concomitant epicardial disease. The MRR has shown to be a valuable diagnostic and prognostic tool in the general coronary artery disease (CAD) population. However, considering the fundamental aspects of its assessment and the unique hemodynamic characteristics of women, it is crucial to provide additional considerations for evaluating the MRR specifically in women.

AIM

The aim of this study was to assess the diagnostic and prognostic applicability of the MRR in women and assess the potential differences across different sexes.

METHODS

From the ILIAS Registry, we enrolled all patients with a stable indication for invasive coronary angiography, ensuring complete physiological and follow-up data. We analyzed the diagnostic value by comparing differences between sexes and evaluated the prognostic value of the MRR specifically in women, comparing it to that in men.

RESULTS

A total of 1494 patients were included of which 26% were women. The correlation between MRR and CFR was good and similar between women (r = 0.80, p < 0.005) and men (r = 0.81, p < 0.005). The MRR was an independent and important predictor of MACE in both women (HR 0.67, 0.47-0.96, p = 0.027) and men (HR 0.84, 0.74-0.95, p = 0.007). The optimal cut-off value for MRR in women was 2.8 and 3.2 in men. An abnormal MRR similarly predicted MACE at 5-year follow-up in both women and men.

CONCLUSION

The MRR seems to be equally applicable in both women and men with stable coronary artery disease.

Association between vessel-specific coronary Aggregated plaque burden, Agatston score and hemodynamic significance of coronary disease (The CAPTivAte study)

Background

CT coronary angiography (CTCA) is a guideline-endorsed assessment for patients with stable angina and suspected coronary disease. Although associated with excellent negative predictive value in ruling out obstructive coronary disease, there are limitations in the ability of CTCA to predict hemodynamically significant coronary disease. The CAPTivAte study aims to assess the utility of Aggregated Plaque Burden (APB) in predicting ischemia based on Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR).

Methods

In this retrospective study, patients who had a CTCA and invasive FFR of the LAD were included. The entire length of the LAD was analyzed using semi-automated software which characterized total plaque burden and plaque morphological subtype (including Low Attenuation Plaque (LAP), Non-calcific plaque (NCP) and Calcific Plaque (CP). Aggregated Plaque Burden (APB) was calculated. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to assess the association between these CT-derived parameters and invasive FFR.

Results

There were 145 patients included in this study. 84.8 % of patients were referred with stable angina. There was a significant linear association between APB and FFR in both univariate and multivariate analysis (Adjusted R-squared = 0.0469; p = 0.035). Mean Agatston scores are higher in FFR positive vessels compared to FFR negative vessels (371.6 (±443.8) vs 251.9 (±283.5, p = 0.0493).

Conclusion

CTCA-derived APB is a reliable predictor of ischemia assessed using invasive FFR and may aid clinicians in rationalizing invasive vs non-invasive management strategies. Vessel-specific Agatston scores are significantly higher in FFR-positive vessels than in FFR-negative vessels. Associations between HU-derived plaque subtype and invasive FFR were inconclusive in this study.

Sex Differences in Clinical Outcomes Associated With Quantitative Flow Ratio-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Background

FAVOR III China (Comparison of Quantitative Flow Ratio Guided and Angiography Guided Percutaneous Intervention in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease) reported improved clinical outcomes in quantitative flow ratio (QFR) relative to angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but the clinical impact of QFR-guided PCI according to sex remains unknown.

Objectives

The authors sought to compare sex differences in the 2-year clinical benefits of a QFR-guided PCI strategy and to evaluate the differences in outcomes between men and women undergoing contemporary PCI.

Methods

This study involved a prespecified subgroup analysis of the FAVOR III China trial, in which women and men were randomized to a QFR-guided strategy or a standard angiography-guided strategy. Sex differences in clinical benefit of the QFR guidance were analyzed for major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, myocardial infarction, or ischemia-driven revascularization within 2 years.

Results

A total of 1,126 women and 2,699 men were eligible and the occurrence of 2-year MACE was similar between women and men (10.3% vs 10.5%; P = 0.96). Compared with an angiography-guided strategy, a QFR-guided strategy resulted in a 7.9% and 9.7% reduction in PCI rates in men and women, respectively. A QFR-guided strategy resulted in similar relative risk reductions for 2-year MACE in women (8.0% vs 12.7%; HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.42-0.90) and men (8.7% vs 12.4%; HR: 0.69; 95% CI: 0.54-0.87) (Pinteraction = 0.61). Furthermore, QFR values were not significantly different between men and women with various angiographic stenosis categories.

Conclusions

A QFR-guided PCI strategy resulted in improved MACE in both men and women at 2 years compared with an angiography-guided PCI strategy. The FAVOR III China Study [FAVOR III China]; (NCT03656848).

Impact of Sex Differences on the Outcomes of Coronary Invasive Physiological Assessment: Long-Term Follow-Up in a Brazilian Population

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the rate of major adverse cardiac events (MACEs; the sum of death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization rates) according to interventional strategies guided by invasive physiological methods in both sexes in a Brazilian population during long-term follow-up for an average of 2 years.

Methods

This retrospective single-center study included 151 consecutive patients (232 lesions) between January 2018 and January 2022. The participants were divided into two groups: the female group (FG), comprising 59 patients with 88 lesions, and the male group (MG), comprising 92 patients with 144 lesions.

Results

The FG had a greater mean age (FG: 67.96 ± 13.12 vs. MG: 62.36 ± 12.01 years, p = 0.009) and lower mean creatinine clearance (FG: 79.35 ± 38.63 vs. MG: 92.02 ± 38.62 mL/min, p = 0.02) than did the MG. The percentage of lesions in the left main coronary artery was higher in the FG than in the MG (12.5% vs. 2.78%, p = 0.006). The mean follow-up time was longer in the MG than in the FG (795.61 ± 350 vs. 619.19 ± 318 days, respectively; p = 0.001). MACE occurred in 11.86% and 13.04% of patients in the FG and MG, respectively (p = 0.850). Secondary outcomes, such as death, reinfarction, and the need for new revascularization, showed no significant between-sex differences.

Conclusions

Our study demonstrated the safety of invasive physiological methods to determine coronary revascularization in both male and female patients in a Brazilian population, as evidenced by the low rates of adverse cardiac events and death after a long-term follow-up.

Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 2

Coronary physiologic assessment is performed to measure coronary pressure, flow, and resistance or their surrogates to enable the selection of appropriate management strategy and its optimization for patients with coronary artery disease. The value of physiologic assessment is supported by a large body of clinical data that has led to major recommendations in all practice guidelines. This expert consensus document aims to convey practical and balanced recommendations and future perspectives for coronary physiologic assessment for physicians and patients in the Asia-Pacific region, based on updated information in the field that includes both wire- and image-based physiologic assessment. This is Part 2 of the whole consensus document, which provides theoretical and practical information on physiologic indexes for specific clinical conditions and patient statuses.

The Impact of Age on the Physiological Assessment of Borderline Coronary Stenoses

Background and Objectives: Coronary angiography is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary artery disease (CAD). In the case of borderline changes, patients require further diagnosis through ischemia assessment via one of the recommended methods of invasive evaluation. This study aimed to assess whether clinical factors influence the risk of a positive result in invasive myocardial ischemia assessment and if these potential factors change with the patient's age and the consistency of ischemia assessment. Materials and Methods: Data were collected retrospectively on all consecutive patients hospitalized in the University Hospital in Krakow between 2020 and 2021, on whom physiological assessments of coronary circulation were performed. Patients were divided into two groups: patients aged 60 or younger and patients older than 60. Results: Despite the older patients having more risk factors for CAD, their physiological assessment results of borderline lesions were similar to those of the younger patients. Positive fractional flow reserve (FFR) assessments were obtained from almost 50% of vessels. In the younger patients, cigarette use and type 2 diabetes mellitus increased the risk of a positive FFR result by 3.5 and 2.5 times, respectively. In the older patients, male gender and peripheral vascular disease significantly increased the risk of a positive FFR by 2.5 and 2 times, respectively. Conclusions: Clinical characteristics of patients undergoing physiological assessment of borderline coronary stenosis varied significantly by age. Refining the definition of borderline lesions to include age, gender, and other factors may improve the identification of patients who would benefit from physiological assessment and coronary revascularization.

Sex Differences in Fractional Flow Reserve- or Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

BACKGROUND

A recent randomized trial reported fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) strategy was noninferior to the intracoronary ultrasound (IVUS)-guided PCI strategy with respect to clinical outcomes with fewer revascularizations.

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to investigate the sex differences in treatment and clinical outcomes according to physiology- or imaging-guided PCI strategies.

METHODS

In this secondary analysis of the FLAVOUR (Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasonography to Guide PCI) trial, the impact of sex on procedural characteristics, PCI rate, and outcomes according to different strategies and treatment types (PCI vs deferral of PCI) was analyzed. The primary outcome was target vessel failure (TVF) at 24 months, defined as a composite of cardiac death, target vessel myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

Of 1,619 patients, 30% were women. Compared with men, women had a smaller minimal lumen area, smaller plaque burden, and higher FFR. They had a lower PCI rate (40.8% vs 47.9%; P = 0.008), which was mainly contributed by FFR guidance. Overall, women showed a lower TVF rate (2.4% vs 4.5%). According to the treatment type, the cumulative incidence of TVF was lower in women than in men among those with the deferral of PCI (1.7% vs 5.2%). However, this trend was not observed in patients who underwent PCI. In both women and men, there were no differences in clinical outcomes between the FFR- and IVUS-guided strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

In cases of intermediate stenosis, despite receiving fewer interventions, women had more favorable outcomes than men. The use of FFR led to a lower PCI rate but had a similar prognostic value compared with IVUS in both women and men.

The effect of sex differences on neointimal characteristics of in-stent restenosis in drug-eluting stents: An optical coherence tomography study

Background

Previous studies have demonstrated that there are sex-related differences in atherosclerosis. However, in terms of the nature of in-stent restenosis (ISR) neointima, the effect of gender on the results is unclear.

Methods

Patients with ISR of drug-eluting stents (DES) who underwent OCT examination in Senior Department of Cardiology of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital from March 2010 to March 2022 were included. The patients were divided into male and female groups.

Results

In this study, a total of 230 DES-ISR patients and 249 DES-ISR target lesions were analyzed. OCT data showed that compared to females, males have a higher incidence of thin-cap fibrous atherosclerosis (TCFA) (37.4% [n = 77] vs. 9.3% [n = 4], p < 0.001) and in-stent neoatherosclerosis (ISNA) (82.0% [n = 169] vs. 62.8% [n = 27]). p = 0.005). In addition, a multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that male was independently associated with a higher incidence of ISNA (OR: 2.659, 95% CI: 1.239-5.707; p = 0.012) and TCFA (OR: 4.216, 95% CI: 1.370-12.976; p = 0.012).

Conclusion

For DES-ISR patients, the incidence of ISNA in female was significantly lower than that in male and vulnerability of neointimal pattern is lower in female than in male.

Multimodality OCT, IVUS and FFR evaluation of coronary intermediate grade lesions in women vs. men

Background

The pathophysiology of atherosclerotic plaque formation and its vulnerability seem to differ between genders due to contrasting risk profiles and sex hormones, however this process is still insufficiently understood. The aim of the study was to compare the differences between sexes regarding the optical coherence tomography (OCT), intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-derived coronary plaque indices.

Methods

In this single-center multimodality imaging study patients with intermediate grade coronary stenoses identified in coronary angiogram (CAG) were evaluated using OCT, IVUS and FFR. Stenoses were considered significant when the FFR value was ≤0.8. Minimal lumen area (MLA), was analyzed by OCT in addition to plaque stratification into fibrotic, calcific, lipidic and thin-cap fibroatheroma (TCFA). IVUS was used for evaluation of lumen-, plaque- and vessel volume, as well as plaque burden.

Results

A total of 112 patients (88 men and 24 women) with chronic coronary syndromes (CCS), who underwent CAG were enrolled. No significant differences in baseline characteristics were present between the study groups. The mean FFR was 0.76 (0.73-0.86) in women and 0.78 ± 0.12 in men (p = 0.695). OCT evaluation showed a higher prevalence of calcific plaques among women than men p = 0.002 whereas lipid plaques were more frequent in men (p = 0.04). No significant differences regarding minimal lumen diameter and minimal lumen area were found between the sexes. In IVUS analysis women presented with significantly smaller vessel area, plaque area, plaque volume, vessel volume (11.1 ± 3.3 mm² vs. 15.0 ± 4.6 mm² p = 0.001, 6.04 ± 1.7 mm² vs. 9.24 ± 2.89 mm² p < 0.001, 59.8 ± 35.2 mm³ vs. 96.3 (52.5-159.1) mm³ p = 0.005, 106.9 ± 59.8 mm³ vs. 153.3 (103-253.4) mm³ p = 0.015 respectively). At MLA site plaque burden was significantly greater for men than women (61.50 ± 7.7% vs. 55.5 ± 8.0% p = 0.005). Survival did not differ significantly between women and men (94.6 ± 41.9 months and 103.51 ± 36.7 months respectively; p = 0.187).

Conclusion

The presented study did not demonstrate significant differences in FFR values between women and men, yet a higher prevalence of calcific plaques by OCT and lower plaque burden at the MLA site by IVUS was found in women vs. men.

Sex differences in computed tomography angiography-derived coronary plaque burden in relation to invasive fractional flow reserve

BACKGROUND

Distinct sex-related differences exist in coronary artery plaque burden and distribution. We aimed to explore sex differences in quantitative plaque burden by coronary CT angiography (CCTA) in relation to ischemia by invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR).

METHODS

This post-hoc analysis of the PACIFIC trial included 581 vessels in 203 patients (mean age 58.1 ​± ​8.7 years, 63.5% male) who underwent CCTA and per-vessel invasive FFR. Quantitative assessment of total, calcified, non-calcified, and low-density non-calcified plaque burden were performed using semiautomated software. Significant ischemia was defined as invasive FFR ≤0.8.

RESULTS

The per-vessel frequency of ischemia was higher in men than women (33.5% vs. 7.5%, p ​< ​0.001). Women had a smaller burden of all plaque subtypes (all p ​< ​0.01). There was no sex difference on total, calcified, or non-calcified plaque burdens in vessels with ischemia; only low-density non-calcified plaque burden was significantly lower in women (beta: -0.183, p ​= ​0.035). The burdens of all plaque subtypes were independently associated with ischemia in both men and women (For total plaque burden (5% increase): Men, OR: 1.15, 95%CI: 1.06-1.24, p ​= ​0.001; Women, OR: 1.96, 95%CI: 1.11-3.46, p ​= ​0.02). No significant interaction existed between sex and total plaque burden for predicting ischemia (interaction p ​= ​0.108). The addition of quantitative plaque burdens to stenosis severity and adverse plaque characteristics improved the discrimination of ischemia in both men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

In symptomatic patients with suspected CAD, women have a lower CCTA-derived burden of all plaque subtypes compared to men. Quantitative plaque burden provides independent and incremental predictive value for ischemia, irrespective of sex.

Combination of coronary CT angiography, FFRCT , and risk factors in the prediction of major adverse cardiovascular events in patients suspected CAD

BACKGROUND

To examine the utility of fractional flow reserve by coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography (FFR_CT ) for predicting major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with suspected coronary artery disease (CAD).

METHODS

This was a nationwide multicenter prospective cohort study including consecutive 1187 patients aged 50-74 years with suspected CAD and had available coronary CT angiography (CCTA). In patients with ≥50% coronary artery stenosis (CAS), FFR_CT was further analyzed. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine the association of FFR_CT and cardiovascular risk factors with incident MACE within 2 years.

RESULTS

Among 933 patients with available information on MACE within 2 years after enrollment, the incidence rate of MACE was higher in 281 patients with CAS than in those without CAS (6.11 vs. 1.16 per 100 patient-year). In 241 patients with CAS, the Cox proportional hazards analysis showed that FFR_CT as well as diabetes mellitus and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level were independently associated with incident MACE. Moreover, the hazard ratio was significantly higher in patients harboring all three factors compared to those harboring 0-2 of the three factors (6.01; 95% confidence interval: 2.77-13.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Combinatorial assessment using CCTA for stenosis, FFR_CT , and risk factors was useful for more accurate prediction of MACE in patients with suspected CAD. Among patients with CAS, those with lower FFR_CT , diabetes mellitus, and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol level were at highest risk for MACE during the 2-year period following enrollment.

Sex-Specific Stress Perfusion Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Suspected Ischemic Heart Disease: Insights From SPINS Retrospective Registry

BACKGROUND

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in women, but current noninvasive cardiac imaging techniques have sex-specific limitations.

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the authors sought to investigate the effect of sex on the prognostic utility and downstream invasive revascularization and costs of stress perfusion cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) for suspected CVD.

METHODS

Sex-specific prognostic performance was evaluated in a 2,349-patient multicenter SPINS (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS] Study) registry. The primary outcome measure was a composite of cardiovascular death and nonfatal myocardial infarction; secondary outcomes were hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure, and late unplanned coronary artery bypass grafting.

RESULTS

SPINS included 1,104 women (47% of cohort); women had higher prevalence of chest pain (62% vs 50%; P < 0.0001) but lower use of medical therapies. At the 5.4-year median follow-up, women with normal stress CMR had a low annualized rate of primary composite outcome similar to men (0.54%/y vs 0.75%/y, respectively; P = NS). In contrast, women with abnormal CMR were at higher risk for both primary (3.74%/y vs 0.54%/y; P < 0.0001) and secondary (9.8%/y vs 1.6%/y; P < 0.0001) outcomes compared with women with normal CMR. Abnormal stress CMR was an independent predictor for the primary (HR: 2.64 [95% CI: 1.20-5.90]; P = 0.02) and secondary (HR: 2.09 [95% CI: 1.43-3.08]; P < 0.0001) outcome measures. There was no effect modification for sex. Women had lower rates of invasive coronary angiography (ICA; 3.6% vs 7.3%; P = 0.0001) and downstream costs ($114 vs $171; P = 0.001) at 90 days following CMR. There was no effect of sex on diagnostic image quality.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress CMR demonstrated excellent prognostic performance with lower rates of ICA referral in women. Stress CMR should be considered as a first-line noninvasive imaging tool for the evaluation of women. (Stress CMR Perfusion Imaging in the United States [SPINS] Study [SPINS]; NCT03192891).

Abnormal physiological findings after FFR-based revascularisation deferral are associated with worse prognosis in women

The prognostic value of abnormal resting Pd/Pa and coronary flow reserve (CFR) after fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularisation deferral according to sex remains unknown. From the ILIAS Registry composed of 20 hospitals globally from 7 countries, patients with deferred lesions following FFR assessment (FFR > 0.8) were included. (NCT04485234) The primary clinical endpoint was target vessel failure (TVF) at 2-years follow-up. We included 1392 patients with 1759 vessels (n = 564 women, 31.9%). Although resting Pd/Pa was similar between the sexes (p = 0.116), women had lower CFR than men (2.5 [2.0-3.2] vs. 2.7 [2.1-3.5]; p = 0.004). During a 2-year follow-up period, TVF events occurred in 56 vessels (3.2%). The risk of 2-year TVF was significantly higher in women with low versus high resting Pd/Pa (HR: 9.79; p < 0.001), whereas this trend was not seen in men. (Sex: P-value for interaction = 0.022) Furthermore, resting Pd/Pa provided an incremental prognostic value for 2-year TVF over CFR assessment only in women. After FFR-based revascularisation deferral, low resting Pd/Pa is associated with higher risk of TVF in women, but not in men. The predictive value of Pd/Pa increases when stratified according to CFR values, with significantly high TVF rates in women in whom both indices are concordantly abnormal.Clinical Trial Registration: Inclusive Invasive Physiological Assessment in Angina Syndromes Registry (ILIAS Registry), NCT04485234.

Multimodality Imaging in the Detection of Ischemic Heart Disease in Women

Women with coronary artery disease tend to have a worse short and long-term prognosis relative to men and the incidence of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease is increasing. Women are less likely to present with classic anginal symptoms when compared with men and more likely to be misdiagnosed. Several non-invasive imaging modalities are available for diagnosing ischemic heart disease in women and many of these modalities can also assist with prognostication and help to guide management. Selection of the optimal imaging modality to evaluate women with possible ischemic heart disease is a scenario which clinicians often encounter. Earlier modalities such as exercise treadmill testing demonstrate significant performance variation in men and women, while newer modalities such as coronary CT angiography, myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are highly specific and sensitive for the detection of ischemia and coronary artery disease with greater parity between sexes. Individual factors, availability, diagnostic performance, and female-specific considerations such as pregnancy status may influence the decision to select one modality over another. Emerging techniques such as strain rate imaging, CT-myocardial perfusion imaging and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging present additional options for diagnosing ischemia and coronary microvascular dysfunction.

Factors Predicting 150 and 200 Microgram Adenosine Requirement during Four Increasing Doses of Intracoronary Adenosine Bolus Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment

Direct intracoronary adenosine bolus is an excellent alternative to intravenous adenosine fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. This study, during four increasing adenosine boluses (50, 100, 150, and 200 mcg), aimed to explore clinical and angiographic predictors of coronary stenotic lesions for which the significant ischemic FFR (FFR ≤ 0.8) occurred at 150 and 200 mcg adenosine doses. Data from 1055 coronary lesions that underwent FFR measurement at the Central Chest Institute of Thailand from August 2011 to July 2021 were included. Baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics were analyzed. The FFR ≤ 0.8 occurred at adenosine 150 and 200 mcg boluses in 47 coronary lesions, while the FFR ≤ 0.8 occurred at adenosine 50 and 100 mcg boluses in 186 coronary lesions. After univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses, four characteristics, including male sex, younger age, non-smoking status, and FFR procedure of RCA, were predictors of the occurrence of FFR ≤ 0.8 at adenosine 150 and 200 mcg doses. Combining all four predictors as a predictive model resulted in an AuROC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.68–0.76), an 86% negative predictive value. Comparing these four predictors, the FFR procedure of RCA gave the most predictive power, with the AuROC of 0.60 (95% CI: 0.56–0.63).

Fractional Flow Reserve Versus Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio in Assessment of Lesion Hemodynamic Significance and Explanation of their Discrepancies. International, Multicenter and Prospective Trial: The FiGARO Study

Background

The FiGARO (FFR versus iFR in Assessment of Hemodynamic Lesion Significance, and an Explanation of Their Discrepancies) trial is a prospective registry searching for predictors of fractional flow reserve/instantaneous wave‐free ratio (FFR/iFR) discrepancy.

Methods and Results

FFR/iFR were analyzed using a Verrata wire, and coronary flow reserve was analyzed using a Combomap machine (both Philips‐Volcano). The risk polymorphisms for endothelial nitric oxide synthase and for heme oxygenase‐1 were analyzed. In total, 1884 FFR/iFR measurements from 1564 patients were included. The FFR/iFR discrepancy occurred in 393 measurements (20.9%): FFRp (positive)/iFRn (negative) type (264 lesions, 14.0%) and FFRn/iFRp (129 lesions, 6.8%) type. Coronary flow reserve was measured in 343 lesions, correlating better with iFR (R=0.56, P<0.0001) than FFR (R=0.36, P<0.0001). The coronary flow reserve value in FFRp/iFRn lesions (2.24±0.7) was significantly higher compared with both FFRp/iFRp (1.39±0.36), and FFRn/iFRn lesions (1.8±0.64, P<0.0001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis confirmed (1) sex, age, and lesion location in the right coronary artery as predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy; and (2) hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency as predictors for FFRn/iFRp discrepancy. The FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy was significantly more frequent in patients with both risk types of polymorphisms (endothelial nitric oxide synthase_r+heme oxygenase‐1_r): 8 patients (24.2%) compared with FFRp/iFRn type of discrepancy: 2 patients (5.9%), P=0.03.

Conclusions

Predictors for FFRp/iFRn discrepancy were sex, age, and location in the right coronary artery. Predictors for FFRn/iFRp were hemoglobin level, smoking, and renal insufficiency. The risk type of polymorphism in endothelial nitric oxide synthase and heme oxygenase‐1 genes was more frequently found in patients with FFRn/iFRp type of discrepancy.

Registration

URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03033810.

Differences in Plaque Characteristics and Myocardial Mass

Background

The mechanism of the fractional flow reserve (FFR) difference according to sex has not been clearly understood.

Objectives

This study sought to evaluate sex differences in coronary stenosis, plaque characteristics, and left ventricular (LV) mass and their implications for physiological significance.

Methods

This was a post hoc analysis of a pooled population of multicenter, international prospective cohorts. Patients (166 women and 489 men) underwent coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) within 90 days before invasive FFR measurements were included. The minimal lumen area, percent of plaque burden, whole vessel plaque volume by composition, high-risk plaque characteristics, and LV mass were analyzed from CCTA images.

Results

Among 1,188 vessels analyzed, the FFR value was higher in women than that in men (0.85 ± 0.13 vs 0.82 ± 0.14; P = 0.001) despite a similar percentage of diameter stenosis between the sexes (45.9% ± 18.9% vs 46.1% ± 17.7%; P = 0.920). The composition of fibrofatty plaque + necrotic core (13.1% ± 16.9% vs 21.2% ± 19.9%; P < 0.001) and frequencies of low attenuation plaque (12.7% vs 24.5%; P < 0.001) and positive remodeling (33.8% vs 45.5%; P = 0.001) were lower in women than in men. Vessel, plaque, and lumen volumes were significantly smaller in women than that in men (all P < 0.001); however, no sex difference was observed in any of these parameters after adjustment for LV mass (all P > 0.10). Sex was not an independent predictor of the FFR value after adjustment for stenosis severity, plaque characteristics, and LV mass.

Conclusions

Higher FFR values for the same stenosis severity in women can be explained by fewer high-risk plaque characteristics and smaller myocardial mass in women than that in men. (CCTA-FFR Registry for Risk Prediction; NCT04037163)

Concurrently Low Coronary Flow Reserve and Low Index of Microvascular Resistance Are Associated With Elevated Resting Coronary Flow in Patients With Chest Pain and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries

BACKGROUND

Coronary microvascular function can be distinctly quantified using the coronary flow reserve (CFR) and index of microvascular resistance (IMR). Patients with low CFR can present with low or high IMR, although the prevalence and clinical characteristics of these patient groups remain unclear.

METHODS

One hundred ninety-nine patients underwent coronary microvascular assessments using coronary thermodilution techniques. A pressure-temperature sensor-tipped guidewire measured proximal and distal coronary pressure, whereas the inverse of the mean transit time to room temperature saline was used to measure coronary blood flow. The CFR and IMR were quantified during adenosine and acetylcholine hyperemia.

RESULTS

Low adenosine and acetylcholine CFR was observed in 70 and 49 patients, respectively, whereas low CFR/low IMR to adenosine and acetylcholine was observed in 39(56%) and 19(39%) patients, respectively. Despite similar adenosine CFR, patients with low CFR/low IMR had increased resting (2.8±1.2 versus 1.3±0.4s^-1) and hyperemic coronary blood flow (4.8±1.5 versus 2.1±0.5s^-1) compared with patients with low CFR/high IMR (both P<0.01). The same pattern was observed in response to acetylcholine. Patients with low CFR/low IMR to adenosine were younger (56±12 versus 63±10 years), women (84% versus 66%), had fewer coronary risk factors (1.1±1.0 versus 1.6±1.1), lower hemoglobin A1c (5.8±0.7 versus 6.1±0.9 mmol/L), and thinner septal thickness (8.5±2.5 versus 9.9±1.6 mm) compared with patients with low CFR/high IMR to adenosine (all P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Low CFR/low IMR to adenosine and acetylcholine are associated with elevated resting coronary blood flow and preserved hyperemic coronary blood flow. These patients present with distinct phenotypic characteristics. Simultaneous CFR and IMR measures appear necessary to differentiate these endotypes.

Sex-based difference in fractional flow reserve and its impact on clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND

Obesity is a real public health problem and is of growing concern. People are resorting to surgical or endoscopic means to fight against overweight and obesity. In recent years, there has been a marked increase in the use of these means and in particular the insertion of a gastric balloon which seems to present less risk than surgical methods. Renal complications from intragastric balloon placement are extremely rare. We report here the case of compression of the left renal vein revealed by lumbar pain and hematuria in an overweight 39-year-old woman who benefited from the balloon gastric placement one month before symptoms. The scanner made the diagnosis and showed a good evolution after the withdrawal of the balloon.

METHODS

This was a prespecified and retrospective analysis of all consecutive patients who underwent FFR assessment for intermediate coronary lesions between January 2014 and December 2015. The primary endpoint was defined as the 1-year composite of cardiac death, vessel-related myocardial infarction, and clinically-driven target vessel revascularization.

RESULTS

In 1554 lesions (23% in women), FFR was lower in men [0.83 ±0.09 vs 0.85 ±0.08, P = .004] driven by LAD values (for LAD P < .001, LCx or RCA P> .40). In proximal lesions (PLs), FFR was lower in men [0.83 ±0.10 vs 0.85 ±0.08, P = .004] with comparable values in non-PLs [0.84 ±0.09 vs 0.85 ±0.08, P = .36]. In PLs, the primary endpoint was higher in women [HR_(adjusted) 3.18 (1.08-9.37), P = .035] with comparable outcomes in non-PLs (P = .032 for interaction). In deferred lesions, the primary endpoint was higher in women [HR_(adjusted) 2.73 (1.10-6.74), P = .03] with no differences in revascularized lesions across sex (P = .02 for interaction). Results were consistent when using propensity score matching analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a sex-based difference in FFR, particularly in stenoses subtending large myocardium, and more evident in deferred lesions.

Sex Differences in the Non-infarct-Related Artery-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Retrospective Study

Introduction: It has been reported that sex has well-established relationships with the prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD) and the major adverse cardiovascular events. Compared with men, the difference of coronary artery and myocardial characteristics in women has effects on anatomical and functional evaluations. Quantitative flow ratio (QFR) has been shown to be effective in assessing the hemodynamic relevance of lesions in stable coronary disease. However, its suitability in acute myocardial infarction patients is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the sex differences in the non-infarct-related artery (NIRA)-based QFR in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).

Methods: In this study, 353 patients with STEMI who underwent angiographic cQFR assessment and interventional therapy were included. According to contrast-flow QFR (cQFR) standard operating procedures: reliable software was used to modeling the hyperemic flow velocity derived from coronary angiography in the absence of pharmacologically induced hyperemia. 353 patients were divided into two groups according to sex. A cQFR ≤0.80 was considered hemodynamically significant, whereas invasive coronary angiography (ICA) luminal stenosis ≥50% was considered obstructive. Demographics, clinical data, NIRA-related anatomy, and functional cQFR values were recorded. Clinical outcomes included the NIRA reclassification rate between men and women, according to the ICA and cQFR assessments.

Results: Women were older and had a higher body mass index (BMI) than men. The levels of diastolic blood pressure, troponin I, peak creatine kinase-MB, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, N terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide, stent diameter, and current smoking rate were found to be significantly lower in the female group than in the male group. Women had a lower likelihood of a positive cQFR ≤0.80 for the same degree of stenosis and a lower rate of NIRA revascularization. Independent predictors of positive cQFR included male sex and diameter stenosis (DS) >70%.

Conclusions: cQFR values differ between the sexes, as women have a higher cQFR value for the same degree of stenosis. The findings suggest that QFR variations by sex require specific interpretation, as these differences may affect therapeutic decision-making and clinical outcomes.

Research on the Method of Predicting Fractional Flow Reserve Based on Multiple Independent Risk Factors

The use of diameter stenosis (DS), as revealed by coronary angiography, for predicting fractional flow reserve (FFR) usually results in a high error rate of detection. In this study, we investigated a method for predicting FFR in patients with coronary stenosis based on multiple independent risk factors. The aim of the study was to improve the accuracy of detection. First, we searched the existing literature to identify multiple independent risk factors and then calculated the corresponding odds ratios. The improved analytic hierarchy process (IAHP) was then used to determine the weighted value of each independent risk factor, based on the corresponding odds ratio. Next, we developed a novel method, based on the top seven independent risk factors with the highest weighted values, to predict FFR. This model was then used to predict the FFR of 253 patients with coronary stenosis, and the results were then compared with previous methods (DS alone and a simplified scoring system). In addition to DS, we identified a range of other independent risk factors, with the highest weighted values, for predicting FFR, including gender, body mass index, location of stenosis, type of coronary artery distribution, left ventricular ejection fraction, and left myocardial mass. The area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the newly developed method was 84.3% (95% CI: 79.2–89.4%), which was larger than 65.3% (95% CI: 61.5–69.1%) of DS alone and 74.8% (95% CI: 68.4–81.2%) of the existing simplified scoring system. The newly developed method, based on multiple independent risk factors, effectively improves the prediction accuracy for FFR.

Impact of sex on the functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions by instantaneous wave-free ratio

Sex differences in coronary physiology and in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease (CAD) have been previously described. Contrasting data have been reported, so far, about the impact of sex on the assessment of the functional significance of intermediate coronary stenoses by fractional flow reserve (FFR) or instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR). The present study aimed at assessing the sex differences in the results of iFR in a cohort of patients undergoing coronary angiography.

METHODS

We included patients undergoing coronary angiography and the functional assessment of intermediate (40 to 70%) coronary lesions in 2 centers. iFR measurement was performed by pressure-recording guidewire and automatically calculated at the core laboratory using the manufacturers' dedicated software. Quantitative parameters of the coronary lesions were calculated by an automatic edge-detection system. Minimal luminal diameter (MLD), reference diameter (RD), percent diameter stenosis, and length of the lesion were measured. Positive iFR was considered for values < 0.90.

RESULTS

We included 325 patients undergoing coronary angiography and iFR evaluation of 371 intermediate coronary stenoses, including 20.6% of women. Females were older, displayed lower body weight and hemoglobin, lower rate of active smoking (p < 0.001) and previous PCI (p = 0.04), lower platelet count (p = 0.001) and creatinine (p = 0.02). Systolic blood pressure and heart rate at admission were more elevated in women (p = 0.001 and p = 0.05, respectively). At angiography, multivessel coronary artery disease was more uncommon (p = 0.001) and proximal lesions were more frequently assessed by iFR (p = 0.04). Mean values of iFR did not differ with sex and neither the percentage of positive iFR (19.1% vs 18.8%, p = 0.99, adjusted OR[95%CI] = 0.51[0.18-1.48], p = 0.22).

CONCLUSION

Among patients undergoing functional assessment of intermediate coronary lesions by instantaneous wave-free ratio, no impact of sex was observed on the absolute values or the rate of positivity of iFR.

[The Role of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Chronic Coronary Syndromes]

The Role of Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization in Chronic Coronary Syndromes Abstract. Coronary heart disease represents the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Optimal management of these patients is therefore crucial and includes lifestyle changes, optimal medical therapy, and coronary revascularization. This review summarizes diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of patients with chronic coronary syndromes, focusing on the 2019 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines for the diagnosis and management of chronic coronary syndromes. In particular, the role of invasive assessment and coronary revascularization in chronic coronary syndromes is discussed.

Sex Differences in Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio or Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided Revascularization Strategy

OBJECTIVES

This study sought to evaluate sex differences in procedural characteristics and clinical outcomes of instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR)- and fractional flow reserve (FFR)-guided revascularization strategies.

BACKGROUND

An iFR-guided strategy has shown a lower revascularization rate than an FFR-guided strategy, without differences in clinical outcomes.

METHODS

This is a post hoc analysis of the DEFINE-FLAIR (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate stenosis to guide Revascularization) study, in which 601 women and 1,891 men were randomized to iFR- or FFR-guided strategy. The primary endpoint was 1-year major adverse cardiac events (MACE), a composite of all-cause death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or unplanned revascularization.

RESULTS

Among the entire population, women had a lower number of functionally significant lesions per patient (0.31 ± 0.51 vs. 0.43 ± 0.59; p < 0.001) and less frequently underwent revascularization than men (42.1% vs. 53.1%; p < 0.001). There was no difference in mean iFR value according to sex (0.91 ± 0.09 vs. 0.91 ± 0.10; p = 0.442). However, the mean FFR value was lower in men than in women (0.83 ± 0.09 vs. 0.85 ± 0.10; p = 0.001). In men, an FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than an iFR-guided strategy (57.1% vs. 49.3%; p = 0.001), but this difference was not observed in women (41.4% vs. 42.6%; p = 0.757). There was no difference in MACE rates between iFR- and FFR-guided strategies in both women (5.4% vs. 5.6%, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.50 to 2.43; p = 0.805) and men (6.6% vs. 7.0%, adjusted hazard ratio: 0.98; 95% confidence interval: 0.66 to 1.46; p = 0.919).

CONCLUSIONS

An FFR-guided strategy was associated with a higher rate of revascularization than iFR-guided strategy in men, but not in women. However, iFR- and FFR-guided strategies showed comparable clinical outcomes, regardless of sex. (Functional Lesion Assessment of Intermediate Stenosis to guide Revascularization [DEFINE-FLAIR]; NCT02053038).

Sex Differences in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve: Lessons From ADVANCE

OBJECTIVES

This study is to determine the management and clinical outcomes of patients investigated with coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-derived fractional flow reserve (FFR_CT) according to sex.

BACKGROUND

Women are underdiagnosed with conventional ischemia testing, have lower rates of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD) at invasive coronary angiography (ICA), yet higher mortality compared to men. Whether FFR_CT improves sex-based patient management decisions compared to CCTA alone is unknown.

METHODS

Subjects with symptoms and CAD on CCTA were enrolled (2015 to 2017). Demographics, symptom status, CCTA anatomy, coronary volume to myocardial mass ratio (V/M), lowest FFR_CT values, and management plans were captured. Endpoints included reclassification rate between CCTA and FFR_CT management plans, incidence of ICA demonstrating obstructive CAD (≥50% stenosis) and revascularization rates.

RESULTS

A total of 4,737 patients (n = 1,603 females, 33.8%) underwent CCTA and FFR_CT. Women were older (age 68 ± 10 years vs. 65 ± 10 years; p < 0.0001) with more atypical symptoms (41.5% vs. 33.9%; p < 0.0001). Women had less obstructive CAD (65.4% vs. 74.7%; p < 0.0001) at CCTA, higher FFR_CT (0.76 ± 0.10 vs. 0.73 ± 0.10; p < 0.0001), and lower likelihood of positive FFR_CT ≤ 0.80 for the same degree stenosis (p < 0.0001). A positive FFR_CT ≤0.80 resulted in equal referral to ICA (n = 510 [54.5%] vs. n = 1,249 [56.5%]; p = 0.31), but more nonobstructive CAD (n = 208 [32.1%] vs. n = 354 [24.5%]; p = 0.0003) and less revascularization (n = 294 [31.4%] vs. n = 800 [36.2%]; p < 0.0001) in women, unless the FFR_CT was ≤0.75 where revascularization rates were similar (n = 253 [41.9%] vs. n = 715 [46.4%]; p = 0.06). Women have a higher V/M ratio (26.17 ± 7.58 mm³/g vs. 24.76 ± 7.22 mm³/g; p < 0.0001) that is associated with higher FFR_CT independent of degree stenosis (p < 0.001). Predictors of revascularization included stenosis severity, FFR_CT, symptoms, and V/M ratio (p < 0.001) but not female sex (p = 0.284).

CONCLUSIONS

FFR_CT differs between the sexes, as women have a higher FFR_CT for the same degree of stenosis. In FFR_CT-positive CAD, women have less obstructive CAD at ICA and less revascularization, which is associated with higher V/M ratio. The findings suggest that CAD and FFR_CT variations by sex need specific interpretation as these differences may affect therapeutic decision making and clinical outcomes. (Assessing Diagnostic Value of Non-invasive FFRCT in Coronary Care [ADVANCE]; NCT02499679).

Effect of Sex Difference on Discordance Between Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve

BACKGROUND

Physiology-guided percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes. Previous trials showed the agreement between iFR and FFR is approximately 80%, however the details of discordance pattern remain to be elucidated.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 1024 consecutive intermediate stenotic lesions for which functional evaluation using both iFR and FFR were performed between January 2015 and June 2016. The lesions were classified into 4 groups according to iFR and FFR concordance [(iFR+/FFR+) and (iFR-/FFR-)] or discordance [(iFR+/FFR-) and (iFR-/FFR+)].

RESULTS

Our study evaluated 451 lesions, 264 lesions (58.5%) from men and 187 lesions (41.5%) from women. iFR was similar between women and men, however FFR was significantly higher in women than men. The rate of discordance between iFR and FFR was 21.3% (iFR+/FFR- 12.4% and iFR-/FFR+ 8.9%) in overall cohort. The prevalence of overall concordance and discordance were similar between men and women, however iFR+/FFR- discordance was significantly higher in women (17.1% vs. 9.1%) whereas iFR-/FFR+ discordance was significantly higher in men (11.3% vs. 4.8%). In multivariable analysis, female sex and older age were significantly associated with iFR+/FFR- discordance (odds ratio 1.88 and 1.48, respectively). Conversely, younger age, higher stenosis, and concomitant chronic total occlusion were independent predictors for iFR-/FFR+ discordance (odds ratio 0.67, 1.82, and 4.32, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite similar prevalence of overall concordance and discordance between men and women, iFR+/FFR- discordance was higher in women and iFR-/FFR+ discordance was higher in men. Multivariable analysis showed female sex to be independent predictor of iFR+/FFR- discordance.

Influence of Sex on Relationship Between Total Anatomical and Physiologic Disease Burdens and Their Prognostic Implications in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease

Background Total atherosclerosis disease burden is associated with clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease. However, the influence of sex on the relationship between total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens and their prognostic implications have not been well defined. Methods and Results A total of 1136 patients who underwent fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement in all 3 major coronary arteries were included in this study. Anatomical and physiologic total disease burden was assessed by SYNTAX (Synergy Between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Taxus and Cardiac Surgery) score, residual SYNTAX score, a total sum of FFR in 3 vessels (3-vessel FFR), and functional SYNTAX score. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events, a composite of cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and ischemia-driven revascularization at 2 years. There were no differences in angiographic diameter stenosis, SYNTAX score, or residual SYNTAX score between women and men. However, both per-vessel FFR (0.89±0.10 versus 0.87±0.11, P<0.001) and 3-vessel FFR (2.72±0.13 versus 2.69±0.15, P<0.001) were higher in women. Multivariable Cox regression analyses showed that total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens were significantly associated with 2-year major adverse cardiac events, and there was no significant interaction between sex and total disease burden for clinical outcomes. Conclusions Despite similar angiographic disease severity, both per-vessel and per-patient physiologic disease severity was less in women than in men. There was no influence of sex on prognostic implications of total anatomical and physiologic disease burdens in patients with coronary artery disease. Clinical Trial Registration URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01621438.

Sex-Specific Interpretation of Coronary Flow Reserve and Fractional Flow Reserve Metrics, Including Their Companions

BACKGROUND

Impairment of coronary flow is usually evaluated by considering the ratio of two measurements. Fractional flow reserve (FFR) estimates impact on an epicardial artery by taking mean post-stenotic pressure divided by mean aortic pressure, both obtained during adenosine induced hyperemia. Coronary flow reserve (CFR) compares hyperemic flow or velocity with the baseline situation, also as a ratio. As severity of underlying pathology may differ for men and women, we investigate the impact of these differences on relevant metrics.

METHODS

As sex associated differences may cancel out in a ratio, this weakness of a ratio can be compensated by analyzing the intrinsic companion (C) and consider polar coordinates. Thus, besides the familiar ratio based metrics, we also analyze FFRC and CFRC. Outcomes of in silico studies are employed to extrapolate actual patient data and predict consequences. For FFR 129 patients (38 women) were invasively studied using pressure wires. CFR was measured noninvasively for the left anterior descending coronary artery by recording ultrasound based Doppler velocity in 114 individuals (28 women).

RESULTS

The FFR can be identified as an indicator of the pressure gradient over the stenosis (R=-0.90), while FFRC differs for men compared to women (P=0.04) and correlates (R=0.93) with post-stenotic driving pressure. CFR shows a difference for men versus women (P=0.04) and is best associated with hyperemic flow (R=0.64), whereas CFRC relates to hyperemia recruited velocity (R=0.97). Simulation studies show that FFR may differ for both sexes when considering elderly.

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of ratios require inclusion of the companion, and sex-specific differences deserve attention.

Sex-Specific Outcomes in Cardiovascular Device Evaluations

Background: Females have historically been underrepresented in cardiovascular device trials. As a result, differences in outcomes for males and females are not possible to be determined in subanalyses. Materials and Methods: Against a backdrop of troubling trends in cardiovascular outcomes for females, we provide a narrative review on the differences in outcomes observed in females undergoing device evaluations in multiple fields of cardiovascular medicine, including coronary revascularization, structural heart disease, and heart failure. We also review predictors of cardiovascular trial nonparticipation as it may provide avenues by which female enrollment in cardiovascular device trials can be improved. Results: Advances have been made in structural heart therapy, where female representation in transcatheter aortic valve replacement studies was nearly 50%. For other indications, coronary revascularization and heart failure, there was clearly a disparity in female recruitment. On average, female representation was 25% in major clinical trials evaluating drug eluting stents, implantable cardioverter defibrillators, cardiac resynchronization defibrillators, and ventricular assist devices. As a result, the best treatment recommendations for females in these fields are currently guided by outcomes evaluated primarily in males. Conclusions: Female enrollment in device clinical trials for coronary revascularization and heart failure has lagged, leaving uncertainty in making benefit/risk assessments of device therapy. The predictors of female nonparticipation in clinical trials can inform a comprehensive strategy to facilitate and enrich the enrollment of females in cardiovascular device trials. This is critical to ensure that sex differences can be considered in treatment selection, so that patients can receive the best available care.

Percutaneous coronary intervention in women: is sex still an issue?

Coronary artery disease among women presents differences in terms of clinical presentation and pathophysiology. To date, women present worse prognoses with more events and higher mortality rate. One the one hand, they are less likely addressed for invasive therapy. One the other hand, revascularization procedures, whether by bypass or by percutaneous coronary intervention, are associated with higher rates of complications and poorer prognosis. Despite higher risk factor burden and comorbidity, women are less affected by obstructive disease and plaque characteristics are more favorable than among men. Abnormalities of endothelial function and micro vascular flow reserve could explain part of the high prevalence of symptoms of angina observed among women. Due to the worse prognosis of microvascular dysfunction, particularly in women, proper diagnosis is mandatory and deserve invasive management. Outcome following ST elevation myocardial infarction is still more severe among women with higher in-hospital mortality, but sex discrepancies are observed even in elective percutaneous coronary intervention. However, improvement of techniques, drugs and devices benefited to both men and women and tend to decrease gender gap. Especially, changes in the design of newer-generation drug-eluting stents (DES) may be particularly important for women. Female sex remains a potent predictor of higher risk of bleeding and vascular complication; thus important efforts should be promoted to develop bleeding avoidance strategies. Sex-based differences still deserve dedicated investigations in terms of physiopathology, particular hormonal impacts, and specific responses to drugs and devices.

Impact of Sex Difference on the Discordance of Revascularization Decision Making Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Diastolic Pressure Ratio During the Wave-Free Period

Background

Sex difference in fractional flow reserve (FFR) and resting index has not been fully clarified. We sought to investigate the impact of sex on the discordance of revascularization decision making between FFR and diastolic pressure ratio during the diastolic wave‐free period (dPR_WFP).

Methods and Results

A total of 759 angiographically intermediate lesions with 30% to 80% diameter stenosis by quantitative coronary angiography in 577 patients in whom FFR and dPR_WFP were measured were investigated. dPR_WFP was measured during the wave‐free window of 5 heart cycles at an independent core laboratory. FFR ≤0.80 and dPR_WFP ≤0.89 were considered positive studies. A total of 164 vessels in 126 women (21.6%) and 595 vessels in 451 men (78.4%) were included. In lesions with negative dPR_WFP, positive FFR was less frequently observed in women (13 of 73; 17.8%) than in men (97 of 286; 33.9%) (P=0.009). In lesions with positive dPR_WFP, the frequency of negative FFR was observed in 22 of 91 vessels (24.2%) in women and 51 of 309 vessels (16.5%) in men, which did not reach statistical significance (P=0.098). In multivariable analyses, female sex was independently associated with FFR‐dPR_WFP discordance both in negative dPR_WFP cohort (odds ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.21–0.98; P=0.036) and in positive dPR_WFP cohort (odds ratio, 2.41; 95% CI, 1.17–4.96; P=0.017) after adjustment for age, weight, quantitative coronary angiography data, and baseline physiological indexes.

Conclusions

The frequency of FFR‐dPR_WFP discordance was significantly associated with sex, which may indicate potential shift of optimal threshold of either FFR or dPR_WFP, or both of them, according to sex.

Renal dysfunction is associated with lower incidence of positive fractional flow reserve values in patients with severe hypertension

BACKGROUND

Renal dysfunction, an important predictor of cardiovascular mortality, is paradoxically associated with a lower incidence of positive coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR) values, possibly due to renal disease-associated myocardial microvascular dysfunction. It is unknown if this relationship is influenced by arterial hypertension, a condition strongly associated with renal- and microvascular dysfunction.

METHODS

The incidence of positive (<0.81) FFR values was retrospectively evaluated in consecutive patients with intermediate severity coronary artery lesions that were either associating or not associating renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance, CrCl <90 mL/min/1.73 m2), and had mild/moderate or severe arterial hypertension (treated by <3 or ≥3 different drugs).

RESULTS

Positive FFR values were found in 49.5% of the 109 included patients, with a significantly lower incidence in those with renal dysfunction: 23 vs. 31 cases (39.7% vs. 60.8%, P=0.03). However, uni- and multivariate subpopulation analysis evidenced that renal dysfunction was a significant independent predictor of fewer positive FFR results only in severely hypertensive patients (univariate P values for mild/moderate and severe hypertension: 0.80 and <0.01, respectively; multivariate P in severely hypertensive patients: 0.04). This categorization significantly restricted the number of borderline FFR results (0.75-0.80) where measurement interpretation could be challenging because of renal dysfunction (from 13.8% to 4.6% of the whole study population, P=0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

In the current study renal dysfunction was independently associated with a significantly higher incidence of negative FFR results in patients with intermediate severity coronary artery lesions only in the presence of severe arterial hypertension. This observation should be confirmed by large-scale prospective clinical trials.

Sex Differences in Long-Term Outcomes in Patients With Deferred Revascularization Following Fractional Flow Reserve Assessment: International Collaboration Registry of Comprehensive Physiologic Evaluation

Background

Sex‐specific differences may influence prognosis after deferred revascularization following fractional flow reserve (FFR) measurement. This study sought to investigate the sex differences in long‐term prognosis of patients with deferred revascularization following FFR assessment.

Methods and Results

A total of 879 patients (879 vessels) with deferred revascularization with FFR >0.75 who underwent FFR and coronary flow reserve measurements were enrolled from 3 countries (Korea, Japan, and Spain). Long‐term outcomes were assessed in 649 men and 230 women by the patient‐oriented composite outcome (POCO, a composite of any death, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization). We applied inverse‐probability weighting based on propensity scores to account for differences at baseline between women and men (age, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, diameter stenosis, lesion length, multivessel disease, FFR, coronary flow reserve. The median follow‐up duration was 1855 days (745–1855 days). Median FFR values were 0.88 (0.83–0.93) in men and 0.89 (0.85–0.94) in women, respectively. The occurrences of POCO were significantly high in men compared with that in women (10.5% versus 4.2%, P=0.007). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed that women had a significantly lower risk of POCO (χ²=7.2, P=0.007). Multivariate COX proportional hazards regression analysis revealed that age, male, diabetes mellitus, diameter stenosis, lesion length, and coronary flow reserve were independent predictors of POCO. After applying IPW, the hazard ratio of males for POCO was 2.07 (95% CI, 1.07–4.04, P=0.032).

Conclusions

This large multinational study reveals that long‐term outcome differs between women and men in favor of women after FFR‐guided revascularization deferral.

Clinical Trial Registration

URL: http://www.ClinicalTrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02186093.

Percutaneous coronary and structural interventions in women: a position statement from the EAPCI Women Committee

Several expert documents on sex-based differences in interventional outcomes are now available, however this is the first position paper from the EAPCI Women Committee discussing the potential influence of sex in the percutaneous treatment of coronary and structural heart disease. Despite the misconception that coronary artery disease is a 'man's disease', contemporary data shows a growing incidence in women. However, women are under-represented in randomised coronary clinical trials (~25%). The generalisation of such studies is therefore problematic in decision-making for females undergoing coronary intervention. Differences in pathophysiology between sexes exist, highlighting the need for greater awareness amongst healthcare professionals to enable best evidence-based therapies for women as well as for men. Reassuringly, women represent half of the population included in transcatheter aortic valve implantation clinical trials and may actually benefit more. Growing evidence is also emerging for other interventional atrial procedures which may well be advantageous to women. Awareness of sex disparities is increasing, and we must all work collaboratively within our profession to ensure we provide effective care for all patients with heart disease. The EAPCI Women Committee aim to highlight such issues through this position paper and through visibility within the interventional community.

Are we ready for a gender-specific approach in interventional cardiology?

Gender differences in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, cardiovascular risk factors, and diagnosis of coronary artery disease and valvular heart disease are well known. Such differences have also been outlined in the management and outcomes after acute coronary syndromes and valvular repair. Regarding the atherosclerotic process, pathological experimental studies suggest that plaque composition and burden may differ by gender. Female gender is associated with worse outcomes in the case of ischemic heart disease and, compared with men, women are less likely to undergo interventional cardiac procedures and sustain worse outcomes. In the setting of valvular heart disease (VHD), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and percutaneous edge-to-edge mitral valve repair are now well-established procedures with high success rates. In women with moderate to severe aortic stenosis, subgroup analyses in TAVI trials have demonstrated gender-related differences suggesting female gender as beneficial in terms of short-, mid-, and long-term outcomes. Similarly, several studies reported different procedural challenges and outcomes in males and females following surgical and percutaneous mitral valve repair. These diverse findings emphasize the necessity to provide gender-specific analyses of interventional methods. This review highlights gender differences in the epidemiology, pathophysiology, treatment options and clinical outcomes of the conditions mentioned above.

Impact of increasing dose of intracoronary adenosine on peak hyperemia duration during fractional flow reserve assessment

BACKGROUND

Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) is currently indicated as a first line strategy for the functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. However, the protocol for inducing hyperemia still lacks standardization. Intracoronary adenosine boli, with a progressive increase to high-dosage, have been proposed as a sensitive and accurate strategy for the classification of coronary stenoses, although being potentially affected by the achievement of plateau of the effect and by a less prolonged and stable hyperemia as compared to intravenous administration. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to define the conditioning parameters and assess the impact of increasing-dose intracoronary adenosine on peak hyperemia duration in patients undergoing FFR for intermediate coronary stenoses.

METHODS

FFR was assessed in patients with intermediate (40 to 70%) lesions by pressure-recording guidewire (Prime Wire, Volcano), after induction of hyperemia with intracoronary boli of adenosine (from 60 to 1440 μg, with dose doubling at each step). Hyperemic duration was defined as the time for the variation form minimum FFR ± 0.02 and time to recovery till baseline values.

RESULTS

We included 87 patients, undergoing FFR evaluation of 101 lesions. Mean peak hyperemia duration and time to recovery significantly increased with adenosine doses escalation (p = 0.02 and p < 0.001). Peak hyperemia duration and time to recovery with 1440 μg adenosine were 14.5 ± 12.6 s and 45.2 ± 30.7 s, respectively. Hyperemia duration was not related to Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) parameters or FFR values. In fact, a similar increase in the time of hyperemic peak was noted when comparing patients with positive or negative FFR (p_between = 0.87) or patients with lesions < or ≥20 mm (p_between = 0.92) and lesions involving left main coronary or proximal left anterior descending artery (LAD) (p_between = 0.07). A linear relationship was observed between time to recovery and FFR variations, with a greater time to baseline required in patients with FFR ≤ 0.80 (p = 0.003) and in lesions ≥ 20 mm (p = 0.006), but not in LAD/LM lesions (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study shows a progressive raise in the duration of peak hyperemia and time to recovery, after the administration of increasing doses of intracoronary adenosine for the assessment of FFR. Therefore, considering the potential advantages of a high-dose adenosine protocol, allowing a more prolonged hyperemia and a more precise and reliable measurement of FFR, further larger studies with such FFR strategy should certainly be advocated to confirm its safety and benefits, before its routinely use recommendation.