Diabetes Management in Long-Term Care: An Exploratory Study of the Current Practices and Processes to Managing Frail Elderly Persons with Type 2 Diabetes

Type 2 Diabetes in Older Adults in Long-Term Care Homes: An Educational Intervention to Improve Diabetes Care

OBJECTIVES

Over 25% of nursing home residents have diabetes. Nurses (registered nurses and registered practical nurses), registered dietitians and personal support workers (PSWs) provide the bulk of diabetes care in long-term care (LTC) homes, but their self-rated diabetes knowledge is poor. In this study, we evaluated the impact of an educational intervention on comfort with, and knowledge of, diabetes management among frontline LTC staff.

METHODS

We implemented an educational intervention in 2 LTC homes in Ontario that targeted nurses and dietitians, PSWs and physicians. A self-assessment questionnaire and a knowledge test were administered to nurses and dietitians and PSWs before and after the intervention. We also measured pre- and postintervention glycated hemoglobin levels, use of sliding scale insulin and type and dose of diabetes medications prescribed.

RESULTS

After the intervention, both the nurses and dietitians and PSWs groups demonstrated increased comfort with diabetes management and improved self-appraised knowledge. Among PSWs, knowledge of foot care improved the most, and the nurses and dietitians group had the greatest improvement in knowledge of blood glucose monitoring. In addition, there was reduced use of sliding scale insulin, and in the number of residents requiring renal-based dose reductions of glucose-lowering medications. This intervention was innovative as it targeted different LTC health-care providers; it demonstrated the potential to increase LTC health-care providers' confidence in diabetes management. Future studies could assess the clinical benefits of an educational intervention on rates of hypoglycemia and improving A1C targets.

CONCLUSIONS

An educational intervention can improve knowledge and comfort of diabetes management of frontline LTC staff.

Relationship between HbA1c and capillary blood glucose self-monitoring in type 2 diabetics

INTRODUCTION

Diabetes Control and Complications Trial has established the importance of glycemic control in reducing the progression of retinopathy, nephropathy, and neuropathy in type 1 diabetics. There is little literature linking the frequency of glycemic monitoring with glycated hemoglobin A (HbA1c) in type 2 diabetics. The objectives were to assess the influence of glycemic self-monitoring on HbA1c in three groups of patients with type 2 diabetes (with insulin, with oral antidiabetics and with combination therapy).

METHODS

The glucometer capillary surveys of 117 patients were counted in the 30 days prior to the visit to the Integrated Diabetes Unit at Centro Hospitalar Tondela-Viseu. In the three groups considered, sociodemographic characteristics (age, gender, area of residence, household and schooling) were evaluated and compared.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant association between HbA1c and the frequency of capillary glucose in any of the groups. In the evaluation of sociodemographic data, contrary to what was expected, the area of residence and schooling did not influence the value of HbA1c.

CONCLUSION

These results question the role of glycemic monitoring in the metabolic control of type 2 diabetics, highlighting the need to implement therapeutic education programs so that these patients can adequately intervene in the therapeutic adjustment as a function of the information obtained by capillary glycemia.

Older patients' preferences and views related to non-face-to-face diabetes chronic care management: a qualitative study from southeast Louisiana

Background: Management of diabetes may be uniquely challenging for older individuals with multiple chronic conditions. Health systems and policymakers have attempted to reduce barriers to chronic care management (CCM) through incentives to provide non-face-to-face care. This qualitative study aimed to investigate and present views on non-face-to-face care management held by elderly patients with diabetes and other chronic conditions in order to contribute to improved programming for this population. Materials and methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients over the age of 64 who have been diagnosed with diabetes and at least one other chronic health condition. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed by experienced researchers using a thematic analytic approach, and an illustrative case study was developed. Results: Thirty individuals participated in this study. Participants were drawn from three health systems in south Louisiana, an area with high rates of morbidity and mortality related to chronic diseases. We identified themes related to lived experiences with diabetes and other medical conditions, perception of personal health status, perceived value of non-face-to-face programs, and support needs for future programming. Additionally, we present one case study describing in detail an individual patient's experience with non-face-to-face CCM. Conclusion: Health systems should consider intentionally recruiting participants who would benefit most from non-face-to-face care, including higher-need, less self-sufficient patients with resource constraints, while continuing to offer in-person services. Future research should examine whether tailoring non-face-to-face programming and support to address unique barriers can further enhance diabetes care at the population level.

Investigating the management of diabetes in nursing homes using a mixed methods approach

AIMS

As populations age there is an increased demand for nursing home (NH) care and a parallel increase in the prevalence of diabetes. Despite this, there is growing evidence that the management of diabetes in NHs is suboptimal. The reasons for this are complex and poorly understood. This study aimed to identify the current level of diabetes care in NHs using a mixed methods approach.

METHODS

The nursing managers at all 44 NHs in County Galway in the West of Ireland were invited to participate. A mixed methods approach involved a postal survey, focus group and telephone interviews.

RESULTS

The survey response rate was 75% (33/44) and 27% (9/33) of nursing managers participated in the qualitative research. The reported prevalence of diagnosed diabetes was 14% with 80% of NHs treating residents with insulin. Hypoglycaemia was reported as 'frequent' in 19% of NHs. A total of 36% of NHs have staff who have received diabetes education or training and 56% have access to diabetes care guidelines. Staff education was the most cited opportunity for improving diabetes care. Focus group and interview findings highlight variations in the level of support provided by GPs and access to dietetic, podiatry and retinal screening services.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a need for national clinical guidelines and standards of care for diabetes management in nursing homes, improved access to quality diabetes education for NH staff, and greater integration between healthcare services and NHs to ensure equity, continuity and quality in diabetes care delivery.