Perioperative care of cannabis users: A comprehensive review of pharmacological and anesthetic considerations

Enhancing the Preanesthesia Evaluation: Consensus Development of the Cannabis Use and Behaviors Assessment Tool (CUBAT)

PURPOSE

This project aimed to develop an evidence-based preanesthesia cannabis use assessment tool to acquire complete and accurate patient history and develop a best-informed, individualized anesthesia and analgesia care plan.

DESIGN

Modified Delphi.

METHODS

Using an evidence synthesis and multistage, modified Delphi process, eight experts from across the United States developed a consensus-based tool to aid in developing a best-informed, individualized plan for anesthesia and analgesia care.

FINDINGS

Two survey rounds integrated informed evidence-based tool revisions. The final tool included instructions for use, a glossary of terms, and seven key assessment items aimed at gathering the most influential information regarding cannabis use.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cannabis Use and Behaviors Assessment Tool is a first-of-its-kind tool providing an essential framework for preanesthesia cannabis use assessment.

Cannabis use disorder and perioperative outcomes following complex cancer surgery

INTRODUCTION

Cannabis usage is increasing in the United States, especially among patients with cancer. We sought to evaluate whether cannabis use disorder (CUD) was associated with higher morbidity and mortality among patients undergoing complex cancer surgery.

METHODS

Patients who underwent complex cancer surgery between January 2016 and December 2019 were identified in the National Inpatient Sample database. CUD was defined according to ICD-10 codes. Propensity score matching was performed to create a 1:1 matched cohort that was well balanced with respect to covariates, which included patient comorbidities, sociodemographic factors, and procedure type. The primary composite outcome was in-hospital mortality and seven major perioperative complications (myocardial ischemia, acute kidney injury, stroke, respiratory failure, venous thromboembolism, hospital-acquired infection, and surgical procedure-related complications).

RESULTS

Among 15 014 patients who underwent a high-risk surgical procedure, a cohort of 7507 patients with CUD (median age; 43 years [IQR: 30-56 years]; n = 3078 [41.0%] female) were matched with 7507 patients who were not cannabis users (median age; 44 years [IQR: 30-58 years); n = 2997 [39.9%] female). CUD was associated with slight increased risk relative to postoperative kidney injury (CUD, 7.8% vs. no CUD, 6.1%); however, in-hospital mortality was slightly lower (CUD, 0.9% vs. no CUD, 1.6%) (both p < 0.001). On multivariable analysis, after controlling for other risk factors, CUD was not associated with higher morbidity and mortality (adjusted odds ratio: 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98-1.15; p = 0.158).

CONCLUSION

CUD was not associated with a higher risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality following complex cancer surgery.

Trends in Adolescent Comorbid Cannabis Use Disorder and Postoperative Complications

BACKGROUND

Increasing legalization and widespread misinformation about the dangers of cannabis use have contributed to the rising prevalence of cannabis use disorder (CUD) among adolescents. Our objective was to determine the prevalence of CUD in adolescent surgical patients and evaluate its association with postoperative complications.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, 1:1 propensity-matched cohort study of adolescents (aged 10-17 years) with and without CUD who underwent inpatient operations at US hospitals participating in the Pediatric Health Information System from 2009 to 2022. The primary outcome was the trend in prevalence of CUD. Secondary outcomes included postoperative complications. Using a Bonferroni correction, we considered a P value < .008 to be significant.

RESULTS

Of 558 721 adolescents undergoing inpatient surgery from 2009 to 2022, 2604 (0.5%) were diagnosed with CUD (2483 were propensity matched). The prevalence of CUD increased from 0.4% in 2009 to 0.6% in 2022 (P < .001). The adjusted odds of respiratory complications, ICU admission, mechanical ventilation, and extended hospital stay were significantly higher in adolescents with CUD (respiratory complications: odds ratio [OR], 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.16-2.00; P = .002; ICU admission: OR, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.61-1.98; P < .001; mechanical ventilation: OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 2.10-2.77; P < .001; extended hospital stay: OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.74-2.20; P < .001). The propensity score-adjusted odds of postoperative mortality or stroke for adolescents with CUD were not significantly increased (mortality: OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.87-2.25; P = .168; stroke: OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 1.13-5.36; P = .024).

CONCLUSIONS

CUD is increasing among adolescents scheduled for surgery. Given its association with postoperative complications, it is crucial to screen adolescents for cannabis use to allow timely counseling and perioperative risk mitigation.

Peri-Operative Impact of Cannabis Use in Conjunction With Elective Primary Breast Augmentation in a Private Practice

Background The consumption of recreational and medicinal cannabis in the United States continues to increase. Understanding the effects of cannabis in patients undergoing elective primary breast augmentation (EPBA) is of paramount importance with the expanding rates of reported cannabis consumption. Objectives This study aims to analyze the peri-operative impact of cannabis use in conjunction with EPBA in a single-surgeon practice in San Francisco, California. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of 134 adult female patients undergoing EPBA from August 2018 to January 2022 within a single-surgeon practice plastic surgery office. Cannabis use was self-reported as current use or former use. Cohorts were grouped as cannabis users and cannabis non-users. Results Of the 134 patient charts identified for analysis, 58 (43.3%) reported cannabis use. Cannabis users were significantly younger than cannabis non-users (26.8 years versus 31.5 years, P<0.001). No significant differences were found between groups among intra-operative blood loss, post-operative complication rates, post-operative narcotic use, or intra-operative anesthetic requirements. The incidence of adverse events, including wound breakdown, skin necrosis, and capsular contracture requiring reoperation, did not differ significantly between cannabis users and cannabis non-user groups. Ninety-six percent of patients had their implants placed subpectorally, and all procedures were done using a Keller funnel. Eighty-three percent of patients had Sientra implants, and 96% of all implants were silicone gel implants. All procedures were done under general anesthesia. Patients were followed for up to two years. Discussion This review found no significant differences in peri-operative and post-operative outcomes between cannabis users and cannabis non-users.

Cannabis smoking and abdominal wall reconstruction outcomes: a propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Despite increasing use of cannabis, literature on perioperative effects is lagging. We compared active cannabis-smokers versus non-smokers and postoperative wound morbidity and reoperations following open abdominal wall reconstruction (AWR).

METHODS

Patients who underwent open, clean, AWR with transversus abdominis release and retromuscular synthetic mesh placement at our institution between January 2014 and May 2022 were identified using the Abdominal Core Health Quality Collaborative database. Active cannabis-smokers were 1:3 propensity matched to non-smokers based on demographics and comorbidities. Wound complications, 30 day morbidity, pain (PROMIS 3a-Pain Intensity), and hernia-specific quality of life (HerQles) were compared.

RESULTS

Seventy-two cannabis-smokers were matched to 216 non-smokers. SSO (18% vs 17% p = 0.86), SSI (11.1% vs 9.3%, p = 0.65), SSOPI (12% vs 12%, p = 0.92), and all postoperative complications (46% vs 43%, p = 0.63) were similar between cannabis-smokers and non-smokers. Reoperations were more common in the cannabis-smoker group (8.3% vs 2.8%, p = 0.041), driven by major wound complications (6.9% vs 3.2%, p = 0.004). No mesh excisions occurred. HerQles scores were similar at baseline (22 [11, 41] vs 35 [14, 55], p = 0.06), and were worse for cannabis-smokers compared to non-smokers at 30 days (30 [12, 50] vs 38 [20, 67], p = 0.032), but not significantly different at 1 year postoperatively (72 [53, 90] vs 78 [57, 92], p = 0.39). Pain scores were worse for cannabis-smokers compared to non-smokers at 30 days postoperatively (52 [46, 58] vs 49 [44, 54], p = 0.01), but there were no differences at 6 months or 1 year postoperatively (p > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Cannabis smokers will likely experience similar complication rates after clean, open AWR, but should be counseled that despite similar wound complication rates, the severity of their wound complications may be greater than non-smokers.

Cannabis Use Is Associated With Increased Use of Prescription Opioids Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVES

Cannabis is an antinociceptive which has been evaluated as a possible adjunct or substitute for opioid use in the treatment of acute pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative cannabis usage and consumption of opioids for postoperative analgesia.

METHODS

Patients who underwent one- or two-level posterior lumbar fusion surgery were categorized as cannabis users or non-cannabis users based on preoperative diagnoses of cannabis use. Total morphine equivalent dose was calculated for both in-house opioid consumption and postoperative prescription opioid usage. Age, ASA, BMI, depression, tobacco use, estimated blood loss, OR time, LOS, disposition to rehab, 30-day readmission, in-house opioid consumption and postoperative prescription opioid usage were compared between groups using t-tests.

RESULTS

Of the 220 opioid naïve patients, 29 (13%) patients were identified as cannabis users while 191 (87%) were non-cannabis users. There were no significant associations between opioid naïve cannabis usage and ASA, BMI, tobacco use, EBL, OR time, LOS, disposition to rehab, or readmission. Opioid naïve cannabis users had greater association with depression (31.3% vs 13.7%, P=.017) and younger age (56.37 years vs 65.37 years, P<.001). Interestingly, cannabis use was associated with a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), with 1.38 vs 2.49 (P=.002). Cannabis users were found to have increased postoperative prescription opioid usage (2545.41 POST-MED vs 1379.72 POST-MED, P=.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis usage is associated with increased usage of opioids postoperatively, both while in-patient and post-discharge, after posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Cannabis and Cannabinoids in the Perioperative Period

Cannabis use is increasingly common, and with a growing number of jurisdictions implementing legalization frameworks, it is likely that providers will encounter more patients who use cannabis. Therefore, it is important for providers to understand the implications of cannabis use and practical considerations for the perioperative period. Cannabis affects multiple organ systems and may influence intraoperative anesthesia, as well as postoperative pain management. The effects of cannabis and key anesthetic considerations are reviewed here.

Perioperative Management of Patients with Craniomaxillofacial Trauma

Successful surgical management of patients with facial fractures requires a detailed preoperative evaluation and postoperative management that differs from elective surgical patients. This review presents evidence-based recommendations from the surgical and anesthesiology literature that address many of the clinical questions that arise during the perioperative management of this group of patients. Surgeons and anesthesiologists must work together at numerous points and make joint decisions, especially where airway and pain management challenges may arise. The multidisciplinary nature of the decision-making process is emphasized.

[Does medicinal cannabis or cannabis consumption have an influence on the perioperative anesthesiological management?]

The greatly increasing use of medicinal cannabis products as well as the upcoming legalization of cannabis not only require a general re-evaluation of how these substances might be classified as illegal drugs, but also enforce a critical view on the possible consequences that cannabis consumption might have on the anesthesiological strategies applied for surgical procedures. Although high-quality clinical studies are still lacking, several clinical studies meanwhile indicate that an active preoperative cannabis consumption seems to be associated with relevant pathophysiological aspects. Patients who regularly consume high doses of cannabis show an increased risk of cardiovascular and respiratory complications as well as the postoperative nausea and vomitting (PONV) associated with anesthesia. This also applies to relatively young patients. Moreover, the requirements for general anesthetics and analgesics seem to be increased in the context of cannabis consumption, e.g., these patients may require additional efforts when it comes to monitoring the depth of anesthesia and providing a personalized multimodal postoperative pain therapy. It therefore appears to be meaningful to carefully assess and document the extent and duration of the preoperative cannabis consumption during the preoperative assessment. Furthermore, the possibility to perform a preoperative dose reduction of cannabis products in cases with high doses should at least be considered. As the consumption of cannabis is not only increasing in Germany but also worldwide, important future insights will offer a guide towards a safe handling of cannabis in perioperative medicine in the coming years.

Cannabis Use Disorder and Perioperative Complications

Importance

Cannabis use is growing in the US and is increasingly perceived as harmless. However, the perioperative impact of cannabis use remains uncertain.

Objective

To assess whether cannabis use disorder is associated with increased morbidity and mortality after major elective, inpatient, noncardiac surgery.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This retrospective, population-based, matched cohort study used data from the National Inpatient Sample for adult patients aged 18 to 65 years who underwent major elective inpatient surgery (including cholecystectomy, colectomy, inguinal hernia repair, femoral hernia repair, mastectomy, lumpectomy, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, hysterectomy, spinal fusion, and vertebral discectomy) from January 2016 to December 2019. Data were analyzed from February to August 2022.

Exposure

Cannabis use disorder, as defined by the presence of specific International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic codes.

Main Outcome and Measures

The primary composite outcome was in-hospital mortality and 7 major perioperative complications (myocardial ischemia, acute kidney injury, stroke, respiratory failure, venous thromboembolism, hospital-acquired infection, and surgical procedure-related complications) based on ICD-10 discharge diagnosis codes. Propensity score matching was performed to create a 1:1 matched cohort that was well balanced with respect to covariates, which included patient comorbidities, sociodemographic factors, and procedure type.

Results

Among 12 422 hospitalizations, a cohort of 6211 patients with cannabis use disorder (median age, 53 years [IQR, 44-59 years]; 3498 [56.32%] male) were matched with 6211 patients without cannabis use disorder for analysis. Cannabis use disorder was associated with an increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality compared with hospitalizations without cannabis use disorder in adjusted analysis (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.04-1.37; P = .01). The outcome occurred more frequently in the group with cannabis use disorder (480 [7.73%]) compared with the unexposed group (408 [6.57%]).

Conclusions and Relevance

In this cohort study, cannabis use disorder was associated with a modest increased risk of perioperative morbidity and mortality after major elective, inpatient, noncardiac surgery. In the context of increasing cannabis use rates, our findings support preoperative screening for cannabis use disorder as a component of perioperative risk stratification. However, further research is needed to quantify the perioperative impact of cannabis use by route and dosage and to inform recommendations for preoperative cannabis cessation.

Developing and validating a natural language processing algorithm to extract preoperative cannabis use status documentation from unstructured narrative clinical notes

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to develop a natural language processing algorithm (NLP) using machine learning (ML) techniques to identify and classify documentation of preoperative cannabis use status.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We developed and applied a keyword search strategy to identify documentation of preoperative cannabis use status in clinical documentation within 60 days of surgery. We manually reviewed matching notes to classify each documentation into 8 different categories based on context, time, and certainty of cannabis use documentation. We applied 2 conventional ML and 3 deep learning models against manual annotation. We externally validated our model using the MIMIC-III dataset.

RESULTS

The tested classifiers achieved classification results close to human performance with up to 93% and 94% precision and 95% recall of preoperative cannabis use status documentation. External validation showed consistent results with up to 94% precision and recall.

DISCUSSION

Our NLP model successfully replicated human annotation of preoperative cannabis use documentation, providing a baseline framework for identifying and classifying documentation of cannabis use. We add to NLP methods applied in healthcare for clinical concept extraction and classification, mainly concerning social determinants of health and substance use. Our systematically developed lexicon provides a comprehensive knowledge-based resource covering a wide range of cannabis-related concepts for future NLP applications.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrated that documentation of preoperative cannabis use status could be accurately identified using an NLP algorithm. This approach can be employed to identify comparison groups based on cannabis exposure for growing research efforts aiming to guide cannabis-related clinical practices and policies.

Medical Cannabis in Hand Surgery: A Review of the Current Evidence

Acute and chronic pain management remains an ongoing challenge for hand surgeons. This has been compounded by the ongoing opioid epidemic in the United States. With the increasing legalization of medical and recreational cannabis throughout the United States and other countries, previous societal stigmas about this substance keep evolving, and recognition of medical cannabis as an opioid-sparing pain management alternative is growing. A review of the current literature demonstrates a strong interest from patients regarding the use of medical cannabis for pain control. Current evidence demonstrates its efficacy and safety for chronic musculoskeletal and neuropathic pain. However, definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of cannabis for pain control in hand and upper extremity conditions require continued investigation. The purpose of this article is to provide a general review of the mechanism of medical cannabis and a scoping review of the current evidence for its efficacy, safety, and potential applicability in hand and upper extremity conditions.

ASRA Pain Medicine consensus guidelines on the management of the perioperative patient on cannabis and cannabinoids

BACKGROUND

The past two decades have seen an increase in cannabis use due to both regulatory changes and an interest in potential therapeutic effects of the substance, yet many aspects of the substance and their health implications remain controversial or unclear.

METHODS

In November 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine charged the Cannabis Working Group to develop guidelines for the perioperative use of cannabis. The Perioperative Use of Cannabis and Cannabinoids Guidelines Committee was charged with drafting responses to the nine key questions using a modified Delphi method with the overall goal of producing a document focused on the safe management of surgical patients using cannabinoids. A consensus recommendation required ≥75% agreement.

RESULTS

Nine questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved on third-round voting. Topics addressed included perioperative screening, postponement of elective surgery, concomitant use of opioid and cannabis perioperatively, implications for parturients, adjustment in anesthetic and analgesics intraoperatively, postoperative monitoring, cannabis use disorder, and postoperative concerns. Surgical patients using cannabinoids are at potential increased risk for negative perioperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific clinical recommendations for perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoids were successfully created.

Is Recreational Marijuana Use Associated With Changes in the Vital Signs or Anesthetic Requirements During Intravenous Sedation?

PURPOSE

The prevalence of tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) use is increasing in the general population due to its increased availability, legality, and cultural acceptability. The purpose of the current study was to measure the association of THC use on the vital signs and anesthetic requirements during intravenous (IV) sedation procedures in recreational marijuana users.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed. A study sample was chosen from July 2018 to May 2022 based on the following inclusion criteria: patients who underwent toxicology screening due to their history of recent drug use and received IV sedation. The predictor variable of the present study is THC status grouped into THC+ and THC-. THC status was established using urine toxicology. Patients who screened positive for THC were coded THC+. Patients who screened negative for THC were coded THC-. Primary outcome variable was changes in vital signs, including mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), and respiratory rate (RR) during IV sedation procedures in THC+ and THC- groups. Secondary outcome variable was difference in medication (midazolam, fentanyl, propofol, and ketamine) requirements in THC+ and THC- groups. Covariates included age, gender, race, weight, duration of surgery, smoking history, and alcohol use, data on psychiatric diagnosis and psychiatric medications. Descriptive statistics and 2-sample t test were calculated. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

In total, 53 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the study, with 27 patients in the THC+ group and 26 patients in the THC- group. There were no significant statistical differences in the MAP_%, HR_%, and RR_% at T₅, T₁₀, T₂₀, and T₃₀ between the THC+ and THC- groups. When comparing THC+ and THC- groups, in bivariate analyses, the THC+ group required, on average, higher doses of fentanyl [83.82 mcg compared to 65 mcg (P = .02)] and propofol [70 mg compared to 45.26 mg (P = .03)] during IV sedation. However, after adjusting the effect of age, gender, and weight, THC had no significant effect on midazolam (P-value = .28), fentanyl (P-value = .12), propofol (P-value = .06) and ketamine (P-value = .86) requirements.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest there are no differences in vital signs or anesthetic requirements between the THC+ and THC- groups.

Cannabis use and post-operative complications in patients undergoing pancreatic resection

BACKGROUND

Many states have legalized medical cannabis with various reported therapeutic benefits. However, there is little data assessing the effects of cannabis on surgical outcomes. We sought to compare post-operative pancreatic resection complications between cannabis users and non-users.

METHODS

This is a single-center, retrospective review of patients who underwent Whipple or distal pancreatectomy from 1/2017-12/2020. The primary outcome was any in-hospital complication, using Clavien-Dindo. Multivariable regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

There were 486 patients who underwent Whipple (n=346, 71.2%) or distal pancreatectomy (n=140, 28.8%). Overall, 21.4% (n=104) reported cannabis use, of whom 80.8% were current users. Cannabis users were younger (60 vs. 66 years, p < 0.001), and more likely to have smoked tobacco (p=0.04), but otherwise had similar demographics as non-users. There were 288 (59.3%) patients who developed an in-hospital complication (grade 1-2, 75.3%; grade 3-5, 24.7%). A trend towards increased complications was observed with tobacco smoking (OR 1.33, 95% CI 0.91-1.94, p=0.14), but no association of cannabis use with complications was observed (OR 0.93, 95% CI 0.58-1.47, p=0.74).

DISCUSSION

A significant proportion of patients undergoing pancreatic resection report cannabis use. These results suggest that there was no association between cannabis use and post-operative complications, future prospective evaluation is warranted.

The role of cannabinoids in pain modulation in companion animals

The use of cannabinoids in both veterinary and human medicine is controversial for legal and ethical reasons. Nonetheless, the availability and therapeutic use of naturally occurring or synthetic phytocannabinoids, such as Δ⁹-tetrahydrocannabidiol and cannabidiol, have been the focus of attention in studies regarding their medical uses. This review aims to examine the role of cannabinoids in pain modulation by analyzing scientific findings regarding the signaling pathways of the endocannabinoid system and discussing the analgesic effects of synthetic cannabinoids compared to cannabinoid extracts and the extent and involvement of their receptors. In animals, studies have shown the analgesic properties of these substances and the role of the cannabinoid binding -1 (CB1) and cannabinoid binding -2 (CB2) receptors in the endocannabinoid system to modulate acute, chronic and neuropathic pain. This system consists of three main components: endogenous ligands (anandamide and 2-arachidonoylglycerol), G protein-coupled receptors and enzymes that degrade and recycle the ligands. Evidence suggests that their interaction with CB1 receptors inhibits signaling in pain pathways and causes psychoactive effects. On the other hand, CB2 receptors are associated with anti-inflammatory and analgesic reactions and effects on the immune system. Cannabis extracts and their synthetic derivatives are an effective therapeutic tool that contributes to compassionate pain care and participates in its multimodal management. However, the endocannabinoid system interacts with different endogenous ligands and neurotransmitters, thus offering other therapeutic possibilities in dogs and cats, such is the case of those patients who suffer from seizures or epilepsy, contact and atopic dermatitis, degenerative myelopathies, asthma, diabetes and glaucoma, among other inflammatory diseases. Moreover, these compounds have been shown to possess antineoplastic, appetite-stimulating, and antiemetic properties. Ultimately, the study of the endocannabinoid system, its ligands, receptors, mechanism of action, and signaling, has contributed to the development of research that shows that hemp-derived and their synthetic derivatives are an effective therapeutic alternative in the multimodal management of pain in dogs and cats due to their ability to prevent peripheral and central sensitization.

Preoperative Preparation and Guidelines for Cannabis-Using Patients Undergoing Elective Surgery

PURPOSE

Appropriate preoperative screening techniques are needed to safely provide anesthesia to increasing numbers of cannabis using surgical patients.

DESIGN

This was a quasi-experimental quality improvement project.

METHODS

Preoperative identification of cannabis users by registered nurses (RNs) and certified registered nurse anesthetists (CRNAs) was compared to baseline identification rates. CRNAs' compliance with evidenced base guidelines was recorded. Perioperative medication requirements were recorded and compared between cannabis-users and non-cannabis users.

FINDINGS

Identification of cannabis users by CRNAs conducting preanesthetic assessments increased from 4.08% to 14.36% while RN identification improved from 11.22% to 13.81%. Compliance with identification guidelines was 69.2% among CRNAs. There were no differences in anesthetic requirements, complications, or postanesthesia care unit (PACU) length of stay between cannabis users and non-users.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative identification of cannabis users allows for safer, more effective perioperative care by CRNAs, registered nurses, and surgical staff.

Current Cannabidiol Safety: A Review

BACKGROUND

Marijuana, also known as cannabis, is the second most widely used illegal psychoactive substance smoked worldwide after tobacco, mainly due to the psychoactive effects induced by D-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (9-THC). Cannabidiol (CBD) is extracted from cannabis and may be used as an anti-inflammatory agent. Some patents on cannabidiol are discussed in this review. The cannabinoid is a non-psychoactive isomer of the more infamous tetrahydrocannabinol (THC); and is available in several administration modes, most known as CBD oil.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to provide an enhanced review of cannabidiol properties used in treating inflammation. This review also emphasises the current safety profile of cannabidiol.

METHODS

Cannabis is also called Marijuana. It is the second most commonly used illegal psychoactive substance in the universe after tobacco. D-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (9-THC) present in cannabis produces psychoactive effects. Cannabidiol (CBD) extracted from cannabis is used for antiinflammatory purposes. Cannabis smoking causes various types of cancer, such as lung, tongue, and jaw. The current review took literature from Google Scholar, PubMed, and Google Patents. Many clinical investigations are included in this review.

RESULT

After analysing the literature on cannabis, it has been suggested that although cannabis is banned in some countries, it may be included in the treatment and mitigation of some diseases and symptoms like pain management, epilepsy, cancer, and anxiety disorder. Mild side effects were frequently observed in cannabis medications, which included infertility in females, liver damage, etc. Conclusion: Cannabis contains chemical compounds such as the cannabinoids delta-9- tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a psychoactive substance, and non-psychoactive cannabidiol (CBD). Cannabidiol has been confirmed as an efficient treatment of epilepsy in several clinical trials, with one pure CBD product named Epidiolex. It is also used in treating anxiety and acne, as a pain reliever, and has anti-inflammatory properties.

Psychosocial Aspects of Metabolic and Bariatric Surgeries and Endoscopic Therapies

Obesity is a prevalent progressive and relapsing disease for which there are several levels of intervention, including metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) and now endoscopic bariatric and metabolic therapies (EBMTs). Preoperative psychological assessment focused on cognitive status, psychiatric symptoms, eating disorders, social support, and substance use is useful in optimizing patient outcomes and minimizing risks in MBS. Very little is known about the psychosocial needs of patients seeking EBMTs, though these investigations will be forthcoming if these therapies become more widespread. As MBS and EBMT inherently alter the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, considerations for the longer-term GI functioning of the patient are relevant and should be considered and monitored.

Cannabinoids for Pain Modulation in Orthopedic Surgery

Cannabinoid compounds are being increasingly used as an analgesic adjuvant in the orthopedic population, but little data exist to either support or oppose this practice pattern. A review of all contemporary (2000-2020) studies on the use of cannabinoids in orthopedics is presented. Physicians and patients are optimistic that cannabinoids can decrease pain scores and perhaps opioid use; however, their application in orthopedics is not well characterized. In addition to the social stigma regarding the use of cannabis, there is limited high-quality evidence of the efficacy of cannabinoids in treating orthopedic-related pain. As cannabis becomes more accessible, well-designed trials are needed to better understand cannabinoids and guide orthopedic practice. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(6):e295-e302.].

Hypertensive Crisis-Related Hospitalizations and Subsequent Major Adverse Cardiac Events in Young Adults with Cannabis Use Disorder: A Nationwide Analysis

Background and Objectives: With the growing recreational cannabis use and recent reports linking it to hypertension, we sought to determine the risk of hypertensive crisis (HC) hospitalizations and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) in young adults with cannabis use disorder (CUD+). Material and Methods: Young adult hospitalizations (18−44 years) with HC and CUD+ were identified from National Inpatient Sample (October 2015−December 2017). Primary outcomes included prevalence and odds of HC with CUD. Co-primary (in-hospital MACCE) and secondary outcomes (resource utilization) were compared between propensity-matched CUD+ and CUD- cohorts in HC admissions. Results: Young CUD+ had higher prevalence of HC (0.7%, n = 4675) than CUD- (0.5%, n = 92,755), with higher odds when adjusted for patient/hospital-characteristics, comorbidities, alcohol and tobacco use disorder, cocaine and stimulant use (aOR 1.15, 95%CI:1.06−1.24, p = 0.001). CUD+ had significantly increased adjusted odds of HC (for sociodemographic, hospital-level characteristics, comorbidities, tobacco use disorder, and alcohol abuse) (aOR 1.17, 95%CI:1.01−1.36, p = 0.034) among young with benign hypertension, but failed to reach significance when additionally adjusted for cocaine/stimulant use (aOR 1.12, p = 0.154). Propensity-matched CUD+ cohort (n = 4440, median age 36 years, 64.2% male, 64.4% blacks) showed higher rates of substance abuse, depression, psychosis, previous myocardial infarction, valvular heart disease, chronic pulmonary disease, pulmonary circulation disease, and liver disease. CUD+ had higher odds of all-cause mortality (aOR 5.74, 95%CI:2.55−12.91, p < 0.001), arrhythmia (aOR 1.73, 95%CI:1.38−2.17, p < 0.001) and stroke (aOR 1.46, 95%CI:1.02−2.10, p = 0.040). CUD+ cohort had fewer routine discharges with comparable in-hospital stay and cost. Conclusions: Young CUD+ cohort had higher rate and odds of HC admissions than CUD-, with prevalent disparities and higher subsequent risk of all-cause mortality, arrhythmia and stroke.

The Association of Cannabis Use Disorder with Acute Limb Ischemia and Critical Limb Ischemia

OBJECTIVES

Heavy cannabis use has been associated with the development of acute myocardial infarction and stroke. The objective of this study was to determine if heavy, chronic cannabis use is associated with the development of acute limb ischemia (ALI) or critical limb ischemia (CLI).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study within the National Inpatient Sample (2006-2015). Patients without cannabis use disorder (CUD) were matched to patients with CUD in a 2:1 ratio using propensity scores. Our primary outcomes were incidence of ALI and CLI. Secondary outcomes included incidence of acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI), chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI), frequency of open or endovascular interventions, length of stay, and total costs. Sensitivity analyses were performed with alternative models, including in the entire unmatched cohort with regression models utilizing survey weights to account for sampling methodology.

RESULTS

We identified a cohort of 46,297 857 unmatched patients. Patients with CUD in the unmatched cohort were younger, with less cardiovascular risk factors, but higher rates of smoking and substance abuse. The matched cohort included 824,856 patients with CUD and 1,610,497 controls. Those with CUD had a higher incidence of ALI (OR 1.20 95% CI: 1.04-1.38 P=.016). Following multiple sensitivity analyses, there was no robust association between CLI and CUD. We observed no robust association of CUD with AMI, CMI, procedures performed, frequency of amputation, costs, or total length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis use disorder was associated with a significantly higher incidence of admission for acute limb ischemia. CUD was not associated with an increased risk of critical limb ischemia following sensitivity analysis. Given CUD is often seen in younger, less co-morbid patients it provides an important target for intervention in this population.

Hand Surgery Patient Perspectives on Medical Cannabis: A Survey of Over 600 Patients

Purpose

Medical cannabis (MC) has been proposed as a potential addition to multimodal pain management regimens in orthopedics. This study evaluates hand and upper-extremity patient perspectives of MC as a treatment for common orthopedic and musculoskeletal pain conditions. This study also aims to identify the proportion of patients already using MC, perceived barriers to MC use, and opinions on insurance coverage and legality of cannabis.

Methods

An anonymous cross-sectional survey study was conducted of all patients at least 18 years old presenting from October 2020 to January 2021 to a hand and upper-extremity outpatient clinic. The survey collected information regarding opinion on MC, including use, legality, and willingness to use MC in the future. Medical cannabis was legal in the states where the study was conducted.

Results

A total of 679 patients completed the survey (response rate 72.5%). Sixty-eight patients (10.0%) reported currently using MC. Of the 623 patients (90.0%) who reported not currently using MC, 504 (80.9%) would consider using MC for chronic pain, while the remaining 119 (19.1%) would not consider the use of MC for chronic pain. Age was not associated with whether a patient would consider using MC (P = .16) or was already using MC (P = .10). The most identified barrier to MC use was cost, reported as either expensive or not affordable by 477 patients (70.5%).

Conclusions

This study found that most patients presenting for hand and upper-extremity complaints would consider using MC (80.9%), and most perceive it as a safe treatment option for common orthopedic conditions. Moreover, 10% of patients reported already using MC. One of the major barriers to MC use is the cost. Most (90.9%) patients support policies for legalization and insurance coverage of MC.

Type of study/level of evidence

Therapeutic Level III.

Considerations for Cannabinoids in Perioperative Care by Anesthesiologists

Increased usage of recreational and medically indicated cannabinoid compounds has been an undeniable reality for anesthesiologists in recent years. These compounds’ complicated pharmacology, composition, and biological effects result in challenging issues for anesthesiologists during different phases of perioperative care. Here, we review the existing formulation of cannabinoids and their biological activity to put them into the context of the anesthesia plan execution. Perioperative considerations should include a way to gauge the patient’s intake of cannabinoids, the ability to gain consent properly, and vigilance to the increased risk of pulmonary and airway problems. Intraoperative management in individuals with cannabinoid use is complicated by the effects cannabinoids have on general anesthetics and depth of anesthesia monitoring while simultaneously increasing the potential occurrence of intraoperative hemodynamic instability. Postoperative planning should involve higher vigilance to the risk of postoperative strokes and acute coronary syndromes. However, most of the data are not up to date, rending definite conclusions on the importance of perioperative cannabinoid intake on anesthesia management difficult.

Higher risk, higher reward? Self‐reported effects of real‐world cannabis use in Parkinson's disease

Background

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

Illicit Drug Use and Endoscopy: When Do We Say No?

BACKGROUND

Illicit drug use (IDU) is often encountered in patients undergoing elective ambulatory surgical procedures such as endoscopy. Given the variety of systemic effects of these drugs, sedation and anesthetics are believed to increase the risk of cardiopulmonary complications during procedures. Procedural cancelations are common, regardless of the drug type, recency of use, and total dosage consumed. There is a lack of institutional and society recommendations regarding the optimal approach to performing outpatient endoscopy on patients with IDU.

AIM

To review the literature for current recommendations regarding the optimal management of outpatient elective endoscopic procedures in patients with IDU. Secondary aim is to provide guidance for clinicians who encounter IDU in endoscopic practice.

METHODS

Systematic review of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, and Google Scholar for articles presenting data on outcomes of elective procedures in patients using illicit drugs.

RESULTS

There are no clinically relevant differences in periprocedural complications or mortality in cannabis users compared to non-users. Endoscopy in patients with remote cocaine use was also found to have similar outcomes to recent use.

CONCLUSIONS

Canceling endoscopic procedures in patients with recent IDU without consideration of the type of drug, dosage, and chronicity may lead to unnecessary delays in care and increased patient morbidity. Healthcare systems would benefit from additional guidelines for evaluating the patient with recent illicit drug use for acute intoxication and consider proceeding with procedures in the non-toxic population.

Cannabis Exposure Decreases Need for Blood Pressure Support During General Anesthesia in Orthopedic Trauma Surgery

Introduction:

As cannabis use continues to increase in popularity, it is important to investigate how it impacts public health in all sectors of the population, including patients undergoing anesthetic management. This retrospective study focuses on the orthopedic trauma population presenting through an emergency department (ED) and receiving a urine drug screen (UDS) with subsequent urgent surgical intervention. We aimed to evaluate differences in response to general anesthesia in patients with exposure to THC, a major cannabinoid, compared to controls that screened negative for THC.

Materials and Methods:

All ED visits at UC Irvine, a level 1 trauma center between November 4, 2017 and January 7, 2020, were evaluated in this study. Only adult patients who received a UDS and underwent urgent orthopedic trauma surgery within 48 h of ED visit were included in this study. Additional inclusion criteria required an anesthesia time greater than 1 h as well as anesthesia induction and intubation while in the operating room. Overall, we analyzed a total of 221 adult patients.

Discussion:

When adjusting for demographic variability, there were statistically significant differences in response to general anesthesia between these two groups. The THC-positive (THC(+)) group was less likely to receive intraoperative vasopressors, had higher mean arterial blood pressure and mean diastolic blood pressure, needed less total fluid input and had a lower overall fluid balance. Chronic exposure to THC has been shown to downregulate cannabinoid 1 receptors and cause alterations in endocannabinoid tone. These are two potential mechanisms by which the THC(+) group in our study may have become more resistant to the typically observed hypotensive effects of general anesthesia.

Conclusion:

The present study suggests that prior use of cannabis, objectively assessed by urinalysis, results in a decreased need for blood pressure support during general anesthesia. The physiological basis for this phenomenon is unclear, but possible causes might include the downregulation of vascular cannabinoid receptor 1 and/or altered endocannabinoid levels after exposure to cannabis.

Cannabis Abuse and Perioperative Complications Following Inpatient Spine Surgery in the United States

MINI

Due to its complicated legal status, the effects of cannabis on elective spine surgery patients have not been well studied. In this nationwide analysis, we find that cannabis abuse is associated with higher perioperative thromboembolism and neurologic complications, respiratory complications, sepsis, length of stay, hospital charges, and rates of unfavorable discharge disposition.

Effect of preoperative cannabis use on perioperative outcomes: a retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION

The reported use of cannabis within surgical population is increasing. Cannabis use is potentially associated with increased harms and varied effects on pain control. These have important implications to perioperative care.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study comparing surgical patients reporting cannabis use preoperatively to control patients with no cannabis exposure, in a 1:2 ratio. To control for confounding, we used a propensity score-matched analysis to assess the adjusted association between cannabis use and study outcomes. Our primary outcome was a composite of (1) respiratory arrest or cardiac arrest, (2) intensive care admission, (3) stroke, (4) myocardial infarction and (5) mortality during this hospital stay. Secondarily, we assessed the effects on pain control, opioid usage, induction agent dose and nausea-vomiting.

RESULTS

Between January 2018 and March 2019, we captured 1818 patients consisting of cannabis users (606) and controls (1212). For propensity score-matched analyses, 524 cannabis patients were compared with 1152 control patients. No difference in the incidence of composite outcome was observed (OR 1.06, 95% CI 0.23 to 3.98). Although a higher incidence of arrhythmias (2.7% vs 1.6%) and decreased incidence of nausea-vomiting needing treatment (9.6% vs 12.6%) was observed with cannabis users vs controls, results were not statistically significant. No significant differences were observed with other secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our results do not demonstrate a convincing association between self-reported cannabis use and major surgical outcomes or pain management. Perioperative decisions should be made based on considerations of dose, duration, and indication.

Preoperative Management of Surgical Patients Using Dietary Supplements: Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement (SPAQI) Consensus Statement

The widespread use of complementary products poses a challenge to clinicians in the perioperative period and may increase perioperative risk. Because dietary supplements are regulated differently from traditional pharmaceuticals and guidance is often lacking, the Society for Perioperative Assessment and Quality Improvement convened a group of experts to review available literature and create a set of consensus recommendations for the perioperative management of these supplements. Using a modified Delphi method, the authors developed recommendations for perioperative management of 83 dietary supplements. We have made our recommendations to discontinue or continue a dietary supplement based on the principle that without a demonstrated benefit, or with a demonstrated lack of harm, there is little downside in temporarily discontinuing an herbal supplement before surgery. Discussion with patients in the preoperative visit is a crucial time to educate patients as well as gather vital information. Patients should be specifically asked about use of dietary supplements and cannabinoids, as many will not volunteer this information. The preoperative clinic visit provides the best opportunity to educate patients about the perioperative management of various supplements as this visit is typically scheduled at least 2 weeks before the planned procedure.

Postoperative Pain Management Is Influenced by Previous Cannabis Use in Neurosurgical Patients

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cannabis use for medical and recreational purposes is growing. Cannabis may have drug-drug interactions for managing pain, anxiety, and seizures. The research regarding cannabis use in patients with craniotomy surgeries is sparse and often conducted in states where cannabis use is legal. This study compared 24-hour postoperative craniotomy pain levels in patients who reported cannabis use in a state where cannabis is not yet legal. METHODS: This is an observational prospective, nonrandomized, pilot study of postoperative craniotomy patients. Patients were consented and given a one-time self-report questionnaire regarding postoperative pain, pain management method, type of pain medication used at home (including cannabis), route of administration, and frequency of use. Subjects scored pain on both the numeric rating scale and the visual analog scale. Demographic data were collected from the electronic medical record. RESULTS: Forty-five patients with a mean age of 57 years, 62% female, participated in this study. There were 33% who reported previous cannabis use. One-way analysis of variance showed a significant difference in the mean postoperative pain scores for the cannabis users (4.58) and nonusers (3.89; P = .0056). There was no significant difference between age (P = .1894) and adequacy of pain control (P = .6584) between users and nonusers. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, a one-time survey in critical care on the sensitive topic of cannabis use is feasible and seems to generate honest responses. One-third of patients reported home use of cannabis in a state where cannabis is illegal.

Perioperative and anaesthetic considerations of marijuana use

The psychoactive substance cannabis is the most-commonly used drug around the world, and its use is becoming more prevalent globally. Additionally, it is becoming available in an increasing variety of forms. As such, it is imperative that perioperative practitioners have an understanding of the drug, its effects, and its implications in perioperative care. There is currently a lack of a standardised approach to a patient who uses cannabis, and prospective studies prove difficult given the current legal status of cannabis. This literature review seeks to provide information regarding cannabis and its use. Specifically, we explore the systemic effects of marijuana as well as perioperative and anaesthetic implications so that safer, more effective care may be administered.

Cannabinoids in dermatologic surgery

Though known as a medicinal herb for centuries, the recent legalization of cannabinoids across many states has ushered in a new era where cannabinoids have become a popular treatment option among clinicians and patients alike. Cannabinoids have demonstrated efficacy in wound healing, reducing inflammation, ameliorating pain, and have shown potential as an antitumor agent. As a result, cannabinoids have been rapidly woven into the fabric of modern medicine. However, the utility of cannabinoids in dermatologic surgery has not been explored to date. In this article, we review the current literature to discuss the potential impact of cannabinoid use in dermatologic surgery.

Therapeutic Application of Cannabis in Medicine and Its Relevance to Thoracic Surgery

BACKGROUND

Cannabis is the most commonly used illicit substance in the United States. As cannabis use rises in popularity and its legalization continues to expand, the scientific community must address the controversy between beneficial and adverse effects of cannabis consumption.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature review to study the medicinal and pathologic effects of cannabis use, with emphasis on its association with cancer pathophysiology and thoracic surgery.

RESULTS

We found evidence that cannabis products often contain carcinogenic materials and that their use is associated with the development of certain head and neck cancers, but not lung cancer. Indeed, several in vitro and in vivo studies have demonstrated that cannabis may have a therapeutic role in cancer given the antiproliferative effects of its active compounds such as δ-9-tetrahydrocannabinol. Cannabis-derived products have also been shown to be effective treatments for chronic pain, neuropathy, spasticity, and as antiemetics.

CONCLUSIONS

We acknowledge that additional studies are required to elucidate the long-term effects of cannabis products and that many potential biases and limitations exist in the literature due to self-reporting and limited survey studies. Appropriate stewardship over cannabis use among our patient population will likely determine its full implications in both oncologic and perioperative outcomes.

Perioperative Pain and Addiction Interdisciplinary Network (PAIN): consensus recommendations for perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoid-based medicine users by a modified Delphi process

In many countries, liberalisation of the legislation regulating the use of cannabis has outpaced rigorous scientific studies, and a growing number of patients presenting for surgery consume cannabis regularly. Research to date suggests that cannabis can impact perioperative outcomes. We present recommendations obtained using a modified Delphi method for the perioperative care of cannabis-using patients. A steering committee was formed and a review of medical literature with respect to perioperative cannabis use was conducted. This was followed by the recruitment of a panel of 17 experts on the care of cannabis-consuming patients. Panellists were blinded to each other's participation and were provided with rater forms exploring the appropriateness of specific perioperative care elements. The completed rater forms were analysed for consensus. The expert panel was then unblinded and met to discuss the rater form analyses. Draft recommendations were then created and returned to the expert panel for further comment. The draft recommendations were also sent to four independent reviewers (a surgeon, a nurse practitioner, and two patients). The collected feedback was used to finalise the recommendations. The major recommendations obtained included emphasising the importance of eliciting a history of cannabis use, quantifying it, and ensuring contact with a cannabis authoriser (if one exists). Recommendations also included the consideration of perioperative cannabis weaning, additional postoperative nausea and vomiting prophylaxis, and additional attention to monitoring and maintaining anaesthetic depth. Postoperative recommendations included anticipating increased postoperative analgesic requirements and maintaining vigilance for cannabis withdrawal syndrome.

Sedation challenges in patients with E-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI)

E-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) has become an epidemic that is increasingly affecting patients across USA. Recently, over 2100 cases have been reported in 49 states, resulting in at least 42 deaths. We present a case of rapid respiratory failure in an otherwise healthy and young patient who used a vaporiser containing tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) during the month prior to admission. The patient eventually required mechanical ventilation. There were significant challenges in achieving the appropriate level of sedation during intubation and mechanical ventilation. As more EVALI cases are being diagnosed in recent months, we highlight an aspect that may be unique to the population of patients who vaporise THC-high sedative and analgesic requirements during intubation and mechanical ventilation.

Delta-9-Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol Drug-Drug Interactions

Although prescribing information (PI) is often the initial source of information when identifying potential drug-drug interactions, it may only provide a limited number of exemplars or only reference a class of medications without providing any specific medication examples. In the case of medical cannabis and medicinal cannabinoids, this is further complicated by the fact that the increased therapeutic use of marijuana extracts and cannabidiol oil will not have regulatory agency approved PI. The objective of this study was to provide a detailed and comprehensive drug-drug interaction list that is aligned with cannabinoid manufacturer PI. The cannabinoid drug-drug interaction information is listed in this article and online supplementary material as a PRECIPITANT (cannabinoid) medication that either INHIBITS/INDUCES the metabolism or competes for the same SUBSTRATE target (metabolic enzyme) of an OBJECT (OTHER) medication. In addition to a comprehensive list of drug-drug interactions, we also provide a list of 57 prescription medications displaying a narrow therapeutic index that are potentially impacted by concomitant cannabinoid use (whether through prescription use of cannabinoid medications or therapeutic/recreational use of cannabis and its extracts).

Cannabis Abuse or Dependence and Post-operative Outcomes After Appendectomy and Cholecystectomy

BACKGROUND

Though cannabis is gaining broader acceptance among society and a noted increase in legalization, little is known regarding its impact on post-operative outcomes. We conducted this study to quantify the relationship between cannabis abuse or dependence (CbAD) on post-operative outcomes after cholecystectomy and appendectomy.

METHODS

Using the 2013-2015 Nationwide Readmissions Database, we identified discharges associated with cholecystectomy or appendectomy from January 2013-August 2015. Patients were grouped by CbAD history. The primary outcomes were length of stay, serious adverse events, home discharge, and 30-day readmission. Propensity-score matching was used to account for differences between groups and all statistics accounted for the matched sample.

RESULTS

The final sample included 3288 patients with a CbAD history matched 1:1 to patients without a CbAD history (total sample = 6576). After matching, acceptable balance was achieved in clinical characteristics between groups. In the cholecystectomy cohort (n = 1707 pairs), CbAD patients had longer hospitalizations (3.5 versus 3.2 d, P 0.003) and similar rates of serious adverse events (6.1 versus 4.8, P 0.092), home discharge (96.1 vs 96.2, P 0.855), and readmission (8.3 versus 6.9, P 0.137). In the appendectomy cohort (n = 1581 pairs), CbAD patients had longer hospital stays (2.7 versus 2.5 d, P 0.024); more frequent serious adverse events (5.0 versus 3.5, P 0.041); and similar home discharge (96.8 vs 97.3, P 0.404) and readmission (5.4 versus 5.1, P 0.639) rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a history of CbAD in the cholecystectomy and appendectomy cohorts had slightly longer hospital stays, and patients with a history of CbAD in the appendectomy group displayed a slight increase in adverse events, but otherwise similar clinical outcomes without clinically significant increases in complications compared to patients without this history.

Analgesic efficacy of cannabinoids for acute pain management after surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Evidence regarding the role of cannabinoids in managing acute postoperative pain is conflicting. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to determine the analgesic efficacy of perioperative cannabinoid compounds for acute pain management after surgery.

Methods

Original research articles evaluating the addition of cannabinoids to standard opioid-based systemic analgesia (Control) in the postoperative period were sought. Our primary outcomes were cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption and rest pain severity at 24 hours postoperatively. We also assessed analgesic consumption in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), pain scores in PACU, 6 and 12 hours postoperatively, and opioid-related and cannabinoid-related side effects, patient satisfaction, and quality of recovery as secondary outcomes.

Results

Eight randomized controlled trials (924 patients) and four observational studies (4259 patients) were analyzed and included. There were insufficient data to pool for quantification of differences in cumulative oral morphine equivalent consumption and rest pain severity at 24 hours postoperatively with the addition of cannabinoids in comparison to Control. Qualitative synthesis revealed no differences in cumulative oral opioid consumption or pain at rest 24 hours postoperatively with the addition of cannabinoids in comparison to Control. Patients receiving cannabinoids appeared to have an increased weighted mean difference 95% CI of pain at 12 hours by 0.83 cm (0.04 to 1.63) (p=0.04). Patients receiving cannabinoids also appeared to have 3.24 times increased odds of developing hypotension postoperatively (95% CI 1.12 to 9.36) (p=0.03). Qualitative and quantitative synthesis revealed no differences in any other secondary outcomes.

Conclusions

Our quantitative and qualitative review of the literature suggests that the analgesic role of perioperative cannabinoid compounds is limited, with no clinically important benefits detected when cannabinoids are added to traditional systemic analgesics compared with traditional systemic analgesics alone. Notably, there appears to be a signal towards increased postoperative pain and hypotension associated with the addition of perioperative cannabinoids to traditional systemic analgesics. These results do not support the routine use of cannabinoids to manage acute postoperative pain at the present time.

The Effects of Marijuana Use on Lumbar Spinal Fusion

MINI: This study compared clinical and patient-reported outcomes following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion between patients who use or do not use marijuana. We found that patients who use marijuana are younger, but do not demonstrate any differences in preoperative or postoperative Oswestry disability index scores or rates of fusion.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate marijuana usage and its effect on outcomes following transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

As marijuana becomes legalized throughout the United States, its medicinal and recreational usage is becoming more mainstream. Clinicians currently have little guidance regarding both short-term and long-term effects of marijuana usage on surgical interventions. While the rate of lumbar spinal fusion in the United States continues to grow, the effect of marijuana usage on fusion remains uncertain.

METHODS

One hundred two patients who underwent TLIF performed by the same surgeon were followed for 12 months. Patients were self-reported for marijuana usage (n = 36). Patient reported outcome measures included preoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI), 6-month ODI, and 12-month ODI, as well as length of stay (LOS), complications, return to operating room (OR), revision surgery, and confirmed fusion. Continuous variables were compared using the independent two-sample t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA), whereas categorical variables were analyzed using the chi-square or Fischer exact tests. Adjusted analysis was performed using a multivariate logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Marijuana usage was associated with a younger population (P < 0.001), but showed no difference regarding sex or body mass index compared with the non-usage group. There was no statistically significant difference in complications, return to OR, or revision surgery between groups. When controlling for factors such as age and preoperative ODI, multivariate analysis demonstrated that marijuana usage did not limit postoperative ODI reduction. The marijuana usage group demonstrated shorter LOS (2.42 vs. 3.00 d, P = 0.020). Fusion rates at 12 months were similar between groups (96% vs. 92.3%, P = 0.678). ODI was similar between groups at all time points.

CONCLUSION

Perioperative outcomes were similar in patients who underwent TLIF regardless of marijuana usage.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.