Use of presepsin and procalcitonin for prediction of SeptiFast results in critically ill patients

Effect of preoperative prophylactic antibiotic use on postoperative infection after percutaneous nephrolithotomy in patients with negative urine culture: a single-center randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the effects of different preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis (ABP) regimens on the incidence of sepsis after percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in patients with negative urine culture.

METHODS

A single-center, randomized controlled trial (June 2022-December 2023) included 120 patients with negative preoperative urine cultures for upper urinary tract stones who underwent PCNL (chictr.org.cn; ChiCTR2200059047). The experimental group and the control group were respectively given different levofloxacin-based preoperative ABP regimes, including 3 days before surgery and no ABP before surgery. Both groups were given a dose of antibiotics before the operation. The primary outcome was differences in the incidence of postoperative sepsis.

RESULTS

A total of 120 subjects were included, including 60 patients in the experimental group and 60 patients in the control group. The baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable and intraoperative characteristics also did not differ. The sepsis rate was not statistically different between the experimental and control groups (13.3% vs.13.3%, P = 1.0). A multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that body mass index (BMI) (OR = 1.3; 95% CI = 1.1-1.6; P = 0.003) and operating time (OR = 1.1; 95% CI = 1.0-1.1; P = 0.012) were independent risk factors of sepsis.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed that prophylactic antibiotic administration for 3 days before surgery did not reduce the incidence of postoperative sepsis in patients with negative urine cultures undergoing PCNL. For this subset of patients, we recommend that a single dose of antibiotics be given prior to the commencement of surgery seems adequate.

Diagnostic and Prognostic Roles of C-Reactive Protein, Procalcitonin, and Presepsin in Acute Kidney Injury Patients Initiating Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

For reducing the high mortality rate of severe acute kidney injury (AKI) patients initiating continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), diagnosing sepsis and predicting prognosis are essential. However, with reduced renal function, biomarkers for diagnosing sepsis and predicting prognosis are unclear. This study aimed to assess whether C-reactive protein (CRP), procalcitonin, and presepsin could be used to diagnose sepsis and predict mortality in patients with impaired renal function initiating CRRT. This was a single-center, retrospective study involving 127 patients who initiated CRRT. Patients were divided into sepsis and non-sepsis groups according to the SEPSIS-3 criteria. Of the 127 patients, 90 were in the sepsis group and 37 were in the non-sepsis group. Cox regression analysis was performed to determine the association between the biomarkers (CRP, procalcitonin, and presepsin) and survival. CRP and procalcitonin were superior to presepsin for diagnosing sepsis. Presepsin was closely related to the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (r = -0.251, p = 0.004). These biomarkers were also evaluated as prognostic markers. Procalcitonin levels ≥3 ng/mL and CRP levels ≥31 mg/L were associated with higher all-cause mortality using Kaplan-Meier curve analysis. (log-rank test p = 0.017 and p = 0.014, respectively). In addition, procalcitonin levels ≥3 ng/mL and CRP levels ≥31 mg/L were associated with higher mortality in univariate Cox proportional hazards model analysis. In conclusion, a higher lactic acid, sequential organ failure assessment score, eGFR, and a lower albumin level have prognostic value to predict mortality in patients with sepsis initiating CRRT. Moreover, among these biomarkers, procalcitonin and CRP are significant factors for predicting the survival of AKI patients with sepsis-initiating CRRT.

Clinical importance and characteristic features of secondary culture-negative sepsis after surgery due to abdominal infection: A retrospective study

PURPOSE

Herein, we identified whether the clinical outcomes differ according to secondary culture results in postoperative sepsis patients and determined the predictors of culture-negative sepsis after abdominal surgery based on the secondary culture results.

METHODS

Patients who admitted to the intensive care unit(ICU) after surgery due to abdominal infection and diagnosed with postoperative sepsis were included. Culture tests were obtained from body fluids and drains. Primary culture test was performed immediately after surgery, and secondary culture test was performed within 48 h to 7days after surgery. The participants were divided into the culture-positive sepsis(CPSS) and the culture-negative sepsis group(CNSS) according to culture positivity, and the clinical outcomes were compared. The predisposing factors of secondary CNSS were determined using multiple logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Among 83 participants, 51 patients (61.4%) showed secondary culture-positivity(2'CPSS) and 32 patients (38.6%) showed secondary culture-negativity(2'CNSS). ICU mortality and in-hospital mortality were not different between two groups, but the length of ICU and hospital stay were significantly longer in 2'CPSS. In multivariate analysis, non-bowel surgery [odds ratio(OR) = 6.934, 95% confidence interval(CI):1.609-29.884, p=0.009], no diabetes (OR = 4.027,95%CI:1.161-13.973, p=0.028), and the prolonged administration of preoperative antibiotics (OR = 1.187,95%CI:1.023-1.377, p=0.024) were revealed as significant predisposing factors of 2'CNSS.

CONCLUSION

Mortality showed no difference according to secondary culture positivity in postoperative sepsis patients after abdominal surgery. If a patient underwent non-bowel surgery or had no diabetes or administered preoperative antibiotics for more than 3 days, the physician should pay more attention to clinical deterioration, even if the seconday culture results are negative.

Biomarkers for sepsis: more than just fever and leukocytosis-a narrative review

A biomarker describes a measurable indicator of a patient's clinical condition that can be measured accurately and reproducibly. Biomarkers offer utility for diagnosis, prognosis, early disease recognition, risk stratification, appropriate treatment (theranostics), and trial enrichment for patients with sepsis or suspected sepsis. In this narrative review, we aim to answer the question, "Do biomarkers in patients with sepsis or septic shock predict mortality, multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS), or organ dysfunction?" We also discuss the role of pro- and anti-inflammatory biomarkers and biomarkers associated with intestinal permeability, endothelial injury, organ dysfunction, blood-brain barrier (BBB) breakdown, brain injury, and short and long-term mortality. For sepsis, a range of biomarkers is identified, including fluid phase pattern recognition molecules (PRMs), complement system, cytokines, chemokines, damage-associated molecular patterns (DAMPs), non-coding RNAs, miRNAs, cell membrane receptors, cell proteins, metabolites, and soluble receptors. We also provide an overview of immune response biomarkers that can help identify or differentiate between systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), sepsis, septic shock, and sepsis-associated encephalopathy. However, significant work is needed to identify the optimal combinations of biomarkers that can augment diagnosis, treatment, and good patient outcomes.

Prediction of Postoperative Sepsis Based on Changes in Presepsin Levels of Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury after Abdominal Surgery

Presepsin (PSP) is a viable biomarker for the detection of bacterial infection, but it lacks accuracy when acute kidney injury (AKI) develops. Herein, we evaluated the diagnostic and prognostic value of PSP in predicting postoperative sepsis after abdominal surgery respective to the degree of AKI. A total of 311 patients who underwent abdominal surgery and were admitted to a surgical intensive care unit were enrolled and classified into non-AKI, mild-AKI (stage 1, stage 2 and stage 3 without renal replacement therapy (RRT)) and severe-AKI (stage 3 with RRT) group, according to the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes criteria. In each group, PSP and other biomarkers were statistically analyzed between non-sepsis and postoperative sepsis at the admission (T0), 24 h (T1), 48 h (T2) and 72 h (T3) after surgery. In non-AKI and mild-AKI group, PSP levels were significantly higher in postoperative sepsis than non-sepsis group, whereas no difference was detected in the severe-AKI group. Cutoff values of PSP in the mild-AKI group for the prediction of postoperative sepsis were 544 pg/mL (AUC: 0.757, p < 0.001) at T0 and 458.5 pg/mL (AUC: 0.743, p < 0.001) at T1, significantly higher than in non-AKI group. In multivariate analysis, predictors of postoperative sepsis in the mild-AKI group were PSP at T2 (odds ratio (OR): 1.002, p = 0.044) and PSP at T3 (OR: 1.001, p = 0.049). PSP can be useful for predicting newly developed sepsis in patients with transient AKI after abdominal surgery with modified cutoff values.

The value of procalcitonin for predicting urosepsis after mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy or flexible ureteroscopy based on different organisms

PURPOSE

To assess the value of procalcitonin (PCT) as an early biomarker for predicting urosepsis caused by Gram-negative (GN) bacteria, Gram-positive (GP) bacteria and fungi following mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and flexible ureteroscopy (FURS).

METHODS

A total number of 356 patients with positive preoperative UC (urine cultures) who underwent mPCNL and FURS between June 2017 and January 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Univariable analysis and multivariable logistic regression analysis were conducted to compare the predictors for urosepsis caused by different organisms. Furthermore, the nomogram was established as a predicted model for urosepsis.

RESULTS

Among 356 positive UC, 265 (74.4%) were positive for GN bacteria, 77 (21.4%) for GP bacteria and 14 (3.9%) for fungal pathogens. Escherichia coli (48.9%) were the predominant pathogens and Enterococcus (54/77) were the most common GP bacteria. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that positive nitrite (OR 3.31, 95% CI 1.20-9.14; P = 0.021), operative time > 90 min (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.10-8.75, P = 0.033) and postoperative PCT > 0.1 ng/mL (OR 56.18, 95% CI 15.20-207.64, P < 0.001) were associated with postoperative urosepsis originated in GN infections, while urosepsis caused by GP bacteria and fungi was not associated with PCT > 0.1 ng/mL (P = 0.198), only stone burden > 800 mm² (OR 3.69, 95% CI 1.01-13.53, P = 0.049) was an independent risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with positive preoperative UC, postoperative PCT > 0.1 ng/mL was an independent risk factor of post-PCNL and post-FURS urosepsis caused by GN bacteria rather than GP bacteria and fungi.

Usefulness of presepsin in predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis or septic shock: a retrospective cohort study

Background

The diagnosis and prediction of prognosis are important in patients with sepsis, and presepsin is helpful. In this study, we aimed to examine the usefulness of presepsin in predicting the prognosis of sepsis in Korea.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with sepsis according to the sepsis-3 criteria were recruited into the study and classified into surviving and non-surviving groups based on in-hospital mortality. A total of 153 patients (32 and 121 patients with sepsis and septic shock, respectively) were included from July 2019 to August 2020.

Results

Among the 153 patients with sepsis, 91 and 62 were in the survivor and non-survivor groups, respectively. Presepsin (p=0.004) and lactate (p=0.003) levels and the sequential organ failure assessment (SOFA) score (p<0.001) were higher in the non-survivor group. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis revealed poor performances of presepsin and lactate in predicting the prognosis of sepsis (presepsin: area under the curve [AUC]=0.656, p=0.001; lactate: AUC=0.646, p=0.003). The SOFA score showed the best performance, with the highest AUC value (AUC=0.751, p<0.001). The prognostic cutoff point for presepsin was 1,176 pg/mL. Presepsin levels higher than 1,176 pg/mL (odds ratio [OR], 3.352; p<0.001), higher lactate levels (OR, 1.203; p=0.003), and higher SOFA score (OR, 1.249; p<0.001) were risk factors for in-hospital mortality.

Conclusion

Presepsin levels were higher in non-survivors than in survivors. Thus, presepsin may be a valuable biomarker in predicting the prognosis of sepsis.

Efficient Early Diagnosis of Sepsis Using Whole-Blood PCR-Reverse Blot Hybridization Assay Depending on Serum Procalcitonin Levels

Sepsis is one of the medical emergencies, and its early detection, within the first hours of development, and proper management improve outcomes. Molecular diagnostic assays using whole blood collected from patients with suspected sepsis have been developed, but the decision making is difficult because of the possibility of false positives, due to contamination. Here, we evaluated the performance of the reverse blot hybridization assay (REBA) Sepsis-ID test for the detection of sepsis-causing microorganisms using whole-blood samples. In addition, the concentrations of C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) were determined to evaluate whether these biomarkers can provide criteria for performing REBA Sepsis-ID in clinical settings. For this study, EDTA-anticoagulated whole blood was simultaneously collected for REBA Sepsis-ID and blood culture from 440 patients with suspected sepsis, from January to October 2015. In addition, CRP and PCT concentrations were measured in 227 patients. The overall positive rates of REBA Sepsis-ID and blood culture were 16.6% (73/440) and 13.9% (61/440), respectively. The pathogen-positive rates of REBA Sepsis-ID and blood culture were 9.8% (43/440) and 9.5% (42/440), respectively. The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curves of PCT and CRP for predicting pathogen-positive results of REBA Sepsis-ID were 0.72 and 0.69, respectively. The PCT concentrations in the group of patients aged ≥50 years were significantly higher than those in the group aged <50 years. After adjusting for age, the PCT AUROC value was 0.77 for predicting pathogen-positive results of REBA Sepsis-ID. The optimal cutoff values of PCT concentrations for subsequent application of REBA Sepsis-ID were 0.12 ng/mL in all patients and 0.22 ng/mL in patients aged ≥50 years. Our observations showed that REBA Sepsis-ID using whole blood was advantageous for the early detection of sepsis-causing microorganisms, and the PCT concentration could be used to determine the necessity of using REBA Sepsis-ID in clinical settings. The application of REBA Sepsis-ID using whole blood, based on the PCT concentration, may contribute to a highly efficient detection of sepsis-causing microorganisms.

Biomarkers in pediatric sepsis: a review of recent literature

Sepsis remains the leading cause of death in infants and children worldwide. Prompt diagnosis and monitoring of infection is pivotal to guide therapy and optimize outcomes. No single biomarker has so far been identified to accurately diagnose sepsis, monitor response and predict severity. We aimed to assess existing evidence of available sepsis biomarkers, and their utility in pediatric population. C-reactive protein and procalcitonin remain the most extensively evaluated and used biomarkers. However, biomarkers related to endothelial damage, vasodilation, oxidative stress, cytokines/chemokines and cell bioproducts have also been identified, often with regard to the site of infection and etiologic pathogen; still, with controversial utility. A multi-biomarker model driven by genomic tools could establish a personalized approach in future disease management.

Biomarkers for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Sepsis

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection. In 2017, almost 50 million cases of sepsis were recorded worldwide and 11 million sepsis-related deaths were reported. Therefore, sepsis is the focus of intense research to better understand the complexities of sepsis response, particularly the twin underlying concepts of an initial hyper-immune response and a counter-immunological state of immunosuppression triggered by an invading pathogen. Diagnosis of sepsis remains a significant challenge. Prompt diagnosis is essential so that treatment can be instigated as early as possible to ensure the best outcome, as delay in treatment is associated with higher mortality. In order to address this diagnostic problem, use of a panel of biomarkers has been proposed as, due to the complexity of the sepsis response, no single marker is sufficient. This review provides background on the current understanding of sepsis in terms of its epidemiology, the evolution of the definition of sepsis, pathobiology and diagnosis and management. Candidate biomarkers of interest and how current and developing point-of-care testing approaches could be used to measure such biomarkers is discussed.

The Pathogenesis of Sepsis and Potential Therapeutic Targets

Sepsis is defined as “a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a host’s dysfunctional response to infection”. Although the treatment of sepsis has developed rapidly in the past few years, sepsis incidence and mortality in clinical treatment is still climbing. Moreover, because of the diverse manifestations of sepsis, clinicians continue to face severe challenges in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of patients with sepsis. Here, we review the recent development in our understanding regarding the cellular pathogenesis and the target of clinical diagnosis of sepsis, with the goal of enhancing the current understanding of sepsis. The present state of research on targeted therapeutic drugs is also elaborated upon to provide information for the treatment of sepsis.

Role of procalcitonin in predicting etiology in bacteremic patients: Report from a large single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Procalcitonin (PCT) is routinely used for an early recognition of severe infections and for promoting appropriate use of antibiotics. However, limited data correlating values of PCT with etiology of infection has been reported.

METHODS

During 2016, all positive blood cultures (BC) were retrospectively extracted in a 1100-beds Italian tertiary-care hospital. PCT and C-reactive protein (CRP) values were recorded within 24h from BC collection. Primary endpoint of the study was to investigate the correlation between PCT and CRP values and the occurrence of bloodstream infections (BSI) caused by bacteria or fungi.

RESULTS

During the study period, 1296 positive BC were included: 712 (54.9%) due to Gram-positive (GP), 525 (40.5%) due to Gram-negative (GN) strains, and 59 (4.6%) caused by fungi. Among GN isolates, enterobacteriaceae were reported in 453 (86.3%) cases. PCT values were higher in patients with GN etiology (26.1±14.2ng/mL) compared to GP (6.9±4.5) and fungi (3.3±2.4). Mean values for CRP in GN, GP, and fungi were not different. Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves showed an area under curve (AUC) of 0.71 for PCT and 0.51 for CRP among GN isolates; an AUC of 0.7 for PCT and 0.52 for CRP among enterobacteriaceae. Lower AUC for PCT were reported for GP and fungi.

CONCLUSIONS

PCT showed moderate performance in early detection (within 24h) of Gram-negative infections, especially those caused by enterobacteriaceae. Further prospective studies are mandatory to confirm these observations.

Presepsin level in predicting patients' in-hospital mortality from sepsis under sepsis-3 criteria

Background: Early recognition of septic patients with poor prognosis is important for clinicians to prescribe personalized therapies which include timely fluid resuscitation therapy and appropriate antimicrobial therapy. We aimed to evaluate the effect of the presepsin level on predicting the prognosis of patients with sepsis under the sepsis-3 criteria.

Methods: Patients who were diagnosed as sepsis under the sepsis-3 criteria were recruited and assigned to the survivor group and the non-survivor group according to their in-hospital mortality. The two groups’ baseline characteristics were analyzed with Pearson’s chi-square (χ²) test or Kruskal–Wallis test. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the independent predictors of in-hospital mortality from sepsis. Receiver operating characteristic analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of presepsin in predicting patients’ in-hospital mortality from sepsis. The correlation between presepsin and the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score was measured with Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. P-values of less than 0.05 were considered to indicate statistical significance.

Results: Overall, 138 patients were included in this study. The presepsin level of the non-survivor group was significantly higher than that of the other group (P=0.000). Binary logistic regression showed that the presepsin level was an independent risk factor of patients’ in-hospital mortality from sepsis (OR =1.221 P=0.026). The presepsin level was positively associated with the SOFA score (ρ=0.396, P=0.000). ROC curve analysis revealed the presepsin level was highly accurate in predicting patients’ in-hospital mortality from sepsis (AUC =0.703, P=0.000). The AUC value of a combination of presepsin and the SOFA score was significantly larger than that of the SOFA score alone (AUC: 0.817 vs 0.793, P=0.041).

Conclusions: Presepsin is a prognostic biomarker with high accuracy in predicting the prognosis of sepsis under the sepsis-3 criteria.

Approach to Neonates and Young Infants with Fever without a Source Who Are at Risk for Severe Bacterial Infection

INTRODUCTION

Among neonates and infants <3 months of age with fever without a source (FWS), 5% to 15% of cases are patients with fever caused by a serious bacterial infection (SBI). To favour the differentiation between low- and high-risk infants, several algorithms based on analytical and clinical parameters have been developed. The aim of this review is to describe the management of young infants with FWS and to discuss the impact of recent knowledge regarding FWS management on clinical practice.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed was used to search for all of the studies published over the last 35 years using the keywords: "fever without source" or "fever of unknown origin" or "meningitis" or "sepsis" or "urinary tract infection" and "neonate" or "newborn" or "infant <90 days of life" or "infant <3 months".

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The selection of neonates and young infants who are <3 months old with FWS who are at risk for SBI remains a problem without a definitive solution. The old Rochester criteria remain effective for identifying young infants between 29 and 60 days old who do not have severe bacterial infections (SBIs). However, the addition of laboratory tests such as C-reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin (PCT) can significantly improve the identification of children with SBI. The approach in evaluating neonates is significantly more complicated, as their risk of SBIs, including bacteremia and meningitis, remains relevant and none of the suggested approaches can reduce the risk of dramatic mistakes. In both groups, the best antibiotic must be carefully selected considering the clinical findings, the laboratory data, the changing epidemiology, and increasing antibiotic resistance of the most common infectious bacteria.

Emerging Technologies for Molecular Diagnosis of Sepsis

Rapid and accurate profiling of infection-causing pathogens remains a significant challenge in modern health care. Despite advances in molecular diagnostic techniques, blood culture analysis remains the gold standard for diagnosing sepsis. However, this method is too slow and cumbersome to significantly influence the initial management of patients. The swift initiation of precise and targeted antibiotic therapies depends on the ability of a sepsis diagnostic test to capture clinically relevant organisms along with antimicrobial resistance within 1 to 3 h. The administration of appropriate, narrow-spectrum antibiotics demands that such a test be extremely sensitive with a high negative predictive value. In addition, it should utilize small sample volumes and detect polymicrobial infections and contaminants. All of this must be accomplished with a platform that is easily integrated into the clinical workflow. In this review, we outline the limitations of routine blood culture testing and discuss how emerging sepsis technologies are converging on the characteristics of the ideal sepsis diagnostic test. We include seven molecular technologies that have been validated on clinical blood specimens or mock samples using human blood. In addition, we discuss advances in machine learning technologies that use electronic medical record data to provide contextual evaluation support for clinical decision-making.

Procalcitonin: a promising diagnostic marker for sepsis and antibiotic therapy

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is a global healthcare problem, characterized by whole body inflammation in response to microbial infection, which leads to organ dysfunction. It is becoming a frequent complication in hospitalized patients. Early and differential diagnosis of sepsis is needed critically to avoid unnecessary usage of antimicrobial agents and for proper antibiotic treatments through the screening of biomarkers that sustains with diagnostic significance.

MAIN BODY OF ABSTRACT

Current targeting conventional markers (C-reactive protein, white blood cell, tumour necrosis factor-α, interleukins, etc.) are non-specific for diagnosing sepsis. Procalcitonin (PCT), a member of the calcitonin super family could be a critical tool for the diagnosis of sepsis. But to distinguish between bacterial versus viral infections, procalcitonin alone may not be effective. Rapid elevation in the concentration of procalcitonin and other newly emerging biomarkers during an infection and its correlation with severity of illness makes it an ideal biomarker for bacterial infection. Beside this, the procalcitonin levels can be used for monitoring response to antimicrobial therapy, diagnosis of secondary inflammations, diagnosis of renal involvement in paediatric urinary tract infection, etc. The present article summarizes the relevance of procalcitonin in the diagnosis of sepsis and how it can be useful in determining the therapeutic approaches.

CONCLUSION

Further studies are needed to better understand the application of PCT in the diagnosis of sepsis, differentiating between microbial and non-microbial infection cases and determining the therapeutic approaches for sepsis.