Effects of propofol on ventricular repolarization and incidence of malignant arrhythmias in adults

Comparison of the effects of propofol and alfaxalone on the electrocardiogram of dogs, with particular reference to QT interval

Cardiac electrical activity is often altered by administration of anesthetic drugs. While the effects of propofol in this regard have previously been described in dogs, to date, there are no reports of the effect of alfaxalone. This study investigated the impact of both propofol and alfaxalone on the ECG of 60 dogs, after premedication with acepromazine and methadone. Heart rate increased significantly in both groups. The PR and QRS intervals were significantly increased following propofol while with alfaxalone the QRS duration was significantly increased and ST segment depression was observed. The QT and JT interval were significantly shorter following induction with alfaxalone, but, when corrected (c) for heart rate, QTc and JTc in both groups were significantly greater following induction. When comparing the magnitude of change between groups, the change in RR interval was greater in the alfaxalone group. The change in both QT and JT intervals were significantly greater following alfaxalone, but when QTc and JTc intervals were compared, there were no significant differences between the two drugs. The similarly increased QTc produced by both drugs may suggest comparable proarrhythmic effects.

Suppression of Electrographic Seizures Is Associated with Amelioration of QTc Interval Prolongation in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury

Introduction: Disorders in electroencephalography (EEG) are commonly noted in patients with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and may be associated with electrocardiographic disturbances. Electrographic seizures (ESz) are the most common features in these patients. This study aimed to explore the relationship between ESz and possible changes in QTc interval and spatial QRS-T angle both during ESz and after ESz resolution. Methods: Adult patients with TBI were studied. Surface 12-lead ECGs were recorded using a Cardiax device during ESz events and 15 min after their effective suppression using barbiturate infusion. The ESz events were diagnosed using Masimo Root or bispectral index (BIS) devices. Results: Of the 348 patients considered for possible inclusion, ESz were noted in 72, with ECG being recorded in 21. Prolonged QTc was noted during ESz but significantly ameliorated after ESz suppression (540.19 ± 60.68 ms vs. 478.67 ± 38.52 ms, p < 0.001). The spatial QRS-T angle was comparable during ESz and after treatment. Regional cerebral oximetry increased following ESz suppression (from 58.4% ± 6.2 to 60.5% ± 4.2 (p < 0.01) and from 58.2% ± 7.2 to 60.8% ± 4.8 (p < 0.05) in the left and right hemispheres, respectively). Conclusion: QTc interval prolongation occurs during ESz events in TBI patients but both it and regional cerebral oximetry are improved after suppression of seizures.

Common anti-COVID-19 drugs and their anticipated interaction with anesthetic agents

The corona virus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has till date (26/7/20) affected 1crore 62 lac 73 thousand 638 people globally with almost 6.5 lakh mortalities. COVID-19 has invaded the operation theatre and intensive care unit (ICU) in a short span of 6 months. It appears inevitable that all of us, as anesthesiologists, have to treat COVID-positive patients, either in the ICU or the operation theatre. Many asymptomatic, presumably noninfected people including frontline health care workers are also consuming potential anticorona viral drugs (such as hydroxychloroquine) prophylactically and may present for surgery. Detailed knowledge of which anesthetic and perioperative care drugs can interact with anti-COVID drugs would be very valuable for pre, intra-, and postoperative management of such patients and COVID-19 positive patients requiring intubation, mechanical ventilation, and ICU-sedation. Powered with this knowledge, anesthesiologists and intensivists can minimize the adverse effects of drug interactions. An extensive literature search using different search engines including Cochrane, Embase, Google Scholar, Scopus, and PubMed for all indexed review articles, original articles, case reports, and referenced webpages was performed to extract the most current and relevant literature on drug-drug interactions for clinicians.

Etomidate vs propofol in coronary heart disease patients undergoing major noncardiac surgery: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The ideal depth of general anesthesia should achieve the required levels of hypnosis, analgesia, and muscle relaxation while minimizing physiologic responses to awareness. The choice of anesthetic strategy in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) undergoing major noncardiac surgery is becoming an increasingly important issue as the population ages. This is because general anesthesia is associated with a risk of perioperative cardiac complications and death, and this risk is much higher in people with CHD.

AIM

To compare hemodynamic function and cardiovascular event rate between etomidate- and propofol-based anesthesia in patients with CHD.

METHODS

This prospective study enrolled consecutive patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists grade II/III) with stable CHD (New York Heart Association class I/II) undergoing major noncardiac surgery. The patients were randomly allocated to receive either etomidate/remifentanil-based or propofol/remifentanil-based general anesthesia. Randomization was performed using a computer-generated random number table and sequentially numbered, opaque, sealed envelopes. Concealment was maintained until the patient had arrived in the operating theater, at which point the consulting anesthetist opened the envelope. All patients, data collectors, and data analyzers were blinded to the type of anesthesia used. The primary endpoints were the occurrence of cardiovascular events (bradycardia, tachycardia, hypotension, ST-T segment changes, and ventricular premature beats) during anesthesia and cardiac troponin I level at 24 h. The secondary endpoints were hemodynamic parameters, bispectral index, and use of vasopressors during anesthesia.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 40 patients in each of the propofol and etomidate groups. The incidences of bradycardia, hypotension, ST-T segment changes, and ventricular premature beats during anesthesia were significantly higher in the propofol group than in the etomidate group (P < 0.05 for all). The incidence of tachycardia was similar between the two groups. Cardiac troponin I levels were comparable between the two groups both before the induction of anesthesia and at 24 h after surgery. When compared with the etomidate group, the propofol group had significantly lower heart rates at 3 min after the anesthetic was injected (T₁) and immediately after tracheal intubation (T₂), lower systolic blood pressure at T₁, and lower diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure at T₁, T₂, 3 min after tracheal intubation, and 5 min after tracheal intubation (P < 0.05 for all). Vasopressor use was significantly more in the propofol group than in the etomidate group during the induction and maintenance periods (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In patients with CHD undergoing noncardiac major surgery, etomidate-based anesthesia is associated with fewer cardiovascular events and smaller hemodynamic changes than propofol-based anesthesia.

Propofol abolishes torsade de pointes in different models of acquired long QT syndrome

There is conflicting evidence regarding the impact of propofol on cardiac repolarization and the risk of torsade de pointes (TdP). The purpose of this study was to elucidate the risk of propofol-induced TdP and to investigate the impact of propofol in drug-induced long QT syndrome. 35 rabbit hearts were perfused employing a Langendorff-setup. 10 hearts were perfused with increasing concentrations of propofol (50, 75, 100 µM). Propofol abbreviated action potential duration (APD₉₀) in a concentration-dependent manner without altering spatial dispersion of repolarization (SDR). Consequently, no proarrhythmic effects of propofol were observed. In 12 further hearts, erythromycin was employed to induce prolongation of cardiac repolarization. Erythromycin led to an amplification of SDR and triggered 36 episodes of TdP. Additional infusion of propofol abbreviated repolarization and reduced SDR. No episodes of TdP were observed with propofol. Similarly, ondansetron prolonged cardiac repolarization in another 13 hearts. SDR was increased and 36 episodes of TdP occurred. With additional propofol infusion, repolarization was abbreviated, SDR reduced and triggered activity abolished. In this experimental whole-heart study, propofol abbreviated repolarization without triggering TdP. On the contrary, propofol reversed prolongation of repolarization caused by erythromycin or ondansetron, reduced SDR and thereby eliminated drug-induced TdP.

Post-operative Brugada electrocardiographic pattern, polymorphic ventricular tachycardia, and sudden death in a child after administration of propofol anaesthesia

A 9-year-old African-American girl presented with sudden cardiac arrest a few hours after adenotonsillectomy. She received anaesthesia which included propofol during the procedure. Her electrocardiogram (EKG) showed type 1 Brugada pattern, and genetic testing revealed a variant of unknown significance in desmoplakin (DSP) gene. We discuss the association between propofol, Brugada EKG pattern, and malignant ventricular arrhythmias.

Effects of anesthetic and sedative agents on sympathetic nerve activity

BACKGROUND

The effects of sedative and anesthetic agents on sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) are poorly understood.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of commonly used sedative and anesthetic agents on SNA in ambulatory dogs and humans.

METHODS

We implanted radiotransmitters in 6 dogs to record stellate ganglion nerve activity (SGNA), subcutaneous nerve activity (ScNA), and blood pressure (BP). After recovery, we injected dexmedetomidine (3 μg/kg), morphine (0.1 mg/kg), hydromorphone (0.05 mg/kg), and midazolam (0.1 mg/kg) on different days. We also studied 12 human patients (10 male; age 68.0 ± 9.1 years old) undergoing cardioversion for atrial fibrillation with propofol (0.77 ± 0.18 mg/kg) or methohexital (0.65 mg/kg) anesthesia. Skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) and electrocardiogram were recorded during the study.

RESULTS

SGNA and ScNA were significantly suppressed immediately after administration of dexmedetomidine (P = .000 and P = .000, respectively), morphine (P = .011 and P = .014, respectively), and hydromorphone (P = .000 and P = .012, respectively), along with decreased BP and heart rate (HR) (P <.001 for each). Midazolam had no significant effect on SGNA and ScNA (P = .248 and P = .149, respectively) but increased HR (P = .015) and decreased BP (P = .004) in ambulatory dogs. In patients undergoing cardioversion, bolus propofol administration significantly suppressed SKNA (from 1.11 ± 0.25 μV to 0.77 ± 0.15 μV; P = .001), and the effects lasted for at least 10 minutes after the final cardioversion shock. Methohexital decreased chest SKNA from 1.59 ± 0.45 μV to 1.22 ± 0.58 μV (P = .000) and arm SKNA from 0.76 ± 0.43 μV to 0.55 ± 0.07 μV (P = .001). The effects lasted for at least 10 minutes after the cardioversion shock.

CONCLUSION

Propofol, methohexital, dexmedetomidine, morphine, and hydromorphone suppressed, but midazolam had no significant effects on, SNA.