Meta-analysis of vancomycin versus linezolid in pneumonia with proven methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

Insights into small-molecule compound CY-158-11 antibacterial activity against Staphylococcus aureus

The widespread prevalence and dissemination of antibiotic-resistant bacteria, coupled with the diminishing supply of new antibiotics, emphasize the pressing necessity for the exploration of innovative antibacterial agents. Previously, we detailed the impact of the small-molecule compound CY-158-11 on S. aureus biofilm. By hindering adhesion and PIA-mediated biofilm formation, subinhibitory concentrations of CY-158-11 exhibit antibiofilm activity toward S. aureus. Here, we sought to elucidate the antibacterial activity and mode of action of this compound. Upon CY-158-11 treatment in culture, the inhibition of bacterial growth, coupled with MBC to MIC of >4, indicated that CY-158-11 exerted a bacteriostatic effect. Particularly, CY-158-11 showed strong antibacterial activity against a wide variety of S. aureus, including multidrug-resistant bacteria. We found that CY-158-11 promoted the permeability of cell membrane and propidium iodide absorption as well as caused the dissipation of membrane potential. The effect of CY-158-11 on the mammalian cytoplasmic membrane was measured using hemolytic and cytotoxicity assays, and the skin irritation and systemic toxicity of the drug were measured by injecting the compound into the skin and tail vein of mice. Moreover, CY-158-11 exhibited considerable efficacy in a subcutaneous abscess mouse model of S. aureus infection. In conclusion, CY-158-11 possesses antibacterial properties, including inhibition of bacterial growth, damage to cell membranes, and treatment of skin abscesses, which can be a promising therapeutic option for combating S. aureus.

IMPORTANCE

The combination of the rising incidence of antibiotic resistance and the shrinking antibiotic pipeline has raised concern about the postantibiotic era. New antibacterial agents and targets are required to combat S. aureus-associated infections. In this study, we identified a maleimide-diselenide hybrid compound CY-158-11 exhibiting antibacterial activity against S. aureus in vitro and in vivo at relatively low concentrations. Furthermore, the investigation of its mode of action revealed that CY-158-11 can selectively perturb the cytoplasmic membrane of bacteria without harming mammalian cells or mouse organs. Thus, CY-158-11 is a compelling novel drug for development as a new therapy for S. aureus infections.

Hematological adverse events associated with anti-MRSA agents: a real-world analysis based on FAERS

This study investigated the patterns of hematological adverse events related to daptomycin (DAP), tigecycline (TIG), vancomycin (VAN) and linezolid (LIN) in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). Adverse event associations were analyzed through calculating reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio (PRR), multiple gamma Poisson shrinkage (MGPS), and Bayesian confidence propagation neural network (BCPNN). A comprehensive descriptive analysis was also conducted considering factors such as age, gender, daily dose, cumulative dose, and time to onset. The leading hematologic adverse events were eosinophilia for daptomycin, coagulation abnormalities and thrombocytopenia for tigecycline, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, and anemia for linezolid, and thrombocytopenia, eosinophilia, and neutropenia for vancomycin. Most of the affected patients were over 55 years old. Daily doses for the tigecycline and daptomycin groups exceeded the standard daily dose. The times to onset were 14.00 days for daptomycin (interquartile range [IQR], 4.00-21.00), 6.00 days for tigecycline (IQR, 2.00-9.00), 10.00 days for linezolid (IQR, 4.00-16.5), and 10.00 days for vancomycin (IQR,5.00-20.00). It is essential to intensify early monitoring and identification of these adverse events, especially in the context of off-label dosages and for elderly patients and individuals taking medication for over one week.

Analysis of Clinical Isolation Characteristics of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria and Drug Sensitivity of Rapidly Growing Mycobacteria in the General Hospital of Guangzhou, China

Purpose

The clinical distribution characteristics of nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) in general hospital were explored to guide the clinical diagnosis and treatment of NTM infection.

Methods

Samples with positive mycobacterium culture in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University were collected and identified through PCR. Phenotypic drug sensitivity experiments were conducted on 44 Mycobacteroides abscessus isolated from clinical departments with broth microdilution method, and rrl, rrs and erm (41) genes associated with drug resistance were detected.

Results

From September 2020 to July 2023, 314 mycobacterium-positive isolates were separated from patients in the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, with 147 (46.8%) NTM isolates were included in our study. The samples were respiratory tract specimens mainly, with 64% bronchoalveolar lavage fluid. Of 144 cases identified, samples were from 133 patients (60 males and 73 females; gender ratio of 0.82:1). NTM was mainly isolated from the people aged 40 and above, especially females (χ2 = 10.688, P = 0.014). M. abscessus (61, 42.36%), M. intracellulare (35, 24.31%) were the two most NTMs in this hospital. Clinical strains of M. abscessus exhibited high resistance to antibiotics, except for cefoxitin (31.8%), linezolid (25.0%), amikacin (0%), and clarithromycin (18.2%). Among 8 strains of M. abscessus with clarithromycin acquired resistance, just 4 strains (50.0%) showed mutations (A2270G, A2271G) in rrl gene, but a new mutation (C2750T) was detected in 1 strain. Among 14 strains of M. abscessus with clarithromycin-induced resistance, 13 (93.0%) strains had T28 erm (41) gene and 1 (7.0%) strain had C28 erm (41) gene.

Conclusion

M. avium-intracellulare complex was gradually becoming predominant strain in Guangzhou area. The resistant situation of M. abscessus in general hospital had shown severe. Potential mutation in rrl gene associated with clarithromycin acquired resistance of M. abscessus were found, but drug-resistant mechanism remained unclear.

Efficacy and Safety of Antibiotics in the Treatment of Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) Infections: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Vancomycin is a first-line drug for the treatment of MRSA infection. However, overuse of vancomycin can cause bacteria to become resistant, forming resistant strains and making infections more difficult to treat. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of different antibiotics in the treatment of MRSA infections and to compare them, mainly with vancomycin, to find better vancomycin alternatives.

METHODS

All studies were obtained from the PubMed and Embase databases from inception to 13 April 2023. The three comprehensive indicators of clinical cure success rate, clinical microbiological success rate, and adverse reactions were evaluated, and the clinical cure success rates of three disease types, complex skin and skin structure infections (cSSSIs), complex skin and soft tissue infections (cSSTIs), and pneumonia, were analyzed in subgroups. All statistical analyses were performed using R and STATA 14.0 software for network meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 38 trials with 6281 patients were included, and 13 drug treatments were evaluated. For MRSA infections, the results of network meta-analysis showed that the clinical success rates of linezolid, the combination of vancomycin and rifampin, and the combination of minocycline and rifampin were better than that of vancomycin (RR 1.71; 95%-CI 1.45-2.02), (RR 2.46; 95%-CI 1.10-5.49) (RR, 2.77; 95%-CI 1.06-7.21). The success rate of clinical microbiological treatment with vancomycin was inferior to that with telavancin (RR 0.74; 95%-CI 0.55-0.99). Linezolid had a higher rate of adverse reactions than teicoplanin (RR 5.35; 95%-CI 1.10-25.98). Subgroup analysis showed that vancomycin had a lower clinical success rate than linezolid in the treatment of MRSA-induced cSSSIs, cSSTIs, and pneumonia (RR 0.59; 95%-CI 0.44-0.80) (RR 0.55; 95%-CI 0.35-0.89) (RR 0.55; 95%-CI 0.32-0.93).

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review and NMA provide a new comparison framework for the clinical treatment of MRSA infection. The NMA suggests that linezolid may be the antibiotic of choice for the treatment of MRSA infections, with the ability to improve clinical and microbiological success rates despite its disadvantage in terms of adverse effects. At the same time, the combination of minocycline and rifampicin may be the most effective drug to treat MRSA-induced cSSSIs, tedizolid may be the best drug to treat MRSA-induced cSSTIs, and the combination of vancomycin and rifampicin may be the most effective treatment for MRSA-induced pneumonia. More high-quality studies are still needed in the future to further identify alternatives to vancomycin.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO registration number CRD42023416788.

Comparative effectiveness and safety of six antibiotics in treating MRSA infections: A network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

This study conducted a network meta-analysis comparing linezolid, teicoplanin, daptomycin, tigecycline, and ceftaroline fosamil with vancomycin for treating MRSA-related diseases, addressing the lack of comprehensive evaluations in existing research on antibiotic therapy for MRSA infections.

METHODS

We systematically searched databases including PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the Cochrane Librar up to August 22, 2023. All eligible randomized controlled trials of the six antibiotics were included in the NMA, and their effectiveness and safety were compared across various MRSA-related diseases. Categorical data were used for the odds ratio (OR), and continuous data were used for mean difference (SMD). The surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) was employed to evaluate the incidence rate.

RESULTS

According to SUCRA results, daptomycin was the most effective treatment (73.0%) in bloodstream infections. In pulmonary infections and skin and soft tissue infections, linezolid out-performed other antibiotics in effectiveness rate (90.6% and 86.3%), microbial killing rate (93.3% and 93.1%). Vancomycin showed lower adverse reactions than teicoplanin, with less hepatotoxicity compared to linezolid and tigecycline. Linezolid had higher thrombocytopenia risk but lower nephrotoxicity risk than others. Vancomycin was less effective in microbial killing rates than linezolid across various infections.

CONCLUSION

The present research suggests that in pulmonary infections and skin and soft tissue infections, linezolid may be a better option for treating MRSA-related diseases. However, caution is warranted due to the association of linezolid with thrombocytopenia.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Our study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of SystematicReviews (PROSPERO); Registration number: CRD42024535142.

Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients

How to cite this article: Khilnani GC, Tiwari P, Mittal S, Kulkarni AP, Chaudhry D, Zirpe KG, et al. Guidelines for Antibiotics Prescription in Critically Ill Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2024;28(S2):S104-S216.

Pharmacotherapies for multidrug-resistant gram-positive infections: current options and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Infections due to multidrug-resistant organisms (MDRO) are a serious concern for public health with high morbidity and mortality. Though many antibiotics have been introduced to manage these infections, there are remaining concerns regarding the optimal management of Gram-positive MDROs.

AREAS COVERED

A literature search on the PubMed/Medline database was conducted. We applied no language and time limits for the search strategy. In this narrative review, we discuss the current options for managing Gram-positive MDROs as well as non-traditional antibacterial agents in development.

EXPERT OPINION

Despite their introduction more than 70 years ago, glycopeptides are still the cornerstone in treating Gram-positive infections: all registrative studies of new antibiotics have glycopeptides as control; these studies are designed as not inferior studies, therefore it is almost impossible to give recommendations other than the use of glycopeptides in the treatment of Gram-positive infections. The best evidence on treatments different from glycopeptides comes from post-hoc analysis and meta-analysis. Non-traditional antibacterial agents are being studied to aid in short and effective antibiotic therapies. The use of non-traditional antibacterial agents is not restricted to replacing traditional antibacterial agents with alternative therapies; instead, they should be used in combination with antibiotic therapies.

Can linezolid be validly measured in endotracheal aspiration in critically ill patients? A proof-of-concept trial

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of anti-infectives such as linezolid is routinely performed in blood of intensive care unit (ICU) patients to optimize target attainment. However, the concentration at the site of infection is considered more important for a successful therapy. Until now, bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) is the gold standard to measure intrapulmonary concentrations of anti-infective agents. However, it is an invasive method and unsuitable for regular TDM. The aim of this proof-of-concept study was to investigate whether it is possible to reliably determine the intrapulmonary concentration of linezolid from endotracheal aspiration (ENTA).

METHODS

Intubated ICU patients receiving 600 mg intravenous linezolid twice daily were examined in steady state. First, preliminary experiments were performed in six patients to investigate which patients are suitable for linezolid measurement in ENTA. In a second step, trough and peak linezolid concentrations of plasma and ENTA were determined in nine suitable patients.

RESULTS

Linezolid can validly be detected in ENTA with viscous texture and > 0.5 mL volume. The mean (SD) linezolid trough concentration was 2.02 (1.27) mg/L in plasma and 1.60 (1.36) mg/L in ENTA, resulting in a median lung penetration rate of 104%. The mean (SD) peak concentration in plasma and ENTA was 10.77 (5.93) and 4.74 (2.66) mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

Linezolid can validly be determined in ENTA with an adequate texture and volume. The penetration rate is comparable to already published BAL concentrations. This method might offer a simple and non-invasive method for TDM at the site of infection "lung". Due to promising results of the feasibility study, comparison of ENTA and BAL in the same patient should be investigated in a further trial.

Comparison of efficacy and safety between daptomycin plus β-lactam and daptomycin monotherapy for bloodstream infections due to gram-positive cocci: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objectives

We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the clinical or microbiological outcomes and safety of a combination of daptomycin (DAP) and β-lactams compared to DAP monotherapy in patients with blood stream infection (BSI) due to gram-positive cocci (GPC).

Methods

We searched Scopus, PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, and Ityuushi databases up to January 30, 2023. Outcomes included all-cause mortality, clinical failure, and creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation.

Results

Six cohorts or case-control studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were included in the final meta-analysis. Combination therapy of DAP and β-lactams significantly reduced the mortality and clinical failure rate for all BSI due to GPC compared with the DAP monotherapy (mortality, odds ratio [OR] = 0.63, 95 % confidence interval [CI] = 0.41-0.98; clinical failure, OR = 0.42, 95 % CI = 0.22-0.81). In contrast, no significant difference was noted in the incidence of CPK elevation between the two groups (OR = 0.85, 95 % CI = 0.39-1.84).

Conclusion

Altogether, combination therapy of DAP and β-lactams can improve the prognosis for patients with BSI due to GPC compared with DAP alone. Therefore, it should be considered as an option for the empirical treatment of BSI caused by GPC.

Antibiotic Strategies for Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Despite advancements in health systems and intensive care unit (ICU) care, along with the introduction of novel antibiotics and microbiologic techniques, mortality rates in severe community-acquired pneumonia (sCAP) patients have not shown significant improvement. Delayed admission to the ICU is a major risk factor for higher mortality. Apart from choosing the appropriate site of care, prompt and appropriate antibiotic therapy significantly affects the prognosis of sCAP. Treatment regimens involving ceftaroline or ceftobiprole are currently considered the best options for managing patients with sCAP. Additionally, several other molecules, such as delafloxacin, lefamulin, and omadacycline, hold promise as therapeutic strategies for sCAP. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the key challenges in managing adults with severe CAP, focusing on essential aspects related to antibiotic treatment and investigating potential strategies to enhance clinical outcomes in sCAP patients.

Cost-effectiveness of linezolid to ventilator-associated pneumonia in Colombia

INTRODUCTION

Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a prominent cause of morbidity and mortality in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Due to the increase in Methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection, it is important to consider other more effective and safer alternatives compared to vancomycin. This motivates evaluating whether the use of an apparently more expensive drug such as linezolid can be cost-effective in Colombia.

METHODS

A decision tree was used to simulate the results in terms of the cost and proportion of cured patients. In the simulation, patients can receive antibiotic treatment with linezolid (LZD 600 mg IV/12 h) or vancomycin (VCM 15 mg/kg iv/12 h) for 7 days, patients they can experience events adverse (renal failure and thrombocytopenia). The model was analyzed probabilistically, and a value of information analysis was conducted to inform the value of conducting further research to reduce current uncertainties in the evidence base. Cost-effectiveness was evaluated at a willingness-to-pay (WTP) value of US$5180.

RESULTS

The mean incremental cost of LZD versus VCM is US$-517. This suggests that LZD is less costly. The proportion of patients cured when treated with LZD compared with VCM is 53 vs. 43%, respectively. The mean incremental benefit of LZD versus VCM is 10 This position of absolute dominance (LZD has lower costs and higher proportion of clinical cure than no supplementation) is unnecessary to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio. There is uncertainty with a 0.999 probability that LZD is more cost-effective than VCM. Our base-case results were robust to variations in all assumptions and parameters.

CONCLUSION

LNZ is a cost-effective strategy for patients, ≥ 18 years of age, with VAP in Colombia- Our study provides evidence that can be used by decision-makers to improve clinical practice guidelines.

Infantile orbital abscess caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a case report and literature review

Objective

To report and review infantile orbital abscess caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA).

Methods

We report a case of MRSA-induced infantile orbital abscess accompanied by sepsis, pneumonia, and purulent meningitis. We systematically review cases of MRSA-induced infantile orbital abscess published in PubMed, Web of Science and ScienceDirect until April 2023.

Results

We reviewed 14 patients [our patient + 13 patients (10 papers) identified via literature searches]. There were nine boys and five girls; nine neonates and five older infants; and 8 full-term births and 1 preterm birth. The gestational age at birth was unknown for five infants. The right and left orbits were affected in 10 and 4 patients, respectively. The clinical presentation included periorbital soft-tissue edema or redness (11 patients), fever (7 patients), exophthalmos (10 patients), limited eye movement (4 patients), purulent eye secretions (2 patients), and skin abscess and convulsion (1 patient each). The source of infection was sinusitis (8 patients), vertical transmission, gingivitis, dacryocystitis, upper respiratory tract infection (1 patient each), and unknown (2 patients). MRSA was detected in blood (6 patients) or pus culture (8 patients). Vancomycin or linezolid were used for 11 patients; corticosteroids were administered to only 1 patient. Surgical drainage was performed for 13 infants (external drainage, 11 patients; endoscopic drainage, 2 patients). Two patients initially had pulmonary and intracranial infections. Except for one patient with neurological dysfunction at discharge, all other infants had no sequelae or complications.

Conclusion

Early aggressive anti-infective treatment and timely drainage are essential for managing MRSA-induced infantile orbital abscess.

Effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin and linezolid in Kuwait: A retrospective cohort study

Background

The effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin and linezolid for managing gram-positive bacterial infections in Kuwait are unknown. This study assessed the effectiveness, safety, and cost of vancomycin, teicoplanin and linezolid for managing gram-positive bacterial infections in Kuwait.

Research design and methods

This retrospective study included adult patients who were prescribed antibiotics (vancomycin, teicoplanin, and linezolid) for the treatment of gram-positive infections at five hospitals in Kuwait. Descriptive statistics were used to assess the effectiveness and safety outcomes. A cost analysis was performed on the patients hospitalised for gram-positive infections.

Results

Among 116 patients, 42.2 % (n = 49) received glycopeptides (vancomycin [n = 45] and teicoplanin [n = 4]) or linezolid (n = 67). Clinical cure was achieved in 100 patients without significant intergroup differences (p = 0.34). Thrombocytopenia and acute kidney injury occurred in 19 and 20 patients (p = 0.82 and 0.96), respectively, and their incidence was similar with all the studied agents. The average cost per patient was USD 983.70. The estimated total direct medical costs were USD 894,570.6, the cost was highest for linezolid (USD 469,682.30) and vancomycin (USD 370,342.5), and lowest for teicoplanin (USD 20,799.9).

Conclusions

Glycopeptides and linezolid were highly effective. Linezolid was the most frequently prescribed agent; its effectiveness and safety were similar according to the antibiotic class. However, treatment with linezolid and vancomycin were associated with considerable costs.

Linezolid dosing in critically ill patients undergoing various modalities of renal replacement therapy: a pooled population pharmacokinetic analysis

The altered pharmacokinetics (PK) of linezolid are pronounced in critically ill patients undergoing different modalities of renal replacement therapy (RRT). This study aimed to provide a pooled population PK analysis of linezolid in patients undergoing RRT, and to evaluate the pharmacodynamic target attainment of linezolid standard dosing (600 mg q12h). In total, 414 pooled linezolid concentration observations from 69 patients undergoing intermittent haemodialysis (IHD), sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) or continuous RRT were used to develop the population PK model. The probability of target attainment (PTA) for the efficacy markers of 85% T>minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)/MIC >100 was evaluated, and the risk of toxicity was estimated based on Cmin ≥10 mg/L. Linezolid concentration data were described adequately by a two-compartment model. Renal function and body weight were identified as significant modifiers for endogenous clearance of linezolid. Simulations demonstrated that the PTA of 85% T>MIC and AUC/MIC>100 was unacceptably low (0-58.6%, MIC ≥1 mg/L) in RRT patients with preserved renal function, while desirable 85% T>MIC attainment (≥ 90%, MIC ≤2 mg/L) was achieved in anuric RRT patients. The predicted risk of toxicity was negligible (<1.0%) in patients with preserved renal function (regardless of RRT modality), while the probability of reaching Cmin ≥10 mg/L was high (17.9-20.9%) for the anuric patient population undergoing IHD or SLED. In conclusion, standard linezolid dosing is adequate for anuric RRT patients with MIC ≤2 mg/L.

Parallel evolution of linezolid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in patients with cystic fibrosis

Linezolid is an antibiotic used to treat serious Staphylococcus aureus infections. Resistance to linezolid is considered rare but could emerge with repeated dosing. We recently reported widespread prescription of linezolid for a cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). The goals of this study were to determine the incidence of linezolid-resistant methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in CF and identify molecular mechanisms for linezolid resistance. We identified patients who cultured S. aureus resistant to linezolid with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) >4 at the University of Iowa CF Center between 2008 and 2018. We obtained isolates from these patients and retested susceptibility to linezolid using broth microdilution. We used whole genome sequencing to perform phylogenetic analysis of linezolid-resistant isolates and examine sequences for mutations or accessory genes that confer linezolid resistance. Between 2008 and 2018, 111 patients received linezolid, and 4 of these patients cultured linezolid-resistant S. aureus. We sequenced 11 resistant and 21 susceptible isolates from these 4 subjects. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that linezolid resistance developed in ST5 or ST105 backgrounds. Three individuals had linezolid-resistant S. aureus with a G2576T mutation in 23S rRNA. One of these subjects additionally had a mutS- mutL- hypermutating S. aureus that produced five resistant isolates with multiple ribosomal subunit mutations. In one subject, the genetic basis for linezolid resistance was unclear. We conclude that linezolid resistant S. aureus can occur through multiple genetic mechanisms in patients with repeated exposure to this antibiotic. IMPORTANCE Patients with cystic fibrosis have persistent lung infections with Staphylococcus aureus that require extensive antibiotic treatments. Linezolid, an antibiotic given by oral or intravenous route, is prescribed repeatedly for patients whose lung disease has progressed. After treatment with linezolid, S. aureus strains can evolve antibiotic resistance through multiple genetic mechanisms. In addition to a common mutation in the 23S ribosomal RNA known to confer linezolid resistance, S. aureus strains can evolve novel resistance based on a combination of mutations affecting the bacterial ribosome. This combination of mutations was observed in a strain that exhibited hypermutation owing to the loss of the DNA repair genes mutS and mutL. In this cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis, linezolid resistance was transient, possibly due to the growth disadvantage of resistant strains. However, ongoing chronic exposure to linezolid may create optimal conditions for the future emergence of resistance to this critical antibiotic.

Contemporary pharmacologic treatments of MRSA for hospitalized adults: rationale for vancomycin versus non-vancomycin therapies as first line agents

INTRODUCTION

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) remains an important pathogen in the hospital setting and causes significant morbidity and mortality each year. Since the initial discovery over 60 years ago, vancomycin has remained a first-line treatment for many different types of MRSA infections. However, significant concerns related to target attainment and nephrotoxicity have spurred efforts to develop more effective agents in the last two decades.

AREAS COVERED

Newer anti-MRSA antibiotics that have been approved since 2000 include linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftaroline. As clinical evidence has accumulated, these newer agents have become more frequently used, and some are now recommended as co-first-line options (along with vancomycin) in clinical practice guidelines. For this review, a scoping review of the literature was conducted to support our findings and recommendations.

EXPERT OPINION

Vancomycin remains an important standard of care for MRSA infections but is limited with respect to nephrotoxicity and rapid target attainment. Newer agents such as linezolid, daptomycin, and ceftaroline have specific indications for treating different types of MRSA infections; however, newer agents also have unique attributes which require consideration during therapy.

Parallel Evolution of Linezolid Resistant Staphylococcus aureus in Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Background

Linezolid is an antibiotic used to treat serious Staphylococcus aureus infections. Resistance to linezolid is considered rare but could emerge with repeated dosing. We recently reported widespread prescription of linezolid for a cohort of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF).

Objectives

The goals of this study were to determine the incidence of linezolid resistance in CF and identify molecular mechanisms for linezolid resistance.

Methods

We identified patients with S. aureus resistant to linezolid (MIC > 4) at the University of Iowa CF Center between 2008 and 2018. We obtained isolates from these patients and retested susceptibility to linezolid using broth microdilution. We used whole genome sequencing to perform phylogenetic analysis of linezolid resistant isolates and examine sequences for mutations or accessory genes that confer linezolid resistance.

Main Results

Between 2008 and 2018, 111 patients received linezolid and 4 of these patients cultured linezolid resistant S. aureus . We sequenced 11 resistant and 21 susceptible isolates from these 4 subjects. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that linezolid resistance developed in ST5 or ST105 backgrounds. Three individuals had linezolid resistant S. aureus with a G2576T mutation in 23S rRNA. One of these subjects additionally had a mutS - mutL - hypermutating S. aureus that produced 5 resistant isolates with multiple ribosomal subunit mutations. In one subject, the genetic basis for linezolid resistance was unclear.

Conclusions

Linezolid resistance evolved in 4 of 111 patients in this study. Linezolid resistance occurred by multiple genetic mechanisms. All resistant strains developed in ST5 or ST105 MRSA backgrounds.

Key Point

Linezolid resistance arises through multiple genetic mechanisms and could be facilitated by mutator phenotypes. Linezolid resistance was transient, possibly due to growth disadvantage.

Catastrophic complications of PVL-MRSA necrotizing pneumonia presenting as respiratory failure and rhabdomyolysis, case report and review of the literature

Panton-Valentine leucocidin toxin-producing methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus is an important uncommon cause of community-acquired pneumonia; we describe a case of necrotizing pneumonia presenting as respiratory failure necessitating early initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, acute kidney injury and rhabdomyolysis, awareness, prompt recognition and appropriate management are crucial due to possible significant pathology.

Effectiveness and Safety of Linezolid Versus Vancomycin, Teicoplanin, or Daptomycin against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vancomycin (VCM) and daptomycin (DAP) are standard therapies for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteremia, despite concerns regarding clinical utility and growing resistance. Linezolid (LZD) affords superior tissue penetration to VCM or DAP and has been successfully used as salvage therapy for persistent MRSA bacteremia, indicating its utility as a first-choice drug against MRSA bacteremia. In a systematic review and meta-analysis, we compared the effectiveness and safety of LZD with VCM, teicoplanin (TEIC), or DAP in patients with MRSA bacteremia. We evaluated all-cause mortality as the primary effectiveness outcome, clinical and microbiological cure, hospital length of stay, recurrence, and 90-day readmission rates as secondary effectiveness outcomes, and drug-related adverse effects as primary safety outcomes. We identified 5328 patients across 2 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), 1 pooled analysis of 5 RCTs, 1 subgroup analysis (1 RCT), and 5 case-control and cohort studies (CSs). Primary and secondary effectiveness outcomes were comparable between patients treated with LZD versus VCM, TEIC, or DAP in RCT-based studies and CSs. There was no difference in adverse event incidence between LZD and comparators. These findings suggest that LZD could be a potential first-line drug against MRSA bacteremia as well as VCM or DAP.

A 600 mg of fixed-dose linezolid in renally impaired patients versus 15 mg/kg intermittent dose-optimized vancomycin in renally non-impaired patients: A single centre retrospective analysis for adult patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus

OBJECTIVES

Both linezolid and vancomycin are approved by USFDA and IDSA guidelines for the management of nosocomial pneumonia due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in clinical practice. Baseline creatinine clearance is the criterion for prescribing vancomycin or linezolid for hospital-acquired pneumonia in our institution. However, patients with renal function impairment are far more difficult to manage in intensive care. Thus, the objectives of the study were to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of 600 mg of fixed-dose linezolid with intermittent dose-optimised vancomycin in hospital-acquired pneumonia due to MRSA and to evaluate parameters of clinical cure.

METHODS

Analysis of a review of patients' charts. Patients with creatinine clearance <80 ml/min received 600 mg linezolid/12 h (n = 139, LN cohort), and patients with creatinine clearance ≥80 ml/min received intravenous 15 mg/kg vancomycin/12 h for 1-2 weeks consecutively or 3 weeks in case of bacteremia (n = 152, VC cohort) for management of hospital-acquired pneumonia due to MRSA.

RESULTS

A 59% of patients from the LN cohort and 47% of patients from the VC cohort were clinically cured. Administration of systemic steroids (p = 0.0412) and ≥ 80 ml/min creatinine clearance (p = 0.0498) were the independent parameters for the clinical cure of patients. Nephrotoxicity was higher among patients of the VC cohort than the LN cohort (p = 0.0464). Treatment failed in 41% of patients from the LN cohort and in 53% of patients from the VC cohort (p = 0.0200).

CONCLUSIONS

A 600 mg of fixed-dose linezolid is an ideal alternative to intermittent dose-optimised vancomycin for better clinical outcomes for patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia due to MRSA, especially for patients with renal impairment.

Targeted Therapy of Severe Infections Caused by Staphylococcus aureus in Critically Ill Adult Patients: A Multidisciplinary Proposal of Therapeutic Algorithms Based on Real-World Evidence

(1) Introduction: To develop evidence-based algorithms for targeted antibiotic therapy of infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill adult patients. (2) Methods: A multidisciplinary team of four experts had several rounds of assessment for developing algorithms concerning targeted antimicrobial therapy of severe infections caused by Staphylococcus aureus in critically ill patients. The literature search was performed by a researcher on PubMed-MEDLINE (until August 2022) to provide evidence for supporting therapeutic choices. Quality and strength of evidence was established according to a hierarchical scale of the study design. Two different algorithms were created, one for methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) and the other for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The therapeutic options were categorized for each different site of infection and were selected also on the basis of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features. (3) Results: Cefazolin or oxacillin were the agents proposed for all of the different types of severe MSSA infections. The proposed targeted therapies for severe MRSA infections were different according to the infection site: daptomycin plus fosfomycin or ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for bloodstream infections, infective endocarditis, and/or infections associated with intracardiac/intravascular devices; ceftaroline or ceftobiprole for community-acquired pneumonia; linezolid alone or plus fosfomycin for infection-related ventilator-associated complications or for central nervous system infections; daptomycin alone or plus clindamycin for necrotizing skin and soft tissue infections. (4) Conclusions: We are confident that targeted therapies based on scientific evidence and optimization of the pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic features of antibiotic monotherapy or combo therapy may represent valuable strategies for treating MSSA and MRSA infections.

Escalation of antimicrobial resistance among MRSA part 2: focus on infections and treatment

INTRODUCTION

MRSA is associated with causing a variety of infections including skin and skin structure infections, catheter and device-related (e.g. central venous catheter, prosthetic heart valve) infections, infectious endocarditis, blood stream infections, bone, and joint infections (e.g. osteomyelitis, prosthetic joint, surgical site), central nervous system infections (e.g. meningitis, brain/spinal cord abscess, ventriculitis, hydrocephalus), respiratory tract infections (e.g. hospital-acquired pneumonia, ventilator-associated pneumonia), urinary tract infections, and gastrointestinal infections. The emergence and spread of multidrug resistant (MDR) MRSA clones has limited therapeutic options. Older agents such as vancomycin, linezolid and daptomycin and a variety of newer MRSA antimicrobials and combination therapy are available to treat serious MRSA infections.

AREAS COVERED

The authors discuss infections caused by MRSA as well as common older and newer antimicrobials and combination therapy for MRSA infections. A literature search of MRSA was performed via PubMed (up to September 2022), using the keywords: antimicrobial resistance; β-lactams; multidrug resistance, Staphylococcus aureus, vancomycin; glycolipopeptides.

EXPERT OPINION

Innovation, discovery, and development of new and novel classes of antimicrobial agents are critical to expand effective therapeutic options. The authors encourage the judicious use of antimicrobials in accordance with antimicrobial stewardship programs along with infection-control measures to minimize the spread of MRSA.

Molecular Epidemiology of Community-Acquired Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Clinical Characteristics of Different Sites of Infection

Purpose

Since community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) was recognized, the molecular epidemiology of CA-MRSA in China has been diverse. It is unclear whether different sites of CA-MRSA infection differ in antimicrobial resistance and clinical characteristics. The purpose of this study was to identify the molecular types, virulence factors and antimicrobial resistance of CA-MRSA strains and to analyze the clinical characteristics of different sites of CA-MRSA infection.

Methods

26 CA-MRSA strains were screened from Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from 2014 to 2022. SCCmec type, MLST type, spa type, Panton-Valentine leukocidin (PVL), hemolysin α (Hla), phenolic soluble regulatory protein α (PSMα), toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (TSST-1), and enterotoxin (SE) A to E were detected by PCR and gene sequencing. Antimicrobial susceptibility tests and the clinical features of CA-MRSA infection cases were collected for statistical analysis.

Results

The predominant type of CA-MRSA was ST59-t437-IV. New non-epidemic types, SCCmec VII, were also found. PVL was seen in 65.4% of CA-MRSA strains and TSST-1 was only be detected in 3.8% of CA-MRSA strain which caused poor prognosis. There were three types of infections: pneumonia (61.5%), infective endocarditis (7.7%), and skin and soft tissue infections (SSTIs) (30.8%). CA-MRSA pneumonia cases were secondary to influenza infection (37.5%). Patients with CA-MRSA-associated infective endocarditis were more likely to have underlying cardiac diseases. Patients with CA-MRSA-associated SSTIs were more likely to have a history of diabetes mellitus, and strains in this group were more susceptible to erythromycin and clindamycin.

Conclusion

ST59-t437-IV was the primary CA-MRSA type in our research and in China. We proposed that TSST-1 might be one of the indicators to predict the severity and prognosis of CA-MRSA infection. Different sites of CA-MRSA infection had difference in antibiotics susceptibility testing and underlying diseases of patients. It could provide a new perspective on treating different types of CA-MRSA infection.

Appropriateness of antimicrobial selection for treatment of pneumonia in selected public hospitals of Eastern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional study

Objective

Inappropriate antimicrobial use leads to drug resistance and poor clinical outcomes. Considering the lack of data regarding the drug use patterns in the treatment of pneumonia in selected study areas, the authors felt compelled to assess the appropriateness of antimicrobial usage in the treatment of pneumonia at Hiwot Fana Specialized Comprehensive University Hospital and Jugal Hospital from May 1 to 31, 2021.

Methods

A cross-sectional retrospective study was conducted using the medical cards of 693 admitted patients with pneumonia. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS version 26. Bivariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with an initial inappropriate antibiotic use. A p value of 0.05 was used to determine the statistical significance of the association using an adjusted odds ratio with 95% confidence interval.

Results

Of the total participants, 116 (16.74%, 95% confidence interval: 14.1-19.6) of them received an initial inappropriate antimicrobial regimen. Ceftriaxone plus azithromycin was the most prescribed antimicrobial agent. Patients who were younger than 5 years (adjusted odds ratio = 1.71; 95% confidence interval: 1.00-2.94), between 6 and 14 years (adjusted odds ratio = 3.14; 95% confidence interval: 1.64-6.00), and older than 65 years (adjusted odds ratio = 2.97; 95% confidence interval: 1.07-2.66), with comorbid conditions (adjusted odds ratio = 1.74; 95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.72) and prescribed by medical interns (adjusted odds ratio = 1.80; 95% confidence interval: 1.14-2.84) were associated with an initial inappropriate antimicrobial use.

Conclusion

Around one out of every six patients had received initial inappropriate treatments. Adherence to the recommendation of guidelines and attention to extreme-aged groups and comorbidity may improve antimicrobial use.

Comparing the pharmacokinetics and organ/tissue distribution of anti-methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus agents using a rat model of sepsis

Sepsis is a major cause of death, and sepsis-derived physiological changes complicate the understanding of drug distribution in organs/tissues, which determines the efficacy and toxicity of antimicrobial agents. In this study, we evaluated and compared the pharmacokinetics of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus treatment agents in sepsis with that of vancomycin, arbekacin, linezolid, and daptomycin.Rat models of sepsis were prepared using cecal ligation puncture. The pharmacokinetics of vancomycin, arbekacin, linezolid, and daptomycin were evaluated using their drug concentration profiles in plasma, kidneys, liver, lungs, skin, and muscles after intravenous administration in normal and septic rats.The kidney/plasma concentration ratio was higher in septic rats than in normal rats for vancomycin, arbekacin, and daptomycin but not for linezolid. The increase in the kidney/plasma concentration ratio for vancomycin was time-dependent, indicating an association between sepsis and stasis of vancomycin in the kidneys. In contrast, the distribution of linezolid from the blood to the organs/tissues in septic rats was comparable to that in normal rats.Sepsis-induced nephrotoxicity results in the stasis of vancomycin in the kidney, suggesting that this exacerbates proximal tubular epithelial cell injury. No dose modification of linezolid may be required for patients with sepsis.

Target Therapeutic Ranges of Anti-MRSA Drugs, Linezolid, Tedizolid and Daptomycin, and the Necessity of TDM

The target therapeutic ranges of vancomycin, teicoplanin, and arbekacin have been determined, and therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is performed in clinical practice. However, TDM is not obligatory for daptomycin, linezolid, or tedizolid. In this study, we examined whether TDM will be necessary for these 3 drugs in the future. There was no significant difference in therapeutic effects on acute bacterial skin and skin structure infection between linezolid and tedizolid by meta-analysis. Concerning the therapeutic effects on pneumonia, the rate of effectiveness after treatment with tedizolid was significantly lower than with linezolid. With respect to safety, the incidences of gastrointestinal adverse events and blood/lymphatic system disorders related to tedizolid were significantly lower than those related to linezolid. Linezolid exhibits potent therapeutic effects on pneumonia, but the appearance of adverse reactions is indicated as a problem. There was a dose-dependent decrease in the platelet count, and the target trough concentration (C_trough) was estimated to be 4-6 or 2-7 µg/mL in accordance with the patient's condition. The efficacy of linezolid may be obtained while minimizing the appearance of adverse reactions by performing TDM. The target therapeutic range of tedizolid cannot be achieved in immunocompromised or severe patients. Therefore, we concluded that TDM was unnecessary, considering step-down therapy with oral drugs, use in non-severe patients, and high-level safety. Concerning daptomycin, high-dose administration is necessary to achieve an area under the curve (AUC) of ≥666 as an index of efficacy. To secure its safety, C_trough (<20 µg/mL) monitoring is important. Therefore, TDM is necessary.

Clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid in intensive care unit patients

Background

To characterize the population of critically ill patients and infections treated with linezolid in the intensive care unit (ICU), and to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of linezolid therapy.

Methods

This multi-center, observational, real-world study was conducted across 52 hospitals between June 9, 2018, and December 28, 2019. Patients who met the following inclusion criteria were included: (1) admitted to the ICU, (2) of any age group, and (3) having a clinical or laboratory diagnosis of a Gram-positive bacterial infection. Clinical efficacy was categorized as success (cured or improved), failed, or non-evaluable. Adverse events and serious adverse events were recorded during treatment.

Results

A total of 366 ICU patients who met the inclusion criteria were evaluated. Linezolid was used as second- and first-line treatment in 232 (63.4%) and 134 (36.6%) patients, respectively. The most common isolated strain was Staphylococcus aureus (methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: n=37/119, 31.1%; methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus: n=15/119, 12.6%); this was followed by Enterococci (vancomycin-resistant Enterococci: n=8/119, 6.7%; vancomycin-susceptible Enterococci: n=11/119, 9.2%) and Streptococcus pneumoniae (multidrug-resistant: n=4/119, 3.4%; non-multidrug resistant: n=2/119, 1.7%). The main infection sites where pathogens were detected included the lung (n=216/366, 59.6%), skin and soft tissue (n=104/366, 28.4%), and blood (n=50/366, 13.7%). Clinical success was achieved in 301 (82.2%) patients; 34 (9.3%) were cured and 267 (73.0%) improved; treatment failure and non-evaluable outcomes were observed in 29 (7.9%) in 36 (9.8%) patients, respectively. Linezolid-related adverse events were reported in 8 (2.2%) patients. No treatment-related serious adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

Based on real-world results, linezolid was found to be effective and safe in the treatment of Gram-positive bacterial infections in critically ill patients.

Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Hospital-Acquired Pneumonia/Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a common cause of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP). MRSA pneumonia is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Several virulence factors allow S. aureus to become an effective pathogen. The polysaccharide intracellular adhesin allows for the production of biofilms, some strains can produce capsular polysaccharides that protect against phagocytosis, microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs) allow for colonization of epithelial surfaces, and S. aureus secretes several exotoxins that aid in tissue destruction. The α-hemolysin exotoxin secreted by S. aureus is one of the most important virulence factors for the bacteria. The diagnosis of MRSA pneumonia can be challenging; the infection may present as a mild respiratory infection or severe respiratory failure and septic shock. Many individuals are colonized with MRSA and thus a positive nasopharyngeal swab does not confirm infection in the lower respiratory tract. The management of MRSA pneumonia has evolved. Historically, vancomycin has been the primary antibiotic used to treat MRSA pneumonia. Over the past decade, prospective studies have shown that linezolid leads to higher rates of clinical cure. Monoclonal antibodies are being studied as potential therapeutic options. MRSA is an important cause of HAP/VAP; novel diagnostics may facilitate rapid diagnosis of this infection and the available literature should be used to make informed decisions on management.

Current pharmacotherapy for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) pneumonia

INTRODUCTION

Currently, several antibiotics are active against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and can be used for the treatment of pneumonia. They show great variability in terms of antibiotic class, indication, pharmacodynamic/pharmacokinetic properties, type of available formulations, spectrum of activity against bacteria other than MRSA, and toxicity profile.

AREAS COVERED

In this narrative review, the authors discuss the characteristics of currently available agents for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of different agents with anti-MRSA activity, and approved for the treatment of pneumonia can allow a personalized approach for any given patient based on the severity of the disease, the setting of occurrence, the patient's baseline risk of toxicity and drug interactions, and the possibility of oral therapy whenever early discharge or outpatient treatment are possible. Although some gray areas still remain, like the lack of high certainty evidence on the efficacy of some old agents and on the precise role of companion agents with toxin inhibitory activity in the case of necrotizing pneumonia, the frequent availability of different treatment choices, each with peculiar characteristics, is already allowing an important step toward a precision medicine approach for the treatment of MRSA pneumonia.

Initial antimicrobial management of sepsis

Sepsis is a common consequence of infection, associated with a mortality rate > 25%. Although community-acquired sepsis is more common, hospital-acquired infection is more lethal. The most common site of infection is the lung, followed by abdominal infection, catheter-associated blood steam infection and urinary tract infection. Gram-negative sepsis is more common than gram-positive infection, but sepsis can also be due to fungal and viral pathogens. To reduce mortality, it is necessary to give immediate, empiric, broad-spectrum therapy to those with severe sepsis and/or shock, but this approach can drive antimicrobial overuse and resistance and should be accompanied by a commitment to de-escalation and antimicrobial stewardship. Biomarkers such a procalcitonin can provide decision support for antibiotic use, and may identify patients with a low likelihood of infection, and in some settings, can guide duration of antibiotic therapy. Sepsis can involve drug-resistant pathogens, and this often necessitates consideration of newer antimicrobial agents.

The alarming association between antibiotic resistance and reduced susceptibility to biocides in nosocomial MRSA isolates from two regional hospitals in Egypt

Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus is one of the major clinical problems in hospitals because of its resistance to many antimicrobials. Biocides are used in hospitals to control nosocomial infections. This work aimed to investigate the relationship between the presence of integrons and reduced susceptibility to both biocides and antimicrobials in nosocomial multidrug-resistant (MDR)-MRSA isolates. A total of 114 clinical and eight environmental MRSA isolates were collected from Zagazig University Hospitals and El-Ahrar Educational Hospital, Egypt. These isolates were identified as MRSA by disk diffusion method (DDM) and confirmed by PCR. Susceptibility profile against 12 antibiotics and five biocides was determined by DDM and agar dilution method, respectively. Presence of integrons was investigated by PCR in MDR isolates. Seventy-five clinical and six environmental isolates were MDR and had reduced susceptibility to biocides. Class I integron was detected in plasmid DNA of 34 isolates and genomic DNA of 14 isolates. Meanwhile, class II integron was only detected in plasmid DNA of 10 clinical isolates. This study revealed a high prevalence of MDR-MRSA clinical and environmental isolates, both had reduced susceptibility to investigated biocides. Class I integron was more predominant in plasmid DNA of isolates, indicating that plasmid is a major carrier for integrons that transfer resistance genes. In conclusion, the association between antibiotic resistance and biocides reduced susceptibility is alarming. The selection of curative antibiotic should depend on the antimicrobial susceptibility profile. Furthermore, biocides should always be used at appropriate concentrations to prevent the evolution of resistance and to control the hospital-transmission of MRSA.