1
|
Doan TTT, Kim J, Kim H, An W, Seo E, Park M. Decision Regret and Decision-Making Process among Caregivers of Older Adults Receiving Home Care: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2024; 25:105166. [PMID: 39043248 DOI: 10.1016/j.jamda.2024.105166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Family caregivers of older adults receiving home care often find themselves in situations in which they must make important and difficult decisions, which can cause conflict and regret. To tailor shared decision making in this context, we aimed to identify the most difficult decisions they faced, assess their levels of decision regret, and explore the associated factors. DESIGN This study used a cross-sectional design. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS Participants included 165 caregivers of older adults who received home care services in Korea. METHODS We identified difficult decisions perceived by family caregivers of older adults and evaluated decision regret using the Decision Regret Scale (DRS), decisional conflict using the Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS), burden of care using the Short Zarit Burden Inventory, and Preference Control Scale (PCS). We then performed descriptive, bivariate, and multivariate linear regression analyses to identify factors predicting decision regret. RESULTS The most frequently reported difficult decisions were related to place of living (71.6%), management of health conditions (15.1%), and end-of-life decisions (13.3%). The mean DCS score was 37.09 (12.67), the DRS score was 32.33 (15.91), and the burden score was 21.81 (8.25). Matching decisions with preferences and aligning decision-making roles significantly reduced regret, while decision conflicts increased regret. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS The positive associations between decision regret, decision conflict, and the alignment of decision-making roles highlight the intricate dynamics involved in the decision-making process for family caregivers. These findings emphasize the need for tailored interventions that recognize and address the diverse factors influencing caregivers' decision-making experiences. Future research exploring the efficacy of targeted interventions such as decision-support programs or caregiver education initiatives could offer valuable insights into mitigating decision-related challenges and improving the overall well-being of both caregivers and care recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thao Thi-Thu Doan
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea; Faculty of Nursing, Hai Phong University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Haiphong, Vietnam
| | - Jinju Kim
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Heejung Kim
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Wonmi An
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Eunkyung Seo
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Myonghwa Park
- CNU Community Care Center, College of Nursing, Chungnam National University, Daejeon, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hatlevoll I, Kristensen AK, Solheim TS, Elvebakken H, Salvesen Ø, Oldervoll LM, Wibe A, Hofsli E. Do older patients with colorectal cancer experience more deterioration in health-related quality of life than younger patients during the first year of palliative chemotherapy? A prospective real-world observational study. J Geriatr Oncol 2024; 15:101715. [PMID: 38359528 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2024.101715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2023] [Revised: 12/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The primary aim was to evaluate changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a real-life population among younger (< 70 years) and older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) during the first year of palliative chemotherapy. The secondary aims were to assess the impact of chemo-break on HRQoL and to report overall survival (OS). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients with newly diagnosed mCRC, ≥ 18 years, and scheduled for first line palliative chemotherapy were included in this multicentre longitudinal observational study. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (0-100) was filled in at baseline and every second month. Changes or differences in QoL scores of >20, 10-20, and 5-10 points were considered to be of large, moderate, and small clinical magnitude, respectively. Comparing means of different QoL scores between groups or over time, a threshold of 5-10 was considered the minimally important difference (MID). Treatments, patient characteristics, and tumour characteristics were prospectively registered. RESULTS A total of 214 patients were included, and 146 were alive after one year. Four months after start of treatment, large deteriorations in fatigue and physical functioning were reported by 40% and 25% of the patients, respectively. Changes in global QoL, physical functioning, role functioning, fatigue, pain, and nausea/vomiting were not significantly different between the age groups and reached baseline levels after one year. Patients on chemo-break reported significant improvements in several HRQoL domains. Median OS was 17.5 months [95% confidence interval 14.4-20.5] with no difference between younger and older patients. DISCUSSION Older patients did not experience more deterioration in HRQoL than younger patients during the first year of palliative chemotherapy. Measures to mitigate the deteriorations in fatigue and physical functioning observed during the first months of palliative treatment are warranted. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT02395224, March 23, 2015, retrospectively registered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingunn Hatlevoll
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
| | | | - Tora S Solheim
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Hege Elvebakken
- Department of Oncology, Ålesund Hospital, Møre og Romsdal Hospital Trust, Ålesund, Norway
| | - Øyvind Salvesen
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Line M Oldervoll
- Department of Public Health and Nursing, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Center for Crisis Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Bergen, Norway
| | - Arne Wibe
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Surgery, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Eva Hofsli
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway; Department of Oncology, St. Olav's Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Crowder V, Brady V, Johnson C, Whisenant M. Patient competence in chronic illness: A concept derivation. J Clin Nurs 2024; 33:1575-1581. [PMID: 38178571 DOI: 10.1111/jocn.16984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2023] [Revised: 12/13/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 01/06/2024]
Abstract
AIMS AND OBJECTIVES This paper aims to inform nursing and other healthcare disciplines by clearly defining patient competence and the skills required to improve self-care behaviours. BACKGROUND Competence has been defined in education and leadership. However, competence in persons with chronic disease has not been expanded upon since one publication in 1983. Patient competence needs to be developed and defined so that healthcare disciplines can understand the attributes necessary for a patient to be deemed competent to promote self-care behaviours. DESIGN A concept derivation. METHODS Walker and Avant's approach to concept derivation was used to identify a base concept (competence) that is well-defined in another field, define the concepts associated with the parent field, and transpose that definition to a new field to formulate a redefined concept. PsycINFO, Scopus, Web of Science and Medline were searched, and 21 articles were included. RESULTS Patient competence is defined as the ability of a person with a chronic illness to reach skill mastery, achieve knowledge, maintain a positive attitude and develop trust in themselves and in healthcare providers that will facilitate active engagement to improve self-care behaviours. CONCLUSIONS Defining patient competence is important in assisting nurses and other healthcare providers in understanding the attributes needed to deem a patient competent, especially those living with chronic illnesses requiring lifelong self-care behaviours. More research is needed to aid in the designing of a precise instrument for measuring this phenomenon. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE Concept derivation of patient competence provides a framework for nurses and other members of the healthcare profession to understand the attributes needed to determine patient competence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivian Crowder
- Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Veronica Brady
- Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Constance Johnson
- Department of Research, Cizik School of Nursing, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Meagan Whisenant
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ihle-Hansen H, Pedersen R, Westbye SF, Sævareid TJL, Brøderud L, Larsen MH, Hermansen K, Rostoft S, Romøren M. Patient preferences in geriatric wards, a survey of health care professionals' practice, experience and attitudes. Eur Geriatr Med 2024; 15:153-158. [PMID: 38282088 PMCID: PMC10876711 DOI: 10.1007/s41999-023-00922-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE We aimed to identify whether health care professionals (HCP) examine their patient and next-of-kin preferences, and to study whether medical decisions follow these preferences. METHOD A cross-sectional web-based survey was conducted with multidisciplinary HCP from 12 geriatric wards in the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority. RESULTS Of the 289 HCPs responding (response rate 61%), mean age 37.8 years (SD 11.3), 235 (81.3%) women, 12.4 (SD 9.6) years of experience and 67 (23.2%) medical doctors, only half report clarifying patients' preferences. The majority reported that they did not inform, involve and treat in line with such preferences. However, 53% believe that HCP, patients and next-of-kin should make clinical decisions together. DISCUSSION Our findings indicate a lack of engagement in conversation and inclusion of patient preferences when providing health interventions in geriatric wards. Measures for change of culture are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hege Ihle-Hansen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
- Department of Neurology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
| | - R Pedersen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - S F Westbye
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - T J L Sævareid
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - L Brøderud
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - M H Larsen
- Lovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway
| | - K Hermansen
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Aalesund, Norway
| | - S Rostoft
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - M Romøren
- Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Leung B, Pilleron S, Bastiaannet E, Coombs LA, Jin R, Kantilal K, Kantilal K, Kenis C, Kobekyaa F, Kosmari L, Krok-Schoen JL, Li J, Mac Eochagain C, Newton L, Ruegg T, Stolz-Baskett P, Zhao Y, Bradley C, Puts M, Haase KR. Cancer treatment-related decision-making among culturally and linguistically diverse older adults with cancer: A scoping review by the International Society of Geriatric Oncology Nursing and Allied Health Interest Group. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101607. [PMID: 37633779 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101607] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/15/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Countries with large economies are observing a growing number of culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) older adults, many of whom will be affected by cancer. Little is known about the experiences and factors that influence cancer treatment decision-making in this population. The purposes of this scoping review are: (1) to summarize the published literature on cancer treatment-related decision-making with this population; and (2) to identify potential differences in how cancer treatment decisions are made compared to non-CALD older adults with cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a scoping review following Arksey and O'Malley and Levac methods, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Scoping Review Guidelines. We conducted a comprehensive multidatabase search, screening 1,139 titles/abstracts. Following data abstraction, we analyzed the data using tabular and narrative summary. RESULTS We extracted data from six studies that met the inclusion criteria: four quantitative and two qualitative; five from the United States and one from Canada. Three themes were identified: (1) barriers to decision-making, (2) the influence of family and friends on decisionmaking, and (3) differences in uptake and types of treatment received between CALD and non-CALD older adults. DISCUSSION This comprehensive review of treatment decision-making among CALD older adults with cancer highlights the paucity of research in this area. The findings are limited to North American populations and may not represent experiences in other regions of the world. Future research should focus on studying their treatment-related decision-making experiences to improve the quality of care for this vulnerable population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bonnie Leung
- Department of Medical Oncology, BC Cancer, Vancouver, Canada; Faculty of Applied Science, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada.
| | - Sophie Pilleron
- Ageing, Cancer, and Disparities Research Unit, Department of Precision Health, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Strassen, Luxembourg
| | - Esther Bastiaannet
- Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Prevention Institute, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lorinda A Coombs
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, Chapel Hill, USA
| | - Rana Jin
- Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kavita Kantilal
- University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Brighton, UK
| | - Kumud Kantilal
- Research Department of Primary Care and Population Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Cindy Kenis
- Department of General Medical Oncology and Geriatric Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Academic Centre for Nursing and Midwifery, KU Leuven - University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francis Kobekyaa
- Faculty of Applied Science, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | | | - Jessica L Krok-Schoen
- Division of Health Sciences, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The Ohio State University, Columbus, USA
| | - Juan Li
- Xiangya School of Nursing, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | | | - Lorelei Newton
- School of Nursing, University of Victoria, Victoria, Canada
| | | | - Petra Stolz-Baskett
- Institute of Nursing, Zurich University of Applied Sciences SHAW, Winterthur, Switzerland; School of Nursing, Midwifery & Health Practice, Te Herenga Waka/Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Yue Zhao
- Department of General, Visceral, Tumor and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Cara Bradley
- Dr. John Archer Library, University of Regina, Regina, Canada
| | - Martine Puts
- Lawrence S. Bloomberg Faculty of Nursing, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Kristen R Haase
- Faculty of Applied Science, School of Nursing, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hwang M, Jiang Y. Personalization in digital health interventions for older adults with cancer: A scoping review. J Geriatr Oncol 2023; 14:101652. [PMID: 37866009 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2023.101652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Revised: 09/28/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Digital health interventions (DHIs) are promising to support older adults with cancer in managing their conditions and improving their health outcomes. However, there is a lack of overall understanding of various DHIs for the aging population with cancer. Specifically, it is unclear how personalization components are included in those DHIs to promote engagement in the interventions among older adults with cancer. This study aimed to provide a comprehensive overview of existing DHIs for older adults with cancer and identify the intervention components, especially personalized features, and effectiveness of these DHIs for improving self-management and psychosocial health. MATERIALS AND METHODS A scoping review was conducted following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, focusing on older adults diagnosed with cancer who participated in DHIs to improve self-management and psychosocial health. Studies using an experimental design and published from 2000 to January 2023 were retrieved from four databases: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Scopus. After primary data extraction of study characteristics, participants, interventions, and outcomes, DHIs were categorized according to personalized features. RESULTS Out of 9,750 articles, 20 were eligible for this scoping review. The main personalized features of DHIs were categorized into four domains: goal setting, adjusting the plan, data-driven approaches, and motivating behavioral changes. Self-management outcomes were focused on physical activity, diet, and symptom management. Quality of life, depression, and anxiety were addressed as psychosocial health-related outcomes. Although no consistent results were reported on the effectiveness, DHIs with a combination of multiple personalized features, more than three domains, were likely to be more effective in improving self-management outcomes. DISCUSSION This review enhances the understanding of personalized DHIs for older adults with cancer by identifying intervention components, personalized features, and effectiveness on self-management and psychosocial health. Several gaps were identified, including the absence of targeted studies exclusively focusing on older adults, a relative scarcity of personalized features for improving patient engagement, a lack of understanding of the mechanism of effective personalized features, and the necessity for more experimental studies. Addressing these gaps can contribute to improving health outcomes and the quality of care for older adults with cancer by providing the direction for developing effective DHIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Misun Hwang
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, MI, USA.
| | - Yun Jiang
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Chang WW, Wu MT, Chang YC, Hu WY. The mediating effect of shared decision-making in enhancing patient satisfaction with participation in cancer clinical trials. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2023; 10:100265. [PMID: 37519403 PMCID: PMC10372169 DOI: 10.1016/j.apjon.2023.100265] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective The participation of patients with advanced cancer(s) in clinical trials is vital for new drug development. We aimed to investigate patients' decision-making processes and satisfaction with their decision (SWD) to participate; the study's purpose was to provide results that can help support high-quality research in clinical trials. In addition, we explored how shared decision-making (SDM) mediates the relationship between understanding informed consent forms and SWD to participate in a clinical trial. Methods A cross-sectional study was conducted. A purposive sample of 111 cancer patients was recruited, and they completed a questionnaire on demographic characteristics, SDM, and decision-making satisfaction to participate in a clinical trial. Correlation and mediation analyses were used. Results Participants aged under 65 years and with higher education reported high SWDs, and SDM significantly mediated the relationship between self-assessed understanding of informed consent forms and SWDs related to clinical trials. Conclusions SDM in patients with lung or liver cancer was a significant mediator between understanding the informed consent form and the patient's SWD. The higher the SWD level of participating in clinical trials, the better study team members' SDM involvement and the better the comprehension of informed consent forms. In addition, patients' age and education level should also be considered as influencing factors in SWD. This survey is the first in Taiwan to examine SDM in drug-related clinical trials. The study results provide evidence to support SDM in a clinical trial model and develop informed consent process policies in research facilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Wen Chang
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | | - Yun-Chen Chang
- School of Nursing and Graduate Institute of Nursing, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Yu Hu
- School of Nursing, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
- Department of Nursing, National Taiwan University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Castelo-Loureiro A, Perez-de-Acha A, Torres-Perez AC, Cunha V, García-Valdés P, Cárdenas-Reyes P, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E. Delivering Palliative and Supportive Care for Older Adults with Cancer: Interactions between Palliative Medicine and Geriatrics. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3858. [PMID: 37568674 PMCID: PMC10417379 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The world's population is aging rapidly, with projections indicating that by 2050 one in six people will be aged ≥65 years. As a result, the number of cancer cases in older people is expected to increase significantly. Palliative care is an essential component of cancer care with a direct impact on quality of life. However, older adults with cancer often suffer from multiple comorbidities, cognitive impairment, and frailty, posing unique challenges in the delivery of palliative care. The complex healthcare needs of older patients with cancer therefore require a comprehensive assessment, including a geriatric evaluation. Collaboration between geriatrics and palliative care can offer a solution to the challenges faced by older people with cancer, since this is a population with overlapping concerns for both disciplines. This review highlights the importance of palliative care for older adults with cancer and the benefits of a multidisciplinary approach. It also addresses the coordination of palliative care and geriatrics for specific symptom management and decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrea Perez-de-Acha
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| | - Ana Cristina Torres-Perez
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| | - Vanessa Cunha
- School of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3G5, Canada
| | - Paola García-Valdés
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
- Department of Palliative Care, Hospital Gea González, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| | - Paula Cárdenas-Reyes
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City 14080, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Brown A. Newly diagnosed hypertension: case study. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2023; 32:556-560. [PMID: 37344134 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2023.32.12.556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/23/2023]
Abstract
The role of an advanced nurse practitioner encompasses the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of a range of conditions. This case study presents a patient with newly diagnosed hypertension. It demonstrates effective history taking, physical examination, differential diagnoses and the shared decision making which occurred between the patient and the professional. It is widely acknowledged that adherence to medications is poor in long-term conditions, such as hypertension, but using a concordant approach in practice can optimise patient outcomes. This case study outlines a concordant approach to consultations in clinical practice which can enhance adherence in long-term conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angela Brown
- Trainee Advanced Nurse Practitioner, East Belfast GP Federation, Northern Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jones KC, Austad K, Silver S, Cordova-Ramos EG, Fantasia KL, Perez DC, Kremer K, Wilson S, Walkey A, Drainoni ML. Patient Perspectives of the Hospital Discharge Process: A Qualitative Study. J Patient Exp 2023; 10:23743735231171564. [PMID: 37151607 PMCID: PMC10159238 DOI: 10.1177/23743735231171564] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Care transitions after hospitalization require communication across care teams, patients, and caregivers. As part of a quality improvement initiative, we conducted qualitative interviews with a diverse group of 53 patients who were recently discharged from a hospitalization within a safety net hospital to explore how patient preferences were included in the hospital discharge process and differences in the hospital discharge experience by race/ethnicity. Four themes emerged from participants regarding desired characteristics of interactions with the discharge team: (1) to feel heard, (2) inclusion in decision-making, (3) to be adequately prepared to care for themselves at home through bedside teaching, (4) and to have a clear and updated discharge timeline. Additionally, participants identified patient-level factors the discharge planning team should consider, including the social context, family involvement, health literacy, and linguistic barriers. Lastly, participants identified provider characteristics, such as a caring and empathetic bedside manner, that they found valuable in the discharge process. Our findings highlight the need for shared decision-making in the discharge planning process to improve both patient safety and satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayla C Jones
- Evans Center for Implementation &
Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian
& Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kirsten Austad
- Evans Center for Implementation &
Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian
& Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, Boston
University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Santana Silver
- Evans Center for Implementation &
Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian
& Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Erika G Cordova-Ramos
- Evans Center for Implementation &
Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian
& Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center, Evans Center for Implementation & Improvement Sciences
(CIIS), Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA,
USA
| | - Kathryn L Fantasia
- Evans Center for Implementation &
Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian
& Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Section of Endocrinology, Diabetes and
Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian
School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Daisy C Perez
- Department of Psychiatry, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kristen Kremer
- Department of Ambulatory Operations, Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Sophie Wilson
- Department of Quality and Patient Safety,
Boston Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allan Walkey
- Evans Center for Implementation &
Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian
& Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Section of Pulmonary, Allergy, Critical
Care and Sleep, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian
School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mari-Lynn Drainoni
- Evans Center for Implementation &
Improvement Sciences (CIIS), Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian
& Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Section of Infectious Diseases,
Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of
Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Health Law Policy &
Management, Boston University School of Public
Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Evaluating the Effectiveness of Visuospatial Memory Stimulation Using Virtual Reality in Head and Neck Cancer Patients—Pilot Study. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15061639. [PMID: 36980525 PMCID: PMC10046573 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15061639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2023] [Revised: 02/26/2023] [Accepted: 03/03/2023] [Indexed: 03/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The prevalence of Cancer-related Cognitive Impairment (CRCI) in cancer patients necessitates the search for methods to help stimulate cognitive function. An innovative and repeatedly used method in oncology departments is virtual reality (VR). To date, no one has used VR for head and neck cancer patients in an attempt to stimulate their working memory. The goal of our research is to intervene with off-the-shelf VR applications in HNC patients to lower the risk of CRCI. Twenty-two patients with head and neck cancer were enrolled in this pilot study to characterize their visuospatial memory capacity, a form of working memory. During the oncological treatment, the patient had 30 min sessions, three times a week, using publicly available applications of VR. No significant changes were observed in the pre- and post-study. The individual patient results present a favorable trend of changes in their working memory after the intervention: despite oncological treatment, visual-spatial memory did not deteriorate in 88% of patients, including 28% of patients with higher scores than before the intervention. In this pilot study, VR was safely used in patients with head and neck cancer with no negative side effects. The use of VR may prevent CRCI in most HNC patients and, in some, VR may improve their cognitive functioning. A more rigorous study with larger numbers and controls is advised.
Collapse
|
12
|
Tallet A, Rey D, Casanova C, Lecourtois D, Bergeaud M, Bendiane MK, Mancini J. Physicians’ Opinion on Intraoperative Radiotherapy as a Therapeutic De-Escalation Option in Older Women with Early Breast Cancer. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:2812-2824. [PMID: 36975427 PMCID: PMC10047225 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30030214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT) is a therapeutic de-escalation option in older women with low-risk early breast cancer (EBC). A qualitative study was implemented to describe EBC physicians’ points of view on IORT as a de-escalation option. Methods: Recorded face-to-face and telephone semi-structured interviews were conducted among diverse physicians from seven French comprehensive cancer centers. Interview transcripts were grouped as corpus to construct a typology. Thematic analysis was performed. Results: Positions toward IORT were contrasted between the 16 participating physicians. Five fully supported IORT as a de-escalation option, four were not in favor, and seven had a more reserved or neutral opinion. Points of divergence concerned treatment efficacy, treatment duration, side effects and sequelae, psychological impact, compliance with adjuvant endocrine therapy, logistical constraints, financial cost, and availability of other techniques of partial breast irradiation. Physicians in favor of IORT emphasized direct benefits for the patient, and those against pointed the lack of specific guidelines, risk of lost opportunity in older women with long life expectancy, and challenges of shared decision making. Conclusions: Despite national policies to preserve cancer patients’ quality of life and increase their participation in medical decision making, therapeutic de-escalation using IORT is not consensual among physicians. Further efforts are needed to promote patient-centered care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnès Tallet
- UNICANCER, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Department of Radiation Oncology, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Dominique Rey
- Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM, Cancer, Biomedicine & Society Group, Ligue 2019 Accredited Team, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Clémence Casanova
- Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM, Cancer, Biomedicine & Society Group, Ligue 2019 Accredited Team, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Delphine Lecourtois
- Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM, Cancer, Biomedicine & Society Group, Ligue 2019 Accredited Team, 13009 Marseille, France
| | | | - Marc-Karim Bendiane
- Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM, Cancer, Biomedicine & Society Group, Ligue 2019 Accredited Team, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Julien Mancini
- Aix-Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM, Cancer, Biomedicine & Society Group, Ligue 2019 Accredited Team, 13009 Marseille, France
- APHM, BIOSTIC, Hop Timone, 13005 Marseille, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-4-91-22-34-87
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Vogel A, Guinemer C, Fürstenau D. Patients' and healthcare professionals' perceived facilitators and barriers for shared decision-making for frail and elderly patients in perioperative care: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:197. [PMID: 36829131 PMCID: PMC9960423 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-023-09120-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Shared decision-making (SDM) in perioperative care, is an organizational approach to instituting sharing of information and decision-making around surgery. It aims at enabling patient autonomy and patient-centered care. Frail and elderly patients suffering from multiple health conditions and increased surgical vulnerability might particularly benefit from SDM. However, little is known about the facilitators and barriers to implementing SDM in perioperative care for the specific needs of frail and elderly patients. Our objective is twofold: First, we aim at collecting, analyzing, categorizing, and communicating facilitators and barriers. Second, we aim at collecting and mapping conceptual approaches and methods employed in determining and analyzing these facilitators and barriers. METHODS The search strategy focused on peer-reviewed studies. We employed a taxonomy which is based on the SPIDER framework and added the items general article information, stakeholder, barriers/facilitators, category, subcategory, and setting/contextual information. This taxonomy is based on preceding reviews. The scoping review is reported under the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Based on the databases MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science, we screened 984 articles, identified, and reviewed 13 original studies. RESULTS Within this review, two primary facilitators concerning patients' willingness to participate in SDM emerged: Patients want to be informed on their medical condition and procedures. Patients prefer sharing decisions with healthcare professionals, compared to decision-making solely by patients or decision-making solely by healthcare professionals. Communication issues and asymmetric power relationships between patients and clinical healthcare professionals are barriers to SDM. Regarding the methodological approaches, the evaluation of the conceptual approaches demonstrates that the selected articles lack employing a distinct theoretical framework. Second, the selected studies mainly used surveys and interviews, observational studies, like ethnographic or video-based studies are absent. CONCLUSION Diverging findings perceived by patients or clinical healthcare professionals were identified. These imply that SDM research related to elderly and frail patients should become more encompassing by employing research that incorporates theory-based qualitative analysis, and observational studies of SDM consultations for understanding practices by patients and clinical healthcare professionals. Observational studies are particularly relevant as these were not conducted. TRIAL REGISTRATION https://osf.io/8fjnb/.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amyn Vogel
- School of Business & Economics, Department of Information Systems, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Camille Guinemer
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniel Fürstenau
- grid.6363.00000 0001 2218 4662Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany ,grid.32190.390000 0004 0620 5453Department of Business IT, IT University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Tian Y, Zhang J, Che H, Su Y. Weaving rapport: doctors' strategies towards patients' noncompliance. BMC Health Serv Res 2023; 23:14. [PMID: 36604662 PMCID: PMC9817401 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-08947-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND A successful therapeutic rapport between doctors and patients is built on effective doctor-patient communication. Noncompliance of patients which challenges their communication has been described in the research, yet the rapport strategies are not well discussed. METHODS This qualitative study investigates the rapport strategies when doctors face noncompliance in consultations and its pragmatic effects achieved through the doctors' speeches. The 10-hour recordings come from the doctor-patient communication in the hospital setting. Thereafter, we analyze their conversation following the Spencer Oatey's rapport management model. RESULTS Compliments and joking in the illocutionary domain, storytelling in the discourse domain, the doctors' participation in the participation domain and the choice of appropriate titles in the stylistic domain are identified and analyzed as the rapport-building strategies. CONCLUSION The present study has offered insights into physicians' rapport-building strategies in the face of rapport-threatening behavior from patients. These strategies will help the doctors to deal with rapport-challenging behavior and boost overall patient wellness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinong Tian
- grid.27255.370000 0004 1761 1174School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong China
| | - Jing Zhang
- grid.27255.370000 0004 1761 1174School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong China
| | - Haiyang Che
- Orthopedics Department, Zibo Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Zibo, Shandong China
| | - Yonggang Su
- grid.27255.370000 0004 1761 1174School of Foreign Languages and Literature, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gaber CE, Shaheen NJ, Sandler RS, Edwards JK, Nichols HB, Sanoff HK, Lund JL. Patterns of care amongst older adults diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal cancer: A cohort study. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:1178-1187. [PMID: 36008272 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 08/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Since the early 2010s, neoadjuvant chemoradiation followed by esophagectomy (trimodal therapy) has been a recommended treatment for patients diagnosed with locally advanced esophageal cancer. However, it may also add treatment-related toxicity, particularly for older adults with significant comorbidity and frailty burdens. We examined contemporary patterns of care in older adults, which have not been well characterized. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-Medicare database to identify a cohort of US adults aged 66 years and older diagnosed with incident locally advanced esophageal cancer between 2004 and 2017. Calendar year age-standardized percentages of treatment receipt were calculated. Joinpoint regression was used to detect temporal trends in treatment receipt. Descriptive associations between patient factors and treatment were assessed. Trend analyses quantified how the percentage of trimodal and definitive chemoradiation (no surgery) patients receiving cisplatin-based, carboplatin-based, and other chemotherapy regimens evolved over time. RESULTS In total, 4332 adults aged ≥66 years with locally advanced esophageal cancer were included. The age-standardized percentage of patients receiving trimodal therapy increased from 16.7% in 2004 to 26.1% in 2017 (annual percent change = 3.5%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.7%-6.4%) in adenocarcinomas and from 7.3% in 2004 to 9.1% in 2017 (annual percent change = 0.4%; 95% CI, -4.1%-5.1%) in squamous cell carcinomas. By 2017, definitive chemoradiation became the most frequently used treatment modality for adenocarcinomas (49.8%; 95% CI, 43.5-56.0) and squamous cell carcinomas (59.5%; 95% CI, 50.8-68.2). Patients with higher comorbidity and frailty burdens were less likely to be treated with trimodal therapy. Amongst patients receiving chemoradiation as part of their treatment, a large and swift channeling away from cisplatin and towards carboplatin-based regimens was observed. DISCUSSION In practice, definitive chemoradiation is the most commonly received treatment by older adults with locally advanced esophageal cancer. Four out of five older adults do not receive trimodal therapy, some of whom are potentially undertreated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles E Gaber
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA.
| | - Nicholas J Shaheen
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, 21 S Columbia St, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA
| | - Robert S Sandler
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA; University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, 21 S Columbia St, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA
| | - Jessie K Edwards
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA
| | - Hazel B Nichols
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA
| | - Hanna K Sanoff
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, 21 S Columbia St, Chapel Hill, NC 27516, USA
| | - Jennifer L Lund
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Gillings School of Global Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, 135 Dauer Drive, CB #7435, Chapel Hill, NC 27599-7435, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cognitive Trajectories in Older Patients with Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy—A Prospective Observational Study. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:5164-5178. [PMID: 35877269 PMCID: PMC9317354 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29070409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2022] [Revised: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Cognitive function can be affected by cancer and/or its treatment, and older patients are at a particular risk. In a prospective observational study including patients ≥65 years referred for radiotherapy (RT), we aimed to investigate the association between patient- and cancer-related factors and cognitive function, as evaluated by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and sought to identify groups with distinct MoCA trajectories. The MoCA was performed at baseline (T0), RT completion (T1), and 8 (T2) and 16 (T3) weeks later, with scores ranging between 0 and 30 and higher scores indicating better function. Linear regression and growth mixture models were estimated to assess associations and to identify groups with distinct MoCA trajectories, respectively. Among 298 patients with a mean age of 73.6 years (SD 6.3), the baseline mean MoCA score was 24.0 (SD 3.7). Compared to Norwegian norm data, 37.9% had cognitive impairment. Compromised cognition was independently associated with older age, lower education, and physical impairments. Four groups with distinct trajectories were identified: the very poor (6.4%), poor (8.1%), fair (37.9%), and good (47.7%) groups. The MoCA trajectories were mainly stable. We conclude that cognitive impairment was frequent but, for most patients, was not affected by RT. For older patients with cancer, and in particular for those with physical impairments, we recommend an assessment of cognitive function.
Collapse
|
17
|
Niemeläinen S, Huhtala H, Jämsen E, Kössi J, Andersen J, Ehrlich A, Haukijärvi E, Koikkalainen S, Koskensalo S, Mattila A, Pinta T, Uotila-Nieminen M, Vihervaara H, Hyöty M. One-year functional outcomes of patients aged 80 years or more undergoing colonic cancer surgery: prospective, multicentre observational study. BJS Open 2022; 6:6668729. [PMID: 35973109 PMCID: PMC9380996 DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2022] [Revised: 05/31/2022] [Accepted: 06/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Older patients are at high risk of experiencing delayed functional recovery after surgical treatment. This study aimed to identify factors that predict changes in the level of support for activities of daily living and mobility 1 year after colonic cancer surgery. Methods This was a multicentre, observational study conforming to STROBE guidelines. The prospective data included pre-and postoperative mobility and need for support in daily activities, co-morbidities, onco-geriatric screening tool (G8), clinical frailty scale (CFS), operative data, and postoperative surgical outcomes. Results A total of 167 patients aged 80 years or more with colonic cancer were recruited. After surgery, 30 per cent and 22 per cent of all patients had increased need for support and decreased motility. Multivariableanalysis with all patients demonstrated that preoperative support in daily activities outside the home (OR 3.23, 95 per cent c.i. 1.06 to 9.80, P = 0.039) was associated with an increased support at follow-up. A history of cognitive impairment (3.15, 1.06 to 9.34, P = 0.038) haemoglobin less than 120 g/l (7.48, 1.97 to 28.4, P = 0.003) and discharge to other medical facilities (4.72, 1.39 to 16.0, P = 0.013) were independently associated with declined mobility. With functionally independent patients, haemoglobin less than 120 g/l (8.31, 1.76 to 39.2, P = 0.008) and discharge to other medical facilities (4.38, 1.20 to 16.0, P = 0.026) were associated with declined mobility. Conclusion Increased need for support before surgery, cognitive impairment, preoperative anaemia, and discharge to other medical facilities predicts an increased need for support or declined mobility 1 year after colonic cancer surgery. Preoperative assessment and optimization should focus on anaemia correction, nutritional status, and mobility with detailed rehabilitation plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susanna Niemeläinen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital , Tampere , Finland
| | - Heini Huhtala
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University , Tampere , Finland
| | - Esa Jämsen
- Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University , Helsinki , Finland
- Department of Surgery, Gerontology Research Center (GEREC) , Tampere , Finland
| | - Jyrki Kössi
- Department of Surgery, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital , Lahti , Finland
| | - Jan Andersen
- Department of Surgery, Vaasa Central Hospital , Vaasa , Finland
| | - Anu Ehrlich
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital , Finland
| | - Eija Haukijärvi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital , Tampere , Finland
| | | | - Selja Koskensalo
- Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University , Helsinki , Finland
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital , Finland
| | - Anne Mattila
- Department of Surgery, Central Hospital of Central Finland , Jyväskylä , Finland
| | - Tarja Pinta
- Department of Surgery, Seinäjoki Central Hospital , Seinäjoki , Finland
| | | | - Hanna Vihervaara
- Division of Digestive Surgery and Urology, Turku University Hospital , Turku , Finland
- Faculty of Medicine, Turku University , Turku , Finland
| | - Marja Hyöty
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere University Hospital , Tampere , Finland
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Toi AK, Ben Charif A, Lai C, Ngueta G, Plourde KV, Stacey D, Légaré F. Difficult Decisions for Older Canadians Receiving Home Care, and Why They Are So Difficult: A Web-Based Decisional Needs Assessment. MDM Policy Pract 2022; 7:23814683221124090. [PMID: 36132436 PMCID: PMC9483974 DOI: 10.1177/23814683221124090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
Background. Older adults receiving home care services often face
decisions related to aging, illness, and loss of autonomy. To inform tailored
shared decision making interventions, we assessed their decisional needs by
asking about the most common difficult decisions, measured associated decisional
conflict, and identified factors associated with it. Methods. In
March 2020, we conducted a cross-sectional survey with a pan-Canadian Web-based
panel of older adults (≥65 y) receiving home care services. For a difficult
decision they had faced in the past year, we evaluated clinically significant
decisional conflict (CSDC) using the 16-item Decisional Conflict Scale (score
0–100) with a >37.5 cutoff. To identify factors associated with CSDC, we
performed descriptive, bivariable, and multivariable analyses using the stepwise
selection method with an assumed entry and exit significance level of 0.15 and
0.20, respectively. Final model selection was based on the Bayesian information
criterion. Results. Among 460 participants with an average age of
72.5 y, difficult decisions were, in order of frequency, about housing and
safety (57.2%), managing health conditions (21.8%), and end-of-life care (8.3%).
CSDC was experienced by 14.6% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 11.5%, 18.1%) of
respondents on all decision points. Factors associated with CSDC included
household size = 1 (OR [95% CI]: 1.81 [0.99, 3.33]; P = 0.27),
household size = 3 (2.66 [0.78, 8.98]; P = 0.83), and household
size = 4 (6.91 [2.23, 21.39]; P = 0.014); preferred option not
matching the decision made (4.05 [2.05, 7.97]; P < 0.001);
passive role in decision making (5.13 [1.78, 14.77]; P =
0.002); and lower quality of life (0.70 [0.57, 0.87];
P<0.001). Discussion. Some older adults
receiving home care services in Canada experience CSDC when facing difficult
decisions. Shared decision-making interventions could mitigate associated
factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alfred Kodjo Toi
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Ali Ben Charif
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Claudia Lai
- Tier 1 Canada Research Chair in Shared Decision Making and Knowledge Translation, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Gérard Ngueta
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Karine V. Plourde
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| | - Dawn Stacey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Patient Decision Aids Research Group, Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - France Légaré
- VITAM–Centre de recherche en santé durable, Centre intégré universitaire de santé et de services sociaux de la Capitale-Nationale, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Research Center CHU de Québec, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
- Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université Laval, Quebec, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Høydahl Ø, Edna TH, Xanthoulis A, Lydersen S, Endreseth BH. Octogenarian patients with colon cancer - postoperative morbidity and mortality are the major challenges. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:302. [PMID: 35313841 PMCID: PMC8939202 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09384-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2021] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Few studies have addressed colon cancer surgery outcomes in an unselected cohort of octogenarian patients. The present study aimed to evaluate the relative survival of octogenarian patients after a major resection of colon cancer with a curative intent. Methods All patients diagnosed with colon cancer at Levanger Hospital between 1980 and 2016 were included. We performed logistic regression to test for associations between 90-day mortality and explanatory variables. We performed a relative survival analysis to identify factors associated with short- and long-term survival. Results Among 237 octogenarian patients treated with major resections with curative intent, the 90-day mortality was 9.3%. Among 215 patients that survived the first 90 days, the 5 year relative survival rate was 98.7%. The 90-day mortality of octogenarian patients was significantly higher than that of younger patients, but the long-term survival converged with that of younger patients. Among octogenarian patients, the incidence of colon cancer more than doubled during our 37-year observation period. The relative increase in patients undergoing surgery exceeded the increase in incidence; hence, more patients were selected for surgery over time. A high 90-day mortality was associated with older age, a high American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) score, and emergency surgery. Moreover, worse long-term survival was associated with a high Charlson Comorbidity Index, a high ASA score, a worse TNM stage, emergency surgery and residual tumours. Both the 90-day and long-term survival rates improved over time. Conclusion Among octogenarian patients with colon cancer that underwent major resections with curative intent, the 90-day mortality was high, but after surviving 90 days, the relative long-term survival rate was comparable to that of younger patients. Further improvements in survival will primarily require measures to reduce the 90-day mortality risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Øystein Høydahl
- Department of Surgery, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway. .,IKOM Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
| | - Tom-Harald Edna
- Department of Surgery, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway.,IKOM Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Athanasios Xanthoulis
- Department of Surgery, Levanger Hospital, Nord-Trøndelag Hospital Trust, Levanger, Norway.,IKOM Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Stian Lydersen
- Regional Centre for Child and Youth Mental Health and Child Welfare - Central Norway, Department of Mental Health, Faculty of Medicine, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Birger Henning Endreseth
- IKOM Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Clinic of Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Seghers PAL(N, Kregting JA, van Huis-Tanja LH, Soubeyran P, O’Hanlon S, Rostoft S, Hamaker ME, Portielje JEA. What Defines Quality of Life for Older Patients Diagnosed with Cancer? A Qualitative Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051123. [PMID: 35267431 PMCID: PMC8909907 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/16/2022] [Accepted: 02/18/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Quality of life has a different meaning for every individual. In older patients with cancer, quality of life is important because anti-cancer treatment may influence their quality of life. In order to assess the aspects of quality of life that matter most to older patients with cancer, we interviewed 63 patients. We used both open-ended questions and asked them to select the most important items from a predefined list: cognition, contact with family or with community, independence, staying in your own home, helping others, having enough energy, emotional well-being, life satisfaction, religion and leisure activities. Physical functioning, social functioning, physical health and cognition are important components of quality of life. In conclusion, maintaining cognition and independence, staying in one’s own home, and maintaining contact with family and community appear to be the most important aspects of quality of life for older patients with cancer. These aspects should be included when making a shared treatment decision. Abstract The treatment of cancer can have a significant impact on quality of life in older patients and this needs to be taken into account in decision making. However, quality of life can consist of many different components with varying importance between individuals. We set out to assess how older patients with cancer define quality of life and the components that are most significant to them. This was a single-centre, qualitative interview study. Patients aged 70 years or older with cancer were asked to answer open-ended questions: What makes life worthwhile? What does quality of life mean to you? What could affect your quality of life? Subsequently, they were asked to choose the five most important determinants of quality of life from a predefined list: cognition, contact with family or with community, independence, staying in your own home, helping others, having enough energy, emotional well-being, life satisfaction, religion and leisure activities. Afterwards, answers to the open-ended questions were independently categorized by two authors. The proportion of patients mentioning each category in the open-ended questions were compared to the predefined questions. Overall, 63 patients (median age 76 years) were included. When asked, “What makes life worthwhile?”, patients identified social functioning (86%) most frequently. Moreover, to define quality of life, patients most frequently mentioned categories in the domains of physical functioning (70%) and physical health (48%). Maintaining cognition was mentioned in 17% of the open-ended questions and it was the most commonly chosen option from the list of determinants (72% of respondents). In conclusion, physical functioning, social functioning, physical health and cognition are important components in quality of life. When discussing treatment options, the impact of treatment on these aspects should be taken into consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jolina A. Kregting
- Department of Internal Medicine, Canisius Wilhelmina Ziekenhuis, 6532 SZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands;
| | | | - Pierre Soubeyran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Université de Bordeaux, 33076 Bordeaux, France;
| | - Shane O’Hanlon
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, St Vincent’s University Hospital, D04 T6F4 Dublin, Ireland;
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Siri Rostoft
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, 0424 Oslo, Norway;
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, 0318 Oslo, Norway
| | - Marije E. Hamaker
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Diakonessenhuis, 3582 KE Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Correspondence: (P.A.L.S.); (M.E.H.)
| | - Johanneke E. A. Portielje
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center-LUMC, 2333 ZA Leiden, The Netherlands;
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
The Role of Shared Decision-Making in Personalised Medicine: Opening the Debate. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2022; 15:ph15020215. [PMID: 35215327 PMCID: PMC8880233 DOI: 10.3390/ph15020215] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Revised: 02/02/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgeons and cancer patients are starting to open the debate on how personalised medicine could use shared decision-making (SDM) to balance the personal and clinical components and thus improve the quality and value of care. Personalised precision medicine (PPM) has traditionally focused on the use of genomic information when prescribing treatments, which are usually pharmaceutical. However, the knowledge base is considerably scarcer in terms of how clinicians can individualise the information they provide patients about the consequences of different treatments, and in doing so involve them in the decision-making process. To achieve this, the ethical implications of SDM must be addressed from both sides. This paper explores the medical characteristics, the SDM implications in severe and fragile patients, potential risks, and observed benefits within this healthcare approach through four clinical cases. Findings shed light on current needs for clinician and patient training and tools related to SDM in PPM, and also remarks on the way in which this shift in healthcare settings is taking place to include the human component together with the biological and technological advances when designing care processes in colorectal cancer.
Collapse
|
22
|
“You have to be sure that the patient has the full picture”: Adaptation of the Best Case/Worst Case communication tool for geriatric oncology. J Geriatr Oncol 2022; 13:606-613. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
23
|
Chen C, Feng Z, Fu Q, Wang J, Zheng Z, Chen H, Feng D. Predictors of Polypharmacy Among Elderly Patients in China: The Role of Decision Involvement, Depression, and Taking Chinese Medicine Behavior. Front Pharmacol 2021; 12:745688. [PMID: 34938179 PMCID: PMC8685318 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2021.745688] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: The prevalence of polypharmacy is gradually increasing in geriatrics, which may contribute to adverse effects, such as potential drug-drug and drug-disease interactions. These side effects remain an important challenge in patient safety, which has a significant impact on mortality and incidence rate. Aims: Therefore, this study aims to understand the epidemiology of polypharmacy and identify factors that have an impact on the management of potentially inappropriate prescribing. Methods: This study is a cross-sectional study, analyzing the prescription data from 720 hospitalized patients aged 50+ with a random cluster sampling method. We used inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) method to group and match polypharmacy and non-polypharmacy patients, and logistic regression was conducted to explore the factors associated with polypharmacy. Results: The prevalence of polypharmacy accounted for 50.14% among the old patients in this study. Female patients (67.34%) have more polypharmacy than male patients, and key predictors associated with polypharmacy in the logistic regression model included the following: domicile (AOR = 0.63, 95% CI 0.42-0.95), annual income (AOR = 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.70), the number of chronic diseases (AOR = 3.68, 95% CI 2.69-5.06), taking Chinese medicine (AOR = 1.70, 95% CI 1.22-2.36), decision involvement (AOR = 1.49 95% CI 1.10-2.03), and depression (AOR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.03-1.96). Conclusion: Polypharmacy is common among the participants with chronic diseases in Hubei province, China. The study emphasizes that gerontology practitioners should be prudent in applying clinical guidelines to provide personalized, comprehensive assessment of decision making of prescriptions, especially in socioeconomically deprived areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chaoyi Chen
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zhanchun Feng
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qian Fu
- School of Medicine and Health Management, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jia Wang
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Zehao Zheng
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Hao Chen
- Second People's Hospital of Yichang City, Yichang, China
| | - Da Feng
- School of Pharmacy, Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Tuch G, Soo WK, Luo KY, Frearson K, Oh EL, Phillips JL, Agar M, Lane H. Cognitive Assessment Tools Recommended in Geriatric Oncology Guidelines: A Rapid Review. Curr Oncol 2021; 28:3987-4003. [PMID: 34677257 PMCID: PMC8534877 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol28050339] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Cognitive assessment is a cornerstone of geriatric care. Cognitive impairment has the potential to significantly impact multiple phases of a person's cancer care experience. Accurately identifying this vulnerability is a challenge for many cancer care clinicians, thus the use of validated cognitive assessment tools are recommended. As international cancer guidelines for older adults recommend Geriatric Assessment (GA) which includes an evaluation of cognition, clinicians need to be familiar with the overall interpretation of the commonly used cognitive assessment tools. This rapid review investigated the cognitive assessment tools that were most frequently recommended by Geriatric Oncology guidelines: Blessed Orientation-Memory-Concentration test (BOMC), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Mini-Cog, Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE), Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire (SPMSQ). A detailed appraisal of the strengths and limitations of each tool was conducted, with a focus on practical aspects of implementing cognitive assessment tools into real-world clinical settings. Finally, recommendations on choosing an assessment tool and the additional considerations beyond screening are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Tuch
- Department of Geriatric Medicine, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Wee Kheng Soo
- Eastern Health Clinical School, Monash University, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia;
- Cancer Services, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
- Aged Medicine Program, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
| | - Ki-Yung Luo
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia; (K.-Y.L.); (K.F.); (E.L.O.); (H.L.)
| | - Kinglsey Frearson
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia; (K.-Y.L.); (K.F.); (E.L.O.); (H.L.)
| | - Ek Leone Oh
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia; (K.-Y.L.); (K.F.); (E.L.O.); (H.L.)
| | - Jane L. Phillips
- Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane City, QLD 4000, Australia;
| | - Meera Agar
- University of Technology Sydney, Ultimo, NSW 2007, Australia;
| | - Heather Lane
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Nedlands, WA 6009, Australia; (K.-Y.L.); (K.F.); (E.L.O.); (H.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rodday AM, Hahn T, Kumar AJ, Lindenauer PK, Friedberg JW, Evens AM, Parsons SK. Association of Treatment Intensity With Survival in Older Patients With Hodgkin Lymphoma. JAMA Netw Open 2021; 4:e2128373. [PMID: 34673965 PMCID: PMC8531990 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Hodgkin lymphoma is an aggressive blood cancer that is highly curable in younger patients who receive multiagent chemotherapy. Worse survival in older patients may reflect less-aggressive treatment, competing risks of death, or different disease biological factors. OBJECTIVE To examine the association between treatment intensity and cause-specific mortality among older adults with Hodgkin lymphoma. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a population-based cohort study of patients aged 65 years or older with Medicare Part A and B fee-for-service coverage who received a diagnosis of Hodgkin lymphoma from 2000 to 2013. The association between treatment intensity and cause-specific mortality was estimated separately for early-stage and advanced-stage disease with Cox proportional hazards models. Multivariable adjustment and propensity score weighting helped control for confounding. Data are from the 1999 to 2016 Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare database. Data analysis was performed from April 2020 to June 2021. EXPOSURES First-line treatment categorized as (1) full chemotherapy regimen, (2) partial chemotherapy regimen, (3) single chemotherapy agent or radiotherapy, or (4) no treatment. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The main outcome was 3-year Hodgkin lymphoma-specific and other-cause mortality. RESULTS Among 2686 patients (mean [SD] age, 75.7 [6.9] years; 1333 men [50%]), 1307 had early-stage disease and 1379 had advanced-stage disease. For Hodgkin lymphoma-specific mortality in patients with early-stage disease, hazard ratios (HRs) were higher for partial regimens (HR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.22-2.57) or no treatment (HR, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.31-2.79) than for full regimens; there was no difference between single-agent chemotherapy or radiotherapy and full regimens. For other-cause mortality in patients with early-stage disease, HRs were higher for partial regimens (HR, 1.69; 95% CI, 1.18-2.44), single-agent chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.13-2.33), or no treatment (HR, 2.71; 95% CI, 1.95-3.78) than for full regimens. For Hodgkin lymphoma-specific mortality in patients with advanced-stage disease, HRs were higher for partial regimens (HR, 3.26; 95% CI, 2.44-4.35), single-agent chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR, 2.85; 95% CI, 1.98-4.11), or no treatment (HR, 4.06; 95% CI, 3.06-5.37) than for full regimens. For other-cause mortality in patients with advanced-stage disease, HRs were higher for partial regimens (HR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.32-2.33), single-agent chemotherapy or radiotherapy (HR, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.15-2.37), or no treatment (HR, 2.24; 95% CI, 1.71-2.94) than for full regimens. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE This cohort study found variability in the magnitude of the association between treatment intensity and mortality by stage and cause-specific mortality, possibly reflecting competing risks of death. However, full chemotherapy regimens were associated with lower mortality and could be considered for older adults who can tolerate them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angie Mae Rodday
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Theresa Hahn
- Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
| | - Anita J. Kumar
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Peter K. Lindenauer
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery and Population Science, University of Massachusetts Medical School Baystate, Springfield
| | | | | | - Susan K. Parsons
- Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Palumbo I, Borghesi S, Gregucci F, Falivene S, Fontana A, Aristei C, Ciabattoni A. Omission of adjuvant radiotherapy for older adults with early-stage breast cancer particularly in the COVID era: A literature review (on the behalf of Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology). J Geriatr Oncol 2021; 12:1130-1135. [PMID: 34020908 PMCID: PMC8131185 DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
This review is aimed at evaluating whether radiation therapy (RT) can be omitted in older adult early-stage low-risk breast cancer (BC) patients. The published data are particularly relevant at present, during the COVID-19 pandemic emergency, to define a treatment strategy and to prioritize essential therapy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and PubMED were systematically researched from outset through April 2020 using Mesh terms. Only randomized controlled trials (RCT), with one arm without adjuvant whole-breast irradiation (WBI), were included in the analysis. Recent literature regarding the COVID pandemic and BC RT was assessed. The reported RCTs identified a group of BC patients (pT1-2N0M0 R0, grade 1-2, estrogen receptor (ER) positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative tumours) in which the absolute risk of local recurrence (LR) was considered low enough to omit RT. The most common risk factors were tumor diameter, nodal and receptor status. Adjuvant RT had a significant impact on LR but not on distant metastasis (DM) or death. During the COVID 19 pandemic, results from RTCs were re-considered to define treatment recommendations for BC patients. International scientific societies and radiation oncology experts suggested RT omission, whenever possible, in older adult early-stage BC patients. Adjuvant RT might be omitted in a highly selected group of older adult early-stage BC patients with favourable prognostic factors. Hypofractionated regimens should be the standard. RT omission, partial breast irradiation (PBI), and ultra- hypofractionated regimens could be considered in selected cases due to the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabella Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Radiation Oncology Department, Arezzo-Valdarno, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Arezzo, Italy
| | - Fabiana Gregucci
- Radiation Oncology Division, Miulli-Felli Hospital, Acquaviva delle Fonti, Bari, Italy
| | - Sara Falivene
- Radiation Oncology Division, Ospedale del Mare, Asl Napoli 1 centro, Napoli, Italy
| | - Antonella Fontana
- Radiation Oncology Division, Santa Maria Goretti Hospital, Latina, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy,Corresponding author at: Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia General Hospital, Sant'Andrea delle Fratte, 06156 Perugia, Italy
| | - Antonella Ciabattoni
- Radiation Oncology Division, San Filippo Neri, Hospital, ASL Roma 1, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tuch G, Sanapala C, Mohile SG, Duberstein PR, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Xu H, Culakova E, Flannery M, Yousefi-Nooraie R, Epstein RM, McHugh C, Aarne V, Kim H, Geer J, O'Rourke MA, Vogelzang NJ, Loh KP. Association Between Caregiver-Oncologist Discordance in Patient's Life Expectancy Estimates and Caregiver Perceived Autonomy Support by the Oncologist. Oncologist 2021; 26:e1992-e2001. [PMID: 34309111 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Caregiver perceived autonomy support by the oncologist is important for caregiver well-being and may be affected by the patient's survival. We determined the association of caregiver-oncologist discordance in patient's life expectancy estimates with perceived autonomy support over time and whether the association differed by patient survival status. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used data from a geriatric assessment cluster-randomized trial (URCC 13070) that recruited patients aged at least 70 years with incurable cancer considering or receiving treatment, their caregivers, and their oncologists. At baseline, caregivers and oncologists were asked to estimate patient's life expectancy (0-6 months, 7-12 months, 1-2 years, 2-5 years, and >5 years; any difference in response was considered discordant). At 4-6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months, caregivers completed the Health Care Climate Questionnaire (HCCQ), which measured perceived autonomy support by the oncologist. Generalized estimating equation modeling was conducted to assess the association of baseline caregiver-oncologist discordance with longitudinal HCCQ scores, stratified by patient 6-month survival status. RESULTS Discordant life expectancy estimates were present in 72.0% of dyads. In multivariate analyses, caregiver-oncologist discordance in patient's life expectancy estimates was associated with higher caregiver HCCQ scores. In stratified analysis, caregiver-oncologist discordance was associated with lower caregiver HCCQ scores (β = -3.46; 95% CI, -4.64 to -2.29) among patients who died within 6 months but with higher caregiver HCCQ scores (β = 1.33; 95% CI, 0.63-2.04) among patients who survived beyond 6 months. CONCLUSION Interventions aimed at mitigating discordance need to consider its association with caregiver perceived autonomy support and patient's survival in order to better inform caregiver expectations. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Among patients who died within the first 6 months, caregivers who estimated a different length of life for the patient compared with oncologists were more likely to report lower support from the oncologist, whereas the opposite relationship was seen within patients who survived beyond the first 6 months. When designing interventions to improve caregiver understanding of the patient's prognosis, its relationship with caregiver-perceived support and patient's survival needs to be considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gina Tuch
- Department of Aged Care, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Chandrika Sanapala
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Supriya G Mohile
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Paul R Duberstein
- Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Medicas y Nutricion Salvador Zubiran, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Huiwen Xu
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Eva Culakova
- Department of Surgery, Cancer Control, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Marie Flannery
- School of Nursing, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Reza Yousefi-Nooraie
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Ronald M Epstein
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA.,Department of Medicine, Palliative Care, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Colin McHugh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Valerie Aarne
- SCOREboard Advisory Group, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Hannah Kim
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| | - Jodi Geer
- Metro Minnesota Community Oncology Research Program, St. Louis Park, Minnesota, USA
| | - Mark A O'Rourke
- National Cancer Institute Community Oncology Research Program (NCORP) of the Carolinas (Greenville Health System NCORP), Greenville, South Carolina, USA
| | | | - Kah Poh Loh
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, James P Wilmot Cancer Institute, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
DuMontier C, Loh KP, Soto-Perez-de-Celis E, Dale W. Decision Making in Older Adults With Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2021; 39:2164-2174. [PMID: 34043434 PMCID: PMC8260915 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.00165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2021] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Clark DuMontier
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Hebrew SeniorLife, Boston, MA
| | - Kah Poh Loh
- James P. Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Enrique Soto-Perez-de-Celis
- Department of Geriatrics, Instituto Nacional de Ciencias Médicas y Nutrición Salvador Zubirán, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - William Dale
- City of Hope Comprehensive Cancer Center, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|