Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) plus ribavirin with or without amantadine in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1 infection

Infectious Disease Transmission in Solid Organ Transplantation: Donor Evaluation, Recipient Risk, and Outcomes of Transmission

In 2016, the Transplantation Society of Australia and New Zealand, with the support of the Australian Government Organ and Tissue authority, commissioned a literature review on the topic of infectious disease transmission from deceased donors to recipients of solid organ transplants. The purpose of this review was to synthesize evidence on transmission risks, diagnostic test characteristics, and recipient management to inform best-practice clinical guidelines. The final review, presented as a special supplement in Transplantation Direct, collates case reports of transmission events and other peer-reviewed literature, and summarizes current (as of June 2017) international guidelines on donor screening and recipient management. Of particular interest at the time of writing was how to maximize utilization of donors at increased risk for transmission of human immunodeficiency virus, hepatitis C virus, and hepatitis B virus, given the recent developments, including the availability of direct-acting antivirals for hepatitis C virus and improvements in donor screening technologies. The review also covers emerging risks associated with recent epidemics (eg, Zika virus) and the risk of transmission of nonendemic pathogens related to donor travel history or country of origin. Lastly, the implications for recipient consent of expanded utilization of donors at increased risk of blood-borne viral disease transmission are considered.

Impact of Donor and Recipient Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms in Living Liver Donor Transplantation for Hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION

Recently, several studies have shown that specific single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) affect liver fibrosis progression in patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. In this study, we examined the impact of donor and recipient SNPs on the progression of fibrosis after liver transplantation for HCV infection.

METHODS

This cohort study enrolled 43 patients with HCV infection who underwent liver transplantation at our hospital. We evaluated 5 genotypes (rs4374383, rs2629751, rs9380516, rs8099917, and rs738409) that have been reported to be significant predictors of fibrosis in HCV infection using a Taqman assay.

RESULTS

Liver fibrosis (stage ≥ F1, New Inuyama classification) was detected at 1 year after liver transplantation in 30 cases (70%). The rs2629751 non-AA-genotype was found to be significantly associated with fibrosis progression at 1 year after liver transplantation (AA:GG or GA = 46%:88%, P < .05). The primary outcome was stage ≥F2 (portoportal septa) or liver-related mortality in 22 patients. The time to stage ≥F2 fibrosis or liver-related mortality was significantly different only in terms of the donor rs2629751 genotype (AA:GG or GA = 5.5 ± 0.6 years:3.6 ± 0.7 years, P = .025).

CONCLUSIONS

The rs2629751 genotype may be an important predictor of posttransplant outcome in HCV-infected patients. This result might be useful in donor selection for liver transplantation in HCV-infected patients and may guide therapeutic decisions regarding early antiviral treatment.

Personalized Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis C and B Dually Infected Patients With Pegylated Interferon Plus Ribavirin: A Randomized Study

We aimed to investigate whether response-guided therapy (RGT) with peginterferon-alpha plus ribavirin by using hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype, pretreatment HCV RNA levels, and rapid virological response (RVR, undetectable HCV RNA at treatment week 4) could be applied for active HCV/hepatitis B virus (HBV) dually infected patients, without compromised the treatment efficacy.A total of 203 patients, seropositive of HCV antibody, HCV RNA and HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), and seronegative for HBV e antigen for >6 months, were randomized to receive peginterferon-alpha/ribavirin by either genotype-guided therapy (GGT, n = 102: HCV genotype 1 [HCV-1], 48 weeks; HCV-2/3, 24 weeks) or RGT (n = 101: HCV-1, 48 or 24 weeks if patients with baseline VL <400,000 IU/mL and RVR; HCV-2/3, 24 or 16 weeks if patients with RVR). The primary endpoint was HCV-sustained virological response (SVR).The HCV SVR rate was comparable between the GGT (77.5%, 79/102) and RGT groups (70.3%, 71/101, P = 0.267), either among HCV-1/HBV (69.4% [43/62] vs 63.5% [40/63], P = 0.571) or among HCV-2/3/HBV (90.0% [36/40] vs 81.6% [31/38], P = 0.342) dually infected patients based on intention-to-treat analysis. In HCV-1/HBV dually infected patients, RVR (odds ratio [OR]: 6.05; 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 2.148-17.025, P = 0.001) and lower pretreatment blood glucose levels (OR: 0.97; CI: 0.944-0.989, P = 0.003) were independent predictors of HCV SVR. Although RVR (OR: 10.68; CI: 1.948-58.514, P = 0.006) was the only significant factor associated with HCV SVR in HCV-2/3/HBV dually infected patients. HBsAg loss at 1 year posttreatment was observed in 17 of 185 (9.2%) patients. The rates of discontinuation and adverse events were similar between the 2 groups.RGT with peginterferon-alpha/RBV may be considered for HBeAg-negative HBV/HCV dually infected patients.

An interferon-free antiviral regimen for HCV after liver transplantation

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the leading indication for liver transplantation worldwide, and interferon-containing regimens are associated with low response rates owing to treatment-limiting toxic effects in immunosuppressed liver-transplant recipients. We evaluated the interferon-free regimen of the NS5A inhibitor ombitasvir coformulated with the ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor ABT-450 (ABT-450/r), the nonnucleoside NS5B polymerase inhibitor dasabuvir, and ribavirin in liver-transplant recipients with recurrent HCV genotype 1 infection.

METHODS

We enrolled 34 liver-transplant recipients with no fibrosis or mild fibrosis, who received ombitasvir-ABT-450/r (at a once-daily dose of 25 mg of ombitasvir, 150 mg of ABT-450, and 100 mg of ritonavir), dasabuvir (250 mg twice daily), and ribavirin for 24 weeks. Selection of the initial ribavirin dose and subsequent dose modifications for anemia were at the investigator's discretion. The primary efficacy end point was a sustained virologic response 12 weeks after the end of treatment.

RESULTS

Of the 34 study participants, 33 had a sustained virologic response at post-treatment weeks 12 and 24, for a rate of 97% (95% confidence interval, 85 to 100). The most common adverse events were fatigue, headache, and cough. Five patients (15%) required erythropoietin; no patient required blood transfusion. One patient discontinued the study drugs owing to adverse events after week 18 but had a sustained virologic response. Blood levels of calcineurin inhibitors were monitored, and dosages were modified to maintain therapeutic levels; no episode of graft rejection was observed during the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with the multitargeted regimen of ombitasvir-ABT-450/r and dasabuvir with ribavirin was associated with a low rate of serious adverse events and a high rate of sustained virologic response among liver-transplant recipients with recurrent HCV genotype 1 infection, a historically difficult-to-treat population. (Funded by AbbVie; CORAL-I ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01782495.).

Aminoadamantanes for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Around 3% of the world's population (approximately 160 million people) are chronically infected with hepatitis C virus. The proportion of infected people who develop clinical symptoms varies between 5% and 40%. Combination therapy with pegylated interferon-alpha plus ribavirin eradicates the virus from the blood six months after treatment (sustained virological response) in approximately 40% to 80% of infected patients, depending on the viral genotype. New antiviral agents, such as boceprevir and telaprevir, in combination with standard therapy, can increase sustained virological response in genotype 1 infected patients to at least 70%. There is therefore an unmet need for drugs that can achieve a higher proportion of sustained virological response. Aminoadamantanes are antiviral drugs used for treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of aminoadamantanes for patients with chronic hepatitis C infection by conducting a systematic review with meta-analyses of randomised clinical trials, as well as trial sequential analyses.

SEARCH METHODS

We conducted electronic searches of the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register (1996 to December 2013), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) 2013, Issue 11 of 12 (1995 to December 2013), MEDLINE (1946 to December 2013), EMBASE (1974 to December 2013), Science Citation Index EXPANDED (1900 to December 2013), the WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (www.who.int/ictrp), Google Scholar, and Eudrapharm up to December 2013 and checked the reference lists of identified publications.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials assessing aminoadamantanes in patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently extracted data. We assessed for risks of systematic errors ('bias') using the 'Risk of bias' tool. We analysed dichotomous data with risk ratio (RR) and continuous data with mean difference (MD) or standardised mean difference (SMD), both with 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used trial sequential analysis to assess the risk of random errors ('play of chance'). We assessed quality using the GRADE system.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 41 randomised clinical trials with 6193 patients with chronic hepatitis C. All trials had high risk of bias. All included trials compared amantadine versus placebo or no intervention. Standard antiviral therapy was administered equally to the intervention and the control groups in 40 trials. The standard antiviral therapy, which was administered to both intervention groups, was interferon-alpha, interferon-alpha plus ribavirin, and peg interferon-alpha plus ribavirin, depending on the time when the trial was conducted.When we meta-analysed all trials together, the overall results demonstrated no significant effects of amantadine, when compared with placebo or no intervention, on our all-cause mortality or liver-related morbidity composite outcome (5/2353 (0.2%) versus 6/2264 (0.3%); RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.17; I² = 0%; 32 trials; very low quality). There was also no significant effect on adverse events (288/2869 (10%) versus 293/2777 (11%); RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.14; I² = 0%; 35 trials; moderate quality). We used both fixed-effect and random-effects meta-analyses. Amantadine, when compared with placebo or no intervention, did not significantly influence the number of patients who failed to achieve a sustained virological response (1821/2861 (64%) versus 1737/2721 (64%); RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.02; I² = 35%; 35 trials; moderate quality). However, in the subgroup using interferon plus ribavirin, amantadine decreased the number of patients who failed to achieve a sustained virological response (422/666 (63%) versus 447/628 (71%); RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.96; I² = 41%; 11 trials; low quality). Similar results were found for failure to achieve an end of treatment virological response. Amantadine, when compared with placebo or no intervention, significantly decreased the number of patients without normalisation of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) serum levels at the end of treatment (671/1141 (59%) versus 732/1100 (67%); RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.83 to 0.94; I² = 47%; 19 trials; low quality). Amantadine, when compared with placebo or no intervention, did not significantly influence the end of follow-up biochemical response (1133/1896 (60%) versus 1151/1848 (62%); RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91 to 1.00; I² = 49%; 21 trials; low quality).The observed beneficial effects could be true effects but could also be due to both systematic errors (bias) and random errors (play of chance). The latter is due to the fact that trial sequential analyses could not confirm or refute our findings. We were not able to perform meta-analyses for failure of histological improvement or quality of life due to a lack of valid data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

This systematic review does not demonstrate any significant effects of amantadine on all-cause mortality or liver-related morbidity composite outcome and on adverse events in patients with hepatitis C; however, the median trial duration was 12 months, with a median follow-up of six months, which is not long enough to assess the composite outcome sufficiently. Overall, we did not see an effect of amantadine on failure to achieve a sustained virological response. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the combination of amantadine plus interferon-alpha and ribavirin seems to increase the number of patients achieving a sustained virological response. This finding may be caused by both systematic errors (bias) and risks of random errors (play of chance), but it could also be real. Based on the results of the overall evidence, it appears less likely that future trials assessing amantadine for patients with chronic hepatitis C will show strong benefits. Therefore, it is probably advisable to wait for the results of trials assessing other direct-acting antiviral drugs. In the absence of convincing evidence of benefit, the use of amantadine is justified in the context of randomised clinical trials assessing the effects of combination therapy. We found a lack of evidence on other aminoadamantanes than amantadine.

SVR12 is higher than SVR24 in treatment-naïve hepatitis C genotype 1 patients treated with peginterferon plus ribavirin

BACKGROUND

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of interventions for the hepatitis C virus have historically used sustained virological response (SVR) at 24 weeks after treatment (SVR24) as the key effect measure. However, recent RCTs investigating the efficacy of new direct acting agents (DAAs) have used SVR at 12 weeks after treatment (SVR12). While there is evidence to suggest SVR24 and SVR12 are similar in patients receiving new DAAs, this is unlikely to be true for patients receiving backbone peginterferon-ribavirin control treatment. Establishing the difference between SVR12 and SVR24 for patients receiving peginterferon-ribavirin treatment is therefore necessary to avoid biased interpretations of the benefits of newer DAAs.

METHODS

We searched the MEDLINE®, Embase™, and Cochrane CENTRAL for RCTs with a peginterferon-ribavirin arm that used SVR24 and/or SVR12. As no RCTs reported on both, we pooled SVR12 and SVR24 proportions using conventional meta-analysis. Proportions were pooled separately for peginterferon alpha-2a and alpha-2b. Further, a Bayesian meta-regression model was employed to estimate the difference between SVR12 and SVR24.

RESULTS

Thirty-five RCTs including a peginterferon arm were identified. Twenty-four trials included a peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin arms, of which 20 reported SVR24 and five reported SVR12. Seventeen trials included a peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin arm, of which 16 reported SVR24 and one reported SVR12. Using Bayesian meta-regression, the pooled SVR12 was 6% higher than SVR24 with peginterferon alpha-2a (53% versus 47%) and 5% higher with peginterferon alpha-2b (45% versus 40%) and 95% credible intervals (CrIs) were only marginally overlapping. The meta-regression also demonstrated a marginally significant relative risk of 1.13 (95% CrI 0.99-1.26) of SVR12 versus SVR24. The conventional pairwise meta-analyses were consistent with these findings.

CONCLUSION

Considering the relatively large difference observed between SVR12 and SVR24, it seems reasonable to insist that future clinical trials report both to allow for complete transparency and clarity in their interpretation.

Polymorphisms of interferon-λ4 and IL28B - effects on treatment response to interferon/ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

The IL28B genotype in rs12979860 predicts success of peginterferon/ribavirin (PEG/RBV) therapy in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Recently, a dinucleotide frame shift variant in ss469415590 (TT or ΔG) was described, which generates the novel interferon lambda 4 protein (IFNL4). IFNL4 ss469415590 (ΔG) allele carriers have an impaired clearance of HCV infection and response to IFN-α therapy. In this study, we compared the role of IFNL4 polymorphism with the two commonly used IL28B SNPs rs12979860 and rs8099917 on response to PEG/RBV in patients with CHC.

AIM

To compare the role of IFNL4 polymorphism with the two commonly used IL28B SNPs rs12979860 and rs8099917 on response to PEG/RBV in patients with CHC.

METHODS

A total of 754 PEG/RBV patients treated (male/female = 484/270; Caucasians: 98.8%; mean age: 42.8 [CI 95%: 42.0-43.6] y; genotype (GT)1: n = 435, GT2: n = 23, GT3: n = 185, GT4: n = 114) were investigated. Liver fibrosis was assessed by liver biopsy in 456 patients. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in ss469415590, rs12979860 and rs8099917 were analysed by RT-PCR system.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 12.9% (n = 97) had the ss469415590 ΔG/ΔG genotype (IFNL4), 51.3% (n = 387) were heterozygous (TT/ΔG) and 35.8% (n = 270) had TT/TT. IFNL4 polymorphism was independently associated with SVR in GT1 (OR: 2.539, CI 95%: 1.629-3.021, P < 0.001) and GT4 (OR: 12.573, CI 95%: 3.427-46.133, P < 0.001), but not in GT3 (OR: 1.514, CI 95%: 0.933-2.458, P = 0.093). IFNL4 correlated strongly with rs12979860 (ρ = 0.988, P < 0.001), but only moderately with rs8099917 (ρ = 0.598, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings underscore the role of IFNL4 for treatment response in patients with CHC genotypes 1 and 4. However, due to its strong correlation with rs12979860 in IL28B, there is no benefit in additional testing for IFNL4 for treatment prediction in Caucasian patients. By contrast, IFNL4 improves prediction of response to interferon-based therapies, if SNP rs8099917 is used.

Effect of gender and ITPA polymorphisms on ribavirin-induced anemia in chronic hepatitis C patients

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the inosine triphosphate pyrophosphatase (ITPA) gene protect patients from ribavirin induced anemia. To investigate other possible protective cofactors, gender differences were analyzed in patients with HCV genotype 1.

METHODS

Hemoglobin levels at baseline (Hb0) and the decline after 4 weeks of treatment (HbΔ4) were analyzed in 308 chronic hepatitis C patients participating in 5 Austrian trials (n=308, age 43.9 ± 11.1, male:185, female:123, BMI 25.3 ± 3.9, no cirrhosis: n=259, liver cirrhosis: n=49). All patients were treated with 180 μg peginterferon-alpha 2a and ribavirin [1000-1200 mg/d; females: mean (95% CI) 15.8 mg/kg (15.4-16.2); males 14.3 (14.1-14.5); p<0.001]. The SNPs rs6051702, rs1127354, rs7270101 and IL28B rs12979860 were analyzed by the StepOnePlus Real time PCR System.

RESULTS

188 were major alleles homozygotes; 95 (30.8%) carried the minor allele (C) of rs6051702, 47 (15.3%) of rs1127354 (A), and 69 (22.4%) of rs7270101 (C). The overall Hb0 was 14.8 g/dl (14.6-14.9) [mean (95%CI); females 13.7 (13.5-13.9); males 15.5; 15.3-15.6; p<0.001]. The overall HbΔ4 was greater in major allele homozygotes [2.8 g/dl (2.6-3.0)] than in minor allele carriers [1.6 (1.4-1.9); p<0.001]. Irrespective of the ITPA genotypes HbΔ4 was smaller in female [2.0 (1.7-2.2)] than in male patients [2.6 (2.4-2.8); p<0.001] and among females in premenopausal [1.5 (1.3-1.8)] than in postmenopausal patients [2.7 (2.3-3.1); p<0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

Irrespective of the protective effect of ITPA mutations, premenopausal females less likely develop ribavirin induced anemia.

Meta-analysis: mortality and serious adverse events of peginterferon plus ribavirin therapy for chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND

Pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) therapy is the current standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C. Determining precisely the risk of serious adverse events (SAEs) and mortality from a single study is rather difficult because of the infrequency of such events. The aim of this systematic review was to assess the rates of SAEs and the mortality of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy in a pooled large sample, and to assess the relationship between SAEs and mortality rates and therapeutic characteristics.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted using MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library to identify randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy and safety of PEG-IFN/RBV therapy. We calculated the crude mortality and SAE rates with 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

Eighty studies with 153 treatment arms that included 27569 patients were enrolled (14401 patients treated with Peg-IFN alpha-2a/RBV and 13168 with Peg-IFN alpha-2b/RBV). All-cause and treatment-related deaths were observed in 50 (0.18%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-0.24%) and sixteen (0.058%; 95% CI 0.033-0.094%) patients, respectively. The crude SAE rate was 7.08% (95% CI 6.75-7.41%). Subgroup analysis revealed higher SAE rates in patients receiving PEG-IFN alpha-2a than in those with PEG-IFN alpha-2b (7.45 vs. 6.74%), and higher SAE rates with higher doses than with the lower doses in PEG-IFN-2a and 2b (11.94 vs. 6.99%, 7.10 vs. 5.05%, respectively), and with extended duration (> 48 weeks) than with standard duration (48 weeks) (15.5 vs. 6.67%) in PEG-IFN alpha-2a.

CONCLUSION

The mortality rate during PEG-IFN/RBV therapy was acceptably low, but the rate of SAEs was not negligible in a treatment for a benign disease, and the rate was affected by treatment regimens.

Host factors determining the efficacy of hepatitis C treatment

Combination therapy with pegylated interferon and ribavirin is the standard of care (SOC) for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). Treating CHC with SOC may show a sustained virological response (SVR) in approximately 50-70 % of genotype 1 CHC patients and an SVR in 70-90 % of genotype 2 CHC patients. The genotype, baseline viral load, and viral kinetics (i.e., rapid virologic response and early virologic response) can be used as predictors of response-guided therapy. Nonetheless, host factors, e.g. age, ethnicity, insulin resistance, and genetic variations, may also play important roles in the SVR in CHC patients treated with SOC. Recent genome-wide association studies have demonstrated that single-nucleotide polymorphisms near the interleukin 28B gene (IL28B) were associated with SVR to treatment with SOC in CHC patients. The IL28B polymorphisms may contribute to the viral kinetics during treatment. Asian people have favorable IL28B polymorphisms. This factor may at least partly explain the high eradication rate of hepatitis C by SOC in Asia. Combination therapy with direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) and SOC can increase the SVR rates both in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. Although the IL28B polymorphisms also affect the SVR of triple therapy with SOC and first-generation protease inhibitors, pilot studies have demonstrated that potent DAAs might overcome the influence of IL28B polymorphisms. Thus, the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection could be simplified in the near future.

Real response to therapy in chronic hepatitis C virus patients: a study from iran

BACKGROUND

Despite significant advances in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C in the past decades, factors which can affect response rates to combination therapy; peginterferon and ribavirin, are still under study and reaching sustained virological response (SVR) is affected by several different factors.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate predictor factors contributing to SVR in Iranian patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The present non-randomized, clinical trial was conducted on 100 patients referred to the Tehran Hepatitis Center in 2009-2011. The patients were administered combined peginterferon α-2a-ribavirin treatment, based on the standard protocol of the Iranian Ministry of Health. At the end of the treatment, the SVR rate and predictors were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean age of the patients was 42 and 78% were male. Genotype 1a was the most common (70%) and 55% of patients were treatment naïve. The outcomes showed that 12%, 16% and 22% patients were; non-responders, breakthroughs and relapsers, respectively, while 50% of the patients reached SVR. Patients reaching SVR were aged 40 years or lower, they were less likely to have been a non-responder in prior treatments, more likely to have a non-1a genotype and a higher number had an HCV RNA of less than 600 000 IU/ml. The multivariate analysis showed that an age of 40 or lower (OR = 3.74, CI95% = 1.52-9.22), a non-1a genotype (OR = 3.71, CI 95% = 1.40-9.81) and an HCV RNA less than 600 000 IU/ml (OR = 2.52, CI 95% = 1.03-6.15) may be useful SVR predictors.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of the present study showed that half of the patients reached SVR through combined peginterferon α-2a and ribavirin treatment, the majority of whom had genotype 3a and a minority had genotype 1a. In addition, an age of 40 or lower, non-1a genotype and a viral load less than 600 000 IU/ml were strong SVR predictors.

Low dose ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C virus infected thalassemia major patients; new indications for combination therapy

BACKGROUND

Treatment guidelines contraindicate ribavirin for treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in thalassemia major patients. Nevertheless, the current evidence suggests that ribavirin might be tolerated by these patients.

OBJECTIVES

Despite this evidence, low dose ribavirin combination therapy has not been compared with peginterferon monotherapy in these patients so far.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred eighty thalassemia patients with detectable HCV-RNA PCR (≥ 50 IU/mL) and liver histology consistent with chronic HCV infection were self-assigned to receive peginterferon alfa-2a (n = 81) monotherapy or its combination therapy with ribavirin, 600-800 mg QD, according to hemoglobin levels (n = 199). Treatment experienced patients were eligible for this study.

RESULTS

Sustained virological response (SVR) was significantly higher in patients who received ribavirin (51 % vs. 38 % P = 0.02). In multivariate regression, OR of ribavirin for prediction of SVR was 2.2 (95 % CI 1.24-3.91). The SVR was significantly higher in the ribavirin group in subgroups of patients with more than 24 years of age, elevated ALT, ferritin < 2006 ng/mL, previous treatment failure, genotype 1, positive history of splenectomy, fibrosis score of 0-4 HAI and viral load < 600,000 IU/mL. Treatment discontinuations due to the safety concerns were comparable between the treatment groups (6.5 and 8 %). Furthermore, transfusion intervals were almost halved in patients who received low dose ribavirin.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the present study, adult thalassemia patients with HCV infection can be treated successfully with low dose ribavirin. Hence, we strongly advise combination therapy in thalassemia patients with aforementioned clinical characteristics. Moreover, ribavirin does not seem to be beneficial in thalassemia patients below 18 years of age.

Differences in clinical outcomes among hepatitis C genotype 1-infected patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a or peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin: a meta-analysis

Background

With the development of new direct acting antiviral (DAA) therapy for hepatitis C, the backbone peginterferon alpha used may be of importance in maximizing treatment outcomes. To this end, the rates of sustained virologic response (SVR), relapse, and treatment discontinuation among hepatitis C genotype 1-infected patients given peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin or peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin were determined using a meta-analysis.

Methods

Randomized trials examining peginterferon alpha-2a or peginterferon alpha-2b co-administered with ribavirin for 48 weeks were included. Data were extracted on SVR, relapse, and treatment discontinuations for treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients. Pooled proportions using fixed and random effects meta-analysis were calculated.

Results

Twenty-six trials provided data on patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin, and 19 trials provided data on patients treated with peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. Five trials were direct head-to-head evaluations. In the subset of trials that included head-to-head evaluations, no significant differences were observed between the two treatments for treatment-naïve (relative risk [RR]: 1.07, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.97–1.18) and treatment-experienced patients (RR: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.58–2.77). Using only active trial arms, a larger proportion of the treatment- naïve patients who were provided peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin achieved a SVR (47%), which is greater than that of treatment-naïve patients who were provided peginterferon alpha- 2b plus ribavirin (40% SVR achievement); however, a larger proportion of treatment- experienced patients who were provided peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin achieved a SVR (16%) when compared with treatment-experienced patients given peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin (12% SVR achievement). A larger proportion of relapses occurred among both treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients given peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin, when compared with treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients taking peginterferon alpha-2b plus ribavirin. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment was greater among treatment-naïve patients taking peginterferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin, but smaller among treatment-experienced patients.

Conclusion

There are small differences in treatment outcomes for different types of peginterferon- alpha. Patient status and complexity of administration may differentiate clinical outcomes.

Optimal treatment duration for patients with HCV genotype 1 infection

The rapidity of viral disappearance on antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C with peginterferon/ribavirin correlates with the cure rate. The earlier the virus becomes undetectable, the higher are the response rates. This observation is the basis of response-guided therapy. Viral clearance within the first 4 weeks of treatment is called a rapid virologic response (RVR). The rate of RVR varies among various populations, with the highest one observed in Asian patients and the lowest in African-Americans. In patients infected with genotypes 1 and 4 who experience a RVR treatment with peginterferon/ribavirin can be shortened to just 24 weeks without losing efficacy (sustained virologic rate in RVR are >80%). In contrast, patients with a slow decline in viral load (> 2 log drop after 12 weeks with still detectable virus) may benefit from treatment extension to 72 weeks. Prolonged treatment reduces relapse rates but has no significant effect on cure rates. The data in patients with genotypes 2 and 3 are less clear, mostly because these genotypes are much easier to cure and a benefit is hard to detect. Nevertheless in patients with RVR and low baseline viral load treatment can be safely shortened to 16 weeks. The recently described polymorphism in the region of the IL28B gene may help to select patients for abbreviated or extended treatment schedules.

Prevalence and clinical significance of GB virus type C/hepatitis G virus coinfection in patients with chronic hepatitis C undergoing antiviral therapy

Coinfection with GBV-C/HGV in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC) may influence clinical course and response rates of antiviral therapy. Aim of the study was to investigate the prevalence of GBV-C/HGV/HCV coinfection and its influence on outcome of interferon/ribavirin combination therapy. Three hundred and four patients with CHC [m/f = 211/93, age: 42 (18-65)] were investigated. HGV RNA detection was performed by polymerase chain reaction prior to and 6 months after the end of antiviral therapy. HGV/HCV coinfection could be identified in 37/304 (12.2%) patients with intravenous drug abuse as the most common source of infection (N = 21, (56.8%)). The predominant HCV genotype in coinfected individuals was HCV-3a (HCV-3a: 51.4%, HCV-1: 37.8%, HCV-4: 10.8%). HGV coinfection was more prevalent in patients infected with HCV-3 compared to HCV-1 or HCV-4 [19/45 (42.2%) vs. 14/185 (7.6%) vs. 4/52 (7.7%), P < 0.01]. Patients with HGV/HCV coinfection were younger [35 (18-56) vs. 43 (19-65), years; P < 0.01], and advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) was less frequent (22.2% vs. 42.9%, P < 0.05). A sustained virological response was achieved more frequently in HGV/HCV coinfected patients [26/37 (70.3%)] than in monoinfected patients [120/267 (44.9%), P < 0.01]. HGV RNA was undetectable in 65.7% of the coinfected patients at the end of follow-up. Intravenous drug abuse seems to be a major risk factor for HGV coinfection in patients with chronic hepatitis C. Coinfection with HGV does not worsen the clinical course of chronic hepatitis C or diminish response of HCV to antiviral therapy. Interferon/ribavirin combination therapy also clears HGV infection in a high proportion of cases.

Impact of IL28B genotype on the early and sustained virologic response in treatment-naïve patients with chronic hepatitis C

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the gene that encodes interleukin (IL)-28B predict response of patients with chronic hepatitis C to antiviral therapy. We investigated the roles of polymorphisms rs12979860 and rs8099917 on the early virologic response of treatment-naïve patients.

METHODS

SNPs were identified by real-time polymerase chain reaction analysis of samples from 682 patients (genotype [GT]1=372, GT2/3=208, GT4=102) who were treated with 180 μg pegylated interferon-α2a and 400 or 800 mg (GT2/3, depending on the protocol) or 1000-1200 mg (GT1/4) ribavirin/day. The duration of treatment was 24 (GT2/3) or 24-72 weeks (GT1/4).

RESULTS

Patients with C/C also had higher rates of rapid virologic response (RVR) (GT1, 38.3% vs 11.6%; GT4, 76.5% vs 23.5%; both P<.001) and sustained virologic responses (SVRs) (GT1, 79.1% vs 43.2%; GT4, 85.3% vs 44.1%; both P<.001). In patients with GT2/3, the RVR was more frequent in carriers of C/C (75.3% vs 52.6%, P<.01), but SVR rates were similar between those with C/C and T (80.5% vs 74.4%, P=.31). Results for rs8099917 were comparable. The positive predictive value of rs12979860 C/C for SVR was higher than that of rs8099917 T/T (80.5% vs 71.6%). Overall, RVR was the best predictor of SVR. In patients who did not have GT1, IL28B polymorphisms did not affect the SVR if RVR data were included in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

An early virologic response to pegylated interferon and ribavirin is more likely among carriers of rs12979860 C/C and rs8099917 T/T, which might underlie their high rates of SVR. Determination of the IL28B genotype and whether patients have an RVR might be used in future studies of patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 or 4.

von Willebrand factor antigen: a novel on-treatment predictor of response to antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C genotypes 1 and 4

BACKGROUND

Levels of von Willebrand factor antigen (vWF-Ag) increase during combination antiviral therapy of chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The present study investigates the association between these changes in vWF-Ag levels and response to treatment.

METHODS

Changes in levels of vWF-Ag on antiviral combination treatment in 184 patients with CHC genotype 1 or 4 infections were measured prospectively and effect on response was studied.

RESULTS

High on-treatment levels of vWF-Ag were associated with relapse (P<0.01) and low on-treatment levels with sustained virological response (SVR). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that vWF-Ag levels of <300% at week 12 of therapy have a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% for SVR. In early virological response (EVR) patients, the PPV of vWF-Ag levels <300% at week 12 was 74%. An even higher PPV of 88% in complete EVRs (undetectable HCV RNA at week 12) was observed for the same cutoff value at week 12.

CONCLUSIONS

On-treatment levels of vWF-Ag can be utilized as an additional predictive marker for response to antiviral therapy. This is especially relevant in EVR patients because EVR alone only has a PPV of 58-72% on SVR, which increased to 74%, when factoring in vWF-Ag levels <300% at week 12, and to 88% in complete EVRs; therefore, measurement of vWF-Ag levels at week 12 is helpful. EVR patients that are above the cutoff values for vWF-Ag that make SVR very probable might profit from an extension of therapy to 72 weeks.

WITHDRAWN: Low dose ribavirin for treatment of HCV infected thalassemia major patients: New indications for combination therapy

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the author(s) and/or editor. The Publisher apologizes for any inconvenience this may cause. The full Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal can be found at http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy.

Influence of amantadine on CD81 expression on lymphocytes in chronic hepatitis C

INTRODUCTION

Interferon alpha (IFN) down regulates CD81 expression on peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Aim of our study was to investigate whether amantadine alters IFN associated down regulation of CD81 expression on PBMC in patients with chronic hepatitis C.

METHODS

Nineteen patients with chronic HCV infection received peginterferon alpha-2a/ribavirin (SOC) for 48 weeks. Patients were randomised to 12 weeks amantadine therapy (n=12) or no additional treatment (n=7). FACS analysis of CD81 expression on CD4(+), CD8(+), CD19(+), and CD56(+) cells was performed at baseline, week (TW) 4, TW12, and TW24 of antiviral therapy.

RESULTS

A significant decline of CD81 expression was observed on CD4(+), CD8(+), and CD56(+) cells (p=0.011, p<0.001, p=0.015, respectively) but not on CD19(+) cells (p>0.2). CD81 expression on CD4(+), CD8(+), CD19(+), and CD56(+) cells was not different between patients treated with SOC plus amantadine and patients treated with SOC alone.

CONCLUSION

The current study confirms that CD81 expression is down regulated by SOC on CD4(+), CD8(+) and CD56(+) cells. Amantadine treatment was not associated with CD81 expression. Interaction between amantadine and CD81 is unlikely to be involved in potential antiviral activity of amantadine in chronic HCV infection.

Antiviral treatment of chronic hepatitis C in clinical routine

OBJECTIVE

Pegylated interferon plus ribavirin is the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C. Sustained virological response (SVR) rates of up to 60% are reported in randomized controlled trials, but it is unclear whether the results from such trials are reproducible in the clinical routine setting. We investigated consecutive treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis C patients at our center to examine the efficacy of treatment with pegylated interferon plus ribavirin in clinical routine.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between 2000 and 2006 we treated a total of 219 patients with pegylated interferon alpha (2a or 2b) and ribavirin (800-1200 mg/d). Among them, 34.8% of patients infected with HCV genotypes 1/4/6 and 18.4% of those with genotypes 2/3 had advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis (F3-F4). For analysis of outcome we subdivided our series into two groups of patients: those who fulfilled standard inclusion criteria in randomized controlled trials and those who did not.

RESULTS

The overall SVR rate was 44.3%. In patients with F0-F2 an SVR was achieved in 52.5%; in those with F3-F4 the SVR rate was 20.8%. In patients infected with genotypes 1/4/6 the SVR rate was 35.4% (SVR: F0-F2 47.7%; F3-F4 19.6%); in those with genotypes 2/3 the rate was 67.8%. The SVR rate in patients with unfavorable baseline factors was significantly lower (32.4% vs. 50%; P = 0.017) and they were more likely to be non-responders (30.9% vs. 13.8%).

CONCLUSION

In everyday clinical practice, up to one-third of patients show unfavorable baseline factors for antiviral therapy, resulting in worse therapeutic outcome. Differences in therapeutic outcome are influenced by patient selection and by the proportion and severity of the underlying liver disease.

Comparative efficacy and overall safety of different doses of consensus interferon for treatment of chronic HCV infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

About one-half of patients with hepatitis C genotype 1 and one-third with genotype 2/3 have treatment failure with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin. Consensus interferon (CIFN) is an option for retreatment of these patients.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize comparative safety and efficacy of different regimens of CIFN for the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C infection.

DATA SOURCE

Medline, Scopus, ISI, and Cochran Central Register of Clinical Trials were used.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) were eligible for inclusion in the study.

PARTICIPANTS

HIV and HBV seronegative patients with positive HCV-RNA during the 6 months before the start of the study were eligible for inclusion.

INTERVENTIONS

Different regimens of CIFN were studied.

STUDY APPRAISAL AND SYNTHESIS METHODS

Studies were appraised based on methods of random sequence generation, allocation concealment, and blinding. The random effects model of DerSimonian and Laird was employed to run the meta-analysis. The end-point was sustained virological response (SVR).

RESULTS

Data of 10 RCTs including 1,600 subjects were extracted. High daily induction dose regimen of CIFN did not yield a higher rate of SVR than low daily induction dose treatment regimen, RR = 0.83 (95% CI 0.58-1.17). A dose of 9 μg thrice weekly (tiw) was associated with a significantly higher rate of SVR compared with 3 μg [RR = 3.14 (95% CI 1.68-5.58)][Symbol: see text]. Withdrawal rate was similar [RR = 1.28 (95% CI 0.65-2.50)] but dose modification was higher in 9 μg [RR = 3.22 (95% CI 1.08-9.60)]. A dose of 18/15 μg tiw was not more effective than 9 μg over a similar treatment duration [RR = 1.02 (95% CI 0. 87-1.19)].

LIMITATIONS

Limitations include inadequate reporting of methodological information and side effects, lack of publication bias assessment due to the small number of studies in each analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

High dose daily induction therapy with CIFN is not superior to low dose therapy in terms of SVR. It seems that 9 μg tiw is the optimal treatment dose of CIFN for treatment of HCV infection. Optimal duration and safety profile of CIFN therapy have yet been elucidated.

A randomized controlled trial of double versus triple therapy with amantadine for genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C in Latino patients

BACKGROUND

With only a third of Latinos achieving sustained virologic response (SVR), there is a need for enhanced HCV treatment. Amantadine has been proposed to improve response rates in addition to standard therapy with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin. Our objective is to evaluate whether triple therapy with amantadine improves SVR rates in this special population.

METHOD

Treatment-naïve Latino subjects with HCV genotype 1 infection were randomized to receive peginterferon alpha-2a plus weight-based ribavirin for 48 weeks (double therapy) or the same regimen plus amantadine 200 mg daily (triple therapy). The primary endpoint was SVR. Predictors of liver fibrosis using APRI and Forns indices were also evaluated.

RESULTS

We enrolled 124 patients with chronic hepatitis C genotype 1. Sixty-three received conventional therapy and 61 patients had triple therapy with amantadine. SVR at week 72 was achieved in 25 patients (39.7%) vs. 26 patients (42.6%) in the double and triple regimen, respectively (p=0.561). After multivariate analysis, advanced fibrosis, obesity, and low pretreatment ALT levels were associated with non-response in both groups (p=0.0234, p=0.0012, p=0.0249, respectively). APRI values delimited an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.724 and Forns index with AUROC of 0.733. There was no difference between both indices in predicting significant fibrosis (Knodell index: F3-F4).

CONCLUSION

Our study demonstrates that the addition of amantadine to standard treatment of chronic HCV does not improve SVR rates in Latino patients with genotype 1. Further research to improve response rates in this special population is needed.

Pegylated interferons for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: pharmacological and clinical differences between peginterferon-alpha-2a and peginterferon-alpha-2b

Chronic infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is a major healthcare problem, affecting an estimated 170 million people worldwide. Interferon-alpha has formed the basis of treatment regimens since the identification of HCV, either alone or in conjunction with the nucleoside analogue ribavirin. The relatively recent introduction of pegylated forms of interferon-alpha, with greater stability and in vivo activity, has substantially improved sustained virological response (SVR) rates compared with unmodified interferon-alpha, with SVR rates of 35-66% when used in conjunction with ribavirin in randomized controlled trials. Two pegylated interferon (peginterferon)-alpha molecules are commercially available for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, and these differ in the size and nature of the covalently attached polyethylene glycol (PEG) moiety, with resulting differences in pharmacokinetics and in dosing regimens. Peginterferon-alpha-2b has a linear 12 kDa PEG chain covalently attached primarily to histidine-34 of interferon-alpha-2b via an unstable urethane bond that is subject to hydrolysis once injected, releasing native interferon-alpha-2b. The branched, 40 kDa PEG chain of peginterferon-alpha-2a is covalently attached via stable amide bonds to lysine residues of interferon-alpha-2a, and circulates as an intact molecule. Consequently, peginterferon-alpha-2a has a very restricted volume of distribution, longer half-life and reduced clearance compared with native interferon-alpha-2a, and can be given once weekly independently of bodyweight. Peginterferon-alpha-2b has a shorter half-life in serum than peginterferon-alpha-2a and requires bodyweight-based dosing. The majority of head-to-head randomized controlled trials, including the large, randomized IDEAL (Individualized Dosing Efficacy versus Flat Dosing to Assess Optimal Pegylated Interferon Therapy) trial (n = 3070), demonstrated similar SVR rates for peginterferon-alpha-2a and peginterferon-alpha-2b (41% vs 39% in IDEAL), in combination with ribavirin; however, two randomized controlled trials (n = 431 and 320) demonstrated a statistically significant benefit for peginterferon-alpha-2a (66% vs 54%, and 69% vs 54%). Furthermore, two large retrospective studies and one prospective observational study in real-life settings have shown a significant benefit for peginterferon-alpha-2a versus peginterferon-alpha-2b, although SVR rates were generally lower than those seen in controlled trials. The use of interferon-alpha with or without ribavirin is frequently associated with a range of adverse effects, including influenza-like symptoms, haematological changes and neuropsychiatric disturbances, and this is true also of the peginterferons, with similar levels of adverse events, dose reduction and discontinuation from treatment. Peginterferon-alpha-2a and peginterferon-alpha-2b appear from comparative studies to be similarly tolerated, with few differences of clinical significance noted. Peginterferon plus ribavirin, as the standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C, may in the future form the basis of improved treatment regimens that include new, targeted anti-HCV agents to increase SVR rates even further.

Clinical trial: a randomized trial of pegylated-interferon-alpha-2a plus ribavirin with or without amantadine in treatment-naïve or relapsing chronic hepatitis C patients

BACKGROUND

The combination therapy of pegylated-interferon-alpha2a plus ribavirin is considered as the standard of care for patients with chronic hepatitis C. A sustained viral response is obtained in 40-50% of naïve patients with genotype 1 and in around 80% of naïve patients with genotype 2 or 3.

AIM

To assess whether amantadine, added to the conventional combination therapy, could improve the treatment efficacy.

METHODS

In all, 630 patients (intent-to-treat population) with chronic hepatitis C were randomized into two groups: 316 patients (treatment group) received pegylated-interferon-alpha2a (180 microg once weekly) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/daily) with amantadine (200 mg/daily); 314 patients (control group) received pegylated-interferon-alpha2a (180 microg once weekly) plus ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/daily) without amantadine. The duration of the treatment was 48 weeks for genotypes 1, 4, 5 and 6, and 24 weeks for genotypes 2 and 3.

RESULTS

There was no statistically significant difference between treatments groups for any of the variables tested for. Subgroups of patients likely to take advantage of the addition of amantadine were not identified.

CONCLUSIONS

This large study definitely excludes the role of amantadine in addition of conventional combination therapy in the treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients.

Another ten stories in antiviral drug discovery (part C): "Old" and "new" antivirals, strategies, and perspectives

The ten stories told here deal with (i) ribavirin as an inhibitor of IMP dehydrogenase and (ii) ribavirin, in combination with pegylated interferon, as the present "standard of care" for hepatitis C; (iii) S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitors as antiviral agents; (iv) new adamantadine derivatives for the treatment of influenza A virus infections; (v) 5-substituted 2'-deoxyuridines (i.e. IDU, TFT) for the treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections; (vi) acyclic guanosine analogues (e.g. acyclovir) for the treatment of HSV infections; (vii) OMP decarboxylase inhibitors (i.e. pyrazofurin) and CTP synthetase inhibitors (i.e. cyclopentenylcytosine) as possible antiviral agents; (viii) the future of cidofovir (and alkoxyalkyl esters thereof) and ST-246 as potential antipoxvirus agents; (ix) the two decade journey from tivirapine to rilpivirine in the ultimate therapy of HIV infections; and (x) the extension of the therapeutic application of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Viread) to the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection, in addition to HIV infection.

Serum level of adiponectin correlated with gender and genotype in patients with chronic hepatitis C

Adiponectin is well recognized as plasma physiologically active polypeptide hormone exclusively derived from human and animal mature adipocytes, with vigorous property in antidiabetic, antiobesity, antiatherogenic, and anti-inflammatory processes. In this study, we investigated the correlation between serum adiponectin level and clinical and pathological parameters in patients with chronic hepatitis C (CHC). The study included 127 patients with CHC and 42 healthy volunteers as controls whose laboratory parameters and serum adiponectin and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) were assessed using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). We demonstrated that a lower serum adiponectin level was associated with male gender, higher gamma-glutamyltransferase (gamma-GGT), higher albumin, higher TNF-alpha, and steatosis grade. The higher level of serum adiponectin in patients with genotype 2a was demonstrated when compared with that in the patients with genotype 1b. Furthermore, of great interest, results suggested that the significant differences regarding viral genotype seemed to occur only in male patients with CHC but not in female patients. In conclusion, serum adiponectin was associated with gender, genotype, liver steatosis, and TNF-alpha in a Chinese population with CHC.

Placebo-controlled trial of 400 mg amantadine combined with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin for 48 weeks in chronic hepatitis C virus-1 infection

The impact of amantadine on virologic response rates of interferon-based treatment of chronic hepatitis C is controversial. The aim of this study was to compare virological response rates in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV)-1 infection treated with 400 mg amantadine or placebo in combination with peginterferon alfa-2a (40 kD) and ribavirin for 48 weeks. Seven hundred four previously untreated chronically HCV-1-infected patients (mean age, 46 +/- 12 years) were randomized to (A) amantadine-sulphate (400 mg/day) (n = 352) or (B) placebo (n = 352), both in combination with 180 microg peginterferon alfa-2a once weekly and ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/day) for 48 weeks. End of treatment and sustained virological response after a 24-week follow-up period were assessed by qualitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) (sensitivity, 50 IU/mL). Demographic and baseline virological parameters were similar in both treatment groups. In groups A and B, 231 of 352 patients (66%) and 256 of 352 patients (72%) achieved an end of treatment response, and 171 of 352 patients (49 %) and 186 of 352 patients (53 %) a sustained virological response, respectively. On-treatment dropout rate in the amantadine group was significantly higher than in the placebo group (32% versus 23%; P = 0.01). However, adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar between both groups. Per-protocol analysis revealed similar sustained virological response rates in both treatment groups (53% versus 55%).

CONCLUSION

In this large placebo-controlled multicenter study, amantadine even at a dose of 400 mg/day did not improve virological response rates of peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin in patients with chronic genotype HCV-1 infection.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in long-term sustained virological responders following antiviral combination therapy for chronic hepatitis C

Antiviral treatment results in a sustained virologic response (SVR) in 50-75% of patients with chronic hepatitis C. Long-term follow up studies have observed ongoing SVR in the overwhelming majority of them. Thus chronic hepatitis C is considered 'cured' if an SVR is achieved. Consequently, it is expected that in sustained virologic responders long-term complications of hepatatic C virus (HCV) related chronic liver disease including hepatocellular carcinoma are eliminated or have a decreased incidence. We report on five patients (three from Austria, two from USA) who developed hepatocellular carcinoma during follow up (3-6 years) after achieving SVR. During follow up and at diagnosis all were HCV-RNA neg. None of the patients had other liver diseases. One patient presented with bilateral adrenal metastasis, the remaining four with large hepatic tumours. Three patients were noncirrhotic at the start of treatment at the time of tumour diagnosis. Successful antiviral treatment in HCV patients does not prevent development of hepatocellular carcinoma even in non-cirrhotic livers. Long-term follow up of patients with SVR is mandatory and should include surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma.

Efficacy of interferon in immunocompromised HCV patients after liver transplantation or with HIV co-infection

BACKGROUND

Interferon (IFN)-based antiviral therapy is increasingly used in immunocompromised patients with chronic hepatitis C after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) and HIV-HCV co-infection. Differences in early viral kinetics have not been compared in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 76 patients (31 OLT, 20 HIV-HCV and 25 HCV control patients) undergoing IFN sensitivity testing before starting antiviral therapy with pegylated IFN-alpha 2a (180 microg week(-1)) plus ribavirin (0.8-1.2 g day(-1)) for 48 weeks. We compared baseline parameters, response to IFN and treatment outcome between the groups and assessed the influence of specific calcineurin inhibitors in OLT patients and immune status in HIV-HCV patients on treatment response.

RESULTS

Viral loads pretherapy were higher in OLT compared to nontransplanted HCV controls (P = 0.003). The same trend was present in HIV-HCV (P = 0.09). The log-drop after test dose was less in OLT compared to HCV (P = 0.02), while no significant difference was found between HIV-HCV and HCV. In HIV-HCV patients viral load log-drop correlated significantly with CD4(+) cell counts (P = 0.001). No difference in viral load pretherapy, log-drop and treatment outcome was noted between different calcineurin inhibitors in OLT patients. Sustained virological response rates were 28% in OLT, 50% in HIV-HCV and 56% in HCV patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Immunosuppression results in high HCV viral loads. Initial efficacy of IFN is significantly impaired in OLT patients, but not in HIV-HCV with largely preserved CD4(+) cell counts. Sustained virological response rates of 28% in OLT patients are suboptimal, but encouraging results are shown for HIV-HCV patients with relatively high CD4(+) cell counts.

Very Early Viral Kinetics on Interferon Treatment in Chronic Hepatitis C virus Genotype 4 Infection

Background

Interferon (IFN)-resistant hepatitis C virus strains limit efficacy of antiviral combination therapy in patients infected with genotypes 1 and 4. A single test dose of IFN was useful to identify non-responders to IFN-α2b/ribavirin (RBV) or likely non-responders to pegylated (PEG)-IFN-α2a/RBV therapy in genotype 1 patients. Our aim was to investigate this approach in genotype 4 patients.

Methods

Viral load was measured in 46 patients before and 24 h after 10 megaunits (MU) IFN-α2b, and before and during 2 weeks of daily 5 MU IFN-α2b administration. Thereafter, patients received 48 weeks combination therapy with either 180 μg PEG-IFN-α2a/week ( n=33), 1.5 μg/kg PEG-IFN-α2b/week ( n=7) or 5 MU IFN-α2b/2 days ( n=6), along with 1–1.2g RBV/day. For prediction analysis the largest group (PEG-IFN-α2a) was evaluated only.

Results

Median 24 h log10 change after 10 MU IFN-α2b was 1.15 (range 0.08–2.48) and after 5 MU IFN-α2b was 0.81 (-0.12–2.22; P<0.0001). Log10 changes after 2 weeks on 5 MU IFN-α2b daily and 24 h after 10 MU were the best predictors of early virological response (defined by negativity of a standard qualitative PCR) to PEG-IFN-α2a/RBV combination therapy (area under curve [AUC]=0.97; P<0.001, receiver operating characteristics), 24 h log10 change after 10 MU was the best predictor of sustained virological response (SVR; AUC=0.91, P=0.001).

Conclusion

As in genotype 1 patients, there is large variation in IFN responsiveness, including the presence of resistant strains, in genotype 4 patients. A 24 h log10 change after 10 MU IFN-α2b is an excellent predictor of SVR on PEG-IFNα2a/RBV combination therapy. This test may be useful to obtain homogeneous groups for clinical studies and could help in clinical decision making.

Hepatitis C virus therapy to date

Chronic hepatitis C is a major contributor to cirrhosis and hepatocellular cancer worldwide, justifying the considerable research effort aimed at understanding the disease and refining its treatment. As a result, significant therapeutic advances have been made in the last decade, particularly with regard to the development of pegylated interferons and ribavirin. This review will discuss the physical properties, pharmacokinetics, viral kinetics and side-effect profiles of the different treatment options and how they have improved, culminating in the use of pegylated interferon and ribavirin combination therapy as the current standard of care.

Controversies in and challenges to our understanding of hepatitis C

Discovered in 1989, the hepatitis C virus (HCV) continues to cause significant morbidity and mortality world-wide despite a huge research commitment to defining and understanding the virus and the disease it causes. This paper discusses a number of areas where progress in the management of the HCV have not kept pace with the scientific understanding of the HCV. It is suggested that in the fields of HCV prevention and providing access to treatment, practice falls short of what could be achieved. The role of alcohol in the pathogenesis of HCV liver injury is discussed. Discrimination against those with HCV infection and particularly those in prison settings fails to match good clinical practice. The complicated processes of sharing information between specialty groups is also discussed in an attempt to optimise knowledge dissemination in this field.

Efficacy of amantadine on quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon-alpha and ribavirin: results from a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

AIM

The aim of this study was to investigate whether amantadine reduces deterioration of quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis C during and after treatment with interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) and ribavirin.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, previously untreated patients with chronic hepatitis C were treated with IFN-alpha plus ribavirin [17] and randomized for treatment with amantadine (200 mg/day, orally, n=136) or placebo (n=131). Quality of life was assessed with the 'Profile of Mood States' scale and the 'Everyday Life' questionnaire at baseline, treatment week (TW) 8, TW24, TW48, and at follow-up.

RESULTS

Early during treatment at TW8, quality of life was not different between patients in the control and the amantadine group. At TW24, the control group but not the amantadine group, however, showed significant deterioration of the modalities depression, fatigue, and vigor compared with baseline. Especially, nonresponders in the amantadine group showed significantly lower deterioration of depression, anger, mind function, everyday life, and zest for life than those in the placebo group. After treatment, the beneficial effects of amantadine disappeared.

CONCLUSION

The addition of amantadine to IFN-alpha plus ribavirin combination therapy may reduce deterioration of depression, fatigue, and vigor during treatment but does not affect quality of life after treatment.

Risk assessment in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: The liver as a risk factor

Patients with liver dysfunction have an increased risk of developing early and late complications after haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). That's why it is mandatory to evaluate liver status before transplantation in all cases. This evaluation should allow us to decide whether HSCT can be performed or whether we should adopt measures focused on preventing these complications. The evaluation of the liver in an HSCT candidate requires the collection of information by history-taking, physical examination, liver-function tests and, occasionally, imaging tests and liver biopsy. Additionally, as infection by hepatitis B or C viruses represents the most relevant cause of hepatic dysfunction after HSCT, the serological status of the patient should be carefully evaluated. This chapter tries to analyse and systematise the most important aspects in the patient's evaluation. Finally, as some liver dysfunctions in the stem-cell donor can have a negative impact for the donor during the harvest and/or for the recipient during HSCT, the methodology to evaluate the donors will also be analysed.

Triple therapy of initial high-dose interferon with ribavirin and amantadine for patients with chronic hepatitis C

AIMS

We previously reported the potential effect of combination therapy of an initial high-dose interferon (IFN) and amantadine on the eradication of HCV-RNA in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The additive effects of amantadine on interferon and ribavirin combination therapy remain controversial. In this study we investigated the efficacy of initial high-dose IFN with ribavirin and amantadine on the virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C with a high viral load of genotype 1b.

METHODS

Twenty-two patients with high viral loads of genotype 1b hepatitis C virus were enrolled in this pilot study. Patients were administered IFN-beta for four weeks and then IFN-alpha2b for 22 weeks with daily oral administration of ribavirin and amantadine.

RESULTS

A sustained virological response (SVR) was shown in 31.8% (seven of 22 patients). With the naïve patients, the SVR rate was 21.4% (three of 14 patients). In patients who could not eradicate HCV-RNA by previous IFN monotherapy, the SVR rate was 50% (four of eight patients).

CONCLUSION

Triple therapy with an initial high dose of IFN with ribavirin and amantadine may be effective, especially for chronic hepatitis C IFN-retreatment patients with a high viral load of genotype 1b.

Short-duration therapy for hepatitis C: suitable for all?

Peginterferon alpha (PegIFN alpha) plus ribavirin achieves sustained virological response (SVR) in more than 50% of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although in the trials which led to the registration of this combination therapy, only a 48-week period of treatment had been evaluated, current international guidelines state that 48 or 24 weeks of treatment should be recommended in accordance with genotype; i.e. 48 weeks for genotypes 1 and 4, and 24 weeks for 2 and 3. However, side effects and the high cost of antiviral therapy forced investigators to evaluate further reductions in the treatment duration. Based on the new evidence that fast and persistent viral clearance is highly predictive of SVR, a week 4 negative HCV RNA by a sensitive molecular assay was recently utilized as a criterion for halving the duration of treatment to 12-16 weeks for genotypes 2 and 3, and 24 weeks for genotype 1 patients. However, some issues on this topic, are still open. In this review, existing evidence is discussed, and both the relevance and limitations of published studies are considered.

Viral determinants of resistance to treatment in patients with hepatitis C

Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection affects more than 170 million persons worldwide and is responsible for the development of liver cirrhosis in many cases. Standard treatment with pegylated alpha interferon (IFN-alpha) in combination with the nucleoside analogue ribavirin leads to a sustained virologic response in approximately half of the patients. IFN-alpha is classified as an indirect treatment, as it interacts with the host's immune response. The mechanism of action of ribavirin is still unknown. The benefit of triple therapy by adding other antiviral agents, e.g., amantadine, is controversial. Currently, new direct antiviral drugs (HCV protease/polymerase inhibitors) are being evaluated in phase 1/phase 2 trials. Phenotypic resistance to antiviral therapy has been attributed to amino acid variations within distinct regions of the HCV polyprotein. While sensitivity to IFN-alpha-based antiviral therapy in vivo is clearly correlated with the number of mutations within the HCV NS5A protein, the underlying functional mechanisms for this association are unknown. In turn, in vitro, several mechanisms to circumvent the host immune defense or to block treatment-induced antiviral activities have been described for different HCV proteins. By the introduction of direct antiviral drugs, hepatitis C therapy now is entering a new era in which the development of resistance may become the most important parameter for treatment success or failure.

Replicative homeostasis III: implications for antiviral therapy and mechanisms of response and non-response

While improved drug regimens have greatly enhanced outcomes for patients with chronic viral infection, antiviral therapy is still not ideal due to drug toxicities, treatment costs, primary drug failure and emergent resistance. New antiviral agents, alternative treatment strategies and a better understanding of viral pathobiology, host responses and drug action are desperately needed. Interferon (IFN) and ribavirin, are effective drugs used to treat hepatitis C (HCV), but the mechanism(s) of their action are uncertain. Error catastrophe (EC), or precipitous loss of replicative fitness caused by genomic mutation, is postulated to mediate ribavirin action, but is a deeply flawed hypothesis lacking empirical confirmation. Paradoxically ribavirin, a proven RNA mutagen, has no impact on HCV viraemia long term, suggesting real viruses, replicating in-vitro, as opposed to mathematical models, replicating in-silico, are likely to resist EC by highly selective replication of fit (~consensus sequence) genomes mediated, in part, by replicative homeostasis (RH), an epicyclic mechanism that dynamically links RNApol fidelity and processivity and other viral protein functions. Replicative homeostasis provides a rational explanation for the various responses seen during treatment of HCV, including genotype-specific and viral load-dependent differential response rates, as well as otherwise unexplained phenomena like the transient inhibition and rebound of HCV viraemia seen during ribavirin monotherapy. Replicative homeostasis also suggests a primarily non-immunological mechanism that mediates increased immune responsiveness during treatment with ribavirin (and other nucleos(t)ide analogues), explicating the enhanced second-phase clearance of HCV ribavirin promotes and, thus, the apparent immunomodulatory action of ribavirin. More importantly, RH suggests specific new antiviral therapeutic strategies.

Hepatitis C Virus p7 membrane protein quasispecies variability in chronically infected patients treated with interferon and ribavirin, with or without amantadine

A clinical study was carried out to compare the response rate of two groups of non-responder (NR) hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 1 chronically infected patients treated with interferon and ribavirin, with or without amantadine. The viral load decreased more markedly in the group treated by tritherapy including amantadine, but the response rate at the end of treatment was not significantly different between bitherapy and tritherapy. As amantadine could have an antiviral effect on the ion channel activity of the p7 HCV protein, the p7 quasispecies was characterized by cloning and sequencing. Sequence data were analyzed to determine the pattern and significance of p7 genetic heterogeneity and a possible relationship with therapy. Subtype differences were confirmed between p7 HCV genotypes 1a and 1b, and quasispecies analysis showed a reduction of genetic diversity in subtype 1a, but not 1b, during tritherapy. However, the absence of changes at numerous positions, as well as the conservative changes at other positions, indicated the high conservation of the p7 structure. Residue His-17, proposed to interact with amantadine, was fully conserved in both subtypes 1a and 1b, independently of amantadine administration. In conclusion, although the analysis of the p7 sequences revealed a selective pressure during therapy, no specific residues appeared to be linked to the effect of amantadine on viral decline. These results suggest that the potential antiviral effect of amantadine might be non-specific and related to a reduction in endosomal acidification and therefore reduced viral entry of HCV via its pH-dependent pathway.

Hepatitis C in HIV-positive patients--treatment and liver disease outcomes

Many human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infected persons are coinfected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and with the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, liver disease from HCV has become an important cause of morbidity and mortality. The current guidelines recommend that human immunodeficiency virus and HCV coinfected patients be evaluated and treated for HCV if there are no major contraindications to treatment. Coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon-a and ribavirin have sustained virologic responses (SVRs) of 27% to 40% which for a variety of reasons are lower than those reported in HCV mono-infected patients. Understanding that most patients will not achieve SVRs, strategies to evaluate for the role of maintenance interferon in delaying complications of liver disease are being evaluated. In patients who have failed prior treatment, cannot tolerate treatment, or who have contraindications to HCV treatment, the use of highly active antiretroviral therapy with careful monitoring for hepatotoxicity and aggressive counseling on alcohol and substance abuse may slow down fibrosis progression. As the data on liver transplantation in coinfected patients accumulate, patients with end stage liver disease should be referred early for evaluation in a transplant center. As new drugs for HCV are being developed, it will be of utmost importance to include coinfected patients earlier in the process on new drug trials and therapeutic strategies.