Early ribavirin pharmacokinetics, HCV RNA and alanine aminotransferase kinetics in HIV/HCV co-infected patients during treatment with pegylated interferon and ribavirin

[Not Available]

Ribavirin in combination with pegylated interferon alpha is the current treatment for chronic hepatitis C (HCV). Ribavirin presents a wide inter-individual pharmacokinetic variability and adequate exposure seems crucial for achieving sustained virologic response. Severe anaemia frequently occurred under ribavirin treatment and is a dose-dependent limiting side effect. Several studies have been carried out in HVC-infected or HIV-HCV co-infected patients to evaluate the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships of ribavirin. Achievement of a sustained virologic response, defined as undetectable HCV-RNA six months after the end of treatment, have been significantly associated with ribavirin concentration. A cut-off for the trough concentration of ribavirin ranging between 2-3μg/ml at week 4 has been proposed. A significant correlation has also been reported between ribavirin concentration and the extent of haemoglobin decline. A ribavirin concentration>2μg/ml is significantly associated to an increase risk of severe anaemia. Non randomized studies have shown that therapeutic drug monitoring of ribavirin improve the management of therapeutic response and haematologic toxicity. Therefore, the level of evidence of the therapeutic drug monitoring of ribavirin is recommended.

Telaprevir and ribavirin interaction: higher ribavirin levels are not only due to renal dysfunction during triple therapy

A higher incidence of anemia has been observed during the treatment of hepatitis C virus genotype 1 (HCV-1) infection with pegylated alpha interferon (pegIFN-α), ribavirin, and telaprevir. We assessed the impacts that concomitant administration of telaprevir and changes in the glomerular filtration rate have on ribavirin plasma levels. The minimum concentrations of ribavirin in plasma (ribavirin Cmin) determined during triple therapy including telaprevir were compared with those observed after telaprevir withdrawal and those observed in the same subjects and in a large cohort during a previous course of pegIFN-α plus ribavirin. Intensive pharmacokinetic sampling for ribavirin was performed at steady state during the triple-therapy phase. Ribavirin levels were measured by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS). Twenty-seven HCV-1/HIV-coinfected patients were enrolled. The median ribavirin Cmin for triple therapy (4.08 μg/ml; range, 2.14 to 5.56 μg/ml) was higher than that observed after telaprevir withdrawal (1.96 μg/ml; range, 0.41 to 3.45 μg/ml) (P < 0.001) and that observed for 125 HCV-1/HIV-coinfected patients treated only with pegIFN-α plus ribavirin (1.65 μg/ml; range, 0.41 to 5.56 μg/ml) (P < 0.001). The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decreased >20% from the baseline value in 11 of 27 patients and became normal after telaprevir removal in almost all cases. There was a negative correlation between eGFR and ribavirin clearance (r(2) = 0.257; P = 0.064) but not the ribavirin area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 h (AUC0-12) (r(2) = 0.001; P = 0.455). Thus, there is a significant pharmacokinetic interaction between telaprevir and ribavirin that results in very high ribavirin levels, which explains the excess of toxicity observed with this drug combination. A blockade of the proximal tubular transporters might be implicated in both the increase in plasma creatinine and the high ribavirin levels. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01818856.).

Ribavirin at the Era of Novel Direct Antiviral Agents for the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus Infection: Relevance of Pharmacological Monitoring

Ribavirin is often used for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. Although its mechanisms of action remain to be clearly elucidated, ribavirin plays a beneficial role for achieving virological response and decreasing the rate of virological relapse after treatment cessation. However, ribavirin may induce side effects leading to early treatment discontinuation. Among them, hemolytic anemia is the most frequent and results from intraerythrocyte accumulation. Pharmacological studies have shown that early ribavirin exposure assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) at day 0 and ribavirin trough concentration during the first three months of therapy were correlated with sustained virological response (SVR). These studies highlighted the relevance of ribavirin pharmacologic monitoring and early dose adaptation during therapy. Although the role of ribavirin within new direct acting antiviral (DAA) combinations will probably decrease in the future, its potential benefit in difficult-to-treat patients such as patients with severe hepatopathy or patients who failed triple therapy including patients with multiresistance will need to be further investigated.

Lower ribavirin biodisponibility in patients with HIV-HCV coinfection in comparison with HCV monoinfected patients

Background

In HIV infected patients, the impact of ribavirin (RBV) pharmacology on sustained virologic response (SVR) to hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment has not been fully investigated. The objective of this study was to compare the early RBV plasma exposure between a population of HIV-HCV coinfected patients and an HCV monoinfected group.

Methods

Early RBV plasma exposure (expressed as Area Under the Curve (AUC) from 0 to 4 h) after a 600 mg first dose of RBV was measured in a population of HIV-HCV coinfected patients in comparison with an HCV monoinfected group. Peripheral blood samples were collected before the 600 mg RBV first dose (T0) to ensure no detectable baseline plasma RBV, and then 30 mn, 1, 2 and 4 hours after RBV intake (T0.5, T1, T2 and T4).

Results

Eighty-six patients with chronic hepatitis C entered the study among whom 23 (27%) were HIV-HCV coinfected. Coinfected patients had a significantly lower RBV-AUC _0-4h (median: 1469 μg*h/L [range 936–3677]) compared with monoinfected patients (2030 μg*h/L [851–7700]; p = 0.018). This RBV under exposure in coinfected patients persisted after normalization of AUC to RBV dose per kilogram of body weight (182 μg*h/L [110–425] versus 271 μg*h/L [82–1091], p = 0.001).

Conclusions

These results suggest that lower early bioavailability of RBV could be one of the reasons for lower SVR in HIV-HCV coinfected patients treated with pegylated interferon/RBV combination therapy. RBV plasma underexposure seems to be associated with the immunological status of the patients with lower AUC_0-4h values observed in the more immunosuppressed coinfected patients.

Impact of the peginterferon-α 2a and ribavirin plasma levels on viral kinetics and sustained virological response in genotype 1 HCV/HIV-co-infected patients with the unfavourable non-CC IL28B genotypes

Studies on the association between the peginterferon-α and ribavirin levels and sustained virological response (SVR) have shown yielded conflicting results, but most of them were performed before the influence of IL28B polymorphisms was known. Our aim was to assess the effects of peginterferon-α 2a and ribavirin plasma levels on viral kinetics and SVR in hepatitis C virus genotype 1 HCV-1/HIV-co-infected patients according to IL28B genotype. This was a cohort study of HCV-1/HIV-co-infected patients who were HCV-treatment naïve and for whom the efficacy of peginterferon-α 2a plus ribavirin was evaluated by per-protocol analysis. The peginterferon-α 2a and ribavirin levels were measured by ELISA and HPLC-UV, respectively. The relationships among host and viral factors, the trough drugs levels and virological responses were analysed by multivariate regression analyses. A total of 131 Caucasian patients were included (cirrhosis:38.9%). Overall, SVR rate was 39.6%. In patients with CC IL28B genotype, SVR was related neither to peginterferon-α 2a nor to ribavirin plasma levels, while higher levels of both drugs were the only variables independently associated with SVR in individuals with CT/TT IL28B genotypes (OR, 5.02; CI95 , 1.45-17.1; P = 0.001 and 4.0; CI95 , 1.08-14.7; P = 0.038, respectively). Moreover, faster viral declines were observed in CT/TT patients when pegIFN-α 2a and ribavirin plasma levels were greater than 3400 pg/mL and 1.6 μg/mL, respectively. In contrast to the results for CC patients, the results in patients carrying the unfavourable CT/TT IL28B genotypes showed that plasma levels of both drugs have significant effects on viral kinetics and SVR.

Host Genetic Factors and Dendritic Cell Responses Associated with the Outcome of Interferon/Ribavirin Treatment in HIV-1/HCV Co-Infected Individuals

HIV-1/HCV co-infection is a significant health problem. Highly active antiretroviral treatment (HAART) against HIV-1 has proved to be fairly successful. On the other hand, direct acting antiviral drugs against HCV have improved cure rates but high cost and development of drug resistance are important concerns. Therefore PEGylated interferon (PEG-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) still remain essential components of HCV treatment, and identification of host factors that predict IFN/RBV treatment response is necessary for effective clinical management of HCV infection. Impaired dendritic cell (DC) and T cell responses are associated with HCV persistence. It has been shown that IFN/RBV treatment enhances HCV-specific T cell functions and it is likely that functional restoration of DCs is the underlying cause. To test this hypothesis, we utilized an antibody cocktail (consisting of DC maturation, adhesion and other surface markers) to perform comprehensive phenotypic characterization of myeloid DCs (mDCs) and plasmacytoid DCs (pDCs) in a cohort of HIV-1/HCV co-infected individuals undergoing IFN/RBV treatment. Our results show that pre-treatment frequencies of mDCs are lower in non-responders (NRs) compared to responders (SVRs) and healthy controls. Although, the treatment was able to restore the frequency of mDCs in NRs, it downregulated the frequency of CCR7⁺, CD54⁺ and CD62L⁺ mDCs. Pre-treatment frequencies of pDCs were lower in NRs and decreased further upon treatment. Compared to SVRs, NRs exhibited higher ratio of PD-L1⁺/CD86⁺ pDCs prior to treatment; and this ratio remained high even after treatment. These findings demonstrate that enumeration and phenotypic assessment of DCs before/during therapy can help predict the treatment outcome. We also show that before treatment, PBMCs from SVRs secrete higher amounts of IFN-γ compared to controls and NRs. Upon genotyping IFNL3 polymorphisms rs12979860, rs4803217 and ss469415590, we found rs12979860 to be a better predictor of treatment outcome. Collectively, our study led to identification of important correlates of IFN/RBV treatment response in HIV-1/HCV co-infected individuals.

Effect of ribavirin on viral kinetics and liver gene expression in chronic hepatitis C

OBJECTIVE

Ribavirin improves treatment response to pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN) in chronic hepatitis C but the mechanism remains controversial. We studied correlates of response and mechanism of action of ribavirin in treatment of hepatitis C.

DESIGN

70 treatment-naive patients were randomised to 4 weeks of ribavirin (1000-1200 mg/d) or none, followed by PEG-IFNα-2a and ribavirin at standard doses and durations. Patients were also randomised to a liver biopsy 24 h before or 6 h after starting PEG-IFN. Hepatic gene expression was assessed by microarray and interferon-stimulated gene (ISG) expression quantified by nCounter platform. Temporal changes in ISG expression were assessed by qPCR in peripheral-blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) and by serum levels of IP-10.

RESULTS

After 4 weeks of ribavirin monotherapy, hepatitis C virus (HCV) levels decreased by 0.5±0.5 log10 (p=0.009 vs controls) and ALT by 33% (p<0.001). Ribavirin pretreatment, while modestly augmenting ISG induction by PEG-IFN, did not modify the virological response to subsequent PEG-IFN and ribavirin treatment. However, biochemical, but not virological, response to ribavirin monotherapy predicted response to subsequent combination treatment (rapid virological response, 71% in biochemical responders vs 22% non-responders, p=0.01; early virological response, 100% vs 68%, p=0.03; sustained virological response 83% vs 41%, p=0.053). Ribavirin monotherapy lowered serum IP-10 levels but had no effect on ISG expression in PBMC.

CONCLUSIONS

Ribavirin is a weak antiviral but its clinical effect seems to be mediated by a separate, indirect mechanism, which may act to reset IFN-responsiveness in HCV-infected liver.

Erythrocyte and plasma ribavirin concentrations in the assessment of early and sustained virological responses to pegylated interferon-alpha 2a and ribavirin in patients coinfected with hepatitis C virus and HIV

OBJECTIVES

To determine the relationship between erythrocyte and plasma ribavirin concentrations in hepatitis C virus (HCV)/HIV-coinfected patients, and to correlate ribavirin exposure with early and sustained virological response (EVR and SVR) and haemoglobin level reductions.

METHODS

Clinical and biological data from 68 HCV/HIV-coinfected patients were recorded at baseline, week 4 (W4), week 12 and at 24 weeks after completion of treatment. Plasma and erythrocyte ribavirin concentrations were determined 12 h after the final ribavirin dose (C(min)).

RESULTS

Erythrocyte ribavirin concentrations were 100-fold higher than plasma concentrations, with a significant relationship between them (P < 0.05). In patients with HCV genotype 1 or 4, a plasma ribavirin C(min) threshold of 1.95 mg/L at W4 tended to predict EVR [sensitivity 44%; specificity 87%; AUC 0.67 (95% CI 0.50-0.84)] and was predictive of SVR [sensitivity 58%; specificity 84%; AUC 0.71 (95% CI 0.51-0.90)]. Among patients with these HCV genotypes, an erythrocyte ribavirin C(min) threshold of 146 mg/L at W4 was found to be the best value for discriminating between responders and non-responders for both EVR [sensitivity 67%; specificity 75%; AUC 0.58 (95% CI 0.24-0.93)] and SVR [sensitivity 50%; specificity 80%; AUC 0.70 (95% CI 0.39-1.01)]. We also demonstrated a significant relationship between reduced haemoglobin levels and plasma ribavirin C(min) at W4 (P = 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic drug monitoring may be useful for the management of anti-HCV treatment in HCV/HIV-coinfected patients.

A pharmacological profile of ribavirin and monitoring of its plasma concentration in chronic hepatitis C infection

Chronic hepatitis C (CHC) infection, usually an asymptomatic infection, has long-term serious complications such as cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, and end-stage liver disease requiring liver transplantation (LT). Several novel drugs against hepatitis C which form part of 'specifically targeted antiviral therapy for hepatitis C' (STAT-C) have been developed. These include NS3/4A protease inhibitors telaprevir, boceprevir, and nucleoside/non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitors (NS5A) which hold promise for future therapy. Despite the development of new anti-hepatitis C virus (HCV) drugs, ribavirin (RBV) remains the single most important drug to prevent relapse and is frequently included among newer regimens being developed with novel small molecule anti-HCV drugs. The current approved treatment is a combination therapy of once weekly subcutaneous pegylated-interferon (PEG-IFN)-α plus body-weight-based oral RBV regimen. The most significant dose-dependent side effect of RBV is hemolytic anemia warranting dose reduction or discontinuation in severe cases compromising sustained virological response (SVR). Monitoring RBV plasma concentration has been challenging due to its peculiar pharmacokinetics and has been done to predict both efficacy and toxicity. Herein, we review the pharmacological profile of RBV and the monitoring of its plasma concentration, monitoring in renal impairment, post-LT, and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-HCV co-infection in patients being treated with combination therapy of PEG-IFN-α and RBV.

Current treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus/HIV-infected individuals: the role of pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Liver disease is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in the era of combination antiretroviral therapy in HIV/hepatitis C virus (HCV) co-infected patients. This review highlights the role of pegylated interferon-alpha (peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) therapy and examines factors associated with response and strategies to maximize responses.

RECENT FINDINGS

HCV viral clearance is lower in HIV co-infected patients than in HCV mono-infected patients. However, in patients who attain sustained response there is clinical benefit in terms of liver disease associated morbidity and mortality and treatment is costeffective. Predictors of response appear similar, although there are a number of modifiable patient-associated and HIV-associated factors that could be addressed. Moreover, the use of weight-based RBV and treatment length guided by early viral responses improve response rate. Avoidance of drug-drug interactions and use of haematopoietic growth factors reduce adverse events and dose reductions and ultimately increase response rates. Very early prediction of treatment futility is promising. Induction dosing strategies have not yielded positive results, though twice weekly peg-IFN-alpha-2a induction therapy merits further investigation.

SUMMARY

Peg-IFN/RBV therapy plays an important role in the management of HCV in HIV-infected patients. Efforts to maximize response to current therapy need to continue while we await new therapies.

Influence of HCV genotype 1 subtypes on the virus response to PEG interferon alpha-2a plus ribavirin therapy

New factors that influence the viral response in HCV non-genotype 2/3 patients must be identified in order to optimize anti-HCV treatment. This multicenter prospective study evaluates the influence of HCV variability and pharmacological parameters on the virological response of these patients to pegylated interferon α2a (peg-IFN-α2a: 180 µg/week) and ribavirin (RBV; 800-1,200 mg/day) for 48 weeks. HCV subtypes were identified by sequencing the NS5B region. Serum RBV and peg-IFN-α2a concentrations were measured at weeks 4 and 12. The 115 patients (67 men; median age = 49, range 31-76) included 64 who had never been treated and 27 co-infected with HIV. The mean baseline HCV RNA was 6.30 ± 0.06 log IU/ml and the HCV genotypes were: G1 (n = 93) with 1a (n = 37) and 1b (n = 50), G4 (n = 20) and G5 (n = 2). Most patients (79/108; 73%) had an early virological response. Independent predictors of an early virological response were interferon naive patients (OR=  2.98, 95% CI: 1.15-7.72) and RBV of >2,200 ng/ml at week 12 (OR = 3.41, 95% CI: 1.31-8.90). Forty of 104 patients (38%) had a sustained virological response. The only independent predictors of a sustained virological response were subtype 1b (OR = 6.82, 95% CI: 1.7-26.8), and HCV RNA <15 IU/ml at week 12 (OR = 25, 95% CI: 6.4-97.6). Thus a serum RBV concentration of >2,200 ng/ml was associated with an early virological response and patients infected with HCV subtype 1b had a better chance of a sustained virological response than did those infected with subtype 1a.

Effect of an induction period of pegylated interferon-α2a and ribavirin on early virological response in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients: results from the CORAL-2 study

BACKGROUND

It is uncertain whether a 4-week induction period of pegylated interferon and ribavirin increases early virological response (EVR) in HIV-HCV-coinfected patients.

METHODS

HIV and HCV genotype 1- and 4-coinfected subjects were randomized to receive pegylated interferon-α2a 270 μg/week plus ribavirin 1,600 mg daily and epoetin-β for 4 weeks, followed by pegylated interferon-α2a at standard dosages plus weight-based ribavirin (WBR) dosage for 8 weeks (induction arm [IA]), or pegylated interferon-α2a plus WBR for 12 weeks (standard therapy arm [SA]). HCV RNA was determined at weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8 and 12. Ribavirin plasma trough concentrations were determined at weeks 4 (RBV-C(4)) and 12 (RBV-C(12)).

RESULTS

A total of 67 patients were included; 33 in the SA and 34 in the IA. Overall, 25% received nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI)-sparing regimens. More patients achieved an HCV RNA decrease ≥1 log(10) at week 4 in the IA than in the SA (62% versus 38%; P=0.017), but EVR rates were similar in the two groups (74% versus 59% in the IA and SA, respectively; P=0.15). Independent predictors of faster HCV RNA decrease at 12 weeks were higher RBV-C(4) and younger age. RBV-C(4) were higher in patients allocated in the IA and in those receiving NRTIs (P=0.039).

CONCLUSIONS

A 4-week induction with pegylated interferon-α2a plus ribavirin was associated with a greater decrease in HCV RNA at week 4; however, this did not translate into higher EVR rates. Higher RBV doses and avoidance of NRTI-sparing antiretroviral regimens might improve HCV treatment efficacy.

Very early prediction of response to HCV treatment with PEG-IFN-alfa-2a and ribavirin in HIV/HCV-coinfected patients

The objective of this study was to find very early viral kinetic markers to predict nonresponse to hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy in a group of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/HCV-coinfected patients. Twenty-six patients (15 HCV genotype-1 and 11 genotype-3) were treated with a 48-week regimen of peginterferon-alfa-2a (PEG-IFN) (180 μg/week) and weight-based ribavirin (11 mg/kg/day). Samples were collected at baseline; 4, 8, 12, 18, 24, 30, 36 and 42 h; days 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 15, 22, 29, 43 and 57 then weekly and monthly. Five patients discontinued treatment. Seven patients (27%) achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). Nadir HCV RNA levels were observed 1.6 ± 0.3 days after initiation of therapy, followed by a 0.3- to 12.9-fold viral rebound until the administration of the second dose of PEG-IFN, which were not associated with SVR or HCV genotype. A viral decline <1.19 log for genotype-1 and <0.97 log for genotype-3, 2 days after starting therapy, had a negative predictive value (NPV) of 100% for SVR. The day 2 virological response had a similar positive predictive value for SVR as a rapid virological response at week 4. In addition, a second-phase viral decline slope (i.e., measured from day 2 to 29) <0.3 log/week had a NPV = 100% for SVR. We conclude that first-phase viral decline at day 2 and second-phase viral decline slope (<0.3 log/week) are excellent predictors of nonresponse. Further studies are needed to validate these viral kinetic parameters as early on-treatment prognosticators of nonresponse in patients with HCV and HIV.

Ribavirin monitoring in chronic hepatitis C therapy: anaemia versus efficacy

The standard treatment of HCV infection with pegylated interferon-alpha2a or -alpha2b and ribavirin is effective in <50% of HCV genotype-1-infected patients. To improve this figure, it might be desirable to obtain optimal plasma concentrations of the drug by increasing the dose. Unfortunately, there is great interpatient variability in ribavirin pharmacokinetics. In the present review, we describe the mechanism of ribavirin-induced anaemia in detail, evaluate host predictive factors for this harmful side effect and assess the literature data on attempts to improve the sustained virological response rate by increasing the dose of ribavirin. We suggest an optimal steady-state concentration range for ribavirin in monoinfected and coinfected patients. Lastly, we propose that it would be of particular value to monitor ribavirin concentrations in HCV genotype-1-infected patients and (regardless of the genotype) coinfected patients, haemodialyzed patients and obese patients.

Hepatitis C virus treatment-related anemia is associated with higher sustained virologic response rate

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment is frequently complicated by anemia from ribavirin (RBV)-related hemolysis and peginterferon-alfa (PEG-IFN)-related bone marrow suppression. We investigated the relationships among treatment outcomes, anemia, and their management with RBV dose reduction and/or erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs).

METHODS

We analyzed data from a trial conducted at 118 United States academic and community centers in treatment-naïve patients with HCV genotype 1. Patients were treated for as many as 48 weeks with 1 of 3 PEG-IFN/RBV regimens. ESAs were permitted for anemic patients (hemoglobin [Hb] <10 g/dL) after RBV dose reduction. Sustained virologic responses (SVR) were assessed based on decreases in Hb, anemia, and ESA use.

RESULTS

While patients received treatment, 3023 had their Hb levels measured at least once. An SVR was associated with the magnitude of Hb decrease: >3 g/dL, 43.7%; ≤3 g/dL, 29.9% (P < .001). Anemia occurred in 865 patients (28.6%); 449 of these (51.9%) used ESAs. In patients with early-onset anemia (≤ 8 weeks of treatment), ESAs were associated with higher SVR rate (45.0% vs 25.9%; P < .001) and reduced discontinuation of treatment because of adverse events (12.6% vs 30.1%, P < .001). ESAs did not affect SVR or discontinuation rates among patients with late-stage anemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Among HCV genotype 1-infected patients treated with PEG-IFN/RBV, anemia was associated with higher rates of SVR. The effect of ESAs varied by time to anemia; patients with early-onset anemia had higher rates of SVR with ESA use, whereas no effect was observed in those with late-onset anemia. Prospective trials are needed to assess the role of ESAs in HCV treatment.

Plasma/erythrocyte ribavirin x100 ratio as an indicator of sustained virological response in HCV genotype 1 patients with early virological response

BACKGROUND

On-treatment predictors during antiviral therapy of HCV are useful because they allow discontinuation of an unnecessary treatment in non-responders. Our aim was to evaluate the usefulness of plasma and erythrocyte ribavirin levels in predicting sustained virological response (SVR) in HCV genotype 1 patients undergoing antiviral treatment.

METHODS

A total of 40 HCV genotype 1 patients treated with pegylated interferon-alpha2a 180 microg weekly plus ribavirin 1,000 or 1,200 mg daily (according to body weight) were included in the study. Plasma and erythrocyte ribavirin levels were evaluated in all patients at week 12 by HPLC. At week 24, ribavirin levels were reassessed in those achieving early virological response (EVR).

RESULTS

A total of 27 patients achieved EVR, whereas 17 achieved SVR. There was no difference among EVR and non-EVR patients in terms of plasma and erythrocyte ribavirin concentrations at week 12. At week 24, EVR patients obtaining SVR exhibited higher mean +/-sd levels of ribavirin in plasma and lower levels in erythrocytes compared with non-SVR patients (in plasma 12.8 +/-10 versus 5.8 +/-4 microM [P<0.02] and in erythrocytes 1,053 +/-504 versus 1,613 +/-589 microM [P<0.03]). When the plasma ribavirin/erythrocyte ribavirin x100 ratio was compared, the difference was enhanced (1.5 +/-1.3 versus 0.4 +/-0.3 microM; P<0.01). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified a cutoff for plasma ribavirin/erythrocyte ribavirin x100 ratio in predicting SVR of 0.71 with a negative predictive value of 0.8 and a positive predictive value of 0.9, whereas those related to EVR were 1 and 0.6, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma ribavirin/erythrocyte ribavirin x100 ratio at week 24 seems to be a good indicator of SVR in HCV genotype 1 patients achieving EVR.

Pharmacodynamics of PEG-IFN-alpha-2a in HIV/HCV co-infected patients: implications for treatment outcomes

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pegylated-interferon-alpha-2a (PEG-IFN) have not been described in HCV/HIV co-infected patients. We sought to estimate the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of PEG-IFN and determine whether these parameters predict treatment outcome.

METHODS

Twenty-six HCV/human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-co-infected patients were treated with a 48-week regimen of PEG-IFN (180 microg/week) plus ribavirin (11 mg/kg/day). HCV RNA and PEG-IFN concentrations were obtained from samples collected until week 12. A modeling framework that includes pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters was developed.

RESULTS

Five patients discontinued treatment. Seven patients achieved a sustained virological response (SVR). PEG-IFN concentrations at day 8 were similar to steady-state levels (p=0.15) and overall pharmacokinetic parameters were similar in SVRs and non-SVRs. The maximum PEG-IFN effectiveness during the first PEG-IFN dose and the HCV-infected cell loss rate (delta), were significantly higher in SVRs compared to non-SVRs (median 95% vs. 86% [p=0.013], 0.27 vs. 0.11 day(-1) [p=0.006], respectively). Patients infected with HCV genotype 1 had a significantly lower average first-week PEG-IFN effectiveness (median 70% vs. 88% [p=0.043]), however, 4- to 12-week PEG-IFN effectiveness was not significantly different compared to those with genotype 3 (p=0.114). Genotype 1 had a significantly lower delta compared to genotype 3 (median 0.14 vs. 0.23 day(-1) [p=0.021]). The PEG-IFN concentration that decreased HCV production by 50% (EC(50)) was lower in genotype 3 compared to genotype 1 (median 1.3 vs. 3.4 [p=0.034]).

CONCLUSIONS

Both the HCV-infected cell loss rate (delta) and the maximum effectiveness of the first dose of PEG-IFN-alpha-2a characterised HIV co-infected patients and were highly predictive of SVR. Further studies are needed to validate these viral kinetic parameters as early on-treatment prognosticators of response in patients with HCV and HIV.

Role of ribavirin in HCV treatment response: now and in the future

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Ribavirin is a broad spectrum antiviral agent that is used with pegylated IFN (Peg-IFN) for HCV treatment. Ribavirin does not significantly reduce HCV viral load when used alone but increases rates of sustained virologic response (SVR) when combined with Peg-IFN. HCV genotype 1 infected patients require higher doses of ribavirin administered for a longer duration of time versus HCV genotypes 2 and 3 patients who respond effectively to Peg-IFN with lower doses of ribavirin and shorter duration of therapy. Higher serum concentrations of ribavirin are associated with higher response rates but also higher rates of hemolytic anemia which is a dose limiting side effect. Alternatives to current therapy are under clinical evaluation.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Systematic literature review of ribavirin use in HCV patients from 1995 to 2009 was conducted.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

To review the efficacy and safety of ribavirin in current HCV treatment and in new therapies in Phase III clinical trials.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Ribavirin is a drug which is essential to produce higher SVR rates both with Peg-IFN and HCV protease inhibitors currently in Phase III clinical trials. Thus, ribavirin is and will remain an important drug to achieving higher SVR rates in HCV infected persons.

The utility of therapeutic drug monitoring for ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C--a critical review

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the utility of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for ribavirin in chronic hepatitis C.

DATA SOURCES

Literature searches were conducted through PubMed (1949-June 2009), EMBASE (1980-June 2009), BIOSIS Previews (1969-June 2009), International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (1970-June 2009), Google, and www.clinicaltrials.gov using the terms ribavirin, therapeutic monitoring, hepatitis C, and drug levels. In addition, pertinent reference citations from identified publications were reviewed. Studies were limited to English language, adult age, and human subjects.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

All articles identified from the data sources were evaluated. Studies that measured ribavirin concentrations or dose and treatment response were included in the review.

DATA SYNTHESIS

While monitoring of ribavirin plasma concentrations to improve treatment response in patients with chronic hepatitis C has been described in the literature, the utility of TDM for ribavirin in this group of patients has not been systematically studied. Thus, a previously published 9-step decision-making algorithm was employed to help determine whether TDM is warranted, based on currently available evidence. Thirty articles involving patients with chronic hepatitis C mono-infection, 12 for hepatitis C-HIV coinfection, 5 for renal dysfunction, and 5 for post-liver transplant patients were reviewed. In all subpopulations, studies exist that either support or refute the usefulness of ribavirin TDM. Additionally, the majority of the included studies had methodologic limitations, such as small sample size, retrospective analyses, and lack of p value adjustment for multiple analyses. Large randomized controlled trials would help to definitively answer this question.

CONCLUSIONS

There is conflicting evidence about the existence of a correlation between ribavirin concentrations and virologic response or development of toxicity. This inconsistent evidence, coupled with the currently employed effective strategies that maximize sustained virologic response and minimize development of anemia, precludes the utility of TDM for ribavirin.

Mathematical modeling of HCV infection and treatment

In the last decade, viral kinetic modeling has played an important role in the analysis of HCV RNA decay after the initiation of antiviral therapy. Models have provided a means of evaluating the antiviral effectiveness of therapy and of estimating parameters, such as the rate of virion clearance and the rate of loss of HCV-infected cells, and they have suggested mechanisms of action for both interferon-alpha and ribavirin. The inclusion of homeostatic proliferation of infected and uninfected hepatocytes in existing viral kinetic models has allowed prediction of most observed HCV RNA profiles under treatment, for example, biphasic and triphasic viral decay and viral rebound to baseline values after the cessation of therapy. In addition, new kinetic models have taken into consideration the different pharmacokinetics of standard and pegylated forms of interferon and have incorporated alanine aminotransferase kinetics and aspects of immune responses to provide a more comprehensive picture of the biology underlying changes in HCV RNA during therapy. Here, we describe our current understanding of the kinetics of HCV infection and treatment.

Differences in Virological Response to Pegylated Interferon and Ribavirin between Hepatitis C Virus (Hcv)-Monoinfected and HCV–Hiv-Coinfected Patients

Background

Suboptimal doses of ribavirin have been suggested to explain the diminished efficacy of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin in hepatitis C virus (HCV)–HIV-coinfected patients.

Methods

A cohort of 104 coinfected patients and an age-, sex- and genotype-matched cohort of HCV-monoinfected patients ( n=104) were compared. All patients received PEG-IFN-α2a 180 μg/week plus ribavirin 800–1,200 mg daily (HCV genotype 2/3 patients received 800 mg daily and those with genotype 1/4 received 1,000–1,200 mg daily) for 48 weeks (24 weeks for monoinfected patients with genotypes 2/3). HCV RNA levels were determined qualitatively at weeks 4, 12, 24, 48 and 72 and quantified monthly until week 12.

Results

The coinfected cohort had more advanced liver disease and lower body weight. HCV genotype 1 patients coinfected with HIV showed higher levels of HCV RNA than monoinfected patients. A significantly higher proportion of coinfected patients interrupted the prescribed treatment period prematurely (84% versus 98%). During the first 12 weeks, smaller decreases in HCV RNA levels were observed in coinfected patients. Among patients with HCV genotype 1, coinfected patients achieved lower rates of early virological response (64% versus 87%), end-of-treatment response (47.3% versus 80%) and sustained virological response (SVR; 27.3% versus 56.4%), but not rapid virological response (RVR). HCV–HIV-coinfected patients with HCV genotype 2/3 achieved significantly lower rates of RVR (52% versus 88%). Multivariate analysis identified RVR, gender and liver fibrosis as independent predictors of SVR.

Conclusions

Differences in efficacy of PEG-IFN-α2a plus ribavirin treatment between HCV–HIV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients were maintained despite optimized ribavirin dose.

Hepatitis C Viral Kinetics in Special Populations

Mathematical models of hepatitis C viral (HCV) kinetics provide a means of estimating the antiviral effectiveness of therapy, the rate of virion clearance and the rate of loss of HCV-infected cells. They have also proved useful in evaluating the extrahepatic contribution to HCV plasma viremia and they have suggested mechanisms of action for both interferon-α and ribavirin. Viral kinetic models can explain the observed HCV RNA profiles under treatment, e.g., flat partial response, biphasic and triphasic viral decay and viral rebound. Current therapy with (pegylated) interferon-α and ribavirin has a poorer success in patients having insulin resistance, hepatic fibrosis, African American ethnicity, HCV/HIV-coinfection, HCV genotype-1 and high baseline viral load. The use of mathematical modeling and statistical analysis of experimental data have been useful in understanding some of these treatment obstacles.

Serum concentrations of ribavirin and pegylated interferon and viral responses in patients infected with HIV and HCV

The hepatitis C virus (HCV) infects a substantial proportion of patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Patients infected with both HCV and HIV respond poorly to anti-HCV treatment with pegylated interferon alpha and ribavirin. But few data are available on the influence of ribavirin and interferon concentrations on treatment outcome for these patients. This study investigated the relationship between the serum pegylated interferon and ribavirin concentrations 3 and 6 months after treatment initiation, and treatment outcome in 35 HCV-HIV coinfected patients. The pegylated interferon and ribavirin concentrations at months 3 and 6 were similar. The pegylated interferon concentrations at 3 months in responders and nonresponders were similar. However, responders tended to have higher ribavirin concentrations (2,322 ng/ml) than nonresponders (1,833 ng/ml; P = 0.08). Responders infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4 had higher ribavirin concentrations (2,672 ng/ml) than did similarly infected nonresponders (1,758 ng/ml; P = 0.04). ROC curve analysis showed that a ribavirin concentration of 2,300 ng/ml was the best threshold for predicting a nonresponse (ROC area = 0.80 +/- 0.12). Thus ribavirin concentrations influence treatment outcome in HIV patients infected with HCV genotype 1 or 4. Monitoring ribavirin concentrations could help adapt ribavirin concentrations and improve the sustained virological response.

Ribavirin exposure after the first dose is predictive of sustained virological response in chronic hepatitis C

The impact of ribavirin exposure on sustained virological response (SVR) in patients with chronic hepatitis C is unknown. Preliminary studies showed marked inter-individual variability of ribavirin concentrations despite dose adjustment for body weight (BW) and suggested there was a correlation between single time point concentrations and SVR. None of them evaluated the global exposure to ribavirin. This study was conducted to determine whether early ribavirin global exposure is related with SVR. An exploratory pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) study was conducted in genotype 1 hepatitis C patients treated with peginterferon alfa-2a and ribavirin (dose-adjusted for BW) for 12 weeks, to which amantadine was added for the following 36 weeks. Full and abbreviated ribavirin area under the concentration time curves (AUC(0-12h), AUC(0-4h)) were derived from plasma concentration profiles at day 0 (D0), week 12 (W12), W12 + 1 day, and W24. Virological follow-up was performed at D0 (0, 12, and 24 hours), W2, W4, W6, and monthly until W72 (TaqMan polymerase chain reaction, cut-off 15 international units/mL). Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the study and 24 completed it. Patients with a SVR had a significantly higher D0 AUC(0-12h) (3695 [1571-6916] versus 2937 [1266-4913] microg/hour/L, P = 0.03) and D0 AUC(0-4h) (2010 [615-3175] versus 1340 [622-2246] microg/hour/L, P = 0.03). Patients with D0 AUCs above the cut-off values defined by receiver operating characteristic curves (3014 microg/hour/L and 1755 microg/hour/L for AUC(0-12h) and AUC(0-4h), respectively) had a significantly better chance of achieving an SVR than patients with AUCs under the thresholds (odds ratio = 16.0, 95% confidence interval 1.54-166.6, P = 0.02 and odds ratio = 8.9, 95% confidence interval, 1.4-56.6; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Ribavirin exposure at D0 is significantly related to SVR. To our knowledge, this is the first study to give an early pharmacokinetic predictor of SVR. We propose a minimum AUC(0-4h) threshold of 1755 microg/hour/L at D0 as a target for ribavirin dose adjustment.

Low Response to Pegylated Interferon plus Ribavirin in HIV-Infected Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C Treated with Abacavir

Background

There is little information about the influence of antiretroviral drugs on the antiviral activity of pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) plus ribavirin (RBV) against hepatitis C virus (HCV).

Methods

All HIV-infected patients with chronic hepatitis C who received first-line PEG-IFN plus RBV were retrospectively analyzed. Only patients in whom virological stopping rules were applied and who did not change their antiretrovirals were chosen. Plasma RBV concentrations were measured at week 4.

Results

A total of 493 patients (78% males, mean age 41 years, 78% on antiretroviral therapy, mean CD4+ T-cell count 561 cells/μl) fit the study inclusion criteria. Mean baseline serum HCV RNA was 5.89 log10 IU/ml, 65% were infected by genotypes 1 or 4 and 40% had advanced liver fibrosis (Metavir F3F4). The overall rate of sustained virological response (SVR) was 38%. Factors associated with lack of SVR in the multivariate analyses (odds ratio [95% confidence interval], P-value) were higher baseline serum HCV RNA (2.42 per log10 IU/ml [1.31–4.46], 0.005), HCV genotypes 1 or 4 (5.95 [2.50–14.29], <0.001) and lower RBV plasma trough concentrations (1.74 per μg/ml [1.15–2.63], 0.009). Interestingly, a trend was noticed for abacavir use (2.22 [0.91–5.40], 0.08), which become significant when only considering the subset of patients with RBV plasma levels <2.3 μg/ml (7.63 [1.39–41.67], 0.02).

Conclusions

The use of abacavir might interfere with the anti-HCV activity of PEG-IFN plus RBV. As both antivirals are guanosine analogues, an inhibitory competition between abacavir and RBV might explain this observation, which is more prominent in patients with lower RBV exposure.

Early Monitoring of Ribavirin Serum Concentration is not Useful to Optimize Hepatitis C Virus treatment in HIV-Coinfected Patients

Background

Emerging data suggest that higher ribavirin (RBV) exposure could improve early hepatitis C virus (HCV) response. Furthermore, interindividual RBV bioavailability shows high variation, and dose-limiting haemolytic anaemia is a common adverse event. Therefore, it has been suggested that monitoring RBV serum levels could be used to drive dose modification and to optimize management of HCV-infected patients receiving combination treatment.

Methods

To assess the effect of RBV serum levels on HCV RNA clearance at week 4 and 12 of treatment, and to determine the correlation between RBV serum concentration and haemoglobin decrease, RBV trough levels were measured by HPLC in stored serum samples obtained from 94 HCV-HIV-coinfected patients at week 4 and 12 of treatment with peginterferon-α2b (1.5 μg/kg/weekly) plus ribavirin (800–1,200 mg/day).

Results

The median RBV levels increased from 1.70 μg/ml at week 4 to 1.97 μg/ml at week 12 of treatment ( P=0.001) and were independently predicted by weight-adjusted dose of RBV and co-administration of tenofovir. Haemoglobin drop was higher among patients who received zidovudine and weakly correlated with RBV level. Although RBV concentration was lower in genotype 1 or 4 HCV-infected patients who cleared the virus at treatment week 4, the ability of this parameter to discriminate between responders and non-responders at treatment week 4 and 12 was poor.

Conclusion

Intracellular RBV accumulation early in treatment might improve the kinetics of HCV response in difficult to treat patients. Although this hypothesis and the potential interaction between RBV and tenofovir warrant further research, our data do not support RBV serum monitoring as a tool to optimize treatment in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients.

Hepatitis C viral kinetics during treatment of hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfected patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Studies of hepatitis C virus and HIV kinetics during treatment have been instrumental in elucidating the viral lifecycle and mechanisms of action of antiviral therapies. We sought to review data on hepatitis C virus kinetics in hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfected patients and to illustrate how viral kinetics might direct therapeutic decisions in these patients.

RECENT FINDINGS

Few studies have so far analysed the dynamic changes in hepatitis C virus RNA after treatment initiation in hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfected patients. These studies applied mathematical models previously developed in hepatitis C virus mono-infected patients, and the results obtained did not reveal major differences in viral kinetics between the two patient groups. Similar to mono-infected patients, early measurements of hepatitis C virus RNA levels after treatment initiation have been shown to have utility in predicting treatment response in coinfected patients.

SUMMARY

Confirmatory studies are required to determine definitively whether differences exist between hepatitis C virus kinetics in mono compared with coinfected patients. With additional data, these methods have the potential to direct decisions in hepatitis C virus/HIV coinfection.