Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of a full dose sofosbuvir-based regimen given daily in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C

Pharmacokinetics of Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir and efficacy of an alternate-day treatment in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C infection

Sofosbuvir/Velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) is a combination drug used for chronic hepatitis C (HCV) infection. However, limited information exists regarding the pharmacokinetics of SOF/VEL and its metabolites in hemodialysis patients. We conducted a prospective investigation of the pharmacokinetic parameters of SOF/VEL after a single dose of SOF/VEL (400/100 mg) on days with and without dialysis in 12 Thai hemodialysis patients with chronic HCV infection, who had been undergoing hemodialysis for a duration of 0.5-20 years. Blood samples were collected before dose (0) and 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0, 3.5, 4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 8.0, and 12.0 h after dose. Dialysate samples were also collected before dose (0) and 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 h after dose. Plasma and dialysate samples were quantified for SOF and its metabolite, GS-331007, and VEL concentrations using a fully validated LCMS technique. In addition, a preliminary efficacy study was conducted using the proposed SOF/VEL dose reduction regimen in all patients. No differences in SOF/VEL PK parameters between on- and off-dialysis studies. On the contrary, GS-331007 exhibited a 30% reduction in the area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24h) on dialysis days compared with non-dialysis days (AUC0-24h ratio 0.68 vs. 1.04, respectively). The dialysis clearance of SOF and GS-331007 was 9.35 (8.72-15.11) and 8.89 (8.52-14.07) mL/min, respectively. Subsequently, an alternate-day regimen of SOF/VEL (400/100 mg) was administered for 12 weeks, resulting in an undetectable plasma HCV viral load without side effects. Further clinical studies are warranted to validate the efficacy and safety of our proposed dose reduction regimen.

Efficacy of Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir Combination in the Treatment of Hepatitis C Virus (HCV) in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Patients

Background Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is still common in patients with chronic renal failure, even those on maintenance dialysis. A bidirectional association exists between HCV infection and chronic renal disease. Objective To assess the efficacy of sofosbuvir and velpatasvir combination in the treatment of chronic HCV in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Methodology This descriptive, cross-sectional study was undertaken at the departments of Gastroenterology and Nephrology Lady Reading Hospital, Peshawar, from April 7, 2021, to October 7, 2021. Patients with chronic HCV and chronic renal disease at stage 4 or 5 were included while patients with decompensated cirrhosis liver, hepatoma, hepatitis B virus/HCV (HBV/HCV) coinfection, and post liver transplant patients were excluded. HCV infection was diagnosed based on detectable HCV ribonucleic acid (HCV RNA) by PCR (polymerase chain reaction). In contrast, CKD was diagnosed based on the Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria for CKD. Sofosbuvir 400 mg orally daily and velpatasvir 100 mg orally with meals were given daily for 12 weeks. Effectiveness was defined as negative HCV RNA by PCR 12 weeks after treatment completion called sustained virological response rate 12 weeks after treatment completion (SVR12). Results A total of 73 patients including 67 (91.78%) males and six (8.22%) females between the ages of 20 years and 70 years were included in this study. The mean age of the participants was 48.77±8.0 years. Twelve weeks after the treatment completion, 69 (94.52%) had negative HCV RNA, whereas four (5.48%) patients had detectable HCV RNA. Conclusion It can be concluded from our study that a fixed-dose combination of sofosbuvir 400 mg and velpatasvir 100 mg is quite effective and recommended for treating chronic hepatitis C infection in patients with chronic renal disease in our local setup.

Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir and sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for hepatitis C in Korea: a Phase 3b study

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Despite the availability of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in Korea, need remains for pangenotypic regimens that can be used in the presence of hepatic impairment, comorbidities, or prior treatment failure. We investigated the efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir and sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir for 12 weeks in HCV-infected Korean adults.

METHODS

This Phase 3b, multicenter, open-label study included 2 cohorts. In Cohort 1, participants with HCV genotype 1 or 2 and who were treatment-naive or treatment-experienced with interferon-based treatments, received sofosbuvir-velpatasvir 400/100 mg/day. In Cohort 2, HCV genotype 1 infected individuals who previously received an NS5A inhibitor-containing regimen ≥ 4 weeks received sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir 400/100/100 mg/day. Decompensated cirrhosis was an exclusion criterion. The primary endpoint was SVR12, defined as HCV RNA < 15 IU/mL 12 weeks following treatment.

RESULTS

Of 53 participants receiving sofosbuvir-velpatasvir, 52 (98.1%) achieved SVR12. The single participant who did not achieve SVR12 experienced an asymptomatic Grade 3 ASL/ALT elevation on day 15 and discontinued treatment. The event resolved without intervention. All 33 participants (100%) treated with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir achieved SVR 12. Overall, sofosbuvir-velpatasvir and sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir were safe and well tolerated. Three participants (5.6%) in Cohort 1 and 1 participant (3.0%) in Cohort 2 had serious adverse events, but none were considered treatment-related. No deaths or grade 4 laboratory abnormalities were reported.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with sofosbuvir-velpatasvir or sofosbuvir-velpatasvir-voxilaprevir was safe and resulted in high SVR12 rates in Korean HCV patients.

Safety considerations in the management of hepatitis C and HIV co-infection

INTRODUCTION

Both HCV and HIV are highly prevalent infections with current estimates of 57 and 38 million people infected worldwide, respectively. Oral antivirals can be curative for HCV and rescue HIV patients from disease progression. Dual therapy in coinfected patients requires expertise.

AREAS COVERED

Four major issues challenge dual HCV and HIV treatment, including overlapping drug-related side effects, hepatitis B reactivation, immune reconstitution inflammatory syndromes (IRIS), and drug-drug interactions (DDI). A search was conducted in PubMed from January 2010 to March 2023.

EXPERT OPINION

The advent of second-generation direct-acting antivirals (DDA) that depict higher antiviral potency, fewer side effects, pangenotypic activity and are co-formulated has expanded the indication of HCV therapy and particularly in HIV-coinfected individuals. Sequential initiation of antiretrovirals (ARV) followed by DAA is generally preferred to start dual treatment concomitantly. Close monitoring of rare episodes of HBV reactivation and IRIS is warranted. The most frequent DDI between DAA and ARV affect drug metabolism by CYP450 induction/inhibition, leading to abnormal drug exposures. Throughout this mechanism interact most HCV and HIV protease inhibitors and non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitors. Exposure to some HIV and HCV nucleos(t)ide analogues (e.g. tenofovir and sofosbuvir, respectively) is subject to induction/inhibition of drug transporters and requires special attention in patients with renal insufficiency.

A review on hepatitis C virus: role of viral and host-cellular factors in replication and existing therapeutic strategies

Background

Hepatitis C virus, a member of Flaviviridae is a single-stranded positive-sense RNA virus infecting 62–79 million people around the globe. This blood-borne virus is one of the leading causes of liver diseases worldwide. This review aims to identify novel potential genes linked to cellular host factors, as well as revise the roles of each gene in hepatitis C Virus infection. This review also aims to provide a comprehensive insight into therapeutic advancements against HCV.

Methods

For this review article, 190 articles were searched via PubMed Central, Bio-One, National Academy of Science, Google Scholar, and Worldwide Science. 0ut of these 190 studies, 55 articles were selected for this review. The inclusion of articles was done on the criteria of high citation and Q1 ranking.

Results

The information gathered from previously published articles highlighted a critical link between host-cellular factors that are important for HCV infection.

Conclusion

Although many advancements in HCV treatment have been made like DAAs and HTAs, the development of a completely effective HCV therapy is still a challenge. Further research on combinations of DAAs and HTAs can help in developing a better therapeutic alternative. Keywords: Hepatitis C virus, Replication cycle, Non-structural proteins, Host-cellular factors, Treatment strategies

The world prevalence, associated risk factors and mortality of hepatitis C virus infection in hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The worldwide burden of HCV infection among hemodialysis patients has not been systematically examined.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE and Scopus to determine the worldwide prevalence of HCV infection, risk factors, and clinical outcomes among hemodialysis patients. Random-effect models and meta-regressions were used to generate pooled estimates and assess heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Four hundred and seven studies with 1,302,167 participants were analyzed. The pooled prevalence of HCV infection was 21%. The highest prevalence was observed in Africa (28%) and low-income countries (48.5%). A significant prevalence decline was observed following the publication year and was also inversely related to GDP and total population of each country. Factors associated with HCV positivity included younger age, longer dialysis duration, more blood transfusions, and dialyzer reuse. The pooled unadjusted hazard ratio for all-cause mortality was 1.12 (95% CI 1.03-1.22), and the adjusted hazard ratio was 1.21 (95% CI 1.12-1.30) in HCV-infected compared to non-HCV infected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV infection among hemodialysis patients is a worldwide shared burden and is associated with a higher risk of death. Avoiding unnecessary blood transfusion and dialyzer reuse should be encouraged to prevent HCV transmission in hemodialysis units.

Sofosbuvir-based hepatitis C therapies in patients with chronic and end-stage kidney disease

Sofosbuvir (SOF), a nucleotide inhibitor of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) polymerase, is a component of several all-oral HCV therapies. GS-331007, SOF's predominant metabolite, is renally eliminated and accumulates 5- to 20-fold in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) or undergoing hemodialysis (HD), respectively. Preclinical data did not determine whether these exposures represented a risk for toxicity. Therefore subjects with advanced CKD were not included in registrational studies and SOF was not initially approved for use in advanced CKD. Nevertheless, after initial licensing, off-label use of SOF at full or reduced doses was reported in patients with kidney disease. Two clinical trials of SOF-containing therapies were conducted in patients with end-stage kidney disease, demonstrating safety and efficacy. These led to expanded US Food and Drug Administration approval in 2019 for the use of SOF-containing regimens in patients with advanced CKD, including dialysis dependence. Even so, given the availability of protease inhibitor-containing direct-acting antiviral regimens, there was a reluctance by some practitioners to use SOF-containing regimens in moderate to severe kidney disease. Here we review the existing data on SOF's pharmacokinetics, toxicology, efficacy and safety in patients with kidney disease. Data from both clinical trials and real-world practice settings indicate that in patients with moderate to severe kidney disease, full-dose SOF-based regimens have high rates of efficacy and acceptable safety and tolerability profiles, without increased risk for cardiac adverse events or clinically meaningful changes in kidney function. SOF-based regimens are safe and effective in patients who have moderate to severe kidney disease, including those undergoing HD.

Recent Information on Pan-Genotypic Direct-Acting Antiviral Agents for HCV in Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is still common in patients with chronic kidney disease. It has been recently discovered that chronic HCV is a risk factor for increased incidence of CKD in the adult general population. According to a systematic review with a meta-analysis of clinical studies, pooling results of longitudinal studies (n = 2,299,134 unique patients) demonstrated an association between positive anti-HCV serologic status and increased incidence of CKD; the summary estimate for adjusted HR across the surveys was 1.54 (95% CI, 1.26; 1.87), (p < 0.0001). The introduction of direct-acting antiviral drugs (DAAs) has caused a paradigm shift in the management of HCV infection; recent guidelines recommend pan-genotypic drugs (i.e., drugs effective on all HCV genotypes) as the first-choice therapy for HCV, and these promise to be effective and safe even in the context of chronic kidney disease.

AIM

The purpose of this narrative review is to show the most important data on pan-genotypic DAAs in advanced CKD (CKD stage 4/5).

METHODS

We recruited studies by electronic databases and grey literature. Numerous key-words ('Hepatitis C' AND 'Chronic kidney disease' AND 'Pan-genotypic agents', among others) were adopted.

RESULTS

The most important pan-genotypic combinations for HCV in advanced CKD are glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB) and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL). Two clinical trials (EXPEDITION-4 and EXPEDITION-5) and some 'real-world' studies (n = 6) reported that GLE/PIB combinations in CKD stage 4/5 gave SVR12 rates ranging between 86 and 99%. We retrieved clinical trials (n = 1) and 'real life' studies (n = 6) showing the performance of SOF/VEL; according to our pooled analysis, the summary estimate of SVR rate was 100% in studies adopting SOF/VEL antiviral combinations. The drop-out rate (due to AEs) in patients on SOF/VEL ranged between 0 and 4.8%.

CONCLUSIONS

Pan-genotypic combinations, such as GLE/PIB and SOF/VEL, appear effective and safe for HCV in advanced CKD, even if a limited number of studies with small sample sizes currently exist on this issue. Studies are under way to assess whether successful antiviral therapy with DAAs will translate into better survival in patients with advanced CKD.

The efficacy of the direct-acting antiviral combination in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C virus Genotype 1 infection

Background Interferon and ribavirin treatments previously used in treating chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection cannot be used effectively in hemodialysis patients due to dose adjustment and drug-related side effects. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) therapies have been reported to be effective in hemodialysis patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of DAAs in hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C. Material and Methods Twenty hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C followed in the gastroenterology outpatient clinic between 2016 and 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Results Twelve of the 20 patients were male, and eight were female. The mean age of the patients was 50.7±8.6 years. Six patients had no treatment experience. Fourteen patients had been previously treated with interferon and/or ribavirin but did not achieve sustained virological response (SVR). Genotype 1b was detected in 14 patients, genotype 1a in 4 patients, and genotype 1 in 2 patients. Patients were treated with ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir (OBV/PTV/r) and dasabuvir (DSV) or ribavirin (RBV) for 12 or 24 weeks. Two patients were cirrhotic and had a Child-Pugh score of A. Treatment was discontinued in 2 patients due to thrombus formation in the arteriovenous fistula in the first month of DAAs treatment. SVR12 was evaluated in 14 of 18 patients and found to be 100%. One of the ten patients accepted as SVR24 had a relapse. This rate of SVR24 was similar to that in the general population. Conclusions Our results supported that the OBV/PTV/r and DSV or RBV regimen was a safe and effective therapy for hemodialysis patients with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1.

Pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals for patients with hepatitis C virus infection and chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major health problem with significant clinical and economic burdens in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 4 or 5. Current guidelines recommend pan-genotypic direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) to be the first-line treatment of choice for HCV. This review summarizes the updated knowledge regarding the epidemiology, natural history, public health perspectives of HCV in patients with CKD stage 4 or 5, including those on maintenance dialysis, and the performance of pan-genotypic DAAs in these patients. The prevalence and incidence of HCV are much higher in patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 than in the general population. The prognosis is compromised if HCV patients are left untreated regardless of kidney transplantation (KT). Following treatment-induced HCV eradication, patient can improve the health-related outcomes by maintaining a long-term aviremic state. The sustained virologic response (SVR₁₂) rates and safety profiles of pan-genotypic DAAs against HCV are excellent irrespective of KT. No dose adjustment of pan-genotypic DAAs is required across CKD stages. Assessing drug–drug interactions (DDIs) before HCV treatment is vital to secure on-treatment safety. The use of prophylactic or preemptive pan-genotypic DAAs in HCV-negative recipients who receive HCV-positive kidneys has shown promise in shortening KT waiting time, achieving excellent on-treatment efficacy and safety, and maintaining post-KT patient and graft survival. HCV elimination is highly feasible through multifaceted interventions, including mass screening, treatment scale-up, universal precautions, and post-SVR₁₂ reinfection surveillance.

Impact of Sofosbuvir-Based Direct-Acting Antivirals on Renal Function in Chronic Hepatitis C Patients With Impaired Renal Function: A Large Cohort Study From the Nationwide HCV Registry Program (TACR)

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Sofosbuvir is approved for chronic hepatitis C (CHC) patients with severe chronic kidney disease (CKD). The impact of sofosbuvir-based therapy on renal function augmentation on a real-world nationwide basis is elusive.

METHODS

The 12,995 CHC patients treated with sofosbuvir-based (n = 6802) or non-sofosbuvir-based (n = 6193) regimens were retrieved from the Taiwan nationwide real-world HCV Registry Program. Serial estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) levels were measured at baseline, end of treatment (EOT), and end of follow-up (EOF) (3 months after EOT).

RESULTS

The eGFR decreased from baseline (91.4 mL/min/1.73 m²) to EOT (88.4 mL/min/1.73 m²; P < .001) and substantially recovered at EOF (88.8 mL/min/1.73 m²) but did not return to pretreatment levels (P < .001). Notably, a significant decrease in eGFR was observed only in patients with baseline eGFR ≥90 mL/min/1.73 m² (from 112.9 to 106.4 mL/min/1.73 m²; P < .001). In contrast, eGFR increased progressively in patients whose baseline eGFR was <90 mL/min/1.73 m² (from 70.0 to 71.5 mL/min/1.73 m²; P < .001), and this increase was generalized across different stages of CKD. The trend of eGFR amelioration was consistent irrespective of sofosbuvir usage. Multivariate adjusted analysis demonstrated that baseline eGFR >90 mL/min/1.73 m² was the only factor independently associated with significant slope coefficient differences of eGFR (-1.98 mL/min/1.73 m²; 95% confidence interval, -2.24 to -1.72; P < .001). The use of sofosbuvir was not an independent factor associated with eGFR change.

CONCLUSIONS

Both sofosbuvir and non-sofosbuvir-based regimens restored renal function in CHC patients with CKD, especially in those with significant renal function impairment.

Establishing a research production line in real-life settings: the case of Hepatitis C management in a viral hepatitis specialized Egyptian center

Efforts toward eradicating the Hepatitis C virus (HCV) have advanced rapidly, due to the development of direct-acting antivirals (DAAs), especially with the appearance of pan-genotypic combinations. Real-world studies, in particular, have verified the efficacy and safety of DAA combinations documented in registration trials. This review documents the results of using DAA combinations in real-life settings in everyday clinical practice in Egypt, the country with the highest prevalence of HCV. The significant number of treated patients in Egypt, which exceeded four million allowed tremendous data about the results of HCV management in real-life settings for different treatment regimens and disease conditions. DAA combinations have resulted in high sustained virologic response rates (SVR12) and few adverse reactions in real-life settings. SVR12 rates ranged from 90% to 100%, depending on the combination of drugs used, the HCV genotype, and the stage of liver disease. Most adverse reactions reported in real-world settings were mild and resulted in treatment discontinuation in only a minority of cases. Data from real-life studies covered most aspects of HCV management that were lacking after initial approval studies. More research is needed to tailor treatment and produce generic HCV combinations to overcome the residual limitations of the currently available DAAs.

Hepatitis C: Standard of Treatment and What to Do for Global Elimination

Hepatitis C virus infection has a substantial effect on morbidity and mortality worldwide because it is a cause of cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, and liver-related death. Direct acting antiviral drugs available today have high efficacy and excellent safety and can be used in all patients with clinically evident chronic liver disease and in groups that demonstrate risk behaviors to reduce the spread of infection. The Global Health Strategy of WHO to eliminate hepatitis infection by 2030 assumes “a 90% reduction in new cases of chronic hepatitis C, a 65% reduction in hepatitis C deaths, and treatment of 80% of eligible people with HCV infections”. In this review effective models and strategies for achieving the global elimination of HCV infection are analyzed. The screening strategies must be simple and equally effective in high-risk groups and in the general population; fast and effective models for appropriate diagnosis of liver disease are needed; strategies for direct acting antiviral drug selection must be cost-effective; linkage to care models in populations at risk and in marginalized social classes must be specifically designed and applied; strategies for obtaining an effective vaccine against HCV infection have yet to be developed.

Effect of Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir and Glecaprevir/Pibrentasvir on Serum Creatinine

Background & objectives

There are reports of worsening renal functions with sofosbuvir, but there are no comparative data of different direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) on serum creatinine. In this retrospective cohort analysis, we examined the treatment effect of two commonly used regimens, sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (SOF/LDV) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (GLE/PIB), on serum creatinine.

Methods

We included all patients treated with SOF/LDV (n = 825) and GLE/PIB (n = 116) between December 1, 2014, and December 31, 2018. An increase of serum creatinine ≥0.3 mg/dL was considered clinically significant. The change of creatinine values from pretreatment to posttreatment between two treatment groups was tested in unadjusted and adjusted generalized linear model, and risk factors associated with creatinine change were assessed. In addition, GLE/PIB-treated patients were matched 1:2 to SOF/LDV-treated patients using propensity scores, and then serum creatinine changes were compared.

Results

The mean baseline creatinine was higher in the GLE/PIB group vs. SOF/LDV group (1.39 ± 1.86 vs. 0.91 ± 0.24, P = 0.007). When compared to baseline, serum creatinine at posttreatment week 4 was significantly higher in SOF/LDV group (0.97 ± 0.4 vs.0.91 ± 0.24, P < 0.001), but there was no significant change in the GLE/PIB group (1.41 ± 1.73 vs. 1.39 ± 1.86, P = 0.52). Overall, there was no significant change in serum creatinine between posttreatment week 4 and week 24 (P = 0.6). Clinically significant increase in serum creatinine was seen in 6% (46/825) of SOF/LDV and 7% (8/116) of GLE/PIB (P = 0.6). The unadjusted and adjusted models indicated that the changes in creatinine from baseline to posttreatment week 4 and week 24 were not associated with the type of DAA combination.

Conclusion

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C infection with both SOF/LDV and GLE/PIB regimens may result in an increase of creatinine, and 6-7% will have an increase in serum creatinine of ≥0.3 mg/dL. The increase in creatinine, however, is unrelated to the type of DAA combination.

Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir with or without low-dose ribavirin for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus infection and severe renal impairment

OBJECTIVE

Data regarding the real-world effectiveness and safety of sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (SOF/VEL) with or without low-dose ribavirin (RBV) in patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and severe renal impairment (RI) are limited. We evaluated the performance of SOF/VEL with or without low-dose RBV in HCV-infected patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4 or 5.

DESIGN

191 patients with compensated (n=181) and decompensated (n=10) liver diseases receiving SOF/VEL (400/100 mg/day) alone and SOF/VEL with low-dose RBV (200 mg/day) for 12 weeks were retrospectively recruited at 15 academic centres in Taiwan. The effectiveness was determined by sustained virological response at off-treatment week 12 (SVR₁₂) in evaluable (EP) and per-protocol populations (PP). The safety profiles were assessed.

RESULTS

The SVR₁₂ rates by EP and PP analyses were 94.8% (95% CI 90.6% to 97.1%) and 100% (95% CI 97.9% to 100%). In patients with compensated liver disease, the SVR₁₂ rates were 95.0% and 100% by EP and PP analyses. In patients with decompensated liver disease, the SVR₁₂ rates were 90.0% and 100% by EP and PP analyses. Ten patients who failed to achieve SVR₁₂ were attributed to non-virological failures. Among the 20 serious adverse events (AEs), none were judged related to SOF/VEL or RBV. The AEs occurring in ≥10% included fatigue (14.7%), headache (14.1%), nausea (12.6%), insomnia (12.0%) and pruritus (10.5%). None had ≥grade 3 total bilirubin or alanine aminotransferase elevations.

CONCLUSION

SOF/VEL with or without low-dose RBV is effective and well-tolerated in HCV-infected patients with severe RI.

Hepatitis C therapy with grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: data from the German Hepatitis C-Registry (DHC-R)

OBJECTIVES

Grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (G/P) are the two preferred treatment options for patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and a glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min. Both therapies have been separately analyzed in different real-life cohorts; however, a direct comparison has not been performed so far. We, therefore, analyzed safety and effectiveness of both regimens in a concerted real-life population.

METHODS

The Germany Hepatitis C-Registry is a prospective national real-world registry. The analysis is based on 2773 patients with documented GFR at baseline treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 1041), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 53) and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 1679).

RESULTS

A total of 93 patients with GFR <30 mL/min were treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir (N = 56), grazoprevir/elbasvir + ribavirin (N = 4), and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (N = 33). They suffered significantly more frequent from diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary heart disease than individuals with GFR >30 mL/min and showed the following baseline characteristics: 20.4, 55.9, 3.2, 12.9, and 5.3% were infected with HCV-genotypes 1a, 1b, 2, 3, and 4; 12.9% suffered from liver cirrhosis; 80.1% were treatment-naïve. Baseline characteristics except distribution of HCV-genotype 1b (n = 43/52 treated with grazoprevir/elbasvir) and sustained virologic response rates (SVR12) did not differ significantly between glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (SVR12: 100%) and grazoprevir/elbasvir (SVR12: 97.9%).Fatigue, headache, abdominal discomfort, and arthralgia were the most frequently reported adverse events without a statistical difference between grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir.

CONCLUSION

In patients with chronic hepatitis C and a baseline GFR ≤30 mL/min grazoprevir/elbasvir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir show an equally favorable safety profile and antiviral efficacy and can both be recommended for real-life use.

Breakthroughs in hepatitis C research: from discovery to cure

In the 1970s, an unknown virus was suspected for documented cases of transfusion-associated hepatitis, a phenomenon called non-A, non-B hepatitis. In 1989, the infectious transmissible agent was identified and named hepatitis C virus (HCV) and, soon enough, the first diagnostic HCV antibody test was developed, which led to a dramatic decrease in new infections. Today, HCV infection remains a global health burden and a major cause of liver cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplantation. However, tremendous advances have been made over the decades, and HCV became the first curable, chronic viral infection. The introduction of direct antiviral agents revolutionized antiviral treatment, leading to viral eradication in more than 98% of all patients infected with HCV. This Perspective discusses the history of HCV research, which reads like a role model for successful translational research: starting from a clinical observation, specific therapeutic agents were developed, which finally were implemented in national and global elimination programmes.

An Updated View on the Antiviral Therapy of Hepatitis C in Chronic Kidney Disease

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus infection remains common in patients with chronic kidney disease, including those on maintenance dialysis. The relationship between hepatitis C virus infection and chronic kidney disease is bi-directional; in fact, HCV is both a cause and consequence of chronic kidney disease. According to a systematic review with meta-analysis of observational studies (n = 23 studies) (n = 574,081 patients on long-term dialysis), anti-HCV positive serologic status was an independent and significant risk factor for death in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease on long-term dialysis. The overall estimate for adjusted mortality (all-cause death risk) with HCV was 1.26 (95% CI, 1.18; 1.34) (p < 0.0001). Interferon-based therapies are biased by low efficacy/safety in chronic kidney disease, but the advent of direct-acting antiviral drugs has made a paradigm shift in the treatment of HCV-infection. These medications give interruption of viral replication because they target specific non-structural viral proteins; four classes of DAAs exist-NS3/4A protease inhibitors, NS5A inhibitors, NS5B nucleoside and non-nucleoside polymerase inhibitors. All-oral, interferon-free, ribavirin-free combinations of DAAs are now available.

AIM

The goal of this narrative review is to report the available treatment options for HCV in advanced chronic kidney disease.

METHODS

We have made an extensive review of the medical literature and various research engines have been adopted.

RESULTS

Some combinations of DAAs are currently recommended for HCV in advanced CKD (including patients on maintenance dialysis): elbasvir/grazoprevir; glecaprevir/pibrentasvir; and sofosbuvir-based regimens. Solid evidence, based on registration and "real life" studies supports their efficacy (SVR rates > 90%) and safety even in patients with advanced CKD. No dosage adjustment is necessary and treatment duration is 8-12 weeks. However, recent data highlight that many patients with advanced CKD remain untreated, and numerous barriers to antiviral treatment of HCV still exist. Whether successful antiviral therapy with DAAs will translate into improved survival in the advanced CKD population is another point of future research.

Sofosbuvir-based regimens for HCV in stage 4-stage 5 chronic kidney disease. A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is an important agent of liver damage in patients with chronic kidney disease and the advent of DAAs has dramatically changed the management of HCV positive patients, including those with advanced CKD. Sofosbuvir is the backbone of many anti-HCV regimens based on DAAs but it remains unclear whether it is appropriate for HCV-infected patients with stage 4-5 CKD.

STUDY AIMS AND DESIGN

We performed a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical studies in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOF-based DAA regimens in patients with stage 4-5 CKD. The primary outcome was sustained viral response (as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcomes were the frequency of SAEs and drop-outs due to AEs (as measures of tolerability). The random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird was adopted, with heterogeneity and stratified analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty clinical studies (n=1537 unique patients) were retrieved. The pooled SVR12 and SAEs rate was 0.99 (95% confidence intervals, 0.97; 1.0, I²=99.8%) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05; 0.13, I²=84.3%), respectively. The pooled SVR12 rate in studies with high HCV RNA levels at baseline was lower, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75; 1.0, I²=73.3%) (P<0.001). The pooled drop-out rate due to AEs was 0.02 (95% CI, -0.01; 0.04, I²=16.1%). Common serious adverse events were anemia (n=26, 38%) and reduced eGFR (n=14, 19%). SAEs were more common in studies adopting full-dose sofosbuvir (pooled rate of SAEs 0.15, 95% CI, 0.06; 0.25; I²=80.1%) and in those based on ribavirin (0.15, 95% CI, 0.07; 0.23, I²=95.8%). Six studies (n=69 patients) reported eGFR levels at baseline/post- antiviral therapy; no consistent changes were found.

CONCLUSIONS

SOF-based regimens appear safe and effective in patients with stage 4-5 CKD. Serum creatinine should be carefully monitored during therapy with SOF in patients with CKD. Randomized controlled studies in order to expand our knowledge on this point are under way.

Sofosbuvir-based regimens for HCV in stage 4-stage 5 chronic kidney disease. A systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C is an important agent of liver damage in patients with chronic kidney disease and the advent of DAAs has dramatically changed the management of HCV positive patients, including those with advanced CKD. Sofosbuvir is the backbone of many anti-HCV regimens based on DAAs but it remains unclear whether it is appropriate for HCV-infected patients with stage 4-5 CKD.

STUDY AIMS AND DESIGN

We performed a systematic review of the literature with a meta-analysis of clinical studies in order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of SOF-based DAA regimens in patients with stage 4-5 CKD. The primary outcome was sustained viral response (as a measure of efficacy); the secondary outcomes were the frequency of SAEs and drop-outs due to AEs (as measures of tolerability). The random-effects model of DerSimonian and Laird was adopted, with heterogeneity and stratified analyses.

RESULTS

Thirty clinical studies (n=1537 unique patients) were retrieved. The pooled SVR12 and SAEs rate was 0.99 (95% confidence intervals, 0.97; 1.0, I²=99.8%) and 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05; 0.13, I²=84.3%), respectively. The pooled SVR12 rate in studies with high HCV RNA levels at baseline was lower, 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75; 1.0, I²=73.3%) (P<0.001). The pooled drop-out rate due to AEs was 0.02 (95% CI, -0.01; 0.04, I²=16.1%). Common serious adverse events were anemia (n=26, 38%) and reduced eGFR (n=14, 19%). SAEs were more common in studies adopting full-dose sofosbuvir (pooled rate of SAEs 0.15, 95% CI, 0.06; 0.25; I²=80.1%) and in those based on ribavirin (0.15, 95% CI, 0.07; 0.23, I²=95.8%). Six studies (n=69 patients) reported eGFR levels at baseline/post- antiviral therapy; no consistent changes were found.

CONCLUSIONS

SOF-based regimens appear safe and effective in patients with stage 4-5 CKD. Serum creatinine should be carefully monitored during therapy with SOF in patients with CKD. Randomized controlled studies in order to expand our knowledge on this point are under way.

The Efficacy and Safety of Sofosbuvir/Daclatasvir Fixed-Dose Combination in Iranian Hemodialysis Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection

Background: Although several regimens have been approved for the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, sofosbuvir-based regimens are not approved for the treatment of HCV infection in patients with severe renal impairment. Methods: This study was conducted on hemodialysis patients infected with HCV. The patients received a constant dose of sofosbuvir/daclatasvir (SOF/DCV). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was evaluated 12 weeks after completion of treatment. Results: Fifty-one hemodialysis patients with HCV infection were selected and treated with a combination of SOF/DCV. Eleven patients expired during the anti-HCV treatment due to causes not related to liver disease or antiviral therapy. Finally, 40 patients finished the treatment, and 36 cases were evaluated for SVR. Among those tested for SVR, 35 (97.2%, 95% CI: 85.5 - 99.9%) achieved SVR and one (2.8%, 95% CI: 0.1 - 14.5%) relapsed. No patient reported severe adverse events. Conclusions: The combination of SOF/DCV showed great efficacy and safety in hemodialysis patients with severe renal impairment and chronic HCV infection.

An updated systematic review and meta-analysis on efficacy of Sofosbuvir in treating hepatitis C-infected patients with advanced chronic kidney disease

Sofosbuvir seems to be a revolutionary treatment for Hepatitis C-infected patients with advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) but existing evidence is not quite adequate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Sofosbuvir-based therapy without Ribavirin for all hepatitis C virus genotypes among patients with advanced CKD. We conducted an updated systematic literature search from the beginning of 2013 up to June 2020. Sustained virologic response (SVR) rate at 12 and/or 24 weeks after the end of treatment, and adverse events in HCV-infected patients with advanced CKD were pooled using random effects models. We included 27 published articles in our meta-analyses, totaling 1,464 HCV-infected patients with advanced CKD. We found a substantial heterogeneity based on the I2 index (P = 0.00, I2 = 56.1%). The pooled SVR rates at 12 and 24 weeks after the end of Sofosbuvir-based treatment were 97% (95% Confidence Interval: 95-99) and 95% (89-99) respectively. The pooled SVR12 rates were 98% (96-100) and 94% (90-97) in patients under 60 and over 60 years old respectively. The pooled incidence of severe adverse events was 0.11 (0.04-0.19). The pooled SVR12 rate after completion of the half dose regimen was as high as the full dose treatment but it was associated with less adverse events (0.06 versus 0.14). The pooled SVR12 rate was 98% (91-100) in cirrhotic patients and 100% (98-100) in non-cirrhotic patients. The endorsement of Sofosbuvir-based regimen can improve the treatment of hepatitis C virus infection in patients with advanced CKD.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C with sofosbuvir in a hemodialysis patient: a case report

The treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in chronic hemodialysis patients remains an issue of great concern for nephrologists. In 2008 the kidney disease improving global outcomes working group suggested the use of pegylated interferon in end stage kidney disease patients treated by dialysis. Since then, series and some clinical trials on different direct-acting antiviral agents have shown better efficacy and tolerance than interferon-based regimens. Data on the efficacy, tolerance and the right dose of sofosbuvir in this population are still unclear. We report a case of chronic HCV genotype 1b infection in a 47-year-old patient on maintenance hemodialysis successfully treated by a combination of sofosbuvir and ledipasvir for 12 weeks. Evolution was marked by the complete regression of the hepatic cytolysis, a complete and sustained virologic response with HCV viral load undetectable for a 24 months follow-up period. No adverse reaction was found. The treatment of HCV genotype 1 or 4 infection in patients on maintenance hemodialysis is possible with sofosbuvir based regimens with a good efficacy/safety ratio in the absence of current recommended drugs for patients with eGFR<30ml/min/1.73m². The prescription of sofosbuvir should be encouraged amongst this population in this setting.

Comedications and potential drug-drug interactions with direct-acting antivirals in hepatitis C patients on hemodialysis

Background/Aims

Direct‐acting antivirals (DAAs) have been approved for hepatitis C virus (HCV) treatment in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis. Nevertheless, the complicated comedications and their potential drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with DAAs might limit clinical practice in this special population.

Methods

The number, class, and characteristics of comedications and their potential DDIs with five DAA regimens were analyzed among HCV-viremic patients from 23 hemodialysis centers in Taiwan.

Results

Of 2,015 hemodialysis patients screened in 2019, 169 patients seropositive for HCV RNA were enrolled (mean age, 65.6 years; median duration of hemodialysis, 5.8 years). All patients received at least one comedication (median number, 6; mean class number, 3.4). The most common comedication classes were ESRD-associated medications (94.1%), cardiovascular drugs (69.8%) and antidiabetic drugs (43.2%). ESRD-associated medications were excluded from DDI analysis. Sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir had the highest frequency of potential contraindicated DDIs (red, 5.6%), followed by glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (4.0%), sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (1.3%), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (1.3%), and elbasvir/grazoprevir (0.3%). For potentially significant DDIs (orange, requiring close monitoring or dose adjustments), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir had the highest frequency (19.9%), followed by sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (18.2%), glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (12.6%), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (12.6%), and elbasvir/grazoprevir (7.3%). Overall, lipid-lowering agents were the most common comedication class with red-category DDIs to all DAA regimens (n=62), followed by cardiovascular agents (n=15), and central nervous system agents (n=10).

Conclusions

HCV-viremic patients on hemodialysis had a very high prevalence of comedications with a broad spectrum, which had varied DDIs with currently available DAA regimens. Elbasvir/grazoprevir had the fewest potential DDIs, and sofosbuvir/velpatasvir/voxilaprevir had the most potential DDIs.

Hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with chronic renal disease: Challenges of interventional treatment

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy worldwide, recognized as the fourth most common cause of cancer related death. Many risk factors, leading to liver cirrhosis and associated HCC, have been recognized, among them viral hepatitis infections play an important role worldwide. Patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD), especially those on maintenance dialysis, show a higher prevalence of viral hepatitis than the general population what increases the risk of HCC onset. In addition, renal dysfunction may have a negative prognostic impact on both immediate and long-term outcomes after malignancy treatment. Several interventional procedures for the treatment of HCC are currently available: thermal ablation, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization, liver surgery or even liver transplantation. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer system provides an evidence-based treatment algorithm to address different categories of patients to the most-effective treatment in consideration of the extension of disease, liver function and performance status. Liver resection and transplantation are usually reserved to patients with early stage HCC and acceptable performance status, while the other treatments are more indicated in case of impaired liver function or locally advanced or unresectable tumors. However, there is no validated treatment algorithm for HCC in CKD patients, mainly due to the rarity of reports in this cohort of patients. Hereby we discuss the available evidences on interventional HCC treatments in CKD patients, and briefly report up-to-date pharmacological therapy for HCC patients affected by viral hepatitis.

EASL recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C: Final update of the series☆

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a major cause of chronic liver disease, with approximately 71 million chronically infected individuals worldwide. Clinical care for patients with HCV-related liver disease has advanced considerably thanks to an enhanced understanding of the pathophysiology of the disease, as well as developments in diagnostic procedures and improvements in therapy and prevention. These therapies make it possible to eliminate hepatitis C as a major public health threat, as per the World Health Organization target, although the timeline and feasibility vary from region to region. These European Association for the Study of the Liver recommendations on treatment of hepatitis C describe the optimal management of patients with recently acquired and chronic HCV infections in 2020 and onwards.

The effect of anemia on the efficacy and safety of treating chronic hepatitis C infection with direct-acting antivirals in patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND/AIM

Chronic hepatitis-C infection is a great health burden in Egypt. The effect of anemia on the efficacy and safety of direct-acting anti-viral (DAA) therapies for those with chronic-kidney disease (CKD) has not been evaluated.

PATIENTS/METHODS

This single-center retrospective study included 235 renal patients: i.e., 70-CKD patients not on hemodialysis (42 with anemia, 28 without); 40 hemodialysis patients (16 anemic; 24 non-anemic), and 125 kidney-transplant (KTx) recipients (40 anemic; 85 non-anemic). Anemia was defined by a hemoglobin level < 10.5 g/dL. Hemodialysis patients received ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir/ombitasvir. KTx patients received sofosbuvir/daclatasvir. CKD patients with eGFR > 30 mL/min/1.73 m² received sofosbuvir/daclatasvir. Those with eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m² received ritonavir-boosted paritaprevir/ombitasvir; 64 non-anemic patients also received ribavirin therapy.

RESULTS

Mean age of CKDs was 49.1 years, 43.2 years for HDs, and 45.2 years for KTx patients. Most were male; body-mass index was ~ 23.8. Anemia did not affect the efficacy of DAAs in hemodialysis, CKD, or KTx patients. Most patients achieved a rapid virologic response (RVR), and a 12- and 24-week sustained viral response. Worsening of anemia among the non-anemic group was mostly related to ribavirin therapy in hemodialysis patients (11/16 patients). Acute kidney injury in CKDs occurred more frequently within the anemic group (59.5%) compared to the non-anemic group (32.1%). For KTx, graft impairment was more common among the anemic group (7/40) compared to the non-anemic group (2/85).

CONCLUSION

Hemoglobin levels of < 10.5 g/dL prior to DAA treatment did not affect the virological response in renal patients but was associated with increased serum creatinine among KTx and those with CKD.

Sofosbuvir: Really Meets the Unmet Needs for Hepatitis C Treatment?

Chronic hepatitis C remains a major public health concern with a prevalence of more than 1% worldwide. Of late, with the discovery of newer drugs, chronic HCV treatment has touched new dimensions. The treatment has progressed from Interferons to Pegylated interferon (Peg IFN) based therapy, with or without ribavirin to treatment with orally active Direct Acting Antivirals (DAA) with Peg IFN and ribavirin and eventually to various combinations of DAA, without IFN. Introduction of newer DAAs has transfigured the treatment of chronic HCV. Chronic HCV patients with advanced liver disease, psychiatric condition, anemia or autoimmune diseases, not eligible for Peg IFN based therapy have a ray of hope now. Amongst all DAAs, nucleoside inhibitors have been the most promising agent. Thus the present review focuses on Sofosbuvir, one of the most effective nucleoside inhibitors; in terms of potency, resistance profile, activity against all genotypes of HCV and adverse effects. FDA approved Sofobuvir for clinical use in 2013. Chemically, it is 2'-deoxy-2'-α-fluoro-β-Cmethyluridine- 5'-triphosphate; a phosphoramidate prodrug that is activated by enzyme present in human liver. It is a highly potent inhibitor of HCV NS5B polymerase. Efficacy of the Sofosbuvir has been established in various phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials like PROTON, ELECTRON, FUSION, POSITRON etc. Sofosbuvir has a good safety profile with few mild to moderate adverse effects. Evidence reveals that sofosbuvir has substantial impact on the treatment of HCV.

Liver and Kidney Recipient Selection of Hepatitis C Virus Viremic Donors: Meeting Consensus Report From the 2019 Controversies in Transplantation

The development of multiple highly effective and safe direct-acting antivirals to treat hepatitis C virus (HCV) has resulted in greater ease and confidence in managing HCV infection in transplant recipients that in turn has impacted the solid organ transplant community as well. In the United States, the opioid epidemic has increased the number of overdose deaths with a concomitant increase in younger HCV viremic donors after brain death being identified. At the same time, a decrease in HCV viremic transplant candidates has led to a growing interest in exploring the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney donor allografts in HCV-negative recipients. To date, experience with the use of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts in HCV-negative recipients is limited to a few small prospective research trials, case series, and case reports. There are also limited data on recipient and donor selection for HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts. In response to this rapidly changing landscape in the United States, experts in the field of viral hepatitis and liver and kidney transplantation convened a meeting to review current data on liver and kidney recipient selection and developed consensus opinions related specifically to recipient and donor selection of HCV viremic liver and kidney allografts.

The combination of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir is effective and safe in treating patients with hepatitis C and severe renal impairment

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Many of the treatment regimens available for hepatitis C include sofosbuvir. Unfortunately, sofosbuvir has not been recommended for use in patients with severe renal impairment leaving these group of patients with very few options. Nevertheless, there are many reports in which these patients have been treated with sofosbuvir-containing regiments without important adverse events. This study aims at determining the safety and effectiveness of a sofosbuvir-based treatment in patients with severe renal impairment, including those on hemodialysis.

METHOD

We enrolled subjects with hepatitis C and estimated glomerular filtration rate under ml/min/1.73m² from 13 centers in Iran. Patients were treated for 12 weeks with a single daily pill containing 400-mg sofosbuvir and 60-mg daclatasvir. Patients with cirrhosis were treated for 24 weeks. Response to treatment was evaluated 12 weeks after end of treatment (sustained viral response [SVR]). ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03063879.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were enrolled from 13 centers. Seventy-five patients were on hemodialysis. Thirty-nine had cirrhosis and eight were decompensated. Fifty-three were Genotype 1, and 27 Genotype 3. Twenty-seven patients had history of previous failed interferon-based treatment. Three patients died in which cause of death was not related to treatment. Six patients were lost to follow-up. The remaining 94 patients all achieved SVR. No adverse events leading to discontinuation of medicine was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir is an effective and safe treatment for patients infected with all genotypes of hepatitis C who have severe renal impairment, including patients on hemodialysis.

Efficacy and safety of sofosbuvir in the treatment of hep C among patients on hemodialysis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection among maintenance hemodialysis patients is implicated in increased morbidity and mortality compared to uninfected patients. Sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens may not be optimal among patients requiring hemodialysis. Several studies, however, provide evidence that use of SOF among HCV-positive patients with renal impairment, is effective and safe. We searched Pubmed and Embase to identify studies reporting the efficacy and safety of SOF-based regimens for the treatment of HCV-positive patients on maintenance hemodialysis and performed a random effects meta-analysis. The overall pooled estimate of the efficacy of SOF-based therapy was 95% (95% CI 91–98%). The efficacy of the SOF-based regimen was 92% (95% CI 80–99%), 98% (95% CI 96–100%), and 100% (95% CI 95–100%) for the following doses: 400 mg on alternate days, 400 mg daily, and 200 mg daily, respectively. The most frequent adverse event was fatigue with a pooled prevalence of 16% (95% CI 5–29%), followed by anemia 15% (95% CI 3–31%), and nausea or vomiting 14% (95% CI 4–27%). Anemia was more prevalent in treatment regimens containing ribavirin (46%, 95% CI 33–59%) compared to ribavirin-free regimens (3%, 95% CI 0–9%). This study suggests that SOF-based regimens in the treatment of HCV infection among hemodialysis patients are both effective and safe.

Sofosbuvir-Based HCV Treatment in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A Single-Center Study

There is scant data on use of sofosbuvir containing direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimens in maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) patients infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV). Recent data have focused on possible safe use of sofosbuvir in MHD patients. The aim of this study was to study the efficacy and safety of the sofosbuvir-based combination DAA in HCV-infected naive patients on MHD. Before starting treatment HCV viral load, genotype, liver function tests, and liver ultrasound were performed in all patients. HCV RNA quantification was assessed at baseline, at end of therapy, at 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after stopping therapy. Forty-three MHD patients (67.4% male, with no cirrhosis) with HCV infection were included in the study. Fifteen patients were diabetics. Thirteen patients received multiple transfusions. None of the patients had baseline cirrhosis. Average vintage of dialysis was 6.2 years. At 24-week follow-up none of the patients relapsed. Full dose sofosbuvir was used in combination with ledipasvir (N = 40, 100% genotype 1) and valpatasvir (N = 3, 2 genotype 1, 1 genotype 3). Sustained virological response (HCV RNA < 12 IU/mL) at 12 and 24 weeks after stopping treatment was seen in 100% of the patients. Full-dose sofosbuvir-based DAA therapy is highly effective for MHD patients with HCV infection.

Hepatitis C in Hemodialysis Units: diagnosis and therapeutic approach

According to data from the last census of the Brazilian Society of Nephrology (SBN), the prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in Brazilian hemodialysis units (HU) is 3.3%, about three times higher than what is reported for the Brazilian general population. Often, professionals working in HU are faced with clinical situations that require rapid HCV diagnosis in order to avoid horizontal transmission within the units. On the other hand, thanks to the development of new antiviral drugs, the cure of patients with HCV, both in the general population and in patients with chronic kidney disease and the disease eradication, appear to be very feasible objectives to be achieved in the near future . In this scenario, SBN and the Brazilian Society of Hepatology present in this review article a proposal to approach HCV within HUs.

COMBINED NS5A & NS5B NUCLEOTIDE INHIBITOR THERAPY FOR PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC HEPATITIS C WITH STAGE 5 CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE ON HEMODIALYSIS

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is the most common hepatotropic viral infection affecting the patients on maintenance hemodialysis. Treatment of chronic HCV infection in stage 4 and 5 CKD includes a combination of elbasvir/grazoprevir and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, which are not available in many countries.

OBJECTIVE

Hence, we have conducted this study to look for the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir combination therapy in this difficult to treat population.

METHODS

We conducted a single-center, prospective, open-label study in which Stage 5 CKD patients on maintenance hemodialysis with HCV infection. Total of 18 patients was included. sofosbuvir with daclatasvir or ledipasvir was used according to genotype for 12 weeks. HCV RNA, genotype, transient elastography (TE) was considered for every patient. HCV RNA was quantified at 4th week, 12th week and 12 weeks post-treatment to look for sustained virologic response (SVR 12).

RESULTS

Infection due to genotype 1 was seen in 12 (66.7%) patients followed by genotype 3 in 4 (22.3%) with each patient of genotype 2 and 5. The median value of HCV RNA was 2,35,000 IU/mL. On TE, all had liver stiffness of <9.4 KPa. All patients had HCV RNA of <15 IU/mL at 4th and 12th week of treatment and 12 weeks post-treatment. No significant change in hemoglobin, eGFR and liver stiffness was observed.

CONCLUSION

Full dose sofosbuvir i.e. 400 mg, in combination with NS5A inhibitors daclatasvir or ledipasvir is found to be safe and effective in patients with end stage renal disease, who are on maintenance hemodialysis.

HEPATITIS C TREATMENT OF RENAL TRANSPLANT AND CHRONIC KIDNEY DISEASE PATIENTS: EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF DIRECT-ACTING ANTIVIRAL REGIMENS CONTAINING SOFOSBUVIR

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antivirals have revolutionized hepatitis C treatment, also for patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but some controversy exists regarding the use of sofosbuvir (SOF) in patients with glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 mL/min.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of these regimens for hepatitis C treatment of patients with CKD and after renal transplantation, as well as the impact of SOF on renal function in non-dialysis patients.

METHODS

All patients with hepatitis C and CKD or renal transplant treated with direct-acting antivirals at a referral center in Brazil between January 2016 and August 2017 were included. Efficacy was evaluated based on viral load (HCV RNA) and a sustained virological response (SVR) consisting of undetectable RNA 12 and/or 24 weeks after the end of treatment (SVR12 and SVR24) was defined as cure. Safety was determined by adverse events and ribavirin, when combined, was administered in escalating doses to all patients with GFR <60 mL/min. The impact of SOF on renal function was determined by the measurement of baseline creatinine during and after the end of treatment and its increase was evaluated using the Acute Kidney Injury Network (AKIN) classification.

RESULTS

A total of 241 patients (52.7% females) with a mean age of 60.72±10.47 years were included. The combination of SOF+daclatasvir was the predominant regimen in 75.6% of cases and anemia was present in 28% of patients who used ribavirin (P=0.04). The SVR12 and SVR24 rates were 99.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The treatment was well tolerated and there were no major clinically relevant adverse events, with the most prevalent being asthenia (57.7%), itching (41.1%), headache (40.7%), and irritability (40.2%). Among conservatively treated and renal transplant patients, oscillations of creatinine levels (AKIN I) were observed in 12.5% of cases during treatment and persisted in only 8.5% after the end of treatment. Of these, 2.0% had an initial GFR <30 mL/min and this percentage decreased to 1.1% after SOF use. Only 0.5% and 1.6% of the patients progressed to AKIN II and AKIN III elevation, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The direct-acting antivirals were safe and efficacious in CKD patients treated with SOF-containing regimens, with the observation of high SVR rates, good tolerability and few severe adverse events. The combination with ribavirin increased the risk of anemia and the administration of escalating doses seems to be useful in patients with GFR <60 mL/min. In patients with GFR <30 mL/min, SOF had no significant renal impact, with serum creatinine returning to levels close to baseline after treatment.

Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir Fixed Drug Combination for the Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis C Infection in Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease and Kidney Transplantation

INTRODUCTION

India is witnessing high hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection burden in patients of chronic kidney disease. Due to unavailability of costly Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes-recommended directly acting antiviral drugs, a widely available pan-genotypic combination of Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir can become an economical option. Data regarding treatment experience of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir combination in chronic kidney disease is scarce. No data from India have been published in patients on renal replacement therapies till now.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included all patients of end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis with treatment-naïve chronic HCV infection treated with sofosbuvir (400 mg) and velpatasvir (100 mg) fixed-dose combination. Pretreatment routine investigations were performed, which included HCV viral load, genotype, fibro scan, endoscopy for esophageal varices, and portal vein Doppler. The patients were followed up with HCV viral load to declare sustained virologic response.

RESULT

patients were included with a mean age of 39.8 ± 10.8 years, and 77.4% were male. Genotype 1 was found to be most prevalent (67.7%), with a median viral load of 106copies/ml. Six (19.3%) patients had hepatitis B virus co-infection. Three (9.7%) patients had cirrhosis. Sustained virologic response (SVR12) was achieved in 30 (96.8%) patients, and one (3.2%) patient had relapse. Furthermore, 14 (45.2%) patients underwent renal transplantation, and none of them had relapsed. Dyspepsia (9.7%) was the most common side effect observed with no major adverse effect.

CONCLUSION

Our study showed excellent efficacy with the safety profile of this drug combination in end-stage renal disease patients. However, larger prospective studies and multicenter randomized controlled trials are needed for further confirmation.

Full-dose sofosbuvir plus low-dose ribavirin for hepatitis C virus genotype 2-infected patients on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND/AIMS

New direct-acting antivirals have shown surprising success in the treatment of hepatitis C, not only in the general population, but also in difficult-to-treat cohorts. However, there is still limited data regarding direct-acting antivirals, including sofosbuvir (SOF), in the context of hemodialysis. The aim of this study was to investigate the safety and outcome of administering full-dose SOF (400 mg/day) plus low-dose ribavirin (RBV, 100 to 200 mg/day) in hemodialysis patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 (GT2) infection.

METHODS

Patients with chronic HCV GT2 infection and end-stage renal disease on maintenance hemodialysis treated with full-dose SOF plus low-dose RBV were retrospectively identified from a database of patients with HCV GT2 who were treated in Konkuk University Chungju Hospital between February 2017 and February 2018. Medical records were reviewed for demographics, medical history, laboratory data, and radiologic and electrocardiographic findings.

RESULTS

All nine patients completed a full course of 12 weeks of treatment with a full-dose SOF plus low-dose RBV regimen. Two had compensated cirrhosis. Seven patients were treatment-naïve, and two had a relapse following previous interferon-based therapy. All patients had a sustained viral response at 12 weeks post-treatment. There was no discontinuation of treatment because of side effects.

CONCLUSION

In hemodialysis patients with HCV GT2 infection, the full-dose SOF plus low-dose RBV regimen appears to be safe and well tolerated, and yields high rates of sustained virologic response.

Sofosbuvir-containing regimens are safe and effective in the treatment of HCV patients with moderate to severe renal impairment

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

This study aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens in patients with moderate to severe renal impairment; a subject which has been questioned by many investigators with conflicting results.

METHODS

This is a real-life multicentre retrospective cohort study on 4944 chronic Hepatitis C virus (HCV) patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) (eGFR <60 mL/min/1.73 m² ) who received SOF-based therapy in specialized treatment centres affiliated to the National Committee for the Control of Viral Hepatitis in Egypt. The efficacy and safety of SOF-based regimens was assessed.

RESULTS

Week 12 virological response rates were 97.5%, 96.7%, 85.7% and 80% in the total cohort, patients with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m² , patients with associated hepatic decompensation and patients on dialysis respectively. Various treatment regimens did not statistically affect the response rates. Treatment experience, cirrhosis and diabetes were predictors of treatment failure on multivariate analysis. Serious adverse events occurred in 0.1% of cases. Forty patients (0.8%) discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSION

Sofosbuvir-based regimens are effective and safe for treating patients with chronic HCV and moderate to severe CKD, and in those with associated hepatic decompensation.

Efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral-based treatment in hepatitis C virus infected patients with chronic renal function impairment: An updated systemic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To further determine the efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral (DAA)-based treatments in hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected patients with renal function impairment.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant studies. All studies assessing the efficacy and safety of DAA-based treatments against HCV infection in patients with renal impairment and HCV infection were eligible for inclusion. Outcomes assessed included efficacy outcomes and safety outcomes. Summary estimates were obtained using an inverse-variance weighted random effect model and Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven studies (n = 1048 participants) were included. The majority of included studies were of fair quality with Newcastle-Ottawa scale scores between 4 and 6. The pooled virologic response rates at the end of treatment or 4, 12, 24 weeks after treatment (ie, EOTR, SVR4, SVR12 and SVR24 rates) were 97.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.0%-99.0%), 80.9% (95% CI, 49.3%-98.7%), 94.1% (95% CI, 91.6%-96.3%) and 89.6% (95% CI, 75.5%-98.1%), respectively. The pooled relapse rate was 6.4% (95% CI, 3.4%-10.4%). The pooled incidence of adverse events and severe adverse events leading to discontinuation were 47.6% (95% CI, 35.0%-60.4%) and 2.9% (95% CI, 1.4%-5.0%), respectively. High heterogeneity among studies exists for SVR4 and SVR24 rates. Formal statistical testing did not identify the presence of publication bias for all measured outcomes except the relapse rate.

CONCLUSION

The results support the efficacy and safety of DAA-based treatments in this population. Future studies with better design, larger sample size and longer follow up will be the next step. SUMMARY AT A GLANCE This systematic review evaluated the efficacy and safety of direct-acting antiviral based therapies in hepatitis C infection in patients with renal impairment. The majority of studies were of fair quality only. These therapies were found to be highly efficacious although there were high rates of adverse events.

Renal safety in 3264 HCV patients treated with DAA-based regimens: Results from a large Italian real-life study

BACKGROUND

Sofosbuvir (SOF)-based regimens have been associated with renal function worsening in HCV patients with estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) ≤ 45 ml/min, but further investigations are lacking.

AIM

To assess renal safety in a large cohort of DAA-treated HCV patients with any chronic kidney disease (CKD).

METHODS

All HCV patients treated with DAA in Lombardy (December 2014-November 2017) with available kidney function tests during and off-treatment were included.

RESULTS

Among 3264 patients [65% males, 67% cirrhotics, eGFR 88 (9-264) ml/min], CKD stage was 3 in 9.5% and 4/5 in 0.7%. 79% and 73% patients received SOF and RBV, respectively. During DAA, eGFR declined in CKD-1 (p < 0.0001) and CKD-2 (p = 0.0002) patients, with corresponding rates of CKD stage reduction of 25% and 8%. Conversely, eGFR improved in lower CKD stages (p < 0.0001 in CKD-3a, p = 0.0007 in CKD-3b, p = 0.024 in CKD-4/5), with 33-45% rates of CKD improvement. Changes in eGFR and CKD distribution persisted at SVR. Baseline independent predictors of CKD worsening at EOT and SVR were age (p < 0.0001), higher baseline CKD stages (p < 0.0001) and AH (p = 0.010 and p < 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

During DAA, eGFR significantly declined in patients with preserved renal function and improved in those with lower CKD stages, without reverting upon drug discontinuation.

Safety and efficacy of direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

This is a real-world evidence study that aims to analyze the efficacy, tolerability and safety profile of paritaprevir/ombitasvir/ritonavir and dasabuvir, in patients with renal impairment.

METHODS

We conducted an observational prospective study, on 232 patients with chronic kidney disease, undergoing treatment with paritaprevir/ombitasvir/ritonavir and dasabuvir, for chronic hepatitis C infection - genotype 1b. Renal and liver function were assessed at the beginning of therapy, monthly during treatment and three months after therapy completion.

RESULTS

All patients achieved sustained virologic response. Common side effects were nausea, fatigue and headache. Close monitoring of tacrolimus blood levels and dose reduction was required in kidney transplant recipients.

CONCLUSIONS

HCV therapy in the setting of renal dysfunction has always been a challenging topic. Direct-acting antivirals have shown promising effects, demonstrating good tolerance and efficacy in patients with HCV infection and renal impairment. Sustained virologic response within our study population was 100%.

Pangenotypic direct acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C virus infection: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Recent approval and adoption of pangenotypic direct acting antivirals (DAAs) necessitated a revision of the 2015 World Health Organization guidelines for the management of persons with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and relevant conference proceedings to identify randomized and non-randomized trials, as well as prospective observational studies of DAAs. The proportions of persons with events were pooled for sustained virological response at 12 weeks post-treatment (SVR12), discontinuations due to adverse events (DAEs), serious adverse events (SAEs), and all-cause mortality. Analyses were stratified by HCV genotype and antiviral treatment experience, with subgroup analyses based on presence of cirrhosis and HIV-HCV coinfection.

FINDINGS

The evidence base consisted of 238 publications describing 142 studies. In the overall analysis, which included all persons irrespective of treatment experience or comorbidities, the pooled proportion achieving SVR12 exceeded 0.94 for all pangenotypic regimens across genotypes 1, 2, and 4. Some heterogeneity may have led to lower SVR rates in persons with genotype 3 infection. High SVR12 (>0.90) was observed in persons with genotype 1 infection with cirrhosis, though evidence varied and was limited for genotypes 2-4. Evidence was sparse for persons with HIV-HCV coinfection. All regimens were associated with small proportions of persons with DAEs, SAEs, or all-cause mortality.

INTERPRETATION

Based on this and other supporting evidence, the WHO issued updated guidelines with a conditional recommendation, based on moderate quality evidence, for the use of pangenotypic DAA regimens for persons with chronic HCV infection aged 18 years and older (July 2018).

FUNDING

This study was funded by the World Health Organization.

Efficacy and tolerability of sofosbuvir and daclatasvir for treatment of hepatitis C genotype 1 & 3 in patients undergoing hemodialysis- a prospective interventional clinical trial

Background

There is paucity of data using direct anti-viral agents (DAA) in patients on maintenance hemodialysis (MHD) infected with HCV-genotype 1 & 3. Aim of the study was to evaluate DAA therapy in patients infected with HCV-genotype 1 & 3 on MHD.

Methods

A prospective open label, parallel, non-randomized interventional trial was conducted in patients with Hepatitis-C on maintenance hemodialysis. Total of Sixty two (62) patients with hepatitis-C on maintenance hemodialysis were screened and 36 patients were enrolled and then equally allocated in 1:1 ratio to group 1 who received 400 mg daily sofosbuvir/ 60 mg daily daclatasvir and group 2 who received thrice a week 400 mg Sofosbuvir and daily 60 mg daclatasvir for 12 weeks. Patients with compensated cirrhosis received therapy for 24 weeks. Relevant data was obtained before, during and after therapy. HCV viral load was assessed at week 4, 8, at end of therapy and 12 weeks after treatment.

Results

Eighteen (18) patients were allocated in each group. Three patients in group 1 withdrawn from the study after 2 weeks due to refusal to participate, while one withdrawn in group 2 due to development of adverse effect. Mean age of patients was 47.22 + 14.17 in group 1 and 53.89 + 14.11 in group 2. Genotype 3 was most common in group 1 patients, n = 12 (66.6%), and n = 11 (61.1%) in group 2. All patients in both groups achieved undetectable viral load at 12th week. As per intention to treat analysis overall 29/36 (80.55%) patients achieved SVR (group 1 = 15/18; group 2 = 14/18) and as per-protocol analysis overall 29/32 (90.62%) patients achieved SVR (group 1 = 15/15; group 2 = 14/17).

Conclusion

Direct acting antiviral therapy using sofosbuvir and declatsavir is highly effective and tolerable in patients with HCV genotype 1 & 3 undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, especially when given daily.

Trial registration

This trial is registered in WHO, International Clinical Trial Registry Platform, through Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT) having IRCT ID: IRCT20170614034526N3, registered retrospectively on 2019-03-08.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with chronic kidney disease with Sofosbuvir-basead regimes

Background

To analyze the effectiveness and the safety of Sofosbuvir-based regimens to treat patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and chronic kidney disease (CKD).

Methods

A retrospective, observational study in patients with chronic HCV infection and CKD treated with Sofosbuvir-based regimens was performed. Liver fibrosis, comorbidities, HCV genotype and sustained virological resposnse (SVR) at 12th week post-treatment were evaluated. Kidney function was accessed by serum creatinine and glomerular filtration rate (GFR). The assumed level of significance was 5 %.

Results

Thirty-five patients were treated. The mean age was 52.1 ± 10.9 years, 19 (54.3 %) were women, 32 (91.4 %) were already kidney transplanted and 3 (8.6 %) were on hemodialysis. The SVR by intention to treat was 88.6 %. The mean GFR was 65.8 ± 28.6 and 63.7 ± 28.3 ml/min pre- and post-treatment respectively (p > 0.05). Treatment was interrupted in 1 (2.85 %) patient due to anemia and in 2 (5.7 %) due to loss of kidney function.

Conclusion

Sofosbuvir-based regimens are effective to treat HCV in patients with CKD. In patients with mild CKD this type of therapy seems to be safe.

Hepatitis C therapy with direct antiviral agents in patients with advanced chronic kidney disease: real-world experience of the German Hepatitis C-Registry (Deutsches Hepatitis C-Register)

BACKGROUND

Direct-acting antiviral agents (DAAs) have revolutionized treatment of chronic hepatitis C in patients with normal glomerular filtration rate (GFR). However, patients with impaired kidney function have been excluded from several clinical trials. We, therefore, investigated the use, effectiveness, and tolerability of DAAs in patients with GFR less than 30 ml/min in the real-world setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An analysis was done within the German Hepatitis C-Registry on 5733 patients including 46 individuals with a baseline GFR less than 30 ml/min treated with sofosbuvir-based (61%) or paritaprevir/ritonavir-based (39%) regimens.

RESULTS

Sustained virological response 12 rates did not differ significantly between patients with baseline GFR less than 30 versus more than 30 ml/min (91 vs. 96%). Nine individuals with a baseline GFR more than 30 ml/min presented with a GFR less than 30 ml/min at the end of treatment. GFR improvement from less than 30 ml/min to more than 30 ml/min was observed in 9/46 cases. Adverse events did not differ in patients with GFR less than 30 versus more than 30 ml/min. However, serious adverse events were significantly more frequent in individuals with GFR less than 30 ml/min and associated with ribavirin.

CONCLUSION

Different DAA therapies can be safely used with high sustained virological response rates in patients with GFR less than 30 ml/min. Ribavirin has to be avoided because of poor tolerability.