Portopulmonary hypertension in the current era of pulmonary hypertension management

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is an established life-saving procedure. The field of LT has changed in the past 10 years from several perspectives, with the expansion of indications, transplantation of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure, evolution of transplant oncology, the use of donations after cardiac death, new surgical techniques, and prioritisation of recipients on the waiting list. In addition, the advent of organ perfusion machines, the recognition of new forms of rejection, and the attention paid to the transition from paediatric to adult patients, have all improved the management of LT recipients. The purpose of the EASL guidelines presented here is not to cover all aspects of LT but to focus on developments since the previous EASL guidelines published in 2016.

Echocardiographic Screening of Liver Transplant Candidates-Prevalence of Features of Portopulmonary Hypertension

Background: The prevalence of portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is relatively low; however, its presence significantly worsens patients' prognosis. When diagnosed, PoPH can be effectively treated, and specific therapies can lead to a substantial reduction in pulmonary circulation pressure, facilitating the safe performance of liver transplantation. Echocardiography is recommended as a first-line method for the non-invasive diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension and serves as a valuable screening tool for patients being evaluated for liver transplantation (LT). The objective of this study was to thoroughly assess the occurrence of echocardiographic signs indicative of pulmonary hypertension and hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS) in candidates for LT. We assumed that our analysis also made it possible to assess how frequently these candidates require further invasive diagnostics for pulmonary hypertension at specialized centers and how often they may need targeted treatment for pulmonary arterioles as a bridge to transplantation, which could improve patient outcomes. Additionally, this study included a comprehensive review of the current literature. Methods: All LT candidates underwent standardized transthoracic echocardiography and contrast evaluation to identify intrapulmonary vascular shunts. Results: A total of 152 liver transplantation candidates (67 women, mean age 50.6 years) were included in the analysis. The estimated echocardiographic probability of pulmonary hypertension was classified as high in only one patient. However, 63 patients exhibited the visualization of microbubbles in the left heart chambers after an average of six cardiac cycles (ranging from three to nine cycles) following their appearance in the right heart. Conclusions: Our analysis shows that the features of PoPH and a high probability of PH were very rare in the LT candidates, and echocardiographic signs suggestive of hepatopulmonary syndrome were more prevalent. Liver transplant candidates need screening for PoPH and HPS, as both PoPH and HPS significantly worsen their prognosis, but specific PH treatment as a bridge to transplantation improves PoPH patients' survival.

Cardiovascular disease assessment and management in liver transplantation

The prevalence and mortality related to end-stage liver disease (ESLD) continue to rise globally. Liver transplant (LT) recipients continue to be older and have inherently more comorbidities. Among these, cardiac disease is one of the three main causes of morbidity and mortality after LT. Several reasons exist including the high prevalence of associated risk factors, which can also be attributed to the rise in the proportion of patients undergoing LT for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). Additionally, as people age, the prevalence of now treatable cardiac conditions, including coronary artery disease (CAD), cardiomyopathies, significant valvular heart disease, pulmonary hypertension, and arrhythmias rises, making the need to treat these conditions critical to optimize outcomes. There is an emerging body of literature regarding CAD screening in patients with ESLD, however, there is a paucity of strong evidence to support the guidance regarding the management of cardiac conditions in the pre-LT and perioperative settings. This has resulted in significant variations in assessment strategies and clinical management of cardiac disease in LT candidates between transplant centres, which impacts LT candidacy based on a transplant centre's risk tolerance and comfort level for caring for patients with concomitant cardiac disease. Performing a comprehensive assessment and understanding the potential approaches to the management of ESLD patients with cardiac conditions may increase the acceptance of patients, who appear too complex, but rather require extra evaluation and may be reasonable candidates for LT. The unique physiology of ESLD can profoundly influence preoperative assessment, perioperative management, and outcomes associated with underlying cardiac pathology, and requires a thoughtful multidisciplinary approach. The strategies proposed in this manuscript attempt to review the latest expert experience and opinions and provide guidance to practicing clinicians who assess and treat patients being considered for LT. These topics also highlight the gaps that exist in the comprehensive care of LT patients and the need for future investigations in this field.

Treatment algorithm for pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension leads to significant impairment in haemodynamics, right heart function, exercise capacity, quality of life and survival. Current therapies have mechanisms of action involving signalling via one of four pathways: endothelin-1, nitric oxide, prostacyclin and bone morphogenetic protein/activin signalling. Efficacy has generally been greater with therapeutic combinations and with parenteral therapy compared with monotherapy or nonparenteral therapies, and maximal medical therapy is now four-drug therapy. Lung transplantation remains an option for selected patients with an inadequate response to therapies.

Making Living-donor Liver Transplantation a Viable Option for Patients With Portopulmonary Hypertension

Liver transplantation (LT) in patients with significant portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is associated with an increased risk of several complications, including graft failure. Graft loss is one of the major reasons. Living donor LT (LDLT) is not routinely performed in the United States in this patient population. In addition, ethical considerations often preclude donation from healthy donors in the setting of a procedure associated with an elevated risk of recipient morbidity and mortality. However, LDLT allows LT to be performed electively, using a superior graft with an improved probability of a good outcome. The key to success in managing these patients is establishing a multidisciplinary team that follows an institutional protocol with clear evaluation and management criteria. These criteria include screening and early diagnosis as well as treatment of PoPH with the goal of optimizing pulmonary arterial hemodynamics and maintaining right ventricular function. Any protocol should include admitting the patient to the hospital a day before surgery for placement of a pulmonary artery catheter to measure and derive relevant hemodynamic variables. A multidisciplinary team should determine the fitness for a transplant a after a careful review of the most up-to-date clinical information. Finally, the team prescribes and executes a plan for optimization and safe perioperative management of the patient. In this report, we discuss our approach to the perioperative management of a patient with significant PoPH who safely underwent LDLT with an excellent postoperative outcome.

Risk stratification and treatment goals in pulmonary arterial hypertension

Risk stratification has gained an increasing role in predicting outcomes and guiding the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The most predictive prognostic factors are three noninvasive parameters (World Health Organization functional class, 6-min walk distance and natriuretic peptides) that are included in all currently validated risk stratification tools. However, suffering from limitations mainly related to reduced specificity of PAH severity, these variables may not always be adequate in isolation for guiding individualised treatment decisions. Moreover, with effective combination treatment regimens and emerging PAH therapies, markers associated with pulmonary vascular remodelling are expected to become of increasing relevance in guiding the treatment of patients with PAH. While reaching a low mortality risk, assessed with a validated risk tool, remains an important treatment goal, preliminary data suggest that invasive haemodynamics and cardiac imaging may add incremental value in guiding treatment decisions.

Definition, classification and diagnosis of pulmonary hypertension

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a haemodynamic condition characterised by elevation of mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) >20 mmHg, assessed by right heart catheterisation. Pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) distinguish pre-capillary PH (PAWP ≤15 mmHg, PVR >2 Wood Units (WU)), isolated post-capillary PH (PAWP >15 mmHg, PVR ≤2 WU) and combined post- and pre-capillary PH (PAWP >15 mmHg, PVR >2 WU). Exercise PH is a haemodynamic condition describing a normal mPAP at rest with an abnormal increase of mPAP during exercise, defined as a mPAP/cardiac output slope >3 mmHg/L/min between rest and exercise. The core structure of the clinical classification of PH has been retained, including the five major groups. However, some changes are presented herewith, such as the re-introduction of "long-term responders to calcium channel blockers" as a subgroup of idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension, the addition of subgroups in group 2 PH and the differentiation of group 3 PH subgroups based on pulmonary diseases instead of functional abnormalities. Mitomycin-C and carfilzomib have been added to the list of drugs with "definite association" with PAH. For diagnosis of PH, we propose a stepwise approach with the main aim of discerning those patients who need to be referred to a PH centre and who should undergo invasive haemodynamic assessment. In case of high probability of severe pulmonary vascular disease, especially if there are signs of right heart failure, a fast-track referral to a PH centre is recommended at any point during the clinical workup.

Clinical outcomes of upfront combination therapy for portopulmonary hypertension

Background

Limited data exists on upfront combination therapy for portopulmonary hypertension. We evaluated the clinical efficacy, long-term outcomes, and safety of upfront combination therapy in patients with portopulmonary hypertension.

Methods

We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study involving a final analysis of 33 consecutive patients diagnosed with portopulmonary hypertension who were taking pulmonary arterial hypertension-specific medication. We compared hemodynamic parameters, risk profiles, composite clinical worsening events, and safety between monotherapy (n = 23) and upfront combination therapy (n = 10).

Results

Twenty-seven patients (82 %) were classified into the Child-Pugh A stage. The change ratios of pulmonary vascular resistance (-32 % vs. -57 %, P = 0.006) were significantly better with upfront combination therapy. Upfront combination therapy also showed significant improvement in risk profiles. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the composite event-free rate was significantly lower in patients who received upfront combination therapy than in those who received monotherapy (P = 0.016), although no statistical differences were observed in all-cause death. In the univariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, upfront combination therapy was a factor for decreasing composite clinical worsening outcomes (hazard ratio 0.190, 95 % confidence interval 0.042-0.854; P = 0.030). No significant hepatic impairments were observed over 2 years of follow-up in the upfront combination group.

Conclusions

In patients with portopulmonary hypertension, upfront combination therapy significantly improved symptoms and short-term hemodynamics, and reduced long-term clinical worsening events without serious adverse effects. This study's findings suggest that patients with portopulmonary hypertension presenting with mild hepatic impairment benefit from upfront combination therapy.

Risk stratification refinements with inclusion of haemodynamic variables at follow-up in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

BACKGROUND

Haemodynamic variables are prognostic factors in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, right heart catheterisation (RHC) is not systematically recommended to assess the risk status during follow-up. This study aimed to assess the added value of haemodynamic variables in prevalent patients to predict the risk of death or lung transplantation according to their risk status assessed by the non-invasive four-strata model as recommended by the European guidelines.

METHODS

We evaluated incident patients with PAH enrolled in the French pulmonary hypertension registry between 2009 and 2020 who had a first follow-up RHC. Cox regression identified, in each follow-up risk status, haemodynamic variables significantly associated with transplant-free survival. Optimal thresholds were determined by time-dependent receiver operating characteristics. Several multivariable Cox regression models were performed to identify the haemodynamic variables improving the non-invasive risk stratification model.

RESULTS

We analysed 1240 incident patients reassessed within 1 year by RHC. None of the haemodynamic variables were significantly associated with transplant-free survival among low-risk (n=386) or high-risk (n=71) patients. Among patients at intermediate (intermediate-low, n=483 and intermediate-high, n=300) risk at first follow-up, multivariable models including either stroke volume index (SVI) or mixed venous oxygen saturation (S vO2 ) were the best. The prognostic performance of a refined six-strata risk stratification model including the non-invasive four-strata model and SVI >37 mL·m-2 and/or S vO2 >65% for patients at intermediate risk (area under the curve (AUC) 0.81; c-index 0.74) was better than that of the four-strata model (AUC 0.79, p=0.009; c-index 0.72).

CONCLUSION

Cardiopulmonary haemodynamics may improve risk stratification at follow-up in patients at intermediate risk.

Pulmonary Complications of Portal Hypertension

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), hepatopulmonary syndrome, and hepatic hydrothorax constitute significant complications of portal hypertension, with important implications for management and liver transplantation (LT) candidacy. POPH is characterized by obstruction and remodeling of the pulmonary resistance arterial bed. Hepatopulmonary syndrome is the most common pulmonary vascular disorder, characterized by intrapulmonary vascular dilatations causing impaired gas exchange. LT may improve prognosis in select patients with POPH. LT is the only effective treatment of hepatopulmonary syndrome. Hepatic hydrothorax is defined as transudative pleural fluid accumulation that is not explained by primary cardiopulmonary or pleural disease. LT is the definitive cure for hepatic hydrothorax.

Role of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) in clinical hepatology

Hospitalized patients with cirrhosis frequently require critical care management for sepsis, HE, respiratory failure, acute variceal bleeding, acute kidney injury (AKI), shock, and optimization for liver transplantation, while outpatients have unique care considerations. Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) enhances bedside examination of the hepatobiliary system and relevant extrahepatic sites. POCUS includes cardiac US and is used to assess volume status and hemodynamic parameters like cardiac output, systemic vascular resistance, cardiac contractility, and pulmonary artery pressure, which aid in the early and accurate diagnosis of heart failure, cirrhotic cardiomyopathy, porto-pulmonary hypertension, hepatopulmonary syndrome, arrhythmia, and pulmonary embolism. This also helps in fluid management and vasopressor use in the resuscitation of patients with cirrhosis. Lung ultrasound (LUS) can help in differentiating pneumonia, effusion, and edema. Further, US guides interventions such as line placement, drainage of abdominal collections/abscesses, relief of tension pneumothorax, drainage of pleural and pericardial effusions, and biliary drainage in cholangitis. Additionally, its role is essential to assess liver masses foci of sepsis, for appropriate sites for paracentesis, and to assess for vascular disorders such as portal vein or hepatic vein thrombosis. Renal US can identify renal and postrenal causes of AKI and aid in diagnosis of prerenal AKI through volume assessment. In this review, we address the principles and methods of POCUS in hospitalized patients and in outpatients with cirrhosis and discuss the application of this diverse modality in clinical hepatology.

Hemodynamic and Clinical Response to Liver Transplantation in Children and Young Adults POPH Patients

Portopulmonary hypertension is an intractable form of pulmonary hypertension. Although liver transplantation is recommended for patients who respond poorly to treatments, the mechanisms by which liver transplantation improves pulmonary hypertension remain unclear. The present study investigated these mechanisms by retrospectively evaluating patients' data. This study retrospectively evaluated echocardiography and catheterization data before and after liver transplantation in 12 patients who underwent liver transplantation from 2001 to 2019. The 12 patients included one male and 11 females, of median age at liver transplantation of 10 years, 2 months. Nine patients underwent liver transplantation for congenital biliary atresia and three for portal vein aplasia or hypoplasia. Mean pulmonary arterial pressure was 44.1 ± 8.1 mmHg at the first cardiac catheter examination, 35.3 ± 7.8 mmHg before liver transplantation, and 29.5 ± 9.3 mmHg 6 months after liver transplantation. Pulmonary artery pressure was reduced by treatments of pulmonary hypertension and by liver transplantation. Pulmonary vascular resistance did not differ before and after liver transplantation, whereas the cardiac index decreased significantly, indicating that the significant reduction in mean pulmonary artery pressure was due to a decrease in cardiac index. Decreased cardiac index was thought to result from improvements in hyperdynamic conditions due to increased (normalized) systemic vascular resistance. Liver transplantation likely suppresses shear stress on pulmonary arteries, preventing further damage by hyper-circulation. A longer-term evaluation is required to determine the effect of improving pulmonary artery remodeling.

Association of Cardiopulmonary Hemodynamics and Mortality in Veterans With Liver Cirrhosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH), associated with increased mortality, can limit treatment options for liver diseases. Data on the continuum of clinical risk related to cardiopulmonary hemodynamics in PoPH are lacking.

METHODS AND RESULTS

As part of the United States national Veterans Affairs Clinical Assessment, Reporting, and Tracking database, we performed a retrospective cohort study of adults with cirrhosis undergoing right heart catheterization between October 1, 2017, and September 30, 2022. Pulmonary hypertension (mean pulmonary arterial pressure [mPAP] >20 mm Hg without PoPH) and PoPH (mPAP >20 mm Hg+pulmonary artery wedge pressure ≤15 mm Hg+pulmonary vascular resistance ≥3 WU) were defined by right heart catheterization hemodynamics. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards using natural splines for hemodynamic variables were used to evaluate the association between cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and mortality following right heart catheterization. A total of 4409 patients were included in the final analysis, predominantly men (96.3%), with a mean age of 68.5 years. Pulmonary hypertension and PoPH were observed in 71.6% and 10.2% of the cohort, respectively. Compared with a reference cardiac index of 2.5 L/min per m2, the hazard for mortality increased progressively with decreasing cardiac index, even after adjustment for mPAP and pulmonary vascular resistance. The minority of patients with PoPH (N=65, 14.5%) were prescribed pulmonary vasodilator therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that pulmonary hypertension and PoPH are prevalent in veterans with chronic liver disease, but low use of targeted PoPH therapy persists. Cardiac function discriminated mortality risk across a wide range of mPAP and pulmonary vascular resistance values and may diagnose and clarify prognosis in this patient population.

The Clinical Course of Portopulmonary Hypertension and Outcomes With Endothelin Receptor Antagonist Treatment: Observational Study of Data From the US Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network

Background

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) occurs in patients with advanced liver disease and can be a contraindication to liver transplant (LT). Improvement of hemodynamic parameters with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) therapies (including endothelin receptor antagonists [ERAs]) may help some patients to become eligible for LT.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective secondary data analysis to describe the clinical course and management of PoPH in patients on a US registry LT waitlist and outcomes in patients receiving an ERA.

Results

At the time of LT waitlist entry (1996-2019), patient characteristics and disease severity were similar in the 685 patients with PoPH enrolled overall (LT waitlist data set) and the 420 of them who underwent LT (LT data set). Most patients (92.0%) had a model for end-stage liver disease exception granted before entering the LT waitlist. Patients spent a median of 8.9 mo (interquartile range, 3.7-19.7) on the LT waitlist before undergoing LT. Overall, 77.1% of patients received PAH treatment at LT waitlist entry (ERAs, 30.1%). Hemodynamic parameters improved in ≥95% of patients between the first assessment versus the second (median interval, 9 mo) and last assessments (median interval, 14 mo). At the first assessment, 49.6% of patients had mean pulmonary arterial pressure ≥45 mm Hg versus 2.6% and 1.8% of patients at the second and last assessments, respectively; 47.5% of patients had pulmonary vascular resistance >450 dynes·s/cm5 versus 0.9% and 0.2% of patients at the second and last assessments. One-year survival was 90.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 87.6-92.9) following LT waitlist entry and was 86.4% (95% CI, 82.6-89.5) after LT; 5-y survival was 67.4% (95% CI, 60.0-73.8) while on the LT waitlist (before LT) and was 75.6% (95% CI, 70.4-80.0) following LT.

Conclusions

This large US study of patients with PoPH on an LT waitlist confirms that effective PAH treatments can help patients achieve acceptable hemodynamics, providing the opportunity to undergo LT.

Safety of Macitentan for the Treatment of Portopulmonary Hypertension: Real-World Evidence from the Combined OPUS/OrPHeUS Studies

INTRODUCTION

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) carries a worse prognosis than other forms of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Data regarding use of PAH-specific therapies in patients with PoPH are sparse as they are usually excluded from clinical trials. This analysis describes patient characteristics, treatment patterns, outcomes, and safety profiles in patients with PoPH newly initiating macitentan in the USA using the OPUS/OrPHeUS combined dataset.

METHODS

OPUS was a prospective, US, multicenter, observational drug registry (April 2014-June 2020); OrPHeUS was a retrospective, US, multicenter chart review (October 2013-March 2017). Additional information regarding patients' liver disease was retrospectively collected for patients with PoPH in OPUS.

RESULTS

The OPUS/OrPHeUS dataset included 206 patients with PoPH (median age 58 years; 52.4% female), with baseline cirrhosis and liver test abnormalities reported in 72.8% and 31.6% of patients respectively. Macitentan was initiated as combination therapy in 74.8% of patients and median (Q1, Q3) exposure to macitentan was 11.9 (3.1, 26.0) months. One-year Kaplan-Meier estimates (95% confidence limit, CL) of patients free from all-cause hospitalization and survival were 48.6% (40.7, 56.0) and 82.2% (75.1, 87.4). Of the 96 patients with PoPH in OPUS, 29.2% were classified as in need of liver transplant due to underlying liver disease during the study; transplant waitlist registration was precluded because of PAH severity for 32.1% and 17.9% were transplanted. Hepatic adverse events (HAE) were experienced by 49.0% of patients; the most common being increased bilirubin (16.0%), ascites (7.3%), and hepatic encephalopathy (5.8%); 1.5% and 21.8% of patients discontinued macitentan as a result of HAE and non-hepatic adverse events.

CONCLUSION

There were no unexpected safety findings in patients with PoPH treated with macitentan. These data add to the evidence supporting the safety and tolerability of macitentan in patients with PoPH. A graphical abstract is available with this article.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

OPsumit® Users Registry (OPUS): NCT02126943; OPsumit® Historical Users cohort (OrPHeUS): NCT03197688; www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov .

The applications of ECMO in liver transplant recipients

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has emerged as a vital instrument for sustaining respiratory and cardiac functions when traditional methods have failed. Its function in managing acute pulmonary and cardiac challenges during liver transplantation (LT) has expanded significantly. While ECMO was initially viewed as a rescue strategy for acute intraoperative or posttransplant complications, its application now also encompasses the pretransplant stage of LT. Our review aims to thoroughly summarize both research and specific cases where ECMO has been utilized across pre- and perioperative phases in liver transplant recipients. By assessing the published literature, we discuss specific indications, the types of ECMO employed, their outcomes, and the unique challenges of applying ECMO during LT. In particular, the pretransplant use of ECMO is increasing, and its prudent introduction prior to LT, supported by meticulous planning, has the potential to optimize patient outcomes. It is challenging to manage liver transplant patients on ECMO. More research and experience are needed to refine the techniques and improve patient outcomes. Furthermore, decision-making must be tailored to each patient's unique circumstances, and a clear, practical, and well-defined plan for subsequent steps is essential.

Expert management of congenital portosystemic shunts and their complications

Congenital portosystemic shunts are often associated with systemic complications, the most challenging of which are liver nodules, pulmonary hypertension, endocrine abnormalities, and neurocognitive dysfunction. In the present paper, we offer expert clinical guidance on the management of liver nodules, pulmonary hypertension, and endocrine abnormalities, and we make recommendations regarding shunt closure and follow-up.

When Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension may be Associated with Portal Hypertension: A Case Report of Two Different Hepatic Disorders in One Patient with Pulmonary Hypertension

BACKGROUND

pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare complication of hepatic diseases with portal hypertension that, however, has a significant influence on prognosis. We present a mini-review of how to diagnose and treat it based on a clinical case.

CASE PRESENTATION

in early childhood, a patient had portal hypertension associated with cavernous transformation of the portal vein. It was successfully treated by reno-splenic surgery. At the age of 20 years, this patient experienced increased dyspnea at minimal physical activity after the hepatic biopsy due to a hepatocellular adenoma. The examination in the specialized unit showed PAH, which was evaluated as associated with portal hypertension (PAH-PoH). The specific two-drug combination therapy was started with prominent improvement in patient's state. Successful surgical tumor treatment was provided some months later. The practical and clinical approaches to the diagnosis and treatment of PAH-PoH are discussed. It was emphasized that not all patients with portal hypertension have pulmonary hypertension, which needs to be treated. A lot of evidence gaps exist in management of these patients.

CONCLUSION

all patients, even with past history of portal hypertension, should be monitored closely and screened for PAH earlier, for better results of treatment.

Is pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with schistosomiasis distinct from pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with portal hypertension?

Pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with schistosomiasis (SchPAH) and pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with portal hypertension (PoPAH) are lung diseases that develop in the presence of liver diseases. However, mechanistic pathways by which the underlying liver conditions and other drivers contribute to the development and progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) are unclear for both etiologies. In turn, these unknowns limit certainty of strategies to prevent, diagnose, and reverse the resultant PAH. Here we consider specific mechanisms that contribute to SchPAH and PoPAH, identifying those that may be shared and those that appear to be unique to each etiology, in the hope that this exploration will both highlight known causal drivers and identify knowledge gaps appropriate for future research. Overall, the key pathophysiologic differences that we identify between SchPAH and PoPAH suggest that they are not variants of a single condition.

Predictors of the response to phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors in pulmonary arterial hypertension: an analysis of the Spanish registry

BACKGROUND

Achieving and maintaining a low-risk profile is associated with favorable outcome in pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The effects of treatment on risk profile are variable among patients.

OBJECTIVE

To Identify variables that might predict the response to treatment with phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE-5i) in PAH.

METHODS

We carried out a cohort analysis of the Spanish PAH registry in 830 patients diagnosed with PAH that started PDE5i treatment and had > 1 year follow-up. 644 patients started PDE-5i either in mono- or add-on therapy and 186 started combined treatment with PDE-5i and endothelin receptor antagonist (ERA). Responders were considered when at 1 year they: (1) were alive; (2) did not present clinical worsening; and (3) improved European Society of Cardiology/European Respiratory Society (ESC/ERS) risk score or remained in low-risk. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were used to analyze variables associated with a favorable response.

RESULTS

Two hundred and ten patients (33%) starting PDE-5i alone were classified as responders, irrespective of whether it was mono- or add-on therapy. In addition to known predictors of PAH outcome (low-risk at baseline, younger age), male sex and diagnosis of portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) or HIV-PAH were independent predictors of favorable response to PDE-5i. Diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) ≤ 40% of predicted was associated with an unfavorable response. When PDE-5i were used in upfront combination, 58% of patients were responders. In this group, diagnosis of idiopathic PAH (IPAH) was an independent predictor of favorable response, whereas connective tissue disease-PAH was associated with an unfavorable response.

CONCLUSION

Male sex and diagnosis of PoPH or HIV-PAH are predictors of favorable effect of PDE-5i on risk profile when used as mono- or add-on therapy. Patients with IPAH respond more favorably to PDE-5i when used in upfront combination. These results identify patient profiles that may respond favorably to PDE-5i in monotherapy and those who might benefit from alternative treatment strategies.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare and progressive disease characterised by remodelling of the pulmonary arteries and progressive narrowing of the pulmonary vasculature. This leads to a progressive increase in pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure and, if left untreated, to right ventricular failure and death. A correct diagnosis requires a complete work-up including right heart catheterisation performed in a specialised centre. Although our knowledge of the epidemiology, pathology and pathophysiology of the disease, as well as the development of innovative therapies, has progressed in recent decades, PAH remains a serious clinical condition. Current treatments for the disease target the three specific pathways of endothelial dysfunction that characterise PAH: the endothelin, nitric oxide and prostacyclin pathways. The current treatment algorithm is based on the assessment of severity using a multiparametric risk stratification approach at the time of diagnosis (baseline) and at regular follow-up visits. It recommends the initiation of combination therapy in PAH patients without cardiopulmonary comorbidities. The choice of therapy (dual or triple) depends on the initial severity of the condition. The main treatment goal is to achieve low-risk status. Further escalation of treatment is required if low-risk status is not achieved at subsequent follow-up assessments. In the most severe patients, who are already on maximal medical therapy, lung transplantation may be indicated. Recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of the disease have led to the development of promising emerging therapies targeting dysfunctional pathways beyond endothelial dysfunction, including the TGF-β and PDGF pathways.

Pulmonary Assessment of the Liver Transplant Recipient

Respiratory symptoms and hypoxemia can complicate chronic liver disease and portal hypertension. Various pulmonary disorders affecting the pleura, lung parenchyma, and pulmonary vasculature are seen in end-stage liver disease, complicating liver transplantation (LT). Approximately 8% of cirrhotic patients in an intensive care unit develop severe pulmonary problems. These disorders affect waiting list mortality and posttransplant outcomes. A thorough history, physical examination, and appropriate laboratory tests help diagnose and assess the severity to risk stratify pulmonary diseases before LT. Hepatopulmonary syndrome (HPS), portopulmonary hypertension (POPH), and hepatic hydrothorax (HH) are respiratory consequences specific to cirrhosis and portal hypertension. HPS is seen in 5-30% of cirrhosis cases and is characterized by impaired oxygenation due to intrapulmonary vascular dilatations and arteriovenous shunts. Severe HPS is an indication of LT. The majority of patients with HPS resolve their hypoxemia after LT. When pulmonary arterial hypertension occurs in patients with portal hypertension, it is called POPH. All other causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension should be ruled out before labeling as POPH. Since severe POPH (mean pulmonary artery pressure [mPAP] >50 mm Hg) is a relative contraindication for LT, it is crucial to screen for POPH before LT. Those with moderate POPH (mPAP >35 mm Hg), who improve with medical therapy, will benefit from LT. A transudative pleural effusion called hepatic hydrothorax (HH) is seen in 5-10% of people with cirrhosis. Refractory cases of HH benefit from LT. In recent years, increasing clinical expertise and advances in the medical field have resulted in better outcomes in patients with moderate to severe pulmonary disorders, who undergo LT.

Symptom-based portopulmonary hypertension screening questionnaire in Japanese patients with chronic liver disease

Background and Aim

As the exact prevalence of portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) and the etiology of chronic liver disease (CLD) remain unknown, the present study aimed to clarify these points in Japanese patients with CLD using symptom-based questionnaire screening.

Methods

Patients with CLD were asked to complete an eight-item written questionnaire on pulmonary hypertension (PH) symptoms. If at least one item response was "yes," the patient was offered ultrasonic echocardiography (UCG). Patients identified as having an intermediate or high risk of PH by UCG were referred to a cardiologist for further evaluation, whereby a definitive diagnosis of PoPH was made using right heart catheterization (RHC) findings.

Results

A total of 1111 patients with CLD completed the survey. Of the 566 symptomatic patients with at least one question answered as "yes," approximately half agreed to undergo UCG (n = 267). Compared with asymptomatic patients, symptomatic patients were significantly older, predominantly female, and more frequently exhibited cirrhosis. Based on UCG findings, 228, 12, and 8 patients had a low, intermediate, or high risk for PH, respectively. Intermediate-/high-risk patients showed significantly more advanced disease progression status than low-risk patients. The frequencies of answer to the eight questions were comparable. Ultimately, three patients were diagnosed as having PoPH (1.1% of UCG cases), one with underlying hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection and two with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC).

Conclusion

This symptom-based PoPH screening study clarified the prevalence of PoPH in CLD patients according to a PH symptom questionnaire, UCG, and RHC. Patients with HCV and PBC may have a higher risk of PoPH.

Portopulmonary Hypertension: An Updated Review

Portal hypertension may have major consequences on the pulmonary vasculature due to the complex pathophysiological interactions between the liver and lungs. Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH), a subset of group 1 pulmonary hypertension (PH), is a serious pulmonary vascular disease secondary to portal hypertension, and is the fourth most common subtype of pulmonary arterial hypertension. It is most commonly observed in cirrhotic patients; however, patients with noncirrhotic portal hypertension can also develop it. On suspicion of PoPH, the initial evaluation is by a transthoracic echocardiogram in which, if elevated pulmonary pressures are shown, patients should undergo right heart catheterization to confirm the diagnosis. The prognosis is extremely poor in untreated patients; therefore, management includes pulmonary arterial hypertension therapies with the aim of improving pulmonary hemodynamics and moving patients to orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). In this article, we review in detail the epidemiology, pathophysiology, process for diagnosis, and most current treatments including OLT and prognosis in patients with PoPH. In addition, we present a diagnostic algorithm that includes the current criteria to properly select patients with PoPH who are candidates for OLT.

Pulmonary hypertension, nephrotic syndrome, and polymyositis due to hepatitis C virus infection: A case report

BACKGROUND

Hepatitis C infection not only damages the liver but also often accompanies many extrahepatic manifestations. Incidences of pulmonary hypertension (PH) caused by hepatitis C are rare, and incidences of concurrent nephrotic syndrome and polymyositis are even rarer.

CASE SUMMARY

Herein we describe the case of a 57-year-old woman who was admitted to our department for intermittent chest tightness upon exertion for 5 years, aggravated with dyspnea for 10 d. After relevant examinations she was diagnosed with PH, nephrotic syndrome, and polymyositis due to chronic hepatitis C infection. A multi-disciplinary recommendation was that the patient should be treated with sildenafil and macitentan in combination and methylprednisolone. During treatment autoimmune symptoms, liver function, hepatitis C RNA levels, and cardiac parameters of right heart catheterization were monitored closely. The patient showed significant improvement in 6-min walking distance from 100 to 300 m at 3-mo follow-up and pulmonary artery pressure drops to 50 mmHg. Long-term follow-up is needed to confirm further efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSION

Increasing evidence supports a relationship between hepatitis C infection and diverse extrahepatic manifestations, but it is very rare to have PH, nephrotic syndrome, and polymyositis in a single patient. We conducted a literature review on the management of several specific extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C.

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension Associated with Portal Hypertension and HIV Infection: Comparative Characteristics and Prognostic Predictors

BACKGROUND

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) may complicate both portal hypertension (Po-PAH) and HIV infection (HIV-PAH). These two conditions, however, frequently coexist in the same patient (HIV/Po-PAH). We evaluated clinical, functional, hemodynamic characteristics and prognostic parameters of these three groups of patients.

METHODS

We included patients with Po-PAH, HIV-PAH and HIV/Po-PAH referred to a single center. We compared clinical, functional and hemodynamic parameters, severity of liver disease [Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) and Model for End-stage Liver Disease-Na (MELD-Na) scores], CD4 count and highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) administration. Prognostic variables were identified through Cox-regression analysis.

RESULTS

Patients with Po-PAH (n = 128) were the oldest, patients with HIV-PAH (n = 41) had the worst hemodynamic profile and patients with HIV/Po-PAH (n = 35) had the best exercise capacity. Independent predictors of mortality were age and CTP score for Po-PAH, HAART administration for HIV-PAH, MELD-Na score and hepatic venous-portal gradient for HIV/Po-PAH.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with HIV/Po-PAH are younger and have a better exercise capacity than patients with Po-PAH, have a better exercise capacity and hemodynamic profile compared to patients with HIV-PAH, and their prognosis seems to be related to the hepatic disease rather than to HIV infection. The prognosis of patients with Po-PAH and HIV-PAH seems to be related to the underlying disease.

Association between Body Composition and the Risk of Portopulmonary Hypertension Assessed by Computed Tomography in Patients with Liver Cirrhosis

The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of body composition on the risk of portopulmonary hypertension using computed tomography (CT) in patients with liver cirrhosis. We retrospectively included 148 patients with cirrhosis treated at our hospital between March 2012 and December 2020. POPH high-risk was defined as main pulmonary artery diameter (mPA-D) ≥ 29 mm or mPA-D to ascending aorta diameter ratio ≥ 1.0, based on chest CT. Body composition was assessed using CT images of the third lumbar vertebra. The factors associated with POPH high-risk were evaluated using logistic regression and decision tree analyses, respectively. Among the 148 patients, 50% were females, and 31% were found to be high-risk cases on evaluation of chest CT images. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) of ≥25 mg/m2 had a significantly higher prevalence of POPH high-risk than those with a BMI < 25 mg/m2 (47% vs. 25%, p = 0.019). After adjusting for confounding factors, BMI (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-1.33), subcutaneous adipose tissue index (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.03), and visceral adipose tissue index (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04) were associated with POPH high-risk, respectively. In the decision tree analysis, the strongest classifier of POPH high-risk was BMI, followed by the skeletal muscle index. Body composition may affect the risk of POPH based on chest CT assessment in patients with cirrhosis. Since the present study lacked data on right heart catheterization, further studies are required to confirm the results of our study.

Current clinical understanding and effectiveness of portopulmonary hypertension treatment

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is a rare subtype of Group 1 pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) with a poor prognosis. According to the most up-to-date definition, PoPH is characterized by a mean pulmonary arterial pressure (PAP) of &gt;20 mmHg at rest, a pulmonary artery wedge pressure of ≤15 mmHg, and a pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) of &gt;2 Wood units with portal hypertension. Like PAH, PoPH is underpinned by an imbalance in vasoactive substances. Therefore, current guidelines recommend PAH-specific therapies for PoPH treatment; however, descriptions of the actual treatment approaches are inconsistent. Given the small patient population, PoPH is often studied in combination with idiopathic PAH; however, recent evidence suggests important differences between PoPH and idiopathic PAH in terms of hemodynamic parameters, treatment approaches, survival, socioeconomic status, and healthcare utilization. Therefore, large, multi-center registry studies are needed to examine PoPH in isolation while obtaining statistically meaningful results. PoPH has conventionally been excluded from clinical drug trials because of concerns over hepatotoxicity. Nevertheless, newer-generation endothelin receptor antagonists have shown great promise in the treatment of PoPH, reducing PVR, PAP, and World Health Organization functional class without causing hepatotoxicity. The role of liver transplantation as a treatment option for PoPH has also been controversial; however, recent evidence shows that this procedure may be beneficial in this patient population. In the future, given the shortage of liver donors, predictors of a favorable response to liver transplantation should be determined to select the most eligible patients. Collectively, advances in these three areas could help to standardize PoPH treatment in the clinic.

Portopulmonary hypertension practice patterns after liver transplantation

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) is a type of pulmonary arterial hypertension occurring exclusively in those with portal hypertensive liver disease. Liver transplantation (LT) can significantly improve outcomes. Current guidelines counsel against immediate adjustments to targeted therapy after LT and suggest routine echocardiography as sufficiently informative to guide therapeutic adjustments. Current practice patterns for adjusting targeted therapy after LT in POPH, and how they compare with guidelines, are not well established. To answer this question, we performed an institutional review board-approved, cross-sectional mixed-methods survey-based study of US POPH providers. Anonymized requests to complete the survey were sent through professional networks between January 20, 2022, and April 20, 2022. Responses were compared between cardiologists and pulmonologists using Fisher's exact tests, at a significance of 0.05. A total of 85 POPH physicians were included in the final analysis (66% pulmonologists and 34% cardiologists). Following LT, the majority of respondents routinely used a combination of standard cardiopulmonary assessment modalities to guide adjustment of targeted therapy following LT. Most respondents (69%) started by adjusting parenteral prostacyclins with small titrations and frequent reassessments within 3 months of LT, but some (19.7%) adjusted targeted therapy immediately after LT. Our results showed that the majority of respondents favored serial integrated cardiopulmonary testing (including routine right heart catheterization) to guide the adjustment of targeted therapy in POPH after LT, and almost one-fifth of respondents weaned therapy immediately after LT. Our study demonstrates heterogeneity in POPH practice patterns after LT, highlights differences between current practice patterns and the most recent guidelines, emphasizes the need for additional research, and supports a team-based approach to standardize care for these high-risk patients and optimize post-LT outcomes.

Portopulmonary Hypertension

PoPH is a well-recognized complication of portal hypertension with or without cirrhosis and is classified as a subset of PAH. Identification of PoPH is crucial as it has a major impact on prognosis and liver transplant candidacy. Echocardiogram is the initial screening tool of choice and the patient should proceed to RHC for confirmation. PAH-directed therapy is the treatment of choice, allowing the patient to achieve a hemodynamic threshold to undergo a liver transplant safely.

Portopulmonary Hypertension: Management and Liver Transplantation Evaluation

Portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) affects 5% to 6% of patients with advanced liver disease and accounts for 5% to 15% of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) cases. Compared with idiopathic PAH, POPH is associated with significantly worse survival. Recent studies have improved our understanding of the role of both PAH therapy and liver transplantation (LT) in the management of POPH and their impact on overall prognosis. We performed a review of the published literature to summarize the available evidence and guidelines regarding the diagnosis and management of POPH. POPH is defined by the presence of precapillary PH in the context of portal hypertension. POPH is associated with increased perioperative risk at the time of LT, which can be stratified by mean pulmonary arterial pressure and pulmonary vascular resistance. Screening with echocardiography is recommended in all LT candidates to facilitate detection and treatment of POPH. Despite a paucity of evidence, POPH is treated similarly to idiopathic PAH with PAH therapy. These therapies are associated with improved pulmonary hemodynamics and facilitation of safe LT. LT can result in improvement or resolution of POPH in half of patients and has been associated with improved survival in highly selected patients. The prognosis in POPH is poor and is impacted by the severity of both PH and liver disease. Management with a combination of PAH therapy and LT in selected patients has been associated with improved pulmonary hemodynamics and survival.

Current Therapy and Liver Transplantation for Portopulmonary Hypertension in Japan

Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) and hepatopulmonary syndrome are severe pulmonary complications associated with liver cirrhosis (LC) and portal hypertension. Three key pathways, involving endothelin, nitric oxide, and prostacyclin, have been identified in the development and progression of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). To obtain a good effect with PAH-specific drugs in PoPH patients, it is important to diagnose PoPH at an early stage and promptly initiate therapy. The majority of therapeutic drugs are contraindicated for Child-Pugh grade C LC, and their effects decrease in the severe PAH stage. Among many LC patients, the measurement of serum brain natriuretic peptide levels might be useful for detecting PoPH. Previously, liver transplantation (LT) for PoPH was contraindicated; however, the indications for LT are changing and now take into account how well the PoPH is controlled by therapeutic drugs. In Japan, new registration criteria for deceased-donor LT have been established for PoPH patients. PoPH patients with a mean pulmonary arterial pressure <35 mmHg and pulmonary vascular resistance <400 dyn/s/cm−5 are indicated for LT, regardless of whether they are using therapeutic drugs. Combined with PAH-specific drugs, LT may lead to excellent long-term outcomes in PoPH patients. We aimed to review current therapies for PoPH, including LT.

Cardiology Assessment of Patients Undergoing Evaluation for Orthotopic Liver Transplantation

Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is a viable treatment option for end-stage liver disease. Significant perioperative stress is placed on the cardiovascular system because of hemodynamic changes and the length of the operation. Diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular disease before OLT are imperative to ensure favorable outcomes. Considerable variability exists among practitioners caring for these patients. Institutions tailor their protocols on the basis of local and historical practices, the preferences of the cardiologists, and the OLT team, and algorithms are not often revised or updated on the basis of the available evidence. In collaboration with cardiology and hepatology experts from leading OLT centers, we sought to examine the diagnostic cardiovascular workup of OLT candidates, including a review of the available literature on the diagnostic modalities used to screen cardiovascular disease before OLT. We advocate an emphasis on noninvasive methods to assess cardiovascular risk with reserved use of invasive risk stratification in select patients.

Pulmonary hypertension due to high cardiac output

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is usually associated with a normal or decreased cardiac output (CO). Less commonly, PH can occur in the context of a hyperdynamic circulation, characterized by high CO (>8 L/min) and/or cardiac index ≥4 L/min/m² in the setting of a decreased systemic vascular resistance. PH due to high CO can occur due to multiple conditions and in general remains understudied. In this review article we describe the pathophysiology, etiology, diagnosis, hemodynamic characteristics, and management of PH in the setting of high CO. It is important to recognize this distinct entity as PH tends to improve with treatment of the underlying etiology and PH specific therapies may worsen the hemodynamic state.

Efficacy evaluation of pulmonary hypertension therapy in patients with portal pulmonary hypertension: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective: To determine the therapeutic effect of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) agents for portal pulmonary hypertension (POPH).

Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: POPH is a serious complication of end-stage liver disease with a low survival rate. Liver transplantation (LT) is an effective treatment. Due to the presence of POPH, some patients cannot undergo LT. After PAH treatment, patients with POPH can obtain good hemodynamics and cardiac function for LT, but there are no standard guidelines.

Methods: Two independent researchers searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for studies published from inception to 27 September 2022, focusing on the changes in hemodynamics and cardiac function in all patients with POPH to understand the effect of PAH treatment on the entire population of POPH patients. Among these, we specifically analyzed the changes in hemodynamics and cardiac function in moderate and severe POPH patients. After collecting the relevant data, a meta-analysis was carried out using the R program meta-package.

Results: A total of 2,775 literatures were retrieved, and 24 literatures were included. The results showed that in all POPH patients (n = 1,046), the following indicators were significantly improved with PAH agents: mPAP: (MD = −9.11 mmHg, p &lt; 0.0001); PVR: (MD = −239.33 dyn·s·cm−5, p &lt; 0.0001); CO: (MD = 1.71 L/min, p &lt; 0.0001); cardiac index: (MD = 0.87 L/(min·m2), p &lt; 0.0001); 6MWD: (MD = 43.41 m, p &lt; 0.0001). In patients with moderate to severe POPH (n = 235), the following indicators improved significantly with PAH agents: mPAP (MD = −9.63 mmHg, p &lt; 0.0001); PVR (MD = −259.78 dyn·s·cm−5, p &lt; 0.0001); CO (MD = 1.76 L/min, p &lt; 0.0001); Cardiac index: (MD = 1.01 L/(min·m2), p = 0.0027); 6MWD: (MD = 61.30 m, p &lt; 0.0001).

Conclusion: The application of PAH agents can improve cardiopulmonary hemodynamics and cardiac function in patients with POPH, especially in patients with moderate to severe POPH, and the above changes are more positive.

Systematic Review Registration:https://inplasy.com, identifier INPLASY202250034.

Temporal Trends in Portopulmonary Hypertension Model for End-stage Liver Disease Exceptions and Outcomes

Model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) exception criteria for portopulmonary hypertension (POPH) were created to prioritize patients for liver transplant before POPH progression. Little is known about trends in POPH exception frequency, disease severity, pulmonary hypertension treatment patterns, or outcomes since the POPH MELD exception began.

Clinical Management and Outcomes of Patients With Portopulmonary Hypertension Enrolled in the Japanese Multicenter Registry

Background: Portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH) is one of the major underlying causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). However, PoPH, especially treatment strategies, has been poorly studied. Therefore, this study evaluated current treatments for PoPH, their efficacy, and clinical outcomes of patients with PoPH. Methods and Results: Clinical data were collected for patients with PoPH who were enrolled in the Japan Pulmonary Hypertension Registry between 2008 and 2021. Hemodynamic changes, functional class, and clinical outcomes were compared between patients with PoPH treated with monotherapy and those treated with combination therapies. Clinical data were analyzed for 62 patients with PoPH, including 25 treatment-naïve patients, from 21 centers in Japan. In more than half the patients, PAH-specific therapy improved the New York Heart Association functional class by at least one class. The 3- and 5-year survival rates of these patients were 88.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 76.0-94.7) and 80.2% (95% CI 64.8-89.3), respectively. Forty-one (66.1%) patients received combination therapy. Compared with patients who had received monotherapy, the mean pulmonary arterial pressure, pulmonary vascular resistance, and cardiac index were significantly improved in patients who had undergone combination therapies. Conclusions: Combination therapy was commonly used in patients with PoPH with a favorable prognosis. Combination therapies resulted in significant hemodynamic improvement without an increased risk of side effects.

Congenital Absence of the Portal Vein as a Rare Cause of Portopulmonary Hypertension-A Case Study Series

Background. Congenital absence of the portal vein (CAPV) is an extremely rare malformation that is caused by aberrant venous development during embryogenesis and is usually associated with congenital portosystemic shunts (CPSS). This hemodynamic allows mesenteric blood to bypass the liver metabolism and causes an imbalance between vasodilators and vasoconstrictors in the pulmonary circulation, which, again, might lead to the development of secondary portopulmonary hypertension (PoPH). Establishing the exact morphology of the splanchnic venous system is important when evaluating possible therapeutic options (differentiating type I and II CAPV), because some variants enable the closure of the shunt, and this represents a potential cure for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). Once PoPH is diagnosed, complex care in a specialized expert centre is necessary. If possible, CPSS closure is recommended. For long-term successful patient management, specific targeted PAH therapy administration is crucial. Significant morbidity and mortality in these patients may result not only from PAH itself but also due to specific PoPH complications, such as compression of the left main coronary artery by pulmonary artery aneurysm. Case Report. We report on two patients with PoPH due to CAPV and CPSS (without any liver disease) who presented as severe PAH and who, before admission to our expert centre, were misdiagnosed as idiopathic PAH. The case reports also represent our experience with respect to the long-term follow-up and PAH-specific medical treatment of these patients, as well as the possible (even fatal) complications of these rare and complex patients.

Combined Tricuspid Valve Repair and Orthotopic Liver Transplantation in a Patient With Severe Tricuspid Regurgitation and Pulmonary Hypertension

Severe pulmonary hypertension and severe tricuspid regurgitation are often considered strict contraindications for orthotopic liver transplantation. A combined approach of tricuspid repair and subsequent liver transplantation could provide a novel approach for patients with severe pulmonary hypertension and tricuspid regurgitation to undergo orthotopic liver transplantation. A 62-year-old male with a history of end-stage renal disease on hemodialysis, cirrhosis, and third-degree atrioventricular heart block status post single lead pacemaker insertion presented for an orthotopic liver transplant. However, after placement of a Swan-Ganz catheter by the anesthesia team, the patient's central venous pressure was found to be high, and his mean pulmonary artery pressure was 40 mmHg. His case was canceled due to concern for poor postoperative outcomes after a subsequent transesophageal echocardiogram revealed a severely dilated right heart and 4+ tricuspid regurgitation with flow reversal into the hepatic veins. After discussion among the hospital's transplant committee, the patient was planned to have a tricuspid valve repair, liver transplant, and kidney transplant surgery several months later. The patient successfully underwent tricuspid valve repair and orthotopic liver transplant and then kidney transplant the following day.

Porto-pulmonary arterial hypertension: Translation of pathophysiological concepts to the bedside

Porto-pulmonary arterial hypertension (PoPAH) is a form of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) that affects patients with cirrhosis, and - to a lesser extent - patients with non-cirrhotic liver diseases. Compared with other forms of PAH, PoPAH is more prevalent in male, in older subjects, and is characterized by lower mean pulmonary arterial pressure (mPAP) and lower pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) with higher cardiac output. Despite more favorable hemodynamics and functional class, patients with PoPAH have a significantly worse survival than patients with other forms of PAH, likely because of liver-related events and therapeutic barriers to PAH-specific therapy. Furthermore, here cardiopulmonary and hepatic complications may affect treatment efficacy. These patients have been excluded from most randomized clinical trials testing PAH-specific treatments. To date, there is only one study investigating efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of PAH-specific therapy in patients with PoPAH in a randomized placebo-controlled setting. In this trial the use of the endothelin-1 receptor antagonist macitentan showed clear hemodynamic benefit without safety concerns. However, the drug effects on functional capacity and mortality remain unclear. Here we review the current knowledge on the pathophysiology and management of PoPAH and report a case vignette of a patient with PoPAH due to hepatorenal polycystic disease.

Pulmonary complications of portal hypertension: The overlooked decompensation

The systemic nature of cirrhosis and portal hypertension has long been recognized, and the amount of data characterizing the interplay between each system is becoming ever so complex. Lung involvement was among the first described associated entities in cirrhosis, with reports dating back to the late nineteenth century. However, it appears that throughout the years, interest in the pulmonary complications of portal hypertension has generally faded, especially in contrast to other decompensating events, as expertise in this field has primarily been concentrated in highly experienced tertiary care facilities and liver transplantation centers. Despite affecting up to 10%-15% of patients with advanced liver disease and having a proven prognostic impact, hepato-pulmonary syndrome, porto-pulmonary hypertension, and hepatic hydrothorax are frequently misdiagnosed, mistreated, or misinterpreted. This lack of precision might adversely impact patient care, referral to expert centers, and, ultimately, liver disease-related mortality and successful transplantation odds. The present minireview aims to increase awareness of the pulmonary complications of chronic liver disease by providing a brief overview of each of the three entities. The paper focuses on the essential theoretical aspects, addressing the most critical knowledge gaps on the one hand and, on the other hand, critically discussing one key issue for each complication.