A prospective outcomes study of Swanson metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for the rheumatoid hand

Primary Arthrodesis of Non-thumb Metacarpophalangeal Joints of the Hand: Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthritis is common secondary to a variety of inflammatory, degenerative, and traumatic causes. Although MCP arthroplasty is more common for the second to fifth digits, primary arthrodesis can be used for high-demand patients with arthritis or unsalvageable fractures of the MCP joint. There has been limited recent studies on the outcomes of these patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 38 fingers in 27 patients with primary arthrodesis from 1990 to 2020 was conducted. The major outcomes were complications, reoperations, radiographic union, and time to union. Patient-reported outcomes including the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and a questionnaire specific to the operative MCP joint were collected.

RESULTS

Rate of radiographic union was 84% including revisions. The average time to union was 3.6 months. Rates of complications, reoperation, and amputation were 26%, 16%, and 7%, respectively. Arthrodesis as part of emergent trauma reconstruction was significantly more likely to result in reoperation (50% vs 7%) and complication (63% vs 17%) than chronic arthritis. Patient-reported outcomes were fair to good with improvement in pain (79%), function (66%), and appearance (40%). Sixty-six percent (66%) of patients were satisfied with their surgery, and 73% would repeat the surgery.

CONCLUSION

Arthrodesis for unsalvageable MCP fractures was associated with higher rates of reoperation and complication than inflammatory or degenerative arthritis. Excluding emergent trauma, MCP fusion was reliable with a reoperation rate of 7% and a modest complication rate of 17%. Patients rated reasonable levels of satisfaction and willingness to repeat the procedure despite complications.

Managing Difficult Problems in Small Joint Arthroplasty: Challenges, Complications, and Revisions

Small joint arthroplasty of the hand has been an established means of joint preservation and pain relief for over a half a century. Despite this, metacarpophalangeal (MCP) and proximal interphalangeal (PIP) joint arthroplasty has not achieved the long-term success seen with hip and knee arthroplasty. Problems following MCP, PIP, and carpometacarpal (CMC) joint arthroplasty can include intraoperative fracture, postoperative dislocation, recurrent pain, limitation of motion, and instability. The hand surgeon needs to be prepared for these problems and their management. This article addresses the management of the most common complications seen following MCP, PIP, and CMC arthroplasty.

Factors Associated With Reoperation After Silicone Metacarpophalangeal Joint Arthroplasty in Patients With Inflammatory Arthritis

Background: Silicone metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty has a high revision rate. It has been suggested that the preoperative degree of ulnar drift and radial wrist deviation influences the durability of MCP silicone arthroplasties. The goal of this study was to evaluate what factors are associated with reoperation after silicone MCP arthroplasty. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively evaluated all adult patients who underwent MCP silicone arthroplasty between 2002 and 2016 at one institutional system for inflammatory arthritis. After manual chart review, we included 73 patients who underwent 252 arthroplasties. Fingers treated included 66 index, 67 long, 60 ring, and 59 small fingers. Results: The overall reoperation rate was 9.1% (N = 23). Indications for reoperation were implant breakage (n = 11), instability (n = 4), soft tissue complications (n = 4), infections (n = 3), and stiffness (n = 1). There was a trend that patients who underwent single-digit arthroplasty had higher rates of revision (19% vs 3.5%, P = .067). Radiographic follow-up demonstrated joint incongruency in 50% of cases, bone erosion in 58% of cases, and implant breakage in 19% of cases. There was a trend toward higher rates of revision in patients without preoperative MCP joint subluxation (19% vs 6.7%, P = .065) The 1-, 5-, and 10-year implant survival rates were 96%, 92%, and 70%, respectively. Revision surgery occurred at <14 months in 15 patients (65%) and after 5 years in 8 (35%) patients. Conclusions: Revision surgery after silicone MCP arthroplasty appears to be bimodal. Patients with greater hand function preoperatively may be at higher risk of revision surgery.

Peri-Prosthetic Joint Infection after Finger Joint Arthroplasty

Background: Endoprosthetic treatment of finger joints is an established procedure. However, data on peri-prosthetic finger joint infections (PJI) are rare. The goal of this retrospective study was to assess infection rates and treatment outcomes after PJI of the finger joints. Methods: Between 1984 and 2014, 1,195 finger joints (978 metacarpal and 217 proximal interphalangeal [PIP] joints) in 518 patients were treated. A retrospective record analysis was conducted. Besides demographic data, infection rates, types of revision surgery, and treatment outcomes were evaluated. Treatment strategies changed during the treatment period. Routinely assessed patient-reported outcome measures, namely the QuickDASH score, visual analogue scale (VAS), an everyday function score (activities of daily living; ADL), and an adapted Clayton score, were compared. Results: In 36 finger joints of 30 patients, a post-operative peri-prosthetic infection could be identified (3%). Infections occurred on average 3.8 years after arthroplasty. For meta-carpal phalangeal (MCP) joints, the best clinical outcomes could be observed after a two-stage revision procedure (QuickDASH score 86). Arthrodesis performed in a one-stage procedure achieved favorable outcomes in PIP joints (QuickDASH score 89). Re-infection mandating revision surgery occurred in seven joints in five patients (7/36; 19.4%). In 25 patients with 29 finger joints, there was no re-infection and no need for revision. Conclusion: Peri-prosthetic infection of finger joint prostheses occurs in approximately 3% of all cases, which is a higher rate than in the more common hip and knee procedures. For MCP joint revision surgery, a two-stage procedure seems to be the best treatment choice. For PIP joint revision, a single-stage revision with arthrodesis in a functional position achieves a good outcome.

Revision Metacarpophalangeal Arthroplasty: A Longitudinal Study of 128 Cases

PURPOSE

The objective was to examine outcomes associated with a large cohort of revision metacarpophalangeal (MCP) arthroplasties.

METHODS

A review of 128 revision MCP arthroplasties performed in 64 patients was performed. The mean age at surgery was 62 years. Fifty nonconstrained (31 pyrocarbon and 19 surface-replacing arthroplasty) and 78 constrained silicone implants were used for revisions.

RESULTS

At a follow-up of 6 years (2 to 16), 20 (16%) implants required a secondary revision surgery. The 5- and 10-year survival rates were 81% and 79%, respectively. Postoperative dislocation occurred in 17 (13%) MCP joints. Subgroup analysis demonstrated a 5-year survival rate of 67% in surface-replacing arthroplasties, compared with 83% for both pyrocarbon and silicone implants (hazard ratio, 2.60; P = 0.09). Clinical improvements in pain and MCP range of motion were noted in most patients postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Revision MCP arthroplasty is a challenging procedure with one in five patients requiring a revision procedure at 5 years and a relatively high rate of postoperative dislocations. However, most patients who did not undergo a secondary revision surgery experienced improvements in pain and range of motion. Worse outcomes are seen in patients with a history of MCP dislocations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV.

A Pulsed Electrical Joint Stimulator for the Treatment of Osteoarthritis of the Hand and Wrist

The hand is commonly affected by osteoarthritis (OA). The development and progression of OA are believed to involve inflammation, even in the early stages of the disease. Inflammatory and proinflammatory cytokines have also been shown to be elevated in the flexor tenosynovium of idiopathic carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). A large percentage of patients with hand OA also have a concomitant CTS. This study evaluated the results of a pulsed electrical joint stimulator in patients who had hand OA with or without CTS. Pain, tenderness, and swelling; grip strength and pinch force; and Patient and Physician Global Assessment and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) results were evaluated. The primary efficacy outcome was pain due to OA in the study hand in the past 48 hours. Secondary outcomes consisted of OA pain in the study thumb in the past 48 hours, grip strength, pinch force, and Patient and Physician Global Assessment and DASH results. All 7 outcome parameters improved in OA patients. On physical examination, individual finger and wrist joints had also improved regarding pain, swelling, and tenderness. In the subset of patients with CTS, CTS pain, paresthesia, weakness, and all CTS symptoms had significantly improved. Patient and Physician Global Assessment and DASH results and pinch force were also significantly improved. This pulsed electrical joint stimulator is effective in providing clinically relevant and statistically significant reductions in the signs and symptoms of OA of the hand and CTS. It could be a useful modality for the treatment of patients who have one of these conditions or both. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e550-e556.].

20 years of rheumatoid hand surgery: what did I learn?

Rheumatoid arthritis is one common form of inflammatory arthritis that affects about 1% of the population. Few conditions in hand surgery have undergone such fundamental changes within the last two decades as rheumatoid arthritis has with regard to clinical presentations and treatments. This article provides a personal practice-guided review of the author's decision making and treatment for patients with rheumatoid arthritis in the past two decades.

Upper-limb motor and sensory function in patients with hip fracture: Comparison with community-dwelling older adults

BACKGROUND

Upper-limb function is important in patients with hip fracture so they can perform activities of daily living and participate in leisure activities. Upper-limb function of these patients, however, has not been thoroughly investigated.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the upper-limb motor and sensory functions in patients with hip fracture by comparing these functions with those of community-dwelling older adults (control group).

METHODS

We compared the results of motor and sensory function tests of upper-limb function - range of motion, strength, sensibility, finger dexterity, comprehensive hand function - between patients with hip fracture (n= 32) and the control group (n= 32).

RESULTS

Patients with hip fracture had significantly reduced grip strength, pinch strength, finger dexterity, and comprehensive hand function compared with the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

Most upper-limb functions are impaired in the patients with hip fracture. Thus, upper-limb function of patients with hip fracture should be considered during treatment.

Seven-Year Outcomes of the Silicone Arthroplasty in Rheumatoid Arthritis Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) causes destruction of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joints, leading to hand deformities, pain, and loss of function. This study prospectively assessed long-term functional and health-related quality-of-life outcomes in RA patients with severe deformity at the MCP joints.

METHODS

RA patients between ages 18 to 80 years with severe deformity at the MCP joints were referred to 1 of the 3 study sites. Subjects who elected to undergo silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty (SMPA) while continuing with medical management were followed in the SMPA cohort. Subjects who elected to continue with medical management alone without surgery were followed in the non-SMPA cohort. Objective measurements included grip and pinch strength as well as arc of motion, ulnar drift, and extensor lag of the MCP joints. Patient-reported outcomes included the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales questionnaire. Radiographs of SMPA implants were assessed and graded as intact, deformed, or fractured.

RESULTS

MHQ scores showed large improvements post-SMPA, and baseline-adjusted expected outcomes in the SMPA group were significantly better at year 7 in function, aesthetics, satisfaction, and overall score compared to non-SMPA. SMPA subjects did not improve in grip or pinch strength, but achieved significant improvement and maintained the improvement long term in ulnar drift and extensor lag.

CONCLUSION

Benefits of the SMPA procedure are maintained over 7 years with low rates of implant fracture or deformity. Non-SMPA patients remained stable in their hand function over the 7-year study duration.

Functional and patient-reported outcomes of the Swanson metacarpo-phalangeal arthroplasty in the rheumatoid hand

INTRODUCTION

Replacement of the metacarpo-phalangeal joints (MCPJ) with silastic Swanson's implants can help decrease pain, stiffness and allow for improved function in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). There is a lack of patient reported outcome measure (PROM) studies assessing the efficacy of this procedure in RA. The aim of this study was to report any change in function, pain, stiffness and satisfaction following the Swanson MCPJ replacement using patient reported outcomes in a rheumatoid population.

METHODS

The combined results of 64 RA patients (71 hands) with 284 Swanson MCPJ arthroplasties (mean follow-up: 75.85 months) were assessed using the validated M-SACRAH questionnaire and a separate satisfaction questionnaire. Radiographic evaluation was performed to insure correct alignment of the hinged prosthesis postoperatively. No attempt was made to identify other predictors, radiologically or clinically. Data analysed in the study was interpreted in the context of the number of hands and survivorship was defined as implant fracture, loosening or revision.

RESULTS

The mean total functional outcome score improved by 46.2% and the total pain outcome improved by 60.2%. The total stiffness outcome improved by 56.9% postoperatively and the results obtained from the satisfaction questions revealed that 73.2% of patients would retrospectively elect to have the procedure again. We report two postoperative complications in this group of superficial wound infections. Radiographically, all MCPJs showed improved alignment, however five patients reported worsening pain, four patients reported increased stiffness and four reported reduced function postoperatively. There was one re-operation of a 5th MCPJ Swanson's, which did not require implant exchange and one implant was revised. Implant survivorship was 98.6%.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient satisfaction and functional surrogate markers were overall favourable. Our results support the continued use of Swanson silastic arthoplasty in advanced RA.

Exploring the factor on sensory motor function of upper limb associated with executive function in communitydwelling older adults

Exercise, such as cardiovascular fitness training, has been shown to have utility in improving executive function but is difficult for older adults with low mobility to perform. Accordingly, there is interest in the development of regimens other than high mobility exercises for older adults with low mobility. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the association between sensory motor function of the upper limb and executive function in community-dwelling older adults. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 57 right-handed, independent, community-dwelling older adults. Sensory motor function of upper limb, including range of motion, strength, sensation, finger dexterity, and comprehensive hand function was measured in both hands. Executive function was assessed using the Delta Trail Making Test. Multiple regression analysis indicated the finger dexterity of the non-dominant hand as independently associated with executive function (β = -0.414, P < 0.001). The findings of the present study may facilitate the development of exercise regimens for improving executive function that are more suitable for older adults with limited physical fitness levels. As this was a cross-sectional study, further studies are required to validate the efficacy of non-dominant finger dexterity training for improving executive function in older adults.

The Importance of Hand Appearance as a Patient-Reported Outcome in Hand Surgery

Hand appearance is meaningful to patients because hands are an essential part of human interactions, communication, and social integration. Recent literature indicates that hand aesthetics is an important, measurable patient-reported outcome. In hand surgery, several outcome instruments exist that accurately measure functional outcomes, but aesthetics is often overlooked or imprecisely measured. This makes comparison of disease burden and effectiveness of therapies, as they pertain to aesthetics, difficult. This special topic article outlines the aesthetic features of the hand, how literature is evaluating the appearance of the hand in outcomes research, and proposes a novel approach to assessing hand aesthetics.

Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures associated with metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To assess the incidence of and identify risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic fractures during primary and revision metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Through our institutional Joint Registry Database, we identified 818 MCP joint arthroplasties performed in 285 patients from 1998 to 2012, including 690 primary arthroplasties and 128 revision arthroplasties. Primary diagnoses included inflammatory arthritis (667), osteoarthritis (75), and posttraumatic arthritis (76). Periprosthetic fractures were identified through review of medical records.

RESULTS

Intraoperative periprosthetic fractures occurred in 23 (3%) fingers (21 patients), including 19 primary and 4 revision arthroplasties. Twelve fractures required stabilization, 4 required only bone grafting, and 1 required both. The fractures occurred during broaching (12), implantation (10), or prior implant removal (1). Diabetes mellitus (DM), younger age, pyrocarbon implant insertion, and cementless fixation increased risk for intraoperative fracture. In particular, DM and the use of pyrocarbon implants significantly increased fracture risk. At 4 years (range, 1.3-10.2 y) average follow-up, no patient with intraoperative fracture had developed a subsequent fracture compared with 3 postoperative fractures in patients without intraoperative fractures. All fractures had healed by the time of the last follow-up. The 2- and 5-year implant survival rates were 96% and 80% in those with intraoperative fractures, respectively, which was not significantly different from those without an intraoperative fracture. When comparing patients with an intraoperative fracture with those without, there was an increased risk of postoperative MCP joint instability defined as implant dislocation. Patients with intraoperative fractures still had noteworthy improvements in their postoperative pain levels and pinch strengths.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative fractures occurred in 3% of MCP joint arthroplasties, including 3% of primary and 3% of revision arthroplasties. Increased risk for fracture was associated with the use of pyrocarbon implants, cementless fixation, and DM. Although these fractures did not appear to adversely affect implant survival, they were associated with increased risk of postoperative instability.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic III.

Variation in rheumatoid hand and wrist surgery among medicare beneficiaries: a population-based cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To examine the rate and variation in rheumatoid arthritis (RA)-related hand and wrist surgery among Medicare (elderly) beneficiaries in the United States, and to identify the patient and provider factors that influence surgical rates.

METHODS

Using the 2006-2010 100% Medicare claims data of beneficiaries with RA diagnosis, we examined rates of rheumatoid hand and wrist arthroplasty, arthrodesis, and hand tendon reconstruction in the United States. We used multivariate logistic regression models to examine variation in receipt of surgery by patient and regional characteristics (density of providers, intensity of use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs).

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2010, the annual rate of RA-related hand and wrist arthroplasty or arthrodesis was 23.1 per 10,000 patients, and the annual rate of hand tendon reconstruction was 4.2 per 10,000 patients. The rates of surgery varied 9-fold across hospital referral regions in the United States. Younger patient age, female sex, white race, higher socioeconomic status (SES), and rural residence were associated with a higher likelihood of undergoing arthroplasty and arthrodesis. We observed a significant decline in rate of arthroplasty and arthrodesis with increasing density of rheumatologists. Tendon reconstruction was not influenced by provider factors, but was correlated with age, race, SES, and rural status of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Surgical reconstruction of rheumatoid hand deformities varies widely across the United States, driven by both regional availability of subspecialty care in rheumatology and individual patient factors.

Update on the surgical treatment for rheumatoid arthritis of the wrist and hand

Surgical procedures for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis are aimed at restoring function and decreasing pain. Over the past four decades multiple procedures have been described in the management of early and late disease. This article will review the most common forms of surgery used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Evidence-based medicine in hand surgery: clinical applications and future direction

Evidence-based medicine empowers physicians to systematically analyze published data so as to quickly formulate treatment plans that deliver safe, robust, and cost-effective patient care. In this article, we sample some areas in hand and upper extremity surgery where the evidence base is strong enough that it has or should have unified treatment strategies; we identify some problems where good evidence has failed to unify treatment, and discuss problems for which evidence is still lacking but needed because treatment remains controversial. We also discuss circumstances in which level 4 evidence is more likely than randomized trials to guide treatment.

Three-dimensional assessment of hand outcome

INTRODUCTION

Patient reported outcome measures are central to National Health Service quality of care assessments. This study investigated the benefit of elective hand surgery by the simultaneous analysis of pain, function and appearance, using a three-dimensional (3D) graphical model for evaluating and presenting outcome.

METHODS

A total of 188 patients scheduled for surgery completed pre- and postoperative questionnaires grading the severity of their pain, dysfunction and deformity of their hand(s). Scores were plotted on a 3D graph to demonstrate the degree of 'normalisation' following surgery.

RESULTS

Surgical groups included: nerve compression (n=53), Dupuytren's disease (n=51), trigger finger (n=20), ganglion (n=17) or other lump (n=21), trapeziometacarpal joint osteoarthritis (n=10), rheumatoid disease (n=5) and other pathology (n=13). A significant improvement towards normality was seen after surgery in each group except for patients with rheumatoid disease.

CONCLUSIONS

This study provides a simple, visual representation of hand surgery outcome by plotting patient scores for pain, function and appearance simultaneously on a 3D graph.

Outcomes of pyrolytic carbon arthroplasty for the proximal interphalangeal joint at 44 months' mean follow-up

BACKGROUND

Short-term results after proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with pyrolytic carbon (pyrocarbon) implant have shown that this implant has high complication rates, but patient satisfaction is high. The authors evaluated the effectiveness of the implant for use in proximal interphalangeal joint at a minimum of 2 years of follow-up.

METHODS

Thirteen consecutive candidates who underwent 21 proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty procedures with pyrocarbon implant were evaluated prospectively. Functional measurements and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were administered preoperatively and at 12 months and intermediate term (>2 years) postoperatively. Preoperative and intermediate-term mean data for all functional measures and questionnaire scores were compared.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were treated, with a mean follow-up of 44 months. Grip strength, key pinch strength, and active arc of motion demonstrated no statistical difference between preoperative and intermediate-term assessment. All domains of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire showed improved large effect size at intermediate-term follow-up, especially pain and satisfaction. There were 10 complications in nine joints (complication rate, 42.9 percent). Patients without complications had better functional outcomes; however, there were no statistical differences in questionnaire scores between patients with and without complications, except for pain (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with pyrocarbon implant seems to be an effective way of reducing pain without sacrificing active arc of motion. Despite a high complication rate, patients were generally satisfied, especially with pain relief, and complications did not affect patients' satisfaction even when hand function was affected. Further decision-making analysis to compare arthroplasty and fusion for each finger may help surgeons to select the appropriate operative procedures.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic, IV.

A technique for motion capture of the finger using functional joint centres and the effect of calibration range of motion on its accuracy

A method of kinematic analysis of the fingers using stereo-photogrammetry, referred to as the phalanx transformation technique, has been proposed. Functional methods were used to define the joint axes and subsequently each finger segments’ anatomical coordinate system. Thirteen subjects were tested and the accuracy of the technique assessed. The average error across the three joints of the finger was found to be 0.6 mm, which translates to a 2.2% error in predicted joint reaction force when using a biomechanical model. The subjects were required to have sufficient movement in their joints to define the joint axes functionally. Some subjects of clinical interest can have a significantly reduced mobility owing to injury or pathology, therefore, the effect of calibration range of motion on accuracy was analysed. It was found that, for a range of motion typical of a subject with rheumatoid arthritis, the errors in predicted joint reaction force were <7%. The accuracy of this technique compared favourably with others previously proposed and, considering the other errors inherent in modelling, those found in this study were deemed to be acceptable.

Objective functional outcomes and patient satisfaction after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

Patient satisfaction is an essential measure of quality of care for rheumatoid arthritis. Prior research demonstrates that patient satisfaction improves after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty (SMPA) despite minimal change in hand function. The purpose of this study was to identify the level of objective functional recovery that yields satisfaction after SMPA. We hypothesized that measurable gains in objective hand function after SMPA will discriminate between satisfied and dissatisfied patients.

METHODS

In this prospective, multicenter, cohort study, we observed 46 patients with rheumatoid arthritis and metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint subluxation for 2 years after reconstructive surgery. We derived satisfaction scores from the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, ranging from 0 (least satisfied) to 100 (most satisfied), and dichotomized them using the Cohen large effect size. We measured hand function at baseline and follow-up including strength (grip strength and pinch strength), finger position (extensor lag and ulnar drift), and MCP arc of motion. We constructed receiver operating characteristic curves to identify optimal cutoffs in hand function that correspond with satisfaction.

RESULTS

At 2 years of follow-up, patients who achieved an extension lag of 30° or less were considered satisfied, which represented a 52% improvement (preoperative lag = 63°). Similarly, patients who gained improvement in ulnar drift from an average of preoperatively 62° to 9° postoperatively were satisfied. Finally, patients who achieved an improvement in MCP arc of motion from an average of 21° to 31° postoperatively were satisfied. No improvements in grip or pinch strength corresponded with postoperative patient satisfaction.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients were satisfied with only modest gains in grip and pinch strength after silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty. However, maintaining finger position, without recurrence of ulnar drift or extensor lag, and MCP arc of motion corresponded with patient satisfaction in the postoperative period.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic II.

Reconstruction of the rheumatoid hand

Previous studies have shown large variation in the rate of common surgical procedures performed for the rheumatoid hand. This article provides a comprehensive overview of each surgical treatment option for rheumatoid hand reconstruction.

Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire

BACKGROUND

The Michigan Hand Questionnaire is one of the most widely used hand-specific surveys that measure health status relevant to patients with acute and chronic hand disorders. However, item redundancy exists in the original version, and an abbreviated survey could minimize responder burden and offer broader applicability.

METHODS

Patients (n = 422) with four specific hand conditions--rheumatoid arthritis (n = 162), thumb carpometacarpal osteoarthritis (n = 31), carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 97), and distal radius fracture (n = 132)--completed the Michigan Hand Questionnaire at two time points. Correlation analysis identified two items from each of six domains (i.e., function, activities of daily living, work, pain, aesthetics, and satisfaction). The Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire score was calculated as the sum of the responses to the 12 items. Psychometric analysis was performed to describe the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire.

RESULTS

The Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire includes 12 items that were highly correlated with the summary Michigan Hand Questionnaire score (r = 0.99, p < 0.001). The Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire scores were highly correlated between the two time periods (r = 0.78, p < 0.001) and by disease type. Responsiveness of the Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire was high for all diseases and similar to that of the original Michigan Hand Questionnaire.

CONCLUSIONS

The 12-item Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire is an efficient and versatile outcomes instrument specific to hand disability that retains the psychometric properties of the original Michigan Hand Questionnaire. The Brief Michigan Hand Questionnaire is an important tool with which to measure patient outcomes and the quality of care in hand surgery.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic, I.(Figure is included in full-text article.).

Hand appearance as a patient motivation for surgery and a determinant of satisfaction with metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE

To determine patient motivations for surgery and satisfaction with outcomes for metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint arthroplasty in 3 domains (appearance, function, and pain) and whether patient-reported satisfaction correlates with standard outcome measures.

METHODS

In a randomized controlled trial of MCP joint implants, 33 patients with rheumatoid arthritis had primary MCP joint arthroplasty: 15 hands received Swanson implants, and 18 received NeuFlex implants. Range of motion, ulnar drift, grip strength, Sollerman hand function test, and the Michigan Hand Questionnaire were collected before surgery and 1 year after surgery. Preoperative patient motivations for and expectations of MCP joint arthroplasty were assessed for function, pain, and appearance. Patient-perceived improvement and satisfaction within the 3 domains and global satisfaction were assessed after surgery.

RESULTS

Function was rated the most important motivator for surgery by 31 patients, pain by 22, and appearance by 15. Twenty-six patients rated 2 or more motivators equally high. Michigan Hand Questionnaire subscores were moderately correlated or weakly correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. The Sollerman score was weakly correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. Range of motion, ulnar drift, and grip strength were not correlated with patient-reported satisfaction. More patients stated that a much better improvement was obtained for appearance than for function or pain relief.

CONCLUSIONS

Patient expectations of MCP joint arthroplasty were uniformly high. The greatest motivation for surgery was functional improvement. Pain was highly ranked, and 25 patients rated hand appearance as the first or second motivator. Patient satisfaction correlated poorly with traditional outcome measures and moderately with patient-reported outcomes. We conclude that appearance should be considered an important motivator for surgery and determinant of satisfaction.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic I.

Current concepts in the management of the rheumatoid hand

Hand surgeons are an integral part of the management team for patients with rheumatoid arthritis. There is now a greater understanding of the national use of rheumatoid hand surgery, which highlights the differences between hand surgeons and rheumatologists regarding the treatment of the rheumatoid hand. Advances in medical treatments have also decreased the prevalence of hand deformities caused by this disease. Hand surgeons today have less exposure to treating rheumatoid hand, but despite more effective medical options, surgery may still offer patients hope for improvement of hand function and appearance. This article summarizes the current state of rheumatoid hand surgery and discuss the surgical treatment strategies for optimizing outcomes for patients with rheumatoid arthritis.

Metacarpophalangeal joint arthritis

Arthritis of the metacarpophalangeal joint can result in considerable disability and pain. Inflammatory, posttraumatic, crystalline, and osteoarthritis are common etiologies of joint disease. A variety of nonsurgical treatment options have been shown to be effective, including activity modification, anti-inflammatory medications, splinting, and cortisone injections. In addition, newer generation disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs geared toward the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis have shown promise in retarding the inflammatory process. Another, relatively newer, conservative treatment option includes topical anti-inflammatories such as diclofenac sodium that are now approved by the Federal Drug Administration. Surgical treatment options most commonly include arthroplasty and arthrodesis. In the treatment of thumb metacarpophalangeal arthritis, arthrodesis is a popular and generally reliable surgical solution. In the fingers, arthroplasty remains the most common treatment option. Traditional constrained silicone joint replacements remain the most commonly used. Newer generation, unconstrained, surface replacement arthroplasties have shown promise in the treatment of osteoarthritis and select cases of inflammatory arthritis in which there is good bone stock, no or minimal deformity, adequate supporting soft tissues, and good disease control.

Current concepts in the surgical management of rheumatoid and osteoarthritic hands and wrists

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a progressively destructive disease. Gradual loss of hand function in RA patients affects their ability for self-care and interferes with their productivity in society. The continuing improvement in the medical management of RA has markedly decreased the incidence of RA hand surgery. In contrast to RA, osteoarthritis (OA) has less inflammatory reaction in the joints and is characterized by degradation of cartilage, resulting in joint destruction and osteophyte formation. The initial treatment of OA is medication and therapy. Steroid injection into affected joints can provide short-term relief, though repeat injections carry a cumulative risk of weakening the soft tissue. In this article the authors share their extensive experience in RA and OA hand surgery to provide a clear discussion of the indications and outcomes of its practice.

Outcomes research in rheumatoid arthritis

Although rheumatoid arthritis causes significant disability for more than 1 million individuals in the United States, prior research regarding surgical treatment options has been limited by study sample size, study design, and methods of comparison. Furthermore, there is wide variation in the referral pattern for hand surgery consideration and type of surgical treatment of rheumatoid hand disease, yet the reasons for these differences are unclear. This review describes the role of outcomes research in rheumatoid hand disease by summarizing variations in surgical treatment, detailing current outcome assessment strategies, and offering potential strategies for designing future studies for rheumatoid hand disease.

Bioreconstructive poly-L/D-lactide implant compared with Swanson prosthesis in metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid patients: a randomized clinical trial

It was hypothesized that the bioresorbable interposition implant might offer a viable alternative to conventional silicone implant arthroplasty in rheumatoid metacarpophalangeal joint destruction. A randomized clinical study was performed to compare a stemless poly-L/D-lactide copolymer 96 : 4 (PLDLA) implant with the Swanson silicone implant. Results in 52 patients (53 hands and 175 joints) at a mean follow-up of 2 years (minimum 1 year) showed that the improvement in clinical assessments was comparable in both groups, except for better maintenance of palmar alignment in the Swanson group. The lack of implant fractures and intramedullary osteolysis were advantages of the PLDLA implant. The bioresorbable PLDLA interposition implant may offer an alternative tool for tailored reconstruction of rheumatoid metacarpophalangeal joints.

Outcomes of trapeziectomy with a modified abductor pollicis longus suspension arthroplasty for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis

PURPOSE

Various arthroplasty procedures have been described for the treatment of thumb carpometacarpal joint osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to determine the outcomes of patients treated with trapeziectomy and a variation of abductor pollicis longus suspension arthroplasty.

METHODS

Eighteen consecutive patients were treated by a single surgeon (K.C.C.) with trapeziectomy and abductor pollicis longus suspension arthroplasty (21 thumbs). Prospective outcomes data were collected before the operation and at 3, 6, and 12 months after surgery. Outcomes were assessed with x-rays, grip/key pinch strength, the Jebsen-Taylor test, and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Immediately after surgery, a 32 percent loss in carpometacarpal joint height was observed and an additional 11 percent proximal metacarpal migration was observed at 1 year. The mean grip strength was 11.1 kg preoperatively and 7.7, 14.3, and 16.7 kg at 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year postoperatively, respectively. Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire results demonstrated improvements in all domains. Statistically significant improvements were noted in the domains of overall score, from 41 to 67 (p = 0.03); activities of daily living, from 43 to 66 (p = 0.01); work, from 41 to 65 (p = 0.05); patient satisfaction, from 25 to 68 (p = 0.01); and pain, which decreased from 73 to 30 (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Abductor pollicis longus suspension arthroplasty is a faster and technically easier technique that avoids any additional deficit by using an accessory tendon. This procedure gives acceptable patient-rated outcomes, especially in pain relief and satisfaction.

Validity and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a multicenter, international study

OBJECTIVE

Millions of patients experience the disabling hand manifestations of rheumatoid arthritis (RA), yet few hand-specific instruments are validated in this population. Our objective was to assess the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire (MHQ) in patients with RA.

METHODS

At enrollment and at 6 months, 128 RA patients with severe subluxation of the metacarpophalangeal joints completed the MHQ, a 37-item questionnaire with 6 domains: function, activities of daily living (ADL), pain, work, aesthetics, and satisfaction. Reliability was measured using Spearman's correlation coefficients between time periods. Internal consistency was measured using Cronbach's alpha. Construct validity was measured by correlating MHQ responses with the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 (AIMS2). Responsiveness was measured by calculating standardized response means (SRMs) between time periods.

RESULTS

The MHQ demonstrated good test-retest reliability (r = 0.66, P < 0.001). Cronbach's alpha scores were high for ADL (α = 0.90), function (α = 0.87), aesthetics (α = 0.79), and satisfaction (α = 0.89), indicating redundancy. The MHQ correlated well with AIMS2 responses. Function (r = -0.63), ADL (r = -0.77), work (r = -0.64), pain (r = 0.59), and summary score (r = -0.74) were correlated with the physical domain. Affect was correlated with ADL (r = -0.47), work (r = -0.47), pain (r = 0.48), and summary score (r = -0.53). Responsiveness was excellent among arthroplasty patients in function (SRM 1.42), ADL (SRM 0.89), aesthetics (SRM 1.23), satisfaction (SRM 1.76), and summary score (SRM 1.61).

CONCLUSION

The MHQ is easily administered, reliable, and valid to measure rheumatoid hand function, and can be used to measure outcomes in rheumatic hand disease.

Differences between the United States and the United Kingdom in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: analyses from a hand arthroplasty trial

Previous studies have found differences in rheumatoid hand surgical practice around the world. The specific aim of this study is to compare baseline characteristics of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients in the United States (US) and the United Kingdom (UK) that may be influenced by the two different health-care systems. Patients were recruited from three sites (two in the US and one in England) as part of a National Institutes of Health funded study to examine outcomes of silicone metacarpophalangeal joint (MCPJ) arthroplasty in RA patients. Outcomes measurements included biomechanical assessments (grip strength, pinch strength, and mean ulnar drift and extensor lag at the MCPJs of all four fingers), a health-related quality of life questionnaire (the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire), and a medication assessment. American patients have a significantly higher income level (p<0.001) and have completed higher levels of education (p<0.001) than British patients. There were no significant differences in terms of self-reported disease severity or deformity at the MCPJs. RA patients in the US are more likely to take biologic medications (p<0.001), steroids (p=0.02), and Cox-2 inhibitors (p=0.02). Patients in the UK are significantly more likely (p<0.001) to take nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. There are differences in the demographic characteristics and medication use of RA patients with hand deformities in the US and UK. These differences may be influenced by the private versus socialized health-care systems. However, the perception of hand disease severity in participants in this study appears to be comparable between these countries.

Outcomes of hand surgery in the patient with rheumatoid arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Surgeons have long been striving to develop new surgical procedures to improve functional outcomes for a variety of hand and wrist deformities resulting from rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The purpose of this review is to assess the latest surgical outcomes related to hand and wrist surgery in the patient with RA.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is a lack of outcome studies in RA hand and wrist surgery to justify many of the surgical procedures proposed for the treatment of the rheumatoid hand. However, advances made by the silicone metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty (SMPA) group regarding hand reconstruction for RA patients have improved patient care for this widely used procedure. Prophylactic versus therapeutic procedures are also discussed.

SUMMARY

Rheumatoid hand is one of the earliest presentations of RA, and the progression of rheumatoid hand disease can be unpredictable. There are a number of surgical treatments for the rheumatoid hand and careful sequential planning of the surgical procedures can maintain patients' hand function and in many cases should enhance outcomes of the rheumatoid hand by correcting existing deformities. An early introduction to a hand surgeon can inform patients of available options and allow longitudinal assessment of structural and functional changes that could be treatable by future surgical interventions.

Clinical research in hand surgery

Clinical research designed to enhance the quality of health care has always received a great deal of national attention. Outcomes studies, clinical trials, and evidence-based research are key components of clinical research that have advanced the field of hand surgery. The purpose of the Weiland Award is to encourage innovations and progress in clinical research in hand surgery for the betterment of patients and to promote hand surgery's visibility in American medicine. This article will highlight my efforts in clinical research through 3 specific research themes: (1) outcomes research, (2) economic analysis, and (3) evidence-based research and quality assessment in health care.

Validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the validity and responsiveness of the Jebsen-Taylor Hand Function Test (JTT) in measuring hand function in patients undergoing hand surgery, compared with the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ).

METHODS

A prospective cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 37), osteoarthritis (n= 10), carpal tunnel syndrome (n = 18), and distal radius fracture (n = 46) were evaluated preoperatively and at 9 to 12 months of follow-up. We administered the JTT and MHQ. We performed correlation and receiver operating characteristic analyses to evaluate the validity of the JTT as a measure of disability. Effect size and standardized response means were calculated to determine responsiveness.

RESULTS

Correlation studies revealed poor correlation of the JTT with MHQ total scores and subsets that relate to hand function. Patients with high MHQ scores generally perform well on the JTT; however, patients with good JTT scores do not necessarily have high MHQ scores. Receiver operating characteristic curves for each condition showed that the change in JTT total score had poor ability to discriminate between high and low MHQ score subjects, with an area under the curve result of 0.52 to 0.66 for each condition. Effect size and standardized response means for all states showed greater responsiveness with the MHQ for each condition compared with the JTT.

CONCLUSIONS

We found poor correlation between the change in JTT and absolute JTT scores after surgery compared with change in MHQ and absolute MHQ scores. In addition, the JTT had poor discriminant validity based on the MHQ as a reference. This study showed that the time to complete activities does not correlate well with patient-reported outcomes. We conclude that the JTT should not be used as a measure of disability or clinical change after surgical intervention.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic III.

A prospective study comparing outcomes after reconstruction in rheumatoid arthritis patients with severe ulnar drift deformities

BACKGROUND

It has been stated by hand surgeons that rheumatoid arthritis patients often are referred "too little and too late." The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate outcomes of rheumatoid arthritis patients with metacarpophalangeal joint deformities (subluxation and ulnar deviation). The authors hypothesized that patients with more severe deformities would have worse outcomes after silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty.

METHODS

Seventy patients who each had combined metacarpophalangeal joint ulnar drift and extensor lag greater than 50 degrees were recruited into this three-center study of silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty. Patients were categorized into two groups based on degrees of deformity: less than 100 degrees or greater than or equal to 100 degrees. Outcomes were assessed at 6 months and 1 year based on the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, grip/pinch strength, metacarpophalangeal joint deviation angles, the Jebsen-Taylor test, and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 questionnaire.

RESULTS

There was no difference in outcomes at the 1-year follow-up between the two groups, after controlling for age, gender, and baseline values. Each of the outcome scores was not different between the two groups, including the six domains in the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire, grip/pinch strength, the Jebsen-Taylor test, and the Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales 2 questionnaire. However, patients with more severe hand deformities have worse ulnar drift and extensor lag after reconstruction.

CONCLUSIONS

Rheumatoid arthritis patients with more severe metacarpophalangeal joint diseases will attain similarly good outcomes after reconstruction when compared with those with less severe deformities. Despite the potential barriers to silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty in rheumatoid arthritis patients with more severe hand deformities, surgical treatment is still beneficial.

Outcomes of pyrolytic carbon arthroplasty for the proximal interphalangeal joint

BACKGROUND

Arthritis of the proximal interphalangeal joint is a debilitating condition commonly treated with arthroplasty. The pyrolytic carbon (pyrocarbon) implant has been developed for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty in these patients. This prospective outcomes study evaluated the outcomes and complications of the pyrocarbon implant for the proximal interphalangeal joint.

METHODS

Consecutive candidates for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty with pyrocarbon implants were evaluated prospectively. Functional measurements and the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire were administered preoperatively and at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Preoperative means and 12-month postoperative means for all functional measures were compared using paired t tests and nonparametric Wilcoxon signed rank sum test, and effect size was reported for the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients treated with 21 implants were enrolled in the study. At the 12-month follow-up period, mean active arc of motion was 38 degrees, decreasing slightly from the preoperative value. Mean grip strength improved from 11.3 kg to 15.1 kg, although the difference was not statistically significant. Mean key pinch values improved significantly from 6.6 kg preoperatively to 9.2 kg at the 12-month follow-up (p = 0.03). Jebsen-Taylor test scores showed improvement, although not significantly. Changes in all Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire domains showed a large effect size. Three patients experienced squeaking of the implant and three patients experienced dislocation of the pyrocarbon joint.

CONCLUSION

The pyrocarbon implant for proximal interphalangeal joint arthroplasty shows encouraging results, primarily in patient satisfaction and pain relief, but is associated with complications related to implant dislocations, which required prolonged treatment with external fixators.

Measures and time points relevant for post-surgical follow-up in patients with inflammatory arthritis: a pilot study

Background

Rheumatic diseases commonly affect joints and other structures in the hand. Surgery is a traditional way to treat hand problems in inflammatory rheumatic diseases with the purposes of pain relief, restore function and prevent progression. There are numerous measures to choose from, and a combination of outcome measures is recommended. This study evaluated if instruments commonly used in rheumatologic clinical practice are suitable to measure outcome of hand surgery and to identify time points relevant for follow-up.

Methods

Thirty-one patients (median age 56 years, median disease duration 15 years) with inflammatory rheumatic disease and need for post-surgical occupational therapy intervention formed this pilot study group.

Hand function was assessed regarding grip strength (Grippit), pain (VAS), range of motion (ROM) (Signals of Functional Impairment (SOFI)) and grip ability (Grip Ability Test (GAT)). Activities of daily life (ADL) were assessed by means of Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Outcome (DASH) and Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM). The instruments were evaluated by responsiveness and feasibility; follow-up points were 0, 3, 6 and 12 months.

Results

All instruments showed significant change at one or more follow-up points. Satisfaction with activities (COPM) showed the best responsiveness (SMR>0.8), while ROM measured with SOFI had low responsiveness at most follow-up time points. The responsiveness of the instruments was stable between 6 and 12 month follow-up which imply that 6 month is an appropriate time for evaluating short-term effect of hand surgery in rheumatic diseases.

Conclusion

We suggest a core set of instruments measuring pain, grip strength, grip ability, perceived symptoms and self-defined daily activities. This study has shown that VAS pain, the Grippit instrument, GAT, DASH symptom scale and COPM are suitable outcome instruments for hand surgery, while SOFI may be a more insensitive test. However, the feasibility of this protocol in clinical practice awaits prospective studies.

A multicenter clinical trial in rheumatoid arthritis comparing silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty with medical treatment

PURPOSE

Metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint deformities caused by rheumatoid arthritis can be treated using silicone metacarpophalangeal joint arthroplasty (SMPA). There is no consensus as to whether this surgical procedure is beneficial. The purpose of the study was to prospectively compare outcomes for a surgical and a nonsurgical cohort of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

METHODS

The prospective study was conducted from January 2004 to May 2008 at 3 referral centers in the United States and England. Over a 3-year period, 70 surgical and 93 nonsurgical patients were recruited. One year data are available for 45 cases and 72 controls. All patients had severe ulnar drift and/or extensor lag of the fingers at the MCP joints. The patients all had 1-year follow-up evaluations. Patients could elect to have SMPA and medical therapy or medical therapy alone. Outcomes included the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ), Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales, grip and pinch strength, Jebson-Taylor test, and ulnar deviation and extensor lag measurements at the MCP joints.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the mean age for the surgical group (60) when compared to the nonsurgical group (62). There was also no significant difference in race, education, and income between the 2 groups. At 1-year follow-up, the mean overall MHQ score showed significant improvement in the surgical group but no change in the nonsurgical group, despite worse MHQ function at baseline in the surgical group. Ulnar deviation and extensor lag improved significantly in the surgical group, but the mean Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales scores and grip and pinch strength showed no significant improvement.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study demonstrated significant improvement for RA patients with poor baseline functioning treated with SMPA. The nonsurgical group had better MHQ scores at baseline, and their function did not deteriorate during the 1-year follow-up interval.

Measuring quality of surgical care: is it attainable?

SUMMARY

Healthcare quality has emerged as an important discussion topic for the American people. With the continued lack of health insurance coverage for over 15 percent of Americans, questions are being posed regarding why the United States has spent $2.1 trillion per year in healthcare and is still unable to provide the highest quality of healthcare in the world. The World Health Organization's 2000 World Health Report ranked the United States at 24 out of 191 member countries in healthcare indices. Because of a looming reduction in the number of Americans covered through the Medicare and Medicaid programs due to budgetary constraints, many initiatives have been proposed to cut the cost of healthcare and at the same time improve the quality of the American system. In this article, the authors summarize the history of these quality initiatives and discuss current and future directions of programs to achieve better healthcare for the country. They also discuss how the American Society of Plastic Surgeons is engaging national organizations to be part of the solution for this crisis.

The minimal clinically important difference of the Michigan hand outcomes questionnaire

PURPOSE

To determine the change in score required in various domains of the Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) to indicate meaningful patient improvement, or the minimal clinically important difference (MCID), for 3 common hand conditions: rheumatoid arthritis (RA), carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and distal radius fracture (DRF).

METHODS

The MHQ was administered to patients at 2 time points. Patient satisfaction was defined as a satisfaction score > or =80% of the standard deviation of that patient sample. The minimal change in score in specific MHQ domains that corresponded with patient satisfaction was determined using receiver operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

For CTS patients, MCIDs of 23, 13, and 8 were identified for the pain, function, and work domains, respectively. For RA patients, pain and function were also identified as having discriminative ability, with MCIDs of 11 and 13, respectively. An MCID of 3 was identified for the activities of daily living domain. For DRF patients, no MHQ domains showed discriminative ability because of the ceiling effect at the 3-month assessment period.

CONCLUSIONS

Individual domains of the MHQ can be used to discriminate between patients who are satisfied and those who are not after either carpal tunnel release or silicone arthroplasty of the metacarpophalangeal joints for RA. Pain and function are the domains of the MHQ that are best able to discriminate between patients who are satisfied and those who are not. The identical function MCID for both RA patients and CTS patients, despite markedly different preoperative values, indicates that a standard amount of functional change may indicate patient satisfaction. High postoperative satisfaction, even only 3 months after surgery, prevented any domains from showing discriminative ability for the DRF patients.

Measuring quality in health care and its implications for pay-for-performance initiatives

The quality of health care is important to American consumers, and discussion on quality will be a driving force toward improving the delivery of health care in America. Funding agencies are proposing a variety of quality measures, such as centers of excellence, pay-for-participation, and pay-for-performance initiatives, to overhaul the health care delivery system in this country. It is quite uncertain, however, whether these quality initiatives will succeed in curbing the unchecked growth in health care spending in this country, and physicians understandably are concerned about more intrusion into the practice of medicine. This article outlines the genesis of the quality movement and discusses its effect on the surgical community.

A comparative study of fragment-specific versus volar plate fixation of distal radius fractures

BACKGROUND

There are many plating systems available for treating distal radius fractures, and deciding which to use can be difficult. This prospective cohort study compared outcomes of two commonly used fixation systems: fragment-specific fixation and a fixed-angle volar locking plate system.

METHODS

Consecutive distal radius fractures were prospectively evaluated in a fragment-specific fixation cohort and a volar locking plate system cohort. Radiographic, functional, and patient-rated outcomes were collected immediately postoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Complications were recorded and graded by severity.

RESULTS

Fourteen distal radius fractures treated with fragment-specific fixation and 85 treated with the volar locking plate system were enrolled. Radial inclination was similar in both cohorts (23 degrees versus 25 degrees); however, volar tilt was worse in the fragment-specific fixation cohort (-10 degrees versus 10 degrees, p < 0.05). The majority (63 percent) of the fragment-specific fixation cohort demonstrated a loss of relative radial length. Grip strength, pinch strength, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire scores, and most range of motion measurements were superior in the volar locking plate system cohort at 6 months, although not all differences were statistically significant. By 12 months the differences in functional and patient-rated outcomes were smaller, suggesting that the fragment-specific fixation cohort tended to reach the outcomes of the volar locking plate system cohort over time. Complications requiring reoperation were higher in the fragment-specific fixation cohort (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The volar locking plate system results in more stable fixation and better objective and subjective outcomes early in the postoperative period. It has fewer complications requiring reoperation than fragment-specific fixation.

Measuring outcomes in hand surgery

Outcomes research in hand surgery provides patients and providers with objective, reliable information to assist in making medical decisions. Endpoint measures in outcomes research and the instruments used to evaluate these endpoints are often specific to a particular disease or region. Hand surgery has many different measurable outcomes that can be used to monitor the quality of surgical practice, inform practice guidelines, and aid in the appropriate allocation of healthcare resources. In this article, we review some research techniques available to study the following surgical outcomes of the hand: national trends in surgical care, surgical complications, objective measures of hand function, patient-reported measures of hand function, and economic burden.

Insufficient flexion of the metacarpophalangeal joint of the little finger following Swanson silicone arthroplasty for rheumatoid arthritis

Twenty-one patients with rheumatoid arthritis who underwent Swanson metacarpophalangeal (MP) arthroplasty from 1994 to 1999 were assessed for active flexion of individual MP joints an average of 59 months (range 27-114 months) postoperative. Published articles of Swanson MP arthroplasty were reviewed. Experienced hand surgeons were surveyed regarding outcomes of metacarpophalangeal arthroplasty. The MP joint of the little finger displayed significantly less flexion than that of the middle and index finger. Seven of eight published studies which present active MP flexion by individual digit demonstrated less flexion in the little finger compared to the index, middle, and ring finger. Half of surgeons surveyed reported that MP range of motion is shifted toward a more extended position, that MP flexion is limited in the ulnar digits, and that an implant that encourages MP flexion would be helpful. Our experience with this cohort, a review of published literature, and a survey of international experts suggest that Swanson arthroplasty frequently results in a range of flexion of the MP joint of the little finger that may be insufficient for its principal functions.

[Prosthetics of metacarpophalangeal joints]

Only a few of the large number of implants developed during the last decades for replacement of the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint have proven to be reliable. The rates of loosening and mechanical failure of almost all types of constrained prostheses are so high that their use cannot be recommended at present. For more than 40 years silicone arthroplasty according to Swanson has been regarded as the gold standard in the prosthetic replacement of the MCP joint. In long-term studies this device provided good pain relief and a lasting correction of preoperative ulnar deviation. The degree of patient satisfaction continues to be high after more than 10 years. With the NeuFlex spacer, a modification of the original Swanson implant, a better range of motion and a reduction of wear-related problems is expected. In this study the results of 130 NeuFlex spacers after a mean time of 3.6 years were examined and 82% of the patients were completely pain free. The mobility of the joints improved from 40 degrees preoperatively to 54 degrees after 3.6 years. Radiologically periprosthetic erosions or osteolyses were seen in approximately 15% of implants. A minimal sinking of the stems developed in 24%, a massive one in 6% and 13% of the spacers were broken. Thus the use of the NeuFlex implant resulted in a better range of motion compared to the Swanson spacer, but the problem of radiological appearance remained unchanged. For unlinked prostheses sufficient soft tissue stability is mandatory as well as wear-resistant surface materials. The pyrocarbon prosthesis according to Beckenbaugh is the only implant for which long-term results are available. In a prospective study we evaluated 28 Ascension pyrocarbon prostheses with a mean follow-up of 4 years. Stability was not found to be a problem. Subjective results were satisfactory, the range of motion remained unchanged, however 46% of prosthesis stems exhibited radiolucent seams, 7 prostheses (25%) were rated as loose and 5 of those had to be replaced by a silicone implant. Use of the implant was abandoned, as it was unreliable regarding bony fixation. There are promising concepts in some new prostheses but independent data are still lacking.