Evaluating the Effect of Comorbidities on the Success, Risk, and Cost of Digital Replantation

Trends and impact of comorbidities on Guyon's Canal release for the treatment of Guyon's Canal syndrome: A decade long nationwide analysis

Background

Guyon's Canal Syndrome (GCS) is a rare nerve entrapment condition with limited studies exploring the trends of GCS patients undergoing Guyon's Canal release. The aim of this study is to examine the trends associated with GCS: (1) Guyon's Canal release procedures performed; (2) surgically relevant comorbidities; (3) 90-day readmissions; and (4) same-day and 90-day reimbursement.

Methods

A retrospective query was performed on the PearlDiver Mariner Database from 2010 to 2020 by CPT code 64719 to identify patients who underwent Guyon's Canal release. A total of 33,3764 patients were identified. Linear regression models were used to analyze trends in procedures performed, comorbidities, readmission, and reimbursement over this period. A P-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Between 2010 and 2020, there was an overall significant decreasing trend in the number of Guyon's Canal release procedures performed (RC, -127.50; p < 0.001). There was an increase in number of GCS patients that had undergone Guyon's Canal release who drink alcohol (RC, 0.33; p < 0.001), are obese (RC, 0.81; p < 0.001), and use tobacco (RC, 0.56; p < 0.004), and decrease number of GCS patients with a history of diabetes (RC, -0.82; p < 0.001), hypothyroidism (RC, -0.56; p < 0.001), PVD (RC, -0.71; p < 0.001), and RA (RC, -0.33; p < 0.001). We also found an overall increasing trend in 90-day readmissions (RC, 0.09; p = 0.019) and increased same-day (RC, 68.09; p < 0.001) and 90-day average reimbursement (RC, 257.15; p < 0.001) from 2010 to 2020.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated a decreasing trend in Guyon's Canal release performed in GCS patients but increasing cost of care implicated by the increased 90-day readmissions and same day and 90-day reimbursement. This may be attributed to the comorbidities present in GCS patients undergoing Guyon's Canal release. Therefore, it is imperative when consulting GCS patients with surgically relevant comorbidities to weigh the risk and benefits of the procedure.

Outcomes following replantation surgery

The ability to perform surgical replantation of individual digits and limbs can provide substantial functional improvement for patients who sustain devastating upper extremity injuries. Defining success in replantation surgery extends beyond the acute period and the binary metrics of survival or loss of the replanted part to include the long-term overall functional outcomes. Functional outcomes include both objective clinical evaluation and patient-reported outcomes. There has been significant variation in the way outcomes following replantation are measured, which inherently leads to heterogeneity in the reported outcome data. Given the variability among outcome measures, we aim to explore the outcomes of replantation surgery, particularly clinical evaluation and patient-reported functional outcomes following replantation.

Indications for replantation and factors that predict success

Since the advent of replantation techniques, there has been uneven progress in terms of success-even considering whether success is defined as continued perfusion of the digit or long term functional outcomes. Early enthusiasm and success have not been maintained despite increasing familiarity with microsurgical techniques and greater understanding of how to optimize outcomes for the individual components of replantation such as tendon repair, nerve repair, and osteosynthesis. Practitioners participating in the care of patients undergoing replantation should be familiar with the history and current understanding of both the indications and contraindications for the procedure, post-operative rehabilitation, and factors contributing to functional outcomes. A review of the literature from the first publications on the topic demonstrates evolution in practice and understanding of which patients should be indicated for replantation. Indications can be considered in three broad categories: injury factors, patient factors, and care context factors. These factors intersect with one another and can inform the surgeon pre-operatively regarding the most likely outcome for a given patient. This insight is critical to discuss pre-operatively with the patient in order to make a shared decision about how to manage their injury.

The Learning Curve in Digital Replant Surgery: 46 Prospectively Collected Cases From a Single Surgeon Over a 10-Year Period

PURPOSE

 Digital replantation is a technically difficult microsurgery requiring significant surgical skill. The aim of this study was to investigate postoperative outcomes associated with the surgical learning curve for microvascular digital replantation.

METHODS

 A prospectively maintained surgical database of consecutive patients who underwent digital replantation from 2002 to 2012 was reviewed. All cases were performed by a single surgeon and began immediately after the surgeon's fellowship. A total of 46 patients were identified. Outcomes of digital replantation were tested for association with time since fellowship, total microvascular operative experience, and location and type of injury.

RESULTS

 Overall, 38/46 (82.6%) of patients underwent a successful digital replantation. There was a significant difference between survival percentages over the years (p=0.04), with improvement seen over time. Total microvascular experience was significantly associated with successful outcomes (p<0.001). After 100 hours of microvascular experience, there was a significant increase in the survival odds ratio (OR 8.5, 95% CI 1.5-47.9). Crush and thumb injuries were more likely to have detrimental outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

 There was marked improvement in replant survival over time, with a significant increase in odds of survival after 100 hours of microvascular experience. One hundred operating hours under the microscope occurred around 2 years in practice for this high-volume surgeon. There is strong evidence that a steep learning curve occurs in microvascular digit replantation surgery.

Digital artery flow hemodynamics: An ultrasonographic study

BACKGROUND

There is a lack of data regarding the baseline hemodynamic blood flow parameters of the wrist and digits. Therefore, we aimed to quantify the digital and radial artery blood flow parameters using ultrasound and assess the influence of patient characteristics on hemodynamics.

METHODS

We analyzed ultrasonographic data from 25 patients (50 hands) between October 2019 and December 2021. Variables of interest included dimensions of the radial artery and index finger (IF) ulnar and radial digital arteries at the palmodigital crease and their corresponding flow parameters. We compared variables among men and women and patients with and without diabetes using Wilcoxon Rank Sum test.

RESULTS

Our cohort consisted of 18 women (36 hands) and three participants with diabetes (six hands). The mean diameter of the IF radial digital artery was 7 mm, and that of the ulnar digital artery was 10 mm. The average peak systolic velocity for the radial digital artery was 21.31 cm/sec, and for the ulnar digital artery, it was 30.03 cm/sec. Comparing men and women, the only significant difference found was in the time-averaged mean velocity for the ulnar digital artery (men:5.66 cm/sec vs. women:9.68 cm/sec, P = 0.02) and volume of flow for the ulnar digital artery (men:10.87cc/min vs. women:18.58cc/min, P = 0.03). We found no differences in blood flow parameters comparing participants with and without diabetes.

CONCLUSION

These data provide a baseline measurement of digital flow hemodynamics that can be used in future studies to model vascular flow after replantation.

A Challenging Case of Thumb Replantation Aided by Intraoperative Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Angiography

Background

This study presents a case of thumb replantation performed despite several risk factors: age, comorbidities, and trauma mechanism are major adverse prognostic factors directly impacting thumb replantation. Most of the literature backs up this claim that a thumb that works, even partially, is a better outcome for the patient than amputation.

Methods

We performed thumb replantation on a 94-year-old patient with type 2 diabetes mellitus who arrived at the emergency department with a thumb avulsion due to a dog bite. The intraoperative indocyanine green fluorescence angiography method aided us in carrying out the operation.

Results

We successfully used indocyanine green angiography intraoperatively to guide surgical debridement and evaluate the efficacy of anastomosis and reperfusion of the replanted segment during surgery. Two months after the operation, the patient had regained satisfactory hand function.

Conclusions

Although indocyanine green angiography is not a technology created for revascularization procedures, it is instrumental in assessing vascular function and predicting a successful outcome. Given its undeniable potential, more research is needed on the possibility of widespread use in hand surgery and its indications.

Free neurovascular toe-(joint)-transfers compared to alternative reconstructive procedures for amputation injuries of two and tripartite fingers with substance loss

BACKGROUND

Complex injuries of the hand frequently result in loss of essential functional features. Common reconstructive procedures for soft tissue defects of the thumb or phalanges are locoregional flaps like Moberg-, Foucher-, Cross-Finger- or Littler flaps. Microneurovascular toe (joint-) transfers complete the arsenal of operative reconstructive procedures and allow for most detailed reconstructions. Our experiences with free toe transplants are reported and diversely discussed regarding contending procedures.

METHODS

From 2010 until 2019 14 patients who received emergency or elective partial or complete toe transfers were compared with a control group (n = 12) treated with contending reconstructive procedures. Aim of the reconstructions was to cover the defect with well-vascularized, sensate tissue, while preserving length and range of motion in a reliable manner.

RESULTS

The Kapandji score showed a significant difference (p- value = 0.04) with a score of 9.8 in comparison to control group (Kapandji index = 8.0).

CONCLUSION

In our heterogenic patient collective free toe transplants have proven to achieve comparable functional results for reconstruction of two and tripartite phalanxes as opposed to common local reconstructive procedures.

Is Prolonged Use of Antibiotic Prophylaxis and Postoperative Antithrombotic and Antispasmodic Treatments Necessary After Digit Replantation or Revascularization?

BACKGROUND

Ensuring the patency of repaired vessels is pivotal in improving the success rate of digit replantation. There is no consensus on how to best approach postoperative treatment for digit replantation. The influence of postoperative treatment on the risk of failure of revascularization or replantation remains unclear.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) Is there an increased risk of postoperative infection with early discontinuation of antibiotic prophylaxis? (2) How are anxiety and depression affected by a treatment protocol consisting of prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis and administration of antithrombotic and antispasmodic drugs and by the failure of a revascularization or replantation procedure? (3) Are there differences in the risk of revascularization or replantation failure based on the number of anastomosed arteries and veins? (4) What factors are associated with failure of revascularization or replantation?

METHODS

This retrospective study was conducted between July 1, 2018, and March 31, 2022. Initially, 1045 patients were identified. One hundred two patients chose revision of amputation. In all, 556 were excluded because of contraindications. We included all patients in whom the anatomic structures of the amputated part of the digit were well preserved, and those with an ischemia time for the amputated part that did not exceed 6 hours. Patients in good health without any other serious associated injuries or systemic diseases and those without a history of smoking were eligible for inclusion. The patients underwent procedures that were performed or supervised by one of four study surgeons. Patients were treated with antibiotic prophylaxis (1 week); patients treated with antithrombotic and antispasmodic drugs were categorized into the prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis group. The remaining patients treated with antibiotic prophylaxis for less than 48 hours and no antithrombotic and no antispasmodic drugs were categorized into the nonprolonged antibiotic prophylaxis group. Postoperative follow-up was for a minimum of 1 month. Based on the inclusion criteria, 387 participants with 465 digits were selected for an analysis of postoperative infection. Twenty-five participants with a postoperative infection (six digits) and other complications (19 digits) were excluded from the next stage of the study, in which we assessed factors associated with the risk of failure of revascularization or replantation. A total of 362 participants with 440 digits were examined, including the postoperative survival rate, variation in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores, the association between the survival rate and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores, and the survival rate based on the number of anastomosed vessels. Postoperative infection was defined as swelling, erythema, pain, purulent discharge, or a positive bacterial culture result. Patients were followed for 1 month. The differences in anxiety and depression scores between the two treatment groups and the differences in anxiety and depression scores based on failure of revascularization or replantation were determined. The difference in the risk of revascularization or replantation failure based on the number of anastomosed arteries and veins was assessed. Except for statistically significant variables (injury type and procedure), we thought that the number of arteries, number of veins, Tamai level, treatment protocol, and surgeons would be important. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to perform an adjusted analysis of risk factors such as postoperative protocol, injury type, procedure, number of arteries, number of veins, Tamai level, and surgeon.

RESULTS

Postoperative infection did not appear to increase without prolonged use of antibiotic prophylaxis beyond 48 hours (1% [3 of 327] versus 2% [3 of 138]; OR 2.4 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.5 to 12.0]; p = 0.37). Intervention with antithrombotic and antispasmodic therapy increased the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores for anxiety (11.2 ± 3.0 versus 6.7 ± 2.9, mean difference 4.5 [95% CI 4.0 to 5.2]; p < 0.01) and depression (7.9 ± 3.2 versus 5.2 ± 2.7, mean difference 2.7 [95% CI 2.1 to 3.4]; p < 0.01). In the analysis based on the failure of revascularization or replantation, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores for anxiety (11.4 ± 4.4 versus 9.7 ± 3.5, mean difference 1.7 [95% CI 0.6 to 2.8]; p < 0.01) and depression (8.5 ± 4.6 versus 7.0 ± 3.1, mean difference 1.5 [95% CI 0.5 to 2.5]; p < 0.01) were higher in the failed revascularization or replantation group than in the successful revascularization or replantation group. There was no increase in the artery-related risk of failure (one versus two anastomosed arteries: 91% versus 89%, OR 1.3 [95% CI 0.6 to 2.6]; p = 0.53). For patients with anastomosed veins, a similar outcome was observed for the two vein-related risk of failure (two versus one anastomosed vein: 90% versus 89%, OR 1.0 [95% CI 0.2 to 3.8]; p = 0.95) and three vein-related risk of failure (three versus one vein anastomosed: 96% versus 89%, OR 0.4 [95% CI 0.1 to 2.4]; p = 0.29). Factors associated with failure of revascularization or replantation included the mechanism of injury (crush: OR 4.2 [95% CI 1.6 to 11.2]; p < 0.01, avulsion: OR 10.2 [95% CI 3.4 to 30.7]; p < 0.01). Revascularization had a lower risk of failure than replantation (OR 0.4 [95% CI 0.2 to 1.0]; p = 0.04). Treatment with a protocol of prolonged antibiotics, antithrombotics, and antispasmodics was not associated with a lower risk of failure (OR 1.2 [95% CI 0.6 to 2.3]; p = 0.63).

CONCLUSION

With proper wound debridement and patency of repaired vessels, prolonged use of antibiotic prophylaxis and regular antithrombotic and antispasmodic treatment may not be necessary for successful digit replantation. However, it may be associated with higher Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale scores. Postoperative mental status is associated with digit survival. Well-repaired vessels, instead of the number of anastomosed vessels, could be critical to survival and decrease the influence of risk factors. Further research on consensus guidelines that compare postoperative treatment and the surgeon's level of expertise after digit replantation should be conducted at multiple institutions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

Single Digit Index Finger Amputation-To Replant or Not?

Background: Single index finger replantation is often listed as a contraindication due to its hindrance of hand function when replanted. Recent studies demonstrate comparable subjective and global functional outcomes for index flexor zone II finger replants versus revision amputations. We therefore sought to identify current opinions of plastic surgery trainees and staff treating single index finger zone II amputations including influential patient and injury characteristics. Methods: With the approval of the Canadian Society of Plastic Surgery, a 17-question survey was sent via email to all listed members on 3 separate occasions. Participation was voluntary and survey responses were compiled and analyzed using SPSS statistical software. Results: Survey response rate was 38.5%. When asked whether the surgeon would replant a single index digit, flexor zone II, sharp amputation, 55.3% of respondents chose "yes," while 44.7% responded "no." Staff (51.5%) were less likely to replant a single index digit amputation. Likelihood of replant dropped substantially in crush (12.4%) and avulsion (17.1%) injury. Smoking was the most likely patient characteristic to change a surgeon's decision (61.9%). Poor range of motion (77.5%) and patient satisfaction (72.5%) were the most frequently listed reasons not to replant. Conclusion: Among Canadian plastic surgeons, there exists disagreement in how single index flexor zone II amputations should be managed. In review of the literature, these notions and previous teaching around replants highlight many inherent surgeon biases with regard to the merit and value of single digit replantation.

Predictors of Success following Microvascular Replantation Surgery of the Upper Extremity in Adult Patients

The purpose of this study is to ascertain which factors are associated with successful replantation in the upper extremity. Secondarily, the purpose was to determine patient factors that differentiate those patients who undergo initial replantation versus initial amputation.

Methods

Data gathered for this retrospective study were obtained from a custom subset of the 2015-2020 IBM Truven MarketScan Commercial and IBM Truven MarketScan Medicare Supplemental databases. Data were sorted using Current Procedural Terminology codes and International Classification of Disease, Ninth and Tenth Revision, diagnosis codes.

Results

Increasing age was significantly associated with undergoing initial amputation compared with replantation (P < 0.001; 95% CI, 47.146-50.654). Among comorbid conditions, patients with diabetes mellitus type II (2.4% versus 24.3%; P < 0.001), hypertension (11.9% versus 28.0%; P = 0.03), end-stage renal disease (0% versus 10.5%; P = 0.03), and hypertensive chronic kidney disease (0% versus 8.7%; P = 0.04) more commonly underwent an initial amputation procedure. When evaluating the need for secondary procedure after replantation, there was no statistical significance between groups when comparing age, gender, insurance type, general comorbidities, connective tissue disorders, mental health disorders, or geographic location.

Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrates that age and the presence of comorbidities are important factors in the differentiation of which patients undergo initial reimplantation versus initial amputation. Additionally, no specific factors were identified that were associated with secondary procedures after replantation.

Risk Factors for Infection Following Operative Treatment of Traumatic Upper Extremity Amputation Injury

Background: Identification of the risk factors for surgical site infection (SSI) can be a straightforward and cost-effective measure to reduce or prevent the occurrence of SSI. However, there are no studies that revealed risk factors for SSI for traumatic upper extremity amputation. The aim of this study is to investigate the risk factors that promote SSI after surgery for traumatic upper extremity amputation using a large nationwide database.

Methods: We used data from the Japan Trauma Data Bank. Diagnoses were defined using the Abbreviated Injury Scale code. We applied multivariate logistic regression to evaluate the infection risk factor. We chose age, sex, vital signs, cause and type of trauma, concomitant injury, diabetes, amputation level, Glasgow coma scale, Injury Severity Score (ISS) and blood transfusion within 24 hours following hospital arrival as confounders. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was adopted to identify thresholds for change in infection risk. We also applied propensity score (PS) matching to adjust for confounding factors that may affect the outcome.

Results: A total of 1,150 patients (967 males, 183 females) had traumatic upper extremity amputation. The mean patient age was 46.5 years. A total of 21 patients (1.8%) suffered from SSI. ISS, blood transfusion, systolic blood pressure (BP) and the upper extremity amputation except for finger were identified as the independent significant risk factors for SSI occurrence by the multivariate analysis (p < 0.05, p < 0.005, p < 0.05 and p < 0.005, respectively). ROC modelling revealed that patients with ISS of over 9 or systolic BP of over 160 had a risk for SSI. After PS matching, the patients with blood transfusion or systolic BP of over 160 had a significantly higher risk of infection (OR 9.0; p = 0.01 and OR 7.0; p = 0.03, respectively).

Conclusions: In treating patients with these risk factors, we must be especially careful in performing thorough debridement and wound care.

Level of Evidence: Level II (Therapeutic)

Development of a Risk Stratification Scoring System to Predict General Surgical Complications for Patients Undergoing Foot and Ankle Surgery

Preventing postoperative complications is crucial for patients, surgeons, and health care facilities. We developed a risk stratification scoring system to optimize postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing foot and ankle surgery. A total of 35,580 patients who underwent foot and ankle procedures from 2005 to 2017 were identified as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP). To assess the risk of a postoperative complication, we identified several independent risk factors associated with 30-day postoperative complications, then proceeded to develop a point-based risk scoring system. To validate our scoring system, we used it on a cohort of patients from the database who underwent foot and ankle surgery. Risk factors that correlated with postoperative complications included tobacco abuse, age (≥65 years), diabetes mellitus, hypertension, elevated creatinine level (≥1.3 mg/dL), hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), congestive heart failure (CHF), hyponatremia (<135 mEq/L), and anemia (hematocrit value, men <42%; women <38%). Point scores for each factor were: anemia, +10; hypoalbuminemia, +9; elevated creatinine level, +6; CHF, +4; diabetes mellitus, +3; hyponatremia, +3; COPD, +2; hypertension, +2; age, +1; and tobacco abuse, +1. For the validation cohort, we stratified patients according to risk as low (0-20 points), medium (21-30 points), and high (≥31 points) risk. In terms of having a postoperative complication, compared with low-risk patients, patients who were at medium risk had an odds ratio of 4.7 (95% CI, 2.8-7.9) and those at high risk had an odds ratio of 8.3 (95% CI, 4.8-14.5). [Orthopedics. 2022;45(3):139-144.].

Factors associated with early and late digital revascularization and replantation failure: a retrospective cohort study

Factors associated with failure of digital revascularization and replantation procedures have been well characterized, but studies have not investigated failures occurring beyond the early postoperative period. A single-centre retrospective chart review included 284 patients (434 digits) who underwent digital revascularization or replantation. Patient-, injury- and surgery-related characteristics were compared among successful procedures, digits that failed while in hospital (early failure), and initially viable digits that failed after hospital discharge (late failure). Overall, 202 patients had successful procedures (71%). There were 51 early failures (18%) and 31 late failures (11%). Crush injuries and vein grafting were associated with early failure only. Complete amputations and leeching were strongly associated with both early and late failure. This study revealed that a substantial proportion of initially viable digits fail after discharge from hospital. Patients with signs of venous congestion may benefit from longer observation periods in hospital to avoid late failure.Level of evidence: IV.

Preoperative Deficiency Anemia in Digital Replantation: A Marker of Disparities, Increased Length of Stay, and Hospital Cost

Introduction  The effects of preoperative anemia have been shown to be an independent risk factor associated with poor outcomes in both cardiac and noncardiac surgery. Socioeconomic status and race have also been linked to poor outcomes in a variety of conditions. This study was designed to study iron deficiency anemia as a marker of health disparities, length of stay and hospital cost in digital replantation. Materials and Methods  Digit replantations performed between 2008 and 2014 were reviewed from the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) database using the ICD-9-CM procedure codes 84.21 and 84.22. Patients with more than one code or with an upper arm (83.24) or hand replantation (84.23) code were excluded. Extracted variables included age, race, comorbidities, hospital type, hospital region, insurance payer type, and median household income quartile. Digit replantations were separated into patients with and without deficiency anemia. Demographics, comorbidities, and access to care were compared between cohorts by chi-squared and t -tests. Multivariate regressions were utilized to assess the effects of anemia on total cost and length of stay. The regression controlled for demographics, region, income, insurance, hospital type, and comorbidities. Beta coefficient was calculated for length of stay and hospital cost. The regression controlled for significant age, race, region, and comorbidities in addition to the above variables. Results  In the studied patient population of those without anemia, 59.5% were Caucasian, and in patients with anemia, 46.7% were Caucasian ( p < 0.001). Whereas in the in the studied patient population of those without anemia, 6.7% were Black, and in patients with anemia, 15.7% were Black ( p < 0.001). Median household income, payer information, length of stay and total cost of hospitalization had statistically significant differences. Using regression and β-coefficient, the effect of anemia on length of stay and cost was also significant ( p < 0.001). Regression controlled for age, race, region and comorbidities, with the β-coefficient for effect on cost 37327.18 and on length of stay 3.96. Conclusion  These data show that deficiency anemias are associated with a significant increase in length and total cost of stay in patients undergoing digital replantation. Additionally, a larger percentage of patients undergoing digital replantations and who have deficiency anemia belong to the lowest income quartile. Our findings present an important finding for public health prevention and resource allocation. Future studies could focus on clinical intervention with iron supplementation at the time of digital replantation.

The Declining Number of Finger Replantations in Germany

INTRODUCTION

Data from the United States have shown that finger replantation numbers have declined significantly in recent years. It is unclear whether this is due to a decrease in amputation injuries or other reasons.

MATERIALS METHODS

Since 2005, all German hospitals have been required to produce structured quality reports. Based on these reports, we analyzed finger and hand replantation development and the incidence of amputation injuries between 2006 and 2018.

RESULTS

Replantations decreased by 30%, whereas amputation injuries increased slightly. In 2018, only 17 centers carried out more than 10 replantations. Most hospitals had replanted less than 4 times a year. The majority of residents participated in fewer than 1 replantation per year. Most specialists performed fewer than 1 replantation per year. The reasons for the decline in replantation remain speculative.

CONCLUSIONS

However, a reduction in amputation injuries was not observed. A change in medical indications, technical skills, and economic motivations needs to be considered. A further loss of specialized technical skills and experience with replantations might be a future consequence of this trend.

Pediatric Digit Replantation Following Traumatic Amputation: Nationwide Analysis of Patient Selection, Outcomes, and Cost

Background: Indications for replantation following traumatic digit amputations are more liberal in the pediatric population than in adults, but delineation of patient selection within pediatrics and their outcomes have yet to be elucidated. This study uses a national pediatric database to evaluate patient characteristics and injury patterns involved in replantation and their outcomes. Methods: The Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Kid's Inpatient Database was queried for traumatic amputations of the thumb and finger from 2000 to 2012. Participants were separated into those who underwent replantation and those who underwent amputation. Patients undergoing replantation were further divided into those requiring revision amputation and/or microvascular revision. Patient age, sex, insurance, digit(s) affected, charges, length of stay, and complications were extracted for each patient. Results: Traumatic digit amputations occurred in 3090 patients, with 1950 (63.1%) undergoing revision amputation and 1140 (36.9%) undergoing replantation. Younger patients, those with thumb injuries, females, and those covered under private insurance were significantly more likely to undergo replantation. Cost, length of stay, and in-hospital complications were significantly greater in replantation patients than in those who had undergone amputation. Following replantation, 237 patients (20.8%) underwent revision amputation and 209 (18.3%) underwent vascular revision, after which 58 required revision amputation. Risk of revision following replantation involved older patients, males, and procedures done recently. Conclusions: Pediatric patients who underwent replantation were significantly younger, female, had thumb injuries, and were covered by private insurance. Our findings demonstrate that in addition to injury factors, demographics play a significant role in the decision for finger replantation and its outcomes.

A four-year community hospital experience regarding procedures for the replantation and revascularization of fingers

Objectives

This study aims to evaluate the clinical results and experiences in a community hospital regarding procedures for the replantation and revascularization of fingers.

Patients and methods

Between June 2015 and December 2019, a total of 58 patients (51 males, 7 females; mean age: 33.4±6.3 years; range, 23 to 46 years) who were followed after total and/or subtotal amputation and replantation were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were evaluated at nine months in terms of cold intolerance, static two-point discrimination, and functional results using the range of motion (ROM) and Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) questionnaire.

Results

The majority of the patients presented with work-related injuries (70%), most commonly by the mechanism of guillotine (64%), and to the dominant hand (76%) and the third finger (36%) most frequently. The overall success rate of digit salvage was 72.9% (n=51). Of 19 digits with unsuccessful surgical outcomes, seven were from total and 12 were from subtotal amputations. In the long-term, cold intolerance was observed in 14 patients (24.1%) according to the cold intolerance severity scale. The mean static two-point discrimination value was 6.0±0.7 mm and the mean QuickDASH score was 22.3±5.0. The mean ROM measured at nine months after surgery in the metacarpophalangeal and interphalangeal joints of the third and fourth digits was significantly lower than that in the others (p<0.05).

Conclusion

The predictors of survival of a replanted digit indicated in this study can be used as a guide and decision-making aid for any attempts for replantation.

Influence of the level of arterial resection on the replanting and revascularization results in hand surgery: prospective study over 22 months

The objective of this work was to assess whether the injury mechanisms are responsible for histological arterial lesions. This prospective single-center study included adults with wrist or hand arterial injury. Arterial resection of at least 2 mm from the proximal and distal stumps was performed before the arterial anastomosis. Histological analysis of the arterial stumps was performed. An ultrasound was performed 1 month postoperatively to check arterial patency. A clinical and functional evaluation was done at 1 month postoperative, then every 3 months. From 2018 to 2020, 46 patients were included with a maximum follow-up of 13 months. There were 35 cuts, 2 crush injuries, 8 amputation and 1 blast injury. Macroscopically, 37% of the margins were considered damaged. Histological analysis showed significant damage in 59% of the sections (27 out of 46 patients) with 50% for crush injury, 55% for cuts by mechanical tool, 62% for cuts by power tool, 62% for amputations and 100% for blasts. The failure rate was 9%: 2 replantations and 2 asymptomatic thromboses diagnosed by ultrasound. Postoperative pain on VAS was 1.75/10, range of motion was 87%, Quick DASH was 8%, SF36 PCS was 69% and SF36 MCS was 70%. Factors influencing the success or failure of anastomosis were the mechanism of injury (p = 0.02), associated nerve damage (p = 0.014) and length of proximal arterial cut (p = 0.046). Histological arterial lesions seem to correlate with the injury mechanism. Cuts caused by glass or crush injuries do not seem to require arterial resections of more than 2 mm. A continuation of the study with a larger number of subjects may generate statistically significant results.

National Population Study of the Effect of Structure and Process on Outcomes of Digit Replantation

BACKGROUND

Surgeon experience, hospital volume, and teaching hospital status may play a role in the success of digit replantation. This study aims to analyze factors that influence digit replantation success rates.

STUDY DESIGN

We examined patients with traumatic digit amputations, between 2000 and 2015, from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan, which comprises data of more than 99% of its population. We measured the number of traumatic digit amputations and success rate of replantation. Chi-square and ANOVA tests were used for descriptive statistics. Regression models were built to analyze the association among patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics, and replant success.

RESULTS

We identified 13,416 digit replantation patients using the eligibility criteria. The overall replantation failure rate was significantly higher in medium- and high-volume hospitals (low-volume: 11%, medium-volume: 17%, and high-volume: 15%, p < 0.001). Teaching hospitals had significantly higher replantation failure rates [(15.5% vs 7.6%), odds ratio (OR) 2.0; confidence interval (CI) 1.1-3.7]. Lower surgeon case volume resulted in a significantly higher failure rate in the thumb replantation (OR 0.89; CI 0.85-0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Teaching hospitals had greater odds of replantation failure, owing to being high volume centers and attempting more replantations. However, the effect of residents performing the replantation during their training should be considered. Teaching units are mandatory for resident training; however, a balance should be established to provide training, but with sufficient supervision to achieve optimal replant success. A national protocol to triage digit amputation cases to high volume centers with experienced microsurgeons will help improve the replantation success rate.

The impact of hospital, surgeon, and patient characteristics on digit replantation decision: A national population study

BACKGROUND

Traumatic finger amputations cause a substantial burden to health care system. The purpose of this study is to investigate the epidemiology of traumatic finger amputations, the incidence of replantation attempts and to examine the patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics that were associated with replantation attempts.

METHODS

We examined 49,469 patients with traumatic digit amputations from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD) of Taiwan. We used Chi-square, ANOVA tests, and regression analysis to determine the important factors in decision to replant.

RESULTS

The replantation rate increased significantly with increased hospital volume (low-volume: 4.7%, medium-volume: 19.1 % and high-volume: 35.9 %). Regional hospitals were more likely to attempt replantation (odds ratio = 1.35). Low-volume hospitals had a replantation failure rate of 11.1 %, medium-volume 19.7 % and high-volume hospitals had 13.8 %.

CONCLUSION

With the national health insurance coverage, hospital volume is a substantial factor to encourage microsurgical-trained staff to perform digit replantation when indicated. The findings from this study will support government initiatives to foster and reward regionalization centers with high to medium case volume of replants to manage this critical function restoring procedure.

Successful Digital Revascularization in a Patient With Factor V Leiden Mutation

Replantation/revascularization involves microsurgical anastomosis of the digital arteries and veins, which are often 2 mm or less in diameter. Thrombosis is a known risk of revascularization that ultimately can lead to ischemic digital loss. Factor V Leiden mutation is present in 3% to 8% of the population and results in generalized hypercoagulability. We present the case of a single-digit revascularization that was successful following vein grafting in a patient with factor V Leiden mutation.

The Effects of Medicaid Expansion on Triage and Regional Transfer After Upper-Extremity Trauma

PURPOSE

Underinsured hand trauma patients are more likely to be transferred to quaternary care centers, which burdens these patients and centers. By increasing insurance coverage, care for less severe upper-extremity injuries may be available closer to patients' homes. We evaluated whether the 2014 expansion of Medicaid in Maryland under the Affordable Care Act decreased the number of uninsured upper-extremity trauma patients and the volume of unnecessary emergency trauma visits at our hand center.

METHODS

We identified all upper-extremity trauma patients between 2010 and 2017 at our hand trauma referral center. Injury severity was classified based on the need for subspecialty care. Bivariate relations between insurance status and demographic covariates, including injury type and distance, both before and after Medicaid expansion were evaluated. We used patient-level and multinomial logistic regression models to evaluate changes in payer and transfer appropriateness.

RESULTS

We studied 12,009 acute upper-extremity trauma patients. With Medicaid expansion, the percentage of trauma patients with Medicaid coverage increased from 15% to 24%, with a decrease in uninsured from 31% to 24%. After Medicaid expansion, non-transfer patient appropriateness decreased and appropriateness of transfers remained consistent across all payers. The average distance patients traveled for care remained similar before and after expansion.

CONCLUSIONS

Medicaid expansion significantly decreased the proportion of uninsured upper-extremity trauma patients. We identified no significant changes in the distances these patients traveled for specialized care. In addition, the appropriateness of transferred patients did not change significantly after expansion, whereas appropriateness of nontransferred patients actually declined after Medicaid expansion.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study indicates no notable change in adherence to transfer guidelines after expansion, and a possible increase in use of emergency services by newly insured patients.

An In-Depth Review of Physician Reimbursement for Digit and Thumb Replantation

PURPOSE

To examine physician and hospital reimbursement for digit and thumb replantation compared with revision amputation.

METHODS

Using the 2009-2016 Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases, we identified patients with a digit or thumb amputation. Following application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, we divided patients into replantation and revision amputation groups. We extracted the mean physician and hospital reimbursement associated with each patient encounter. For comparison, we examined the work Relative Value Unit (wRVU) and Medicare Physician Fee Schedule (MPFS) for the respective procedures in addition to several common hand surgery procedures.

RESULTS

We identified 51,716 patients. Following application of our inclusion and exclusion criteria, 219 replantation and 6,209 revision amputation patients were included in our analysis. For replantation, the mean physician and hospital reimbursements ranged from $3,938 to $7,753 and $30,683 to $56,256, respectively. For revision amputation, the mean physician and hospital reimbursements ranged from $1,030 to $1,206 and $2,877 to $4,188, respectively. On multivariable analysis, hospitals performing replantation earned $37,788 more per case compared with revision amputation. Using the wRVU and MPFS data, we determined that replantation reimburses at $78/wRVU compared with higher earnings for revision amputation ($108), carpal tunnel release ($101), cubital tunnel release ($97), trigger finger release ($116), open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) distal radius fracture ($87), flexor tendon repair ($98), extensor tendon repair ($122), repair of digital nerve ($89), and ORIF articular fracture ($82), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Low physician reimbursement for replantation compared with less complex hand procedures makes it difficult to recruit and retain hand surgeons for this purpose. By understanding the wRVU and MPFS system, hand surgeons and professional societies can explore ways to promote change in the way replantation is valued by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) as well as by hospital administrators.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic/Decision Analysis III.

Approach to Fingertip Injuries

The fingertip is mankind's tactile interface with the physical world, from reading braille, to using touchscreens, to wielding power tools. Its special tissue architecture demands astute evaluation and meticulous surgical or nonsurgical care after injury to return patients to their preinjury level of function. Attentive deliberation of physiologic, vocational, and psychosocial factors could improve the odds of achieving satisfactory results. In this article, we explore these aspects of fingertip injury to provoke readers to examine their practices and philosophies.

Outcomes Following Replantation/Revascularization in the Hand

The variability in reported outcomes and outcome measures used in digit replantation makes it difficult to compare results among studies. This article reviews the principles of measuring functional and patient-reported outcomes after replantation, and describes the recommended instruments to use and ways to report results.

Indications for Replantation and Revascularization in the Hand

The indications for upper extremity replantation are fluid, and it has long been appreciated that they change with time. Traditional strong indications for replantation include hand, thumb, or multiple digit amputation in adults, and almost any amputation in a child. Patients often desire replantation of single nonthumb digits based on aesthetic preference and personal/cultural values. Replantation in these situations is acceptable and rewarding, but individual consideration of patient, injury, and circumstantial factors is critical to avoid patient morbidity and unsatisfactory outcomes.

The Effect of Increasing Age on Outcomes of Digital Revascularization or Replantation

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of increasing age on rates of digital failure.

METHOD

A retrospective cohort study of digital replantation or revascularization patients was undertaken from 2005 to 2016. Data collected consisted of patient demographics, smoking status, injury mechanisms, procedure types, and postoperative morbidity and mortality. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression were performed to assess outcomes. All comparisons were made between patients older than and younger than 60 years.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-three patients underwent replantation or revascularization; 11 percent were older than 60 years. The majority of patients had multiple devascularized digits (70 percent), most commonly inflicted by a blade mechanism (77 percent). Approximately half of the patients underwent revascularization alone (54.4 percent). American Society of Anesthesiologists score and number of comorbidities were significantly greater in the older adult group. Overall, 88 patients (31 percent) experienced digital replantation or revascularization failure, with 12 failures in patients aged 60 years or older. Multivariate logistic regression demonstrated that age did not have an impact on failure rate. Older patients did not experience more major complications, but had significantly higher rates of minor complications (p = 0.0485).

CONCLUSIONS

Older patients presented with significantly higher American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status and number of comorbidities, but did not experience higher rates of digital failure, major perioperative complications, or 30-day mortality. Adults aged 60 years or older should be offered digital replantation or revascularization if medically or surgically indicated.

CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Risk, II.

The success of salvage procedures for failing digital replants: A retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The success of salvage procedures for failing digital replants (FR) is poorly documented. We sought to evaluate the success of salvage procedures for FR and factors contributing to successes and failures of replants.

METHODS

Adult patients who presented to our center between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2015, suffered ≥1 digital amputation(s), and underwent digital replantation were included. Preoperative, perioperative, and postoperative details were recorded. Digits were monitored postoperatively via nursing and physician assessments. The presumed reason for failure, details, and outcomes of salvage attempts were recorded for FR. Length of hospital stay and complications were also recorded.

RESULTS

Fifty-two patients and 83 digits were included. Fifty-two digits (63%) were compromised (arterial ischemia in 15 digits; venous congestion in 37 digits) and 48 digits had salvage therapy. Twenty-one FR (44%) were salvaged via operative (1 of 2; 50%), nonoperative (19 of 43; 44%), and combined (1 of 3; 33%) therapies. FR patients were more likely than those with successful replants to receive a blood transfusion (52 vs. 23%; p = .009) with more transfused units (3.45 ± 3.30 vs. 0.86 ± 0.95; p = .001). Length of stay was prolonged for FR patients (9 [range: 2-22] vs. 7 [range: 3-19] days; p = .039). Ultimately, 59% (49 of 83) of replants were successful, where 25% (21 of 83) were successfully salvaged.

CONCLUSION

Nonoperative and operative salvage therapies improve the rate of replant survival. We suggest close postoperative monitoring of all replants and active salvage interventions for compromised replants in the postoperative period.

Development of a Risk Stratification Scoring System to Predict General Surgical Complications in Hand Surgery Patients

PURPOSE

Avoidance of postoperative complications is important to both patients and surgeons. In an attempt to optimize postoperative outcomes, a risk stratification scoring system has been created to aid in optimizing risk factors for general surgical complications in hand surgery patients.

METHODS

Patients were identified who underwent hand procedures as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Independent risk factors associated with postoperative complications within 30 days of surgery were identified and used to develop a point-scoring system to estimate the relative risk for sustaining complications. For validation, the system was tested on a subset of patients from the database who had undergone hand surgery.

RESULTS

A total of 49,272 patients were identified as having undergone hand surgery from 2005 to 2015. The incidence of postoperative complications within 30 days of hand surgery was 2.3%. Risk factors associated with postoperative complications were male sex, tobacco abuse, congestive heart failure, anemia (male hematocrit less than 42; female less than 38), elevated creatinine (greater than 1.3 mg/dL), hypoalbuminemia (less than 3.5 g/dL), and hyponatremia (less than 135 mEq/L). Point scores derived for each of these factors were: hypoalbuminemia, +5; congestive heart failure, +2; anemia, +2; elevated creatinine, +2; male sex, +1; tobacco abuse, +1; and hyponatremia, +1. In the validation cohort, patients categorized as low-risk (0-3) using the point-scoring system had a 2.4% rate of 30-day complications; patients categorized as medium risk (4-7) had a 10.4% complication rate (relative risk = 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 3.1-5.9 compared with low risk) and high risk (≥8), 28.9% (relative risk = 11.9; 95% confidence interval, 9.0-15.7).

CONCLUSIONS

This point-scoring system predicts risk for general postoperative complications after hand surgery. These data may help surgeons identify areas of clinical concern with patients to reduce the risk for sustaining postoperative complications.

TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic II.

[Strategies for complex injuries of the hand]

The quality of the reconstruction, follow-up treatment and care determine the treatment outcome of complex hand injuries. The initial estimation and therapy are decisive. Optimal results necessitate a structured approach with strategic planning, including thorough débridement, precise analysis of the resulting defect and loss of function and if possible unilateral reconstruction and well-founded planning of secondary interventions. Within the framework of the detailed patient clarification the perspectives, possibilities and alternatives must be realistically presented. Taking these fundamental strategic steps into consideration, the primary aims of reconstruction and preservation of function, rapid occupational and social reintegration and avoidance of delayed complications can best be realized. There is no standard approach for these extremely variable injuries. Decisive is that even in cases of apparently harmless injuries, the involvement of functional structures must be considered early in the initial stages.