1
|
De Brouwer M, Bonte P, Arndt D, Vander Sande M, Dimou A, Verborgh R, De Turck F, Ongenae F. Optimized continuous homecare provisioning through distributed data-driven semantic services and cross-organizational workflows. J Biomed Semantics 2024; 15:9. [PMID: 38845042 PMCID: PMC11154993 DOI: 10.1186/s13326-024-00303-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/09/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In healthcare, an increasing collaboration can be noticed between different caregivers, especially considering the shift to homecare. To provide optimal patient care, efficient coordination of data and workflows between these different stakeholders is required. To achieve this, data should be exposed in a machine-interpretable, reusable manner. In addition, there is a need for smart, dynamic, personalized and performant services provided on top of this data. Flexible workflows should be defined that realize their desired functionality, adhere to use case specific quality constraints and improve coordination across stakeholders. User interfaces should allow configuring all of this in an easy, user-friendly way. METHODS A distributed, generic, cascading reasoning reference architecture can solve the presented challenges. It can be instantiated with existing tools built upon Semantic Web technologies that provide data-driven semantic services and constructing cross-organizational workflows. These tools include RMLStreamer to generate Linked Data, DIVIDE to adaptively manage contextually relevant local queries, Streaming MASSIF to deploy reusable services, AMADEUS to compose semantic workflows, and RMLEditor and Matey to configure rules to generate Linked Data. RESULTS A use case demonstrator is built on a scenario that focuses on personalized smart monitoring and cross-organizational treatment planning. The performance and usability of the demonstrator's implementation is evaluated. The former shows that the monitoring pipeline efficiently processes a stream of 14 observations per second: RMLStreamer maps JSON observations to RDF in 13.5 ms, a C-SPARQL query to generate fever alarms is executed on a window of 5 s in 26.4 ms, and Streaming MASSIF generates a smart notification for fever alarms based on severity and urgency in 1539.5 ms. DIVIDE derives the C-SPARQL queries in 7249.5 ms, while AMADEUS constructs a colon cancer treatment plan and performs conflict detection with it in 190.8 ms and 1335.7 ms, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Existing tools built upon Semantic Web technologies can be leveraged to optimize continuous care provisioning. The evaluation of the building blocks on a realistic homecare monitoring use case demonstrates their applicability, usability and good performance. Further extending the available user interfaces for some tools is required to increase their adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mathias De Brouwer
- Department of Information Technology, IDLab - Ghent University - imec, 9052, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Pieter Bonte
- Stream Intelligence Lab, KU Leuven Kulak, Kortrijk, 8500, Belgium
| | - Dörthe Arndt
- International Center for Computational Logic, Technische Universität Dresden, 01187, Dresden, Germany
| | | | - Anastasia Dimou
- Department of Computer Science, KU Leuven, 2860, Sint-Katelijne-Waver, Belgium
| | - Ruben Verborgh
- Department of Electronics and Information Systems, IDLab - Ghent University - imec, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Filip De Turck
- Department of Information Technology, IDLab - Ghent University - imec, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Femke Ongenae
- Department of Information Technology, IDLab - Ghent University - imec, 9052, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rosu OA, Tolea MI, Parosanu AI, Stanciu MI, Cotan HT, Nitipir C. Challenges in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Oral Amelanotic Malignant Melanoma: A Case Report. Cureus 2024; 16:e57875. [PMID: 38725781 PMCID: PMC11079336 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.57875] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/08/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is extremely rare and usually has a poor prognosis. Early diagnosis is very important and can improve survival but it is usually difficult due to a lack of symptomatology. We present the first case of a 39-year-old East European woman with oral amelanotic melanoma, who underwent surgery and adjuvant immunotherapy; however, after six months, she developed local recurrence. The patient continued immunotherapy with external radiotherapy targeting the oral tumor recurrence. During therapy, imagistic reevaluation brought evidence of bones, lungs, liver, endotracheal, and brain metastases. Histological differential diagnosis between amelanotic OMM and leiomyosarcoma was necessary to establish the right course of treatment. A series of complications further delayed chemotherapy administration, making the treatment in this case very challenging. The patient had a significant, although late response to immunotherapy, and maintained a good performance status during disease progression with a survival of 15 months until present.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oana A Rosu
- Oncology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucuresti, ROU
| | | | - Andreea I Parosanu
- Oncology, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, ROU
- Oncology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, ROU
| | - Miruna I Stanciu
- Medical Oncology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, ROU
| | - Horia T Cotan
- Oncology, Elias Emergency University Hospital, Bucharest, ROU
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nakashima K, Homma Y, Taniguchi J, Kubota N, Otsuki A, Ito H, Otsuka Y, Kondo K, Ohfuji S, Fukushima W, Hirota Y. Immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccine in patients with lung cancer receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A single-center prospective cohort study. J Infect Chemother 2023; 29:1038-1045. [PMID: 37481070 DOI: 10.1016/j.jiac.2023.07.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 06/27/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 07/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with lung cancer have a high risk of influenza complications. International guidelines recommend annual influenza vaccination for patients with cancer. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are progressively used to treat lung cancer. Data regarding immunogenicity and safety of influenza vaccine are limited in patients with lung cancer receiving ICIs; therefore, we conducted this single-center, prospective observational study in the Japanese population. METHODS Patients with lung cancer receiving ICIs and influenza immunization were enrolled. Blood samples were collected from patients for serum antibody titer measurement pre- and 4 ± 1 weeks post-vaccination. The primary endpoint was seroprotection rate (sP) at 4 ± 1 weeks post-vaccination. The secondary endpoints were geometric mean titer (GMT), mean fold rise, seroresponse rate (sR), seroconversion rate (sC), and immune-related adverse events (irAEs), defined as adverse effects caused by ICI administration, 6 months post-vaccination. RESULTS Influenza vaccination in the 23 patients included in the immunogenicity analyses significantly increased GMT for all strains, and sP, sR, and sC were 52%-91%, 26%-39%, and 26%-35%, respectively. In the 24 patients included in the safety analyses, 7 (29%) and 5 (21%) patients exhibited systemic and local reactions, respectively. Only one patient (4%) (hypothyroidism, grade 2) showed post-vaccination irAEs. CONCLUSIONS Overall, influenza vaccination in patients with lung cancer receiving ICIs showed acceptable immunogenicity and safety, thus supporting annual influenza vaccination in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kei Nakashima
- Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan; Kameda Institute for Health sciences, 462 Yokosuka, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-0001, Japan; Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1 Chome-4-3 Asahimachi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan.
| | - Yuya Homma
- Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
| | - Jumpei Taniguchi
- Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
| | - Norihiko Kubota
- Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
| | - Ayumu Otsuki
- Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ito
- Department of Pulmonology, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
| | - Yoshihito Otsuka
- Department of Clinical Laboratory, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-0041, Japan
| | - Kyoko Kondo
- Management Bureau, Osaka Metropolitan University Hospital, 1 Chome-5-7 Asahimachi, Osaka, 545-0051, Japan
| | - Satoko Ohfuji
- Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1 Chome-4-3 Asahimachi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Research Center for Infectious Disease Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1 Chome-4-3 Asahimachi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Wakaba Fukushima
- Department of Public Health, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1 Chome-4-3 Asahimachi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan; Research Center for Infectious Disease Sciences, Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka Metropolitan University, 1 Chome-4-3 Asahimachi, Osaka, 545-8585, Japan
| | - Yoshio Hirota
- Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, SOUSEIKAI Medical Group (Medical Co. LTA), 3-5-1 Kashiiteriha, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 813-0017, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ishak AR, Hsieh YC, Srinivasan H, See KC. Review of Vaccination Recommendations in Guidelines for Non-Communicable Diseases with Highest Global Disease Burden among Adults 75 Years Old and Above. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1076. [PMID: 37376465 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11061076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This scientific review paper explores international and country-specific healthcare guidelines for non-communicable diseases with the highest burden among individuals aged 75 years and above. The study aims to identify the best vaccination practices and standardize healthcare practices to improve vaccination adherence in this vulnerable population. Given that older people are more prone to infectious illnesses and have higher rates of morbidity and mortality, vaccinations are essential for disease prevention. Despite the proven efficacy of vaccinations, adherence has plateaued in recent years, partly due to a lack of accessibility, public education, and variability in disease-specific guidelines. This paper highlights the need for a more robust and standardized international vaccination model to improve quality of life and reduce disability-adjusted life years among the elderly. The findings of this study call for further research to review the guidelines as more implementations are put in place, including non-English guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdul Rahman Ishak
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Yu Chun Hsieh
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Harshitha Srinivasan
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| | - Kay Choong See
- Department of Medicine, Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore 117597, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chew C, Shih V, Han Z. Evaluation of antibiotic appropriateness at an outpatient oncology centre. J Oncol Pharm Pract 2023; 29:874-884. [PMID: 35306916 DOI: 10.1177/10781552221087604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Current evidence supporting antimicrobial stewardship programs focused largely in inpatient setting. With the shift in cancer management from inpatient to ambulatory setting, it is crucial to examine the prevalence and predictors of inappropriate antibiotics prescribing. This is a retrospective cross-sectional study conducted at the National Cancer Centre Singapore (NCCS). Patients at least 21 years, with an active or past cancer diagnosis and prescribed with at least one oral antibiotic by a NCCS physician from 1st July to 30th September 2019 were included. Antibiotic appropriateness was assessed using institutional antibiotic guidelines or published clinical practice guidelines. For cases where antibiotics appropriateness cannot be ascertained using these guidelines, an independent three-member expert panel was consulted. A total of 815 patients were screened; 411 (59.4% females) were included with mean age of 62.4 years. The top three cancer diagnoses were breast (26.5%), lung (15.6%) and head and neck (13.6%). More than half (58.6%) received appropriate antibiotic choice. Of which, 235 (97.5%), 238 (98.8%) and 194 (80.5%) received appropriate dose, frequency and duration respectively. The presence of non-oncologic immunosuppressive comorbidities (OR 4.890, 95% CI 1.556-15.369, p-value = 0.007), antibiotic allergy (OR 2.352, 95% CI 1.178-4.698, p-value = 0.015) and skin and soft tissue infections (OR 2.004, 95% CI 1.276-3.146, p-value = 0.003) were associated with a higher incidence of inappropriate antibiotic choice. This study highlighted that inappropriate antibiotic prescribing is prevalent in the ambulatory oncology setting. Predicators identified can aid in the design of targeted strategies to optimise antibiotic use in ambulatory oncology patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cindy Chew
- Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Vivianne Shih
- Department of Pharmacy, National Cancer Centre Singapore, Singapore
| | - Zhe Han
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Science, National University of Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Yamada H, Yamada Y, Iihara H, Kobayashi R, Tanaka H, Suzuki A. A pharmacist check of patients' infection-related condition prior to drug preparation reduces anticancer drug wastage after mixing: a retrospective study. J Pharm Policy Pract 2023; 16:5. [PMID: 36650580 PMCID: PMC9847088 DOI: 10.1186/s40545-023-00518-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/07/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND We previously reported that a standardized pharmacist check of medical orders related to the administration criteria of anticancer drugs prior to preparation of injectable anticancer drugs was useful for reducing drug wastage after mixing. To further reduce anticancer drug wastage after preparation, we added a pharmacist check of patients' infection-related condition to the previous protocol and assessed the effectiveness of the modified protocol for reducing injectable anticancer drug wastage. METHODS In addition to the administration criteria of anticancer drugs, patients' infection-related condition, which was based on a body temperature ≥ 37.5 °C or elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) or white blood cell (WBC) count from baseline, was added to pharmacists' checklist of items used previously to prepare injectable anticancer drugs. We retrospectively compared the number, type and cost of anticancer drugs discarded after preparation and the reasons for discarding these drugs between pre- and post-protocol modification. RESULTS The rate at which anticancer drugs were discarded after preparation was significantly reduced after introducing the modified protocol compared to the original protocol (0.288% [18/6253] vs. 0.095% [6/6331], P = 0.013). Furthermore, the number of cases for which mixed anticancer agents were discarded because of infection decreased from 11 (fever: n = 8; elevated CRP or WBC: n = 3) to one (elevated CRP: n = 1) a year. CONCLUSIONS In addition to the standard administration criteria of anticancer drugs, checking patients' infection-related condition, defined by a body temperature ≥ 37.5 °C or elevated CRP or WBC from baseline, before mixing by the pharmacist is useful for reducing anticancer drug wastage after preparation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirotsugu Yamada
- grid.411704.7Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194 Japan ,grid.256342.40000 0004 0370 4927United Graduate School of Drug Discovery and Medical Information Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan
| | - Yuto Yamada
- grid.411704.7Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194 Japan
| | - Hirotoshi Iihara
- grid.411704.7Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194 Japan
| | - Ryo Kobayashi
- grid.411704.7Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194 Japan ,grid.411697.c0000 0000 9242 8418Laboratory of Advanced Medical Pharmacy, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Gifu, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Tanaka
- grid.256342.40000 0004 0370 4927United Graduate School of Drug Discovery and Medical Information Sciences, Gifu University, Gifu, Japan ,grid.411697.c0000 0000 9242 8418Laboratory of Immunobiology, Department of Biofunctional Analysis, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Gifu, Japan
| | - Akio Suzuki
- grid.411704.7Department of Pharmacy, Gifu University Hospital, 1-1 Yanagido, Gifu, 501-1194 Japan ,grid.411697.c0000 0000 9242 8418Laboratory of Advanced Medical Pharmacy, Gifu Pharmaceutical University, Gifu, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shah N, Mustafa SS, Vinh DC. Management of secondary immunodeficiency in hematological malignancies in the era of modern oncology. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 181:103896. [PMID: 36528276 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2022.103896] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Revised: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Secondary immunodeficiency (SID) in patients with B-cell hematological malignancies is a common condition that presents with recurrent infection. SID is due to both the inherent immune defects due to the malignancy, as well as secondary to cancer therapies, many of which have B-cell depleting properties. The early diagnosis of SID and the optimization of intervention strategies are key to delivering the most effective cancer treatments and reducing infection-related morbidity and mortality. This review discusses current practice, recommendations, and challenges for SID diagnosis, based on the evaluation of clinical history and laboratory assessments, and the effectiveness of specific vaccines and immunoglobulin replacement therapy in reducing the frequency and recurrence of infections in patients with SID, and the healthcare system-associated costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina Shah
- Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, United States.
| | - S Shahzad Mustafa
- Rochester Regional Health, Rochester, NY, United States; Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry, Rochester, NY, United States
| | - Donald C Vinh
- Department of Medicine, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tsiakos K, Gavrielatou N, Vathiotis IA, Chatzis L, Chatzis S, Poulakou G, Kotteas E, Syrigos NK. Programmed Cell Death Protein 1 Axis Inhibition in Viral Infections: Clinical Data and Therapeutic Opportunities. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:vaccines10101673. [PMID: 36298538 PMCID: PMC9611078 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10101673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2022] [Revised: 09/29/2022] [Accepted: 10/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
A vital function of the immune system is the modulation of an evolving immune response. It is responsible for guarding against a wide variety of pathogens as well as the establishment of memory responses to some future hostile encounters. Simultaneously, it maintains self-tolerance and minimizes collateral tissue damage at sites of inflammation. In recent years, the regulation of T-cell responses to foreign or self-protein antigens and maintenance of balance between T-cell subsets have been linked to a distinct class of cell surface and extracellular components, the immune checkpoint molecules. The fact that both cancer and viral infections exploit similar, if not the same, immune checkpoint molecules to escape the host immune response highlights the need to study the impact of immune checkpoint blockade on viral infections. More importantly, the process through which immune checkpoint blockade completely changed the way we approach cancer could be the key to decipher the potential role of immunotherapy in the therapeutic algorithm of viral infections. This review focuses on the effect of programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 blockade on the outcome of viral infections in cancer patients as well as the potential benefit from the incorporation of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treatment of viral infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Tsiakos
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
- Correspondence:
| | - Niki Gavrielatou
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA
| | - Ioannis A. Vathiotis
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
| | - Loukas Chatzis
- Pathophysiology Department, Athens School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
| | - Stamatios Chatzis
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, “Hippokration” Hospital, 115 27 Athens, Greece
| | - Garyfallia Poulakou
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
| | - Elias Kotteas
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
| | - Nikolaos K. Syrigos
- 3rd Department of Internal Medicine, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 157 72 Athens, Greece
- Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center, Boston, MA 02215, USA
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lin EPY, Huang LC, Whisenant J, York S, Osterman T, Lewis J, Iams W, Skotte E, Cass A, Hsu CY, Shyr Y, Horn L. Associations of influenza vaccination with severity of immune-related adverse events in patients with advanced thoracic cancers on immune checkpoint inhibitors. ERJ Open Res 2022; 8:00684-2021. [PMID: 36225333 PMCID: PMC9549316 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00684-2021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Whether influenza vaccination (FV) is associated with the severity of immune-related adverse events (IRAEs) in patients with advanced thoracic cancer on immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is not fully understood. Methods Patients enrolled in this retrospective cohort study were identified from the Vanderbilt BioVU database and their medical records were reviewed. Patients with advanced thoracic cancer who received FV within 3 months prior to or during their ICI treatment period were enrolled in the FV-positive cohort and those who did not were enrolled in the FV-negative cohort. The primary objective was to detect whether FV is associated with decreased IRAE severity. The secondary objectives were to evaluate whether FV is associated with a decreased risk for grade 3-5 IRAEs and better survival times. Multivariable ordinal logistic regression was used for the primary analysis. Results A total of 142 and 105 patients were enrolled in the FV-positive and FV-negative cohorts, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference in patient demographics or cumulative incidences of IRAEs between the two cohorts. In the primary analysis, FV was inversely associated with the severity of IRAEs (OR 0.63; p=0.046). In the secondary analysis, FV was associated with a decreased risk for grade 3-5 IRAEs (OR 0.42; p=0.005). Multivariable Cox regression showed that FV was not associated with survival times. Conclusions Our study showed that FV does not increase toxicity for patients with advanced thoracic cancer on ICIs and is associated with a decreased risk for grade 3-5 IRAEs. No statistically significant survival differences were found between patients with and without FV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Pei-Ying Lin
- Dept of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Dept of Medical Research, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Dept of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
- Dept of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ching Huang
- Dept of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jennifer Whisenant
- Division of Hemato-oncology, Dept of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sally York
- Division of Hemato-oncology, Dept of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Travis Osterman
- Division of Hemato-oncology, Dept of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Dept of Biomedical Informatics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Jennifer Lewis
- Division of Hemato-oncology, Dept of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Wade Iams
- Division of Hemato-oncology, Dept of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Emily Skotte
- Division of Hemato-oncology, Dept of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Amanda Cass
- Division of Hemato-oncology, Dept of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Chih-Yuan Hsu
- Dept of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Yu Shyr
- Dept of Biostatistics, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Center for Quantitative Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- These authors contributed equally
| | - Leora Horn
- Division of Hemato-oncology, Dept of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Vanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- These authors contributed equally
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Tsiakos K, Kyriakoulis KG, Kollias A, Kyriakoulis IG, Poulakou G, Syrigos K. Influenza Vaccination in Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Immunother 2022; 45:291-298. [PMID: 35639000 DOI: 10.1097/cji.0000000000000424] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination is not well-studied in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed aiming to summarize available data regarding influenza vaccination in ICI-treated cancer patients. Peer-reviewed studies or nonpeer-reviewed conference abstracts including ICI-treated cancer patients who received at least 1 dose of influenza vaccine were deemed eligible. A systematic search in PubMed/EMBASE was performed until October 26, 2021. Endpoints of interest included mortality as the primary outcome and secondary safety outcomes such as the incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Twenty-five studies were included in the systematic review, among which 9 were included in the meta-analysis. Meta-analysis of 3 studies (n=589, weighted age 64 y, men 61%, influenza vaccinated 32%) showed pooled odds ratio for death in influenza vaccinated versus nonvaccinated patients at 1.25 [(95% confidence intervals (CI): 0.81-1.92), P=non significant (NS)]. Meta-analysis of 6 studies studies (n=1285, weighted age 60 y, men 59%, influenza vaccinated 48%) showed pooled odds ratio for any irAEs in influenza vaccinated versus nonvaccinated patients at 0.82 [95% CI: 0.63-1.08, P=NS]. Similar results were observed in sensitivity analyses for serious irAEs, as well as when only peer-reviewed studies were included. Influenza vaccination appears to be a safe and reasonable intervention for cancer patients receiving ICIs. Most data are derived from retrospective observational studies. Randomized studies are needed to provide high-quality evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Tsiakos
- Third Department of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Sotiria Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Spagnolo F, Boutros A, Croce E, Cecchi F, Arecco L, Tanda E, Pronzato P, Lambertini M. Influenza vaccination in cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review. Eur J Clin Invest 2021; 51:e13604. [PMID: 34021591 PMCID: PMC8365730 DOI: 10.1111/eci.13604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2021] [Revised: 05/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a concern that influenza vaccination may increase the incidence of immune-related adverse events in patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). The aim of this systematic review was to summarize the available data on the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination in cancer patients receiving ICIs. METHODS Studies reporting safety and efficacy outcomes of influenza vaccination in cancer patients receiving ICIs were included. Only descriptive statistics were conducted to obtain a pooled rate of immune-related adverse events in vaccinated patients. RESULTS Ten studies assessing the safety and eight assessing the efficacy of influenza vaccination in cancer patients receiving ICIs were identified, for a total of 1124 and 986 vaccinated patients, respectively. Most patients had melanoma or lung cancer and received a single agent anti-PD-1, but also other tumour types and immunotherapy combinations were represented. No severe vaccination-related toxicities were reported. The pooled incidence of any grade immune checkpoint inhibitor-related adverse events was 28.9%. In the 6 studies specifying the incidence of grade 3-4 toxicities, the pooled incidence was 7.5%. No grade 5 toxicities were reported. No pooled descriptive analysis was conducted in studies reporting efficacy outcomes due to the heterogeneity of endpoints and data reporting. Nevertheless, among the eight studies included, seven reported positive efficacy outcomes of influenza vaccination. CONCLUSION The results of this systematic review support the safety and efficacy of influenza vaccination in cancer patients receiving ICIs. These results are particularly relevant in the context of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Spagnolo
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Boutros
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Elena Croce
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Federica Cecchi
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Enrica Tanda
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Pronzato
- Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Chong CR, Park VJ, Cohen B, Postow MA, Wolchok JD, Kamboj M. Safety of Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Cancer Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 70:193-199. [PMID: 30874791 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciz202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cancer patients are at a higher risk for developing influenza (flu)- related complications. It is unclear if the flu vaccine exacerbates immune events in patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). METHODS We conducted an institutional review board-IRB-approved retrospective review of advanced cancer patients on ICIs who received the flu vaccine during three 3 consecutive seasons: 2014-2015, 2015-2016, and 2016-2017. The primary outcome assessed was any "new onset" immune-related adverse event (IRAE). A subset analysis of vaccinated patients newly treated with anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) agents (nivolumab or pembrolizumab) was conducted to assess overall IRAE rates for comparison with published clinical trials. RESULTS During the three 3 seasons, 370 patients met criteria for ICI and vaccination within ~ twoapproximately 2 months (65 days). The most common underlying cancers were lung (46%) and melanoma (19%); 61% of patients received an anti-PD-1 agent only. In the entire cohort, 20% experienced an IRAE (any grade); incidence of grade 3 or 4 toxicity was 8%. No grade 5 events occurred. In the subset of 170 patients newly treated with anti-PD-1 agents, the overall IRAE rate was 18% and, grade 3/4 events occurred in 7.6%. Influenza was diagnosed in 2 patients. CONCLUSIONS No increase in incidence or severity of IRAEs was detected in patients on ICIs who received the inactivated influenza vaccine within ~ approximately 2 months of ICI. For newly treated patients on anti-PDI-1 agents, IRAE rates were comparable to those from published clinical trials and did not vary with order of administration. Routine seasonal flu vaccination is encouraged in patients on ICIs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Curtis R Chong
- Gastrointestinal Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vivian J Park
- Department of Pharmacy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Bevin Cohen
- Office of Nursing Research, Department of Nursing, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,School of Nursing, Columbia University Medical Center
| | - Michael A Postow
- Melanoma & Immunotherapeutics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jedd D Wolchok
- Melanoma & Immunotherapeutics Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Mini Kamboj
- Infection Control, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.,Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li J, Zhang D, Sun Z, Bai C, Zhao L. Influenza in hospitalised patients with malignancy: a propensity score matching analysis. ESMO Open 2020; 5:e000968. [PMID: 33093022 PMCID: PMC7583803 DOI: 10.1136/esmoopen-2020-000968] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Patients with malignancy are vulnerable to influenza viruses and are at high risk of developing serious complications. However, few studies have investigated the impact of influenza infection among hospitalised patients with malignancy. Methods Cancer-related hospitalisations were identified by using data from National Inpatient Sample in the USA between 2012 and 2014. We conducted a 1:1 propensity score matching analysis to compare the in-hospital outcomes between cancer patients with and without influenza. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were also performed to identify independent prognosis predictors of mortality. Results We identified 13 186 849 weighted cancer-related hospitalisations during the study period, and 47 850 of them (0.36%) had a concomitant diagnosis of influenza. After propensity score matching, cancer patients with concomitant influenza had a higher mortality (5.4% vs 4.2%; OR, 1.30; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.49; p<0.001), longer length of stay (6.3 days vs 5.6 days; p<0.001) but lower costs (US$14 605.9 vs US$14 625.5; p<0.001) in hospital than those without influenza. In addition, cancer patients with influenza had a higher incidence of complications, including pneumonia (18.4% vs 13.2%; OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.37 to 1.62; p<0.001), neutropenia (7.1% vs 3.4%; OR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.91 to 2.50; p<0.001), sepsis (19.5% vs 9.3%; OR, 2.36; 95% CI, 2.16 to 2.58; p<0.001), dehydration (14.8% vs 8.8%; OR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.65 to 1.97; p<0.001) and acute kidney injury (19.9% vs 17.6%; OR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.08 to 1.25; p<0.001) than those without influenza. Older age, no insurance, more comorbidities, lung cancer and haematological malignancy were independently associated with higher mortality. Conclusion Influenza is associated with worse in-hospital clinical outcomes among hospitalised patients with malignancy. Annual influenza vaccination and early initiation of antiviral therapy are recommended in this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiarui Li
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Dingding Zhang
- Medical Research Center, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhao Sun
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chunmei Bai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Lin Zhao
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bersanelli M, Buti S, De Giorgi U, Di Maio M, Giannarelli D, Pignata S, Banna GL. State of the art about influenza vaccination for advanced cancer patients receiving immune checkpoint inhibitors: When common sense is not enough. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2019; 139:87-90. [DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2018] [Revised: 05/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
|
15
|
Wijn DH, Groeneveld GH, Vollaard AM, Muller M, Wallinga J, Gelderblom H, Smit EF. Influenza vaccination in patients with lung cancer receiving anti–programmed death receptor 1 immunotherapy does not induce immune-related adverse events. Eur J Cancer 2018; 104:182-187. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2018.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2018] [Accepted: 09/19/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
16
|
Gao L, Li SC. Cost-effectiveness analysis of lipegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis in women with breast cancer in Australia: a modelled economic evaluation. Breast Cancer 2018; 25:671-680. [PMID: 29802592 DOI: 10.1007/s12282-018-0872-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To examine the cost-effectiveness of lipegfilgrastim versus pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis in women with early stage breast cancer. METHODS Two Markov models including a chemotherapy and a post-chemotherapy models were constructed with a time horizon of 12 weeks and 30 years, respectively. All the transition probabilities and utility weights were derived from clinical trials and/or published literatures. The costs populated in the chemotherapy model were extracted from Medicare, Pharmaceutical Benefit Scheme and the Independent Hospital Pricing Authority. No cost was considered in the post-chemotherapy model. Sensitivity analyses were performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS From the first chemotherapy model, lipegfilgrastim was associated with fewer episodes of severe neutropenia (SN) (N = 142 per 1000 patients treated), febrile neutropenia (FN) (N = 29 per 1000 patients treated), infection (N = 17 per 1000 patients treated) and chemotherapy delayed (N = 170 per 1000 patients treated) and lower cost ($116.88 less per patient treated). The post-chemotherapy model indicated lipegfilgrastim led to higher gains in both life years (18.72 versus 18.61) and quality-adjusted life years (17.28 versus 17.18) in comparison to pegfilgrastim. Sensitivity analysis showed that the results from the chemotherapy model is very sensitive to the baseline risk of SN; while from the probabilistic sensitivity analysis, lipegfilgrastim was likely to be more cost-effective than pegfilgrastim based on two models. CONCLUSIONS Lipegfilgrastim was likely to be a cost-effective alternative to pegfilgrastim as primary prophylaxis. The sensitivity analysis showed the confidence interval for the cost and benefit outcomes overlapped to a great extent, suggesting an insignificant difference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan Gao
- Deakin Health Economics, Centre for Population Health Research, Faculty of Health, Deakin University, 1 Gheringhap St, Geelong, VIC, 3220, Australia.
| | - Shu-Chuen Li
- School of Biomedical Sciences and Pharmacy, Faculty of Health and Medicine, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Influenza vaccination in adult patients with solid tumours treated with chemotherapy. Eur J Cancer 2017; 76:134-143. [PMID: 28324748 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Patients with solid tumours receiving chemotherapy are at risk for influenza complications. Yearly influenza vaccination is recommended to patients treated with chemotherapy. However, adherence to vaccination is low, most likely due to lack of data on efficacy, optimal timing and safety of vaccination. There is scarce evidence for the effectiveness of the influenza vaccine in adult patients with solid tumours and chemotherapy on reduction of pneumonia, decreased mortality and fewer interruptions of oncological treatment. A review of 20 non-randomised serological studies in adult patients with different cancer types and chemotherapy provides insight in general trends of response to vaccination. Overall, the magnitude of the antibody response after influenza vaccination (i.e. seroconversion) can be lower than in healthy controls, but the majority of patients with solid tumours is able to mount a timely, protective immunological response (i.e. seroprotection) regardless of chemotherapy schedule, similar to healthy controls. Small sample sizes, patient heterogeneity and lack of comparable study designs limit more specific recommendations related to cancer type and optimal timing of vaccination. The inactivated influenza vaccine is safe to administer to immunosuppressed patients; side-effects are similar to those in healthy individuals. Although vaccination before start of chemotherapy is preferred to ensure optimal protection in adults with solid tumours, also vaccination during chemotherapy can reduce influenza-related complications considering the overall trends in serological response. Given the increased morbidity and mortality of influenza, influenza vaccination should be advocated as an inexpensive and safe preventive measure in patients with solid tumours receiving chemotherapy.
Collapse
|
18
|
Brand JS, Colzani E, Johansson ALV, Giesecke J, Clements M, Bergh J, Hall P, Czene K. Infection-related hospitalizations in breast cancer patients: Risk and impact on prognosis. J Infect 2016; 72:650-658. [PMID: 27063280 DOI: 10.1016/j.jinf.2016.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2015] [Revised: 02/04/2016] [Accepted: 04/03/2016] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Infections are a common cause of hospitalization in breast cancer patients. We studied the risk, clinical characteristics and outcomes of infection-related hospitalizations in this patient population. METHODS A Swedish registry-based study including 8338 breast cancer patients diagnosed between 2001 and 2008, followed prospectively for infection-related hospitalizations until 2010. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated using background rates from the general female population. Associations with clinical characteristics and mortality were analyzed using flexible parametric survival models. RESULTS In total, 720 patients experienced an infection-related hospitalization during a median follow-up of 4.9 years. Infection rates were highest within the first year of diagnosis (SIR = 5.61, 95% CI; 4.98-6.32), and site-specific risks were most pronounced for sepsis (SIR = 3.14, 95% CI; 2.66-3.71) and skin infections (SIR = 2.80, 95% CI; 2.24-3.50). Older age at diagnosis, comorbidities, markers of tumor aggressiveness, chemotherapy and axillary node dissection were independent predictors of infectious disease risk. Infection-related hospitalizations were also independently associated with overall and breast cancer-specific death. CONCLUSIONS A significant number of breast cancer patients are hospitalized with an infection following diagnosis, which in turn predicts poor prognosis. The risk profile of infection-related hospitalizations is multifactorial, including patient, tumor and treatment-related factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judith S Brand
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| | - Edoardo Colzani
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna L V Johansson
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Giesecke
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Mark Clements
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jonas Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Radiumhemmet, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Hall
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kamila Czene
- Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|