Comparison of outcomes after everolimus-eluting stent implantation in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients in the Tokyo-MD PCI study

Diabetes and restenosis

Restenosis, defined as the re-narrowing of an arterial lumen after revascularization, represents an increasingly important issue in clinical practice. Indeed, as the number of stent placements has risen to an estimate that exceeds 3 million annually worldwide, revascularization procedures have become much more common. Several investigators have demonstrated that vessels in patients with diabetes mellitus have an increased risk restenosis. Here we present a systematic overview of the effects of diabetes on in-stent restenosis. Current classification and updated epidemiology of restenosis are discussed, alongside the main mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of this event. Then, we summarize the clinical presentation of restenosis, emphasizing the importance of glycemic control in diabetic patients. Indeed, in diabetic patients who underwent revascularization procedures a proper glycemic control remains imperative.

Association of Ankle Brachial Index with Clinical Outcomes Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Aortic Aneurysm

Objective Since patients with thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA)/abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) are often complicated with coronary artery disease, it is common for those patients to undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The ankle brachial index (ABI) is usually measured in patients with TAA/AAA to screen the presence of peripheral arterial disease. The present study investigated the association between the ABI and clinical outcomes following PCI in patients with TAA/AAA. Methods We divided 200 TAA/AAA patients who underwent PCI into a normal ABI group (n=137) and an abnormal ABI group (n=63) according to the ABI cut-off level of 1.00. The primary endpoint was one-year major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fetal myocardial infarction, stroke, target vessel revascularization, and hospitalization for heart failure. Results Mean ABIs in the normal and abnormal ABI groups were 1.12±0.09 and 0.86±0.11, respectively (p<0.01). Kaplan-Meier curves showed MACE were more frequent in the abnormal ABI group than in the normal ABI group (p=0.01). A multivariate Cox hazard analysis revealed that an abnormal ABI was significantly associated with 1-year MACE (vs. ABI ≥1.0: HR 3.02, 95% confidence interval 1.00-9.08, p=0.049). Conclusion Among patients with TAA/AAA who underwent PCI, abnormal ABI was significantly associated with 1-year MACE, suggesting the utility of the ABI measurement in this high-risk population.

Final five-year results of the REMEDEE Registry: Real-world experience with the dual-therapy COMBO stent

Objectives

This final report from the REMEDEE Registry assessed the long‐term safety and efficacy of the dual‐therapy COMBO stent in a large unselected patient population.

Background

The bio‐engineered COMBO stent (OrbusNeich Medical BV, The Netherlands) is a dual‐therapy pro‐healing stent. Data of long‐term safety and efficacy of the this stent is lacking.

Methods

The prospective, multicenter, investigator‐initiated REMEDEE Registry evaluated clinical outcomes after COMBO stent implantation in daily clinical practice. One thousand patients were enrolled between June 2013 and March 2014.

Results

Five‐year follow‐up data were obtained in 97.2% of patients. At 5‐years, target lesion failure (TLF) (composite of cardiac death, target‐vessel myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization) was present in 145 patients (14.8%). Definite or probable stent thrombosis (ST) occurred in 0.9%, with no additional case beyond 3‐years of follow‐up. In males, 5‐year TLF‐rate was 15.6 versus 12.6% in females (p = .22). Patients without diabetes mellitus (DM) had TLF‐rate of 11.4%, noninsulin‐treated DM 22.7% (p = .001) and insulin‐treated DM 41.2% (p < .001). Patients presenting with non‐ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE‐ACS) had higher incidence of TLF compared to non‐ACS (20.4 vs. 13.3%; p = .008), while incidence with STE‐ACS was comparable to non‐ACS (10.7 vs. 13.3%; p = .43).

Conclusion

Percutaneous coronary intervention with the dual‐therapy COMBO stent in unselected patient population shows low rates of TLF and ST to 5 years. Remarkably, no case of ST was noted beyond 3 years.

The Hypercholesterolemia Paradox in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: An Analysis of a Multicenter PCI Registry

Objective The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between hypercholesterolemia (HC) and clinical events through a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) registry. HC is a well-known independent risk factor for long-term cardiovascular events after PCI. However, it has been reported to be associated with a lower risk of adverse events in patients with cancer or acute coronary syndrome. Methods We analyzed the relationship between HC and adverse events in patients treated with everolimus-eluting stents (EESs) through the Tokyo-MD PCI study (an all-comer, multicenter, observational registry). The propensity score method was applied to select two groups with similar baseline characteristics. Results The unadjusted population included 1,536 HC patients and 330 non-HC patients. Propensity score matching yielded 314 matched pairs. After baseline adjustment, the outcomes of HC patients were significantly better than those of the non-HC patients with respect to the primary endpoint, which was a combination of mortality from all causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal neurological events, and major bleeding [hazard ratio (HR) 0.56, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.39-0.81; p=0.002], and the secondary endpoints, which included a combination of mortality from all causes, nonfatal MI, and nonfatal neurological events (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.39-0.88; p=0.01), and major bleeding (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.20-0.88; p=0.02). A subgroup analysis showed age as an interaction factor for the primary endpoint (interaction p=0.035). Conclusion HC was associated with better outcomes in patients who underwent EES implantation, even after baseline adjustment.

Factors Influencing Stent Restenosis After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients with Coronary Heart Disease: A Clinical Trial Based on 1-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND This study observed the incidence of in-stent restenosis (ISR) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and discusses the risk factors of ISR based on clinical data, coronary angiography, and stent features, to provide a theoretical basis for the prevention and treatment of ISR. MATERIAL AND METHODS We selected 1132 cases who received stent implantation at the Shaanxi People's Hospital from June 2014 to June 2016 and were followed up by coronary angiography within 1 year. Based on coronary angiography, the cases were divided into ISR and non-ISR groups. ISR was defined as a reduction in lumen diameter by over 50% after PCI. The ISR group consisted of 93 cases and the non-ISR group consisted of 1039 cases. Medical history, biochemical indicators, features of coronary artery lesions, and stent status were analyzed retrospectively. Risk factors of ISR were identified by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Among 1132 cases, 93 cases had ISR, with the overall incidence of 8.21%. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses indicated that postoperative hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels (OR=2.309, 1.579-3.375 mg/L), postoperative homocysteine (HCY) levels (OR=2.202, 1.268-3.826 μmol/L), history of diabetes (OR=1.955,1.272-3.003), coronary bifurcation lesions (OR=3.785, 2.246-6.377), and stent length (OR=1.269, 1.179-1.365 mm) were independent risk factors of ISR after PCI (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Elevated hs-CRP and HCY levels after PCI, history of diabetes, coronary bifurcation lesions, and greater stent length were associated with a higher risk of ISR. Patients with a higher risk of ISR should receive routine follow-up and intense medication management after PCI to control the risk factors and to reduce ISR.

Obesity paradox in the era of percutaneous coronary intervention with 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents: an analysis of a multicenter PCI registry

Being overweight has been identified as independent risk factors for coronary artery disease. However, overweight patients have been reported frequently to have better mortality outcomes, and there is little data showing they are at a disadvantage regarding secondary prevention of cardiovascular events. We analyzed the influence of being overweight (defined as body mass index > 25 kg/m²) on adverse events in patients who underwent everolimus-eluting stent (EES) implantation using a multicenter registry with a maximum follow-up of 3 years. Propensity score matching was done for adjusting baseline characteristics. We defined primary end points as major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE: a composite of mortality from all causes, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and nonfatal stroke) and "MACCE excluding non-cardiac mortality". Other adverse events were analyzed as key secondary end points. Out of 1918 patients, 450 pairs were obtained through propensity score matching. Overweight patients were superior to non-overweight patients regarding MACCE (event rates: 8.2 vs. 13.8% in overweight vs. non-overweight, respectively; log-rank p = 0.009) and "MACCE excluding non-cardiac mortality" (5.9 vs. 10.1%, p = 0.03). On secondary end points, not only did overweight patients have significantly fewer major bleeding events (2.2 vs. 4.8%, p = 0.02), but they also had smaller adverse event rates for almost all such events; the differences were not statistically significant. Overweight patients had better outcomes for MACCE, even on excluding non-cardiac mortalities. No result was supportive of an evident advantage to non-overweight EES-implanted patients in terms of secondary prevention of cardiovascular events.

Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus According to Insulin Treatment After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Era

Limited data exist regarding the clinical outcomes of patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using second-generation drug-eluting stents (DES), especially according to DM treatment. The purpose of this study was to compare clinical outcomes among patients without DM, with non-insulin-treated DM (non-ITDM), and with ITDM after PCI using second-generation DES. We analyzed 4,812 consecutive patients who underwent PCI using second-generation DES. Primary outcomes were patient-oriented composite outcome (a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, and any revascularization) at 3 years. Among the total population, 3,026 patients have no DM, 1,169 have non-ITDM, and 617 have ITDM. Patients with DM, regardless of non-ITDM and ITDM, showed significantly higher risk of patient-oriented composite outcome (21.0% vs 14.5%; adjusted hazard ratio [HR_adj]1.41, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19 to 1.66, p <0.001), mainly driven by significantly higher risk of cardiac death and any revascularization compared with non-DM. Among DM population, ITDM showed significantly higher risk of cardiac death (7.7% vs 3.7%; HR_adj 1.97, 95% CI 1.19 to 3.27, p = 0.009), any revascularization (17.0% vs 11.4%; HR_adj 1.40, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.93, p = 0.041), and definite/probable stent thrombosis (1.7% vs 0.7%; HR_adj 2.80, 95% CI 1.04 to 7.56, p = 0.042) compared with non-ITDM. In conclusion, even in the era of second-generation DES, patients with DM are at significantly higher risk of patient-oriented adverse events. Among these, patients with ITDM showed the highest risk of adverse events, mainly driven by higher risk of mortality, any revascularization, and definite/probable stent thrombosis.

High-risk Plaque and Calcification Detected by Coronary CT Angiography to Predict Future Cardiovascular Events After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether high-risk plaque (HRP) and calcium assessed by coronary computed tomography (CT) could predict future cardiovascular events after second-generation drug-eluting stent (DES) placement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed 317 patients from December 2012 to April 2015 who underwent coronary CT followed by DES placement. HRP was defined as a plaque with positive remodeling and low attenuation or a plaque with a napkin-ring sign. Coronary calcium was assessed by Agatston score (AS). Patients were divided into three groups: low risk, HRP negative and AS <400; intermediate risk, HRP positive and AS ≥400; high risk, HRP positive and AS ≥400. The primary end point was a composite of all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, fatal arrhythmia, or repeated revascularization. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the distribution of time to events.

RESULTS

A total of 74 events (23%) occurred during a median follow-up of 25.8 months. Patients with primary end points had HRP more frequently (70% vs 51%, P = 0.003) and were more calcified (AS, 471 [interquartile range, 143-1614] vs 289 [interquartile range, 63-787]; P = 0.01) than patients without primary end points. The frequency of primary end point increased significantly in the intermediate- and high-risk patients (P = 0.0011). Multivariate analysis showed that the hazard ratio of the intermediate- and high-risk groups was 1.91 (95% confidence interval, 1.04-3.77; P = 0.037) and 2.66 (95% confidence interval, 1.27-5.73; P = 0.009), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Plaque and calcification analysis by coronary CT could predict future cardiovascular events after second-generation DES placement.

Comparison of clinical outcomes after drug-eluting stent implantation in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients in China: A retrospective study

Diabetes mellitus (DM) has been proved to be a predictor of adverse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Drug-eluting stents (DESs) could reduce the adverse events in DM patients. In this study, we aimed to analyze the clinical outcome after DES implantation in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients in China. Totally, 200 Chinese DM patients and 400 Chinese non-DM patients were enrolled in this retrospective study. Compared with non-DM patients, DM patients were more likely to have a higher incidence of cardiac death (3.5% vs. 1.0%, P = .048), stent thrombosis (2.5% vs. 0.5%, P = .044), target lesion revascularization (6.0% vs. 1.8%, P = .005), target vessel failure (15.5% vs. 8.0%, P < .001), target lesion failure (14.0% vs. 4.3%, P < .001), myocardial infarction (4.5% vs. 1.5%, P = .030), and major adverse cardiac events (12.5% vs. 5.0%, P = .001) at 2-year follow-up. However, the incidence of target vessel revascularization (7.5% vs. 5.5%, P = .340) was similar between DB and non-DB patients. Patients with DB (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.54, P = .001), older than 80 years (HR = 1.33, P = .027) with hypercholesterolemia (HR = 1.03, P < .001), serum creatinine >177 μmol/L (HR = 3.04, P = .011), a history of cerebral vascular accident (HR = 4.29, P = .010), or a history of myocardial infarction (HR = 31.4, P < .001) were more likely to experience adverse events. In China, DM could also be served as an independent predictor of adverse outcomes after DES implantation. These patients should be reexamined more frequently.

Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes after the second-generation cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stents implantation in diabetic versus non-diabetic patients: a subgroup analysis from the prospective FOCUS registry

BACKGROUND

Diabetes mellitus (DM) was broadly acknowledged as a risk factor for adverse events after coronary stent implantation. However, the role of DM in patients treated with second-generation cobalt-chromium sirolimus-eluting stents (CoCr-SES) was less known.

METHODS

A total of 4720 patients available for 3-year follow-up in the prospective FOCUS registry were subdivided into the DM group and the non-DM group to assess the effect of DM on the clinical outcomes after CoCr-SES implantation both before and after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

The rates of major adverse cardiovascular event was low (<10%) in both DM and non-DM groups but significantly greater in the DM group after matching (9.6% versus 6.1%; p = 0.005). Although the soft endpoints including target vessel revascularization (2.3% versus 2.3%; p = 0.938) and target lesion revascularization (1.2% versus 1.1%; p = 0.828) was not significantly different between two groups, the hard endpoints represented by cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (7.3% versus 5.3%; p = 0.012) demonstrated a significant increase in the DM group.

CONCLUSIONS

This subgroup analysis demonstrated that DM significantly increased the risk of adverse events after implantation of CoCr-SES, but the general safety and efficacy performance of CoCr-SES in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients was satisfying and comparable with other types of new-generation drug-eluting stents.