1
|
Flanigan MR, Bell SG, Donovan HS, Zhao J, Holder-Murray JM, Esper SA, Ficerai-Garland G, Taylor SE. Variables impacting prolonged post-anesthesia care unit length of stay in gynecologic cancer patients in the era of same day minimally invasive hysterectomy. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 186:211-215. [PMID: 38850766 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.05.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Revised: 05/29/2024] [Accepted: 05/31/2024] [Indexed: 06/10/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive surgery for treatment of gynecologic malignancies is associated with decreased pain, fewer complications, earlier return to activity, lower cost, and shorter hospital stays. Patients are often discharged the day of surgery, but occasionally stay overnight due to prolonged post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stays. The objective of this study was to identify risk factors for prolonged PACU length of stay (LOS). METHODS This is a single institution retrospective review of patients who underwent minimally invasive hysterectomy for gynecologic cancer from 2019 to 2022 and had a hospital stay <24-h. The primary outcome was PACU LOS. Demographics, pre-operative diagnoses, and surgical characteristics were recorded. After Box-Cox transformation, linear regression was used to determine significant predictors of PACU LOS. RESULTS For the 661 patients identified, median PACU LOS was 5.04 h (range 2.16-23.76 h). On univariate analysis, longer PACU LOS was associated with increased age (ρ = 0.106, p = 0.006), non-partnered status [mean difference (MD) = 0.019, p = 0.099], increased alcohol use (MD = 0.018, p = 0.102), increased Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score (ρ = 0.065, p = 0.097), and ASA class ≥3 (MD = 0.033, p = 0.002). Using multivariate linear regression, increased age (R2 = 0.0011, p = 0.043), non-partnered status (R2 = 0.0389, p < 0.001), and ASA class ≥3 (R2 = 0.0250, p = 0.023) were associated with increased PACU LOS. CONCLUSIONS Identifying patients at risk for prolonged PACU LOS, including patients who are older, non-partnered, and have an ASA class ≥3, may allow for interventions to improve patient experience, better utilize hospital resources, decrease PACU overcrowding, and limit postoperative admissions and complications. The relationship between non-partnered status and PACU LOS is the most novel relationship identified in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret R Flanigan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, USA.
| | - Sarah G Bell
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, USA
| | | | - Jian Zhao
- University of Pittsburgh School of Nursing, USA
| | - Jennifer M Holder-Murray
- Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA; Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA
| | - Stephen A Esper
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine of UPMC, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, USA
| | | | - Sarah E Taylor
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Magee-Womens Hospital of UPMC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ray MM, Yeung J, Hoehn J, Valenti M, Lewis KE, Pauls RN, Crisp CC. Same-Day Discharge is Safe, Feasible Following Vaginal Hysterectomy with Apical Suspension. Int J Womens Health 2024; 16:655-661. [PMID: 38645981 PMCID: PMC11032660 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s451435] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2024] [Indexed: 04/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose Studies involving minimally invasive hysterectomy and robotic sacrocolpopexy have demonstrated safety and feasibility of same-day discharge. There are limited data, however, on same-day discharge outcomes for vaginal hysterectomy and pelvic reconstruction. This study aimed to compare 30 and 90-day surgical outcomes between same-day discharge versus overnight stay following vaginal hysterectomy and apical suspension. Patients and Methods This retrospective study evaluated surgeries performed over two time periods. Overnight stay was standard between December 2018 and February 2020. Same-day discharge was standard from December 2020 to February 2022. All patients who underwent vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension were included. The primary outcome was to determine if there was an increase in 30-day readmission rates. Secondary outcomes included emergency department visits and reoperations within 30 days, the previous variables at 90 days, and the rate for successful same-day discharge. Results A total of 324 patients were analyzed over the 30 months: 149 (46%) in the overnight stay group and 175 (54%) in the same-day discharge group. At 30 days, no difference was found between groups for readmissions (2.7% vs 4.0%, p = 0.56), emergency department visits (14.8% vs 14.9%, p = 1.0), or reoperations (2.0% vs.1.7%, p = 1.0). At 90 days, outcomes were also similar. Same-day discharge as standard practice was successful in 80% of patients. Conclusion In this retrospective two cohort study, the safety of same-day discharge following vaginal hysterectomy with apical suspension was demonstrated with no increased risk of 30 or 90-day readmissions, emergency visits, or reoperation rates. The majority (80%) of patients were discharged on the day of surgery, suggesting feasibility of this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlana M Ray
- Urogynecology Division, TriHealth, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | - Jonathan Hoehn
- Hatton Research Institute, TriHealth, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Matthew Valenti
- OB/GYN Department, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thoen CW, Sæle M, Strandberg RB, Eide PH, Kinn LG. Patients' experiences of day surgery and recovery: A meta-ethnography. Nurs Open 2024; 11:e2055. [PMID: 38268268 PMCID: PMC10701296 DOI: 10.1002/nop2.2055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 11/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
AIM To explore and synthesise findings from qualitative studies on adult patients' experiences of day surgery and the processes of recovery. BACKGROUND There has been a shift in the practice of elective surgery, from inpatient to ambulatory treatment. Accordingly, more patients are undergoing day surgery and expected to care for themselves at home. To our knowledge, an updated metasynthesis on patients' experiences of day surgery across diverse contexts and continents is lacking. DESIGN Meta-ethnography. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and CINAHL were systematically searched for qualitative research in English published between 2006 and 2023. Noblit and Hare's meta-ethnographic approach guided the synthesis of findings from 12 qualitative studies, and the eMERGe Reporting Guidance was used in the writing of this article. RESULTS Four themes were revealed: (1) requests for tailored information, (2) challenges of recognising and understanding postoperative symptoms, (3) being dependent on continuous professional and personal support and (4) calling for individual adaptation. CONCLUSION Our meta-ethnography indicates there is a need to improve information provision to better prepare patients for the processes of day surgery and recovery and promote their self-care abilities. Our findings highlight the importance of ensuring adequate levels of individualised care and support throughout the treatment process. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE To improve quality of care in day surgery practice, implementation of interventions to enhance information provision and promote self-care during recovery at home may be considered. Pre-admission appointments that incorporate provision of tailored information and assessment of the patients' individual needs of care and support, home conditions and access to assistance from family/friends can be recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cathrine Ween Thoen
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
| | - Monica Sæle
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
| | - Ragnhild Bjarkøy Strandberg
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
| | - Petrin Hege Eide
- Department of Health and Caring Sciences, Faculty of Health and Social SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
| | - Liv Grethe Kinn
- Department of Welfare and Participation, Faculty of Health and Social SciencesWestern Norway University of Applied SciencesBergenNorway
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nelson G, Fotopoulou C, Taylor J, Glaser G, Bakkum-Gamez J, Meyer LA, Stone R, Mena G, Elias KM, Altman AD, Bisch SP, Ramirez PT, Dowdy SC. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: Addressing implementation challenges - 2023 update. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 173:58-67. [PMID: 37086524 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.04.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 30.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/11/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite evidence supporting its use, many Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) recommendations remain poorly adhered to and barriers to ERAS implementation persist. In this second updated ERAS® Society guideline, a consensus for optimal perioperative care in gynecologic oncology surgery is presented, with a specific emphasis on implementation challenges. METHODS Based on the gaps identified by clinician stakeholder groups, nine implementation challenge topics were prioritized for review. A database search of publications using Embase and PubMed was performed (2018-2023). Studies on each topic were selected with emphasis on meta-analyses, randomized controlled trials, and large prospective cohort studies. These studies were then reviewed and graded by an international panel according to the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. RESULTS All recommendations on ERAS implementation challenge topics are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly. CONCLUSIONS The updated evidence base and recommendations for stakeholder derived ERAS implementation challenges in gynecologic oncology are presented by the ERAS® Society in this consensus review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Nelson
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - C Fotopoulou
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - J Taylor
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - G Glaser
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - J Bakkum-Gamez
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - L A Meyer
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - R Stone
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - G Mena
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - K M Elias
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - A D Altman
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - S P Bisch
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - P T Ramirez
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S C Dowdy
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Rochester, MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ward A, Roberts S, Harvey N, Dana E, Goumalatsou C, Tipples M. Implementation of total laparoscopic hysterectomy as day case surgery. BMJ Open Qual 2023; 12:bmjoq-2022-002154. [PMID: 36941008 PMCID: PMC10030925 DOI: 10.1136/bmjoq-2022-002154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Elective surgeries within the National Health Service are frequently cancelled due to shortages of inpatient beds due to acute emergency admissions, and more recently, the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this quality improvement project was to initiate a day case hysterectomy pathway, prospectively collecting data on a group of selected motivated patients to assess its feasibility and safety. Interventions to maximise the chance of same day discharge included preoperative education and hydration, alterations in anaesthetic and surgical techniques and collaborative working between surgeons and recovery nurses to safely discharge patients. In change cycle 1, 93% of patients were discharged on the same day as surgery. In change cycle 2, 100% of patients were discharged on the same day as surgery. In a patient questionnaire, 90% of patients would recommend a day case hysterectomy to their friends or family. Day case hysterectomy was safely introduced to our unit, through leaders actively encouraging contributions and feedback throughout the initiation of the pathway from different components of the multidisciplinary team, from conception to roll out of the guideline for use by other gynaecological surgical teams within the trust.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alistair Ward
- Gynaecology Department, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK
| | - Samantha Roberts
- Gynaecology Department, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK
| | - Naomi Harvey
- Gynaecology Department, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK
| | - Emily Dana
- Gynaecology Department, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK
| | - Charlotte Goumalatsou
- Gynaecology Department, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK
| | - Melanie Tipples
- Gynaecology Department, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Giannini A, Magrina JF, Magtibay PM, Butler KA. Same-day dismissal for endometrial cancer robotic surgery: feasibility factors. Updates Surg 2022; 75:743-755. [PMID: 36472771 DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01424-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Accepted: 11/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to investigate the factors in feasibility and safety of same-day dismissal (SDD) of endometrial cancer patients undergoing robotic hysterectomy and staging. A single-institution retrospective chart review of endometrial cancer patients who underwent robotic hysterectomy and staging between 2012 and 2021 was performed. Patient demographics, medical and surgical history, intra- and postoperative events were examined as possible factors related to non-SDD. These factors were analyzed using univariate (chi-square test) and multivariate logistic regression analysis. Of the 292 patients, 117 (40%) had SDD, and 175 (60%) had non-SDD. The SDD rate increased from 13.8% to 88% over the 10-year study period. The factors significantly associated with non-SDD (p < 0.05) were surgery in the first 5 years after the introduction of the SDD and ERAS protocols (2012-2016), age > 75 years, and comorbidities such as cardiovascular diseases, anemia (Hb < 11 g/dl), and anticoagulant therapy. Extensive adhesiolysis, the performance of complete pelvic and/or aortic lymphadenectomy, operating time > 180 min, and PACU discharge after 2:00 p.m. were significant factors for non-SDD. Sentinel lymph node sampling was significantly associated with SDD (OR 0.050; CI 0.273-0.934, p = 0.029). We reported no significant difference in the number, setting and timing of any unscheduled postoperative contacts, complications, and readmissions between SDD and non-SDD groups. SDD after robotic hysterectomy and staging for endometrial cancer is feasible and safe. There are patient and surgery factors for the failure of SDD. The sentinel lymph node sampling was significantly associated with achieving SDD. Trial registration: Institutional Review Board approved the study protocol (#: 1764-05).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Giannini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Pisa, Via Roma 67, 56126, Pisa, Italy
| | - Javier F Magrina
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Paul M Magtibay
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA
| | - Kristina A Butler
- Department of Medical and Surgical Gynecology, Mayo Clinic, 5777 East Mayo Boulevard, Phoenix, AZ, 85054, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Sakko Y, Aimagambetova G, Terzic M, Ukybassova T, Bapayeva G, Gusmanov A, Zhakhina G, Zhantuyakova A, Gaipov A. The Prevalence, Indications, Outcomes of the Most Common Major Gynecological Surgeries in Kazakhstan and Recommendations for Potential Improvements into Public Health and Clinical Practice: Analysis of the National Electronic Healthcare System (2014-2019). INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14679. [PMID: 36429398 PMCID: PMC9690357 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192214679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 10/30/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Major gynecological surgeries are indicated for the treatment of female genital pathologies. It is key to examine trends in gynecologic surgical procedures and updated recommendations by international gynecological societies to find opportunities for improvement of local guidelines. To date, a very limited number of reports have been published on the epidemiology of gynecological surgeries in Kazakhstan. Moreover, some local guidelines for gynecological conditions do not comply with the international recommendations. Thus, this study aims to investigate the prevalence, indications, and outcomes of the most common major gynecological surgeries by analyzing large-scale Kazakhstani healthcare data, and identifying possible opportunities for improvement of the local public health and clinical practice. METHODS A descriptive, population-based study among women who underwent a gynecological surgery in healthcare settings across the Republic of Kazakhstan during the period of 2014-2019 was performed. Data were collected from the Unified Nationwide Electronic Health System (UNEHS). RESULTS In total, 80,401 surgery cases were identified and analyzed in the UNEHS database for a period of 6 years (2014-2019). The median age of the participants was 40 years old, with 61.1% in reproductive age. The most prevalent intervention was a unilateral salpingectomy-29.4%, with 72.6% patients aged between 18-34 years. The proportion of different types of hysterectomies was 49.4%. In 20% of cases, subtotal abdominal hysterectomy was performed due to uterine leiomyoma. The proportion of laparoscopic procedures in Kazakhstani gynecological practice is as low-11.59%. CONCLUSIONS The Kazakhstani public health and gynecological care sector should reinforce implementation of contemporary treatment methods and up-to-date policies and guidelines. The overall trends in surgical procedures performed for gynecological pathologies, including uterine leiomyoma and ectopic pregnancy treatment, should be changed in favor of the minimally invasive methods in order to adopt a fertility-sparing approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yesbolat Sakko
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Gulzhanat Aimagambetova
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Milan Terzic
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
- Clinical Academic Department of Women’s Health, CF “University Medical Center”, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| | - Talshyn Ukybassova
- Clinical Academic Department of Women’s Health, CF “University Medical Center”, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Gauri Bapayeva
- Clinical Academic Department of Women’s Health, CF “University Medical Center”, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Arnur Gusmanov
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Gulnur Zhakhina
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| | - Almira Zhantuyakova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
| | - Abduzhappar Gaipov
- Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Nazarbayev University, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
- Clinical Academic Department of Internal Medicine, CF “University Medical Center”, Astana 010000, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ambulatory anesthesia and discharge: an update around guidelines and trends. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2022; 35:691-697. [PMID: 36194149 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Provide an oversight of recent changes in same-day discharge (SDD) of patient following surgery/anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in combination with less invasive surgical techniques have dramatically changed perioperative care. Preparing and optimizing patients preoperatively, minimizing surgical trauma, using fast-acting anesthetics as well as multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia regime and liberal prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting are basic cornerstones. The scope being to maintain physiology and minimize the impact on homeostasis and subsequently hasten and improve recovery. SUMMARY The increasing adoption of enhanced protocols, including the entire perioperative care bundle, in combination with increased use of minimally invasive surgical techniques have shortened hospital stay. More intermediate procedures are today transferred to ambulatory pathways; SDD or overnight stay only. The traditional scores for assessing discharge eligibility are however still valid. Stable vital signs, awake and oriented, able to ambulate with acceptable pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting are always needed. Drinking and voiding must be acknowledged but mandatory. Escort and someone at home the first night following surgery are strongly recommended. Explicit information around postoperative care and how to contact healthcare in case of need, as well as a follow-up call day after surgery, are likewise of importance. Mobile apps and remote monitoring are techniques increasingly used to improve postoperative follow-up.
Collapse
|
9
|
Byford S, Madhok D, Baldan P, Amey G, Barber J, Harris R, Walker G. Introduction of the day case total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) protocol. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol 2022; 62:881-886. [PMID: 35906724 DOI: 10.1111/ajo.13598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Traditionally total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) patients are admitted for 1-2 days post-operatively. Day case TLH has been proven to be feasible and safe in other countries; however, this tertiary Queensland hospital is one of the first Australian institutions to introduce a day case TLH protocol. AIM To pilot the implementation of our day case TLH protocol assessing the feasibility, safety and patient satisfaction of same-day discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS A retrospective audit of the implementation of our day case TLH protocol at a tertiary Queensland hospital was conducted. Primary outcome was length of post-operative hospital stay. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and post-operative re-presentation rates. Patient satisfaction was assessed through a patient questionnaire. RESULTS Seventy-seven patients were included in the study. There were 94.81% patients who went home on the same day. Their average length of post-operative hospital stay was 7.72 (SD ± 3.36) hours. Of the patients who did achieve same-day discharge, the average length of stay was 7.05 (SD ±1.46) hours. There were no significant differences in perioperative complications or re-presentation rates compared to previously published literature. Patients reported they were extremely satisfied with day case TLH. CONCLUSION The implementation of our day case TLH protocol is feasible, safe and well received by patients in our tertiary Australian hospital. These results can have multimodal effects in healthcare: decrease in hospital costs by reducing length of stay and overnight admissions, improved theatre efficiency and patient flow, while maintaining patient safety and satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Byford
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Drishti Madhok
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Paula Baldan
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Guy Amey
- Anesthetics, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - James Barber
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Rhys Harris
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| | - Graeme Walker
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Gold Coast University Hospital, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Youssef Y, Afaneh H, Borahay MA. Strategies for Cost Optimization in Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery. JSLS 2022; 26:JSLS.2022.00015. [PMID: 36071991 PMCID: PMC9385110 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2022.00015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Cost and quality are important, complex, and intertwined surgical outcomes. Evidence suggests that major cost drivers include operating room time, length of stay, re-admission, surgical complications, and quality of pre-operative and operative care in general. Our practices shape both costs and quality of gynecologic surgery. Various factors are explored in this review article to present and identify ways to implement cost-effective change that also improve quality of patient care. Database: We searched MEDLINE and PubMed databases for relevant articles. Discussion: Clinical preferences and decisions, surgeon experience, trainee education, and defensive medicine can influence cost. In addition, an incongruent physician-administration relationship may impact decisions across the healthcare system. The accelerating adoption of minimally invasive surgery, particularly the robotic approach, presents both an opportunity and a challenge. An example of practices that improve outcomes, patient satisfaction, and cut cost is pre-operative optimization, enhanced recovery after surgery, and the growing adoption of outpatient hysterectomy. The identification of cost-drivers and finding strategies to improve them would simultaneously improve quality and patient outcomes while reducing costs in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youssef Youssef
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hurley Medical Center/Michigan State University College of Human Medicine, Flint, MI
| | - Huda Afaneh
- Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH
| | - Mostafa A Borahay
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Vertaldi S, Anoldo P, Cantore G, Chini A, D'Amore A, D'Armiento M, Gennarelli N, Maione F, Manigrasso M, Marello A, Schettino P, Sorrentino C, Sosa Fernandez LM, De Palma GD, Milone M. Histopathological Examination and Endoscopic Sinusectomy: Is It Possible? Front Surg 2022; 9:793858. [PMID: 35310433 PMCID: PMC8927015 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.793858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Although carcinomatous degeneration is a rare occurrence, some authors support the need for a histopathological examination after pilonidal cyst excision. Today, minimally invasive techniques are widely spread for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease but opposed to standard procedures, these techniques could not allow to perform a histopathological examination because of the absence of a specimen. The aim of this two-institutions study is to evaluate whether histopathological examination of the pilonidal sinus excision material can be successfully performed after an endoscopic ablation of the cyst. Materials and Methods We identified all consecutive patients from January 2021 to September 2021 with diagnosis of pilonidal sinus disease who underwent Video Assisted Ablation of Pilonidal Sinus (VAAPS) followed by histopathological examination. Results A total of 45 patients were included in the study. All patients were Caucasians and aged below 50 years. Nine of them underwent surgery due to recurrence of PSD. No evidence of malignancy was detected in the histopathological examination of the pilonidal sinus sampling material. Discussion We were able to send pilonidal sinus sampling material for a histopathological examination in all patients who underwent minimally invasive technique for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease. No evidence of malignancy was found in any of the 45 samples. Our findings prove that minimally invasive ablation of pilonidal sinus does not preclude histopathological examination of the cysts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Vertaldi
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
- *Correspondence: Sara Vertaldi
| | - Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Grazia Cantore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessia Chini
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Anna D'Amore
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Maria D'Armiento
- Pathology Unit, Department of Public Health, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicola Gennarelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Maione
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Michele Manigrasso
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Alessandra Marello
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Pietro Schettino
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Carmen Sorrentino
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Giovanni D. De Palma
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Milone
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, University of Naples “Federico II”, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|