Recommandations de bonne pratique : prévention et traitement de la maladie thrombo-embolique veineuse en médecine

Pulmonary embolism after a long-haul flight

The relation between long-haul flights (LHF) and venous thromboembolic disease is well established. Nonetheless, the incidence of pulmonary embolisms after these flights is probably underestimated because of the difficulties in case ascertainment. Reunion Island appears to present the ideal geographic conditions for accurately assessing this incidence. We aimed to assess the incidence of pulmonary embolisms in people who had recently taken a LHF to Reunion Island. We conducted a retrospective multi-center descriptive study and included all cases of pulmonary embolisms diagnosed between January 1, 2015, and January 30, 2017 (according to the hospitals' discharge summary database) in the island's four public hospitals within 30 days after taking an LHF to Reunion. We took different delays of diagnosis to calculate the incidence. We have considered the time to diagnosis at 1 month as significant according to the time applied in the Geneva score for risk factors. The study included 45 patients landing on Reunion over a 2-year period. The total number of passengers arriving by LHF during this period was 1,223,001. The incidence of pulmonary embolism after an LHF was thus calculated at 36.8 per million travelers at 1 month. The incidence for PE diagnosed, after 15 days was 29.4 per million travelers, and after 7 days, it was 21.9 per million travelers. The male/female ratio was 0.67. The mean interval between the flight and symptom onset was 7 days. In our population, the incidence of pulmonary embolisms after LHFs in our study is clearly higher than that reported in the literature (36.8 vs 4.8). Our exhaustive data collection probably explains this difference. A case-control study appears necessary to analyze the risk factors for pulmonary embolism after a LHF.

Compression stockings to prevent postthrombotic syndrome: Literature overview and presentation of the CELEST trial

Postthrombotic syndrome (PTS) is a burdensome and costly complication of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) that develops in 20%-40% of patients within 2 years after proximal DVT. In the absence of effective curative treatment, management of PTS relies on its prevention after DVT. The effectiveness of elastic compression stockings (ECS) to prevent PTS is uncertain. We present an overview of published studies assessing the efficacy of ECS to prevent PTS and present the protocol for the CELEST clinical trial. While previous open-label randomized trials have reported a 50% risk reduction in PTS in patients treated with >30 mm Hg ankle pressure ECS, a large double-blind trial reported no effect of ECS. We discuss the main potential limitations of these trials, including a placebo effect and suboptimal compliance to ECS. We present the protocol of the CELEST double-blind randomized trial comparing 2 years of high strength (ankle pressure 35 mm Hg) versus lower strength (ankle pressure 25 mm Hg) ECS in the prevention of PTS after a first acute symptomatic, unilateral, proximal DVT. The use of lower-strength ECS than that used in previous studies should favor compliance. CELEST may provide important evidence about the efficacy of ECS in the prevention of PTS after DVT. The results will be interpreted in the light of results from recent clinical trials assessing ECS for PTS prevention that reported that the duration of ECS use should be tailored to the individual, if ECS are efficacious in the prevention of PTS.

[Impact of an intervention on the practice of venous thromboprophylaxis recommendations in a geriatric setting.]

The practice of prevention of venous thromboembolic disease in hospitalized elderly patients does not comply with published recommendations, in 30% of cases. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of recalling the recommendations on the venous thromboprophylaxis.

[Risk factors for hospital mortality during pulmonary embolism]

OBJECTIVES

The objective of our work is to identify the risk factors for hospital mortality during pulmonary embolism in a pneumology department.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

All patients admitted to the pneumology department of Habib-Bourguiba hospital between 2014 and 2019, with a final diagnosis of PE are analyzed.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were included, 62% of whom were female, with an average age of 63±16 years. Pulmonary fibrosis was noted in eight patients. On admission, the mean Simplified Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index score was 1.46±1.05. The mean duration of hospitalization was 10.6±7 days. The hospital mortality rate was 12%. The independent risk factors for intra-hospital mortality were arterial hypotension (OR: 6.13; 95%CI: 2.88-14.35; p=0.001), cancer (OR: 2.66; 95%CI: 1.22-9.54; p=0.026), a VD/LV ratio at echocardiography>0.9 (OR: 1.84; 95%CI: 1.06-7.69; p=0.039) and severe hypoxemia (OR: 4.86; 95%CI: 2.19-11,34; p=0.006).

CONCLUSION

Pulmonary embolism mortality remains high despite improvements in diagnostic and therapeutic management. It is important for our country to take these results into consideration for a better management of patients admitted for pulmonary embolism, and to improve survival.

[Evaluation of an "Emergency Thrombosis" care system in a university-hospital department of general emergencies]

GOAL

Describe the use of diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic algorithms for venous thromboembolism (VTE), derived from the 2014 European guidelines, in a teaching hospital's emergencies department and compare two groups: the 2015 group "without a care path" and the 2017 group "with a care path".

METHOD

Comparative and retrospective study of the characteristics of emergencies department patients admitted for VTE from January to June 2015 for the 2015 group and from January to June 2017 for the 2017 group.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine patients were included in the 2015 group and 62 patients in the 2017 group. In 24% of cases a clinical probability rule was calculated in the 2017 group (vs. no score in 2015, P<0.05). In the 2015 group, 10% of patients did not have a D-Dimer measurement in case of low clinical probability (vs. 0% in 2017, P<0.05). For both groups, the severity score sPESI was not noted in the medical record. All patients with pulmonary embolism were hospitalized in both groups. A total of 36% of patients with deep vein thrombosis (DVT) were hospitalized in the 2015 group (vs. none in 2017, P<0.05). A total of 52.5% of patients were treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOAS) in the 2017 group vs. 32.5% in the 2015 group (P<0.05). In 18% of cases DOAS were prescribed by emergency physicians in the 2017 group vs. 2.5% in the 2015 group (P<0.05). Mean hospital stay was 7.4 days in the 2017 group and 9.4 days in the 2015 group (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

We observed a change in clinical practices and prescriptions after the establishment of an "Emergency Thrombosis" care system. Indeed, improvement in the calculation of the clinical probability score, increase in the outpatient management of DVT, increase in prescribing DOAS and reducing the length of hospital stay were the main revisions. The implementation of standardized digitally calculated clinical and prognostic probability scores would optimize this care path, as well as allow a better distribution of the post-emergency consultations created for outpatients.

Six months versus two years of oral anticoagulation after a first episode of unprovoked deep-vein thrombosis. The PADIS-DVT randomized clinical trial

The optimal duration of anticoagulation after a first episode of unprovoked deep-vein thrombosis is uncertain. We aimed to assess the benefits and risks of an additional 18 months of treatment with warfarin versus placebo, after an initial 6 months of anticoagulation for a first unprovoked proximal deep-vein thrombosis. We conducted a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial comparing an additional 18 months of warfarin with placebo in patients with a unprovoked proximal deep-vein thrombosis initially treated for 6 months (treatment period: 18 months; follow up after treatment period: 24 months). The primary outcome was the composite of recurrent venous thromboembolism or major bleeding at 18 months. Secondary outcomes were the composite at 42 months, as well as each component of the composite, and death unrelated to pulmonary embolism or major bleeding, at 18 and 42 months. All outcomes were centrally adjudicated. A total of 104 patients, enrolled between July 2007 and October 2013 were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis; no patient was lost to follow-up. During the 18-month treatment period, the primary outcome occurred in none of the 50 patients in the warfarin group and in 16 out of 54 patients (cumulative risk, 29.6%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.03; 95% confidence interval: 0.01 to 0.09; P<0.001). During the entire 42-month study period, the composite outcome occurred in 14 patients (cumulative risk, 36.8%) in the warfarin group and 17 patients (cumulative risk, 31.5%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.35-1.46). In conclusion, after a first unprovoked proximal deep-vein thrombosis initially treated for 6 months, an additional 18 months of warfarin therapy reduced the composite of recurrent venous thrombosis and major bleeding compared to placebo. However, this benefit was not maintained after stopping anticoagulation. Clinical registration: this trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00740493.

Screening cancer after venous thromboembolism: How many abnormal tests before diagnosing cancer? An analysis of practice

INTRODUCTION

Since Trousseau, we knows that venous thrombemboembolism (VTE) can reveal occult cancer. Different strategies of cancer screening have been evaluated: they are often time-consuming, cause stress and anxiety, and frequently require second-look examinations (due to the risk of false positives), with ultimately a very low yield (about 5%). We evaluated the number of suspect cancer tests before reporting them to the number of cancers finally diagnosed, after a VTE, in the setting of practice's analysis.

METHODS

We studied retrospectively patients hospitalized for a VTE and with a cancer screening, between 2011 and 2012. Screening cancer was defined by performing at least one of the following tests: PSA, fecal occult blood test, mammography, abdominopelvic iconography (abdominal ultrasound and/or abdominal CT scan). We recorded the suspected cancer tests, the cancers diagnosed, their stage and the survival. These results were expressed as a percentage with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Out of the 491 patients treated for a VTE, screening cancer was performed on 295 patients (median age 66.2 years). Nineteen PSA (16.7%, 95% CI [10.3-25]) were abnormal, with 2 localized prostate cancers. Nineteen fecal occult blood tests (15.3%, 95% CI [9.5-23]) were positive, with 2 local cancers. Five mammograms suspected cancer (4.7% 95% CI [1.6-10.8]) for one confirmed. Thirty-eight abdomino-pelvic iconographies (14.4% 95% CI [10.4-19.2]) were suspect, with 7 confirmed cancers, 6 being metastatic at times of diagnostic.

CONCLUSION

Among the 607 tests performed, 81 were suspected of cancer (13.3%) for only 12 cancers confirmed (2.0%). Screening cancer exposes patients to several false positive tests.

Disease burden and unmet needs for prevention of venous thromboembolism in medically ill patients in Europe show underutilisation of preventive therapies

It was the aim of this review to assess the incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and current practice patterns for VTE prophylaxis among medical patients with acute illness in Europe. A literature search was conducted on the epidemiology and prophylaxis practices of VTE prevention among adult patients treated in-hospital for major medical conditions. A total of 21 studies with European information published between 1999 and April 2010 were retrieved. Among patients hospitalised for an acute medical illness, the incidence of VTE varied between 3.65% (symptomatic only over 10.9 days) and 14.9% (asymptomatic and symptomatic over 14 days). While clinical guidelines recommend pharmacologic VTE prophylaxis for patients admitted to hospital with an acute medical illness who are bedridden, clear identification of specific risk groups who would benefit from VTE prophylaxis is lacking. In the majority of studies retrieved, prophylaxis was under-used among medical inpatients; 21% to 62% of all patients admitted to the hospital for acute medical illnesses did not receive VTE prophylaxis. Furthermore, among patients who did receive prophylaxis, a considerable proportion received medication that was not in accord with guidelines due to short duration, suboptimal dose, or inappropriate type of prophylaxis. In most cases, the duration of VTE prophylaxis did not exceed hospital stay, the mean duration of which varied between 5 and 11 days. In conclusion, despite demonstrated efficacy and established guidelines supporting VTE prophylaxis, utilisation rates and treatment duration remain suboptimal, leaving medical patients at continued risk for VTE. Improved guideline adherence and effective care delivery among the medically ill are stressed.

[Venous thromboembolic disease: Comparison of management practices in France, Italy and Spain]

BACKGROUND

Many national and international guidelines have been established for venous thromboembolic disease (VTE). Homogeneous management practices could be expected in the different European countries. To verify this hypothesis, we compared practices in France, Italy and Spain.

METHOD

We used data from the international RIETE registry to compare VTE management between France, Italy and Spain.

RESULTS

From 2001 January to 2011 January, patients were consecutively included in France (n=1548), Italy (n=2083) and Spain (29,824). All patients received anticoagulant treatment. Low molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) was the most frequently used drug as initial therapy in all three countries, but unfractionated heparin (UFH) was more frequently used in France and Italy than in Spain. In France, the proportion of patients receiving LMWH was lower than the proportion of patients with active cancer (cancer 22.5 %, long-term treatment with LMWH 17.4 %). A vena cava filter was significantly more frequently used in France (5.5 % in France, 3.2 % in Italy and 2 % in Spain, P<0.0001). High bleeding risk because of surgery with recent thromboembolic disease was the most frequent indication in France and Italy for vena cava filter placement (36.4 %, and 31.3 %, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Despite the publication of national and international guidelines, VTE management differs among the three major European countries included in the RIETE registry, France, Italy and Spain.

After deep vein thrombosis, which patients refer to vascular specialist for anticoagulant withdrawal? A Delphi study results between general practitioners and vascular specialists

AIM

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a potential serious common disease. Its management is, except in particular cases, on an outpatient basis. General practitioner's (GP) role usually includes the treatment risk/benefit reassessment. The treatment duration can vary and is difficult to define. The national and international guidelines do not explain clearly when to refer, or not, to a vascular specialist in order to stop treatment. The study's objective was to identify, for DVT, when a GP has to refer or not to a vascular specialist, for anticoagulant withdrawal.

METHODS

A modified Delphi consensus study had been conducted by a panel of general practitioners and vascular specialists to identify, in which situations all clinicians agree that GPs can stop anticoagulation on their own and other situations in which GP have to refer to vascular specialists. Clinical situations and their respective duration of anticoagulant therapy have been identified by a DVT management guideline literature research.

RESULTS

After two rounds, a strong agreement had been reached for each clinical situation. For 7 clinical situations, GPs were able to stop anticoagulation on their own, for 13 clinical situations; it was necessary to refer to a vascular specialist. We obtained a consensus regarding 3 modulating factors.

DISCUSSION

Consensual situations, in which the general practitioners may be able to stop anticoagulation themselves, are isolated distal DVT without cancer and proximal DVT caused by a major reversible risk factor. Situations justifying a vascular medical advice were unprovoked DVT, DVT in a context of pregnancy, postpartum, cancer and proximal DVT in a context of hormonal therapy.

Sequelae of large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: Current status and future prospects

Large-head metal-on-metal (MoM) bearings were re-popularised in the late 1990s with the introduction of modern hip resurfacing (HR), followed closely by large metal head total hip arthroplasty (THA). A worldwide increase in the use of MoM hip arthroplasty subsequently saw a sharp decline, due to serious complications.MoM was rapidly adopted in the early 2000s until medical device alerts were issued by government regulatory agencies and national and international organisations, leading to post-marketing surveillance and discontinuation of these implants.Guidelines for MoM hip implant follow-up differ considerably between regulatory authorities worldwide; this can in part be attributed to missing or conflicting evidence.The authors consider that the use of large-head MoM THA should be discontinued. MoM HR should be approached with caution and, when considered, should be used only in patients who meet all of the recommended selection criteria, which limits its indications considerably.The phased introduction of new prostheses should be mandatory in future. Close monitoring of outcomes and long-term follow-up is also necessary for the introduction of new prostheses. Cite this article: van Lingen CP, Zagra LM, Ettema HB, Verheyen CC. Sequelae of large-head metal-on-metal hip arthroplasties: current status and future prospects. EFORT Open Rev 2016;1:345-353. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.1.160014.

[Venous thrombo-embolic disease in cancer. Low molecular weight heparin indications]

Cancer and venous thrombo-embolic disease (VTE) are closely related. Indeed, cancer can reveal VTE and VTE can be the first sign of cancer. Low molecular weight heparin (LWMH) is now the first line treatment in cancer patients. Compliance with marketing authorizations and guidelines are crucial for patient-centered decision-making. This work deals with the prescription of LWMH in patients who develop VTE during cancer in order to better recognize what should or should not be done. The patient's wishes must be taken into consideration when making the final therapeutic decision. The other treatments are discussed: vitamin K antagonists and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) may be useful.

A prospective, active haemovigilance study with combined cohort analysis of 19,175 transfusions of platelet components prepared with amotosalen-UVA photochemical treatment

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

A photochemical treatment process (PCT) utilizing amotosalen and UVA light (INTERCEPT(™) Blood System) has been developed for inactivation of viruses, bacteria, parasites and leucocytes that can contaminate blood components intended for transfusion. The objective of this study was to further characterize the safety profile of INTERCEPT-treated platelet components (PCT-PLT) administered across a broad patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This open-label, observational haemovigilance programme of PCT-PLT transfusions was conducted in 21 centres in 11 countries. All transfusions were monitored for adverse events within 24 h post-transfusion and for serious adverse events (SAEs) up to 7 days post-transfusion. All adverse events were assessed for severity (Grade 0-4), and causal relationship to PCT-PLT transfusion.

RESULTS

Over the course of 7 years in the study centres, 4067 patients received 19,175 PCT-PLT transfusions. Adverse events were infrequent, and most were of Grade 1 severity. On a per-transfusion basis, 123 (0.6%) were classified an acute transfusion reaction (ATR) defined as an adverse event related to the transfusion. Among these ATRs, the most common were chills (77, 0.4%) and urticaria (41, 0.2%). Fourteen SAEs were reported, of which 2 were attributed to platelet transfusion (<0.1%). No case of transfusion-related acute lung injury, transfusion-associated graft-versus-host disease, transfusion-transmitted infection or death was attributed to the transfusion of PCT-PLT.

CONCLUSION

This longitudinal haemovigilance safety programme to monitor PCT-PLT transfusions demonstrated a low rate of ATRs, and a safety profile consistent with that previously reported for conventional platelet components.

[Management of deep-vein thrombosis: A 2015 update]

Deep vein thrombosis (DVT) is a frequent and multifactor disease, with two major complications, post thrombotic syndrome and pulmonary embolism. Both transient (surgery, plaster immobilization, bed rest/hospitalization) and chronic/persistent (age, cancer, clinical or biological thrombophilia…) risk factors modulate treatment duration. Diagnostic management relies on clinical evaluations, probability followed by laboratory tests or imaging. So far, compression ultrasound is the diagnostic test of choice to make a positive diagnosis of DVT. Anticoagulants at therapeutic dose for at least 3 months constitute the cornerstones of proximal (i.e. involving popliteal or more proximal veins) DVT therapeutic management. The arrival of new oral anticoagulants should optimize ambulatory management of DVT.

[Management of pulmonary embolism: A 2015 update]

Pulmonary embolism (PE) is a frequent, serious and multifactorial disease, the incidence of which increases with advanced age. In the absence of pathognomonic clinical signs or symptoms, diagnostic management lies in the evaluation of clinical pre-test probability followed by a laboratory or an imaging test. So far, multidetector computed tomography angiography is the diagnostic test of choice to make a positive diagnosis of PE. Anticoagulants at therapeutic dose for at least 3 months constitute the cornerstones of PE therapeutic management. Duration of anticoagulant treatment is modulated according to the presence of transient (surgery, plaster immobilization, bed rest/hospitalization) and chronic/persistent (age, cancer, clinical or biological thrombophilia…) risk factors of PE. Thrombolysis is usually prescribed only for cases of severe PE with arterial hypotension. Arrival of new oral anticoagulants, which have recently been shown to be as effective and as safe as vitamin K antagonist, should simplify and ease ambulatory management of PE and favor more prolonged treatments with anticoagulant for cases of unprovoked PE or PE provoked by a chronic/persistent risk factor.

[Optimal duration of anticoagulant treatment after venous thromboembolic disease]

Determination of the optimal duration of anticoagulant treatment for venous thromboembolic disease (VTED) is a major step in the management of patients with this disease. The assessment depends on the identification of two sets of risk factors: those for recurrence after anticoagulant treatment is stopped and those for hemorrhage in cases of prolonged treatment. Nonetheless, the determination of the optimal duration remains controversial. Recent data finally make it possible to clarify this decision. Recent treatment trials demonstrate that patients at high risk of recurrence receive no sustained benefit from a prolonged but limited anticoagulant treatment. In other words, the choice is simplified: either the risk is low, and treatment for 3months is sufficient, or the risk is high, and treatment must be envisioned for an unlimited duration. Adequate identification of patients eligible for short or unlimited treatment is more crucial than ever and depends on the presence of determinant clinical variables, as the information from laboratory or morphologic tests is generally marginal. The risk of thromboembolic recurrence is low when the initial episode is triggered by a major reversible factor, and a short treatment of 3months is thus indicated. These inducing factors are mainly surgery, lower limb injuries, immobilization for a medical condition, pregnancy, or use of combined estrogen-progestin contraceptives. Among patients with VTED not induced by these factors, the risk of recurrence is high and requires planning anticoagulant treatment for an unlimited duration. Nonetheless, the risk of hemorrhage is a major constraint to such unlimited treatment. Accordingly, the perspectives for secondary prevention that is equally effective but has a lower risk of hemorrhage are currently under evaluation. Finally, patients with cancer are in a separate category, with a very high risk of recurrence that justifies treatment for at least 6months.

[Home care for acute pulmonary embolism: Feasibility and general practitioner acceptability]

BACKGROUND

In France, initial management of pulmonary embolism (PE) is performed in the hospital setting. The latest international guidelines suggest that PE at low risk of mortality can be treated in the ambulatory care setting. This means that ambulatory care pathways and general practitioner (GP) opinions concerning such a change in practice need to be determined.

OBJECTIVES

To determine: (1) rate of patients eligible for an ambulatory management of their PE and reasons for hospitalization of PE at low risk of mortality; (2) acceptability for GPs of PE home care and patient's desired care pathway.

METHODS

Two-part prospective observational study conducted in Montpellier University Hospital from May 2012 to August 2013: (1) in-hospital study including all consecutive patients with non-hospital acquired PE; (2) telephonic survey on PE patient's ambulatory care pathway conducted among GPs.

RESULTS

In-hospital study: 99.1% (n=211) of included patients were hospitalized and only 14.1% (n=30) had all criteria for home care. Patient's pathway survey: 68.3% (n=112) of GPs, particularly those aged 40-54 years and those who had already managed patients alone after hospital discharge, were in favour of home care for PE. One hundred and thirty-nine (84.8%) GPs wanted a collaborative management with an expert thrombosis physician and an outpatient follow-up visit at one week.

CONCLUSION

Few patients managed at Montpellier University Hospital are eligible for ambulatory management of their PE. GPs have a favorable opinion of home care for PE if it is conducted in collaboration with an expert thrombosis physician.

[Deep venous thrombosis complications during infections in pediatric patients: analysis of a series of 24 cases]

Venous thromboembolism disease (VTE) is rare in children (5.3 of 10,000 hospitalized children). However, morbidity and mortality are high, especially when the child is already suffering from severe sepsis. We report an analytical study of 24 cases of deep venous thrombosis occurring in children during infection, recorded at the Montpellier University Hospital between 1999 and 2009. Many parameters were studied in each population (age, sex, familial and personal history of thrombosis, history of thrombophilia, the presence of a venous catheter, a causative organism, time to onset of thrombus, topography of lesions, acquired abnormalities of hemostasis, and thrombosis prophylaxis). The children were aged from 1 day of life to 16 years. Thromboses occurred in two clinical contexts: "contact" thrombosis (which appeared near the infection) and disseminated thrombosis. This is an early complication because in most of the cases, it appeared in the first 10 days of sepsis. Infection and coagulation appear to be closely related and the states of latent or decompensated disseminated intravascular coagulation are common. Nevertheless, it is not possible to predict the occurence of a thrombotic event. The presence of risk factors (venous catheters, acquired thrombophilia, or constitutional thrombophilia) may increase the thrombogenic potential of the infection. VTE should always be suspected and sought in case of an unfavorable clinical course, and routine prophylaxis of thrombosis during sepsis should be discussed.

Incidence and predictors of venous thromboembolism recurrence after a first isolated distal deep vein thrombosis

BACKGROUND

Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis (iDDVT) (i.e. without proximal DVT or pulmonary embolism) represents half of all cases of lower limb DVT. Its clinical significance and management are controversial. Data on long-term follow-up are scarce, especially concerning risk and predictors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) recurrence.

METHODS

Using data from the OPTIMEV (OPTimisation de l'Interrogatoire dans l'évaluation du risque throMbo-Embolique Veineux) study, a prospective, observational, multicenter study, we compared, 3 years after an index VTE event and after discontinuation of anticoagulants, (i) the incidence and type of recurrence in patients without cancer with a first iDDVT vs. a first isolated proximal DVT (iPDVT) and (ii) predictors of recurrence after iDDVT.

RESULTS

Compared with patients with iPDVT (n = 259), patients with an iDDVT (n = 490) had a lower annualized incidence of overall VTE recurrence (5.2% [95% confidence interval 3.6-7.6] vs. 2.7% [1.9-3.8], respectively; P = 0.02) but a similar incidence of pulmonary embolism recurrence (1.0% [0.5-2.3] vs. 0.9% [0.5-1.6], respectively; P = 0.83). An age of > 50 years, unprovoked character of index iDDVT, and involvement of more than one vein in one or both legs each independently tripled the risk of recurrence, with the latter then being ≥ 3% per patient-year. Neither muscular vein nor deep-calf vein location of iDDVT nor clot diameter with compression influenced the risk of recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

After stopping anticoagulants, patients with iDDVT have a significantly lower risk of overall VTE recurrence than did patients with iPDVT but a similar risk of serious recurrent VTE. Age > 50 years, unprovoked iDDVT, and number of thrombosed veins (more than one) influenced the risk of recurrence and may help to define patients at significant risk of recurrence.

[Venous thromboembolism and cancer]

Incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is high in patients with cancer and varies with the type, the stage and the histologic type of the cancer but also with some anticancer therapies and patient related risk factors. Therapeutic trials on long-term prophylaxis have not provided convincing results. In patients with established VTE, the risk of recurrence and bleeding is high. Although prolonged treatment with low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) is more efficient than vitamin K antagonists in patients with VTE and cancer, it is already associated with a risk of recurrence which is much higher than in non-cancer patients. The nature of the treatment to be administered after the initial six months, which is often required in this context and the treatment of recurrent VTE during anticoagulant treatment are still debated. Some long-standing data suggest that LMWH could play an adjuvant role as specific anticancer treatment. These data have still not been confirmed in clinical trials but several studies in different cancer types are ongoing.

[Temporary vena caval filters: report on cohort of 72 patients in Grenoble, France]

Patients with a contra-indication for anticoagulation can benefit from temporary vena caval filters for protection against pulmonary embolism or recurrence. The filter can be removed secondarily, once the contra-indication is overcome, enabling better long-term outcome by reducing the risk of thrombotic and mechanic complications inherent in these devices. However, it has been shown in several studies that effective withdrawal rates were low and could be improved by the establishment of protocols and registries. We report a retrospective study of withdrawal in 72 patients in whom an ALN® vena caval filter was implanted at the Grenoble University Hospital over a period of three years with an intention for secondary retrieval. Seventy percent of the indications were related to the coexistence of thrombotic and hemorrhagic conditions. Fifty-five percent of filters were removed, the remaining 45% shared involved patients who died before retrieval (11%), those lost to follow-up (4%), technical failure of retrieval (6%), withdrawal technically unfeasible (3%), retrieval refused by patients (6%) and medical indications for continuing filtration (15%). Despite an effective follow-up of these patients and 91% success rate of withdrawal, nearly one out of two filters remains in place. A long-term follow-up of these patients is needed to learn more about the outcome of these filters.

Pulmonary embolism and 3-month outcomes in 4036 patients with venous thromboembolism and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: data from the RIETE registry

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have a modified clinical presentation of venous thromboembolism (VTE) but also a worse prognosis than non-COPD patients with VTE. As it may induce therapeutic modifications, we evaluated the influence of the initial VTE presentation on the 3-month outcomes in COPD patients.

METHODS

COPD patients included in the on-going world-wide RIETE Registry were studied. The rate of pulmonary embolism (PE), major bleeding and death during the first 3 months in COPD patients were compared according to their initial clinical presentation (acute PE or deep vein thrombosis (DVT)).

RESULTS

Of the 4036 COPD patients included, 2452 (61%; 95% CI: 59.2-62.3) initially presented with PE. PE as the first VTE recurrence occurred in 116 patients, major bleeding in 101 patients and mortality in 443 patients (Fatal PE: first cause of death). Multivariate analysis confirmed that presenting with PE was associated with higher risk of VTE recurrence as PE (OR, 2.04; 95% CI: 1.11-3.72) and higher risk of fatal PE (OR, 7.77; 95% CI: 2.92-15.7).

CONCLUSIONS

COPD patients presenting with PE have an increased risk for PE recurrences and fatal PE compared with those presenting with DVT alone. More efficient therapy is needed in this subtype of patients.

Superficial venous thrombosis and compression ultrasound imaging

BACKGROUND

A current debate concerning suspected superficial vein thrombosis (SVT) focuses on the need of performing a compression ultrasound (CUS) exploration for confirming the diagnosis of SVT. This study was conducted to determine the clinical relevance and optimal CUS exploration in patients with symptomatic SVT.

METHODS

We analyzed the characteristics of SVT and concomitant deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in patients included in the Prospective Observational Superficial Thrombophlebitis (POST) multicenter, observational prospective study. All patients underwent complete bilateral lower limb CUS, exploring both the superficial and deep venous systems.

RESULTS

A total of 844 patients with clinical symptoms of SVT were recruited, of which 99 isolated SVTs (21.4%) had saphenofemoral/popliteal junction involvement, and 198 (23.5%) had a concomitant DVT, with 41.8% of them proximal DVTs. In 83 patients (41.9%), DVT and SVT were not contiguous. Five of 639 patients (1%) had an isolated contralateral DVT (ie, not bilateral). Age ≥ 75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.6-3.4), inpatient status (OR, 5.4; 95% CI, 3.4-8.7), a personal history of DVT or pulmonary embolism (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.8), and SVT on nonvaricose veins (OR, 3.3; 95% CI, 2.1-5.0) were significantly and independently associated with an increased risk of concomitant DVT. Half of the patients exhibited none of these risk factors, and the prevalence of concomitant DVT dropped to 11%.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with symptomatic SVT, a CUS exploration screening the whole venous system of the affected limb is useful because it provides information that has important consequences for the management of these patients.

[Epidemiology and management of isolated distal deep venous thrombosis]

Isolated distal deep-vein thromboses (DVT) are infra-popliteal DVT without involvement of proximal veins or pulmonary embolism (PE). They can affect deep calf (tibial anterior, tibial posterior, or peroneal) or muscular (gastrocnemius or soleal) veins. They represent half of all lower limbs DVT. Proximal and distal DVTs differ in terms of risk factor profile, proximal DVT being more frequently associated with chronic risk factors and distal DVT with transient ones. Their natural history (rate of spontaneous proximal extension) is debated leading to uncertainties on the need to diagnose and treat them with anticoagulant drugs. In the long term, the risk of venous thromboembolic recurrence is lower than that of proximal DVT and their absolute risk of post-thrombotic syndrome is unknown. French national guidelines suggest treating with anticoagulants for 6 weeks a first episode of isolated distal DVT provoked by a transient risk factor and treating for at least 3 months unprovoked or recurrent or active cancer-related distal DVT. The use of compression stockings use is suggested in case of deep calf vein thrombosis. Ongoing therapeutic trials should provide important data necessary to establish an evidence-based mode of care, especially about the need to treat distal DVT at low risk of extension with anticoagulants.

[Optimal duration of anticoagulation of venous thromboembolism]

The optimal duration of anticoagulation after venous thromboembolism (VTE) is determined according to the risk of recurrent VTE after stopping anticoagulant therapy and the risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding while on antivitamin K. Clinical risk factors appears to be determinant to predict the risk of recurrence whereas the influence of biochemical and morphological tests is uncertain. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism is low when the initial episode was provoked by a reversible major risk factor (surgery): 3 months of anticoagulation is optimal. Conversely, this risk is high when venous thromboembolism was unprovoked or associated with persistent risk factor (cancer): 6 months or more prolonged anticoagulation is warranted. After this first estimation, the duration of anticoagulation may be modulated according to the presence of additional minor risk factors (major thrombophilia, chronic pulmonary hypertension, massive pulmonary embolism): 6 months if VTE was provoked and 12 to 24 months if VTE was unprovoked. If the risk of anticoagulant related bleeding is high, the duration of anticoagulation should be shortened (3 months if VTE was provoked and 6 or 3 months if it was unprovoked). Lastly, if VTE occurred in the setting of a cancer, anticoagulation should be conducted for 6 months or more while cancer is active or on ongoing treatment. Despite an increasing knowledge of the risk factors of recurrent VTE, a number of issues remain unresolved; randomised trial comparing different duration of anticoagulation are needed.

[Cancer and venous thromboembolism]

Cancer and venous thrombo-embolism is a frequent clinical association. Tumour cells activate the coagulation cascade. Surgery, chemotherapy and antiangiogenic agents are also associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. Current evidence does not suggest that a systematic screening for cancer after an unexplained thrombosis is associated with a clinical benefit. Risk factors for thrombosis specific to the cancer population have been identified. Recent studies suggest that prophylactic treatment may reduce the incidence of venous thrombo-embolism in patients with cancer. These results need to be confirmed. Treatment of venous thrombo-embolism in cancer patients is primarily based on low-molecular weight heparin administered for 3 or 6 months. Experimental data suggest that low-molecular weight heparin may also increase the survival of patients with cancer through a direct effect on tumour biology. Several clinical trials are underway to confirm this hypothesis.

[The optimal duration of anticoagulant treatment following pulmonary embolism]

The optimal course of oral anticoagulant therapy is determined according to the risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism after stopping therapy and the risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding. Clinical risk factors appear to be important in predicting the risk of recurrence whereas the influence of biochemical and morphological tests is uncertain. The risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism is low when the initial episode was provoked by a reversible major risk factor (surgery): 3 months of anticoagulation is sufficient. Conversely, the risk is high when venous thromboembolism was unprovoked or associated with persistent risk factor (cancer): 6 months or more prolonged anticoagulation is necessary. After this first estimation, the duration of anticoagulation may be modulated according to the presence or absence of certain additional risk factors (major thrombophilia, chronic pulmonary hypertension, massive pulmonary embolism): 6 months if pulmonary embolism was provoked and 12 to 24 months if pulmonary embolism was unprovoked. If the risk of anticoagulant-related bleeding is high, the duration of anticoagulation should be shortened (3 months if pulmonary embolism was provoked and 3 to 6 months if it was unprovoked). Lastly, if pulmonary embolism occurred in association with cancer, anticoagulation should be conducted for 6 months or more if the cancer is active or treatment is on going. Despite an increasing knowledge of the risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism, a number of issues remain unresolved. Randomised trials comparing different durations of anticoagulation are needed.

[Cancer and venous thromboembolism]

INTRODUCTION

Cancer and venous thromboembolism are frequently associated.

STATE OF THE ART

Venous thromboembolism is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with cancer. Thrombosis in cancer patients is related to the expression of tissue factor and other procoagulants by tumour cells. Surgery, chemotherapy and antiangiogenic agents are also associated with an increased risk of thrombosis. Venous thromboembolism may be the first manifestation of cancer, the risk being especially increased during the first six months following an unexplained episode of idiopathic thrombosis. Current evidence does not suggest that a systematic screening for cancer after an unexplained thrombosis is associated with a clinical benefit. Risk factors for thrombosis specific to the cancer population have been identified. A recent controlled trial suggests that low-molecular weight heparin may reduce the incidence of venous thromboembolism in patients with cancer. These results need to be confirmed. Treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients is primarily based on low-molecular weight heparin administered for three or six months.

PERSPECTIVES

Low-molecular weight heparin may increase the survival of patients with cancer through a direct effect on tumour biology. Several clinical trials are underway to confirm this hypothesis.

CONCLUSION

Thrombosis in cancer patients is a frequent and difficult to treat condition. The role of long-term prophylaxis remains to be defined. The treatment of venous thromboembolism in cancer patients is primarily based on low-molecular weight heparin. Large clinical trials are currently assessing the effect of low-molecular weight heparin on the long-term survival of patients with cancer.

[Thrombosis and assisted reproductive techniques (ART)]

Assisted reproductive techniques (ART) concern procedures designed to increase fertility of couples: artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization (IVF), either classical or after intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), transfer of frozen embryos, or gamete intrafallopian transfer. Their use has greatly increased these last years. They may be associated with severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome and one possible major complication is venous or arterial thrombosis. Thromboses are rare but potentially serious with important sequellae. They are mostly observed in unusual sites such as head and neck vessels and the mechanism is still unknown although hypotheses have been proposed. This review is an update of our knowledge and an attempt to consider guidelines for the prevention and treatment of ART-associated thromboses, which frequently occur when the woman is pregnant. Prevention of severe ovarian hyperstimulation by appropriate stimulation procedures, detection of women at risk of hyperstimulation and of women at high risk of thrombosis should allow reduction of the risk of thrombosis, possibly by administration of a thromboprophylaxis at a timing and dose which can be only determined by extrapolation.