Comparison of efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and cyclophosphamide among patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A prospective cohort study

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil for steroid reduction in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: a prospective cohort study

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune inflammatory disease that can affect multiple generations and cause complications with long-term prednisolone treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in preventing NMOSD relapse while reducing prednisolone dosage. The trial involved nine patients with NMOSD who received MMF along with prednisolone dose reduction. MMF was effective in achieving prednisolone dose reduction without relapse in 77.8% of patients, with a significant decrease in mean annualized relapse rate. All adverse events were mild. The findings suggest that MMF could be a viable treatment option for middle-aged and older patients who require steroid reduction.Clinical trial registration number: jRCT, jRCTs051180080. Registered February 27th, 2019-retrospectively registered, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/en-latest-detail/jRCTs051180080.

Measuring the economic burden of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder in Colombia

OBJECTIVE

To assess the economic burden of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) in the Colombian context.

METHODS

Analyses were conducted from a societal perspective using the prevalence-based approach. Costs were expressed in 2022 US dollars (1 USD = $3,914.46 COP). Direct medical costs were assessed from a bottom-up approach. Indirect costs included loss of productivity of the patient and their caregivers. The economic burden of NMOSD in Colombia was estimated as the sum of direct and indirect costs.

RESULTS

The direct cost of treating a patient with NMOSD was USD$ 8,149.74 per year. When projecting costs nationwide, NMOSD would cost USD$ 7.2 million per year. Of these costs, 53.5% would be attributed to relapses and 34.4% to pharmacological therapy. Indirect costs potentially attributed to NMOSD in Colombia were estimated at USD$ 1.5 million per year per cohort. Of these, 78% are attributable to loss of patient productivity, mainly due to reduced access to the labor market and premature mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The NMOSD has a representative economic burden at the patient level, with direct costs, particularly related to relapses and medicines, being the main component of total costs. These findings are useful evidence that requires attention from public policymakers in Colombia.

Evidence-based management of optic neuritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Optic neuritis can result from several distinct causes, including multiple sclerosis (MS), neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD), when not idiopathic. This review discusses evidence-based treatment approaches contingent upon each specific cause of optic neuritis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Current evidence highlights the need for prompt plasmapheresis as adjunct to intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) in patients with NMOSD-associated optic neuritis. Recent advances have included a proliferation of novel disease modifying therapies (DMTs) for long-term management of NMOSD and an understanding of how existing therapeutic options can be leveraged to optimally treat MOGAD.

SUMMARY

In acute idiopathic or MS-associated optic neuritis, IVMP hastens visual recovery, though it does not substantially affect final visual outcomes. IVMP and adjunctive plasmapheresis are beneficial in the treatment of NMOSD-associated optic neuritis, with a shorter time-to-treatment associated with a higher likelihood of recovery. The natural history of untreated MOGAD-associated optic neuritis is unclear but treatment with IVMP is near-universal given phenotypic similarities with NMOSD. Long-term immunosuppressive therapy is warranted in patients with NMOSD as well as in patients with MOGAD with poor visual recovery or recurrent attacks.

Mycophenolate mofetil reduces the risk of relapse in anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 encephalitis: a prospective observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is frequently used in the treatment of neurological autoimmune disorders. However, its effect on the relapse risk in anti-leucine-rich glioma-inactivated protein 1 (anti-LGI1) encephalitis is not well studied.

METHODS

In this prospective observational cohort study, anti-LGI1 encephalitis patients were grouped according to MMF treatment status (MMF and non-MMF groups). The primary outcome was relapse after disease onset.

RESULTS

A total of 83 patients were included, with a median onset age of 60 years. Fifty-four patients were men (65.1%). The MMF group comprised 28 patients and the non-MMF group comprised 55. Median follow-up from symptom onset was 26 months. Relapse occurred in 43 patients (51.8%). Median modified Rankin scale (mRS) score at enrollment was significantly higher in the MMF group than the non-MMF group (3 vs. 2; p = 0.001). Median mRS score at last follow-up was comparable between groups (1 vs. zero; p = 0.184). Both MMF treatment (HR 0.463; 95% CI, 0.231-0.929; p = 0.030) and cognitive impairment at enrollment (HR 3.391; 95% CI, 1.041-11.044; p = 0.043) were independent predictors of relapse. Starting immunotherapy before development of cognitive impairment trended towards reducing relapse risk. Outcome at last follow-up was good (mRS score 0-2) in all patients except for one in the non-MMF group. Adverse events associated with MMF treatment were mild and transient.

CONCLUSION

Although the outcome of anti-LGI1 encephalitis patients is generally favorable, relapse is common, especially in those with cognitive impairment. MMF treatment is well-tolerated and can significantly reduce the risk of relapse.

Overlap syndrome of anti-aquaporin-4 positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and systemic lupus erythematosus: A systematic review of individual patient data

BACKGROUND

Neurological involvement can occur in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) due to co-existing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). The symptoms can mimic those of neuropsychiatric manifestations of SLE. Pathogenic anti-aquaporin-4 (AQP4) antibodies, commonly found in NMOSD, are responsible for the neuroinflammatory response and secondary demyelinating lesions. These anti-AQP4 antibodies can be the drivers of neuroinflammatory process in SLE patients, which is distinct from the immunopathogenesis seen in traditional neuropsychiatric SLE. The clinical course is often a relapsing one and is managed differently. In this review, we describe and outline the clinical course and outcomes of AQP4+ NMOSD/SLE overlap cases.

METHODS

To investigate the co-existence of SLE with AQP4+NMOSD, we conducted a systematic review of individual patient data from case reports and case series reported in major databases. The study extracted clinic-demographic features, imaging and laboratory profiles, treatment approaches, and outcomes of these patients. Inclusion criteria for the review required patients to have positivity for AQP4 or NMO in the blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and exhibit at least one manifestation of both NMOSD and SLE.

RESULTS

In this overlap between SLE and AQP4+NMOSD, a high female preponderance was observed, with 42 out of 46 patients (91.3%) being female. Nearly half of the NMOSD cases (47.8%) had onset after lupus, with a median of 5 years between the two diagnoses. Hematological manifestations were seen in the majority of patients (63%), as well as longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (87%), and brainstem involvement on imaging (29.6%). Cerebrospinal fluid analysis showed a dominantly lymphocytic pleocytosis, with oligoclonal bands being reported scarcely. Although cyclophosphamide was the most common steroid sparing agent used for maintenance, robust evidence for both efficacy and safety in AQP4+NMOSD is available for mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine, and rituximab. The majority of reported cases showed a relapsing course, while one patient had a monophasic course.

CONCLUSION

AQP4+NMOSD in SLE patients is a relapsing and neurologically disabling disorder that can mimic neuropsychiatric manifestations, frequently occurs after the onset of lupus or may predate, responds to immunosuppressants, and necessitates indefinite treatment.

A Clinical Approach to Existing and Emerging Therapeutics in Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare but highly disabling disease of the central nervous system. Unlike multiple sclerosis, disability in NMOSD occurs secondary to relapses that, not uncommonly, lead to blindness, paralysis, and death. Recently, newer, targeted immunotherapies have been trialed and are now in the treatment arsenal. We have endeavoured to evaluate the current state of NMOSD therapeutics.

RECENT FINDINGS

This review provides a pragmatic evaluation of recent clinical trials and post-marketing data for rituximab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, eculizumab, and ravalizumab, contrasted to older agents. We also review contemporary issues such as treatment in the context of SARS-CoV2 infection and pregnancy. There has been a dramatic shift in NMOSD morbidity and mortality with earlier and improved disease recognition, diagnostic accuracy, and the advent of more effective, targeted therapies. Choosing a maintenance therapy remains nuanced depending on patient factors and accessibility. With over 100 putative agents in trials, disease-free survival is now a realistic goal for NMOSD patients.

Overlap syndrome of anti-aquaporin 4 positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and primary Sjögren's syndrome: a systematic review of individual patient data

Central nervous system (CNS) involvement can occur in primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) due to co-existing neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) which has a highly relapsing course requiring indefinite immunosuppression, and if not diagnosed early, damage accrual occurs over time leading to permanent disability and morbidity. In this review, we describe and outline the clinical course and outcomes of anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibody seropositive NMOSD with pSS overlap cases. To investigate the co-existence of AQP4 + NMOSD with pSS, we conducted a review of individual patient data from case reports and case series found in major databases. The study extracted clinico-demographic features, imaging and laboratory profiles, treatment approaches, and outcomes of these patients. Inclusion criteria for the review required patients to have positivity for anti-AQP4 or NMO-IgG autoantibodies in the blood and/or cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and exhibit at least one manifestation of both pSS and NMOSD. In this overlap between AQP4 + NMOSD and pSS, 44 patients were included of whom 41 (93.2%) were females. The mean age of pSS onset was 44.8 ± 18.4 years and NMOSD onset was 43.2 ± 19.8 years. In 20 (45.5%) patients, NMOSD preceded pSS onset, 13 (29.5%) NMOSD occurred after pSS onset, and 11 (25%) patients had a simultaneous presentation. 31 (70.5%) patients experienced acute transverse myelitis, 21 (47.7%) optic neuritis, 14 (31.8%) cerebral syndrome, 10 (22.7%) acute brainstem syndrome, 5 (11.4%) area postrema syndrome, and 2 (4.5%) diencephalic clinical syndromes. For the treatment of acute phase, 40 (90.9%) patients received intravenous methylprednisolone, 15 (34.1%) received plasma exchange, and 10 (22.7%) received intravenous immunoglobulin; and for the induction/maintenance therapy, 16 (36.4%) patients received cyclophosphamide, 6 (13.6%) received rituximab, 16 (36.4%) received azathioprine, and 10 (22.7%) received mycophenolate mofetil. Disease course was monophasic in 2 (4.5%) and relapsing in 27 (61.4%) patients. At median (IQR) follow-up duration of 2.4 (6) years, 39 (88.6%) patients showed improvement, 3 (6.8%) showed stabilization and 2 (4.5%) showed worsening of their NMOSD manifestations. In this overlap syndrome of AQP4 + NMOSD and pSS, patients have a neurologically disabling disorder that can mimic neurological manifestations of pSS, frequently occurs prior to the onset of pSS, has a relapsing course, responds well to immunosuppressants, and necessitates indefinite treatment. Collaborative multicentre studies are needed to clarify the natural history and outcomes of this rare overlap syndrome.

Systematic Review of Treatment Options and Therapeutic Responses for Lesions of the Sella and Orbit: Evidence-Based Recommendations

OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory pathologies of the sella and orbit are rare but require prompt diagnosis to initiate effective treatment. Because uniform recommendations for treatment are currently lacking, we performed an evidence-based review to identify recommendations.

METHODS

We performed a literature search of the PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases to identify papers evaluating treatment of inflammatory pathologies of the sella and orbit. We used PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines to define recommendations, specifically examining aggregated sample sizes, disease-specific patient follow-up, and clinical trials focused on inflammatory diseases of the sella and orbit.

RESULTS

A total of 169 studies were included and organized by disease pathology. Treatments for various pathologies were recorded. Treatment options included surgery, radiation, steroids, targeted treatments, immunomodulators, intravenous immune globulin, and plasmapheresis. Steroids were the most often employed treatment, second-line management options and timing varied. Pathological diagnosis was highly associated with treatment used. Most evidence were level 3 without available control groups, except for 13 trials in neuromyelitis optica with level 1 or 2 evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first evidence-based review to provide recommendations on specific treatments for pathologies of the orbit and sella. The reported data may be useful to help guide randomized clinical trials and provide resource for clinical management decisions based on the available evidence.

Aquaporin-4 Antibody Dynamics and Relapse Risk in Seropositive Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Treated with Immunosuppressants

OBJECTIVE

To investigate aquaporin-4 antibody (AQP4-IgG) dynamics and relapse risk in patients with seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder treated with immunosuppressants.

METHODS

This observational cohort study with prospectively collected data included 400 neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder patients seropositive for AQP4-IgG and treated with immunosuppressants. Serum AQP4-IgG was detected by fixed cell-based assay every 6 months.

RESULTS

After treatment with immunosuppressants, 128 patients became AQP4-IgG seronegative. The median time to become seronegative for 400 patients was 76.4 months (61.4 months, NA). Among those patients with negative change of AQP4-IgG, the mean annualized relapse rate significantly decreased after patients became seronegative (0.20 vs 0.77, p < 0.001), and a positive correlation was observed between time to become seronegative and relapse (OR 1.018, 95% CI 1.001-1.035, p < 0.05). Independent risk factors for AQP4-IgG becoming seronegative were older age at onset, initiation of immunosuppressants at onset, and shorter disease duration before maintenance therapy. Independent risk factors for relapse included younger age (≤46.4 years) at onset, poly-system involvement in the first attack, and unchanged or increased AQP4-IgG titer. The relapse risk was not associated with sex, combination with connective tissue disease, seropositivity for systemic autoimmune antibodies, or incomplete recovery from the first attack.

INTERPRETATION

Patients with younger age at onset, poly-system involvement in the first attack, and unchanged or increased titer of AQP4-IgG are most likely to experience relapse under treatment with immunosuppressants. Time to AQP4-IgG becoming seronegative and change of AQP4-IgG titer may become the surrogate efficacy biomarkers in clinical trials. ANN NEUROL 2023.

Treatment and Relapse Prevention of Typical and Atypical Optic Neuritis

Optic neuritis (ON) is an inflammatory condition involving the optic nerve. Several important typical and atypical ON variants are now recognized. Typical ON has a more favorable prognosis; it can be idiopathic or represent an early manifestation of demyelinating diseases, mostly multiple sclerosis (MS). The atypical spectrum includes entities such as antibody-driven ON associated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody disease (MOGAD), chronic/relapsing inflammatory optic neuropathy (CRION), and sarcoidosis-associated ON. Appropriate and timely diagnosis is essential to rapidly decide on the appropriate treatment, maximize visual recovery, and minimize recurrences. This review paper aims at presenting the currently available state-of-the-art treatment strategies for typical and atypical ON, both in the acute phase and in the long-term. Moreover, emerging therapeutic approaches and novel steps in the direction of achieving remyelination are discussed.

Comparison on the effect of seven drugs to prevent relapses of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A modeling analysis of literature aggregate data

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an immune-mediated demyelinating disease of the central nervous system. This study aimed to perform a comprehensive comparison of the effect of seven drugs to prevent relapses of NMOSD.

METHOD

A literature search was conducted using public databases. Clinical studies on the seven drugs (eculizumab, inebilizumab, satralizumab, rituximab, tocilizumab, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil) to prevent relapses of NMOSD were identified. A time-course model was established using the time to first relapse as the primary endpoint, in order to evaluate the long-term effect of each drug in preventing relapse.

RESULTS

Twenty-four trials, including 2207 patients, were included in the model analysis. The results showed that monoclonal antibody therapy could significantly prolong the time to first relapse. Among all seven drugs, eculizumab can most significantly prevent patient from relapse. The estimated proportion of relapse-free patients treated with eculizumab was 98.9% at 24 months.

CONCLUSION

Based on the construction of a time-course pharmacodynamic model, this study made a comprehensive quantitative comparison of seven drugs for the treatment of NMOSD for the first time. These results can not only serve as a quantitative supplement for the rational use of drugs in clinical practice but also provide a pharmacodynamic reference for clinical trial design and decision making in the future.

Progress in treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD): Novel insights into therapeutic possibilities in NMOSD

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare autoimmune inflammatory demyelinating disorder of the central nervous system (CNS), which is a severely disabling disorder leading to devastating sequelae or even death. Repeated acute attacks and the presence of aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) antibody are the typical characteristics of NMOSD. Recently, the phase III trials of the newly developed biologicals therapies have shown their effectiveness and good tolerance to a certain extent when compared with the traditional therapy with the first- and second-line drugs. However, there is still a lack of large sample, double-blind, randomized, clinical studies to confirm their efficacy, safety, and tolerability. Especially, these drugs have no clear effect on NMOSD patients without AQP4-IgG and refractory patients. Therefore, it is of strong demand to further conduct large sample, double-blind, randomized, clinical trials, and novel therapeutic possibilities in NMOSD are discussed briefly here.

Results of a Survey on Diagnostic Procedures and Treatment Choices for Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder in Korea: Beyond the Context of Current Clinical Guidelines

Background and Purpose

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). We investigated the medical behaviors of experts in Korea when they are diagnosing and treating NMOSD.

Methods

An anonymous questionnaire on the diagnosis and treatment of NMOSD was distributed to experts in CNS demyelinating diseases.

Results

Most respondents used the 2015 diagnostic criteria for NMOSD and applied a cerebrospinal fluid examination, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain and spine, and anti-aquaporin-4 antibody testing to all suspected cases of NMOSD. All respondents prescribed steroid pulse therapy as an first-line therapy in the acute phase of NMOSD, and 67% prescribed azathioprine for maintenance therapy in NMOSD. However, details regarding monitoring, the tapering period of oral steroids, second-line therapy use in refractory cases, management during pregnancy, and schedule of follow-up MRI differed according to the circumstances of individual patients. We analyzed the differences in response rates between two groups of respondents according to the annual number of NMOSD patients that they treated. The group that had been treating ≥10 NMOSD patients annually preferred rituximab more often as the second-line therapy (p=0.011) and had more experience with rituximab treatment (p=0.015) compared with the group that had been treating <10 NMOSD patients.

Conclusions

This study has revealed that NMOSD experts in Korea principally follow the available treatment guidelines. However, the differences in specific clinical practices applied to uncertain cases that have been revealed will need to be investigated further in order to formulate suitable recommendations.

Evaluation of effect of empirical attack-preventive immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: An update systematic review and meta -analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disease of the central nervous system, which mainly involves the optic nerve and spinal cord. Frequent relapse can accumulate the degree of disability. At present, the main treatment options are immunosuppressants and blood purification. The first-line immunosuppressants for NMOSD are mainly rituximab (RTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and azathioprine (AZA). Therefore, we designed this systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety and effect of the above three drugs in the treatment of NMOSD patients.

METHODS

The following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and related entry terms are used to search English literature in PubMed, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases, respectively. MeSH include: Neuromyelitis optic and Rituximab or Azathioprine or Mycophenolate Mofetil; entry terms include: NMO Spectrum Disorder, NMO Spectrum Disorders, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorder, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, Devic Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica, Devic, Devic's Disease, Devic Syndrome, Devic's Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorders, CD20 Antibody, Rituximab CD20 Antibody, Mabthera, IDEC-C2B8 Antibody, GP2013, Rituxan, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Mofetil, Mycophenolate, Mycophenolic Acid, Morpholinoethyl Ester, Cellcept, Mycophenolate Sodium, Myfortic, Mycophenolate Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mycophenolate, RS 61443, RS-61443, RS61443, azathioprine sodium, azathioprine sulfate (note: literature retrieval operators "AND" "OR" "NOT" are used to link MeSH with Entry Terms.) The literature search found a total of 3058 articles about rituximab, mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine in the treatment of NMOSD, 63 of which were included in this study after a series of screening.

RESULTS

930,933,732 patients with NMOSD were enrolled, who had been treated with MMF, AZA and RTX, respectively. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of EDSS before and after RTX treated was -0.58 (95%CI: -0.72, -0.44) (I² = 0%, p = 0.477), before and after MMF treated was -0.47 (95%CI: -0.73, -0.21) (I² = 85.6%, p<0.001), before and after AZA treated was -0.41 (95%CI: -0.60, -0.23) (I² = 65.4%, p<0.001). there was no significant difference in the effect of the three drugs on reducing EDSS scores (RTX vs MMF, p = 0.522; RTX vs AZA, p = 0.214; MMF vs AZA, p = 0.732). The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) of ARR before and after RTX treated was -1.45 (95%CI: -1.72, -1.18) (I² = 72.4%, p<0.001), before and after MMF treated was -1.14 (95%CI: -1.31, -0.97) (I² = 54.5%, p<0.001), before and after AZA treated was -1.11 (95%CI: -1.39, -0.83) (I² = 83.4%, p<0.001). RTX significantly reduced ARR compared with the other two drugs (RTX vs MMF, p = 0.039; RTX vs AZA, p = 0.049; MMF vs AZA, p = 0.436).

CONCLUSION

The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis showed that the treatment of NMOSD patients with RTX, MMF and AZA is associated with decreased number of relapses and disability improvement as well, and there was no significant difference in the effect of the three drugs on reducing EDSS scores, but RTX significantly reduced ARR compared with the other two drugs.

Efficacy and safety of modified reduced-dose rituximab in Chinese patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of a modified reduced-dose rituximab (mRTX) regimen compared with azathioprine (AZA) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in Chinese patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD).

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, 71 patients with NMOSD were treated with AZA (n = 24), MMF (n = 18), or mRTX (n = 29). The primary outcome was initial relapse after first-line immunosuppressant therapy. The annualized relapse rate (ARR), expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score, activities of daily living (ADL) scale score, and treatment-related adverse events were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Significant ARR reductions were observed in the three groups, with relapse-free rates of 37.5%, 72.2%, and 79.3% in the AZA, MMF, and RTX groups, respectively. Compared with AZA, mRTX and MMF significantly reduced the NMOSD relapse risk. Relapse within 1 year before immunosuppressant therapy or ARR before immunosuppressant therapy increased the NMOSD relapse risk. mRTX and MMF were superior to AZA in reducing the EDSS score and increasing the ADL score, but there was no significant difference between the mRTX and MMF groups. Additionally, mRTX-treated patients were less likely to use steroids concurrently than those treated with AZA and MMF. The adverse event rate in the AZA group was relatively higher than that in the MMF and mRTX groups, though no significant difference was noted among the three groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with AZA, mRTX and MMF significantly reduced the NMOSD relapse risk. mRTX-treated patients presented less concomitant steroid use than those treated with AZA and MMF, fewer adverse events, and better tolerance.

A meta-analysis comparing first-line immunosuppressants in neuromyelitis optica

Objective

As phase III trials have shown interest in innovative but expensive drugs in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), data are needed to clarify strategies in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica (NMO). This meta‐analysis compares the efficacy of first‐line strategies using rituximab (RTX), mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), or azathioprine (AZA), which are still widely used.

Methods

Studies identified by the systematic review of Huang et al. (2019) were selected if they considered at least two first‐line immunosuppressants among RTX, MMF, and AZA. We updated this review. The Medline, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, and ClinicalTrials databases were queried between November 2018 and April 2020. To be included, the hazard ratio (HR) [95% CI] for the time to first relapse after first‐line immunosuppression had to be available, calculable, or provided by the authors.

Results

We gathered data from 919 NMO patients (232 RTX‐, 294 MMF‐, and 393 AZA‐treated patients). The risk of first relapse after first‐line immunosuppression was 1.55 [1.04, 2.31] (p = 0.03) for MMF compared with RTX, 1.42 [0.87, 2.30] (p = 0.16) for AZA compared with RTX, and 0.94 [0.58, 1.54] (p = 0.08) for MMF compared with AZA.

Interpretation

The findings suggest that RTX is more efficient than MMF as a first‐line therapy. Even if the results of our meta‐analysis cannot conclude that RTX has a better efficacy in delaying the first relapse than AZA, the observed effect difference between both treatments combined with the results of previous studies using as outcome the annualized relapse rate may be in favor of RTX.

Comparisons of clinical phenotype, radiological and laboratory features, and therapy of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder by regions: update and challenges

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) associated with autoantibody (ab) to aquaporin-4 (AQP4). There is obvious variation between regions and countries in the epidemiology, clinical features and management in NMOSD. Based on published population-based observation and cohort studies, the different clinical pattern of NMOSD has been seen in several geographical regions and some of these patients with NMOSD-like features do not fully meet the current diagnostic criteria, which is needed to consider the value of recently revised diagnostic criteria. At present, all treatments applied in NMOSD have made great progress, however, these treatments failed in AQP4 ab negative and refractory patients. Therefore, it is necessary to turn into an innovative idea and to open a new era of NMOSD treatment to develop novel and diverse targets and effective therapeutic drugs in NMOSD and to conduct the trails in large clinical samples and case-control studies to confirm their therapeutic effects on NMOSD in the future, which still remain a challenge.

Efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: An update systematic review and meta -analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD) is an autoimmune astrocyte disease that mainly affects the optic nerve and spinal cord resulting in blindness or paralysis. Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is one of the available immunotherapies with purported beneficial effects for patients with NMOSD. The present review aimed to conduct an update systematic review and meta-analysis for the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in the treatment of NMOSD and analyze main factors affecting the efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil.

METHODS

The following Medical Subject Heading (MeSH) and related entry terms are used to search English literature in PubMed, MEDLINE and CENTRAL databases, respectively. MeSH include: Neuromyelitis optic and Mycophenolic Acid; entry terms include: NMO Spectrum Disorder, NMO Spectrum Disorders, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorder, Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders, Devic Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica, Devic, Devic's Disease, Devic Syndrome, Devic's Neuromyelitis Optica, Neuromyelitis Optica (NMO) Spectrum Disorders, Mycophenolate Mofetil, Mofetil, Mycophenolate, Mycophenolic Acid Morpholinoethyl Ester, Cellcept, Mycophenolate Sodium, Myfortic, Mycophenolate Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mofetil Hydrochloride, Mycophenolate, RS 61,443, RS-61,443, RS61443; (note: literature retrieval operators "AND" "OR" "NOT" are used to link MeSH with Entry Terms.) 30 studies were included in this systematic review and 14 studies were included in meta-analysis. The main efficacy indicators were the difference of the annualized relapse rate (ARR) between before and after mycophenolate mofetil treatments.

RESULTS

In 14 studies involving 930 patients (815 women, 115 men), the ARR were reduced by an average of -1.17 (95%CI, -1.28 to -1.07).

CONCLUSION

Our systematic review and update meta-analysis provide new evidences that mycophenolate mofetil can substantially reduce ARR ratio.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Beyond Infection Risk

There is an increasing need for better understanding of the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) on patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). A few pilot studies have investigated COVID-19 infections in NMOSD, but few studies have addressed disease activity and immune status of these patients during the pandemic. We carried out a cross-sectional study to examine immune status, relapses, and COVID-19 infections in a cohort of NMOSD patients using an electronic patient registry (MSNMOBase) for multiple sclerosis and related disorders. An online questionnaire was administered to all NMOSD patients in the registry from January 1, 2011, to June 1, 2020. Clinical demographic characteristics, immune status, relapses, treatments, COVID-19 infections, and preventive measures were evaluated. Of the 752 registered patients, 535 (71.1%) with qualified data were included. A total of 486 used preventive therapies during the pandemic, including mycophenolate mofetil (71.2%), azathioprine (13.3%), and other immunosuppressants (6.4%). Neither median immune cell counts nor immunoglobulin levels (p > 0.05) were significantly different between patients with or without immunosuppression. During the pandemic, no patients were diagnosed with COVID-19, and the majority (>95%) took one or more effective protective measures (e.g., wearing a mask and social distancing). However, a significantly higher annualized relapse rate (ARR) was observed in the 33 patients with treatment interruptions due to the pandemic compared to before it (p < 0.05), whereas ARR changes were not found in patients with continuous treatments or those without treatments (p > 0.05). Interruption frequency was significantly higher in patients with relapses compared to those without (34.9 vs. 15.7%, p < 0.01). For stable NMOSD patients during the pandemic, the risk of relapse due to treatment interruption may be higher than the risk of COVID-19 infection when protective measures are used, and continuous relapse-prevention treatments may be necessary.

Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder Treatment-Current and Future Prospects

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an immune-mediated demyelinative disorder of the central nervous system affecting mainly the optical nerves and the spinal cord. The recurrent course of the disease, with exacerbations and incomplete remissions, causes accumulating disability, which has a profound impact upon patients’ quality of life. The discovery of antibodies against aquaporin 4 (AQP4) and their leading role in NMO etiology and the formulation of diagnostic criteria have improved appropriate recognition of the disease. In recent years, there has been rapid progress in understanding the background of NMO, leading to an increasing range of treatment options. On the basis of a review of the relevant literature, the authors present currently available therapeutic strategies for NMO as well as ongoing research in this field, with reference to key points of immune-mediated processes involved in the background of the disease.

Effectiveness of treatments in Neuromyelitis optica to modify the course of disease in adult patients. Systematic review of literature

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis Optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory disease, which manifests mostly as recurrent episodes of optic neuritis or myelitis that cause important disability. Early diagnosis and prompt initiation of immunosuppressive therapy are crucial in reducing relapses, disability, and mortality. Even though, there are few prospective randomized controlled trials, several drugs have proved to be both effective and safe. Azathioprine and Rituximab represent the standard of care and are used as first-line treatment agents worldwide. However, recent studies have unveiled new therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies. To make treatment recommendations and management guidelines, it is imperative to define an appropriate standard of care.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, and LILACS databases using the following terms: "(NMO OR Devic OR Neuromyelitis Optica) AND (Azathioprine OR Prednisone OR Rituximab OR Tocilizumab OR Bortezomib OR Inebilizumab OR Eculizumab OR Satralizumab)" including both, randomized clinical trials and observational studies published between January 2006 and January 2021. The inclusion criteria comprised patients aged 18 or older, NMOSD diagnosis following the Wingerchuck criteria, two or more therapies been compared, and the evaluation of both efficacy and safety outcomes. All studies comparing treatment only with placebo were excluded. Quality was assessed according with the design of the study, and results were synthesized through comparative tables for each outcome evaluated, differentiating the results of randomized and non-randomized studies.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 1447 patients were included. Twelve studies evaluated the expanded disability status scale (EDSS) before and after treatment; in five of seven evaluating rituximab, it outperformed its comparators in improving the disability degree. Eleven studies assessed the annual relapse rate (ARR). Again, in six of seven evaluating rituximab, it was superior to other therapies. Time to relapse (TTR) was reported in five studies. The three studies that included Rituximab revealed a longer time to relapse in this arm of treatment. Finding were consistent in randomized and non-randomized studies. The new molecules Satralizumab, Eculizumab and Tocilizumab were evaluated in one study each, proving to be highly effective and safe. The safety profile analysis showed a higher number of adverse events for Azathioprine.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review demonstrates a superiority tendency of Rituximab upon the other treatments strengthening the available evidence about NMOSD management. Superiority in EDSS outcomes, annual relapse rate, time to first relapse and relapses during treatment time was evidenced in the Rituximab group compared to other medications, with lower rates of adverse events. New molecules Tocilizumab, Eculizumab and Satralizumab also showed superiority in the evaluated results, especially in the relapses during treatment time outcome, although with subtle differences in EDSS and ARR outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that monoclonal antibodies are highly effective and safe for the treatment of NMOSD; Rituximab showed better performance on multiple outcomes and has more evidence available. New molecules: Eculizumab, Tocilizumab, Satralizumab are good options for treatment. Drugs like Azathioprine and Mycophenolate are effective, but with a worse risk-benefit ratio, therefore, they are useful alternatives in places that do not have access to monoclonal antibodies.

The evaluation of lymph node cell proliferation response by liposomes loaded with major histocompatibility complex class II binding aquaporin 4 antigen peptide

Autoimmune responses to aquaporin 4 (AQP4) cause neuromyelitis optica (NMO); thus, specific immunotolerance to this self-antigen could represent a new NMO treatment. We generated the liposome-encapsulated AQP4 peptide 201-220 (p201-220) to induce immunotolerance. Liposomes were generated using phosphatidylserine and the polyglycidol species PG8MG. The in vivo tissue distribution of the liposomes was tested using an ex vivo imaging system. To confirm the antigen presentation capacity of PG8MG liposomes, dendritic cells were treated with PG8MG liposome-encapsulated AQP4 p201-220 (AQP4-PG8MG liposomes). Immunotolerance induction by AQP4-PG8MG liposomes was evaluated using the ex vivo cell proliferation of lymph node cells isolated from AQP4 p201-220-immunized AQP4-deficient mice. Fluorescent dye-labeled PG8MG liposomes were distributed to the lymph nodes. AQP4 p201-220 was presented on dendritic cells. AQP4-PG8MG liposomes were tended to suppress immune responses to AQP4 p201-220. Thus, the encapsulation of AQP4 peptides in PG8MG liposomes represents a new strategy for suppressing autoimmune responses to AQP4.

Optimal management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder with aquaporin-4 antibody by oral prednisolone maintenance therapy

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a relapsing neuroinflammatory disease associated with aquaporin-4 antibody. Since disabilities in patients with NMOSD accumulate with attacks, relapse prevention is crucially important for improving long-term outcomes. Corticosteroids are inexpensive and promising drugs for relapse prevention in NMOSD, but few studies have analysed the efficacy of corticosteroids in NMOSD, especially regarding the appropriate dosing and tapering regimens.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective analysis of corticosteroid therapy in aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD patients fulfilling the 2015 international consensus diagnostic criteria was conducted.

RESULTS

Medical records of a total of 89 Japanese patients with aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD seen at Department of Neurology, Tohoku University Hospital (2000~2016) were reviewed. At the last follow-up, 66% of the patients were treated with prednisolone (PSL) monotherapy, and the percentage of those receiving PSL monotherapy or a combination of PSL and other immunosuppressants increased from 17.5% in 2000 to 94.1% in 2016. On the other hand, annualised relapse rate (ARR) decreased from 0.78 (13 attacks in 200 person-months) in 2000 to 0.07 (5 attacks in 819 person-months) in 2016. Under PSL treatment, the mean ARR significantly decreased, and disabilities stabilized (PSL treatment vs no-medication; ARR: 0.21 vs 0.98, P < 0.01, Expanded Disability Status Scale score change: +0.02 vs +0.89, P < 0.01, observation periods: 60.1 vs 68.2 months, P=0.26). Using Kaplan-Meier curves, the 10-year relapse-free rate was 46.5% with PSL monotherapy and 7.1% with no medication (hazard ratio: 0.069, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.024-0.199, P < 0.01). Rapid tapering of PSL (10 mg or less in one year and/or 5 mg or less in two years after clinical attacks) was associated with frequent relapses compared to gradual tapering (more than 10 mg in one year and more than 5 mg in two years after clinical attacks) (rapid vs gradual, 36.7% vs 17.7%, odds ratio 2.69, 95% CI 1.12-6.44, P = 0.02). However, even with PSL of 5 mg/day or less, the relapse rate was low after two years of acute treatment (before vs after, 53.8% vs 13.6%, odds ratio 0.12, 95% CI 0.03-0.50, P < 0.01). Nine patients needed additional immunosuppressants due to insufficient relapse prevention by PSL monotherapy. PSL monotherapy was generally well tolerated, but seven patients had severe adverse events, mainly bone fractures (5 with bone fracture, 1 with femoral capital necrosis and 1 with cerebral infarction).

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that PSL monotherapy is effective to prevent relapses in about half of patients with aquaporin-4 antibody-positive NMOSD if the doses are gradually reduced. Although it is important to have a treatment strategy tailored to each patient, this study provides evidence that PSL monotherapy can be an option for relapse prevention in some patients with NMOSD.

Remedial Effect of Intravenous Cyclophosphamide in Corticosteroid-Refractory Patients in the Acute Phase of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder-Related Optic Neuritis

Background: To investigate the remedial efficacy and safety of intravenous cyclophosphamide (CP) in the acute phase in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder-related optic neuritis (NMOSD-ON) who are refractory to intravenous methylprednisolone (MP) treatment.

Design: This study was a single-center, retrospective, observational case-control cohort study.

Methods: Thirty-six patients who had acute NMOSD-ON attacks and were refractory to MP treatment were included. Patents were divided into two groups: the remedial CP group, and the MP group. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), mean deviation (MD) of the visual field (VF), visual evoked potential amplitude (VEP-A), visual evoked potential latency (VEP-T), and average thickness of the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) at onset, 1 month (m), 3 m, and 6 m after the attack were analyzed. Routine blood test results, liver and kidney function, routine urinalysis results and general condition were analyzed for safety issues at each follow-up. Fisher's exact test, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used for statistical analysis.

Results: The remedial CP group showed significant improvement over 6 m with regard to BCVA and MD (P < 0.05),whereas MP group only showed significant improvement in MD (P < 0.05). Regarding remedial CP intervention time window, the CP ≤ 30 days group showed significant improvement over 6 m with regard to BCVA (P = 0.002), MD (P = 0.003), and VEP-A (P = 0.036), while those CP > 30 days group did not. Both two subgroups showed significantly RNFL thickness reduction, however, BCVA, MD, VEP-A, VEP-T, and RNFL thickness showed no significant differences between the two subgroups at any follow-up point (P > 0.05).

Conclusion: CP within 30 days of attack onset is safe and might have a beneficial degree of therapeutic efficacy for acute-phase treatment of NMOSD-ON that is refractory to MP treatment alone.

Rituximab efficacy at different initial and maintenance doses in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: Experience from a national health institute in México

BACKGROUND

NMOSD is an inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system that primarily affects the optic nerves and spinal cord. Rituximab (RTX) is a monoclonal antibody directed against CD20, an epitope expressed on pre-B and mature B cells. It has of wide use in several antibody-mediated autoimmune diseases.

OBJECTIVES

To demonstrate RTX clinical efficacy at different initial and maintenance doses administered in patients with NMOSD.

METHODS

In this retrospective/observational study we recruited subjects with NMOSD with at least one RTX infusion. Annual relapse rates (ARR) were compared in several induction and maintenance regimens with RTX in 66 patients with NMOSD.

RESULTS

Fifty-four (81.8%) were female and two thirds (66.7%) had positive anti-AQP4 antibodies. The most prevalent induction and maintenance regimens were 1000 mg on days 1 and 15 (51.5%) and 1000 mg every 6 months (40.9%), respectively. Overall, the annual relapse rate (ARR) decreased from 1.15 to 0.46 with RTX (p < 0.001). In patients with persistent relapses, the ARR decreased from 1.66 to 1.22, representing a relative risk reduction of 24%. Treatment with RTX decreased the ARR from 1.36 to 0.4 in the 500 mg induction and maintenance dose subgroup, and from 0.7 to 0.4 in the 1000 mg induction and maintenance dose subgroup.

CONCLUSION

RTX treatment in patients with NMOSD demonstrated a marked and sustained reduction in the ARR, regardless of induction and maintenance regimens. EDSS stability was observed, even in patients with active and severe NMOSD.

Efficacy for the Annual Relapse Rate after the Immunosuppressive Therapy in Patients Associated with Anti-AQP4 or Anti-MOG Antibody-Positive Optic Neuritis

Purpose

Although oral prednisolone is the first-line treatment for preventing recurrent optic neuritis (ON) after the completion of acute-phase treatment, especially anti-aquaporin 4 (AQP4) antibody-positive ON, and anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) antibody-positive ON, some patients experience relapses. Immunosuppressants could be effective in reducing the recurrence rate for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and MOG antibody-related diseases, but there have been few studies addressing this issue focusing on the changes in ophthalmic parameters. The objective of the study was to analyze the impact of off-label uses of immunosuppressants to reduce recurrent ON.

Design

Retrospective observational study, clinical case series.

Methods

We reviewed the medical charts of 11 cases (22 eyes) who underwent immunosuppressive therapy in Kobe University Hospital and compared the annualized relapse rate (ARR) before and after immunosuppressive therapy. We also evaluated the dosage of prednisolone, complications of immunosuppressants, and other visual functional ophthalmologic parameters.

Results

Eleven cases in total had AQP4 antibody (9 cases) and/or MOG antibody (3 cases). One case was double positive for these antibodies. Nine patients received azathioprine and two received mycophenolate mofetil as an initial immunosuppressive therapy. The median duration of immunosuppressant treatment was 2.8 years. The median ON ARR before immunosuppressive therapy was 0.33, and this decreased significantly to 0 after the therapy (p = 0.02). The dose of prednisolone was reduced from 17.8 ± 7.1 mg/day before to 5.8 ± 2.2 mg/day after immunosuppressive therapy (p < 0.01). Although two patients presented with mild elevation of liver enzymes and nausea, all patients were able to continue taking the immunosuppressants.

Conclusions

Immunosuppressants can potentially decrease relapses and steroid dosage in patients with anti-AQP4 or MOG antibody-positive ON without severe adverse events and the exacerbation of visual acuities.

Advances in the Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a rare, relapsing-remitting neuroinflammatory disorder of the central nervous system. Advances in the understanding of NMOSD pathogenesis and identification of the NMO-specific pathogenic anti-AQP4 autoantibody have led to the development of highly effective disease-modifying strategies. Five placebo-controlled, randomized trials for NMOSD have been successfully completed as of 2020. These trials support the efficacy of rituximab and tocilizumab and led to the FDA approval of eculizumab, satralizumab and inebilizumab for NMOSD. Our review provides an update on these evidence-based disease-modifying therapies and discussed the treatment of acute relapses in NMOSD.

E.U. paediatric MOG consortium consensus: Part 5 - Treatment of paediatric myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorders

In recent years, the understanding about the different clinical phenotypes, diagnostic and prognostic factors of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-antibody-associated disorders (MOGAD) has significantly increased. However, there is still lack of evidence-based treatment protocols for acute attacks and children with a relapsing course of the disease. Currently used acute and maintenance treatment regimens are derived from other demyelinating central nervous system diseases and are mostly centre-specific. Therefore, this part of the Paediatric European Collaborative Consensus attempts to provide recommendations for acute and maintenance therapy based on clinical experience and evidence available from mainly retrospective studies. In the acute attack, intravenous methylprednisolone (IVMP) leads to a favourable outcome in the majority of patients and can be followed by tapering of oral steroids up to a maximum of three months to maintain the benefit of acute treatment by suppressing disease activity. Intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIG) and plasmapheresis constitute second-line therapies in case of insufficient response to IVMP. After a first relapse, maintenance treatment should be started in order to prevent further relapses and the possibility of permanent sequelae. Four first-line therapies consisting of rituximab (RTX), azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil or monthly IVIG have been identified by the consensus group. In case of further relapses despite maintenance treatment, the consensus group recommends treatment escalation with RTX or IVIG, followed by combining those two, and ultimately adding maintenance oral steroids. Many open questions remain which need to be addressed in further international prospective evaluation of MOGAD treatment. This international collaboration is essential to expand the state of current knowledge.

Efficacy and safety of mycophenolate mofetil therapy in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is an immunosuppressive agent (IS) which is widely prescribed in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) patients. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of MMF in controlling relapse and disease severity. Eligible studies obtained from the EMBASE and Ovid MEDLINE databases were studies of NMOSD patients treated with MMF, which reported treatment outcomes as Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR) or Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) before and after treatment. Fifteen studies included 1047 patients, of whom 915 (87.4%) were aquaporin-4 immunoglobulin seropositive. The total number of patients that received MMF was 799. A meta-analysis on ARR was conducted in 200 patients from 4 studies and on EDSS in 158 patients from 3 studies. The result showed a significant improvement with a mean reduction of 1.13 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.60-1.65] in ARR, and a mean reduction of 0.85 (95% CI 0.36-1.34) in EDSS after MMF therapy. Adverse events occurred in 106 (17.8%) of 594 patients during MMF therapy. This systematic review and meta-analysis showed that using MMF as a preventive therapy in NMOSD patients can significantly reduce relapse rates and improve disease severity with acceptable tolerability.

Recent progress in maintenance treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder

Background

Treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) has so far been based on retrospective case series. The results of six randomized clinical trials including five different monoclonal antibodies targeting four molecules and three distinct pathophysiological pathways have recently been published.

Methods

Literature search on clinical trials and case studies in NMOSD up to July 10. 2020.

Results

We review mechanism of action, efficacy and side effects, and consequences for reproductive health from traditional immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies including rituximab, inebilizumab, eculizumab, tocilizumab and satralizumab.

Conclusion

In NMOSD patients with antibodies against aquaporin 4, monoclonal antibodies that deplete B cells (rituximab and inebilizumab) or interfere with interleukin 6 signaling (tocilizumab and satralizumab) or complement activation (eculizumab) have superior efficacy compared to placebo. Tocilizumab and rituximab were also superior to azathioprine in head-to-head studies. Rituximab, tocilizumab and to some extent eculizumab have well-known safety profiles for other inflammatory diseases, and rituximab and azathioprine may be safe during pregnancy.

Efficacy and safety of azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A meta-analysis of real-world studies

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to perform a meta-analysis of the efficacy and safety of azathioprine (AZA) for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD), considering the potential predictive factors related to patient response to AZA in this disease.

METHODS

We performed a systematic online query in PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, WANFANG DATA, and CQVIP DATA. The available studies on the use of AZA in NMOSD patients were included.

RESULTS

We analyzed a total of 21 studies including 1016 patients. Results demonstrated that AZA significantly decreased annual relapse rate (ARR) by 1.164 (95% confidence intervals (CI), -1.396 to -0.932; p < 0.001). Subgroup analysis showed that AZA significantly decreased ARR in both low-dose group (effect size (ES): -1.545) and moderate-dose group (ES: -2.026). AZA therapy also resulted in a significant reduction of 1.117 (95% CI: -1.668 to -0.566; p < 0.001) in expanded disability status scale (EDSS) score. AZA did not affect EDSS score in the low-dose subgroup (ES: -0.535; p = 0.209) or the moderate-dose subgroup (ES: -0.709; p = 0.064). During AZA therapy, 47% of patients did not experience any relapses (95% CI, 39% to 54%). In addition, 13% of patients developed leukopenia, 11% had elevated liver enzyme levels, 8% experienced nausea or vomiting, 5% developed pancytopenia and 6% died during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

AZA is effective in reducing relapse and improving patients' neurological function. However, liver function monitoring and routine blood monitoring remain necessary. Within the safe upper limit, a higher dose of AZA may be associated with a better efficacy for NMOSD.

Management Strategies of Patients with Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder During the COVID-19 Pandemic Era

The ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is a global health emergency of international concern and has affected management plans of many autoimmune disorders. Immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapies are pivotal in the management of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), potentially placing patients at an increased risk of contracting infections such as COVID-19. The optimal management strategy of NMOSD during the COVID-19 era remains unclear. Here, however, we examined the evidence of NMOSD disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) use during the present period and highlighted different scenarios including treatment of relapses as well as initiation and maintenance of DMTs in order to optimize care of NMOSD patients in the COVID-19 era.

Long-term efficacy of mycophenolate mofetil in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disorders: A prospective study

Objective

To investigate whether the use of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) could reduce the relapse risk in patients with myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-immunoglobulin G (IgG)-associated disorders (MOGADs).

Methods

This prospective observational cohort study included patients with MOGAD at Peking Union Medical College Hospital between January 1, 2017, and April 30, 2019. The patients were divided into 2 groups: those with (MMF+) or without (MMF−) MMF therapy. The primary outcome was relapse at follow-up. We used Cox proportional hazards models to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) for relapse.

Results

Seventy-nine patients were included in our MOG cohort. Fifty (63.3%) were adults at index date, and 47 (59.5%) were women. Fifty-four (68.4%) were in the MMF+ group, and 25 (31.6%) were in the MMF− group. Clinical and demographic factors, MOG-IgG titer, and follow-up time (median, 472.5 days for MMF+, 261.0 days for MMF−) were comparable between the groups. Relapse rates were 7.4% (4/54) in the MMF+ group and 44.0% (11/25) in the MMF− group. Of all potential confounders, only the use of MMF was associated with reduced risk of relapse. The HR for relapse among patients in the MMF+ group was 0.14 (95% CI, 0.05–0.45) and was 0.08 (95% CI, 0.02–0.28) in a model adjusted for age, sex, disease course, and MOG-IgG titer. MMF therapy also remained associated with a reduced relapse risk in sensitivity analyses. Only one patient (1.9%) discontinued MMF therapy because of adverse effect.

Conclusions

These findings provide a clinical evidence that MMF immunosuppression therapy may prevent relapse in patients with MOGAD.

Classification of evidence

This study provides class IV evidence that for patients with MOGAD, MMF reduces relapse risk.

Aquaporin-4-IgG positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder and systemic autoimmune diseases overlap syndrome: a single-center experience

Objective

To describe the clinical and radiological characteristics and outcomes of patients with aquaporin-4-immunoglobulin G (AQP4-IgG) seropositive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) coexisting with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and primary Sjögren's syndrome (pSS) in a single center.

Methods

We included patients with diagnosis of NMOSD and a concomitant diagnosis of SLE or pSS. Demographic, clinical, serological and imaging characteristics were retrieved from clinical charts.

Results

Twelve patients were included, of whom 11 (91.7%) were women. Seven (58.3%) had SLE and five (41.7%) pSS. In five (41.7%) patients NMOSD followed SLE/pSS onset, four (33.3%) patients had a simultaneous presentation, and in three (25%) NMOSD preceded pSS onset. The mean age at first neurological event was 39 years. Eleven patients (91.7%) experienced acute transverse myelitis/longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis, five (41.7%) optic neuritis, three (25%) a cerebral syndrome and two (16.7%) each area postrema syndrome, acute brainstem syndrome and cerebellar syndrome. Eleven (91.7%) patients went into either total or partial NMOSD remission at median follow-up of 89.5 months.

Conclusion

AQP4-IgG seropositive NMOSD arose in the context of quiescent SLE and pSS with extraglandular features. As NMOSD coexisting with SLE/pSS is rare, collaborative multicenter studies are needed to clarify the natural history and outcomes of this overlap syndrome.

Effectiveness and tolerability of immunosuppressants and monoclonal antibodies in preventive treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Several immunosuppressants or monoclonal antibodies have been used as preventive treatment for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSD); however, the optimal therapies have not been clarified. In this study, we aimed to compare and rank the effectiveness and tolerability of all preventive therapies for NMOSD.

METHODS

Qualified studies were identified in a search of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and ClinicalTrials.gov databases. We combined direct and indirect evidence via meta-analyses. The annualized relapse rate (ARR) was defined as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score and hazard ratios (HR) for the counts of adverse events (AEs).

RESULTS

We identified one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and five observational studies including a total 631 patients with NMOSD. Among these, the follow-up time ranged from 12 to 40 months. For the primary outcome, rituximab (RTX) was hierarchically superior, with the significant standardized mean difference versus azathioprine (-0.86; 95% confidence interval: -1.60, -0.11). Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was ranked the most tolerable therapy, whereas cyclophosphamide was the least tolerable.

CONCLUSION

RTX and MMF may be recommended as optimal treatments to prevent relapse in NMOSD. Low-dose cyclosporine A could be a promising alternative therapy.

Efficacy and tolerability of azathioprine for neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is an inflammatory and autoimmune disorder of the central nervous system that typically presents with optic neuritis and myelitis. Azathioprine (AZA) is one of the available immunotherapies with purported beneficial effects for patients with NMOSD. At present, there are no systematic reviews that extensively pooled the effects of AZA compared to other interventions for this condition. The objective of this study, therefore, is to determine the efficacy and safety of AZA in patients with NMOSD using systematic review of relevant studies.

METHODS

Major health electronic databases, which included CENTRAL, MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, LILACS, ClinicalTrials.gov, and HERDIN, were searched from May 2017 to November 2018 for relevant studies involving adult and pediatric patients with NMOSD. Randomized controlled trials, and either prospective or retrospective cohort designs that assessed the reduction or prevention of relapse or disability and the occurrence of adverse events related to AZA use compared to placebo or to other active drugs were considered. Assessment of risk of bias was performed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

From a total of 273 records, 9 relevant studies (1 randomized controlled trial (RCT), 3 prospective cohort studies, 5 retrospective studies) which involved a total of 977 patients, were included. One RCT and several observational studies revealed that AZA regimen may be inferior to rituximab in terms of annualized relapse rate, reduction of disability as measured by the expanded disability status scale (EDSS), risk for relapse and relapse-free rate. Efficacy data were very limited in the comparison of AZA to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), to cyclophosphamide, and to interferon-β for patients with NMOSD. Occurrence of any adverse event, elevated liver enzymes/hepatoxicity, leukopenia and hair loss associated with AZA use were significantly greater compared to MMF, which may lead to medication noncompliance.

CONCLUSION

AZA improves relapses and disability in patients with NMOSD but this regimen is associated with relatively frequent adverse events based on limited published evidences. More well-conducted clinical trials are necessary to establish with certainty the beneficial and harmful effects of AZA in patients with NMOSD.

Mycophenolate mofetil in paediatric autoimmune or immune-mediated diseases of the central nervous system: clinical experience and recommendations

AIM

To gather data on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in paediatric autoimmune/immune-mediated central nervous system (CNS) conditions, focusing on safety and factors that may affect MMF efficacy.

METHOD

Retrospective, multicentre study based on four paediatric neurology centres.

RESULTS

Forty-four children were included (30 females, 14 males): 19 had proven/suspected autoimmune encephalitis, 14 had inflammatory demyelinating CNS diseases, and 11 had other autoimmune/immune-mediated CNS conditions. Before MMF, all received first-line immune therapies, and 17 had second-line rituximab and/or cyclophosphamide. MMF was started at a median of 9.5 months from disease onset (range 1-127mo) (median age 9y 4mo, range 1y 5mo-16y 5mo), and was used for median 18 months (range 0.3-73mo). On MMF, 31 patients were relapse-free, whereas eight relapsed (excluding patients with chronic-progressive course). Relapses on MMF were associated with medication weaning/cessation, or with suboptimal MMF dosage/duration. Adverse events of MMF occurred in eight patients: six moderate (gastrointestinal, movement disorder, dermatological) and two severe (infectious).

INTERPRETATION

MMF use in paediatric neuroimmunology is heterogeneous, although relatively safe. We have identified factors that may affect MMF efficacy and provide recommendations on MMF usage.

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) use was heterogeneous with relatively common adverse events, although mostly not severe. MMF treatment reduced median annualized relapse rate, although 20% of patients relapsed on MMF. A high relapse rate pre-MMF and late MMF start were associated with higher probability of relapsing on MMF. Most relapses were associated with suboptimal MMF dosage, short MMF duration, or concurrent medication weaning/discontinuation.

Mycophenolate mofetil, azathioprine and methotrexate usage in paediatric anti-NMDAR encephalitis: A systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Available data on mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), azathioprine (AZA) and methotrexate (MTX) for paediatric-onset anti-N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor encephalitis (anti-NMDARE) is limited.

METHODS

Systematic literature review on patients treated with MMF/AZA/MTX for paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE, with focus on modes of use, efficacy and safety.

RESULTS

87 patients were included (age at onset median 11 years, range 0.8-18 years; 69% females). 46% had a relapsing course. 52% received MMF, 27% AZA, 15% MTX, and 6% a combination of MMF/AZA/MTX (7 patients received intrathecal MTX). Before MMF/AZA/MTX, 100% patients received steroids, 83% intravenous immunoglobulin and 45% plasma exchange, and 50% received second-line treatments (rituximab/cyclophosphamide). MMF/AZA/MTX were administered >6 months from onset in 51%, and only after relapse in 40%. Worst mRS before MMF/AZA/MTX was median 4.5 (range 3-5). At last follow-up (median 2 years, range 0.2-8.6), median mRS was 1 (range 0-6). Median annualised relapse rate was 0.4 (range 0-6.7) pre-MMF/AZA/MTX (excluding first events), and 0 on MMF/AZA/MTX (mean 0.03, range 0-0.8). 7% patients relapsed on MMF/AZA/MTX. These relapsing patients had low rate of second-line treatments before MMF/AZA/MTX (25%), long median time between onset and MMF/AZA/MTX usage (18 months), and frequently they were started on MMF/AZA/MTX only after relapse (75%). Relapse rate was lower among patients who received first immune therapy ≤30 days (25%) than later (64%), who received second-line treatments at first event (14%) rather than not (64%), who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX after the first (12%) rather than subsequent events (17%), and who were started on MMF/AZA/MTX ≤3 months from onset (33%) rather than later (53%). Adverse reactions to MMF/AZA/MTX occurred in 2 cases (cytomegalovirus colitis and respiratory infection), of grade 3 Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0.

DISCUSSION

Our literature review disclosed heterogeneity in the use of MMF/AZA/MTX in paediatric-onset anti-NMDARE. MMF/AZA/MTX usage is mostly restricted to retrospective cohort descriptions. These agents may reduce risk of relapse, and have a reasonable safety profile, however data on larger cohorts are required to definitively determine effect.

Acute epileptic seizures in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein encephalomyelitis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: A comparative cohort study

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the incidence and characteristics of acute epileptic seizures in myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein encephalomyelitis (MOG-EM) and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). In this study, we compared the incidence and characteristics of acute epileptic seizures in MOG-EM and NMOSD patients.

METHODS

MOG-EM (n = 61) and NMOSD (n = 565) cases obtained from the MSNMOBase (2011-2018) were retrospectively reviewed.

RESULTS

Acute epileptic seizures were observed in 13 (21.3%) patients with MOG-EM and two (0.4%) patients with NMOSD (P < 0.001). In both MOG-EM and NMOSD patients, more than half of seizures were single and of focal onset; slow wave and cortical/subcortical lesions were the most common abnormalities. In MOG-EM patients, no difference was found in the proportion of single seizure with and without anti-epileptic drugs (AEDs; 64.3% vs. 45.5%, P = 0.435). Long-term AED use did not significantly reduce the occurrence of acute epileptic seizures, which was 66.7% before and after treatment. In patients with MOG-EM and NMOSD, mycophenolate mofetil significantly reduced acute epileptic seizure occurrence (P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

Acute epileptic seizures were more common in MOG-EM patients than in NMOSD patients. The long-term use of AEDs might be unnecessary given the use of immunotherapy in cases of MOG-EM.

Low-Dose Mycophenolate Mofetil for Treatment of Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorders: A Prospective Multicenter Study in South China

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of low-dose mycophenolate mofetil (MMF, 1,000 mg/day) treatment of neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs).

Methods: This study was a multicenter, open, prospective, follow-up clinical trial. The data include retrospective clinical data from the pretreatment phase and prospective data from the post-treatment phase. From September 2014 to February 2017, NMOSD patients seropositive for aquaporin 4-IgG (AQP4-IgG) were treated with low-dose MMF.

Results: Ninety NMOSD patients were treated with MMF for a median duration of 18 months (range 6–40 months). The median annual recurrence rate (ARR) decreased from 1.02 before treatment to 0 (P < 0.0001) after treatment, and the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score decreased from 4 to 3 (P < 0.0001). The EDSS score was significantly lower (P = 0.038) after the first 90 days of treatment. The serum AQP4-IgG titer decreased in 50 cases (63%). The median Simple McGill pain score (SF-MPQ) was reduced in 65 patients (88%) with myelitis from 17 (range 0–35) to 11 (range 0–34) after treatment (P < 0.0001). The median Hauser walking index (Hauser Walk Rating Scale) was reduced from 2 (range 1–9) before treatment to 1 (range 0–7) after treatment (P < 0.0001). Adverse events were documented in 43% of the patients, and eight patients discontinued MMF due to intolerable adverse events. Fourteen (16%) of the total patients discontinued MMF after our last follow-up for various reasons and switched to azathioprine or rituximab.

Conclusion: Low-dose MMF reduced clinical relapse and disability in NMOSD patients in South China. However, some patients still suffered from adverse events at this dosage.

Clinical Trial Registration: www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier : NCT02809079.

Dose effects of mycophenolate mofetil in Chinese patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders: a case series study

BACKGROUND

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) spectrum disorder (NMOSD) is a devastating autoimmune inflammatory disorder of the central nervous system, which can result in blindness or paralysis. Currently, there is a dire need for new treatment options in the clinic. Several case series have shown that mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) may be an effective treatment for NMOSD patients. The dosing of MMF in the treatment of NMOSD has been poorly studied. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy, tolerability, influential factors and optimal dosage of MMF in Chinese patients with NMOSD.

METHODS

A case series of 109 NMO or NMOSD (limited forms of NMO with seropositive AQP4-IgG) patients were retrospectively analyzed and followed up. Out of the 109 patients, 86 patients had received MMF for 6 months or longer and were included for efficacy assessment.

RESULTS

When comparing the annualized relapse rate (ARR) of MMF treatment with that of pre-MMF treatment period, MMF was found to significantly reduce ARR in 75 (87%) patients (p < 0.0001). The median pre-treatment Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score in remission decreased from 3 (range, 0-8.5) to 2.5 (range, 0-8) at the last follow-up (p = 0.006), yet no significant difference was found in the visual score. The higher doses of MMF (1750 mg/d to 2000 mg/d) significantly lowered the relapse risks compared with lower doses (1000 mg/d or less, p < 0.0001) or moderate doses (1250 to 1500 mg/d, p = 0.031). Coexisting with systemic autoimmune diseases (HR, 2.418; p = 0.0345) and attack number before MMF initiation (HR, 1.117; p = 0.02) were important risk factors for relapses. MMF was generally well tolerated with adverse effects occurring in 21 patients (19%). While four patients decreased their daily doses because of the adverse effects, only one patient stopped MMF treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

MMF is generally effective and well tolerated in Chinese NMOSD patients. High-dose MMF was more potent than the lower dose for NMOSD patients, with 1750 mg of daily MMF being the recommended dosage for Chinese patients with NMOSD. MMF treatment reduces the frequency of relapses and improves the quality of life for patients with this debilitating disease.

Comparison of myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody disease and AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) when they co-exist with anti-NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor encephalitis

BACKGROUND

Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG)-antibody (ab) disease and AQP4-IgG-positive neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) can co-exist with anti-NMDA (N-methyl-D-aspartate) receptor encephalitis (NMDARe).

OBJECTIVES

To characterize MOG-ab disease and AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD during NMDARe.

METHODS

We analyzed all the patients with overlapping MOG-ab disease and NMDARe (MNOS) and patients with AQP4-IgG-positive NMOSD and NMDARe (ANOS) in our hospital and compared those data with data from systematically review of previously published reports.

RESULTS

In our cohorts, 11.9% patients with MOG-ab disease and 0.6% patients with NMOSD had overlapping NMDARe (P < 0.01). After treatment with steroids and/or intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), the median modified Rankin Scale (mRS) of the MNOS group decreased significantly during attacks associated with or without NMDARe (P < 0.01 for both), while that of the ANOS group did not (attack: P < 0.05; attack associated with NMDARe: P > 0.05). Analyzed together with previously reported cases, 6% patients with MNOS and 40% patients with ANOS also used rituximab or cyclophosphamide after steroids and/or IVIg (P < 0.05) during attacks associated with NMDARe.

CONCLUSION

Compared with NMOSD, MOG-ab disease may more commonly co-exist with NMDARe. MNOS patients respond better to steroids and IVIg than do ANOS patients during attacks associated with NMDARe.

Neuromyelitis optica and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The discovery of highly specific auto-antibodies directed against the water channel aquaporin 4 was a quantum leap in the definition, classification and management of neuromyelitis optica (NMO). Herein, we propose an update on epidemiological, clinical and therapeutic advances in the field, underlining unmet needs.

RECENT FINDINGS

Large-scale epidemiological studies have recently provided a more precise evaluation of NMO prevalence and a better stratification regarding ethnicity and sex. New criteria have been proposed for so-called NMO spectrum disorders (NMOSD) and their relevance is currently being assessed. The identification of a new clinical entity associated to antibodies against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein questions the border of NMOSD.

SUMMARY

The concept of NMOSD is opening a new era in clinical practice, allowing an easier and more homogeneous diagnosis and an increase in newly identified cases. This will facilitate clinical studies and support new therapeutic trial. Future researches should focus on the position of seronegative NMOSD and myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein-IgG disorders in the field and on promising strategies, including the immune tolerisation approaches, to eventually cure NMO.