1
|
Zhang R, Zhou X, Raithel E, Ren C, Zhang P, Li J, Bai L, Zhao J. A reproducibility study of knee cartilage volume and thickness values derived by fully automatic segmentation based on three-dimensional dual-echo in steady state data from 1.5 T and 3 T magnetic resonance imaging. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2024; 37:69-82. [PMID: 37815638 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-023-01122-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 09/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the repeatability of cartilage volume and thickness values at 1.5 T MRI using a fully automatic cartilage segmentation method and reproducibility of the method between 1.5 T and 3 T data. METHODS The study included 20 knee joints from 10 healthy subjects with each subject having undergone double-knee MRI. All knees were scanned at 1.5 T and 3 T MR scanners using a three-dimensional (3D) high-resolution dual-echo in steady state (DESS) sequence. Cartilage volume and thickness of 21 subregions were quantified using a fully automatic cartilage segmentation research application (MR Chondral Health, version 3.0, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). The volume and thickness values derived from fully automatically computed segmentation masks were analyzed for the scan-rescan data from the same volunteers. The accuracy of the automatic segmentation of the cartilage in 1.5 T images was evaluated by the dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and Hausdorff distance (HD) using the manually corrected segmentation as a reference. The volume and thickness values calculated from 1.5 T and 3 T were also compared. RESULTS No statistically significant differences were found for cartilage thickness or volume across all subregions between the scan-rescanned data at 1.5 T (P > 0.05). The mean DSC between the fully automatic and manually corrected knee cartilage segmentation contours at 1.5 T was 0.9946. The average value of HD was 2.41 mm. Overall, there was no statistically significant difference in the cartilage volume or thickness in most-subregions between the two field strengths (P > 0.05) except for the medial region of femur and tibia. Bland-Altman plot and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) showed high consistency between results obtained based on same and different scanning sequences. CONCLUSION The cartilage segmentation software had high repeatability for DESS images obtained from the same device. In addition, the overall reproducibility of the images obtained from equipment of two different field strengths was satisfactory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ranxu Zhang
- Department of CT/MR, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province Biomechanical Key Laboratory of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Xiaoyue Zhou
- MR Collaboration, Siemens Healthineers Ltd, Shanghai, 200126, China
| | | | - Congcong Ren
- Department of CT/MR, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province Biomechanical Key Laboratory of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Ping Zhang
- Department of CT/MR, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province Biomechanical Key Laboratory of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Junfei Li
- Department of CT/MR, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province Biomechanical Key Laboratory of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Lin Bai
- Department of CT/MR, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province Biomechanical Key Laboratory of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China
| | - Jian Zhao
- Department of CT/MR, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Hebei Province Biomechanical Key Laboratory of Orthopedics, Shijiazhuang, 050051, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wilson RL, Emery NC, Pierce DM, Neu CP. Spatial Gradients of Quantitative MRI as Biomarkers for Early Detection of Osteoarthritis: Data From Human Explants and the Osteoarthritis Initiative. J Magn Reson Imaging 2023; 58:189-197. [PMID: 36285338 PMCID: PMC10126208 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28471] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthy articular cartilage presents structural gradients defined by distinct zonal patterns through the thickness, which may be disrupted in the pathogenesis of several disorders. Analysis of textural patterns using quantitative MRI data may identify structural gradients of healthy or degenerating tissue that correlate with early osteoarthritis (OA). PURPOSE To quantify spatial gradients and patterns in MRI data, and to probe new candidate biomarkers for early severity of OA. STUDY TYPE Retrospective study. SUBJECTS Fourteen volunteers receiving total knee replacement surgery (eight males/two females/four unknown, average age ± standard deviation: 68.1 ± 9.6 years) and 10 patients from the OA Initiative (OAI) with radiographic OA onset (two males/eight females, average age ± standard deviation: 57.7 ± 9.4 years; initial Kellgren-Lawrence [KL] grade: 0; final KL grade: 3 over the 10-year study). FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE 3.0-T and 14.1-T, biomechanics-based displacement-encoded imaging, fast spin echo, multi-slice multi-echo T2 mapping. ASSESSMENT We studied structure and strain in cartilage explants from volunteers receiving total knee replacement, or structure in cartilage of OAI patients with progressive OA. We calculated spatial gradients of quantitative MRI measures (eg, T2) normal to the cartilage surface to enhance zonal variations. We compared gradient values against histologically OA severity, conventional relaxometry, and/or KL grades. STATISTICAL TESTS Multiparametric linear regression for evaluation of the relationship between residuals of the mixed effects models and histologically determined OA severity scoring, with a significance threshold at α = 0.05. RESULTS Gradients of individual relaxometry and biomechanics measures significantly correlated with OA severity, outperforming conventional relaxometry and strain metrics. In human explants, analysis of spatial gradients provided the strongest relationship to OA severity (R2 = 0.627). Spatial gradients of T2 from OAI data identified variations in radiographic (KL Grade 2) OA severity in single subjects, while conventional T2 alone did not. DATA CONCLUSION Spatial gradients of quantitative MRI data may improve the predictive power of noninvasive imaging for early-stage degeneration. EVIDENCE LEVEL 1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 1.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert L. Wilson
- Paul M. Rady Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, 1111 Engineering Drive, 427 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309
| | - Nancy C. Emery
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, University of Colorado Boulder, 1900 Pleasant Street, 334 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309
| | - David M. Pierce
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Connecticut, 191 Auditorium Road, Unit 3139, Storrs, CT 06269
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Connecticut, 260 Glenbrook Road, Unit 3247, Storrs, CT 06269
| | - Corey P. Neu
- Paul M. Rady Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Colorado Boulder, 1111 Engineering Drive, 427 UCB, Boulder, CO 80309
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lartey R, Nanavati A, Kim J, Li M, Xu K, Nakamura K, Shin W, Winalski CS, Obuchowski N, Bahroos E, Link TM, Hardy PA, Peng Q, Kim J, Liu K, Fung M, Wu C, Li X. Reproducibility of T 1ρ and T 2 quantification in a multi-vendor multi-site study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2023; 31:249-257. [PMID: 36370959 PMCID: PMC10016129 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.10.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Revised: 10/08/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the multi-vendor multi-site reproducibility of two-dimensional (2D) multi-echo spin-echo (MESE) T2 mapping (product sequences); and to evaluate the longitudinal reproducibility of three-dimensional (3D) magnetization-prepared angle-modulated partitioned k-space spoiled gradient echo snapshots (MAPSS) T1ρ and T2 mapping (research sequences), and 2D MESE T2 mapping, separated by 6 months, in a multi-vendor multi-site setting. METHODS Phantoms and volunteers (n = 5 from each site, n = 20 in total) were scanned on four 3 T magnetic resonance (MR) systems from four sites and three vendors (Siemens, General Electric, and Phillips). Two traveling volunteers (3 knees) scanned at all 4 sites at baseline and 6-month follow-up. Data was transferred to one site for centralized processing. Coefficients of variation (CVs) were calculated to evaluate reproducibility. RESULTS For baseline 2D MESE T2 measures, average CV were 0.37-2.45% (intra-site) and 5.96% (inter-site) for phantoms, and 3.15-8.49% (intra-site) and 14.16% (inter-site) for volunteers. For longitudinal phantom data, intra-site CVs were 1.42-3.48% for 3D MAPSS T1ρ, 1.77-3.56% for 3D MAPSS T2, and 1.02-2.54% for 2D MESE T2. For the longitudinal volunteer data, the intra-site CVs were 2.60-4.86% for 3D MAPSS T1ρ, 3.33-7.25% for 3D MAPSS T2, and 3.11-8.77% for 2D MESE T2. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated excellent intra-site reproducibility of 2D MESE T2 imaging, while its inter-site variation was slightly higher than 3D MAPSS T2 imaging (10.06% as previously reported). This study also showed excellent reproducibility of longitudinal T1ρ and T2 cartilage quantification, in a multi-vendor multi-site setting for both product 2D MESE T2 and 3D MAPSS T1p/T2 research sequences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Lartey
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - A Nanavati
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - J Kim
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - M Li
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - K Xu
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - K Nakamura
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - W Shin
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - C S Winalski
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - N Obuchowski
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA
| | - E Bahroos
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), CA, USA
| | - T M Link
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco (UCSF), CA, USA
| | - P A Hardy
- Department of Radiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington KY, USA
| | - Q Peng
- Department of Radiology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine and Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - J Kim
- Arthritis Foundation, GA, USA
| | - K Liu
- Siemens Medical Solution Inc., USA
| | - M Fung
- GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA
| | - C Wu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - X Li
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xie D, Murray J, Lartey R, Gaj S, Kim J, Li M, Eck BL, Winalski CS, Altahawi F, Jones MH, Obuchowski NA, Huston LJ, Harkins KD, Friel HT, Damon BM, Knopp MV, Kaeding CC, Spindler KP, Li X. Multi-vendor multi-site quantitative MRI analysis of cartilage degeneration 10 Years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: MOON-MRI protocol and preliminary results. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2022; 30:1647-1657. [PMID: 36049665 PMCID: PMC9671830 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2022.08.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/08/2022] [Revised: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe the protocol of a multi-vendor, multi-site quantitative MRI study for knee post-traumatic osteoarthritis (PTOA), and to present preliminary results of cartilage degeneration using MR T1ρ and T2 imaging 10 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). DESIGN This study involves three sites and two MR platforms. The patients are from a nested cohort (termed as Onsite cohort) within the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) cohort 10 years after ACLR. Phantoms and controls were scanned for evaluating reproducibility. Cartilage was automatically segmented, and T1ρ and T2 were compared between operated, contralateral, and control knees. RESULTS Sixty-eight ACL-reconstructed patients and 20 healthy controls were included. In phantoms, the intra-site coefficients of variation (CVs) of repeated scans ranged 1.8-2.1% for T1ρ and 1.3-1.7% for T2. The inter-site CVs ranged 1.6-2.1% for T1ρ and 1.1-1.4% for T2. In human subjects, the intra-site scan/rescan CVs ranged 2.2-3.5% for T1ρ and 2.6-4.9% for T2 for the six major compartments. In patients, operated knees showed significantly higher T1ρ and T2 values mainly in medial femoral condyle, medial tibia and trochlear cartilage compared with contralateral knees, and showed significantly higer T1ρ and T2 values in all six compartments compared to healthy control knees. The patient contralateral knees showed higher T1ρ and T2 values mainly in the lateral femoral condyle, lateral tibia, trochlear, and patellar cartilage compared to healthy control knees. CONCLUSION A platform and workflow with rigorous quality control has been established for a multi-vendor multi-site quantitative MRI study in evaluating PTOA 10 years after ACLR. Our preliminary report suggests significant cartilage matrix changes in both operated and contralateral knees compared with healthy control knees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- D Xie
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Orthopaedics, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China.
| | - J Murray
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - R Lartey
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - S Gaj
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - J Kim
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - M Li
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - B L Eck
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - C S Winalski
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - F Altahawi
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - M H Jones
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - N A Obuchowski
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - L J Huston
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - K D Harkins
- Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - H T Friel
- MR Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Highland Heights, OH, USA.
| | - B M Damon
- Departments of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA.
| | - M V Knopp
- Wright Center of Innovation in Biomedical Imaging, Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - C C Kaeding
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.
| | - K P Spindler
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - X Li
- Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA; Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Imaging Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kemnitz J, Steidle-Kloc E, Wirth W, Fuerst D, Wisser A, Eder SK, Eckstein F. Local MRI-based measures of thigh adipose tissue derived from fully automated deep convolutional neural network-based segmentation show a comparable responsiveness to bidirectional change in body weight as from quality controlled manual segmentation. Ann Anat 2021; 240:151866. [PMID: 34823014 DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2021.151866] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thigh intermuscular (IMF) and subcutaneous (SCF) fat are associated with joint function, inflammation and knee osteoarthritis. Fully automated segmentation from MRI is important to study the above relationship in larger cohorts. However, such algorithms are not clinically evaluated for longitudinal studies. Our aim was to evaluate a fully automated U-Net segmentation approach and its ability to detect longitudinal changes in thigh IMF and SCF during weight changes compared to manual segmentation. METHODS 103 Osteoarthritis Initiative subjects, were studied, 52 with> 10% weight loss, and 51 with> 10% weight gain over 2-years. Longitudinal change in IMF and SCF were determined from baseline and year-2 axial thigh MRIs using U-Net segmentation. The standardised response mean (SRM) was used as measure of sensitivity to change. RESULTS The U-Net took substantially less time (single-slice MRI:< 1 s) and IMF and SCF showed very similar sensitivity to change as manual segmentation: With an average weight gain of + 14%, we observed an + 12% /+ 26% increase in IMF / SCF (SRM=0.99 /1.03) using the U-Net, compared with + 21% /+ 27% (SRM=0.60 /1.07) for manual segmentation. During an average weight loss of - 18%, we observed an - 14% /- 22% reduction in IMF /SCF (SRM = - 1.04 /-1.20) using the U-Net, compared with - 16% /- 22% (SRM = - 0.70 /-1.23) for manual segmentation. CONCLUSION U-Net segmentation replicates longitudinal changes of IMF and SCF associated with weight changes with a similar sensitivity to change as manual segmentation. This method is applicable to large databases for studying relationships between IMF and SCF and various disease conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jana Kemnitz
- Department of Imaging and Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria; Faculty of Computer Science, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Eva Steidle-Kloc
- Department of Imaging and Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Wirth
- Department of Imaging and Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| | - David Fuerst
- Department of Imaging and Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| | - Anna Wisser
- Department of Imaging and Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| | - Sebastian K Eder
- Department of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, St. Anna Children's Hospital, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna; First Department of Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Felix Eckstein
- Department of Imaging and Functional Musculoskeletal Research, Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chalian M, Li X, Guermazi A, Obuchowski NA, Carrino JA, Oei EH, Link TM. The QIBA Profile for MRI-based Compositional Imaging of Knee Cartilage. Radiology 2021; 301:423-432. [PMID: 34491127 PMCID: PMC8574057 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
MRI-based cartilage compositional analysis shows biochemical and microstructural changes at early stages of osteoarthritis before changes become visible with structural MRI sequences and arthroscopy. This could help with early diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment monitoring of osteoarthritis. Spin-lattice relaxation time constant in rotating frame (T1ρ) and T2 mapping are the MRI techniques best established for assessing cartilage composition. Only T2 mapping is currently commercially available, which is sensitive to water, collagen content, and orientation of collagen fibers, whereas T1ρ is more sensitive to proteoglycan content. Clinical application of cartilage compositional imaging is limited by high variability and suboptimal reproducibility of the biomarkers, which was the motivation for creating the Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (QIBA) Profile for cartilage compositional imaging by the Musculoskeletal Biomarkers Committee of the QIBA. The profile aims at providing recommendations to improve reproducibility and to standardize cartilage compositional imaging. The QIBA Profile provides two complementary claims (summary statements of the technical performance of the quantitative imaging biomarkers that are being profiled) regarding the reproducibility of biomarkers. First, cartilage T1ρ and T2 values are measurable at 3.0-T MRI with a within-subject coefficient of variation of 4%-5%. Second, a measured increase or decrease in T1ρ and T2 of 14% or more indicates a minimum detectable change with 95% confidence. If only an increase in T1ρ and T2 values is expected (progressive cartilage degeneration), then an increase of 12% represents a minimum detectable change over time. The QIBA Profile provides recommendations for clinical researchers, clinicians, and industry scientists pertaining to image data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation and assessment procedures for T1ρ and T2 cartilage imaging and test-retest conformance. This special report aims to provide the rationale for the proposed claims, explain the content of the QIBA Profile, and highlight the future needs and developments for MRI-based cartilage compositional imaging for risk prediction, early diagnosis, and treatment monitoring of osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majid Chalian
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging
and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology–Roosevelt
Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (M.C.); Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI)
(X.L.), and Department of Biostatistics (N.A.O.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Mass (A.G.); Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery,
New York, NY (J.A.C.); Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine,
Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (E.H.O.);
European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (E.H.O.); and Department of Radiology and
Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Calif
(T.M.L.)
| | - Xiaojuan Li
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging
and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology–Roosevelt
Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (M.C.); Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI)
(X.L.), and Department of Biostatistics (N.A.O.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Mass (A.G.); Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery,
New York, NY (J.A.C.); Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine,
Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (E.H.O.);
European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (E.H.O.); and Department of Radiology and
Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Calif
(T.M.L.)
| | - Ali Guermazi
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging
and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology–Roosevelt
Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (M.C.); Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI)
(X.L.), and Department of Biostatistics (N.A.O.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Mass (A.G.); Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery,
New York, NY (J.A.C.); Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine,
Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (E.H.O.);
European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (E.H.O.); and Department of Radiology and
Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Calif
(T.M.L.)
| | - Nancy A. Obuchowski
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging
and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology–Roosevelt
Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (M.C.); Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI)
(X.L.), and Department of Biostatistics (N.A.O.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Mass (A.G.); Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery,
New York, NY (J.A.C.); Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine,
Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (E.H.O.);
European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (E.H.O.); and Department of Radiology and
Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Calif
(T.M.L.)
| | - John A. Carrino
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging
and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology–Roosevelt
Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (M.C.); Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI)
(X.L.), and Department of Biostatistics (N.A.O.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Mass (A.G.); Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery,
New York, NY (J.A.C.); Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine,
Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (E.H.O.);
European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (E.H.O.); and Department of Radiology and
Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Calif
(T.M.L.)
| | - Edwin H. Oei
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging
and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology–Roosevelt
Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (M.C.); Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI)
(X.L.), and Department of Biostatistics (N.A.O.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Mass (A.G.); Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery,
New York, NY (J.A.C.); Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine,
Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (E.H.O.);
European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (E.H.O.); and Department of Radiology and
Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Calif
(T.M.L.)
| | - Thomas M. Link
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging
and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology–Roosevelt
Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (M.C.); Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI)
(X.L.), and Department of Biostatistics (N.A.O.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Mass (A.G.); Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery,
New York, NY (J.A.C.); Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine,
Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (E.H.O.);
European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (E.H.O.); and Department of Radiology and
Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Calif
(T.M.L.)
| | - for the RSNA QIBA MSK Biomarker Committee
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Musculoskeletal Imaging
and Intervention, University of Washington, UW Radiology–Roosevelt
Clinic, 4245 Roosevelt Way NE, Box 354755, Seattle, WA 98105 (M.C.); Department
of Biomedical Engineering, Program of Advanced Musculoskeletal Imaging (PAMI)
(X.L.), and Department of Biostatistics (N.A.O.), Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland,
Ohio; Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston,
Mass (A.G.); Department of Radiology and Imaging, Hospital for Special Surgery,
New York, NY (J.A.C.); Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine,
Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands (E.H.O.);
European Imaging Biomarkers Alliance (E.H.O.); and Department of Radiology and
Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, Calif
(T.M.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kwoh CK, Guehring H, Aydemir A, Hannon MJ, Eckstein F, Hochberg MC. Predicting knee replacement in participants eligible for disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug treatment with structural endpoints. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2020; 28:782-791. [PMID: 32247871 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2020.03.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Revised: 03/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate associations between 2-year change in radiographic or quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) structural measures, and knee replacement (KR), within a subsequent 7-year follow-up period. METHOD Participants from the Osteoarthritis Initiative were selected based on potential eligibility criteria for a disease-modifying osteoarthritis (OA) drug trial: Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 or 3; medial minimum joint space width (mJSW) ≥2.5 mm; knee pain at worst 4-9 in the past 30 days on an 11-point scale, or 0-3 if medication was taken for joint pain; and availability of structural measures over 2 years. Mean 2-year change in structural measures was estimated and compared with two-sample independent t-tests for KR and no KR. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was estimated using 2-year change in structural measures for prediction of future KR outcomes. RESULTS Among 627 participants, 107 knees underwent KR during a median follow-up of 6.7 years after the 2-year imaging period. Knees that received KR during follow-up had a greater mean loss of cartilage thickness in the total femorotibial joint and medial femorotibial compartment on qMRI, as well as decline in medial fixed joint space width on radiographs, compared with knees that did not receive KR. These imaging measures had similar, although modest discrimination for future KR (AUC 0.62, 0.60, and 0.61, respectively). CONCLUSIONS 2-year changes in qMRI femorotibial cartilage thickness and radiographic JSW measures had similar ability to discriminate future KR in participants with knee OA, suggesting that these measures are comparable biomarkers/surrogate endpoints of structural progression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C K Kwoh
- University of Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona College of Medicine, Tucson, AZ, USA.
| | | | - A Aydemir
- EMD Serono Global Clinical Development Center, Billerica, MA, USA.
| | - M J Hannon
- University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| | - F Eckstein
- Institute of Anatomy & Cell Biology, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Ludwig Boltzmann Institute for Arthritis and Rehabilitation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany.
| | - M C Hochberg
- University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Böckelmann F, Hammon M, Lettmaier S, Fietkau R, Bert C, Putz F. Penile bulb sparing in prostate cancer radiotherapy : Dose analysis of an in-house MRI system to improve contouring. Strahlenther Onkol 2018; 195:153-163. [PMID: 30315483 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-018-1377-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/20/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to assess the reduction in dose to the penile bulb (PB) achieved by MRI-based contouring following drinking and endorectal balloon (ERB) instructions. PATIENTS AND METHODS A total of 17 prostate cancer patients were treated with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and interstitial brachytherapy (IBT). CT and MRI datasets were acquired back-to-back based on a 65 cm3 air-filled ERB and drinking instructions. After rigid co-registration of the imaging data, the CT-based planning target volume (PTV) used for treatment planning was retrospectively compared to an MRI-based adaptive PTV and the dose to the PB was determined in each case. The adapted PTV encompassed a caudally cropped CT-based PTV which was defined on the basis of the MRI-based prostate contour plus an additional 5 mm safety margin. RESULTS In the seven-field IMRT treatment plans, the MRI-based adapted PTV achieved mean (Dmean) and maximum (Dmax) doses to the PB which were significantly lower (by 7.6 Gy and 10.9 Gy, respectively; p <0.05) than those of the CT-contoured PTV. For 6 patients, the estimated PB Dmax (seven-field IMRT and IBT) for the adapted PTV was <70 Gy, whereas only 1 patient fulfilled this criterium with the CT-based PTV. CONCLUSION MRI-based contouring and seven-field IMRT-based treatment planning achieved dose sparing to the PB. Whereas the comparison of MRI and CT contouring only relates to external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) sparing, considering EBRT and IBT shows the improvement in PB sparing for the total treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Böckelmann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - M Hammon
- Department of Radiology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Maximiliansplatz 1, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - S Lettmaier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - R Fietkau
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - C Bert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
| | - F Putz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitätsstraße 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ruhdorfer A, Haniel F, Petersohn T, Dorrenberg J, Wirth W, Dannhauer T, Hunter DJ, Eckstein F. Between-group differences in infra-patellar fat pad size and signal in symptomatic and radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis vs non-progressive controls and healthy knees - data from the FNIH Biomarkers Consortium Study and the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2017; 25:1114-1121. [PMID: 28216313 PMCID: PMC5466837 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2017.02.789] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2016] [Revised: 01/15/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine cross-sectional and longitudinal between-group differences of infra-patellar fat pad (IPFP) size and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) signal from fat-suppressed intermediate-weighted images with clinically relevant symptomatic and radiographic progression of knee osteoarthritis (OA), vs healthy references. METHODS We studied 110 case knees (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade [KLG1-3]) with radiographic (≥0.7 mm loss in joint space width [JSW]) and symptomatic progression (≥+9/100 units on the Western Ontario and McMasters Universities Osteoarthritis Index [WOMAC] knee pain subscale) vs 118 control knees without progression from the Foundation for the National Institutes of Health (FNIH) Biomarkers Consortium cohort. We further studied 88 knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) healthy reference cohort without (risk factors) of knee OA. The IPFP was manually segmented using baseline and year-2 sagittal fat-suppressed intermediate-weighted spin-echo 3 T MRIs. Baseline measures and longitudinal change in IPFP volume and 3D MRI signal (mean, standard deviation [SD]) were compared between groups. RESULTS No statistically significant baseline differences in IPFP volume, 3D MRI signal mean or signal heterogeneity (SD) were observed between progressor and non-progressor OA knees. Yet, the IPFP 3D MRI signal SD, but not its volume, was statistically significantly greater in OA vs healthy knees. No statistically significant 2-year changes in IPFP volume were observed in either group, but the increase in 3D MRI signal heterogeneity (SD) was greater in progressor vs non-progressor knees, and was greater in OA vs healthy knees. CONCLUSION Whereas IPFP-related morphometric measures did not statistically significantly differ between groups, a stronger increase in 3D IPFP MRI signal and signal heterogeneity may be associated with radiographic/symptomatic progression of OA, when compared to non-progressive OA or healthy knees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anja Ruhdorfer
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg &
Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Franziska Haniel
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg &
Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Tobias Petersohn
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg &
Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jan Dorrenberg
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg &
Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Wirth
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg &
Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria,Chrondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| | - Torben Dannhauer
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg &
Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria,Chrondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| | - David J. Hunter
- Rheumatology Department, Royal North Shore Hospital & Institute
of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University of Sydney, Sydney,
Australia
| | - Felix Eckstein
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg &
Nuremberg, Salzburg, Austria,Chrondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eagle S, Potter HG, Koff MF. Morphologic and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of knee articular cartilage for the assessment of post-traumatic osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res 2017; 35:412-423. [PMID: 27325163 DOI: 10.1002/jor.23345] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2016] [Accepted: 06/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Orthopedic trauma, such as anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) disruption, is a common source of osteoarthritis in the knee. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a non-invasive multi-planar imaging modality commonly used to evaluate hard and soft tissues of diarthrodial joints following traumatic injury. The contrast provided by generated images enables the evaluation of bone marrow lesions as well as delamination and degeneration of articular cartilage. We will provide background information about MRI signal generation and decay (T1 and T2 values), the utility of morphologic MRI, and the quantitative MRI techniques of T1ρ , T2 , and T2 * mapping, to evaluate subjects with traumatic knee injuries, such as ACL rupture. Additionally, we will provide information regarding the dGEMRIC, sodium, and gagCEST imaging techniques. Finally, the description and utility of newer post hoc analysis techniques, such as texture analysis, will be given. Continued development and refinement of these advanced MRI techniques will facilitate their clinical translation. © 2016 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 35:412-423, 2017.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonja Eagle
- MRI Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Imaging-MRI, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, Room: BW-08G, New York, New York, 10021
| | - Hollis G Potter
- MRI Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Imaging-MRI, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, Room: BW-08G, New York, New York, 10021
| | - Matthew F Koff
- MRI Laboratory, Department of Radiology and Imaging-MRI, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, Room: BW-08G, New York, New York, 10021
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Link TM, Neumann J, Li X. Prestructural cartilage assessment using MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 45:949-965. [PMID: 28019053 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25554] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2016] [Accepted: 10/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Cartilage loss is irreversible, and to date, no effective pharmacotherapies are available to protect or regenerate cartilage. Quantitative prestructural/compositional MR imaging techniques have been developed to characterize the cartilage matrix quality at a stage where abnormal findings are early and potentially reversible, allowing intervention to halt disease progression. The goal of this article is to critically review currently available technologies, present the basic concept behind these techniques, but also to investigate their suitability as imaging biomarkers including their validity, reproducibility, risk prediction and monitoring of therapy. Moreover, we highlighted important clinical applications. This review article focuses on the currently most relevant and clinically applicable technologies, such as T2 mapping, T2*, T1ρ, delayed gadolinium enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC), sodium imaging and glycosaminoglycan chemical exchange saturation transfer (gagCEST). To date, most information is available for T2 and T1ρ mapping. dGEMRIC has also been used in multiple clinical studies, although it requires Gd contrast administration. Sodium imaging and gagCEST are promising technologies but are dependent on high field strength and sophisticated software and hardware. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 5 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2017;45:949-965.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas M Link
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Jan Neumann
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Xiaojuan Li
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kwee RM, Wirth W, Hafezi-Nejad N, Zikria BA, Guermazi A, Demehri S. Role of physical activity in cartilage damage progression of subjects with baseline full-thickness cartilage defects in medial tibiofemoral compartment: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2016; 24:1898-1904. [PMID: 27327782 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2015] [Revised: 05/21/2016] [Accepted: 06/11/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the association between physical activity and cartilage damage progression in medial tibiofemoral compartment (MTFC) using 2-year follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in subjects with denuded areas of subchondral bone (dABs) at the central weight-bearing medial femur (cMF) at baseline MRI examination. METHODS One hundred subjects from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) progression cohort with dABs at the cMF at 3T MRI at baseline (51% men; mean age 62.2 years, range 45-79) were included. Sagittal 3D dual-echo steady-state with water excitation images were used to assess 2-year MTFC cartilage change. Associations between 2-year average Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) and 2-year MTFC cartilage change were assessed by linear regression analysis. Subgroup analyses were performed. RESULTS No associations between PASE and 2-year MTFC cartilage change were observed in the entire cohort. Similarly, in the subgroup with cartilage loss during the 2 years, the non-refuted confidence intervals for the regression coefficients were tightly clustered around the null value (regression coefficients for: mean cMF.ThCtAB = -0.00059; 98.75% CI: -0.00130 to 0.00012), cMF.dAB% = 0.02176; 98.75% CI: -0.02514 to 0.06865, Mean MT.ThCtAB = -0.00013; 98.75% CI: -0.00064 to 0.00038, MT.dAB% = 0.02543; 98.75% CI: -0.01485 to 0.06571. CONCLUSION In the entire group of subjects with dABs at the cMF at baseline, no association between physical activity and 2-year MTFC cartilage change was detected. Due to the limited sample size of our study, small-sized effects may not have been detected in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M Kwee
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Radiology, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - W Wirth
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria; Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| | - N Hafezi-Nejad
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - B A Zikria
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - A Guermazi
- Department of Radiology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - S Demehri
- Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Layer-specific femorotibial cartilage T2 relaxation time in knees with and without early knee osteoarthritis: Data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). Sci Rep 2016; 6:34202. [PMID: 27670272 PMCID: PMC5037443 DOI: 10.1038/srep34202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2016] [Accepted: 09/09/2016] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based spin-spin relaxation time (T2) mapping has been shown to be associated with cartilage matrix composition (hydration, collagen content &orientation). To determine the impact of early radiographic knee osteoarthritis (ROA) and ROA risk factors on femorotibial cartilage composition, we studied baseline values and one-year change in superficial and deep cartilage T2 layers in 60 subjects (age 60.6 ± 9.6 y; BMI 27.8 ± 4.8) with definite osteophytes in one knee (earlyROA, n = 32) and with ROA risk factors in the contralateral knee (riskROA, n = 28), and 89 healthy subjects (age 55.0 ± 7.5 y; BMI 24.4 ± 3.1) without signs or risk factors of ROA. Baseline T2 did not differ significantly between earlyROA and riskROA knees in the superficial (48.0 ± 3.5 ms vs. 48.1 ± 3.1 ms) or the deep layer (37.3 ± 2.5 ms vs. 37.3 ± 1.8 ms). However, healthy knees showed significantly lower superficial layer T2 (45.4 ± 2.3 ms) than earlyROA or riskROA knees (p ≤ 0.001) and significantly lower deep layer T2 (35.8 ± 1.8 ms) than riskROA knees (p = 0.006). Significant longitudinal change in T2 (superficial: 0.5 ± 1.4 ms; deep: 0.8 ± 1.3 ms) was only detected in healthy knees. These results do not suggest an association of early ROA (osteophytes) with cartilage composition, as assessed by T2 mapping, whereas cartilage composition was observed to differ between knees with and without ROA risk factors.
Collapse
|
14
|
Eckstein F, Boudreau R, Wang Z, Hannon MJ, Duryea J, Wirth W, Cotofana S, Guermazi A, Roemer F, Nevitt M, John MR, Ladel C, Sharma L, Hunter DJ, Kwoh CK. Comparison of radiographic joint space width and magnetic resonance imaging for prediction of knee replacement: A longitudinal case-control study from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Eur Radiol 2016; 26:1942-51. [PMID: 26376884 PMCID: PMC4794411 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3977-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2015] [Revised: 04/27/2015] [Accepted: 08/10/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate whether change in fixed-location measures of radiographic joint space width (JSW) and cartilage thickness by MRI predict knee replacement. METHODS Knees replaced between 36 and 60 months' follow-up in the Osteoarthritis Initiative were each matched with one control by age, sex and radiographic status. Radiographic JSW was determined from fixed flexion radiographs and subregional femorotibial cartilage thickness from 3 T MRI. Changes between the annual visit before replacement (T0) and 2 years before T0 (T-2) were compared using conditional logistic regression. RESULTS One hundred and nineteen knees from 102 participants (55.5 % women; age 64.2 ± 8.7 [mean ± SD] years) were studied. Fixed-location JSW change at 22.5 % from medial to lateral differed more between replaced and control knees (case-control [cc] OR = 1.57; 95 % CI: 1.23-2.01) than minimum medial JSW change (ccOR = 1.38; 95 % CI: 1.11-1.71). Medial femorotibial cartilage loss displayed discrimination similar to minimum JSW, and central tibial cartilage loss similar to fixed-location JSW. Location-independent thinning and thickening scores were elevated prior to knee replacement. CONCLUSIONS Discrimination of structural progression between knee pre-placement cases versus controls was stronger for fixed-location than minimum radiographic JSW. MRI displayed similar discrimination to radiography and suggested greater simultaneous cartilage thickening and loss prior to knee replacement. KEY POINTS • Fixed-location JSW predicts surgical knee replacement more strongly than minimum JSW. • MRI predicts knee replacement with similar accuracy to radiographic JSW. • MRI reveals greater cartilage thinning and thickening prior to knee replacement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Eckstein
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg Austria & Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany.
| | - Robert Boudreau
- Department of Epidemiology, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Zhijie Wang
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh and Pittsburgh VAHS, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Michael J Hannon
- Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh and Pittsburgh VAHS, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jeff Duryea
- Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Wolfgang Wirth
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg Austria & Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| | - Sebastian Cotofana
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg Austria & Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| | - Ali Guermazi
- Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Imaging Core Lab (BICL), LLC, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Frank Roemer
- Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Imaging Core Lab (BICL), LLC, Boston, MA, USA
- Department of Radiology, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Leena Sharma
- Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - David J Hunter
- Royal North Shore Hospital & Institute of Bone and Joint Research, Kolling Institute, University Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - C Kent Kwoh
- Division of Rheumatology and the University of Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Li X, Pedoia V, Kumar D, Rivoire J, Wyatt C, Lansdown D, Amano K, Okazaki N, Savic D, Koff MF, Felmlee J, Williams SL, Majumdar S. Cartilage T1ρ and T2 relaxation times: longitudinal reproducibility and variations using different coils, MR systems and sites. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23:2214-2223. [PMID: 26187574 PMCID: PMC4663102 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.07.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2014] [Revised: 06/15/2015] [Accepted: 07/06/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the longitudinal reproducibility and variations of cartilage T1ρ and T2 measurements using different coils, MR systems and sites. METHODS Single-Site study: Phantom data were collected monthly for up to 29 months on four GE 3T MR systems. Data from phantoms and human subjects were collected on two MR systems using the same model of coil; and were collected on one MR system using two models of coils. Multi-site study: Three participating sites used the same model of MR systems and coils, and identical imaging protocols. Phantom data were collected monthly. Human subjects were scanned and rescanned on the same day at each site. Two traveling human subjects were scanned at all three sites. RESULTS Single-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.8% to 2.7% for T1ρ and 1.8-2.8% for T2. Significant differences were found in T1ρ and T2 values using different MR systems and coils. Multi-Site Study: The phantom longitudinal RMS-CVs ranged from 1.3% to 2.6% for T1ρ and 1.2-2.7% for T2. Across three sites (n = 16), the in vivo scan-rescan RMS-CV was 3.1% and 4.0% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. Phantom T1ρ and T2 values were significantly different between three sites but highly correlated (R > 0.99). No significant difference was found in T1ρ and T2 values of traveling controls, with cross-site RMS-CV as 4.9% and 4.4% for T1ρ and T2, respectively. CONCLUSION With careful quality control and cross-calibration, quantitative MRI can be readily applied in multi-site studies and clinical trials for evaluating cartilage degeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaojuan Li
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Deepak Kumar
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Cory Wyatt
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Keiko Amano
- University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Matzat SJ, McWalter EJ, Kogan F, Chen W, Gold GE. T2 Relaxation time quantitation differs between pulse sequences in articular cartilage. J Magn Reson Imaging 2015; 42:105-13. [PMID: 25244647 PMCID: PMC4369475 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24757] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2014] [Accepted: 08/28/2014] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To compare T2 relaxation time measurements between MR pulse sequences at 3 Tesla in agar phantoms and in vivo patellar, femoral, and tibial articular cartilage. METHODS T2 relaxation times were quantified in phantoms and knee articular cartilage of eight healthy individuals using a single echo spin echo (SE) as a reference standard and five other pulse sequences: multi-echo SE (MESE), fast SE (2D-FSE), magnetization-prepared spoiled gradient echo (3D-MAPSS), three-dimensional (3D) 3D-FSE with variable refocusing flip angle schedules (3D vfl-FSE), and quantitative double echo steady state (qDESS). Cartilage was manually segmented and average regional T2 relaxation times were obtained for each sequence. A regression analysis was carried out between each sequence and the reference standard, and root-mean-square error (RMSE) was calculated. RESULTS Phantom measurements from all sequences demonstrated strong fits (R(2) > 0.8; P < 0.05). For in vivo cartilage measurements, R(2) values, slope, and RMSE were: MESE: 0.25/0.42/5.0 ms, 2D-FSE: 0.64/1.31/9.3 ms, 3D-MAPSS: 0.51/0.66/3.8 ms, 3D vfl-FSE: 0.30/0.414.2 ms, qDESS: 0.60/0.90/4.6 ms. CONCLUSION 2D-FSE, qDESS, and 3D-MAPSS demonstrated the best fits with SE measurements as well as the greatest dynamic ranges. The 3D-MAPSS, 3D vfl-FSE, and qDESS demonstrated the closest average measurements to SE. Discrepancies in T2 relaxation time quantitation between sequences suggest that care should be taken when comparing results between studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Feliks Kogan
- Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Weitian Chen
- MR Applied Science Laboratory, GE Healthcare, Menlo Park, California, USA
| | - Garry E. Gold
- Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
- Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eckstein F, Le Graverand MPH. Plain radiography or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): Which is better in assessing outcome in clinical trials of disease-modifying osteoarthritis drugs? Summary of a debate held at the World Congress of Osteoarthritis 2014. Semin Arthritis Rheum 2015; 45:251-6. [PMID: 26142321 DOI: 10.1016/j.semarthrit.2015.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2015] [Revised: 04/23/2015] [Accepted: 06/01/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is the most common disease of synovial joints and currently lacks treatment options that modify structural pathology. Imaging is ideally suited for directly evaluating efficacy of disease-modifying OA drugs (DMOADs) in clinical trials, with plain radiography and MRI being most often applied. The current article is based on a debate held on April 26, 2014, at the World Congress of Osteoarthritis: The authors were invited to contrast strengths and limitations of both methods, highlighting scientific evidence on reliability, construct-validity, and correlations with clinical outcome, and comparing their sensitivity to change in knee OA and sensitivity to DMOAD treatment. The authors concluded that MRI provides more comprehensive information on articular tissues pathology, and that implementation of radiography in clinical trials remains a challenge. However, neither technique has thus far been demonstrated to be strongly superior over the other; for the time being it therefore appears advisable to use both in parallel in clinical trials, to provide more evidence on their relative performance. Radiographic JSW strongly depends on adequate positioning; it is not specific to cartilage loss but also to the meniscus. MRI provides somewhat superior sensitivity to change compared with the commonly used non-fluoroscopic radiographic acquisition protocols, and has recently provided non-location-dependent measures of cartilage thickness loss and gain, which are potentially more sensitive in detecting DMOAD effects than radiographic JSW or region-specific MRI. Non-location-dependent measures of cartilage thickness change should thus be explored further in context of anabolic and anti-catabolic DMOADs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Eckstein
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg & Nuremberg, Strubergasse 21, A5020 Salzburg, Austria; Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Joseph GB, McCulloch CE, Nevitt MC, Heilmeier U, Nardo L, Lynch JA, Liu F, Baum T, Link TM. A reference database of cartilage 3 T MRI T2 values in knees without diagnostic evidence of cartilage degeneration: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2015; 23:897-905. [PMID: 25680652 PMCID: PMC4444394 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2015.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2014] [Revised: 01/27/2015] [Accepted: 02/01/2015] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE 1) To establish a gender- and BMI-specific reference database of cartilage T2 values, and 2) to assess the associations between cartilage T2 values and gender, age, and BMI in knees without radiographic osteoarthritis or MRI-based (WORMS 0/1) evidence of cartilage degeneration. DESIGN 481 subjects aged 45-65 years with Kellgren-Lawrence Scores 0/1 in the study knee were selected. Baseline morphologic cartilage 3T MRI readings (WORMS scoring) and T2 measurements (resolution = 0.313 mm × 0.446 mm) were performed in the medial and lateral femurs, medial and lateral tibias, and patella compartments. To create a reference database, a logarithmic transformation was applied to the data to obtain the 5th-95th percentile values for T2. RESULTS Significant differences in mean cartilage T2 values were observed between joint compartments. Although females had slightly higher T2 values than males in a majority of compartments, the differences were only significant in the medial femur (P < 0.0001). A weak positive association was seen between age and T2 in all compartments, most pronounced in the patella (3.27% increase in median T2/10 years, P = 0.009). Significant associations between BMI and T2 were observed, most pronounced in the lateral tibia (5.33% increase in median T2/5 kg/m(2) increase in BMI, P < 0.0001), and medial tibia (4.81% increase in median T2 /5 kg/m(2) increase in BMI, P < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS This study established the first reference database of T2 values in a large sample of morphologically normal cartilage plates in knees without radiographic knee osteoarthritis (OA). While cartilage T2 values were weakly associated with age and gender, they had the highest correlations with BMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G B Joseph
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| | - C E McCulloch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| | - M C Nevitt
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| | - U Heilmeier
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| | - L Nardo
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| | - J A Lynch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| | - F Liu
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| | - T Baum
- Institut für Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, München, Germany.
| | - T M Link
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bloecker K, Wirth W, Guermazi A, Hitzl W, Hunter DJ, Eckstein F. Longitudinal change in quantitative meniscus measurements in knee osteoarthritis--data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Eur Radiol 2015; 25:2960-8. [PMID: 25801196 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-015-3710-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2014] [Revised: 02/18/2015] [Accepted: 03/05/2015] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to apply 3D MRI-based measurement technology to studying 2-year change in quantitative measurements of meniscus size and position. METHODS Forty-seven knees from the Osteoarthritis Initiative with medial radiographic joint space narrowing had baseline and 2-year follow-up MRIs. Quantitative measures were obtained from manual segmentation of the menisci and tibia using coronal DESSwe images. The standardized response mean (SRM = mean/SD change) was used as measure of sensitivity to longitudinal change. RESULTS Medial tibial plateau coverage decreased from 34.8% to 29.9% (SRM -0.82; p < 0.001). Change in medial meniscus extrusion in a central image (SRM 0.18) and in the central five slices (SRM 0.22) did not reach significance, but change in extrusion across the entire meniscus (SRM 0.32; p = 0.03) and in the relative area of meniscus extrusion (SRM 0.56; p < 0.001) did. There was a reduction in medial meniscus volume (10%; p < 0.001), width (7%; p < 0.001), and height (2%; p = 0.08); meniscus substance loss was strongest in the posterior (SRM -0.51; p = 0.001) and weakest in the anterior horn (SRM -0.15; p = 0.31). CONCLUSION This pilot study reports, for the first time, longitudinal change in quantitative 3D meniscus measurements in knee osteoarthritis. It provides evidence of improved sensitivity to change of 3D measurements compared with single slice analysis. KEY POINTS • First longitudinal MRI-based measurements of change of meniscus position and size. • Quantitative longitudinal evaluation of meniscus change in knee osteoarthritis. • Improved sensitivity to change of 3D measurements compared with single slice analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Bloecker
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg and Nuremberg; Salzburg, Strubergasse 21, A5020, Salzburg, Austria,
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Imaging of cartilage and bone: promises and pitfalls in clinical trials of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2014; 22:1516-32. [PMID: 25278061 PMCID: PMC4351816 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2014.06.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2014] [Revised: 05/22/2014] [Accepted: 06/22/2014] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Imaging in clinical trials is used to evaluate subject eligibility, and/or efficacy of intervention, supporting decision making in drug development by ascertaining treatment effects on joint structure. This review focusses on imaging of bone and cartilage in clinical trials of (knee) osteoarthritis. We narratively review the full-text literature on imaging of bone and cartilage, adding primary experience in the implementation of imaging methods in clinical trials. Aims and constraints of applying imaging in clinical trials are outlined. The specific uses of semi-quantitative and quantitative imaging biomarkers of bone and cartilage in osteoarthritis trials are summarized, focusing on radiography and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Studies having compared both imaging methodologies directly and those having established a relationship between imaging biomarkers and clinical outcomes are highlighted. To make this review of practical use, recommendations are provided as to which imaging protocols are ideal for capturing specific aspects of bone and cartilage tissue, and pitfalls in their usage are highlighted. Further, the longitudinal sensitivity to change, of different imaging methods is reported for various patient strata. From these power calculations can be accomplished, provided the strength of the treatment effect is known. In conclusion, current imaging methodologies provide powerful tools for scoring and measuring morphological and compositional aspects of most articular tissues, capturing longitudinal change with reasonable to excellent sensitivity. When employed properly, imaging has tremendous potential for ascertaining treatment effects on various joint structures, potentially over shorter time scales than required for demonstrating effects on clinical outcomes.
Collapse
|
21
|
Surowiec RK, Lucas EP, Ho CP. Quantitative MRI in the evaluation of articular cartilage health: reproducibility and variability with a focus on T2 mapping. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2014; 22:1385-95. [PMID: 24170187 DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2714-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2013] [Accepted: 10/08/2013] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Early diagnosis of cartilage degeneration and longitudinal tracking of cartilage health including repair following surgical intervention would benefit from the ability to detect and monitor changes of the articular cartilage non-invasively and before gross morphological alterations appear. METHODS Quantitative MR imaging has shown promising results with various imaging biomarkers such as T2 mapping, T1 rho and dGEMRIC demonstrating sensitivity in the detection of biochemical alterations within tissues of interest. However, acquiring accurate and clinically valuable quantitative data has proven challenging, and the reproducibility of the quantitative mapping technique and its values are essential. Although T2 mapping has been the focus in this discussion, all quantitative mapping techniques are subject to the same issues including variability in the imaging protocol, unloading and exercise, analysis, scanner and coil, calculation methods, and segmentation and registration concerns. RESULTS The causes for variability between time points longitudinally in a patient, among patients, and among centres need to be understood further and the issues addressed. CONCLUSIONS The potential clinical applications of quantitative mapping are vast, but, before the clinical community can take full advantage of this tool, it must be automated, standardized, validated, and have proven reproducibility prior to its implementation into the standard clinical care routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel K Surowiec
- Steadman Philippon Research Institute, 181 W Meadow Dr, Suite 1000, Vail, CO, 81657, USA,
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Eckstein F, Kwoh CK, Link TM. Imaging research results from the osteoarthritis initiative (OAI): a review and lessons learned 10 years after start of enrolment. Ann Rheum Dis 2014; 73:1289-300. [PMID: 24728332 DOI: 10.1136/annrheumdis-2014-205310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
The Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) is a multicentre, prospective, observational, cohort study of knee osteoarthritis (OA) that began recruitment in 2004. The OAI provides public access to clinical and image data, enabling researchers to examine risk factors/predictors and the natural history of knee OA incidence and progression, and the qualification of imaging and other biomarkers. In this narrative review, we report imaging findings and lessons learned 10 years after enrolment has started. A literature search for full text articles published from the OAI was performed up to 31 December 2013 using Pubmed and the OAI web page. We summarise the rationale, design and imaging protocol of the OAI, and the history of OAI publications. We review studies from early partial, and later full OAI public data releases. The latter are structured by imaging method and tissue, reviewing radiography and then MRI findings on cartilage morphology, cartilage lesions and composition (T2), bone, meniscus, muscle and adipose tissue. Finally, analyses directly comparing findings from MRI and radiography are summarised. Ten years after the first participants were enrolled and first papers published, the OAI has become an invaluable resource to the OA research community. It has fuelled novel methodological approaches of analysing images, and has provided a wealth of information on OA pathophysiology. Continued collection and public release of long-term observations will help imaging measures to gain scientific and regulatory acceptance as 'prognostic' or 'efficacy of intervention' biomarkers, potentially enabling shorter and more efficient clinical trials that can test structure-modifying therapeutic interventions (NCT00080171).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Eckstein
- Institute of Anatomy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria Chondrometrics GmbH, Ainring, Germany
| | - C Kent Kwoh
- Division of Rheumatology and University of Arizona Arthritis Center, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA
| | - Thomas M Link
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, UCSF, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Serebrakian AT, Poulos T, Liebl H, Joseph GB, Lai A, Nevitt MC, Lynch JA, McCulloch CE, Link TM. Weight loss over 48 months is associated with reduced progression of cartilage T2 relaxation time values: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014; 41:1272-1280. [PMID: 24700497 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.24630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2013] [Accepted: 02/20/2014] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess whether changes in knee cartilage MR-based T2 relaxation times are associated with weight loss in individuals with risk factors for knee osteoarthritis (OA) compared with controls with stable weight. MATERIALS AND METHODS One hundred twenty-seven individuals with risk factors for knee OA were studied: 62 subjects had a body mass index (BMI) decrease≥10% over 48 months and 65 controls had a BMI change <3%. Cartilage segmentation from five knee compartments at baseline and 48-month follow-up was performed, and T2 maps were generated. The association of change in T2 values over 48 months in the weight-loss group versus the control group was assessed using multiple linear regression models. RESULTS Weight loss was associated with significantly smaller increases in cartilage T2 in the medial femoral condyle (P = 0.035) and overall medial compartment (P = 0.006) compared with the controls. In a subgroup analysis comparing weight-loss subjects who were obese (BMI≥30 kg/m(2) ) and overweight (BMI 25-30 kg/m(2) ) at baseline, obesity was associated with smaller increases in cartilage T2 values in the medial femoral condyle (P = 0.022), lateral femoral condyle (P = 0.015), patella (P = 0.002), and globally across all compartments (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION A decrease in BMI of ≥ 10% was associated with a slower progression of T2 values in individuals with risk factors for OA, suggesting a beneficial impact of weight loss on cartilage matrix degeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arman T Serebrakian
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco
| | - Theresa Poulos
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco
| | - Hans Liebl
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco
| | - Gabby B Joseph
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco
| | - Andrew Lai
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco
| | - Michael C Nevitt
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - John A Lynch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - Charles E McCulloch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco
| | - Thomas M Link
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Baum T, Joseph G, Karampinos D, Jungmann P, Link T, Bauer J. Cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation time as non-invasive biomarker for knee osteoarthritis and cartilage repair procedures. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21:1474-84. [PMID: 23896316 PMCID: PMC3929642 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 142] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2013] [Revised: 06/21/2013] [Accepted: 07/17/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this work was to review the current literature on cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation time. METHODS Electronic searches in PubMed were performed to identify relevant studies about T2 relaxation time measurements as non-invasive biomarker for knee osteoarthritis (OA) and cartilage repair procedures. RESULTS Initial osteoarthritic changes include proteoglycan loss, deterioration of the collagen network, and increased water content within the articular cartilage and menisci. T2 relaxation time measurements are affected by these pathophysiological processes. It was demonstrated that cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation time values were significantly increased in subjects with compared to those without radiographic OA and focal knee lesions, respectively. Subjects with OA risk factors such as overweight/obesity showed significantly greater cartilage T2 values than normal controls. Elevated cartilage and meniscal T2 relaxation times were found in subjects with vs without knee pain. Increased cartilage T2 at baseline predicted morphologic degeneration in the cartilage, meniscus, and bone marrow over 3 years. Furthermore, cartilage repair tissue could be non-invasively assessed by using T2 mapping. Reproducibility errors for T2 measurements were reported to be smaller than the T2 differences in healthy and diseased cartilage indicating that T2 relaxation time may be a reliable discriminatory biomarker. CONCLUSIONS Cartilage and meniscal T2 mapping may be suitable as non-invasive biomarker to diagnose early stages of knee OA and to monitor therapy of OA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T. Baum
- Institut für Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany,Address correspondence and reprint requests to: T. Baum, Institut für Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany. Tel: 49-89-4140-2621; Fax: 49-89-4140-4834
| | - G.B. Joseph
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
| | - D.C. Karampinos
- Institut für Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany
| | - P.M. Jungmann
- Institut für Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany
| | - T.M. Link
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research Group, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
| | - J.S. Bauer
- Institut für Radiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany,Abteilung für Neuroradiologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Ismaninger Str. 22, 81675 München, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mosher TJ, Walker EA, Petscavage-Thomas J, Guermazi A. Osteoarthritis year 2013 in review: imaging. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21:1425-35. [PMID: 23891696 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2013] [Revised: 06/24/2013] [Accepted: 07/13/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To review recent original research publications related to imaging of osteoarthritis (OA) and identify emerging trends and significant advances. METHODS Relevant articles were identified through a search of the PubMed database using the query terms "OA" in combination with "imaging", "radiography", "MRI", "ultrasound", "computed tomography", and "nuclear medicine"; either published or in press between March 2012 and March 2013. Abstracts were reviewed to exclude review articles, case reports, and studies not focused on imaging using routine clinical imaging measures. RESULTS Initial query yielded 932 references, which were reduced to 328 citations following the initial review. MRI (118 references) and radiography (129 refs) remain the primary imaging modalities in OA studies, with fewer reports using computed tomography (CT) (35 refs) and ultrasound (23 refs). MRI parametric mapping techniques remain an active research area (33 refs) with growth in T2*- and T1-rho mapping publications compared to prior years. Although the knee is the major joint studied (210 refs) there is interest in the hip (106 refs) and hand (29 refs). Imaging continues to focus on evaluation of cartilage (173 refs) and bone (119 refs). CONCLUSION Imaging plays a major role in OA research with publications continuing along traditional lines of investigation. Translational and clinical research application of compositional MRI techniques is becoming more common driven in part by the availability of T2 mapping data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI). New imaging techniques continue to be developed with a goal of identifying methods with greater specificity and responsiveness to changes in the joint, and novel functional neuroimaging techniques to study central pain. Publications related to imaging of OA continue to be heavily focused on quantitative and semiquantitative MRI evaluation of the knee with increasing application of compositional MRI techniques in the hip.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T J Mosher
- Department of Radiology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lin W, Alizai H, Joseph G, Srikhum W, Nevitt M, Lynch J, McCulloch C, Link T. Physical activity in relation to knee cartilage T2 progression measured with 3 T MRI over a period of 4 years: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21:1558-66. [PMID: 23831632 PMCID: PMC3874212 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.06.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 71] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Revised: 06/12/2013] [Accepted: 06/17/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this study was to analyze the longitudinal association between physical activity levels and early degenerative cartilage changes in the knee, measured using T2 relaxation times over a period of 4 years in individuals without clinical or radiographic evidence of OA. DESIGN Cartilage T2 was measured at baseline and after 2 and 4 years in 205 subjects aged 45-60 years from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) incidence and normal cohorts with no knee pain (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score of zero), and a Kellgren Lawrence (KL) score of <2 at baseline. Physical activity was scored using the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE) questionnaire, which was obtained yearly over 4 years. The relationship between physical activity and T2 was studied using a mixed model linear regression, including random effects, and adjusted for age, sex, and body mass index (BMI). RESULTS T2 values for all PASE tertiles progressed over the 4-year period. T2 progression was increased in the highest tertile of physical activity compared to the mid-tertile at the medial tibia (MT) (P = 0.041), patella (Pat) (P = 0.019), and average T2 of all knee compartments combined (P = 0.033). Subjects with the lowest 15% PASE scores showed significantly higher T2 progression compared to the mid-level physical activity group at the lateral femur (LF) (P = 0.025), lateral tibia (LT) (P = 0.043), medial femur (MF) (P = 0.044), tibiofemoral compartment (P = 0.017), patellofemoral compartment (P = 0.016), lateral compartments (P = 0.003), and average of all compartments (P = 0.043). CONCLUSION High and very low PASE scores were associated with greater progression of cartilage T2 measurements in asymptomatic, middle-aged individuals, suggesting accelerated cartilage matrix biochemical degeneration over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W. Lin
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
| | - H. Alizai
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
| | - G.B. Joseph
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
| | - W. Srikhum
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
| | - M.C. Nevitt
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 5700, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
| | - J.A. Lynch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 5700, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
| | - C.E. McCulloch
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 5700, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA
| | - T.M. Link
- Musculoskeletal and Quantitative Imaging Research, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California San Francisco, 185 Berry Street, Suite 350, San Francisco, CA 94107, USA, Address correspondence and reprint requests to: T.M. Link, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, UCSF, 400 Parnassus Ave, A-367, Box 0628, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA. (T.M. Link)
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Urish KL, Keffalas MG, Durkin JR, Miller DJ, Chu CR, Mosher TJ. T2 texture index of cartilage can predict early symptomatic OA progression: data from the osteoarthritis initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2013; 21:1550-7. [PMID: 23774471 PMCID: PMC3779506 DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2013.06.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2012] [Revised: 05/10/2013] [Accepted: 06/05/2013] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is an interest in using Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) to identify pre-radiographic changes in osteoarthritis (OA) and features that indicate risk for disease progression. The purpose of this study is to identify image features derived from MRI T2 maps that can accurately predict onset of OA symptoms in subjects at risk for incident knee OA. METHODS Patients were selected from the Osteoarthritis Initiative (OAI) control cohort and incidence cohort and stratified based on the change in total Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) score from baseline to 3-year follow-up (80 non-OA progression and 88 symptomatic OA progression patients). For each patient, a series of image texture features were measured from the baseline cartilage T2 map. A linear discriminant function and feature reduction method was then trained to quantify a texture metric, the T2 texture index of cartilage (TIC), based on 22 image features, to identify a composite marker of T2 heterogeneity. RESULTS Statistically significant differences were seen in the baseline T2 TIC between the non-progression and symptomatic OA progression populations. The baseline T2 TIC differentiates subjects that develop worsening of their WOMAC score OA with an accuracy between 71% and 76%. The T2 TIC differences were predominantly localized to a dominant knee compartment that correlated with the mechanical axis of the knee. CONCLUSION Baseline heterogeneity in cartilage T2 as measured with the T2 TIC index is able to differentiate and predict individuals that will develop worsening of their WOMAC score at 3-year follow-up.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth L. Urish
- Corresponding Author: Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Division of Musculoskeletal Sciences, College of Medicine, The Pennsylvania State University, 30 Hope Drive EC089, Hershey, PA 17033. . Phone: 412.736.4261; Fax: 717.531.7583
| | - Matthew G Keffalas
- Department of Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 227C Electrical Engineering West, University Park, PA
| | - John R. Durkin
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, 533 Scaife Hall, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260
| | - David J. Miller
- Department of Electrical Engineering, The Pennsylvania State University, 227C Electrical Engineering West, University Park, PA
| | - Constance R. Chu
- Cartilage Restoration Laboratory, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, 3471 5 Avenue, Suite 911, Pittsburgh, PA, 15260
| | - Timothy J Mosher
- Department of Radiology, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, 500 University Drive, MC, H066, Hershey PA 17033
| |
Collapse
|