1
|
Ashare RL, Worster B, Nugent SM, Smith DM, Morasco BJ, Leader AE, Case AA, Meghani SH. Cannabis and opioid perceptions, co-use, and substitution among patients across 4 NCI-Designated Cancer Centers. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 2024; 2024:267-274. [PMID: 39108237 PMCID: PMC11303867 DOI: 10.1093/jncimonographs/lgad027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Revised: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Prescription opioids are used for managing pain in persons with cancer, however, there are socioeconomic and racial disparities in medication access. Cannabis is increasingly used for cancer symptom management and as an opioid alternative. Limited data are available about patterns of opioid and cannabis use among patients with cancer. We used survey data from 4 National Cancer Institute-designated cancer centers in 3 states (n = 1220) to assess perceptions, use of cannabis and opioids for pain, their substitution, and racial and ethnic differences in each outcome. Compared with White patients, Black patients were less likely to use opioids for pain (odds ratio [OR] = 0.66; P = .035) and more likely to report that cannabis was more effective than opioids (OR = 2.46; P = .03). Race effects were mitigated (P > .05) after controlling for socioeconomic factors. Further research is needed to understand cannabis and opioid use patterns and how overlapping social determinants of health create a disadvantage in cancer symptom management for Black patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca L Ashare
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychology, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Brooke Worster
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Shannon M Nugent
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Danielle M Smith
- Department of Health Behavior, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Benjamin J Morasco
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA
| | - Amy E Leader
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center at Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amy A Case
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Care, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Salimah H Meghani
- Abramson Cancer Center at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gibson LP, Ferrer RA, Meghani SH, Acevedo AM. Potential role of cannabis in ameliorating observed racialized disparities in cancer pain management. J Natl Cancer Inst 2024; 116:1019-1025. [PMID: 38471103 PMCID: PMC11223862 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djae058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Cancer-related pain affects a large proportion of all patients with cancer yet remains inadequately managed, particularly among patients from certain racialized backgrounds. Recently, there has been increased research and clinical interest in the use of medical cannabis for cancer pain management, including its potential to ameliorate race-based disparities in cancer pain control. Although medical cannabis is not currently a US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment option for cancer-related pain, many oncologists discuss and recommend its use with their patients, underscoring the need for researchers and clinicians to proactively identify barriers to cannabis for cancer pain management that may disproportionately affect patients from certain racial groups. In this commentary, we highlight challenges that patients from racialized backgrounds may face when incorporating cannabis into their palliative care regimens and discuss opportunities for researchers and clinicians to address these challenges should medical cannabis become a recommended treatment option for cancer pain management. In particular, we identify challenges at the structural (eg, lack of insurance coverage), clinician (eg, racialized stereotypes regarding addiction and pain), and individual (eg, internalized stigma) levels and emphasize the importance of multilevel approaches in combating these challenges as the evidence base regarding medical cannabis and its potential harms and therapeutic benefits continues to accumulate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laurel P Gibson
- Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
| | - Rebecca A Ferrer
- Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| | - Salimah H Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Amanda M Acevedo
- Basic Biobehavioral and Psychological Sciences Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yamamoto Y, Yamamoto S, Tsuge T, Urano K, Matsuura K. Analysis of Nausea and Vomiting Frequency Following Opioid Dose Escalation and Its Risk Factors: A Single-Center Retrospective Observational Study. J Palliat Med 2024; 27:301-306. [PMID: 37733255 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2023.0314] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and Objective: Opioid-induced nausea and vomiting (OINV) is known to develop not only upon opioid introduction but also during opioid dose escalation, but the actual details are unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the frequency of OINV in opioid dose escalation at a single center and to identify risk factors. Methods: A retrospective analysis of the medical records of hospitalized patients with cancer who underwent increased intake of oral oxycodone extended-release tablets at Komaki City Hospital between January 2016 and December 2019 was performed. Associations between the incidence of OINV and multiple factors were analyzed, including patient demographics, opioid daily dose, comorbidities, history of nausea after opioid introduction, and prophylactic antiemetic drugs. Results: Of the 132 patients analyzed, 56 (42.4%; grades 1 and 2, 36 and 20, respectively) developed opioid-induced nausea after opioid dose escalation, 26 (19.7%; grades 1 and 2, 19 and 7, respectively) developed opioid-induced vomiting, 58 (43.9%) had either opioid-induced nausea or vomiting. Thirty-five of 60 patients (55.0%) developed OINV among those who received prophylactic antiemetic drugs at opioid dose escalation. Performance status (≥2) (odds ratio [OR]: 2.36, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.15-4.84, p = 0.02) and history of nausea for opioid introduction (OR: 2.92, 95% CI: 1.20-7.10, p = 0.02) were detected as risk factors for the development of OINV. Conclusion: This study revealed a high incidence of OINV during opioid dose escalation, indicating that careful monitoring is required as at the time of opioid introduction. Further validation by a prospective study is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Seiji Yamamoto
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Science, School of Pharmacy, Aichi Gakuin University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Taiga Tsuge
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Science, School of Pharmacy, Aichi Gakuin University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
- Department of Pharmacy, Ena Hospital, Ena, Gifu, Japan
| | - Kimihiko Urano
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Science, School of Pharmacy, Aichi Gakuin University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| | - Katsuhiko Matsuura
- Department of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Science, School of Pharmacy, Aichi Gakuin University, Nagoya, Aichi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yeager KA, Rosa WE, Belcher SM, Lee SM, Lee H, Bruner DW, Meghani SH. A Qualitative Study of the Pain Experience of Black Individuals With Cancer Taking Long-Acting Opioids. Cancer Nurs 2024; 47:E73-E83. [PMID: 36737858 PMCID: PMC10400728 DOI: 10.1097/ncc.0000000000001197] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Little is known about the experience of Black individuals with cancer taking long-acting opioids for cancer pain. OBJECTIVE This study aimed to describe the day-to-day experience of living with pain and the experiences of taking opioids for pain management among Black individuals with cancer prescribed with long-acting opioids. METHODS This qualitative descriptive study was part of a larger investigation focused on opioid adherence. Participants (N = 14) were interviewed using a semistructured interview guide. Analysis followed conventional content analysis and constant comparison approaches. Sociodemographics, clinical information, and the Brief Pain Inventory form were collected. RESULTS The majority of the subsample was female (64.3%), not married (78.6%), and with a median age of 52.5 years. Participants were taking either MS Contin (85.7%) or OxyContin (14.3%). The Brief Pain Inventory median "average" pain severity scores and pain interference scores were 5.1/10 (interquartile range [IQR] = 6.1) and 3.5/10 (IQR = 6.7), respectively. Three themes are reported from the analyses: desire for control, barriers to pain relief, and isolation versus connectedness. CONCLUSION Our findings highlight the persistent nature of moderate to severe cancer pain and how pain and its treatment interfere with patients' lives. The findings describe ways that patients learn to manage and exert control over pain despite conflicting attitudes and dealing with opioid stigma. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE Clinicians should partner with patients with cancer, especially people of color, who may experience intersecting stigmas related to their cancer pain and opioid use, to best provide an individualized and culturally sensitive pain treatment plan.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Yeager
- Author Affiliations: Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing (Drs Bruner, Yeager, and H. Lee and Ms S. Lee); Winship Cancer Institute (Drs Bruner and Yeager); Office of the Senior Vice President for Research (Dr Bruner), Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (Dr Rosa), New York, New York; School of Nursing (Dr Belcher); Palliative Research Center (Dr Belcher), University of Pittsburgh; Hillman Cancer Center, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (Dr Belcher), Pennsylvania; and Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania (Dr Meghani), Philadelphia
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Worster B, Meghani SH, Leader AE, Nugent SM, Jones KF, Yeager KA, Liou K, Ashare RL. Toward reducing racialized pain care disparities: Approaching cannabis research and access through the lens of equity and inclusion. Cancer 2024; 130:497-504. [PMID: 37941524 PMCID: PMC11212108 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
There is growing interest in cannabis use for cancer pain. This commentary aims to discuss the evidence surrounding cannabis use for cancer pain in the context of the long-racialized landscape of cannabis policies and the disparity in pain control among cancer patients holding minoritized racial identities. Much evidence surrounding both the benefits and harms of cannabis use in cancer patients, and all patients in general, is lacking. Although drawing on the research in cancer that is available, it is also important to illustrate the broader context about how cannabis' deep roots in medical, political, and social history impact patient use and health care policies. There are lessons we can learn from the racialized disparities in opioid risk mitigation strategies, so they are not replicated in the settings of cannabis for cancer symptom management. Additionally, the authors intentionally use the term "cannabis" here rather than "marijuana.: In the early 1900s, the lay press and government popularized the use of the word "marijuana" instead of the more common "cannabis" to tie the drug to anti-Mexican prejudice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke Worster
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Salimah H Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Science, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Amy E Leader
- Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Jefferson Health, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Shannon M Nugent
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
- Knight Cancer Institution, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Katie Fitzgerald Jones
- Center for Aging and Serious Illness, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Katherine A Yeager
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Kevin Liou
- Integrative Medicine Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Rebecca L Ashare
- Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Meghani SH, Quinn R, Robinson A, Chittams J, Vapiwala N, Naylor M, Cheatle M, Knafl GJ. Trajectories and predictors of high-occurrence pain flares in ambulatory cancer patients on opioids. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2024; 8:pkae003. [PMID: 38268502 PMCID: PMC10880071 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkae003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 01/26/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain flares have a substantive impact on the quality of life and well-being of patients with cancer. We identified longitudinal trajectories (clusters) of cancer pain flares in ambulatory patients and sociodemographic and clinical predictors of these trajectories. METHODS In a prospective cohort study using ecological momentary assessment (mEMA), we collected patient-reported daily pain flare ratings data over 5 months and identified predictors and correlates using validated measures. RESULTS The mean age of the sample (N = 270) was 60.9 years (SD = 11.2), 64.8% were female, and 32.6% self-identified as African American. Four pain flare clusters were identified. The "high-occurrence" cluster (23% of patients) experienced 5.5 (SD = 5.47) daily flares, whereas low-moderate clusters (77%) reported 2.4 (SD = 2.74) daily flares (P < .000). Those in the high-occurrence cluster reported higher pain scores (P = .000), increased pain-related interference (P = .000), depressive symptoms (P = .023), lower quality of life (P = .001), and reduced pain self-efficacy (P = .006). Notably, 67.2% of those prescribed opioids as needed (PRN only) were in the high-occurrence pain flare cluster, compared with 27.9% with PRN and around-the-clock opioid prescriptions (P = .024). Individual predictors of high-occurrence pain flares were income below $30 000, unemployment, being African American, lower education level, Medicaid insurance, current opioid misuse (COMM), baseline inpatient hospital stay duration, and PRN-only opioid regimen. In the multiple predictor model, lower education level, unemployment, COMM score, extended inpatient duration, and PRN-only opioid regimen remained significant. CONCLUSION In ambulatory patients with cancer, high occurrence of pain flares may be mitigated by attention to opioid prescription factors and addressing social determinants of health needs of underserved patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salimah H Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences; NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryan Quinn
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences; NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Robinson
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences; NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jesse Chittams
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences; NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Neha Vapiwala
- Abramson Cancer Center, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mary Naylor
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences; NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Martin Cheatle
- Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - George J Knafl
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Munir MM, Woldesenbet S, Endo Y, Ejaz A, Cloyd JM, Obeng-Gyasi S, Dillhoff M, Waterman B, Gustin J, Pawlik TM. Association of Race/Ethnicity, Persistent Poverty, and Opioid Access Among Patients with Gastrointestinal Cancer Near the End of Life. Ann Surg Oncol 2023; 30:8548-8558. [PMID: 37667099 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14218-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 08/08/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social determinants of health (SDoH) can impact access to healthcare. We sought to assess the association between persistent poverty (PP), race/ethnicity, and opioid access among patients with gastrointestinal cancer near the end-of-life (EOL). METHODS SEER-Medicare patients with gastric, liver, pancreatic, biliary, colon, and rectal cancer were identified between 2008 and 2016 near EOL, defined as 30 days before death or hospice enrolment. Data were linked with county-level poverty from the American Community Survey and the US Department of Agriculture (2000-2015). Counties were categorized as never high-poverty (NHP), intermittent high-poverty (IHP) and persistent poverty (PP). Trends in opioid prescription fills and daily dosages (morphine milligram equivalents per day) were examined. RESULTS Among 48,631 Medicare beneficiaries (liver: n = 6551, 13.5%; pancreas: n = 13,559, 27.9%; gastric: n = 5486, 1.3%; colorectal: n = 23,035, 47.4%), there was a steady decrease in opioid prescriptions near EOL. Black, Asian, Hispanic, and other racial groups had markedly decreased odds of filling an opioid prescription near EOL (Black: OR 0.84, 95% CI 0.79-0.90; Asian: OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.79-0.94; Hispanic: OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.84-0.95; Other: OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93; all p < 0.05). Even after filling an opioid prescription, this subset of patients received lower daily doses versus White patients (Black: -16.5 percentage points, 95% CI -21.2 to -11.6; Asian: -11.9 percentage points, 95% CI -18.5 to -4.9; Hispanic: -19.1 percentage points, 95%CI -23.5 to -14.6; all p < 0.05). The disparity in opioid access and average daily doses among was attenuated in IHP/PP areas for Asian, Hispanic, and other racial groups, yet exacerbated among Black patients. CONCLUSIONS Race/ethnicity-based disparities in EOL pain management persist with SDoH-based variations in EOL opioid use. In particular, PP impacted EOL opioid access and utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Selamawit Woldesenbet
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan M Cloyd
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Samilia Obeng-Gyasi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brittany Waterman
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jillian Gustin
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, The Urban Meyer III and Shelley Meyer Chair for Cancer Research, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Blue B, Pierre A, Mikhael J. Culturally Responsive Care Delivery in Oncology: The Example of Multiple Myeloma. CLINICAL LYMPHOMA, MYELOMA & LEUKEMIA 2023; 23:651-659. [PMID: 37290997 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) represents ∼1% of all cancers and is the second most common hematologic malignancy worldwide. The incidence of MM is at least two times higher in Blacks/African Americans compared with their White counterparts, and Hispanics/Latinxs are among the youngest patients diagnosed with the disease. Recent advances in available treatments for MM have demonstrated significant improvement in survival outcomes; however, patients from non-White racial/ethnic groups clinically benefit less due to multiple factors including access to care, socioeconomic status, medical mistrust, underutilization of novel therapies, and exclusion from clinical trials. Health inequities in disease characteristics and risk factors based on race also contribute to inequities in outcomes. In this review, we highlight racial/ethnic factors as well as structural barriers attributed to variations in MM epidemiology and management. We focus on three populations-Black/African American, Hispanic/Latinx, and American Indian/Alaska Native-and review factors that healthcare professionals may consider when treating patients of color. We offer tangible advice for healthcare professionals on how to incorporate cultural humility into their practice by following the five key steps: establishing trust, respecting cultural diversity, undergoing cross-cultural training, counseling patients on appropriate available clinical trial options, and connecting patients to community resources. The outlined recommendations will help the medical community to better understand and apply the important concept of cultural humility into their practice to provide the best care for all their patients, regardless of race/ethnicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon Blue
- H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Department of Malignant Hematology, Tampa, FL.
| | - Amy Pierre
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Division of Multiple Myeloma and Lymphoma, Montvale, NJ; Flatiron Health, Division of Research Oncology and Real World Evidence, New York, NY
| | - Joseph Mikhael
- Translational Genomics Research Institute, City of Hope Cancer Center, Phoenix, AZ; International Myeloma Foundation, Chief Medical Officer, Studio City, CA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Enzinger AC, Ghosh K, Keating NL, Cutler DM, Clark CR, Florez N, Landrum MB, Wright AA. Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Opioid Access and Urine Drug Screening Among Older Patients With Poor-Prognosis Cancer Near the End of Life. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:2511-2522. [PMID: 36626695 PMCID: PMC10414726 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.01413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 19.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2022] [Revised: 10/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To characterize racial and ethnic disparities and trends in opioid access and urine drug screening (UDS) among patients dying of cancer, and to explore potential mechanisms. METHODS Among 318,549 non-Hispanic White (White), Black, and Hispanic Medicare decedents older than 65 years with poor-prognosis cancers, we examined 2007-2019 trends in opioid prescription fills and potency (morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs] per day [MMEDs]) near the end of life (EOL), defined as 30 days before death or hospice enrollment. We estimated the effects of race and ethnicity on opioid access, controlling for demographic and clinical factors. Models were further adjusted for socioeconomic factors including dual-eligibility status, community-level deprivation, and rurality. We similarly explored disparities in UDS. RESULTS Between 2007 and 2019, White, Black, and Hispanic decedents experienced steady declines in EOL opioid access and rapid expansion of UDS. Compared with White patients, Black and Hispanic patients were less likely to receive any opioid (Black, -4.3 percentage points, 95% CI, -4.8 to -3.6; Hispanic, -3.6 percentage points, 95% CI, -4.4 to -2.9) and long-acting opioids (Black, -3.1 percentage points, 95% CI, -3.6 to -2.8; Hispanic, -2.2 percentage points, 95% CI, -2.7 to -1.7). They also received lower daily doses (Black, -10.5 MMED, 95% CI, -12.8 to -8.2; Hispanic, -9.1 MMED, 95% CI, -12.1 to -6.1) and lower total doses (Black, -210 MMEs, 95% CI, -293 to -207; Hispanic, -179 MMEs, 95% CI, -217 to -142); Black patients were also more likely to undergo UDS (0.5 percentage points; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.8). Disparities in EOL opioid access and UDS disproportionately affected Black men. Adjustment for socioeconomic factors did not attenuate the EOL opioid access disparities. CONCLUSION There are substantial and persistent racial and ethnic inequities in opioid access among older patients dying of cancer, which are not mediated by socioeconomic variables.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea C. Enzinger
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Kaushik Ghosh
- New England Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
| | - Nancy L. Keating
- Department of Healthcare Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - David M. Cutler
- New England Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA
- Department of Healthcare Policy, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
- Department of Economics, Harvard University, Boston, MA
- Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health (DMC), Boston, MA
| | - Cheryl R. Clark
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Primary Care, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Narjust Florez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Alexi A. Wright
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Azizoddin DR, Beck M, Flowers KM, Wilson JM, Chai P, Johnsky L, Cremone G, Edwards R, Hasdianda A, Boyer E, Schreiber KL. Psychological Evaluation of Patients With Cancer Presenting to the Emergency Department With Pain: Independent Predictors of Worse Pain Severity, Interference, and Higher Hourly Opioid Administration. JCO Oncol Pract 2022; 18:e1648-e1660. [PMID: 35994699 PMCID: PMC9810145 DOI: 10.1200/op.22.00142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 06/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Pain is a common complaint in patients with cancer presenting to the emergency department (ED). This prospective study evaluated whether biopsychosocial factors could help predict cancer patients with risk of higher pain severity, pain interference, and opioid consumption. METHODS Patients with cancer presenting to the ED with a complaint of moderate-severe pain (≥ 4/10-numeric rating scale) completed validated self-report measures assessing sociodemographics, cancer-related treatments, pain severity and interference, medication use, and psychological symptoms (depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, and sleep disturbance). Opioids administered and subsequent hospitalization were abstracted. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses assessed factors associated with pain-related outcomes. RESULTS Participants (n = 175) presented with a variety of cancer types, with 76% having metastatic disease and 42% reporting current outpatient opioid use. Higher pain catastrophizing, lower depressive symptoms, lower income, outpatient opioid use, and historical chronic pain were independently associated with worse pain (P ≤ .05). Higher pain catastrophizing, anxiety, sleep disturbance, outpatient opioid use, and education were independently associated with worse pain interference (P ≤ .05). The sole independent predictor of ED opioid administration was outpatient opioid use. Patients taking outpatient opioids were younger, had lower health literacy, worse pain catastrophizing, sleep disturbance, depression/anxiety, and greater rates of metastatic cancer and cancer-related surgery (P ≤ .05). CONCLUSION Biopsychosocial factors, particularly pain catastrophizing, remained significantly associated with worse pain outcomes for patients with cancer in the ED even after controlling for demographic and clinical variables. Patient outpatient opioid use was independently associated with worse pain, interference, and greater opioid administration, identifying this as a marker for who may benefit most from adjuvant pharmacologic and behavioral interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desiree R. Azizoddin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Health Promotion Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Meghan Beck
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - K. Mikayla Flowers
- Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Jenna M. Wilson
- Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Peter Chai
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
- The Koch Institute for Integrated Cancer Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA
- The Fenway Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lily Johnsky
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | | | - Robert Edwards
- Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Adriana Hasdianda
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Edward Boyer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Kristin L. Schreiber
- Department of Anesthesiology Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Janevic MR, Mathur VA, Booker SQ, Morais C, Meints SM, Yeager KA, Meghani SH. Making Pain Research More Inclusive: Why and How. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2022; 23:707-728. [PMID: 34678471 PMCID: PMC9018873 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2021.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 09/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/09/2023]
Abstract
Current knowledge about mechanisms and interventions for pain has largely been derived from samples that are healthier, wealthier, younger, and more likely to be White than the general population. Failure to conduct inclusive pain research not only restricts generalizability and application of findings, but also hampers the discovery of mechanisms and the development of measures and interventions that are valid across population subgroups. Most of all, inclusive practices are critical to ensure that underrepresented groups derive equitable benefit from pain research. Here, we provide guidance for the pain research community on how to adopt inclusive research practices. We define "inclusion" to encompass a range of identities and characteristics, including racialized group/ethnicity, disability status, gender identity, sexual orientation, and age. We first describe principles relevant to promoting inclusion in pain research, including attention to: 1) stakeholder engagement; 2) structural factors underlying inequities; 3) the limitations of "disparity" research; 4) intersectionality; and 5) universal design. Next, we provide checklists with practical strategies for making studies more inclusive at each stage of the research process. We conclude by calling for system-level changes to ensure that the future of pain research is socially just, scientifically productive, and responsive to the needs of all people. PERSPECTIVE: This paper offers guidance on promoting inclusion of underrepresented groups in pain research. We describe principles relevant to conducting more inclusive research; eg, attention to stakeholder engagement, structural factors, and universal design. We provide checklists with practical strategies for inclusion at each stage of the research process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Vani A. Mathur
- Department of Psychological & Brain Sciences, Texas A&M University
| | - Staja Q. Booker
- College of Nursing, Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science University of Florida
| | - Calia Morais
- Department of Community Dentistry and Behavioral Science, University of Florida
| | - Samantha M. Meints
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School
| | | | - Salimah H. Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences; New Courtland Center for Transitions and Health; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Jones KF, Laury E, Sanders JJ, Starr LT, Rosa WE, Booker SQ, Wachterman M, Jones CA, Hickman S, Merlin JS, Meghani SH. Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Delivering Antiracist Care to Black Americans. J Palliat Med 2022; 25:479-487. [PMID: 34788577 PMCID: PMC9022452 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Racial disparities, including decreased hospice utilization, lower quality symptom management, and poor-quality end-of-life care have been well documented in Black Americans. Improving health equity and access to high-quality serious illness care is a national palliative care (PC) priority. Accomplishing these goals requires clinician reflection, engagement, and large-scale change in clinical practice and health-related policies. In this article, we provide an overview of key concepts that underpin racism in health care, discuss common serious illness disparities in Black Americans, and propose steps to promote the delivery of antiracist PC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Esther Laury
- Louise Fitzpatrick College of Nursing, Villanova University, Villanova, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Justin J. Sanders
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Lauren T. Starr
- New Courtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - William E. Rosa
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Staja Q. Booker
- Department of Biobehavioral Nursing Science, University of Florida College of Nursing, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| | - Melissa Wachterman
- Section of General Internal Medicine, VA Boston Healthcare System, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Christopher A. Jones
- Department of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Susan Hickman
- Department of Community and Health Systems, Indiana University School of Nursing, Indiana University Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Inc., Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Jessica S. Merlin
- Section of Palliative Care and Medical Ethics, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Salimah H. Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- New Courtland Center for Transitions and Health, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Roberto A, Greco MT, Uggeri S, Cavuto S, Deandrea S, Corli O, Apolone G. A living systematic review to assess the analgesic undertreatment in cancer patients. Pain Pract 2022; 22:487-496. [PMID: 35014151 DOI: 10.1111/papr.13098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2021] [Revised: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
This living, systematic review aims to provide an updated summary of the available evidence on pain undertreatment prevalence in patients with cancer; correlations with some potential determinants and confounders were also carried out. We updated a systematic review published in 2014, including observational and experimental studies reporting the use of the pain management index (PMI) in adults with cancer and pain, from 2014 to 2020. We conducted searches in PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar. We performed univariate and multivariable regression analyses to describe the relationship between PMI and a list of potential explanatory variables. Twenty new papers were identified, yielding a total sample size of 66 studies. The proportion of patients classified as undertreated according to the year of study publication shows a higher decrease from 1994 to 2013 (-13% as relative change) than the most recent years 2014-2020 (-11%). The quality of the included studies has increased over the years (from 80% to 93%). At the multivariable analysis, a statistically significant relationship was confirmed between undertreatment and the year of the publication of the study and with a low-medium economic level of the countries where the studies were conducted. Despite the improvement when compared to the period 1994-2000,-still about 40% of the cases identified received an analgesic treatment inadequate to the intensity of pain, according to the PMI. Despite its intrinsic limitations, PMI continues to be widely used and it could allow a continuous monitoring of pain management across a different mix of studies and patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Roberto
- Traslational Research in Gynecology Oncology Unit, Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical Research, Oncology Departement, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Maria T Greco
- Pain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical Research, Oncology Departement, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Sara Uggeri
- Pain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical Research, Oncology Departement, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Silvio Cavuto
- Clinical Trials and Statistics Unit, Azienda USL di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Silvia Deandrea
- Prevention Department, Agency for Health Protection, Pavia, Italy
| | - Oscar Corli
- Pain and Palliative Care Research Unit, Laboratory of Methodology for Clinical Research, Oncology Departement, Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Apolone
- Scientific Directorate, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study aims to investigate racial-ethnic differences in reasons for misuse of prescription medications among a nationally representative sample of US adults. METHODS We analyzed data from the 2015-2019 National Surveys on Drug Use and Health. The study population includes US adults (18-49 years old) who reported misuse of 3 types of prescription drugs (stimulants [n = 6139], sedatives and tranquilizers [n = 5643], and pain relievers [n = 8780]) for 3 reasons: medical-only (eg, to help with pain), recreational-only (eg, to get high), or combined medical and recreational reasons. Multinomial logistic regressions assessed the association between reasons of misuse of prescription medications and self-identified race-ethnicity. RESULTS Misuse of the 4 types of prescription medications was primarily motivated by medical reasons (63%-80%). Compared to non-Hispanic Whites, non-Hispanic Blacks (nHB), and Hispanics (H) were less likely to report misuse of pain relievers for combined (nHB: adjusted relative risk ratio [aRRR] = 0.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.4, 0.7; H; aRRR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.5, 0.9) or recreational reasons (nHB: aRRR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.6, 1.0; H; aRRR = 0.7, 95% CI: 0.6, 0.9) rather than medical-only reasons. The odds of misuse of sedatives and tranquilizers for recreational-only reasons as opposed to medical-only reasons were higher among nHB (aRRR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.3, 2.7) and H (aRRR = 1.9, 95% CI: 1.4, 2.4) than among non-Hispanic Whites. CONCLUSIONS The increased misuse of prescription pain relievers for medical reasons among racial-ethnic minority groups demonstrates a continued need to investigate underlying structural factors driving these behaviors. The higher odds of sedative and tranquilizer misuse for recreational purposes among racial-ethnic minority groups warrant further investigation.
Collapse
|
15
|
Meghani SH, Quinn R, Ashare R, Levoy K, Worster B, Naylor M, Chittams J, Cheatle M. Impact of Cannabis Use on Least Pain Scores Among African American and White Patients with Cancer Pain: A Moderation Analysis. J Pain Res 2021; 14:3493-3502. [PMID: 34764689 PMCID: PMC8577564 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s332447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Based on many published reports, African American patients with cancer experience higher pain severity scores and lower pain relief than White patients. This disparity results from undertreatment of pain and is compounded by low adherence to prescribed non-opioid and opioid analgesics among African American patients with cancer. While nearly one in four patients use cannabis to manage cancer-related symptoms, less is known about how cannabis use influences pain relief in this patient population. METHODS This study is based on preliminary data from an ongoing study of longitudinal outcomes of opioid therapy among African American and White patients with cancer. Linear mixed-effects models were utilized to assess the interaction of race and cannabis use on pain relief using "least pain" item scores from the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) averaged across three time points. Models were adjusted for sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS This analysis included 136 patients (49 African American, 87 White). Overall, 30.1% of the sample reported cannabis use for cancer pain. The mean "least pain" score on BPI was 3.3 (SD=2.42) on a scale of 0-10. African American patients had a mean "least pain" score 1.32±0.48 units higher (indicating lower pain relief) than White patients (p=0.006). Cannabis use did not have a significant main effect (p=0.28). However, cannabis use was a significant moderator of the relationship between race and "least pain" (p=0.03). In the absence of cannabis use, African Americans reported higher "least pain" scores compared to Whites (mean difference=1.631±0.5, p=0.001). However, this disparity was no longer observed in African American patients reporting cannabis use (mean "least pain" difference=0.587±0.59, p=0.32). CONCLUSION These findings point to the possible role of cannabis in cancer pain management and its potential to reduce racial disparities. These findings are preliminary and further research into the role of cannabis in cancer pain outcomes is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salimah H Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Ryan Quinn
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Rebecca Ashare
- Department of Psychiatry, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Psychology, State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA
| | - Kristin Levoy
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Department of Community and Health Systems, School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA
- Center for Aging Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Brooke Worster
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Cancer Center, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Mary Naylor
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jesse Chittams
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Martin Cheatle
- Department of Psychiatry and Anesthesiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Azizoddin DR, Schreiber K, Beck MR, Enzinger AC, Hruschak V, Darnall BD, Edwards RR, Allsop MJ, Tulsky JA, Boyer E, Mackey S. Chronic pain severity, impact, and opioid use among patients with cancer: An analysis of biopsychosocial factors using the CHOIR learning health care system. Cancer 2021; 127:3254-3263. [PMID: 34061975 PMCID: PMC9981278 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.33645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2021] [Revised: 04/09/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the biopsychosocial underpinnings of chronic noncancer pain, relatively little is known about the contribution of psychosocial factors to chronic cancer pain. The authors aimed to characterize associations between biopsychosocial factors and pain and opioid use among individuals with chronic pain and cancer. METHODS The authors conducted a retrospective, cross-sectional study of 700 patients with chronic pain and cancer seeking treatment at an academic tertiary pain clinic. Patients completed demographic questionnaires and validated psychosocial and pain measures. Multivariable, hierarchical linear and logistic regressions assessed the relative contributions of biopsychosocial factors to the primary dependent variables of pain severity, pain interference, and opioid use. RESULTS Participants were 62% female and 66% White with a mean age of 59 ± 15 years, and 55% held a college degree or higher. Older age, African American or "other" race, sleep disturbance, and pain catastrophizing were significantly associated with higher pain severity (F(5,657) = 22.45; P ≤ .001; R2 = 0.22). Depression, sleep disturbance, pain catastrophizing, lower emotional support, and higher pain severity were significantly associated with pain interference (F(5,653) = 9.47; P ≤ .001; R2 = 0.44). Lastly, a poor cancer prognosis (Exp(B) = 1.62) and sleep disturbance (Exp(B) = 1.02) were associated with taking opioids, whereas identifying as Asian (Exp(B) = 0.48) or Hispanic (Exp(B) = 0.47) was associated with lower odds of using opioids. CONCLUSIONS Modifiable psychological factors-specifically sleep disturbance, depression, and pain catastrophizing-were uniquely associated with pain and opioid use in patients with chronic pain and diverse cancer diagnoses. Future behavioral pain interventions that concurrently target sleep may improve pain among patients with cancer. LAY SUMMARY Feeling depressed, worrying about pain, and bad sleep are related to higher pain symptoms in individuals with chronic pain and cancer. Specifically, those who struggle to sleep have worse pain and use more opioids. Also, individuals who have a bad prognosis for their cancer are more likely to be using opioid pain medications. Although race and cancer are related to chronic pain in patients, psychological well-being is also strongly related to this same pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Desiree R. Azizoddin
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Kristin Schreiber
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Andrea C. Enzinger
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Division of Population Sciences, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Valerie Hruschak
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Beth D. Darnall
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Robert R. Edwards
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Department of Anesthesiology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew J. Allsop
- Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - James A. Tulsky
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts,Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts,Division of Palliative Medicine, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Sean Mackey
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative Medicine, and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kwekkeboom K, Serlin RC, Ward SE, LeBlanc TW, Ogunseitan A, Cleary J. Revisiting patient-related barriers to cancer pain management in the context of the US opioid crisis. Pain 2021; 162:1840-1847. [PMID: 33337597 PMCID: PMC8119296 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000002173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Patient fear of addiction is a well-documented barrier to the use of analgesic medications for cancer pain control. Over the past 2 decades in the United States, an "opioid crisis" has arisen, accompanied by risk messages delivered through news outlets, public health education, and patient-provider communication. The purpose of this study was to determine if patient-related barriers to cancer pain management-specifically, fears of addiction-and related pain outcomes (pain severity, pain interference with daily life, and adequacy of pain management) have worsened over the last 20 years. A sample of 157 outpatients with active recurrent or active metastatic cancer completed the Barriers Questionnaire-II (BQ-II) and measures of pain and analgesic use. We identified 7 comparison studies published between 2002 and 2020 that reported patient-related barriers using the BQ-II. Significant linear relationships were found between later year of publication and greater fear of addiction (harmful effect subscale score, B = 0.0350, R2 = 0.0347, F1,637 = 23.19, P < 0.0001) and between year of publication and more pain management barriers overall (total BQ-II score, B = 0.039, R2 = 0.065, F1,923 = 73.79, P < 0.0001). Relationships between BQ-II scores (harmful effect and total) and pain outcomes did not change over time. Despite worsening in patient-related barriers, the proportion of patients with adequate vs inadequate analgesic use did not differ over time. Notably, 40% of participants reported inadequate analgesic use, a statistic that has not improved in 20 years. Additional research is necessary to clarify factors contributing to changing beliefs. Findings indicate a continuing need for clinical and possibly system/policy-level interventions to support adequate cancer pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristine Kwekkeboom
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, School of Nursing, Madison, WI, United States
| | - Ronald C Serlin
- Emeritus, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Educational Psychology, (Serlin), School of Nursing (Ward), Madison, WI, United States
| | - Sandra E Ward
- Emeritus, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Department of Educational Psychology, (Serlin), School of Nursing (Ward), Madison, WI, United States
| | | | - Adeboye Ogunseitan
- Northwestern University, School of Medicine, Evanston, IL, United States
| | - James Cleary
- Indiana University, School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Meghani SH, Persico AL, Fudin J, Knafl GJ. Gaps in the Use of Long-Acting Opioids Within Intervals of Consecutive Days Among Cancer Outpatients Using Electronic Pill Caps. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:687-693. [PMID: 32935134 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study describes individual cancer patients' nonuse of extended-release or long-acting (ER/LA) opioids, including periods of gap between opioid doses taken. DESIGN Secondary analysis of a three-month observational study of prescribed ER/LA opioids monitored using electronic pill caps. SETTING Two outpatient oncology clinics of a large health system in the Mid-Atlantic region. PARTICIPANTS Inclusion was based on self-identified African Americans and whites, at least 18 years old, diagnosed with solid tumors or multiple myeloma. For the current analysis, the additional inclusion criterion was prescription of an oral ER/LA opioid for cancer pain to be taken around the clock. METHODS The electronic monitoring period for each study participant was partitioned into intervals of days between days with one or more openings (using medication event monitoring systems) representing rates of ER/LA opioid nonuse over consecutive days and over time. RESULTS Of the sample (N = 109), two-thirds of the cancer patients had some nonuse of prescribed ER/LA opioids, with one in four having nonuse during 31.5-87.5% of their electronic-monitoring periods. Nonuse over periods of five or more, six or more, and seven or more consecutive days occurred for 37.6%, 34.9%, and 30.3% of the participants, respectively. CONCLUSIONS About one in three ambulatory cancer patients in this study had substantial gaps between days of ER/LA opioid use, potentially resulting in risk of overdose depending upon the prescribed ER/LA opioid type, dose, and length of the time the opioid was stopped and resumed at the previous dose. This phenomenon has received little to no attention in the opioid safety discourse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salimah H Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences; New Courtland Center for Transitions and Health; Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Jeffrey Fudin
- Samuel S. Stratton Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Albany, New York, USA.,Albany College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Albany, New York, USA.,Western New England University, Springfield, Massachusetts, USA.,Remitigate Therapeutics, Delmar, New York, USA
| | - George J Knafl
- The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Rosa WE, Riegel B, Ulrich CM, Chittams J, Quinn R, Meghani SH. The Association Between Analgesic Treatment Beliefs and Electronically Monitored Adherence for Cancer Pain. Oncol Nurs Forum 2021; 48:45-58. [PMID: 33337438 DOI: 10.1188/21.onf.45-58] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine whether clusters based on analgesic treatment beliefs among patients with cancer predict objective analgesic adherence. SAMPLE & SETTING 207 patients with cancer in the outpatient setting who were aged 18 years or older, self-identified as White or African American, were diagnosed with solid tumor or multiple myeloma, and were prescribed at least one around-the-clock analgesic prescription for reported cancer pain. METHODS & VARIABLES This study is a secondary analysis of an existing dataset. General linear modeling with a backward elimination approach was applied to determine whether previously identified analgesic treatment belief clusters, as well as sociodemographic, clinical, and pain variables, were associated with adherence behaviors. RESULTS Significant explanatory factors were experiential in nature and included sociodemographic, clinical, and pain-related variables, explaining 21% of the variance in analgesic adherence. Analgesic belief clusters were not predictive of adherence. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Future research should examine sociodemographic and other clinical factors, as well as the influence of analgesic treatment beliefs, to better understand adherence behaviors among patients with cancer.
Collapse
|
20
|
Design and conduct of confirmatory chronic pain clinical trials. Pain Rep 2020; 6:e845. [PMID: 33511323 PMCID: PMC7837951 DOI: 10.1097/pr9.0000000000000854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 08/07/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to provide readers with a basis for understanding the emerging science of clinical trials and to provide a set of practical, evidence-based suggestions for designing and executing confirmatory clinical trials in a manner that minimizes measurement error. The most important step in creating a mindset of quality clinical research is to abandon the antiquated concept that clinical trials are a method for capturing data from clinical practice and shifting to a concept of the clinical trial as a measurement system, consisting of an interconnected set of processes, each of which must be in calibration for the trial to generate an accurate and reliable estimate of the efficacy (and safety) of a given treatment. The status quo of inaccurate, unreliable, and protracted clinical trials is unacceptable and unsustainable. This article gathers aspects of study design and conduct under a single broad umbrella of techniques available to improve the accuracy and reliability of confirmatory clinical trials across traditional domain boundaries.
Collapse
|
21
|
Brooks JV, Poague C, Formagini T, Roberts AW, Sinclair CT, Keirns CC. Palliative Care's Role Managing Cancer Pain During the Opioid Crisis: A Qualitative Study of Patients, Caregivers, and Clinicians. J Pain Symptom Manage 2020; 60:1127-1135.e2. [PMID: 32645454 PMCID: PMC7680449 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.06.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2020] [Revised: 06/22/2020] [Accepted: 06/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT Patients with cancer face symptoms because of disease and treatment, and pain is common and complex. The opioid crisis may complicate patients' and clinicians' experiences of managing pain in cancer care. OBJECTIVES In our study of perceptions and experiences with palliative care (PC) at an outpatient cancer center, we examined communication around symptom management throughout cancer care, and pain and its management emerged as particularly salient. The objective of this article is to describe, from the perspectives of patients, caregivers, and oncology health care professionals, the role of PC in navigating the complicated dynamics of pain management amidst the opioid crisis. METHODS A qualitative descriptive study with grounded theory components was designed to investigate experiences with and perceptions of specialist PC and symptom management, including pain. Interviews were audiorecorded and transcribed, and focused coding identified themes related to pain and pain management from all three perspectives. RESULTS About 44 patients, caregivers, and non-PC health care professionals completed interviews. Patients with cancer and their caregivers had many concerns about pain management and were specifically concerned about opioid use and stigma. For patients, PC improved pain management and helped to destigmatize appropriate pain management. Oncology clinicians reported that partnering with PC facilitated complex pain management and also provided moral support around difficult opioid recommendations for patients. CONCLUSION PC offers the potential to uniquely support both patients and other oncology professionals in optimally navigating the complexity around pain management for cancer care in the midst of the opioid crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Veazey Brooks
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA.
| | - Claire Poague
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Taynara Formagini
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Andrew W Roberts
- Department of Population Health, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; University of Kansas Cancer Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Christian T Sinclair
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Carla C Keirns
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA; Department of History and Philosophy of Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Belcher SM, Watkins Bruner D, Hofmeister CC, Kweon J, Meghani SH, Yeager KA. Characterizing Pain Experiences: African American Patients With Multiple Myeloma Taking Around-the-Clock Opioids. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2020; 24:538-546. [PMID: 32945786 PMCID: PMC10432153 DOI: 10.1188/20.cjon.538-546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite known disparities by race, studies to date have not focused on pain characterization among African American patients with multiple myeloma. OBJECTIVES This study aimed to characterize the pain experience, beliefs about pain and pain control, and additional symptoms among African American patients with multiple myeloma taking around-the-clock opioids. METHODS This study employed secondary analysis of baseline data from a completed longitudinal study of opioid adherence. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize the sample, pain experience, beliefs regarding pain and pain control, and related symptoms. FINDINGS Participants (N = 34) experienced everyday pain and additional symptoms, and half experienced depression. Pain management barriers included dislike of pills, fear of addiction, and bothersome side effects from pain and medication. Additional larger studies can incorporate multilevel factors contributing to high symptom burden.
Collapse
|
23
|
Pierre A, Williams TH. African American Patients With Multiple Myeloma: Optimizing Care to Decrease Racial Disparities. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2020; 24:439-443. [PMID: 32678364 DOI: 10.1188/20.cjon.439-443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The incidence of multiple myeloma in African Americans is two to three times higher than in other ethnicities and is the leading hematologic malignancy in African Americans. Despite the high incidence of multiple myeloma in African American individuals, a vast majority experience delays in diagnosis and reduced usage of effective therapies, including stem cell transplantation, as well as low participation in clinical trials. Racial disparities, social and financial health disparities, and barriers to earlier access to care can lead to poorer patient outcomes. There are also unique characteristics in the disease manifestation in African Americans with multiple myeloma that are imperative for oncology nurses to understand and recognize to provide optimal care.
Collapse
|
24
|
Rosa WE, Meghani SH, Stone PW, Ferrell BR. Opportunities for Nursing Science to Advance Patient Care in the Time of COVID-19: A Palliative Care Perspective. J Nurs Scholarsh 2020; 52:341-343. [PMID: 32725813 PMCID: PMC7323245 DOI: 10.1111/jnu.12570] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 05/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- William E Rosa
- Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholar, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Salimah H Meghani
- Professor & Term Chair of Palliative Care, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Patricia W Stone
- Centennial Professor of Health Policy, Director, Center for Health Policy, Director, Center for Improving Palliative Care for Vulnerable Adults with MCC (CIPC), Columbia University School of Nursing, New York, NY
| | - Betty R Ferrell
- Professor and Director of Nursing Research, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rosa WE, Chittams J, Riegel B, Ulrich CM, Meghani SH. Patient Trade-Offs Related to Analgesic Use for Cancer Pain: A MaxDiff Analysis Study. Pain Manag Nurs 2020; 21:245-254. [PMID: 31648906 PMCID: PMC7170763 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.07.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 07/26/2019] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Many patients with cancer pain deviate from prescribed analgesic regimens. Our aim was to elicit the trade-offs patients make based on their beliefs about analgesic use and rank utilities (importance scores) using maximum difference (MaxDiff) scaling. We also investigated if there were unique clusters of patients based on their analgesic beliefs. METHODS This was a secondary analysis of a three-month, prospective observational study. Patients (N = 207) were self-identified African Americans and Whites, >18 years, diagnosed with multiple myeloma or solid tumor, and were prescribed at least one around-the-clock analgesic for cancer pain. MaxDiff analysis allowed us to identify patients utilities. Second, a cluster analysis assisted in ranking how analgesic beliefs differed by groups. Third, clusters were described by comparing key sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS Participants' beliefs were a significant factor in choices related to analgesic use (chi-square = 498.145, p < .0001). The belief, 'Pain meds keep you from knowing what is going on in your body', had the highest patient endorsement. Two distinct clusters of patients based on analgesic beliefs were identified; 'knowing body' was ranked as top priority for both clusters. The belief that cancer patients become addicted to analgesics was moderately important for both clusters. Severity of side effects was the only key variable significantly different between clusters (p = .043). CONCLUSIONS Our findings support tailored pain management interventions that attend to individual beliefs about cancer pain and analgesic use. Future research should explore the relationship between analgesic utilities, actual analgesic taking behaviors, and how they impact patients' cancer pain outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E Rosa
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - Jesse Chittams
- BECCA Lab, Office of Nursing Research, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Barbara Riegel
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Connie M Ulrich
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Salimah H Meghani
- University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Fear of analgesic side effects predicts preference for acupuncture: a cross-sectional study of cancer patients with pain in the USA. Support Care Cancer 2020; 29:427-435. [PMID: 32383073 PMCID: PMC8407756 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05504-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2019] [Accepted: 04/27/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Approximately one in two cancer patients globally are under-treated for pain. Opioids and other analgesics represent the mainstay of cancer pain management; however, barriers to their use are well-documented. We evaluated whether acupuncture would be a preferable treatment option among cancer patients with attitudinal barriers to pharmacological pain management. METHODS We conducted a cross-sectional survey of cancer patients at a tertiary urban cancer center and eleven suburban/rural hospitals in the Northeastern United States. We assessed attitudinal barriers to pharmacological pain management with the Barriers Questionnaire (BQ-13). The BQ-13 consists of two subscales: pain management beliefs and analgesic side effects. We also asked patients whether they prefer acupuncture, analgesics, or have no preference between these two modalities for pain management. Covariates included sociodemographics, clinical characteristics, and attitudes/beliefs about acupuncture. We used logistic regression to examine the association between attitudinal barriers and acupuncture preference. RESULTS Among 628 patients, 197 (31.4%) preferred acupuncture for pain management, 146 (23.3%) preferred analgesics, and 285 (45.4%) had no preference. The highest reported attitudinal barriers were fear of addiction and fear of analgesic-associated constipation and nausea. Adjusting for covariates, we found that attitudinal barriers related to fear of analgesic side effects were significantly associated with acupuncture preference (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.17-1.81), but barriers related to pain management beliefs were not (AOR 1.17, 95% CI 0.91-1.51). Attitudes/beliefs about acupuncture (i.e., greater expected benefits, fewer perceived barriers, and more positive social norms) and female gender also predicted acupuncture preference, whereas race and educational status did not. CONCLUSION Acupuncture may be a preferable treatment option among cancer patients at risk of inadequately controlled pain due to fear of analgesic side effects. Evidence-based integration of acupuncture and analgesics, guided by patient treatment preferences, represents an essential aspect of patient-centered care and has potential to address unmet cancer pain management needs.
Collapse
|
27
|
Rosa WE. Healthcare Decision-Making of African-American Patients: Comparing Positivist and Postmodern Approaches to Care. Nurs Sci Q 2020; 32:140-147. [PMID: 30888293 DOI: 10.1177/0894318419826255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Healthcare decision-making (HCDM) may be a potentially challenging time for any person. When considered against the backdrop of being a minority, experiencing disparate care based on racial bias, and confronting the implications of advanced serious illness, the practices and processes of HCDM become increasingly complex. The purpose of this paper is to consider the HCDM of African-American patients with advanced serious illness through the lens of positivism and postmodernism and to make the argument that postmodern nursing is the ideal ethical and equitable approach to HCDM. Postmodernism reengages nurses to consider HCDM of African-American patients with advanced serious illness as an individualized, contextualized, whole-person process, requiring all ways of knowing. A postmodern nursing approach may promote sustainable and human-centered health interventions that will reposition an often marginalized group to the center of practice, policy, and research progress.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William E Rosa
- 1 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Future of Nursing Scholar, University of Pennsylvania School of Nursing, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Cognition and Sociodemographic Determinants for Effective Pain Control in Patients with Cancer Pain: a Cross-sectional Survey in China. Curr Med Sci 2020; 40:249-256. [DOI: 10.1007/s11596-020-2167-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2020] [Revised: 03/15/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
|
29
|
Rosa WE, Riegel B, Ulrich CM, Meghani SH. A concept analysis of analgesic nonadherence for cancer pain in a time of opioid crisis. Nurs Outlook 2020; 68:83-93. [DOI: 10.1016/j.outlook.2019.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Revised: 06/20/2019] [Accepted: 06/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
30
|
Ludwick A, Corey K, Meghani S. Racial and Socioeconomic Factors Associated with the Use of Complementary and Alternative Modalities for Pain in Cancer Outpatients: An Integrative Review. Pain Manag Nurs 2020; 21:142-150. [DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.08.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 08/19/2019] [Accepted: 08/23/2019] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
31
|
Ma X, Lu Y, Yang H, Yu W, Hou X, Guo R, Wang Y, Zhang Y. Relationships between patient-related attitudinal barriers, analgesic adherence and pain relief in Chinese cancer inpatients. Support Care Cancer 2019; 28:3145-3151. [PMID: 31701270 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-019-05082-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2019] [Accepted: 09/16/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate patient-related attitudinal barriers and identify associated factors in Chinese cancer inpatients receiving opioids and to explore relationships between patient-related attitudinal barriers, analgesic adherence and pain relief. METHODS A cross-sectional study was conducted. A total of 146 participants completed face-to-face surveys, including information about demographics, the Barriers Questionnaire-Chinese (BQ-C), analgesic adherence, average pain and breakthrough pain in the past 24 h. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were performed to test the differences in the attitudinal barrier scores between the adherence and nonadherence groups, the complete and incomplete pain relief groups and the groups based on demographics. RESULTS The majority of participants in this study were men (67.8%), over half of all participants were less than 60 years old, gastrointestinal cancer (47.3%) was the most common diagnosis and 59 (40.4%) acquired comprehensive pain education from the last discharge guidance procedure. The total BQ-C mean (SD) score was 1.61 ± 0.94. A total of 87 (59.6%) patients with cancer pain were completely relieved. Most of the patients (73.3%) completely took analgesics by orders. There was no significant difference in the total BQ-C score between the adherence group and the nonadherence group (P > 0.05), but the difference was significant between the complete pain relief group and the incomplete pain relief group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION The findings of this study support unsatisfactory pain management and moderate analgesic adherence for Chinese inpatients. It is suggested that patient-related attitudinal barriers do not play an undermining role in pain management by negatively affecting patients' analgesic adherence. Conversely, patients' beliefs are more likely to be shaped by under treatment rather than as a cause.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoxiao Ma
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yuhan Lu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China.
| | - Hong Yang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Wenhua Yu
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Xiaoting Hou
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Renxiu Guo
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yun Wang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| | - Yaru Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education/Beijing), Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, No. 52 Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100142, China
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Meghani SH, Rosa WE, Chittams J, Vallerand AH, Bao T, Mao JJ. Both Race and Insurance Type Independently Predict the Selection of Oral Opioids Prescribed to Cancer Outpatients. Pain Manag Nurs 2019; 21:65-71. [PMID: 31501079 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmn.2019.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2019] [Revised: 07/12/2019] [Accepted: 07/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Previous research suggests that racial disparities in patients' reported analgesic adverse effects are partially mediated by the type of opioid prescribed to African Americans despite the presence of certain comorbidities, such as renal disease. AIMS We aimed to identify independent predictors of the type of opioid prescribed to cancer outpatients and determine if race and chronic kidney disease independently predict prescription type, adjusting for relevant sociodemographic and clinical confounders. DESIGN We conducted a secondary analysis of a 3-month observational study. SETTING Outpatient oncology clinics of an academic medical center. PARTICIPANTS/SUBJECTS Patients were older than 18 years of age, self-identified as African American or White, and had an analgesic prescription for cancer pain. METHODS Cancer patients (N = 241) were recruited from outpatient oncology clinics within a large mid-Atlantic healthcare system. RESULTS Consistent with published literature, most patients (75.5%) were prescribed either morphine or oxycodone preparations as oral opioid therapy for cancer pain. When compared with Whites, African Americans were significantly more likely to be prescribed morphine (33% vs 14%) and less likely to be prescribed oxycodone (38% vs 64%) (p < .001). The estimated odds for African Americans to receive morphine were 2.573 times that for Whites (95% confidence interval 1.077-6.134) after controlling for insurance type, income, and pain levels. In addition, the presence of private health insurance was negatively associated with the prescription of morphine and positively associated with prescription of oxycodone in separate multivariable models. The presence of chronic kidney disease did not predict type of analgesic prescribed. CONCLUSIONS Both race and insurance type independently predict type of opioid selection for cancer outpatients. Larger clinical studies are needed to fully understand the sources and clinical consequences of racial differences in opioid selection for cancer pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salimah H Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; NewCourtland Center for Transitions and Health, Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
| | - William E Rosa
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Jesse Chittams
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | | | - Ting Bao
- Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jun J Mao
- Bendheim Integrative Medicine Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Jefferson K, Quest T, Yeager KA. Factors Associated with Black Cancer Patients' Ability to Obtain Their Opioid Prescriptions at the Pharmacy. J Palliat Med 2019; 22:1143-1148. [PMID: 30883244 PMCID: PMC6735324 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2018.0536] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Black cancer patients experience pain. Barriers to opioid medications for pain may include geographic factors. This study examines neighborhood factors associated with difficulties receiving prescription opioids from pharmacies for black cancer patients. Design: A secondary data analysis of a study on opioid adherence was used to examine neighborhood-level and individual factors related to difficulties filling prescriptions for opioids. Setting/Subjects: Patients being treated for cancer pain with opioids (n = 104) were recruited. All self-identified as black, were 21 years or older, had cancer diagnoses, and had been prescribed extended release opioids. Measurements: A seven-item survey to identify problems filling opioids was completed by 98 participants along with a nine-item scale to assess perceived neighborhood characteristics. Scales of neighborhood amenities and neglect were created from the perceived neighborhood characteristics scale using principal components analysis. The 2009-2013 American Community Survey data were used to estimate the census tract percentage of non-Hispanic black residents, residents ≥25 years of age without a high school degree or equivalent, and households earning below the federal poverty level within the past 12 months. Results: Nearly 51% reported problems getting their opioids filled: 28% had to wait days and 24% had to return to the pharmacy multiple times. The main theme identified in analysis of an open-ended question was pharmacies not stocking medication. Neighborhood locations that rated higher on the amenities scale were protective for pharmacies sufficiently stocking opioids. Conclusions: Additional research on pharmacies sufficiently stocking opioid pain and neighborhood perceptions is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Jefferson
- Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Tammie Quest
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Hazard Vallerand A, Hasenau SM, Robinson-Lane SG, Templin TN. Improving Functional Status in African Americans With Cancer Pain: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Oncol Nurs Forum 2019; 45:260-272. [PMID: 29466352 DOI: 10.1188/18.onf.260-272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the efficacy of the Power Over Pain-Coaching (POP-C) intervention to improve functional status among African American outpatients with cancer pain.
. SAMPLE & SETTING 310 African American patients were recruited from an urban comprehensive cancer center. The study took place in the patients' homes.
. METHODS & VARIABLES A two-group randomized design with repeated measures was used. Data were analyzed with linear mixed effects regression analysis and structural equation change score models. Variables were pain, pain-related distress, functional status, perceived control over pain, and the following antecedents to control. RESULTS Functional status was improved in POP-C participants relative to control group participants (p < 0.05). Distress also was differentially decreased (p < 0.05). Pain intensity ratings decreased significantly in all patients (p < 0.05). The largest intervention effects were observed in the living with pain component.
. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING Perceived control over pain was strongly related to functional status and is amenable to interventions using the POP-C intervention components described in this article.
Collapse
|
35
|
Opioids and Cancer Pain Management in the United States: Public Policy and Legal Challenges. Semin Oncol Nurs 2019; 35:322-326. [DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2019.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
36
|
Wright EM, El-Jawahri A, Temel JS, Carr A, Safren SA, Park ER, Pirl WF, Bruera E, Traeger L. Patient Patterns and Perspectives on Using Opioid Regimens for Chronic Cancer Pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57:1062-1070. [PMID: 30831237 PMCID: PMC6557123 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.02.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
CONTEXT With increasing attention to the undertreatment of cancer pain in parallel with concerns about opioid misuse, little is known about how patients with advanced cancer adhere to opioid regimens for chronic cancer pain. OBJECTIVES We explored patient approaches to managing chronic cancer pain with long-acting opioids. METHODS In a multimethods study at an academic medical center, adult patients with chronic cancer pain (n = 17) used electronic pill caps to record adherence to prescribed long-acting opioid regimens. After eight weeks, patients viewed their adherence records and completed a semistructured interview about their opioid use. With a framework approach, we coded interview data (Kappa >0.95) and identified themes in how patients perceived and used opioids to manage cancer pain. RESULTS Patients (59% female; 94% non-Hispanic white; median age = 65 years) felt grateful about pain benefit from opioids yet concerned about opioid side effects and addiction/tolerance. Main reasons for nonadherence included both intentional decisions (e.g., skipping doses) and unintentional barriers (e.g., missing doses due to inconsistent sleep schedules). Overall, patients set their own opioid adherence goals and developed routines to achieve them. Residual pain varied and was not consistently linked with opioid adherence. CONCLUSION Patients commonly felt conflicted about using prescribed long-acting opioids to manage cancer pain due to concurrent perceptions of their risks and benefits, and they set their own parameters for opioid-taking practices. Intentional and unintentional deviations from prescribed opioid schedules highlight the need to enhance adherence communication, education, and counseling, to optimize the use of long-acting opioids as a component of cancer pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily M Wright
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Areej El-Jawahri
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Jennifer S Temel
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Alaina Carr
- Department of Psychology, University of Colorado Denver, Denver, Colorado, USA
| | - Steven A Safren
- Department of Psychology, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA
| | - Elyse R Park
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - William F Pirl
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Lara Traeger
- Massachusetts General Hospital Cancer Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Pain Burden and Pain Management in the Context of Opioid Overdose Risk. CURR EPIDEMIOL REP 2019. [DOI: 10.1007/s40471-019-00202-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2022]
|
38
|
Shields CG, Griggs JJ, Fiscella K, Elias CM, Christ SL, Colbert J, Henry SG, Hoh BG, Hunte HER, Marshall M, Mohile SG, Plumb S, Tejani MA, Venuti A, Epstein RM. The Influence of Patient Race and Activation on Pain Management in Advanced Lung Cancer: a Randomized Field Experiment. J Gen Intern Med 2019; 34:435-442. [PMID: 30632104 PMCID: PMC6420510 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-018-4785-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2018] [Revised: 08/30/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain management racial disparities exist, yet it is unclear whether disparities exist in pain management in advanced cancer. OBJECTIVE To examine the effect of race on physicians' pain assessment and treatment in advanced lung cancer and the moderating effect of patient activation. DESIGN Randomized field experiment. Physicians consented to see two unannounced standardized patients (SPs) over 18 months. SPs portrayed 4 identical roles-a 62-year-old man with advanced lung cancer and uncontrolled pain-differing by race (black or white) and role (activated or typical). Activated SPs asked questions, interrupted when necessary, made requests, and expressed opinions. PARTICIPANTS Ninety-six primary care physicians (PCPs) and oncologists from small cities, and suburban and rural areas of New York, Indiana, and Michigan. Physicians' mean age was 52 years (SD = 27.17), 59% male, and 64% white. MAIN MEASURES Opioids prescribed (or not), total daily opioid doses (in oral morphine equivalents), guideline-concordant pain management, and pain assessment. KEY RESULTS SPs completed 181 covertly audio-recorded visits that had complete data for the model covariates. Physicians detected SPs in 15% of visits. Physicians prescribed opioids in 71% of visits; 38% received guideline-concordant doses. Neither race nor activation was associated with total opioid dose or guideline-concordant pain management, and there were no interaction effects (p > 0.05). Activation, but not race, was associated with improved pain assessment (ẞ, 0.46, 95% CI 0.18, 0.74). In post hoc analyses, oncologists (but not PCPs) were less likely to prescribe opioids to black SPs (OR 0.24, 95% CI 0.07, 0.81). CONCLUSIONS Neither race nor activation was associated with opioid prescribing; activation was associated with better pain assessment. In post hoc analyses, oncologists were less likely to prescribe opioids to black male SPs than white male SPs; PCPs had no racial disparities. In general, physicians may be under-prescribing opioids for cancer pain. TRIAL REGISTRATION NCT01501006.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cleveland G Shields
- Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
- Regenstrief Center for Healthcare Engineering, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
- Human Development & Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Jennifer J Griggs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Hematology/ Oncology Division, and Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
- Department of Health Management & Policy, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Kevin Fiscella
- Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Cezanne M Elias
- Human Development & Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Sharon L Christ
- Human Development & Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
- Department of Statistics, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Joseph Colbert
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Stephen G Henry
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of California Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Beth G Hoh
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Haslyn E R Hunte
- School of Public Health, Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| | - Mary Marshall
- Human Development & Family Studies, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA
| | - Supriya Gupta Mohile
- James P Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Sandy Plumb
- Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
- James P Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Mohamedtaki A Tejani
- James P Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Alison Venuti
- Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA
| | - Ronald M Epstein
- Center for Communication and Disparities Research, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
- Department of Family Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
- James P Wilmot Cancer Center, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
- Department of Medicine, University of Rochester School of Medicine, Rochester, NY, USA.
- Family Medicine Research Programs, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yeager KA, Williams B, Bai J, Cooper HLF, Quest T, Meghani SH, Bruner DW. Factors Related to Adherence to Opioids in Black Patients With Cancer Pain. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 57:28-36. [PMID: 30316809 PMCID: PMC6310640 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.10.491] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/05/2018] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Cancer pain relief is often inadequate because of poor adherence to pain medication, especially for black patients. OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to describe factors related to adherence to around-the-clock opioids among 110 black patients being treated for cancer pain. METHODS Sociodemographic, clinical, symptoms, and social support data were collected at baseline; pain and adherence data were collected at 30 days. Associations between these variables and opioid adherence measured by Medication Event Monitoring System were estimated using multiple regression. RESULTS Mean age was 56 (±10.1), the majority were women (63%) and college educated (56%). Mean pain severity at baseline equaled 4.6 (±2.3). Mean dose adherence was 60% (±28.5), while mean schedule adherence was 33.0% (±31.0). In adjusted analysis, 26% of the variance in dose adherence was explained by recent chemotherapy, changes in pain, concerns about nausea, and doctors' focus on cure versus pain control (P<0.001); 27% of the variance in schedule adherence was explained by recent chemotherapy, changes in pain, symptom burden, and concerns about doctors focus on cure versus pain control (P<0.001). CONCLUSION Findings confirm pain medication adherence is poor and pain was not well relieved. Multiple factors influence adherence to around-the-clock opioids. Clinicians need to partner with patients by providing a personalized pain treatment plan including an in-depth assessment of treatment choices and adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine A Yeager
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
| | - Bryan Williams
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Jinbing Bai
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Hannah L F Cooper
- Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Tammie Quest
- School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Salimah H Meghani
- School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Deborah W Bruner
- Nell Hodgson Woodruff School of Nursing, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA; Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Ngamkham S, Holden JE, Smith EL. A Systematic Review: Mindfulness Intervention for Cancer-Related Pain. Asia Pac J Oncol Nurs 2019; 6:161-169. [PMID: 30931361 PMCID: PMC6371675 DOI: 10.4103/apjon.apjon_67_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Moderate-to-severe pain is a common problem experienced by patients with cancer. Although analgesic drugs are effective, adverse side effects are common and some analgesic drugs are addictive. Nonpharmacological treatment may be a way to treat cancer pain without causing negative side effects. Mindfulness is used as an effective nonpharmacological treatment to improve quality of life (QoL) and to address psychological problems including distress, anxiety, stress, and depression. However, the effect of mindfulness on pain severity has not been sufficiently investigated. Therefore, a systematic review was undertaken to describe the effectiveness of mindfulness interventions for pain and its underlying pathophysiologic mechanisms. The search was conducted in PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, and CINAHL and included only empirical studies published from 2008 to 2017. Search terms included mindfulness, mindfulness-based intervention, meditation, cancer, pain, and cancer-related pain. Six studies met the search criteria. These studies tested several types of intervention including mindfulness-based stress reduction, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, meditation with massage, and mindful awareness practices. Study outcomes include improved pain severity, anxiety, stress, depression, and QoL. However, most studies reviewed were conducted in the United States and Denmark. Further research is needed to test culturally appropriate mindfulness interventions to reduce pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Srisuda Ngamkham
- Department of Nursing Administration and Professional Development, Boromarajonani College of Nursing Sawanpracharak Nakhonsawan, Nakhonsawan, Thailand
| | - Janean E Holden
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ellen Lavoie Smith
- Department of Health Behavior and Biological Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
A nationwide survey of adherence to analgesic drugs among cancer patients in Taiwan: prevalence, determinants, and impact on quality of life. Support Care Cancer 2018; 27:2857-2867. [PMID: 30552596 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4599-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2018] [Accepted: 12/10/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Poor adherence to analgesic drugs is one of the most common barriers to adequate pain management. This prospective, cross-sectional, patient-oriented observational study aimed to explore the adherence rate, clinical factors, and impact of adherence to analgesic drugs on the quality of life (QoL) among cancer outpatients in Taiwan. METHODS Eight hundred ninety-seven consecutive adult outpatients with cancer who had reported tumor pain and received regular analgesic drug treatment were enrolled from 16 medical centers across Taiwan. The Brief Pain Inventory was used to assess pain intensity and QoL. Morisky's four-item medication adherence scale was used to assess adherence to analgesic drugs. Clinical factors possibly associated with good adherence to analgesic drugs were analyzed using multivariate logistic regression analyses. RESULTS Of the 897 patients, 26.9% met criteria for the good, 35.5% for the moderate, and 37.6% for the poor adherence groups. The good adherence group had significantly better QoL outcomes than the moderate and poor adherence groups (all p < 0.05). Age ≥ 50 years, head and neck or hematological malignancies, cancer-related pain, patients who agreed or strongly agreed that the side effects of analgesic drugs were tolerable, and patients who disagreed or strongly disagreed that the dosing schedule could be flexibly self-adjusted to deal with the actual pain were predictors of good adherence to analgesic drugs. CONCLUSIONS Awareness of the clinical factors associated with adherence to analgesic drugs may help clinicians to identify cancer patients at a greater risk of non-adherence, reinforce optimal pain management, and improve the QoL by enhancing adherence to pain medications.
Collapse
|
42
|
Mayahara M, Wilbur J, Fogg L, Breitenstein SM. Behavioral Pain Intervention for Hospice and Palliative Care Patients: An Integrative Review. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2018; 35:1245-1255. [PMID: 29772922 DOI: 10.1177/1049909118775421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the advances in pain management, achieving optimal pain control in hospice and palliative care is challenging. Patient/caregiver's lack of pain management knowledge, poor pain reporting, and poor adherence to pain management regimens are all associated with inadequate pain control. The purpose of this integrated review is to examine behavioral interventions designed for patients and caregivers to improve pain control in hospice and palliative care settings. Ten studies were identified through a database search. Seven of the 10 studies found significant improvement in at least 1 pain marker. Of the 7 studies that looked at changes in pain knowledge, 5 had significant improvements in at least 1 knowledge subscale. The 2 studies that looked at adherence to pain management found significant improvements. One limitation of the reviewed studies was that the delivery of them would not be efficient across all health-care settings, and, as a consequence, more technologically sophisticated delivery methods are needed. Therefore, while it is clear from the review that effective pain management interventions have been developed for hospice and palliative care patients, it is also clear that future research needs to focus on providing these same interventions through a more technologically sophisticated delivery method.
Collapse
|
43
|
Moryl N, Dave V, Glare P, Bokhari A, Malhotra VT, Gulati A, Hung J, Puttanniah V, Griffo Y, Tickoo R, Wiesenthal A, Horn SD, Inturrisi CE. Patient-Reported Outcomes and Opioid Use by Outpatient Cancer Patients. THE JOURNAL OF PAIN 2018; 19:278-290. [PMID: 29154919 PMCID: PMC5811357 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2017] [Revised: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 11/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
The Memorial Sloan Kettering Pain Registry contains patient characteristics, treatments, and outcomes for a prospective cohort of 1,534 chronic pain cancer patients who were seen at outpatient pain service clinics. Average pain intensity (Brief Pain Inventory) was reported as mild by 24.6% of patients, moderate by 41.5%, and severe by 33.9%. The patient's report of average percent pain relief and health state (EuroQOL 5 dimensions) was inversely related to average pain intensity category, whereas measures of pain interference, number of worst pain locations, and physical and psychological distress were directly related to pain intensity category. Eighty-six percent of patients received an opioid at 1 or more clinic encounters. Regression analysis revealed that male sex or being younger (65 years of age or younger) was associated with a greater likelihood of an opioid ordered. Male sex nearly doubled the likelihood of a higher dose being ordered than female sex. Bivariate analysis found that patients receiving opioids reported significantly more pain relief than no-opioid patients. However, patients receiving opioids had higher pain interference scores, lower index of health state, and more physical distress than no-opioid patients Our results identify the need to consider opioid use and dosage when attempting to understand patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and factors affecting pain management. PERSPECTIVE This report describes the results of the analyses of PROs and patient-related electronic health record data collected under standard of care from cancer patients at outpatient pain management clinics of Anesthesiology and Palliative Care at the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. Consideration of sex and age as predictors of opioid use is critical in attempting to understand PROs and their relationship to pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Moryl
- Palliative Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vinnidhy Dave
- Palliative Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Paul Glare
- Palliative Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Ali Bokhari
- Palliative Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vivek T Malhotra
- Anesthesia Pain Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Amitabh Gulati
- Anesthesia Pain Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Joseph Hung
- Anesthesia Pain Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Vinay Puttanniah
- Anesthesia Pain Services, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yvona Griffo
- Palliative Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Roma Tickoo
- Palliative Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Alison Wiesenthal
- Palliative Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Susan D Horn
- Health System Innovation and Research Division, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Charles E Inturrisi
- Palliative Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; Department of Pharmacology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
|
45
|
Odonkor CA, Kim G, Erdek M. Global cancer pain management: a systematic review comparing trials in Africa, Europe and North America. Pain Manag 2017; 7:299-310. [PMID: 28699421 DOI: 10.2217/pmt-2016-0047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM Despite the rise in cancer survivorship, few reviews have examined the quality of studies of cancer pain management and practices around the globe. With a void in trials spanning multiple geographical settings, this review evaluates the quality of cancer trials across three continents. MATERIALS & METHODS A literature review and search of established databases was conducted to identify eligible studies. The Cochrane method, the Jadad Score and a cancer pain-specific ad hoc tool were used to evaluate quality of studies. RESULTS Eighteen studies representing a total of 4693 individuals were included in the review. Study quality correlated positively with study sample size and palliative care index. Trials in all three continents were prone to use opioids for pain management, whereas trials in Europe and North America utilized other adjuvant therapies such as antidepressants and steroids. CONCLUSION This review underscores the need for better multidimensional quality assessment tools for cancer pain trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles A Odonkor
- Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Gabriel Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Howard University College of Medicine, Washington, DC 20059, USA
| | - Michael Erdek
- Division of Pain Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology & Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Robinson-Lane SG, Booker SQ. Culturally Responsive Pain Management for Black Older Adults. J Gerontol Nurs 2017; 43:1-8. [PMID: 28253407 PMCID: PMC5581727 DOI: 10.3928/00989134-20170224-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2016] [Accepted: 01/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
HOW TO OBTAIN CONTACT HOURS BY READING THIS ARTICLE INSTRUCTIONS XX contact hours will be awarded by Villanova University College of Nursing upon successful completion of this activity. A contact hour is a unit of measurement that denotes 60 minutes of an organized learning activity. This is a learner-based activity. Villanova University College of Nursing does not require submission of your answers to the quiz. A contact hour certificate will be awarded once you register, pay the registration fee, and complete the evaluation form online at http://goo.gl/gMfXaf. To obtain contact hours you must: 1. Read the article, "XXXX XXXX XXXXXX XXXXXXX XXXX XXXX XXX XXX XXXX XX" found on pages XX-XX, carefully noting any tables and other illustrative materials that are included to enhance your knowledge and understanding of the content. Be sure to keep track of the amount of time (number of minutes) you spend reading the article and completing the quiz. 2. Read and answer each question on the quiz. After completing all of the questions, compare your answers to those provided within this issue. If you have incorrect answers, return to the article for further study. 3. Go to the Villanova website listed above to register for contact hour credit. You will be asked to provide your name; contact information; and a VISA, MasterCard, or Discover card number for payment of the $20.00 fee. Once you complete the online evaluation, a certificate will be automatically generated. This activity is valid for continuing education credit until MONTH XX, 20XX. CONTACT HOURS This activity is co-provided by Villanova University College of Nursing and SLACK Incorporated. Villanova University College of Nursing is accredited as a provider of continuing nursing education by the American Nurses Credentialing Center's Commission on Accreditation. ACTIVITY OBJECTIVES 1. XXX 2. XXX DISCLOSURE STATEMENT Neither the planners nor the author have any conflicts of interest to disclose. The management of pain for Black older adults has received inadequate attention by health care professionals despite evidence of greater pain intensity, depressive symptoms, and functional disability compared with White American older adults. Pain management for this population may be significantly improved with more careful attention to the provision of culturally responsive care. As professionals concerned with the optimization of health and reduction of suffering throughout the lifespan, nurses have an ethical, moral, and professional responsibility to provide culturally responsive care to the populations they serve-particularly when clear disparities in health exist. By considering how culture affects important health beliefs, values, preferences, and customs, and integrating this understanding into practice, quality of life is likely to be improved. [Journal of Gerontological Nursing, xx(x), xx-xx.].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sheria G. Robinson-Lane
- Assistant Professor, University of Michigan School of Nursing, Department of Systems, Populations and Leadership, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Staja Q. Booker
- Doctoral Candidate, University of Iowa College of Nursing, Iowa City, IA
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Meghani SH, Knafl GJ. Salient concerns in using analgesia for cancer pain among outpatients: A cluster analysis study. World J Clin Oncol 2017; 8:75-85. [PMID: 28246587 PMCID: PMC5309716 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v8.i1.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2016] [Revised: 12/01/2016] [Accepted: 12/14/2016] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To identify unique clusters of patients based on their concerns in using analgesia for cancer pain and predictors of the cluster membership.
METHODS This was a 3-mo prospective observational study (n = 207). Patients were included if they were adults (≥ 18 years), diagnosed with solid tumors or multiple myelomas, and had at least one prescription of around-the-clock pain medication for cancer or cancer-treatment-related pain. Patients were recruited from two outpatient medical oncology clinics within a large health system in Philadelphia. A choice-based conjoint (CBC) analysis experiment was used to elicit analgesic treatment preferences (utilities). Patients employed trade-offs based on five analgesic attributes (percent relief from analgesics, type of analgesic, type of side-effects, severity of side-effects, out of pocket cost). Patients were clustered based on CBC utilities using novel adaptive statistical methods. Multiple logistic regression was used to identify predictors of cluster membership.
RESULTS The analyses found 4 unique clusters: Most patients made trade-offs based on the expectation of pain relief (cluster 1, 41%). For a subset, the main underlying concern was type of analgesic prescribed, i.e., opioid vs non-opioid (cluster 2, 11%) and type of analgesic side effects (cluster 4, 21%), respectively. About one in four made trade-offs based on multiple concerns simultaneously including pain relief, type of side effects, and severity of side effects (cluster 3, 28%). In multivariable analysis, to identify predictors of cluster membership, clinical and socioeconomic factors (education, health literacy, income, social support) rather than analgesic attitudes and beliefs were found important; only the belief, i.e., pain medications can mask changes in health or keep you from knowing what is going on in your body was found significant in predicting two of the four clusters [cluster 1 (-); cluster 4 (+)].
CONCLUSION Most patients appear to be driven by a single salient concern in using analgesia for cancer pain. Addressing these concerns, perhaps through real time clinical assessments, may improve patients’ analgesic adherence patterns and cancer pain outcomes.
Collapse
|
48
|
Oldenmenger WH, Sillevis Smitt PAE, de Raaf PJ, van der Rijt CCD. Adherence to Analgesics in Oncology Outpatients: Focus on Taking Analgesics on Time. Pain Pract 2016; 17:616-624. [DOI: 10.1111/papr.12490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2016] [Revised: 05/10/2016] [Accepted: 06/07/2016] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Wendy H. Oldenmenger
- Department of Medical Oncology; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | | | - Pleun J. de Raaf
- Department of Medical Oncology; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute; Rotterdam The Netherlands
| | - Carin C. D. van der Rijt
- Department of Medical Oncology; Erasmus MC Cancer Institute; Rotterdam The Netherlands
- Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation; Utrecht The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Meghani SH, Knafl GJ. Patterns of analgesic adherence predict health care utilization among outpatients with cancer pain. Patient Prefer Adherence 2016; 10:81-98. [PMID: 26869772 PMCID: PMC4734825 DOI: 10.2147/ppa.s93726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies in chronic noncancer pain settings have found that opioid use increases health care utilization. Despite the key role of analgesics, specifically opioids, in the setting of cancer pain, there is no literature to our knowledge about the relationship between adherence to prescribed around-the-clock (ATC) analgesics and acute health care utilization (hospitalization) among patients with cancer pain. PURPOSE To identify adherence patterns over time for cancer patients taking ATC analgesics for pain, cluster these patterns into adherence types, combine the types into an adherence risk factor for hospitalization, identify other risk factors for hospitalization, and identify risk factors for inconsistent analgesic adherence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from a 3-month prospective observational study of patients diagnosed with solid tumors or multiple myeloma, having cancer-related pain, and having at least one prescription of oral ATC analgesics were collected. Adherence data were collected electronically using the medication event-monitoring system. Analyses were conducted using adaptive modeling methods based on heuristic search through alternative models controlled by likelihood cross-validation scores. RESULTS Six adherence types were identified and combined into the risk factor for hospitalization of inconsistent versus consistent adherence over time. Twenty other individually significant risk factors for hospitalization were identified, but inconsistent analgesic adherence was the strongest of these predictors (ie, generating the largest likelihood cross-validation score). These risk factors were adaptively combined into a model for hospitalization based on six pairwise interaction risk factors with exceptional discrimination (ie, area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve of 0.91). Patients had from zero to five of these risk factors, with an odds ratio of 5.44 (95% confidence interval 3.09-9.58) for hospitalization, with a unit increase in the number of such risk factors. CONCLUSION Inconsistent adherence to prescribed ATC analgesics, specifically the interaction of strong opioids and inconsistent adherence, is a strong risk factor for hospitalization among cancer outpatients with pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Salimah H Meghani
- Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, NewCourtland Center of Transitions and Health, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA
- Correspondence: Salimah H Meghani, Department of Biobehavioral Health Sciences, School of Nursing, University of Pennsylvania, Claire M Fagin Hall, 418 Curie Boulevard – Room 337, Philadelphia, PA 19104-4217, USA, Tel +1 215 573 7128, Fax +1 215 573 7507, Email
| | - George J Knafl
- School of Nursing, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|