1
|
De Virgilio Suglia C, Stefanizzi P, Graziano G, Moscara L, Delle Fontane A, Minelli M, Tafuri S. Efficacy of vaccination during pregnancy in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants younger than 12 months. Puglia (Italy), 2021-23. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2403831. [PMID: 39288786 PMCID: PMC11409503 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2024.2403831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2024] [Revised: 09/03/2024] [Accepted: 09/10/2024] [Indexed: 09/19/2024] Open
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study evaluated the effectiveness of maternal vaccination against COVID-19 in reducing the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants younger than 12 months. The study, conducted at the "Policlinico" University Hospital of Bari, included 3346 newborns and their mothers. The study explored the degree of protection offered by maternal vaccination depending on the timing, type, and trimester of vaccination, also taking into account the mother's history of infection. We compared the incidence rate of infection between children of vaccinated and unvaccinated mothers; the values were 10.2% and 18.1%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant. The overall effectiveness of the vaccine against the infection was 45%. Further analysis revealed increasing efficacy as the doses of vaccine administered to the mother increased and in case of a previous history of maternal infection. Dual immune stimulation (vaccination and natural infection) was 83% effective in preventing infection among newborns. The multivariable models confirmed the protective effect of vaccination with all types of vaccines used. The analysis of infection's incidence in newborns revealed an interesting temporal trend, with increasing incidence with time, suggesting a possible correlation with the persistence of maternal antibodies or with the gradual weaning. The results on the protective capacity of vaccines are in line with the global literature. Strengths of study include sample size, robust methodology, and multivariate analyses. Institutions could intensify awareness campaigns to encourage both pregnant women and all those who would like to become pregnant to receive SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Pasquale Stefanizzi
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Giusy Graziano
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Lorenza Moscara
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Arianna Delle Fontane
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Minelli
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| | - Silvio Tafuri
- Hygiene Unit - Interdisciplinary Department of Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ciapponi A, Berrueta M, Argento FJ, Ballivian J, Bardach A, Brizuela ME, Castellana N, Comandé D, Gottlieb S, Kampmann B, Mazzoni A, Parker EPK, Sambade JM, Stegelmann K, Xiong X, Stergachis A, Buekens P. Safety and Effectiveness of COVID-19 Vaccines During Pregnancy: A Living Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Drug Saf 2024; 47:991-1010. [PMID: 39009928 PMCID: PMC11399161 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-024-01458-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/17/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pregnant persons are susceptible to significant complications following COVID-19, even death. However, worldwide COVID-19 vaccination coverage during pregnancy remains suboptimal. OBJECTIVE This study assessed the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines administered to pregnant persons and shared this evidence via an interactive online website. METHODS We followed Cochrane methods to conduct this living systematic review. We included studies assessing the effects of COVID-19 vaccines in pregnant persons. We conducted searches every other week for studies until October 2023, without restrictions on language or publication status, in ten databases, guidelines, preprint servers, and COVID-19 websites. The reference lists of eligible studies were hand searched to identify additional relevant studies. Pairs of review authors independently selected eligible studies using the web-based software COVIDENCE. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were performed independently by pairs of authors. Disagreements were resolved by consensus. We performed random-effects meta-analyses of adjusted relative effects for relevant confounders of comparative studies and proportional meta-analyses to summarize frequencies from one-sample studies using R statistical software. We present the GRADE certainty of evidence from comparative studies. Findings are available on an interactive living systematic review webpage, including an updated evidence map and real-time meta-analyses customizable by subgroups and filters. RESULTS We included 177 studies involving 638,791 participants from 41 countries. Among the 11 types of COVID-19 vaccines identified, the most frequently used platforms were mRNA (154 studies), viral vector (51), and inactivated virus vaccines (17). Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination may result in minimal to no important differences compared to no vaccination in all assessed maternal and infant safety outcomes from 26 fewer to 17 more events per 1000 pregnant persons, and 13 fewer to 9 more events per 1000 neonates, respectively. We found statistically significant reductions in emergency cesarean deliveries (9%) with mRNA vaccines, and in stillbirth (75-83%) with mRNA/viral vector vaccines. Low to very low-certainty evidence suggests that vaccination during pregnancy with mRNA vaccines may reduce severe cases or hospitalizations in pregnant persons with COVID-19 (72%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 42-86), symptomatic COVID-19 (78%; 95% CI 21-94), and virologically confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (82%; 95% CI 39-95). Reductions were lower with other vaccine types and during Omicron variant dominance than Alpha and Delta dominance. Infants also presented with fewer severe cases or hospitalizations due to COVID-19 and laboratory-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection (64%; 95% CI 37-80 and 66%; 95% CI 37-81, respectively). CONCLUSIONS We found a large body of evidence supporting the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines during pregnancy. While the certainty of evidence is not high, it stands as the most reliable option available, given the current absence of pregnant individuals in clinical trials. Results are shared in near real time in an accessible and interactive format for scientists, decision makers, clinicians, and the general public. This living systematic review highlights the relevance of continuous vaccine safety and effectiveness monitoring, particularly in at-risk populations for COVID-19 impact such as pregnant persons, during the introduction of new vaccines. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION PROSPERO: CRD42021281290.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agustín Ciapponi
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
- Centro de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Salud Pública (CIESP-IECS), CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Mabel Berrueta
- Department of Mother and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Fernando J Argento
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jamile Ballivian
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Ariel Bardach
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina
- Centro de Investigaciones Epidemiológicas y Salud Pública (CIESP-IECS), CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martin E Brizuela
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Noelia Castellana
- Department of Mother and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Daniel Comandé
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Sami Gottlieb
- Department of Sexual and Reproductive Health and Research World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Beate Kampmann
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Charite Centre for Global Health, Charité, Universitätsmedizin, Vaccine Centre, Berlin, Germany
| | - Agustina Mazzoni
- Department of Mother and Child Health, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Juan M Sambade
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Katharina Stegelmann
- Argentine Cochrane Center, Institute for Clinical Effectiveness and Health Policy (IECS), Ravignani 2024, C1414CPV, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Xu Xiong
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Andy Stergachis
- Schools of Pharmacy and Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Pierre Buekens
- School of Public Health and Tropical Medicine, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zerbo O, Timbol J, Hansen J, Goddard K, Layefsky E, Ross P, Fireman B, Nguyen D, Greenhow T, Klein N. Incidence and Risk of Coronavirus Disease 2019 Hospitalization Among Unvaccinated Children. Influenza Other Respir Viruses 2024; 18:e70022. [PMID: 39428981 PMCID: PMC11491685 DOI: 10.1111/irv.70022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2024] [Revised: 09/28/2024] [Accepted: 10/01/2024] [Indexed: 10/22/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study is to determine the incidence and risk factors associated with COVID-19 hospitalization among unvaccinated children. METHODS Children aged 0- < 18 years, members of Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC), were followed from March 1, 2020, until the earliest occurrence of: chart-confirmed COVID-19 hospitalization, disenrollment from KPNC, age 18 years, receipt of COVID-19 vaccine, death, or study end (December 31, 2022). We calculated the incidence rate of hospitalization by SARS-CoV-2 variant period and by age group. We determined risk factors for hospitalization using Poisson regression. We also conducted descriptive analyses of hospitalized cases. RESULTS Among 1,107,799 children, 423 were hospitalized for COVID-19 during follow-up. The incidence of hospitalization increased with each new SARS-CoV-2 variant and was highest among children aged < 6 months. Among the < 6-month-olds, the incidence rate per 100,000 person-months was 7 during predelta, 13.3 during delta, and 22.4 during omicron. Black (RR = 2.05, 95% CI: 1.33-3.16) and Hispanic children (RR = 1.82, 95% CI: 1.34-2.46) and children with any comorbidities were at high risk of hospitalization (RR = 3.81, 95% CI: 2.94-4.95). Overall, 20.3% of hospitalized children were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU), but ICU admission was 36.1% among 12- < 18-year-olds. The majority of ICU admits (91.8%) had no comorbidities. CONCLUSION Children too young to be vaccinated had the highest incidence of COVID-19 hospitalization, while adolescents had the highest proportion of ICU admissions. To prevent severe disease in children and adolescents, everyone eligible should be vaccinated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ousseny Zerbo
- Vaccine Study CenterKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - Julius Timbol
- Vaccine Study CenterKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - John R. Hansen
- Vaccine Study CenterKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - Kristin Goddard
- Vaccine Study CenterKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - Evan Layefsky
- Vaccine Study CenterKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - Pat Ross
- Vaccine Study CenterKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - Bruce Fireman
- Vaccine Study CenterKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - Dao Nguyen
- Department of PediatricsKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - Tara L. Greenhow
- Pediatrics Infectious DiseasesKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| | - Nicola P. Klein
- Vaccine Study CenterKaiser Permanente Northern CaliforniaOaklandCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fernández-García S, Del Campo-Albendea L, Sambamoorthi D, Sheikh J, Lau K, Osei-Lah N, Ramkumar A, Naidu H, Stoney N, Sundaram P, Sengupta P, Mehta S, Attarde S, Maddock S, Manning M, Meherally Z, Ansari K, Lawson H, Yap M, Kew T, Punnoose A, Knight C, Sadeqa E, Cherian J, Ravi S, Chen W, Walker K, O'Donoghue K, van Wely M, van Leeuwen E, Kostova E, Kunst H, Khalil A, Brizuela V, Kara E, Kim CR, Thorson A, Oladapo OT, Mofenson L, Gottlieb SL, Bonet M, Moss N, Zamora J, Allotey J, Thangaratinam S. Effectiveness and safety of COVID-19 vaccines on maternal and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Glob Health 2024; 9:e014247. [PMID: 38580375 PMCID: PMC11002410 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2023-014247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 01/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/07/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the effects of COVID-19 vaccines in women before or during pregnancy on SARS-CoV-2 infection-related, pregnancy, offspring and reactogenicity outcomes. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES Major databases between December 2019 and January 2023. STUDY SELECTION Nine pairs of reviewers contributed to study selection. We included test-negative designs, comparative cohorts and randomised trials on effects of COVID-19 vaccines on infection-related and pregnancy outcomes. Non-comparative cohort studies reporting reactogenicity outcomes were also included. QUALITY ASSESSMENT, DATA EXTRACTION AND ANALYSIS Two reviewers independently assessed study quality and extracted data. We undertook random-effects meta-analysis and reported findings as HRs, risk ratios (RRs), ORs or rates with 95% CIs. RESULTS Sixty-seven studies (1 813 947 women) were included. Overall, in test-negative design studies, pregnant women fully vaccinated with any COVID-19 vaccine had 61% reduced odds of SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy (OR 0.39, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.75; 4 studies, 23 927 women; I2=87.2%) and 94% reduced odds of hospital admission (OR 0.06, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.71; 2 studies, 868 women; I2=92%). In adjusted cohort studies, the risk of hypertensive disorders in pregnancy was reduced by 12% (RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.92; 2 studies; 115 085 women), while caesarean section was reduced by 9% (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.85 to 0.98; 6 studies; 30 192 women). We observed an 8% reduction in the risk of neonatal intensive care unit admission (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87 to 0.97; 2 studies; 54 569 women) in babies born to vaccinated versus not vaccinated women. In general, vaccination during pregnancy was not associated with increased risk of adverse pregnancy or perinatal outcomes. Pain at the injection site was the most common side effect reported (77%, 95% CI 52% to 94%; 11 studies; 27 195 women). CONCLUSION COVID-19 vaccines are effective in preventing SARS-CoV-2 infection and related complications in pregnant women. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020178076.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Fernández-García
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Laura Del Campo-Albendea
- Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Jameela Sheikh
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Karen Lau
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nana Osei-Lah
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Anoushka Ramkumar
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Harshitha Naidu
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Nicole Stoney
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul Sundaram
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Samay Mehta
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shruti Attarde
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sophie Maddock
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Millie Manning
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Kehkashan Ansari
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Heidi Lawson
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Magnus Yap
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Tania Kew
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Andriya Punnoose
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Chloe Knight
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Eyna Sadeqa
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Jiya Cherian
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Sangamithra Ravi
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | - Wentin Chen
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Madelon van Wely
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elizabeth van Leeuwen
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC Department of Obstetrics Gynecology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Elena Kostova
- Amsterdam UMC Location AMC Center for Reproductive Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Heinke Kunst
- Queen Mary University of London Blizard Institute, London, UK
- Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Asma Khalil
- St George's University of London, London, UK
| | - Vanessa Brizuela
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Edna Kara
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Caron Rahn Kim
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Anna Thorson
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Olufemi T Oladapo
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Lynne Mofenson
- Research, Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Sami L Gottlieb
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | - Mercedes Bonet
- Department of Reproductive Health and Research, World Health Organization, Geneve, Switzerland
| | | | - Javier Zamora
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Clinical Biostatistics Unit, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain
- CIBERESP, Madrid, Spain
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - John Allotey
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Shakila Thangaratinam
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Global Women's Health, Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Centre (BRC), University Hospitals Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cardemil CV, Cao Y, Posavad CM, Badell ML, Bunge K, Mulligan MJ, Parameswaran L, Olson-Chen C, Novak RM, Brady RC, DeFranco E, Gerber JS, Pasetti M, Shriver M, Coler R, Berube B, Suthar MS, Moreno A, Gao F, Richardson BA, Beigi R, Brown E, Neuzil KM, Munoz FM. Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination and Prevention of Symptomatic Infection in Infants. Pediatrics 2024; 153:e2023064252. [PMID: 38332733 PMCID: PMC10904887 DOI: 10.1542/peds.2023-064252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Maternal vaccination may prevent infant coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to quantify protection against infection from maternally derived vaccine-induced antibodies in the first 6 months of an infant's life. METHODS Infants born to mothers vaccinated during pregnancy with 2 or 3 doses of a messenger RNA COVID-19 vaccine (nonboosted or boosted, respectively) had full-length spike (Spike) immunoglobulin G (IgG), pseudovirus 614D, and live virus D614G, and omicron BA.1 and BA.5 neutralizing antibody (nAb) titers measured at delivery. Infant severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection was determined by verified maternal-report and laboratory confirmation through prospective follow-up to 6 months of age between December 2021 and July 2022. The risk reduction for infection by dose group and antibody titer level was estimated in separate models. RESULTS Infants of boosted mothers (n = 204) had significantly higher Spike IgG, pseudovirus, and live nAb titers at delivery than infants of nonboosted mothers (n = 271), and were 56% less likely to acquire infection in the first 6 months (P = .03). Irrespective of boost, for each 10-fold increase in Spike IgG titer at delivery, the infant's risk of acquiring infection was reduced by 47% (95% confidence interval 8%-70%; P = .02). Similarly, a 10-fold increase in pseudovirus titers against Wuhan Spike, and live virus nAb titers against D614G, and omicron BA.1 and BA.5 at delivery were associated with a 30%, 46%, 56%, and 60% risk reduction, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Higher transplacental binding and nAb titers substantially reduced the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants, and a booster dose amplified protection during a period of omicron predominance. Until infants are age-eligible for vaccination, maternal vaccination provides passive protection against symptomatic infection during early infancy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina V. Cardemil
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Yi Cao
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Christine M. Posavad
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Martina L. Badell
- Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Emory University Hospital Midtown Perinatal Center, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Katherine Bunge
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Women’s Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Mark J. Mulligan
- New York University Langone Vaccine Center, and Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Lalitha Parameswaran
- New York University Langone Vaccine Center, and Division of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Department of Medicine, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Courtney Olson-Chen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York
| | - Richard M. Novak
- Division of Infectious Diseases, University of Illinois, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rebecca C. Brady
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Emily DeFranco
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Jeffrey S. Gerber
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Marcela Pasetti
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Mallory Shriver
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Rhea Coler
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, Washington
| | - Bryan Berube
- Seattle Children’s Research Institute, Center for Global Infectious Disease Research, Seattle, Washington
| | - Mehul S. Suthar
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Alberto Moreno
- Emory Vaccine Center, Emory School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Fei Gao
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
| | - Barbra A. Richardson
- Departments of Biostatistics and Global Health, University of Washington, Divisions of Vaccine and Infectious Disease and Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Richard Beigi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Magee-Women’s Hospital, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Elizabeth Brown
- Departments of Biostatistics and Global Health, University of Washington, Divisions of Vaccine and Infectious Disease and Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Kathleen M. Neuzil
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Flor M. Munoz
- Departments of Pediatrics and Molecular Virology & Microbiology, Baylor College of Medicine, and Texas Children’s Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Zhong J, Wang W, Liu S, Chen Y, Xiong H, Meng X, Zhang D, Ma Y. Effectiveness of Maternal Inactivated COVID-19 Vaccination against Omicron Infection in Infants during the First 12 Months of Life: A Test-Negative Case-Control Study. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1402. [PMID: 37766080 PMCID: PMC10534404 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11091402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2023] [Revised: 08/12/2023] [Accepted: 08/17/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of maternal inactivated COVID-19 vaccination before delivery for infants against Omicron infection in Guangzhou, China. A test-negative case-control design was conducted. This study selected infants born from 1 November 2021 to 23 November 2022 and tested for SARS-CoV-2 between 13 April 2022 and 30 November 2022 during outbreaks in Guangzhou. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to compare the maternal vaccination status of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines before delivery in cases and controls to estimate vaccine effectiveness (VE) for infants within 12 months. According to eligibility criteria, we finally selected 205 test-positive and 114 test-negative infants, as well as their mothers. The effectiveness of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines among fully vaccinated mothers was 48.4% (7.3% to 71.7%) for infants within 12 months, with the effectiveness of partial and booster vaccination showing no significant difference. Effectiveness for full vaccination presented a slight increase according to infants' age at testing, with 49.6% (-12.3% to 78.4%) for 0-6 months and 59.9% (-0.6% to 84.4%) for over 6 months. A greater protective effect of two-dose vaccination was manifested in infants whose mother had received the second dose during the first trimester (65.9%, 95% CI: 7.7% to 87.9%) of pregnancy rather than preconception (43.5%, 95% CI: -8.7% to 71.1%). Moreover, VE could be improved to 77.1% (11.1% to 95.3%) when mothers received two doses both during pregnancy and 91.8% (41.1% to 99.6%) with receipt of a booster dose during pregnancy. Maternal vaccination with two doses of inactivated COVID-19 vaccines before delivery was moderately effective against Omicron infection in infants during the first 12 months of life. Full vaccination or a booster dose during pregnancy could confer better protection against Omicron for infants, although it might be overestimated due to the insufficient sample size in subgroups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiayi Zhong
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Wen Wang
- Institute of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University & Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, China
| | - Shuang Liu
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Yifei Chen
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Husheng Xiong
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Xiang Meng
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Dingmei Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510080, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Quality Monitoring and Evaluation of Vaccines and Biological Products, Guangzhou 510080, China
| | - Yu Ma
- Institute of Public Health, Guangzhou Medical University & Guangzhou Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Guangzhou 510440, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Juliá-Burchés C, Martínez-Varea A. An Update on COVID-19 Vaccination and Pregnancy. J Pers Med 2023; 13:jpm13050797. [PMID: 37240967 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13050797] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 04/27/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Pregnant women are more prone to experience severe COVID-19 disease, including intensive care unit (ICU) admission, use of invasive ventilation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), and mortality compared to non-pregnant individuals. Additionally, research suggests that SARS-CoV-2 infection during pregnancy is linked to adverse pregnancy outcomes, such as preterm birth, preeclampsia, and stillbirth, as well as adverse neonatal outcomes, including hospitalization and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit. This review assessed the available literature from November 2021 to 19 March 2023, concerning the safety and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination during pregnancy. COVID-19 vaccination administered during pregnancy is not linked to significant adverse events related to the vaccine or negative obstetric, fetal, or neonatal outcomes. Moreover, the vaccine has the same effectiveness in preventing severe COVID-19 disease in pregnant individuals as in the general population. Additionally, COVID-19 vaccination is the safest and most effective method for pregnant women to protect themselves and their newborns from severe COVID-19 disease, hospitalization, and ICU admission. Thus, vaccination should be recommended for pregnant patients. While the immunogenicity of vaccination in pregnancy appears to be similar to that in the general population, more research is needed to determine the optimal timing of vaccination during pregnancy for the benefit of the neonate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Juliá-Burchés
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| | - Alicia Martínez-Varea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, La Fe University and Polytechnic Hospital, Avenida Fernando Abril Martorell 106, 46026 Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Zerbo O, Ray GT, Fireman B, Layefsky E, Goddard K, Lewis E, Ross P, Omer S, Greenberg M, Klein NP. Maternal SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and infant protection against SARS-CoV-2 during the first six months of life. Nat Commun 2023; 14:894. [PMID: 36854660 PMCID: PMC9974935 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-023-36547-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023] Open
Abstract
We examined the effectiveness of maternal vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 infection in 30,311 infants born at Kaiser Permanente Northern California from December 15, 2020, to May 31, 2022. Using Cox regression, the effectiveness of ≥2 doses of COVID-19 vaccine received during pregnancy was 84% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 66, 93), 62% (CI: 39, 77) and 56% (CI: 34,71) during months 0-2, 0-4 and 0- 6 of a child's life, respectively, in the Delta variant period. In the Omicron variant period, the effectiveness of maternal vaccination in these three age intervals was 21% (CI: -21,48), 14% (CI: -9,32) and 13% (CI: -3,26), respectively. Over the entire study period, the incidence of hospitalization for COVID-19 was lower during the first 6 months of life among infants of vaccinated mothers compared with infants of unvaccinated mothers (21/100,000 person-years vs. 100/100,000 person-years). Maternal vaccination was protective, but protection was lower during Omicron than during Delta. Protection during both periods decreased as infants aged.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ousseny Zerbo
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA.
| | - G Thomas Ray
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Bruce Fireman
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Evan Layefsky
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Kristin Goddard
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Edwin Lewis
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Pat Ross
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA
| | - Saad Omer
- Yale University, Institute for Global Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Internal Medicine (Infectious Diseases), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Mara Greenberg
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kaiser Permanente Northern California Oakland, Oakland, CA, USA
- Regional Perinatal Service Center, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Santa Clara, CA, USA
| | - Nicola P Klein
- Kaiser Permanente Northern California, Vaccine Study Center, Oakland, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Affiliation(s)
- Dana Danino
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University; The Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Ilan Youngster
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University; Pediatric Infectious Disease Unit, Shamir Medical Center, Beer Yaakov, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Jorgensen SCJ, Hernandez A, Fell DB, Austin PC, D'Souza R, Guttmann A, Brown KA, Buchan SA, Gubbay JB, Nasreen S, Schwartz KL, Tadrous M, Wilson K, Kwong JC. Maternal mRNA covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy and delta or omicron infection or hospital admission in infants: test negative design study. BMJ 2023; 380:e074035. [PMID: 36754426 PMCID: PMC9903336 DOI: 10.1136/bmj-2022-074035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the effectiveness of maternal mRNA covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy against delta and omicron severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection and hospital admission in infants. DESIGN Test negative design study. SETTING Community and hospital testing in Ontario, Canada. PARTICIPANTS Infants younger than six months of age, born between 7 May 2021 and 31 March 2022, who were tested for SARS-CoV-2 between 7 May 2021 and 5 September 2022. INTERVENTION Maternal mRNA covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Laboratory confirmed delta or omicron infection or hospital admission of the infant. Multivariable logistic regression estimated vaccine effectiveness, with adjustments for clinical and sociodemographic characteristics associated with vaccination and infection. RESULTS 8809 infants met eligibility criteria, including 99 delta cases (4365 controls) and 1501 omicron cases (4847 controls). Infant vaccine effectiveness from two maternal doses was 95% (95% confidence interval 88% to 98%) against delta infection and 97% (73% to 100%) against infant hospital admission due to delta and 45% (37% to 53%) against omicron infection and 53% (39% to 64%) against hospital admission due to omicron. Vaccine effectiveness for three doses was 73% (61% to 80%) against omicron infection and 80% (64% to 89%) against hospital admission due to omicron. Vaccine effectiveness for two doses against infant omicron infection was highest with the second dose in the third trimester (53% (42% to 62%)) compared with the first (47% (31% to 59%)) or second (37% (24% to 47%)) trimesters. Vaccine effectiveness for two doses against infant omicron infection decreased from 57% (44% to 66%) between birth and eight weeks to 40% (21% to 54%) after 16 weeks of age. CONCLUSIONS Maternal covid-19 vaccination with a second dose during pregnancy was highly effective against delta and moderately effective against omicron infection and hospital admission in infants during the first six months of life. A third vaccine dose bolstered protection against omicron. Effectiveness for two doses was highest with maternal vaccination in the third trimester, and effectiveness decreased in infants beyond eight weeks of age.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C J Jorgensen
- Institute of Medical Science, Temerty Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Deshayne B Fell
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Peter C Austin
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Rohan D'Souza
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
- School of Graduate Studies, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Astrid Guttmann
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON, Canada
- The Edwin SH Leong Centre for Healthy Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kevin A Brown
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sarah A Buchan
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jonathan B Gubbay
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sharifa Nasreen
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kevin L Schwartz
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Public Health Ontario, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Mina Tadrous
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Leslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Kumanan Wilson
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Jeffrey C Kwong
- ICES, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Centre for Vaccine Preventable Diseases, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Department of Family and Community Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|