Venlafaxine and mirtazapine treatment lowers serum concentrations of dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate in depressed patients remitting during the course of treatment

DHEA and response to antidepressant treatment: A Mendelian Randomization analysis

Treatment response is hard to predict and detailed mechanisms unknown. Lower levels of the dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA(S)) - a precursor to testosterone and estrogen - have been associated to depression and to response to antidepressant treatment. Previous studies however may have been ridden by confounding and reverse causation. The aim of this study is to evaluate whether higher levels of DHEA(S) are causally linked to response to antidepressants using mendelian randomization (MR). We performed a Two-sample MR analysis using data the largest publicly available GWAS of DHEA(S) levels (n = 14,846) using eight common genetic variants associated to DHEA(S) (seven single nucleotide polymorphisms and one variant rs2497306) and the largest GWAS of antidepressant response (n = 5218) using various MR methods (IVW, MR Egger, Weighted mean, weighted mode, MR-PRESSO) and single SNP analysis. We further investigated for pleiotropy conducting a look up on PhenoScanner and GWAS Catalog. Results show no evidence for DHEA(S) gene risk score from any of MR methods, however, we found a significant association on individual variant analysis for rs11761538, rs17277546, and rs2497306. There was some evidence for heterogeneity and pleiotropy. This is the first paper to show some evidence for a causal association of genetically-predicted DHEA and improvement of depressive symptoms. The effect is not a simple linear effect, and we were unable to dissect whether the effect was direct effect of DHEA(S), mediated by DHEA(S) or on the pathway is not yet clear. Further studies using more refined instrumental variables will help clarify this association.

Reduced urine pregnenolone concentration after clinical response in patients with depression: An open-label short-term prospective study

BACKGROUND

Identifying biological alterations in patients with depression, particularly those that differ between responders and non-responders, is of interest to clinical practice. Biomarker candidates involve neuroactive steroids, including pregnenolone (PREG) and allopregnanolone (ALLO). However, alterations in PREG and ALLO associated with treatment response are understudied. This study's main aim was to evaluate the effects of antidepressant treatment, clinical response, and treatment duration on PREG and ALLO in depression.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a 4-week, open-label trial, participants were allocated randomly to the venlafaxine (n = 27) or mirtazapine (n = 30) group. Urine concentrations of PREG and ALLO were assessed through gas chromatography-mass spectrometry. Participants collected night urine between 10:30 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Two primary outcomes were analyzed. Firstly, the effect of treatment (mirtazapine or venlafaxine), clinical response (operationalized through the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale), and time (baseline compared to 28 days) on the urine concentrations of PREG or ALLO in depression. Finally, the effect of clinical response and time on the urine concentration of PREG or ALLO, independently of the antidepressant given (mirtazapine or venlafaxine). Linear mixed models were carried out.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in PREG and ALLO concentrations between baseline and 28 days in responders and non-responders when investigating the venlafaxine or the mirtazapine group. However, we found a significant reduction of urine PREG concentration after 28 days of treatment in responders who received either venlafaxine or mirtazapine (estimate = -0.56; p = 0.016; 95CI [-1.003; -0.115]; Cohen's d = -0.61).

CONCLUSIONS

Our main results indicate that responders in depression show reduced urinary PREG concentrations after 4-weeks of therapy, independently of the antidepressant used. More studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Higher serum DHEA concentrations before and after SSRI treatment are associated with remission of major depression

BACKGROUND

Dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfated ester DHEA-sulfate (DHEA-S), (together DHEA[S]), are the most abundant adrenal steroids in humans and are found in blood and the brain, where they function as neurosteroids with direct receptor affinities. Preclinical studies suggest that DHEA(S) has antidepressant/neuroprotective properties, and exogenously administered DHEA has shown antidepressant efficacy in humans. Nonetheless, the role of endogenous DHEA(S) levels in major depressive disorder (MDD) and antidepressant outcomes remains unclear.

METHODS

Morning fasting serum DHEA(S) concentrations were determined in 36 healthy, unmedicated MDD adults with Hamilton Depression (HDRS) ratings ≥17, and 75 healthy controls. MDD participants then completed eight weeks of open-label SSRI treatment before DHEA(S) levels were re-sampled; those with post-treatment HDRS ratings ≤7 were classified as "Remitters." Pre- and post-treatment DHEA(S) levels of Remitters and Non-remitters were compared, controlling for age, sex, and BMI.

RESULTS

Pre-treatment HDRS ratings did not differ between Remitters and Non-remitters (p=0.179). Baseline DHEA levels of Remitters were significantly higher than both Non-remitters (p=0.008) and controls (p=0.004); baseline DHEA-S levels of Remitters were also higher than Non-remitters (p=0.040) but did not significantly differ from controls (p=0.096). Non-remitters did not significantly differ from controls. Post-treatment DHEA(S) levels remained higher in Remitters compared to Non-remitters (DHEA: p=0.013; DHEA-S: p=0.040).

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that higher circulating DHEA(S) levels (while unmedicated and after eight weeks of SSRI treatment) predict SSRI-associated remission in MDD. This raises the possibility that endogenous DHEA(S) abundance is a physiological adjunct to SSRI efficacy, as suggested by prior preclinical and clinical studies.

Serum DHEAS levels are associated with the development of depression

The aim of study was to evaluate the association between serum DHEAS levels and depression with a case-control study together with a meta-analysis. Radioimmunoassay (RIA) was performed to measure the serum DHEAS levels of all participants before and after treatment. Depression Patients were divided into mild depression and severe depression based on Hamilton depression scale (HAMD24) and received 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) and citalopram (20mg/d) for 8 weeks. Case-control studies related to our study theme were enrolled for meta-analysis and Comprehensive Meta-analysis 2.0 (CMA 2.0) was used for statistical analysis. After treatment, DHEAS levels in depression patients were significantly increased, while before and after treatment, DHEAS levels were all lower in depression patients than in controls (all P<0.001); further analysis on age revealed that DHEAS levels were decreased with the rising of age. Meta-analysis results suggested that serum DHEAS levels (ng/mL) were significantly higher in healthy controls compared to depression patients (SMD=0.777, 95%CI=0.156-1.399, P=0.014). In conclusion, our study suggests that serum DHEAS levels are associated with the development of depression and it decreased with the rising of age.

DHEAS and cortisol/DHEAS-ratio in recurrent depression: State, or trait predicting 10-year recurrence?

BACKGROUND

Major depressive disorder (MDD) has been associated with low dehydroepiandrosterone-sulphate (DHEAS), - particularly relative to high cortisol - although conflicting findings exist. Moreover, it is unclear whether low DHEAS is only present during the depressive state, or manifests as a trait that may reflect vulnerability for recurrence. Therefore, we longitudinally tested whether low DHEAS and high cortisol/DHEAS-ratio in recurrent MDD (I) reflects a trait, and/or (II) varies with depressive state. In addition, we tested associations with (III) previous MDD-episodes, (IV) prospective recurrence, and (V) effects of cognitive therapy.

METHODS

At study-entry, we cross-sectionally compared morning and evening salivary DHEAS and molar cortisol/DHEAS-ratio of 187 remitted recurrent MDD-patients with 72 matched controls. Subsequently, patients participated in an 8-week randomized controlled cognitive therapy trial. We repeated salivary measures after 3 months and 2 years. We measured clinical symptoms during a 10-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Remitted patients showed steeper diurnal DHEAS-decline (p<.005) and a flatter diurnal profile of cortisol/DHEAS-ratio (p<.001) than controls. We found no state-effect in DHEAS or cortisol/DHEAS-ratio throughout follow-up and no association with number of previous episodes. Higher morning cortisol/DHEAS-ratio predicted shorter time till recurrence over the 10-year follow-up in interaction with the effects of cognitive therapy (p<.05). Finally, cognitive therapy did not influence DHEAS or cortisol/DHEAS-ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Diurnal profiles of DHEAS and cortisol/DHEAS-ratio remain equally altered in between depressive episodes, and may predict future recurrence. This suggests they represent an endophenotypic vulnerability trait rather than a state-effect, which provides a new road to understand recurrent depression and its prevention.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN68246470.

Clinical significance of decreased protein expression of dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate in the development of depression: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous evidence has shown that adrenal androgens, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and its sulfate derivative (DHEAS) have significant functions related to the control of mood, affect, and anxiety. Changes in their expression levels are reportedly related to several psychiatric disorders. The objective of this meta-analysis was to explore the role of DHEAS protein expression in patients with depression.

METHOD

Web of Science, Cochrane Library, CISCOM, CINAHL, Google Scholar, China BioMedicine (CBM) and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) were electronically searched. Only those studies that analyzing DHEAS expression in depression patients were considered eligible for inclusion. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) were pooled with a 95% confidence interval (CI) in accordance with the random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten clinical case-control studies, consisting of 4496 subjects (493 patients with depression and 4003 healthy controls) were incorporated for analysis. Results revealed a lower DHEAS protein expression level in patients with depression than in normal controls (SMD=0.17, 95% CI: 0.06-0.27, P=0.002). Ethnicity-stratified analysis indicated that lower levels of DHEAS expression in depression patients were not observed in Caucasians or Asians (both P>0.05).

CONCLUSION

Elevated DHEAS protein expression may be correlated with the biological pathophysiology of depression, indicating that checking DHEAS levels and administration of DHEAS could contribute to the effective treatment of depression.

Plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate levels in patients with major depressive disorder correlate with remission during treatment with antidepressants

OBJECTIVE

We attempted to investigate whether dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate (DHEA-S) levels are associated with remission of major depressive disorder by assessing scores on the 17-Item Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression before and after antidepressant treatment.

METHODS

Plasma DHEA-S levels in 24 patients diagnosed with major depressive disorder on the basis of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (text revision) before and after antidepressant treatment, and 24 healthy, gender-matched, and age-matched controls were measured using a radioimmunoassay kit.

RESULTS

Plasma DHEA-S levels in patients were significantly higher than those in healthy controls. In patients who achieved remission after antidepressant treatment, plasma DHEA-S levels significantly declined compared with the levels before treatment. A significant correlation was observed between changes in DHEA-S levels and Absence of Depressive and Anxious Mood scores, which are calculated from the 2-Item Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Depression rating as follows: severity of depressive mood and anxiety in patients before and after antidepressant treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that plasma DHEA-S levels can be used as a putative indicator of the state of remission in patients with major depressive disorder. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Neuropeptide receptor ligands as drugs for psychiatric diseases: the end of the beginning?

The search for novel drugs for treating psychiatric disorders is driven by the growing medical need to improve on the effectiveness and side-effect profile of currently available therapies. Given the wealth of preclinical data supporting the role of neuropeptides in modulating behaviour, pharmaceutical companies have been attempting to target neuropeptide receptors for over two decades. However, clinical studies with synthetic neuropeptide ligands have been unable to confirm the promise predicted by studies in animal models. Here, we analyse preclinical and clinical results for neuropeptide receptor ligands that have been studied in clinical trials for psychiatric diseases, including agents that target the receptors for tachykinins, corticotropin-releasing factor, vasopressin and neurotensin, and suggest new ways to exploit the full potential of these candidate drugs.

Neuroimmune endocrine effects of antidepressants

Antidepressant pharmacotherapy is to date the most often used treatment for depression, but the exact mechanism of action underlying its therapeutic effect is still unclear. Many theories have been put forward to account for depression, as well as antidepressant activity, but none of them is exhaustive. Neuroimmune endocrine impairment is found in depressed patients; high levels of circulating corticosteroids along with hyperactivation of the immune system, high levels of proinflammatory cytokines, low levels of melatonin in plasma and urine, and disentrainment of circadian rhythms have been demonstrated. Moreover, antidepressant treatment seems to correct or at least to interfere with these alterations. In this review, we summarize the complex neuroimmune endocrine and chronobiological alterations found in patients with depression and how these systems interact with each other. We also explain how antidepressant therapy can modify these systems, along with some possible mechanisms of action shown in animal and human models.

Mirtazapine versus other antidepressive agents for depression

BACKGROUND

Mirtazapine has a unique mechanism of antidepressive action and is one of the commonly used antidepressants in clinical practice.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the present review was to assess the evidence on the efficacy and acceptability of mirtazapine compared with other antidepressive agents in the acute-phase treatment of major depression in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Collaboration Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis review group's specialised register (CCDANCTR), which includes relevant randomised controlled trials from the following bibliographic databases: The Cochrane Library (all years to April 2011), EMBASE, (1980 to July 2011) MEDLINE (1950 to July 2011) and PsycINFO (1974 to July 2011). Reference lists of the reports of relevant studies were checked and experts in the field contacted. The review was not limited to English-language articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) allocating participants with major depression to mirtazapine versus any other antidepressive agent.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently checked eligibility and extracted data on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary outcome was response to treatment. The secondary outcomes included dropouts and individual adverse events.Meta-analyses were conducted using the random-effects model.

MAIN RESULTS

A total of 29 RCTs (n = 4974), mostly following up the participants for six weeks in outpatient clinics and inadequately reporting the risk of bias, were included. In comparison with tricyclic antidepressants (10 trials, n = 1553) there was no robust evidence to detect a difference between mirtazapine and tricyclics in terms of response at two weeks (odds ratio (OR) 0.85, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.13) or at the end of acute-phase treatment (at 6 to 12 weeks) (OR 0.89, 95% CI 0.72 to 1.10). In comparison with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) (12 trials, n = 2626) mirtazapine was significantly more effective at two weeks (OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.30 to 1.88) and at the end of acute-phase treatment (OR 1.19, 95% CI 1.01 to 1.39). Mirtazapine was significantly more effective than a serotonin-noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor (venlafaxine only, two trials, n = 415) at two weeks (OR 2.29, 95% CI 1.45 to 3.59) and at the end of acute-phase treatment (OR 1.53, 95% CI 1.03 to 2.25).In terms of dropouts, there was no robust evidence to detect a difference between mirtazapine and other antidepressants. Mirtazapine was more likely to cause weight gain or increased appetite and somnolence than SSRIs but less likely to cause nausea or vomiting and sexual dysfunction.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Some statistically significant and possibly clinically meaningful differences between mirtazapine and other antidepressive agents were found for the acute-phase treatment of major depression. Mirtazapine is likely to have a faster onset of action than SSRIs during the acute-phase treatment. Dropouts occur similarly in participants treated with mirtazapine and those treated with other antidepressants, although the adverse event profile of mirtazapine is unique.

Fluvoxamine enhances prefrontal dopaminergic neurotransmission in adrenalectomized/castrated mice via both 5-HT reuptake inhibition and σ(1) receptor activation

RATIONALE

Fluvoxamine, a selective serotonin (5-HT) reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) and an agonist for the σ(1) receptors, increases extracellular monoamines in the prefrontal cortex, but it is not known whether the σ(1) receptor is involved in the neurochemical effect of fluvoxamine.

OBJECTIVES

In view of the fact that circulating steroids exert a tonic modulatory effect on σ(1) receptor-mediated effects, the present study examines the effects of fluvoxamine on prefrontal extracellular monoamine levels in adrenalectomized/castrated mice lacking the peripheral sources of steroids.

RESULTS

Fluvoxamine-induced increases in the extracellular levels of dopamine (DA), but not of 5-HT and noradrenaline, were significantly higher in adrenalectomized/castrated than in sham-operated mice, and this effect was blocked by BD1047, a selective σ(1) receptor antagonist. In contrast, the effects of paroxetine, an SSRI without affinity for the σ(1) receptors, and (+)-SKF-10,047, a selective σ(1) receptor agonist, on the extracellular monoamine levels did not differ between adrenalectomized/castrated and sham-operated mice, while the increase in extracellular DA levels induced by co-administration of these drugs was higher in adrenalectomized/castrated than in the control mice. Moreover, fluvoxamine increased c-Fos expression, a marker of neuronal activity, in the prefrontal cortex of adrenalectomized/castrated mice, and this effect was blocked by BD1047. The similar increase in c-Fos expression was observed by co-administration of paroxetine and (+)-SKF-10,047.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest that fluvoxamine enhances prefrontal dopaminergic neurotransmission via both 5-HT reuptake inhibition and σ(1) receptor activation under the circulating neuroactive steroid-deficient conditions.

Neuroactive steroids in affective disorders: target for novel antidepressant or anxiolytic drugs?

In the past decades considerable evidence has emerged that so-called neuroactive steroids do not only act as transcriptional factors in the regulation of gene expression but may also alter neuronal excitability through interactions with specific neurotransmitter receptors such as the GABA(A) receptor. In particular, 3α-reduced neuroactive steroids such as allopregnanolone or allotetrahydrodeoxycorticosterone have been shown to act as positive allosteric modulators of the GABA(A) receptor and to play an important role in the pathophysiology of depression and anxiety. During depression, the concentrations of 3α,5α-tetrahydroprogesterone and 3α,5β-tetrahydroprogesterone are decreased, while the levels of 3β,5α-tetrahydroprogesterone, a stereoisomer of 3α,5α-tetrahydroprogesterone, which may act as an antagonist for GABAergic steroids, are increased. Antidepressant drugs such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) or mirtazapine apparently have an impact on key enzymes of neurosteroidogenesis and have been shown to normalize the disequilibrium of neuroactive steroids in depression by increasing 3α-reduced pregnane steroids and decreasing 3β,5α-tetrahydroprogesterone. Moreover, 3α-reduced neuroactive steroids have been demonstrated to possess antidepressant- and anxiolytic-like effects both in animal and human studies for themselves. In addition, the translacator protein (18 kDa) (TSPO), previously called peripheral benzodiazepine receptor, is the key element of the mitochondrial import machinery supplying the substrate cholesterol to the first steroidogenic enzyme (P450scc), which transforms cholesterol into pregnenolone, the precursor of all neurosteroids. TSPO ligands increase neurosteroidogenesis and are a target of novel anxiolytic drugs producing anxiolytic effects without causing the side effects normally associated with conventional benzodiazepines such as sedation or tolerance. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Neuroactive Steroids: Focus on Human Brain.