1
|
Tetlow SM, Zhang L, Borowiecki M, Kim Y, Gentzke AS, Wang TW, Cornelius ME, Hawkins NA. A Safety Net Tobacco Use Cessation Resource: Quitline Service Usage, 2019. Prev Chronic Dis 2023; 20:E84. [PMID: 37769250 PMCID: PMC10557988 DOI: 10.5888/pcd20.230033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Quitlines are free, accessible evidence-based services that may provide an important resource for people facing barriers to clinical treatment for cessation of tobacco use. METHODS Using 2019 intake data from the National Quitline Data Warehouse, we examined quitline service usage, stratified by sociodemographic characteristics. Only US quitlines reporting service type data were included (n = 40 [of 51]). Callers (aged ≥12 years) who registered with a quitline, reported current use of a tobacco product, and received at least 1 service comprised the analytic data. Chi-square tests examined differences in quitline services received by participant characteristics. RESULTS In 2019, 182,544 people reporting current use of a tobacco product received at least 1 service from a quitline in 39 states and the District of Columbia. Among them, 80.4% had attained less than a college or university degree and 70.4% were uninsured or enrolled in Medicaid or in Medicare (aged <65 years). By educational attainment (aged ≥25 years), receipt of cessation medications ranged from 59.4% of callers with a college or university degree to 65.0% of callers with a high school diploma (P < .001). The range by insurance coverage was 59.3% of callers with private insurance to 74.7% of callers with Medicare (aged <65 years) (P < .001). CONCLUSION Quitlines served as a resource for low-SES populations in 2019, providing cessation services to many people who may face barriers to clinical cessation treatment. Strengthening and expanding quitlines may help to increase cessation among populations with a disproportionately high prevalence of tobacco product use and improve the health and well-being of people in the US.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia M Tetlow
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, MS S107-7, 4770 Buford Hwy, Atlanta, GA 30341
| | - Lei Zhang
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Yoonsang Kim
- NORC at the University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Andrea S Gentzke
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Teresa W Wang
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Monica E Cornelius
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Nikki A Hawkins
- Office on Smoking and Health, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alghzawi HM, Storr CL. Gender Differences in the Interrelations Among Social Support, Stressful Life Events, and Smoking Cessation in People With Severe Mental Illnesses. J Am Psychiatr Nurses Assoc 2023; 29:146-160. [PMID: 33926296 DOI: 10.1177/10783903211008248] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Social support and stressful life events (SLEs) have been found to be influential factors for smoking cessation in the general population, but little is known about these factors among smokers with severe mental illnesses (SMIs) and whether their associations with smoking cessation differ by gender. AIMS To examine the association between social support and smoking cessation as mediated by SLEs in people with SMI and to examine whether the interrelations among social support, SLEs, and smoking cessation differ by gender. METHODS A population sample of 4,610 American lifetime adult smokers with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, or major depressive disorder were identified in a limited public use data set of the 2012-2013 National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions. Four mediation and moderated mediation models were used to examine gender differences in the interrelations among social support (total and three subscales of the Interpersonal Support Evaluation List-12), SLEs (summative score of positive responses to 16 types experienced in past year and related to health, job, death, or legal situations), and smoking status in prior year. RESULTS Total, appraisal, and tangible support among females exerted indirect effects on smoking cessation via decreasing SLE scores. Among males, only belonging support exerted an indirect effect on smoking cessation via an increased SLE score. CONCLUSIONS Findings suggest that interventions focusing on improving social support should be a priority for those working with smokers with SMI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hamzah M Alghzawi
- Hamzah M. Alghzawi, PhD, MSN, RN, Medstar Good Samaritan Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Carla L Storr
- Carla L. Storr, ScD, MPH, University of Maryland School of Nursing, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bernstein SL, Dziura J, Weiss J, Brooks AH, Miller T, Vickerman KA, Grau LE, Pantalon MV, Abroms L, Collins LM, Toll B. Successful Optimization of Tobacco Dependence Treatment in the Emergency Department: A Randomized Controlled Trial Using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy. Ann Emerg Med 2023; 81:209-221. [PMID: 36585318 PMCID: PMC9868063 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2022.08.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2021] [Revised: 06/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE Tobacco dependence treatment initiated in the hospital emergency department (ED) is effective. However, trials typically use multicomponent interventions, making it difficult to distinguish specific components that are effective. In addition, interactions between components cannot be assessed. The Multiphase Optimization Strategy allows investigators to identify these effects. METHODS We conducted a full-factorial, 24 or 16-condition optimization trial in a busy hospital ED to examine the performance of 4 tobacco dependence interventions: a brief negotiation interview; 6 weeks of nicotine replacement therapy with the first dose delivered in the ED; active referral to a telephone quitline; and enrollment in SmokefreeTXT, a free short-messaging service program. Study data were analyzed with a novel mixed methods approach to assess clinical efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and qualitative participant feedback. The primary endpoint was tobacco abstinence at 3 months, verified by exhaled carbon monoxide using a Bedfont Micro+ Smokerlyzer. RESULTS Between February 2017 and May 2019, we enrolled 1,056 adult smokers visiting the ED. Odd ratios (95% confidence intervals) from the primary analysis of biochemically confirmed abstinence rates at 3 months for each intervention, versus control, were: brief negotiation interview, 1.8 (1.1, 2.8); nicotine replacement therapy, 2.1 (1.3, 3.2); quitline, 1.4 (0.9, 2.2); SmokefreeTXT, 1.1 (0.7, 1.7). There were no statistically significant interactions among components. Economic and qualitative analyses are in progress. CONCLUSION The brief negotiation interview and nicotine replacement therapy were efficacious. This study is the first to identify components of ED-initiated tobacco dependence treatment that are individually effective. Future work will address the scalability of the brief negotiation interview and nicotine replacement therapy by offering provider-delivered brief negotiation interviews and nicotine replacement therapy prescriptions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven L Bernstein
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT; Yale Center for Implementation Science, New Haven, CT; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.
| | - James Dziura
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - June Weiss
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Avis H Brooks
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Ted Miller
- Pacific Institute of Research and Evaluation, Calverton, MD
| | | | - Lauretta E Grau
- Yale Center for Implementation Science, New Haven, CT; Department of Epidemiology of Microbial Diseases, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT
| | - Michael V Pantalon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Lorien Abroms
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University, Washington, DC
| | - Linda M Collins
- The Methodology Center and Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA
| | - Benjamin Toll
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Fennell BS, Piñeiro B, Vidrine DJ, Frank-Pearce SG, Wetter DW, Simmons VN, Vidrine JI. Ask-Advise-Connect: Differential Enrollment and Smoking Cessation Outcomes Between Primary Care Patients Who Received Quitline-Delivered Treatment in Spanish vs English. Ann Fam Med 2022; 20:519-525. [PMID: 36443074 PMCID: PMC9705036 DOI: 10.1370/afm.2878] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2021] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study examined differences in Quitline treatment enrollment, engagement, and smoking cessation outcomes among primary care patients preferring Spanish and English using the evidence-based tobacco treatment Ask-Advise-Connect. METHODS Ask-Advise-Connect was implemented April 2013 through February 2016 in a large safety-net health system to connect smokers with treatment via a link in the electronic health record. Rates of treatment enrollment, engagement, acceptance of nicotine replacement therapy, and smoking abstinence (self-reported and biochemically confirmed) were compared at 6 months among patients who received treatment in Spanish and English using χ 2 tests. Logistic regression examined language and nicotine replacement therapy and their interaction as predictors of abstinence. RESULTS The smoking status of 218,915 patients was assessed and recorded in the electronic health record. Smoking prevalence was 8.4% among patients preferring Spanish and 27.0% among those preferring English. Spanish-preferring patients were less likely to enroll in treatment (10.7% vs 12.0%, χ 2 = 12.06, P = .001) yet completed more counseling calls when enrolled (median = 2 vs 1, P <.001). Patients who received treatment in Spanish (vs English) were twice as likely to be abstinent at 6 months (self-reported: 25.1% vs 14.5%, odds ratio [OR] = 1.98, 95% CI, 1.62-2.40; biochemically confirmed: 7.6% vs 3.7%, OR = 2.13, 95% CI, 1.52-2.97). Receipt of nicotine replacement therapy increased abstinence for all patients and language did not interact with nicotine replacement therapy to predict abstinence. CONCLUSIONS Automated point-of-care approaches such as Ask-Advise-Connect have great potential to reach Spanish-preferring smokers. Those who received tobacco treatment in Spanish (vs English) demonstrated better engagement and cessation outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bárbara Piñeiro
- Centre d'Estudis Demogràfics, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Damon J Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Summer G Frank-Pearce
- Stephenson Cancer Center and Hudson College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| | - David W Wetter
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and the Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Vani N Simmons
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Jennifer I Vidrine
- Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Flocke SA, Albert EL, Lewis SA, Seeholzer EL, Bailey SR. Characteristics of Patients Engaging in Quitline Counseling After an Electronic Referral. Am J Prev Med 2021; 61:e191-e195. [PMID: 34134884 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2021.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Proactive, electronic referral of primary care patients to quitlines has great potential to provide evidence-based tobacco-cessation assistance to tobacco users. However, the quitline contact rates and engagement of individuals beyond 1 counseling call are poor. This study examines the characteristics of electronically referred patients who engage with the quitline. METHODS This cross-sectional study included 2,407 primary care patients who reported using tobacco and accepted an electronic referral to the quitline. Outcomes included contact, enrollment, and receipt of ≥2 counseling sessions from the quitline. All measures were assessed from the electronic health record. The association of patient characteristics and outcomes was evaluated using logistic regression modeling with generalized estimating equation methods. Data were collected in 2016‒2018 and were analyzed in 2020. RESULTS Among 2,407 referred patients, 794 (33.0%) were contacted; of those, 571 enrolled (71.9%); and of those, 240 (42.0%) engaged in ≥2 quitline counseling sessions. In multivariable analyses, older adults (aged 50-64 and ≥65 years) were significantly more likely to be contacted (OR=2.32, 95% CI=1.6, 3.4) and to receive ≥2 counseling sessions (OR=2.34, 95% CI=1.2, 4.7) than those aged 18-34 years. Those with both Medicare and Medicaid insurance coverage were more likely than those with Medicaid only to be contacted (OR=1.71, 95% CI=1.4, 2.2), to enroll (OR=1.84, 95% CI=1.2, 2.9), and to receive ≥2 counseling sessions (OR=1.83, 95% CI=1.2, 2.9). CONCLUSIONS The current quitline phone-based approach is less likely to engage younger adults and those with Medicaid coverage; however, there is a need to improve quitline engagement across all patients. Identification and testing of alternative engagement approaches are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan A Flocke
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
| | - Elizabeth L Albert
- School of Medicine, Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Steven A Lewis
- Population Health Research Institute, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio; Center for Health Care Research and Policy, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Eileen L Seeholzer
- Population Health Research Institute, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio; Center for Health Care Research and Policy, The MetroHealth System, Cleveland, Ohio; Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Steffani R Bailey
- Department of Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Khodadadi AB, Carroll W, Lee EL, Hansen B, Scarinci IC. It Takes Two to Tango: Patients' and Providers' Perspectives in Tobacco Cessation and Head/Neck Cancer. Oncologist 2021; 26:761-770. [PMID: 34105215 DOI: 10.1002/onco.13856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco cessation among patients with head/neck cancer continues to be challenging despite evidence that cessation improves treatment outcomes. The purpose of this study was to understand barriers/facilitators to tobacco cessation among patients with head/neck cancer and health care providers and to obtain perspectives toward the development of a patient-centered tobacco cessation intervention. MATERIALS AND METHODS In-depth qualitative interviews with 10 health care providers and 21 patients with head/neck cancer (12 inpatients and 9 outpatients) who were current or former smokers. RESULTS Health was a common motivator to quit among patients. Although most patients indicated that their health care provider asked and advised them to quit, they were unaware of cessation resources. Suggestions for a tobacco cessation program included involvement of former smokers, health care provider involvement/counseling, supporting written materials, and incorporating follow-up and family support. Health care providers identified patients' anger/frustration associated with the disease, social/demographic issues, and poor quality of life as the three most frequent challenges in treating patients. Although all providers reported asking about tobacco use, 70% emphasized a lack of formal training in tobacco cessation and lack of time. Their suggestions for a cessation program included having a "quarterback" responsible for this component with support from the entire health care team and continuity between outpatient and inpatient services to promote cessation, prevent relapse, and highlight the importance of follow-up and social support. CONCLUSION There is great interest and need, both from patients and providers, for tobacco cessation services in the oncology setting tailored for patients with head/neck cancer in the context of cancer care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE Although the combination of pharmacotherapy and cognitive-behavioral intervention is the standard evidence-based treatment for tobacco dependence, it must be adapted to meet the needs and wants of patients and providers to be effective. This study provides an in-depth examination of such needs among patients with head and neck cancer and providers in the context of cancer care. Providers and patients emphasized the need of having a trained health care provider dedicated to providing tobacco cessation through seamless integration between outpatient and inpatient services as well as follow-up with an emphasis on family involvement throughout the process.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - William Carroll
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Erica L Lee
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Barbara Hansen
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| | - Isabel C Scarinci
- University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Merianos AL, Jandarov RA, Gordon JS, Lyons MS, Mahabee-Gittens EM. Healthcare resources attributable to child tobacco smoke exposure. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0247179. [PMID: 33621228 PMCID: PMC7901732 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tobacco smoke exposure (TSE) places an economic toll on the U.S. healthcare system. There is a gap in the literature on pediatric emergency department (ED) and urgent care related healthcare costs and utilization specific to tobacco smoke-exposed patients. The objectives were to assess pediatric ED visits, urgent care visits and hospital admissions longitudinally, and baseline visit costs among tobacco smoke-exposed children (TSE group) relative to unexposed children (non-TSE group). Methods and findings We conducted a retrospective study using electronic medical records of 380 children ages 0–17 years in the TSE group compared to 1,140 in the non-TSE group propensity score matched via nearest neighbor search by child age, sex, race, and ethnicity. Linear and Poisson regression models were used. Overall, children had a mean of 0.19 (SE = 0.01) repeat visits within 30-days, and 0.69 (SE = 0.04) pediatric ED visits and 0.87 (SE = 0.03) urgent care visits over 12-months following their baseline visit. The percent of children with ≥ 1 urgent care visit was higher among the TSE group (52.4%) than the non-TSE group (45.1%, p = 0.01). Children in the TSE group (M = $1,136.97, SE = 76.44) had higher baseline pediatric ED visit costs than the non-TSE group (M = $1,018.96, SE = 125.51, p = 0.01). Overall, children had 0.08 (SE = 0.01) hospital admissions over 12-months, and the TSE group (M = 0.12, SE = 0.02) had higher mean admissions than the non-TSE group (M = 0.06, SE = 0.01, p = 0.02). The child TSE group was at 1.85 times increased risk of having hospital admissions (95% CI = 1.23, 2.79, p = 0.003) than the non-TSE group. Conclusions Tobacco smoke-exposed children had higher urgent care utilization and hospital admissions over 12-months, and higher pediatric ED costs at baseline. Pediatric ED visits, urgent care visits, and hospitalizations may be opportune times for initiating tobacco control interventions, which may result in reductions of preventable acute care visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley L. Merianos
- School of Human Services, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
- Center for Addiction Research, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Roman A. Jandarov
- Department of Environmental and Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
| | - Judith S. Gordon
- College of Nursing, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, United States of America
| | - Michael S. Lyons
- Center for Addiction Research, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
| | - E. Melinda Mahabee-Gittens
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Race differences in predictors of weight gain among a community sample of smokers enrolled in a randomized controlled trial of a multiple behavior change intervention. Prev Med Rep 2021; 21:101303. [PMID: 33489726 PMCID: PMC7807159 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2020.101303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2019] [Revised: 11/24/2020] [Accepted: 12/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
African Americans have disproportionate rates of post-cessation weight gain compared to non-Hispanic whites, but few studies have examined this weight gain in a multiracial sample of smokers receiving evidence-based treatment in a community setting. We examined race differences in short-term weight gain during an intervention to foster smoking cessation plus weight management. Data were drawn from the Best Quit Study, a randomized controlled trial conducted via telephone quitlines across the U.S. from 2013 to 2017. The trial tested the effects on cessation and weight gain prevention of adding a weight control intervention either simultaneously with or sequentially after smoking cessation treatment. African Americans (n = 665) and whites (n = 1723) self-reported smoking status and weight during ten intervention calls. Random effects longitudinal modeling was used to examine predictors of weight change over the intervention period (average 16 weeks). There was a significant race × treatment effect; in the simultaneous group, weight increased for African Americans at a faster rate compared to whites (b = 0.302, SE = 0.129, p < 0.05), independent of smoking status, age, baseline obesity, and education. After stratifying the sample, the effect of treatment group differed by race. Education level attenuated the rate of weight gain for African Americans in the simultaneous group, but not for whites. African Americans receiving smoking and weight content simultaneously gained weight faster than whites in the same group; however, the weight gain was slower for African Americans with higher educational attainment. Future studies are needed to understand social factors associated with treatment receptivity that may influence weight among African American smokers.
Collapse
|
9
|
Albert EL, Rose JC, Gill IJ, Flocke SA. Quitting the quitline: a qualitative study of patient experience of electronic referrals to quitlines. BMC Public Health 2020; 20:1080. [PMID: 32646397 PMCID: PMC7350715 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-020-09185-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of electronic referrals (eReferrals) to state quitlines (QLs) for tobacco-using patients is a promising approach for addressing smoking cessation on a large scale. However, QL contact, enrollment, and completion rates are low. The purpose of this study was to examine the eReferral to QL process from the patient's perspective in order to inform strategies for improving QL engagement. METHODS We conducted interviews with 55 patients who agreed to an eReferral at a primary care visit to 1 of 8 safety-net community health centers in Cuyahoga County, Ohio (September 2017-August 2018). Interviews were designed to explore the experiences of three subgroups of patients who subsequently: 1) declined participation in the QL; 2) were unreachable by the QL; or 3) were enrolled in or had completed the QL program. Analysis was guided by a phenomenological approach designed to identify emergent themes. RESULTS Reasons for QL program non-completion included changing life circumstances and events making cessation unviable; misunderstandings about the QL; discomfort with telephonic counseling; perceived lack of time for counseling; cell phone barriers; and having already quit smoking. We found that some individuals who were no longer engaged with the QL still desired continued support from the QL. CONCLUSIONS Participants intentionally and unintentionally disengage from the QL for a wide variety of reasons, several of which are mediated by low socioeconomic status. Integrating QL care with community-based resources that address these mediators could be a promising strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth L Albert
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7136, USA.
| | - Jeanmarie C Rose
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7136, USA
| | - India J Gill
- Center for Community Health Integration, Case Western Reserve University, 10900 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH, 44106-7136, USA
| | - Susan A Flocke
- Department of Family Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
National trends and state-level variation in the duration of incoming quitline calls to 1-800-QUIT-NOW during 2012–2015. J Smok Cessat 2020. [DOI: 10.1017/jsc.2020.9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractIntroductionThe duration of incoming quitline calls may serve as a crude proxy for the potential amount of reactive counseling provided.AimsTo explore whether call duration may be useful for monitoring quitline capacity and service delivery.MethodsUsing data on the duration of incoming quitline calls to 1-800-QUIT-NOW from 2012 through 2015, we examined national trends and state-level variation in average call duration. We estimated a regression model of average call duration as a function of total incoming calls, nationally and by state, controlling for confounders.ResultsFrom 2012 through 2015, average call duration was 11.4 min, nationally, and was 10 min or longer in 33 states. Average call duration was significantly correlated with quitline service provider. Higher incoming call volume was significantly associated with lower average call duration in 32 states and higher average call duration in five states (P-value <0.05). The relationship between call volume and call duration was not correlated with quitline service provider.ConclusionsVariation in average call duration across states likely reflects different service delivery models. Average call duration was associated with call volume in many states. Significant changes in call duration may highlight potential quitline capacity issues that warrant further investigation.
Collapse
|
11
|
Patten CA, Fu S, Vickerman K, Bock MJ, Nelson D, Zhu SH, Balls-Berry JE, Torres AJ, Brockman TA, Hughes CA, Klein AE, Valdez-Soto M, Keller PA. Support person interventions to increase use of quitline services among racially diverse low-income smokers: A pilot study. Addict Behav Rep 2019; 9:100171. [PMID: 31193750 PMCID: PMC6542743 DOI: 10.1016/j.abrep.2019.100171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2018] [Revised: 02/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Social support from nonsmokers may have a role in prompting smokers to use evidence-based cessation treatment. Prior studies found that an intervention for nonsmoking support persons (SPs) was effective for promoting smokers' use of free, state quitline services. This pilot study adapted and assessed feasibility of this intervention for a racially diverse, low-income population. METHODS Single group, non-randomized design enrolling SP-smoker dyads with low income status enrolled in one of three study "waves" of 10 pairs each. Participants were recruited using flyers and in-person outreach methods. The SP intervention included a 1-session coaching call and written materials; study waves 2 and 3 also included text messaging and a monetary incentive for smokers who used quitline services. Using content analysis, the intervention was iteratively adapted based on SP feedback. Baseline measures assessed socio-demographics, dyad and tobacco use characteristics. Follow-up assessments were conducted among SPs at 1-month follow-up and among smokers at 3-months follow-up. Feasibility indicators were recruitment, retention, and SP intervention acceptability and adherence. Secondary outcomes were smokers' use of any quitline service verified by quitline staff and 7-day, point prevalence, biochemically verified smoking abstinence at 3 months. RESULTS Recruitment of 30 dyads was feasible; in-person recruitment methods were the most successful. SPs who completed follow-up assessments found the intervention acceptable, suggesting only minor content modifications, and they perceived the quitline information as novel. But the study had some feasibility challenges (e.g., SP coaching call completion: 60% and SP study retention: 53%). At 3 months, 2 smokers (7%) had used any quitline service and 13% were biochemically confirmed smoking abstinent. CONCLUSIONS This pilot study demonstrated feasibility of recruiting SP-smoker dyads from diverse, low-income communities. While the intervention was well received, its delivery was not feasible in this population. Results suggest that further consumer adaptation of the intervention is needed among both SPs and smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christi A. Patten
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Steven Fu
- Veterans Affairs HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Mail code: 152, Bldg 9, One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, United States
| | - Katrina Vickerman
- Optum Center for Wellbeing Research, Optum Health, 999 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, United States
| | - Martha J. Bock
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - David Nelson
- Veterans Affairs HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Mail code: 152, Bldg 9, One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, United States
| | - Shu-Hong Zhu
- University of California San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive #0905, La Jolla, CA 92093, United States
| | - Joyce E. Balls-Berry
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science Community Engagement Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Alula Jimenez Torres
- Optum Center for Wellbeing Research, Optum Health, 999 Third Ave, Seattle, WA 98104, United States
| | - Tabetha A. Brockman
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science Community Engagement Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Christine A. Hughes
- Department of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Abigail E. Klein
- Veterans Affairs HSR&D Center for Chronic Disease Outcomes Research, Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Mail code: 152, Bldg 9, One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, United States
- Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, One Veterans Drive, Minneapolis, MN 55417, United States
| | - Miguel Valdez-Soto
- Center for Clinical and Translational Science Community Engagement Program, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905, United States
| | - Paula A. Keller
- ClearWay Minnesota℠, 8011 34th Ave S, Suite 400, Minneapolis, MN 55425, United States
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McQueen A, Roberts C, Garg R, Caburnay C, Fu Q, Gordon J, Bush T, Pokojski R, Thompson T, Kreuter M. Specialized tobacco quitline and basic needs navigation interventions to increase cessation among low income smokers: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials 2019; 80:40-47. [PMID: 30904596 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.03.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2018] [Revised: 03/14/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Smoking in the United States follows a clear socioeconomic gradient: low-income Americans smoke more and quit less than those with more education and income. Evidence-based interventions like tobacco quitlines are designed to make effective cessation services available on a population basis to all smokers. However, these interventions do not address many of the unique challenges faced by low-income smokers, including unmet basic needs like food, housing, personal safety and money for necessities that often supersede health needs. Research is needed to maximize the use and effectiveness of tobacco quitlines in low-income populations. This paper details the rationale, design and methods for a 2 × 2 randomized controlled trial currently underway comparing the effects of Standard and Specialized Tobacco Quitlines with and without Basic Needs Navigation on intervention engagement and smoking cessation among low-income smokers. Smokers are recruited from United Way 2-1-1 in Missouri and all participants receive tobacco quitline services from Optum. Quitline and navigation services are provided for 3 months. Participants complete telephone surveys at baseline, 3- and 6-month follow up. The primary study outcome is self-reported 7-day point prevalence abstinence at 6-month follow up. Embedding the study in practice agencies will accelerate dissemination and scalability should our findings demonstrate intervention effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy McQueen
- Washington University, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, United States of America; Washington University, Brown School, Health Communication Research Laboratory, United States of America.
| | - Christina Roberts
- Washington University, Brown School, Health Communication Research Laboratory, United States of America
| | - Rachel Garg
- Washington University, Brown School, Health Communication Research Laboratory, United States of America
| | - Charlene Caburnay
- Washington University, Brown School, Health Communication Research Laboratory, United States of America
| | - Qiang Fu
- Saint Louis University College for Public Health and Social Justice, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, United States of America
| | - Jacob Gordon
- Washington University, Brown School, Health Communication Research Laboratory, United States of America
| | - Terry Bush
- Optum Center for Wellbeing Research, United States of America
| | - Robin Pokojski
- United Way of Greater St. Louis, United States of America
| | - Tess Thompson
- Washington University, Brown School, Health Communication Research Laboratory, United States of America
| | - Matthew Kreuter
- Washington University, Brown School, Health Communication Research Laboratory, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Piñeiro B, Wetter DW, Vidrine DJ, Hoover DS, Frank-Pearce SG, Nguyen N, Zbikowski SM, Williams MB, Vidrine JI. Quitline treatment dose predicts cessation outcomes among safety net patients linked with treatment via Ask-Advise-Connect. Prev Med Rep 2019; 13:262-267. [PMID: 30723660 PMCID: PMC6351387 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2019.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2018] [Revised: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
The efficacy of tobacco treatment delivered by state quitlines in diverse populations is well-supported, yet little is known about associations between treatment dose and cessation outcomes following the implementation of Ask-Advise-Connect (AAC), an electronic health record-based systematic referral process that generates a high volume of proactive calls from the state quitline to smokers. The current study is a secondary analysis of a 34-month implementation trial evaluating ACC in 13 safety-net clinics in Houston, TX. Treatment was delivered by a quitline and comprised up to five proactive, telephone-delivered multi-component cognitive-behavioral treatment sessions. Associations between treatment dose and abstinence were examined. Abstinence was assessed by phone six months after treatment enrollment, and biochemically confirmed via mailed saliva cotinine. Among smokers who enrolled in treatment and agreed to follow-up (n = 3704), 29.2% completed no treatment sessions, 35.5% completed one session, 16.4% completed two sessions, and 19.0% completed ≥three sessions. Those who completed one (vs. no) sessions were no more likely to report abstinence (OR: 0.98). Those who completed two (vs. no) sessions were nearly twice as likely to report abstinence (OR: 1.83). Those who completed ≥three (vs. no) sessions were nearly four times as likely to report abstinence (OR: 3.70). Biochemically-confirmed cessation outcomes were similar. Most smokers received minimal or no treatment, and treatment dose had a large impact on abstinence. Results highlight the importance of improving engagement in evidence-based treatment protocols following enrollment. Given that motivation to quit fluctuates, systematically offering enrollment to all smokers at all visits is important. The majority of smokers received minimal or no evidence-based tobacco treatment. Smokers who completed 0 or 1 treatment sessions were unlikely to achieve abstinence. Completion of 2 calls doubled the likelihood of abstinence at 6 months. Completion of ≥3 calls was associated with a near quadrupling of abstinence rates. Improving engagement in evidence-based treatment protocols is a research priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bárbara Piñeiro
- Oklahoma Tobacco Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - David W Wetter
- Huntsman Cancer Institute and the Department of Population Health Sciences, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Damon J Vidrine
- Oklahoma Tobacco Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.,Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Diana S Hoover
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Summer G Frank-Pearce
- Oklahoma Tobacco Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.,Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Nga Nguyen
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - Mary B Williams
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, College of Public Health, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Jennifer I Vidrine
- Oklahoma Tobacco Research Center, Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA.,Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Flocke SA, Vanderpool R, Birkby G, Gullett H, Seaman EL, Land S, Zeliadt S. Addressing Tobacco Cessation at Federally Qualified Health Centers: Current Practices & Resources. J Health Care Poor Underserved 2019; 30:1024-1036. [PMID: 31422986 PMCID: PMC6724530 DOI: 10.1353/hpu.2019.0071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
This study assesses the current practices of Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) to address tobacco cessation with patients. A national sample of 112 FQHC medical directors completed the web-based survey. Frequently endorsed barriers to providing tobacco cessation services were: patients lacking insurance coverage (35%), limited transportation (27%), and variance in coverage of cessation services by insurance type (26%). Nearly 50% indicated that two or more tobacco cessation resources met the needs of their patients; 25% had one resource, and the remaining 25% had no resources. There were no differences among resource groups in the use of electronic health record (EHR) best-practice-alerts for tobacco use or in the perceived barriers to providing tobacco cessation assistance. Systems changes to harmonize coverage of tobacco assistance, such as broader accessibility to evidence-based cessation services could have a positive impact on the efforts of FQHCs to provide tobacco cessation assistance to their patients.
Collapse
|
15
|
Predictors of engagement in post-discharge quitline counseling among hospitalized smokers. J Behav Med 2018; 42:139-149. [PMID: 30027388 DOI: 10.1007/s10865-018-9951-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 07/13/2018] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Quitlines provide evidence-based tobacco treatment and multiple calls yield higher quit rates. This study aimed to identify subgroups of smokers with greater quitline engagement following referral during hospitalization. Data were from a randomized clinical trial assessing the effectiveness of fax referral (referral faxed to proactive quitline) versus warm handoff (patient connected to quitline at bedside) (n = 1054). Classification and regression trees analyses evaluated individual and treatment/health system-related variables and their interactions. Among all participants, warm handoff, higher ratings of the tobacco treatment care transition, and being older predicted completing more quitline calls. Among patients enrolled in the quitline, higher transition of care ratings, being older, and use of cessation medication post-discharge predicted completing more calls. Three of the four factors influencing engagement were characteristics of treatment within the hospital (quality of tobacco treatment care transition and referral method) and therapy (use of cessation medications), suggesting potential targets to increase quitline engagement post-discharge.
Collapse
|
16
|
Bush T, Lovejoy J, Javitz H, Torres AJ, Wassum K, Tan MM, Spring B. Simultaneous vs. sequential treatment for smoking and weight management in tobacco quitlines: 6 and 12 month outcomes from a randomized trial. BMC Public Health 2018; 18:678. [PMID: 29855294 PMCID: PMC5984316 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-018-5574-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2017] [Accepted: 05/17/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Smoking cessation often results in weight gain which discourages many smokers from quitting and can increase health risks. Treatments to reduce cessation-related weight gain have been tested in highly controlled trials of in-person treatment, but have never been tested in a real-world setting, which has inhibited dissemination. METHODS The Best Quit Study (BQS) is a replication and "real world" translation using telephone delivery of a prior in-person efficacy trial. DESIGN randomized control trial in a quitline setting. Eligible smokers (n = 2540) were randomized to the standard 5-call quitline intervention or quitline plus simultaneous or sequential weight management. Regression analyses tested effectiveness of treatments on self-reported smoking abstinence and weight change at 6 and 12 months. RESULTS Study enrollees were from 10 commercial employer groups and three state quitlines. Participants were between ages 18-72, 65.8% female, 68.2% white; 23.0% Medicaid-insured, and 76.3% overweight/obese. The follow-up response rate was lower in the simultaneous group than the control group at 6 months (p = 0.01). While a completers analysis of 30-day point prevalence abstinence detected no differences among groups at 6 or 12 months, multiply imputed abstinence showed quit rate differences at 6 months for:simultaneous (40.3%) vs. sequential (48.3%), p = 0.034 and simultaneous vs. control (44.9%), p = 0.043. At 12 months, multiply imputed abstinence, was significantly lower for the simultaneous group (40.7%) vs. control (46.0%), p < 0.05 and vs. sequential (46.3%), p < 0.05. Weight gain at 6 and 12 months was minimal and not different among treatment groups. The sequential group completed fewer total calls (3.75) vs. control (4.16) and vs. simultaneous group (3.83), p = 0.01, and fewer weight calls (0.94) than simultaneous (2.33), p < 0.0001. The number of calls completed predicted 30-day abstinence, p < 0.001, but not weight outcomes. DISCUSSION This study offers a model for evaluating population-level public health interventions conducted in partnership with tobacco quitlines. CONCLUSIONS Simultaneous (vs. sequential) delivery of phone/web weight management with cessation treatment in the quitline setting may adversely affect quit rate. Neither a simultaneous nor sequential approach to addressing weight produced any benefit on suppressing weight gain. This study highlights the need and the challenges of testing intensive interventions in real-world settings. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01867983 . Registered: May 30, 2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Terry Bush
- Alere Wellbeing (a solely owned subsidiary of Optum), 999 Third Avenue Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98104-1139 USA
| | | | | | - Alula Jimenez Torres
- Alere Wellbeing (a solely owned subsidiary of Optum), 999 Third Avenue Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98104-1139 USA
| | - Ken Wassum
- Alere Wellbeing (a solely owned subsidiary of Optum), 999 Third Avenue Suite 2000, Seattle, WA 98104-1139 USA
| | - Marcia M. Tan
- Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| | - Bonnie Spring
- Center for Behavior and Health, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bernstein SL, Dziura J, Weiss J, Miller T, Vickerman KA, Grau LE, Pantalon MV, Abroms L, Collins LM, Toll B. Tobacco dependence treatment in the emergency department: A randomized trial using the Multiphase Optimization Strategy. Contemp Clin Trials 2018; 66:1-8. [PMID: 29287665 PMCID: PMC5851600 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2017] [Revised: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/25/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tobacco dependence remains the leading preventable cause of death in the developed world. Smokers are disproportionately from lower socioeconomic groups, and may use the hospital emergency department (ED) as an important source of care. A recent clinical trial demonstrated the efficacy of a multicomponent intervention to help smokers quit, but the independent contributions of those components is unknown. METHODS This is a full-factorial (16-arm) randomized trial in a busy hospital ED of 4 tobacco dependence interventions: brief motivational interviewing, nicotine replacement therapy, referral to a telephone quitline, and a texting program. The trial utilizes the Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST) and a novel mixed methods analytic design to assess clinical efficacy, cost effectiveness, and qualitative participant feedback. The primary endpoint is tobacco abstinence at 3months, verified by participants' exhaled carbon monoxide. RESULTS Study enrollment began in February 2017. As of April 2017, 52 of 1056 planned participants (4.9%) were enrolled. Telephone-based semi-structured participant interviews and in-person biochemical verification of smoking abstinence are completed at the 3-month follow-up. Efficacy and cost effectiveness analyses will be conducted after follow-up is completed. DISCUSSION The goal of this study is to identify a clinically efficacious, cost-effective intervention package for the initial treatment of tobacco dependence in ED patients. The efficacy of this combination can then be tested in a subsequent confirmatory trial. Our approach incorporates qualitative feedback from study participants in evaluating which intervention components will be tested in the future trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION Trial (NCT02896400) registered in ClinicalTrials.gov on September 6, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven L Bernstein
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, United States; Department of Health Policy, Yale School of Public Health, United States; Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, United States.
| | - James Dziura
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, United States; Department of Health Policy, Yale School of Public Health, United States
| | - June Weiss
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, United States
| | - Ted Miller
- Pacific Institute of Research and Evaluation, Calverton, MD, United States
| | | | - Lauretta E Grau
- Department of Health Policy, Yale School of Public Health, United States
| | - Michael V Pantalon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, United States
| | - Lorien Abroms
- Department of Prevention and Community Health, Milken Institute School of Public Health at George Washington University, United States
| | - Linda M Collins
- The Methodology Center and Department of Human Development and Family Studies, Pennsylvania State University, College Station, PA, United States
| | - Benjamin Toll
- Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT, United States; Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Motivational Benefits of Social Support and Behavioural Interventions for Smoking Cessation. J Smok Cessat 2018; 13:216-226. [PMID: 30984294 DOI: 10.1017/jsc.2017.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
This study examined the role of social support and behavioral interventions used during the last unsuccessful quit attempt for smokers' intentions to quit smoking within the next 6 months, and identified smokers' attributes associated with use of social support and behavioral interventions. The analytic sample included 7,195 adult daily smokers who responded to the 2010-2011 Tobacco Use Supplement to the Current Population Survey, conducted in the US, and indicated having a serious quit attempt in the past 12 months. Smokers who relied on social support from friends and family had higher odds of intending to quit than those who did not (OR= 1.39, 95% CI= 1.22:1.58), and smokers who used interventions had higher odds of intending to quit than those who did not (OR= 1.36, 95% CI= 1.07:1.74). These associations were similar for both sexes, all age groups, and nicotine dependence levels. Both, relying on social support and use of behavioral interventions were more common among smokers who were female, higher educated, residing in the Western US region, and those who used pharmacological aids for smoking cessation. Social support and behavioral interventions are associated with higher intentions to quit among attempters who relapsed and thus, may aid future smoking cessation.
Collapse
|