1
|
Root KT, Hones KM, Hao KA, Brolin TJ, Wright JO, King JJ, Wright TW, Schoch BS. A Systematic Review of Patient Selection Criteria for Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthop Clin North Am 2024; 55:363-381. [PMID: 38782508 DOI: 10.1016/j.ocl.2023.12.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/25/2024]
Abstract
The utilization of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is increasing, driving associated annual health care costs higher. Opting for outpatient over inpatient TSA may provide a solution by reducing costs. However, there is no single set of accepted patient selection criteria for outpatient TSA. Here, the authors identify and systematically review 14 articles to propose evidence-based criteria that merit postoperative admission. Together, the studies suggest that patients with limited ability to abmluate independently or a history of congestive heart failure may benefit from postoperative at least one night of hospital based monitoring and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin T Root
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Keegan M Hones
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road # 3341, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA
| | - Kevin A Hao
- College of Medicine, University of Florida, 1600 SW Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Tyler J Brolin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, 1211 Union Avenue # 500, Memphis, TN 38104, USA
| | - Jonathan O Wright
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road # 3341, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA
| | - Joseph J King
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road # 3341, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA
| | - Thomas W Wright
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Florida, 3450 Hull Road # 3341, Gainesville, FL 32607, USA
| | - Bradley S Schoch
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL 32224, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fedorka CJ, Zhang X, Liu HH, Gottschalk MB, Abboud JA, Warner JJP, MacDonald P, Khan AZ, Costouros JG, Best MJ, Fares MY, Kirsch JM, Simon JE, Sanders B, O'Donnell EA, Armstrong AD, da Silva Etges APB, Jones P, Haas DA, Woodmass J. Racial and gender disparities in utilization of outpatient total shoulder arthroplasties. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024:S1058-2746(24)00410-5. [PMID: 38852710 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.04.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Utilization in outpatient total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) has increased significantly in recent years. It remains largely unknown whether utilization of outpatient TSA differs across gender and racial groups. This study aimed to quantify racial and gender disparities both nationally and by geographic regions. METHODS 168,504 TSAs were identified using Medicare fee-for-service inpatient and outpatient claims data and beneficiary enrollment data from 2020 to 2022Q4. The percentage of outpatient cases, defined as cases discharged on the same day of surgery, was evaluated by racial and gender groups and by different census divisions. A multivariate logistics regression model controlling for patient sociodemographic information (White vs. non-White race, age, gender, and dual eligibility for both Medicare and Medicaid), hierarchical condition category (HCC) score, hospital characteristics, year fixed effects, and patient residency state fixed effects was performed. RESULTS The TSA volume per 1000 beneficiaries was 2.3 for the White population compared with 0.8, 0.6, and 0.3 for the Black, Hispanic, and Asian population, respectively. A higher percentage of outpatient TSAs were in White patients (25.6%) compared with Black patients (20.4%) (P < .001). The Black TSA patients were also younger, more likely to be female, more likely to be dually eligible for Medicaid, and had higher HCC risk scores. After controlling for patient sociodemographic characteristics and hospital characteristics, the odds of receiving outpatient TSAs were 30% less for Black than the White group (odds ratio 0.70). Variations were observed across different census divisions, with South Atlantic (0.67, P < .01), East North Central (0.56, P < .001), and Middle Atlantic (0.36, P < .01) being the 4 regions observed with significant racial disparities. Statistically significant gender disparities were also found nationally and across regions, with an overall odds ratio of 0.75 (P < .001). DISCUSSION Statistically significant racial and gender disparities were found nationally in outpatient TSAs, with Black patients having 30% (P < .001) fewer odds of receiving outpatient TSAs than White patients, and female patients with 25% (P < .001) fewer odds than male patients. Racial and gender disparities continue to be an issue for shoulder arthroplasties after the adoption of outpatient TSAs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine J Fedorka
- Cooper Bone and Joint Institute, Cooper University Hospital, Camden, NJ, USA.
| | | | | | | | - Joseph A Abboud
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jon J P Warner
- Boston Shoulder Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Adam Z Khan
- Department of Orthopedics, Northwest Permanente PC, Portland, OR, USA
| | - John G Costouros
- Institute for Joint Restoration and Research, California Shoulder Center, Menlo Park, CA, USA
| | - Matthew J Best
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Mohamad Y Fares
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Jacob M Kirsch
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason E Simon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital/Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Brett Sanders
- Center for Sports Medicine and Orthopaedics, Chattanooga, TN, USA
| | - Evan A O'Donnell
- Boston Shoulder Institute, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - April D Armstrong
- Bone and Joint Institute, Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Flurin PH, Abadie P, Lavignac P, Laumonerie P, Throckmorton TW. Outpatient vs. inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: complication rates, clinical outcomes, and eligibility parameters. JSES Int 2024; 8:483-490. [PMID: 38707575 PMCID: PMC11064623 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2023.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Improvements in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), fast-track surgery, multimodal anesthesia, and rehabilitation protocols have opened up the possibility of outpatient care that is now routinely practiced at our European institution. The first objective of this study was to define the TSA outpatient population and to verify that outpatient management of TSA does not increase the risk of complications. The second objective was to determine patient eligibility parameters and the third was to compare functional outcomes and identify influencing factors. Methods The study included 165 patients who had primary TSA (106 outpatient and 59 inpatient procedures). The operative technique was the same for both groups. Demographics, complications, readmissions, and revisions were collected. American Society of Anesthesiologists, Constant, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, University of California Los Angeles shoulder, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores were obtained preoperatively and at 1.5, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Satisfaction and visual analog scale pain scores also were documented. Statistical analysis was completed using multivariate linear regression. Results Outpatients were significantly younger and had lower American Society of Anesthesiologists scores than inpatients. The rates of complications, readmissions, and reoperations were not significantly different between groups. Outpatient surgery was not an independent risk factor for complications. At 1.5 months, better outcomes were noted in the outpatient group for all scores, and these reached statistical significance. Distance to home, dominant side, operative time, and blood loss were not associated with functional results. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that outpatient care was significantly associated with improved scores at 1.5 months and did not affect functional outcomes at 6 and 12 months. Conclusion This study reports the results of routine outpatient TSA within a European healthcare system. TSA performed in an outpatient setting was not an independent risk factor for complications and seemed to be an independent factor in improving early functional results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Thomas W. Throckmorton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Univeristy of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Raji Y, Smith KL, Megerian M, Maheshwer B, Sattar A, Chen RE, Gillespie RJ. Same-day discharge vs. inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: an age stratified comparison of postoperative outcomes and hospital charges. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2024:S1058-2746(24)00242-8. [PMID: 38604401 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2024.02.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2023] [Revised: 02/19/2024] [Accepted: 02/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/13/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the number of total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) procedures increases, there is a growing interest in improving patient outcomes, limiting costs, and optimizing efficiency. One approach has been to transition these surgeries to an outpatient setting. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to conduct an age-stratified analysis comparing the 90-day postoperative outcomes of primary TSA in the same-day discharge (SDD) and inpatient (IP) settings with a specific focus on the super-elderly. METHODS This retrospective study included all patients who underwent primary anatomic or reverse TSA between January 2018 and December 2021 in ambulatory and IP settings. The outcome measures included length of stay (LOS), complications, hospital charges, emergency department (ED utilization), readmissions, and reoperations within 90 days following TSA. Patients with LOS ≤8 hours were considered as SDD, and those with LOS >8 hours were considered as IP. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS There were 121 and 174 procedures performed in SDD and IP settings, respectively. There were no differences in comorbidity indices between the SDD and IP groups (American Society of Anesthesiologists score P = .12, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index P = .067). The SDD cohort was younger than the IP group (SDD 67.0 years vs. 73.0 IP years, P < .001), and the SDD group higher rate of intraoperative tranexamic acid use (P = .015) and lower estimated blood loss (P = .009). There were no differences in 90-day overall minor (P = .20) and major complications (P = 1.00), ED utilization (P = .63), readmission (P = .25), or reoperation (P = .51) between the SDD and IP groups. When stratified by age, there were no differences in overall major (P = .80) and minor (P = .36) complications among the groups. However, the LOS was directly correlated with increasing age (LOS = 8.4 hours in ≥65 to <75-year cohort vs. LOS = 25.9 hours in ≥80-year cohort; P < .001). There were no differences in hospital charges between SDD and IP primary TSA in all 3 age groups (P = .82). CONCLUSION SDD TSA has a shorter LOS without increasing postoperative major and minor complications, ED encounters, readmissions, or reoperations. Older age was not associated with an increase in the complication profile or hospital charges even in the SDD setting, although it was associated with increased LOS in the IP group. These results suggest that TSA can be safely performed expeditiously in an outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yazdan Raji
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| | - Kira L Smith
- Sports Medicine Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Mark Megerian
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Bhargavi Maheshwer
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Abdus Sattar
- Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Raymond E Chen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Sports Medicine Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Robert J Gillespie
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Sports Medicine Institute, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, USA; Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zhang D, Dyer GSM, Earp BE. The Relationship Between Preoperative International Normalized Ratio and Postoperative Major Bleeding in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev 2024; 8:01979360-202404000-00010. [PMID: 38569086 PMCID: PMC10994459 DOI: 10.5435/jaaosglobal-d-23-00174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 03/01/2024] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to assess the relationship between preoperative international normalized ratio (INR) levels and major postoperative bleeding events after total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). METHODS The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for TSA from 2011 to 2020. A final cohort of 2405 patients with INR within 2 days of surgery were included. Patients were stratified into four groups: INR ≤ 1.0, 1.0 < INR ≤ 1.25, 1.25< INR ≤ 1.5, and INR > 1.5. The primary outcome was bleeding requiring transfusion within 72 hours, and secondary outcome variables included complication, revision surgery, readmission, and hospital stay duration. Multivariable logistic and linear regression analyses adjusted for relevant comorbidities were done. RESULTS Of the 2,405 patients, 48% had INR ≤ 1.0, 44% had INR > 1.0 to 1.25, 7% had INR > 1.25 to 1.5, and 1% had INR > 1.5. In the adjusted model, 1.0 < INR ≤ 1.25 (OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.176 to 2.459), 1.25 < INR ≤ 1.5 (OR 2.508, 95% CI 1.454 to 4.325), and INR > 1.5 (OR 3.200, 95% CI 1.233 to 8.302) were associated with higher risks of bleeding compared with INR ≤ 1.0. DISCUSSION The risks of thromboembolism and bleeding lie along a continuum, with higher preoperative INR levels conferring higher postoperative bleeding risks after TSA. Clinicians should use a patient-centered, multidisciplinary approach to balance competing risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dafang Zhang
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp), and the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp)
| | - George S. M. Dyer
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp), and the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp)
| | - Brandon E. Earp
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp), and the Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA (Dr. Zhang, Dr. Dyer, and Dr. Earp)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ardon AE, Nimma S, Nin OC. Twenty-three-hour stays in the ambulatory surgical center: benefits, pathways and protocols. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2023; 36:617-623. [PMID: 37615495 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/25/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To summarize recent evidence that discusses the clinical, financial, and logistical implications of a 23 h stay postsurgical stay unit in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC). RECENT FINDINGS Twenty-three-hour stays in ambulatory surgery centers are safe, but proper patient selection and optimization are key to maintaining a high level of safety. The financial implications of overnight stays in ASCs rely heavily on payment structures and comparative costs at hospital-based outpatient surgery centers. The establishment of pathways and protocols for clinical care are key to the success of a 23 h stay at an ASC. SUMMARY A concurrent concern with the recent increase in outpatient surgery and medical complexity of cases performed in an ambulatory surgical center (ASC) is the possibility that patients may need overnight stay. Further, whether certain patients would benefit from anticipated 23 h observation rather than same-day discharge is an emerging topic. Overnight stays in ASCs may have financial advantages and decrease the risk of unanticipated admission with proper patient selection. The use of protocols and established pathways is key to the success of this model.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto E Ardon
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville
| | - Sindhuja Nimma
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville
| | - Olga C Nin
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hachadorian M, Chang RN, Prentice HA, Paxton EW, Rao AG, Navarro RA, Singh A. Association between same-day discharge shoulder arthroplasty and risk of adverse events in patients with American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥3: a cohort study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:e556-e564. [PMID: 37268285 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.04.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2022] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Same-day discharge for shoulder arthroplasty (SA) is well-supported in the literature; however, most studies have focused on healthier patients. Indications for same-day discharge SA have expanded to include patients with more comorbidities, but safety of same-day discharge in this population remains unknown. We sought to compare outcomes following same-day discharge vs. inpatient SA in a cohort of patients considered higher risk for adverse events, defined as an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification of ≥3. METHODS Data from Kaiser Permanente's SA registry were utilized to conduct a retrospective cohort study. All patients with an ASA classification of ≥3 who underwent primary elective anatomic or reverse SA in a hospital from 2018 to 2020 were included. The exposure of interest was in-hospital length of stay: same-day discharge vs. ≥1-night hospital inpatient stay. The likelihood of 90-day post-discharge events, including emergency department (ED) visit, readmission, cardiac complication, venous thromboembolism, and mortality, was evaluated using propensity score-weighted logistic regression with noninferiority testing using a margin of 1.10. RESULTS The cohort included a total of 1814 SA patients, of whom 1005 (55.4%) had same-day discharge. In propensity score-weighted models, same-day discharge was not inferior to an inpatient stay SA regarding 90-day readmission (odds ratio [OR] = 0.64, one-sided 95% upper bound [UB] = 0.89) and overall complications (OR = 0.67, 95% UB = 1.00). We lacked evidence in support of noninferiority for 90-day ED visit (OR = 0.96, 95% UB = 1.18), cardiac event (OR = 0.68, 95% UB = 1.11), or venous thromboembolism (OR = 0.91, 95% UB = 2.15). Infections, revisions for instability, and mortality were too rare to evaluate using regression analysis. CONCLUSIONS In a cohort of over 1800 patients with an ASA of ≥3, we found same-day discharge SA did not increase the likelihood of ED visits, readmissions, or complications compared with an inpatient stay, and same-day discharge was not inferior to an inpatient stay with regard to readmissions and overall complications. These findings suggest that it is possible to expand indications for same-day discharge SA in the hospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Hachadorian
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California San Diego, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Richard N Chang
- Medical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Heather A Prentice
- Medical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Elizabeth W Paxton
- Medical Device Surveillance and Assessment, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | - Anita G Rao
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Northwest Permanente Medical Group, Vancouver, WA, USA
| | - Ronald A Navarro
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, South Bay, CA, USA
| | - Anshuman Singh
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, San Diego, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Federico VP, McCormick JR, Nie JW, Mehta N, Cohn MR, Menendez ME, Denard PJ, Simcock XC, Nicholson GP, Garrigues GE. Costs of shoulder and elbow procedures are significantly reduced in ambulatory surgery centers compared to hospital outpatient departments. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:2123-2131. [PMID: 37422131 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Revised: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 05/28/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent literature has shown the advantages of outpatient surgery for many shoulder and elbow procedures, including cost savings with equivalent safety in appropriately selected patients. Two common settings for outpatient surgeries are ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs), which function as independent financial and administrative entities, or hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs), which are owned and operated by hospital systems. The purpose of this study was to compare shoulder and elbow surgery costs between ASCs and HOPDs. METHODS Publicly available data from 2022 provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) was accessed via the Medicare Procedure Price Lookup Tool. Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were used to identify shoulder and elbow procedures approved for the outpatient setting by CMS. Procedures were grouped into arthroscopy, fracture, or miscellaneous. Total costs, facility fees, Medicare payments, patient payment (costs not covered by Medicare), and surgeon's fees were extracted. Descriptive statistics were used to calculate means and standard deviations. Cost differences were analyzed using Mann-Whitney U tests. RESULTS Fifty-seven CPT codes were identified. Arthroscopy procedures (n = 16) at ASCs had significantly lower total costs ($2667 ± $989 vs. $4899 ± $1917; P = .009), facility fees ($1974 ± $819 vs. $4206 ± $1753; P = .008), Medicare payments ($2133 ± $791 vs. $3919 ± $1534; P = .009), and patient payments ($533 ± $198 vs. $979 ± $383; P = .009) compared with HOPDs. Fracture procedures (n = 10) at ASCs had lower total costs ($7680 ± $3123 vs. $11,335 ± $3830; P = .049), facility fees ($6851 ± $3033 vs. $10,507 ± $3733; P = .047), and Medicare payments ($6143 ± $2499 vs. $9724 ± $3676; P = .049) compared with HOPDs, although patient payments were not significantly different ($1535 ± $625 vs. $1610 ± $160; P = .449). Miscellaneous procedures (n = 31) at ASCs had lower total costs ($4202 ± $2234 vs. $6985 ± $2917; P < .001), facility fees ($3348 ± $2059 vs. $6132 ± $2736; P < .001), Medicare payments ($3361 ± $1787 vs. $5675 ± $2635; P < .001), and patient payments ($840 ± $447 vs. $1309 ± $350; P < .001) compared with HOPDs. The combined cohort (n = 57) at ASCs had lower total costs ($4381 ± $2703 vs. $7163 ± $3534; P < .001), facility fees ($3577 ± $2570 vs. $6539.1 ± $3391; P < .001), Medicare payments ($3504 ± $2162 vs. $5892 ± $3206; P < .001), and patient payments ($875 ± $540 vs. $1269 ± $393; P < .001) compared with HOPDs. CONCLUSION Shoulder and elbow procedures performed at HOPDs for Medicare recipients were found to have average total cost increase of 164% compared with those performed at ASCs (184% savings for arthroscopy, 148% for fracture, and 166% for miscellaneous). ASC use conferred lower facility fees, patient payments, and Medicare payments. Policy efforts to incentivize migration of surgeries to ASCs may translate into substantial health care cost savings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent P Federico
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - James W Nie
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nabil Mehta
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | | | | | - Xavier C Simcock
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gregory P Nicholson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rizvi SMT, Lenane B, Lam P, Murrell GAC. Shoulder Arthroplasty as a Day Case: Is It Better? J Clin Med 2023; 12:3886. [PMID: 37373583 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Revised: 05/31/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: A retrospective case-controlled study was performed to evaluate the outcomes of shoulder arthroplasty performed as a day case in carefully selected patients, compared to the traditional inpatient approach. Materials and Methods: Patients who had total or hemiarthroplasty of the shoulder performed as a day case or inpatient procedure were recruited. The primary outcome compared rates of uneventful recovery, defined by the absence of complications or readmission to the hospital within six months of surgery, between the inpatient and outpatient groups. Secondary outcomes included examiner-determined functional and patient-determined pain scores at one, six, twelve, and twenty-four weeks post-surgery. A further assessment of patient-determined pain scores was carried out at least two years post-surgery (5.8 ± 3.2). Results: 73 patients (36 inpatients and 37 outpatients) were included in the study. Within this time frame, 25/36 inpatients (69%) had uneventful recoveries compared to 24/37 outpatients (65%) (p = 0.17). Outpatients showed significant improvement over pre-operative baseline levels in more secondary outcomes (strength and passive range-of-motion) by six months post-operation. Outpatients also performed significantly better than inpatients in external rotation (p < 0.05) and internal rotation (p = 0.05) at six weeks post-surgery. Both groups showed significant improvement compared to pre-operative baselines in all patient-determined secondary outcomes except the activity level at work and sports. Inpatients, however, experienced less severe pain at rest at six weeks (p = 0.03), significantly less frequent pain at night (p = 0.03), and extreme pain (p = 0.04) at 24 weeks, and less severe pain at night at 24 weeks (p < 0.01). By a minimum of two years post-operation, inpatients were more comfortable repeating their treatment setting for future arthroplasty (16/18) compared to outpatients (7/22) (p = 0.0002). Conclusions: At a minimum of two years of follow-up, there were no significant differences in rates of complications, hospitalizations, or revision surgeries between patients that underwent shoulder arthroplasty as an inpatient versus an outpatient. Outpatients demonstrated superior functional outcomes but reported more pain at six months post-surgery. Patients in both groups preferred inpatient treatment for any future shoulder arthroplasty. What is Known About This Subject: Shoulder arthroplasty is a complex procedure and has traditionally been performed on an inpatient basis, with patients admitted for six to seven days post-surgery. One of the primary reasons for this is the high level of post-operative pain, usually treated with hospital-based opioid therapy. Two studies demonstrated outpatient TSA to have a similar rate of complications as inpatient TSA; however, these studies only examined patients within a shorter-term 90-day post-operative period and did not evaluate functional outcomes between the two groups or in the longer term. What This Study Adds to Existing Knowledge: This study provides evidence supporting the longer-term results of shoulder arthroplasty done as a day case in carefully selected patients, which are comparable to outcomes in patients that are admitted to the hospital post-surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Syed Mohammed Taif Rizvi
- Orthopaedic Research Institute, The St George Hospital, Level 2, 4-10 South Street, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
| | - Benjamin Lenane
- Orthopaedic Research Institute, The St George Hospital, Level 2, 4-10 South Street, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
| | - Patrick Lam
- Orthopaedic Research Institute, The St George Hospital, Level 2, 4-10 South Street, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
| | - George A C Murrell
- Orthopaedic Research Institute, The St George Hospital, Level 2, 4-10 South Street, Kogarah, NSW 2217, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Allen J, Abdelmonem M, Fieraru G, Guyver P. Introducing A Day-Case Shoulder Arthroplasty Pathway In The UK - How We Did It. Shoulder Elbow 2023; 15:311-320. [PMID: 37325384 PMCID: PMC10268136 DOI: 10.1177/17585732221079582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2021] [Revised: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 09/20/2023]
Abstract
Background As the demand for elective orthopaedics grows, day-case arthroplasty is gaining popularity. The aim of this study was to create a safe and reproducible pathway for day-case shoulder arthroplasty (DCSA) based upon a literature review and discussion with the local multidisciplinary team (MDT). Methods A literature review was performed using OVID MEDLINE and Embase databases reporting 90-day complication and admission rates following DCSA. Minimum follow-up was 30 days. Day-case was defined as discharge on the same day of surgery. Results The literature review revealed a mean 90-day complication rate of 7.7% [range, 0-15.9%] and mean 90-day readmission rate of 2.5% [range 0-9.3%]. A pilot protocol was devised based upon the literature review and consisted of 5 phases: (1) pre-operative assessment, (2) intra-operative phase, (3) post-operative phase, (4) follow-up, and (5) readmission protocol. This was presented, discussed, amended, and ultimately ratified by the local MDT. In May 2021 the unit successfully completed its first day-case shoulder arthroplasty. Discussion This study proposes a safe and reproducible pathway for DCSA. Patient selection, well-defined protocols and communication within the MDT are important factors to achieve this. Further studies with extended follow-up will be needed to gauge long-term success within our unit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James Allen
- Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Huddersfield, UK
- Huddersfield Royal Infirmary, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Mohamed Abdelmonem
- Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Gabriel Fieraru
- Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Huddersfield, UK
| | - Paul Guyver
- Derriford Hospital, University Hospitals Plymouth NHS Trust, Huddersfield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Baxter NB, Davis ES, Chen JS, Lawton JN, Chung KC. Utilization, Complications, and Costs of Inpatient versus Outpatient Total Elbow Arthroplasty. Hand (N Y) 2023; 18:509-515. [PMID: 34293938 PMCID: PMC10152523 DOI: 10.1177/15589447211030693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although total hip and knee arthroplasty have largely moved to the outpatient setting, total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) remains a predominantly inpatient procedure. Currently, evidence on the safety and potential cost savings of outpatient TEA is limited. Therefore, we aimed to compare the costs and complications associated with performing TEA in the inpatient versus outpatient setting. METHODS We identified patients who received elective TEA using the Truven Health MarketScan database. Outcomes of interest were 90-day complication rate, readmission rate, and procedure costs in the inpatient and outpatient settings. We used propensity score matching and logistic regression analysis to assess how patient comorbidities and surgical setting influenced complications and readmission rates. The median cost per patient was compared using the Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS We identified 307 outpatient and 414 inpatient TEA procedures over a 9-year period. Elixhauser comorbidity scores were higher for the inpatient cohort. The incidence of surgical complications was significantly higher in the inpatient than the outpatient cohort (27% vs 9%). The odds of 90-day readmissions were similar in the 2 groups (37% vs 25%). In terms of cost, the median inpatient TEA was more expensive than outpatient TEA ($26 817 vs $18 412). However, the median cost for occupational therapy within 90 days of surgery was higher for outpatient TEA patients ($687 vs $571). CONCLUSIONS The results of this study demonstrate that surgeons can consider a transition toward outpatient TEA for patients without significant comorbidities, as this will substantially reduce health care costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Elissa S. Davis
- University of Michigan Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, USA
| | - Jung-Sheng Chen
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology and Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | | | - Kevin C. Chung
- University of Michigan Department of Surgery, Ann Arbor, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Perioperative risk stratification tools for shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2023; 32:e293-e304. [PMID: 36621747 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Risk stratification tools are being increasingly utilized to guide patient selection for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to identify the existing calculators used to predict discharge disposition, postoperative complications, hospital readmissions, and patient candidacy for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty and to compare the specific components used to generate their prediction models. METHODS This review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis protocol. PubMed, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and OVID Medline were searched for studies that developed calculators used to determine patient candidacy for outpatient surgery or predict discharge disposition, the risk of postoperative complications, and hospital readmissions after anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). Reviews, case reports, letters to the editor, and studies including hemiarthroplasty cases were excluded. Data extracted included authors, year of publication, study design, patient population, sample size, input variables, comorbidities, method of validation, and intended purpose. The pros and cons of each calculator as reported by the respective authors were evaluated. RESULTS Eleven publications met inclusion criteria. Three tools assessed patient candidacy for outpatient TSA, 3 tools evaluated the risk of 30- or 90-day hospital readmission and postoperative complications, and 5 tools predicted discharge destination. Four calculators validated previously constructed comorbidity indices used as risk predictors after shoulder arthroplasty, including the Charlson Comorbidity Index, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, modified Frailty Index, and the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment, while 7 developed newcalculators. Nine studies utilized multiple logistic regression to develop their calculators, while 1 study developed their algorithm based on previous literature and 1 used univariate analysis. Five tools were built using data from a single institution, 2 using data pooled from 2 institutions, and 4 from large national databases. All studies used preoperative data points in their algorithms with one tool additionally using intraoperative data points. The number of inputs ranged from 5 to 57 items. Four calculators assessed psychological comorbidities, 3 included inputs for substance use, and 1 calculator accounted for race. CONCLUSION The variation in perioperative risk calculators after TSA highlights the need for standardization and external validation of the existing tools. As the use of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty increases, these calculators may become outdated or require revision. Incorporation of socioeconomic and psychological measures into these calculators should be investigated.
Collapse
|
13
|
Reddy RP, Sabzevari S, Charles S, Singh-Varma A, Como M, Lin A. Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty in the COVID-19 era: 90-day complications and risk factors. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 32:1043-1050. [PMID: 36470518 PMCID: PMC9719845 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.10.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Revised: 10/13/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the COVID-19 pandemic placing an increased burden on health care systems, shoulder arthroplasties are more commonly being performed as outpatient procedures. The purpose of this study was to characterize the 90-day episode-of-care complications of consecutive shoulder arthroplasties defaulted for outpatient surgery without using a prior algorithm for patient selection and to assess for their risk factors. We hypothesized that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty would be a safe procedure for all patients, regardless of patient demographics and comorbidities. METHODS A retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent planned outpatient anatomic or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty between March 2020 and January 2022 with 3-month follow-up was performed. All patients were scheduled for outpatient surgery regardless of medical comorbidities. Patient demographics; pre/postoperative patient-reported outcomes including visual analog scale, subjective shoulder value, and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score; pre/postoperative range of motion; and complications were collected from medical chart review. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of the following outcomes: 1. Unplanned overnight hospital stay, 2. 90-day unplanned emergency department (ED)/clinic visit, 3. 90-day hospital readmission, 4. 90-day complications requiring revision. RESULTS One hundred twenty-seven patients (47% male, 17% tobacco users, 18% diabetics) with a mean age 69 ± 9 years were identified, of whom 92 underwent reverse total shoulder arthroplasty and 35 underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty. All patient-reported outcomes and range of motion were significantly improved at 3 months. There were 15 unplanned overnight hospital stays (11.8%) after the procedure. Within 90 days postoperatively, there were 17 unplanned ED/clinic visits (13.4%), 7 hospital readmissions (5.5%), and 4 complications requiring revision (3.1%). Factors predictive of unplanned overnight stay included age above 70 years (odds ratio [OR], 36.80 [95% confidence interval [CI], 2.20-615.49]; P = .012), tobacco use (OR, 12.90 [95% CI, 1.23-135.31]; P = .033), and American Society of Anesthesiologists status of 3 (OR, 13.84 [95% CI, 1.22-156.57]; P = .034). The only factor predictive of unplanned ED/clinic visit was age over 70 years old (OR, 7.52 [95% CI, 1.26-45.45]; P = .027). No factors were predictive of 90-day hospital readmission or revision. CONCLUSION Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is a safe procedure with excellent outcomes and low rates of readmissions and can be considered as the default plan for all patient undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Patients who are above 70 years of age, use tobacco, and have ASA score of 3, however, may be less suitable for outpatient arthroplasty and should be counseled regarding the higher risk of unplanned overnight hospitalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rajiv P Reddy
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Soheil Sabzevari
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Shaquille Charles
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Anya Singh-Varma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Matthew Como
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Albert Lin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UPMC Freddie Fu Sports Medicine Center, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Khan AZ, Best MJ, Fedorka CJ, Belniak RM, Haas DA, Zhang X, Armstrong AD, Jawa A, O'Donnell EA, Simon JE, Wagner ER, Malik M, Gottschalk MB, Updegrove GF, Makhni EC, Warner JJP, Srikumaran U, Abboud JA. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shoulder arthroplasty: surgical trends and postoperative care pathway analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:2457-2464. [PMID: 36075547 PMCID: PMC9444574 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Revised: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND COVID-19 triggered disruption in the conventional care pathways for many orthopedic procedures. The current study aims to quantify the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on shoulder arthroplasty hospital surgical volume, trends in surgical case distribution, length of hospitalization, posthospital disposition, and 30-day readmission rates. METHODS This study queried all Medicare (100% sample) fee-for-service beneficiaries who underwent a shoulder arthroplasty procedure (Diagnosis-Related Group code 483, Current Procedural Terminology code 23472) from January 1, 2019, to December 18, 2020. Fracture cases were separated from nonfracture cases, which were further subdivided into anatomic or reverse arthroplasty. Volume per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries was calculated from April to December 2020 and compared to the same months in 2019. Length of stay (LOS), discharged-home rate, and 30-day readmission for the same period were obtained. The yearly difference adjusted for age, sex, race (white vs. nonwhite), Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Hierarchical Condition Category risk score, month fixed effects, and Core-Based Statistical Area fixed effects, with standard errors clustered at the provider level, was calculated using a multivariate analysis (P < .05). RESULTS A total of 49,412 and 41,554 total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) cases were observed April through December for 2019 and 2020, respectively. There was an overall decrease in shoulder arthroplasty volume per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries by 14% (19% reduction in anatomic TSA, 13% reduction in reverse shoulder arthroplasty, and 3% reduction in fracture cases). LOS for all shoulder arthroplasty cases decreased by 16% (-0.27 days, P < .001) when adjusted for confounders. There was a 5% increase in the discharged-home rate (88.0% to 92.7%, P < .001), which was most prominent in fracture cases, with a 20% increase in discharged-home cases (65.0% to 73.4%, P < .001). There was no significant change in 30-day hospital readmission rates overall (P = .20) or when broken down by individual procedures. CONCLUSIONS There was an overall decrease in shoulder arthroplasty volume per 1000 Medicare beneficiaries by 14% during the COVID-19 pandemic. A decrease in LOS and increase in the discharged-home rates was also observed with no significant change in 30-day hospital readmission, indicating that a shift toward an outpatient surgical model can be performed safely and efficiently and has the potential to provide value.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Z Khan
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Matthew J Best
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - Robert M Belniak
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Starling Physicians Group, New Britain, CT, USA
| | | | | | - April D Armstrong
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Bone and Joint Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Boston Sports and Shoulder Center, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Evan A O'Donnell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jason E Simon
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Newton-Wellesley Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Eric R Wagner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | | | | | - Gary F Updegrove
- Department of Orthopaedics and Rehabilitation, Bone and Joint Institute, Penn State Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Eric C Makhni
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit, MI, USA
| | - Jon J P Warner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston Shoulder Institute, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Uma Srikumaran
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
| | - Joseph A Abboud
- Rothman Institute, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Calkins TE, Baessler AM, Throckmorton TW, Black C, Bernholt DL, Azar FM, Brolin TJ. Safety and short-term outcomes of anatomic vs. reverse total shoulder arthroplasty in an ambulatory surgery center. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:2497-2505. [PMID: 35718256 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.05.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2022] [Revised: 04/26/2022] [Accepted: 05/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A scarcity of literature exists comparing outcomes of outpatient anatomic (aTSA) and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). This study was performed to compare early outcomes between the 2 procedures in a freestanding ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and to determine if the addition of preoperative interscalene nerve block (ISNB) with periarticular liposomal bupivacaine injection (PAI) in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) would improve outcomes over PAI alone. METHODS Medical charts of all patients undergoing outpatient primary aTSA or rTSA at 2 ASCs from 2012 to 2020 were reviewed. A total of 198 patients were ultimately identified (117 aTSA and 81 rTSA) to make up this retrospective cohort study. Patient demographics, PACU outcomes, complications, readmissions, reoperations, calls to the office, and unplanned clinic visit rates were compared between procedures. PACU outcomes were compared between those receiving ISNB with PAI and those receiving PAI alone. RESULTS Patients undergoing rTSA were older (61.1 vs. 55.7 years, P < .001) and more likely to have American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class 3 (51.9% vs. 41.0%, P = .050) compared to patients having aTSA. No patient required an overnight stay. Time in the PACU before discharge (89.1 vs. 95.6 minutes, P = .231) and pain scores at discharge (3.0 vs. 3.0, P = .815) were similar for aTSA and rTSA, respectively. One intraoperative complication occurred in the aTSA group (posterior humeral circumflex artery injury) and 1 in the rTSA group (calcar fracture) (P = .793). Ninety-day postoperative total complication (7.7% vs. 7.4%), shoulder-related complication (6.0% vs. 6.2%), medical-related complication (1.7% vs. 1.2%), admission (0.8% vs. 2.5%), reoperation (2.6% vs. 1.2%), and unplanned clinic visit (6.0% vs. 6.1%) rates were similar between aTSA and rTSA, respectively (P ≥ .361 for all comparisons). At 1 year, there were 8 reoperations and 15 complications in the aTSA group compared with 1 reoperation and 8 complications in the rTSA group (P = .091 and P = .818, respectively). Patients who had ISNB spent less time in PACU (75 vs. 97 minutes, P < .001), had less pain at discharge (0.2 vs. 3.9, P < .001), and consumed less oral morphine equivalents in the PACU (1.2 vs. 16.6 mg, P < .001). CONCLUSION Early postoperative outcomes and complication rates were similar between the 2 groups, and all patients were successfully discharged home the day of surgery. The addition of preoperative ISNB led to more efficient discharge from the ASC with less pain in the PACU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tyler E Calkins
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Aaron M Baessler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Thomas W Throckmorton
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Carson Black
- College of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - David L Bernholt
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Frederick M Azar
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA
| | - Tyler J Brolin
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Biomedical Engineering, University of Tennessee-Campbell Clinic, Memphis, TN, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ambulatory anesthesia and discharge: an update around guidelines and trends. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 2022; 35:691-697. [PMID: 36194149 DOI: 10.1097/aco.0000000000001194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Provide an oversight of recent changes in same-day discharge (SDD) of patient following surgery/anesthesia. RECENT FINDINGS Enhanced recovery after surgery pathways in combination with less invasive surgical techniques have dramatically changed perioperative care. Preparing and optimizing patients preoperatively, minimizing surgical trauma, using fast-acting anesthetics as well as multimodal opioid-sparing analgesia regime and liberal prophylaxis against postoperative nausea and vomiting are basic cornerstones. The scope being to maintain physiology and minimize the impact on homeostasis and subsequently hasten and improve recovery. SUMMARY The increasing adoption of enhanced protocols, including the entire perioperative care bundle, in combination with increased use of minimally invasive surgical techniques have shortened hospital stay. More intermediate procedures are today transferred to ambulatory pathways; SDD or overnight stay only. The traditional scores for assessing discharge eligibility are however still valid. Stable vital signs, awake and oriented, able to ambulate with acceptable pain, and postoperative nausea and vomiting are always needed. Drinking and voiding must be acknowledged but mandatory. Escort and someone at home the first night following surgery are strongly recommended. Explicit information around postoperative care and how to contact healthcare in case of need, as well as a follow-up call day after surgery, are likewise of importance. Mobile apps and remote monitoring are techniques increasingly used to improve postoperative follow-up.
Collapse
|
17
|
Perera E, Flood B, Madden K, Goel DP, Leroux T, Khan M. A systematic review of clinical outcomes for outpatient vs. inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Shoulder Elbow 2022; 14:523-533. [PMID: 36199506 PMCID: PMC9527489 DOI: 10.1177/17585732211007443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/10/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is growing in popularity as a cost-effective and potentially equally safe alternative to inpatient arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to investigate literature relating to outpatient shoulder arthroplasty, looking at clinical outcomes, complications, readmission, and cost compared to inpatient arthroplasty. METHODS We conducted a systematic review of Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library databases from inception to 6 April 2020. Methodological quality was assessed using MINORS and GRADE criteria. RESULTS We included 17 studies, with 11 included in meta-analyses and 6 in narrative review. A meta-analysis of hospital readmissions demonstrated no statistically significant difference between outpatient and inpatient cohorts (OR = 0.89, p = 0.49). Pooled post-operative complications identified decreased complications in those undergoing outpatient surgery (OR = 0.70, p = 0.02). Considerable cost saving of between $3614 and $53,202 (19.7-69.9%) per patient were present in the outpatient setting. Overall study quality was low and presented a serious risk of bias. DISCUSSION Shoulder arthroplasty in the outpatient setting appears to be as safe as shoulder arthroplasty in the inpatient setting, with a significant reduction in cost. However, this is based on low quality evidence and high risk of bias suggests further research is needed to substantiate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edward Perera
- Epsom & St. Helier University NHS Hospital, London, UK
| | - Breanne Flood
- Research Institute of St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Kim Madden
- Research Institute of St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada,Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Danny P Goel
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Timothy Leroux
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Moin Khan
- Research Institute of St. Joseph’s Healthcare Hamilton, Hamilton, Canada,Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada,Moin Khan, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Avenue East, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 4A6.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Puzzitiello RN, Moverman MA, Pagani NR, Menendez ME, Salzler MJ. Current Status Regarding the Safety of Inpatient Versus Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. HSS J 2022; 18:428-438. [PMID: 35846253 PMCID: PMC9247601 DOI: 10.1177/15563316211019398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Surgeons have begun to transition total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) to the outpatient setting in order to contain costs and reallocate resources. PURPOSE The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate the safety and cost of outpatient TSA by assessing associated complication rates, clinical outcomes, and total treatment charges. METHODS The MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Library online databases were queried in March 2020 for studies on outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Inclusion criteria were (1) a study population undergoing TSA, (2) discharge on the day of surgery, and (3) inclusion of at least 1 reported outcome. RESULTS Of 20 studies identified that met inclusion criteria, 14 were comparative studies involving an inpatient control group, 2 of which were matched by age and comorbidities. The remaining studies used control groups consisting of inpatient TSAs who were older or more medically infirm according to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) or Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) scores. The combined average age of the outpatient and inpatient groups was 66.5 and 70.1 years, respectively. Patients who underwent outpatient TSA had similar rates of readmissions, emergency department visits, and perioperative complications in comparison to inpatients. Patients also reported comparably high levels of satisfaction with outpatient procedures. Four economic analyses demonstrated substantial cost savings with outpatient TSA in comparison to inpatient surgery. CONCLUSION In carefully selected patients, outpatient TSA appears to be equally safe but less resource intensive than inpatient arthroplasty. Nonetheless, there remains a need for larger prospective studies to decisively characterize the relative safety of outpatient TSA among patients with similar baseline health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard N. Puzzitiello
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA,Richard N. Puzzitiello, MD, Department of
Orthopaedic Surgery, Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine,
Boston, MA 02111, USA.
| | - Michael A. Moverman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicholas R. Pagani
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mariano E. Menendez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew J. Salzler
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery,
Tufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Sandler AB, Scanaliato JP, Narimissaei D, McDaniel LE, Dunn JC, Parnes N. The transition to outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:e315-e331. [PMID: 35278682 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2022.01.154] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2021] [Revised: 01/24/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND HYPOTHESIS Transitioning shoulder arthroplasty (SA) from an inpatient to outpatient procedure is associated with increased patient satisfaction and potentially decreased costs; however, concerns exist about complications following same-day discharge. We hypothesized that outpatient SA would be associated with low rates of failed discharges, readmissions, and complications, rendering it a safe and effective option for SA. METHODS A systematic review of the outpatient SA literature identified 16 of 447 studies with level III and IV evidence that met the inclusion criteria with at least 90 days of follow-up. Data on patient demographic characteristics, preoperative and postoperative protocols, surgery characteristics, failed discharges, complications, and readmissions were collected and pooled for analysis. RESULTS A total of 990 patients were included in our analysis. Many studies identified specific institutional protocols for determining eligibility for outpatient SA, including preoperative clearance from an anesthesiologist; identification of a perioperative caretaker; and exclusion of patients based on cardiac, pulmonary, or hematologic risk factors. Failed same-day discharge occurred in only 0.9% of patients (7 of 788), and 2.1% of patients (9 of 418) and 0.79% of patients (2 of 252) presented to an emergency department or urgent care facility for a perioperative concern. The readmission rate for periprosthetic fracture, arthrofibrosis, infection, subscapularis rupture, and anterior subluxation was 1.3% (7 of 529 patients). Complications occurred in 7.0% of patients (70 of 990), with 5.4% of patients (53 of 990) experiencing a surgical complication and 1.7% (17 of 990) having a medical complication. There were 28 total reoperations (2.9%, 28 of 955 patients). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION Outpatient SA is associated with low rates of failed discharges, readmissions, and complications. Additionally, the medical and surgical complications that occur after outpatient SA are unlikely to be prevented by the short inpatient stay characteristic of traditional SA. With careful screening measures to identify appropriate candidates for same-day discharge, outpatient SA represents a safe approach to prevent unnecessary hospitalizations and to decrease costs associated with SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis B Sandler
- George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA.
| | - John P Scanaliato
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Danielle Narimissaei
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Lea E McDaniel
- George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
| | - John C Dunn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, William Beaumont Army Medical Center, El Paso, TX, USA
| | - Nata Parnes
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Carthage Area Hospital, Carthage, NY, USA; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Claxton-Hepburn Medical Center, Ogdensburg, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Seetharam A, Ghosh P, Prado R, Badman BL. Trends in outpatient shoulder arthroplasty during the COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) era: increased proportion of outpatient cases with decrease in 90-day readmissions. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2022; 31:1409-1415. [PMID: 35091073 PMCID: PMC8789381 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.12.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2021] [Revised: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/19/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The COVID-19 (coronavirus disease 2019) pandemic has placed an increased burden on health care resources, with hospitals around the globe canceling or reducing most elective surgical cases during the initial period of the pandemic. Simultaneously, there has been an increased interest in performing outpatient total joint arthroplasty in an efficient manner while maintaining patient safety. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) during the COVID-19 era with respect to outpatient surgery and postoperative complications. METHODS We conducted a retrospective chart review of all primary anatomic and reverse TSAs performed at our health institution over a 3-year period (January 2018 to January 2021). All cases performed prior to March 2020 were considered the "pre-COVID-19 era" cohort. All cases performed in March 2020 or later comprised the "COVID-19 era" cohort. Patient demographic characteristics and medical comorbidities were also collected to appropriately match patients from the 2 cohorts. Outcomes measured included type of patient encounter (outpatient vs. inpatient), total length of stay, and 90-day complications. RESULTS A total of 567 TSAs met the inclusion criteria, consisting of 270 shoulder arthroplasty cases performed during the COVID-19 era and 297 cases performed during the pre-COVID-19 era. There were no significant differences in body mass index, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, smoking status, or distribution of pertinent medical comorbidities between the 2 examined cohorts. During the COVID-19 era, 31.8% of shoulder arthroplasties were performed in an outpatient setting. This was significantly higher than the percentage in the pre-COVID-19 era, with only 4.5% of cases performed in an outpatient setting (P < .0001). The average length of stay was significantly reduced in the COVID-19 era cohort (0.81 days vs. 1.45 days, P < .0001). There was a significant decrease in 90-day readmissions during the COVID-19 era. No significant difference in 90-day emergency department visits, 90-day venous thromboembolism events, or 90-day postoperative infections was observed between the 2 cohorts. CONCLUSION We found a significant increase in the number of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty cases being performed at our health institution during the COVID-19 era, likely owing to a multitude of factors including improved perioperative patient management and increased hospital burden from the COVID-19 pandemic. This increase in outpatient cases was associated with a significant reduction in average hospital length of stay and a significant decrease in 90-day readmissions compared with the pre-COVID-19 era. The study data suggest that outpatient TSA can be performed in a safe and efficient manner in the appropriate patient cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Brian L. Badman
- Reprint requests: Brian L. Badman, MD, 8607 E US 36, Avon, IN 46123, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
MacLean IS, Lu Y, Patel BH, Agarwalla A, Nolte MT, Lavoie-Gagne O, Romeo AA, Forsythe B. A Risk Stratification Nomogram to Predict Inpatient Admissions After Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Among Patients Eligible for Medicare. Orthopedics 2022; 45:43-49. [PMID: 34734779 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20211101-09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
The goal of this study was to establish a risk stratification nomogram to aid in determining the need for inpatient admission among patients who were eligible for Medicare and were undergoing primary total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried to identify all patients older than 65 years who underwent primary TSA between 2006 and 2016. The primary outcome measure was inpatient admission, as defined by hospital length of stay longer than 2 days. Multiple demographic, comorbid, and peri-operative variables were used in a multivariate logistic regression model to yield a risk stratification nomogram. A total of 1514 inpatient and 6020 out-patient admissions were analyzed. Age older than 80 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.69; P<.0001; 95% CI, 2.21-3.27), female sex (OR, 2.18; P<.0001; 95% CI, 1.90-2.51), dependent functional status (OR, 1.69; P<.0001; 95% CI, 1.2-2.38), dialysis (OR, 3.48; P=.029; 95% CI, 1.14-10.63), admission from an inpatient facility (OR, 1.76; P<.0001; 95% CI, 1.70-1.82), and inflammatory arthritis (OR, 1.69; P<.02; 95% CI, 1.25-13.78) were the greatest determinants of inpatient stay. The resulting predictive model showed acceptable discrimination and calibration. Our model enabled reliable and straightforward identification of the most suitable candidates for inpatient admission among patients who were eligible for Medicare and were undergoing primary TSA. Patients who were receiving dialysis, who had dyspnea at rest, and who had bleeding disorders were more likely to be admitted as inpatients after TSA. Larger multicenter studies are necessary to externally validate the proposed predictive nomogram. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(1):43-49.].
Collapse
|
22
|
Al-Mohrej OA, Prada C, Leroux T, Shanthanna H, Khan M. Pharmacological Treatment in the Management of Glenohumeral Osteoarthritis. Drugs Aging 2022; 39:119-128. [DOI: 10.1007/s40266-021-00916-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
|
23
|
Safety and Cost Effectiveness of Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e233-e241. [PMID: 34644715 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00562] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Changes in healthcare policy have driven many hospital-based surgeries to the outpatient environment. Multiple studies have shown outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is a safe alternative to the inpatient setting. This systematic review evaluates patient selection, perioperative protocols, complications, costs, patient satisfaction, and clinical outcomes of outpatient TSA and compares these with their inpatient counterparts. METHODS The Emnbase, Medline, and CENTRAL databases were queried on April 30, 2020, for outpatient TSA studies, identifying 232 articles, with 21 meeting inclusion criteria. This involved 25,808 and 231,408 patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient TSA, respectively. Failed same-day discharge, readmissions, revision surgeries, cost, and complications among outpatient TSA were aggregated when raw numbers were available. Statistical significance for comparisons among outpatient and inpatient TSA within individual studies was alpha = 0.05. RESULTS Ten studies evaluated same-day discharge rate, with 440 of 446 patients (98.7%) meeting the goals. Fourteen studies evaluated readmissions, revision surgeries, and complications, with readmissions in 238 of 6,133 patients (3.9%), revision surgeries in 32 of 1,484 patients (2.1%), and complications in 376 of 4,977 patients (7.6%). Readmission rates were similar between inpatients and outpatients, with only one study finding more readmissions after inpatient TSA. Complications were more common in inpatient TSA in five studies. Outpatient TSA demonstrated a charge reduction of $25,509 to $53,202 per patient, and patient satisfaction after outpatient TSA was "good to excellent" in more than 95% of patients. Patient selection for outpatient TSA used patient age, medical comorbidities, social support, living proximity to location of surgery, and lack of preoperative opioid use. DISCUSSION Outpatient TSA in appropriately selected patients is a safe and cost-effective alternative to inpatient TSA. However, the literature is limited to national database or small retrospective studies. Large prospective, cohort studies are necessary to further assess differences in complication profiles between outpatient and inpatient TSA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level IV; systematic review.
Collapse
|
24
|
Allahabadi S, Cheung EC, Hodax JD, Feeley BT, Ma CB, Lansdown DA. Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty-A Systematic Review. J Shoulder Elb Arthroplast 2022; 5:24715492211028025. [PMID: 34993380 PMCID: PMC8492032 DOI: 10.1177/24715492211028025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Recent reports have shown that outpatient shoulder arthroplasty (SA) may be a safe alternative to inpatient management in appropriately selected patients. The purpose was to review the literature reporting on outpatient SA. Methods A systematic review of publications on outpatient SA was performed. Included publications discussed patients who were discharged on the same calendar day or within 23 hours from surgery. Articles were categorized by discussions on complications, readmissions, and safety, patient selection, pain management strategies, cost effectiveness, and patient and surgeon satisfaction. Results Twenty-six articles were included. Patients undergoing outpatient SA were younger and with a lower BMI than those undergoing inpatient SA. Larger database studies reported more medical complications for patients undergoing inpatient compared to outpatient SA. Articles on pain management strategies discussed both single shot and continuous interscalene blocks with similar outcomes. Both patients and surgeons reported high levels of satisfaction following outpatient SA, and cost analysis studies demonstrated significant cost savings for outpatient SA. Conclusion In appropriately selected patients, outpatient SA can be a safe, cost-saving alternative to inpatient care and may lead to high satisfaction of both patients and physicians, though further studies are needed to clarify appropriate utilization of outpatient SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachin Allahabadi
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Edward C Cheung
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jonathan D Hodax
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - Brian T Feeley
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Chunbong B Ma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Drew A Lansdown
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, San Francisco, California
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Trudeau MT, Peters JJ, LeVasseur MR, Hawthorne BC, Dorsey CG, Wellington IJ, Shea KP, Mazzocca AD. Inpatient Versus Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty Outcomes: A Propensity Score Matched Risk-Adjusted Analysis Demonstrates the Safety of Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty. J ISAKOS 2022; 7:51-55. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jisako.2022.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
26
|
Carbone A, Vervaecke AJ, Ye IB, Patel AV, Parsons BO, Galatz LM, Poeran J, Cagle P. Outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty: A cost and outcome comparison in a comorbidity matched analysis. J Orthop 2021; 28:126-133. [PMID: 34937996 DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2021.11.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies comparing total and reverse shoulder arthroplasty (TSA/RSA) are subject to surgeon selection bias. This study objective is to compare the outcomes and cost of outpatient TSA/RSA to inpatient TSA/RSA. Methods 108,889 elective inpatient and outpatient TSA/RSA from Medicare claims data (2016-2018). 90-day readmission and total 90-day costs were compared following propensity score matching. Results Younger and healthier patients are receiving outpatient TSA/RSA. Outpatient TSA/RSA was associated with fewer 90-day readmissions (OR 0.48 CI 0.38-0.59, p < 0.001) and lower 90-day costs (-20.1% CI -19.1%; -21.1%, p < 0.001). Conclusions Outpatient TSA/RSA surgery offers lower complication rates and total costs. Level of evidence III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Carbone
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Ivan B Ye
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Akshar V Patel
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Bradford O Parsons
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Leesa M Galatz
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jashvant Poeran
- Institute for Healthcare Delivery Science, Department of Population Healthy Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - Paul Cagle
- Leni & Peter W. May Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Ueda Y, Matsushita T, Shibata Y, Takiguchi K, Ono K, Kida A, Ono R, Nagai K, Araki D, Hoshino Y, Matsumoto T, Niikura T, Sakai Y, Kuroda R. Satisfaction with playing pre-injury sports 1 year after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a hamstring autograft. Knee 2021; 33:282-289. [PMID: 34739959 DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2021.10.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Revised: 09/24/2021] [Accepted: 10/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Few studies have examined patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sports after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. The purpose of this study was to investigate patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sport and identify factors associated with satisfaction. METHODS A total of 97 patients underwent unilateral ACL reconstruction using a hamstring autograft and returned to pre-injury sports 1 year after surgery. Patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sport was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS) and an ordinal four-grade scale. Problems related to the operated knee were also assessed. Knee muscle strength, single leg hop distance, knee laxity, subjective knee pain, and fear of movement/reinjury using Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-11 (TSK-11) were measured. Multivariate linear regression analysis was performed to determine the factors associated with patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sport 1 year after surgery. RESULTS The average VAS score for patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sports 1 year after surgery was 77.8 ± 20.2. Of the 97 patients, 87 patients (89.7%) answered "satisfied" or "mostly satisfied", whereas 51 patients (52.6%) had one or more problems. Multivariate linear regression analysis identified that the TSK-11 score was associated with patient satisfaction with playing a pre-injury sport 1 year after surgery. CONCLUSION Most of the patients who returned to pre-injury sports were satisfied with their outcomes. In contrast, approximately half of the patients had one or more problems after returning to play pre-injury sports. In particular, fear of movement/reinjury was significantly associated with patient satisfaction with playing pre-injury sport 1 year after surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuya Ueda
- Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan; Department of Community Health Sciences, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takehiko Matsushita
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan.
| | - Yohei Shibata
- Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kohei Takiguchi
- Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kumiko Ono
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Japan
| | - Akihiro Kida
- Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kobe University Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Rei Ono
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Kobe University Graduate School of Health Sciences, Kobe, Japan
| | - Kanto Nagai
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Daisuke Araki
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hoshino
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Matsumoto
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Takahiro Niikura
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Yoshitada Sakai
- Division of Rehabilitation Medicine, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Ryosuke Kuroda
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Xiang X. [Interpretation of 2020 American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) on the Management of Glenohumeral Joint Osteoarthritis Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guideline]. ZHONGGUO XIU FU CHONG JIAN WAI KE ZA ZHI = ZHONGGUO XIUFU CHONGJIAN WAIKE ZAZHI = CHINESE JOURNAL OF REPARATIVE AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY 2021; 35:1403-1410. [PMID: 34779165 DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.202105085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
Based on peer-reviewed systematic reviews and randomized controlled trials published between January 2000 and June 2019 with regards to the management of glenohumeral joint osteoarthritis (GJO), the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) established the clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of GJO. The guidelines provided practice recommendations including risk factors, non-surgical treatment, surgical treatment, prosthesis selection, and perioperative management for GJO. The recommendations were graded according to different evidence strength. This paper interprets the guidline in order to provide reference for domestic medical workers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xianxiang Xiang
- Department of Sports Medicine, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian Liaoning, 116001, P.R.China
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
O'Donnell EA, Fury MS, Maier SP, Bernstein DN, Carrier RE, Warner JJP. Outpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty Patient Selection, Patient Experience, and Cost Analyses: A Systematic Review. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202111000-00003. [PMID: 34757981 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utilization of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty has been increasing. With increasing pressure to reduce costs, further underscored by the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, many health-care organizations will move toward outpatient interventions to conserve inpatient resources. Although abundant literature has shown the advantages of outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is a relative paucity describing outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Thus, the purpose of this study was to summarize the peer-reviewed literature of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty with particular attention to patient selection, patient outcomes, and cost benefits. METHODS The PubMed, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Embase databases were queried according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. All articles on outpatient shoulder arthroplasty were included. Data on patient selection, patient outcomes, and cost analyses were recorded. Patient outcomes, including complications, reoperations, and readmissions, were analyzed by weighted average. RESULTS Twenty-three articles were included for analysis. There were 3 review articles and 20 studies with Level-III or IV evidence as assessed per The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery Level of Evidence criteria. Patient selection was most often predicated on age <70 years, body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m2, absence of active cardiopulmonary comorbidities, and presence of home support. Complications and readmissions were not common and either improved or were equivalent to those of inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Patient satisfaction was high in studies of short-term and intermediate-term follow-up. The proposed cost benefit ranged from $747 to $53,202 with outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. CONCLUSIONS The published literature to date supports outpatient shoulder arthroplasty as an effective, safe, and cost-reducing intervention with proper patient selection. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan A O'Donnell
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew S Fury
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Stephen P Maier
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David N Bernstein
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Institute for Strategy and Competitiveness, Harvard Business School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Robert E Carrier
- University of New England College of Osteopathic Medicine, Biddeford, Maine
| | - Jon J P Warner
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Mehta N, Bohl DD, Cohn MR, McCormick JR, Nicholson GP, Garrigues GE, Verma NN. Trends in outpatient versus inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty over time. JSES Int 2021; 6:7-14. [PMID: 35141669 PMCID: PMC8811390 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2021.09.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study was to investigate the safety of outpatient and inpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and to investigate changes over time. Methods Patients undergoing primary TSA during 2006-2019 as part of the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were identified. Patients were divided into an early cohort (2006-2016, 12,401 patients) and a late cohort (2017-2019, 12,845 patients). Outpatient procedures were defined as those discharged on the day of surgery. Patient comorbidities and rate of adverse events within 30 days postoperatively were compared with adjustment for baseline characteristics using standard multivariate regression. Results There was a significant reduction in complications over time when considering all cases (5.69% in the early cohort vs. 3.67% in the late cohort, adjusted relative risk [RR] = 0.65, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.58-0.73, P < .001). The rate of complications decreased over time among inpatients (5.80% vs. 3.90%, adjusted RR = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.60-0.76, P < .001). However, there was no difference in the rate of complications among outpatients over time (1.98% vs. 1.38%, adjusted RR = 0.64, 95% CI = 0.28-1.47, P = .293). There were significantly more complications among inpatients vs. outpatients in both the early and late cohorts (early: 5.80% vs. 1.98%, adjusted RR = 2.57, 95% CI = 1.24-5.34, P = .011, late: 3.90% vs. 1.38%, adjusted RR = 2.28, 95% CI = 1.39-3.74, P = .001). TSA became more common in elderly patients over 70 years of age over time in both the inpatient and outpatient cohorts, whereas fewer young patients (aged 18-59 years) underwent TSA in the late cohorts than in the early cohorts for both the inpatient and outpatient samples (P < .001). Conclusion The overall complication rate of TSA has decreased over time as outpatient TSA has become increasingly common. When contemporary data are examined, the complication rate of outpatient procedures has remained constant over time while that of inpatient procedures decreased, despite the changing demographics of patients undergoing TSA. This indicates that outpatient TSA remains a safe procedure as patient selection criteria have evolved, while the safety of inpatient TSA continues to improve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabil Mehta
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Corresponding author: Nabil Mehta, MD, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, 1611 W Harrison St, Suite 360, Chicago, IL 60621, USA.
| | - Daniel D. Bohl
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Matthew R. Cohn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Gregory P. Nicholson
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Grant E. Garrigues
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nikhil N. Verma
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Is outpatient shoulder arthroplasty safe? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:1968-1976. [PMID: 33675972 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2020] [Revised: 02/02/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amid rising health care costs and recent advances in surgical and anesthetic protocols, the rate of outpatient joint arthroplasty has risen steadily in recent years. Although the safety of outpatient total knee arthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty has been well established, outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is still in its infancy. The purpose of this study was to synthesize the current literature and provide further data regarding the outcomes and safety of outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. METHODS A systematic review was conducted following the standard PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Included were studies that evaluated the outcomes of patients undergoing outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) or reverse TSA. Meta-analysis was conducted using Mantel-Haenszel statistics to generate odds ratios (ORs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) comparing outpatient and inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. RESULTS Twelve studies were included, with a total of 194,513 patients, of whom 7162 were outpatients. Of the studies, 8 were level III and 4 were level IV. The average age of the outpatients was 66.6 years, and the average age of the inpatients was 70.1 years. The overall OR for complications was significantly lower in outpatients (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.35-0.45) than in inpatients. There was no significant difference in rates of 90-day readmission (OR, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.03), revision (OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.65-1.41), and infection (OR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.64-1.35) when comparing outpatients with inpatients. CONCLUSION Outpatient TSA, in an appropriately selected patient population, is safe and results in comparable patient outcomes to those of inpatient shoulder arthroplasty. Given the expected increase in the number of patients requiring TSA, surgeons, hospital administrators, and insurance carriers should strongly consider the merits of a cost- and care-efficient approach to total shoulder replacement.
Collapse
|
32
|
Polisetty TS, Grewal G, Drawbert H, Ardeljan A, Colley R, Levy JC. Determining the validity of the Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) tool for identifying patients for safe same-day discharge after primary shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:1794-1802. [PMID: 33290852 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.10.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2020] [Revised: 10/21/2020] [Accepted: 10/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early discharge has been a target of cost-control efforts given the growing demand for joint replacement surgery. The Outpatient Arthroplasty Risk Assessment (OARA) score, a medically based risk-assessment score, has shown high predictive ability in achieving safe early discharge following outpatient lower-extremity arthroplasty using a score threshold initially set at ≤59 points but more recently adapted to ≤79 points. However, no study has been performed using the OARA tool for shoulder replacement, which has been shown to have lower associated medical risks than lower-extremity arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to determine the OARA score threshold for same-day discharge (SDD) following shoulder arthroplasty and evaluate its effectiveness in selecting patients for SDD. We hypothesized that the OARA score threshold for shoulder arthroplasty would be higher than that for lower-extremity arthroplasty. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 422 patients who underwent primary anatomic or reverse shoulder arthroplasty between April 2018 and October 2019 performed by a single surgeon. As standard practice, all patients were counseled preoperatively regarding SDD and given the choice to stay overnight. Medical history, length of stay, and 90-day readmissions were obtained from medical records. Analysis of variance testing and screening test characteristics compared the performance of the OARA score vs. the American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status (ASA-PS) class and a previously published OARA score threshold used to define a low risk of outpatient lower-extremity arthroplasty. RESULTS A preoperative OARA score cutoff of ≤110 points demonstrated a sensitivity of 98.0% for identifying patients with SDD after shoulder arthroplasty, compared with 66.7% using the hip and knee OARA score threshold of ≤59 points (P < .0001) and 80.4% using ASA-PS class ≤ 2 (P = .008). OARA scores ≤ 110 points also showed a negative predictive value of 98.9% and a false-negative rate of 2.0% but remained incomprehensive with a specificity of 24.0% (P < .0001). Analysis of variance demonstrated that mean OARA scores increased significantly with length of stay (P = .001) compared with ASA-PS classes (P = .82). Patients with OARA scores ≤ 110 points were also 2.5 times less likely to have 90-day emergency department visits (P = .04) than those with OARA scores > 110 points. There was no difference in 30- and 90-day readmission rates for patients with OARA scores ≤ 59 points, OARA scores ≤ 110 points, and ASA-PS classes ≤ 2. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that a preoperative OARA score threshold of ≤110 points is effective and conservative in screening patients for SDD following shoulder arthroplasty, with low rates of 90-day emergency department visits and readmissions. This threshold is a useful screening tool to identify patients who are not good candidates for SDD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Gagan Grewal
- Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Hans Drawbert
- Herbert Wertheim College of Medicine, Florida International University, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Ardeljan
- College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Ryan Colley
- Holy Cross Orthopedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Harris AB, Best MJ, Weiner S, Gupta HO, Jenkins SG, Srikumaran U. Hospital Readmission Rates Following Outpatient Versus Inpatient Shoulder Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2021; 44:e173-e177. [PMID: 33002176 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20200925-03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an alternative to surgery with inpatient admission for appropriate patients. Controlled studies assessing differences in perioperative outcomes between inpatient and outpatient TSA are lacking. In this study, the primary outcome was 30-day all-cause hospital readmission following inpatient vs outpatient TSA. The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to identify patients undergoing both primary and revision TSA from 2010 to 2017. Patients were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes. A 1:1 propensity score matching was used to create two groups of patients, those who underwent outpatient surgery and those who underwent inpatient surgery, while matching for age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, primary vs revision surgery, smoking, diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure. This study had a power of 85% to detect a difference of 1% in 30-day readmission. Following 1:1 propensity score matching, 1714 patients who underwent inpatient TSA and 1714 patients who underwent outpatient TSA were analyzed. All-cause 30-day readmission rates were 3.4% in the outpatient group and 1.7% in the inpatient group (P<.01). A total of 1.9% of patients who underwent outpatient surgery had a 30-day readmission for a surgical complication compared with 1.4% of patients who underwent inpatient surgery (P=.32). Although patients who underwent outpatient TSA had an increased risk of all-cause 30-day readmission compared with equally matched controls who underwent inpatient TSA, readmission for surgical complications was equivalent between the two groups. Careful patient selection for outpatient TSA should be emphasized to minimize the potential for postoperative hospital admission. [Orthopedics. 2021;44(2):e173-e178.].
Collapse
|
34
|
Kaiser TJ, Shanley E, Denninger TR, Reuschel B, Kissenberth MJ, Tolan SJ, Thigpen CA, Pill SG. Preoperative screening in patients having elective shoulder surgery reveals a high rate of fall risk. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:S84-S88. [PMID: 33895300 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2021.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 04/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/13/2021] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fall risk is an acknowledged but relatively understudied concern for older patients undergoing shoulder surgery. The cause is multifactorial, and it includes advanced age, impaired upper extremity function, use of shoulder abduction braces, and postoperative use of opioid medications. No previous study has examined preoperative fall risk in patients undergoing elective shoulder surgery. Previous literature looking at fall risk in elective orthopedic procedures has predominantly focused on falls occurring in the hospital setting, although falls have also been shown to occur in the outpatient setting. Gait speed and Timed Up and Go (TUG) are well-researched functional measures in the aging population with established cutoff scores indicating increased fall risk. The purpose of this study was to quantify gait speed and TUG scores in a series of patients who were scheduled to undergo either rotator cuff repair (RCR) or total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in order to assess overall risk of fall in these populations. METHODS A total of 198 patients scheduled for TSA or RCR surgery were evaluated preoperatively from multiple outpatient physical therapy clinics within Greenville, South Carolina. The TUG score (>14 seconds considered high fall risk) and 10 Meter Walk test (<0.7 m/s considered high risk for falls) were recorded for each patient. Patient-reported outcomes were also collected, including Veteran's Rand 12 Physical Component and Mental Component Scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form score, and the Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation. RESULTS Patients undergoing TSA (n = 80; 65.4 ± 11.4 years) were older than those undergoing RCR (n = 118; 59.0 ± 14.2 years). Fifty-nine percent of all patients were classified as being a high risk for falls based on gait speed <0.7 m/s. Patients in the TSA group were more likely to display preoperative fall risk compared to patients in the RCR group (62% vs. 38%; χ2 = 8.9, P = .03). There were no significant differences in ambulatory status, Veteran's Rand 12 Physical Component and Mental Component Scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form, or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores between groups (P = .11). DISCUSSION Both patient groups demonstrated a high rate of fall risk in preoperative evaluation. Patients undergoing TSA more often displayed fall risk compared with patients undergoing RCR. Although patients in the TSA group were older, there was no association between age or ambulatory status and fall risk. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that fall risk screening may be important for patients undergoing TSA and RCR surgeries. The higher fall risk in the TSA group may be an important consideration as this procedure shifts toward outpatient status.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J Kaiser
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC, USA
| | - Ellen Shanley
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | - Beth Reuschel
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | - Stefan J Tolan
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC, USA
| | | | - Stephan G Pill
- Steadman Hawkins Clinic of the Carolinas, Greenville, SC, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Moverman MA, Menendez ME, Mahendraraj KA, Polisetty T, Jawa A, Levy JC. Patient risk factors for acromial stress fractures after reverse shoulder arthroplasty: a multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:1619-1625. [PMID: 33038496 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the growing recognition of acromial stress fractures (ASFs) after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA), most of the current data are derived from single-center studies with limited generalizability. This multicenter study investigated the incidence of ASFs after RTSA and identified preoperative patient characteristics associated with their occurrence. METHODS Using 2 institutional registries from different regions of the United States, we identified 1479 patients undergoing either primary or revision RTSA between 2013 and 2018 with minimum 3-month follow-up. ASFs were defined as radiographic evidence of an acromial or scapular spine fracture with clinical symptoms (eg, tenderness over the acromion or scapular spine). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify preoperative patient factors associated with the development of ASFs. RESULTS Overall, 54 (3.7%) patients were diagnosed with an ASF after RTSA. Patient-related factors independently associated with the development of an ASF included female sex (odds ratio [OR], 2.21 reference: male; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03-4.74; P < .05), rheumatoid arthritis (OR, 2.30; 95% CI, 1.02-5.16; P < .05), osteoporosis (OR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.24-5.21; P < .05), a diagnosis of degenerative joint disease with rotator cuff tear (OR, 4.74 reference: degenerative joint disease without rotator cuff tear; 95% CI, 1.84-12.23; P < .05), and fracture malunion/nonunion (OR, 5.21; 95% CI, 1.20-22.76; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS The non-negligible percentage of ASFs that occur after RTSA is associated with the diagnoses of rotator cuff dysfunction and chronic fracture sequelae in female patients with suboptimal bone health. This information can be used to counsel patients and set expectations about potential setbacks in recovery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael A Moverman
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Mariano E Menendez
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Kuhan A Mahendraraj
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Boston Sports and Shoulder Center, Waltham, MA, USA
| | - Teja Polisetty
- Department of Orthopaedics, Holy Cross Orthopaedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| | - Andrew Jawa
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, New England Baptist Hospital, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA; Boston Sports and Shoulder Center, Waltham, MA, USA.
| | - Jonathan C Levy
- Department of Orthopaedics, Holy Cross Orthopaedic Institute, Fort Lauderdale, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Huddleston HP, Mehta N, Polce EM, Williams BT, Fu MC, Yanke AB, Verma NN. Complication rates and outcomes after outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: a systematic review. JSES Int 2021; 5:413-423. [PMID: 34136848 PMCID: PMC8178605 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.11.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As the number of total shoulder arthroplasties (TSAs) performed annually increases, some surgeons have begun to shift toward performing TSAs in the outpatient setting. However, it is imperative to establish the safety of outpatient TSA. The purpose of this systematic review was to define complication, readmission, and reoperation rates and patient-reported outcomes after outpatient TSA. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines using three databases (PubMed, Ovid, and Embase). English-language publications describing results on complication rates in patients who underwent TSA in an outpatient or ambulatory setting were included. All nonclinical and deidentified database studies were excluded. Bias assessment was conducted with the methodologic index for nonrandomized studies criteria. Results Seven studies describing outcomes in outpatient TSA were identified for inclusion. The included studies used varying criteria for selecting patients for an outpatient procedure. The total outpatient 90-day complication rate (commonly including hematomas, wound issues, and nerve palsies) ranged from 7.1%-11.5%. Readmission rates ranged from 0%-3.7%, and emergency and urgent care visits ranged from 2.4%-16.1%. Patient-reported outcomes improved significantly after outpatient TSA in all studies. Two studies found a higher complication rate in the comparative inpatient cohort (P = .023-.027). Methodologic index for nonrandomized studies scores ranged from 9 to 11 (of 16) for noncomparative studies (n = 3), while all comparative studies received a score of a 16 (of 24). Conclusion Outpatient TSA in properly selected patients results in a similar complication rate to inpatient TSA. Further studies are needed to aid in determining proper risk stratification to direct patients to inpatient or outpatient shoulder arthroplasty.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Nabil Mehta
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Evan M Polce
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | | - Michael C Fu
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Adam B Yanke
- Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Cointat C, Gauci MO, Azar M, Tran L, Trojani C, Boileau P. Outpatient shoulder prostheses: Feasibility, acceptance and safety. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 2021; 107:102913. [PMID: 33798792 DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2021.102913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2020] [Revised: 10/11/2020] [Accepted: 10/26/2020] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Outpatient surgery in France is defined by the national authority for health (HAS) as a scheduled surgery enabling same-day discharge without any increased risk to the patient. With the advent of enhanced recovery after surgery, outpatient lower limb arthroplasty has become a common procedure. However, only 1.1% of knee arthroplasties in France were performed on an outpatient basis in 2017. OBJECTIVES 1) assess early morbidity and mortality after outpatient shoulder arthroplasties to validate eligibility and safety criteria; and 2) assess patient acceptance of outpatient surgery. METHODS A single-center study with the following inclusion criteria: primary shoulder arthroplasty, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) score I or II, no cognitive impairment, and no coronary artery or thromboembolic diseases. Analgesia was provided by bupivacaine via a peripheral nerve catheter in the first 72 hours followed by oral analgesics. Patients were discharged if the post-anesthetic discharge scoring system (PADSS) was>9/10 and the visual analog scale (VAS) was<5/10. Postoperative telephone interviews were carried out on D1, D2 and D3 to assess pain with the numerical rating scale and to collect data on their analgesic consumption. All patients were seen by an independent observer at one and six months for a clinical and radiologic follow-up and at 90 days during a consultation with the senior surgeon. The primary endpoint was the 90-day morbidity and mortality rate (readmissions, rehospitalizations, and minor and major complications). A satisfaction questionnaire was collected at one and six months. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were offered an outpatient shoulder arthroplasty between February 2016 and February 2018: 12 (33%) refused with no valid reasons and 24 patients agreed to the procedure (seven hemiarthroplasties, nine anatomic shoulder arthroplasties and eight reverse shoulder arthroplasties). The mean age at surgery was 70 years (55-82), mean body mass index (BMI) was 26 (21-32) and 14 patients were ASA II (66%). Three patients (12%) refused same-day discharge despite a PADSS score>9/10 and adequate pain management. Two patients (8%) were not discharged home on the same day as the surgery for medical reasons (one for pain and one for high blood pressure). No readmissions or complications were reported for the 19 outpatient arthroplasties. None of the outpatients used opioids. All patients were satisfied with their functional outcome, 84% were satisfied with the outpatient management and 17% felt they were insufficiently monitored and regretted that they were not hospitalized. CONCLUSIONS 1) outpatient shoulder arthroplasty can be safely proposed to selected patients with low comorbidities, regardless of their age and type of implant; 2) the acceptance rate for outpatient shoulder arthroplasty remained low among our patient population. These results should incite us to better educate patients about outpatient surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV; retrospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Cointat
- Unité de recherche clinique Côte d'Azur (UR2CA), service de chirurgie orthopédique et chirurgie du sport, institut universitaire locomoteur et du sport (iULS), CHU de Nice, hôpital Pasteur 2, 30, voie Romaine, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Marc Olivier Gauci
- Unité de recherche clinique Côte d'Azur (UR2CA), service de chirurgie orthopédique et chirurgie du sport, institut universitaire locomoteur et du sport (iULS), CHU de Nice, hôpital Pasteur 2, 30, voie Romaine, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Michel Azar
- Unité de recherche clinique Côte d'Azur (UR2CA), service de chirurgie orthopédique et chirurgie du sport, institut universitaire locomoteur et du sport (iULS), CHU de Nice, hôpital Pasteur 2, 30, voie Romaine, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Laurie Tran
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation, institut Arnault-Tzanck, 171, rue du Commandant Gaston-Cahuzac, 06700 Saint-Laurent-du-Var, France
| | - Christophe Trojani
- Unité de recherche clinique Côte d'Azur (UR2CA), service de chirurgie orthopédique et chirurgie du sport, institut universitaire locomoteur et du sport (iULS), CHU de Nice, hôpital Pasteur 2, 30, voie Romaine, 06001 Nice, France; Groupe Kantys, institut de chirurgie réparatrice locomoteur et du sport (ICR), 7, avenue Durante, 06000 Nice, France
| | - Pascal Boileau
- Unité de recherche clinique Côte d'Azur (UR2CA), service de chirurgie orthopédique et chirurgie du sport, institut universitaire locomoteur et du sport (iULS), CHU de Nice, hôpital Pasteur 2, 30, voie Romaine, 06001 Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Polce EM, Kunze KN, Fu MC, Garrigues GE, Forsythe B, Nicholson GP, Cole BJ, Verma NN. Development of supervised machine learning algorithms for prediction of satisfaction at 2 years following total shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2021; 30:e290-e299. [PMID: 33010437 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2020.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 08/28/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient satisfaction after primary anatomic and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) represents an important metric for gauging patients' perception of their care and surgical outcomes. Although TSA confers improvement in pain and function for most patients, inevitably some will remain unsatisfied postoperatively. The purpose of this study was to (1) train supervised machine learning (SML) algorithms to predict satisfaction after TSA and (2) develop a clinical tool for individualized assessment of patient-specific risk factors. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of primary anatomic and reverse TSA patients between January 2014 and February 2018. A total of 16 demographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes were evaluated for predictive value. Five SML algorithms underwent 3 iterations of 10-fold cross-validation on a training set (80% of cohort). Assessment by discrimination, calibration, Brier score, and decision-curve analysis was performed on an independent testing set (remaining 20% of cohort). Global and local model behaviors were evaluated with global variable importance plots and local interpretable model-agnostic explanations, respectively. RESULTS The study cohort consisted of 413 patients, of whom 331 (82.6%) were satisfied at 2 years postoperatively. The support vector machine model demonstrated the best relative performance on the independent testing set not used for model training (concordance statistic, 0.80; calibration intercept, 0.20; calibration slope, 2.32; Brier score, 0.11). The most important factors for predicting satisfaction were baseline Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation score, exercise and activity, workers' compensation status, diagnosis, symptom duration prior to surgery, body mass index, age, smoking status, anatomic vs. reverse TSA, and diabetes. The support vector machine algorithm was incorporated into an open-access digital application for patient-level explanations of risk and predictions, available at https://orthopedics.shinyapps.io/SatisfactionTSA/. CONCLUSION The best-performing SML model demonstrated excellent discrimination and adequate calibration for predicting satisfaction following TSA and was used to create an open-access, clinical decision-making tool. However, rigorous external validation in different geographic locations and patient populations is essential prior to assessment of clinical utility. Given that this tool is based on partially modifiable risk factors, it may enhance shared decision making and allow for periods of targeted preoperative health-optimization efforts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evan M Polce
- Division of Sports Medicine & Shoulder, Department of Orthopedics, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Kyle N Kunze
- Division of Sports Medicine & Shoulder, Department of Orthopedics, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Michael C Fu
- Division of Sports Medicine & Shoulder, Department of Orthopedics, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Grant E Garrigues
- Division of Sports Medicine & Shoulder, Department of Orthopedics, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian Forsythe
- Division of Sports Medicine & Shoulder, Department of Orthopedics, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Gregory P Nicholson
- Division of Sports Medicine & Shoulder, Department of Orthopedics, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Brian J Cole
- Division of Sports Medicine & Shoulder, Department of Orthopedics, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Nikhil N Verma
- Division of Sports Medicine & Shoulder, Department of Orthopedics, Midwest Orthopedics at Rush, Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Vajapey SP, Contreras ES, Neviaser AS, Bishop JY, Cvetanovich GL. Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review Evaluating Outcomes and Cost-Effectiveness. JBJS Rev 2021; 9:01874474-202105000-00002. [PMID: 33956691 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.rvw.20.00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Orthopaedic surgical procedures are increasingly being performed in outpatient settings. The drive for cost reduction without compromising patient safety and outcomes has increased interest in outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA). The primary aim of this study was to perform a review of the evidence regarding the outcomes and cost-effectiveness of outpatient TSA. METHODS A search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases was performed using several keywords: "outpatient," "shoulder replacement," "ambulatory," "day case," "day-case," "shoulder arthroplasty," "same day," and "shoulder surgery." Studies that were published from May 2010 to May 2020 in the English language were considered. Research design, questions, and outcomes were recorded for each study. Qualitative and quantitative pooled analysis was performed on the data where appropriate. RESULTS Twenty studies met the inclusion criteria. Six retrospective studies compared complication rates between inpatient and outpatient cohorts and found no significant differences. Four studies found that the complication rate was lower in the outpatient cohort compared with the inpatient cohort. In a pooled analysis, the readmission rate after outpatient TSA was significantly lower than the readmission rate after inpatient TSA at 30 days (0.65% vs. 0.95%) and 90 days (2.03% vs. 2.87%) postoperatively (p < 0.05 for both). Four studies evaluated the cost of outpatient TSA in comparison with inpatient TSA. All of these studies found that TSA at an ambulatory surgery center was significantly less costly than TSA at an inpatient facility, both for the health-care system and for the patient. Patient selection for outpatient TSA may depend on several important factors, including the presence or absence of diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, congestive heart failure, poor functional status, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class, chronic narcotic use, higher body mass index, and older age. CONCLUSIONS Our results show that patient selection is the most critical factor that predicts the success of outpatient TSA. While outpatient TSA is significantly less costly than inpatient TSA, patients undergoing outpatient TSA are more likely to be healthier than patients undergoing inpatient TSA. More high-quality long-term studies are needed to add to this body of evidence. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sravya P Vajapey
- Department of Orthopaedics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dillon MT, Chan PH, Prentice HA, Royse KE, Paxton EW, Okike K, Khatod M, Navarro RA. The effect of a statewide COVID-19 shelter-in-place order on shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture volume and length of stay. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021; 31:339-345. [PMID: 34334985 PMCID: PMC7923956 DOI: 10.1053/j.sart.2021.01.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Although the COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted elective shoulder arthroplasty throughput, traumatic shoulder arthroplasty procedures are less apt to be postponed. We sought to evaluate shoulder arthroplasty utilization for fracture during the COVID-19 pandemic and California's associated shelter-in-place order compared to historical controls. Methods We conducted a cohort study with historical controls, identifying patients who underwent shoulder arthroplasty for proximal humerus fracture in California using our integrated electronic health record. The time period of interest was following the implementation of the statewide shelter-in-place order: March 19, 2020-May 31, 2020. This was compared to three historical periods: January 1, 2020-March 18, 2020, March 18, 2019-May 31, 2019, and January 1, 2019-March 18, 2019. Procedure volume, patient characteristics, in-hospital length of stay, and 30-day events (emergency department visit, readmission, infection, pneumonia, and death) were reported. Changes over time were analyzed using linear regression adjusted for usual seasonal and yearly changes and age, sex, comorbidities, and postadmission factors. Results Surgical volume dropped from an average of 4.4, 5.2, and 2.6 surgeries per week in the historical time periods, respectively, to 2.4 surgeries per week after shelter-in-place. While no more than 30% of all shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed during any given week were for fracture during the historical time periods, arthroplasties performed for fracture was the overwhelming primary indication immediately after the shelter-in-place order. More patients were discharged the day of surgery (+33.2%, P = .019) after the shelter-in-place order, but we did not observe a change in any of the corresponding 30-day events. Conclusions The volume of shoulder arthroplasty for fracture dropped during the time of COVID-19. The reduction in volume could be due to less shoulder trauma due to shelter-in-place or a change in the indications for arthroplasty given the perceived higher risks associated with intubation and surgical care. We noted more patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty for fracture were safely discharged on the day of surgery, suggesting this may be a safe practice that can be adopted moving forward. Level of Evidence Level III; Retrospective Case-control Comparative Study
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark T Dillon
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, The Permanente Medical Group, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Priscilla H Chan
- Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Kathryn E Royse
- Surgical Outcomes and Analysis, Kaiser Permanente, San Diego, CA, USA
| | | | - Kanu Okike
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Hawaii Permanente Medical Group, Honolulu, HI, USA
| | - Monti Khatod
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, West Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ronald A Navarro
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, South Bay, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Complications and Readmissions After Reverse and Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty With Same-day Discharge. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2021; 29:116-122. [PMID: 32501854 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-20-00245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recent studies have demonstrated the safety of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) in an outpatient setting. No clinical studies, to date, have specifically analyzed complication and readmission rates after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) with same-day discharge. The purpose of this study was to compare the 90-day complication and readmission rates of patients undergoing TSA and RTSA with same-day discharge. METHODS Ninety-eight consecutive patients who underwent 104 shoulder arthroplasties with same-day discharge (52 TSA and 52 RTSA) between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed. Suitability for same-day discharge was determined preoperatively using the standardized criteria. Demographic variables, operative time, 90-day readmission, and complication rates were recorded and compared between groups. Differences between the patients undergoing TSA versus RTSA were evaluated with Student t-test, Mann-Whitney test, or Chi square tests as statistically appropriate and reported as P values. RESULTS Average age in the TSA cohort was significantly lower (60.1 ± 7.4 versus 67.5 ± 7.5, respectively; P < 0.001). Total operating room time was significantly shorter in the RTSA cohort (153 ± 30.1 minutes versus 171 ± 20.9). Three minor postoperative complications (5.8%) were observed in the TSA cohort (three seromas) within the 90-day postoperative period. There were four postoperative complications (7.7%) in the RTSA cohort (two postoperative seromas, one periprosthetic fracture, and one dislocation). None of the TSA patients required readmission and 1 RTSA (periprosthetic fracture) patient required readmission within 90 days. DISCUSSION RTSA with same-day discharge is a safe option for appropriately selected patients despite significantly increased age. 90-day readmission and complication rates between outpatient TSA and RTSA are similar. DATA AVAILABILITY Yes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS NA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III (case-control).
Collapse
|
42
|
Paynter JW, Raley JA, Kyrkos JG, Paré DW, Houston H, Crosby LA, Parada SA. Routine postoperative laboratory tests are unnecessary after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:1656-1664. [PMID: 32192880 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.12.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2019] [Revised: 12/11/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obtaining postoperative laboratory studies after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is a common practice. However, justification of this practice remains unclear. This study assesses the utility of routine postoperative laboratory studies in RSA. METHODS The electronic medical records of 369 patients who underwent RSA over 10 years were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 213 patients qualified for analysis. Primary outcomes were intervention related to abnormal laboratory values, length of stay, and 90-day emergency department visits/readmissions. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with abnormal laboratory values and postoperative visits/readmissions. RESULTS Of 213 patients analyzed, 188 (88.7%) had abnormal postoperative laboratory values: 69% had an abnormal hemoglobin (Hgb) or hematocrit level, but only 12% underwent interventions. Lower preoperative Hgb was a significant predictor of receiving a transfusion. A significant association existed between abnormal postoperative electrolyte and creatinine levels with lower body mass index (BMI) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Only 4 patients (1.8%) received non-transfusion related intervention. Emergency department visits were not statistically different between patients with positive or negative laboratory tests (P = .73). CONCLUSION Because 87.3% of laboratory studies did not influence patient management, we recommend against routine testing for primary RSA. This study demonstrates that the practice of obtaining routine postoperative laboratory studies is not justified. We recommend selectively obtaining a postoperative basic metabolic profile in patients with increased American Society of Anesthesiologists classification and/or CCI with a lower BMI. We also recommend selectively ordering postoperative complete blood count in patients with a lower preoperative Hgb.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jordan W Paynter
- Department of Orthopaedics, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - James A Raley
- Department of Orthopaedics, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Judith G Kyrkos
- Department of Orthopaedics, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA.
| | - Daniel W Paré
- Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Harrison Houston
- Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA
| | - Lynn A Crosby
- Veterans Affairs Nebraska-Western Iowa Health Care System, Omaha, NE, USA
| | - Stephen A Parada
- Department of Orthopaedics, Augusta University Medical Center, Augusta, GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Erickson BJ, Shishani Y, Jones S, Sinclair T, Bishop ME, Romeo AA, Gobezie R. Outpatient versus inpatient anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes and complications. JSES Int 2020; 4:919-922. [PMID: 33345235 PMCID: PMC7738588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2020.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is an effective treatment option for glenohumeral arthritis. Historically, this surgical procedure was performed on an inpatient basis. There has been a recent trend in performing TSA on an outpatient basis in the proper candidates. Methods All patients who underwent outpatient TSA performed by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2017 were included. Demographic information and clinical outcome scores, as well as data on complications, readmissions, and revision surgical procedures, were recorded. This group of patients was then compared with a matched cohort of patients who underwent inpatient TSA over the same period. Results Overall, 94 patients (average age, 60.4 years; 67.0% male patients) underwent outpatient TSA and were included. Patients who underwent outpatient TSA showed significant improvement in all clinical outcome scores at both 1 and 2 years postoperatively. The control group consisted of 77 patients who underwent inpatient TSA (average age, 62.6 years; 53.2% male patients). No significant differences in complications or improvements in clinical outcome scores were found between the inpatient and outpatient groups. Conclusion TSA performed in an outpatient setting is a safe and reliable procedure that provides significant improvement in clinical outcome scores and no difference in complication rates compared with inpatient TSA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Stacy Jones
- Cleveland Shoulder Institute, Beachwood, OH, USA
| | - Tia Sinclair
- Cleveland Shoulder Institute, Beachwood, OH, USA
| | | | - Anthony A Romeo
- Dupage Medical Group, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Joliet, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
44
|
A Novel Machine Learning Model Developed to Assist in Patient Selection for Outpatient Total Shoulder Arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2020; 28:e580-e585. [PMID: 31663914 PMCID: PMC7180108 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-19-00395] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patient selection for outpatient total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is important to optimizing patient outcomes. This study aims to develop a machine learning tool that may aid in patient selection for outpatient total should arthroplasty based on medical comorbidities and demographic factors. METHODS Patients undergoing elective TSA from 2011 to 2016 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were queried. A random forest machine learning model was used to predict which patients had a length of stay of 1 day or less (short stay). A multivariable logistic regression was then used to identify which variables were significantly correlated with a short or long stay. RESULTS From 2011 to 2016, 4,500 patients were identified as having undergone elective TSA and having the necessary predictive features and outcomes recorded. The machine learning model was able to successfully identify short stay patients, producing an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.77. The multivariate logistic regression identified numerous variables associated with a short stay including age less than 70 years and male sex as well as variables associated with a longer stay including diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and American Society of Anesthesiologists class greater than 2. CONCLUSIONS Machine learning may be used to predict which patients are suitable candidates for short stay or outpatient TSA based on their medical comorbidities and demographic profile.
Collapse
|
45
|
Outpatient vs. inpatient reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes and complications. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2020; 29:1115-1120. [PMID: 32035819 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.10.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2019] [Revised: 10/23/2019] [Accepted: 10/27/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) is an effective treatment option for many shoulder conditions. Historically, this surgical procedure was performed on an inpatient basis. There has been a recent trend to perform RTSA on an outpatient basis in proper candidates. METHODS All patients who underwent outpatient RTSA performed by a single surgeon between 2015 and 2017 were included. Demographic information and clinical outcome scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, visual analog scale, and Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation scores), as well as data on complications, readmission, and revision surgery, were recorded. This group of patients was then compared with a cohort of patients who underwent RTSA in the inpatient setting during the same period. RESULTS Overall, 241 patients (average age, 68.9 years; 52.3% female patients) underwent outpatient RTSA and were included. Patients who underwent outpatient RTSA showed significant improvements in all clinical outcome scores at both 1 and 2 year postoperatively (all P < .0001). The control group of patients who underwent RTSA as inpatients consisted of 373 patients (average age, 72 years; 66% female patients). Significantly more controls had diabetes (P = .007), and controls had a higher body mass index (P = .022). No significant differences existed in improvements in clinical outcome scores between the inpatient and outpatient groups. Complication rates were significantly lower for outpatient cases than for inpatient controls (7.0% vs. 12.7%, P = .023). CONCLUSION RTSA performed in an outpatient setting is a safe and reliable procedure that provides significant improvements in clinical outcome scores with fewer complications compared with inpatient RTSA.
Collapse
|
46
|
Leroux TS, Maldonado-Rodriguez N, Paterson JM, Aktar S, Gandhi R, Ravi B. No Difference in Outcomes Between Short and Longer-Stay Total Joint Arthroplasty with a Discharge Home: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Involving 46,660 Patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2020; 102:495-502. [PMID: 31703047 DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.19.00796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Outcomes following total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a short length of hospital stay have been reported; however, most studies have not accounted for an inherent patient selection bias and discharge disposition. The purpose of this study was to utilize a propensity score to match and compare the outcomes of patients undergoing THA or TKA with short and longer lengths of stay with a discharge directly home. METHODS An administrative database from Ontario, Canada, which has a single-payer health-care system, was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent THA or TKA from 2008 to 2016. Patients were subsequently stratified into 2 groups based on their length of stay: short length of stay (≤2 days; thereafter referred to as short stay) and longer length of stay (>2 days; thereafter referred to as longer stay). Using a propensity score, patients who underwent short-stay THA or TKA were matched to patients who underwent longer-stay THA or TKA. Matching was based on 15 demographic, medical, and surgical factors. Our primary outcomes included postoperative complications, health-care utilization (readmission and emergency department presentation), and health-care costs. RESULTS Overall, 89,656 TKAs (14,645 short stays and 75,011 longer stays) and 52,610 THAs (9,426 short stays and 43,184 longer stays) were included in this study. Patients who underwent short-stay THA or TKA were significantly more likely (p < 0.05) to be younger, male, healthier, and from a higher socioeconomic status and to have undergone the procedure with a higher-volume surgeon. Over 95% of short-stay cases were successfully matched to longer-stay cases, and we found no significant difference in complications, health-care utilization, and costs between patients on the basis of the length of stay. CONCLUSIONS Patients undergoing short-stay THA or TKA with a discharge home were more likely to be younger, healthy, male patients from a higher socioeconomic status. Higher-volume surgeons are also more likely to perform short-stay THA or TKA. These characteristics confirm the previously held belief that a selection bias exists when comparing cohorts based on time to discharge. When comparing matched cohorts of patients who underwent short-stay and longer-stay THA or TKA, we observed no difference in outcomes, suggesting that a short stay with a discharge home in the appropriately selected patient is safe following THA or TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Timothy S Leroux
- The Arthritis Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - J Michael Paterson
- The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Suriya Aktar
- The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Rajiv Gandhi
- The Arthritis Program, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Bheeshma Ravi
- The Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences (ICES), Toronto, Ontario, Canada.,Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Charles MD, Cvetanovich G, Sumner-Parilla S, Nicholson GP, Verma N, Romeo AA. Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty: outcomes, complications, and readmissions in 2 outpatient settings. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2019; 28:S118-S123. [PMID: 31133407 DOI: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is currently a paucity of non-database studies looking at safety and outcomes after outpatient shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to report our initial safety experience with outpatient shoulder arthroplasty including 90-day complications and readmissions. Our hypothesis was that the rate of early complications after outpatient shoulder arthroplasty would be low and similar to that of inpatient procedures regardless of outpatient setting. METHODS We analyzed 50 consecutive patients who underwent outpatient shoulder arthroplasties (44 anatomic total shoulder arthroplasties, 4 reverse total shoulder arthroplasties, and 2 hemiarthroplasties) from 2014-2017. The readmission rate and complications were recorded. All patients were available for minimum 3-month follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, and visual analog scale scores were recorded. RESULTS The average age was 56.9 ± 6.9 years; average body mass index, 29.75 ± 5.9; and average Charleston Comorbidity Index, 1.6 ± 1.2. There were 6 complications (12%) (hematoma, deep venous thrombosis, axillary nerve injury, acute infection, and 2 subscapularis failures). Only 4 occurred within the 90-day global period, and only 1 patient required readmission. Our subscapularis failures occurred after 3 months postoperatively and required additional surgery (arthroscopic repair and revision to reverse total shoulder arthroplasty). At last follow-up, all had significant improvements (P < .001) in range of motion and functional scores (American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, and visual analog scale scores). No difference in the complications and functional outcomes was found between the patients based on their surgical setting. CONCLUSION Outpatient shoulder arthroplasty is a safe option for appropriately selected patients. No difference in complications and outcomes occurs regardless of outpatient setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Charles
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, UCSF Fresno Orthopaedics, Fresno, CA, USA.
| | - Gregory Cvetanovich
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA
| | | | | | - Nikhil Verma
- Midwest Orthopaedics at Rush University, Chicago, IL, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|