Traditional Growing Rods Versus Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods for the Surgical Treatment of Early-Onset Scoliosis: A Case-Matched 2-Year Study

Magnetically controlled growing rods increase 3D true spine length in idiopathic early onset scoliosis patients: results from a multicenter study

PURPOSE

To determine, at 2 year follow-up, 3D spine growth for idiopathic early onset scoliosis (iEOS) patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR).

METHODS

From an international EOS registry, patients with iEOS treated with MCGR were identified. Scoliosis, kyphosis, traditional coronal height, and 3D true spine length (3D-TSL) were measured pre-index surgery, post-index, and at 2 year follow-up.

RESULTS

135 participants, mean age 8.1 years (2.7-15.6) were included. Scoliosis improved from 71° pre-index to 41° post-index (p < 0.001) and remained constant at 2 years (43°, p = 0.58). Kyphosis improved from 49° to 36° (p < 0.001); then increased by 2 years to 42° (p = 0.002). Traditional T1-S1 height, which reflects both spine growth and changes in deformity, increased from pre-index to post-index (274 mm vs. 310 mm; p < 0.001), and again at 2 years (332 mm, p < 0.001). As 3D-TSL reflects growth of the spine, independent of changes in deformity, as expected it did not change perioperatively (335 mm vs. 339 mm, p = 0.83), but significantly changed by 2 years (367 mm; p < 0.001). Participants < 5 years at surgery increased 22 mm (8.2%), 5-10 years increased 26 mm (7.8%), and > 10 increased 41 mm (11.0%). For instrumented levels, mean vertebral growth was 1.3 mm/level for < 5 years, 1.4 mm/level for 5-10 years, and 2.2 mm/level for > 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

As kyphosis increased over time, these out of the coronal plane changes justify the use of 3D-TSL for this cohort of patients. For idiopathic EOS patients treated with MCGR, 3D spine length increased by 28 mm during the 2 year post-operative period.

Supine Traction vs Fulcrum Bending Radiographs in Preoperative Imaging of Scoliosis Patients Treated With Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods (MCGR) - which Technique is Better to Predict Surgical Correction of the Main Curve?

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES

Flexibility radiographs such as traction or bending radiographs are essential in preoperative imaging to assess for curve flexibility and to estimate the amount of operative correction in order to determine the type and length of instrumentation in growth-accompanying scoliosis treatment. Both traction and bending radiographs are controversially discussed in the literature. The predictability of flexibility radiographs of postoperative main curve correction specifically in patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) has not yet been studied.

METHODS

Juvenile patients with idiopathic or neuromuscular scoliosis that were surgically treated with a primary MCGR implant with pedicle screw fixation between 2018-2022 were retrospectively registered. Patients that underwent prior spine surgery, with supine lying-down radiograph and patients with missing traction or bending radiographs available were excluded. Image analysis was conducted using Surgimap® software. For statistical analysis, t test and ANOVA analysis were used to compare the means between groups with a significance level set at P < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 50 patients, 34 diagnosed with idiopathic scoliosis (IS) and 16 diagnosed with neuromuscular scoliosis (NMS), were included. Globally, main curve Cobb angles were significantly higher in supine traction compared to fulcrum bending images (44.8° vs 39.6°; P < 0.001) and in the IS subgroup (42.4° vs 37.3°; P < 0.001). Compared to postoperative images, significant differences of supine traction but not fulcrum bending radiographs were detected in total (P < 0.001; P = 0.20) as well as IS (P < 0.001; P = 0.32) and NMS (P < 0.001; P = 0.44) subgroups. Fulcrum bending images displayed significantly higher flexibility rates (FR) and flexibility index (FI) compared to traction images in total (FR: 42.9 vs 35.2, P < 0.001; FI: 1.08 vs 1.58, P = 0.024) and the IS subgroup (FR: 44.2 vs 35.8, P < 0.001; FI: 1.19 vs 1.43, P = 0.033).

CONCLUSIONS

Fulcrum bending radiographs showed better flexibility and prediction of operative main curve correction compared to supine traction radiographs in total and IS subgroup. Fulcrum bending might be more precise for predicting the postoperative main curve correction potential of primary MCGR surgery in IS patients.

Validity of machine learning algorithms for automatically extract growing rod length on radiographs in children with early-onset scoliosis

The magnetically controlled growing rod technique is an effective surgical treatment for children who have early-onset scoliosis. The length of the instrumented growing rods is adjusted regularly to compensate for the normal growth of these patients. Manual measurement of rod length on posteroanterior spine radiographs is subjective and time-consuming. A machine learning (ML) system using a deep learning approach was developed to automatically measure the adjusted rod length. Three ML models-rod model, 58 mm model, and head-piece model-were developed to extract the rod length from radiographs. Three-hundred and eighty-seven radiographs were used for model development, and 60 radiographs with 118 rods were separated for final testing. The average precision (AP), the mean absolute difference (MAD) ± standard deviation (SD), and the inter-method correlation coefficient (ICC[2,1]) between the manual and artificial intelligence (AI) adjustment measurements were used to evaluate the developed method. The AP of the 3 models were 67.6%, 94.8%, and 86.3%, respectively. The MAD ± SD of the rod length change was 0.98 ± 0.88 mm, and the ICC[2,1] was 0.90. The average time to output a single rod measurement was 6.1 s. The developed AI provided an accurate and reliable method to detect the rod length automatically.

Growth-friendly spinal surgery: Review of the effect on truncal growth

Background

Pediatric spinal deformity surgery affects ultimate spinal height in the growing child. This effect on ultimate spinal height has also been shown to affect pulmonary development and ultimately pulmonary function. There has been an increasing trend toward growth-friendly spinal surgery in early onset scoliosis to minimize the negative consequences of early spinal fusion surgery. Such growth-friendly techniques include VEPTR, MCGR, and Shilla. Which technique allows for the most growth after initial implantation is still not clear.

Methods

An extensive literature review on the topic of pediatric spinal growth was undertaken. Topics reviewed include: normal growth, growth after intervention by various methods, and the effect on pulmonary function. We have summarized the literature for the techniques identified and compared these with normal population data..

Results

The data for various surgical techniques were reviewed. These included VEPTR, standard growing rods, and MCGR. The measurement techniques for determining ultimate spinal growth varied based upon the technique for measurement and the timing of initial and final measurements. The results of attained spinal growth were not directly correlated to pulmonary function values.

Conclusions

There is still no standardized ideal time or technique for assessing the best results in this area. We suggest that some of what is called growth from growth-friendly techniques is lengthening from the initial deformity correction. This nomenclature needs to be clarified. In addition, how and when to determine ultimate spinal growth from each surgical technique and by which radiographic technique needs to be standardized.

Unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) occurs in 40% of MCGR patients at an average of 2 years after initial implantation

PURPOSE

This study calculated the rates of Unplanned Return to the Operating Room (UPROR) in early-onset scoliosis patients who had no previous spine surgery and underwent Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) implantation.

METHODS

We reviewed surgical, radiographic, and UPROR outcomes for EOS patients treated with the MCGR implant < 12 years + 11 months of age, had complete preop/postop major curve measurements, and had complete MCGR details.

RESULTS

376 patients underwent MCGR implantation at a mean age of 7.7 years (1.8-12.9). Diagnoses included 106 (28%) idiopathic, 84 (22%) syndromic, 153 (41%) neuromuscular, and 33 (9%) congenital. The mean preop-cobb was 76.7° (9-145°), and an immediate postop correction was 41% (0-84%). We found that 38% (142/376) of patients experienced an UPROR prior to the maximal actuator length being achieved. UPROR occurred at mean 2 years (3 days-5 years) after initial implantation. Of the 142 patients who experienced UPROR there were 148 complications that lead to an UPROR. The most common reason for UPROR was anchor (55/148: 37%) or MCGR implant related (33/148: 22%). Wound related (22/148:15%), Neuro related 4/148: 3%), and other (34/148: 23%) accounted for the remaining UPROR occurrences.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, the MCGR UPROR rate was 142/376 (38%) after an average of 2 years post implantation. At 2-year follow-up, only 20% of MCGR patients had experienced an UPROR. However, between 2 and 5 years, the development of an UPROR increased precipitously with only 39% of MCGR patients remaining UPROR free at 5 years post MCGR implantation. The most common reason for UPROR was related to anchor or MCGR implant-related complications. This information can be utilized to set realistic expectations about the need and timing of future surgical procedures with patients and their families.

Current Concepts in the Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis

Despite many surgical advances in the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) over the past two decades, this condition remains a challenge to address. While otherwise healthy children can have EOS, many of these patients have complicated comorbidities making proper treatment algorithms extraordinarily difficult. Non-operative measures can be successful when initiated early, but are many times utilized as a delay tactic until growth-friendly operative procedures can be safely performed. This article will summarize the current concepts in the treatment of EOS with a focus on the surgical advances that have recently been made.

Complications and Health-Related Quality of Life in Children with Various Etiologies of Early-Onset Scoliosis Treated with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods-A Multicenter Study

Background: Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) refers to spinal deformities that develop and are diagnosed before the age of 10. The most important goals of the surgical treatment of EOS are to stop the progression of curvature, achieve the best possible correction, preserve motion, and facilitate spinal growth. The objectives of this multicenter study were to analyze the risk of complications among patients with EOS treated using magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) and assess the patients' and their parents' quality of life after diagnosis and treatment with a minimum two-year follow-up. Methods: Patients given an ineffective nonoperative treatment qualified for surgery with MCGRs. This study involved 161 patients (90 females and 71 males) who were classified according to the etiology of curvature. The intraoperative and postoperative complications and those that occurred during the continuation of treatment with MCGRs were recorded and analyzed. The 24-item Early-Onset Scoliosis Questionnaire (EOSQ-24) was used to evaluate the patients' quality of life and satisfaction with the treatment. Results: Implant-related complications requiring instrumentation revision were recorded in 26% of the patients. Medical complications occurred in 45% of the population. The EOSQ-24 revealed a significant improvement in the average scores during the follow-up. Conclusions: The treatment of early-onset scoliosis with MCGRs carries 66% risks of incurring medical and mechanical complications, the latter 26% of patients requiring revision procedures. Children with neuromuscular scoliosis, females, and with curvature greater than 90 degrees are at a higher risk of developing complications. Limiting the number of elective surgeries necessitated to prolong the instrumentation and treatment process for patients with MCGRs can greatly enhance their quality of life and satisfaction throughout the follow-up period.

Comparison of traditional growth rods and magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis: a case-matched mid term follow-up study

PURPOSE

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has always been a challenging situation for spine surgeons. The aim of treatment is to control the direction of curve progression to allow for the complete development of lungs. Among all the growth constructs available, traditional growth rods (TGR) and magnetically controlled growth rods (MCGR) are most widely used. The MCGR has been introduced a few years back and there is a dearth of long-term follow-up studies. The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of TGR and MCGR for the treatment of EOS.

METHODS

All patients of EOS managed with either TGR or MCGR were included in the study. The patients managed with other methods or having follow-up < 2-years were excluded from the study. A total of 20 patients were recruited in the MCGR group and 28 patients were recruited in the TGR group. Both groups were matched by etiology, gender, pre-operative radiological parameters, and complications including unplanned surgeries.

RESULTS

The mean age in our study was 7.90 years in the MCGR group and 7.46 years in the TGR group. The mean duration of follow-up in the MCGR group was 50.89 months and in the TGR group 94.2 months. Pre-operative cobb's angle in the coronal plane and T1-S1 were comparable in both groups with a mean cobb's angle of 65.4 in MCGR and 70.5 in TGR. The mean T1-S1 length in the MCGR group was 36.1cms and in the TGR group was 35.2 cms (p = 0.18). The average increase in T1-S1 length was 1.3 cm/year in the TGR group and 1.1 cm/year in the MCGR group (p > 0.05). The TGR patients underwent 186 open lengthening surgeries and 11 unplanned surgeries for various complications. The MCGR group has 180 non-invasive lengthening with only 4 unplanned returns to OT for various causes.

CONCLUSION

The curve correction was similar in both TGR and MCGR groups. The average T1-S1 length achieved on final follow-up was similar in both groups. The MCGR patients have attained similar correction with fewer invasive procedures and lesser complications compared to the TGR group.

Lowest instrumented vertebrae in early onset scoliosis: is there a role for a more selective approach?

PURPOSE

This purpose of this study was to assess the impact of patient and implant characteristics on LIV selection in ambulatory children with EOS and to assess the relationship between the touched vertebrae (TV), the last substantially touched vertebrae (LSTV), the stable vertebrae (SV), the sagittal stable vertebrae (SSV), and the LIV.

METHODS

A multicenter pediatric spine database was queried for patients ages 2-10 years treated by growth friendly instrumentation with at least 2-year follow up. The relationship between the LIV and preoperative spinal height, curve magnitude, and implant type were assessed. The relationships between the TV, LSTV, SV, SSV, and the LIV were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Overall, 281 patients met inclusion criteria. The LIV was at L3 or below in most patients with a lumbar LIV: L1 (9.2%), L2 (20.2%), L3 (40.9%), L4 (29.5%). Smaller T1 - T12 length was associated with more caudal LIV selection (p = 0.001). Larger curve magnitudes were similarly associated with more caudal LIV selection (p = < 0.0001). Implant type was not associated with LIV selection (p = 0.32) including MCGR actuator length (p = 0.829). The LIV was caudal to the TV in 78% of patients with a TV at L2 or above compared to only 17% of patients with a TV at L3 or below (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most EOS patients have an LIV of L3 or below and display TV-LIV and LSTV-LIV incongruence. These findings suggest that at the end of treatment, EOS patients rarely have the potential for selective thoracic fusion. Further work is necessary to assess the potential for a more selective approach to LIV selection in EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Ultrasonographic assessment of magnetic growing rods overestimates the lengthening of the thoracic spine compared to radiographs in early-onset scoliotic patients

PURPOSE

Magnetic growing rods (MGRs) are one of the most common procedures to treat early-onset scoliosis (EOS). Radiographic examinations (X-ray) or ultrasonographic (US) assessments are used to evaluate the lengthening of the rods. X-ray exposes patients to radiation, while the US has not been validated and may be affected by the radiologist's ability to assess elongation. The research question of the present study is to compare the difference between US and X-ray growth assessments in EOS patients treated with MGRs.

METHODS

The study enrolled 65 patients consecutively from July 2011 to July 2022. Noninvasive lengthening was performed every four months, and X-ray follow-up was performed at different intervals. An experienced radiologist assessed the mean US rod elongation per session. The mean elongation/session of T2-T12 and T2-S1 was calculated, and the results were compared using an independent t-test.

RESULTS

The mean age at operation was 8.8 ± 2 years, and the mean follow-up was four ± two years. The average rod elongation assessed by the US was 3.1 ± 0.1 mm. The average rod elongation evaluated by X-ray was 1.2 ± 2.9 mm (T2-T12) and 1.8 ± 1.9 mm (T2-S1). The difference between the values measured by US and X-ray was statistically significant in the T2-T12 group (p < 0.05) and not significant in the T2-S1 group (p = 0.34).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the most extensive single-center study comparing US and X-ray data for MGRs in EOS patients. US overestimates thoracic spine elongation compared to X-ray. US elongation analysis could be appropriate in long thoracolumbar curves.

Is posterior vertebral arthrodesis at the end of the electromagnetic rod lengthening program necessary for all patients? Comparative analysis of sixty six patients who underwent definitive spinal arthrodesis and twenty four patients with in situ lengthening rods

PURPOSE

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) should be removed or changed at most two years after their implantation in the treatment of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) (Safety notice July 2021). However, in the face of patients at high risk of intraoperative complications and relying on the principle of auto-fusion of the spine, some surgeons would prefer a more wait-and-see attitude. The aim of this study was to report on patients who did not undergo final fusion at the end of the lengthening program with MCGR and to compare them with those who did.

METHODS

This was a multicenter study with ten centres. We collected all graduate patients with EOS who had received MCGR between 2011 and 2022.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients had final fusion at the end of the lengthening program and 24 patients kept MCGRs in situ. The mean total follow-up time was 66 months (range, 25.3-109), and the mean follow-up time after final lengthening was 24.9 months (range, 3-67.7). Regarding the main curve and thoracic height, there was no significant difference in the percentage of correction over the whole follow-up between the two groups (p = 0.099, p = 0.176) although there was a significant difference between the end of lengthening and the last follow-up (p < 0.001). After completion of the lengthening program, 18 patients who had final fusion developed 24 of the 26 recorded complications (92.3%).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the manufacturer's published safety notice, not all patients systematically benefited from the removal of the MCGRs. Although arthrodesis significantly improved the scoliotic deformity, no significant difference was found in terms of radiographic outcome between patients who underwent spinal fusion and those who kept the MCGRs in situ.

Health-related quality of life and clinical outcomes for magnetically controlled growing rod patients after treatment termination

PURPOSE

To determine the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and clinical outcomes of children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) followed to definitive fusion (DF).

METHODS

A retrospective review of EOS patients treated with MCGR and followed to DF was performed. Outcomes included HRQoL scores, radiographic, clinical, and unplanned returns to the operating room (UPROR) data collected at pre-MCGR implantation, immediately post-MCGR implantation, pre-DF, and post-DF. HRQoL scores were collected at least 6 months post-DF.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients (57.1% females, mean age at MCGR insertion 7.19 ± 1.5 years, mean pre-MCGR Cobb 64.7° ± 17.6) met inclusion criteria. MCGR treatment resulted in an overall 30.2% improvement in coronal plane deformity following DF. The mean growth rates between MCGR implantation and pre-DF for T1-T12 height and T1-S1 length were 0.33 ± 0.23 mm/month and 0.49 ± 0.28 mm/month, respectively. Of the 28 included patients, 26 (92.9%) experienced at least one UPROR, with a total of 52 surgical complications occurring in the total cohort, representing 1.9 UPROR/patient. Interestingly, there was a decline in scores reported between post-MCGR implantation and the pre-DF time-point (N = 16, 78.2 ± 14.9 vs 69.7 ± 17.8, p = 0.02). These scores recovered post-DF, resulting in an overall unchanged HRQoL when comparing pre-MCGR to post-DF (N = 11, 79.9 ± 15.1 vs 76.7 ± 17.9, p = 0.44).

CONCLUSION

While MCGR treatment achieves coronal plane deformity control and facilitates spinal growth, only 7.1% of children experienced a complication-free treatment course when followed to definitive fusion. Patients achieved modest curve correction and spinal growth, while maintaining stable HRQoL outcomes between pre-MCGR and post-DF.

Patients treated by magnetic growing rods for early-onset scoliosis reach the expected average growth

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGRs) are one of the most common procedures to treat early-onset scoliosis (EOS). One of the major concerns is that patients treated with MGCR do not reach an adequate height with MGCR. The present study has one of the largest sample sizes of EOS patients treated by MGCR. This study aims to demonstrate the efficacy of the treatment with MGCR in EOS patients, comparing our results with the estimated growth.

METHODS

Patients were consecutively enrolled from July 2011 to July 2022. The same surgical equipe performed all the procedures. The mean length of the patients was assessed by X-ray (T2-T12 and T2-S1 distance) by a team of expert radiologists. The estimated growth by Dimeglio was compared with the mean elongation obtained by year.

RESULTS

65 patients were included. 16 patients underwent final surgery. In group 1, patients reached a growth of 3.6 ± 8.7 mm (T2-T12) and 9.6 ± 27.6 mm (T2-S1). In group 2, patients grew 5.4 ± 5.7 mm (T2-T12) and 9 ± 9 mm (T2-S1).81% of the estimated elongation during the treatment was obtained during the first surgery. The difference between Dimeglio's estimated growth and the value obtained by MGCR was -4.3 ± 8.7 mm(T2-T12) and -12.3 ± 12.2 mm (T2-S1) in group 1 (p < 0.001) and -1.1 ± 4.2 mm (T2-T12) and -6.6 ± 6.0 mm (T2-S1) in group 2 (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

MGCR patients reached and overlapped the growth target according to the score by Dimeglio. However, the value of growth tended to reduce over the years. Lastly, obtaining the most significant elongation possible at the first surgery is mandatory, comprising 81% of the total value.

Predictors of Rod Length Gain and Sagittal Alignment Change After Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod Lengthening

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

There are preoperative characteristics that predict rod lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). The lengthening of MCGR will lead to increased kyphosis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The amount of length gained by MCGR is variable, and predictors are lacking. Similarly, sagittal plane changes over the MCGR lengthening period have not been investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with MCGR and a minimum 2-year follow-up were identified and those with previous spine surgery were excluded. Preimplantation, postimplantation, and last follow-up postlengthening radiographs were examined. Multiple linear regression analyses were used for rod length gain predictors.

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients with early-onset scoliosis met inclusion criteria: nine idiopathic, five congenital, 14 neuromuscular, 20 syndromic, and eight skeletal dysplasia patients. No difference was seen between subtypes of early-onset scoliosis for rod length gain ( P =0.62). Shorter preoperative T1-T12 height and higher curve correction rate after implantation were significant predictors for rod length gain ( P <0.001). Preoperative major curve magnitude and kyphosis were not significant predictors. Flattening of the spine around the actuator and compensative increase in T1-T5 kyphosis were seen secondarily after MCGR implantation. Maximum sagittal kyphosis, T1-T5 kyphosis, and T5-T12 kyphosis did not change during lengthening. Lumbar lordosis significantly decreased postimplantation (first erect) but then increased during lengthening. Pelvic incidence and sacral slope both increased during lengthening, but this may be age related.

CONCLUSION

Patients who gained the most rod length with MCGR were those with an initially shorter T1-T12 height and better initial curve correction at implantation, likely representing that implants work best in small patients with flexible curves. Diagnosis, preoperative curve magnitude, and thoracic kyphosis were not related to rod length gain. Thoracic kyphosis did not deteriorate over the lengthening phase.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective cohort study.

Failure to lengthen consensus for the magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR)

INTRODUCTION

MCGR lengthening has become an important innovation in treating patients with EOS. An alternative to traditional growing instrumentation, a single surgical procedure is necessary for insertion of the construct, followed by non-invasive lengthening in the outpatient setting. With every new technology emanates a new complication to troubleshoot. Failure to lengthen in the MCGR is a significant cause of revision surgery. Currently, no consensus exists on how to define a MCGR lengthening failure, what steps are necessary after a failure to lengthen, and what factors determine these next steps. The primary goal of this study was to establish a consensus on how to define and navigate a MCGR that fails to lengthen.

METHODS

A series of 3 surveys were distributed to 49 early onset scoliosis surgeons with 37 responses between December 2021 and April 2022. Consensus was defined as at least 70% agreement.

RESULTS

37 of 49 surgeons (75%) responded to the first survey, and all 37 surgeons responded to the following two surveys (100%). Consensus statements were reached on 25% of questions (3/12) from survey 1, 40% of questions (4/10) on survey 2, and 100% of questions (5/5) on survey 3. The questions that reached consensus are detailed in Table 1. Consensus steps to navigate a rod that fails to lengthen 1 mm (97%) in the office include retrying during the same visit (78%), changing technique in the office (88%), and not adjusting the interval between lengthening appointments (78%). Table 1 Items that reached consensus from each survey (12 total) Survey Question Response, Consensus Percentage 1 If a rod does not lengthen, do you try again in that office visit?​ Yes, 78% 1 All modes of XR are equivalent when determining failure to lengthen? Yes, 70% 1 If you are unsuccessful at lengthening, you should change the lengthening interval? No, 78% 2 Re-lengthening a rod following a failure to lengthen one should change their technique? Yes, 88% Reposition patient, 100% Alternate rods, 90% No traction in OR, 92.6% 2 Is a MCGR non-operational following 3 consecutive visits where the rod failed lengthening? Yes, 100% 2 Considerations when determining next steps with a non-operational rod? Skeletal Age, 100% Curve Progression, 97% Curve Stiffness, 93.8% Family Convenience, 83% Chronologic Age, 77% Time from Last Lengthening, 70% 2 Can an APP follow your protocol for a rod that has failed to lengthen? Yes, 81% 3 Are you comfortable using either clunk or stall to describe the phenomena of the internal clutch failing within the actuator when lengthening? Yes, 97.3% 3 Clunk/stall try again before an adjustment? Yes, 81% 3 Define failure to lengthen? Less than 1 mm length achieved, 97% 3 After two failure to lengthen events do you discuss next surgical steps?​ Yes, 97% 3 Once a rod had been classified as non-operational (no longer lengthening despite interventions) do you consider the underlying diagnosis when making next step decisions? Yes, 97% CONCLUSION: Best clinical practice guidelines using a Delphi method established a consensus on defining failure to lengthen in a MCGR (less than 1 mm), appropriate responses to failure to lengthen (re-attempt to lengthen and re-position patient) and a definition for a non-functional MCGR (failure to lengthen 3 consecutive times). This consensus will help standardize research on this important problem.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

V-expert opinion.

Predictive Parameters for Chêneau Brace Efficacy in Patients with Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective consecutive cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

For patients with mild to moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS), bracing is the standard therapy to prevent progression of deformity. Still, not all patients benefit from treatment in the same way. Therefore, predictive parameters are needed to determine if patients are likely to benefit from brace therapy.

METHODS

Fourty-five AIS patients treated with a Chêneau brace were evaluated retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were based on SRS-criteria. Whole spine X-rays were performed pre-brace, in-brace, and at least 6 months after termination of brace treatment. Gender, age, Risser's sign, vertebral rotation determined by Nash and Moe grading system, in-brace correction and in-brace time per day were parameters evaluated. Treatment success and failure groups were compared to determine possible predictive parameters for successful brace treatment.

RESULTS

Chêneau brace treatment was successful preventing curve progression in 69%. We found significant differences between success and failure group concerning age (14 ± .22 vs 12.4 ± .4; P < .001) and Risser's sign (1.71 ± .16 vs .5 ± .17; P < .001) at beginning of brace treatment. Most significantly, initial in-brace curve correction was correlated with successful outcome after brace treatment (r = .64 (P < .001)).

CONCLUSIONS

As one of few studies adhering to the criteria defined by the Scoliosis Research Society our study shows reliable predictive parameters for Chêneau brace treatment success in patients with AIS. Data shown in this paper will help to differentiate AIS patients who are likely to benefit from adequate bracing therapy from those who could rather benefit from early surgical treatment.

Instrumentation failure following pediatric spine deformity growth-sparing surgery using traditional growing rods or vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs

BACKGROUND

Instrumentation failure (IF) is a major complication associated with growth-sparing surgery for pediatric spinal deformities; however, studies focusing on IF following each surgical procedure are lacking. We aimed to evaluate the incidence, timing, and rates of unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) associated with IF following each surgical procedure in growth-sparing surgeries using traditional growing rods (TGRs) and vertical expandable prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs).

METHODS

We reviewed 1,139 surgical procedures documented in a Japanese multicenter database from 2015 to 2017. Of these, 544 TGR and 455 VEPTR procedures were included for evaluation on a per-surgery basis. IF was defined as the occurrence of an implant-related complication requiring revision surgery.

RESULTS

The surgery-based incidences of IF requiring revision surgery in the TGR and VEPTR groups were 4.3% and 4.0%, respectively, with no significant intergroup difference. Remarkably, there was a negative correlation between IF incidence per surgical procedure and the number of lengthening surgeries in both groups. In addition, rod breakage in the TGR group and anchor-related complications in the VEPTR group tended to occur relatively early in the treatment course. The surgery-based rates of UPROR due to IF in the TGR and VEPTR groups were 2.0% and 1.5%, respectively, showing no statistically significant difference.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that IF, such as anchor related-complications and rod breakage, occurs more frequently earlier in the course of lengthening surgeries. This finding may help in patient counseling and highlights the importance of close postoperative follow-up to detect IF and improve outcomes.

Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods Graduation: Lessons From a Single-center Series of 48 Patients

BACKGROUND

Magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) treatment for early-onset scoliosis (EOS) has become a widely utilized method of deformity control, but long-term follow-up reports are sparse. We evaluated the outcomes of a large group of consecutive pediatric patients diagnosed with EOS who were treated by MCGR to the endpoint of definitive spinal fusion in a single center. We hypothesized that lessons learned from treating a large volume of MCGR patients would lower the complication rate in comparison to what was previously reported by other studies.

METHODS

The records of 48 EOS patients with varied etiologies who were treated by MCGR between 2012 and 2022 and reached the end of treatment were analyzed retrospectively for baseline and final radiographic measurements and surgery-related complications.

RESULTS

The mean percent of improvement in the major coronal deformity was 51.7±25.0% and the mean T1 to T12 total growth was 52.9±21.9 mm. The total complication rate was 22.9% of which 12.5% required a single unplanned surgery, 6.3% required multiple unplanned surgeries, and 4% did not require any unplanned surgery.

CONCLUSION

MCGR treatment provides adequate control of EOS, enabling satisfactory growth of the thoracic spine. The complication rate in a single large volume center is moderate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Radiographic and clinical outcomes after definitive spine fusion for skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis

PURPOSE

To assess the intermediate-term radiographic and clinical outcomes of skeletally immature idiopathic scoliosis (IS) patients that underwent definitive fusion (DF).

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients with IS who were Risser 0 with open tri-radiate cartilages at the time of DF with minimum 5-year follow-up. Outcomes included Scoliosis Research Society (SRS)-30 scores, major Cobb angle, pulmonary function tests (PFTs), and unplanned returns to the operating room (UPROR). Adding-on was defined as progression of the major Cobb angle > 5° or tilt of the lowest instrumented vertebra > 5°.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients (78% female, mean age 12.2 ± 1.3 years old, mean preoperative major Cobb 64.8° ± 15.9) were included. Of these patients, 20 (62.5%) experienced adding-on and 6 (18.8%) required a revision surgery to correct their progressive spinal deformity. Adding-on was associated with lower 5-year postoperative SRS scores for appearance (3.7 ± 0.7 vs 4.4 ± 0.3, p = 0.0126), mental health (4.2 ± 0.6 vs 4.6 ± 0.3, p = 0.0464), satisfaction with treatment (4.0 ± 0.8 vs 4.7 ± 0.4, p = 0.0140), and total score (4.0 ± 0.4 vs 4.4 ± 0.2, p = 0.0035). The results of the PFTs did not differ between groups. Patients experienced an average of 0.53 UPROR/patient.

CONCLUSION

DF in skeletally immature patients results in a high rate of adding-on, which adversely affects Health-Related Quality of Life. However, reoperation rates, both planned and unplanned, remain lower when compared to patients undergoing growth-friendly treatment.

Is spinal height gain associated with rod orientation and the use of cross-links in magnetically controlled growing rods in early-onset scoliosis?

Optimal orientation for magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs) is unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate associations of rod orientation with implant-related complications (IRCs) and spinal height gains. Using an international early-onset scoliosis (EOS) database, we retrospectively reviewed 57 patients treated with dual MCGRs from May 2013 to July 2015 with minimum 2-year follow-up. Outcomes of interest were IRCs and left/right rod length gains and thoracic (T1-T12) and spinal (T1-S1) heights. We compared patients with two rods lengthened in the cephalad ( standard; n  = 18) versus opposite ( offset; n  = 39) directions. Groups did not differ in age, sex, BMI, duration of follow-up, EOS cause, ambulatory status, primary curve magnitude, baseline thoracic height, or number of distractions/year. We compared patients whose constructs used ≥1 cross-link (CL group; n  = 22) versus no CLs (NCL group; n  = 35), analyzing thoracic height gains per distraction ( α  = 0.05). Offset and standard groups did not differ in left or right rod length gains overall or per year or in thoracic or spinal height gain. Per distraction, the CL and NCL groups did not differ significantly in left or right rod length or thoracic or spinal height gain. Complications did not differ significantly between rod orientation groups or between CL groups. MCGR orientation and presence of cross-links were not associated with differences in rod length gain, thoracic height, spinal height, or IRCs at 2-year follow-up. Surgeons should feel comfortable using either MCGR orientation. Level of evidence: 3, retrospective.

Clinical and radiological results of final fusion in patients who underwent lengthening with magnetically controlled growing rods. About 66 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 years

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of definitive arthrodesis on frontal and sagittal spine balance in EOS patients treated with MCGR, as well as the complications associated with this procedure and the outcome at last follow-up.

METHODS

This was a multicentre study in 10 French centres. All patients who underwent posterior spinal arthrodesis after completion of MCGR treatment, regardless of age, etiology of scoliosis between 2011 and 2022, were included.

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients who had a final fusion after the lengthening programme were included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 5.5 ± 1.7 years (range: 2.1-9). The mean follow-up time after arthrodesis was 24 ± 18 months (range: 3-68) and the mean age at arthrodesis was 13.5 ± 1.5 years (range: 9.5-17). The main and secondary curves were significantly (p < 0.005 and p = 0.03) improved by arthrodesis (16.4° and 9° respectively) and stabilised at the last follow-up. The T1-T12 and T1-S1 distances increased by 8.4 mm and 14 mm with spinal fusion, with no significant difference (p = 0.096 and p = 0.068). There was no significant improvement in the rest of the parameters with arthrodesis, nor was there any significant deterioration at last follow-up. After final fusion, there were a total of 24 complications in 18 patients (27.3%) that routinely led to repeat surgery.

CONCLUSION

Final fusion after MCGR provides satisfactory additional correction of the main and secondary curves and a moderate increase in the T1-T12 distance but has no impact on sagittal balance and other radiological parameters. The post-operative complication rate is particularly high in patients at risk of complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level 4.

Clinical and radiographic evolution of graduate patients treated with magnetically controlled growing rods: results of a French multicentre study of 90 patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to investigate patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS) who completed their electromagnetic lengthening rod program to assess the demographics of this population and to analyze the evolution of clinical and radiological parameters and the occurrence of complications.

METHODS

This was a multicenter study with 10 French centers. We collected all patients with EOS who had undergone electromagnetic lengthening between 2011 and 2022. They had to have reached the end of the procedure (graduate).

RESULTS

A total of 90 graduate patients were included. The mean follow-up time over the entire period was 66 months (25.3-109). Of these, only 66 patients (73.3%) underwent definitive spinal arthrodesis at the end of the lengthening phase, whereas 24 patients (26.7%) kept their hardware in situ with a mean follow-up time from the last lengthening of 25 months (3-68). Patients had an average of 2.6 surgeries (1-5) over the entire follow-up. Patients had an average of 7.9 lengthenings for a mean total lengthening of 26.9 mm (4-75). Analysis of the radiological parameters showed a percentage reduction in the main curve of 12 to 40%, depending on the etiology, with an average reduction of 73-44°, and an average thoracic height of 210 mm (171-214) for an average improvement of 31 mm (23-43). There was no significant difference in the sagittal parameters. During the lengthening phase, there were a total of 56 complications in 43 patients (43.9%; n = 56/98), of which 39 in 28 patients (28.6%) resulted in unplanned surgery. In the graduate patients, there were a total of 26 complications in 20 patients (22.2%), all of which resulted in unscheduled surgery.

CONCLUSION

MCGR, allow to decrease the number of surgeries, to progressively improve the scoliotic deformity and to reach a satisfactory thoracic height at the price of an important complication rate linked in particular to the complexity of the management of patients with an EOS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II

Surgical Treatment of Spinal Deformities in Pediatric Orthopedic Patients

Scoliosis and Scheuermann's disease are common spinal deformities that affect a substantial population, particularly adolescents, often impacting their quality of life. This comprehensive review aims to present a detailed understanding of these conditions, their diagnosis, and various treatment strategies. Through an extensive exploration of current literature, the review discusses the etiology of these spinal deformities and the use of diagnostic tools such as X-rays and MRI. It further delves into the range of treatment options available, from conservative approaches such as physiotherapy and bracing to more invasive surgical interventions. The review underscores the necessity of an individualized treatment approach, taking into account factors such as the patient's age, the severity of the curvature, and overall health. This all-encompassing perspective on scoliosis and Scheuermann's disease will aid in evidence-based decision making in their management with the goal of improving patient outcomes.

Effects of spinal deformities on lung development in children: a review

Scoliosis before the age of 5 years is referred to as early-onset scoliosis (EOS). While causes may vary, EOS can potentially affect respiratory function and lung development as children grow. Moreover, scoliosis can lead to thoracic insufficiency syndrome when aggravated or left untreated. Therefore, spinal thoracic deformities often require intervention in early childhood, and solving these problems requires new methods that include the means for both deformity correction and growth maintenance. Therapeutic strategies for preserving the growing spine and thorax include growth rods, vertically expandable titanium artificial ribs, MAGEC rods, braces and casts. The goals of any growth-promoting surgical strategy are to alter the natural history of cardiorespiratory development, limit the progression of underlying spondylarthrosis deformities and minimize negative changes in spondylothorax biomechanics due to the instrumental action of the implant. This review further elucidates EOS in terms of its aetiology, pathogenesis, pathology and treatment.

Hybrid technique versus traditional dual growing rod technique to treat congenital early-onset scoliosis: a comparative study with more than 3 years of follow-up

OBJECTIVE

The authors' objective was to compare the intermediate outcomes of patients with severe congenital early-onset scoliosis (CEOS) treated with posterior vertebrectomy/hemivertebrectomy with short fusion and dual growing rods (hybrid technique [HT]) and those treated with traditional dual growing rods (TDGRs).

METHODS

A retrospective study of patients who underwent the HT and TDGR technique for CEOS was conducted. The inclusion criteria were CEOS (age < 10 years), Risser stage 0, treatment with HT or TDGR, index surgery performed between 2004 and 2017, and minimum follow-up of 3 years. For patients who completed lengthening procedures, the last lengthening procedure was considered the latest follow-up. Demographic, radiographic, clinical, and patient-reported outcomes and revisions were compared between groups.

RESULTS

Sixty-one patients with CEOS were included in this study, with 16 treated with HT and 45 with TDGR technique. There were no differences in age at index surgery, duration of treatment, or number of lengthening procedures. The lengthening interval was longer in the HT group. The preoperative mean ± SD main curve was 81.8° ± 17.1° for the HT group and 63.3° ± 16.9° for the TDGR group (p < 0.05). However, main curve correction was better in the HT group, and no differences in residual curve were found between groups. Although the preoperative apex vertebral translation (AVT) of the HT group was greater, the correction of AVT was better in the HT group (p < 0.05). No differences in T1-S1 and T1-12 height were found between groups at the latest follow-up. The growth of T1-S1 height was less in the HT group (p < 0.05), whereas the growth of T1-12 height was similar between groups. Patients in the HT group had a lower risk of mechanical complications but higher risks of dural tears and neurological complications.

CONCLUSIONS

HT may provide better correction and apex control ability than TDGR for EOS patients with severe and rigid deformity at the apex level, and it significantly decreased the risk of mechanical complications with little influence on growth of the thoracic spine. HT may be an option for patients with severe CEOS with large asymmetrical growth potential around the apex of the curve.

Maintenance of curve correction and unplanned return to the operating room with magnetically controlled growing rods: a cohort of 24 patients with follow-up between 2 and 7 years

PURPOSE

Early onset scoliosis (EOS) is defined as spinal curvature affecting children below 10 years of age. Non-operative treatment can consist of casting and bracing. When curvature progresses despite these treatments, operative intervention is indicated. Traditional growing rods (TGR) have been a mainstay of treatment. Unfortunately, TGR's require planned return to the operating room every 6-9 months. Magnetic controlled growing rods (MCGR) ideally provide curve correction and allow the spine to grow without frequent surgeries. However, the ability to correct and maintain correction after MCGR has not been well-characterized. The purpose of this study is to evaluate maintenance of curve correction in patients treated primarily with MCGR and analyze the rate of complications including unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR).

METHODS

24 patients with EOS were retrospectively reviewed. These patients were subdivided into 4 subcategories: congenital, idiopathic, neuromuscular (NMS), and syndromic. The major curve correction (%) and T1-S1 distance were assessed utilizing scoliosis plain film radiographs over time. Complications and return to the operating room for any reason were recorded. Patients were followed until conversion to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) or most recent lengthening of MCGR.

RESULTS

There were 11 male and 13 female patients averaging 8 years at the time of index surgery. The average preoperative curve angle was 61.1°. Initial curve correction with MCGR obtained at the index procedure was 46.2%, reducing the mean curve angle to 32.7° (p < 0.05). Curve correction at a mean 6.2 years (2.4-7.4) follow-up was 36.1°, 40.9% curve correction. 75% of patients underwent conversion to PSF during the study period 4.8 years (2.4-7.0) after initial MCGR surgery. 15% of patients were still undergoing MCGR lengthening after 6.1 years. 54.2% of patients had at least one UPROR.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with EOS with curve progression, MCGRs can maintain curve correction well after 2 years. Furthermore, MCGR allowed patients to grow over time to safely delay timing to definitive fusion. On average, patients underwent conversion to PSF after 4.7 years at an average age of 13.5. Although the complication rate in the first 2 years is relatively low, 54.2% of patients underwent an UPROR. As the use of MCGR increases, surgeons should be aware of possible complications associated with this technology and counsel patients accordingly. Further research is needed to continue to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MCGR in this challenging patient population.

The evolving stall rate of magnetically controlled growing rods beyond 2 years follow-up

PURPOSE

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have become the dominant distraction-based implant for the treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS). Recent studies, however, have demonstrated rising rates of implant failure beyond short-term follow-up. We sought to evaluate a single-center experience with MCGR for the treatment of EOS to define the rate of MCGR failure to lengthen, termed implant stall, over time.

METHODS

A single-center, retrospective review was conducted identifying children with EOS undergoing primary MCGR implantation. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of implant stalling, defined as a failure of the MCGR to lengthen on three consecutive attempted lengthening sessions with minimum of 2 years follow-up. Clinical and radiographic variables were collected and compared between lengthening and stalled MCGRs. A Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was conducted to assess implant stalling over time.

RESULTS

A total of 48 children met inclusion criteria (mean age 6.3 ± 1.8 years, 64.6% female). After a mean 56.9 months (range of 27 to 90 months) follow-up, 25 (48%) of children experienced implant stalling at a mean of 26.0 ± 14.1 months post-implantation. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated that only 50% of MCGR continue to successfully lengthen at 2 years post-implantation, decreasing to < 20% at 4 years post-implantation.

CONCLUSION

Only 50% of MCGR continue to successfully lengthen 2 years post-implantation, dropping dramatically to < 20% at 4 years, adding to the available knowledge regarding the long-term viability and cost-effectiveness of MCGR in the management of EOS. Further research is needed to validate these findings.

Use of intra-operative internal distraction for the application of magnetically controlled growth rods (MCGR): a technique for maximizing correction in the rigid immature spine during index surgery

OBJECTIVE

Operative treatment of early onset scoliosis (EOS) with Magnetically Controlled Growing Rod (MCGR) in moderate-to-severe curves poses a challenge due to the limited amount of force and length available with the implant. The purpose of this study was to assess the use of the intra-operative internal spine distraction using Harrington Outrigger, before definitive implantation of MCGR, with regard to initial correction, maintenance of correction, truncal balance, and complication rates.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

16 EOS patients treated with the application of MCGR using the intra-operative internal distractor technique were included in the study. More than 50% of cases were congenital scoliosis with multiple vertebral anomalies. All patients were followed up for a minimum of 2 years. Radiological measurement of change in Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, T1-S1 length, T1-T12l length, and sagittal balance were done at pre-op, immediate post-op, after 1 year, and 2 years. All the complications were noted and documented.

RESULTS

The mean age of the operated patients was 8 ± 1.7 years, range (4-10 years). Mean pre-operative Cobb angle was 70.4 degrees. The mean correction of major Cobb angle was 34.6°. The percentage correction achieved in post-operative Cobb angle was about 51%. Mean change in post-operative thoracic kyphosis was 18.5° (40%). The average gain in immediate post-operative spinal length (T1-S1) and thoracic height (T1-T12) was 46.7 mm (18.3%) and 41 mm (23%), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Large and rigid curves in EOS can achieve a significant correction of Cobb angle and coronal imbalance during the index operation, by the use of intra-operative internal distraction at the time of MCGR insertion.

LEVEL AND TYPE OF STUDY

Retrospective clinical study, level 4.

Re-evaluating consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for early onset scoliosis: a 10-year update

PURPOSE

Consensus and uncertainty in early onset scoliosis (EOS) treatment were evaluated in 2010. It is currently unknown how treatment preferences have evolved over the past decade. The purpose of this study was to re-evaluate consensus and uncertainty among treatment options for EOS patients to understand how they compare to 10 years ago.

METHODS

11 pediatric spinal surgeons (similar participants as in 2010) were invited to complete a survey of 315 idiopathic and neuromuscular EOS cases (same cases as in 2010). Treatment options included the following: conservative management, distraction-based methods, growth guidance/modulation, and arthrodesis. Consensus was defined as ≥ 70% agreement, and uncertainty was < 70%. Associations between case characteristics and consensus for treatments were assessed via chi-squared and multiple regression analyses. Case characteristics associated with uncertainty were described.

RESULTS

Eleven surgeons [31.7 ± 7.8 years of experience] in the original 2010 cohort completed the survey. Consensus for conservative management was found in idiopathic patients aged ≤ 3, whereas in 2010, some of these cases were selected for surgery. There is currently consensus for casting idiopathic patients aged 1 or 2 with moderate curves, whereas in 2010, there was uncertainty between casting and bracing. Among neuromuscular cases with consensus for surgery, arthrodesis was chosen for patients aged 9 with larger curves.

CONCLUSION

Presently, preferences for conservative management have increased in comparison to 2010, and casting appears to be preferred over bracing in select infantile cases. Future research efforts with higher levels-of-evidence should be devoted to elucidate the areas of uncertainty to improve care in the EOS population.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level V.

Younger age at spinal cord detethering is potentially associated with a reduced risk of curve progression in children with early onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

In children with early onset scoliosis (EOS) who have tethered spinal cord (TSC), spinal cord detethering is commonly performed prior to spinal deformity correction (SDC). The purpose of this study was to investigate whether age or curve magnitude at the time of detethering is associated with curve progression at a follow-up of at least 2 years. It was hypothesized that patients who undergo detethering at a younger age, or those with a smaller curve magnitude, would experience a reduced rate of curve progression when compared with those who are older or with larger curves.

METHODS

Patients with EOS who underwent detethering at least 2 years prior to SDC were identified in a multicenter international registry. Radiographs were assessed just prior to the detethering procedure (pre-detether) and at the most recent visit prior to SDC (most recent post-detether). The rate of curve progression > 10° was examined. Owing to unequal follow-up in individual patients, Cox regression was used to investigate associations between primary variables (age and magnitude of major coronal curve) and rate of curve progression.

RESULTS

37 patients met inclusion criteria and 18 (mean age: 3.7 ± 2.9 years, 66.7% female, mean follow-up: 3.4 ± 1.3 years) had radiographic data available for analysis. Pre-detether and most recent post-detether major coronal curves were 44.8° ± 18.5° and 47.6° ± 23.9°, respectively. 5 (27.8%) patients had curve progression > 10° at a follow-up of 3.2 ± 1.2 years. Patients with progression > 10° were older at the time of detethering when compared with those without (5.6 ± 2.8 vs. 3 ± 2.7 years, p = 0.084). Regression analysis demonstrated that as age at detethering increased by 1 year, the rate of curve progression > 10° increased by 28.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.899; 1.839, p = 0.169]. There was no evidence of an association between pre-detethering curve magnitude and rate of curve progression > 10° [HR: 1.027, 95% CI 0.977; 1.079, p = 0.297].

CONCLUSION

In a small multicenter cohort of EOS patients with TSC, younger age, but not curve size, at the time of detethering was associated with a lower rate of scoliosis progression. Although these results indicate a potential role for early spinal cord detethering in the EOS population, they require further prospective investigation with a larger number of patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II.

Complications of single growing rod constructs in the treatment of severe early-onset scoliosis: a lesson relearned

PURPOSE

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is one of the most challenging areas of orthopedic management. Previous studies have reported that EOS patients were associated with high risk of complications following growth-friendly surgery. This study was performed to evaluate the complications of single traditional growing rods (TGRs) in the treatment of EOS.

METHODS

In a retrospective chart review study, medical records of all EOS patients treated with single TGRs between 2006 and 2018 were analyzed. Patients under the age of 10 at the time of surgery who had at least 24 months of follow-up were included. Intra- and post-operative complications included both device-related and disease-related complications. Statistical analysis was performed with SPSS.

RESULTS

A total of 35 patients with a mean age of 5.7 ± 2.1 years with the mean follow-up duration of 33.3 ± 9.1 months were included in the final analysis. Of the 35 participants, 27 children (77.1%) experienced at least one complication. A total of 61 complications were observed, giving rise to 1.7 complications per patient. An unplanned surgical procedure was needed to manage 42 of the 61 complications (68.8%). Thirty-five cases of implant failure, 11 cases of deep infection, and 2 cases of junctional kyphosis were identified.

CONCLUSION

It seems that even in the setting that the use of dual TGRs is not possible, the use of single TGRs as the only therapeutic modality should be minimized due to high rate of complications even as a bridge treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level III.

Comparison of surgical interventions for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Several growth-preserving surgical techniques are employed in the management of early-onset scoliosis (EOS). The authors' objective was to compare the use of traditional growing rods (TGRs), magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs), Shilla growth guidance techniques, and vertically expanding prosthetic titanium ribs (VEPTRs) for the management of EOS.

METHODS

A systematic review of electronic databases, including Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane, was performed. Outcomes of interest included correction of Cobb angle, T1-S1 distance, and complication rate, including alignment, hardware failure and infection, and planned and unplanned reoperation rates. The percent changes and 95% CIs were pooled across studies using random-effects meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 67 studies were identified, which included 2021 patients. Of these, 1169 (57.8%) patients underwent operations with TGR, 178 (8.8%) Shilla growth guidance system, 448 (22.2%) MCGR, and 226 (11.1%) VEPTR system. The mean ± SD age of the cohort was 6.9 ± 1.2 years. The authors found that the Shilla technique provided the most significant improvement in coronal Cobb angle immediately after surgery (mean [95% CI] 64.3% [61.4%-67.2%]), whereas VEPTR (27.6% [22.7%-33.6%]) performed significantly worse. VEPTR also performed significantly worse than the other techniques at final follow-up. The techniques also provided comparable gains in T1-S1 height immediately postoperatively (mean [95% CI] 10.7% [8.4%-13.0%]); however, TGR performed better at final follow-up (21.4% [18.7%-24.1%]). Complications were not significantly different among the patients who underwent the Shilla, TGR, MCGR, and VEPTR techniques, except for the rate of infections. The TGR technique had the lowest rate of unplanned reoperations (mean [95% CI] 15% [10%-23%] vs 24% [19%-29%]) but the highest number of planned reoperations per patient (5.31 [4.83-5.82]). The overall certainty was also low, with a high risk of bias across studies.

CONCLUSIONS

This analysis suggested that the Shilla technique was associated with a greater early coronal Cobb angle correction, whereas use of VEPTR was associated with a lower correction rate at any time point. TGR offered the most significant height gain at final follow-up. The complication rates were comparable across all surgical techniques. The optimal surgical approach should be tailored to individual patients, taking into consideration the strengths and limitations of each option.

Real-world evidence in health technology assessment of high-risk medical devices: Fit for purpose?

Health technology assessment (HTA) of medical devices (MDs) increasingly rely on real-world evidence (RWE). The aim of this study was to evaluate the type and the quality of the evidence used to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of high risk MDs (Class III) by HTA agencies in Europe (four European HTA agencies and EUnetHTA), with particular focus on RWE. Data were extracted from HTA reports on the type of evidence demonstrating (cost-)effectiveness, and the quality of observational studies of comparative effectiveness using the Good Research for Comparative Effectiveness principles. 25 HTA reports were included that incorporated 28 observational studies of comparative effectiveness. Half of the studies (46%) took important confounding and/or effect modifying variables into account in the design and/or analyses. The most common way of including confounders and/or effect modifiers was through multivariable regression analysis. Other methods, such as propensity score matching, were rarely employed. Furthermore, meaningful analyses to test key assumptions were largely omitted. Resulting recommendations from HTA agencies on MDs is therefore (partially) based on evidence which is riddled with uncertainty. Considering the increasing importance of RWE it is important that the quality of observational studies of comparative effectiveness are systematically assessed when used in decision-making.

Longitudinal comparison of direct medical cost, radiological and health-related quality of life treatment outcomes between traditional growing rods and magnetically controlled growing rods from preoperative to maturity

Background

Magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) have replaced traditional growing rods (TGR) in the past decade, however, a comparison of their direct costs and treatment outcomes based on real longitudinal data is lacking. This study aims to compare the direct cost and treatment outcomes between TGR and MCGR, whilst incorporating complications, reoperations and changes in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) throughout the entire treatment course.

Methods

Patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) who underwent initial growing rod surgery between 2003 and 2016 at a tertiary scoliosis clinic were studied with longitudinal data. Accumulated direct medical costs were calculated based on the unit cost of surgeries of each TGR and MCGR, costs incurred for any rod exchange or remedial surgery for post-operative complication. Treatment outcomes were evaluated via: Patient’s HRQoL using SRS-22r questionnaire, and radiological parameters (including major curve correction, spine length gains, spinal balance) throughout the treatment until maturity.

Results

A total of 27 EOS patients (16 MCGR, 11 TGR) were studied. Total direct cost of index surgery for MCGR was HKD$223,108 versus lower cost of HKD$135,184 for TGR (p < 0.001). At 2–3 years post-index surgery, accumulative total direct medical cost of MCGR and TGR became most comparable (TGR:MCGR ratio = 1.010) and had reached neutrality between the two groups since. Radiological parameters had no intergroup differences at maturity. For HRQoL, TGR group had shown the trend of less pain (domain score mean difference: 0.53, p = 0.024) post-index surgery and better self-appearance (domain score mean difference: 1.08, p = 0.017) before fusion. Higher satisfaction with treatment (domain score mean difference: 0.76, p = 0.029) was demonstrated by TGR patients at fusion/maturity. MCGR had negative (r_s = -0.693) versus TGR’s positive (r_s = 0.989) correlations (p < 0.05) of cost and SRS-22r total scores at 2–3 years post-index surgery.

Conclusions

From index surgery to maturity, TGR demonstrated better satisfaction with treatment by patients and comparable overall HRQoL with MCGR during the treatment course, as MCGR did not show apparent benefit despite less surgeries and cost neutrality between the two groups at 2–3 years post-index surgery.

Early-onset scoliosis: a narrative review

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is defined as any spinal deformity that is present before 10 years old, regardless of etiology.

Deformity must be evaluated based on the intercorrelation between the lungs, spine, and thorax.

Curvatures of early-onset have increased risk of progression, cardiorespiratory problems, and increased morbidity and mortality.

Progression of the deformity may produce thoracic insufficiency syndrome, where a distorted thorax is unable to support normal respiratory function or lung growth.

Management and treatment of EOS should pursue a holistic approach in which the psychological impact and quality of life of the patient are also taken into consideration.

Growth-friendly surgical techniques have not met the initial expectations of correcting scoliotic deformity, promoting thoracic growth, and improving pulmonary function.

Does the presence of programmable implanted devices in patients with early onset scoliosis alter typical operative and postoperative practices? A survey of spine surgeons

PURPOSE

Operative and postoperative management of early onset scoliosis (EOS) patients with programmable implanted devices has not been well characterized in the literature. The aim of this study was to describe current practices for pediatric spine surgeons who operate on patients with these devices.

METHODS

An electronic survey was distributed to 167 pediatric spine surgeons between January and March of 2021. The survey queried participants on operative and postoperative management of patients with the following implanted devices: vagal nerve stimulators, ventriculoperitoneal shunts, intrathecal baclofen pumps, pacemakers, and cochlear implants. Descriptive statistics were used to assess survey data.

RESULTS

Fifty-three respondents (31.7% response rate) with a mean 16.5 (SD 12.0) years in practice completed the survey. Depending on the type of device present, surgeons report changing their operative plan anywhere from 28.6 to 60.1% of the time when inserting magnetically controlled growing rods. Most respondents reported performing transcranial motor evoked potentials (80.0-98.0%) and monopolar cautery (70.0-92.9%) across implanted devices. Only 10% (n = 5) of surgeons reported complications related to operative and/or postoperative management of these patients. No complications were related to cautery, neuromonitoring, or surgical placement of MCGRs.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates variation in operative and postoperative management of these patients with various programmable implanted devices. Much of this inconsistency in practice is likely due to decades old case reports, constantly changing device manufacturer recommendations, and/or published simulation studies. Reported heterogeneity in management across surgeons necessitates development of published guidelines regarding proper operative and postoperative management of patients with EOS and implanted devices.

The Spring Distraction System for Growth-Friendly Surgical Treatment of Early Onset Scoliosis: A Preliminary Report on Clinical Results and Safety after Design Iterations in a Prospective Clinical Trial

Background: The Spring Distraction System (SDS) is a dynamic growth-friendly implant to treat early onset scoliosis (EOS). Previous SDS studies showed promising results in terms of curve correction and complication profile. Nevertheless, complications did occur, which led to modifications in the implant design. The main iterations were a larger rod diameter and a more sagittal stable sliding mechanism. The purpose of this study was to investigate the performance of these iterations. Methods: All patients treated with the modified SDS and >1 year follow-up were included. Radiographic outcomes, severe adverse events (SAEs), unplanned returns to the operating room (UPRORs) and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) were investigated. Results: Seventeen EOS patients (three congenital, four idiopathic, nine neuromuscular, one syndromic) were included. Mean age at surgery was 9.5 ± 2.5 years. Similar to the first generation SDS, about 50% initial correction was achieved and maintained, and spinal growth was near physiological. Most importantly, SAEs and UPRORs were diminished and favorable with 0.10/patient/year. In addition, HRQoL increased during the first year postoperatively, indicating the implant was well accepted. Conclusion: These preliminary results indicate that the iterations of the SDS are effective in terms of reducing SAEs and UPRORs and increasing HRQoL in patients with EOS.

How does magnetically controlled growing rods insertion affect sagittal alignment in ambulatory early onset scoliosis patients?

PURPOSE

The importance of sagittal alignment restoration in early onset scoliosis (EOS) management has rarely been investigated to date. The aim was to report the influence of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) insertion on the sagittal alignment of EOS patients.

METHODS

All consecutive ambulatory patients operated with MCGR rods between 2011 and 2018 were retrospectively included in four institutions. Standing biplanar radiographs were performed preoperatively, in the early postoperative period and at latest follow-up. Global and local sagittal parameters, spinal global shape and harmony were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 37 ambulatory EOS patients were included (mean age at surgery 8.5 (± 2) years). 70% had a balanced construct postoperatively. Both MaxTK (- 17°, p = 0.02) and MaxLL (- 15°, p = 0.001) were significantly reduced, particularly at the instrumented levels. The number of vertebrae included in the lumbar lordosis significantly increased (+ 2 levels, p = 0.02), as well as the thoraco-lumbar inflexion point (+ 2 levels, p < 0.001) and the kyphosis apex (+ 1 level, p < 0.001). Overall mechanical failure rate was 40.5%, and radiological PJK was observed in 43% of the patients, with 11 remaining asymptomatic. Patients with initial hyperkyphosis (> 50°) developed more complications (62% vs. 28%, p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

MCGR insertion flattened the spine in EOS, at both instrumented and non-instrumented levels. Overall spinal harmony was modified, with a cranial shift of the thoraco-lumbar inflexion point and the thoracic kyphosis apex, associated with a lengthening of the lumbar lordosis. The rate of complication remained high, some explanations being found in the radiological changes reported such as the preoperative location of the TK apex.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Outcomes of MCGR at > 3 year average follow-up in severe scoliosis: who undergoes elective revision vs UPROR?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate mid-term outcomes of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR), evaluate factors associated with unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) vs achieving full length. Full length was defined as achieving > 85% of the elongating portion of the rod.

METHODS

IRB approved retrospective single site study. 106 patients underwent MCGR between 2014 and 2020, 58 met inclusion criteria, all genders, ethnicities, and etiologies were included. Patients with < 1 year follow-up or previous instrumentation were excluded.

RESULTS

Follow-up averaged 43 months. 23 patients achieved full length 13 were revised to a new MCGR and 10 to a fusion; 5 were fused due to skeletal maturity; 12 were still lengthening; 2 were being observed; 16 experienced UPROR. Major curves improved from 80° (50-114) preoperative to 40° (7-78) at most recent follow-up or prior to revision, and 24° (4-57) after fusion. Fusion patients averaged 1.3 (1-4) procedures prior to fusion and gained 75 mm (38-142) in T1-S1 length. 16 patients experienced UPROR, 11 were male (p = 0.0238). All failures to elongate were male as was the rod fracture. Age was not correlated with UPROR (p = 0.318), but did correlate with implant-specific causes of UPROR. Specifically, anchor failure was associated with younger age and rod failure with older age at implantation (p = 0.013). There was no correlation between UPROR and major curve, flexibility or kyphosis.

CONCLUSION

This is the largest site study evaluating mid-term outcomes in MCGR patients. At > 3.5 year follow-up 47% were electively revised, 27% underwent UPROR, 26% were still lengthening, and 3% were being observed. UPROR was associated with male gender and age at implantation was associated with implant-related causes of UPROR. MCGR continues to have high complication rates, better knowledge of MCGR outcomes may improve patient education, surgical timing, and decision-making.

No Difference in the Rates of Unplanned Return to the Operating Room Between Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods and Traditional Growth Friendly Surgery for Children With Cerebral Palsy

BACKGROUND

Early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is common in children with cerebral palsy (CP). The effectiveness of magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) and the risk for unplanned return to the operating room (UPROR) remain to be studied in this patient population. The primary outcome of this study was to examine the frequency of UPROR between MCGRs as compared with traditional growth friendly (TGF) surgeries for children with EOS secondary to CP.

METHODS

Patients with EOS secondary to CP were prospectively identified from an international database, with data retrospectively analyzed. Scoliosis, kyphosis, T1-S1, and T1-T12 height were measured preoperation, immediate postoperation, and at minimum 2-year follow-up. The risk and etiology of UPRORs were compared between MCGR and TGF.

RESULTS

Of the 120 patients that met inclusion criteria, 86 received TGF (age 7.5±0. 1.8 y; mean follow-up 7.0±2.9 y) and 34 received MCGR (age 7.1±2.2 y, mean follow-up 2.8±0.0.5 y). Compared with TGF, MCGR resulted in significant improvements in maintenance of scoliosis (P=0.007). At final follow-up, UPRORs were 8 of 34 patients (24%) for MCGR and 37 of 86 patients (43%) for TGF (P=0.05). To minimize the influence of follow-up period, UPRORs within the first 2 years postoperation were evaluated: MCGR (7 of 34 patients, 21%) versus TGF (20 of 86 patients, 23%; P=0.75). Within the first 2 years, etiology of UPROR as a percentage of all patients per group were deep infection (13% TGF, 6% MCGR), implant failure/migration (12% TGF, 9% MCGR), dehiscence (4% TGF, 3% MCGR), and superficial infection (4% TGF, 3% MCGR). The most common etiology of UPROR for TGF was deep infection and for MCGR was implant failure/migration.

CONCLUSION

For patients with EOS secondary to CP, there was no difference in the risk of UPROR within the first 2 years postoperatively whether treated with TGF surgery or with MCGRs (23% TGF, 21% MCGR).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-retrospective cohort, therapeutic study.

A comparison of the post-fusion outcome of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with traditional and magnetically controlled growing rods

AIMS

The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of patients with early-onset scoliosis (EOS), who had undergone spinal fusion after distraction-based spinal growth modulation using either traditional growing rods (TGRs) or magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGRs).

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective review of skeletally mature patients who had undergone fusion for an EOS, which had been previously treated using either TGRs or MCGRs. Measured outcomes included sequential coronal T1 to S1 height and major curve (Cobb) angle on plain radiographs and any complications requiring unplanned surgery before final fusion.

RESULTS

We reviewed 43 patients (63% female) with a mean age of 6.4 years (SD 2.6) at the index procedure, and 12.2 years (SD 2.2) at final fusion. Their mean follow-up was 8.1 years (SD 3.4). A total of 16 patients were treated with MCGRs and 27 with TGRs. The mean number of distractions was 7.5 in the MCGR group and ten in the TGR group (p = 0.471). The mean interval between distractions was 3.4 months in the MCGR group and 8.6 months in the TGR group (p < 0.001). The mean Cobb angle had improved by 25.1° in the MCGR group and 23.2° in TGR group (p = 0.664) at final follow-up. The mean coronal T1 to S1 height had increased by 16% in the MCGR group and 32.9% in TGR group (p = 0.001), although the mean T1 to S1 height achieved at final follow-up was similar in both. Unplanned operations were needed in 43.8% of the MCGR group and 51.2% of TGR group (p = 0.422).

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective, single-centre review, there were no significant differences in major curve correction or gain in spinal height at fusion. Although the number of planned procedures were fewer in patients with MCGRs, the rates of implant-related complications needing unplanned revision surgery were similar in the two groups. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2022;104-B(2):257-264.

Single distraction-rod constructs in severe early-onset scoliosis: Indications and outcomes

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Since the study of Thompson, et al in 2005, use of dual-growing rod constructs have become the gold standard for operative treatment in early-onset scoliosis. However, use of dual-growing rod constructs may not be possible, due to patient size and the type, location and severity of the spinal deformity.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to: (1) describe the deformities treated with single-growing rod constructs, and (2) report the outcomes of single-growing rods since 2005.

STUDY DESIGN

Observational, descriptive case series METHODS: A prospective, multi-center, international database of early-onset scoliosis patients were queried to identify all patients with single traditional growing rods (sTGR) or magnetically-controlled growing rods (sMCGR) since the 2005. Patients were excluded if there were greater than 1 rod or if there was less than 2 years of follow-up postoperatively. Twenty-five patients (13 female, 12 male) were identified from the database query, which satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Mean age at index surgery was 4.7 years (1.3 to 9.3 years) and mean follow-up was 4.3 years (2.0 to 10.6 years). Eleven patients were classified as congenital (all mixed-type), six neuromuscular, five idiopathic and three syndromic. Proximal foundations were ribs in 23 patients and pedicle screws in two patients. The distal foundations were the spine in 25 patients and three pelvic S-hooks. All single rods were on the concave side of the deformity. Interpretation of preoperative radiographs determined in 72% (18/25) of cases dual growing rods would be difficult and/or suboptimal due to patient size (longitudinal a/o weight) and/or kyphosis/kyphoscoliosis with severe rotation. Maximal coronal deformity improved 30% (83.9 degrees to 58.6 degrees) at latest follow-up. Maximal kyphosis increased 17% (45.6 degrees to 57.4 degrees). Postoperative length increase: T1-T12, 17.0 mm (4.6 mm/year); T1-S1, 34 mm (9.4 mm/year). Total secondary surgeries for TGRs were 100: 66 lengthenings, 32 revisions, two unknown. 10 MCGRs secondary surgeries occurred in nine patients (seven for maximized actuators and three for foundation migration). At latest follow-up 20 continued with lengthenings (five TGR & 15 MCGR), four underwent definitive fusions, and one completed lengthening (implants retained).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of severe EOS with single rods demonstrated a 30% coronal correction. T1-S1 length increased at 9.4 mm/year and T1-T12 length at 4.6 mm/year, which are comparable to published reports on dual MCGRs. Single TGRs and MCGRs in EOS can provide acceptable short-term outcomes when dual rods are not deemed appropriate.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of single growing rod constructs, in the 4-8 years old patient with EOS, can achieve reasonable short-term radiographic outcomes.

How much does depth matter? Magnetically controlled growing rod distraction directly influenced by rod tissue depth

PURPOSE

Magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) is a relatively innovative technique. MCGR benefits over traditional growing rods are known but limitations and complications are being revealed. The purpose of this study was to examine the importance of tissue depth on rod lengthening.

METHODS

A single-institution retrospective review of 72 MCGR patients was performed. Ultrasound measured rod distraction. Differences in programmed and actual distraction, and complications were recorded. Tissue depths and achieved length were averaged and used to construct a regression to account for variability.

RESULTS

Percentage of std and offset orientation rod lengthening relative to the programmed distraction was inversely proportional to rod depth (std R = 0.50, p = 0.002) (offset R = 0.60, p < 0.001). Expected std rod lengthening achieved decreased by 1.46%/mm depth. Expected offset rod lengthening achieved decreased by 1.68%/mm depth. 28 pts (38.9%) sustained complications. Age, sex, BMI, standard tissue depth, and/or offset tissue depth had no predictive ability with respect to complications sustained (overall model R = 0.31, p = 0.36).

CONCLUSION

In a series of EOS surgical patients treated with MCGRs, the relationship between percentage of programmed lengthening achieved as well as total lengthening was inversely proportional to tissue depth of the rod. There was a trend towards increasing frequency of complications recorded with decreasing tissue depth though this was not significant. These data can help with surgical planning during MCGR placement.

Developments, Focuses, and Trends in Early-Onset Scoliosis From 2005 to 2020: A Systematic Bibliometric Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Although several studies have been reported on early-onset scoliosis (EOS), a bibliometric analysis is still lacking. A systematic bibliometric analysis will enable researchers to understand the scope of the research topics, identify research focuses and key literature, and predict future research directions.

METHODS

Literature data were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection database. The Web of Science Results Analysis and Citation Report were used to analyze the reported studies in different views. CiteSpace and VOSviewer were used for further analysis, including a cooperation network analysis of the authors, institutions, countries and/or regions, discipline and journal analysis, reference co-citation analysis, and keyword co-occurrence analysis.

RESULTS

The final analysis included 674 relevant studies reported from 2005 to 2020. During the study period, the field of EOS has expanded rapidly. Multiple cooperation was found among the authors, institutions, and countries and/or regions, with some making great contributions. The results of the reference co-citation analysis showed that the studies had several main focuses, including the growing rod (GR), magnetically controlled GR, an EOS 24-item questionnaire, and a growth evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

From 2005 to 2020, surgical treatment has remained the focus of research in the EOS field. The magnetically controlled GR is the latest research focus, which might become more comprehensive in the future. The Gr has remained the most popular topic, and potential new surgical techniques might require improvement to become the favored techniques. In addition, assessing the health-related quality of life and growth parameters of patients with EOS have become a popular topic.

A biomechanical study on the effect of lengthening magnitude on spine off-loading in magnetically controlled growing rod surgery: Implications on lengthening frequency

Purpose: To assess whether the magnitude of lengthening in magnetically controlled growing rod (MCGR) surgeries has an immediate or delayed effect on spinal off-loading. Methods: 9 whole porcine spines were instrumented using two standard MCGRs from T9 to L5. Static compression testing using a mechanical testing system (MTS) was performed at three MCGR lengthening stages (0 mm, 2 mm, and 6 mm) in each spine. At each stage, five cycles of compression at 175N with 25 min of relaxation was carried out. Off-loading was derived by comparing the load sustained by the spine with force applied by the MTS to the spine. Micro-CT imaging was subsequently performed. Results: The mean load sustained by the vertebral body before lengthening was 39.69N, and immediately after lengthening was 25.12N and 19.91N at 2 mm and 6 mm lengthening, respectively; decreasing to 10.07N, 8.31N, and 8.17N after 25 minutes of relaxation, at 0 mm, 2 mm, and 6 mm lengthening stages, respectively. There was no significant difference in off-loading between 2 mm and 6 mm lengthening stages, either instantaneously (p = 0.395) or after viscoelastic relaxation (p = 0.958). CT images showed fractures/separations at the level of pedicle screws in six spines and in the vertebral body's growth zone in five spines after 6 mm MCGR lengthening. Conclusion: This study demonstrated MCGRs cause significant off-loading of the spine leading to stress shielding. 6 mm of lengthening caused tissue damage and microfractures in some spines. There was no significant difference in spine off-loading between 2 mm and 6 mm MCGR lengthening, either immediately after lengthening or after viscoelastic relaxation.

Magnetically Controlled Growing Rods Graduation: Deformity Control with High Complication Rate

STUDY DESIGN

A multicenter retrospective review of consecutive series of patients.

OBJECTIVE

Long-term experience with using the magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR) to treat patients with deformity in the growing spine to the conclusion of treatment with posterior spine fusion.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

MCGR treatment for growing spine gained popularity with paucity of long-term follow up data. We hypothesized that final fusion might be more effective in bringing additional correction of the spine deformity after treatment with MCGR than that reported after traditional growing rods (TGR) due to less scarring and auto-fusion.

METHODS

Retrospective review of 47 patients with varied etiology, treated between 2011 and 2017 which graduated treatment were followed in five academic medical centers for average of 50 months (range, 10-88).

RESULTS

The initial mean coronal deformity of 69.6° (95% CI 65-74) was corrected to 40° (95% CI 36-40) immediately after the MCGR implantation but progressed to 52.8° (95% CI 46-59) prior to the final surgery (P < 0.01). Nevertheless, thoracic spine growth (T1-T12 height) improved from 187.3 mm (95% CI 179-195) following index surgery to 208.9 mm (95% CI 199-218) prior to final fusion (P < 0.01). Significant correction and spinal length were obtained at final fusion, but metallosis was a frequent observation (47%, 22/47). The average growth rate was 0.5 mm/month (95% CI 0.3-0.6). The overall complication rate within our cohort was 66% (31/47) with 45% (21/47) of unplanned returns to the operating theater. 32% (15/47) of the patients had an implant related complication. Unplanned surgery was highly correlated with thoracic kyphosis greater than 40° (OR 5.42 95% CI 1.3-23).

CONCLUSION

Treatment of growing spine deformities with MCGR provides adequate control of spine deformity it is comparable to previously published data about TGR. The overall high complications rate over time and specifically implant related complications.Level of Evidence: 4.

Inter- and intrarater reliability of measuring lengthening of magnetically controlled growing rods on digital radiographs

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to determine inter- and intraobserver reliability of delta rod extension, and total rod length measured on digital x-rays in patients with early onset scoliosis (EOS) treated with magnetically controlled growing rods (MCGR). For the last decade, patients with EOS have been treated with MCGR. Replacement of MCGR relies heavily on the measurement done at every lengthening session. Only a few studies have looked at inter- and intraobserver reliability of rod lengthening, and none have used the delta extension before.

METHODS

202 radiographs presented in random order were rated and measured twice with at least a 14-day interval and differing order of the radiographs. The measuring was done at both rods. All x-rays came from 15 patients diagnosed with EOS and treated with MCGR from 2009 until 2019. The total extension length and the delta extension (the difference in total extension length between two lengthening in succession) were measured, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) calculated for both measurements RESULTS: Intrarater ICC scores varied from moderate to good, but non-significantly. Interrater reliability increased significantly from moderate (ICC 0.72 [0.68; 0.76] and 0.73 [0.69; 0.77] to excellent (ICC 0.91 [0.88; 0.93] and 0.97 [0.96: 0.98]), when examining delta extension every sixth instead of every second month.

CONCLUSION

Measuring rod lengthening on x-rays can be done every 6 months, with an ample reliability. The ICC's for the delta extension with 2-3 months interval were only moderately precise, compared to the near perfect ICC's for the total extension length.

The role of traditional growing rods in the era of magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early-onset scoliosis

PURPOSE

To describe the clinical and radiographic profile of early-onset scoliosis (EOS) patients treated with traditional growing rods (TGR) during the magnetically-controlled growing rod (MCGR) era.

METHODS

A US multicenter EOS database was reviewed to identify (1) patients who underwent TGR after MCGR surgery was introduced at their institution, (2) patients who underwent MCGR during the same time period. Of 19 centers, 8 met criteria with all EOS etiologies represented. Clinical notes were reviewed to determine the indication for TGR. Patient demographics and pre-operative radiographs were compared between groups.

RESULTS

A total of 25 TGR and 127 MCGR patients were identified. The TGR patients were grouped by indication into the sagittal plane profile (n = 11), trunk height (n = 6), co-morbidities/need for MRI (n = 4), and other (ex: behavioral issues, remaining growth). Four patients had a combination of sagittal profile and short stature with sagittal profile listed as primary factor. The TGR short trunk group had a mean T1-S1 length of 192 mm vs 273 mm for the MCGR group (p = 0.0002). The TGR sagittal profile group, had a mean maximal kyphosis of 61° vs 55° for the MCGR group (p = 0.09).

CONCLUSION

TGR continues to have a role in the MCGR era. In this study, the most commonly reported indications for TGR were sagittal plane profile and trunk height. These results suggest that TGR is indicated in patients of short stature with stiff hyperkyphotic curves. As further experience is gained with MCGR, the indications for TGR will likely be refined.