1
|
Kelly D, Barrett J, Brand G, Leech M, Rees C. Factors influencing decision-making processes for intensive care therapy goals: A systematic integrative review. Aust Crit Care 2024; 37:805-817. [PMID: 38609749 DOI: 10.1016/j.aucc.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2024] [Revised: 02/23/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delivering intensive care therapies concordant with patients' values and preferences is considered gold standard care. To achieve this, healthcare professionals must better understand decision-making processes and factors influencing them. AIM The aim of this study was to explore factors influencing decision-making processes about implementing and limiting intensive care therapies. DESIGN Systematic integrative review, synthesising quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-methods studies. METHODS Five databases were searched (Medline, The Cochrane central register of controlled trials, Embase, PsycINFO, and CINAHL plus) for peer-reviewed, primary research published in English from 2010 to Oct 2022. Quantitative, qualitative, or mixed-methods studies focussing on intensive care decision-making were included for appraisal. Full-text review and quality screening included the Critical Appraisal Skills Program tool for qualitative and mixed methods and the Medical Education Research Quality Instrument for quantitative studies. Papers were reviewed by two authors independently, and a third author resolved disagreements. The primary author developed a thematic coding framework and performed coding and pattern identification using NVivo, with regular group discussions. RESULTS Of the 83 studies, 44 were qualitative, 32 quantitative, and seven mixed-methods studies. Seven key themes were identified: what the decision is about; who is making the decision; characteristics of the decision-maker; factors influencing medical prognostication; clinician-patient/surrogate communication; factors affecting decisional concordance; and how interactions affect decisional concordance. Substantial thematic overlaps existed. The most reported decision was whether to withhold therapies, and the most common decision-maker was the clinician. Whether a treatment recommendation was concordant was influenced by multiple factors including institutional cultures and clinician continuity. CONCLUSION Decision-making relating to intensive care unit therapy goals is complicated. The current review identifies that breadth of decision-makers, and the complexity of intersecting factors has not previously been incorporated into interventions or considered within a single review. Its findings provide a basis for future research and training to improve decisional concordance between clinicians and patients/surrogates with regards to intensive care unit therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diane Kelly
- Intensive Care Unit, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, VIC, Australia; Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Faculty of Medicine Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
| | - Jonathan Barrett
- Intensive Care Unit, Epworth Hospital, Richmond, VIC, Australia; Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Gabrielle Brand
- Monash Nursing & Midwifery, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Frankston, VIC, Australia
| | - Michelle Leech
- Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; Monash Medical Centre, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia
| | - Charlotte Rees
- Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Faculty of Medicine Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia; School of Health Sciences, College of Medicine, Nursing & Wellbeing, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Miranda SP, Morris RS, Rabas M, Creutzfeldt CJ, Cooper Z. Early Shared Decision-Making for Older Adults with Traumatic Brain Injury: Using Time-Limited Trials and Understanding Their Limitations. Neurocrit Care 2023; 39:284-293. [PMID: 37349599 DOI: 10.1007/s12028-023-01764-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023]
Abstract
Older adults account for a disproportionate share of the morbidity and mortality after traumatic brain injury (TBI). Predicting functional and cognitive outcomes for individual older adults after TBI is challenging in the acute phase of injury. Given that neurologic recovery is possible and uncertain, life-sustaining therapy may be pursued initially, even if for some, there is a risk of survival to an undesired level of disability or dependence. Experts recommend early conversations about goals of care after TBI, but evidence-based guidelines for these discussions or for the optimal method for communicating prognosis are limited. The time-limited trial (TLT) model may be an effective strategy for managing prognostic uncertainty after TBI. TLTs can provide a framework for early management: specific treatments or procedures are used for a defined period of time while monitoring for an agreed-upon outcome. Outcome measures, including signs of worsening and improvement, are defined at the outset of the trial. In this Viewpoint article, we discuss the use of TLTs for older adults with TBI, their potential benefits, and current challenges to their application. Three main barriers limit the implementation of TLTs in these scenarios: inadequate models for prognostication; cognitive biases faced by clinicians and surrogate decision-makers, which may contribute to prognostic discordance; and ambiguity regarding appropriate endpoints for the TLT. Further study is needed to understand clinician behaviors and surrogate preferences for prognostic communication and how to optimally integrate TLTs into the care of older adults with TBI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephen P Miranda
- Department of Neurosurgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
- Perelman Center for Advanced Medicine, 15 South Tower, 3400 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA, 19104, USA.
| | - Rachel S Morris
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | - Mackenzie Rabas
- Department of Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA
| | | | - Zara Cooper
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Maas DS, Hughes S, Macmillan PJ, Rodriguez Carranza LP, Nguyen M. Physician Perceptions and Beliefs Regarding End-of-Life Care in a Central California Health System. Am J Hosp Palliat Care 2023; 40:1079-1086. [PMID: 36426418 DOI: 10.1177/10499091221141624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: We sought to describe the preparedness, beliefs, and experience regarding end-of-life (EOL) care for in-training and attending physicians. We hoped to clarify how medical training impacts views about EOL, and topics where physicians desire more EOL training. Methods: An online anonymous survey was sent to 766 physicians who worked at Community Medical Centers in Fresno, California from October to December 2016. Descriptive statistics of the population were compiled. Chi-squared and Mann-Whitney U tests comparing differences in personal experience, and preparedness and confidence with palliative care topics by training level were performed. Results: 195 physicians responded to the survey (25%). Respondents were 42% in-training, 55% male, 57% Caucasian, and 38% Christian. Compared to attendings those in-training were younger, more often female, and more likely to have a DO degree. The 2 groups did not differ in ethnicity, specialty, or religion. Attendings were more likely than those in-training (46% vs 14%, P < .001) to have an advance directive, reported a higher level of formal training in discussing prognosis (P = .037), and had higher confidence with palliative care topics like delivering bad news (P = .002), discussing resuscitation status (P = .015), and discussing the new California EOL Option Act (P < .001). Thirty-two percent of respondents believed patients often starve at EOL. Otherwise, knowledge was 90% correct. Conclusions: Physicians in-training are less prepared to discuss EOL topics. Physicians in-training and attendings desire more education in pain management at EOL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David S Maas
- Hospice and Palliative Medicine Fellowship, University of California San Francisco Fresno Family and Community Medicine, Fresno, CA, USA
| | - Susan Hughes
- University of California San Francisco Fresno Family and Community Medicine, Fresno, CA, USA
| | - Patrick J Macmillan
- University of California San Francisco Fresno Internal Medicine, Fresno, CA, USA
| | | | - Madeline Nguyen
- Family and Community Medicine, Peach Tree Health, Sacramento, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Schipa C, Luca E, Ripa M, Sollazzi L, Aceto P. Preoperative evaluation of the elderly patient. Saudi J Anaesth 2023; 17:482-490. [PMID: 37779566 PMCID: PMC10540990 DOI: 10.4103/sja.sja_613_23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 07/12/2023] [Accepted: 07/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, the pre-operative evaluation of older patients is a critical step in the decision-making process. Clinical assessment and care planning should be considered a whole process rather than separate issues. Clinicians should use validated tools for pre-operative risk assessment of older patients to minimize surgery-related morbidity and mortality and enhance care quality. Traditional pre-operative consultation often fails to capture the pathophysiological and functional profiles of older patients. The elderly's pre-operative evaluation should be focused on determining the patient's functional reserve and reducing any possible peri-operative risk. Therefore, older adults may benefit from the Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment (CGA) that allows clinicians to evaluate several aspects of elderly life, such as depression and cognitive disorders, social status, multi-morbidity, frailty, geriatric syndromes, nutritional status, and polypharmacy. Despite the recognized challenges in applying the CGA, it may provide a realistic risk assessment for post-operative complications and suggest a tailored peri-operative treatment plan for older adults, including pre-operative optimization strategies. The older adults' pre-operative examination should not be considered a mere stand-alone, that is, an independent stage of the surgical pathway, but rather a vital step toward a personalized therapeutic approach that may involve professionals from different clinical fields. The aim of this review is to revise the evidence from the literature and highlight the most important items to be implemented in the pre-operative evaluation process in order to identify better all elderly patients' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Schipa
- Dipartimento di Scienze dell’emergenza, anestesiologiche e della rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
| | - Ersilia Luca
- Dipartimento di Scienze dell’emergenza, anestesiologiche e della rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
| | - Matteo Ripa
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
- Ophthalmology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Liliana Sollazzi
- Dipartimento di Scienze dell’emergenza, anestesiologiche e della rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
| | - Paola Aceto
- Dipartimento di Scienze dell’emergenza, anestesiologiche e della rianimazione, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Largo A. Gemelli, 8, 00168, Rome
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Peden CJ, Aggarwal G, Aitken RJ, Anderson ID, Balfour A, Foss NB, Cooper Z, Dhesi JK, French WB, Grant MC, Hammarqvist F, Hare SP, Havens JM, Holena DN, Hübner M, Johnston C, Kim JS, Lees NP, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN, Mohseni S, Ordoñez CA, Quiney N, Sharoky C, Urman RD, Wick E, Wu CL, Young-Fadok T, Scott MJ. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS®) Society Consensus Guidelines for Emergency Laparotomy Part 3: Organizational Aspects and General Considerations for Management of the Emergency Laparotomy Patient. World J Surg 2023; 47:1881-1898. [PMID: 37277506 PMCID: PMC10241556 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-023-07039-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This is Part 3 of the first consensus guidelines for optimal care of patients undergoing emergency laparotomy using an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) approach. This paper addresses organizational aspects of care. METHODS Experts in management of the high-risk and emergency general surgical patient were invited to contribute by the International ERAS® Society. PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and MEDLINE database searches were performed for ERAS elements and relevant specific topics. Studies were selected with particular attention to randomized clinical trials, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and large cohort studies, and reviewed and graded using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. Recommendations were made on the best level of evidence, or extrapolation from studies on elective patients when appropriate. A modified Delphi method was used to validate final recommendations. RESULTS Components of organizational aspects of care were considered. Consensus was reached after three rounds of a modified Delphi process. CONCLUSIONS These guidelines are based on best current available evidence for organizational aspects of an ERAS® approach to patients undergoing emergency laparotomy and include discussion of less common aspects of care for the surgical patient, including end-of-life issues. These guidelines are not exhaustive but pull together evidence on important components of care for this high-risk patient population. As much of the evidence is extrapolated from elective surgery or emergency general surgery (not specifically laparotomy), many of the components need further evaluation in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carol J. Peden
- Department of Anesthesiology Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, 2020 Zonal Avenue IRD 322, Los Angeles, CA 90033 USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Geeta Aggarwal
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU5 7XX UK
| | - Robert J. Aitken
- Sir Charles Gardiner Hospital, Hospital Avenue, Nedlands, WA 6009 Australia
| | - Iain D. Anderson
- Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Stott La, Salford, M6 8HD UK
- University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Angie Balfour
- Western General Hospital, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, EH4 2XU Scotland
| | | | - Zara Cooper
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120 USA
- Division of Trauma, Burns, Surgical Critical Care, and Emergency Surgery, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 1620 Tremont Street, Boston, MA 02120 USA
| | - Jugdeep K. Dhesi
- Perioperative Medicine for Older People Undergoing Surgery (POPS), Guy’s and St Thomas’ NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
- Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King’s College London, London, UK
- Research Department of Targeted Intervention, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, University College London, London, UK
| | - W. Brenton French
- Department of Surgery, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System, 1200 E. Broad Street, Richmond, VA 23298 USA
| | - Michael C. Grant
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 1800 Orleans Street, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
| | - Folke Hammarqvist
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, CLINTEC, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge, Hälsovägen 3. B85, S 141 86 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sarah P. Hare
- Department of Anaesthesia, Perioperative Medicine and Critical Care, Medway Maritime Hospital, Windmill Road, Gillingham, Kent, ME7 5NY UK
| | - Joaquim M. Havens
- Division of Trauma, Burns and Surgical Critical Care, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115 USA
| | - Daniel N. Holena
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Medical College of Wisconsin, 8701 Watertown Plank Rd, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
| | - Martin Hübner
- Department of Visceral Surgery, Lausanne University Hospital CHUV, University of Lausanne (UNIL), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Carolyn Johnston
- Department of Anaesthesia, St George’s Hospital, Tooting, London, UK
| | - Jeniffer S. Kim
- Kaiser Permanente Research, Department of Research & Evaluation, 100 South Los Robles Ave, 2nd Floor, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
| | - Nicholas P. Lees
- Department of General & Colorectal Surgery, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Scott La, Salford, M6 8HD UK
| | - Olle Ljungqvist
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Health and Medical Sciences, Örebro University, Örebro, Sweden
| | - Dileep N. Lobo
- Gastrointestinal Surgery, Nottingham Digestive Diseases Centre and National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, Queen’s Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals and University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
- MRC Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research, Queen’s Medical Centre, School of Life Sciences, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, NG7 2UH UK
| | - Shahin Mohseni
- Division of Trauma and Emergency Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medical Sciences, Orebro University Hospital, Orebro University, 701 85 Orebro, Sweden
| | - Carlos A. Ordoñez
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Fundación Valle del Lili, Cra 98 No. 18 – 49, 760032 Cali, Colombia
- Sección de Cirugía de Trauma y Emergencias, Universidad del Valle – Hospital Universitario del Valle, Cl 5 No. 36-08, 760032 Cali, Colombia
| | - Nial Quiney
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Surrey County Hospital, Egerton Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU5 7XX UK
| | - Catherine Sharoky
- Division of Traumatology, Surgical Critical Care and Emergency Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
| | - Richard D. Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, The Ohio State University and Wexner Medical Center, 410 West 10th Ave, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
| | - Elizabeth Wick
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Francisco, 513 Parnassus Ave HSW1601, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
| | - Christopher L. Wu
- Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, and Department of Anesthesiology, Weill-Cornell Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY 10021 USA
| | - Tonia Young-Fadok
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Arizona, 5777 e. Mayo Blvd., Phoenix, AZ 85054 USA
| | - Michael J. Scott
- Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, and Leonard Davis Institute for Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce St, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
- University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Schultz K, Howard S, Moreno K, Siegel T, Zonies D, Brasel K, Cook M. What Should the Surgeons Do at the Family Meeting: A Multi-Disciplinary Qualitative Description of Surgeon Participation in Palliative Care Discussions. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2023; 80:110-118. [PMID: 36089480 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2022.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2022] [Revised: 06/12/2022] [Accepted: 08/14/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE National guidelines have suggested that quality surgical care should incorporate effective palliative care (PC). Numerous barriers to surgeon participation remain and the domains of optimal surgeon participation are unclear. DESIGN Eight semi-structured and multi-professional focus groups with 34 total participants. Discussion was transcribed, and qualitative approaches were used to encode, identify, and categorize emergent themes. SETTING Oregon Health & Science University, Portland Oregon. A tertiary care teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS 34 multi-disciplinary participants in eight focus groups, identified on a volunteer basis. RESULTS Key themes defining domains of optimal surgeon/palliative practice include: (1) "primary/secondary PC" which detailed conflict between the surgeon's desire to be part of palliative discussions and competing clinical/time demands. (2) "role/responsibility" described the tension surgeons feel around a desire to provide honest and goal concordant care (3) "teamwork/conflict" detailed the approach to disagreement among multidisciplinary teams. CONCLUSIONS In this qualitative analysis, emergent themes suggest that surgeons want to be involved in the PC of their patients but are limited by available time and competing for ethical obligations. Tension between competing communication and care obligations and PC goals is common, and discord around patient goals remains an issue. This work highlights the need for a standardized curriculum to improve the PC of surgical patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristen Schultz
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Shannon Howard
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Kirstin Moreno
- Office of Educational Improvement Innovation, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Timothy Siegel
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Medical Oncology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - David Zonies
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Karen Brasel
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Mackenzie Cook
- Department of Surgery, Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Heylen J, Kemp O, Macdonald NJ, Mohamedfaris K, Scarborough A, Vats A. Pre-operative resuscitation discussion with patients undergoing fractured neck of femur repair: a service evaluation and discussion of current standards. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 2022; 142:1769-1773. [PMID: 33586032 DOI: 10.1007/s00402-021-03806-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2020] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The majority of neck of femur (NOF) fracture patients are frail and at a higher risk of cardiac arrest. This makes discussion of treatment escalation vital to informed care. The optimal time for these discussions is prior to admission or trauma. However, when this has not occurred, it is vital that these discussions happen early in the patient's admission when family is often present and before further deterioration in their condition. We undertook a service evaluation to evaluate and discuss the effect of clinician education on improving rates of timely discussion amongst orthopaedic doctors. MATERIALS AND METHODS The first cycle included 94 patients. Their notes were reviewed for presence of a ReSPECT (Recommend Summary Plan for Emergency Care and Treatment) form prior to operation and whether this it countersigned by a consultant. Following this, clinician education was undertaken and a re-audit was carried out involving 57 patients. RESULTS ReSPECT form completion rates rose from 23% in cycle 1-32% in cycle 2 following intervention. The proportion which consultants signed rose from 41% to 56% following intervention. CONCLUSION This project demonstrates how a basic education program can prove limited improvements in the rates of timely resuscitation discussions. We discuss a current lack in quality research into educational programs for discussion of treatment escalation for orthopaedic trainees. We suggest there is room to improve national best practice guidelines and training to ensure these discussions are carried out more frequently and to a better standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Heylen
- Rowley Bristow Unit Orthopaedics St Peter's Hospital, Chertsey, United Kingdom.
| | - O Kemp
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - N J Macdonald
- Rowley Bristow Unit Orthopaedics St Peter's Hospital, Chertsey, United Kingdom
| | - K Mohamedfaris
- Rowley Bristow Unit Orthopaedics St Peter's Hospital, Chertsey, United Kingdom
| | | | - A Vats
- Rowley Bristow Unit Orthopaedics St Peter's Hospital, Chertsey, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Harnischfeger N, Rath HM, Oechsle K, Bergelt C. Addressing palliative care and end-of-life issues in patients with advanced cancer: a systematic review of communication interventions for physicians not specialised in palliative care. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e059652. [PMID: 35715185 PMCID: PMC9207918 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-059652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify and summarise evaluated interventions aiming to improve the communication of palliative care (PC) and end-of-life (EoL) issues in physicians caring for cancer patients. Such interventions are needed with regard to the aim of an earlier communication of those issues in oncology daily practice, which is associated with a range of benefits for patients and caregivers but is often impeded by physicians' communication insecurities. DESIGN Systematic review based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. DATA SOURCES Relevant publications were systematically searched in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL and Web of Science databases in September 2020 with an update in July 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included publications reporting a quantitative evaluation of a communication intervention on one or more PC/EoL issues with a communication-related main outcome. Target group had to be physicians caring for cancer patients non-specialist in PC. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two independent raters extracted intervention characteristics, publication characteristics and publication quality. Results were narratively synthesised. RESULTS 24 publications reporting 22 interventions were included. 13 publications reported randomised controlled trials. A majority of the interventions addressed one specific PC/EoL issue, most often breaking bad news. Teaching strategies mostly involved role-plays. Target group were mainly oncologists. In addition to self-reported outcome measurements for evaluation, most publications also reported the use of external rating data. All but one publication reported significant intervention effects on at least one outcome parameter. Publication quality was overall moderate. CONCLUSIONS The empirically tested communication interventions on PC/EoL issues seem to effectively improve physicians' communication. Future interventions should focus on other issues than breaking bad news, such as preparing for the future. Target group should also be organ-specific oncologists, as all primary caring physicians are responsible for timely communication. Our risk-of-bias assessment revealed some weaknesses, indicating that more high-quality studies for evaluation are needed. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42020191054.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nele Harnischfeger
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hilke M Rath
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Karin Oechsle
- Palliative Care Unit, Department of Oncology, Hematology and BMT, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Corinna Bergelt
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
- Department of Medical Psychology, University Medicine Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lee KC, Walling AM, Senglaub SS, Bernacki R, Fleisher LA, Russell MM, Wenger NS, Cooper Z. Improving Serious Illness Care for Surgical Patients: Quality Indicators for Surgical Palliative Care. Ann Surg 2022; 275:196-202. [PMID: 32502076 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003894] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Develop quality indicators that measure access to and the quality of primary PC delivered to seriously ill surgical patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA PC for seriously ill surgical patients, including aligning treatments with patients' goals and managing symptoms, is associated with improved patient-oriented outcomes and decreased healthcare utilization. However, efforts to integrate PC alongside restorative surgical care are limited by a lack of surgical quality indicators to evaluate primary PC delivery. METHODS We developed a set of 27 preliminary indicators that measured palliative processes of care across the surgical episode, including goals of care, decision-making, symptom assessment, and issues related to palliative surgery. Then using the RAND-UCLA Appropriateness method, a 12-member expert advisory panel rated the validity (primary outcome) and feasibility of each indicator twice: (1) remotely and (2) after an in-person moderated discussion. RESULTS After 2 rounds of rating, 24 indicators were rated as valid, covering the preoperative evaluation (9 indicators), immediate preoperative readiness (2 indicators), intraoperative (1 indicator), postoperative (8 indicators), and end of life (4 indicators) phases of surgical care. CONCLUSIONS This set of quality indicators provides a comprehensive set of process measures that possess the potential to measure high quality PC for seriously ill surgical patients throughout the surgical episode.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine C Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Anne M Walling
- Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
- Affiliated Adjunct Staff, RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Steven S Senglaub
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Rachelle Bernacki
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Lee A Fleisher
- Department of Anesthesiology and Medicine, Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Marcia M Russell
- Greater Los Angeles Veterans Affairs Healthcare System, Los Angeles, CA
- Department of Surgery, Dave Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Neil S Wenger
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Health Services Research, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA
- Affiliated Adjunct Staff, RAND Health, Santa Monica, CA
| | - Zara Cooper
- The Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
- Hebrew SeniorLife Marcus Institute for Aging Research, Boston, MA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Greene F. Surgical palliative care: a coming of age. BMJ Support Palliat Care 2021; 12:46-48. [PMID: 34916241 DOI: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2021] [Accepted: 11/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
|
11
|
Robertson AC, Fowler LC, Kimball TS, Niconchuk JA, Kreger MT, Brovman EY, Rickerson E, Sadovnikoff N, Hepner DL, McEvoy MD, Bader AM, Urman RD. Efficacy of an Online Curriculum for Perioperative Goals of Care and Code Status Discussions: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Anesth Analg 2021; 132:1738-1747. [PMID: 33886519 DOI: 10.1213/ane.0000000000005548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preoperative goals of care (GOC) and code status (CS) discussions are important in achieving an in-depth understanding of the patient's care goals in the setting of a serious illness, enabling the clinician to ensure patient autonomy and shared decision making. Past studies have shown that anesthesiologists are not formally trained in leading these discussions and may lack the necessary skill set. We created an innovative online video curriculum designed to teach these skills. This curriculum was compared to a traditional method of learning from reading the medical literature. METHODS In this bi-institutional randomized controlled trial at 2 major academic medical centers, 60 anesthesiology trainees were randomized to receive the educational content in 1 of 2 formats: (1) the novel video curriculum (video group) or (2) journal articles (reading group). Thirty residents were assigned to the experimental video curriculum group, and 30 were assigned to the reading group. The content incorporated into the 2 formats focused on general preoperative evaluation of patients and communication strategies pertaining to GOC and CS discussions. Residents in both groups underwent a pre- and postintervention objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) with standardized patients. Both OSCEs were scored using the same 24-point rubric. Score changes between the 2 OSCEs were examined using linear regression, and interrater reliability was assessed using weighted Cohen's kappa. RESULTS Residents receiving the video curriculum performed significantly better overall on the OSCE encounter, with a mean score of 4.19 compared to 3.79 in the reading group. The video curriculum group also demonstrated statistically significant increased scores on 8 of 24 rubric categories when compared to the reading group. CONCLUSIONS Our novel video curriculum led to significant increases in resident performance during simulated GOC discussions and modest increases during CS discussions. Further development and refinement of this curriculum are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy C Robertson
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Leslie C Fowler
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Thomas S Kimball
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan A Niconchuk
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Michael T Kreger
- Department of Anesthesiology, Southeast Health Medical Center, Dothan, Alabama
| | - Ethan Y Brovman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth Rickerson
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nicholas Sadovnikoff
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David L Hepner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Matthew D McEvoy
- From the Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Angela M Bader
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Richard D Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
The importance of integrated palliative care in surgical oncology has been established by high-level evidence demonstrating improved patient-centered outcomes. There has been substantial improvement in efforts to incorporate palliative medicine training into medical and surgical education over the last decade. However, although trainees may feel confident in managing patients at the end of life, they may not have the insight or proficiency to provide optimal palliative care. Surgeons and palliative care physicians should collaborate on methods to optimize palliative care education for both trainees and practicing surgeons. A growing number of palliative care resources are available to this end.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra C Istl
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Blalock 684, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA. https://twitter.com/AllyIstl
| | - Fabian M Johnston
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Blalock 684, 600 North Wolfe Street, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Hicks-Courant K, Graul A, Ko E, Giuntoli R, Martin L, Morgan M, Haggerty A. Sources of Palliative Care Knowledge Among Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Gynecologic Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage 2021; 61:566-570.e1. [PMID: 32976942 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2020.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2020] [Revised: 09/10/2020] [Accepted: 09/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT A minority of patients with advanced or metastatic gynecologic cancer utilize palliative care and lack of knowledge may be a barrier to receiving palliative care services. OBJECTIVES To identify sources used by patients with advanced or metastatic gynecologic cancer to learn about palliative care and evaluate for differences in knowledge about palliative care and palliative care utilization by knowledge source. METHODS Patients with gynecologic cancer receiving treatment for advanced or metastatic gynecologic cancer at a single academic medical center were surveyed about their awareness of and knowledge about palliative care. Medical chart review was conducted. RESULTS Of the 111 women surveyed, 70 had heard of palliative care (63%). Sixty-eight specified from where they learned of palliative care: cancer care (n = 28; 41.2%), word of mouth (n = 26; 38.2%), work (n = 6; 8.8%), self-education (n = 4; 5.9%), personal experience (n = 2; 2.9%), or do not know (n = 2; 2.9%). Knowledge about palliative care (P = 0.35) and palliative care utilization (P = 0.81) did not differ by awareness of palliative care. CONCLUSION Most women receiving treatment for advanced gynecologic cancer have heard of palliative care from sources other than their cancer care providers. Knowledge about palliative care and source of knowledge about palliative care were not associated with palliative care utilization. Awareness of palliative care and palliative care utilization may be improved by increasing the low rate of health provider-based education and engaging cancer patients' social networks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ashley Graul
- St. Luke's University Health Network, Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Emily Ko
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Lainie Martin
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mark Morgan
- University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Merchant SJ, Booth CM. ASO Author Reflections: Palliative Chemotherapy for Upper Gastrointestinal Cancer: Balancing Hope, Reality, Survival, and Symptoms. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:88-89. [PMID: 33141371 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-09295-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 10/04/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shaila J Merchant
- Division of General Surgery and Surgical Oncology, Kingston Health Sciences Centre, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada. .,Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
| | - Christopher M Booth
- Division of Medical Oncology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.,Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Yefimova M, Aslakson RA. Preoperative Conversations About Postoperative Risks, Outcomes, and Quality of Life-Time to Start Thinking Outside the Box. JAMA Netw Open 2020; 3:e2024048. [PMID: 33180125 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.24048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Yefimova
- Office of Research, Patient Care Services, Stanford Healthcare, Stanford, California
- Department of Medicine and Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Section of Palliative Care, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | - Rebecca A Aslakson
- Department of Medicine and Division of Primary Care and Population Health, Section of Palliative Care, Stanford University, Stanford, California
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Cook M, Zonies D, Brasel K. Prioritizing Communication in the Provision of Palliative Care for the Trauma Patient. CURRENT TRAUMA REPORTS 2020; 6:183-193. [PMID: 33145148 PMCID: PMC7595000 DOI: 10.1007/s40719-020-00201-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Communication skills in the ICU are an essential part of the care of trauma patients. The goal of this review is to summarize key aspects of our understanding of communication with injured patients in the ICU. Recent Findings The need to communicate effectively and empathetically with patients and identify primary goals of care is an essential part of trauma care in the ICU. The optimal design to support complex communication in the ICU will be dependent on institutional experience and resources. The best/worst/most likely model provides a structural model for communication. Summary We have an imperative to improve the communication for all patients, not just those at the end of their life. A structured approach is important as is involving family at all stages of care. Communication skills can and should be taught to trainees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mackenzie Cook
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Mail Code L611, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97230 USA
| | - David Zonies
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Mail Code L611, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97230 USA
| | - Karen Brasel
- Division of Trauma, Critical Care and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, Oregon Health and Science University, Mail Code L611, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR 97230 USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fiorentino M, Mosenthal AC, Bryczkowski S, Lamba S. Teaching Residents Communication Skills around Death and Dying in the Trauma Bay. J Palliat Med 2020; 24:77-82. [PMID: 32716675 DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2020.0076] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract Background: Traumatic events are sudden, unexpected, and often devastating. The delivery of difficult news to patients and families in the trauma setting has unique challenges that necessitate communication skills that may differ from those used in other clinical environments. Objective: Design and implement a novel curriculum to teach, assess, and provide feedback to trauma residents on the communication skills necessary for delivering difficult news to patients and families in the trauma setting. Methods: This communication curriculum was delivered in three separate phases: (1) didactics using a video education e-module, (2) simulated practice of trauma resuscitation with a high-fidelity mannequin followed by role play of delivering difficult news, (3) an observed skills assessment using standardized patients (SPs). Each phase focused on delivery of difficult news of death and of uncertain/poor prognosis after a resuscitation in the trauma bay. Learners were trauma residents that included postgraduate year (PGY) 1-2 general surgery residents and PGY 1-4 emergency medicine residents at a level 1 trauma center. Outcomes include resident comfort, knowledge, and confidence in delivering difficult news in the trauma setting. Results: Thirty-nine trauma residents participated in the three-phase curriculum. There was an increase in the mean scores of resident-reported comfort, knowledge, and confidence in delivering difficult news for the seriously injured. SPs rated 78% of residents as competent to perform delivery of difficult news in the trauma bay independently. Conclusions: A curriculum to teach and assess trauma residents in the skills necessary to deliver difficult news in the trauma setting is both feasible and effective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sangeeta Lamba
- Rutgers-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Abstract
Patients with frailty experience substantial physical and emotional distress related to their condition and face increased morbidity and mortality compared with their nonfrail peers. Palliative care is an interdisciplinary medical specialty focused on improving quality of life for patients with serious illness, including those with frailty, throughout their disease course. Anesthesiology providers will frequently encounter frail patients in the perioperative period and in the intensive care unit (ICU) and can contribute to improving the quality of life for these patients through the provision of palliative care. We highlight the opportunities to incorporate primary palliative care, including basic symptom management and straightforward goals-of-care discussions, provided by the primary clinicians, and when necessary, timely consultation by a specialty palliative care team to assist with complex symptom management and goals-of-care discussions in the face of team and/or family conflict. In this review, we apply the principles of palliative care to patients with frailty and synthesize the evidence regarding methods to integrate palliative care into the perioperative and ICU settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita C. Crooms
- Department of Neurology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Laura P. Gelfman
- Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Suwanabol PA, Vitous CA, Perumalswami CR, Li SH, Raja N, Dillon BR, Lee CW, Forman J, Silveira MJ. Surgery Residents' Experiences With Seriously-Ill and Dying Patients: An Opportunity to Improve Palliative and End-of-Life Care. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL EDUCATION 2020; 77:582-597. [PMID: 32063510 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.12.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2019] [Revised: 04/25/2019] [Accepted: 12/21/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe how and when surgery residents provided primary palliative care and engaged specialty palliative care services. DESIGN Phase I consisted of a previously validated survey instrument supplemented with additional questions. We then conducted semistructured interviews with a subset of the survey respondents (Phase II). Using thematic analysis, we characterized surgery residents' perceptions of palliative care delivery among surgical patients. SETTING General surgery residency programs across the state of Michigan. PARTICIPANTS General surgery residents across the state of Michigan. All residents in participating programs were invited to complete the survey in Phase I. Phase II consisted of a subset of the survey respondents who underwent semistructured interviews. Interview respondents were sampled to reflect the overall surveyed group. RESULTS Among 119 survey respondents (response rate 70%), all had encountered a palliative care specialist but only 58.8% had been taught when to consult or to refer to palliative care. Survey respondents reported on a multitude of barriers within the clinician, patient and family, and systemic domains. Interviews expanded on survey findings and 4 influential factors of palliative care delivery emerged: (1) Resident Education and Training; (2) Resident Attitudes Toward Palliative Care; (3) Knowledge of Palliative Care; and (4) Training within a Surgical Culture. CONCLUSIONS This study reveals how surgery resident training and experiences impact palliative and end-of-life care for surgical patients at teaching institutions. Knowledge of how and when residents are providing primary palliative care and engaging with palliative care services will inform future knowledge and behavioral interventions for trainees who often provide care for patients nearing the end of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pasithorn A Suwanabol
- Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
| | - C Ann Vitous
- Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Chithra R Perumalswami
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Sylvia H Li
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Nicholas Raja
- University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - Christina W Lee
- Department of Surgery, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Jane Forman
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Center for Clinical Management, Ann Arbor Veterans Affairs Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Maria J Silveira
- Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan; Division of Geriatric and Palliative Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
|
21
|
Ramachenderan J, Auret K. The Challenge of Perioperative Advance Care Planning. J Pain Symptom Manage 2019; 58:538-542. [PMID: 31029807 DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2019.04.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2019] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/18/2019] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
As our population ages, there will be an increasing number of patients with life-limiting disease who may be referred for major elective surgery and more pressingly may present acutely, requiring major emergency surgical intervention. Owing to the high risk of perioperative and postoperative complications associated this group of patients, it is paramount that specific advance care planning that encompasses a patient's goals of care and resuscitative status be clarified before undergoing surgery in this acute period. In doing so, this will lead to a better quality of life for patients with a limited trajectory and allow for more informed decisions to be made about their health care. Furthermore, it will help to prevent futile and inappropriate treatments that do not respect a patient's wishes and their clinical status. In this case discussion, we explore the key themes about the challenge of perioperative advance care planning for patients with life-limiting disease and provide a framework to help guide conversation in this crucial period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Ramachenderan
- Great Southern Regional Palliative Care Service, Albany Health Campus, Western Australia Country Health Service.
| | - Kirsten Auret
- Rural Clinical School of Western Australia, University of Western Australia, Albany, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Choi C, Pagel PS, Estimé SR. Navigating Goals of Care While Confronting an Urgent, Difficult Intubation: A Case Report. A A Pract 2019; 12:193-195. [PMID: 30169388 DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000000881] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Urgent airway management is challenging because time constraints limit thorough evaluation and planning before endotracheal intubation. In this report, we describe a case in which an airway history review revealed extraordinarily complex airway anatomy that led to a decision not to attempt intubation in a man with end-stage chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We emphasize the utility of reviewing history and imaging before attempted urgent intubation. We discuss the importance of a multidisciplinary approach that includes the patient, their family, and consultants when high-risk intubation is contemplated. The ethical role of the anesthesiologist is also discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Choi
- From the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Paul S Pagel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Stephen R Estimé
- From the Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care, and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Improving Preoperative Completion of Advanced Care Planning Documents in Patients With Expected Postoperative Intensive Care Unit Stay. A A Pract 2019; 12:455-458. [DOI: 10.1213/xaa.0000000000000993] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
24
|
Munz SM, Helman JI, Tiner MK, Hart AL. Recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma-incorporating advance care planning in education and practice. SPECIAL CARE IN DENTISTRY 2019; 39:246-251. [PMID: 30748030 DOI: 10.1111/scd.12369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2018] [Revised: 01/18/2019] [Accepted: 02/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
This reflection describes a life-limiting case of oral squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) that required thoughtful management facilitated by an advance care plan (ACP). A 70-year-old female was diagnosed with a T4aN2bM0 biopsy-proven invasive, well-differentiated keratinizing SCC. Surgical wide-local excision included teeth #11-16 with left unilateral neck dissection, levels I-V. She was rehabilitated with maxillary obturator prosthesis and underwent chemoradiation therapy. Her course was complicated by dysphagia and trismus. She experienced multiple recurrences. At a certain point, negative margins could not be achieved without facial disfigurement. The patient, her husband, and providers decided together that further management would be palliative. Before the additional surgical procedures, she communicated a thorough ACP with her husband and providers who were prepared to facilitate difficult care decisions on her behalf. The patient passed away at home with hospice care at the age of 74. This motivated patient with oral SCC and impactful postmanagement complications appreciated the clarity of an ACP. Her values and goals of care were incorporated with ongoing communication and documentation of this plan, which was instrumental in facilitating her person-centered care. The providers apply lessons learned here in future practice and education of residents and students.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie M Munz
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Hospital Dentistry, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Joseph I Helman
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery/Hospital Dentistry, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Margaret K Tiner
- Speech-Language Pathology, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Anita L Hart
- Department of Nursing, Michigan Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Urman RD, Lilley EJ, Changala M, Lindvall C, Hepner DL, Bader AM. A Pilot Study to Evaluate Compliance with Guidelines for Preprocedural Reconsideration of Code Status Limitations. J Palliat Med 2018; 21:1152-1156. [DOI: 10.1089/jpm.2017.0601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D. Urman
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Perioperative Research, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Elizabeth J. Lilley
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Surgery, Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey
| | - Marguerite Changala
- School of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California
| | - Charlotta Lindvall
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Department of Psychosocial Oncology and Palliative Care, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Division of Palliative Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - David L. Hepner
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Angela M. Bader
- Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative, and Pain Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
- Center for Surgery and Public Health, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|