2016 The American Association for Thoracic Surgery (AATS) consensus guidelines: Surgical treatment of infective endocarditis: Executive summary

A nomogram for prediction of early mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis: a retrospective single-center study

OBJECTIVE

Despite advancements in surgical techniques, operations for infective endocarditis (IE) remain associated with relatively high mortality. The aim of this study was to develop a nomogram model to predict the early postoperative mortality in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for infective endocarditis based on the preoperative clinical features.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 357 patients with IE who underwent surgeries at our center between January 2007 and June 2023. Independent risk factors for early postoperative mortality were identified using univariate and multivariate logistic regression models. Based on these factors, a predictive model was developed and presented in a nomogram. The performance of the nomogram was evaluated through the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA). Internal validation was performed utilizing the bootstrapping method.

RESULTS

The nomogram included nine predictors: age, stroke, pulmonary embolism, albumin level, cardiac function class IV, antibotic use <4weeks, vegetation size ≥1.5 cm, perivalvular abscess and preoperative dialysis. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the model was 0.88 (95%CI:0.80-0.96). The calibration plot indicated strong prediction consistency of the nomogram with satisfactory Hosmer-Lemeshow test results (χ2 = 13.490, p = 0.142). Decision curve analysis indicated that the nomogram model provided greater clinical net benefits compared to "operate-all" or "operate-none" strategies.

CONCLUSIONS

The innovative nomogram model offers cardiovascular surgeons a tool to predict the risk of early postoperative mortality in patients undergoing IE operations. This model can serve as a valuable reference for preoperative decision-making and can enhance the clinical outcomes of IE patients.

Comparison of Medical Therapy, Valve Surgery, and Percutaneous Mechanical Aspiration for Tricuspid Valve Infective Endocarditis

BACKGROUND

The opioid pandemic, and particularly injection drug use, has led to an increase in cases of tricuspid valve infective endocarditis. Indications for valve surgery in right-sided infective endocarditis are not well-defined. Percutaneous mechanical aspiration is considered an alternative in patients at high risk for re-infection of a prosthetic valve but lacks robust outcomes data. This retrospective analysis compares the primary outcome of death within 1 year for patients with isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis treated with medical therapy alone vs percutaneous mechanical aspiration or valve surgery.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective cohort study of patients with isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis over a 10-year period. Medical record review was performed to collect demographic-and outcomes-related data. The association between treatment group and outcomes was assessed using Cox proportional hazard regression with inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

Between January 1, 2009, and December 31, 2018, 215 patients with isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis and surgical indications were identified. One hundred patients (46.5%) were managed medically, 49 (22.8%) were managed surgically, and 66 (30.7%) underwent percutaneous mechanical aspiration. There was no significant difference in 1-year mortality between the 3 treatment groups (P = .15). Vegetation size > 2.0 cm was associated with increased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 3.01; P = .03). Addiction medicine consultation was associated with decreased 1-year mortality (hazard ratio 0.117; P = .0008).

CONCLUSION

The study highlights that surgery or percutaneous mechanical aspiration in addition to medical therapy does not improve 1-year mortality in patients with isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis. Addiction medicine consultation was associated with decreased 1-year mortality in patients with injection drug use-associated isolated tricuspid valve infective endocarditis.

A Single-Centre Experience of the Management of Infective Endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Treatment for infective endocarditis (IE) is usually medical, with surgery reserved for those failing medical management or developing complications. Currently, 25%-50% of patients undergo surgery for IE with a 70%-80% immediate survival rate. However, there is controversy over the timing of surgery following cerebrovascular events, which occur in 15%-30% of IE patients. This study aimed to investigate whether surgical management is superior to medical management in patients with IE and to determine the optimal timing for surgery following the development of neurological symptoms.

METHODS

Data were collected retrospectively between 2012 and 2018 from 436 patients diagnosed with IE and treated at our tertiary teaching hospital. The authors analysed the type of treatment, the timing of surgery, and the outcomes of these including mortality, IE recurrence, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

A total of 421 patients were included in the analysis. More than two-thirds (69.1%) of patients underwent surgical intervention. The survival rate of patients having surgery for IE was 77.2%, compared to 50.7% in patients who did not undergo surgical intervention. 6.8% of patients presented with neurological symptoms; 73.3% of these patients had surgery within 14 days with a 90.9% survival.

CONCLUSION

This study finds surgery to be safe with a seemingly higher survival rate compared to medical management alone, although this may be confounded by patients in the medical group being less likely to have surgery. Surgery in patients presenting with neurological symptoms is safe within 2 weeks from presentation with excellent outcomes.

Aortic root allograft reoperations

OBJECTIVE

To investigate outcomes after aortic root allograft reoperation, identify risk factors for morbidity and mortality, and describe practice evolution since publication of our 2006 allograft reoperation study.

METHODS

From January 1987 to July 2020, 602 patients underwent 632 allograft-related reoperations at Cleveland Clinic: 144 before 2006 (early era, which suggested radical explant was superior to aortic-valve-replacement-within-allograft [AVR-only]), and 488 from 2006 to present (recent era). Indications for reoperation were structural valve deterioration in 502 (79%), infective endocarditis in 90 (14%), and nonstructural valve deterioration/noninfective endocarditis in 40 (6.3%). Reoperative techniques included radical allograft explant in 372 (59%), AVR-only in 248 (39%), and allograft preservation in 12 (1.9%). Perioperative events and survival were assessed among indications, techniques, and eras.

RESULTS

Operative mortality by indication was 2.2% (n = 11) for structural valve deterioration, 7.8% (n = 7) in those with infective endocarditis, and 7.5% (n = 3) for nonstructural valve deterioration/noninfective endocarditis, and by surgical approach 2.4% (n = 9) after radical explant, 4.0% (n = 10) for AVR-only, and 17% (n = 2) for allograft preservation. Operative adverse events occurred in 4.9% (n = 18) of radical explants and 2.8% (n = 7) of AVR-only procedures (P = .2). Patients undergoing radical explants received larger valves than those undergoing AVR-only (median, 25 vs 23 mm).

CONCLUSIONS

Aortic root allograft reoperations present a technical challenge but can be performed with low mortality and morbidity. Radical explant offers outcomes similar to AVR-only while allowing for implant of larger prostheses. Increasing experience with allograft reoperations has permitted excellent outcomes; thus, risk of reoperation should not dissuade surgeons from using allografts for invasive aortic valve infective endocarditis and other indications.

Beyond the Valve: Incidence, Outcomes, and Modifiable Factors of Acute Kidney Injury in Patients with Infective Endocarditis Undergoing Valve Surgery-A Retrospective, Single-Center Study

Background/Objectives: Infective endocarditis (IE) often requires surgical intervention, with postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), posing a significant concern. This retrospective study aimed to investigate AKI incidence, its impact on short-term mortality, and identify modifiable factors in patients with IE scheduled for valve surgery. Methods: This single-center study enrolled 130 consecutive IE patients from 2013 to 2021 undergoing valve surgery. The creatinine levels were monitored pre- and postoperatively, and AKI was defined by Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) criteria. Patient demographics, comorbidities, procedural details, and complications were recorded. Primary outcomes included AKI incidence; the relevance of creatinine levels for AKI detection; and the association of AKI with 30-, 60-, and 180-day mortality. Modifiable factors contributing to AKI were explored as secondary outcomes. Results: Postoperatively, 35.4% developed AKI. The highest creatinine elevation occurred on the second postoperative day. Best predictive value for AKI was a creatinine level of 1.35 mg/dL on the second day (AUC: 0.901; sensitivity: 0.89, specificity: 0.79). Elevated creatinine levels on the second day were robust predictors for short-term mortality at 30, 60, and 180 days postoperatively (AUC ranging from 0.708 to 0.789). CK-MB levels at 24 h postoperatively and minimum hemoglobin during surgery were identified as independent predictors for AKI in logistic regression. Conclusions: This study highlights the crucial role of creatinine levels in predicting short-term mortality in surgical IE patients. A specific threshold (1.35 mg/dL) provides a practical marker for risk stratification, offering insights for refining perioperative strategies and optimizing outcomes in this challenging patient population.

Native Infective Endocarditis: A State-of-the-Art-Review

Native valve infective endocarditis (NVE) is a global phenomenon, defined by infection of a native heart valve and involving the endocardial surface. The causes and epidemiology of the disease have evolved in recent decades, with a doubling of the average patient age. A higher incidence was observed in patients with implanted cardiac devices that can result in right-sided infection of the tricuspid valve. The microbiology of the disease has also changed. Previously, staphylococci, which are most often associated with health-care contact and invasive procedures, were the most common cause of the disease. This has now been superseded by streptococci. While innovative diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have emerged, mortality rates have not improved and remain at 30%, which is higher than that for many cancer diagnoses. The lack of randomized trials and logistical constraints impede clinical management, and long-standing controversies such as the use of antibiotic prophylaxis persist. This state of the art review addresses clinical practice, controversies, and strategies to combat this potentially devastating disease. A multidisciplinary team will be established to provide care for patients with presumptive NVE. The composition of the team will include specialists in cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, and infectious disease. The prompt administration of combination antimicrobial therapy is essential for effective NVE treatment. Additionally, a meticulous evaluation of each patient is necessary in order to identify any indications for immediate valve surgery. With the intention of promoting a more comprehensive understanding of the procedural management of native infective endocarditis and to furnish clinicians with a reference, the current evidence for the utilization of distinct strategies for the diagnosis and treatment of NVE are presented.

Infection of Transcatheter Valvular Devices

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review explores the epidemiology, clinical traits, and diagnosis of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement-Associated Infective Endocarditis (TAVR-IE) and mitral transcatheter edge-to-edge repair infective endocarditis (TEER-IE), focusing on a multimodal imaging approach. It addresses the rising prevalence of TAVR and TEER, emphasizing the need to understand long-term complications and clinical consequences, which poses significant challenges despite advancements in valve technology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Studies report a variable incidence of TAVR-IE and TEER-IE influenced by diverse patient risk profiles and procedural factors. Younger age, male gender, and certain comorbidities emerge as patient-related risk factors. Procedure-related factors include intervention location, valve type, and technical aspects. Microbiologically, Staphylococcus aureus, Viridans Group Streptococcus, and Enterococcus are frequently encountered pathogens. TAVR-IE and TEER-IE diagnosis involves a multimodal imaging approach due to limitations in echocardiography. Blood cultures and imaging aid identification, with Fluorescence in situ hybridization is showing promise. Treatment encompasses medical management with antibiotics and, when necessary, surgical intervention. The management approach requires a multidisciplinary "Endocarditis Team." This review underscores the need for continued research to refine risk prediction, enhance diagnostic accuracy, and optimize management strategies for TAVR-IE, considering the evolving landscape of transcatheter interventions.

The Role of Microbes in Surgical Decision Making for Infective Endocarditis: Mitral Valve Repair or Replacement?

BACKGROUND

The benefits of mitral repair versus replacement for endocarditis are inconclusive. This study compares outcomes of patients with infective endocarditis undergoing mitral valve repair versus replacement and investigates the impact of microbial etiology.

METHODS

All 251 patients undergoing mitral valve surgery for active endocarditis between 2010 and 2023 were enrolled, 180 (71.7%) replacement and 71 (28.3%) repair. To adjust for imbalances, inverse probability of treatment weighting was applied and 187 patients were obtained.

RESULTS

The analysis between groups, following the application of inverse probability of treatment weighting, showed no statistically significant differences across all considered outcomes. Early and late death was observed respectively in 6 (8.5%) and 11 (15.5%) patients in the repair group versus 24 (13.3%) and 45 (25.0%) in the replacement group without statistical significance (p = 0.221 and p = 0.446). Relapse occurred in six patients (8.5%) in the repair group after a median time of 4.0 months and in six (3.3%) in the replacement after 6.9 months (p = 0.071).

CONCLUSIONS

Surgical strategy in mitral endocarditis has no effect on major postoperative complications, mortality, or medium/long-term survival. Staphylococcus aureus and Coagulase-negative Staphylococci represent a risk for early mortality and relapse. However, mitral valve repair for endocarditis can be pursued when it ensures the complete eradication of all infected tissue, particularly in cases caused by Streptococcus infection, in young patients, and after a minimum of 18 days of antibiotic therapy.

Infective Endocarditis Due to High-Level Gentamicin-Resistant Enterococcus faecalis Complicated Multisystemic Complications in an Elderly Patient

The escalating incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) caused by aminoglycoside-resistant Enterococcus is a growing concern for clinicians. This issue is particularly pronounced in elderly patients, who face an elevated risk of renal damage during antibiotic treatment, thereby limiting available pharmacological options. Furthermore, elderly patients often present with multiple comorbidities, leading to heightened mortality rates. In this article, we present a case involving an elderly male patient who sought medical attention on two separate occasions due to inflammation of the lower extremities and lumbosacral pain. Subsequent diagnosis revealed infective endocarditis (IE) caused by high-level gentamicin-resistant Enterococcus faecalis through blood culture and echocardiography. The patient also experienced peripheral and cerebral arterial embolism, secondary spine infection, and subsequent heart failure, highlighting the severity of the clinical situation. Following an initial 10-day course of vancomycin and ceftriaxone therapy, the patient developed renal impairment, necessitating a switch to bactericidal therapy with ampicillin in combination with ceftriaxone. Additionally, aortic valve replacement was performed during this period. Ultimately, the patient achieved clinical remission. This case underscores the critical importance of prompt and accurate diagnosis, appropriate antibiotic selection, and timely surgical intervention in enhancing the prognosis of elderly patients with IE.

Statin therapy improves outcomes in infective endocarditis: evidence from a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Beyond its ability to decrease cholesterol, statin medication has been proved to have a variety of pleiotropic effects, such as anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effects. Statins are an appealing therapeutic option for individuals with infective endocarditis because of these effects, as the condition is linked to a strong inflammatory response.

METHODS

A comprehensive search was done in Medline/PubMed, Cochrane database (CENTRAL), and Google Scholar to identify relevant studies reporting outcomes of interest (rate of mortality, intensive care unit admission, and embolic events) comparing those who are on statin therapy to nonusers were included. We performed a random effect meta-analysis to pool each study's individual results.

RESULTS

Three articles were included in the study. The pooled results regarding our primary endpoint showed there was a significant reduction in mortality among statin users in all time points (1-year mortality: OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.61-0.79, I2: 0%; Chi2 = 0.01; p < 0.0001). Meta-analysis for the secondary outcome showed statin users are less frequently admitted to the intensive care unit (OR 0.73, 95% CI 0.59-0.90, I2: 0%; Chi2 = 0.00; p = 0.0004). The rate of mortality was significantly lower for those with a previous history of cerebrovascular disease who were on statin therapy compared to those without cerebrovascular diseases (CVD).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study support a significant association with statin therapy as a potential treatment proposed for individuals at risk of infective endocarditis.

18F-FDG PET/CT and Radiolabeled Leukocyte SPECT/CT Imaging for the Evaluation of Cardiovascular Infection in the Multimodality Context: ASNC Imaging Indications (ASNC I2) Series Expert Consensus Recommendations From ASNC, AATS, ACC, AHA, ASE, EANM, HRS, IDSA, SCCT, SNMMI, and STS

This document on cardiovascular infection, including infective endocarditis, is the first in the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Imaging Indications (ASNC I2) series to assess the role of radionuclide imaging in the multimodality context for the evaluation of complex systemic diseases with multisocietal involvement including pertinent disciplines. A rigorous modified Delphi approach was used to determine consensus clinical indications, diagnostic criteria, and an algorithmic approach to diagnosis of cardiovascular infection including infective endocarditis. Cardiovascular infection incidence is increasing and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current strategies based on clinical criteria and an initial echocardiographic imaging approach are effective but often insufficient in complicated cardiovascular infection. Radionuclide imaging with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography/CT leukocyte scintigraphy can enhance the evaluation of suspected cardiovascular infection by increasing diagnostic accuracy, identifying extracardiac involvement, and assessing cardiac implanted device pockets, leads, and all portions of ventricular assist devices. This advanced imaging can aid in key medical and surgical considerations. Consensus diagnostic features include focal/multifocal or diffuse heterogenous intense 18F-FDG uptake on valvular and prosthetic material, perivalvular areas, device pockets and leads, and ventricular assist device hardware persisting on non-attenuation corrected images. There are numerous clinical indications with a larger role in prosthetic valves, and cardiac devices particularly with possible infective endocarditis or in the setting of prior equivocal or non-diagnostic imaging. Illustrative cases incorporating these consensus recommendations provide additional clarification. Future research is necessary to refine application of these advanced imaging tools for surgical planning, to identify treatment response, and more.

Tricuspid valve repair for infective endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

The progressive increase in the use of implantable electronic devices, vascular access for dialysis and the increased life expectancy of patients with congenital heart diseases has led in recent years to a considerable number of right-side infective endocarditis, especially of the tricuspid valve (TV). Although current guidelines recommend TV repair for native tricuspid valve endocarditis (TVE), the percentage of valve replacements remains very high in numerous studies. The aim of our study is to analyse our experience in the treatment of TVE with a reparative approach.

METHODS

This case series includes all the patients who underwent surgery for acute or healed infective endocarditis on the native TV, at the Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc (Bruxelles, Belgium) between February 2001 and December 2020.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were included in the study. Twenty-eight (90.3%) underwent TV repair and 3 (9.7%) had a TV replacement with a mitral homograft. The repair group was divided into 2 subgroups, according to whether a patch was used during surgery or not. Hospital mortality was 33.3% (n = 1) for the replacement group and 7.1% (n = 2) for repair (P = 0.25). Overall survival at 10 years was 75.6% [95% confidence interval (CI): 52-89%]. Further, freedom from reoperation on the TV at 10 years was 59.3% (95% CI: 7.6-89%) vs 93.7% (95% CI: 63-99%) (P = 0.4) for patch repair and no patch use respectively. Freedom from recurrent endocarditis at 10 years was 87% (95% CI: 51-97%).

CONCLUSIONS

Considering that TVE is more common in young patients, a repair-oriented approach should be considered as the first choice. In the case of extremely damaged valves, the use of pericardial patch is a valid option. If repair is not feasible, the use of a mitral homograft is an additional useful solution to reduce the prosthetic material.

Perioperative care in infective endocarditis

Patients undergoing surgery for acute infective endocarditis are among those with the highest risk. Their preoperative condition has significant impact on outcomes. There are specific issues related with the preoperative situation, intraoperative findings, and postoperative management. In this narrative review, focus is placed on the most critical aspects in the perioperative period including the management and weaning from mechanical ventilation, the management of vasoplegia, the management of the chest open, antithrombotic therapy, transfusion, coagulopathy, management of atrial fibrillation, the duration of antibiotic therapy, and pacemaker implantation.

Outcomes after surgery for infective endocarditis

The role of surgery in infective endocarditis is becoming established the world over. In spite of all recent advances, endocarditis remains a lethal disease following surgery. With the emergence of more difficult-to-treat microorganisms, sicker and older patients with multiple co-morbidities, and an increase in healthcare-associated infections, the need for surgery in the management of infective endocarditis is only bound to increase. Data on the use of surgery in endocarditis till date is largely from observational data due to the relative rarity of the disease and variable practice patterns around the world. Hopefully, with increasing awareness and more inter-institutional and international collaborations, more robust data will emerge to further establish the role of surgery. For the time being, individual patient management will require the active multi-disciplinary approach of an endocarditis team to provide the best possible outcomes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01647-9.

Management of cardiopulmonary bypass in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic strokes in surgery for active infective endocarditis

Stroke and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) are serious complications that are difficult to manage during surgery for active infectious endocarditis (AIE). Relevant society guidelines still recommend delaying the cardiac surgery for AIE with ICH for 4 weeks. Some early studies indicated that the mortality rate decreases when cardiac surgery for ICH is delayed. In contrast, some reported that surgical intervention should not be delayed if an early operation is demanded, even in patients with ICH. The current literature on early vs. late surgery for infectious endocarditis (IE) with ICH is conflicting. Changing the cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) strategy might be necessary to improve the surgical outcomes of IE with ICH. Some studies reported that cardiac surgery using nafamostat mesylate (NM) as an alternative anticoagulant during CPB was performed successfully. The combination of NM and low-dose heparin was beneficial for early surgery in patients with AIE complicated by cerebral infarction and ICH, without worsening cerebral lesions. In this report, we review and discuss the management of CPB in patients with ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke during surgery for AIE.

Aortic valve replacement with rapid-deployment bioprosthesis in case of infective endocarditis: a literature review

Purpose

Recently, the use of rapid deployment (RD) aortic valve prostheses has been introduced for the treatment of aortic valve replacement (AVR), showing excellent hemodynamic performances.According to these data, some groups have proposed new RD valves as an alternative solution in the case of infective aortic endocarditis (IAE) to reduce the use of foreign materials, and the manipulation of the annulus.The aim of this review is to report the results of early clinical experiences with the use of RD bioprostheses in the case of IAE, in order to discuss technical and clinical aspects of this emerging strategy to better elucidate its advantages and limitations as a potential therapeutic solution.

Methods

An in-depth search of PubMed from January to March 2023 was performed. English-language articles were selected independently by authors following the criteria in order to consider all available experiences (full papers, case reports, and case series) that have investigated the use of RD in case of IAE.

Results

The use of rapid deployment bioprosthesis represents a bailout strategy in case of severe aortic valve endocarditis and should be evaluated with caution in selected cases. This review collects the first, initial, and pioneering experiences of the use of the RD prosthesis in case of infective endocarditis, particularly when the fragility of the annular tissues precludes a secure anchoring of sutured prostheses.The reduced use of foreign materials by minimizing the number of stitches, the reduced cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and aortic cross-clamp times, and the excellent hemodynamic performances associated with the use of RD bioprosthesis represent the most important advantages that could justify their use in the setting of aortic valve endocarditis.

Conclusion

Although there are few anecdotal experiences, surgical aortic valve replacement with the use of RD represents an emerging strategy in case of aortic valve endocarditis. Its advantages, pros, and cons are under debate, and robust clinical trials are needed to demonstrate its safety and efficacy.

18F-FDG PET/CT and radiolabeled leukocyte SPECT/CT imaging for the evaluation of cardiovascular infection in the multimodality context: ASNC Imaging Indications (ASNC I2) Series Expert Consensus Recommendations from ASNC, AATS, ACC, AHA, ASE, EANM, HRS, IDSA, SCCT, SNMMI, and STS

This document on cardiovascular infection, including infective endocarditis, is the first in the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Imaging Indications (ASNC I2) series to assess the role of radionuclide imaging in the multimodality context for the evaluation of complex systemic diseases with multi-societal involvement including pertinent disciplines. A rigorous modified Delphi approach was used to determine consensus clinical indications, diagnostic criteria, and an algorithmic approach to diagnosis of cardiovascular infection including infective endocarditis. Cardiovascular infection incidence is increasing and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current strategies based on clinical criteria and an initial echocardiographic imaging approach are effective but often insufficient in complicated cardiovascular infection. Radionuclide imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography/CT leukocyte scintigraphy can enhance the evaluation of suspected cardiovascular infection by increasing diagnostic accuracy, identifying extracardiac involvement, and assessing cardiac implanted device pockets, leads, and all portions of ventricular assist devices. This advanced imaging can aid in key medical and surgical considerations. Consensus diagnostic features include focal/multi-focal or diffuse heterogenous intense 18F-FDG uptake on valvular and prosthetic material, perivalvular areas, device pockets and leads, and ventricular assist device hardware persisting on non-attenuation corrected images. There are numerous clinical indications with a larger role in prosthetic valves, and cardiac devices particularly with possible infective endocarditis or in the setting of prior equivocal or non-diagnostic imaging. Illustrative cases incorporating these consensus recommendations provide additional clarification. Future research is necessary to refine application of these advanced imaging tools for surgical planning, to identify treatment response, and more.

Tricuspid valve repair and replacement for infective endocarditis

Infective endocarditis represents a challenging and life-threatening clinical condition affecting native and prosthetic heart valves, endocardium, and implanted cardiac devices. Right-sided infective endocarditis account for approximately 5-10% of all infective endocarditis and are often associated with intravenous drug use, intracardiac devices, central venous catheters, and congenital heart disease. The tricuspid valve is involved in 90% of right-side infective endocarditis. The primary treatment of tricuspid valve infective endocarditis is based on long-term intravenous antibiotics. When surgery is required, different interventions have been proposed, ranging from valvectomy to various types of valve repair to complete replacement of the valve. Percutaneous removal of vegetations using the AngioVac system has also been proposed in these patients. The aim of this narrative review is to provide an overview of the current surgical options and to discuss the results of the different surgical strategies in patients with tricuspid valve infective endocarditis.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s12055-023-01650-0.

Clinical Features and Patient Outcomes in Infective Endocarditis with Surgical Indication: A Single-Centre Experience

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis (IE) is marked by a heightened risk of embolic events (EEs), uncontrolled infection, or heart failure (HF).

METHODS

Patients with IE and surgical indication were enrolled from October 2015 to December 2018. The primary endpoint consisted of a composite of major adverse events (MAEs) including all-cause death, hospitalizations, and IE relapses. The secondary endpoint was all-cause death.

RESULTS

A total of 102 patients (66 ± 14 years) were enrolled: 50% with IE on prosthesis, 33% with IE-associated heart failure (IE-aHF), and 38.2% with EEs. IE-aHF and EEs were independently associated with MAEs (HR 1.9, 95% CI 1.1-3.4, p = 0.03 and HR 2.1, 95% CI 1.2-3.6, p = 0.01, respectively) and Kaplan-Meier survival curves confirmed a strong difference in MAE-free survival of patients with EEs and IE-aHF (p < 0.01 for both). IE-aHF (HR 4.3, 95% CI 1.4-13, p < 0.01), CRP at admission (HR 5.6, 95% CI 1.4-22.2, p = 0.01), LVEF (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.9-1, p < 0.05), abscess (HR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.6, p < 0.05), and prosthetic detachment (HR 4.6, 95% CI 1.5-14.1, p < 0.01) were independently associated with the all-cause death endpoint.

CONCLUSIONS

IE-aHF and EEs were independently associated with MAEs. IE-aHF was also independently associated with the secondary endpoint.

Recent Insights Into Native Valve Infective Endocarditis: JACC Focus Seminar 4/4

This focused review highlights the latest issues in native valve infective endocarditis. Native valve disease moderately increases the risk of developing infective endocarditis. In 2023, new diagnostic criteria were published by the Duke-International Society of Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases group. New pathogens were designated as typical, and findings on computed tomography imaging were included as diagnostic criteria. It is now recognized that a multidisciplinary approach to care is vital, and the role of an "endocarditis team" is highlighted. Recent studies have suggested that a transition from intravenous to oral antibiotics in selected patients may be reasonable, and the role of long-acting antibiotics is discussed. It is also now clear that an aggressive surgical approach can be life-saving in some patients. Finally, results of several recent studies have suggested there is an association between dental and other invasive procedures and an increased risk of developing infective endocarditis. Moreover, data indicate that antibiotic prophylaxis may be effective in some scenarios.

Repair of a fistula between the aorta and right ventricular outflow tract secondary to infective endocarditis of a unicuspid aortic valve and previously repaired ventricular septal defect

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis of the aortic valve can result in a wide range of destructive pathology beyond the valve leaflets and annulus which require careful surgical planning to provide appropriate debridement and reconstruction. Failure to do so can result in a failure of surgical treatment, recurrent infection and cardiac failure with concomitant high morbidity and mortality.

CASE REPORT

We describe the case of a 45-year-old male with previous patch repair of a ventricular septal defect, who was diagnosed with sub-acute bacterial endocarditis of the native aortic valve and developed a new fistula from the aorta to the right ventricular outflow tract which. This was managed surgically.

CONCLUSION

This unique case highlights another spectrum of infective endocarditis with a unique approach to repair and management.

18F-FDG PET/CT and radiolabeled leukocyte SPECT/CT imaging for the evaluation of cardiovascular infection in the multimodality context: ASNC Imaging Indications (ASNC I2) Series Expert Consensus Recommendations from ASNC, AATS, ACC, AHA, ASE, EANM, HRS, IDSA, SCCT, SNMMI, and STS

This document on cardiovascular infection, including infective endocarditis, is the first in the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Imaging Indications (ASNC I2) series to assess the role of radionuclide imaging in the multimodality context for the evaluation of complex systemic diseases with multi-societal involvement including pertinent disciplines. A rigorous modified Delphi approach was used to determine consensus clinical indications, diagnostic criteria, and an algorithmic approach to diagnosis of cardiovascular infection including infective endocarditis. Cardiovascular infection incidence is increasing and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current strategies based on clinical criteria and an initial echocardiographic imaging approach are effective but often insufficient in complicated cardiovascular infection. Radionuclide imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (CT) and single photon emission computed tomography/CT leukocyte scintigraphy can enhance the evaluation of suspected cardiovascular infection by increasing diagnostic accuracy, identifying extracardiac involvement, and assessing cardiac implanted device pockets, leads, and all portions of ventricular assist devices. This advanced imaging can aid in key medical and surgical considerations. Consensus diagnostic features include focal/multi-focal or diffuse heterogenous intense 18F-FDG uptake on valvular and prosthetic material, perivalvular areas, device pockets and leads, and ventricular assist device hardware persisting on non-attenuation corrected images. There are numerous clinical indications with a larger role in prosthetic valves, and cardiac devices particularly with possible infective endocarditis or in the setting of prior equivocal or non-diagnostic imaging. Illustrative cases incorporating these consensus recommendations provide additional clarification. Future research is necessary to refine application of these advanced imaging tools for surgical planning, to identify treatment response, and more.

Case Report: Can preoperative implantation of veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation lead to embolic events in infective endocarditis?

Early-stage infective endocarditis (IE) can lead to severe complications, including infarctions and metastatic infections caused by inflammatory embolus shedding. Common embolism sites include the brain, spleen, kidneys, lungs, and intestines. Additionally, acute heart failure (AHF) can occur in up to 40% of cases, and its presence can impact the clinical outcomes of patients with IE. Cardiogenic shock (CGS) is often more likely to occur after AHF has taken place. If bacteria invade the blood, infectious shock can occur. Patients with IE can experience simple CGS, septic shock, or a combination of the two. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) typically serves as a Bridge for Heart failure and Cardiogenic shock. Previous research indicates that there are limited reports of ECMO support for patients with IE after CGS has occurred. Because CGS may occur at any time during IE treatment, it is important to understand the timing of ECMO auxiliary support and how to carry out comprehensive treatment after support. Timely treatment can help to reduce or avoid the occurrence of serious complications and improve the prognosis of patients with IE. Our work combines a case study to review the ECMO support of IE patients after CGS through a literature review. Overall, we suggest that when patients with IE have large bacterial thrombosis and a greater risk of shedding, it is recommended to carefully evaluate the indications and contraindications for ECMO after discussion by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). Still, active surgical treatment at an early stage is recommended.

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a disease with high in-hospital mortality. The objective of the present investigation was to develop and validate a nomogram that precisely anticipates in-hospital mortality in ICU individuals diagnosed with infective endocarditis.

METHODS

Retrospectively collected clinical data of patients with IE admitted to the ICU in the MIMIC IV database were analyzed using the Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) regression to identify potential hazards. A logistic regression model incorporating multiple factors was established, and a dynamic nomogram was generated to facilitate predictions. To assess the classification performance of the model, an ROC curve was generated, and the AUC value was computed as an indicator of its diagnostic accuracy. The model was subjected to calibration curve analysis and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test to assess its goodness of fit. To evaluate the clinical relevance of the model, decision-curve analysis (DCA) was conducted.

RESULTS

The research involved a total of 676 patients, who were divided into two cohorts: a training cohort comprising 473 patients and a validation cohort comprising 203 patients. The allocation ratio between the two cohorts was 7:3. Based on the independent predictors identified through LASSO regression, the final selection for constructing the prediction model included five variables: lactate, bicarbonate, white blood cell count (WBC), platelet count, and prothrombin time (PT). The nomogram model demonstrated a robust diagnostic ability in both the cohorts used for training and validation. This is supported by the respective area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.843 and 0.891. The results of the calibration curves and HL tests exhibited acceptable conformity between observed and predicted outcomes. According to the DCA analysis, the nomogram model demonstrated a notable overall clinical advantage compared to the APSIII and SAPSII scoring systems.

CONCLUSIONS

The nomogram developed during the study proved to be highly accurate in forecasting the mortality of patients with IE during hospitalization in the ICU. As a result, it may be useful for clinicians in decision-making and treatment.

18F-FDG PET/CT and radiolabeled leukocyte SPECT/CT imaging for the evaluation of cardiovascular infection in the multimodality context: ASNC Imaging Indications (ASNC I2) Series Expert Consensus Recommendations from ASNC, AATS, ACC, AHA, ASE, EANM, HRS, IDSA, SCCT, SNMMI, and STS

This document on cardiovascular infection, including infective endocarditis, is the first in the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology Imaging Indications (ASNC I2) series to assess the role of radionuclide imaging in the multimodality context for the evaluation of complex systemic diseases with multi-societal involvement including pertinent disciplines. A rigorous modified Delphi approach was used to determine consensus clinical indications, diagnostic criteria, and an algorithmic approach to diagnosis of cardiovascular infection including infective endocarditis. Cardiovascular infection incidence is increasing and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Current strategies based on clinical criteria and an initial echocardiographic imaging approach are effective but often insufficient in complicated cardiovascular infection. Radionuclide imaging with 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and single photon emission computed tomography/CT leukocyte scintigraphy can enhance the evaluation of suspected cardiovascular infection by increasing diagnostic accuracy, identifying extracardiac involvement, and assessing cardiac implanted device pockets, leads, and all portions of ventricular assist devices. This advanced imaging can aid in key medical and surgical considerations. Consensus diagnostic features include focal/multi-focal or diffuse heterogenous intense 18F-FDG uptake on valvular and prosthetic material, perivalvular areas, device pockets and leads, and ventricular assist device hardware persisting on non-attenuation corrected images. There are numerous clinical indications with a larger role in prosthetic valves, and cardiac devices particularly with possible infective endocarditis or in the setting of prior equivocal or non-diagnostic imaging. Illustrative cases incorporating these consensus recommendations provide additional clarification. Future research is necessary to refine application of these advanced imaging tools for surgical planning, to identify treatment response, and more.

Endocarditis

Infectious endocarditis (IE) is a universally fatal condition if left unmanaged, requiring urgent evaluation and treatment. Fever, new heart murmur, vegetations found by echocardiogram, and bacteremia are the most common symptoms and findings. Blood cultures and echocardiography are obligatory diagnostic modalities and should be used with the modified Duke criteria, the accepted diagnostic aid, when establishing a diagnosis of IE. When IE is suspected, consultations with cardiology, infectious disease, and cardiothoracic surgery teams should be made early. Staphylococci, Streptococci, and Enterococci are common pathogens, necessitating bactericidal antimicrobial therapy. Importantly, up to 50% of patients with IE will require cardiothoracic surgical intervention.

Infective Endocarditis in Patients Addicted to Injected Opioid Drugs

BACKGROUND

Persons who inject drugs and require surgery for infective endocarditis have 2 potentially lethal diseases. Current postoperative rehabilitation efforts seem ineffective in preventing loss to follow-up, injection drug use relapse (relapse), and death.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to characterize drug use, psychosocial issues, surgical outcome, and postoperative addiction management, as well as loss to follow-up, relapse, and mortality and their risk factors.

METHODS

From January 2010 to June 2020, 227 persons who inject drugs, age 36 ± 9.9 years, underwent surgery for infective endocarditis at a quaternary hospital having special interest in developing addiction management programs. Postsurgery loss to follow-up, relapse, and death were assessed as competing risks and risk factors identified parametrically and by machine learning. CIs are 68% (±1 SE).

RESULTS

Heroin was the most self-reported drug injected (n = 183 [81%]). Psychosocial issues included homelessness (n = 56 [25%]), justice system involvement (n = 150 [66%]), depression (n = 118 [52%]), anxiety (n = 104 [46%]), and post-traumatic stress disorder (n = 33 [15%]). Four (1.8%) died in-hospital. Medication for opioid use disorder prescribed at discharge increased from 0% in 2010 to 100% in 2020. At 1 and 5 years, conditional probabilities of loss to follow-up were 16% (68% CI: 13%-22%) and 59% (68% CI: 44%-65%), relapse 32% (68% CI: 28%-34%) and 79% (68% CI: 74%-83%), and mortality 21% (68% CI: 18%-23%) and 68% (68% CI: 62%-72%). Younger age, heroin use, and lower education level were predictors of relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

Infective endocarditis surgery can be performed with low mortality in persons who inject drugs, but addiction is far more lethal. Risk of loss to follow-up and relapse require more effective addiction strategies without which this major loss to society will continue.

The Surgical Treatment of Infective Endocarditis: A Comprehensive Review

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a severe cardiac complication with high mortality rates, especially when surgical intervention is delayed or absent. This review addresses the expanding role of surgery in managing IE, focusing on the variation in surgical treatment rates, the impact of patient demographics, and the effectiveness of different surgical approaches. Despite varying global data, a notable increase in surgical interventions for IE is evident, with over 50% of patients undergoing surgery in tertiary centres. This review synthesizes information from focused literature searches up to July 2023, covering preoperative to postoperative considerations and surgical strategies for IE. Key preoperative concerns include accurate diagnosis, appropriate antimicrobial treatment, and the timing of surgery, which is particularly crucial for patients with heart failure or at risk of embolism. Surgical approaches vary based on valve involvement, with mitral valve repair showing promising outcomes compared to replacement. Aortic valve surgery, traditionally favouring replacement, now includes repair as a viable option. Emerging techniques such as sutureless valves and aortic homografts are explored, highlighting their potential advantages in specific IE cases. The review also delves into high-risk groups like intravenous drug users and the elderly, emphasizing the need for tailored surgical strategies. With an increasing number of patients presenting with prosthetic valve endocarditis and device-related IE, the review underscores the importance of comprehensive management strategies encompassing surgical and medical interventions. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive overview of current evidence in the surgical management of IE, highlighting the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach and ongoing research to optimize patient outcomes.

Cutaneous signs of selected cardiovascular disorders: A narrative review

Cardiovascular diseases are the leading cause of mortality and morbidity globally. Clinicians must know cutaneous signs of cardiovascular disease, including petechiae, macules, purpura, lentigines, and rashes. Although cutaneous manifestations of diseases like infectious endocarditis and acute rheumatic fever are well established, there is an indispensable need to evaluate other important cardiovascular diseases accompanied by cutaneous signs. Moreover, discussing the latest management strategies in this regard is equally imperative. This review discusses distinctive skin findings that help narrow the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases and recommendations on appropriate treatment.

Enterococcus faecalis Endocarditis of All Four Native Valves: A Case Report

Enterococcus faecalis is commonly implicated in Infective Endocarditis (IE), resulting in remarkable morbidity and mortality. We present an unusual case documenting the clinical course and outcome of an elderly female patient who developed quadruple valve endocarditis due to Enterococcus faecalis infection. She presented with altered mental status, resulting in hospitalization, and was found to have bacteremia complicated by endocarditis, epidural abscess, discitis, and splenic infarction. Urinalysis was consistent with bacterial infection two days before being admitted to the hospital. Unfortunately, despite aggressive therapeutic regimens, the patient died.  This is one of the few documented endocarditis cases involving all heart valves. It reviews the importance of maintaining a high index of clinical suspicion for assessing IE, with a low threshold for performing a transesophageal echocardiogram as a diagnostic tool.

A Contemporary Review of the Use of Extracorporeal CytoSorb® Hemoadsorption Therapy in Patients with Infective Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis (IE) is a rare but severe disease with high morbidity and mortality. Cardiac surgery plays a major role in the contemporary clinical management of IE patients. During cardiac surgery, cardiopulmonary bypass significantly contributes to an increased risk of organ dysfunction and mortality by inducing an acute inflammatory response, vascular endothelial cell injury, impairment of the coagulation cascade, and ischemia-reperfusion injury. During the past decade, the use of extracorporeal hemoadsorption therapy with the CytoSorb® hemoadsorber (CytoSorbents Europe GmbH, Berlin, Germany) has been proposed as an adjuvant therapy to mediate inflammatory responses in IE patients undergoing cardiac surgery with cardiopulmonary bypass. However, there is currently no systematic evaluation of the effect of CytoSorb® hemoadsorption on clinical outcomes such as hemodynamics, organ dysfunction, and mortality in patients with IE. Therefore, in this review, we exclusively discuss contemporary findings concerning the rationale, clinical evidence, and future perspectives for CytoSorb® hemoadsorption therapy in IE patients.

Quadruple valve replacement for patient with infective endocarditis 16 years after Fallot's Tetralogy Repair procedure: A case report

A 33-year-old man, who had previously undergone repair for Tetralogy of Fallot, presented with extensive infective endocarditis. Following thorough preoperative preparation and evaluation, we performed a simultaneous quadruple valve replacement alongside the repatching of the remaining defect. We posit that this comprehensive one-stage surgical intervention not only enhanced the patient's quality of life but also reduced the necessity for future reoperations. Our approach offers valuable insights for managing adult patients with repaired congenital heart diseases and multiple valve pathologies.

Impact of Aortic Root Abscess on Surgical Outcomes of Infective Endocarditis

Locally destructive infective endocarditis (IE) of the aortic valve complicated by abscess formation in the aortic root may seriously affect patients' outcomes. Surgical repair of such conditions is often challenging. This is a single-center observational analysis of consecutive patients treated surgically for IE between 2009 and 2019. We divided the cohort into two groups considering the presence of an aortic root abscess and compared the characteristics and postoperative outcomes of patients accordingly. Moreover, we examined three different procedures performed in abscess patients regarding operative data and postoperative results: an isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (AVR), AVR with patch reconstruction of the aortic root (AVR + RR) or the Bentall procedure. The whole cohort comprised 665 patients, including 140 (21.0%) patients with an aortic root abscess and 525 (78.9%) as the control group. The abscess group of patients received either AVR (66.4%), AVR + RR (17.8%), or the Bentall procedure (15.7%). The mean age in the whole cohort was 62.1 ± 14.8. The mean EuroSCORE II was 8.0 ± 3.5 in the abscess group and 8.4 ± 3.7 in the control group (p = 0.259). The 30-day and 1-year mortality rates were 19.6% vs. 11.3% (p = 0.009) and 40.1% vs. 29.6% (p = 0.016) in the abscess compared to the control group. The multivariable regression analysis did not reveal aortic root abscess as an independent predictor of mortality. Rather, age > 60 correlated with 30-day mortality and infection with Streptococcus spp. correlated with 1-year mortality. In the analysis according to the performed procedures, KM estimates exhibited comparable long-term survival (log-rank p = 0.325). IE recurrence was noticed in 12.3% of patients after AVR, 26.7% after AVR + RR and none after Bentall (p = 0.069). We concluded that patients with an aortic root abscess suffer worse short and long-term outcomes compared to other IE patients. The post-procedural survival among ARA patients did not significantly vary based on the procedures performed.

Isolated mitral valve endocarditis: Patient, disease, and surgical factors that influence outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to investigate patient characteristics, valve pathology, bacteriology, and surgical techniques related to outcome of patients who underwent surgery for isolated native (NVE) or prosthetic (PVE) mitral valve endocarditis.

METHODS

From January 2002 to January 2020, 447 isolated mitral endocarditis operations were performed, 326 for NVE and 121 for PVE. Multivariable analysis of time-related outcomes used random forest machine learning.

RESULTS

Staphylococcus aureus was the most common causative organism. Of 326 patients with NVE, 88 (27%) underwent standard mitral valve repair, 43 (13%) extended repair, and 195 (60%) valve replacement. Compared with NVE with standard repair, patients who underwent all other operations were older, had more comorbidities, worse cardiac function, and more invasive disease. Hospital mortality was 3.8% (n = 17); 0 (0%) after standard valve repair, 3 (7.0%) after extended repair, 8 (4.1%) after NVE replacement, and 6 (5.0%) after PVE re-replacement. Survival at 1, 5, and 10 years was 91%, 75%, and 62% after any repair and 86%, 62%, and 44% after replacement, respectively. The most important risk factor for mortality was renal failure. Risk-adjusted outcomes, including survival, were similar in all groups. Unadjusted extended repair outcomes, particularly early, were similar or worse than replacement in terms of reinfection, reintervention, regurgitation, gradient, and survival.

CONCLUSIONS

A patient- and pathology-tailored approach to surgery for isolated mitral valve endocarditis has low mortality and excellent results. Apparent superiority of standard valve repair is related to patient characteristics and pathology. Renal failure is the most powerful risk factor. In case of extensive destruction, extended repair shows no benefit over replacement.

B-type natriuretic peptide levels at admission predict the prognosis of patients with infective endocarditis undergoing cardiac surgery

Purpose: The objective of this study was to explore the relationship between elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) levels and the prognosis of patients with infective endocarditis (IE) undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: In total, 162 IE patients with recorded BNP levels upon admission were included in the present study. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. Results: Multivariate Cox analysis revealed a significant association between log BNP and all-cause mortality. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed a poorer prognosis for patients with BNP levels ≥ the 75th percentile. Furthermore, the linear trend test indicated a significant link between BNP quartiles and the primary end point within the models. Conclusion: Elevated BNP levels upon admission could predict all-cause mortality in IE patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

A Nationwide Study on Mitral Valve Repair vs Replacement for Active Endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Real-world evidence supporting the reproducibility and superiority of valve repair over replacement in active mitral valve infective endocarditis is lacking.

METHODS

Data from a prospective nationwide database, including all cardiac surgical procedures in The Netherlands, were used. Adult patients undergoing primary mitral valve intervention who had a diagnosis of active infective endocarditis and who underwent surgery between 2013 and 2020 were included. Survival analysis was performed for the whole follow-up period as well as after applying the landmark of 90 days.

RESULTS

Of 715 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 294 (41.1%) underwent valve repair. Mitral valve repair rates decreased slightly over the course of the study. The early mortality rate was 13.0%, and a trend of steadily declining early mortality rates over the course of the study, despite a steady increase in patient complexity, was observed. On risk-adjusted analysis, mitral valve replacement demonstrated inferior results when compared with valve repair (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.216; 95% CI, 1.425-3.448; P < .001), even after a landmark analysis was performed (adjusted hazard ratio 2.489; 95% CI, 1.124-5.516; P = .025). These results were confirmed by a propensity score-adjusted analysis (adjusted hazard ratio 2.251; 95% CI, 1.029-4.21; P = .042).

CONCLUSIONS

Contemporary trends in mitral valve surgery for active infective endocarditis suggest growing patient complexity but slightly declining early mortality rates. A trend of decreasing mitral valve repair rates was seen. The results of this study suggest improved late outcomes of valve repair compared with valve replacement.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Infective Endocarditis Management and Outcomes: Analysis of a National Clinical Database

COVID-19 has widely affected health care delivery, but its impact on the management of infective endocarditis (IE), including valve surgery, is uncertain. We compared the national trends in admissions, demographics, and outcomes of IE before and after COVID-19 onset, using a national sample of IE admissions between 2016 and 2022 from the Vizient Clinical Database. The pre-COVID-19 and post-COVID-19 time periods were separated by the start of the second quarter of 2020, the time during which the COVID-19 pandemic was declared. For all admissions and for admissions involving valve surgery, pre-COVID-19 versus post-COVID-19 baseline characteristics and outcomes were compared using 2-sample t tests or chi-square tests. Propensity score-matched cohorts were similarly compared. Before COVID-19, there were 82,867 overall and 11,337 valve-related surgical admissions, and after COVID-19, there were 45,672 overall and 6,322 valve-related surgical admissions. In the matched analysis for all admissions, the in-hospital mortality increased from 11.4% to 12.4% after COVID-19 onset (p <0.001); in-hospital stroke (4.9% vs 6.0%, p <0.001), myocardial infarction (1.3% vs 1.4%, p = 0.03), and aspiration pneumonia (1.8% vs 2.4%, p <0.001) also increased, whereas other complications remained stable. In the matched analysis of surgical admissions, there was decreased in-hospital mortality (7.7% vs 6.7%, p = 0.03) and intensive care unit stay (8.5 ± 12.5 vs 8.0 ± 12.6 days, p = 0.04); other outcomes remained stable. In conclusion, patients admitted with IE after COVID-19 were more medically complex with worsened outcomes and mortality, whereas patients who underwent valve surgery had stable outcomes and improved mortality despite the pandemic.

A 73-Year-Old Woman with a Fall

A 73-Year-Old Woman with a FallA 73-year-old woman who had a cholecystectomy 2 months ago presented for evaluation after a fall. How do you approach the evaluation, and what is your differential diagnosis?

A 7-Year-Old Boy with Fever and Dark Urine

A 7-Year-Old Boy with Fever and Dark UrineA 7-year-old boy with surgically repaired tetralogy of Fallot presented for evaluation of fever and dark urine. How do you approach the evaluation, and what is the diagnosis?

Outcomes of double-valve surgery for infective endocarditis are improving in the modern era

BACKGROUND

The incidence of infective endocarditis (IE) is rapidly increasing. Contemporary outcomes following high-risk double valve surgery (DVS) for IE are not well described.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2021, 211 patients with IE underwent combined aortic and mitral valve surgery at a tertiary care referral center. Data from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons registry, including demographics, operative details, and outcomes, were collected. Risk factors for 30-day and 1-year-mortality were analyzed. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

The study cohort had a male preponderance (73%), with a median age of 56 years (interquartile range [IQR], 44 to 63 years). Forty-five patients (21%) had a history of intravenous (IV) drug abuse, 50 (24%) were on preoperative dialysis, and 50 (24%) had prosthetic valve endocarditis. Thirty-day and 1-year mortality were 14% (n = 30) and 30% (n = 61), respectively. On multivariable Cox regression adjusting for age, prosthetic valve endocarditis, postoperative intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), history of dialysis (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 2.9; P = .002) and IV drug abuse (aHR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.1-3.5; P = .02) were predictive of decreased survival. Undergoing surgery after 2010 was predictive of improved survival (aHR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3 to 0.8; P = .006). These patients were more likely to undergo urgent/emergent surgery (83% vs 29%; P < .001) and less likely to have an aortic root abscess (40% vs 58%; P = .03) or to require the commando procedure (13% vs 33%; P = .002).

CONCLUSIONS

In this large series evaluating outcomes of DVS for IE in the modern era, although the mortality risk remained elevated, improving outcomes may be associated with earlier surgical intervention before significant disease progression. Multidisciplinary evaluation for complex IE may be considered to better understand the optimal timing and repair strategy.

Glomerulonephritis Associated With Infected Cardiac Pacemaker Lead Mimics Infective Endocarditis-Associated Glomerulonephritis With Resolution After Lead Removal: A Case Report and Literature Review

The incidence of cardiac pacemaker lead infections is increasing due to the rise in cardiac implantable device use. These infections mimic infective endocarditis (IE) and cause a variety of complications. However, there is a scarcity of knowledge regarding glomerulonephritis (GN) resulting from cardiac pacemaker-lead infections. This report describes a 71-year-old female who presented with GN associated with a cardiac pacemaker-lead infection. The patient was successfully treated with intravenous (IV) antibiotics, IV steroids, and early surgical removal of the cardiac pacemaker lead, resulting in the resolution of GN. Current guidelines do not address cardiac pacemaker lead infection-associated GN as an indication for lead removal. Given the success of our treatment approach and the rising incidence of cardiac pacemaker infections, we suggest the consideration of early surgical removal of the cardiac lead, in conjunction with antibiotics and steroids, for the treatment of cardiac lead infection associated with GN. Further research is necessary to determine the prevalence and optimal management of this complication.

Infective endocarditis after surgical aortic or mitral valve replacement: A nationwide population-based study

OBJECTIVE

Evidence regarding the incidence of prosthetic valve endocarditis and its association with the use of mechanical or biologic prosthetic valves is limited.

METHODS

Patients who underwent aortic or mitral valve replacement in the years 2000 to 2017 were identified from Taiwan's National Health Insurance Research Database and grouped according to the type of prosthesis used (mechanical or biologic). Propensity score matching was performed to reduce confounding.

RESULTS

A total of 22,844 patients were included, with 11,950 (52.2%) and 10,934 (47.8%) in the mechanical prosthesis and biologic prosthesis groups, respectively. After matching, each group contained 5441 patients. During follow-up, patients with a biologic prosthesis had a significantly higher risk of infective endocarditis (IE) than those with a mechanical valve (3.4% vs 1.9%; subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.78; 95% CI, 1.40-2.26). Moreover, biologic prostheses were associated with greater risks of all-cause mortality and redo valve surgery, but lesser risks of ischemic stroke, hemorrhagic stroke, major bleeding, and gastrointestinal bleeding. In subgroup analysis, biologic prostheses were consistently associated with a greater risk of IE in all subgroups, specifically single-valve replacement-aortic, single-valve replacement-mitral, double-valve replacement, active IE (IE diagnosed during index hospitalization), any IE (active or old), and not having a history of IE.

CONCLUSIONS

In this nationwide population-based retrospective cohort study, biologic prosthesis use was associated with a greater risk of IE during follow-up compared with mechanical valve use. However, mechanical valve use was associated with a greater risk of ischemic stroke and hemorrhagic complications.

Contemporary Features and Management of Endocarditis

Infective endocarditis is a rare but devastating disease. Morbidity and mortality rates have failed to improve despite new technological advances. The disease has evolved over time with new significant populations at risk-most notably those with prosthetic valves or implantable cardiovascular devices. These devices pose new challenges for achieving a timely and accurate diagnosis of infection. While the modified Duke criteria is accepted as the gold standard for diagnosing native valve endocarditis, it has been shown to have significantly inferior sensitivity when it comes to identifying infections related to right-heart endocarditis, prosthetic valves, and indwelling cardiac devices. Additionally, prosthetic valves and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices can exhibit shadowing and artifact, rendering transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography results inconclusive or even normal. Having a keen awareness of the varying clinical presentations, as well as emerging valvular imaging modalities such as F-fluorodeoxyglucose cardiac positron-emission tomography plus computed tomography, promises to improve the evaluation and diagnosis of infective endocarditis. However, indications for appropriate use of these studies and guidance on modern clinical management are still needed.

A Literature Review on the Use of Aortic Allografts in Modern Cardiac Surgery for the Treatment of Infective Endocarditis: Is There Clear Evidence or Is It Merely a Perception?

Infective valve endocarditis is caused by different pathogens and 60% of those involve the aortic valve with valve failure. Although S. aureus is recognized as the most frequently isolated causative bacterium associated with IE in high-income countries, Gram-positive cocci nevertheless play a crucial role in promoting infection in relation to their adhesive matrix molecules. The presence of pili on the surface of Gram-positive bacteria such as in different strains of Enterococcus faecalis and Streptococcus spp., grants these causative pathogens a great offensive capacity due to the formation of biofilms and resistance to antibiotics. The indications and timing of surgery in endocarditis are debated as well as the choice of the ideal valve substitute to replace the diseased valve(s) when repair is not possible. We reviewed the literature and elaborated a systematic approach to endocarditis management based on clinical, microbiological, and anatomopathological variables known to affect postoperative outcomes with the aim to stratify the patients and orient decision making. From this review emerges significant findings on the risk of infection in the allograft used in patients with endocarditis and no endocarditis etiology suggesting that the use of allografts has proved safety and effectiveness in patients with both pathologies.

Surgical Challenges in Infective Endocarditis: State of the Art

Infective endocarditis (IE) is still a life-threatening disease with frequent lethal outcomes despite the profound changes in its clinical, microbiological, imaging, and therapeutic profiles. Nowadays, the scenario for IE has changed since rheumatic fever has declined, but on the other hand, multiple aspects, such as elderly populations, cardiovascular device implantation procedures, and better use of multiple imaging modalities and multidisciplinary care, have increased, leading to escalations in diagnosis. Since the ESC and AHA Guidelines have been released, specific aspects of diagnostic and therapeutic management have been clarified to provide better and faster diagnosis and prognosis. Surgical treatment is required in approximately half of patients with IE in order to avoid progressive heart failure, irreversible structural damage in the case of uncontrolled infection, and the prevention of embolism. The timing of surgery has been one of the main aspects discussed, identifying cases in which surgery needs to be performed on an emergency (within 24 h) or urgent (within 7 days) basis, irrespective of the duration of antibiotic treatment, or cases where surgery can be postponed to allow a brief period of antibiotic treatment under careful clinical and echocardiographic observation. Mainly, guidelines put emphasis on the importance of an endocarditis team in the handling of systemic complications and how they affect the timing of surgery and perioperative management. Neurological complications, acute renal failure, splenic or musculoskeletal manifestations, or infections determined by multiresistant microorganisms or fungi can affect long-term prognosis and survival. Not to be outdone, anatomical and surgical factors, such as the presence of native or prosthetic valve endocarditis, a repair strategy when feasible, anatomical extension and disruption in the case of an annular abscess (mitral valve annulus, aortic mitral curtain, aortic root, and annulus), and the choice of prosthesis and conduits, can be equally crucial. It can be hard for surgeons to maneuver between correct pre-operative planning and facing unexpected obstacles during intraoperative management. The aim of this review is to provide an overview and analysis of a broad spectrum of specific surgical scenarios and how their challenging management can be essential to ensure better outcomes and prognoses.