Foregut function before and after lung transplant

Respiratory-swallow patterning and oropharyngeal swallowing impairment in patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplant

BACKGROUND

Although swallowing impairment is prevalent following lung transplantation, baseline respiratory and swallowing characteristics are often overlooked. Respiratory disease processes may predispose lung transplant candidates to altered respiratory-swallow patterning and swallowing impairment.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study included patients referred for a Modified Barium Swallow Study during lung transplant evaluation. Swallowing impairment was measured using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile and Penetration-Aspiration Scale. Respiratory plethysmographic signals synchronized with videofluoroscopy were analyzed to determine phase patterning, pause duration, and rate. Mixed-effects logistic regression was used to identify linkages between respiratory and swallowing measures.

KEY RESULTS

Fifty patients were included and demonstrated delayed swallow initiation (49/50), oral residue (37/50), incomplete pharyngoesophageal segment opening (35/50), and esophageal retention (43/50). Airway invasion occurred infrequently (10/50). Atypical respiratory patterning was significantly associated with impairment in pharyngeal swallow initiation (OR [95% CI] = 1.76 [1.16, 2.68], p = 0.009), laryngeal elevation (OR [95% CI] = 1.45 [1.01, 2.07], p = 0.044), and laryngeal vestibular closure (OR [95% CI] = 2.57 [1.48, 4.46], p < 0.001). Increased pause duration was associated with impaired initiation (OR [95% CI] = 2.24 [1.20, 4.16], p = 0.011), laryngeal elevation (OR [95% CI] = 1.18 [1.03, 1.36], p = 0.018), laryngeal closure (OR [95% CI] = 1.28 [1.9, 1.50], p = 0.003), and tongue base retraction (OR [95% CI] = 1.33 [1.13, 1.56], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

Patients undergoing evaluation for lung transplant demonstrated impaired swallowing and phase patterning. Preliminary findings implicate the need for further evaluation of respiratory-swallow coordination and its potential role in swallowing impairment before and after lung transplantation.

Esophageal Function Testing Patterns in the Evaluation and Management of Lung Transplantation: Results of a National Survey

GOALS

We surveyed esophageal motility laboratories affiliated with adult pulmonary transplant centers to determine esophageal function testing (EFT) practices.

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal dysmotility are associated with worse lung transplant outcomes, yet no consensus guidelines for EFT exist in this population.

STUDY

A deidentified online survey was sent to gastrointestinal motility laboratory directors of 49 academic and community-affiliated medical centers that perform lung transplants. Practice characteristics, including annual lung transplant volume and institutional EFT practices pre-lung transplantation and post-lung transplantation were queried. Respondents were categorized by transplant volume into small and large programs based on median annual volume.

RESULTS

Among 35 respondents (71% response rate), the median annual transplant volume was 37, and there were 18 large programs. Institutional EFT protocols were used pretransplant by 24 programs (68.6%) and post-transplant by 12 programs (34.2%). Among small and large programs, 52.9% and 72.2% always obtained high-resolution manometry before transplant, respectively. Endoscopy before transplant was performed more often in small programs (n=17, 100%) compared with large programs (n=15,83.3%). Pretransplant endoscopy ( P =0.04), barium esophagram ( P <0.01), and high-resolution manometry ( P =0.04) were more common than post-transplant. In contrast, post-transplant reflux monitoring off-therapy was more common than pretransplant ( P =0.01). In general, pulmonologists direct referrals for EFT and gastroenterology consultation (n=28, 80.0%), with symptoms primarily prompting testing.

CONCLUSIONS

In the absence of established guidelines, substantial variability exists in pretransplant and post-transplant EFT, directed by pulmonologists. Standardized EFT protocols and gastroenterologist-directed management of esophageal dysfunction has potential to improve lung transplant outcomes.

Impaired esophagogastric junction relaxation and lung transplantation outcomes

The implications of impaired esophagogastric junction relaxation (i.e. esophagogastric junction outflow obstruction and achalasia) in lung transplants recipients (LTRs) are unclear. Thus, we examined the prevalence and clinical outcomes of LTRs with an abnormally elevated integrated relaxation pressure (IRP) on high-resolution manometry before lung transplantation (LTx). After IRB approval, we reviewed data on LTRs who underwent LTx between January 2019 and August 2022 with a preoperative median IRP >15 mmHg. Differences in overall survival and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD)-free survival between LTRs with a normalized median IRP after LTx (N-IRP) and those with persistently high IRP (PH-IRP) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier curves and the log-rank test. During the study period, 352 LTx procedures were performed; 44 (12.5%) LTRs had an elevated IRP before LTx, and 37 (84.1%) completed a postoperative manometry assessment (24 [70.6%] males; mean age, 65.2 ± 9.1 years). The median IRP before and after LTx was 18.7 ± 3.8 mmHg and 12 ± 5.6 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001); the median IRP normalized after LTx in 24 (64.9%) patients. Two-year overall survival trended lower in the N-IRP group than the PH-IRP group (77.2% vs. 92.3%, P = 0.086), but CLAD-free survival (P = 0.592) and rates of primary graft dysfunction (P = 0.502) and acute cellular rejection (P = 0.408) were similar. An abnormally elevated IRP was common in LTx candidates; however, it normalized in roughly two-thirds of patients after LTx. Two-year survival trended higher in the PH-IRP group, despite similar rates of primary graft dysfunction and acute cellular rejection as well as similar CLAD-free survival between the groups.

Update on extraesophageal manifestations of gastroesophageal reflux

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Symptoms/complications related to extraesophageal reflux (EER) are increasingly prevalent presentations and pose significant challenges for clinicians. We summarize and discuss clinical advances and developments in pathophysiology, testing and treatment algorithms of upper/lower airway manifestations of EER.

RECENT FINDINGS

Growing evidence supports likely multifactorial causes of laryngeal symptoms, including EER, oropharyngeal pathologies, allergic conditions, and cognitive-affective processes (brain-larynx interaction). Diagnostic paradigm for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is shifting towards a personalized approach with noninvasive strategies/prediction tools to risk-stratify patients for upfront reflux testing over empiric acid suppression trials. Management should be multipronged to include antireflux therapies and treatments targeting other causes. Lower airway complications of EER may result in lung dysfunction and poor transplant outcomes. Esophageal symptoms are often absent and routine esophageal/reflux testing to guide timely antireflux therapies may lead to improved outcomes. Modalities that leverage impedance technology may be important, given the potential role of nonacidic reflux. Novel impedance-based metrics such as mean nocturnal baseline impedance and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index may provide adjunctive diagnostic values.

SUMMARY

Standardized approach to diagnosis/management of EER should include multidisciplinary care teams and consider different phenotypes, nonreflux contributors, and the complex gut-airway relationships. Prompt antireflux therapies after careful candidate selection may improve outcomes of these airway complications.

The impact of lung transplantation on esophageal motility and inter-relationships with reflux and lung mechanics in patients with restrictive and obstructive respiratory disease

BACKGROUND

For many patients with lung disease the only proven intervention to improve survival and quality of life is lung transplantation (LTx). Esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux (GER) are common in patients with respiratory disease, and often associate with worse prognosis following LTx. Which, if any patients, should be excluded from LTx based on esophageal concerns remains unclear. Our aim was to understand the effect of LTx on esophageal motility diagnosis and examine how this and the other physiological and mechanical factors relate to GER and clearance of boluses swallowed.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 62 patients with restrictive (RLD) and obstructive (OLD) lung disease (aged 33-75 years; 42 men) who underwent high resolution impedance manometry and 24-h pH-impedance before and after LTx.

KEY RESULTS

RLD patients with normal motility were more likely to remain normal (p = 0.02), or if having abnormal motility to change to normal (p = 0.07) post-LTx than OLD patients. Esophageal length (EL) was greater in OLD than RLD patients' pre-LTx (p < 0.001), reducing only in OLD patients' post-LTx (p = 0.02). Reduced EL post-LTx associated with greater contractile reserve (r = 0.735; p = 0.01) and increased likelihood of motility normalization (p = 0.10). Clearance of reflux improved (p = 0.01) and associated with increased mean nocturnal baseline impedance (p < 0.001) in RLD but not OLD. Peristaltic breaks and thoraco-abdominal pressure gradient impact both esophageal clearance of reflux and boluses swallowed (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

RLD patients are more likely to show improvement in esophageal motility than OLD patients post-LTx. However, the effect on GER is more difficult to predict and requires other GI, anatomical and pulmonary factors to be taken into consideration.

Esophageal Motility Abnormalities in Lung Transplant Recipients With Esophageal Acid Reflux Are Different From Matched Controls

Background/Aims

There is an increased incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) after lung transplantation (LT) that can be associated with graft dysfunction. It is unclear if the underlying esophageal motility changes in GERD are different following LT. This study aimed to use esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) to explore GERD mechanisms in LT recipients compared to matched controls.

Methods

This was a retrospective study including patients with pathologic acid reflux who underwent HRM and pH testing at our healthcare facility July 2012 to October 2019. The study included 12 LT recipients and 36 controls. Controls were matched in a 1:3 ratio for age, gender, and acid exposure time (AET).

Results

LT recipients had less hypotensive esophagogastric junction (EGJ) (mean EGJ-contractile integral 89.2 mmHg/cm in LT vs 33.9 mmHg/cm in controls, P < 0.001). AET correlated with distal contractile integral and total EGJ-contractile integral only in LT group (r = -0.79, P = 0.002 and r = -0.57, P = 0.051, respectively).

Conclusions

Following LT, acid reflux is characterized by a less hypotensive EGJ compared to controls with similar AET. The strongest correlation with AET after LT was found to be esophageal peristaltic vigor. These results add to the understanding of reflux after LT and may help tailor an individualized treatment plan.

Pulmonary and esophageal function in lung transplantation: Fundamental principles and clinical application

The lungs and esophagus have a close anatomical and physiological relationship. Over the years, reflux-induced pulmonary injury has gained wider recognition, but the full effects of pulmonary disease on esophageal function are still unknown. Intrathoracic pressure dynamics potentially affect esophageal function, especially in patients with end-stage lung disease, both obstructive and restrictive. Lung transplantation is the only viable option for patients with end-stage pulmonary disease and has provided us with a unique opportunity to study these effects as transplantation restores the intrathoracic environment. Esophageal and foregut functional testing before and after transplantation provide insights into the pathophysiology of the foregut-pulmonary axis, such as how underlying pulmonary disease and intrathoracic pressure changes affect esophageal physiology. This review summarizes the available literature and shares the research experience of a lung transplant center, covering topics such as pre- and posttransplant foregut function, esophageal motility in lung transplant recipients, immune-mediated mechanisms of graft rejection associated with gastroesophageal reflux, and the role of antireflux surgery in this population.

Selective dysfunction of the crural diaphragm in patients with chronic restrictive and obstructive lung disease

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is known to be associated with chronic lung diseases. The driving force of GER is the transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi) generated mainly by costal and crural diaphragm contraction. The latter also enhances the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) pressure to guard against GER.

METHODS

The relationship between Pdi and EGJ pressure was determined using high resolution esophageal manometry in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD, n = 26), obstructive lung disease (OLD, n- = 24), and healthy subjects (n = 20).

KEY RESULTS

The patient groups did not differ with respect to age, gender, BMI, and pulmonary rehabilitation history. Patients with ILD had significantly higher Pdi but lower EGJ pressures as compared to controls and OLD patients (p < 0.001). In control subjects, the increase in EGJ pressure at all-time points during inspiration was greater than Pdi. In contrast, the EGJ pressure during inspiration was less than Pdi in 14 patients with ILD and 7 patients with OLD. The drop in EGJ pressure was usually seen after the peak Pdi in ILD group (p < 0.0001) and before the peak Pdi in OLD group, (p = 0.08). Nine patients in the ILD group had sliding hiatus hernia, compared to none in control subjects (p = 0.003) and two patients in the OLD, (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES

A higher Pdi and low EGJ pressure, and dissociation between Pdi and EGJ pressure temporal relationship suggests selective dysfunction of the crural diaphragm in patients with chronic lung diseases and may explain the higher prevalence of GERD in ILD as seen in previous studies.

Abnormal bolus reflux on impedance-pH testing independently predicts 3-year pulmonary outcome and mortality in pulmonary fibrosis

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Gastroesophageal reflux has been associated with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), although the directionality of the relationship has been debated. Data on the value of objective reflux measures in predicting IPF disease progression and mortality remain limited. We aimed to evaluate the association between multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH testing (MII-pH) and 3-year pulmonary outcomes in IPF patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of adults with IPF who underwent pre-lung transplant MII-pH off acid suppression at a tertiary center. Patients were followed for 3 years after MII-pH for poor pulmonary outcomes (hospitalization for respiratory exacerbation or death). A secondary analysis was performed using mortality as outcome of interest. Time-to-event analyses using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were performed to evaluate associations between MII-pH and poor outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-four subjects (mean age = 61.7 ± 8 years, 62% male) were included. Increased bolus exposure time (BET) on MII-pH was associated with decreased time to poor pulmonary outcomes and death (log-ranked P-value = 0.017 and 0.031, respectively). On multivariable Cox regression analyses controlling for potential confounders including age, sex, smoking history, body mass index, proton pump inhibitor use, baseline pulmonary function, and anti-fibrotic therapy, increased BET was an independent predictor for poor pulmonary outcomes [hazard ratio 3.18 (95% confidence interval: 1.25-8.09), P = 0.015] and mortality [hazard ratio 11.3 (95% confidence interval: 1.37-63.9), P = 0.025] over 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Increased BET on MII-pH is an independent predictor of poor pulmonary outcomes and mortality over 3 years in IPF patients. These findings also support a role for gastroesophageal reflux in IPF disease progression and the potential impact of routine reflux testing and treatment.

Acid exposure time is sensitive for detecting gastroesophageal reflux disease and is associated with long-term survival after lung transplant

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in patients who have undergone lung transplantation and is associated with poorer outcomes, but guidelines are lacking to direct management strategies in this population. We assessed the diagnostic yield of impedance metrics compared to pH-metry alone for detecting GERD among lung transplant recipients and evaluated their association with clinical outcomes. We performed a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients who underwent lung transplantation. Demographic data, acid exposure time (AET), number of reflux episodes, mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI), post-reflux swallowing-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI), and clinical outcomes including mortality were collected. The relationship between GERD metrics and clinical outcomes was assessed using Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Fisher's exact test as appropriate. Of the 76 patients studied, 29 (38%) had GERD based on abnormal AET after lung transplantation. One (1.3%) patient had GERD based on elevated number of reflux episodes and abnormal distal MNBI detected GERD in 19 (26%) patients, resulting in 62% sensitivity and 94% specificity. Two (2.6%) patients had normal PSPWI. Patients with low distal MNBI had significantly decreased forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) at 3-year posttransplant compared to those without low distal MNBI (P = 0.03). Three-year survival was significantly worse among patients with elevated AET (66.7% vs. 89.1%, P = 0.03) but not with low distal MNBI (68.4% vs. 84.3%, P = 0.18). Abnormal AET is more sensitive for detecting GERD than other reflux metrics studied and is associated with survival, suggesting pH-metry alone may be sufficient to guide GERD management after lung transplant.

Pre-Lung transplant reflux testing demonstrates high prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux in cystic fibrosis and reduces chronic rejection risk

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) has been associated with poor outcomes after lung transplantation for chronic lung disease, including increased risk of chronic rejection. GER is common in cystic fibrosis (CF), but factors influencing the likelihood of pre-transplant pH testing, and the impact of testing on clinical management and transplant outcomes in patients with CF are unknown.

AIM

To evaluate the role of pre-transplant reflux testing in the evaluation of lung transplant candidates with CF.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study from 2007-2019 at a tertiary medical center that included all patients with CF undergoing lung transplant. Patients with pre-transplant anti-reflux surgery were excluded. Baseline characteristics (age at transplantation, gender, race, body mass index), self-reported GER symptoms prior to transplantation, and pre-transplant cardiopulmonary testing results, were recorded. Reflux testing consisted of either 24-h pH- or combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring. Post-transplant care included a standard immunosuppressive regimen, and regular surveillance bronchoscopy and pulmonary spirometry in accordance with institutional practice as well as in symptomatic patients. The primary outcome of chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) was defined clinically and histologically per International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation criteria. Statistical analysis was performed with Fisher’s exact test to assess differences between cohorts, and time-to-event Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

After applying inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 60 patients were included in the study. Among all CF patients, 41 (68.3%) completed reflux monitoring as part of pre-lung transplant evaluation. Objective evidence of pathologic reflux, defined as acid exposure time > 4%, was found in 24 subjects, representing 58% of the tested group. CF patients with pre-transplant reflux testing were older (35.8 vs 30.1 years, P = 0.01) and more commonly reported typical esophageal reflux symptoms (53.7% vs 26.3%, P = 0.06) compared to those without reflux testing. Other patient demographics and baseline cardiopulmonary function did not significantly differ between CF subjects with and without pre-transplant reflux testing. Patients with CF were less likely to undergo pre-transplant reflux testing compared to other pulmonary diagnoses (68% vs 85%, P = 0.003). There was a decreased risk of CLAD in patients with CF who underwent reflux testing compared to those who did not, after controlling for confounders (Cox Hazard Ratio 0.26; 95%CI: 0.08-0.92).

CONCLUSION

Pre-transplant reflux testing revealed high prevalence of pathologic reflux in CF patients and was associated with decreased risk of CLAD. Systematic reflux testing may enhance outcomes in this patient population.

Ineffective esophageal motility is associated with acute rejection after lung transplantation independent of gastroesophageal reflux

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux is associated with poorer outcomes after lung transplant, likely through recurrent aspiration and allograft injury. Although prior studies have demonstrated a relationship between impedance-pH results and transplant outcomes, the role of esophageal manometry in the assessment of lung transplant patients remains debated, and the impact of esophageal dysmotility on transplant outcomes is unclear. Of particular interest is ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) and its associated impact on esophageal clearance.

AIM

To assess the relationship between pre-transplant IEM diagnosis and acute rejection after lung transplantation.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of lung transplant recipients at a tertiary care center between 2007 and 2018. Patients with pre-transplant anti-reflux surgery were excluded. Manometric and reflux diagnoses were recorded from pre-transplant esophageal function testing. Time-to-event analysis using Cox proportional hazards model was applied to evaluate outcome of first episode of acute cellular rejection, defined histologically per International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines. Subjects not meeting this endpoint were censored at time of post-transplant anti-reflux surgery, last clinic visit, or death. Fisher’s exact test for binary variables and student’s t-test for continuous variables were performed to assess for differences between groups.

RESULTS

Of 184 subjects (54% men, mean age: 58, follow-up: 443 person-years) met criteria for inclusion. Interstitial pulmonary fibrosis represented the predominant pulmonary diagnosis (41%). During the follow-up period, 60 subjects (33.5%) developed acute rejection. The all-cause mortality was 16.3%. Time-to-event univariate analyses demonstrated significant association between IEM and acute rejection [hazard ratio (HR): 1.984, 95%CI: 1.03-3.30, P = 0.04], confirmed on Kaplan-Meier curve. On multivariable analysis, IEM remained independently associated with acute rejection, even after controlling for potential confounders such as the presence of acid and nonacid reflux (HR: 2.20, 95%CI: 1.18-4.11, P = 0.01). Nonacid reflux was also independently associated with acute rejection on both univariate (HR: 2.16, 95%CI: 1.26-3.72, P = 0.005) and multivariable analyses (HR: 2.10, 95%CI: 1.21-3.64, P = 0.009), adjusting for the presence of IEM.

CONCLUSION

Pre-transplant IEM was associated with acute rejection after transplantation, even after controlling for acid and nonacid reflux. Esophageal motility testing may be considered in lung transplant to predict outcomes.

Characterizing Swallowing Impairment in a Post-Lung Transplant Population

BACKGROUND

Lung transplant recipients carry significant pre- and post-lung transplant dysphagia risk factors related to altered respiratory-swallow coordination as well as acute injury and decompensation resulting in the acute post-lung transplant recovery period. However, we are only beginning to understand the potential physiological contributors to altered swallowing in this population.

METHOD

A retrospective, cross-sectional, cohort study of post-lung transplant patients was performed. All participants received a modified barium swallow study (MBSS) as part of standard care during their acute hospitalization using the Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP) protocol and scoring metric. A combination of MBSImP scores, Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) scores, Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS) scores, International Dysphagia Diet Standardization Initiative (IDDSI) scale levels, and the time from lung transplant to MBSS was collected, as well as measures of swallowing impairment and swallowing-related outcomes. Differences in swallowing physiology and swallowing-related outcomes between participants with typical versus atypical PAS were explored.

RESULTS

Forty-two participants met our prespecified inclusion criteria. We identified atypical laryngeal penetration and/or aspiration in 52.4% of our post-lung transplant cohort. Silent aspiration occurred in 75% of those patients who aspirated. Comparing typical versus atypical PAS scores, we found statistically significant associations with laryngeal elevation (Component 8), p < .0001; anterior hyoid excursion (Component 9), p = .0046; epiglottic movement (Component 10), p = .0031; laryngeal vestibule closure (Component 11), p < .0001; pharyngeal stripping (Component 12), p = .0058; pharyngeal total scores, p = .0001; FOIS scores, p = .00264; and IDDSI liquid levels, p = .0009.

CONCLUSIONS

Swallowing impairment resulting in abnormal bolus invasion is prevalent in post-lung transplant patients. Airway invasion in this cohort was related to pharyngeal swallow impairment and resulted in modified oral intake. Our findings help expand upon prior literature, which only reported the incidence of aspiration and pathological laryngeal penetration. Our results suggest that the potential for aerodigestive system impairment and negative sequela should not be underestimated in the post-lung transplant population.

A potential mechanism by which aspiration of duodenogastric fluid augments the risk for bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation

OBJECTIVE

Aspiration of duodenogastric refluxate may damage the respiratory epithelium of lung allografts in transplant recipients. We sought to define a mechanism by which aspiration of duodenogastric fluid augments the risk of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplant in a murine model.

METHODS

We analyzed the immunological effects of acute aspiration of duodenogastric fluid (0.5 mL/kg) on transplant naive (strain DBA/2J) and transplanted mice (strain B6D2F1/J to strain DBA/2J). Serum antibodies to the lung self-antigens (SAgs) K-alpha1 tubulin and collagen-V were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Exosomes were isolated from serum, and immunoblot membranes were probed for antibodies to lung SAgs. Lung sections were assessed for fibrotic burden and obliterative bronchiolitis lesions by histologic and immunohistochemical analyses, including trichrome staining.

RESULTS

Transplanted mice that received duodenogastric fluid developed higher levels of antibodies to the lung SAgs K-alpha1 tubulin and collagen-V and exosomes with lung SAgs on posttransplant days 14 and 28 than transplanted mice with sham aspiration or transplant naive mice (with and without aspiration). All lung allografts demonstrated severe grade A4 rejection on posttransplant day 14, with the highest mean fibrotic burden and mean number of obliterative bronchiolitis-like lesions per microscopic field on day 28 in recipients with aspiration.

CONCLUSIONS

This study links aspiration of duodenogastric fluid after lung transplant to higher autoimmune responses to lung SAgs and the release of circulating exosomes with lung SAgs, which together promote sustained immune responses leading to extensive lung parenchymal damage and, ultimately, severe obliterative bronchiolitis-the histologic hallmark of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.

Association Between Antibodies Against Lung Self-Antigens and Gastroesophageal Reflux in Lung Transplant Candidates

Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) and pretransplant antibodies against lung self-antigens (SAbs) collagen-V and/or k-alpha 1 tubulin are both independently associated with allograft dysfunction after lung transplantation (LTx). The role of GER in inducing lung injury and SAbs is unknown. We aimed to study the association between pre-LTx GER and SAbs. After IRB approval, we retrieved SAb assays conducted between 2015 and 2019 and collected 24 hour GER data for these patients. Patients were divided into 2 groups: no reflux (GER-) and pathologic reflux (GER+) to compare the prevalence of SAbs. Multivariate analysis was used to study the association between GER and SAbs in the whole cohort and in restrictive lung disease (RLD) and obstructive lung disease (OLD) subsets. Proximal esophageal reflux (PER) events ≥5 was considered abnormal. Patients (n = 134; 73 men) were divided into groups: GER- (54.5%, n = 73) and GER+ (45.5%, n = 61). The prevalence of GER was higher in the RLD than in the OLD subset (p < 0.001). The overall prevalence of SAbs was 53.7% (n = 72), higher in the GER+ than the GER- group (65.6% vs 43.8%, p = 0.012), but comparable between RLD and OLD subsets. Overall, SAbs were associated with GER (p = 0.012) and abnormal PER (p = 0.017). GER and abnormal PER increased the odds of SAbs in the RLD subset (OR [95% CI]: 2.825 [1.033-7.725], p = 0.040 and OR [95% CI]: 3.551 [1.271-9.925], p = 0.014, respectively) but not in the OLD subset. LTx candidates have a high prevalence of SAbs, which are significantly associated with GER and abnormal PER in patients with RLD.

Morbidity of antireflux surgery in lung transplant and matched nontransplant cohorts is comparable

BACKGROUND

Safety data on perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic antireflux surgery (LARS) after lung transplantation (LT) are lacking. We compared the 30-day readmission rate and short-term morbidity after LARS between LT recipients and matched nontransplant (NT) controls.

METHODS

Adult patients who underwent LARS between January 1, 2015, and October 31, 2021, were included. The participants were divided into two groups: LT recipients and NT controls. First, we compared 30-day readmission rates after LARS between the LT and NT cohorts. Next, we compared 30-day morbidity after LARS between the LT cohort and a 1-to-2 propensity score-matched NT cohort.

RESULTS

A total of 1328 patients (55 LT recipients and 1273 NT controls) were included. The post-LARS 30-day readmission rate was higher in LT recipients than in the overall NT controls (14.5% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). Compared to matched NT controls, LT recipients had a lower prevalence of paraesophageal hernia, a smaller median hernia size, and higher peristaltic vigor. Also compared to the matched NT controls, the LT recipients had a lower median operative time but a longer median length of hospital stay. The proportion of patients with a post-LARS event within 30 postoperative days was comparable between the LT and matched NT cohorts (21.8% vs 14.5%, p = 0.24).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a higher perceived risk of comorbidity burden, LT recipients and matched NT controls had similar rates of post-LARS 30-day morbidity at our large-volume center with expertise in transplant and foregut surgery. LARS after LT is safe.

Utilization of Oil Red O staining for assessing aspiration risk in lung transplant patients: A multidisciplinary prospective study with clinical practice insights

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease with microaspiration has been associated with graft dysfunction in lung transplant patients. Identifying patients with aspiration is clinically important because it enables implementation of appropriate interventions like antireflux therapy. Oil Red O (ORO) staining with determination of the lipid-laden macrophage index (LLMI) has been proposed as a noninvasive surrogate marker in the detection of aspiration. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate clinical utilization of ORO staining in the assessment of aspiration risk.

METHODS

All transbronchial surgical pathology biopsies obtained in lung transplant patients undergoing routine surveillance from August 2020 through November 2021 were included in this study. Clinical team members prospectively ascertained the aspiration risk category (ARC) of each patient both before and after biopsy findings and recorded reasons for change in ARC.

RESULTS

A total of 132 transbronchial biopsies with concurrent LLMI were included in the study. LLMI was low in 51 cases (38.6%), including 21 of the 54 cases (38.9%) where aspiration was suggested based on the transbronchial biopsy findings. In total, 19 cases (14.4%) underwent a change in ARC post-biopsy including 10 that were upgraded and nine cases that were downgraded. Transbronchial biopsy findings were noted as the reason for change in ARC in the majority (15/19; 79%) of cases; only a minority (2/19; 10.5%) were due to the LLMI. Notably, 16 cases (12.1%) had a low LLMI with high-risk post-biopsy ARC and nine cases (6.8%) had a high LLMI with low-risk post-biopsy ARC.

CONCLUSIONS

This study observed that clinical evaluation for aspiration relied more heavily on transbronchial biopsy findings. Although LLMI may retain clinical utility in some scenarios, reevaluation of the clinical value of ORO testing would be prudent.

The Transdiaphragmatic Pressure Gradient and the Lower Esophageal Sphincter in the Pathophysiology of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: an Analysis of 500 Esophageal Function Tests

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) pathophysiology is multifactorial. Greater importance has been attributed to a defective lower esophageal sphincter (LES) in comparison to an altered transdiaphragmatic pressure gradient (TPG). This study aims to evaluate the role of the TPG and LES disfunction in GERD pathogenesis.

METHODS

Five hundred consecutive esophageal function tests from patients with clinically suspected GERD were reviewed. Patients were classified according to the pH monitoring in GERD positive or GERD negative. Abdominal pressure, thoracic pressure, TPG (abdominal-thoracic pressures), LES resting pressure (mid-respiratory, expiratory, and EGJ-CI), and LES retention pressure (LES resting pressure-TPG) were determined.

RESULTS

GERD was present in 296 (59%) individuals. GERD-positive patients were mostly males. LES resting pressure (by all parameters) and thoracic pressure were not different between groups. Abdominal pressure and TPG were higher in GERD-positive patients. LES retention pressure (by all parameters) was lower in GERD-positive patients. DeMeester score had a positive correlation with LES resting pressure, TPG, and LES retention pressure (by all parameters) but not with abdominal pressure and thoracic pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

LES valvular competency as measured by absolute resting pressure was not reliable to predict GERD; however, it was associated with GERD severity. Relative LES pressure (LES retention pressure) predicted GERD presence and severity, but no parameter showed superiority. TPG plays an important role in the pathophysiology of GERD since it is related to GERD presence and severity; still TPG is altered mostly based on a higher abdominal pressure.

Esophageal Dysfunction in Post-lung Transplant: An Enigma

The prevalence of lung transplants has increased over the years, albeit with a low survival rate amongst all solid organ transplants, including liver and heart transplantation. Microaspiration is one of the primary mechanisms that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of lung injury following lung transplants. Of late, esophageal dysfunction such as gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal hypercontractility is often noted post-lung transplant. However, reflux is associated with chronic allograft lung injury such as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome, which is one of the predictors for long-term survival in this specialized population. Its role in acute lung injury post-lung transplant is still being explored. This review critically examines the salient points which provide the current understanding of the characteristics, pathophysiology, and implications of esophageal dysfunction following lung transplant.

Impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and lung transplant recipients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a prevalent subset of interstitial lung disease (ILD) that often progresses to require lung transplantation. Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is common in the IPF population, and GER-related micro-aspiration appears to be an important risk factor for IPF pathogenesis and for the deterioration of transplanted lung function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Many patients with IPF have elevated esophageal acid exposure on reflux testing despite having no or minimal symptoms. Studies on the effects of medical GERD therapy on IPF-related outcomes have had mixed results. Antireflux surgery is safe in appropriately selected IPF patients, and appears to have potential for slowing the decline of lung function. GERD can persist, improve or develop after lung transplantation, and the presence of GERD is associated with allograft injury and pulmonary function decline in lung transplant recipients.

SUMMARY

Clinicians should have a low threshold to assess for objective evidence of GERD in IPF patients. Antireflux surgery in IPF patients with GERD appears to improve lung function, but further studies are needed before surgical treatment can be recommended routinely in this setting. In lung transplant recipients, reflux testing after transplant is the most accurate way to guide GERD treatment decisions.

Sorting out the Relationship Between Esophageal and Pulmonary Disease

The aim of this review is to explore the relationship between esophageal syndromes and pulmonary diseases considering the most recent data available. Prior studies have shown a close relationship between lung diseases such as asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disorders (COPD), Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), and lung transplant rejection and esophageal dysfunction. Although the association has long been demonstrated, the exact relationship remains unclear. Clinical experience has shown a bidirectional relationship where esophageal disease may influence the outcomes of pulmonary disease and vice versa. The impact of esophageal dysfunction on pulmonary disorders may also be related to 2 different mechanisms: the reflux pathway leading to microaspiration and the reflex pathway triggering vagally mediated airway reactions. The aim of this review is to further explore these relationships and pathophysiologic mechanisms. Specifically, we discuss the proposed hypotheses for the relationship between the 2 diseases, as well as the pathophysiology and new developments in clinical management.

Foregut Dysmotility in the Lung Transplant Patient

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To explore the role of upper gastrointestinal disease in the clinical course of lung transplant patients - including its pathophysiology, diagnostic testing, and treatment options.

RECENT FINDINGS

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and foregut motility disorders are more prevalent among end-stage lung disease patients and are associated with poorer outcomes in lung transplant recipients. A proposed mechanism is the exposure of the lung allograft to aspirated contents, resulting in inflammation and rejection. Diagnostic tools to assess for these disorders include multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) testing, high resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), and gastric emptying scintigraphy. The main treatment options are medical management with acid suppressants and/or prokinetic agents and anti-reflux surgery. In particular, data support the use of early anti-reflux surgery to improve outcomes. Newer diagnostic tools such as MII-pH testing and HREM allow for the identification of both acid and non-acid reflux and esophageal motility disorders, respectively. Recent studies have demonstrated that early anti-reflux surgery within six months post-transplant better protects against allograft injury and pulmonary function decline when compared to late surgery. However, further prospective research is needed to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of these diagnostic approaches and interventions.

Fundoplication after lung transplantation in patients with systemic sclerosis-related end-stage lung disease

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux and aspiration are risk factors for chronic lung allograft dysfunction in lung transplant recipients. Patients with systemic sclerosis are at an increased risk of aspiration due to esophageal dysmotility and an ineffective lower esophageal sphincter. The aim of this study is to understand the effect of fundoplication on outcomes in systemic sclerosis recipients.

METHODS

Between 2001 and 2019, 168 systemic sclerosis patients were referred for lung transplantation-51 (30.3%) were listed and 36 (21.4%) were transplanted. Recipients were stratified whether they underwent a fundoplication (n = 10, 27.8%) or not (n = 26, 72.2%). Freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction and survival were analyzed using log-rank test. Multivariable analysis for known risk factors was performed using a Cox-proportional hazards model.

RESULTS

Median time to fundoplication after transplantation was 16.4 months (interquartile range: 9.6-25.1) and all were laparoscopic (Dor 50%, Nissen 40%, Toupet 10%). There were no differences in acute rejection ⩾ A1 (26.9% vs 30%), or primary graft dysfunction grades 2-3 at 72 h (42.3% vs 40%) between groups. Recipients with fundoplication had an increased freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction (p = 0.035) and overall survival (p = 0.01). Fundoplication was associated with a reduced risk of mortality adjusting for other comorbidities (hazard ratio = 0.13; 95% confidence interval = 0.02-0.65; p = 0.014). Double and single lung transplant did not have different post-transplant survival.

CONCLUSION

Fundoplication in systemic sclerosis lung transplant recipients is associated with greater freedom from chronic lung allograft dysfunction and overall survival. Screening for reflux and aspiration followed by early fundoplication may delay graft deterioration in this population.

ISHLT consensus document on lung transplantation in patients with connective tissue disease: Part III: Pharmacology, medical and surgical management of post-transplant extrapulmonary conditions statements

Patients with connective tissues disease (CTD) are often on immunomodulatory agents before lung transplantation (LTx). Till now, there's no consensus on the safety of using these agents perioperative and post-transplant. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation-supported consensus document on LTx in patients with CTD addresses the risk and contraindications of perioperative and post-transplant management of the biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD), kinase inhibitor DMARD, and biologic agents used for LTx candidates with underlying CTD, and the recommendations and management of non-gastrointestinal extrapulmonary manifestations, and esophageal disorders by medical and surgical approaches for CTD transplant recipients.

Identification of Lung Transplant Recipients with a Survival Benefit after Fundoplication

BACKGROUND

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and aspiration of enteric contents is associated with worse outcomes after lung transplant. The purpose of this study is to elucidate populations that benefit the most from fundoplication after lung transplant.

METHODS

Lung transplants from 2001-2019 (n=971) were retrospectively reviewed and stratified by a fundoplication before (n=128) or after (n=24) chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD) development vs those who didn't. Patients with a fundoplication prior to CLAD were propensity-matched to those without a fundoplication. The primary outcome of interest was post-transplant survival. Time-to-event rates were calculated using a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model and Kaplan-Meier functions.

RESULTS

A fundoplication prior to CLAD improved post-transplant survival before and after propensity-matching, and remained a significant predictor after adjusting for baseline characteristics (HR:0.57, 95% CI:0.4-0.8, P=0.001). Recipients with a restrictive disorder (HR: 0.46, 95% CI:0.3-0.73, P=0.001), age <65 (HR:0.48, 95% CI:0.32-0.71, P<0.001), and both single (HR:0.47, 95% CI:0.28-0.79, P=0.005) or double (HR:0.55, 95% CI:0.32-0.93, P=0.027) lung transplants had a significant decrease in mortality after fundoplication. The effect was present after excluding early deaths and/or CLAD diagnoses. GERD diagnosed by pH, impedance or EGD was not associated with worse outcomes. Among patients with CLAD, a fundoplication was an independent predictor of post-CLAD survival (HR:0.27, 95% CI:0.12-0.61, P=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

A fundoplication before or after CLAD development is an independent predictor of survival. Younger patients with restrictive disease, independent of the type of transplant, have a survival benefit. GERD diagnosed by conventional methods was not associated with worse survival.

Bilateral Lung Transplant for a Connective Tissue Disorder: Esophageal Motility and 3-year Survival

Connective tissue disorders (CTDs) are associated with esophageal dysmotility and gastroesophageal reflux disease, which may diminish survival after lung transplantation (LTx). We studied LTx outcomes in patients with a CTD stratified by esophageal motility. We identified patients who underwent bilateral LTx from 2012 to 2017. Patients with a CTD were classified by pre-LTx diagnosis: absent esophageal motility (AEM), ineffective esophageal motility (IEM), or preserved esophageal motility (PEM). The primary endpoint was 3-year survival. Sub-analysis compared survival between the AEM group and a propensity-matched (lung allocation score), non-CTD control group. Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used. In total, 495 patients underwent LTx; 33 (6.7%) had a CTD. Median (IQR) age was 62 years (55.5-67.0); 24 (72.7%) were women. Survival trended lower for recipients with a CTD than without a CTD at 1-year (84.8% vs 91.8%; p = 0.2) and 3-years (66.7% vs 73.5%; p = 0.5). Within the CTD cohort, 1- and 3-year survival was significantly higher in the PEM (100%, 87.5%) and IEM (100%, 85.7%) groups than in the AEM group (50%, 20%; p < 0.001). The AEM group had significantly lower survival at 1-year (50% vs 92.5%) and 3-years (20% vs 65%) than a lung allocation score-matched cohort of patients without a CTD. LTx recipients with a CTD and AEM had significantly lower survival than those with PEM or IEM as well as significantly lower survival than that of a propensity-matched cohort of patients without a CTD. Patients with a CTD and AEM should be considered for LTx with extreme caution and counseled appropriately.

Clinical spectrum and presentation of patients with absent contractility

Background

Primary absent contractility is an uncommon finding on high-resolution manometry (HRM). The goal of this study was to describe the clinical spectrum and presentation of patients with primary absent contractility.

Methods

We queried a prospectively maintained esophageal testing registry to identify patients with absent contractility who presented between August 2016 and September 2018. Patients with poor quality studies and patients with insufficient clinical records as well as those with a history of previous foregut surgery or esophagram consistent with achalasia were excluded.

Results

A total of 2068 patients underwent HRM during the study period. Of these, 66 patients (3.2%) met the inclusion criteria and formed the study cohort; 52 patients in the cohort had an upper gastrointestinal contrast study, 50 had endoscopy, and 51 completed a foregut symptom questionnaire. Thirty-eight patients (57.6%) were women. The mean age was 56.6±13.86 years, and the mean body mass index was 26.37±5.7 kg/m². Almost half of the patients (29/66, 43.9%) were undergoing lung transplant evaluation, and 22 patients (37.3%) had a history of autoimmune immune-mediated or myopathic diseases. On the symptom questionnaire, 42 of 51 patients (82.3%) reported heartburn, 24 of 51 (47.1%) reported dysphagia, and 23 of 51 patients (45.1%) reported both. On ambulatory pH monitoring, 23 of 37 patients (62.2%) had pathological esophageal acid exposure (acid exposure time >6%).

Conclusions

Absent contractility on HRM is uncommon and is frequently associated with connective tissue, myopathic or autoimmune disorders. The usual clinical presentation is reflux, dysphagia or both.

Factors associated with esophageal motility improvement after bilateral lung transplant in patients with an aperistaltic esophagus

OBJECTIVES

We reported that esophageal peristalsis can improve after lung transplant (LTx), even in patients with pretransplant esophageal aperistalsis. This improvement was associated with better outcomes. We analyzed preoperative factors and sought to predict persistent aperistalsis or motility improvement in patients with pre-LTx esophageal aperistalsis.

METHODS

Patients with esophageal aperistalsis who underwent LTx between January 2013 and December 2016 were included. Preoperative barium esophagrams were blinded and re-examined; subjective scores were assigned to motility and dilation patterns. Postoperative high-resolution manometry was used to divide patients into 2 groups: persistent esophageal aperistalsis (PEA) or improved esophageal peristalsis (IEP).

RESULTS

We identified 29 patients: 20 with restrictive lung disease, 7 with obstructive lung disease, and 2 with pulmonary arterial hypertension. Post-LTx, 10 patients had PEA and 19 had IEP (mean age, 53.3 ± 6.6 years and 61.2 ± 10.6 years, respectively; P = .04). All 9 patients (100%) with obstructive lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension but only 10 of 20 patients (50%) with restrictive lung disease had IEP post-LTx (P = .01). All 4 patients with scleroderma had PEA. Nearly absent contractility on preoperative esophagrams was more prevalent in the PEA group than in the IEP group (100% vs 58.8%; P = .06). No further differences were observed between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with esophageal aperistalsis and obstructive lung disease or pulmonary arterial hypertension, but not patients with restrictive lung disease and scleroderma, are likely to have IEP post-LTx. Additional studies may determine whether subjective esophagram assessment can help predict IEP post-LTx in patients with restrictive lung disease without scleroderma.

An update on current treatment strategies for managing bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation

INTRODUCTION

Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a subtype of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, is quite common, with up to half of all lung recipients developing BOS within 5 years of transplantation. Preventive efforts are aimed at alleviating known risk factors of BOS development, while the primary goal of treatment is to delay the irreversible, fibrotic airway changes, and progressive loss of lung function.

AREAS COVERED

This narrative review will briefly discuss the updated definition, clinical presentation, pathogenesis, risk factors, and survival after BOS while paying particular attention to the salient evidence for optimal preventive strategies and treatments based on investigations in the modern era.

EXPERT OPINION

Future translational research focused on further characterizing the complex interplay between immune and nonimmune mechanisms mediating chronic lung rejection is the first step toward mitigating risk of allograft injury, improving early disease detection with noninvasive biomarkers, and ultimately, developing an effective, targeted therapy that can extend the life of the lung allograft.

Esophageal Evaluation for Patients Undergoing Lung Transplant Evaluation: What Should We Do for Evaluation and Management

Lung transplantation is a high-risk, but lifesaving, procedure for patients with end-stage lung disease. Although 1-year survival is high, long-term survival is not nearly as high, due mainly to acute and chronic rejection. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is the most common type of chronic rejection and often leads to poor outcomes. For this reason, esophageal testing in the lung transplant population has become a major issue, and this article discusses the evidence behind esophageal testing, the importance of esophageal dysmotility gastroesophageal reflux disease, both acidic and nonacidic reflux, and aspiration and the treatment of these findings.

Extraesophageal syndrome of gastroesophageal reflux: relationships with lung disease and transplantation outcome

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is prevalent and may be associated with both esophageal and extraesophageal syndromes, which include various pulmonary conditions. GERD may lead to pulmonary complications through the "reflux" (aspiration) or "reflex" (refluxate-triggered, vagally mediated airway spasm) mechanisms. While GERD may cause or worsen pulmonary disorders, changes in respiratory mechanics due to lung disease may also increase reflux. Typical esophageal symptoms are frequently absent and objective assessment with reflux monitoring is often needed for diagnosis. Impedance monitoring should be considered in addition to traditional pH study due to the involvement of both acidic and weakly acidic/nonacidic reflux. Antireflux therapy may improve outcomes of some pulmonary complications of GERD, although careful selection of a candidate is paramount to successful outcomes. Further research is needed to identify the optimal testing strategy and patient phenotypes that would benefit from antireflux therapy to improve pulmonary outcomes.

Simple Manometric Index for Comprehensive Esophagogastric Junction Barrier Competency Against Gastroesophageal Reflux

BACKGROUND

The esophagogastric junction (EGJ) is an anatomic and physiologic barrier against gastroesophageal reflux. Comprehensive evaluation of EGJ barrier parameters using high-resolution manometry in patients with GERD has not been well established. We propose a simple index for comprehensive EGJ antireflux competency.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients who underwent high-resolution manometry and 24-hour pH monitoring between January 2017 and September 2018 were included. Of these, patients with normal esophageal motility were selected. EGJ antireflux competency was assessed based on the following 3 categories: anatomic configuration of the EGJ complex (ie EGJ morphology), backflow-preventive pressure on the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) (ie LES pressure integral), and backflow-promotive pressure across the LES (ie thoracoabdominal pressure gradient). Each category was scored on a scale of 0 to 2, applying clinically meaningful divisions, and a cumulative score was calculated (EGJ index: 0 to 6 points). DeMeester score > 14.72 indicated GERD.

RESULTS

In total, 259 patients met study criteria. Of these, GERD was noted in 109 patients (42.1%). The pH parameters were gradually exacerbated, depending on the EGJ index. Good correlations were seen between EGJ index and previously proposed parameters for EGJ disruption, including LES length, LES pressure, and LES pressure integral (area under the curve > 0.9 [excellent validation]). No patient had GERD if the EGJ index score was 0. However, GERD was seen in as high as 85.7% of patients with the highest score of 6.

CONCLUSIONS

EGJ disruption severity was clearly graded based on a simple scoring method, which can improve evaluation and development of clinical strategies for GERD.