Access or excess? Examining the argument for regionalized cardiac care

Center case volume is associated with Society of Thoracic Surgeons-defined failure to rescue in cardiac surgery

OBJECTIVE

Our understanding of the impact of a center's case volume on failure to rescue (FTR) after cardiac surgery is incomplete. We hypothesized that increasing center case volume would be associated with lower FTR.

METHODS

Patients undergoing a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation in a regional collaborative (2011-2021) were included. After we excluded patients with missing Society of Thoracic Surgeons Predicted Risk of Mortality scores, patients were stratified by mean annual center case volume. The lowest quartile of case volume was compared with all other patients. Logistic regression analyzed the association between center case volume and FTR, adjusting for patient demographics, race, insurance, comorbidities, procedure type, and year.

RESULTS

A total of 43,641 patients were included across 17 centers during the study period. Of these, 5315 (12.2%) developed an FTR complication, and 735 (13.8% of those who developed an FTR complication) experienced FTR. Median annual case volume was 226, with 25th and 75th percentile cutoffs of 136 and 284 cases, respectively. Increasing center-level case volume was associated with significantly greater center-level major complication rates but lower mortality and FTR rates (all P values < .01). Observed-to-expected FTR was significantly associated with case volume (P = .040). Increasing case volume was independently associated with decreasing FTR rate in the final multivariable model (odds ratio, 0.87 per quartile; confidence interval, 0.799-0.946, P = .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Increasing center case volume is significantly associated with improved FTR rates. Assessment of low-volume centers' FTR performance represents an opportunity for quality improvement.

Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Center of Excellence recognition is associated with improved failure to rescue after cardiac arrest

OBJECTIVE

The influence of Extracorporeal Life Support Organization (ELSO) center of excellence (CoE) recognition on failure to rescue after cardiac surgery is unknown. We hypothesized that ELSO CoE would be associated with improved failure to rescue.

METHODS

Patients undergoing a Society of Thoracic Surgeons index operation in a regional collaborative (2011-2021) were included. Patients were stratified by whether or not their operation was performed at an ELSO CoE. Hierarchical logistic regression analyzed the association between ELSO CoE recognition and failure to rescue.

RESULTS

A total of 43,641 patients were included across 17 centers. In total, 807 developed cardiac arrest with 444 (55%) experiencing failure to rescue after cardiac arrest. Three centers received ELSO CoE recognition, and accounted for 4238 patients (9.71%). Before adjustment, operative mortality was equivalent between ELSO CoE and non-ELSO CoE centers (2.08% vs 2.36%; P = .25), as was the rate of any complication (34.5% vs 33.8%; P = .35) and cardiac arrest (1.49% vs 1.89%; P = .07). After adjustment, patients undergoing surgery at an ELSO CoE facility were observed to have 44% decreased odds of failure to rescue after cardiac arrest, relative to patients at non-ELSO CoE facility (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.316-0.993; P = .047).

CONCLUSIONS

ELSO CoE status is associated with improved failure to rescue following cardiac arrest for patients undergoing cardiac surgery. These findings highlight the important role that comprehensive quality programs serve in improving perioperative outcomes in cardiac surgery.

Living in high-poverty areas is associated with reduced survival in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms

OBJECTIVES

Studies have demonstrated that socioeconomic status, insurance, race, and distance impact clinical outcomes in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysms. The purpose of this study was to assess if these factors also impact clinical outcomes in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAAs).

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of patients with TAAAs confirmed by computed tomography imaging between 2009 and 2019 at a single institution. Patients' zip codes were mapped to American Community Survey Data to obtain geographic poverty rates. We used the standard U.S. Census definition of high-poverty concentration as >20% of the population living at 100% of the poverty rate. Our primary outcome was overall survival, stratified by whether the patient underwent repair.

RESULTS

Of 578 patients, 575 had zip code data and were analyzed. In both the nonoperative (N = 268) and operative (N = 307) groups, there were no significant differences in age, race, comorbidities, clinical urgency, surgery utilization, or surgery modality between patients living in high-poverty areas (N = 95, 16.4%) vs not. In the nonoperative group, patients from high-poverty areas were more likely to have aneurysm due to dissection (37.5% vs 17.6%, P = .03). In multivariate analyses, patients from high-poverty zip codes had significantly worse nonoperative survival (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.9, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.3, P = .03). In the repair group, high poverty was also a significant predictor of reduced postoperative survival (HR: 1.65, 95% CI: 1-2.63, P = .04). Adding the Gagne Index, these differences persisted in both groups (nonoperative: HR: 1.93, 95% CI: 1.01-3.70, P = .05; operative: HR: 1.62, 95% CI: 1.03-2.56, P = .04). In Kaplan-Meier analysis, the difference in postoperative survival began approximately 1.5 years after repair. Private insurance was predictive of improved postoperative survival (HR: 0.42, 95% CI: 0.18-0.95, P = .04) but reduced nonoperative survival (HR: 2.05, 95% 1.01-4.14, P = .04). Data were insufficient to determine if race impacted survival discretely from poverty status. These results were found after adjusting for age, race, sex, maximum aortic diameter, coronary artery disease, distance from the hospital, insurance, and active smoking. Interestingly, in multivariate regression, traveling greater than 100 miles was correlated with increased surgery utilization (odds ratio: 1.58, 95% CI: 1.08-2.33, P = .02) and long-term survival (HR: 0.61, 95% CI: 0.41-0.92, P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with TAAAs living in high-poverty areas had significantly more dissections and suffered a nearly doubled risk of mortality compared with patients living outside such areas. These data suggest that these disparities are attributed to the overall impacts of poverty and highlight the pressing need for research into TAAA disparities.

Effects of Sociodemographic Factors on Access to and Outcomes in Congenital Heart Disease in the United States

Congenital heart defects (CHDs) are complex conditions affecting the heart and/or great vessels that are present at birth. These defects occur in approximately 9 in every 1000 live births. From diagnosis to intervention, care has dramatically improved over the last several decades. Patients with CHDs are now living well into adulthood. However, there are factors that have been associated with poor outcomes across the lifespan of these patients. These factors include sociodemographic and socioeconomic positions. This commentary examined the disparities and solutions within the evolution of CHD care in the United States.

Global Access to Cardiac Surgery Centers: Distribution, Disparities, and Targets

BACKGROUND

Global data on cardiac surgery centers are outdated and survey-based. In 1995, there were 0.7 centers per million population, ranging from one per 120,000 in North America to one per 33 million in sub-Saharan Africa. This study analyzes the contemporary distribution of cardiac surgery centers and proposes targets relative to countries' cardiovascular disease (CVD) burdens.

METHODS

Medical databases, gray literature, and governmental reports were used to identify the most recent post-2010 data that describe the number of centers performing cardiac surgery in each nation. The 2019 Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation Global Burden of Disease Results Tool provided national CVD burdens. One-third of the CVD burden was assumed to be surgical. Center targets were proposed as the average or half of the average of centers per million surgical CVD patients in high-income countries.

RESULTS

5,111 cardiac surgery centers were identified across 230 nations and territories with available data, equaling 0.73 centers per million population. The median (interquartile range) number of centers ranged from 0 (0-0.06) per million in low-income countries to 0.75 (0-1.44) in high-income countries. Targets were 612.2 (optimistic) or 306.1 (conservative) centers per million surgical CVD incidence. In 2019, low-income, lower-middle-income, and upper-middle-income countries possessed 34.8, 149.0, and 271.9 centers per million surgical CVD incidence.

CONCLUSION

Little progress has been made to increase cardiac surgery centers per population despite growing CVD burdens. Today's global cardiac surgical capacity remains insufficient, disproportionately affecting the world's poorest regions.

Systems of Care Factors Should Be Considered in Regionalization of Congenital Cardiac Surgery

BACKGROUND

Regionalization of care has been proposed to optimize outcomes in congenital cardiac surgery (CCS). We hypothesized that hospital infrastructure and systems of care factors could also be considered in regionalization efforts.

METHODS

Observed-to-expected (O/E) mortality ratio and hospital volumes were obtained between 2015 and 2018 from public reporting data. Using a resource dependence framework, we examined factors obtained from American Hospital Association, Children's Hospital Association, and hospital websites. Linear regression models were estimated with volume only, then with hospital factors, stratified by procedural complexity. Robust regression models were reestimated to assess the impact of outliers.

RESULTS

We found wide variation in the volume of congenital cardiac surgeries performed (89-3920) and in the surgical outcomes (O/E ratio range, 0.3-3.1). Six outlier hospitals performed few high-complexity cases with high mortality. Univariate analysis including all cases indicated that higher volume predicted lower O/E ratio (β = -0.02; SE = 0.008; P = .011). However, this effect was driven by the most complex cases. Models stratified by The Society of Thoracic Surgeons-European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery category show that volume is a significant predictor only in category 5 cases (β = -1.707; SE = 0.663; P = .012). Robust univariate regression accounting for outliers found no effect of volume on O/E ratio (β = 0.005; SE = 0.002; P = .975). Elimination of outliers through robust multivariate regression decreased the volume-outcome relationship and found a modest relationship between health plan ownership and outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Systems of care factors should be considered in addition to volume in designing regionalization in CCS. Patient-level data sets will better define these factors.

Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status Independently Predicts Outcomes After Mitral Valve Surgery

BACKGROUND

Socioeconomic status has increasingly recognized influence on outcomes after cardiac surgery. However, singular metrics fail to fully capture the socioeconomic context within which patients live, which vary greatly between neighborhoods. We sought to explore the impact of neighborhood-level socioeconomic status on patients undergoing mitral valve surgery in the United States.

METHODS

Adults undergoing first-time, isolated mitral valve surgery were queried from The Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database between 2012 and 2018. Socioeconomic status was quantified using the Area Deprivation Index, a weighted composite including average housing prices, household incomes, education, and employment levels. The associations between regional deprivation, access to mitral surgery, valve repair rates, and outcomes were evaluated using logistic regression.

RESULTS

Among 137,100 patients included, patients with socioeconomic deprivation had fewer elective presentations, more comorbidity burden, and more urgent/emergent surgery. Patients from less disadvantaged areas received operations from higher volume surgeons and had higher repair rates (highest vs lowest quintile: 72% vs 51%, P < .001, more minimally-invasive approach (33% vs 20%, P < .001), lower composite complication rate (42% vs 50%, P < .001), and lower 30-day mortality (1.8% vs 3.9%, P < .001). After hierarchical multivariable adjustment, the Area Deprivation Index significantly predicted 30-day mortality and repair rate (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In a risk-adjusted national analysis of mitral surgery, patients from more deprived areas were less likely to undergo mitral repair and more likely to have complications. Further work at targeting neighborhood-level disparity is important to improving mitral surgical outcomes in the United States.

Regionalization or Access to Care? A Joint Pediatric Heart Care Program That Achieves Both: One Program-Two Sites

Background: Regionalization of care for children with congenital heart disease has been proposed as a method to improve outcomes. This has raised concerns about limiting access to care. We present the details of a joint pediatric heart care program (JPHCP) which utilized regionalization and actually improved access to care. Methods: In 2017, Kentucky Children's Hospital (KCH) launched the JPHCP with Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (CCHMC). This unique satellite model was the product of several years of planning, leading to a comprehensive strategy with shared personnel, conferences, and a robust transfer system; "one program-two sites." Results: Between March 2017 and the end of June 2022, 355 operations were performed at KCH under the auspices of the JPHCP. As of the most recent published Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) outcome report (through the end of June 2021), for all STAT categories, the JPHCP at KCH outperformed the STS overall in postoperative length of stay, and the mortality rate was lower than expected for the case mix. Of the 355 operations, there were 131 STAT 1, 148 STAT 2, 40 STAT 3, and 36 STAT 4 operations, with two operative mortalities: an adult undergoing surgery for Ebstein anomaly, and a premature infant who died from severe lung disease many months after aortopexy. Conclusions: With a select case mix, and by affiliating with a large volume congenital heart center, the creation of the JPHCP at KCH was able to achieve excellent congenital heart surgery results. Importantly, access to care was improved for those children at the more remote location utilizing this one program-two sites model.

Cardiac surgery and the sustainable development goals: a review

Background

In 2015, the United Nations adopted the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) as key priorities to improve the global health and international development agenda in an intersectoral manner, highlighting 17 SDGs. Six billion people lack access to safe, timely, and affordable cardiac surgical care due to capacity, geographic, and financial barriers. Nevertheless, cardiac surgery is largely disregarded on the global health agenda. In this review, we explore the intersection between cardiac surgery and the SDGs to delineate potential policy and advocacy avenues for the cardiothoracic surgical community.

Main body

A narrative review was performed using the PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and WHO databases with variations of the search terms “cardiac surgery,” “cardiovascular diseases,” and keywords extracted from individual SDGs. All SDGs were manually reviewed to define intersectionality with global cardiac surgery. Out of 17 SDGs, 15 are relevant and require additional attention from the cardiovascular community. SDG3, “Good Health and Well-being,” is the most relevant, although the intersection between global cardiac surgery and other SDGs is apparent. A call for interdisciplinary collaboration through increased preventive mechanisms, rigorous, all-inclusive clinical trials, advocacy with relevant legislators, and mobilizing capacity building mechanisms are made.

Conclusion

Meeting the SDGs will require recognition of cardiovascular disease management, including cardiac surgical care. Cardiac surgeons are essential stakeholders of multidisciplinary collaborations working to improve access to safe, timely, and affordable cardiac surgery for all. Their role as advocates will be vital to establish local, national, regional, and international partnerships and to ensure progress towards SDG attainment.

Regionalization of congenital cardiac surgical care: what it will take

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Decentralized, inconsistent healthcare delivery results in variable outcomes and wastes nearly one trillion dollars annually in the United States (US). Congenital heart surgery (CHS) is not immune due to high, variable costs and inconsistent outcomes across hospitals. Many European countries and Canada have addressed these issues by regionalizing CHS. Centralizing resources lowers costs, reduces in-hospital mortality and improves long-term survival. Although the impact on travel distance for patients is limited, the effect on healthcare disparities requires study. This review summarizes current data and integrates these into paths to regionalization through health policy, research, and academic collaboration.

RECENT FINDINGS

There are too many CHS programs in the US with unnecessarily high densities of centers in certain regions. This distribution lowers center and surgeon case volumes, creates redundancy, and increases variation in costs and outcomes. Simultaneously, adhering to suboptimal allocation impedes the understanding of optimal regionalization models to optimize congenital cardiac care delivery.

SUMMARY

CHS regionalization models developed for the US increase surgeon and center volume, decrease healthcare spending, and improve patient outcomes without substantially increasing travel distance. Regionalization in countries with few or no existing CHS programs is yet to be explored, but may be associated with more efficient spending and procedural complexity expansion.

Low parental socioeconomic position results in longer post-Norwood length of stay

BACKGROUND

Length of stay (LOS) has been proposed as a quality metric in congenital heart surgery, but LOS may be influenced by parental socioeconomic position (SEP). We aimed to examine the relationship between post-Norwood LOS and SEP.

METHODS

Patients undergoing a Norwood procedure from 2008 to 2018 for hypoplastic left heart syndrome from a single institution, who were discharged alive before second-stage palliation, were included. SEP was defined by Area Deprivation Index, distance from hospital, insurance status, and immigration status. A directed acyclic graph identified confounders for the effect of SEP on LOS, which included gestational age, hypoplastic left heart syndrome subtype, postoperative cardiac arrest, reoperations, and ventilator days. A negative binomial model was used to assess effect of SEP on LOS.

RESULTS

In total, 98 patients were discharged alive at a median 37 days (15th-85th percentile 26-72). The majority of patients were children of US citizens and permanent residents (n = 89; 91%). Private insurance covered 54 (55%), with 44 (45%) covered by Medicaid or Tricare. Median Area Deprivation Index was 54 (15th-85th percentile, 25-87). Median distance traveled was 72 miles (15th-85th percentile, 17-469 miles). For every 10 percentile increase in Area Deprivation Index, LOS increased 4% (incidence rate ratio, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.007-1.077; P = .022). Insurance type, immigration status, and distance traveled did not affect postoperative length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant relationship between SEP and LOS. Consideration of LOS as a quality indicator may penalize hospitals providing care for patients with lower parental SEP.

Failure to Rescue After Cardiac Surgery at Minority-Serving Hospitals: Room for Improvement

BACKGROUND

Despite living closer to high-performing centers, minority patients reportedly receive care at lower-quality hospitals. Investigating opportunities for improvement at minority-serving hospitals may help attenuate disparities in care among cardiothoracic surgery patients. We sought to investigate the relationship between hospital quality and failure-to-rescue (FTR).

METHODS

Over 451,000 cardiac surgery patients from 2000-2011 at minority-serving hospitals (MSH) were identified from the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. After stratifying patients by hospital mortality quartile, outcomes at poorly performing MSH were compared to those at high-performing MSH. Propensity-score matching was used for comparisons.

RESULTS

Though patients at poorly performing centers were more likely black, there were no significant differences in admission status (urgent vs elective), income, insurance, or risk before matching. There were no differences in comorbidities between low- and high-performing MSH including chronic lung disease, coagulopathy, hypertension, and renal failure. While complications remained similar across mortality quartiles (29%, 32%, 31%, 36% respectively; p<0.0001), FTR increased in a stepwise manner (5.4%, 8.7%, 11.2%, 15.5%; p<0.0001). The same was true after propensity-score matching - FTR nearly tripled in the highest-mortality centers (14.4% vs 5.3%; p<0.0001) while complications only increased 1.2-fold from 31.1% to 36.7% (p=0.0058). This finding persisted even when stratified by procedure type and by complication.

CONCLUSIONS

Improving timely management of complications after cardiac surgery may serve as a promising opportunity for increasing quality of care at MSH. When considering centralization of care in cardiac surgery, equal emphasis should be placed on collaboration between tertiary care centers and low-quality MSH to mitigate disparities in care.