"Trifecta" in partial nephrectomy

[Update from d-uo: what can healthcare research contribute to renal cell carcinoma?]

BACKGROUND

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) accounts for about 13.5% of all urological tumors. Healthcare research analyzes whether treatment recommendations from controlled studies or guidelines are being implemented in routine care. A prerequisite for the assessment and scientific study of the quality of care in the treatment of urological tumors is standardized documentation.

OBJECTIVES

This article illustrates healthcare research in RCC by presenting current data from the prospective of the VERSUS study (VERSorgUngsStudie) by d‑uo (Deutsche Uro-Onkologen).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The VERSUS study is a noninterventional, prospective, multicentric study for the documentation and descriptive statistical analysis of the diagnosis, treatment, and aftercare of uro-oncological patients.

RESULTS

Of 25,065 patients currently included in the VERSUS study, 1976 have a diagnosis of RCC. Data regarding stage distribution, reason leading to initial diagnosis, distribution of symptomatic vs. asymptomatic patients as well as surgical margins from surgical treatment of RCC are presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite providing interesting results, the VERSUS study remains limited with regard to the depth of the data, since it relies on the same dataset as the German cancer registry. In order to provide more comprehensive healthcare research, organ-related cancer registries like the Urothelial Cancer National Registry (UroNAT) and the Prostate Cancer National Registry (ProNAT) by d‑uo are necessary. These national cancer registries by d‑uo are unique in that they comprise all tumor stages. The Renal Cancer National Registry (ReNAT) by d‑uo is in preparation and will be a valuable contribution to quality assurance of oncological care in Germany.

Association between glycemia and outcomes of neonates with hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

The research aimed to provide the most recent and comprehensive analysis and evidence update comparing outcomes in neonatal encephalopathy (NE) based on different glycemia levels.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A comprehensive search of Cochrane, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, CNKI, and Wanfang databases was conducted until September 2023. The purpose was to identify research that examined the effects of hyperglycemia, hypoglycemia, and normoglycemia on NE outcomes. The hyperglycemic, normoglycemic and hypoglycemic group were compared. Outcomes measured were mortality, abnormal MRI, hearing or visual unfavorable outcomes, neurodevelopmental delay, cerebral palsy, and all unfavorable outcomes.

RESULTS

Thirteen literatures comprising 2,427 participants (1,233 with normoglycemia, 835 with hyperglycemia, and 359 with hypoglycemia) were considered. Pooled analysis showed more overall adverse outcomes, higher mortality and worse hearing or visual outcomes in the hyperglycemic and hypoglycemic group compared to the normoglycemic group. There was no notable distinction found in abnormal MRI and cerebral palsy among all groups. The hypoglycemic group exhibited greater neurodevelopmental delay than normoglycemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Maintaining normal blood glucose levels in neonates with NE can help reduce the risk of adverse consequences such as hearing and visual impairment.

The effect of 11th rib excision on perioperative outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy for upper pole renal tumors

INTRODUCTION

We aimed to evaluate the effect of eleven11th rib resection.on the perioperative period TRIFECTA criteria in patients who underwent retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy (PN) with the diagnosis of upper pole kidney tumors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the data of the patients who underwent Open PN for upper pole renal masses between 2018 and 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: PN with rib resection and PN without rib resection. The demographic characteristics, tumor sizes, PADUA scores, warm-cold renal ischemia times, mass excision and tumor bed suturing times, histopathological tumor type and surgical margin positivity of the patients were examined. Both groups were evaluated comparatively based on this data.

RESULTS

The renal nephrometry scores of the two groups were similar. The total renal ischemia time was significantly shorter in the patients who underwent a rib resection than in those who did not (p < 0.001). Both the tumor excision and tumor bed suturing times were significantly shorter in the group that underwent a rib resection than in the group that did not (p < 0.001). The Clavien-Dindo complication grades were statistically similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Complex in nature and high-risk renal masses located in the upper pole of the kidney, partial nephrectomy performed with an 11th rib resection can be considered a reliable surgical option with a shorter ischemia time, supporting the preservation of long-term renal function.

Exploring the Role of Intracorporeal Ultrasound in Partial Nephrectomies: A Systematic Review

Renal cell carcinoma accounts for the sixth most common cancer in the United Kingdom. With the increasing application of cross-sectional imaging, the frequency of incidental renal masses has increased over time. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy has become the standard of care in the management of size and stage-appropriate renal masses. The objective of this systematic review was to analyse the surgical outcomes when intracorporeal ultrasound was utilised as an adjunct in partial nephrectomy. A comprehensive search in PubMed and Google Scholar was performed in July 2024 for publications in the English language. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the role of intracorporeal ultrasound as an adjunct in robotic partial nephrectomies and its impact on tumour clearance. After identifying 609 records, 52 records were screened and 44 records were sought for retrieval. Eight publications were included in this systematic review comprising 765 patients. Seven of the eight studies reported outcomes from single centres. The mean percentage of negative surgical margins was 97.6% (range = 92.1-100%). The use of intracorporeal ultrasound as an adjunct in partial nephrectomy for T1 renal cell cancer has proven to improve the rates of negative surgical margins thereby reducing the incidence of local recurrence and distant metastasis.

Impact of a kidney-adjusted ERAS® protocol on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy

PURPOSE

Evaluation of a kidney-adjusted enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) protocol (kERAS) in patients undergoing nephron-sparing surgery (PN).

METHODS

The kERAS protocol is a multidimensional protocol focusing on optimized perioperative fluid and nutrition management as well as strict intraoperative and postoperative blood pressure limits. It was applied in a prospective cohort (n = 147) of patients undergoing open or robotic PN. Patients were analyzed for the development of acute postoperative renal failure (AKI), achievement of TRIFECTA criteria, upstaging or new onset of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and length of hospital stay (LOS) and compared to a retrospective cohort (n = 162) without application of the protocol.

RESULTS

Cox regression analyses could not confirm a protective effect of kERAS on the development of AKI post-surgery. A positive effect was observed on TRIFECTA achievement (OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.0-4.5, p = 0.0374). Patients treated with the kERAS protocol showed less long-term CKD upstaging compared to those treated with the standard protocol (p = 0.0033). There was no significant effect on LOS and new onset of CKD.

CONCLUSION

The implementation of a kERAS protocol can have a positive influence on long-term renal function in patients undergoing PN. It can be used safely without promoting AKI. Furthermore, it can be realized with a manageable amount of additional effort.

Trifecta outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy in obese patients: A comparison of body mass index <25, 25 to <30, and ≥30

OBJECTIVE

We analyzed robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN) outcomes in obese patients based on body mass index (BMI) and trifecta achievement.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 296 patients who underwent RPN at Kansai Medical University Hospital between 2014 and 2022. The preoperative clinical data and perioperative outcomes were evaluated. Trifecta achievement (negative surgical margin, no major complications, and no acute kidney injury on postoperative day three) and its relationship to three BMI groups (<25, 25 to <30, and ≥30) were the primary outcome. The correlation between factors in achieving trifecta and BMI was evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses assessed variables for achieving the trifecta with logistic regression analysis. C-statistics quantitatively evaluated the prediction accuracy.

RESULTS

Among 296 patients, 264 (89.2%) achieved trifecta (BMI categories were <25 [89.9%], 25 to <30 [89.4%], and ≥30 [82.6%]). There was no significant BMI-related difference (p = 0.566). Intraoperative blood loss increased with the BMI (p = 0.034). Multivariate analyses showed preoperative aspects and dimensions used for anatomic (PADUA) score independently predicted trifecta failure (odds ratio 1.71; 95% confidence interval 1.32-2.20; p < 0.001). The C-statistics of the PADUA score increased with increasing BMI.

CONCLUSIONS

Higher BMI patients had more intraoperative blood loss during RPN. However, RPN remains safe and has acceptable quality and functional outcomes. Since patients with high PADUA scores combined with a high BMI may be at risk of trifecta failure, this should be explained before RPN.

Efficacy of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy compared to conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumor: a multicenter, prospective study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors with the reported outcomes of conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy and investigate the transition of renal function after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label trial across 17 academic centers in Japan. Patients with endophytic renal tumors classified as cT1, cN0, cM0 were included and underwent robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. We defined two primary outcomes to assess functional and oncological aspects of the procedure, which were represented by the warm ischemic time and positive surgical margin, respectively. Comparisons were made using control values previously reported in laparoscopic partial nephrectomy studies. In the historical control group, the warm ischemia time was 25.2, and the positive surgical margin was 13%.

RESULTS

Our per-protocol analysis included 98 participants. The mean warm ischemic time was 20.3 min (99% confidence interval 18.3-22.3; p < 0.0001 vs. 25.2). None of the 98 participants had a positive surgical margin (99% confidence interval 0-5.3%; p < 0.0001 vs. 13.0%). The renal function ratio of eGFR before and after protocol treatment multiplied by splits was 0.70 (95% confidence interval: 0.66-0.75). Factors such as preoperative eGFR, resected weight, and warm ischemic time influenced the functional loss of the partially nephrectomized kidney after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors offers a shorter warm ischemia time and comparable positive surgical margin rate compared with conventional laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.

Impact of tumor multiplicity on the prognosis of patients with primary renal cell carcinoma: a SEER database analysis

To compare clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with multiple renal cell carcinoma versus single renal cell carcinoma. Develop a prognostic model for predicting prognosis in patients with multiple tumors and analyze prognostic factors. Patients with primary multiple renal cell carcinoma were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2015). They were divided into single-tumor and multiple-tumor groups. Survival analysis was conducted using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. A Cox regression model was used to identify potential prognostic factors. A total of 19,489 renal cell carcinoma cases were included, with 947 in the multiple-tumor group and 18,542 in the single-tumor group. The multiple-tumor group had lower cancer-specific survival (P = 0.03, HR = 1.431). Cox regression identified risk factors for the multiple-tumor group including number of tumors, gender, combined summary stage, T stage, N stage, tumor size, and type of surgery. The predicted probabilities showed acceptable agreement with the actual observations at 3-, 5-, and 8-years area under the curve values in both the training and validation cohorts (0.831 vs. 0.605; 0.775 vs. 0.672; and 0.797 vs. 0.699, respectively). Compared with single renal cell carcinoma, multiple renal cell carcinoma is associated with decreased cancer-specific survival. Additionally, we identified several prognostic factors including the number of tumors, T stage, tumor size, and type of surgery. These findings offer valuable insights for selecting appropriate treatment strategies for patients diagnosed with multiple renal cell carcinomas.

Thermal Ablation for Small Renal Masses: Identifying Anthropometric Factors for Predicting Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes

OBJECTIVES

To test for specific anthropometric parameters to predict perioperative outcomes after thermal ablation (TA) for renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Retrospective single center (2008-2022) analysis of 538 T1a-b RCC patients treated with TA. We tested for specific anthropometric parameters, namely skin to tumor distance (STTD), perirenal fat thickness (PFT), median psoas muscle axial area (PMAA) and median paravertebral muscle axial area (PVMAA), to predict TRIFECTA achievement: (1) absence of CLAVIEN-DINDO≥ 3 complications; (2) complete ablation; (3) absence of ≥ 30% decrease in eGFR. Univariable (ULRM) and multivariable logistic regression models (MLRM) were used for testing TRIFECTA achievement.

RESULTS

Overall, 103 patients (19%) did not achieve TRIFECTA. Of all anthropometric factors, only lower PMAA was associated with no TRIFECTA achievement (10 vs. 11 cm2, P = .02). However, ULRMs and MLRMs did not confirmed the aforementioned association. We than tested for the 3 specific TRIFECTA items. In separate ULRM and MLRM predicting incomplete ablation, both continuously coded STTD (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.02; CI: 1.01-1.03; P = .02) and STTD strata (STTD > 10 cm; OR: 2.1; CI: 1.1-4.1; P = .03) achieved independent predictor status. Conversely, in separate ULRM and MLRM predicting CLAVIEN-DINDO ≥3 complications, both continuously coded PFT (OR: 1.04; CI: 1.01-1.07; P = .01) and PFT strata (PFT ≥ 14 mm; OR: 3.3; CI: 1.6-10.2; P = .003) achieved independent predictor status. Last, none of the anthropometric parameters were associated with eGFR decrease ≥ 30%.

CONCLUSION

None of the tested anthropometric parameters predicted TRIFECTA achievement. However, when the 3 specific TRIFECTA items were tested, STTD and PFT were associated with, respectively, incomplete ablation and CLAVIEN-DINDO ≥ 3 complications.

Renal Function Preservation in Purely Off-Clamp Sutureless Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Initial Experience and Technique

The aim of our study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a sutureless off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (sl-oc RAPN), particularly its impact on renal function. A multicenter study was conducted from April 2021 to June 2022. Patients diagnosed with a renal mass of >2 cm and a PADUA score of ≤6 consecutively underwent an sl-oc RAPN procedure. Tumor features, patients characteristics, and intraoperative outcomes were assessed. An evaluation of renal function was performed preoperatively, and again at 1 and 3 months after surgery by measuring the creatinine and blood urea nitrogen levels. The renal function of the two separate kidneys was assessed by a sequential renal scintigraphy performed before and at least 30 days after surgery. A total of 21 patients underwent an sl-oc RAPN. The median age was 64 years (IQR 52/70), the median tumor diameter was 40 mm (IQR 29/45), and the median PADUA score was 4 (3.5/5). The intraoperative outcomes included operative time (OT), 90 (IQR 74/100) min; estimated blood loss (EBL), 150 (IQR 50/300) mL; and perioperative complications, CD > 3 1(5%); only two patients presented positive surgical margins in their final histology (2/21, 10%). Compared to the preoperative value, a decrease in renal function was highlighted with a statistically significant median decrease of 10 mL/min (p < 0.01). The renal scintigraphy showed an overall decrease in renal function compared to the preoperative value, with a range in the operated kidney that varied from 0 to 15 mL/s and from 0% to 40%, with a median value of 4 mL/s and 12%. sl-oc RAPN is a safe procedure, with a minimal impact on kidney function alteration. This technique has proven effective in preserving renal function and maintaining optimal oncological outcomes with limited complications.

Achieving trifecta outcomes in robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy within a fellowship training centre

To assess the robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) trifecta rate within a fellowship program. Patients undergoing RAPN 01/01/2010-01/07/2023 were enrolled from a prospectively maintained database. All cases were performed jointly with surgical fellows, except when privately insured. Patients were excluded if they were converted to open or radical nephrectomy. The primary outcome was achieving the 'trifecta' of negative surgical margins, no complications < 30 days post-operatively and warm ischaemia time (WIT) < 25 min. The secondary outcomes were factors associated with trifecta success. Ethics approval was obtained. In the enrolment period, 355 patients underwent intended RAPN, of whom seven were excluded due to conversion to conversion to radical nephrectomy (6 patients) or conversion to open (one). Amongst the 348 eligible patients, median age was 60 years, 115 (33%) were female and 19 were private patients. WIT was < 25 min for 324/337 patients (96%), surgical margins were negative in 325 (93%), 294 (84%) were complication-free at 30 days and 301/320 (94%) had a < 30% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3-6 months postoperatively. Subsequently, trifecta outcomes were achieved in 253/337 (75%) patients. Comparing with patients without those with trifecta success were similar in all thirteen measured patients and tumour factors. In a teaching hospital, with a fellowship training programme, trifecta outcome is achievable for most RAPN patients, and at a rate comparable to international standards. Fellowship centres should monitor their outcomes to ensure high patient outcomes are maintained alongside training requirements.

Best predictive single nephrometry score component to correlate with achievement of trifecta outcome in laparoscopic and robotic surgery

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the predictive value of individual components of the R.E.N.A.L scoring system for Laparoscopic (LPN) and Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN).

METHODS

Patients that had undergone a Laparoscopic (LPN) or Robotic Partial Nephrectomy (RPN) between 2018 and 2023 were reviewed. Our data collection included Race, Ethnicity, Age, BMI, R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score, and complications. Cases that achieved trifecta outcomes were designated as "Group A" and cases that did not achieve trifecta were "Group B". All the data were collected using REDCap database.

RESULTS

A total of 111 cases were included, Group A consisted of 82% of all cases, whereas Group B 18%. Radius score demonstrated significant distinction concerning trifecta attainment and was the most predictive component of the 5 scoring metrics of the nephrometry system. In a subgroup analysis, R-score of 3 or a renal mass measuring ≥ 7 cm, was a significant independent negative predictor for trifecta outcomes, as well as tumor size at presentation.

CONCLUSION

Renal nephrometry score is predictive of trifecta outcomes for patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic partial nephrectomy. Radius of mass was the most effective predictive component of the nephrometry score for trifecta prediction.

Three-dimensional computed tomography-based resection process map for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: propensity score matching of a single-center retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We aimed to examine the effect of preoperative three-dimensional (3D) computed tomography (CT)-based resection process map (RPM) imaging on the outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 177 patients (RPM group, n = 92; non-RPM group, n = 85) who underwent this surgery between November 2012 and April 2022. Patient-specific contrast-enhanced CT images were used to construct an RPM, a 3D representation of the kidney showing the planned tumor resection and a 5 mm safety margin. Outcome analyses were performed using propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was the trifecta achievement rate.

RESULTS

We extracted 90 cases. The trifecta achievement rate showed no significant differences between the RPM (73.3%) and non-RPM groups (73.3%). However, the RPM group had fewer Grade 3 and higher complications (0.0% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.026). The da Vinci Xi (OR 3.38, p = 0.016) and tumor diameter (OR 0.95, p = 0.013) were independent factors affecting trifecta achievement in multivariate analysis. Using RPM imaging was associated with the absence of Grade 3 and higher perioperative complications (OR 5.33, p = 0.036) in univariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Using preoperative 3D CT-based RPM images before RAPN may not affect trifecta achievement, but may reduce serious complication occurrence by providing detailed information on tumor resection.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy in younger versus older adults with renal cell carcinoma: a propensity score-matched analysis

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to compare the surgical outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) between younger and older patients after adjusting for their background differences. We particularly assessed RAPN outcomes and safety in older patients.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated 559 patients clinically diagnosed with T1 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and treated with RAPN between 2013 and 2022 at five institutions in Japan. The patients were classified into two groups according to their age during surgery (younger group: < 75 years, older group: ≥ 75 years). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to adjust for the differences in the backgrounds between younger and older patients, and surgical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

Among the 559 patients, 422 (75.5%) and 137 (24.5%) were classified into the younger and older groups, respectively; 204 and 102 patients from the younger and older groups were matched according to PSM, respectively. Subsequently, patient characteristics other than age were not significantly different between the two groups. In the matched cohort, the older group had more patients with major complications (younger, 3.0%; older, 8.8%; P = 0.045).

CONCLUSION

Surgical outcomes of RAPN in older patients with RCC were comparable with those in younger patients, although older patients experiencedsignificantly more complications than younger patients. These results suggest the need for further detailed preoperative evaluation and appropriate postoperative management in older patients receiving RAPN.

Revolutionary Advances of Robotic Surgery in Urology Field

The advent of robotic surgery has significantly impacted various surgical fields, particularly urology, gynecology, general surgery, and cardiac surgery. While the da Vinci robotic platform has been predominant over the past two decades, recent years have witnessed the emergence of new robotic platforms in Japan, now actively used in clinical practice. Currently, the available systems in Japan, alongside the da Vinci, include the Hinotori, Senhance, Hugo Ras, and Saroa surgical systems. This review focuses on comparing the notable functions of each system in urologic surgery, emphasizing the areas in which they differ from the da Vinci robotic platform. The development of new robotic systems is ongoing, promising not only cost reductions but also the introduction of innovative devices and educational systems. Soft robotics, which constructs robotic devices using soft, adaptable materials, has the potential to become central to the next generation of robotic surgery. Moreover, the collaboration between Artificial Intelligence (AI) and robotic surgery significantly contributes to increasing efficiency, accuracy, and safety in the medical field, with more innovative applications expected in the future.

Artificial intelligence and machine learning trends in kidney care

BACKGROUND

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) in kidney care has seen a significant rise in recent years. This study specifically analyzed AI and ML research publications related to kidney care to identify leading authors, institutions, and countries in this area. It aimed to examine publication trends and patterns, and to explore the impact of collaborative efforts on citation metrics.

METHODS

The study used the Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) of Clarivate Analytics Web of Science Core Collection to search for AI and machine learning publications related to nephrology from 1992 to 2021. The authors used quotation marks and Boolean operator "or" to search for keywords in the title, abstract, author keywords, and Keywords Plus. In addition, the 'front page' filter was applied. A total of 5425 documents were identified and analyzed.

RESULTS

The results showed that articles represent 75% of the analyzed documents, with an average author to publications ratio of 7.4 and an average number of citations per publication in 2021 of 18. English articles had a higher citation rate than non-English articles. The USA dominated in all publication indicators, followed by China. Notably, the research also showed that collaborative efforts tend to result in higher citation rates. A significant portion of the publications were found in urology journals, emphasizing the broader scope of kidney care beyond traditional nephrology.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings underscore the importance of AI and ML in enhancing kidney care, offering a roadmap for future research and implementation in this expanding field.

Robot-assisted Simple Enucleation Versus Standard Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy for Low- or Intermediate-complexity, Clinical T1 Renal Tumors: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial

BACKGROUND

Although partial nephrectomy has become the gold standard for T1 renal tumors whenever technically feasible, simple enucleation has shown superior results. To the best of our knowledge, no randomized controlled trials comparing these two surgical approaches have been published.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the surgical margin status for robot-assisted simple enucleation (RASE) and standard robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (sRAPN) for clinical T1 renal tumors.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, noninferiority trial. A total of 380 patients aged 18-80 yr with newly diagnosed, sporadic, unilateral clinical T1 renal tumors (RENAL score <10) were enrolled and randomized to RASE or sRAPN. The primary endpoint was the positive surgical margin (PSM) rate, with a noninferiority margin of 7.5% set. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03624673).

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

We defined noninferiority for RASE versus standard RAPN as an upper 95% confidence interval (CI) bound of <7.5% for the difference in the proportion of patients with a PSM.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A cohort of 380 patients was enrolled and randomly assigned to RASE (n = 190) or sRAPN (n = 190). On intention-to-treat analysis for patients with malignant tumors, 2.3% of patients in the RASE group and 3.0% in the sRAPN group had a PSM. The RASE group showed noninferiority to the sRAPN group within a 7.5% margin (difference -0.7%, 95% CI -4.0% to 2.7%). Per-protocol analysis also demonstrated noninferiority of RASE. The RASE group had a shorter median operative time (145 vs 155 min; p = 0.018) and a lower rate of tumor bed suturing (8.9% vs 43%; p < 0.001) in comparison to the sRAPN group. Estimated blood loss was considerably lower in the sRAPN group than in the RASE group (p = 0.046). The rate of recurrence did not differ between the groups (p > 0.9).

CONCLUSIONS

RASE for the management of low- to intermediate-complexity tumors is noninferior to sRAPN in terms of the PSM rate. Long-term follow-up is needed to draw conclusions regarding oncological outcomes.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We carried out a trial to compare simple tumor enucleation versus partial nephrectomy for renal tumors. The outcome we assessed was the proportion of patients with a positive surgical margin. Our results show that simple tumor enucleation is not inferior to partial nephrectomy for this outcome. Longer follow-up is needed to assess other cancer control outcomes.

Off-clamp vs on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare intra- and postoperative outcomes between off-clamp and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN), using data from randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or covariate-matched studies (propensity score-matched or matched-pair analysis).

METHODS

A Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-compliant literature review was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and CENTRAL for relevant studies comparing off-clamp to on-clamp RAPN. Primary outcomes were estimated blood loss, postoperative percentage decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), and margin positive rate. Secondary outcomes were operative time, postoperative eGFR, length of stay, all postoperative complications, major complications, and need for transfusion. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to generate mean differences (MDs) or odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

A total of 10 studies (2307 patients) were shortlisted for analysis. There was no significant difference in estimated operative blood loss between off-clamp and on-clamp RAPN (MD 21.9 mL, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.9 to 44.7 mL; P = 0.06, I2  = 58%). Off-clamp RAPN yielded a smaller postoperative eGFR deterioration (MD 3.10%, 95% CI 1.05-5.16%; P = 0.008, I2  = 13%) and lower odds of margin positivity (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.40-0.94; P = 0.03, I2  = 0%). No significant differences were found for all secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Off-clamp and on-clamp RAPN are similarly effective approaches for selected renal masses. Within the classic trifecta of PN outcomes, off-clamp RAPN yields similar rates of perioperative complications and may possibly offer better preservation of renal function and reduced margin-positive rates.

Surgical and functional outcomes of repeat robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy compared with repeat open partial nephrectomy

OBJECTIVES

To examine the surgical and functional outcomes of patients who have undergone repeat open partial nephrectomy (reOPN) or robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (reRAPN).

METHODS

Until May 2022, 3310 patients with renal tumors underwent nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) at affiliated institutions. Of these, 22 and 17 patients who underwent reOPN and reRAPN, respectively, were included in this study.

RESULTS

No significant differences were found between the groups in terms of sex, age, comorbidities, recurrent tumor size at repeat NSS, interval from recurrence to initial NSS, and nephrometry score. ReRAPN had a shorter operative time (median: 138.0 vs. 214.0 min; p = 0.0023) and less estimated blood loss (median: 50.0 vs. 255.0 mL; p = 0.0261) than reOPN. The incidence of complications with Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ 2 was higher in the reOPN group than in the reRAPN group (31.8 vs. 5.9%; p = 0.0467). The mean decrease in the estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 months postoperatively was not significantly different between the groups. The trifecta achievement rates in the reRAPN (64.7%) and reOPN (27.3%) groups were significantly different (p = 0.0194). On multivariate analysis, age and surgical method were significant predictors of trifecta achievement after partial nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no differences in postoperative renal functional outcomes between reOPN and reRAPN. ReRAPN is superior to reOPN in terms of surgical burden. Therefore, ReRAPN is an important minimally invasive surgery for recurrent renal cell carcinoma.

Are 3D Image Guidance Systems Ready for Use? A Comparative Analysis of 3D Image Guidance Implementations in Minimally Invasive Partial Nephrectomy

Introduction: Three-dimensional image-guided surgical (3D-IGS) systems for minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) can potentially improve the efficiency and accuracy of intraoperative anatomical localization and tumor resection. This review seeks to analyze the current state of research regarding 3D-IGS, including the evaluation of clinical outcomes, system functionality, and qualitative insights regarding 3D-IGS's impact on surgical procedures. Methods: We have systematically reviewed the clinical literature pertaining to 3D-IGS deployed for MIPN. For inclusion, studies must produce a patient-specific 3D anatomical model from two-dimensional imaging. Data extracted from the studies include clinical results, registration (alignment of the 3D model to the surgical scene) method used, limitations, and data types reported. A subset of studies was qualitatively analyzed through an inductive coding approach to identify major themes and subthemes across the studies. Results: Twenty-five studies were included in the review. Eight (32%) studies reported clinical results that point to 3D-IGS improving multiple surgical outcomes. Manual registration was the most utilized (48%). Soft tissue deformation was the most cited limitation among the included studies. Many studies reported qualitative statements regarding surgeon accuracy improvement, but quantitative surgeon accuracy data were not reported. During the qualitative analysis, six major themes emerged across the nine applicable studies. They are as follows: 3D-IGS is necessary, 3D-IGS improved surgical outcomes, researcher/surgeon confidence in 3D-IGS system, enhanced surgeon ability/accuracy, anatomical explanation for qualitative assessment, and claims without data or reference to support. Conclusions: Currently, clinical outcomes are the main source of quantitative data available to point to 3D-IGS's efficacy. However, the literature qualitatively suggests the benefit of accurate 3D-IGS for robotic partial nephrectomy.

Partial nephrectomy series using Versius robotic surgical system: technique and outcomes of an initial experience

Partial nephrectomy (PN) represents a procedure where the use of a robot has further enabled successful completion of this complex surgery. The results of this procedure using Versius Robotic Surgical System (VRSS) still need to be evaluated. Our working group described the technique and reported the initial results of a series of PN using VRSS. We presented our setting, surgical technique and outcomes for PN, using VRSS. Between 2022 and 2023, 15 patients underwent PN performed by two surgeons in two different centers. Fifteen patients underwent PN. The median lesion size identified on preoperative imaging was 4 (IQR 2.3-5) cm. Median PADUA score was 8 (IQR 7-9). Two procedures were converted to radical nephrectomy for enhanced oncological disease control. Of the 13 nephrectomies that were completed as partial, 7 were performed clampless and 6 with warm ischemia clamping. Median clamping time was 10 (IQR 9-11) minutes. No procedure was converted to open. Median blood loss was 200 (IQR 100-250) mL. Median total operative time was 105 (IQR 100-110) minutes. Median console time was 75 (IQR 66-80) minutes. Median set-up time was 13 (IQR 12-14) minutes. No intraoperative complications were reported. The median hospitalization time was 4 (IQR 3.5-4) days. None of the patients were transfused and none of the patients required readmission. In a pathology report, one patient had a positive surgical margin. Our initial experience suggests that performing PN using VRSS is feasible with good short-term outcomes.

Partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: recommendations of the Italian Society of Urology RCC working group

INTRODUCTION

Partial nephrectomy (PN) aims to remove renal tumors while preserving renal function without affecting oncological and perioperative surgical outcomes. Aim of this paper is to summarize the current evidence on PN and to provide evidence-based recommendations on indications, surgical technique, perioperative management and postoperative surveillance of PN for renal tumors in the Italian clinical and health care system context.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

This review is the result of an interactive peer-reviewing process of the recent literature on PN for renal tumors carried out by an expert panel composed of members of the Italian Society of Urology (SIU) Renal Cell Carcinoma Working Group.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

PN for localized renal tumors is not inferior to radical nephrectomy in terms of survival outcomes while significantly better preserving renal function. Loss of renal function after PN is influenced by medical comorbidities/preoperative renal function and surgical variables such volume of parenchyma preserved and ischemia time. Urologists should select the clamping strategy during PN based on their experience and patient-specific factors. PN can be performed with any surgical approach based on surgeon's expertise and skills. Robotic PN has the potential to expand the minimally invasive indications without interfering with oncological outcomes. The use of 3D virtual models, real time ultrasound and fluorescence tools to assess the anatomy and vascularization of renal tumors during PN may allow a more accurate preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance. Proper postoperative surveillance protocols are essential to detect tumor recurrences and assess functional outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

PN is the standard of care for treatment of localized T1 renal tumors. Recent data supports PN also for selected T2-T3a tumors in experienced institutions. Careful preoperative planning, adequate surgical skills and volumes and appropriate postoperative management and surveillance are paramount to optimize PN oncological and functional outcomes.

How many cases are required to achieving early proficiency in purely off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy?

Background and purpose

Off-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (Offc-RAPN) is a technically challenging procedure that can effectively avoid renal ischemia owing to the absence of hilar vessel preparation and clamping. However, data on the learning curve (LC) for this technique are limited. The purpose of this study was to assess the LC of Offc-RAPN and compare the perioperative outcomes between different learning phases.

Methods

This retrospective study included 50 consecutive patients who underwent purely Offc-RAPN between January 2022 and April 2023. Multidimensional cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis method was used to assess LC. Spearman's correlation and LOWESS analysis were performed to analyze the continuous variables of perioperative outcomes. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes were compared using χ2-test, t-test and U-test.

Results

CUSUM analysis identified two LC phases: phase I (the first 24 cases) and phase II (the subsequent 26 cases). Phase II showed significant reductions in mean operative time (133.5 vs. 115.31 min; p = 0.04), mean console time (103.21 vs. 81.27 min; p = 0.01), and mean postoperative length of stay (5.33 vs. 4.30 days; p = 0.04) compared to phase I. However, no significant differences were observed in other perioperative outcomes or baseline characteristics between the two LC phases.

Conclusions

Offc-RAPN performed by a surgeon with experience in laparoscopic and robotic surgeries achieved early proficiency in 24 cases. Moreover, Offc-RAPN alone is safe and feasible even in the initial phase of the LC for an experienced surgeon.

Retroperitoneoscopic Clampless, Sutureless Hybrid Therapy in the Management of Renal Hilar Tumors

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the outcomes and feasibility of a retroperitoneoscopic clampless, sutureless hybrid technique in the management of renal hilar tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of consecutive patients with renal hilar tumors who received retroperitoneoscopic clampless, sutureless hybrid therapy between January 2017 and April 2021 was included. The hybrid surgical technique involved microwave ablation (MWA), followed by clampless tumor enucleation and sutureless hemostasis. Surgical, pathological, and oncological outcomes were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Sixty patients were included in this study. The median tumor size was 3.5 cm (2-5), the median RENAL score was 7 (range 6-10), the median operative time was 110 min (70-130), and the median estimated blood loss was 80 mL (30-130). The median length of postoperative hospital stay was 3 days (2-4), and no warm ischemia time was observed, except in one patient who required conversion to conventional on-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) with a 10 min warm ischemia time. Three minor complications (Clavien-Dindo grade I) and one major complication (Clavien-Dindo grade III) were recorded postoperatively. Thus far, no blood transfusions have been required. Renal dysfunction or tumor recurrence did not occur within a median follow-up of 45 months.

CONCLUSION

The retroperitoneoscopic hybrid technique involving MWA, clampless tumor enucleation, and sutureless hemostasis is a feasible and safe option for the management of selective renal hilar tumors. Complete tumor removal with maximal renal function preservation can be achieved, with a low complication rate.

Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy Using Intra-arterial Renal Hypothermia for Highly Complex Endophytic or Hilar Tumors: Case Series and Description of Surgical Technique

Background

In partial nephrectomy for highly complex tumors with expected long ischemia time, renal hypothermia can be used to minimize ischemic parenchymal damage.

Objective

To describe our case series, surgical technique, and early outcomes for robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) using intra-arterial cold perfusion through arteriotomy.

Design setting and participants

A retrospective analysis was conducted of ten patients with renal tumors (PADUA score 9-13) undergoing RAPN between March 2020 and March 2023 with intra-arterial cooling because of expected arterial clamping times longer than 25 min.

Surgical procedure

Multiport transperitoneal RAPN with full renal mobilization and arterial, venous, and ureteral clamping was performed. After arteriotomy and venotomy, 4°C heparinized saline is administered intravascular through a Fogarty catheter to maintain renal hypothermia while performing RAPN.

Measurements

Demographic data, renal function, console and ischemia times, surgical margin status, hospital stay, estimated blood loss, and complications were analyzed.

Results and limitations

The median warm and cold ischemia times were 4 min (interquartile range [IQR] 3-7 min) and 60 min (IQR 33-75 min), respectively. The median rewarming ischemia time was 10.5 min (IQR 6.5-23.75 min). The median pre- and postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate values at least 1 mo after surgery were 90 ml/min (IQR 78.35-90 ml/min) and 86.9 ml/min (IQR 62.08-90 ml/min), respectively. Limitations include small cohort size and short median follow-up (13 [IQR 9.1-32.4] mo).

Conclusions

We demonstrate the feasibility and first case series for RAPN using intra-arterial renal hypothermia through arteriotomy. This approach broadens the scope for minimal invasive nephron-sparing surgery in highly complex renal masses.

Patient summary

We demonstrate a minimally invasive surgical technique that reduces kidney infarction during complex kidney tumor removal where surrounding healthy kidney tissue is spared. The technique entails arterial cold fluid irrigation, which temporarily decreases renal metabolism and allows more kidneys to be salvaged.

Cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) for evaluating learning curve (LC) of robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN)

Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) is becoming a standard treatment for localized renal tumors worldwide. Data on the learning curve (LC) of RALPN are still insufficient. In the present study, we have attempted to gain further insight in this area by evaluating the LC using cumulative summation analysis (CUSUM). A series of 127 robotic partial nephrectomies were performed by two surgeons at our center between January 2018 and December 2020. CUSUM analysis was used to evaluate LC for operative time (OT). The different phases of surgical experience were compared in terms of perioperative parameters and pathologic outcomes. In addition, multivariate linear regression analysis was used to confirm the results of the CUSUM analysis by adjusting the phases of surgical experience for the other confounding factors that may affect OT. The median age of patients was 62 years, mean BMI was 28, and mean tumor size was 32 mm. Tumor complexity was classified as low, intermediate, and high risk according to the PADUA score in 44%, 38%, and 18%, respectively. The mean OT was 205 min, and trifecta was achieved in 72.4%. According to the CUSUM diagram, the LC of OT was divided into three phases: initial learning phase (18 cases), plateau phase (20 cases), and mastery phase (subsequent cases). The mean OT was 242, 208, and 190 min in the first, second, and third phases, respectively (P < 0.001). Surgeon experience phases were significantly associated with OT in multivariate analysis considering other preoperative and operative parameters. Surgical outcome was comparable between the three phases in terms of complications and achievement of trifecta; hospital stay was shorter in the mastery phase than in the first 2 phases (4 days vs 5 days, P = 0.02). The LC for RALPN is divided into 3 performance phases with CUSUM. Mastery of surgical technique was achieved after performing 38 cases. The initial learning phase of RALPN has no negative impact on surgical and oncologic outcomes .

Comparing the outcomes of open, laparoscopic and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) to determine the advantages and disadvantages of open (OPN), laparoscopic (LPN), and robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) with particular attention to intraoperative, immediate postoperative, as well as longer-term functional and oncological outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses-NMA guidelines. Binary data were compared using odds ratios (ORs). Mean differences (MDs) were used for continuous variables. ORs and MDs were extracted from the articles to compare the efficacy of the various surgical approaches. Statistical validity is guaranteed when the 95% credible interval does not include 1.

RESULTS

In total, there were 31 studies included in the NMA with a combined 7869 patients. Of these, 33.7% (2651/7869) underwent OPN, 20.8% (1636/7869) LPN, and 45.5% (3582/7689) RAPN. There was no difference for either LPN or RAPN as compared to OPN in ischaemia time, intraoperative complications, positive surgical margins, operative time or trifecta rate. The estimated blood loss (EBL), postoperative complications and length of stay were all significantly reduced in RAPN when compared with OPN. The outcomes of RAPN and LPN were largely similar except the significantly reduced EBL in RAPN.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review and NMA suggests that RAPN is the preferable operative approach for patients undergoing surgery for lower-staged RCC.

Off-clamp Versus On-clamp Robot-assisted Partial Nephrectomy: A Propensity-matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy is the preferred treatment option for the management of small renal masses. On-clamp partial nephrectomy is associated with a risk of ischemia and a greater loss of postoperative renal function, while the off-clamp procedure decreases the duration of renal ischemia, leading to better renal function preservation. However, the efficacy of the off- versus on-clamp partial nephrectomy for renal function preservation remains debatable.

OBJECTIVE

To compare perioperative and functional outcomes following off- and on-clamp robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This study used the prospective multinational collaborative Vattikuti Collective Quality Initiative (VCQI) database for RAPN.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary objective of this study was the comparison of perioperative and functional outcomes between patients who underwent off- and on-clamp RAPN. Propensity scores were calculated for age, sex, body mass index (BMI), renal nephrometry score (RNS) and preoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR).

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Of the 2114 patients, 210 had undergone off-clamp RAPN and others on-clamp procedure. Propensity matching was possible for 205 patients in a 1:1 ratio. After matching, the two groups were comparable for age, sex, BMI, tumor size, multifocality, tumor side, face of tumor, RNS, polar location of the tumor, surgical access, and preoperative hemoglobin, creatinine, and eGFR. There was no difference between the two groups for intraoperative (4.8% vs 5.3%, p = 0.823) and postoperative (11.2% vs 8.3%, p = 0.318) complications. Need for blood transfusion (2.9% vs 0, p = 0.030) and conversion to radical nephrectomy (10.2% vs 1%, p < 0.001) were significantly higher in the off-clamp group. At the last follow-up, there was no difference between the two groups for creatinine and eGFR. The mean fall in eGFR at the last follow-up compared with that at baseline was equivalent between the two groups (-16.0 vs -17.3 ml/min, p = 0.985).

CONCLUSIONS

Off-clamp RAPN does not result in better renal functional preservation. Alternatively, it may be associated with increased rates of conversion to radical nephrectomy and need for blood transfusion.

PATIENT SUMMARY

With this multicentric study, we noted that performing robotic partial nephrectomy without clamping the blood supply to the kidney is not associated with better preservation of renal function. However, off-clamp partial nephrectomy is associated with increased rates of conversion to radical nephrectomy and blood transfusion.

Can Simplified PADUA Renal (SPARE) Nephrometry scoring system help predict renal function outcomes after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy? (UroCCR study 93)

BACKGROUND

The SPARE Nephrometry Score (NS) is described as easier to implement than the RENAL and PADUA NSs, currently more widely used. Our objective was to compare the accuracy of SPARE NS in predicting renal function outcomes following RAPN.

METHODS

A multicentric retrospective study was conducted using French kidney cancer network (UroCCR, NCT03293563) database. All patients included had RAPN for cT1 renal tumors between May 2010 and March 2021. SPARE was compared to RENAL, PADUA and Tumor Size to predict postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD) upstaging, de novo CKD at 3-6 months follow-up and Trifecta failure. The ability of the different NSs and tumor size to predict renal function outcomes was evaluated using uni- and multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

According to our study criteria, 1171 patients were included. Mean preoperative tumor size and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were 3.4±1.4 cm and 85.8 mL/min/1.73 m2. In total, 266 (22.7%), 87 (7.4%), 94 (8%), and 624 (53.3%) patients had AKI, de novo CKD, CKD upstaging, and Trifecta failure, respectively. In multivariate analysis, all three NSs and tumor size were independent predictors of AKI, CKD de novo, CKD upgrade and Trifecta failure. There was no significant difference between all three NS and tumor sizes in predicting renal function outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

SPARE Score seems to be a valid alternative to predict renal function outcomes after RAPN. Nevertheless, in our study, tumor size was as accurate as NSs in predicting postoperative outcomes and, therefore, seems to be the logical choice for surgical decisions.

Impact of renal sinus protrusions on achieving trifecta in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy

Objective

The objective of this work is to assess the relationship between the morphological characteristics of a central tumour and the perioperative outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN).

Subjects and Methods

We retrospectively analysed the data from 186 patients with central tumours involving the renal sinus, who underwent RAPN in a single-centre study between February 2015 and June 2022. All cases were assigned a RENAL nephrometry score based on preoperative images. The shape of the protruding portion of the tumour was classified into four types: 'flat', 'spherical', 'single-hump', and 'complex-hump', and was independently assessed by two readers. The trifecta is defined as the warm ischemia time within 25 min, negative surgical margins, and no major postoperative complications. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with the failing trifecta.

Results

Trifecta was achieved in 113 cases (60.8%), and the achievement rate in flat, spherical, single-hump, and complex-hump types was 83.3%, 74.5%, 64.3%, and 21.3%, respectively. Prolonged warm ischemia time was the primary cause of the failure to achieve the trifecta. The rate of positive surgical margins and upstage to pathological T3a was greater for complex humps while the rate of major complications and postoperative GFR preservation did not differ between shapes. On multivariate analysis for failing trifecta achievement, the complex-hump protrusion was found to be an independent positive predictor (odds ratio: 15.8; p < 0.001), whereas the height and width of protrusion were not significantly related.

Conclusions

The degree of difficulty varied among central tumours, and it was not possible to precisely measure it with existing scoring systems. Complex-hump protrusions strongly correlate with failure to achieve the trifecta. Preoperative assessment of the morphology of protrusion is useful for predicting outcomes.

How far has robot-assisted partial nephrectomy reached?

Nephron-sparing surgery is the standard treatment for small renal mass (SRM). Nephron-sparing surgery has evolved from an open to a minimally invasive technique. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is the latest technique in this field and is reported to be safe and feasible, showing oncologically and functionally superior or compatible results compared with open and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for SRM. This is not limited to only SRM but also applies to large and complex renal masses and other challenging situations. RAPN showed good oncological and functional outcomes for ≥clinical T2 renal tumors, complex renal masses (PADUA score ≥10, RENAL score ≥10), hilar renal tumors, and multiple renal tumors. In addition, the outcomes of RAPN in these challenging cases were not inferior to those in conventional cases. RAPN could also be applied to a number of challenging cases in which the open technique was considered first. RAPN showed good results in patients with a solitary kidney, horseshoe kidney, and in repeat surgeries. Furthermore, RAPN could be safely performed on obese, elderly, and pediatric patients. Finally, this review evaluates efficiency and utility of RAPN based on the results of challenging cases of renal masses and to project the future of RAPN.

Clinical application of superselective transarterial embolization of renal tumors in zero ischaemia robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy

Objective

To assess the feasibility and safety of zero ischaemia robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) after preoperative superselective transarterial embolization (STE) of T1 renal cancer.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the data of 32 patients who underwent zero ischaemia RALPN after STE and 140 patients who received standard robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (S-RALPN). In addition, we selected 35 patients treated with off-clamp RALPN (O-RALPN) from September 2017 to March 2022 for comparison. STE was performed by the same interventional practitioner, and zero ischaemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) was carried out by experienced surgeon 1-12 hours after STE. The intraoperative data and postoperative complications were recorded. The postoperative renal function, routine urine test, urinary Computed Tomography (CT), and preoperative and postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) data were analyzed.

Results

All operations were completed successfully. There were no cases of conversion to opening and no deaths. The renal arterial trunk was not blocked. No blood transfusions were needed. The mean operation time was 91.5 ± 34.28 minutes. The mean blood loss was 58.59 ± 54.11 ml. No recurrence or metastasis occurred.

Conclusion

For patients with renal tumors, STE of renal tumors in zero ischaemia RALPN can preserve more renal function, and it provides a safe and feasible surgical method.

A new surgical technique for sutureless partial nephrectomy: renal sutureless device

BACKGROUND

Several factors impact the preservation of renal function after partial nephrectomy. Warm ischemia time is the main modifiable surgical factor. Renorrhaphy represents the key of hemostasia, but it is associated with increase of warm ischemia time and complications. The aim of this study was to describe our initial surgical experience with a new surgical technique for sutureless partial nephrectomy, based on the application of our own developed renal-sutureless-device-RSD.

METHODS

Between 2020-2021, 10 patients diagnosed with renal cell carcinoma stage cT1a-b cN0M0 with an exophytic component were operated using renal-sutureless-device-RSD. Surgical technique of sutureless partial nephrectomy with renal-sutureless-device-RSD is described in a step-by-step fashion. Clinical data was collected in a dedicated database. Presurgical, intraoperative, postoperative variables, pathology and functional results were evaluated. Medians and ranges of values for selected variables were reported as descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Partial nephrectomy was carried out with the use of renal-sutureless-device-RSD without renorrhaphy in all cases (70%cT1a-30%cT1b). Median tumor size was 3.15 cm (IQR: 2.5-4.5). R.E.N.A.L Score had a range between 4a-10. Median surgical time was 97.5 minutes (IQR 75-105). Renal artery clamping was only required in 4 cases, with a median warm ischemia time of 12.5 minutes (IQR 10-15). No blood transfusion, intraoperative and postoperative complications were noted. Free-of-disease margin rate achieved was 90%. Median length of stay was 2 days (IQR 2-2). Laboratory data on hemoglobin and hematocrit levels, as well as renal function tests, remained stable after partial nephrectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our initial experience suggests that a sutureless PN using the RSD device is feasible and safe. Further investigation is needed to determine the clinical benefit of this technique.

Simplifying Retroperitoneal Robotic Single-port Surgery: Novel Supine Anterior Retroperitoneal Access

BACKGROUND

Multiport robotic surgery in the retroperitoneum is limited by the bulky robotic frame and clashing of instruments. Moreover, patients are placed in the lateral decubitus position, which has been linked to complications.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the feasibility and safety of a supine anterior retroperitoneal access (SARA) technique with the da Vinci Single-Port (SP) robotic platform.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Between October 2022 and January 2023, 18 patients underwent surgery using the SARA technique for renal cancer, urothelial cancer, or ureteral stenosis. Perioperative variables were prospectively collected and outcomes were assessed.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

With the patient in a supine position, a 3-cm incision is made at the McBurney point and the abdominal muscles are dissected. Finger dissection is used to develop the retroperitoneal space for the da Vinci SP access port. After docking, the first step is to dissect retroperitoneal tissue to reveal the psoas muscle. This allows identification of the ureter, the inferior renal pole, and the hilum.

MEASUREMENTS

A descriptive statistical analysis was performed. Data collected included demographics, operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), surgical margin status, complications, length of hospital stay, 30-d Clavien-Dindo complications, and postoperative narcotic use.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

Twelve patients underwent partial nephrectomy (PN) and two each underwent pyeloplasty, radical nephroureterectomy, and radical nephrectomy. In the PN group, mean age was 57 yr (interquartile range [IQR] 30-73), median body mass index was 32 kg/m2 (IQR 17-58), and 25% had stage ≥3 chronic kidney disease. The median Charlson comorbidity index was 3 (IQR 0-7) and 75% of PN patients had an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3. The median RENAL score was 5 (IQR 4-7). The median WIT was 25 min (IQR 16-48) and the median tumor size was 35 mm (IQR 16-50). The median estimated blood loss was 105 ml (IQR 20-400) and the median operative time was 160 min (IQR 110-200). Positive surgical margins were found in one patient. In the overall cohort, one patient was readmitted and managed conservatively; 83% of the PN group were discharged on the same day as their surgery, with the remainder discharged the next day. At 7 d after surgery, no patients reported narcotic use.

CONCLUSIONS

The SARA approach is feasible and safe. Larger studies are needed to confirm this approach as a one-step solution for upper urinary tract surgery.

PATIENT SUMMARY

We assessed initial outcomes of a novel approach for accessing the retroperitoneum (the space behind the abdominal cavity and in front of the back muscles and spine) during robot-assisted surgery in the upper urinary tract. The patient is placed on their back and surgery is performed with a single-port robot. Our results show that this approach was feasible and safe, with low complication rates, less postoperative pain, and earlier discharge. This is a promising start, but larger studies are needed to confirm our findings.

A Novel Technique of Renorrhaphy in Difficult Partial Nephrectomies by Single-Layered Parenchymal Imbrication

Background In partial nephrectomies, achieving the trifecta outcome of negative tumor margins, no surgical complications, and minimal decline in renal function depends on various factors, with the complexity of the tumor described by the nephrometry score being chief among them. These factors often motivate surgeons toward a minimally invasive route even if the preferred route is an open approach. We describe an innovative renorrhaphy technique that overcomes the commonly encountered difficulty in reconstructing the renal parenchyma after resecting a complex tumor with a single-layered parenchymal imbrication (SLPI) technique. Methodology We conducted a retrospective review of case records of the patients who had undergone partial nephrectomies in our center from March 2017 to March 2021. The patients who underwent the SLPI technique were chosen, and data were extracted. Data collected included patients' preoperative imaging findings; intraoperative parameters such as ischemia time, blood loss, and number of renal arteries; and postoperative factors such as margin positivity rate, urine leak, secondary bleeding, follow-up imaging, and recurrence rates. Results A total of 28 patients were included in our study. The estimated blood loss was 234 mL (standard deviation [SD] = 55 mL), warm ischemia time was 31 minutes (SD 4 minutes), a hospital stay of 3 days (SD 2 days), two minor complications, two intraoperative complications, and one margin positivity. There were no major complications or recurrences. Conclusions The novel technique of SLPI renorrhaphy can help deal with complex renal masses and is an easily reproducible technique both in open and minimally invasive approaches.

Comparison of peri- and intraoperative outcomes of open vs robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a propensity-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard surgical treatment for resectable renal cell carcinoma (RCC) tumors. However, the decision whether a robotic (RAPN) or open PN (OPN) approach is chosen is often based on the surgeon's individual experience and preference. To overcome the inherent selection bias when comparing peri- and postoperative outcomes of RAPN vs. OPN, a strict statistical methodology is needed.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to identify RCC patients treated with RAPN and OPN between January 2003 and January 2021. Study endpoints were estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS), rate of intraoperative and postoperative complications, and trifecta. In the first step of analyses, descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models (MVA) were applied. In the second step of analyses, to validate initial findings, MVA were applied after 2:1 propensity-score matching (PSM).

RESULTS

Of 615 RCC patients, 481 (78%) underwent OPN vs 134 (22%) RAPN. RAPN patients were younger and presented with a smaller tumor diameter and lower RENAL-Score sum, respectively. Median EBL was comparable, whereas LOS was shorter in RAPN vs. OPN. Both intraoperative (27 vs 6%) and Clavien-Dindo > 2 complications (11 vs 3%) were higher in OPN (both < 0.05), whereas achievement of trifecta was higher in RAPN (65 vs 54%; p = 0.028). In MVA, RAPN was a significant predictor for shorter LOS, lower rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications as well as higher trifecta rates. After 2:1 PSM with subsequent MVA, RAPN remained a statistical and clinical predictor for lower rates of intraoperative and postoperative complications and higher rates of trifecta achievement but not LOS.

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in baseline and outcome characteristics exist between RAPN vs. OPN, probably due to selection bias. However, after applying two sets of statistical analyses, RAPN seems to be associated with more favorable outcomes regarding complications and trifecta rates.

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for complex renal tumors: Analysis of a large multi-institutional database

INTRODUCTION

Highly complex renal masses pose a challenge to urologic surgeons' ability to perform robotic partial nephrectomy (RPN). Given the increased utilization of the robotic approach for small renal masses, we sought to characterize the outcomes and determine the safety and feasibility of RPN for complex renal masses from our large multi-institutional cohort.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry Scores ≥10 who underwent RPN in our multi-institutional cohort (N = 372). Baseline demographic, clinical and tumor related characteristics were evaluated with the primary endpoint of trifecta achievement (defined as negative surgical margin, no major complications, and warm ischemia time ≤25 min). Relationships between variables were assessed using the chi-square test of independence, Fisher exact test, Mann-Whitney U test, and Kruskal Wallis test. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between baseline characteristics and trifecta achievement.

RESULTS

Of 372 patients in the study, mean age was 58 years, and median BMI was 30.49 kg/m². The median tumor size was 4.3 cm (3.0-5.9 cm). Most of the patients had R.E.N.A.L. scores of 10 (n = 253; 67.01%). Overall, trifecta was achieved in 72.04% of patients. Stratifying intraoperative and postoperative outcomes by R.E.N.A.L. scores, there was no significant difference in trifecta achievement, operative time, warm ischemia time (WIT), open conversion, major complication, or positive margin rates. Length of hospital stay was significantly longer for higher R.E.N.A.L. scores (median days 2 vs. 1, P = 0.012). Multivariate analyses for factors associated with trifecta achievement concluded that age and baseline eGFR were independently associated with trifecta achievement.

CONCLUSION

RPN is a safe and reproducible procedure for complex tumors with R.E.N.A.L. Nephrometry scores ≥10. Our results suggest excellent rates of trifecta achievement and short-term functional outcomes when performed by experienced surgeons. Long-term oncological and functional evaluation are needed to further support this conclusion.

Robotic-assisted tumor enucleation versus robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma: a single-institution experience

OBJECTIVES

To compare the perioperative and oncological outcomes of robotic-assisted tumor enucleation (RATE) and robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in the treatment of intermediate and high complexity renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

METHODS

We retrospectively collected the data of 359 patients with intermediate and high complexity RCC who underwent RATE and RAPN. The perioperative, oncological, and pathological outcomes of the two groups were compared, and univariate and multivariate analyses were used to evaluate the risk factors for warm ischemia time (WIT) > 25 min.

RESULTS

Compared with RAPN group, patients in RATE group had shorter operative time (P < 0.001), shorter WIT (P < 0.001), and less estimated blood loss (EBL) (P < 0.001). The decrease rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in RATE group was better than that in RAPN group (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that RAPN and higher PADUA score were independent risk factors for WIT > 25 min (both P < 0.001). The rate of positive surgical margin was similar between the two groups, but the local recurrence rate of the RATE group was higher than that of the RAPN group (P = 0.027).

CONCLUSIONS

RATE and RAPN have similar oncological outcomes for the treatment of intermediate and high complexity RCC. In addition, RATE was superior to RAPN in perioperative outcomes.

Volumetric Analysis of Renal Masses as Predictors of Partial Nephrectomy Outcomes

Objective: To examine the role of endophytic tumor volume (TV) assessment (endophycity) on perioperative partial nephrectomy (PN) outcomes. Patients and Methods: Retrospective review of 212 consecutive laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies from single institution using preoperative imaging and 1-year follow-up. Demographics, comorbidities, RENAL nephrometry scores, and all peri- and postoperative outcomes were recorded. Volumetric analysis performed using imaging software, independently assessed by two blinded radiologists. Univariate and multivariate statistical analysis were completed to assess predictive value of endophycity for all clinically meaningful outcomes. Results: Among those undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS), lower tumor endophycity was associated with higher likelihood of trifecta outcome (negative surgical margin, <10% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, the absence of complications) irrespective of max tumor size. For MIS, estimated blood loss increased with greater tumor endophycity regardless of tumor size. Among those who underwent open partial nephrectomy, lower tumor endophycity was associated with trifecta outcomes for tumors >4 cm only. On multivariate analysis with log-scaled odds ratios (OR), tumor endophycity and total kidney volume had the strongest correlation with tumor-related complications (OR = 3.23, 2.66). The analysis identified that tumor endophycity and TV on imaging were inversely correlated with of trifecta outcomes (OR = 0.53 for both covariates). Conclusions: Volumetric assessment of tumor endophycity performed well in identifying PN outcomes. As automated imaging software improves, volumetric analysis may prove to be a useful adjunct in preoperative planning and patient counseling.

Reply to May et al. The Goal of Achieving High-Quality Surgical First-Line Therapy in Patients with Penile Cancer Is Important; However, Some Collective Efforts Are Still Required in Order to Reach It. Comment on "Brassetti et al. Combined Reporting of Surgical Quality and Cancer Control after Surgical Treatment for Penile Tumors with Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection: The Tetrafecta Achievement. Curr. Oncol. 2023, 30, 1882-1892"

We have carefully read the comment by May et al. [...].

Three-dimensional virtual models assistance predicts higher rates of "successful" minimally invasive partial nephrectomy: an Institutional analysis across the available trifecta definitions

PURPOSE

3D virtual models (3DVMs) are nowadays under scrutiny to improve partial nephrectomy (PN) outcomes. Five different Trifecta definitions have been proposed to optimize the framing of "success" in the PN field. Our aim is to analyze if the use of 3DVMs could impact the success rate of minimally invasive PN (mi-PN), according to the currently available definitions of Trifecta.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

At our Institution 250 cT1-2N0M0 renal masses patients treated with mi-PN were prospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria were the availability of contrast-enhanced CT, baseline and postoperative serum creatinine, and eGFR. These patients were then compared with a control group of 710 patients who underwent mi-PN with the same renal function assessments, but without 3DVMs. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) models were used to predict the trifecta achievement according to the different trifecta definitions.

RESULTS

Among the definitions, Trifecta rates ranged between 70.8% to 97.4% in the 3DVM group vs. 56.8% to 92.8% in the control group (all p values < 0.05). 3DVMs showed better postoperative outcomes in terms of ΔeGFR, ( - 16.6% vs.  - 2.7%, p = 0.03), postoperative complications (15%, vs 22.9%, p = 0.002) and major complications (Clavien Dindo > 3, 2.8% vs 5.6%, p = 0.03). At MLR 3DVMs assistance independently predicted higher rates of successful PN across all the available definitions of Trifecta (OR: 2.7 p < 0.001, OR:2.0 p = 0.0008, OR:2.8 p = 0.02, OR 2.0 p = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

The 3DVMs availability was found to be the constant predictive factor of successful PN, with a twofold higher probability of achieving Trifecta regardless of the different definitions available in Literature.

Partial nephrectomy in solitary kidneys: comparison between open surgery and robotic-assisted laparoscopy on perioperative and functional outcomes (UroCCR-54 study)

PURPOSE

The management of solitary kidney tumors is a surgical challenge, requiring irreproachable results on both oncological and functional outcomes. The goal of our study was to compare the perioperative results of robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) to open surgery in this indication.

METHODS

We led a multicentric study based on the prospectively maintained French national database UroCCR. Patients who underwent partial nephrectomy on a solitary kidney between 1988 and 2020 were included. Clinical and pathological data were retrospectively analyzed. The main outcome of the study was the analysis of the variation of the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated according to MDRD at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months depending on the chosen surgical approach. The secondary outcomes were the comparison of Trifecta success, perioperative complications, and length of hospital stay.

RESULTS

In total, 150 patients were included; 68 (45%) in the RAPN group and 82 (55%) in the open surgery group. The two groups were comparable for all data. The variation of eGFR at 3, 6, 12, or 24 months was comparable without any significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.45). Trifecta was achieved in 40% of the patients in the RAPN group and 33% in the open group (p = 0.42). A significant difference was observed for the length of stay, 5 days for the robot group versus 9 days for the open surgery group (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

In our study, the surgical approach did not modify functional results and we noted a significant decrease in hospital stay and complications in the RAPN group. RAPN is a safe and efficient method for management of kidney tumors in solitary kidneys.

A Novel Three-dimensional Planning Tool for Selective Clamping During Partial Nephrectomy: Validation of a Perfusion Zone Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Selective clamping during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) requires extensive knowledge on patient-specific renal vasculature, obtained through imaging.

OBJECTIVE

To validate an in-house developed perfusion zone algorithm that provides patient-specific three-dimensional (3D) renal perfusion information.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

Between October 2020 and June 2022, 25 patients undergoing RAPN at Ghent University Hospital were included. Three-dimensional models, based on preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans, showed the clamped artery's ischemic zone, as calculated by the algorithm.

SURGICAL PROCEDURE

All patients underwent selective clamping during RAPN. Indocyanine green (ICG) was administered to visualize the true ischemic zone perioperatively. Surgery was recorded for a postoperative analysis.

MEASUREMENTS

The true ischemic zone of the clamped artery was compared with the ischemic zone predicted by the algorithm through two metrics: (1) total ischemic zone overlap and (2) tumor ischemic zone overlap. Six urologists assessed metric 1; metric 2 was assessed objectively by the authors.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

In 92% of the cases, the algorithm was sufficiently accurate to plan a selective clamping strategy. Metric 1 showed an average score of 4.28 out of 5. Metric 2 showed an average score of 4.14 out of 5. A first limitation is that ICG can be evaluated only at the kidney surface. A second limitation is that mainly patients with impaired renal function are expected to benefit from this technology, but contrast-enhanced CT is required at present.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed new tool demonstrated high accuracy when planning selective clamping for RAPN. A follow-up prospective study is needed to determine the tool's clinical added value.

PATIENT SUMMARY

In partial nephrectomy, the surgeon has no information on which specific arterial branches perfuse the kidney tumor. We developed a surgeon support system that visualizes the perfusion zones of all arteries on a three-dimensional model and indicates the correct arteries to clamp. In this study, we validate this tool.

3D-Image guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: a multi-institutional propensity score-matched analysis (UroCCR study 51)

PURPOSE

Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a difficult procedure with risk of significant perioperative complications. The objective was to evaluate the impact of preoperative planning and intraoperative guidance with 3D model reconstructions on perioperative outcomes of RAPN.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent RAPN for kidney tumor by three high-volume expert surgeons from academic centers. Clinical data were collected prospectively after written consent into the French kidney cancer network database UroCCR (CNIL-DR 2013-206; NCT03293563). Our cohort was divided into two groups: 3D-Image guided RAPN group (3D-IGRAPN) and control group. A propensity score according to age, pre-operative renal function and RENAL tumor complexity score was used. Both surgical techniques were compared in terms of perioperative outcomes.

RESULTS

The initial study cohort included 230 3D-IGRAPN and 415 control RAPN. Before propensity-score matching, patients in the 3D-IGRAPN group had a larger tumor (4.3 cm vs. 3.5 cm, P < 0.001) and higher RENAL complexity score (9 vs. 8, P < 0.001). Following propensity-score matching, there were 157 patients in both groups. The rate of major complications was lower for patients in the 3D-IGRAPN group (3.8% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.04). The median percentage of eGFR variation recorded at first follow-up was lower in the 3D-IGRAPN group (- 5.6% vs. - 10.5%, P = 0.002). The trifecta achievement rate was higher in the 3D-IGRAPN group (55.7% vs. 45.1%; P = 0.005).

CONCLUSION

Three-dimensional kidney reconstructions use for pre-operative planning and intraoperative surgical guidance lowers the risk of complications and improve perioperative clinical outcomes of RAPN.

Robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy: single-layer cortical renorrhaphy is associated with reduced rate of renal artery pseudoaneurysm compared to double-layer renorrhaphy

The study compares the outcome of patients who underwent single-layer outer cortical renorraphy (SLOCR) and double-layer cortical renorraphy (DLR) in our institution. The retrospective analysis of 181 patients who underwent RAPN was performed. Propensity score matching was accomplished on 67 patients using age, BMI, size, distance from collecting system, hilar location and pathological stage. Intraoperative factors assessed included warm ischemia time, renorraphy time, blood loss and operative duration (Levey et al. in Clin Chem 53:766-772, 2007) Post-operative hospital stay, complications like renal artery pseudoaneurysm (RAP), hemorrhage, urine leak and reduction in eGFR were measured. The 67 patients in SLOCR group were compared with similar number in the DLR group using propensity score matching. Warm ischemia time (P < .001), renorraphy time (P < .001) and symptomatic pseudoaneurysm (RAP) rate (P < .001) were significantly less in SLOCR group. SLOCR is associated with reduced rate of symptomatic post-operative RAP.

A survey of augmented reality methods to guide minimally invasive partial nephrectomy

INTRODUCTION

Minimally invasive partial nephrectomy (MIPN) has become the standard of care for localized kidney tumors over the past decade. The characteristics of each tumor, in particular its size and relationship with the excretory tract and vessels, allow one to judge its complexity and to attempt predicting the risk of complications. The recent development of virtual 3D model reconstruction and computer vision has opened the way to image-guided surgery and augmented reality (AR).

OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to perform a systematic review to list and describe the different AR techniques proposed to support PN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The systematic review of the literature was performed on 12/04/22, using the keywords "nephrectomy" and "augmented reality" on Embase and Medline. Articles were considered if they reported surgical outcomes when using AR with virtual image overlay on real vision, during ex vivo or in vivo MIPN. We classified them according to the registration technique they use.

RESULTS

We found 16 articles describing an AR technique during MIPN procedures that met the eligibility criteria. A moderate to high risk of bias was recorded for all the studies. We classified registration methods into three main families, of which the most promising one seems to be surface-based registration.

CONCLUSION

Despite promising results, there do not exist studies showing an improvement in clinical outcomes using AR. The ideal AR technique is probably yet to be established, as several designs are still being actively explored. More clinical data will be required to establish the potential contribution of this technology to MIPN.

Comparison of Transperitoneal and Retroperitoneal Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Patients with Completely Lower Pole Renal Tumors

(1) Background: For completely lower pole renal tumors, we compared the perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy via transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. (2) Methods: Complete lower pole renal tumors were defined as tumors that received 1 point for the “L” element of the R.E.N.A.L. and located at the lower pole of kidney. After confirming consistency in baseline characteristics, oncological and functional benefits were compared. Pentafecta achievement was used to represent the perioperative optimal outcome, followed by multivariate analysis of factors associated with the lack of pentafecta achievement. (3) Results: Among 151 patients identified, 116 (77%) underwent robotic partial nephrectomy via a transperitoneal approach and 35 (23%) via a retroperitoneal approach. Patients undergoing transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy experienced more blood loss than those undergoing retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy (50 mL vs. 40 mL, p = 0.015). No significant differences were identified for operative time (120 min vs. 120 min), ischemia time (19 min vs. 20 min), positive surgical margins (0.0% vs. 2.86%), postoperative rate of complication (12.07% vs. 5.71%). No significant differences were identified in pathologic variables, eGFR decline in postoperative 12-month (3.9% vs. 5.4%) functional follow-up. Multivariate cox analysis showed that tumor size (OR: 0.523; 95% CI: 0.371−0.736; p < 0.001) alone was independently correlated to the achievement of pentafecta. (4) Conclusions: For completely lower pole renal tumors, transperitoneal and retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy provide similar outcomes. These two surgical approaches remain feasible options for these cases.