68 Ga-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography/Computerized Tomography for Primary Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer in Men with Contraindications to or Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging: A Prospective Observational Study

A comparative study of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and pelvic MRI in newly diagnosed prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate the difference in the diagnostic efficacy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and pelvic MRI in primary prostate cancer, as well as the correlation between the two methods and histopathological parameters and serum PSA levels.

METHODS

A total of 41 patients with suspected prostate cancer who underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT imaging in our department from 2018 to 2023 were retrospectively collected. All patients underwent 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI scans. The sensitivity, PPV and diagnostic accuracy of MRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were calculated after comparing the results of MRI and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT with biopsy. The Spearman test was used to calculate the correlation between 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT, MRI parameters, histopathological indicators, and serum PSA levels.

RESULTS

Compared with histopathological results, the sensitivity, PPV and diagnostic accuracy of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were 95.1%, 100.0% and 95.1%, respectively. The sensitivity, PPV and diagnostic accuracy of MRI in the diagnosis of prostate cancer were 82.9%, 100.0% and 82.9%, respectively. There was a mild to moderately positive correlation between Gleason (Gs) score, Ki-67 index, serum PSA level and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT parameters (p < 0.05). There was a moderately negative correlation between the expression of AMACR (P504S) and 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT parameters (p < 0.05). The serum PSA level and the Gs score were moderately positively correlated with the MRI parameters (p < 0.05). There was no correlation between histopathological parameters and MRI parameters (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Compared with MRI, 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT has higher sensitivity and diagnostic accuracy in the detection of malignant prostate tumors. In addition, the Ki-67 index and AMACR (P504S) expression were only correlated with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT parameters. Gs score and serum PSA level were correlated with 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT and MRI parameters. 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examination can provide certain reference values for the clinical diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of malignant prostate tumors.

Diagnostic performance of 18F‑DCFPyL PET vs. 68Ga‑PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected prostate cancer: A systemic review and meta‑analysis

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET)/CT was compared with that of 18F-DCFPyL PET for patients with suspected prostate cancer (PCa). Up to September 2023, the PubMed, Embase and Web of Science databases were thoroughly searched for relevant papers. Studies examining the diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in patients with suspected PCa were included in the present review. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Performance Studies-2 tool was used to rate the diagnostic performance of each study. The diagnostic performance of 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for primary PCa was examined by 13 studies included, comprising 1,178 patients. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of 18F-DCFPyL PET were 0.92 (95% CI, 0.85-0.96) and 0.59 (95% CI, 0.08-0.96), respectively. For 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.96 (95% CI, 0.88-0.99) and 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57-0.82), respectively. 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT both had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.92 (95% CI, 0.89-0.94). In addition, the Fagan nomogram revealed that the post-test probabilities for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT could rise to 69 and 77% when the pre-test probability was set at 50%. In conclusion, a comparable diagnostic performance for patients with suspected PCa was determined for 18F-DCFPyL PET and 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT. However, it is crucial to keep in mind that the findings of the present meta-analysis come from investigations with modest sample sizes. Therefore, more extensive research is required to obtain more solid data.

Key learnings from concordant systematic biopsies in prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography-guided prostate biopsies: Enhancing targeting accuracy

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis and staging have evolved with the advent of 68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT). This study investigates the role of complementary systematic biopsies (SB) during PSMA-PET/CT-guided targeted prostate biopsies (PET-TB) for PCa detection, grading, and distribution. We address the uncertainty surrounding the necessity of SB in conjunction with PET-TB.

METHODS

We analyzed PCa grading and distribution in 30 men who underwent PET-TB and SB because of contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging or high clinical suspicion of PCa. Tumor distribution was assessed in relation to the PET-highlighted lesions. Standardized reporting schemes, encompassing SUVmax , PRIMARY score, and miTNM classification, were evaluated.

RESULTS

80% of patients were diagnosed with PCa, with 70% classified as clinically significant (csPCa). SB detected more csPCa cases than PET-TB, but the differences were not statistically significant. Discordant results were observed in 25% of cases, where SB outperformed PET-TB. Spatial analysis revealed that tumor-bearing cores from SB were often located in close proximity to the PET-highlighted region. Reporting schemes showed potential for csPCa detection with significantly increased SUVmax in csPCA patients. Subsequent follow-up data underscored the importance of SB in precise PCa grading and staging.

CONCLUSIONS

While PET-TB can simplify prostate biopsy and reduce invasiveness by core number, SB cannot be omitted yet due to potential PET-TB targeting errors. Factors such as limited spatial resolution and fusion inaccuracies contribute to the need for SB. Standardization in reporting schemes currently cannot compensate for targeting errors highlighting the need for refinement.

An Update on the Role of mpMRI and 68Ga-PSMA PET Imaging in Primary and Recurrent Prostate Cancer

The objective of this work was to review comparisons of the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 (prostate-specific membrane antigen) PET/CT and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) in the detection of prostate cancer among patients undergoing initial staging prior to radical prostatectomy or experiencing recurrent prostate cancer, based on histopathological data. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed and Web of Science, and relevant articles were analyzed with various parameters, including year of publication, study design, patient count, age, PSA (prostate-specific antigen) value, Gleason score, standardized uptake value (SUVmax), detection rate, treatment history, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and PI-RADS (prostate imaging reporting and data system) scores. Only studies directly comparing PSMA-PET and mpMRI were considered, while those examining combined accuracy or focusing on either modality alone were excluded. In total, 24 studies comprising 1717 patients were analyzed, with the most common indication for screening being staging, followed by relapse. The findings indicated that 68Ga-PSMA-PET/CT effectively diagnosed prostate cancer in patients with suspected or confirmed disease, and both methods exhibited comparable efficacy in identifying lesion-specific information. However, notable heterogeneity was observed, highlighting the necessity for standardization of imaging and histopathology systems to mitigate inter-study variability. Future research should prioritize evaluating the combined diagnostic performance of both modalities to enhance sensitivity and reduce unnecessary biopsies. Overall, the utilization of PSMA-PET and mpMRI in combination holds substantial potential for significantly advancing the diagnosis and management of prostate cancer.

68Ga-prostate specific membrane antigen-11 PET/CT versus multiparametric MRI in the detection of primary prostate cancer: A systematic review and head-to-head comparative meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The goal of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of two diagnostic methods, 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI, in detecting primary prostate cancer without limitations on the Gleason score.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive literature review, searching databases such as PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science until June 2023. Our objective was to identify studies that compared the efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI in detecting primary prostate cancer. To determine heterogeneity, the I2 statistic was used. Meta-regression analysis and leave-one-out sensitivity analysis were conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Initially, 1286 publications were found, but after careful evaluation, only 16 studies involving 1227 patients were analyzed thoroughly. The results showed that the 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT method had a pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.87 (95 % CI: 0.80-0.92) and 0.80 (95 % CI: 0.69-0.89), respectively, for diagnosing prostatic cancer. Similarly, the values for mpMRI were determined as 0.84 (95 % CI: 0.75-0.92) and 0.74 (95 % CI: 0.61-0.86), respectively. There were no significant differences in diagnostic effectiveness observed when comparing two primary prostate cancer methodologies (pooled sensitivity P = 0.62, pooled specificity P = 0.50). Despite this, the funnel plots showed symmetry and the Egger test results (P values > 0.05) suggested there was no publication bias.

CONCLUSIONS

After an extensive meta-analysis, it was found that both 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI demonstrate similar diagnostic effectiveness in detecting primary prostate cancer. Future larger prospective studies are warranted to investigate this issue further.

PSMA PET/CT Versus mpMRI for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: An Updated Overview

In the last years, PSMA-PET imaging and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) have improved the clinical management of prostate cancer (PCa) patients. Currently, mpMRI is recommended by the EAU (European Association of Urology) guidelines for the primary diagnosis of PCa, whereas PSMA-PET is reserved for disease staging, particularly in high risk localized or locally advanced disease, as well as for biochemical recurrence after surgery. Nevertheless, several studies have explored the added value of PSMA-PET in other clinical scenarios, including primary diagnosis and especially for the detection of clinically significant PCa (csPCa). In the present contribution, we will provide an overview and an update on the current literature on imaging detection of csPCa, with a particular focus on mpMRI, PSMA-PET and their comparison.

PSMA PET/CT for Primary Staging of Prostate Cancer - An Updated Overview

Prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer is becoming increasingly popular due to simultaneous assessment of whole-body disease burden, with superior sensitivity and specificity for detecting metastases compared to conventional imaging. PSMA PET in combination with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) improves the sensitivity of assessment of extra-prostatic extension and seminal vesicle invasion compared to mpMRI alone, and may serve as a second line modality for image-guided biopsy in selected patients with negative mpMRI and/or negative primary biopsies. The superior diagnostic accuracy of PSMA PET/CT affects clinical decision-making with a change of clinical management in one-fourth of patients compared to conventional imaging. However, at present, the effect of implementing PSMA PET/CT for primary staging on patient outcomes is not clear, and prospective studies are warranted. There are several PSMA tracers with similar performance and minor individual pharmacokinetic differences such as higher rate of unspecific bone uptake with 18F-PSMA-1007, but on the other hand, lower urinary excretion, which could give an advantage in the detection of local recurrence. Proper training of the reporting physicians and knowledge of the pitfalls of the specific PSMA tracer used is of utmost importance for high-quality reading. We aim to provide an overview of the current literature and an update on the status of PSMA PET/CT for primary staging of prostate cancer.

Prediction of T staging in PI-RADS 4-5 prostate cancer by combination of multiparametric MRI and 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT

BACKGROUND

In this study, we explored the diagnostic performances of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and combination of 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI (mpMRI + PET/CT) for extracapsular extension (ECE). Based on the analyses above, we tested the feasibility of using mpMRI + PET/CT results to predict T staging in prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

By enrolling 75 patients of prostate cancer with mpMRI and 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT before radical prostatectomy, we analyzed the detection performances of ECE in mpMRI, 68 Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT and mpMRI + PET/CT on their lesion images matched with their pathological sample images layer by layer through receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis. By inputting the lesion data into Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS), we divided the lesions into different PI-RADS scores. The improvement of detecting ECE was analyzed by net reclassification improvement (NRI). The predictors for T staging were evaluated by using univariate and multivariable analysis. The Kappa test was used to evaluate the prediction ability.

RESULTS

One hundred three regions of lesion were identified from 75 patients. 50 of 103 regions were positive for ECE. The ECE diagnosis AUC of mpMRI + PET/CT is higher than that of mpMRI alone (ΔAUC = 0.101; 95% CI, 0.0148 to 0.1860; p < 0.05, respectively). Compared to mpMRI, mpMRI + PET/CT has a significant improvement in detecting ECE in PI-RADS 4-5 (NRI 36.1%, p < 0.01). The diagnosis power of mpMRI + PET/CT was an independent predictor for T staging (p < 0.001) in logistic regression analysis. In patients with PI-RADS 4-5 lesions, 40 of 46 (87.0%) patients have correct T staging prediction from mpMRI + PET/CT (κ 0.70, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

The prediction of T staging in PI-RADS 4-5 prostate cancer patients by mpMRI + PET/CT had a quite good performance.

Using prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography to guide prostate biopsies and stage men at high-risk of prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To assess whether a diagnostic pathway in which prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron-emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is used as a single imaging modality is feasible to guide targeted biopsy and to detect clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve men at high-risk of disease.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 60 men with a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level of 20-50 ng/mL underwent 18 F-PSMA(DCFPyL)-PET/CT prior to prostate biopsies in this prospective, non-randomised cohort study. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was not performed. Using a 12-segment mapping model of the prostate, PSMA-guided targeted biopsy was performed along with systematic biopsies. The detection rate of PCa and csPCa was assessed for combined systematic and targeted biopsy, and for targeted biopsy only. csPCa was defined as a prostate biopsy with an International Society of Uropathology (ISUP) Grade Group ≥2.

RESULTS

Lesions suspicious for PCa in the prostate gland were observed on all PSMA-PET/CTs. A total of 27/60 men (45%) already had metastatic disease on staging 18 F-PSMA(DCFPyL)-PET/CT. Combined PSMA-guided targeted and systematic biopsies detected PCa in 56/60 (93.3%) patients, with 52 of them (92.9%) having csPCa. PSMA-guided targeted biopsy, if performed as a single biopsy modality, identified PCa in 52/60 men (86.7%) and in 27/27 men (100%) men with metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Using the PSMA-driven single imaging modality pathway in biopsy-naïve men at high-risk of PCa, a substantial number of diagnostic MRI scans could be avoided while at the same time obtaining adequate targeting, staging, and detection of csPCa.

Diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric MRI- and microultrasound-targeted biopsy in biopsy-naïve patients with a PI-RADS 5 lesion: a single-institutional study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)- and microultrasound (microUS)-guided targeted biopsy (TBx) in detecting prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant (cs) PCa among men with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS 5) lesions and to compare this combined TBx (CTBx) strategy with CTBx plus systemic biopsy (SBx).

METHODS

One hundred and thirty-six biopsy-naïve patients with PI-RADS 5 lesion at multiparametric MRI undergoing CTBx plus SBx were retrospectively evaluated. Analysis of diagnostic performance of microUS-TBx, MRI-TBx, CTBx, SBx and combined CTBx plus SBx was performed. Cost (downgrade, upgrade and biopsy core) to effectiveness (detection rate) was compared.

RESULTS

CTBx achieved a comparable detection rate to CTBx plus SBx in diagnosis of PCa and csPCa (PCa: 78.7% [107/136] vs 79.4% [108/136]; csPCa: 67.6% [92/136] vs 67.6% [92/136]; p > 0.05) and outperformed SBx (PCa: 58.8% [80/136]; csPCa: 47.8% [65/136]; p < 0.001). Using CTB would have avoided 41.1% (56/136) unnecessary SBx, without missing any csPCa. The rate of any upgrading or csPCa upgrading was significantly higher by SBx than by CTBx [33/65 (50.8%) vs 17/65 (26.1%) and 20/65 (30.8%) vs 4/65 (6.15%), respectively, p < 0.05]. Considering csPCa detection rate, microUS showed high sensitivity and positive predictive value (94.6%, 87.9%, respectively), with lower specificity and negative predictive value (25.0% and 44.4%, respectively). At multivariable logistic regression models, positive microUS was identified as an independent predictor of csPCa (p = 0.024).

CONCLUSIONS

A combined microUS/MRI-TBx approach could be the ideal imaging tool for characterizing primary disease in PI-RADS five patients, allowing SBx to be avoided.

[68Ga]Ga-PSMA and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/MRI vs. Histopathological Images in Prostate Cancer: A New Workflow for Spatial Co-Registration

This study proposed a new workflow for co-registering prostate PET images from a dual-tracer PET/MRI study with histopathological images of resected prostate specimens. The method aims to establish an accurate correspondence between PET/MRI findings and histology, facilitating a deeper understanding of PET tracer distribution and enabling advanced analyses like radiomics. To achieve this, images derived by three patients who underwent both [68Ga]Ga-PSMA and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET/MRI before radical prostatectomy were selected. After surgery, in the resected fresh specimens, fiducial markers visible on both histology and MR images were inserted. An ex vivo MRI of the prostate served as an intermediate step for co-registration between histological specimens and in vivo MRI examinations. The co-registration workflow involved five steps, ensuring alignment between histopathological images and PET/MRI data. The target registration error (TRE) was calculated to assess the precision of the co-registration. Furthermore, the DICE score was computed between the dominant intraprostatic tumor lesions delineated by the pathologist and the nuclear medicine physician. The TRE for the co-registration of histopathology and in vivo images was 1.59 mm, while the DICE score related to the site of increased intraprostatic uptake on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA and [68Ga]Ga-RM2 PET images was 0.54 and 0.75, respectively. This work shows an accurate co-registration method for histopathological and in vivo PET/MRI prostate examinations that allows the quantitative assessment of dual-tracer PET/MRI diagnostic accuracy at a millimetric scale. This approach may unveil radiotracer uptake mechanisms and identify new PET/MRI biomarkers, thus establishing the basis for precision medicine and future analyses, such as radiomics.

A Systematic Review of the Variability in Performing and Reporting Intraprostatic Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Primary Staging Studies

Context

Prostate cancer (PCa) remains one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths in men worldwide. Men at risk are typically offered multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and, if suspicious, a targeted biopsy. However, false-negative rates of magnetic resonance imaging are consistently 18%; therefore, there is growing interest in improving the diagnostic performance of imaging through novel technologies. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for PCa staging and, more recently, for intraprostatic tumour localisation. However, significant variability has been observed in how PSMA PET is performed and reported.

Objective

In this review, we aim to evaluate how pervasive this variability is in trials investigating the performance of PSMA PET in primary PCa workup.

Evidence acquisition

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines, we performed an optimal search in five different databases. After removing duplicates, 65 studies were included in our review.

Evidence synthesis

Studies dated back as early as 2016, with numerous different source countries. There was variation in the reference standard for PSMA PET, with some using biopsy specimens or surgical specimens, and in some cases, a combination of the two. Similar inconsistencies were noted when studies selected histological definitions of clinically significant PCa, while some omitted their definition altogether. The most significant variations in performing PSMA PET were the radiotracer type, dose, acquisition time after injection, and the PET camera being utilised. Substantial variation in the reporting of PSMA PET was noted, with no consistency in defining what constitutes a positive intraprostatic lesion. Across 65 studies, four different definitions were used.

Conclusions

This systematic review has highlighted considerable variation in obtaining and performing a PSMA PET study in the context of primary PCa diagnosis. Given the discrepancy in how PSMA PET was performed and reported, it questions the homogony of studies from centre to centre. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for this to become a consistently useful and reproducible modality in the diagnosis of PCa.

Patient summary

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PET) is being utilised for staging and localisation of prostate cancer (PCa); however, there is significant variability in performing and reporting PSMA PET. Standardisation of PSMA PET is required for results to be consistently useful and reproducible for the diagnosis of PCa.

DEPROMP Trial: the additive value of PSMA-PET/CT-guided biopsy for prostate cancer management in biopsy naïve men-study protocol for a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The primary objective is to determine the proportion of men with suspected prostate cancer (PCA) in whom the management plans are changed by additive gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) guided prostate biopsy (PET-TB) in combination with standard of care (SOC) using systematic (SB) and multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-guided biopsy (MR-TB) compared with SOC alone. The major secondary objectives are to determine the additive value of the combined approach of SB + MR-TB + PET-TB (PET/MR-TB) for detecting clinically significant PCA (csPCA) compared to SOC; to determine sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and diagnostic accuracy of imaging techniques, respective imaging classification systems, and each biopsy method; and to compare preoperatively defined tumor burden and biomarker expression and pathological tumor extent in prostate specimens.

METHODS

The DEPROMP study is a prospective, open-label, interventional investigator-initiated trial. Risk stratification and management plans after PET/MR-TB are conducted randomized and blinded by different evaluation teams of experienced urologists based on histopathological analysis and imaging information: one including all results of the PET/MR-TB and one excluding the additional information gained by PSMA-PET/CT guided biopsy. The power calculation was centered on pilot data, and we will recruit up to 230 biopsy-naïve men who will undergo PET/MR-TB for suspected PCA. Conduct and reporting of MRI and PSMA-PET/CT will be performed in a blinded fashion.

DISCUSSION

The DEPROMP Trial will be the first to evaluate the clinically relevant effects of the use of PSMA-PET/CT in patients with suspected PCA compared to current SOC. The study will provide prospective data to determine the diagnostic yields of additional PET-TB in men with suspected PCA and the impact on treatment plans in terms of intra- and intermodal changes. The results will allow a comparative analysis of risk stratification by each biopsy method, including a performance analysis of the corresponding rating systems. This will reveal potential intermethod and pre- and postoperative discordances of tumor stage and grading, providing the opportunity to critically assess the need for multiple biopsies.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

German Clinical Study Register DRKS 00024134. Registered on 26 January 2021.

18 F-DCFPyL positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging-guided ultrasound fusion biopsy is an identical pathway in prostate cancer diagnosis

BACKGROUND

Prostate biopsy is still unavoidable in patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen even though multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is widely used. ¹⁸ F-DCFPyL positron emission tomography (PET)/MRI was proved to be promising both in sensitivity and specificity. But its guiding fusion biopsy and the advantages in the diagnosis of prostate disease is seldom reported. This study aimed to verify the feasibility and advantage of ¹⁸ F-DCFPyL PET/MRI-guided fusion targeted biopsy (TB) over whole-mount histopathology (WMH) for prostate cancer diagnosis.

METHODS

A prospective study of 94 biopsy-naïve patients were conducted using ¹⁸ F-DCFPyL PET/MRI scans and scored on a scale of 1-4. Systematic biopsy was performed for all patients. Patients with suspicious lesions also underwent PET/MRI/transrectal ultrasound-guided fusion biopsy. Patients with pathologically confirmed cancer underwent surgery and WMH sections. Systematic biopsy was compared with TB for the detection of index tumors (ITs). Significant cancer was defined as Grade group (GG) 2 or higher no matter the length of the cancer core.

RESULTS

¹⁸ F-DCFPyL PET/MRI detected 30/94 (32%) patients with a score of 4, all of whom were verified to have prostate cancer. While it detected 10 patients with a score of 1 (10.6%), they were shown to have no cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of ¹⁸ F-DCFPyL PET/MRI were 94.4% and 75%, respectively, if images with a score of 3 are defined as positive. Systematic biopsy detected 18% (203/1128) samples as prostate cancer; conversely, TB detected 113 samples out of 259 scores (43.6%). A statistically significant difference was seen between the PCa detection rates by TB and SB (p < 0.001). All targeted lesions were pathologically proven to be the IT on WMH.

CONCLUSIONS

In biopsy-naïve patients, the ultrasound fusion biopsy targeted by ¹⁸ F-DCFPyL PET/MRI is an identical pathway for the detection of prostate cancer.

Assessing the Role of High-resolution Microultrasound Among Naïve Patients with Negative Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging and a Persistently High Suspicion of Prostate Cancer

Background

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is an invaluable diagnostic tool in the decision-making for prostate biopsies (PBx). However, a non-negligible proportion of patients with negative MRI (nMRI) may still harbour prostate cancer (PCa).

Objective

To assess whether microultrasound (micro-US) can help in substratifying the presence of PCa and clinically significant PCa (csPCa; ie, any Gleason score ≥7 PCa) in patients with nMRI despite a persistently high clinical suspicion of PCa.

Design setting and participants

A total of 125 biopsy-naïve patients who underwent micro-US-guided PBx with the ExactVu system for a persistently high suspicion of PCa despite nMRI were prospectively enrolled.

Intervention

The Prostate Risk Identification using micro-US (PRI-MUS) protocol was used to identify suspicious areas; PBx included targeted sampling of PRI-MUS ≥3 areas and systematic sampling.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis

The primary endpoint was the assessment of micro-US diagnostic accuracy in detecting csPCa. Secondary endpoints included determining the proportion of patients with nMRI who may avoid PBx after micro-US or transrectal US, presence of cribriform and intraductal patterns on biopsy core examination, predictors of csPCa in patients presenting with nMRI, and comparing micro-US-targeted and systematic PBx in identifying csPCa.

Results and limitations

Considering csPCa detection rate, micro-US showed optimal sensitivity and negative predictive value (respectively, 97.1% and 96.4%), while specificity and positive predictive value were 29.7% and 34.0%, respectively. Twenty-eight (22.4%) patients with a negative micro-US examination could have avoided PBx with one (2.9%) missed csPCa. Cribriform and intraductal patterns were found in 14 (41.2%) and four (11.8%) of csPCa patients, respectively. In multivariable logistic regression models, positive micro-US, age, digital rectal examination, and prostate-specific antigen density ≥0.15 emerged as independent predictors of PCa. Targeted and systematic sampling identified 33 (97.1%) and 26 (76.5%) csPCa cases, respectively. The main limitation of the current study is represented by its retrospective single-centre nature on an operator-dependent technology.

Conclusions

Micro-US represents a valuable tool to rule out the presence of csPCa among patients with a persistent clinical suspicion despite nMRI.

Patient summary

According to our results, microultrasound (micro-US) may represent an effective tool for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with negative magnetic resonance imaging (nMRI), providing high sensitivity and negative predictive value. Further randomised studies are needed to confirm the potential role of micro-US in the diagnostic pathway of patients with a persistent suspicion of prostate cancer despite nMRI.

Incorporating Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography in Management Decisions for Men with Newly Diagnosed or Biochemically Recurrent Prostate Cancer

CONTEXT

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising molecular target for prostate cancer (PCa) that has allowed the development of a novel diagnostic approach to PCA in the primary and recurrent settings.

OBJECTIVE

To summarize available data and recommendations regarding the use of PSMA in newly diagnosed and recurrent PCa via a narrative review.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A literature review was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) and Scopus. The search strategy included meta-analyses, reviews, and original studies on staging and restaging with ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT).

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Studies comparing PSMA-targeted imaging and conventional imaging suggest superior performance of PSMA-targeted imaging in primary and recurrent PCa, albeit with several clinically relevant limitations. Pretreatment ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT allowed more accurate PCa staging in compared to routine practice for high-risk cases, and identified a number of otherwise unknown metastatic lesions. In biochemically recurrent PCa, PSMA PET can reveal sites of recurrence with greater sensitivity and specificity than conventional imaging, potentially detecting a major proportion of occult disease. This review will help providers in applying the most up-to-date and relevant literature to (1) determine which patients truly have oligometastatic disease and (2) ascertain who is most likely to experience a meaningful response to local consolidation in the biochemical recurrence setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Data on PSMA diagnostic studies in primary and recurrent PCa highlight the accuracy and clinical application of PSMA PET. While this review and the evidence to date might lead to a perception of superiority in metastasis directed therapy, fundamental lack of phase III clinical trials with clinically meaningful outcomes are yet to be determined.

PATIENT SUMMARY

PSMA (prostate-specific membrane antigen) scans have shown great promise for initial evaluation of prostate cancer (PCa) and in detection of PCa recurrence. The benefits are more apparent for initial staging of PCa. There are more limited clinical trial results for PCa recurrence on how best to use this new technique to guide cancer treatment.

The Role of [68Ga]PSMA PET/CT for Clinical Suspicion of Prostate Cancer in Patients with or without Previous Negative Biopsy: A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

In this paper we systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. A critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement was conducted. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in the analysis. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, its use combined with MRI improved sensitivity for csPCa detection, thus potentially avoiding unnecessary biopsies. Overall, [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT resulted a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI.

Abstract

The purpose of the study is to systematically evaluate the evidence regarding the role of [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT for clinical suspicions of prostate cancer in patients with or without previous negative biopsy. We performed a critical review of PubMed and Web of Science according to the PRISMA statement. Eighteen publications were selected for inclusion in this analysis. QUADAS-2 evaluation was adopted for quality analyses. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-11 was the radiotracer of choice in 15 studies, while [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA-617 was used in another 3. In 8 articles, there was a direct comparison with mpMRI. The total number of patients included was 1379, ranging from 15 to 291, with a median age of 64 years (range: 42–90). The median baseline PSA value was 12.9 ng/mL, ranging from 0.85 to 4156 ng/mL. Some studies evaluated the PSMA uptake comparing the SUVmax of suspicious lesions with the SUVmax of the normal biodistribution to find out optimal cut-off points. In addition, some studies suggested a significant association between PSA levels, PSA density, and [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT finding. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT seems to be more accurate in identifying primary prostate cancer with PSA values between 4 and 20 ng/mL than mpMRI. Moreover, in some trials, the combination of PSMA PET/CT and MRI improved the NPV in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) than MRI alone. Our findings are limited by the small numbers of studies and patient heterogeneity. [⁶⁸Ga]PSMA PET/CT is a promising technique in patients with clinical suspicion of PCa and precedent negative biopsy or contraindications to MRI. Furthermore, its use combined with MRI improves sensitivity for csPCa detection and can avoid unnecessary biopsies.

Prospective evaluation of the role of imaging techniques and TMPRSS2:ERG mutation for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer

Objectives

To test the hypothesis of a relationship between a specific genetic lesion (T2:ERG) and imaging scores, such as PI-RADS and PRI-MUS, and to test the effectiveness of these parameters for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (csPCa).

Materials and methods

This is a prospective study of men with suspected PCa enrolled between 2016 and 2019 at a high-volume tertiary hospital. Patients underwent systematic US-guided biopsy, plus targeted biopsy if they were presenting with >=1 suspicious lesion (PI-RADS>2) at mpMRI or PR-IMUS >2 at micro-ultrasound assessment. For each patient, one core from the highest PI-RADS or PRI-MUS lesion was collected for T2:ERG analysis. Multivariable logistic regression models (LRMs) were fitted for csPCa with a clinical model (age, total PSA, previous biopsy, family history for PCa), a clinical plus PI-RADS, clinical plus T2:ERG, clinical plus PI-RADS plus T2:ERG, and T2:ERG plus PI-RADS alone.

Results

The cohort consists of 158 patients: 83.5% and 66.2% had respectively a diagnosis of PCa and csPCa after biopsy. A T2:ERG fusion was found in 37 men and 97.3% of these patients harbored PCa, while 81.1% were diagnosed with csPCa. SE of T2:ERG assay for csPCa was 28.8%, SP 87.0%, NPV 38.8%, and PPV 81.1%. Of 105 patients who performed mpMRI 93.% had PIRADS ≥3. SE of mpMRI for csPCa was 98.5%, SP was 12.8%, NPV was 83.3%, and PPV was 65.7%. Among 67 patients who were subjected to micro-US, 90% had a PRI-MUS ≥3. SE of micro-US for csPCa was 89.1%, SP was 9.52%, NPV was 28.6%, and PPV was 68.3%. At univariable LRM T2:ERG was confirmed as independent of mpMRI and micro-US result (OR 1.49, p=0.133 and OR 1.82, p=0.592, respectively). At multivariable LRM the clinical model alone had an AUC for csPCa of 0.74 while the clinical model including PI-RADS and T2:ERG achieved an AUC of 0.83.

Conclusions

T2:ERG translocation and imaging results are independent of each other, but both are related csPCa. To evaluate the best diagnostic work-up for PCa and csPCa detection, all available tools (T2:ERG detection and imaging techniques) should be employed together as they appear to have a complementary role.

Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography in primary prostate cancer diagnosis: First-line imaging is afoot

Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (PSMA PET) is an excellent molecular imaging technique for prostate cancer. Currently, PSMA PET for patients with primary prostate cancer is supplementary to conventional imaging techniques, according to guidelines. This supplementary function of PSMA PET is due to a lack of systematic review of its strengths, limitations, and potential development direction. Thus, we review PSMA ligands, detection, T, N, and M staging, treatment management, and false results of PSMA PET in clinical studies. We also discuss the strengths and challenges of PSMA PET. PSMA PET can greatly increase the detection rate of prostate cancer and accuracy of T/N/M staging, which facilitates more appropriate treatment for primary prostate cancer. Lastly, we propose that PSMA PET could become the first-line imaging modality for primary prostate cancer, and we describe its potential expanded application.

Radiomics Analysis on [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET and MRI-ADC for the Prediction of Prostate Cancer ISUP Grades: Preliminary Results of the BIOPSTAGE Trial

Simple Summary

Radiomics analysis is used on magnetic resonance imaging – apparent diffusion coefficient (MRI-ADC) maps and [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET uptake maps to assess unique tumor traits not visible to the naked eye and predict histology-proven ISUP grades in a cohort of 28 patients. Our study’s main goal is to report imaging features that can distinguish patients with low ISUP grades from those with higher grades (ISUP one+) by employing logistic regression statistical models based on MRI-ADC and 68Ga-PSMA data, as well as assess the features’ stability under small contouring variations. Our findings reveal that MRI-ADC and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET imaging features-based models are equivalent and complementary for predicting low ISUP grade patients. These models can be employed in broader studies to confirm their ISUP grade prediction ability and eventually impact clinical workflow by reducing overdiagnosis of indolent, early-stage PCa.

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCa) risk categorization based on clinical/PSA testing results in a substantial number of men being overdiagnosed with indolent, early-stage PCa. Clinically non-significant PCa is characterized as the presence of ISUP grade one, where PCa is found in no more than two prostate biopsy cores.MRI-ADC and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET have been proposed as tools to predict ISUP grade one patients and consequently reduce overdiagnosis. In this study, Radiomics analysis is applied to MRI-ADC and [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET maps to quantify tumor characteristics and predict histology-proven ISUP grades. ICC was applied with a threshold of 0.6 to assess the features’ stability with variations in contouring. Logistic regression predictive models based on imaging features were trained on 31 lesions to differentiate ISUP grade one patients from ISUP two+ patients. The best model based on [⁶⁸Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET returned a prediction efficiency of 95% in the training phase and 100% in the test phase whereas the best model based on MRI-ADC had an efficiency of 100% in both phases. Employing both imaging modalities, prediction efficiency was 100% in the training phase and 93% in the test phase. Although our patient cohort was small, it was possible to assess that both imaging modalities add information to the prediction models and show promising results for further investigations.

Preliminary Evaluation of 68Ga-P16-093, a PET Radiotracer Targeting Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Prostate Cancer

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising molecular target for imaging of prostate adenocarcinoma. ⁶⁸Ga-P16-093, a small molecule PSMA ligand, previously showed equivalent diagnostic performance compared to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in a pilot study of prostate cancer patients with biochemical recurrence (BCR). We performed a pilot study for further characterization of ⁶⁸Ga-P16-093 including comparison to conventional imaging.

PROCEDURES

Patients were enrolled into two cohorts. The biodistribution cohort included 8 treated prostate cancer patients without recurrence, who underwent 6 whole body PET/CT scans with urine sampling for dosimetry using OLINDA/EXM. The dynamic cohort included 15 patients with BCR and 2 patients with primary prostate cancer. Two patients with renal cell carcinoma were also enrolled for exploratory use. A dynamic PET/CT was followed by 2 whole body scans for imaging protocol optimization based on bootstrapped replicates. ⁶⁸Ga-P16-093 PET/CT was compared for diagnostic performance against available ¹⁸F-fluciclovine PET/CT, ^99mTc-MDP scintigraphy, diagnostic CT, and MRI.

RESULTS

⁶⁸Ga-P16-093 deposited similar effective dose (0.024 mSv/MBq) and lower urinary bladder dose (0.064 mSv/MBq) compared to ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11. The kidneys were the critical organ (0.290 mSv/MBq). While higher injected activities were preferable, lower injected activities at 74-111 MBq (2-3 mCi) yielded 80% retention in signal-to-noise ratio. The optimal injection-to-scan interval was 60 min, with acceptable delay up to 90 min. ⁶⁸Ga-P16-093 PET/CT showed superior diagnostic performance over conventional imaging with overall patient-level lesion detection rate of 71%, leading to a change in management in 42% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on its favorable imaging characteristics and diagnostic performance in prostate cancer, ⁶⁸Ga-P16-093 PET/CT merits further investigation in larger clinical studies.

18F-Fluciclovine versus PSMA PET Imaging in Primary Tumor Detection during Initial Staging of High-Risk Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose Fluorine 18 (18F)-fluciclovine and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) tracers are commonly used for localizing biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer, but their accuracy in primary tumor detection in the initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer has not been established. Materials and Methods A systematic review was performed of the electronic databases for original studies published between 2012 and 2020. Included studies were those in which 18F-fluciclovine or PSMA PET was used for initial staging of patients with high-risk prostate cancer. The diagnostic performance data were collected for primary tumor with histopathologic results as reference standard. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool was used for quality appraisal. A random-effects model was used to summarize the effect sizes and to evaluate the difference between two groups. Results Overall, 28 studies met the eligibility criteria, and 17 were included in the meta-analysis (18F-fluciclovine = 4, PSMA = 13). Of these 17 studies, 12 (70%) were judged to have high risk of bias in one of the evaluated domains, and nine studies were deemed to have applicability concerns. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratio for 18F-fluciclovine versus PSMA were 85% (95% CI: 73%, 92%) versus 84% (95% CI: 77%, 89%) (P = .78), 77% (95% CI: 60%, 88%) versus 83% (95% CI: 76%, 89%) (P = .40), and 18.88 (95% CI: 5.01, 71.20) versus 29.37 (95% CI: 13.35, 64.60) (P = .57), respectively, with no significant difference in diagnostic test accuracy. Conclusion 18F-fluciclovine and PSMA PET demonstrated no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy in primary tumor detection during initial staging of high-risk prostate cancer. Keywords: PET, Prostate, Molecular Imaging-Cancer, Staging Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2022.

Efficacy of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT with biparametric MRI in diagnosing prostate cancer and predicting risk stratification: a comparative study

BACKGROUND

This retrospective study aimed to investigate the efficacy of the combined application of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 positron emission computed tomography/computed tomography (bpMRI/PET) in the qualitative diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

METHODS

The 105 patients with suspected PCa included in the study underwent bpMRI and PET/CT. BpMRI examinations included conventional sequences and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Major lesions were qualitatively diagnosed according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). A PET/CT scan was started 60 min after intravenous ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 injection. The area with the highest radioactivity on PET/CT images was defined as the major lesion, and the maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max) was measured. All cases were confirmed by biopsy and pathology. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was performed on the data to calculate sensitivity, specificity, and the Youden index.

RESULTS

Of the 105 patients, 68 patients were diagnosed with PCa, and 37 patients had benign prostatic lesions. With a PI-RADS score ≥3 as the diagnostic threshold, the accuracy of bpMRI in identifying benign and malignant prostate lesions was similar to that of PET/CT (SUV_max threshold ≥10.9), and the Youden indices were 0.60 and 0.64, respectively. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI in the differential diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk PCa versus low-risk PCa or benign lesions were 63% and 88%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.51. With an SUV_max ≥12.9 as the diagnostic threshold, the sensitivity and specificity of PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk PCa versus low-risk PCa or benign lesions were 74% and 94%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.68. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI/PET in diagnosing PCa were 94% and 81%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.75. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI/PET in the differential diagnosis of intermediate- to high-risk PCa versus low-risk PCa or benign lesions were 80% and 88%, respectively, and the Youden index was 0.68.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined application of bpMRI and PET improves the accuracy of the qualitative diagnosis of prostate lesions, and its diagnostic efficacy for risk stratification in patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa is similar to that of PET/CT and higher than that of bpMRI alone.

Current state of prostate-specific membrane antigen PET/CT imaging-targeted biopsy techniques for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer

Clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) is the focus of clinical diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer (PCa). The current standard for diagnosing csPCa in men at risk relies on a transrectal (and in some instances transperineal) ultrasound-guided biopsy (TRUS-GB) that is blind to the location of cancer, leading to false-negative csPCa diagnoses. Over the past decade, PSMA PET/CT imaging-targeted prostate biopsy (PSMA PET/CT-TB), which obtains tissue samples from a defined suspicious area, has emerged as a promising solution for improving csPCa detection. Its feasibility and higher csPCa diagnostic value have been reported by a few case reports and studies. The current manuscript will review this latest targeted prostate puncture technology, summarize the existing applications of PSMA PET/CT-TB, including technical considerations, and discuss the advantages and challenges of each technique.

Dual-tracer PET/CT-targeted, mpMRI-targeted, systematic biopsy, and combined biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: a pilot study

PURPOSE

Growing evidence proved the efficacy of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) and prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT)-guided targeted biopsy (TB) in prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis, but there is no direct comparison between mpMRI-TB and PSMA PET/CT-TB. Gastrin-releasing peptide receptor (GRPR) is highly expressed in PCa, which can compensate for the unstable expression of PSMA in PCa. Therefore, we designed a study to compare the efficiency of mpMRI-TB, dual-tracer (GRPR and PSMA) PET/CT-TB, systematic biopsy, and combined biopsy for the diagnosis of prostate cancer.

METHODS

One hundred twelve suspicious PCa patients were enrolled from September 2020 to June 2021. Patients with anyone of positive dual-tracer PET/CT or mpMRI underwent TB, and all enrolled patients underwent systematic biopsy (SB) after TB. The primary outcome was the detection rates of PCa in different biopsy strategies. Secondary outcomes were the performance of three imaging methods, omission diagnostic rates, and upgrading and downgrading of biopsy samples relative to those of prostatectomy specimens in different biopsy strategies. McNemar's tests and Bonferroni correction in multiple comparisons were used to compare the primary and secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

In 112 men, clinically significant PCa (grade group[GG] ≥ 2) accounted for 34.82% (39/112), and nonclinically significant PCa (GG = 1) accounted for 4.46% (5/112). ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT-TB achieved higher PCa detection rate (69.77%) and positive ratio of biopsy cores (0.44) compared with SB (39.29% and 0.12) and mpMRI-TB (36.14% and 0.23), respectively (P < 0.005). Dual-tracer PET/CT screen out patients for avoiding 52.67% (59/112) unnecessary biopsy, whereas dual-tracer PET/CT-TB plus SB achieved high detection rate (77.36%) without misdiagnosis of csPCa.

CONCLUSION

Dual-tracer PET/CT might screen patients for avoiding unnecessary biopsy. Dual-tracer PET/CT-TB plus SB might be a more effective and promising strategy for the definite diagnosis of clinically significant PCa than mpMRI-TB.

Future perspective of focal therapy for localized prostate cancer

Objective

To summarize the recent literature discussing focal therapy for localized prostate cancer.

Methods

A thorough literature review was performed using PubMed to identify recent studies involving focal therapy for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

Results

In an effort to decrease the morbidity associated with prostate cancer treatment, many urologists are turning to focal therapy as an alternative treatment option. With this approach, the cancer bearing portion of the prostate is targeted while leaving the benign tissue untouched. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging remains the gold standard for visualization during focal therapy, but new imaging modalities such as prostate specific membrane antigen/positron emission tomography and contrast enhanced ultrasound are being investigated. Furthermore, several biomarkers, such as prostate cancer antigen 3 and prostate health index, are used in conjunction with imaging to improve risk stratification prior to focal therapy. Lastly, there are several novel technologies such as nanoparticles and transurethral devices that are under investigation for use in focal therapy.

Conclusion

Focal therapy is proving to be a promising option for the treatment of localized prostate cancer. However, further study is needed to determine the true efficacy of these exciting new technologies.

Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography for lesion-directed high-dose-rate brachytherapy dose escalation

•

This paper evaluated lesion-directed prostatic high dose rate brachytherapy.

•

Lesions defined by prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography.

•

Dose escalation was confirmed using whole-mount digital histology.

•

Targeting lesions led to significantly higher dose to high-grade histologic cancer.

Background and purpose

Prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging (PSMA-PET) has demonstrated potential for intra-prostatic lesion localization. We leveraged our existing database of co-registered PSMA-PET imaging with cross sectional digitized pathology to model dose coverage of histologically-defined prostate cancer when tailoring brachytherapy dose escalation based on PSMA-PET imaging.

Materials and methods

Using a previously-developed automated approach, we created segmentation volumes delineating underlying dominant intraprostatic lesions for ten men with co-registered pathology-imaging datasets. To simulate realistic high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) treatments, we registered the PSMA-PET-defined segmentation volumes and underlying cancer to 3D trans-rectal ultrasound images of HDR-BT cases where 15 Gray (Gy) was delivered. We applied dose/volume optimization to focally target the dominant intraprostatic lesion identified on PSMA-PET. We then compared histopathology dose for all high-grade cancer within whole-gland treatment plans versus PSMA-PET-targeted plans. Histopathology dose was analyzed for all clinically significant cancer with a Gleason score of 7or greater.

Results

The standard whole-gland plans achieved a median [interquartile range] D98 of 15.2 [13.8–16.4] Gy to the histologically-defined cancer, while the targeted plans achieved a significantly higher D98 of 16.5 [15.0–19.0] Gy (p = 0.007).

Conclusion

This study is the first to use digital histology to confirm the effectiveness of PSMA-PET HDR-BT dose escalation using automatically generated contours. Based on the findings of this study, PSMA-PET lesion dose escalation can lead to increased dose to the ground truth histologically defined cancer.

Diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/MRI-guided biopsy in patients with suspected prostate cancer: a prospective single-center study

PURPOSE

Ultrasound-guided biopsy (US biopsy) with 10-12 cores has a suboptimal sensitivity for clinically significant prostate cancer (sigPCa). If US biopsy is negative, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy is recommended, despite a low specificity for lesions with score 3-5 on Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PIRADS). Screening and biopsy guidance using an imaging modality with high accuracy could reduce the number of unnecessary biopsies, reducing side effects. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of positron emission tomography/MRI with 68Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-PET/MRI) to detect and localize primary sigPCa (ISUP grade group 3 and/or cancer core length ≥ 6 mm) and guide biopsy.

METHODS

Prospective, open-label, single-center, non-randomized, diagnostic accuracy study including patients with suspected PCa by elevation of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and a suspicious lesion (PIRADS ≥3) on multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Forty-two patients underwent PSMA-PET/MRI followed by both PSMA-PET/MRI-guided and section-based saturation template biopsy between May 2017 and February 2019. Primary outcome was the accuracy of PSMA-PET/MRI for biopsy guidance using section-based saturation template biopsy as the reference standard.

RESULTS

SigPCa was found in 62% of the patients. Patient-based sensitivity, specificity, negative and positive predictive value, and accuracy for sigPCa were 96%, 81%, 93%, 89%, and 90%, respectively. One patient had PSMA-negative sigPCa. Eight of nine false-positive lesions corresponded to cancer on prostatectomy and one in six false-negative lesions was negative on prostatectomy.

CONCLUSION

PSMA-PET/MRI has a high accuracy for detecting sigPCa and is a promising tool to select patients with suspicion of PCa for biopsy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial was retrospectively registered under the name "Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging (PET/MRI) Guided Biopsy in Men with Elevated PSA" (NCT03187990) on 06/15/2017 ( https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03187990 ).

Determining the diagnostic value of PSMA-PET/CT imaging in patients with persistent high prostate specific antigen levels and negative prostate biopsies

PURPOSE

To assess the diagnostic performance of prostate specific membranous antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) imaging to localize primary prostate cancer (PCa) in men with persistent elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels and previous prostate biopsies that were negative for PCa.

METHODS

In this study, 34 men with persistently elevated PSA-levels, previous negative for PCa biopsies and who subsequently underwent diagnostic PSMA-PET/CT imaging were retrospectively evaluated. Men were divided into 3 groups: 1. 12 men with a previous negative mpMRI scan (PI-RADS 1-2) 2. 17 men with a positive mpMRI scan (PI-RADS 3-5), but negative MRI-targeted biopsies and 3. Four men in whom mpMRI was contraindicated. If PSMA-avid lesions were seen, patients underwent 2-4 cognitive targeted biopsies in combination with systematic biopsies. The detection rate of PSMA-PET/CT for PCa, and the accuracy of (possible) targeted biopsies were calculated.

RESULTS

Included men had a median PSA-level of 22.8 ng/mL (Interquartile Range 15.6-30.0) at the time of PSMA-PET/CT. Elevated PSMA-ligand uptake in the prostate suspicious for PCa was observed in 22/34 patients (64.7%). In 18/22 patients (54.5%), PSMA-targeted prostate biopsies were performed. In 3/18 patients (16.6%), the targeted biopsies showed International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) score 1-2 PCa. The other men had inflammation or benign findings after histopathological examination of the biopsy cores.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the clinical value of PSMA-PET/CT for patients with an elevated PSA-level, and negative for PCa biopsies was low. Only very few men were diagnosed with PCa, and no clinically significant PCa was found.

A decade of multi-modality PET and MR imaging in abdominal oncology

OBJECTIVES

To investigate trends observed in a decade of published research on multimodality PET(/CT)+MR imaging in abdominal oncology, and to explore how these trends are reflected by the use of multimodality imaging performed at our institution.

METHODS

First, we performed a literature search (2009-2018) including all papers published on the multimodality combination of PET(/CT) and MRI in abdominal oncology. Retrieved papers were categorized according to a structured labelling system, including study design and outcome, cancer and lesion type under investigation and PET-tracer type. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and evolutions over time were plotted graphically. Second, we performed a descriptive analysis of the numbers of MRI, PET/CT and multimodality PET/CT+MRI combinations (performed within a ≤14 days interval) performed during a similar time span at our institution.

RESULTS

Published research papers involving multimodality PET(/CT)+MRI combinations showed an impressive increase in numbers, both for retrospective combinations of PET/CT and MRI, as well as hybrid PET/MRI. Main areas of research included new PET-tracers, visual PET(/CT)+MRI assessment for staging, and (semi-)quantitative analysis of PET-parameters compared to or combined with MRI-parameters as predictive biomarkers. In line with literature, we also observed a vast increase in numbers of multimodality PET/CT+MRI imaging in our institutional data.

CONCLUSIONS

The tremendous increase in published literature on multimodality imaging, reflected by our institutional data, shows the continuously growing interest in comprehensive multivariable imaging evaluations to guide oncological practice.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The role of multimodality imaging in oncology is rapidly evolving. This paper summarizes the main applications and recent developments in multimodality imaging, with a specific focus on the combination of PET+MRI in abdominal oncology.

What's behind 68Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in primary prostate cancer PET? Investigation of histopathological parameters and immunohistochemical PSMA expression patterns

Purpose

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA-) PET has become a promising tool in staging and restaging of prostate carcinoma (PCa). However, specific primary tumour features might impact accuracy of PSMA-PET for PCa detection. We investigated histopathological parameters and immunohistochemical PSMA expression patterns on radical prostatectomy (RPE) specimens and correlated them to the corresponding ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET examinations.

Methods

RPE specimens of 62 patients with preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET between 2016 and 2018 were analysed. WHO/ISUP grade groups, growth pattern (expansive vs. infiltrative), tumour area and diameter as well as immunohistochemical PSMA heterogeneity, intensity and negative tumour area (PSMA_%neg) were correlated with spatially corresponding SUV_max on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11-PET in a multidisciplinary analysis.

Results

All tumours showed medium to strong membranous (2–3 +) and weak to strong cytoplasmic (1–3 +) PSMA expression. Heterogeneously expressed PSMA was found in 38 cases (61%). Twenty-five cases (40%) showed at least 5% and up to 80% PSMA_%neg. PSMA_%neg, infiltrative growth pattern, smaller tumour area and diameter and WHO/ISUP grade group 2 significantly correlated with lower SUV_max values. A ROC curve analysis revealed 20% PSMA_%neg as an optimal cutoff with the highest sensitivity and specificity (89% and 86%, AUC 0.923) for a negative PSMA-PET scan. A multiple logistic regression model revealed tumoural PSMA_%neg (p < 0.01, OR = 9.629) and growth pattern (p = 0.0497, OR = 306.537) as significant predictors for a negative PSMA-PET scan.

Conclusions

We describe PSMA_%neg, infiltrative growth pattern, smaller tumour size and WHO/ISUP grade group 2 as parameters associated with a lower ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 uptake in prostate cancer. These findings can serve as fundament for future biopsy-based biomarker development to enable an individualized, tumour-adapted imaging approach.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00259-021-05501-1.

Mismatched Imaging Findings of Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT vs mpMRI

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) is the modality of choice for initial diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa), including biopsy-naïve patients. Nevertheless, clinicians must be aware of the possibility that up to one-fourth of clinically significant cancers might be missed by the modality. Acknowledgment of this occurrence and the increased availability of 68 Ga-PSMA PET/CT in clinical routine, open the door to new, fascinating, indications for this functional modality in the context of PCa detection. With the case herein illustrated, we report a paradigmatic example of mismatch findings between PET/CT and mpMRI better elucidating the potential indication.

Alkaline phosphatase-triggered self-assembly of near-infrared nanoparticles for the enhanced photoacoustic imaging of tumors

In this chapter, we discuss the need for the development of enzyme-activatable probes in the field of tumor-targeted photoacoustic (PA) imaging, then we give a brief description of the innovation of designing alkaline phosphatase (ALP)-activatable probes for PA imaging. After that, we provide detailed protocols for the syntheses and characterizations of a near-infrared photoacoustic imaging probe, 1P, developed in our research group. With this tool, 1P could form nanoparticles 1-NPs under the catalysis of ALP and thus could be used to enhance PA imaging both in vitro and in vivo.

[Clinical aspects in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer]

BACKGROUND

Diagnosis and treatment of primary prostate cancer (PCA) have undergone significant changes in the last few years due to modern imaging.

OBJECTIVES

Established and modern diagnostic and therapeutic modalities for detection and treatment of primary PCA are presented and discussed critically.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Background knowledge and guideline recommendations on primary PCA are summarized and additional information from relevant publications is given.

RESULTS

Modern imaging, in particular multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), has revolutionized the diagnostic work-up of primary PCA. Due to mpMRI, tumors are detected significantly better in both initial and re-biopsy with a significant reduction of overdiagnosis of clinically insignificant PCA. Therapeutic approaches such as active surveillance, radical prostatectomy and focal therapies are increasingly being planned and carried out relying on MR-imaging information concerning tumor extent and tumor aggressiveness. In addition, prostate-specific membrane antigen-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PSMA-PET/CT) has shown superiority in assessing patients with suspected biochemical recurrence and in primary staging of PCA compared to conventional imaging in terms of detection of metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

Modern imaging, especially mpMRI and PSMA-PET/CT, has added substantial benefits in modern diagnosis and treatment of primary PCA. Moreover, multiparametric ultrasound is also a promising addition to the radiological armamentarium in the management of primary PCA.

The use of 29 MHz transrectal micro-ultrasound to stratify the prostate cancer risk in patients with PI-RADS III lesions at multiparametric MRI: A single institutional analysis

INTRODUCTION

Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) has emerged as the most accurate diagnostic tool, showing a high sensitivity in the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer (csCaP). However only a minority of patients with a PI-RADS 3 lesion at multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are diagnosed with csCaP. The aim of the current study was to assess whether high resolution micro-ultrasound (microUS) could help in sub-stratifying the risk of csCaP in this specific population.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the records of 111 consecutive patients scheduled for a prostate biopsy with at least 1 PI-RADS 3 lesions at MRI. We excluded patients with a PIRADS >3 lesion, even if they had a coexisting PIRADS 3 lesions. MicroUS was performed in all patients before prostate biopsy by an operator blind to MRI results. The Prostate Risk Identification using MicroUS (PRI-MUS) protocol was used to assess the risk of CaP and csCaP. All patients received both targeted and systematic biopsies. The primary endpoint was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of microUS in detection of csCaP in patients with a PI-RADS 3 lesion at MRI. Specifically, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of microUS were determined. Multivariable logistic regression models (MLRMs) were fitted to identify predictors of CaP. The diagnostic accuracy was reported as area under the receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULTS

Overall, 43 patients (38.7%) harboured CaP and 22 (20%) csCaP. MicroUS showed a high sensitivity and negative predictive value (100%), while its specificity and positive predictive value were 33.7% and 27.2%, respectively. Among patients without lesions at microUS, 25 (83.3%) did not harbour CaP, while 5 (16.7%) patients were diagnosed with a Gleason score 6 CaP, with no patients harbouring csCaP. Using microUS, the csCaP detection would have remained 100%, while reducing the detection of insignificant CaP of a 23.8% extent (n = 5). In MLRMs, lesion identified at microUS and continuously-coded PSAd were independent predictors of CaP. The accuracy of a model including PRI-MUS score, digital rectal examination (DRE), PSA density, age and family history was 0.744 (95% CI: 0.645 - 0.843).

CONCLUSION

In our single-institutional retrospective study, microUS was potentially capable to stratify the presence of CaP in patients with an equivocal MRI. Further prospective studies on larger populations are needed to validate our results.

68Ga-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (psma) positron emission tomography (pet) in prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Introduction:

Prostate cancer (PC) is the second most commonly diagnosed cancer in males. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET/CT, a non-invasive diagnostic tool to evaluate PC with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression, has emerged as a more accurate alternative to assess disease staging. We aimed to identify predictors of positive ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET and the accuracy of this technique.

Materials and methods:

Diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study with prospective and retrospective approaches. We performed a comprehensive literature search on PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase database in search of studies including PC patients submitted to radical prostatectomy or radiotherapy with curative intent and presented biochemical recurrence following ASTRO 1996 criteria. A total of 35 studies involving 3910 patients submitted to 68-Ga-PSMA PET were included and independently assessed by two authors: 8 studies on diagnosis, four on staging, and 23 studies on restaging purposes. The significance level was α=0.05.

Results:

pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.90 (0.86-0.93) and 0.90 (0.82-0.96), respectively, for diagnostic purposes; as for staging, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.93 (0.86-0.98) and 0.96 (0.92-0.99), respectively. In the restaging scenario, pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.76 (0.74-0.78) and 0.45 (0.27-0.58), respectively, considering the identification of prostate cancer in each described situation. We also obtained specificity and sensitivity results for PSA subdivisions.

Conclusion:

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA PET provides higher sensitivity and specificity than traditional imaging for prostate cancer.

Can 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT predict pathological upgrading of prostate cancer from MRI-targeted biopsy to radical prostatectomy?

PURPOSE

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) positron emission tomography (PSMA-PET) is an ideal tool for staging and restaging of prostate cancer (PCa). This study was designed to investigate the prognostic role of preoperative ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT in predicting pathological upgrading from multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy (mpMRI-TB) to final radical prostatectomy (RP) specimens in patients with localized PCa.

METHODS

A total of 67 biopsy-confirmed localized PCa patients with mpMRI and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT prior to RP were included. Clinical and imaging characteristics derived from mpMRI and PET/CT were compared in patients with or without pathological upgrading. Predictors for pathological upgrading were evaluated by using univariate and multivariable analyses. A prediction model was developed based on the identified parameters and validated using internal validation.

RESULTS

Pathological upgrading from mpMRI-TB to final RP specimens occurred in 38.8% (26/67) of the patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed SUV_max (OR: 1.223, 95% CI 1.068-1.399, p = 0.003); highest tumor grade at mpMRI-TB, ISUP grade group (ISUP GG) 1 vs. 4 (OR: 0.11, 95% CI 0.000-0.452, p = 0.018) and ISUP GG 2 vs. 4 (OR: 0.16, 95% CI 0.001-0.252, p = 0.003); and multifocality on PET/CT (OR: 9.821, 95% CI 1.438-67.085, p = 0.02) were independent risk factors for pathological upgrading. Our developed prediction model based on the identified parameter showed good calibration at internal validation (mean absolute error = 0.033).

CONCLUSION

⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT was found to be an ideal biomarker for the prediction of pathological upgrading from mpMRI-TB to RP, especially for patients with lower tumor grade at mpMRI-TB.

Combined Utility of 68Ga-Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography and Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Predicting Prostate Biopsy Pathology

BACKGROUND

⁶⁸Gallium-labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET) is a valuable staging tool, but its utility in characterising primary prostate cancer remains unclear. The maximum standardised uptake value (SUVmax) is a quantification measure of highest radiotracer uptake within PET-avid lesions.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the utility of SUVmax in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) on biopsy alone and in combination with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI).

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

This was a retrospective analysis of 200 men who underwent ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, mpMRI, and transperineal template prostate biopsy between 2016 and 2018.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS

The primary and secondary outcomes were detection of grade group (GG) 3-5 and GG 2-5 prostate cancer, respectively. We used the Mann-Whitney U test to compare SUVmax by GG, and calculated sensitivity and specificity for csPCa detection via ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT, mpMRI, and both. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to identify predictors of csPCa on biopsy.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

The median SUVmax was greater for GG 3-5 tumours (6.40, interquartile range [IQR] 4.47-11.0) than for benign and GG 1-2 tumours (3.14, IQR 2.55-3.91; p <  0.001). The median SUVmax was greater for GG 3 (5.70, IQR 3.68-8.67) than for GG 2 (3.47, IQR 2.70-4.74; p <  0.001). For GG 3-5 disease, sensitivity was 86.5%, 95.9%, and 98.6%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 88.4%, 88.5%, and 93.3% using SUVmax ≥4, a Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score of 3-5, and both, respectively. This combined model detected more GG 3-5 disease than mpMRI alone (98.6% vs 95.9%; p =  0.04). SUVmax was an independent predictor of csPCa for GG 3-5 disease only (odds ratio 1.27 per unit, 95% confidence interval 1.13-1.45). Our results are limited by the retrospective study design.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater SUVmax on ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT is associated with detection of GG 3-5 cancer on biopsy. The combination of PI-RADS score and SUVmax provides higher sensitivity and NPV than either alone. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT may be useful alongside mpMRI in improving risk stratification for localised disease.

PATIENT SUMMARY

The amount of a radioactive tracer taken up in the prostate during a type of scan called PET (positron emission tomography) can predict whether aggressive prostate cancer is likely to be found on biopsy. This may complement the more usual type of scan, MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), used to detect prostate cancer.

A Pilot Study of 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT or PET/MRI and Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy for Intra-Prostatic PET-Positive Lesions

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic performance of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) based 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT-ultrasound (PET/CT-US) or PET/MRI-ultrasound (PET/MRI-US) fusion targeted biopsy for intra-prostatic PET-positive lesions.

METHODS

From April 2018 to November 2019, we prospectively enrolled 55 candidates to perform PET/CT-US or PET/MRI-US fusion targeted biopsies for solitary PET-positive prostate lesions (two to four cores/lesion). The positive rates of prostate cancer based on patients and biopsy cores were calculated respectively. With reference to the pathological results of biopsy cores, the MR signal characteristics in the area of the PET-positive lesion were analyzed for the patients who underwent PET/MRI.

RESULTS

A total of 178 biopsy cores were taken on the 55 patients. One hundred forty-six biopsy cores (82.0%, 146/178) from 51 (92.7%, 51/55) patients were positive for prostate cancer; 47 (85.5%, 47/55) were clinically significant prostate cancer. It is noteworthy that nine patients underwent both 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT and PET/MRI examinations; the seven patients with prostate cancer showed abnormal MR signal in the area of the PET-positive lesion while the other two patients with prostatic hyperplasia and prostatitis showed normal MR signal in the area of the PET-positive lesion.

CONCLUSION

This study indicated that 18F-DCFPyL PET/CT-US or PET/MRI-US fusion targeted prostate biopsies may be valuable for prostate cancer diagnosis and have a high detection rate of clinically significant prostate cancer for PET-positive lesions. PET/MR can rule out some false PET-positive lesions, which may potentially reduce unnecessary prostate biopsies.

Diagnostic Accuracy of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for Initial Detection in Patients With Suspected Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND. Early diagnosis is important in the overall management of prostate cancer (PCa). Gallium-68-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT has an established role in the detection of recurrent disease and staging of patients with intermediate- to high-risk PCa. However, only a small number of studies have evaluated its role in the initial diagnosis of PCa. OBJECTIVE. This systematic review was conducted to evaluate the diagnostic performance of 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in the initial detection of PCa in patients with clinical or biochemical findings suspicious for PCa. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION. This systematic review followed PRISMA guidelines. Searches in PubMed, Scopus, and Embase were conducted using relevant keywords, and articles published through April 30, 2020, were included. Using histopathology results as the reference standard, the numbers of true- and false-positives and true- and false-negatives were extracted. Pooled estimates of diagnostic test accuracy-including sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, negative likelihood ratio, and summary ROC (SROC) curve-were generated using bivariate random-effects meta-analysis. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS. Seven studies comprising 389 patients were included in the systematic review and meta-analysis. The pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for the initial diagnosis of PCa using 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT were 0.97 (95% CI, 0.90-0.99), 0.66 (95% CI, 0.52-0.78), 2.86 (95% CI, 1.95-4.20), and 0.05 (95% CI, 0.01-0.15), respectively. The test had high accuracy; the area under the SROC curve was 0.91 (95% CI, 0.88-0.93). CONCLUSION. Gallium-68-labeled PSMA PET/CT had excellent sensitivity and negative likelihood ratio in the initial diagnosis of PCa in patients with clinical or biochemical findings suspicious for PCa. CLINICAL IMPACT. Gallium-68-labeled PSMA PET/CT had high diagnostic accuracy for the initial detection of PCa in patients with clinical or biochemical findings suspicious for PCa and has potential utility as a rule-out test for these patients.

Clinical Utility of 18F-PSMA-1007 Positron Emission Tomography/Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Prostate Cancer: A Single-Center Experience

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical utility of ¹⁸F-PSMA-1007 positron emission tomography (PSMA PET)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) imaging in patients with suspected or defined prostate cancer.

Methods

In the pilot study, we retrospectively investigated 62 patients who underwent PSMA-PET/MRI for suspected or defined PCa between June 2019 and June 2020. Patients were grouped into three subgroups: (1) suspected PCa without histological evidence, (2) primary PCa, (3) biochemical recurrent prostate cancer (BRPCa). Two nuclear physicians independently interpreted the results of PSMA-PET/MRI. Management strategies before PSMA-PET/MRI were retrospectively reported, and the management strategy was re-evaluated for each patient considering the PSMA-PET/MRI result. The changes in strategies were recorded. Besides, the correlation between prostate specific antigen (PSA) level and management changes was also accessed by Fisher exact test, and two-side p < 0.05 was assumed as statistical significance.

Results

There were 28 patients in the suspected PCa group (group 1), 12 in the primary PCa group (group 2), and 22 in the BRPCa group (group 3). Overall, the intended decisions were changed in 26 (41.9%) of 62 patients after PSMA-PET/MRI, including 11/28 (39.3%) in suspected PCa group, 1/12 (8.4%) in primary PCa group, and 14/24 (63.6%) in BCR group. In group 1, the main impact on subsequent management included decreased active surveillance (from 20 to 9) and increased prostate biopsy (from 8 to 19). PSA levels were not significantly associated with management changes in suspected PCa patients (p = 0.865). In group 2, the main impact on subsequent management included decreased radical surgery (from 8 to 7), and multimodal therapy appearance (n = 1). Only in the category of PSA levels of ≥20 ng/ml, the management of primary PCa was changed. In group 3, the main impact on subsequent management included decreased salvage radiotherapy (from 5 to 2), increased systemic therapy (from 6 to 7), and increased multimodal therapy (from 11 to 13). The highest proportion of management changes occurred in BCR patients with 0.5≤PSA<1 ng/ml.

Conclusion

From our preliminary experience, PSMA-PET/MRI may be a valued tool for defining PCa lesions and changing management. The biggest impact of management intent was in patients with BRPCa, especially in patients with 0.5≤PSA<1 ng/ml. However, further studies are needed to confirm our pilot findings.

Detection and localisation of primary prostate cancer using 68 gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography compared with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging and radical prostatectomy specimen pathology

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of ⁶⁸ gallium prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography (⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT) with multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in detecting and localising primary prostate cancer when compared with radical prostatectomy (RP) specimen pathology.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective review of men who underwent ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI for primary prostate cancer before RP across four centres between 2015 and 2018. Patients undergoing imaging for recurrent disease or before non-surgical treatment were excluded. We defined pathological index tumour as the lesion with highest International Society of Urological Pathology Grade Group (GG) on RP specimen pathology. Our primary outcomes were rates of accurate detection and localisation of RP specimen pathology index tumour using ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT or mpMRI. We defined tumour detection as imaging lesion corresponding with RP specimen tumour on any imaging plane, and localisation as imaging lesion matching RP specimen index tumour in all sagittal, axial, and coronal planes. Secondary outcomes included localisation of clinically significant and transition zone (TZ) index tumours. We defined clinically significant disease as GG 3-5. We used descriptive statistics and the Mann-Whitney U-test to define and compare demographic and pathological characteristics between detected, missed and localised tumours using either imaging modality. We used the McNemar test to compare detection and localisation rates using ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI.

RESULTS

In all, 205 men were included in our analysis, including 133 with clinically significant disease. There was no significant difference between ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI in the detection of any tumour (94% vs 95%, P > 0.9). There was also no significant difference between localisation of all index tumours (91% vs 89%, P = 0.47), clinically significant index tumours (96% vs 91%, P = 0.15) or TZ tumours (85% vs 80%, P > 0.9) using ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI. Limitations include retrospective study design and non-central review of imaging and pathology.

CONCLUSION

We found no significant difference in the detection or localisation of primary prostate cancer between ⁶⁸ Ga-PSMA PET/CT and mpMRI. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate a combined PET/MRI model in minimising tumours missed by either modality.

Meeting report from the Prostate Cancer Foundation PSMA theranostics state of the science meeting

INTRODUCTION

The Prostate Cancer Foundation (PCF) convened a PCF prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) Theranostics State of the Science Meeting on 18 November 2019, at Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY.

METHODS

The meeting was attended by 22 basic, translational, and clinical researchers from around the globe, with expertise in PSMA biology, development and use of PSMA theranostics agents, and clinical trials. The goal of this meeting was to discuss the current state of knowledge, the most important biological and clinical questions, and critical next steps for the clinical development of PSMA positron emission tomography (PET) imaging agents and PSMA-targeted radionuclide agents for patients with prostate cancer.

RESULTS

Several major topic areas were discussed including the biology of PSMA, the role of PSMA-targeted PET imaging in prostate cancer, the physics and performance of different PSMA-targeted PET imaging agents, the current state of clinical development of PSMA-targeted radionuclide therapy (RNT) agents, the role of dosimetry in PSMA RNT treatment planning, barriers and challenges in PSMA RNT clinical development, optimization of patient selection for PSMA RNT trials, and promising combination treatment approaches with PSMA RNT.

DISCUSSION

This article summarizes the presentations from the meeting for the purpose of globally disseminating this knowledge to advance the use of PSMA-targeted theranostic agents for imaging and treatment of patients with prostate cancer.

Making the Case for Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen-Targeted Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography in Suspected Prostate Cancer

Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) over-expression is a hallmark of prostate adenocarcinoma and many PSMA targeting positron emission tomography (PET) radiopharmaceuticals have been developed over the last decade. The role of 68Ga-PSMA-11 PET-computed tomography (CT) is well established in staging and biochemical recurrence of PCa, with growing interest and evidence regarding its utility in suspected prostate cancer.

Histologic validation of auto-contoured dominant intraprostatic lesions on [18F] DCFPyL PSMA-PET imaging

BACKGROUND

PSMA-PET¹ has shown good concordance with histology, but there is a need to investigate the ability of PSMA-PET to delineate DIL² boundaries for guided biopsy and focal therapy planning.

OBJECTIVE

To determine threshold and margin combinations that satisfy the following criteria: ≥95% sensitivity with max specificity and ≥95% specificity with max sensitivity.

DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS

We registered pathologist-annotated whole-mount mid-gland prostatectomy histology sections cut in 4.4 mm intervals from 12 patients to pre-surgical PSMA-PET/MRI by mapping histology to ex-vivo imaging to in-vivo imaging. We generated PET-derived tumor volumes using boundaries defined by thresholded PET volumes from 1-100% of SUV³_max in 1% intervals. At each interval, we applied margins of 0-30 voxels in one voxel increments, giving 3000 volumes/patient.

OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Mean and standard deviation of sensitivity and specificity for cancer detection within the 2D oblique histologic planes that intersected with the 3D PET volume for each patient.

RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS

A threshold of 67% SUV max with an 8.4 mm margin achieved a (mean ± std.) sensitivity of 95.0 ± 7.8% and specificity of 76.4 ± 14.7%. A threshold of 81% SUV max with a 5.1 mm margin achieved sensitivity of 65.1 ± 28.4% and specificity of 95.1 ± 5.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary evidence of thresholding and margin expansion of PSMA-PET images targeted at DILs validated with histopathology demonstrated excellent mean sensitivity and specificity in the setting of focal therapy/boosting and guided biopsy. These parameters can be used in a larger validation study supporting clinical translation.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen theranostics in advanced prostate cancer: an evolving option

OBJECTIVES

To review current data for the role of prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT) for patients with advanced prostate cancer. This review provides an update for multidisciplinary teams on the current and potential future applications of theranostics in prostate cancer.

METHODS

Narrative review focussing on PSMA as a target for RLT, and data using RESULTS: RLT with PSMA is an exciting therapeutic alternative to the existing management options already in use for patients with metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). To date, most evidence exists regarding small-molecule PSMA inhibitors bound to beta-emitting radioisotopes such as 177Lu (Lu-PSMA). Prospective phase II data supports the safety and efficacy of Lu-PSMA in men with heavily pre-treated progressive mCRPC, and several late-phase randomised trials of Lu-PSMA are underway, with many more in the pipeline. Early results are encouraging, indicating that the theranostic approach may play a vital role in management of advanced prostate cancer and perhaps even in much earlier disease states.

CONCLUSIONS

PSMA RLT is a promising new treatment option for men with mCPRC, and may also have utility in less advanced prostate cancer.

Clinical impact of PET imaging in prostate cancer management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Imaging of prostate cancer has been a rapidly evolving field in recent years with the introduction of multiple new PET tracer agents. Introduction of novel imaging techniques into clinical practice requires careful evaluation, with the ultimate aims of improved patient outcomes, better sequencing of treatments, and cost effectiveness. The increased sensitivity and specificity of these new PET agents present both challenges and opportunities. We know they frequently change management, but are these effective management changes, and is it always in the best interests of the patients?

RECENT FINDINGS

This review will focus on recent publications that provide high-level evidence for the use of PET in prostate cancer. It will discuss studies that have evaluated the clinical impact of PET imaging in prostate cancer and will review a number of trials that demonstrate the potential of PET to change current standard of care, from diagnosis, to prognostic capabilities in men with metastatic prostate cancer.

SUMMARY

Evidence for the use of PET in prostate cancer is building with studies evaluating diagnostic accuracy of PET at all stages of prostate cancer. We review the evidence available, focusing on prospective trials that are measuring the impact of new technology on patient outcomes.