1
|
Katayama S, Pradere B, Grossman NC, Potretzke AM, Boorjian SA, Ghoreifi A, Daneshmand S, Djaladat H, Sfakianos JP, Mari A, Khene ZE, D'andrea D, Hayakawa N, Fujita K, Heindenreich A, Raman JD, Roumiguié M, Abdollah F, Breda A, Fontana M, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Clinical Significance of Tumor Location for Ureteroscopic Tumor Grading in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Endourol 2024. [PMID: 39264866 DOI: 10.1089/end.2024.0335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Although previous literature shows tumor location as a prognostic factor in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), there remains uninvestigated regarding the impact of tumor location on grade concordance and discrepancies between ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy and final radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) pathology. Methods: In this international study, we retrospectively reviewed the records of 1,498 patients with UTUC who underwent diagnostic URS with concomitant biopsy followed by RNU between 2005 and 2020. Tumor location was divided into four sections: the calyceal-pelvic system, proximal ureter, middle ureter, and distal ureter. Patients with multifocal tumors were excluded from the study. We performed multiple comparison tests and logistic regression analyses. Results: Overall, 1,154 patients were included; 54.4% of those with low-grade URS biopsies were upgraded on RNU. In the multiple comparison tests, middle ureter tumors exhibited the highest probability of upgrading, meanwhile pelvicalyceal tumors exhibited the lowest probability of upgrading (73.7% vs 48.5%, p = 0.007). Downgrading was comparable across all tumor locations. On multivariate analyses, middle ureteral location was significantly associated with a low probability of grade concordance (odds ratio [OR] 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-1.00; p = 0.049) and an increased risk of upgrading (OR 2.80; 95% CI, 1.20-6.52; p = 0.017). The discordance did not vary regardless of caliceal location, including the lower calyx. Conclusions: Middle ureteral tumors diagnosed to be low grade had a high probability to be undergraded. Our data can inform providers and their patients regarding the likelihood of undergrading according to tumor location, facilitating patient counseling and shared decision making regarding the choice of kidney sparing vs RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nico C Grossman
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Cantonal Hospital of Lucerne, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Siamak Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, New York, USA
| | - Andrea Mari
- Unit of Oncologic Minimally-Invasive Urology and Andrology - Careggi Hospital, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Florence, Firenze, Italy
| | - Zine-Eddine Khene
- Department of Urology, Hospital Pontchaillou, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - David D'andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nozomi Hayakawa
- Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology, Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University, Osakasayama, Japan
| | - Axel Heindenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, Robot-Assisted and Reconstructive Surgery, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mathieu Roumiguié
- Department of Urology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer, Toulouse, France
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Vattikuti Urology Institute Center for Outcomes Research, Analytics and Evaluation (VCORE), Henry Ford Health System, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matteo Fontana
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ditonno F, Franco A, Veccia A, Bertolo R, Wu Z, Wang L, Abdollah F, Finati M, Simone G, Tuderti G, Helstrom E, Correa A, De Cobelli O, Ferro M, Porpiglia F, Amparore D, Tufano A, Perdonà S, Bhanvadia R, Margulis V, Brönimann S, Singla N, Puri D, Derweesh IH, Mendiola DF, Gonzalgo ML, Ben-David R, Mehrazin R, Moon SC, Rais-Bahrami S, Yong C, Sundaram CP, Moghaddam FS, Ghoreifi A, Djaladat H, Autorino R, Antonelli A. Decisional and prognostic impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy in high-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A multi-institutional collaborative analysis (ROBUUST collaborative group). Urol Oncol 2024; 42:290.e1-290.e9. [PMID: 38760274 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2024.04.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 04/20/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) with or without biopsy remains a subject of contention in the management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with varying recommendations across different guidelines. The study aims to analyse the decision-making and prognostic role of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) in high-risk UTUC patients undergoing curative surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective multi-institutional analysis of high-risk UTUC patients from the ROBUUST dataset, a comparison between patients who received or not preoperative URS and biopsy before curative surgery was carried out. Logistic regression analysis evaluated differences between patients receiving URS and its impact on treatment strategy. Survival analysis included 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival (OS). After adjusting for high-risk prognostic group features, Cox proportional hazard model estimated significant predictors of time-to-event outcomes. RESULTS Overall, 1,912 patients were included, 1,035 with preoperative URS and biopsy and 877 without. Median follow-up: 24 months. Robot-assisted radical nephroureterectomy was the most common procedure (55.1%), in both subgroups. The 5-year OS (P = 0.04) and CSS (P < 0.001) were significantly higher for patients undergoing URS. The 5-year RFS (P = 0.6), and MFS (P = 0.3) were comparable between the 2 groups. Preoperative URS and biopsy were neither a significant predictor of worse oncological outcomes nor of a specific treatment modality. CONCLUSIONS The advantage in terms of OS and CSS in patients undergoing preoperative URS could derive from a better selection of candidates for curative treatment. The treatment strategy is likely more influenced by tumor features than by URS findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Ditonno
- University of Verona, Department of Urology, Verona, Italy; Rush University, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL
| | - Antonio Franco
- Rush University, Department of Urology, Chicago, IL; Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | - Zhenjie Wu
- Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University, Department of Urology, Shanghai, China
| | - Linhui Wang
- Changhai Hospital Naval Medical University, Department of Urology, Shanghai, China
| | - Firas Abdollah
- Henry Ford Hospital, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Marco Finati
- Henry Ford Hospital, Vattikuti Urology Institute, Detroit, MI
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- IRCCS Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Department of Urology, Rome, Italy
| | - Emma Helstrom
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Andres Correa
- Fox Chase Cancer Center, Department of Urology, Philadelphia, PA
| | | | - Matteo Ferro
- European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Division of Urology, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Porpiglia
- University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Division of Urology, Turin, Italy
| | - Daniele Amparore
- University of Turin San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, Division of Urology, Turin, Italy
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Department of Urology, Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori Fondazione Pascale, Department of Urology, Naples, Italy
| | - Raj Bhanvadia
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Department of Urology, Dallas, TX
| | - Stephan Brönimann
- John Hopkins University, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Nirmish Singla
- John Hopkins University, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Baltimore, MD
| | - Dhruv Puri
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA
| | - Ithaar H Derweesh
- UC San Diego School of Medicine, Department of Urology, La Jolla, CA
| | - Dinno F Mendiola
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Mark L Gonzalgo
- University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Desai Sethi Urology Institute, Miami, FL
| | - Reuben Ben-David
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | - Reza Mehrazin
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, Department of Urology, New York, NY
| | - Sol C Moon
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Soroush Rais-Bahrami
- Department of Urology, University of Alabama, Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, AL
| | - Courtney Yong
- Indiana University, Department of Urology, Indianapolis, IN
| | | | - Farshad Sheybaee Moghaddam
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center University of Southern California, Institute of Urology, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Zhao J, Shen Y, Guo M, Matin SF, Hansel DE, Guo CC. Diagnostic accuracy of upper tract urothelial carcinoma using biopsy, urinary cytology, and nephroureterectomy specimens: A tertiary cancer center experience. Am J Clin Pathol 2024:aqae065. [PMID: 38860463 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqae065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/12/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We studied the diagnostic accuracy and discordance of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) by comparing biopsy and urinary cytology with matched nephroureterectomy specimens. METHODS Sixty-nine patients with UTUC without neoadjuvant treatment were retrospectively identified who had matched biopsy and nephroureterectomy specimens. Twenty patients had concurrent upper tract cytology. H&E and cytology slides were re-reviewed. Statistical analysis was performed. RESULTS Patients included 48 men and 21 women with a mean age of 69 years. A concordant grade between biopsy and surgical specimen was present in 49 (71%) patients. The mean size of biopsy specimens in the discordant group was significantly smaller than that in the concordant group. Invasion was evaluated in 48 biopsy cases that had adequate subepithelial tissue, and 33 of them were diagnosed with concordant invasion status. Mean tumor size in both tumor grade and invasion discordant groups was significantly larger than that in the concordant group. High-grade urothelial carcinoma was detected in 84% of cases using urinary cytology. CONCLUSIONS Our study demonstrates the diagnostic challenges of UTUC on small biopsy specimens. Biopsy specimen size and tumor size are significantly associated with the diagnostic discordance. Upper tract cytology showed high diagnostic accuracy and should be complementary to the biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianping Zhao
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Yuan Shen
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Ming Guo
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Donna E Hansel
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| | - Charles C Guo
- Department of Pathology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, US
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nally E, Young M, Chauhan V, Wells C, Szabados B, Powles T, Jackson-Spence F. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC): Prevalence, Impact and Management Challenge. Cancer Manag Res 2024; 16:467-475. [PMID: 38774494 PMCID: PMC11107909 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s445529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2024] [Indexed: 05/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an aggressive and difficult malignancy to treat. Owing to its rarity and the lack of specific high-level data, management mirrors that of urothelial cancer of the bladder (UCB). Over the past decade, UTUC has shown minimal improvement in survival rates. Its location makes the diagnosis and staging of UTUC more complex. Moreover, surgery often leads to a decline in renal function, rendering a proportion of patients ineligible for cisplatin. There is debate as to how best manage locally advanced UTUC perioperatively. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have changed the treatment landscape for UCB, the response to ICIs in UTUC has been variable. With new technologies, our understanding of the molecular biology of UTUC has grown, helping to identify key molecular differences from UCB. This review summarises the evidence available on UTUC as a disease entity, discusses treatment in perioperative and metastatic settings, and considers future directions for the management of patients diagnosed with UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth Nally
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Matthew Young
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Vishwani Chauhan
- Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew’s Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Connor Wells
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Thomas Powles
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gravestock P, Cullum D, Somani B, Veeratterapillay R. Diagnosing upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A review of the role of diagnostic ureteroscopy and novel developments over last two decades. Asian J Urol 2024; 11:242-252. [PMID: 38680592 PMCID: PMC11053284 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 08/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective The role of ureteroscopy in the diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma is yet to be fully determined. We aimed to provide an up to date evaluation of its role and the emerging technologies in the field. Methods A literature search of the last two decades (from 24th May, 2001 to 24th May, 2021) was carried out identifying 147 papers for potential inclusion within this narrative review. Results Diagnostic ureteroscopy is undeniably useful in its ability to visualise and biopsy indeterminate lesions, and to risk stratify malignant lesions that may be suitable for kidney sparing surgery. However, an increased risk of intravesical recurrence following nephroureterectomy when a prior diagnostic ureteroscopy has been performed, inadequate sampling at biopsy, complications from the procedure, and difficult ureteric access are all potential drawbacks. Furthermore, whilst generally an accurate diagnostic procedure, it risks missing carcinoma in-situ lesions. Despite this, evidence shows that routine use of ureteroscopy changes the management of patients in a large proportion of cases, preventing unnecessary surgery or facilitating kidney sparing surgery. The overall rate of complications is low, and improved biopsy techniques and the use of tissue biomarkers for improved staging and grading are encouraging. The risks of delays to definitive management and post-ureteroscopy intravesical recurrence do not seem to affect survival, and trials are in progress to determine whether intravesical therapy can mitigate the latter. Further promising techniques are being investigated to improve shortcomings, particularly in relation to improved diagnosis of carcinoma in situ and preoperative staging. Conclusion Ureteroscopy has a role in the diagnosis of upper tract malignancy, though whether it should be used routinely is yet to be determined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul Gravestock
- Urology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Daniel Cullum
- Urology Department, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Bhaskar Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Abstract
Upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is an uncommon malignancy involving the renal pelvis and ureter. Careful pathologic analysis plays a critical role in the diagnosis and clinical management of UTUC. In combination with clinical and radiologic evaluation, pathologic features can be used to stratify patients into low-risk and high-risk groups. This risk stratification can help clinicians select the optimal treatment for patients with UTUC, such as kidney-sparing (conservative) treatment, radical nephroureterectomy or ureterectomy, and perioperative systemic therapy. However, due to the technical difficulty of obtaining sufficient tissue from the upper urinary tract, it is often challenging for pathologists to accurately grade the tumor and assess tumor invasion in small biopsy specimens. Although the majority of UTUCs are pure urothelial carcinoma, a considerable subset of UTUCs show histologic subtypes or divergent differentiation. Recent studies have identified genetically distinct molecular subtypes of UTUC by examining DNA, RNA, and protein expression profiles. The prognosis of pT3 UTUC, particularly renal pelvic UC, remains controversial, and several studies have proposed subclassification of pT3 UTUC. Lynch syndrome is a significant risk factor for UTUC, and screening tests may be considered in young patients and those with familial histories of the disease. Despite significant progress in recent years, several issues remain to be addressed in the pathologic diagnosis, molecular classification, and treatment of UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianping Zhao
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Charles C. Guo
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Priya Rao
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ye J, Wang X, Liao X, Chen Z, Wang X, Zhang C, Han P, Wei Q, Bao Y. Survival impact of variant histology in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. Urol Oncol 2024; 42:69.e1-69.e9. [PMID: 38151426 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Revised: 11/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/29/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the prognostic impact of variant histology (VH) on survival outcomes in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 635 UTUC patients who underwent RNU at our institution from May 2003 to June 2019 were retrospectively acquired and analyzed. After propensity score matching (PSM), we investigated the impact of VH on overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) by using cumulative incidence plots with the log-rank test, Cox regression models, and competing risk regression models. RESULTS Overall, 121 (19.1%) patients were diagnosed with VH, including 68 (10.7%) with squamous cell differentiation (SCD) and 28 (4.4%) with adenocarcinoma differentiation (AD). After PSM, the presence of VH was significantly associated with worse OS (HR 1.70, 95% CI 1.25-2.32) and CSS (HR 1.64, 95% CI 1.17-2.31) only in locally advanced UTUC patients (pT>2). In the subgroup analysis, SCD revealed inferior outcomes (OS: HR 1.81, 95% CI 1.28-2.57; CSS: HR 1.73, 95% CI 1.18-2.54) compared with pure urothelial carcinoma (pUC), whereas AD conferred comparable outcomes. In addition, compared with pUC patients, SCD patients with extensive squamous components had significantly decreased OS (HR 4.17, 95% CI 1.84-9.44) and CSS (HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.61-1.99), whereas those with regional squamous components had similar survival outcomes. CONCLUSION For UTUC patients after RNU, the presence of VH is associated with aggressive clinicopathological features and inferior survival outcomes. However, the survival outcomes of localized UTUC patients (pT≤2) with VH, and patients with the AD or regional SCD subtype are comparable to those of patients with pUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianjun Ye
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xiaoli Wang
- West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; Breast Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xinyang Liao
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Zeyu Chen
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Xingyuan Wang
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chichen Zhang
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China; West China School of Medicine, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Ping Han
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Qiang Wei
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| | - Yige Bao
- Department of Urology and Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Jue JS, Alameddine M, Armenakas NA. Overcoming Understaging and Undergrading in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Comment on Ghoreifi et al. Modern Kidney-Sparing Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Cancers 2023, 15, 4495. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1002. [PMID: 38473362 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16051002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Kidney-sparing management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has become more common but is still most limited by inaccurate histopathologic diagnosis [...].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Jue
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY 10075, USA
| | - Mahmoud Alameddine
- Department of Urology, Ottumwa Regional Health Center, Ottumwa, IA 52501, USA
| | - Noel A Armenakas
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY 10075, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Basile G, Gallioli A, Martini A, Verri P, Robalino J, Dieguez L, Gavrilov P, Territo A, Uleri A, Gaya JM, Algaba F, Palou J, Breda A. Oncologic surveillance intensity after endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2024; 76:88-96. [PMID: 38426423 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05593-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The optimal oncologic surveillance in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) elected for conservative treatment is still a matter of debate. METHODS Patients elected for endoscopic treatment of UTUC were followed up according to EAU guidelines recommendations after treatment. Bladder cancer recurrence-free survival (BCa-RFS), UTUC recurrence-free survival (UTUC-RFS), radical nephroureterectomy-free survival (RNU-FS), and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. The crude risks of BCa and UTUC recurrences over time were estimated with the Locally Weighted Scatterplot Smoothing method. RESULTS Overall, 54 and 55 patients had low- and high-risk diseases, respectively. Median follow-up was 46.9 (IQR: 28.7-68.7) and 36.9 (IQR: 19.8-60.1) months in low and high-risk patients, respectively. In low-risk patients, BCa recurrence risk was more than 20% at 24 months follow-up. At 60 months, time point after which cystoscopy and imaging should be interrupted, the risk of BCa recurrence and UTUC recurrence were 14% and 7%, respectively. In high-risk patients, the risk of BCa and UTUC recurrence at 36 months was approximately 40% and 10%, respectively. Conversely, at 60 months, the risk of bladder recurrence and UTUC recurrence was 28% and 8%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS For low-risk patients, cystoscopy should be performed semi-annually until 24 months, while upper tract assessment should be obtained up to 60 months, as per current EAU guidelines recommendations. For high-risk patients, upper tract assessment should be intensified to semi-annually up to 36 months, then obtained yearly. Conversely, cystoscopy should be ideally performed semi-annually until 60 months and yearly thereafter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Basile
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain -
- Department of Urology, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy -
| | - Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Martini
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paolo Verri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Urology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Jorge Robalino
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Lucia Dieguez
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Pavel Gavrilov
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Angelo Territo
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Uleri
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Department of Urology, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Josep M Gaya
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ferran Algaba
- Department of Pathology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Pinar U, Calleris G, Grobet-Jeandin E, Grande P, Benamran D, Thibault C, Gontero P, Rouprêt M, Seisen T. The role of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. World J Urol 2023; 41:3205-3230. [PMID: 36905443 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-023-04330-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 03/12/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To summarize evidence regarding the use of neoadjuvant (NAC) and adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) among patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS A comprehensive literature search of PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE and the Cochrane library was performed to identify any original or review article on the role of perioperative chemotherapy for UTUC patients treated with RNU. RESULTS With regards to NAC, retrospective studies consistently suggested that it may be associated with better pathological downstaging (pDS) ranging from 10.8 to 80% and complete response (pCR) ranging from 4.3 to 15%, while decreasing the risk of recurrence and death as compared to RNU alone. Even higher pDS ranging from 58 to 75% and pCR ranging from 14 to 38% were observed in single-arm phase II trials. With regards to AC, retrospective studies provided conflicting results although the largest report from the National Cancer Database suggested an overall survival benefit in pT3-T4 and/or pN + patients. In addition, a phase III randomized controlled trial showed that the use of AC was associated with a disease-free survival benefit (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = [0.30-0.68]; p = 0.0001) in pT2-T4 and/or pN + patients with acceptable toxicity profile. This benefit was consistent in all subgroups analyzed. CONCLUSIONS Perioperative chemotherapy improves oncological outcomes associated with RNU. Given the impact of RNU on renal function, the rational is stronger for the use of NAC which impacts final pathology and potentially prolongs survival. However, the level of evidence is stronger for the use of AC that has been proven to decrease the risk of recurrence after RNU with a potential survival benefit.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ugo Pinar
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | | | - Pietro Grande
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Daniel Benamran
- Division of Urology, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Constance Thibault
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou, Institut du Cancer Paris CARPEM, AP-HP Centre, Paris, France
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Department of Urology, San Giovanni Battista Hospital, Città Della Salute E Della Scienza and University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Thomas Seisen
- GRC 5, Predictive Onco-Urology, APHP, Pitié-Salpêtrière, Urology, Sorbonne University, 75013, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Luo Z, Yan Y, Jiao B, Huang T, Liu Y, Chen H, Guan Y, Ding Z, Zhang G. Prognostic value of the systemic immune-inflammation index in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma after radical nephroureterectomy. World J Surg Oncol 2023; 21:337. [PMID: 37880772 PMCID: PMC10601258 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-023-03225-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/14/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the prognostic significance of the systemic immune-inflammation index (SII) for patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and develop nomogram models for predicting overall survival (OS), intravesical recurrence (IVR), and extra-urothelial recurrence (EUR). METHODS We retrospectively studied the clinical and pathological features of 195 patients who underwent RNU for UTUC. All patients were randomly divided into a training cohort (99 cases) and a validation cohort (96 cases). The training cohort was used to develop nomogram models, and the models were validated by the validation cohort. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression and Cox regression were performed to identify independent predictors. The concordance index (C-index), receiver operator characteristics (ROC) analysis, and calibration plot were used to evaluate the reliability of the models. The clinical utility compared with the pathological T stage was assessed using the net reclassification index (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), and decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS SII was an independent risk factor in predicting OS and EUR. The C-index values of the nomogram predicting OS, IVR, and EUR were 0.675, 0.702, and 0.756 in the training cohort and 0.715, 0.756, and 0.713 in the validation cohort. A high level of SII was correlated with the invasion of the mucosa, muscle layer of the ureter, nerves, vessels, and fat tissues. CONCLUSION We developed nomogram models to predict the OS, IVR, and EUR of UTUC patients. The efficacy of these models was substantiated through internal validation, demonstrating favorable discrimination, calibration, and clinical utility. A high level of SII was associated with both worse OS and shorter EUR-free survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhenkai Luo
- Graduate School of Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, No. 17 Nanli, Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100730, China
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, No. 17 Nanli, Panjiayuan, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100021, China
| | - Yangxuanyu Yan
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
- Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Binbin Jiao
- Department of Urology, Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Gongren Tiyuchang Nanlu, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100020, China
| | - Tao Huang
- Department of Urology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, No.300. Guangzhou Road, Nanjing, 210029, China
| | - Yuhao Liu
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
- Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Haijie Chen
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
- Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Yunfan Guan
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
- Peking University China-Japan Friendship School of Clinical Medicine, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China
| | - Zhenshan Ding
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
| | - Guan Zhang
- Department of Urology, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Yinghuadong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing, 100029, China.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bitaraf M, Ghafoori Yazdi M, Amini E. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) Diagnosis and Risk Stratification: A Comprehensive Review. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4987. [PMID: 37894354 PMCID: PMC10605461 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15204987] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis and risk stratification are cornerstones of therapeutic decisions in the management of patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Diagnostic modalities provide data that can be integrated, to provide nomograms and stratification tools to predict survival and adverse outcomes. This study reviews cytology, ureterorenoscopy and the novel tools and techniques used with it (including photodynamic diagnosis, narrow-band imaging, optical coherence tomography, and confocal laser endomicroscopy), and biopsy. Imaging modalities and novel biomarkers are discussed in another article. Patient- and tumor-related prognostic factors, their association with survival indices, and their roles in different scores and predictive tools are discussed. Patient-related factors include age, sex, ethnicity, tobacco consumption, surgical delay, sarcopenia, nutritional status, and several blood-based markers. Tumor-related prognosticators comprise stage, grade, presentation, location, multifocality, size, lymphovascular invasion, surgical margins, lymph node status, mutational landscape, architecture, histologic variants, and tumor-stroma ratio. The accuracy and validation of pre-operative predictive tools, which incorporate various prognosticators to predict the risk of muscle-invasive or non-organ confined disease, and help to decide on the surgery type (radical nephroureterectomy, or kidney-sparing procedures) are also investigated. Post-operative nomograms, which help decide on adjuvant chemotherapy and plan follow-up are explored. Finally, a revision of the current stratification of UTUC patients is endorsed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Erfan Amini
- Uro-Oncology Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran 1419733141, Iran; (M.B.); (M.G.Y.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Yoshida T, Ohe C, Nakamoto T, Kinoshita H. Learning from the past and present to change the future: Endoscopic management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 2023; 30:634-647. [PMID: 37294007 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend endoscopic management (EM) for patients with low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, as well as those with an imperative indication. However, regardless of the tumor risk, radical nephroureterectomy is still mainly performed worldwide despite the benefits of EM, such as renal function maintenance, no hemodialysis requirement, and treatment cost reduction. This might be explained by the association of EM with a high risk of local recurrence and progression. Furthermore, the need for rigorous patient selection and close surveillance following EM may be relevant. Nevertheless, recent developments in diagnostic modalities, pathological evaluation, surgical devices and techniques, and intracavitary regimens have been reported, which may contribute to improved risk stratification and treatments with superior oncological outcomes. In this review, considering recent advances in endourology and oncology, we propose novel treatment strategies for optimal EM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Yoshida
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Corporate Sponsored Research Programs for Multicellular Interactions in Cancer, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Chisato Ohe
- Corporate Sponsored Research Programs for Multicellular Interactions in Cancer, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Nakamoto
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Kinoshita
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Territo A, Fontanet S, Meneghetti I, Gallioli A, Sanguedolce F, Rodriguez-Faba Ó, Gaya J, Palou J, Huguet J, Breda A. Manejo del carcinoma in situ de tramo urinario superior diagnosticado por biopsia ureteroscópica: ¿es el bacilo de Calmette-Guérin una alternativa a la nefroureterectomía? Actas Urol Esp 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.acuro.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023]
|
15
|
Song E, Suek T, Davaro F, Hamilton Z. Variant histology in upper tract carcinomas: Analysis of the National Cancer Database. Urol Oncol 2023; 41:206.e1-206.e9. [PMID: 36822992 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2023.01.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Revised: 01/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper urinary tract malignancies are relatively uncommon, with the majority representing urothelial carcinoma (UC). Variant histology (VH) is rare but has been increasingly shown to confer worse prognoses, and standardized approaches to treatment for upper tract cancers with VH have not been established. Our study aimed to analyze outcomes amongst various treatment modalities for upper tract malignancies based on VH subtype. Additionally, we stratified mortality outcomes associated with the upper tract tumors based on their primary location in the renal pelvis (RP) versus ureter. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried for patients who were diagnosed with upper tract malignancy of the RP or ureter from 2005 to 2016. Populations were grouped based on tumor location (RP vs. ureter) and substratified based on tumor histology (UC vs. VH). Cox regression (CR) was used for multivariable survival analysis. RESULTS A total of 63,826 patients with upper tract malignancies met inclusion criteria: 36,692 (57.5%) cases involving the RP and 27,134 (42.5%) cases involving the ureter. VH was noted in 2.5% of all tumors with the squamous cell variant being the most common subtype (62.5%). VH presented with higher stage, increased mortality, and higher proportion of metastatic disease relative to UC. Patients with VH were less likely to undergo surgical intervention and more likely to receive radiation or adjuvant chemotherapy. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not associated with tumor downstaging for VH. On multivariable CR, receiving definitive surgical excision improved survival for patients with any VH, and chemotherapy improved survival for patients with renal VH. On subanalysis of CR by VH subtype, survival benefits for surgery were significant for adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine, and squamous in a renal location and adenocarcinoma, neuroendocrine, sarcoma, and squamous in a ureteral location. Additionally, benefits of chemotherapy were significant for adenocarcinoma in a renal location and neuroendocrine in a ureteral location. CONCLUSION Patients with upper tract VH are more likely to present at advanced stages and experience higher mortality rates when compared to pure UC. Generally, survival benefits are seen with either surgical excision or chemotherapy for renal VH and with surgical excision for ureteral VH, but mortality rates for these treatment modalities differ amongst specific subtypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Song
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Timothy Suek
- Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Facundo Davaro
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | - Zachary Hamilton
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Saint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Zollinger BW, Shoen EJ, Gresham CF, Whalen MJ. Current laser therapy options for endoscopic treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Curr Urol 2023; 17:62-67. [PMID: 37692140 PMCID: PMC10487284 DOI: 10.1097/cu9.0000000000000158] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2022] [Accepted: 07/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Endoscopic management via retrograde ureteroscopic laser ablation of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has become the preferred treatment modality for low-risk tumors. The most popular ablative lasers over the past 15-20 years have been the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) and neodymium (Nd:YAG) lasers, but recently the thulium (Th:YAG) laser has emerged as a potential alternative. This review compares the mechanism of action, physiological properties and effects, and oncologic outcomes of Ho:YAG/Nd:YAG lasers versus the Th:YAG laser for UTUC treatment. Potential advantages of the Th:YAG laser over existing technologies are outlined, followed by a discussion of emerging laser technologies in UTUC management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ezra J. Shoen
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine, Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY, USA
| | - Charles F. Gresham
- Department of Urology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Michael J. Whalen
- Department of Urology, George Washington University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jue JS, Armenakas NA. Upper Tract Tumor En Bloc Enucleation: A Novel Approach to the Diagnosis and Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Urology 2023; 174:196-200. [PMID: 36681329 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2023.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2022] [Revised: 12/28/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To describe and demonstrate our novel en bloc enucleation technique for the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of upper tract tumors. METHODS We detail the instruments required for this procedure, as well as the surgical technique to perform an en bloc enucleation and specimen removal. Endoscopic video of a 2 cm renal pelvis tumor demonstrates all aspects of the technique, and histopathologic slides illustrate the diagnostic information obtained. RESULTS A ureteral access sheath is inserted distal to the upper tract tumor, and a flexible ureteroscope is used to visualize the extent of upper tract disease and tumor characteristics. A 200 μm thulium fiber laser partially ablates the tumor surface to create an edge for tissue biopsy and post-ablation urine cytology. The tumor base is identified and the sub epithelial connective tissue is carefully entered with low ablation laser settings. The correct tissue plane is extended by maintaining the ureteroscope in the subepithelial connective tissue and continuing the dissection along the entire width of the tumor base. Once the tumor is enucleated, a Nitinol stone retrieval basket is used to remove the specimen(s) and a ureteral stent is placed. CONCLUSIONS En bloc enucleation may provide extensive histopathologic information in upper tract urothelial carcinoma. In cases where complete enucleation is not feasible, this procedure may afford a mechanism for large caliber biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joshua S Jue
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY.
| | - Noel A Armenakas
- Department of Urology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cheng PY, Lee HY, Li WM, Huang SK, Liu CL, Chen IHA, Lin JT, Lo CW, Yu CC, Wang SS, Chen CS, Tseng JS, Lin WR, Yeong-Chin J, Cheong IS, Jiang YH, Lee YK, Chen YT, Chen SH, Chiang BJ, Hsueh TY, Huang CY, Wu CC, Lin WY, Tsai YC, Yu KJ, Huang CP, Huang YY, Tsai CY. Preoperative hydronephrosis is an independent protective factor of renal function decline after nephroureterectomy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Front Oncol 2023; 13:944321. [PMID: 36910617 PMCID: PMC9998910 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.944321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/03/2023] [Indexed: 02/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives To evaluate the predictive role of pre-nephroureterectomy (NU) hydronephrosis on post-NU renal function (RF) change and preserved eligibility rate for adjuvant therapy in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Patients and methods This retrospective study collected data of 1018 patients from the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration Group registry of 26 institutions. The patients were divided into two groups based on the absence or presence of pre-NU hydronephrosis. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated pre- and post-NU respectively. The one month post-NU RF change, chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression, and the preserved eligibility rate for adjuvant therapy were compared for each CKD stage. Results 404 (39.2%) patients without and 614 (60.8%) patients with pre-NU hydronephrosis were enrolled. The median post-NU change in the eGFR was significantly lower in the hydronephrosis group (-3.84 versus -12.88, p<0.001). Pre-NU hydronephrosis was associated with a lower post-NU CKD progression rate (33.1% versus 50.7%, p< 0.001) and was an independent protective factor for RF decline after covariate adjustment (OR=0.46, p<0.001). Patients with pre-NU hydronephrosis had a higher preserved eligibility rate for either adjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (OR=3.09, 95%CI 1.95-4.69) or immune-oncology therapy (OR=2.31, 95%CI 1.23-4.34). Conclusion Pre-NU hydronephrosis is an independent protective predictor for post-NU RF decline, CKD progression, and eligibility for adjuvant therapy. With cautious selection for those unfavorably prognostic, non-metastatic UTUC patients with preoperative hydronephrosis, adjuvant rather than neoadjuvant therapy could be considered due to higher chance of preserving eligibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pai-Yu Cheng
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Divisions of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Hsiang-Ying Lee
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Ministry of Health and Welfare Pingtung Hospital, Pingtung, Taiwan.,Cohort Research Center, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Steven K Huang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan.,Department of Medical Science Industries, College of Health Sciences, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Liang Liu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chi Mei Medical Center, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - I-Hsuan Alan Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Tai Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Wen Lo
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Chin Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, The Buddhist Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Shian-Shiang Wang
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Applied Chemistry, National Chi Nan University, Nantou, Taiwan
| | - Chuan-Shu Chen
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,Institute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan.,Department of Senior Citizen Service Management, National Taichung University of Science and Technology, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Jen-Shu Tseng
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan.,Institute of Biomedical Informatics, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wun-Rong Lin
- Department of Urology, MacKay Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Mackay Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jou Yeong-Chin
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan.,Department of Health and Nutrition Biotechnology, Asian University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Ian-Seng Cheong
- Department of Urology, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chiayi Christian Hospital, Chiayi, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Hong Jiang
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yu Khun Lee
- Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation and Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
| | - Yung-Tai Chen
- Department of Urology Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shin-Hong Chen
- Department of Urology Taiwan Adventist Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Bing-Juin Chiang
- College of Medicine, Fu-Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Cardinal Tien Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Life Science, College of Science, National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Y Hsueh
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Taipei City Hospital renai branch, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chao-Yuan Huang
- Department of Urology, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Chang Wu
- Department of Urology, Shuang Ho Hospital, Taipei Medical University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan.,TMU Research Center of Urology and Kidney (TMU-RCUK), Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Wei Yu Lin
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.,Chang Gung University of Science and Technology, Chia-Yi, Taiwan.,Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Yao-Chou Tsai
- School of Medicine, Buddhist Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, Taipei Tzu chi Hospital, The Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Urology, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Kai-Jie Yu
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.,Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology and Graduate Institute of Biochemical and Biomedical Engineering, National Taipei University of Technology, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Ping Huang
- Department of Urology, China Medical University and Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan.,School of Medicine, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yi-You Huang
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-You Tsai
- Divisions of Urology, Department of Surgery, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Electrical Engineering, Yuan Ze University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Katayama S, Pradere B, Grossman NC, Potretzke AM, Boorjian SA, Ghoreifi A, Daneshmand S, Djaladat H, Sfakianos JP, Mari A, Khene ZE, D'Andrea D, Hayakawa N, Breda A, Fontana M, Fujita K, Antonelli A, van Doeveren T, Steinbach C, Mori K, Laukhtina E, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Karakiewicz PI, Araki M, Compérat E, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Biological and prognostic implications of biopsy upgrading for high-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma at nephroureterectomy. Int J Urol 2023; 30:63-69. [PMID: 36349904 PMCID: PMC10098861 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Technical limitations of ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy has been considered responsible for substantial upgrading rate in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). However, the impact of tumor specific factors for upgrading remain uninvestigated. METHODS Patients who underwent URS biopsy were included between 2005 and 2020 at 13 institutions. We assessed the prognostic impact of upgrading (low-grade on URS biopsy) versus same grade (high-grade on URS biopsy) for high-grade UTUC tumors on radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) specimens. RESULTS This study included 371 patients, of whom 112 (30%) and 259 (70%) were biopsy-based low- and high-grade tumors, respectively. Median follow-up was 27.3 months. Patients with high-grade biopsy were more likely to harbor unfavorable pathologic features, such as lymphovascular invasion (p < 0.001) and positive lymph nodes (LNs; p < 0.001). On multivariable analyses adjusting for the established risk factors, high-grade biopsy was significantly associated with worse overall (hazard ratio [HR] 1.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.10-2.75; p = 0.018), cancer-specific (HR 1.94; 95% CI, 1.07-3.52; p = 0.03), and recurrence-free survival (HR 1.80; 95% CI, 1.13-2.87; p = 0.013). In subgroup analyses of patients with pT2-T4 and/or positive LN, its significant association retained. Furthermore, high-grade biopsy in clinically non-muscle invasive disease significantly predicted upstaging to final pathologically advanced disease (≥pT2) compared to low-grade biopsy. CONCLUSIONS High tumor grade on URS biopsy is associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive UTUC tumors. URS low-grade UTUC that becomes upgraded to high-grade might carry a better prognosis than high-grade UTUC on URS. Tumor specific factors are likely to be responsible for upgrading to high-grade on RNU.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nico C Grossman
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Alireza Ghoreifi
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Sia Daneshmand
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Hooman Djaladat
- Department of Urology, Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - John P Sfakianos
- Department of Urology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Hospital, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Zine-Eddine Khene
- Department of Urology, Hospital Pontchaillou, CHU Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Nozomi Hayakawa
- Department of Urology, St. Marianna University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Matteo Fontana
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonoma University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Kazutoshi Fujita
- Department of Urology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Alessandro Antonelli
- Urology Unit AUOI Verona, Department of Surgery, Dentistry, Pediatrics and Gynecology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Thomas van Doeveren
- Department of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Christina Steinbach
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Eva Compérat
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.,Department of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.,Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.,Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA.,Hourani Center for Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan.,Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York City, New York, USA.,Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.,Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Territo A, Fontanet S, Meneghetti I, Gallioli A, Sanguedolce F, Rodriguez-Faba Ó, Gaya JM, Palou J, Huguet J, Breda A. Management of primary upper urinary tract carcinoma in situ diagnosed by ureteroscopic biopsy: Is bacillus Calmette-Guerin an alternative to nephroureterectomy? Actas Urol Esp 2022; 47:221-228. [PMID: 36379260 DOI: 10.1016/j.acuroe.2022.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 10/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) represents the gold standard treatment for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC); however, attempts have been made to treat upper urinary tract CIS (UT-CIS) conservatively. The aim of this study was to compare the outcome of patients with primary UT-CIS treated in our center by means of RNU vs. bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) instillations. METHODS This retrospective study included patients with diagnosis of primary UT-CIS between 1990 and 2018. All patients had histological confirmation of UT-CIS in the absence of other concomitant UTUC. Histological confirmation was obtained by ureteroscopy with multiple biopsies. Patients were treated with BCG instillations, RNU or distal ureterectomy. Clinicopathological features and outcomes were compared between RNU and BCG groups. RESULTS A total of 28 patients and 29 renal units (RUs) were included. Sixteen (57.1%) patients (17 RUs) received BCG. BCG was administered via nephrostomy tube in 4 patients, with a single-J ureteral stent in 5, and using a Double-J stent in 7. Complete response and persistence or recurrence were detected in ten (58.8%) and seven (41.2%) RUs treated with BCG, respectively. Eight (27.6%) RUs underwent RNU, and 4 (13.8%) Rus distal ureterectomy. No differences were found in recurrence-free survival (p=0.841) and cancer-specific survival (p=0.77) between the RNU and BCG groups. CONCLUSIONS Although RNU remains the gold standard treatment for UT-CIS, our results confirm that BCG instillations are also effective. Histological confirmation of UT-CIS is mandatory before any treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Territo
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Fontanet
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - I Meneghetti
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Gallioli
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F Sanguedolce
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Ó Rodriguez-Faba
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J M Gaya
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Palou
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Huguet
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Breda
- Departamento de Urología, Fundació Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Neuzillet Y, Seisen T, Traxer O, Allory Y, Audenet F, Leon P, Loriot Y, Pradère B, Roumiguié M, Xylinas E, Masson-Lecomte A, Roupret M. French AFU Cancer Committee Guidelines - Update 2022-2024: Upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). Prog Urol 2022; 32:1164-1194. [PMID: 36400481 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2022.08.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/01/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The aim was to propose an update of the French Urology Association Cancer Committee (ccAFU) Recommendations on the management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinomas (UUT-UC). METHODS A systematic Medline search was performed between 2020 and 2022, taking account of the diagnosis, treatment options and follow-up of UUT-UC, while evaluating the references with their levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CTU acquisition during excretion and flexible ureterorenoscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment. Nevertheless conservative treatment can be discussed for low risk lesions: tumour of low-grade, with no infiltration on imaging, unifocal<2cm, eligible for full treatment therefore requiring close endoscopic surveillance by flexible ureteroscopy in compliant patients. After RNU, postoperative instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce the risk of recurrence in the bladder. Adjuvant chemotherapy has shown clinical benefits compared to surveillance after RNU for tumours (pT2-T4 N0-3 M0). CONCLUSION These updated recommendations should contribute to improving not only patients' level of care, but also the diagnosis and decision-making concerning treatment for UUT-UC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Y Neuzillet
- Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, Université Paris Saclay, Suresnes, France.
| | - T Seisen
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| | - O Traxer
- Sorbonne Université, GRC#20 Lithiase Urinaire et EndoUrologie, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Tenon, 75020 Paris, France
| | - Y Allory
- Service d'anatomopathologie, Institut Curie, Université Paris Saclay, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - F Audenet
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou AP-HP Centre, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - P Leon
- Service d'urologie, clinique Pasteur, Royan, France
| | - Y Loriot
- Service d'oncologie médicale, Institut Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - B Pradère
- Service d'urologie UROSUD, Clinique Croix Du Sud, 31130 Quint-Fonsegrives, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Service d'urologie, CHU de Toulouse, UPS, Université de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Service d'urologie, Hôpital Saint-Louis AP-HP, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - M Roupret
- Sorbonne Université, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urologie, Hôpital Pitié-Salpetrière, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
He Y, Gao W, Ying W, Feng N, Wang Y, Jiang P, Gong Y, Li X. A Novel Preoperative Prediction Model Based on Deep Learning to Predict Neoplasm T Staging and Grading in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11195815. [PMID: 36233682 PMCID: PMC9571440 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11195815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2022] [Revised: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To create a novel preoperative prediction model based on a deep learning algorithm to predict neoplasm T staging and grading in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients diagnosed with UTUC between 2001 and 2012 at our institution. Five deep learning algorithms (CGRU, BiGRU, CNN-BiGRU, CBiLSTM, and CNN-BiLSTM) were used to develop a preoperative prediction model for neoplasm T staging and grading. The Matthews correlation coefficient (MMC) and the receiver-operating characteristic curve with the area under the curve (AUC) were used to evaluate the performance of each prediction model. Results: The clinical data of a total of 884 patients with pathologically confirmed UTUC were collected. The T-staging prediction model based on CNN-BiGRU achieved the best performance, and the MMC and AUC were 0.598 (0.592–0.604) and 0.760 (0.755–0.765), respectively. The grading prediction model [1973 World Health Organization (WHO) grading system] based on CNN-BiGRU achieved the best performance, and the MMC and AUC were 0.612 (0.609–0.615) and 0.804 (0.801–0.807), respectively. The grading prediction model [2004 WHO grading system] based on BiGRU achieved the best performance, and the MMC and AUC were 0.621 (0.616–0.626) and 0.824 (0.819–0.829), respectively. Conclusions: We developed an accurate UTUC preoperative prediction model to predict neoplasm T staging and grading based on deep learning algorithms, which will help urologists to make appropriate treatment decisions in the early stage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhui He
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Wenzhi Gao
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
- Department of Urology, The Third Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050052, China
| | - Wenwei Ying
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
| | - Ninghan Feng
- Department of Urology, The Second People’s Hospital of Wuxi, Wuxi 214002, China
| | - Yang Wang
- Department of Urology, The Second People’s Hospital of Wuxi, Wuxi 214002, China
| | - Peng Jiang
- Department of Urology, The Second People’s Hospital of Wuxi, Wuxi 214002, China
| | - Yanqing Gong
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
- Correspondence: (Y.G.); (X.L.)
| | - Xuesong Li
- Department of Urology, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing 100034, China
- Correspondence: (Y.G.); (X.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Shvero A, Hubosky SG. Management of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:611-619. [PMID: 35212921 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-021-01179-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We review the epidemiology, risk factors, diagnosis, and treatment of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), with a distinction between the different risk groups. RECENT FINDINGS Endoscopic treatment with laser ablation of tumors has an evolving role in treating low-grade UTUC including select large and multifocal tumors, along with complementary topical chemotherapeutic treatment that can reach difficult intrarenal locations. Template lymphadenectomy is recommended in patients undergoing nephroureterectomy. A recent randomized control trial showed benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy for locally advanced disease. Advances in immunologic therapy have shown promise in treating metastatic UTUC, and immunologic-based therapies have been incorporated into treatment regimens. Notable progress has been made in both the surgical and medical treatment arms for UTUC, thus extending the reach of nephron-sparing therapy for those with localized disease and increasing overall survival for those with locally advanced disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Asaf Shvero
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.,Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat-Gan, Israel.,Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Scott G Hubosky
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Thomas Jefferson University, 1025 Walnut Street, Suite 1100, Philadelphia, PA, 19107, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Klein JT, John A, Bohnert L, Enderle MD, Linzenbold W, Bolenz C. Improving the Quality of Human Upper Urinary Tract Specimens by Cryobiopsy. Front Oncol 2022; 12:810367. [PMID: 35223492 PMCID: PMC8881114 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.810367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2021] [Accepted: 01/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
ObjectiveThe quality of histopathological specimens obtained from the upper urinary tract with conventional flexible ureterorenoscopic biopsy needs to be improved. We investigated the feasibility and biopsy quality of specimens obtained by cryobiopsy, compared with standard ureterorenoscopic biopsy techniques in a human ex vivo model.Materials and MethodsHuman ureters obtained from nephrectomy specimens (N=12) were dissected and canulated with an ureteral access sheath. Ureterorenoscopic biopsies were randomly obtained from different sites of the renal pelvic caliceal system using different types of instruments. The performance of two newly developed flexible cryoprobes with outer diameters of 1.1 mm (CB11) and 0.9 mm (CB09) was compared with that of the biopsy forceps(FB) and Bigopsy®(BiG) and two different Dormia baskets N‐Gage (NG) and Zero‐Tip (ZT). We assessed the feasibility of the various biopsy techniques based on the number of biopsy attempts needed to obtain macroscopically discernible biopsies. The specimens were examined histopathologically for size, biopsy quality, presence of various artifact types, and representativeness.ResultsBiopsies taken with the cryoprobes showed a higher biopsy quality than biopsies taken with the comparative instruments. The CB11 provided significantly larger biopsies than forceps biopsies and also than biopsies with ZT. The CB09 was able to collect larger samples when compared with the FB and BiG biopsy forceps. There were no significant differences in artifact area, except for the CB11 cryoprobe compared with the NG. To clarify the results a subdivision of larger or smaller than 20% artifact area was performed. A significant difference was found between CB11 and the forceps biopsies, as well as between CB11 and NG and ZT in favor of the cryoprobe. The representation of the histopathological sample was also determined. Biopsies taken with CB11 were more representative compared with forceps biopsies BiG and FB and basket biopsies NG and ZT.ConclusionsIn a standardized comparative ex vivo setting, larger biopsies were obtained by using the cryobiopsy technique with the CB11 probe. Qualitatively, cryobiopsy specimens were overlaid by fewer artifacts and a higher biopsy quality was achieved in histopathologic examination compared with standard instrumentation. Further stepwise development will transfer the promising cryobiopsy technique into the clinical setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan T. Klein
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Axel John
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Lars Bohnert
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Markus D. Enderle
- Department of Research and Basic Technologies, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Walter Linzenbold
- Department of Research and Basic Technologies, Erbe Elektromedizin GmbH, Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Christian Bolenz
- Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
- *Correspondence: Christian Bolenz,
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gallioli A, Breda A, Palou J. Re: Pretreatment Risk Stratification for Endoscopic Kidney-sparing Surgery in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An International Collaborative Study. Eur Urol 2022; 81:428-429. [PMID: 35105478 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2022.01.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2021] [Accepted: 01/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea Gallioli
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
| | - Alberto Breda
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Joan Palou
- Department of Urology, Fundació Puigvert, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Malshy K, Nativ O, Zisman A, Sadeh O, Hoffman A, Amiel GE, Mullerad M. Can Endoscopic Appearance, Selective Cytology, and Pathological Sampling During Ureteroscopy Accurately Predict Tumor Grade of Upper-Tract Urothelial Carcinoma? Rambam Maimonides Med J 2022; 13:RMMJ.10459. [PMID: 35089121 PMCID: PMC8798584 DOI: 10.5041/rmmj.10459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study examined the reliability of the various parameters obtained in diagnostic ureteroscopy for upper-tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) in predicting the degree of differentiation in the final pathological report after radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). METHODS We conducted a retrospective review of patients undergoing RNU at a single tertiary hospital between 2000 and 2020. Only patients who underwent preoperative diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) were included. The results of urine selective cytology, endoscopic appearance of the tumor, and biopsy taken during ureteroscopy were compared to the final pathological report. RESULTS In total, 111 patients underwent RNU. A preliminary URS was performed in 54. According to endoscopic appearance, 40% of the "solid"-looking tumors were high grade (HG), while 52% of those with a papillary appearance were low grade (LG). Positive cytology predicted HG tumors in 86% of cases. However, 42% of patients with negative cytology had HG disease. The biopsies acquired during URS showed that HG disease findings matched the final pathology in 75% of cases. However, 25% of patients noted as being HG, based on URS biopsies, were noted to have LG disease based on nephroureterectomy biopsies. Full analyses revealed that 40% of the cases diagnosed as LG based on the URS biopsies actually had HG disease. CONCLUSIONS Direct tumor observation of papillary lesions, negative cytology, and biopsies indicating LG disease are of low predictive value for classifying the actual degree of tumor differentiation. No single test can accurately rule out HG disease. In light of the rising use of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy in UTUC, a reliable predictive model should be developed that accurately discriminates between HG and LG disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kamil Malshy
- To whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail:
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Koll FJ, Meisenzahl E, Haller B, Maisch P, Kirchhoff F, Horn T, Gschwend JE, Schmid SC. Evaluation of Pre-operative Biopsy, Surgical Procedures and Oncologic Outcomes in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC). Front Surg 2021; 8:790738. [PMID: 34901146 PMCID: PMC8655158 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.790738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose: Discordance between pre-operative biopsy and final pathology for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) is high and optimal management remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy of pre-operative biopsy, to identify prognostic factors and to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy on survival and oncologic outcome in UTUC. Methods: We analyzed records of patients receiving surgical treatment for UTUC. Pathology of pre-operative biopsy was compared to surgical specimen. We used Kaplan-Meier method to estimate survival probabilities and Cox's proportional hazards models to estimate the association between covariates and event times. Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A matched-pair analysis was performed to evaluate the effect of adjuvant chemotherapy. Results: 151 patients underwent surgical treatment (28% open, 36% laparoscopic, 17% robotic radical nephroureterectomy; 14% segmental ureteral resections and 5% palliative nephrectomy) for UTUC and were included in the analysis. Upstaging from <pT1 in endoscopic biopsy to ≥pT1 in final pathology occurred in 61% of patients and upgrading from low-grade to high-grade occurred in 30% of patients. Five-year OS was 59.5%. In the univariate Cox-regression model pathological stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion and positive surgical margins were associated with OS. Matched pair analysis for stage (<pT3; ≥pT3; pN+) and age revealed a significant survival benefit for adjuvant chemotherapy (HR 0.40, 0.14-0.77, p < 0.018) in this cohort. Conclusion: UTUC is often underestimated in pre-operative biopsy, and it is associated with significant mortality. Pathological stage and grade, lymphovascular invasion and lymph node metastases are predictors of oncologic outcome and survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florestan J Koll
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.,Department of Urology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Eva Meisenzahl
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Bernhard Haller
- Institute of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp Maisch
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.,Department of Urology, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | - Florian Kirchhoff
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Thomas Horn
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Jürgen E Gschwend
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Sebastian C Schmid
- Department of Urology, Rechts der Isar Medical Center, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Mori K, Katayama S, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Quhal F, Sari Motlagh R, Mostafaei H, Grossmann NC, Rajwa P, Zimmermann K, Karakiewicz PI, Abufaraj M, Fajkovic H, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Enikeev DV, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Discordance Between Clinical and Pathological Staging and Grading in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2021; 20:95.e1-95.e6. [PMID: 34764007 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2021.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This study aimed to evaluate the concordance in tumor stage and grade between ureteroscopic (URS) biopsy and radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Records of 1,214 UTUC patients who had undergone URS biopsy followed by RNU were included. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify factors contributing to the pathological upstaging. RESULTS The concordance between URS biopsy-based clinical and RNU pathological staging was 34.5%. Clinical understaging occurred in 59.5% patients. Upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred in 240 (41.7%) of 575 patients diagnosed with ≤cT1 disease. Of those diagnosed with muscle-invasive disease on final pathology, 89.6% had been clinically diagnosed with ≤cT1 disease. In the univariable analyses, computed tomography urography (CTU)-based invasion, ureter location, hydronephrosis, high-grade cytology, high-grade biopsy, sessile architecture, age, and women sex were significantly associated with pathological upstaging (P < .05). In the multivariable analyses, CTU-based invasion and hydronephrosis remained associated with pathological upstaging (P < .05). URS biopsy-based clinical and pathological gradings were concordant in 634 (54.2%) patients. Clinical undergrading occurred in 496 (42.4%) patients. CONCLUSIONS Clinical understaging/undergrading and upstaging to muscle-invasive disease occurred in a high proportion of UTUC patients undergoing RNU. Despite the inherent selection bias, these data underline the challenges of accurate UTUC staging and grading. In daily clinical practice, URS biopsy and CTU offer the most accurate preoperative information albeit with limited predictive value when used alone. These findings should be considered when utilizing preoperative, risk-adapted strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, France; Université François Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | | | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Sorbonne University, GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, AP-HP, Urology, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, F-75013 PARIS, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rouprêt M, Audenet F, Roumiguié M, Pignot G, Masson-Lecomte A, Compérat E, Houédé N, Larré S, Brunelle S, Xylinas E, Neuzillet Y, Méjean A. [French ccAFU guidelines - update 2020-2022: upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma]. Prog Urol 2021; 30:S52-S77. [PMID: 33349430 DOI: 10.1016/s1166-7087(20)30750-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION -The purpose was to propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS - A systematic Medline search was performed between 2018 and 2020, as regards diagnosis, options of treatment and follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate different references with levels of evidence. RESULTS - The diagnosis of this rare pathology is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low risk lesion: unifocal tumor, possible complete resection and low grade and absence of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended to reduce risk of bladder recurrence. A systemic chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION - These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, Predictive onco-urology, AP-HP, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital européen Georges-Pompidou, AP-HP, université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, Toulouse, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, Paris, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital Tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, ONCOTYPE-URO, Paris, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie médicale, CHU Carémeau, Nîmes, Montpellier Université, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, Reims, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude-Bernard, AP-HP, université Paris-Descartes, Paris, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles - Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, Suresnes, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n° 5, Predictive onco-urology, AP-HP, hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière, 83, boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75013 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Katayama S, Mori K, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Motlagh RS, Laukhtina E, Moschini M, Grossmann NC, Araki M, Teoh JYC, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Enikeev D, Karakiewicz PI, Abufaraj M, Compérat E, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Accuracy and Clinical Utility of a Tumor Grade- and Stage-based Predictive Model in Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:761-768. [PMID: 34053904 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among various clinicopathologic factors used to identify low-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), tumor grade and stage are of utmost importance. The clinical value added by inclusion of other risk factors remains unproven. OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of a tumor grade- and stage-based (GS) model to identify patients with UTUC for whom kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) could be attempted. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this international study, we reviewed the medical records of 1240 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Complete data needed for risk stratification according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were available for 560 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine if risk factors were associated with the presence of localized UTUC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GS, EAU, and NCCN models in predicting pathologic stage were calculated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 198 patients (35%) had clinically low-grade, noninvasive tumors, and 283 (51%) had ≤pT1disease. On multivariable analyses, none of the EAU and NCCN risk factors were associated with the presence of non-muscle-invasive UTUC among patients with low-grade and low-stage UTUC. The GS model exhibited the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value among all three models. According to the GS, EAU, and NCCN models, the proportion of patients eligible for KSS was 35%, 6%, and 4%, respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed that the net benefit of the three models was similar within the clinically reasonable range of probability thresholds. CONCLUSIONS The GS model showed favorable predictive accuracy and identified a greater number of KSS-eligible patients than the EAU and NCCN models. A decision-making algorithm that weighs the benefits of avoiding unnecessary kidney loss against the risk of undertreatment in case of advanced carcinoma is necessary for individualized treatment for UTUC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY We assessed the ability of three models to predict low-grade, low-stage disease in patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract. No risk factors other than grade assessed on biopsy and stage assessed from scans were associated with better prediction of localized cancer. A model based on grade and stage may help to identify patients who could benefit from kidney-sparing treatment of their cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, Sorbonne University, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Foerster B, Abufaraj M, Matin SF, Azizi M, Gupta M, Li WM, Seisen T, Clinton T, Xylinas E, Mir MC, Schweitzer D, Mari A, Kimura S, Bandini M, Mathieu R, Ku JH, Marcq G, Guruli G, Grabbert M, Czech AK, Muilwijk T, Pycha A, D'Andrea D, Petros FG, Spiess PE, Bivalacqua T, Wu WJ, Rouprêt M, Krabbe LM, Hendricksen K, Egawa S, Briganti A, Moschini M, Graffeille V, Kassouf W, Autorino R, Heidenreich A, Chlosta P, Joniau S, Soria F, Pierorazio PM, Shariat SF. Pretreatment Risk Stratification for Endoscopic Kidney-sparing Surgery in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An International Collaborative Study. Eur Urol 2021; 80:507-515. [PMID: 34023164 DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.05.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Several groups have proposed features to identify low-risk patients who may benefit from endoscopic kidney-sparing surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). OBJECTIVE To evaluate standard risk stratification features, develop an optimal model to identify ≥pT2/N+ stage at radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), and compare it with the existing unvalidated models. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS This was a collaborative retrospective study that included 1214 patients who underwent ureterorenoscopy with biopsy followed by RNU for nonmetastatic UTUC between 2000 and 2017. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS We performed multiple imputation of chained equations for missing data and multivariable logistic regression analysis with a stepwise selection algorithm to create the optimal predictive model. The area under the curve and a decision curve analysis were used to compare the models. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 659 (54.3%) and 555 (45.7%) patients had ≤pT1N0/Nx and ≥pT2/N+ disease, respectively. In the multivariable logistic regression analysis of our model, age (odds ratio [OR] 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.0-1.03, p = 0.013), high-grade biopsy (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.37-2.40, p < 0.001), biopsy cT1+ staging (OR 3.23, 95% CI 1.93-5.41, p < 0.001), preoperative hydronephrosis (OR 1.37 95% CI 1.04-1.80, p = 0.024), tumor size (OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.17, p = 0.029), invasion on imaging (OR 5.10, 95% CI 3.32-7.81, p < 0.001), and sessile architecture (OR 2.31, 95% CI 1.58-3.36, p < 0.001) were significantly associated with ≥pT2/pN+ disease. Compared with the existing models, our model had the highest performance accuracy (75% vs 66-71%) and an additional clinical net reduction (four per 100 patients). CONCLUSIONS Our proposed risk-stratification model predicts the risk of harboring ≥pT2/N+ UTUC with reliable accuracy and a clinical net benefit outperforming the current risk-stratification models. PATIENT SUMMARY We developed a risk stratification model to better identify patients for endoscopic kidney-sparing surgery in upper tract urothelial carcinoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beat Foerster
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Winterthur, Winterthur, Switzerland
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mounsif Azizi
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA; Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, University of Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mohit Gupta
- Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wei-Ming Li
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Thomas Seisen
- Urology, GRC 5, Predictive ONCO-URO, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Timothy Clinton
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Evanguelos Xylinas
- Department of Urology, Bichat-Claude Bernard Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris Descartes University, Paris, France
| | - M Carmen Mir
- Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia Foundation, Valencia, Spain
| | - Donald Schweitzer
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Mari
- Department of Urology, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Marco Bandini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Romain Mathieu
- Department of Urology, University of Rennes, Rennes, France
| | - Ja H Ku
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Gautier Marcq
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada; Urology Department, Claude Huriez Hospital, CHU Lille, Lille, France
| | | | - Markus Grabbert
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anna K Czech
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Tim Muilwijk
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Armin Pycha
- Department of Urology, Provincial Hospital of Bozen, Bozen, Italy; Medical School, Sigmund Freud University, Vienna, Austria
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Firas G Petros
- Department of Urology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA; Department of Urology and Kidney Transplant, The University of Toledo Medical Center and Eleanor N. Dana Cancer Center, Toledo, OH, USA
| | - Philippe E Spiess
- Department of Genitourinary Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Trinity Bivalacqua
- Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Wen-Jeng Wu
- Department of Urology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Urology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology, GRC 5, Predictive ONCO-URO, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, AP-HP, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Laura-Maria Krabbe
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kees Hendricksen
- Department of Urology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Moschini
- Division of Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Lucerne, Switzerland
| | | | - Wassim Kassouf
- Division of Urology, McGill University Health Center, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | | | - Axel Heidenreich
- Department of Urology, Uro-Oncology, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Piotr Chlosta
- Department of Urology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | - Steven Joniau
- Department of Urology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Francesco Soria
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Torino School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Phillip M Pierorazio
- Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, Jordan University Hospital, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Rodrigues Pessoa R, Morrison JC, Konety B, Gershman B, Maroni P, Kukreja JB, Cost N, Flaig T, Kessler E, Sharma P, Kim SP. National trends in clinical and pathologic staging for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: Implications for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Urol Oncol 2021; 39:832.e9-832.e15. [PMID: 33820697 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2021] [Accepted: 03/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With growing support of perioperative chemotherapy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), current biopsy methods are challenging, and little is known as to the degree to which patients would appropriately receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) from biopsy alone. Herein, we sought to assess the rates of appropriate clinical use of NAC and identify clinicopathologic factors associated with aggressive UTUC amongst patients undergoing radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for clinically localized disease. METHODS From 2004 to 2013, we identified all treatment naïve patients diagnosed with clinically localized, high grade UTUC (cTa-4Nx) who underwent RNU from the National Cancer Database (NCDB). Pathologic criteria for NAC (pT2-4N0,x; pTanyN1) from RNU represented the primary outcome. Bivariate and multivariable analyses were utilized to identify covariates associated with primary outcome to determine appropriate use of NAC. RESULTS During the study interval, 5,362 patients were diagnosed with clinically localized UTUC and underwent RNU. Overall, 49.1% of patients presented with an unknown primary tumor stage (Tx) and 24.5% had invasive UTUC from biopsy. On multivariable analysis, upper tract tumor size was associated with invasive UTUC eligible for NAC (all P < 0.05). Amongst patients with cTx UTUC from biopsy, half of patients had pathologic noninvasive UTUC (pTa,is,1) from RNU and would be overtreated with NAC. CONCLUSION Significant uncertainty persists in assigning primary upper tract tumor depth and represents a key barrier to widespread implementation of NAC for patients with high grade UTUC. Further research is needed to more accurately determine clinical criteria to identify patients for NAC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jeffrey C Morrison
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Badrinath Konety
- Rush University Medical Center, Division of Urology, Chicago, IL
| | - Boris Gershman
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Division of Urologic Surgery, Boston, MA
| | - Paul Maroni
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Janet B Kukreja
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO
| | - Nicholas Cost
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO; Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO
| | - Thomas Flaig
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | - Elizabeth Kessler
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Department of Medical Oncology, Aurora, CO
| | - Pranav Sharma
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Department of Urology, Lubbock, TX
| | - Simon P Kim
- University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Center, Division of Urology, Aurora, CO; Yale University, Cancer Outcomes Public Policy and Effectiveness Research (COPPER) Center, New Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Mori K, Resch I, Miura N, Laukhtina E, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Katayama S, D'Andrea D, Kardoust Parizi M, Abufaraj M, Fukuokaya W, Collà Ruvolo C, Luzzago S, Knipper S, Palumbo C, Karakiewicz PI, Briganti A, Enikeev DV, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Egawa S, Shariat SF. Prognostic role of the systemic immune-inflammation index in upper tract urothelial carcinoma treated with radical nephroureterectomy: results from a large multicenter international collaboration. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2021; 70:2641-2650. [PMID: 33591412 PMCID: PMC8360829 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-021-02884-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the prognostic role of the preoperative systemic immune–inflammation index (SII) in patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU).
Materials and methods We retrospectively analyzed our multi-institutional database to identify 2492 patients. SII was calculated as platelet count × neutrophil/lymphocyte count and evaluated at a cutoff of 485. Logistic regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of SII with muscle-invasive and non-organ-confined (NOC) disease. Cox regression analyses were performed to investigate the association of SII with recurrence-free, cancer-specific, and overall survival (RFS/CSS/OS). Results Overall, 986 (41.6%) patients had an SII > 485. On univariable logistic regression analyses, SII > 485 was associated with a higher risk of muscle-invasive (P = 0.004) and NOC (P = 0.03) disease at RNU. On multivariable logistic regression, SII remained independently associated with muscle-invasive disease (P = 0.01). On univariable Cox regression analyses, SII > 485 was associated with shorter RFS (P = 0.002), CSS (P = 0.002) and OS (P = 0.004). On multivariable Cox regression analyses SII remained independently associated with survival outcomes (all P < 0.05). Addition of SII to the multivariable models improved their discrimination of the models for predicting muscle-invasive disease (P = 0.02). However, all area under the curve and C-indexes increased by < 0.02 and it did not improve net benefit on decision curve analysis. Conclusions Preoperative altered SII is significantly associated with higher pathologic stages and worse survival outcomes in patients treated with RNU for UTUC. However, the SII appears to have relatively limited incremental additive value in clinical use. Further study of SII in prognosticating UTUC is warranted before routine use in clinical algorithms. Supplementary Information The online version of this article (10.1007/s00262-021-02884-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Irene Resch
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Noriyoshi Miura
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Ehime University Graduate School of Medicine, Ehime, Japan
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, CHRU Tours, Université François Rabelais de Tours, PRES Centre Val de Loire, Tours, France
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - David D'Andrea
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
| | - Mehdi Kardoust Parizi
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Shariati Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria
- Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Claudia Collà Ruvolo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Urology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Stefano Luzzago
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Sophie Knipper
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Carlotta Palumbo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
- Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Science, and Public Health, Urology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Department of Urology, Vita Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Dmitry V Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- Urology department, Sorbonne Université, ONCOTYPE-URO, AP-HP, Hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, GRC n°5, 75013, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia.
- Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan.
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.
- Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic.
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA.
- Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria.
- European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Tsuzuki S, Kimura S, Fukuokaya W, Yanagisawa T, Hata K, Miki J, Kimura T, Abe H, Egawa S. Modified Glasgow prognostic score is a pre-surgical prognostic marker of disease mortality in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2021; 51:138-144. [PMID: 32728722 DOI: 10.1093/jjco/hyaa133] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To investigate the prognostic value of pre-surgical modified Glasgow prognostic score in upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 273 urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients treated with radical nephroureterectomy. The modified Glasgow prognostic score was evaluated based on pre-surgical serum C-reactive protein and albumin. Association of modified Glasgow prognostic score with recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival rates was estimated using Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test was used to compare survival outcome. Cox regression analyses were performed for the assessment of the modified Glasgow prognostic score with recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival. RESULTS Of total 273 patients, the modified Glasgow prognostic score 0, 1 and 2 were assigned in 216 (79%), 45 (17%) and 12 (4%), respectively. The recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients with modified Glasgow prognostic score 2 were significantly worse than those with modified Glasgow prognostic score 0. On univariate analysis, modified Glasgow prognostic score 2 was associated with worse recurrence-free survival, cancer-specific survival and overall survival (all P value <0.01). On multivariate analyses, modified Glasgow prognostic score 2 was independently associated with worse cancer-specific survival and overall survival (hazard ratio: 4.73, 95% confidence interval: 1.31-17.2 and hazard ratio: 3.66, 95% confidence interval: 1.08-12.4, respectively). In the subgroup analyses of advanced urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients, modified Glasgow prognostic score 2 was independently associated with worse recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 4.31, 95% confidence interval: 1.69-11.1). CONCLUSIONS Pre-surgical modified Glasgow prognostic score independently predicts cancer-specific survival and overall survival of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients. Assessment of pre-surgical modified Glasgow prognostic score status could help identifying the worse survivor of urinary tract urothelial carcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunsuke Tsuzuki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoji Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Wataru Fukuokaya
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.,Department of Urology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa City, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yanagisawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kenichi Hata
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jun Miki
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takahiro Kimura
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hirokazu Abe
- Department of Urology, Kameda Medical Center, Kamogawa City, Japan
| | - Shin Egawa
- Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Margulis V, Ghandour RA, Singla N. Nephroureterectomy for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Indications and Technique. Bladder Cancer 2021. [DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-70646-3_38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
36
|
Freund JE, Duivenvoorden MJC, Sikma BT, Vernooij RWM, Savci-Heijink CD, Legemate JD, de Reijke TM. The Diagnostic Yield and Concordance of Ureterorenoscopic Biopsies for Grading of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Dutch Nationwide Analysis. J Endourol 2020; 34:907-913. [PMID: 32483982 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0246] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives: To evaluate the diagnostic yield and concordance of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) grading between ureterorenoscopic biopsies and surgical resections. Materials and Methods: The nationwide Dutch Pathology Registry (nationwide network and registry of histo- and cytopathology in the Netherlands [PALGA]) was searched for UTUC-positive renal units (RUs) with histopathology excerpts from ureterorenoscopic biopsies and surgical resections, matched for laterality and localization of the tumor, from 2011 until 2018. The positive predictive value (concordance) of the biopsy grade with regard to the final grade according to the World Health Organization (WHO) 2004 classification was calculated. Results: A total of 1002 UTUC-positive rental units were included, of which 776 UTUC-positive RUs were graded according to the WHO 2004 classification in the ureterorenoscopic biopsy, the localization-matched surgical resection, or in both. The diagnostic yield of biopsies for a classifying diagnosis was 89% with a sensitivity for UTUC of 84%. In case of UTUC, the diagnostic yield for biopsy-based grading and staging was 97% and 72%, respectively. The concordance of high-grade biopsies with regard to the final histopathology was 97% and 62% for low-grade biopsies. Upgrading to final high grade occurred in 33% of the low-grade biopsies. Downgrading to final low grade occurred in 2% of high-grade biopsies. Conclusions: This is the first study to portray the limitations of ureterorenoscopic biopsies for UTUC in a nationwide cohort. The diagnostic yield of ureterorenoscopic biopsies for a classifying diagnosis is suboptimal, but the diagnostic yield for grading according to the WHO 2004 classification is high. Yet, a worrisome amount of ureterorenoscopic biopsies are upgraded with regard to the surgical resection. Consequently, one-third of patients, who qualify for kidney-sparing treatment according to one of the criteria recommended for risk stratification, might be stratified incorrectly. These findings stress the importance of a timely and stringent ureterorenoscopic follow-up after kidney-sparing surgery and highlight the need for improvements in the diagnostic approach to optimize the risk stratification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Erik Freund
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Pathology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mylène J C Duivenvoorden
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Boukje T Sikma
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robin W M Vernooij
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jaap D Legemate
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology and Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Ye Z, Mi Q, Luo D, Li Z, Luo J. A case report of primary upper urinary tract signet-ring cell carcinoma and literature review. BMC Urol 2020; 20:75. [PMID: 32590974 PMCID: PMC7318531 DOI: 10.1186/s12894-020-00645-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Upper tract urothelial carcinoma with pure non-urothelial histology is an exception but variants are present in ~ 25% of cases. Primary upper urinary tract signet -ring cell carcinoma is extremely rare. Case presentation We report the case of a 65-year-old male diagnosed primary upper urinary tract signet-ring cell carcinoma while underwent percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Radical nephroureterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy were performed sequentially. The patient is now recovering well with a regular follow-up for more than 1 year. Conclusions The upper urinary tract malignancy often appears as a high grade, high stage tumor and has a uniformly poor prognosis, but a timely multimodal management can bring a good outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohua Ye
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China
| | - Qiwu Mi
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China.
| | - Daosheng Luo
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China
| | - Zhixiong Li
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China
| | - Jiexin Luo
- Department of Urology, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, 523000, China
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Brant A, Almassi N, Sirintrapun SJ, Russo P. Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma in a Patient With Horseshoe Kidney. Urology 2020; 142:e20-e24. [PMID: 32389816 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2020.04.097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Revised: 04/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/23/2020] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Aaron Brant
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY
| | - Nima Almassi
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | | | - Paul Russo
- Urology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Yoshida T, Kobayashi T, Kawaura T, Miyake M, Ito K, Okuno H, Murota T, Makita N, Kawakita M, Kawa G, Kitawaki T, Fujimoto K, Matsuyama H, Shiina H, Azuma H, Ogawa O, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T. Development and external validation of a preoperative nomogram for predicting pathological locally advanced disease of clinically localized upper urinary tract carcinoma. Cancer Med 2020; 9:3733-3741. [PMID: 32253820 PMCID: PMC7286474 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.2988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2020] [Revised: 02/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/28/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To develop and validate a preoperative nomogram to predict pathological locally advanced disease (pLAD) of clinically localized upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) treated with extirpative surgery. Methods In total, 1101 patients with cN0M0 UTUC (development cohort, n = 604; validation cohort, n = 497) from 2 independent academic databases were retrospectively analyzed. pLAD was defined as pT3/4 and/or pN+. Multivariate logistic regression was used to develop a nomogram. The accuracy of the nomogram was evaluated with a receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration plot, and decision curve analysis. Results The development and validation cohorts comprised 204 (33.8%) and 178 (35.8%) patients with pLAD, respectively. The multivariate analyses showed that the neutrophil‐to‐lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio [HR], 2.27; P < .001), chronic kidney disease (HR, 1.56; P = .032), tumor location (HR, 1.60; P = .029), hydronephrosis (HR, 2.71; P < .001), and local invasion on imaging (HR, 8.59; P < .001) were independent predictive factors. After bootstrapping, a well‐calibrated nomogram achieved discriminative accuracy of 0.77 in the development cohort. The decision curve analysis demonstrated improved risk prediction against threshold probabilities (≥8%) of pLAD. These results were consistent in the validation cohort. Conclusion Our novel nomogram allows for more highly accurate prediction of pLAD of UTUC. This nomogram integrates standard imaging and laboratory factors that help to identify patients who will benefit from preoperative chemotherapy, extended lymph node dissection, or both.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Yoshida
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Kori Hospital, Osaka, Japan.,Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Kobayashi
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takayuki Kawaura
- Department of Mathematics, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makito Miyake
- Department of Urology, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan
| | - Katsuhiro Ito
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.,Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Okuno
- Department of Urology, National Hospital Organization Kyoto Medical Center, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Takashi Murota
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Noriyuki Makita
- Department of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Mutsushi Kawakita
- Department of Urology, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Kobe, Japan
| | - Gen Kawa
- Department of Urology, Saiseikai Noe Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoki Kitawaki
- Department of Mathematics, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | | | - Hideyasu Matsuyama
- Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Ube, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Shiina
- Department of Urology, Shimane University School of Medicine, Izumo, Japan
| | - Haruhito Azuma
- Department of Urology, Osaka Medical College, Takatsuki, Japan
| | - Osamu Ogawa
- Department of Urology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Kinoshita
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tadashi Matsuda
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Yoshida T, Setsuda S, Ishizuka M, Inoue T, Kinoshita H, Matsuda T. Photodynamic Diagnosis with Oral 5-Aminolevulinic Acid for Upper Urinary Tract Carcinoma: A Prospective Clinical Trial. J Endourol 2020; 34:509-515. [PMID: 31964177 DOI: 10.1089/end.2019.0725] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose: In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness and safety of photodynamic diagnosis (PDD) of upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) using oral 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA). Materials and Methods: Consecutive adult patients with suspected UTUC based on imaging and urine cytology findings were prospectively enrolled from May 2018 to January 2019. 5-ALA (20 mg/kg) was orally administered 2 to 3 hours before diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS). Sixty-three biopsy samples were collected from 20 eligible patients using white light (WL) and PDD-URS. The primary endpoint was sensitivity, and the secondary endpoints were specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV), diagnostic accuracy, and safety. Results: The sensitivity of photodynamic URS was significantly higher than that of WL-URS (93.8% vs 62.5%, p = 0.0025). Although the specificity and PPV were not different between the two procedures, PDD-URS showed a significantly higher NPV (92.3% vs 69.2%, p = 0.027) and accuracy (0.86 vs 0.75, p = 0.0297) than WL-URS. With respect to safety, no grade ≥3 adverse events related to 5-ALA administration occurred in any patients. Conclusion: We found that PDD-URS with oral 5-ALA is a safe and superior diagnostic tool for detection of UTUC compared with conventional WL-URS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Yoshida
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
| | | | | | - Takaaki Inoue
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Kinoshita
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
| | - Tadashi Matsuda
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Hirakata, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Grade Prediction Based on the Ureteroscopic Appearance: Caution Should be Taken. Urology 2019; 132:69-74. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2019.05.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2019] [Revised: 05/23/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
42
|
[French ccAFU guidelines - Update 2018-2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma]. Prog Urol 2019; 28 Suppl 1:R34-R47. [PMID: 31610873 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION To propose an update of the French guidelines from the national committee ccAFU on upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). METHODS A systematic Medline search was performed between 2016 and 2018, with regards to the diagnosis, the options of treatment and the follow-up of UTUC, to evaluate the different studies with levels of evidence. RESULTS The diagnosis of this rare disease is based on CT-scan acquisition during excretion and ureteroscopy with histological biopsies. Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) remains the gold standard for surgical treatment, nevertheless a conservative endoscopic approach can be proposed for low-risk diseases: unifocal tumour, possible complete resection low-grade and lack of invasion on CT-scan. Close monitoring with endoscopic follow-up (flexible ureteroscopy) in compliant patients is therefore necessary. After RNU, bladder instillation of chemotherapy is recommended in order to reduce the risk of bladder recurrence. An adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended after RNU in pT2-T4 N0-3 M0 disease. CONCLUSION These updated guidelines will contribute to increase the level of urological care for diagnosis and treatment of UTUC.
Collapse
|
43
|
Freund JE, Faber DJ, Bus MT, van Leeuwen TG, de Bruin DM. Grading upper tract urothelial carcinoma with the attenuation coefficient of in-vivo optical coherence tomography. Lasers Surg Med 2019; 51:399-406. [PMID: 30919487 DOI: 10.1002/lsm.23079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/08/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION With catheter based optical coherence tomography (OCT), high resolution images of the upper urinary tract can be obtained, thereby facilitating the detection of upper tract urothelial carcinomas (UTUC). We hypothesized that the attenuation coefficient of the OCT signal (μOCT ) is related to the histopathologic grade of the tumor. OBJECTIVES In this study, we aimed to define the μOCT cut-off for discriminating high grade and low grade papillary UTUC. METHODS For this post-hoc analysis, data from OCT imaging of papillary UTUC was obtained from patients during ureterorenoscopy. OCT images and raw data were simultaneously analyzed with in-house developed software. The μOCT determined in papillary UTUCs and corresponding histopathologic grading from either biopsies or radical resection specimens were compared. RESULTS Thirty-five papillary UTUC from 35 patients were included. μOCT analysis was feasible in all cases. The median μOCT was 3.3 mm-1 (IQR 2.7-3.7 mm-1 ) for low-grade UTUC and 4.9 mm-1 (IQR 4.3-6.1 mm-1 ) for high-grade UTUC (P = 0.004). ROC analysis yielded a μOCT cut-off value of >4.0 mm-1 (AUC = 0.85, P < 0.001) with a sensitivity of 83% and a specificity of 94% for high-grade papillary UTUC. CONCLUSIONS This study proposes a μOCT cut-off of 4.0 mm-1 for quantitative grading of UTUC with ureterorenoscopic OCT imaging. The promising diagnostic accuracy calculations justify further studies to validate the proposed cut-off value. Implementation of the software for the μOCT analysis in OCT systems may allow for μOCT assessment at real time during ureterorenoscopy. Lasers Surg. Med. 51:399-406, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Erik Freund
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Faber
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mieke T Bus
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ton G van Leeuwen
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniel M de Bruin
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jung H, Giusti G, Fajkovic H, Herrmann T, Jones R, Straub M, Baard J, Osther PJS, Brehmer M. Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018: aspects of treatment. World J Urol 2019; 37:2279-2287. [PMID: 31123852 PMCID: PMC6825640 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02811-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2018] [Accepted: 05/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To provide an overview of treatment modalities for management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Methods In accordance with the standards for a scoping review, data presentation and discussion at the Consultation on UTUC in Stockholm, 6–7 September 2018, consensus was reached on the latest and most important treatment recommendations for UTUC. Using Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase, publications were selected based on quality, clinical relevance, and level of evidence. Results Kidney-sparing surgery should be attempted for low-grade UTUC. Radical nephroureterectomy with bladder cuff excision is first option for high-grade disease. Post-operative bladder instillation of chemotherapy should be offered after RNU to reduce intravesical recurrence rate. Identification of tumor grade and stage is crucial when selecting treatment. Ureteroscopic management of low-grade and non-invasive UTUC achieves disease-free survival similar to that offered by radical nephroureterectomy but seems to be a risk factor for intravesical recurrence. Lymphadenectomy appears important for high-risk disease, although the therapeutic benefit needs further validation. There is little evidence supporting use of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) and mitomycin C as monotherapy and adjuvant treatment in UTUC. A randomized clinical trial has indicated that platin-based chemotherapy for invasive UTUC improves disease-free survival, suggesting that adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered standard care for ≥ T2 N0–3M0 disease. Conclusions Risk stratification assessment is feasible and mandatory in UTUC. Identification of tumor grade and stage is essential for optimal treatment selection. Kidney-sparing surgery should be offered in low-risk disease, whereas radical nephroureterectomy and adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered in high-risk disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helene Jung
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Ville Turro Division, Milan, Italy
| | - Harun Fajkovic
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Herrmann
- Department of Urology, Kantonsspital Frauenfeld, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | - Robert Jones
- Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland UK
| | - Michael Straub
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
- Department of Urology, Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Marianne Brehmer
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Malm C, Grahn A, Jaremko G, Tribukait B, Brehmer M. Predicting invasiveness and disease-specific survival in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: identifying relevant clinical tumour characteristics. World J Urol 2019; 37:2335-2342. [PMID: 31016451 PMCID: PMC6825649 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02760-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this prospective study was to identify the tumour characteristics that are associated with invasiveness and those that are relevant for disease-specific survival (DSS) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma, UTUC. METHODS From a prospective consecutive cohort of patients with suspicion of UTUC, those who were diagnosed with UTUC using URS prior to rNU between 2005 and 2012 were included. Tumour characteristics were analysed for prediction of invasiveness and association with DSS. Stages were categorised as superficial (pTa-1 and CIS only) or invasive (≥ pT2). Tumours were graded according to WHO 1999 classification. DSS was analysed regarding possible association with stage, grade, size, multifocality, location, ploidy and rate of proliferation. Associations were tested using Fisher's exact test, Pearson Chi-square or Cox's regression. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were constructed. RESULTS Forty-five consecutive patients were included, and 43 of them were included in the final analyses because their rNU specimens were available for reassessment. The only tumour characteristics that were significantly associated with stage were tumour grade (P < 0.001), DNA ploidy (P = 0.045) and rate of proliferation (P = 0.004). No association with stage was noted for size, multifocality or location. Grade, stage and rate of proliferation were associated with DSS. CONCLUSIONS Grade, DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction were the only tumour characteristics associated with stage in our study. However, DNA ploidy was not associated with DSS. The prognostic factors that we identified were tumour grade, stage, and S-phase fraction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Camilla Malm
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Urology, Stockholm South General Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alexandra Grahn
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Division of Urology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Georg Jaremko
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.,Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Bernhard Tribukait
- Department of Oncology and Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marianne Brehmer
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Diagnostic ureteroscopy prior to nephroureterectomy for urothelial carcinoma is associated with a high risk of bladder recurrence despite technical precautions to avoid tumor spillage. World J Urol 2019; 38:159-165. [DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02768-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
|
47
|
Fojecki G, Magnusson A, Traxer O, Baard J, Osther PJS, Jaremko G, Seitz C, Knoll T, Giusti G, Brehmer M. Consultation on UTUC, Stockholm 2018 aspects of diagnosis of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. World J Urol 2019; 37:2271-2278. [PMID: 30915526 PMCID: PMC6825655 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02732-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose To summarize knowledge on upper urinary tract carcinoma (UTUC) regarding diagnostic procedures, risk factors and prognostic markers. Methods A scoping review approach was applied to search literature in Pubmed, Web of Science, and Embase. Consensus was reached through discussions at Consultation on UTUC in Stockholm, September 2018. Results Tumor stage and grade are the most important prognostic factors. CT urography (CTU) including corticomedullary phase is the preferred imaging modality. A clear tumor on CTU in combination with high-grade UTUC in urine cytology identifies high-risk UTUC, and in some cases indirect staging can be obtained. Bladder urine cytology has limited sensitivity, and in most cases ureterorenoscopy (URS) with in situ samples for cytology and histopathology are mandatory for exact diagnosis. Image-enhancing techniques, Image S1 and narrow-band imaging, may improve tumor detection at URS. Direct confocal laser endomicroscopy may help to define grade during URS. There is strong correlation between stage and grade, accordingly correct grading is crucial. The correlation is more pronounced using the 1999 WHO than the 2004 classification: however, the 1999 system risks greater interobserver variability. Using both systems is advisable. A number of tissue-based molecular markers have been studied. None has proven ready for use in clinical practice. Conclusions Correct grading and staging of UTUC are mandatory for adequate treatment decisions. Optimal diagnostic workup should include CTU with corticomedullary phase, URS with in situ cytology and biopsies. Both WHO classification systems (1999 and 2004) should be used to decrease risk of undergrading or overtreatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grzegorz Fojecki
- Department of Urology, Hospital of Southern Jutland, Sønderborg, Denmark
| | | | | | - Joyce Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Holland
| | - Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
- Urological Research Center, Lillebaelt Hospital, University of Southern Denmark, Vejle, Denmark
| | - Georg Jaremko
- Department of Clinical Pathology and Cytology, Karolinska University Hospital Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christian Seitz
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Knoll
- Department of Urology, Teaching Hospital University Tuebingen, Sindelfingen, Germany
| | - Guido Giusti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS San Raffaele Hospital, Ville Turro Division, Milan, Italy
| | - Marianne Brehmer
- Division of Urology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Danderyd Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Freund JE, Liem EIML, Savci-Heijink CD, Baard J, Kamphuis GM, de la Rosette JJMCH, de Bruin DM. Confocal laser endomicroscopy for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: validation of the proposed criteria and proposal of a scoring system for real-time tumor grading. World J Urol 2019; 37:2155-2164. [PMID: 30684035 PMCID: PMC6763512 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02646-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2018] [Accepted: 01/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) is a fluorescence-based fiber-optic imaging technique with the potential for intraoperative grading of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). This study aims to (1) investigate the prevalence of the previously proposed CLE criteria for bladder cancer in papillary UTUC, (2) estimate the diagnostic value of CLE for UTUC grading and (3) propose a scoring system for a more quantifiable approach of CLE-based grading of UTUC. Materials and methods Ureteroscopic CLE was performed in patients with UTUC. Following CLE imaging, co-localized biopsies were taken for histopathologic comparison. Postoperatively, two blinded raters assessed the CLE images. Results Fifty-three papillary UTUCs (34 low grade and 19 high grade) were imaged with CLE in 36 patients. All the previously described CLE criteria were identifiable in varying proportions. After excluding 10 non-diagnostic recordings (5 low grade and 5 high grade) due to insufficient image quality, the histopathologic grade was correctly identified with CLE in 26 low-grade UTUCs (90%) and in 12 high-grade UTUCs (86%). The most prevalent CLE criteria with the highest diagnostic potential were cellular organization, morphology and cohesiveness of cells. A scoring system was proposed with these criteria, which yielded similar diagnostic accuracies. Conclusions Based on the previously proposed criteria, CLE enables accurate grading of papillary UTUC at a non-diagnostic rate of 19%. The most prevalent CLE criteria with the highest diagnostic potential for grading of papillary UTUC are cellular organization, morphology and cohesiveness of cells. The proposed scoring system may simplify the assessment of CLE images for UTUC grading but external validation is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J E Freund
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - E I M L Liem
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - C D Savci-Heijink
- Department of Pathology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J Baard
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G M Kamphuis
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J J M C H de la Rosette
- Department of Urology, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D M de Bruin
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Department of Biomedical Engineering and Physics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Rouprêt M, Xylinas E, Colin P, Houédé N, Compérat E, Audenet F, Larré S, Masson-Lecomte A, Pignot G, Brunelle S, Roumiguié M, Neuzillet Y, Méjean A. RETRACTED: Recommandations françaises du Comité de Cancérologie de l’AFU — Actualisation 2018—2020 : tumeurs de la voie excrétrice supérieure French ccAFU guidelines — Update 2018—2020: Upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Prog Urol 2018; 28:S32-S45. [PMID: 30318333 DOI: 10.1016/j.purol.2018.07.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2018] [Accepted: 07/31/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This article has been retracted: please see Elsevier Policy on Article Withdrawal (http://www.elsevier.com/locate/withdrawalpolicy).
Cet article est retiré de la publication à la demande des auteurs car ils ont apporté des modifications significatives sur des points scientifiques après la publication de la première version des recommandations.
Le nouvel article est disponible à cette adresse: doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005.
C’est cette nouvelle version qui doit être utilisée pour citer l’article.
This article has been retracted at the request of the authors, as it is not based on the definitive version of the text because some scientific data has been corrected since the first issue was published.
The replacement has been published at the doi:10.1016/j.purol.2019.01.005.
That newer version of the text should be used when citing the article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Rouprêt
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Sorbonne Université, GRC n∘5, ONCOTYPE-URO, hôpital Pitié-Salpêtrière, AP-HP, 75013 Paris, France.
| | - E Xylinas
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie de l'hôpital Bichat-Claude Bernard, université Paris Descartes, Assistance publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 75018 Paris, France
| | - P Colin
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital privé de la Louvière, 59042 Lille, France
| | - N Houédé
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'oncologie Médicale, CHU Caremaux, Montpellier université, 30029 Nîmes, France
| | - E Compérat
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'anatomie pathologique, hôpital tenon, HUEP, Sorbonne Université, GRC n∘5, ONCOTYPE-URO, 75020 Paris, France
| | - F Audenet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Européen-Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| | - S Larré
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, CHU de Reims, 51100 Reims, France
| | - A Masson-Lecomte
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Saint-Louis, université Paris-Diderot, 75010 Paris, France
| | - G Pignot
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de chirurgie oncologique 2, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - S Brunelle
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service de radiologie, institut Paoli-Calmettes, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - M Roumiguié
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Département d'urologie, CHU Rangueil, 31400 Toulouse, France
| | - Y Neuzillet
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Foch, université de Versailles-Saint-Quentin-en-Yvelines, 92150 Suresnes, France
| | - A Méjean
- Comité de cancérologie de l'Association française d'urologie, groupe vessie, Maison de l'Urologie, 11, rue Viète, 75017 Paris, France; Service d'urologie, hôpital Européen-Georges-Pompidou, université Paris Descartes, AP-HP, 75015 Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|