1
|
Mendoza-Jiménez MJ, van Exel J, Brouwer W. On spillovers in economic evaluations: definition, mapping review and research agenda. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024; 25:1239-1260. [PMID: 38261132 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01658-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024]
Abstract
An important issue in economic evaluations is determining whether all relevant impacts are considered, given the perspective chosen for the analysis. Acknowledging that patients are not isolated individuals has important implications in this context. Increasingly, the term "spillovers" is used to label consequences of health interventions on others. However, a clear definition of spillovers is lacking, and as a result, the scope of the concept remains unclear. In this study, we aim to clarify the concept of spillovers by proposing a definition applicable in health economic evaluations. To illustrate the implications of this definition, we highlight the diversity of potential spillovers through an expanded impact inventory and conduct a mapping review that outlines the evidence base for the different types of spillovers. In the context of economic evaluations of health interventions, we define spillovers as all impacts from an intervention on all parties or entities other than the users of the intervention under evaluation. This definition encompasses a broader range of potential costs and effects, beyond informal caregivers and family members. The expanded impact inventory enables a systematic approach to identifying broader impacts of health interventions. The mapping review shows that the relevance of different types of spillovers is context-specific. Some spillovers are regularly included in economic evaluations, although not always recognised as such, while others are not. A consistent use of the term "spillovers", improved measurement of these costs and effects, and increased transparency in reporting them are still necessary. To that end, we propose a research agenda.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María J Mendoza-Jiménez
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
- Facultad de Ciencias Sociales y Humanísticas, Escuela Superior Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL), Guayaquil, Ecuador.
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management (ESHPM), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus Centre for Health Economics Rotterdam (EsCHER), Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
den Toom M, Blanken L, Horn I, Veerman S, van der Vlugt-Molenaar JJB, de Koning MB, Bogers J, Enterman J, de Jonge M, Cianci D, Frederix GWJ, de Haas H, Storosum BW, Veereschild M, Javadzadeh M, Schulte PFJ, Cohen D, van Os J, Cahn W, de Haan L, Zantvoord JB, Luykx JJ. Electroconvulsive Therapy Versus Aripiprazole Addition to Clozapine in Patients with Clozapine-Resistant Symptoms (EMECLO): A Protocol of a Single-Blind, Multicenter, Randomized-Controlled Feasibility Trial. PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY 2024. [PMID: 39187245 DOI: 10.1055/a-2364-4357] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, guidance on the most effective treatment for patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia-spectrum disorders (SSD) is lacking. While augmentation strategies to clozapine with aripiprazole and electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) have been demonstrated to be effective in patients with clozapine-resistant schizophrenia spectrum disorders (CRS), head-to-head comparisons between these addition strategies are unavailable. We therefore aim to examine the feasibility of a larger randomized, single-blind trial comparing the effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and safety of aripiprazole addition vs. ECT addition in CRS. METHODS In this multi-center, randomized, single-blind feasibility study, the feasibility of recruiting 20 participants with CRS who will be randomized to either aripiprazole or bilateral ECT addition will be assessed. The main endpoint is the number of patients willing to be randomized. The number of screened individuals and reasons to decline participation will be recorded. Effects will be estimated for the benefit of the foreseen larger trial. To that end, differences between both arms in symptom severity will be assessed using blinded video assessments. In addition, tolerability (e. g., cognitive functioning), safety, quality of life, recovery, and all-cause discontinuation will be compared. The follow-up period is 16 weeks, after which non-responders will be given the option to switch to the other treatment. DISCUSSION Strengths of this feasibility trial include maintaining blinding with video assessment, a possibility to switch groups in case of non-response, and a broad set of outcome measures. Identification of factors contributing to non-participation and drop-out will generate valuable information on trial feasibility and may enhance recruitment strategies in a follow-up RCT. TRIAL REGISTRATION The study has been approved by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the Amsterdam University Medical Center, location AMC, and was registered on 1 May 2022 in the EU Clinical Trials Register (EudraCT) under the trial name 'EMECLO' (2021-006333-19).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Laura Blanken
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry, Dijklander Ziekenhuis, Hoorn, Netherlands
| | - Inge Horn
- MS centrum, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
| | - Selene Veerman
- Mental Health Service Noord Holland Noord, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Jan Bogers
- Mental Health Service Rivierduinen, High Care Clinics and Rivierduinen Academy, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - HansJ de Haas
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
- Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Dan Cohen
- Mental Health Service Noord Holland Noord, The Netherlands
| | - Jim van Os
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center
| | - Wiepke Cahn
- Department of Psychiatry, UMC Utrecht Brain Center
| | - Lieuwe de Haan
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
- Arkin Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jurjen J Luykx
- Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuropsychology, School for Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GGZ InGeest Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gerards MHG, Slotegraaf AI, Verburg AC, Kruizenga HM, Cup EHC, Kalf JG, Lenssen AF, Meijer WM, Ben ÂJ, van Dongen JM, de van der Schueren MAE, Graff MJL, Akkermans RP, van der Wees PJ, Hoogeboom TJ. One-year evaluation of people recovering from COVID-19 receiving allied primary healthcare: A nationwide prospective cohort study. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 2024; 67:101874. [PMID: 39173549 DOI: 10.1016/j.rehab.2024.101874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2023] [Revised: 04/16/2024] [Accepted: 06/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/24/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND A Dutch nationwide prospective cohort study was initiated to investigate recovery trajectories of people recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and costs of treatment by primary care allied health professionals. OBJECTIVES The study described recovery trajectories over a period of 12 months and associated baseline characteristics of participants recovering from COVID-19 who visited a primary care allied health professional. It also aimed to provide insight into the associated healthcare and societal costs. METHODS Participants completed participant-reported standardized outcomes on participation, health-related quality of life, fatigue, physical functioning, and costs at baseline (ie, start of the treatment), 3, 6, 9 and 12 months. RESULTS A total of 1451 participants (64 % women, 76 % mild/moderate severity) with a mean (SD) age of 49 (12) years were included. Linear mixed models showed significant and clinically relevant improvements over time in all outcome measures between baseline and 12 months. Between 6 and 12 months, we found significant but not clinically relevant improvements in most outcome measures. Having a worse baseline score was the only baseline factor that was consistently associated with greater improvement over time on that outcome. Total allied healthcare costs (mean €1921; SEM €48) made up about 3% of total societal costs (mean €64,584; SEM €3149) for the average participant in the cohort. CONCLUSIONS The health status of participants recovering from COVID-19 who visited an allied health professional improved significantly over a 12-month follow-up period, but nearly the improvement occurred between baseline and 6 months. Most participants still reported severe impairments in their daily lives, and generated substantial societal costs. These issues, combined with the fact that baseline characteristics explained little of the variance in recovery over time, underscore the importance of continued attention for the management of people recovering from COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRATION clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04735744).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa H G Gerards
- Department of Epidemiology, Care and Public Health Institute (CAPHRI), Faculty of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Maastricht University, P. Debyeplein 1, 6229 HA Maastricht, the Netherlands; Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Anne I Slotegraaf
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, the Netherlands
| | - Arie C Verburg
- IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical centre, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP Nijmegen, the Netherlands.
| | - Hinke M Kruizenga
- Department of Nutrition & Dietetics, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Aging and Vitality, Amsterdam UMC location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, De Boelelaan 117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Sports and Nutrition, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Dr Meurerlaan 8, 1067 SM Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Edith H C Cup
- Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud university medical centre, Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525 GC Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna G Kalf
- Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud university medical centre, Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525 GC Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Antoine F Lenssen
- Department of Physical Therapy, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Willemijn M Meijer
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Nivel, Otterstraat 118, 3513 CR Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ângela Jornada Ben
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, van der Boechorstraat 7, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Johanna M van Dongen
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, van der Boechorstraat 7, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, van der Boechorstraat 7, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marian A E de van der Schueren
- Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Stippeneng 4, 6708 WE Wageningen, the Netherlands; Department of Nutrition, Dietetics and Lifestyle, HAN University of Applied Sciences, Kapittelweg 35, 6525 EN Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Maud J L Graff
- IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical centre, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud university medical centre, Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525 GC Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Reinier P Akkermans
- IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical centre, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Primary and Community Care, Radboud University Medical Centre, Geert Grooteplein Noord 21, 6521 EZ Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Philip J van der Wees
- IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical centre, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP Nijmegen, the Netherlands; Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud university medical centre, Reinier Postlaan 4, 6525 GC Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Thomas J Hoogeboom
- IQ healthcare, Radboud university medical centre, Kapittelweg 54, 6525 EP Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tang YH, van Bakelen NB, Gareb B, Spijkervet FKL. Response to the comment on "Arthroscopy versus arthrocentesis and versus conservative treatments for temporomandibular joint disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis". Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2024:S0901-5027(24)00309-6. [PMID: 39168717 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijom.2024.08.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2024] [Accepted: 08/09/2024] [Indexed: 08/23/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Y H Tang
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - N B van Bakelen
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands.
| | - B Gareb
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - F K L Spijkervet
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Taul-Madsen L, Hvid LG, Sellebjerg F, Christensen JR, Ratzer R, Sejbæk T, Svendsen KB, Papp V, Højsgaard Chow H, Lundbye-Jensen J, Dawes H, Dalgas U. Study protocol: effects of exercise booster sessions on preservation of exercise-induced adaptations in persons with multiple sclerosis, a multicentre randomised controlled trial-the MS BOOSTER trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e085241. [PMID: 39153792 PMCID: PMC11331840 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-085241] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Multiple sclerosis (MS) causes a broad range of symptoms, with physical function being one of the most disabling consequences according to patients themselves. Exercise effectively improves lower extremity physical function. Nonetheless, it is unknown which exercise modality is most effective and it remains challenging to keep persons with MS adhering to exercise over a longer period. Therefore, the present study aims to investigate how exercise booster sessions (EBS) influence the sustainability of exercise-induced effects on physical function, and furthermore, to investigate which exercise modality (aerobic training or resistance training) is most effective in terms of improving physical function. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study is a multi-arm, parallel-group, open-label multicentre randomised controlled trial investigating the effects of EBS. Participants (n=150) are initially randomised to 12 weeks of either resistance training+usual care, aerobic training+usual care or usual care. After 12 weeks of intervention, participants in the exercise groups will again be randomised to either EBS+usual care or usual care during a 40-week follow-up period. The primary outcome is physical function (composite score based on 6-min walk test and five-time sit to stand), and the secondary outcomes are fatigue, cognition, physical activity, symptoms of depression and quality of life. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The study is approved by the Central Denmark Region Committees on Health Research Ethics (1-10-72-237-21) and is registered at the Danish Data Protection Agency (2016-051-000001) and at Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04913012). All study findings will be published in scientific peer-reviewed journals and presented at scientific conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04913012.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lars G Hvid
- Exercise Biology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus & Ry, Denmark
- The Danish MS Hospitals, Ry, Denmark
| | - Finn Sellebjerg
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | | | - Rikke Ratzer
- Danish Multiple Sclerosis Centre, Rigshospitalet, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Tobias Sejbæk
- Department of Neurology, Sydvestjysk Sygehus, Esbjerg, Denmark
| | | | - Viktoria Papp
- Department of Neurology, Odense Universitetshospital, Odense, Denmark
| | | | - Jesper Lundbye-Jensen
- Department of Nutrition, Exercise and Sports, Københavns Universitet, Kobenhavn, Denmark
| | - Helen Dawes
- Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
van Delft EAK, van Bruggen SGJ, Sosef NL, Bloemers FW, Schep NWL, Vermeulen J. Non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients < 50 years of age : Three weeks of cast immobilisation versus one week of brace immobilisation: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Trials 2024; 25:544. [PMID: 39152494 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08375-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 08/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures are treated by 3 to 5 weeks of cast immobilisation. Many patients with a distal radius fracture suffer from long-term functional restrictions, which might be related to stiffness due to cast immobilisation. Current literature indicates that 1 week of immobilisation might be safe; however, no level 1 evidence is available. This trial aims to compare 1 week of brace immobilisation with 3 weeks of cast immobilisation in patients with distal radius fractures that do not need reduction. METHODS The aim of this trial is to evaluate the non-inferiority of 1 week of brace immobilisation in patients with non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures. A two-armed single blinded multicentre randomised clinical trial will be conducted in three hospitals. Adult patients, between 18 and 50 years old, independent for activities of daily living, with a non- or minimally displaced distal radius fracture can be included in this study. The intervention group is treated with 1 week of brace immobilisation, and the control group with 3 weeks of cast immobilisation. Primary outcome is the patient-reported outcome measured by the Patient-Related Wrist Evaluation score (PRWE) at 6 months. Secondary outcomes are patient-reported outcome measured by the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand score at 6 weeks and 6 months, PRWE at 6 weeks, range of motion, patient-reported pain score measured by VAS score, radiological outcome (dorsal/volar tilt, radial height, ulnar variance, presence of intra-articular step off), complications and cost-effectiveness measured by the EuroQol 5 Dimension questionnaire, Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Productivity Cost Questionnaire. DISCUSSION This study will provide evidence on the optimal period of immobilisation in non-operatively treated displaced and reduced distal radius fractures. Both treatment options are accepted treatment protocols and both treatment options have a low risk of complications. Follow-up will be according to the current treatment protocol. This study will provide level 1 evidence on the optimal period and way of immobilisation for non- or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in adult patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION ABR 81638 | NL81638.029.22 | www.toetsingonline.nl . 18th of October 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva A K van Delft
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands.
| | - Suus G J van Bruggen
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Nico L Sosef
- Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hospital, Boerhaavelaan 22, Haarlem, 2035 RC, The Netherlands
| | - Frank W Bloemers
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Amsterdam UMC, Meibergdreef 9, Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, The Netherlands
| | - Niels W L Schep
- Department of Trauma and Hand Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, Rotterdam, 3079 DZ, The Netherlands
| | - Jefrey Vermeulen
- Department of Trauma and Hand Surgery, Maasstad Hospital, Maasstadweg 21, Rotterdam, 3079 DZ, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Hezik-Wester V, de Groot S, Kanters T, Wagner L, Ardesch J, Brouwer W, Corro-Ramos I, van Exel J, Versteegh M. The Cost-Effectiveness of Seizure Dogs for Persons Living With Severe Refractory Epilepsy: Results From the EPISODE Study. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024:S1098-3015(24)02803-1. [PMID: 39127247 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.07.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 07/16/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The Epilepsy Support Dog Evaluation study was commissioned by the Dutch Ministry of Health, Welfare and Sports to inform a reimbursement decision on seizure dogs. The randomized trial found that seizure dogs reduce seizure frequency and improve health-related quality of life of persons with severe refractory epilepsy (PSREs). This article examined the cost-effectiveness (CE) of adding seizure dogs to usual care for PSREs in The Netherlands. METHODS A microsimulation model was developed, informed by generalized linear mixed models using patient-level trial data from the Epilepsy Support Dog Evaluation study. The model adopted a 10-year time horizon and took a societal perspective. Seizure frequency was predicted as a function of time with the seizure dog. Patient utilities, caregiver utilities, and costs were predicted as a function of seizure frequency and time with the seizure dog. RESULTS Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) of PSREs with a seizure dog and usual care alone were estimated at 6.28 and 5.65, respectively (Δ 0.63). For caregivers, estimated QALYs were 6.94 and 6.52, respectively (Δ 0.42). Total costs were respectively €228 691 and €226 261 (Δ €2430). Intervention costs were largely offset by savings in informal care and healthcare. The incremental CE ratio was €2314/QALY. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 91% probability of seizure dogs being cost-effective at the €50 000/QALY threshold. The incremental CE ratio fell well below this threshold in scenario analyses. CONCLUSIONS Seizure dogs are likely to be a cost-effective addition to usual care for PSREs in The Netherlands.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valérie van Hezik-Wester
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Saskia de Groot
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Tim Kanters
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Louis Wagner
- Academic Center for Epileptology, Kempenhaeghe, Heeze, The Netherlands
| | | | - Werner Brouwer
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Isaac Corro-Ramos
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Job van Exel
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Versteegh
- Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Erasmus Center for Health Economics Rotterdam, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Stichting Epilepsie Instellingen Nederland, Heemstede, The Netherlands; Huygens & Versteegh, Zwijndrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Berger I, Medairos R, Margolin E, Antonelli J, Lipkin ME, Scales CD, Kaye DR. Work absence and productivity loss of patients undergoing a trial of spontaneous passage for ureteral stones. Urolithiasis 2024; 52:111. [PMID: 39105811 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01608-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2024] [Accepted: 07/20/2024] [Indexed: 08/07/2024]
Abstract
Patients with ureteral stones are often managed with a spontaneous trial of passage. While cost effective, the current literature has not examined the effects of a trial of passage on patients' work productivity. In this study, we aim to characterize work absence and productivity losses in a cohort of patients undergoing a trial of passage for ureteral stones. Actively employed patients aged 18 to 64 and discharged from Duke emergency departments without surgical intervention for ureteral stones ≤ 10 mm were contacted by phone four weeks after their presentation. Participants completed the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire which assesses three domains: absenteeism - missed work; presenteeism -productivity when returning to work; and unpaid work - assistance with household work. Linear regression associated demographic and stone factors with productivity losses.109 patients completed the survey. In total, 67% of patients missed work, 46% had decreased productivity when returning to work, and 55% required assistance with unpaid work. 59% of patients with stones ≤ 5 mm missed work versus 84% with stones > 5 mm (p = 0.009). African American race (coefficient 23.68, 95% confidence interval 2.24-45.11, p = 0.031), first-time stone formers (coefficient 20.28, 95% confidence interval 2.50-38.07, p = 0.026), and patients with stones > 5 mm (coefficient 25.34, 95% CI 5.25-45.44, p = 0.014) were associated with increased productivity losses. The majority of patients miss work while undergoing a trial of passage and many have decreased productivity when returning to work. This information may help counsel patients in emergency departments, especially first-time stone formers, and prevent return visits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Berger
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA.
| | - Robert Medairos
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Ezra Margolin
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Jodi Antonelli
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Michael E Lipkin
- Department of Urology, Duke University Medical Center DUMC, 3704 Duke South Yellow Zone Room 1079, 27710, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Charles D Scales
- Department of Urology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University National Clinician Scholars Program, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - Deborah R Kaye
- Department of Urology, Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke Cancer Institute, Margolis Center for Health Policy, Duke University Medical Center, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bruschetta R, Latella D, Formica C, Campisi S, Failla C, Marino F, Iacono Isidoro S, Giambò FM, Bonanno L, Cerasa A, Quartarone A, Marino S, Pioggia G, Calabrò RS, Tartarisco G. "BrainHeart": Pilot Study on a Novel Application for Elderly Well-Being Based on Mindfulness Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Bioengineering (Basel) 2024; 11:787. [PMID: 39199745 PMCID: PMC11351599 DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11080787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Revised: 07/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/01/2024] [Indexed: 09/01/2024] Open
Abstract
The rising prevalence of mental illness is straining global mental health systems, particularly affecting older adults who often face deteriorating physical health and decreased autonomy and quality of life. Early detection and targeted rehabilitation are crucial in mitigating these challenges. Mindfulness acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) holds promise for enhancing motivation and well-being among the elderly, although delivering such psychological interventions is hindered by limited access to services, prompting exploration of remote delivery options like mobile applications. In this paper, we introduce the BrainHeart App (v.1.1.8), a mobile application tailored to improve physical and mental well-being in seniors. The app features a 10-day ACT program and other sections promoting healthy lifestyle. In a pilot study involving twenty participants, individuals engaged in daily mental exercises for 10 days using the app. Clinical evaluations, including assessments of psychological flexibility, overall cognitive profile, mindfulness disposition, cognitive fusion, and heart rate collected with Polar H10, were conducted at baseline (T0) and one month post-intervention (T1). Analysis revealed significant improvements in almost all neuropsychological scores, with high usability reported (system usability scale average score: 82.3 ± 9.31). Additionally, a negative correlation was found between usability and experiential avoidance (r = -0.51; p = 0.026), and a notable difference in heart rate was observed between baseline and post-intervention (F-value = 3.06; p-value = 0.09). These findings suggest that mindfulness-ACT exercises delivered via the BrainHeart App can enhance the well-being of elderly individuals, highlighting the potential of remote interventions in addressing mental health needs in this population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberta Bruschetta
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, C/O via Leanza, Istituto Marino, Mortelle, 98164 Messina, Italy; (R.B.); (S.C.); (C.F.); (F.M.); (S.I.I.); (G.P.)
| | - Desiree Latella
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, via Palermo S.S. 113—C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.F.); (F.M.G.); (L.B.); (A.Q.); (S.M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Caterina Formica
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, via Palermo S.S. 113—C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.F.); (F.M.G.); (L.B.); (A.Q.); (S.M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Simona Campisi
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, C/O via Leanza, Istituto Marino, Mortelle, 98164 Messina, Italy; (R.B.); (S.C.); (C.F.); (F.M.); (S.I.I.); (G.P.)
- C.O.T. Cure Ortopediche Traumatologiche S.P.A, 98124 Messina, Italy
| | - Chiara Failla
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, C/O via Leanza, Istituto Marino, Mortelle, 98164 Messina, Italy; (R.B.); (S.C.); (C.F.); (F.M.); (S.I.I.); (G.P.)
| | - Flavia Marino
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, C/O via Leanza, Istituto Marino, Mortelle, 98164 Messina, Italy; (R.B.); (S.C.); (C.F.); (F.M.); (S.I.I.); (G.P.)
| | - Serena Iacono Isidoro
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, C/O via Leanza, Istituto Marino, Mortelle, 98164 Messina, Italy; (R.B.); (S.C.); (C.F.); (F.M.); (S.I.I.); (G.P.)
| | - Fabio Mauro Giambò
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, via Palermo S.S. 113—C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.F.); (F.M.G.); (L.B.); (A.Q.); (S.M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Lilla Bonanno
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, via Palermo S.S. 113—C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.F.); (F.M.G.); (L.B.); (A.Q.); (S.M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Antonio Cerasa
- Institute of BioImaging and Complex Biological Systems (IBSBC-CNR), via T. Campanella, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
- S. Anna Institute, 88900 Crotone, Italy
| | - Angelo Quartarone
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, via Palermo S.S. 113—C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.F.); (F.M.G.); (L.B.); (A.Q.); (S.M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Silvia Marino
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, via Palermo S.S. 113—C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.F.); (F.M.G.); (L.B.); (A.Q.); (S.M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Giovanni Pioggia
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, C/O via Leanza, Istituto Marino, Mortelle, 98164 Messina, Italy; (R.B.); (S.C.); (C.F.); (F.M.); (S.I.I.); (G.P.)
| | - Rocco Salvatore Calabrò
- IRCCS Centro Neurolesi “Bonino-Pulejo”, via Palermo S.S. 113—C.da Casazza, 98124 Messina, Italy; (C.F.); (F.M.G.); (L.B.); (A.Q.); (S.M.); (R.S.C.)
| | - Gennaro Tartarisco
- National Research Council of Italy, Institute for Biomedical Research and Innovation, C/O via Leanza, Istituto Marino, Mortelle, 98164 Messina, Italy; (R.B.); (S.C.); (C.F.); (F.M.); (S.I.I.); (G.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Broekema AEH, de Souza NFS, Groen RJM, Soer R, Reneman MF, Kuijlen JMA, van Asselt ADI. Cost-effectiveness of posterior versus anterior surgery for cervical radiculopathy: results from a multicentre randomised non-inferiority trial (FACET). EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE EUROPEAN SPINE SOCIETY, THE EUROPEAN SPINAL DEFORMITY SOCIETY, AND THE EUROPEAN SECTION OF THE CERVICAL SPINE RESEARCH SOCIETY 2024; 33:3087-3098. [PMID: 38847818 DOI: 10.1007/s00586-024-08340-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2024] [Revised: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 05/26/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE For cervical nerve root compression, anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (anterior surgery) or posterior foraminotomy (posterior surgery) are safe and effective options. Posterior surgery might have a more beneficial economic profile compared to anterior surgery. The purpose of this study was to analyse if posterior surgery is cost-effective compared to anterior surgery. METHODS An economic evaluation was performed as part of a multicentre, noninferiority randomised clinical trial (Foraminotomy ACDF Cost-effectiveness Trial) with a follow-up of 2 years. Primary outcomes were cost-effectiveness based on arm pain (Visual Analogue Scale (VAS; 0-100)) and cost-utility (quality adjusted life years (QALYs)). Missing values were estimated with multiple imputations and bootstrap simulations were used to obtain confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS In total, 265 patients were randomised and 243 included in the analyses. The pooled mean decrease in VAS arm at 2-year follow-up was 44.2 in the posterior and 40.0 in the anterior group (mean difference, 4.2; 95% CI, - 4.7 to 12.9). Pooled mean QALYs were 1.58 (posterior) and 1.56 (anterior) (mean difference, 0.02; 95% CI, - 0.05 to 0.08). Societal costs were €28,046 for posterior and €30,086 for the anterior group, with lower health care costs for posterior (€12,248) versus anterior (€16,055). Bootstrapped results demonstrated similar effectiveness between groups with in general lower costs associated with posterior surgery. CONCLUSION In patients with cervical radiculopathy, arm pain and QALYs were similar between posterior and anterior surgery. Posterior surgery was associated with lower costs and is therefore likely to be cost-effective compared with anterior surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A E H Broekema
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Postal Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - N F Simões de Souza
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Postal Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R J M Groen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Postal Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - R Soer
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Groningen Pain Centre, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Research Group Smart Health, Saxion University of Applied Sciences, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - M F Reneman
- Department of Rehabilitation, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - J M A Kuijlen
- Department of Neurosurgery, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Postal Box 30.001, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - A D I van Asselt
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Sciences, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Knöps E, Spuls P, Duijnhoven R, Dijkgraaf M, van Barreveld M, Arents B, van Enst A, Garritsen F, Merkus M, Middelkamp-Hup P, Musters A, Bosma A, Hyseni A, Dijkstra J, Hijnen DJ, Gerbens L. The UPDATE trial (UVB Phototherapy in Dermatology for ATopic Eczema): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial of narrowband UVB with optimal topical therapy versus optimal topical therapy in patients with atopic eczema. Trials 2024; 25:482. [PMID: 39014498 PMCID: PMC11253338 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08334-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 07/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Narrowband ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) phototherapy is commonly prescribed for patients with moderate-to-severe atopic eczema (AE). The efficacy of NB-UVB, however, has not yet properly been established, as current evidence is of low certainty. Our aim is to assess the short-term and long-term (cost-)effectiveness and safety of NB-UVB in adult AE patients by performing a pragmatic, multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-endpoint (PROBE) trial. This protocol outlines its methodology. METHODS A pragmatic, multicenter, PROBE trial will be performed with 1:1 randomization of 316 adult patients with moderate-to-severe AE who have inadequate disease control with topical therapy and who are eligible for optimal topical therapy (OTT) or NB-UVB in combination with OTT as a next step. Participants in the interventional arm will receive a minimum of 3 months of OTT combined with 8 to 16 weeks of NB-UVB. The control group receives 3 months of OTT. Following the interventional phase, follow-up will continue for 9 months. Physician-reported and patient-reported outcomes (according to the Harmonising Outcome Measures for Eczema (HOME) Core Outcome Set) and adverse events are assessed at 4 weeks, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months. DISCUSSION The UPDATE trial aims to provide high-quality evidence regarding the (cost-)effectiveness and safety of NB-UVB phototherapy in moderate-to-severe AE patients. Challenges that are addressed in the protocol include the possible bias arising from applying open-label treatment and the necessity of introducing OTT into the study design to prevent a high dropout rate. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05704205. Registered on December 8, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Knöps
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Phyllis Spuls
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ruben Duijnhoven
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marit van Barreveld
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Bernd Arents
- Dutch Association for People With Atopic Dermatitis, Nijkerk, the Netherlands
| | - Annefloor van Enst
- Nederlandse Vereniging Voor Dermatologie en Venereologie, NVDV, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Floor Garritsen
- Department of Dermatology, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, the Netherlands
| | - Maruschka Merkus
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pina Middelkamp-Hup
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Annelie Musters
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Angela Bosma
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ariënna Hyseni
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jitske Dijkstra
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk Jan Hijnen
- Department of Dermatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Louise Gerbens
- Department of Dermatology, Amsterdam UMC, Location Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health, Infection and Immunity, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
van Veldhuisen SL, Keusters WR, Kuppens K, de Raaff CAL, van Veen RN, Wiezer MJ, Swank DJ, Demirkiran A, Boerma EJG, Greve JWM, van Dielen FMH, de Castro SMM, Frederix GWJ, Hazebroek EJ. Cost-effectiveness and safety of continuous pulse oximetry for management of undiagnosed obstructive sleep apnea in bariatric surgery: a nationwide cohort study. Surg Obes Relat Dis 2024:S1550-7289(24)00676-2. [PMID: 39127531 DOI: 10.1016/j.soard.2024.06.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 06/11/2024] [Accepted: 06/22/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Undetected obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent in patients undergoing bariatric surgery and increases perioperative risks. Screening for OSA using preoperative polygraphy (PG) with subsequent continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is costly and time-consuming. Postoperative continuous pulse oximetry (CPOX) is less invasive, and is hypothesized to be a safe and cost-effective alternative. OBJECTIVES This nationwide multicenter prospective observational cohort study compared CPOX monitoring with OSA-screening using PG. SETTING High-volume bariatric centers. METHODS Patients were either postoperatively monitored using CPOX without preoperative OSA-screening, or underwent preoperative PG and CPAP treatment when OSA was diagnosed. Cohort placement was based on local hospital protocols. Cost-effectiveness was analyzed using quality adjusted life years (QALYs) and healthcare costs. Surgical outcomes were also analyzed. Propensity score matching was used in sensitivity analyses. RESULTS A total of 1390 patients were included. QALYs were similar between groups at baseline and 1-year postoperatively. Postoperative complications, intensive care unit (ICU)-admissions and admissions, particularly OSA-related, did not differ between groups. Mean costs per patient/year in the CPOX group was €3094 versus €3680 in the PG group; mean difference €-586 (95% CI €-933-€-242). Following propensity score matching, 1090 of 1390 included patients remained, and similar findings for cost-effectiveness, complications, and ICU admissions were observed. CONCLUSION CPOX monitoring without preoperative OSA-screening was not associated with higher complication or readmission rates compared to PG. CPOX resulted in lower costs from a healthcare perspective and can therefore be considered a cost-effective alternative to routine OSA-screening in patients undergoing bariatric surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Willem R Keusters
- Department of Public Health, Julius Center Research Program Methodology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Kim Kuppens
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Marinus J Wiezer
- Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ahmet Demirkiran
- Department of Surgery, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jan-Willem M Greve
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Hospital, Heerlen, The Netherlands; Department of Surgery, Nutrim, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Geert W J Frederix
- Department of Public Health, Julius Center Research Program Methodology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Eric J Hazebroek
- Department of Surgery/Vitalys Clinic, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, The Netherlands; Division of Human Nutrition and Health, Wageningen University and Research, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wegerif ECJ, Ünlü Ç, Generaal MI, van den Bor RM, van de Ven PM, Bots ML, de Borst GJ. Rationale and design for the randomized placebo-controlled double-blind trial studying the effect of single antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel) versus dual antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel/acetylsalicylic acid) on the occurrence of atherothrombotic events following lower extremity peripheral transluminal angioplasty (CLEAR-PATH). Am Heart J 2024; 273:121-129. [PMID: 38608997 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
RATIONALE Antiplatelet therapy (APT) is the standard of care after endovascular revascularization (EVR) in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). APT aims to prevent both major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and major adverse limb events (MALE). Nonetheless, the rates of MACE and MALE after EVR remain high. In coronary artery and cerebrovascular disease, dual APT (DAPT)compared to acetylsalicylic acid alone has been proven to reduce MACE without increasing the risk of major bleeding when applied for a restricted number of weeks. However, within the PAD population, insufficient data are available to understand the potential attributable effect of DAPT over single APT (SAPT). Therefore, prospective randomized studies in targeted study populations are warranted. TRIAL DESIGN CLEAR-PATH is a Dutch multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized trial comparing SAPT (clopidogrel 75 mg plus placebo) with DAPT (clopidogrel 75 mg plus acetylsalicylic acid 80 mg) in patients with PAD undergoing EVR. CLEAR-PATH includes a time-to-event analysis with a follow-up of one year. The primary composite efficacy endpoint consists of all-cause mortality, nonfatal stroke, nonfatal myocardial infarction, severe limb ischemia, (indication for) re-intervention due to any symptomatic restenosis, re-occlusion, or due to acute limb ischemia, and major amputation. The primary safety endpoint contains major bleeding following the Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction classification. The enrolment started in August 2022. In total 450 primary efficacy outcome events are required which expectedly amounts to 1696 subjects. Recruitment will take approximately 36 months. CONCLUSION CLEAR-PATH will assess the efficacy and safety of DAPT compared to SAPT following EVR in PAD patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL80009.041.21.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emilien C J Wegerif
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Çağdaş Ünlü
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Northwest Hospital Group, Alkmaar, The Netherlands
| | - Manon I Generaal
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Rutger M van den Bor
- Department of Data Science and Biostatistics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Peter M van de Ven
- Department of Data Science and Biostatistics, Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel L Bots
- Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Gert J de Borst
- Division of Vascular Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Hartmann S, Timm C, Barnow S, Rubel JA, Lalk C, Pruessner L. Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Treatment for Bulimia Nervosa: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2419019. [PMID: 38958978 PMCID: PMC11223002 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.19019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Accepted: 04/26/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Despite the existence of effective treatments, many individuals with bulimia nervosa (BN) do not receive evidence-based therapies. Integrating digital interventions into routine care might reach more patients and reduce the clinical burden of BN. Objective To evaluate the effectiveness of a web-based cognitive behavioral self-help intervention for individuals with BN. Design, Setting, and Participants A 2-group randomized clinical trial without follow-up was conducted between February 2, 2021, and July 9, 2022, in Germany. Participants aged between 18 and 65 years who met the diagnostic criteria for BN were enrolled online via self-referral. Data analyses were conducted from October 24, 2022, to December 23, 2023. Interventions A web-based cognitive behavioral self-help intervention including 12 weekly modules was compared with a waiting-list control group only having access to routine care. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the change in the number of bulimic episodes between baseline and posttreatment. Secondary outcomes included changes in global eating disorder symptoms, clinical impairment, well-being, work capacity, comorbid symptoms, self-esteem, and emotion regulation complemented by weekly measures and ecological momentary assessment. Intention-to-treat analyses were performed. Results Participants (N = 154; mean [SD] age, 29.6 [8.6] years; 149 [96.8%] female) receiving the web-based intervention demonstrated a significantly greater decrease in bulimic episodes compared with the control group (Cohen d = -0.48; 95% CI, -0.75 to -0.20; P < .001), representing a significant change in binge-eating episodes (Cohen d = -0.61; 95% CI, -0.89 to -0.33; P < .001), but not in compensatory behaviors (Cohen d = -0.25; 95% CI, -0.51 to 0.02; P = .21). The intervention was superior in improving global eating disorder symptoms (Cohen d = -0.61; 95% CI, -0.89 to -0.32; P < .001) and clinical impairment (Cohen d = -0.62; 95% CI, -0.92 to -0.33; P < .001). No significant effects were found for well-being (Cohen d = -0.08; 95% CI, -0.37 to 0.22; P > .99) and work capacity (Cohen d = -0.01; 95% CI, -0.68 to 0.66; P = .99). Exploratory analyses indicated significant changes in self-esteem and emotion regulation difficulties, but not in comorbid symptoms. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, a web-based cognitive behavioral self-help intervention effectively decreased eating disorder symptoms and illness-related burden in individuals with BN, underlining the potential of digital interventions to complement established treatments. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04876196.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Christina Timm
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - Sven Barnow
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Delnoij TSR, Suverein MM, Essers BAB, Hermanides RC, Otterspoor L, Elzo Kraemer CV, Vlaar APJ, van der Heijden JJ, Scholten E, den Uil C, Akin S, de Metz J, van der Horst ICC, Maessen JG, Lorusso R, van de Poll MCG. Cost-effectiveness of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation vs. conventional cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a pre-planned, trial-based economic evaluation. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2024; 13:484-492. [PMID: 38652269 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuae050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 03/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
AIMS When out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) becomes refractory, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) is a potential option to restore circulation and improve the patient's outcome. However, ECPR requires specific materials and highly skilled personnel, and it is unclear whether increased survival and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) justify these costs. METHODS AND RESULTS This cost-effectiveness study was part of the INCEPTION study, a multi-centre, pragmatic randomized trial comparing hospital-based ECPR to conventional CPR (CCPR) in patients with refractory OHCA in 10 cardiosurgical centres in the Netherlands. We analysed healthcare costs in the first year and measured HRQOL using the EQ-5D-5L at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs), cost-effectiveness planes, and acceptability curves were calculated. Sensitivity analyses were performed for per-protocol and as-treated subgroups as well as imputed productivity loss in deceased patients. In total, 132 patients were enrolled: 62 in the CCPR and 70 in the ECPR group. The difference in mean costs after 1 year was €5109 (95% confidence interval -7264 to 15 764). Mean quality-adjusted life year (QALY) after 1 year was 0.15 in the ECPR group and 0.11 in the CCPR group, resulting in an ICER of €121 643 per additional QALY gained. The acceptability curve shows that at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €80.000, the probability of ECPR being cost-effective compared with CCPR is 36%. Sensitivity analysis showed increasing ICER in the per-protocol and as-treated groups and lower probabilities of acceptance. CONCLUSION Hospital-based ECPR in refractory OHCA has a low probability of being cost-effective in a trial-based economic evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thijs S R Delnoij
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Martje M Suverein
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Brigitte A B Essers
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technical Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Luuk Otterspoor
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Carlos V Elzo Kraemer
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Alexander P J Vlaar
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Amsterdam University Medical Center location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joris J van der Heijden
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Scholten
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
| | - Corstiaan den Uil
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine and Department of Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sakir Akin
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, HagaZiekenhuis, The Hague, The Netherlands
| | - Jesse de Metz
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Iwan C C van der Horst
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Jos G Maessen
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Roberto Lorusso
- Cardiovascular Research Institute Maastricht, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Marcel C G van de Poll
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P. Debyelaan 25, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Foldager FN, Kierkegaard-Brøchner S, Kemp JL, van Tulder MW, Lund B, Mygind-Klavsen B, Bibby BM, Dalgas U, Mechlenburg I. First-line treatment for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and hip-related quality of life: study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing a 6-month supervised strength exercise intervention to usual care (the Better Hip Trial). BMJ Open 2024; 14:e078726. [PMID: 38908842 PMCID: PMC11328646 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a motion-related and position-related clinical condition of the hip associated with pain, reduced physical function and hip-related quality of life (QoL). Interestingly, higher maximal muscle strength is associated with less pain, better physical function and improved QoL in people with FAIS. Furthermore, preliminary evidence suggests that a proportion of patients with FAIS respond positively to strength exercise as first-line treatment. Nonetheless, there is little evidence supporting a specific exercise intervention offered as a first-line treatment. We will conduct a randomised controlled trial investigating the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a 6-month strength exercise intervention compared with usual care as first-line treatment in patients with FAIS. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a multicentre randomised controlled trial that will be conducted at hospitals and physiotherapy clinics across Denmark and Australia. A total of 120 patients with FAIS will be randomised (1:1) to 6 months of supervised strength exercise or usual care. The primary outcome is the change in hip-related QoL measured using the International Hip and Outcome Tool 33 (iHOT-33) from baseline to the end of intervention. A health economic evaluation will be conducted from a societal and healthcare perspective based on the data collection over a 12-month period starting at baseline. The analysis will calculate incremental cost-effectiveness ratios using quality-adjusted life-years and iHOT-33 scores while estimating costs using microcosting and cost questionnaires. Secondary outcomes include objectively measured physical function at baseline and after 6 months and patient-reported outcomes measured at baseline, 3-month, 6-month and 12-month follow-up. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The trial has been approved by the Committee on Health Research Ethics in the Central Denmark Region (journal no 1-10-72-45-23) and La Trobe University Human Ethics Committee (HEC24042) and is registered at the Central Denmark Region List of Research Projects (journal no 1-16-02-115-23). Informed consent will be obtained from each participant before randomisation. Results will be published in international peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05927935.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik Nicolai Foldager
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Signe Kierkegaard-Brøchner
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Physio and Occupational Therapy and Orthopaedic Surgery, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | - Joanne L Kemp
- La Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia
| | - Maurits W van Tulder
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Faculty Behavioural & Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Bent Lund
- Orthopaedic Surgery, Horsens Regional Hospital, Horsens, Denmark
| | | | - Bo Martin Bibby
- Department of Biostatistics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ulrik Dalgas
- Exercise Biology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Inger Mechlenburg
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Exercise Biology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Wiethoff I, Sikking M, Evers S, Gabrio A, Henkens M, Michels M, Verdonschot J, Heymans S, Hiligsmann M. Quality of life and societal costs in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES 2024; 10:334-344. [PMID: 37709575 PMCID: PMC11187720 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/16/2023]
Abstract
AIMS Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is a major cause of heart failure impairing patient wellbeing and imposing a substantial economic burden on society, but respective data are missing. This study aims to measure the quality of life (QoL) and societal costs of DCM patients. METHODS AND RESULTS A cross-sectional evaluation of QoL and societal costs of DCM patients was performed through the 5-level EuroQol and the Medical Consumption Questionnaire and Productivity Cost Questionnaire, respectively. QoL was translated into numerical values (i.e. utilities). Costs were measured from a Dutch societal perspective. Final costs were extrapolated to 1 year, reported in 2022 Euros, and compared between DCM severity according to NYHA classes. A total of 550 DCM patients from the Maastricht cardiomyopathy registry were included. Mean age was 61 years, and 34% were women. Overall utility was slightly lower for DCM patients than the population mean (0.840 vs. 0.869, P = 0.225). Among EQ-5D dimensions, DCM patients scored lowest in 'usual activities'. Total societal DCM costs were €14 843 per patient per year. Cost drivers were productivity losses (€7037) and medical costs (€4621). Patients with more symptomatic DCM (i.e. NYHA class III or IV) had significantly higher average DCM costs per year compared to less symptomatic DCM (€31 099 vs. €11 446, P < 0.001) and significantly lower utilities (0.631 vs. 0.883, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION DCM is associated with high societal costs and reduced QoL, in particular with high DCM severity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabell Wiethoff
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurits Sikking
- Department of Cardiology, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia Evers
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Centre for Economic Evaluation and Machine Learning, 3500 AS Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Gabrio
- Department of Methodology and Statistics, Faculty of Health Medicine and Life Science, Maastricht University, 6229 HA Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Henkens
- Department of Cardiology, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 HX Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Heart Institute (NLHI), 3511 EP Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Michelle Michels
- Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Job Verdonschot
- Department of Cardiology, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Reference Network for Rare, Low Prevalence and Complex Diseases of the Heart (ERN GUARD-Heart), Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Stephane Heymans
- Department of Cardiology, CARIM, Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6229 ER Maastricht, The Netherlands
- European Reference Network for Rare, Low Prevalence and Complex Diseases of the Heart (ERN GUARD-Heart), Maastricht University Medical Centre, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Cardiovascular Research, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mickaël Hiligsmann
- Department of Health Services Research, Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Bontinck J, Meeus M, Voogt L, Chys M, Coppieters I, Cagnie B, De Meulemeester K. Online Exercise Programs for Chronic Nonspecific Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial Reveals Comparable Effects of Global, Local, and Combined Approaches. Phys Ther 2024; 104:pzae040. [PMID: 38498321 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzae040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2023] [Revised: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/20/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Specific neck exercises are recommended in the rehabilitation of chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP). They are unfortunately often accompanied by acute pain flare-ups. Global exercises might be a beneficial addition, as they activate endogenous analgesia without overloading painful structures. However, it is still unclear which type of exercise is most effective. This randomized controlled trial was done to evaluate the effect of an online blended program of global and specific neck exercises, compared to programs including only 1 of both types of exercise. METHODS Forty-eight patients with CNNP were randomized into 3 groups. Online questionnaires were collected at baseline, at midtreatment, immediately after treatment, and at the 3-month follow-up. Quantitative sensory testing and actigraphy were assessed at baseline and after treatment. Linear mixed-model analyses were performed to evaluate treatment effects within and between groups. Neck pain-related disability after treatment was considered the primary outcome. RESULTS No time × treatment interaction effects were found. All groups improved in neck pain-related disability, pain intensity, self-reported symptoms of central sensitization, local pain sensitivity, physical activity, and pain medication use. No effects were found on quality of life, sleep quality, depression, anxiety, stress, widespread pain sensitivity, health economics, or actigraphy measurements. A higher global perceived effect was reported after performing the blended program, compared to the other groups. CONCLUSION A blended exercise program was not superior to the stand-alone programs in reducing disability. Nevertheless, the global perceived effect of this type of exercise was higher. Future research necessitates larger sample sizes to adequately explore the optimal type of exercise for patients with CNNP. IMPACT Exercise therapy should be an important part of the rehabilitation of patients with CNNP, regardless of the type of exercise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jente Bontinck
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mira Meeus
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, MOVANT, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lennard Voogt
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium
- Research Centre for Health Care Innovations, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Chys
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Iris Coppieters
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Laboratory for Brain-Gut Axis Studies (LaBGAS), Translational Research in Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), Department of Chronic Diseases and Metabolism (CHROMETA), KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Leuven Brain Institute, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Barbara Cagnie
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Kayleigh De Meulemeester
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Pain in Motion International Research Group, www.paininmotion.be, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
van der Zaag AY, Bhagirath SC, Boerman AW, Schinkel M, Paranjape K, Azijli K, Ridderikhof ML, Lie M, Lissenberg-Witte B, Schade R, Wiersinga J, de Jonge R, Nanayakkara PWB. Appropriate use of blood cultures in the emergency department through machine learning (ABC): study protocol for a randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e084053. [PMID: 38821574 PMCID: PMC11149153 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-084053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2024] [Accepted: 05/10/2024] [Indexed: 06/02/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The liberal use of blood cultures in emergency departments (EDs) leads to low yields and high numbers of false-positive results. False-positive, contaminated cultures are associated with prolonged hospital stays, increased antibiotic usage and even higher hospital mortality rates. This trial aims to investigate whether a recently developed and validated machine learning model for predicting blood culture outcomes can safely and effectively guide clinicians in withholding unnecessary blood culture analysis. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A randomised controlled, non-inferiority trial comparing current practice with a machine learning-guided approach. The primary objective is to determine whether the machine learning based approach is non-inferior to standard practice based on 30-day mortality. Secondary outcomes include hospital length-of stay and hospital admission rates. Other outcomes include model performance and antibiotic usage. Participants will be recruited in the EDs of multiple hospitals in the Netherlands. A total of 7584 participants will be included. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Possible participants will receive verbal information and a paper information brochure regarding the trial. They will be given at least 1 hour consideration time before providing informed consent. Research results will be published in peer-reviewed journals. This study has been approved by the Amsterdam University Medical Centers' local medical ethics review committee (No 22.0567). The study will be conducted in concordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and in accordance with the Medical Research Involving Human Subjects Act, General Data Privacy Regulation and Medical Device Regulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT06163781.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anuschka Y van der Zaag
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Acute Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sheena C Bhagirath
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Acute Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anneroos W Boerman
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Acute Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Michiel Schinkel
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Acute Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (C.E.M.M.), Amsterdam University Medical Centres, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ketan Paranjape
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Acute Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kaoutar Azijli
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Milan L Ridderikhof
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Mei Lie
- Department of EVA Service Center, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit Lissenberg-Witte
- Department of Epidemiology & Data Science, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Rogier Schade
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Joost Wiersinga
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Center for Experimental and Molecular Medicine (C.E.M.M.), Amsterdam UMC Locatie AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Robert de Jonge
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Prabath W B Nanayakkara
- Department of Internal Medicine, Section General Internal Medicine, Amsterdam UMC Locatie VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
van den Berg LN, Aardoom JJ, Kiveron LE, Botterweg RD, van den Akker – van Marle ME, Chavannes NH, Hoitsma E. The feasibility and usability of a personal health record for patients with multiple sclerosis: a 2-year evaluation study. Front Hum Neurosci 2024; 18:1379780. [PMID: 38841119 PMCID: PMC11150701 DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2024.1379780] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Accepted: 04/29/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a persistent inflammatory condition impacting the brain and spinal cord, affecting globally approximately 2.8 million individuals. Effective self-management plays a crucial role in the treatment of chronic diseases, including MS, significantly influencing health outcomes. A personal health record (PHR) is a promising tool to support self-management, potentially empowering patients and enhancing their engagement in treatment and health. Despite these promising aspects, challenges in implementation persist and PHRs are still a relatively new concept undergoing rapid development. Objective This study aimed to assess the feasibility and usability of the PHR. Secondary objectives included evaluating implementation determinants, and exploring preliminary effects on quality of care for both patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs), self-management, self-efficacy for patients, job satisfaction, efficiency, and demand for HCPs, and preliminary effects on costs and health-related quality of life. Methods This study had a mixed-methods design. Quantitative data of patients (n = 80) and HCPs (n = 12) were collected via self-reported questionnaires at baseline (T0), after one year (T1), and after two years (T2). One focus group interview was conducted at T2 with patients (n = 7), and another one with HCPs (n = 4), to get a more in-depth understanding of the feasibility and usability of the PHR via the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology framework, and to further explore the secondary objectives in-depth. Results Most patients never logged in during the first year and logged in a couple of times per year during the second year, averaging around 15 min per log-in session. The HCPs mainly logged in a couple of times per year over the two years with an average use of six minutes per session. Patient usability and satisfaction scores were below average and moderate, respectively: with SUS-scores of 59.9 (SD = 14.2, n = 33) at T1 and 59.0 (SD = 16.3, n = 37) at T2, and CSQ-8 scores of 21.4 (SD = 5.0, n = 34) at T1, and 22.1 (SD = 5.0, n = 39) at T2. HCPs had similar usability and satisfaction scores. Multiple facilitators and barriers were identified by both patients and HCPs, such as (in)sufficient knowledge of how to use the PHR, lack of staff capacity and ICT obstacles. No significant differences were found in the preliminary effects. Qualitative data showed, among others, that both patients and HCPs saw the benefit of the PHR in terms of performance expectancy, by gaining more insight into health and health data, but challenges remained regarding effort expectancy, such as log-in issues and experiencing difficulties with information retrieval. Conclusion The feasibility and usability were considered moderate by patients and HCPs; however, potential regarding the performance of the PHR was observed. Implementation challenges, such as the complexity of usage, lowered the adoption of the PHR. The evolving nature of PHRs requires ongoing evaluation and adaptation to optimize their potential benefits. Utilizing a participatory design approach and a dedicated implementation team could help in achieving this optimization, ultimately enhancing their adoption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Liselot N. van den Berg
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Jiska J. Aardoom
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Léone E. Kiveron
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, Netherlands
| | | | | | - Niels H. Chavannes
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- National eHealth Living Lab, Leiden, Netherlands
| | - Elske Hoitsma
- Department of Neurology, Alrijne Hospital Leiden, Leiden, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Pruessner L, Timm C, Barnow S, Rubel JA, Lalk C, Hartmann S. Effectiveness of a Web-Based Cognitive Behavioral Self-Help Intervention for Binge Eating Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2411127. [PMID: 38753330 PMCID: PMC11099688 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.11127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/07/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Binge eating disorder (BED) is one of the most frequent eating pathologies and imposes substantial emotional and physical distress, yet insufficient health care resources limit access to specialized treatment. Web-based self-help interventions emerge as a promising solution, offering more accessible care. Objective To examine the effectiveness of a web-based cognitive behavioral self-help intervention for individuals with BED. Design, Setting, and Participants This 2-arm, parallel-group randomized clinical trial conducted from January 15, 2021, to August 3, 2022, in Germany and other German-speaking countries enrolled patients aged 18 to 65 years who met the diagnostic criteria for BED (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [Fifth Edition]). Data analysis occurred between January 27 and September 4, 2023, following our statistical analysis plan. Interventions Participants were randomized to a web-based self-help intervention or a waiting-list control condition. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was a change in objective binge eating episodes from baseline to after treatment. Secondary outcomes included global eating pathology, clinical impairment, work capacity, well-being, comorbid psychopathology, self-esteem, and emotion regulation. Results A total of 1602 patients were screened, of whom 154 (mean [SD] age, 35.93 [10.59] years; 148 female [96.10%]) fulfilled the criteria for BED and were randomized (77 each to the intervention and control groups). The web-based intervention led to significant improvements in binge eating episodes (Cohen d, -0.79 [95% CI, -1.17 to -0.42]; P < .001), global eating psychopathology (Cohen d, -0.71 [95% CI, -1.07 to -0.35]; P < .001), weekly binge eating (Cohen d, -0.49 [95% CI, -0.74 to -0.24]; P < .001), clinical impairment (Cohen d, -0.75 [95% CI, -1.13 to -0.37]; P < .001), well-being (Cohen d, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.01 to 0.75]; P = .047), depression (Cohen d, -0.49 [95% CI, -0.86 to -0.12]; P = .01), anxiety (Cohen d, -0.37 [95% CI, -0.67 to -0.07]; P = .02), self-esteem (Cohen d, 0.36 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.59]; P = .003), and emotion regulation (difficulties: Cohen d, -0.36 [95% CI, -0.65 to -0.07]; P = .01 and repertoire: Cohen d, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.19 to 0.84]; P = .003). Conclusion and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of a web-based self-help intervention for patients with BED, the findings confirmed its effectiveness in reducing binge eating episodes and improving various mental health outcomes, highlighting a scalable solution to bridge the treatment gap for this condition. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04876183.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luise Pruessner
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Christina Timm
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Sven Barnow
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Julian A. Rubel
- Department of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Christopher Lalk
- Department of Psychology, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Steffen Hartmann
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
de Wijkerslooth EM, Boerma EJG, van Rossem CC, Koopmanschap MA, Baeten CI, Beverdam FH, Bosmans JW, Consten EC, Dekker JWT, Emous M, van Geloven AA, Gijsen AF, Heijnen LA, Jairam AP, van der Ploeg AP, Steenvoorde P, Toorenvliet BR, Vermaas M, Wiering B, Wijnhoven BP, van den Boom AL. Two Days Versus Five Days of Postoperative Antibiotics for Complex Appendicitis: Cost Analysis of a Randomized, Noninferiority Trial. Ann Surg 2024; 279:885-890. [PMID: 37698025 PMCID: PMC10997181 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000006089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/13/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare costs for 2 days versus 5 days of postoperative antibiotics within the antibiotics after an aPPendectomy In Complex appendicitis trial.Background:Recent studies suggest that restrictive antibiotic use leads to a significant reduction in hospital stays without compromising patient safety. Its potential effect on societal costs remains underexplored. METHODS This was a pragmatic, open-label, multicenter clinical trial powered for noninferiority. Patients with complex appendicitis (age ≥ 8 years) were randomly allocated to 2 days or 5 days of intravenous antibiotics after appendectomy. Patient inclusion lasted from June 2017 to June 2021 in 15 Dutch hospitals. The final follow-up was on September 1, 2021. The primary trial endpoint was a composite endpoint of infectious complications and mortality within 90 days. In the present study, the main outcome measures were overall societal costs (comprising direct health care costs and costs related to productivity loss) and cost-effectiveness. Direct health care costs were recorded based on data in the electronic patient files, complemented by a telephone follow-up at 90 days. In addition, data on loss of productivity were acquired through the validated Productivity Cost Questionnaire at 4 weeks after surgery. Cost estimates were based on prices for the year 2019. RESULTS In total, 1005 patients were evaluated in the "intention-to-treat" analysis: 502 patients were allocated to the 2-day group and 503 to the 5-day group. The mean difference in overall societal costs was - €625 (95% CI: -€ 958 to -€ 278) to the advantage of the 2-day group. This difference was largely explained by reduced hospital stay. Productivity losses were similar between the study groups. Restricting postoperative antibiotics to 2 days was cost-effective, with estimated cost savings of €31,117 per additional infectious complication. CONCLUSIONS Two days of postoperative antibiotics for complex appendicitis results in a statistically significant and relevant cost reduction, as compared with 5 days. Findings apply to laparoscopic appendectomy in a well-resourced health care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Evert-Jan G. Boerma
- Departments of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen/Sittard, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marc A. Koopmanschap
- Departments of Surgery, Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Coen I.M. Baeten
- Departments of Surgery, Groene Hart Hospital, Gouda, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Esther C.J. Consten
- Departments of Surgery, Meander Medical Center, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
- Departments of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - Marloes Emous
- Departments of Surgery, Medical Center Leeuwarden, Leeuwarden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Anton F. Gijsen
- Departments of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Luc A. Heijnen
- Departments of Surgery, Northwest Clinics, Alkmaar/Den Helder, The Netherlands
| | - An P. Jairam
- Departments of Surgery, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pascal Steenvoorde
- Departments of Surgery, Medical Spectrum Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - Maarten Vermaas
- Departments of Surgery, IJsselland Hospital, Capelle a/d Ijssel, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Wiering
- Departments of Surgery, Slingeland Hospital, Doetinchem, The Netherlands
| | - Bas P.L. Wijnhoven
- Departments of Surgery, Erasmus MC—University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Loes van den Boom
- Departments of Surgery, Erasmus MC—University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ben ÂJ, van der Vaart LR, E Bosmans J, Roovers JPWR, Lagro-Janssen ALM, van der Vaart CH, Vollebregt A. Cost-effectiveness of pessary therapy versus surgery for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse: an economic evaluation alongside a randomised non-inferiority controlled trial. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075016. [PMID: 38692718 PMCID: PMC11086579 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pessary therapy as an initial treatment option compared with surgery for moderate to severe pelvic organ prolapse (POP) symptoms in secondary care from a healthcare and a societal perspective. DESIGN Economic evaluation alongside a multicentre randomised controlled non-inferiority trial with a 24-month follow-up. SETTING 21 hospitals in the Netherlands, recruitment conducted between 2015 and 2022. PARTICIPANTS 1605 women referred to secondary care with symptomatic prolapse stage ≥2 were requested to participate. Of them, 440 women gave informed consent and were randomised to pessary therapy (n=218) or to surgery (n=222) in a 1:1 ratio stratified by hospital. INTERVENTIONS Pessary therapy and surgery. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The Patient Global Impression of Improvement (PGI-I), a 7-point scale dichotomised into successful versus unsuccessful, with a non-inferiority margin of -10%; quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) measured by the EQ-5D-3L; healthcare and societal costs were based on medical records and the institute for Medical Technology Assessment questionnaires. RESULTS For the PGI-I, the mean difference between pessary therapy and surgery was -0.05 (95% CI -0.14; 0.03) and -0.03 (95% CI -0.07; 0.002) for QALYs. In total, 54.1% women randomised to pessary therapy crossed over to surgery, and 3.6% underwent recurrent surgery. Healthcare and societal costs were significantly lower in the pessary therapy (mean difference=-€1807, 95% CI -€2172; -€1446 and mean difference=-€1850, 95% CI -€2349; -€1341, respectively). The probability that pessary therapy is cost-effective compared with surgery was 1 at willingness-to-pay thresholds between €0 and €20 000/QALY gained from both perspectives. CONCLUSIONS Non-inferiority of pessary therapy regarding the PGI-I could not be shown and no statistically significant differences in QALYs between interventions were found. Due to significantly lower costs, pessary therapy is likely to be cost-effective compared with surgery as an initial treatment option for women with symptomatic POP treated in secondary care. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NTR4883.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ângela J Ben
- Department of Health Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa R van der Vaart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Amsterdam Reproduction & Development Research Institute, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith E Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Paul W R Roovers
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Gynecology, Women's Health Bergman Clinics, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Carl H van der Vaart
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Gynecology, Women's Health Bergman Clinics, Hilversum, The Netherlands
| | - Astrid Vollebregt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Spaarne Hospital, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Penington E, Wild J, Warnock-Parkes E, Grey N, Murray H, Kerr A, Stott R, Rozental A, Andersson G, Clark DM, Tsiachristas A, Ehlers A. Cost-effectiveness of therapist-assisted internet-delivered psychological therapies for PTSD differing in trauma focus in England: an economic evaluation based on the STOP-PTSD trial. Lancet Psychiatry 2024; 11:339-347. [PMID: 38554731 DOI: 10.1016/s2215-0366(24)00055-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2024] [Revised: 02/07/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although there are effective psychological treatments for post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), they remain inaccessible for many people. Digitally enabled therapy is a way to overcome this problem; however, there is little evidence on which forms of these therapies are most cost effective in PTSD. We aimed to assess the cost-effectiveness of the STOP-PTSD trial, which evaluated two therapist-assisted, internet-delivered cognitive behavioural therapies: cognitive therapy for PTSD (iCT-PTSD) and a programme focusing on stress management (iStress-PTSD). METHODS In this health economic evaluation, we used data from the STOP-PTSD trial (n=217), a single-blind, randomised controlled trial, to compare iCT-PTSD and iStress-PTSD in terms of resource use and health outcomes. In the trial, participants (aged ≥18 years) who met DSM-5 criteria for PTSD were recruited from primary care therapy services in South East England. The interventions were delivered online with therapist support for the first 12 weeks, and three telephone calls over the next 3 months. Participants completed questionnaires on symptoms, wellbeing, quality of life, and resource use at baseline, 13 weeks, 26 weeks, and 39 weeks after randomisation. We used a cost-effectiveness analysis to assess cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) at 39 weeks post-randomisation, from the perspective of the English National Health Service (NHS) and personal social services and on the basis of intention-to-treat for complete cases. Treatment modules and the platform design were developed with extensive input from service users: service users also advised on the trial protocol and methods, including the health economic measures. This is a pre-planned analysis of the STOP-PTSD trial; the trial was registered prospectively on the ISRCTN Registry (ISRCTN16806208). FINDINGS NHS costs were similar across treatment groups, but clinical outcomes were superior for iCT-PTSD compared with iStress-PTSD. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for NHS costs and personal social services was estimated as £1921 per QALY. iCT-PTSD had an estimated 91·6% chance of being cost effective at the £20 000 per QALY threshold. From the societal perspective, iCT-PTSD was cost saving compared with iStress-PTSD. INTERPRETATION iCT-PTSD is a cost-effective form of therapist-assisted, internet-delivered psychological therapy relative to iStress-PTSD, and it could be considered for clinical implementation. FUNDING Wellcome Trust and National Institute of Health Research Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ed Penington
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Jennifer Wild
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Phoenix Australia Centre for Posttraumatic Mental Health, Department of Psychiatry, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, NSW, Australia
| | - Emma Warnock-Parkes
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK; Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings' College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Nick Grey
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, UK; School of Psychology, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - Hannah Murray
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Alice Kerr
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings' College London, London, UK; South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Richard Stott
- Department of Psychology, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, Kings' College London, London, UK
| | - Alexander Rozental
- Department of Psychology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden; Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Gerhard Andersson
- Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Behavioural Sciences and Learning and Department of Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
| | - David M Clark
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Apostolos Tsiachristas
- Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
| | - Anke Ehlers
- Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK; Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Van Netten JJ, Aan De Stegge WB, Dijkgraaf MGW, Bus SA. Cost-effectiveness of temperature monitoring to help prevent foot ulcer recurrence in people with diabetes: A multicenter randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2024; 40:e3805. [PMID: 38686868 DOI: 10.1002/dmrr.3805] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/24/2023] [Revised: 01/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
AIMS Diabetes-related foot ulcers are common, costly, and frequently recur. Multiple interventions help prevent these ulcers. However, none of these have been prospectively investigated for cost-effectiveness. Our aim was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of at-home skin temperature monitoring to help prevent diabetes-related foot ulcer recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Multicenter randomized controlled trial. We randomized 304 persons at high diabetes-related foot ulcer risk to either usual foot care plus daily at-home foot skin temperature monitoring (intervention) or usual care alone (control). Primary outcome was cost-effectiveness based on foot care costs and quality-adjusted life years (QALY) during 18 months follow-up. Foot care costs included costs for ulcer prevention (e.g., footwear, podiatry) and for ulcer treatment when required (e.g., consultation, hospitalisation, amputation). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated for intervention versus usual care using probabilistic sensitivity analysis for willingness-to-pay/accept levels up to €100,000. RESULTS The intervention had a 45% probability of being cost-effective at a willingness-to-accept of €50,000 per QALY lost. This resulted from (non-significantly) lower foot care costs in the intervention group (€6067 vs. €7376; p = 0.45) because of (significantly) fewer participants with ulcer recurrence(s) in 18 months (36% vs. 47%; p = 0.045); however, QALYs were (non-significantly) lower in the intervention group (1.09 vs. 1.12; p = 0.35), especially in those without foot ulcer recurrence (1.09 vs. 1.17; p = 0.10). CONCLUSIONS At-home skin temperature monitoring for diabetes-related foot ulcer prevention compared with usual care is at best equally cost-effective. The intervention resulted in cost-savings due to preventing foot ulcer recurrence and related costs, but this came at the expense of QALY loss, potentially from self-monitoring burdens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaap J Van Netten
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Program Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wouter B Aan De Stegge
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Group Twente, Almelo, the Netherlands
| | - Marcel G W Dijkgraaf
- Department of Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Public Health, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sicco A Bus
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Amsterdam UMC location University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Program Rehabilitation, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Lammers EMJ, Zijlstra JM, Retèl VP, Aleman BMP, van Leeuwen FE, Nijdam A. Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Survivorship Care for Survivors of Hodgkin Lymphoma (INSIGHT Study): Protocol for a Multicenter Retrospective Cohort Study With a Quasi-Experimental Design. JMIR Res Protoc 2024; 13:e55601. [PMID: 38635308 PMCID: PMC11066749 DOI: 10.2196/55601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) occurs at young ages, with the highest incidence between 20 and 40 years. While cure rates have improved to 80%-90% over the past decades, survivors of HL are at substantial risk of late treatment-related complications, such as cardiovascular diseases, breast cancer, severe infections, and hypothyroidism. To reduce morbidity and mortality from late treatment effects, the Dutch Better care after lymphoma, Evaluation of long-term Treatment Effects and screening Recommendations (BETER) consortium developed a survivorship care program for 5-year survivors of HL that includes risk-based screening for and treatment of (risk factors for) late adverse events. Even though several cancer survivorship care programs have been established worldwide, there is a lack of knowledge about their effectiveness in clinical practice. OBJECTIVE The Improving Nationwide Survivorship care Infrastructure and Guidelines after Hodgkin lymphoma Treatment (INSIGHT) study evaluates whether Dutch BETER survivorship care for survivors of HL decreases survivors' burden of disease from late adverse events after HL treatment and associated health care costs and improves their quality of life. METHODS The INSIGHT study is a multicenter retrospective cohort study with a quasi-experimental design and prospective follow-up, embedded in the national BETER survivorship care infrastructure. The first BETER clinics started in 2013-2016 and several other centers started or will start BETER clinics in 2019-2024. This allows us to compare survivors who did and those who did not receive BETER survivorship care in the last decade. Survivors in the intervention group are matched to controls (n=450 per group) based on sex, age at diagnosis (±5 years), age in 2013 (±5 years), and treatment characteristics. The primary outcome is the burden of disease in disability-adjusted life years from cardiovascular disease, breast cancer, severe infections, and hypothyroidism. In a cost-effectiveness analysis, we will assess the cost of BETER survivorship care per averted or gained disability-adjusted life year and quality-adjusted life year. Secondary outcomes are BETER clinic attendance, adherence to screening guidelines, and knowledge and distress about late effects among survivors of HL. Study data are collected from a survivor survey, a general practitioner survey, medical records, and through linkages with national disease registries. RESULTS The study was funded in November 2020 and approved by the institutional review board of the Netherlands Cancer Institute in July 2021. We expect to finalize recruitment by October 2024, data collection by early 2025, and data analysis by May 2025. CONCLUSIONS INSIGHT is the first evaluation of a comprehensive survivorship program using real-world data; it will result in new information on the (cost-)effectiveness of survivorship care in survivors of HL in clinical practice. The results of this study will be used to improve the BETER program where necessary and contribute to more effective evidence-based long-term survivorship care for lymphoma survivors. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/55601.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M J Lammers
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, location Vrije Universiteit, Cancer Center, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Valesca P Retèl
- Department of Health Technology Assessment, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Flora E van Leeuwen
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Annelies Nijdam
- Department of Epidemiology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Barakat A, Cornelis JE, Dekker JJM, Lommerse NM, Beekman ATF, Blankers M. Economic evaluation of intensive home treatment in comparison to care as usual alongside a randomised controlled trial. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-024-01675-1. [PMID: 38598073 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-024-01675-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is a dearth of research on the cost-effectiveness of intensive home treatment (IHT), an alternative to psychiatric hospitalisation for patients experiencing psychiatric crises. We therefore present a health economic evaluation alongside a pre-randomised controlled trial of IHT compared to care as usual (CAU). METHOD Patients were pre-randomised to IHT or CAU using a double-consent open-label Zelen design. For the cost-utility analysis, the EuroQol 5-dimensional instrument was used. The cost-effectiveness was assessed using the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS). RESULTS Data of 198 patients showed that each additional QALY gained from offering IHT instead of CAU was on average associated with an extra cost of €48,003. There is a 38% likelihood that IHT will lead to more QALYs at lower costs compared to CAU. An improvement of one additional point on the BPRS by offering IHT instead of CAU was associated with an extra cost of €19,203. There is a 38% likelihood that IHT will lead to higher BPRS score improvements at lower costs. Based on the NICE willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 (€35,000) per QALY, IHT could potentially be considered cost-effective with a likelihood of 55-60% when viewed from a societal perspective, and > 75% from a health care perspective. CONCLUSIONS IHT appears slightly more attractive in terms of cost-utility and cost-effectiveness than CAU, although differences in both costs and effects are small especially when viewed from the societal costs perspective. From the health care sector costs perspective, IHT has a higher probability of being cost-effective compared to CAU. TRIALS REGISTRATION Netherlands Trial Register: NTR6151.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ansam Barakat
- Department of Psychiatry Amsterdam UMC/VUmc, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
- Department of Research, Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Jurgen E Cornelis
- Department of Research, Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Emergency Psychiatry, Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jack J M Dekker
- Department of Research, Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nick M Lommerse
- Department of Research, Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aartjan T F Beekman
- Department of Psychiatry Amsterdam UMC/VUmc, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Innovation, GGZ InGeest Specialized Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Blankers
- Department of Research, Arkin Institute for Mental Health Care, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Trimbos Institute, Netherlands Institute of Mental Health and Addiction, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Psychiatry Amsterdam UMC/AMC , Amsterdam Public Health research institute Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Pinckaers FME, Grutters JPC, Huijberts I, Gabrio A, Boogaarts HD, Postma AA, van Oostenbrugge RJ, van Zwam WH, Evers SMAA. Cost and Utility Estimates per Modified Rankin Scale Score up to 2 Years Post Stroke: Data to Inform Economic Evaluations From a Societal Perspective. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2024; 27:441-448. [PMID: 38244981 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 11/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/02/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Model-based health economic evaluations of ischemic stroke are in need of cost- and utility estimates related to relevant outcome measures. This study aims to describe societal cost- and utility estimates per modified Rankin Scale (mRS)-score at different time points within 2 years post stroke. METHODS Included patients had a stroke between 3 months and 2.5 years ago. mRS and EQ-5D-5L were scored during a telephone interview. Based on the interview date, records were categorized into a time point: 3 months (3M; 3-6 months), 1 year (Y1; 6-18 months), or 2 years (Y2; 18-30 months). Patients completed a questionnaire on healthcare utilization and productivity losses in the previous 3 months. Initial stroke hospitalization costs were assessed. Mean costs and utilities per mRS and time point were derived with multiple imputation nested in bootstrapping. Cost at 3 months post stroke were estimated separately for endovascular treatment (EVT)-/non-EVT-patients. RESULTS 1106 patients were included from 18 Dutch centers. At each time point, higher mRS-scores were associated with increasing average costs and decreasing average utility. Mean societal costs at 3M ranged from €11 943 (mRS 1, no EVT) to €55 957 (mRS 5, no EVT). For Y1, mean costs in the previous 3 months ranged from €885 (mRS 0) to €23 215 (mRS 5), and from €1655 (mRS 0) to €22 904 (mRS 5) for Y2. Mean utilities ranged from 0.07 to 0.96, depending on mRS and time point. CONCLUSIONS The mRS-score is a major determinant of costs and utilities at different post-stroke time points. Our estimates may be used to inform future model-based health economic evaluations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florentina M E Pinckaers
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | | | - Ilse Huijberts
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Andrea Gabrio
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Methodology and Statistics, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alida A Postma
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; School for Mental Health and Neuroscience (MHENS), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert J van Oostenbrugge
- School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Wim H van Zwam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, The Netherlands; School for Cardiovascular Diseases (CARIM), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Silvia M A A Evers
- Care and Public Health Research Institute (CAPHRI), Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Health Services Research, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Centre of Economic Evaluation and Machine Learning, Trimbos Institute, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rubel J, Väth T, Hanraths S, Pruessner L, Timm C, Hartmann S, Barnow S, Lalk C. Evaluation of an online-based self-help program for patients with generalized anxiety disorder - A randomized controlled trial. Internet Interv 2024; 35:100716. [PMID: 38328275 PMCID: PMC10847028 DOI: 10.1016/j.invent.2024.100716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/17/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives This study aimed to evaluate the effects of an online self-help intervention for generalized anxiety disorder (GAD). Our primary outcomes were generalized anxiety symptoms, measured using the Generalized Anxiety Disorder - 7 (GAD-7; Spitzer et al., 2006), and wellbeing based on the World Health Organization Wellbeing Index - 5 (WHO-5; Topp et al., 2015). Methods A total of 156 German-speaking patients aged 18 to 65 with a diagnosis of GAD and internet access were included in this randomized controlled trial. The intervention group (N = 78) received access to a 12-week online self-help program, while the waitlist control group (N = 78) received access after the 12-week waiting period. Results The intervention group showed a significant improvement in generalized anxiety symptoms compared to the control group (t(df = 123.73) = 4.52, p < .001) with a large effect size (d = 0.88, 95 %-CI: 0.50; 1.26). Additionally, the intervention group demonstrated a significant increase in wellbeing compared to the control group (t(df = 87,86) = 3.48, p < .001), with a moderate effect size (d = 0.62, 95 % CI: 0.27; 0.98). However, no significant effects were observed for secondary outcomes of functional impairments, work productivity, mental health literacy, and healthcare demands. For exploratory outcomes, improvement was found for anxiety and worry symptoms. Conclusions These findings suggest that an online-based self-help intervention effectively reduces GAD symptoms and improves overall wellbeing. Future research should explore the long-term effects of this intervention and investigate potential mechanisms underlying its efficacy. Public health implications Online-based self-help programs provide a promising treatment option for individuals with GAD who face barriers to traditional face-to-face therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J. Rubel
- Department of Humanities, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Germany
| | - T. Väth
- Department of Humanities, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Germany
| | - S. Hanraths
- Department of Humanities, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Germany
| | - L. Pruessner
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - C. Timm
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - S. Hartmann
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - S. Barnow
- Department of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Germany
| | - C. Lalk
- Department of Humanities, Institute of Psychology, Osnabrück University, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
van der Boor CF, Taban D, Tol WA, Akellot J, Neuman M, Weiss HA, Greco G, Vassall A, May C, Nadkarni A, Kinyanda E, Roberts B, Fuhr DC. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a transdiagnostic intervention for alcohol misuse and psychological distress in humanitarian settings: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial in Uganda. Trials 2024; 25:148. [PMID: 38414078 PMCID: PMC10900822 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-07980-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The war in South Sudan has displaced more than four million people, with Uganda hosting the largest number of South Sudanese refugees. Research in Uganda has shown elevated levels of alcohol misuse and psychological distress among these refugees. The World Health Organization (WHO) has developed a trans-diagnostic scalable psychological intervention called Problem Management Plus (PM +) to reduce psychological distress among populations exposed to adversities. Our study aims to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the CHANGE intervention, which builds on PM + , to also address alcohol misuse through problem-solving therapy and selected behavioural strategies for dealing with alcohol use disorders. We hypothesise that the CHANGE intervention together with enhanced usual care (EUC) will be superior to EUC alone in increasing the percentage of days abstinent. METHODS A parallel-arm individually randomised controlled trial will be conducted in the Rhino Camp and Imvepi settlements in Uganda. Five hundred adult male South Sudanese refugees with (i) elevated levels of alcohol use (between 8 and 20 on the Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test [AUDIT]); and (ii) psychological distress (> 16 on the Kessler Psychological Distress Scale) will be randomly assigned 1:1 to EUC or CHANGE and EUC. CHANGE will be delivered by lay healthcare providers over 6 weeks. Outcomes will be assessed at 3 and 12 months post-randomisation. The primary outcome is the percentage of days abstinent, measured by the timeline follow-back measure at 3 months. Secondary outcomes include percentage of days abstinent at 12 months and alcohol misuse (measured by the AUDIT), psychological distress (i.e. depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress disorder), functional disability, perpetration of intimate partner violence, and health economic indicators at 3 and 12 months. A mixed-methods process evaluation will investigate competency, dose, fidelity, feasibility, and acceptability. Primary analyses will be intention-to-treat. DISCUSSION CHANGE aims to address alcohol misuse and psychological distress with male refugees in a humanitarian setting. If it is proven to be effective, it can help fill an important under-researched gap in humanitarian service delivery. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN ISRCTN10360385. Registered on 30 January 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catharina F van der Boor
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | - Dalili Taban
- HealthRight International, Plot 855, Mawanda Road -Kamwokya, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Wietse A Tol
- Department of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Bartholinsgade 4, Bg. 9, 1356 København K, CSS, Bg. 9, Building: 9.2.16, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Josephine Akellot
- HealthRight International, Plot 855, Mawanda Road -Kamwokya, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Melissa Neuman
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Helen A Weiss
- MRC International Statistics and Epidemiology Group, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Giulia Greco
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Anna Vassall
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Carl May
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Abhijit Nadkarni
- Centre for Global Mental Health (CGMH), Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- Addictions Research Group, Sangath, Goa, India
| | - Eugene Kinyanda
- MRC/UVRI Uganda Research Unit, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Plot 51-59 Nakiwogo Road, PO Box 49, Entebbe, Uganda
| | - Bayard Roberts
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| | - Daniela C Fuhr
- Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
- Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology, Achterstraße 30, 28359, Bremen, Germany
- Health Sciences, University of Bremen, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Thwaites S, Abrahams J, Thewlis D, Rickman M. The absence of reporting standards and a lack of objective, performance-based outcomes following intramedullary nailing of tibial shaft fractures: findings from a scoping review into 179 articles. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg 2024; 50:59-70. [PMID: 37555990 PMCID: PMC10924025 DOI: 10.1007/s00068-023-02338-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/10/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This scoping review was conducted to summarise the outcome tools reported in the assessment of tibial shaft fractures treated with intramedullary (IM) nailing, with a key focus on knee pain and function, and performance-based outcomes. METHODS PubMed and Embase databases were searched on May 31, 2023. All study designs and populations were included, including ex vivo studies without fracture. Studies with only open or intra-articular fractures, or other fracture fixation, were excluded. Reported outcome tools and pertinent study characteristics were extracted and summarised. RESULTS Of 488 articles identified, 179 met the inclusion criteria. For in vivo studies (n = 152), there were 13,705 fractures; the IM nailing approach not described for 30% of these. There were 133 unique patient outcomes, with a binary assessment of knee pain (29% of studies) and Lysholm score (21%) most common. Only 10/152 (7%) in vivo studies included an objective, performance-based measure of knee function. Fracture union was most frequent (52%) of 81 different clinical outcomes. For ex vivo studies (n = 29), there were 408 tibias included, with nail insertion location most prevalent (66% of studies) of 34 reported outcomes. CONCLUSION The heterogeneity of outcome tools reported limits comparison between studies and the most commonly reported patient outcomes may not be the most appropriate. Future studies should report the IM nailing approach and consider capturing both patient-reported and performance-based outcomes to help inform surgical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Simon Thwaites
- Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - John Abrahams
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Dominic Thewlis
- Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Mark Rickman
- Centre for Orthopaedic and Trauma Research, Adelaide Medical School, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
- Department of Orthopaedics and Trauma, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Elayan S, Angelini V, Buskens E, de Boer A. The Economic Costs of Informal Care: Estimates from a National Cross-Sectional Survey in The Netherlands. THE EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS : HEPAC : HEALTH ECONOMICS IN PREVENTION AND CARE 2024:10.1007/s10198-023-01666-8. [PMID: 38294595 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-023-01666-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2024]
Abstract
Faced with an unprecedented demand for long-term care, European health care systems are moving towards mixed care models, where the welfare state and informal caregivers share care responsibilities. While informal care is often viewed as a means of alleviating pressure on public care, it comes with significant economic costs for caregivers, their employers, and society at large. This study uses nationally representative data to estimate the total direct (informal care time and out-of-pocket costs) and indirect (productivity) economic costs of informal care in the Netherlands in 2019. Informal care time costs are estimated using the opportunity cost and the proxy good methods. Indirect costs are estimated using the human capital and friction cost approaches. Our results reveal the considerable annual societal cost of informal care in the Netherlands, ranging between €17.5 billion and €30.1 billion, depending on the valuation approach. These costs are equivalent to 2.15% and 3.71% of Dutch GDP in 2019, comparable to the public expenditure on long-term care in that year. Female caregivers account for slightly more than half (53%-57%) of the total costs. Around 57%-88% of these costs are in the form of informal care time. The main driver of indirect costs is the temporary cessation of work, which comprises 12%-17% of the total costs. Findings corroborate that substantial resources, yet thus far largely disregarded, are spent on informal care even in a country with a relatively generous public long-term care system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saif Elayan
- Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Nettelbosje 2, 9747 AE, Groningen, The Netherlands.
| | - Viola Angelini
- Department of Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Groningen, Nettelbosje 2, 9747 AE, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik Buskens
- Department of Epidemiology, University Medical Centre Groningen, University of Groningen, Hanzeplein 1, 9700 RB, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Alice de Boer
- Faculty of Social Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- The Netherlands Institute for Social Research (SCP), 2500 BD, The Hague, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Roose E, Huysmans E, Leysen L, Mostaqim K, Van Wilgen P, Beckwée D, De Couck M, Timmermans A, Bults R, Nijs J, Lahousse A. Effect of perceived injustice-targeted pain neuroscience education compared with biomedically focused education in breast cancer survivors: a study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial (BCS-PI trial). BMJ Open 2024; 14:e075779. [PMID: 38233049 PMCID: PMC10806532 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075779] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/19/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current treatments for pain in breast cancer survivors (BCSs) are mostly biomedically focused rather than biopsychosocially driven. However, 22% of BCSs with pain are experiencing perceived injustice, which is a known predictor for adverse pain outcomes and opioid prescription due to increased maladaptive pain behaviour. Educational interventions such as pain neuroscience education (PNE) are suggested to target perceived injustice. In addition, motivational interviewing can be an effective behavioural change technique. This trial aims to examine whether perceived injustice-targeted PNE with the integration of motivational interviewing is superior to biomedically focused pain education in reducing pain after 12 months in BCS with perceived injustice and pain. In addition, improvements in quality of life, perceived injustice and opioid use are evaluated, and a cost-effectiveness analysis will finally result in a recommendation concerning the use of perceived injustice-targeted PNE in BCSs with perceived injustice and pain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This two-arm multicentre randomised controlled trial will recruit female BCS (n=156) with pain and perceived injustice. Participants will be randomly assigned to perceived injustice-targeted PNE or biomedically focused pain education in each centre. Both interventions include an online session, an information leaflet and three one-to-one sessions. The primary outcome (pain), secondary outcomes (quality of life, perceived injustice and outcomes for cost-effectiveness analysis) and explanatory outcomes (pain phenotyping, sleep, fatigue and cognitive-emotional factors) will be assessed at baseline and at 0, 6, 12 and 24 months postintervention using self-reported questionnaires online. Treatment effects over time will be evaluated using linear mixed model analyses. Additionally, a cost-utility analysis will be done from a healthcare payer and societal perspective. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The ethical agreement was obtained from the Main Ethics Committee (B.U.N.1432020000068) at the University Hospital Brussels and all other participating hospitals. Study results will be disseminated through presentations, conferences, social media, press and journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT04730154.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Roose
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- REVAL Research Group, Universiteit Hasselt, Diepenbeek, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Rehabilitation Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
| | - Eva Huysmans
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Research Foundation-Flanders, (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Laurence Leysen
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Kenza Mostaqim
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Research Foundation-Flanders, (FWO), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Paul Van Wilgen
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Transcare Pain Transdisciplinary Pain Treatment Center, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - David Beckwée
- Rehabilitation Research Group, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussel, Belgium
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, University of Antwerp, Antwerpen, Belgium
| | - Marijke De Couck
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Rinske Bults
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jo Nijs
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Unit of Physiotherapy, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gotenburg, Sweden
| | - Astrid Lahousse
- Pain in Motion Research Group (PAIN), Department of Physiotherapy, Human Physiology and Anatomy, Faculty of Physical Education & Physiotherapy, Vrije Universiteit Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Physical Medicine and Physiotherapy, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aarts J, Saddal SRD, Bosmans JE, de Groot V, de Jong BA, Klein M, Ruitenberg MFL, Schaafsma FG, Schippers ECF, Schoonheim MM, Uitdehaag BMJ, van der Veen S, Waskowiak PT, Widdershoven GAM, van der Hiele K, Hulst HE. Don't be late! Postponing cognitive decline and preventing early unemployment in people with multiple sclerosis: a study protocol. BMC Neurol 2024; 24:28. [PMID: 38225561 PMCID: PMC10789039 DOI: 10.1186/s12883-023-03513-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Up to 65% of people with multiple sclerosis (PwMS) develop cognitive deficits, which hampers their ability to work, participating in day-to-day life and ultimately reducing quality of life (QoL). Early cognitive symptoms are often less tangible to PwMS and their direct environment and are noticed only when symptoms and work functioning problems become more advanced, i.e., when (brain) damage is already advanced. Treatment of symptoms at a late stage can lead to cognitive impairment and unemployment, highlighting the need for preventative interventions in PwMS. AIMS This study aims to evaluate the (cost-) effectiveness of two innovative preventative interventions, aimed at postponing cognitive decline and work functioning problems, compared to enhanced usual care in improving health-related QoL (HRQoL). METHODS Randomised controlled trial including 270 PwMS with mild cognitive impairment, who have paid employment ≥ 12 h per week and are able to participate in physical exercise (Expanded Disability Status Scale < 6.0). Participants are randomised across three study arms: 1) 'strengthening the brain' - a lifestyle intervention combining personal fitness, mental coaching, dietary advice, and cognitive training; 2) 'strengthening the mind' - a work-focused intervention combining the capability approach and the participatory approach in one-on-one coaching by trained work coaches who have MS themselves; 3) Control group-receiving general information about cognitive impairment in MS and receiving care as usual. Intervention duration is four months, with short-term and long-term follow-up measurements at 10 and 16 months, respectively. The primary outcome measure of the Don't be late! intervention study will be HRQoL as measured with the 36-item Short Form. Secondary outcomes include cognition, work related outcomes, physical functioning, structural and functional brain changes, psychological functioning, and societal costs. Semi-structured interviews and focus groups with stakeholders will be organised to qualitatively reflect on the process and outcome of the interventions. DISCUSSION This study seeks to prevent (further) cognitive decline and job loss due to MS by introducing tailor-made interventions at an early stage of cognitive symptoms, thereby maintaining or improving HRQoL. Qualitative analyses will be performed to allow successful implementation into clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with reference number NCT06068582 on 10 October 2023.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jip Aarts
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands.
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands.
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Shalina R D Saddal
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands
- MS Center Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Judith E Bosmans
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Vincent de Groot
- MS Center Amsterdam, Rehabilitation Medicine, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Brigit A de Jong
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Martin Klein
- Medical Psychology, MS Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marit F L Ruitenberg
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frederieke G Schaafsma
- MS Center Amsterdam, Public and Occupational Health, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Esther C F Schippers
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands
| | - Menno M Schoonheim
- MS Center Amsterdam, Anatomy and Neurosciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernard M J Uitdehaag
- MS Center Amsterdam, Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sabina van der Veen
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands
| | - Pauline T Waskowiak
- Medical Psychology, MS Center Amsterdam, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Neuroscience, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Guy A M Widdershoven
- Ethics, Law & Medical Humanities, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC Location VUmc, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Karin van der Hiele
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Hanneke E Hulst
- Health, Medical and Neuropsychology Unit, Institute of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Leiden University, Wassenaarseweg 52, Leiden, 2333 AK, The Netherlands
- Leiden Institute for Brain and Cognition, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Geerts M, Hoeijmakers JG, van Eijk-Hustings Y, Brandts L, Gorissen-Brouwers CM, Merkies IS, Joore MA, Faber CG. Cost of illness of patients with small fiber neuropathy in the Netherlands. Pain 2024; 165:153-163. [PMID: 37556388 PMCID: PMC10723644 DOI: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2023] [Revised: 06/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/16/2023] [Indexed: 08/11/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Neuropathic pain is associated with substantial healthcare costs. However, cost-of-illness studies of small fiber neuropathy (SFN) are scarce. Our aim was to estimate the healthcare, patient and family, and productivity costs of patients with SFN in the Netherlands from a healthcare and societal perspective. In addition, the association of costs with age, pain impact on daily life, anxiety, depression, and quality of life (Qol) were examined. Cost questionnaires were completed by 156 patients with confirmed SFN. The average annual total health care and societal cost (€, 2020) was calculated at patient, SFN adult population, and societal level. The average annual healthcare, patient and family, and productivity costs per patient with a Pain Impact Numerical Rating Scale of 0 to 3 (mild), 4 to 6 (moderate), and 7 to 10 (severe) were calculated by using the cost questionnaire data. Quality of life was determined by the EuroQol 5D utility scores. Anxiety and depression were assessed using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Associations of all costs were analyzed using linear regression analyses. At the patient level, the average annual SFN healthcare and societal cost of SFN was €3614 (95% confidence interval [CI] €3171-€4072) and €17,871 (95% CI €14,395-€21,480). At the SFN population level, the average healthcare costs were €29.8 (CI €26.4-€34.2) million, and on a societal level, these were €147.7 (CI 120.5-176.3) million. Severe pain was associated with significant lower Qol and higher depression scores, higher healthcare, patient and family, and productivity costs ( P < 0.001).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margot Geerts
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Janneke G.J. Hoeijmakers
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Yvonne van Eijk-Hustings
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Lloyd Brandts
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Carla M.L. Gorissen-Brouwers
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Ingemar S.J. Merkies
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
- Department of Neurology, Curacao Medical Center, J. H. J. Hamelbergweg, Willemstad, Curacao
| | - Manuela A. Joore
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Medical Technology Assessment, Maastricht University Medical Center+, CAPHRI Care and Public Health Research Institute, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Catharina G. Faber
- Department of Neurology, Maastricht University Medical Center+, School of Mental Health and Neuroscience, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Heward E, Dempsey J, Molloy J, Isba R, Lunn J, Ashcroft DM, Hay AD, Nichani JR, Bruce IA. Outcome measures for use in trials of paediatric otorrhoea: A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2024; 176:111820. [PMID: 38103308 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2023.111820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Paediatric otorrhoea (PO) describes a middle ear infection that results in a perforation of the tympanic membrane and ear discharge, in children and young people (CYP). Prolonged infection may be associated with hearing loss and developmental delay. The current management of paediatric otorrhoea is variable, including non-invasive treatments (conservative, oral antibiotics, topical antibiotics) and surgery, reflecting the lack of a sufficiently strong evidence base. Outcome reporting is fundamental to producing reliable and meaningful evidence to inform best practice. OBJECTIVES Primary objective: to determine which outcome measures are currently used to evaluate treatment success in studies of non-surgical treatments for paediatric otorrhoea. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES to identify outcome measurement instruments used in the literature and assess their applicability for use in clinical trials of PO. METHODS This systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023407976). Database searches of EMBASE, MEDLINE and Cochrane was performed on June 6, 2023, covering from Jan 1995 to May 2023. Randomised controlled trials or study protocols involving CYP with PO were included following PRISMA guidelines. Risk of bias was assessed with Cochrane's tool. RESULTS Of the 377 papers identified, six were included in the systematic review. The primary outcome of five of the studies related to otorrhoea cessation; both time to cessation and proportion recovered at various time points were used as measures. Two measurement instruments were identified: Otitis Media-6 Questionnaire and the Institute for Medical Technology Assessment Productivity Cost Questionnaire. Both were shown to be applicable measurement instruments when used in clinical trials of PO. CONCLUSIONS To promote homogeneity and facilitate meaningful comparison and combination of studies, we propose that time to cessation of otorrhoea from onset of otorrhoea should be used as the primary outcome in future studies. Further research is needed to establish if this is the most important outcome to children and their caregivers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot Heward
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK; Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK.
| | - James Dempsey
- Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - John Molloy
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK; Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Rachel Isba
- Alder Hey Children's NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Judith Lunn
- Lancaster Medical School, Lancaster University, Health Innovation One, Sir John Fisher Drive, Lancaster, UK
| | - Darren M Ashcroft
- Division of Pharmacy & Optometry, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK; NIHR Greater Manchester Patient Safety Translational Research Centre (PSTRC), University of Manchester, UK
| | - Alastair D Hay
- Centre for Academic Primary Care, Bristol Medical School, Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jaya R Nichani
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK; Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| | - Iain A Bruce
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, UK; Royal Manchester Children's Hospital, Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, UK
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
van den Bosch S, Takes R, de Ridder M, de Bree R, Al-Mamgani A, Schreuder W, Hoebers F, van Weert S, Elbers J, Hardillo J, Meijer T, Plaat B, de Jong M, Jansen J, Wellenstein D, van den Broek G, Vogel W, Arens A, Kaanders J. Personalized neck irradiation guided by sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx with a clinically negative neck: (Chemo)radiotherapy to the PRIMary tumor only. Protocol of the PRIMO study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100696. [PMID: 37965060 PMCID: PMC10641572 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Elective neck irradiation (ENI) is performed in head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy. The aim is to eradicate nodal metastases that are not detectable by pretreatment imaging techniques. It is conceivable that personalized neck irradiation can be performed guided by the results of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). It is expected that ENI can be omitted to one or both sides of the neck in 9 out of 10 patients, resulting in less radiation side effects with better quality of life. Methods/design This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial aiming to compare safety and efficacy of treatment with SLNB guided neck irradiation versus standard bilateral ENI in 242 patients with cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx for whom bilateral ENI is indicated. Patients randomized to the experimental-arm will undergo SLNB. Based on the histopathologic status of the SLNs, patients will receive no ENI (if all SLNs are negative), unilateral neck irradiation only (if a SLN is positive at one side of the neck) or bilateral neck irradiation (if SLNs are positive at both sides of the neck). Patients randomized to the control arm will not undergo SLNB but will receive standard bilateral ENI. The primary safety endpoint is the number of patients with recurrence in regional lymph nodes within 2 years after treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint is patient reported xerostomia-related quality of life at 6 months after treatment. Discussion If this trial demonstrates that the experimental treatment is non-inferior to the standard treatment in terms of regional recurrence and is superior in terms of xerostomia-related quality of life, this will become the new standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. van den Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R.P. Takes
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M. de Ridder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R. de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A. Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W.H. Schreuder
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F.J.P. Hoebers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S. van Weert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J.B.W. Elbers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J.A. Hardillo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T.W.H. Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - B.E.C. Plaat
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M.A. de Jong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J.C. Jansen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D.J. Wellenstein
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G.B. van den Broek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - W.V. Vogel
- Department of Medical Imaging/Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A.I.J. Arens
- Department of Medical Imaging/Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J.H.A.M. Kaanders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Jamal M, Kuijper TM, Hazes J, Lopes Barreto D, Weel A. A trial-based economic evaluation of the CaFaSpA referral strategy for axial spondyloarthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2024; 53:1-9. [PMID: 37650240 DOI: 10.1080/03009742.2023.2243081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the cost-utility from healthcare and societal perspectives of the digital CaFaSpA referral strategy (CS) for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) in primary care patients with chronic low back pain (CLBP). METHOD A cluster randomized controlled trial was performed in the Netherlands. General practice units were randomized into CS or usual care (UC). Economic evaluation was performed from the healthcare and societal perspectives within a 12-month time horizon. Outcome measures encompassed disability [Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ)] and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-3L). Direct medical (iMTA Medical Consumption Questionnaire) and indirect costs (iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire), including productivity loss, were evaluated. Incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were calculated. RESULTS The study included 90 GP clusters with 563 patients (CS: n = 260; UC: n = 303) (mean ± sd age 36.3 ± 7.5 years; 66% female). After 12 months, no minimal important differences in outcomes were observed for RMDQ (-0.21, 95%CI -1.52 to 1.13) or EQ-5D (-0.02, 95%CI -0.08 to 0.05). However, total costs were significantly lower in the CS group owing to lower productivity loss costs. The ICUR for RMDQ was €18,059 per point decrease and €220,457 per quality-adjusted life year increase. CONCLUSIONS Digital referral did not decrease the overall healthcare status of patients after 1 year of follow-up and appears to be more cost-effective than UC. Therefore, CS can be used as an appropriate primary care referral model for CLBP patients at risk for axSpA. This will accelerate timely provision of care by the right caregiver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Jamal
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T M Kuijper
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jmw Hazes
- Department of Rheumatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - D Lopes Barreto
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Aeam Weel
- Department of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, Maasstad Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Health Technology Assessment, Erasmus School of Health Policy & Management, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kerver N, Karssies E, Krabbe PFM, van der Sluis CK, Groen H. Economic evaluation of upper limb prostheses in the Netherlands including the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip versus standard myoelectric hand prostheses. Disabil Rehabil 2023; 45:4311-4321. [PMID: 36533430 PMCID: PMC10721225 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2151653] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the costs, quality of life, and user experiences associated with upper limb prosthesis use, and to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of multi-grip compared to standard myoelectric hand prostheses (MHPs/SHPs). MATERIALS AND METHODS The EQ-5D-5L to assess the quality of life, the patient-reported outcome measure to assess the preferred usage features of upper limb prosthesis (PUF-ULP), and a cost questionnaire (societal perspective) were completed by 242 prosthesis users (57% men; mean age = 58 years). Incremental cost-utility and cost-effectiveness ratios (ICUR/ICER) with respectively the EQ-5D-5L and PUF-ULP were calculated to compare MHPs with SHPs. Statistical uncertainty was estimated using bootstrapping. Netherlands Trial Registry number: NL7682. RESULTS The mean yearly total costs related to prosthesis use of MHPs (€54 112) and SHPs (€23 501) were higher compared to prostheses with tools/accessories (€11 977), body-powered (€11 298), and cosmetic/passive prostheses (€10 132). EQ-5D-5L and PUF-ULP scores did not differ between prosthesis types. ICUR was €-728 833 per quality-adjusted life year; ICER was €-187 798 per PUF-ULP point gained. CONCLUSIONS Myoelectric prostheses, especially MHPs, were most expensive compared to other prostheses, while no differences in quality of life and user experiences were apparent. MHPs were not cost-effective compared to SHPs. When prescribing MHPs, careful consideration of advantages over SHPs is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke Kerver
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Elise Karssies
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Paul F. M. Krabbe
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Corry K. van der Sluis
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Henk Groen
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Jansen FM, van Linschoten RCA, Kievit W, Smits LJT, Pauwels RWM, de Jong DJ, de Vries AC, Boekema PJ, West RL, Bodelier AGL, Gisbertz IAM, Wolfhagen FHJ, Römkens TEH, Lutgens MWMD, van Bodegraven AA, Oldenburg B, Pierik MJ, Russel MGVM, de Boer NK, Mallant-Hent RC, ter Borg PCJ, van der Meulen-de Jong AE, Jansen JM, Jansen SV, Tan ACITL, Hoentjen F, van der Woude CJ. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Increased Adalimumab Dose Intervals in Crohn's Disease Patients in Stable Remission: The Randomized Controlled LADI Trial. J Crohns Colitis 2023; 17:1771-1780. [PMID: 37310877 PMCID: PMC10673815 DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjad101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS We aimed to assess cost-effectiveness of increasing adalimumab dose intervals compared to the conventional dosing interval in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] in stable clinical and biochemical remission. DESIGN We conducted a pragmatic, open-label, randomized controlled non-inferiority trial, comparing increased adalimumab intervals with the 2-weekly interval in adult CD patients in clinical remission. Quality of life was measured with the EQ-5D-5L. Costs were measured from a societal perspective. Results are shown as differences and incremental net monetary benefit [iNMB] at relevant willingness to accept [WTA] levels. RESULTS We randomized 174 patients to the intervention [n = 113] and control [n = 61] groups. No difference was found in utility (difference: -0.017, 95% confidence interval [-0.044; 0.004]) and total costs (-€943, [-€2226; €1367]) over the 48-week study period between the two groups. Medication costs per patient were lower (-€2545, [-€2780; -€2192]) in the intervention group, but non-medication healthcare (+€474, [+€149; +€952]) and patient costs (+€365 [+€92; €1058]) were higher. Cost-utility analysis showed that the iNMB was €594 [-€2099; €2050], €69 [-€2908; €1965] and -€455 [-€4,096; €1984] at WTA levels of €20 000, €50 000 and €80 000, respectively. Increasing adalimumab dose intervals was more likely to be cost-effective at WTA levels below €53 960 per quality-adjusted life year. Above €53 960 continuing the conventional dose interval was more likely to be cost-effective. CONCLUSION When the loss of a quality-adjusted life year is valued at less than €53 960, increasing the adalimumab dose interval is a cost-effective strategy in CD patients in stable clinical and biochemical remission. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT03172377.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fenna M Jansen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Reinier C A van Linschoten
- Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wietske Kievit
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Science, Department for Health Evidence, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Lisa J T Smits
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Renske W M Pauwels
- Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Dirk J de Jong
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Annemarie C de Vries
- Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Paul J Boekema
- Maxima Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Rachel L West
- Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ingrid A M Gisbertz
- Bernhoven Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Uden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank H J Wolfhagen
- Albert Schweitzer Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dordrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Tessa E H Römkens
- Jeroen Bosch Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, ‘s-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice W M D Lutgens
- Elisabeth Tweesteden Ziekenhuis, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tilburg, The Netherlands
| | - Adriaan A van Bodegraven
- Zuyderland Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology, Geriatrics, Internal and Intensive Care Medicine (Co-MIK), Sittard-Geleen/Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Oldenburg
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke J Pierik
- Maastricht University Medical Center+, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maurice G V M Russel
- Medisch Spectrum Twente, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Twente, The Netherlands
| | - Nanne K de Boer
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Vrije University Amsterdam, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AGEM Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Pieter C J ter Borg
- Ikazia Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Jeroen M Jansen
- OLVG, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sita V Jansen
- Reinier de Graaf Gasthuis, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Adrianus C I T L Tan
- Canisius Wilhelmina Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Frank Hoentjen
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Tingulstad A, Maas ET, Rysstad T, Øiestad BE, Aanesen F, Pripp AH, Van Tulder MW, Grotle M. Six-month cost-effectiveness of adding motivational interviewing or a stratified vocational advice intervention to usual case management for workers with musculoskeletal disorders: the MI-NAV economic evaluation. J Occup Med Toxicol 2023; 18:25. [PMID: 37964240 PMCID: PMC10644648 DOI: 10.1186/s12995-023-00394-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2023] [Accepted: 11/08/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This study evaluates the six-month cost-effectiveness and cost-benefits of motivational interviewing (MI) or a stratified vocational advice intervention (SVAI) added to usual case management (UC) for workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. METHODS This study was conducted alongside a three-arm RCT including 514 employed workers on sick leave for at least 50% for ≥ 7 weeks. All participants received UC. The UC + MI group received two MI sessions, and the UC + SVAI group received 1-4 SVAI sessions. Sickness absence days, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and societal costs were measured between baseline and six months. RESULTS Adding MI to UC, resulted in incremental cost-reduction of -2580EUR (95%CI -5687;612), and a reduction in QALYs of -0.001 (95%CI -0.02;0.01). Secondly, adding MI to UC resulted in an incremental cost-reduction of -538EUR (95%CI -1358;352), and reduction of 5.08 (95%CI -3.3;13.5) sickness-absence days. Financial return estimates were positive, but not statistically significant. Adding SVAI to UC, resulted in an incremental cost-reduction of -2899 EUR (95% CI -5840;18), and a reduction in QALYs of 0.002 (95% CI -0.02;0.01). Secondly, adding SVAI to UC resulted in an statistically significant incremental cost-reduction of -695 EUR (95% CI -1459;-3), and a reduction of 7.9 (95% CI -0.04;15.9) sickness absence days. Financial return estimates were positive and statistically significant. The probabilities of cost-effectiveness for QALYs were high for adding MI or SVAI (ceiling ratio 0.90). CONCLUSIONS In comparison to UC only, adding MI to UC tends to be cost-effective. Adding SVAI to UC is cost-effective for workers on sick leave due to musculoskeletal disorders. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov (identifier: NCT03871712).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Tingulstad
- Department of Rehabilitation and Health Technology, Centre for Intelligent Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, St.Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, Oslo, 0130, Norway.
| | - Esther T Maas
- Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, and the Amsterdam Movement Sciences Research Institute, de Boelelaan 1085, Amsterdam, 1081 HV, The Netherlands
| | - Tarjei Rysstad
- Department of Rehabilitation and Health Technology, Centre for Intelligent Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, St.Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, Oslo, 0130, Norway
| | - Britt Elin Øiestad
- Department of Rehabilitation and Health Technology, Centre for Intelligent Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, St.Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, Oslo, 0130, Norway
| | - Fiona Aanesen
- National Institute of Occupational Health, Majorstuen, P.O. Box 5330, Oslo, 0304, Norway
| | - Are Hugo Pripp
- Department of Rehabilitation and Health Technology, Centre for Intelligent Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, St.Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, Oslo, 0130, Norway
| | - Maurits W Van Tulder
- Faculty Behavioural and Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Van Der Boechorststraat 7, Amsterdam, 1081 BT, The Netherlands
| | - Margreth Grotle
- Department of Rehabilitation and Health Technology, Centre for Intelligent Musculoskeletal Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, St.Olavs Plass, P.O. Box 4, Oslo, 0130, Norway
- Department of Research, Innovation and Education, Division of Clinical Neuroscience, Research and Communication Unit for Musculoskeletal Health (FORMI), Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål, Building 37B, P.O. Box 4956, Oslo, Nydalen, 0424, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Klaassen-Dekker A, Drossaert CHC, Van Maaren MC, Van Leeuwen-Stok AE, Retel VP, Korevaar JC, Siesling S. Personalized surveillance and aftercare for non-metastasized breast cancer: the NABOR study protocol of a multiple interrupted time series design. BMC Cancer 2023; 23:1112. [PMID: 37964214 PMCID: PMC10647159 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-023-11504-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Follow-up of curatively treated primary breast cancer patients consists of surveillance and aftercare and is currently mostly the same for all patients. A more personalized approach, based on patients' individual risk of recurrence and personal needs and preferences, may reduce patient burden and reduce (healthcare) costs. The NABOR study will examine the (cost-)effectiveness of personalized surveillance (PSP) and personalized aftercare plans (PAP) on patient-reported cancer worry, self-rated and overall quality of life and (cost-)effectiveness. METHODS A prospective multicenter multiple interrupted time series (MITs) design is being used. In this design, 10 participating hospitals will be observed for a period of eighteen months, while they -stepwise- will transit from care as usual to PSPs and PAPs. The PSP contains decisions on the surveillance trajectory based on individual risks and needs, assessed with the 'Breast Cancer Surveillance Decision Aid' including the INFLUENCE prediction tool. The PAP contains decisions on the aftercare trajectory based on individual needs and preferences and available care resources, which decision-making is supported by a patient decision aid. Patients are non-metastasized female primary breast cancer patients (N = 1040) who are curatively treated and start follow-up care. Patient reported outcomes will be measured at five points in time during two years of follow-up care (starting about one year after treatment and every six months thereafter). In addition, data on diagnostics and hospital visits from patients' Electronical Health Records (EHR) will be gathered. Primary outcomes are patient-reported cancer worry (Cancer Worry Scale) and overall quality of life (as assessed with EQ-VAS score). Secondary outcomes include health care costs and resource use, health-related quality of life (as measured with EQ5D-5L/SF-12/EORTC-QLQ-C30), risk perception, shared decision-making, patient satisfaction, societal participation, and cost-effectiveness. Next, the uptake and appreciation of personalized plans and patients' experiences of their decision-making process will be evaluated. DISCUSSION This study will contribute to insight in the (cost-)effectiveness of personalized follow-up care and contributes to development of uniform evidence-based guidelines, stimulating sustainable implementation of personalized surveillance and aftercare plans. TRIAL REGISTRATION Study sponsor: ZonMw. Retrospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (2023), ID: NCT05975437.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Klaassen-Dekker
- Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - C H C Drossaert
- Health & Technology Department, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - M C Van Maaren
- Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | | | - V P Retel
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Erasmus School of Health Policy and Management, Erasmus University Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J C Korevaar
- Faculty of Health, Nutrition & Sport, The Hague University of Applied Sciences, The Hague, The Netherlands
- Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL), Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - S Siesling
- Health Technology and Services Research Department, Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
- Department of Research and Development, Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organisation (IKNL), Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Kruiswijk AA, van de Sande MAJ, Haas RL, van den Akker-van Marle EM, Engelhardt EG, Marang-van de Mheen P, van Bodegom-Vos L. (Cost-)effectiveness of an individualised risk prediction tool (PERSARC) on patient's knowledge and decisional conflict among soft-tissue sarcomas patients: protocol for a parallel cluster randomised trial (the VALUE-PERSARC study). BMJ Open 2023; 13:e074853. [PMID: 37918933 PMCID: PMC10626817 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Current treatment decision-making in high-grade soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) care is not informed by individualised risks for different treatment options and patients' preferences. Risk prediction tools may provide patients and professionals insight in personalised risks and benefits for different treatment options and thereby potentially increase patients' knowledge and reduce decisional conflict. The VALUE-PERSARC study aims to assess the (cost-)effectiveness of a personalised risk assessment tool (PERSARC) to increase patients' knowledge about risks and benefits of treatment options and to reduce decisional conflict in comparison with usual care in high-grade extremity STS patients. METHODS The VALUE-PERSARC study is a parallel cluster randomised control trial that aims to include at least 120 primarily diagnosed high-grade extremity STS patients in 6 Dutch hospitals. Eligible patients (≥18 years) are those without a treatment plan and treated with curative intent. Patients with sarcoma subtypes or treatment options not mentioned in PERSARC are unable to participate. Hospitals will be randomised between usual care (control) or care with the use of PERSARC (intervention). In the intervention condition, PERSARC will be used by STS professionals in multidisciplinary tumour boards to guide treatment advice and in patient consultations, where the oncological/orthopaedic surgeon informs the patient about his/her diagnosis and discusses benefits and harms of all relevant treatment options. The primary outcomes are patients' knowledge about risks and benefits of treatment options and decisional conflict (Decisional Conflict Scale) 1 week after the treatment decision has been made. Secondary outcomes will be evaluated using questionnaires, 1 week and 3, 6 and 12 months after the treatment decision. Data will be analysed following an intention-to-treat approach using a linear mixed model and taking into account clustering of patients within hospitals. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Medical Ethical Committee Leiden-Den Haag-Delft (METC-LDD) approved this protocol (NL76563.058.21). The results of this study will be reported in a peer-review journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NL9160, NCT05741944.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anouk A Kruiswijk
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Rick L Haas
- Department of Radiotherapy, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Ellen G Engelhardt
- Division of Psychosocial Research and Epidemiology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Perla Marang-van de Mheen
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Leti van Bodegom-Vos
- Department of Biomedical Data Sciences, Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Bradley CP, Orchard V, McKinley G, Heggie R, Wu O, Good R, Watkins S, Lindsay M, Eteiba H, McGowan J, McGeoch R, Corcoran D, Kellman P, McConnachie A, Berry C. The coronary microvascular angina cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging trial: Rationale and design. Am Heart J 2023; 265:213-224. [PMID: 37657593 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2023.08.067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Coronary microvascular dysfunction may cause myocardial ischemia with no obstructive coronary artery disease (INOCA). If functional testing is not performed INOCA may pass undetected. Stress perfusion cardiovascular MRI (CMR) quantifies myocardial blood flow (MBF) but the clinical utility of stress CMR in the management of patients with suspected angina with no obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) is uncertain. OBJECTIVES First, to undertake a diagnostic study using stress CMR in patients with ANOCA following invasive coronary angiography and, second, in a nested, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial to assess the effect of disclosure on the final diagnosis and health status in the longer term. DESIGN All-comers referred for clinically indicated coronary angiography for the investigation of suspected coronary artery disease will be screened in 3 regional centers in the United Kingdom. Following invasive coronary angiography, patients with ANOCA who provide informed consent will undergo noninvasive endotyping using stress CMR within 3 months of the angiogram. DIAGNOSTIC STUDY Stress perfusion CMR imaging to assess the prevalence of coronary microvascular dysfunction and clinically significant incidental findings in patients with ANOCA. The primary outcome is the between-group difference in the reclassification rate of the initial diagnosis based on invasive angiography versus the final diagnosis after CMR imaging. RANDOMIZED, CONTROLLED TRIAL Participants will be randomized to inclusion (intervention group) or exclusion (control group) of myocardial blood flow to inform the final diagnosis. The primary outcome of the clinical trial is the mean within-subject change in the Seattle Angina Questionnaire summary score (SAQSS) at 6 months. Secondary outcome assessments include the EUROQOL EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (Brief-IPQ), the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (TSQM-9), the Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI), the International Physical Activity Questionnaire- Short Form (IPAQ-SF), the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) and the 8-item Productivity Cost Questionnaire (iPCQ). Health and economic outcomes will be assessed using electronic healthcare records. VALUE To clarify if routine stress perfusion CMR imaging reclassifies the final diagnosis in patients with ANOCA and whether this strategy improves symptoms, health-related quality of life and health economic outcomes. CLINICALTRIALS GOV: NCT04805814.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Conor P Bradley
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK; Department of Cardiology, NHS Golden Jubilee Hospital, Clydebank, Scotland, UK
| | - Vanessa Orchard
- Department of Cardiology, NHS Golden Jubilee Hospital, Clydebank, Scotland, UK
| | - Gemma McKinley
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Robert Heggie
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Olivia Wu
- Health Economics and Health Technology Assessment, School of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Richard Good
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK; Department of Cardiology, NHS Golden Jubilee Hospital, Clydebank, Scotland, UK
| | - Stuart Watkins
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK; Department of Cardiology, NHS Golden Jubilee Hospital, Clydebank, Scotland, UK
| | - Mitchell Lindsay
- Department of Cardiology, NHS Golden Jubilee Hospital, Clydebank, Scotland, UK
| | - Hany Eteiba
- Department of Cardiology, NHS Golden Jubilee Hospital, Clydebank, Scotland, UK
| | - James McGowan
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Ayr, Ayr, UK
| | - Ross McGeoch
- Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Hairmyres, East Kilbride, Scotland, UK
| | - David Corcoran
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Peter Kellman
- National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Alex McConnachie
- Robertson Centre for Biostatistics, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK
| | - Colin Berry
- School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Health, British Heart Foundation Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland, UK; Department of Cardiology, NHS Golden Jubilee Hospital, Clydebank, Scotland, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Bal MI, Hilberink SR, Roelofs PPDM, van der Slot WMA, Bentvelsen L, Miedema HS, Roebroeck ME. Effect evaluation of a vocational rehabilitation program for young adults with chronic physical conditions at risk for unemployment: A controlled clinical trial. Scand J Occup Ther 2023; 30:1292-1302. [PMID: 37378582 DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2023.2228019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2022] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/15/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The work participation of young adults with chronic physical conditions lag behind compared to healthy age-mates. 'At Work' is a vocational rehabilitation intervention provided by occupational therapists, that supports them for entering the competitive labour market after graduating post-secondary education. AIM To evaluate the effects of 'At Work' on self-efficacy, work-ability and employment status as compared to usual care. MATERIALS AND METHODS In total, 88 young adults were included in a multicentre controlled trial; 49 entered 'At Work', 39 received usual care. GEE-analyses were applied. RESULTS Scores on all outcome measures substantially improved over time in the intervention group, but no significant effects were found as compared to the control group. The effect on general self-efficacy showed a positive trend in favour of the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE Unlike previous study results pointing to positive outcomes of At Work', the current study did not support the effectiveness of this program on work-related self-efficacy, work-ability and paid employment, as compared to usual care. Yet, we did find an indication for positive intervention effect on general self-efficacy, which is known to be an important capacity to achieve social participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolijn I Bal
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Sander R Hilberink
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pepijn P D M Roelofs
- Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilma M A van der Slot
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Harald S Miedema
- Research Center Innovations in Care, Rotterdam University of Applied Sciences, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Marij E Roebroeck
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
van der Graaff SJA, Reijman M, Meuffels DE, Koopmanschap MA, Eijgenraam SM, van Es EM, Hofstee DJ, Auw Yang KG, Noorduyn JCA, van Arkel ERA, van den Brand ICJB, Janssen RPA, Liu WY, Bierma-Zeinstra SMA. Cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus physical therapy for traumatic meniscal tears in patients aged under 45 years. Bone Joint J 2023; 105-B:1177-1183. [PMID: 37909164 DOI: 10.1302/0301-620x.105b11.bjj-2023-0107.r1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2023]
Abstract
Aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy versus physical therapy plus optional delayed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy in young patients aged under 45 years with traumatic meniscal tears. Methods We conducted a multicentre, open-labelled, randomized controlled trial in patients aged 18 to 45 years, with a recent onset, traumatic, MRI-verified, isolated meniscal tear without knee osteoarthritis. Patients were randomized to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy or standardized physical therapy with an optional delayed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy after three months of follow-up. We performed a cost-utility analysis on the randomization groups to compare both treatments over a 24-month follow-up period. Cost utility was calculated as incremental costs per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy compared to physical therapy. Calculations were performed from a healthcare system perspective and a societal perspective. Results A total of 100 patients were included: 49 were randomized to arthroscopic partial meniscectomy and 51 to physical therapy. In the physical therapy group, 21 patients (41%) received delayed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy during follow-up. Over 24 months, patients in the arthroscopic partial meniscectomy group had a mean 0.005 QALYs lower quality of life (95% confidence interval -0.13 to 0.14). The cost-utility ratio was €-160,000/QALY from the healthcare perspective and €-223,372/QALY from the societal perspective, indicating that arthroscopic partial meniscectomy incurs additional costs without any added health benefit. Conclusion Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is arthroscopic partial meniscectomy is unlikely to be cost-effective in treating young patients with isolated traumatic meniscal tears compared to physical therapy as a primary health intervention. Arthroscopic partial meniscectomy leads to a similar quality of life, but higher costs, compared to physical therapy plus optional delayed arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine J A van der Graaff
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Max Reijman
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Duncan E Meuffels
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Marc A Koopmanschap
- Institute for Medical Technology Assessment, Erasmus University, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Susanne M Eijgenraam
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Eline M van Es
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Hofstee
- Department of Orthopaedics, Noordwest Hospital Group, Alkmaar, Netherlands
| | - Kiem G Auw Yang
- Department of Orthopaedics, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Julia C A Noorduyn
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, OLVG, Amsterdam, Netherlands
- Department of Human Movement Sciences, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ewoud R A van Arkel
- Department of Orthopaedics, Haaglanden Medical Centre, Den Haag, Netherlands
| | | | - Rob P A Janssen
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Trauma, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, Netherlands
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, Netherlands
- Department of Paramedical Sciences, Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Wai-Yan Liu
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Trauma, Máxima Medical Centre, Eindhoven, Netherlands
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery & Trauma, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, Netherlands
| | - Sita M A Bierma-Zeinstra
- Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
- Department of General Practice, Erasmus MC University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Pei LX, Chan H, Erdelyi S, Jae L, Brubacher JR. Circumstances and outcome of active transportation injuries: protocol of a British Columbian inception cohort study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e079219. [PMID: 37879691 PMCID: PMC10603471 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/27/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Active transport (AT) is promoted by urban planners and health officials for its environmental, economic and societal benefits and its uptake is increasing. Unfortunately, AT users can be injured or killed due to falls or collisions. Active transport injury (ATI) prevention efforts are hindered by limited research on the circumstances, associated infrastructure, injury pattern, severity and outcome of ATI events. This study seeks to address these knowledge gaps by identifying built environment features associated with injury and risk factors for a poor outcome following ATI. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This prospective observational study will recruit an inception cohort of 2000 ATI survivors, including pedestrians, cyclists and micromobility users aged 16 years and older who arrive at a participating emergency department within 48 hours of sustaining an ATI. Baseline interviews capture demographic and socioeconomic information, pre-injury health and functional status, as well as circumstances of the injury event and recovery expectations. Follow-up interviews at 2, 4, 6 and 12 months postinjury (key stages of recovery) use standardised health-related quality of life tools to determine physical and mental health outcomes, functional recovery and healthcare resource use and lost productivity costs. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The Active Transportation Injury Circumstances and Outcome Study is approved by our institutional research ethics board and the research ethics boards of all participating sites. This study aims to provide healthcare providers with knowledge of risk factors for poor outcome following ATI with the goal of improving patient management. Additionally, this study will provide insight into the circumstances of ATI events including built environment features and how those circumstances relate to recovery outcomes. This information can be used to inform city engineers and planners, policymakers and public health officials to plan roadway design and injury prevention policy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lulu X Pei
- Emergency Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Herbert Chan
- Emergency Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Shannon Erdelyi
- Emergency Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Lina Jae
- Emergency Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Jeffrey R Brubacher
- Emergency Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
van Linschoten RCA, Huberts AS, van Leeuwen N, Hazelzet JA, van der Woude J, West RL, van Noord D. Validity of the self-administered comorbidity questionnaire in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Therap Adv Gastroenterol 2023; 16:17562848231202159. [PMID: 37877105 PMCID: PMC10591493 DOI: 10.1177/17562848231202159] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 09/01/2023] [Indexed: 10/26/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement has selected the self-administered comorbidity questionnaire (SCQ) to adjust case-mix when comparing outcomes of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treatment between healthcare providers. However, the SCQ has not been validated for use in IBD patients. Objectives We assessed the validity of the SCQ for measuring comorbidities in IBD patients. Design Cohort study. Methods We assessed the criterion validity of the SCQ for IBD patients by comparing patient-reported and clinician-reported comorbidities (as noted in the electronic health record) of the 13 diseases of the SCQ using Cohen's kappa. Construct validity was assessed using the Spearman correlation coefficient between the SCQ and the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), clinician-reported SCQ, quality of life, IBD-related healthcare and productivity costs, prevalence of disability, and IBD disease activity. We assessed responsiveness by correlating changes in the SCQ with changes in healthcare costs, productivity costs, quality of life, and disease activity after 15 months. Results We included 613 patients. At least fair agreement (κ > 0.20) was found for most comorbidities, but the agreement was slight (κ < 0.20) for stomach disease [κ = 0.19, 95% CI (-0.03; 0.41)], blood disease [κ = 0.02, 95% CI (-0.06; 0.11)], and back pain [κ = 0.18, 95% CI (0.11; 0.25)]. Correlations were found between the SCQ and the clinician-reported SCQ [ρ = 0.60, 95% CI (0.55; 0.66)], CCI [ρ = 0.39, 95% CI (0.31; 0.45)], the prevalence of disability [ρ = 0.23, 95% CI (0.15; 0.32)], and quality of life [ρ = -0.30, 95% CI (-0.37; -0.22)], but not between the SCQ and healthcare or productivity costs or disease activity (|ρ| ⩽ 0.2). A change in the SCQ after 15 months was not correlated with a change in any of the outcomes. Conclusion The SCQ is a valid tool for measuring comorbidity in IBD patients, but face and content validity should be improved before being used to correct case-mix differences.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reinier Cornelis Anthonius van Linschoten
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, P.O Box 10900, Rotterdam 3004BA, Netherlands
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Anouk Sjoukje Huberts
- Department of Quality and Patientcare, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Nikki van Leeuwen
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | - Jan Antonius Hazelzet
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, Netherlands
| | | | - Rachel Louise West
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Desirée van Noord
- Department of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Franciscus Gasthuis & Vlietland, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Giangregorio LM, Bleakney RR, Brien S, Butcher SJ, Chan BCF, Chilibeck PD, Devries MC, Funnell L, Jain R, Keller HH, Milligan J, Mourtzakis M, O’Hare BS, Thabane L, Cheung AM. Finding the Optimal Resistance Training Intensity for Your Bones: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther 2023; 103:pzad120. [PMID: 37669136 PMCID: PMC10549785 DOI: 10.1093/ptj/pzad120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the effect of twice-weekly, moderate-to-high intensity progressive resistance training (PRT) for 1 year on lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD) in individuals with low BMD, compared to attention control. Secondary analyses will examine if resistance training improves other health outcomes; if high intensity is more effective than moderate intensity resistance training for all outcomes; the cost of intervention versus benefit; the willingness to pay; and harms. METHODS For this study, 324 men or postmenopausal women aged ≥50 years with a femoral neck, total hip, or lumbar spine BMD T-score of ≤-1, or a Fracture Risk Assessment Tool probability of ≥20% for major osteoporotic fracture or ≥ 3% for hip fracture are being recruited to participate in a randomized controlled trial with 1:1:1 randomization. Participants will be stratified by site (3 centers) to twice-weekly, supervised PRT at moderate intensity (about 10 repetitions maximum), to high intensity PRT (≤6 repetitions maximum), or to a home posture and balance exercise program (attention control) for 1 year (resistance training to comparator allocation ratio of 2:1). The primary outcome is lumbar spine BMD via dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Secondary outcomes include trabecular bone score, proximal femur and total hip BMD and structure, bone-free and appendicular lean mass, physical functioning, falls, fractures, glucose metabolism, cost per life-year gained, adverse events, and quality of life. Between-group differences will be tested in intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses using analysis of covariance, chi-square tests, or negative binomial or logistic regression, adjusting for site and baseline values. IMPACT The Finding the Optimal Resistance Training Intensity For Your Bones trial will support decision making on resistance training for people at risk of fracture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lora M Giangregorio
- Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert R Bleakney
- Department of Medical Imaging, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sheila Brien
- Canadian Osteoporosis Patient Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Scotty J Butcher
- School of Rehabilitation Science, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Brian C F Chan
- KITE Research Institute, Toronto Rehabilitation Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Philip D Chilibeck
- College of Kinesiology, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Michaela C Devries
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - Larry Funnell
- Canadian Osteoporosis Patient Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ravi Jain
- Osteoporosis Strategy, Osteoporosis Canada, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Heather H Keller
- Schlegel-UW Research Institute for Aging, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | - James Milligan
- Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marina Mourtzakis
- Department of Kinesiology and Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Lehana Thabane
- Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Biostatistics Unit, St Joseph’s Healthcare, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
- Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Angela M Cheung
- Department of Medicine, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bek LM, Berentschot JC, Hellemons ME, Remerie SC, van Bommel J, Aerts JGJV, Ribbers GM, van den Berg-Emons HJG, Heijenbrok-Kal MH. Return to work and health-related quality of life up to 1 year in patients hospitalized for COVID-19: the CO-FLOW study. BMC Med 2023; 21:380. [PMID: 37784149 PMCID: PMC10546751 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03083-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Currently, evidence about the long-term consequences of COVID-19 on return to work and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is limited. We evaluated return to work and its associations with baseline characteristics and physical and mental recovery over time in patients up to 1 year after hospitalization for COVID-19. Secondly, we aimed to evaluate the association between return to work and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHODS CO-FLOW, a multicenter prospective cohort study, enrolled adult participants hospitalized for COVID-19, aged ≥ 18 years within 6 months after hospital discharge. Return to work and HRQoL were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months after hospital discharge using the iMTA Productivity Cost Questionnaire and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, respectively. Data were collected between July 1, 2020, and September 1, 2022. Generalized estimating equations with repeated measurements were used to assess outcomes over time. RESULTS In the CO-FLOW study, 371 participants were employed pre-hospitalization. At 3, 6, and 12 months post-discharge, 50% (170/342), 29% (92/317), and 15% (44/295) of participants had not returned to work, and 21% (71/342), 21% (65/317), and 16% (48/295) only partially, respectively. ICU admission (adjusted odds ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.17 (0.10 to 0.30), p < 0.001), persistent fatigue (0.93 (0.90 to 0.97), p < 0.001), female sex (0.57 (0.36 to 0.90), p = 0.017), and older age (0.96 (0.93 to 0.98), p < 0.001) were independently associated with no return to work. ICU patients required a longer time to return to work than non-ICU patients. Patients who did not return or partially returned to work reported lower scores on all domains of HRQoL than those who fully returned. CONCLUSIONS One year after hospitalization for COVID-19, only 69% of patients fully returned to work, whereas 15% did not return and 16% partially returned to work. No or partial return to work was associated with reduced HRQoL. This study suggests that long-term vocational support might be needed to facilitate return to work. TRIAL REGISTRATION World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform NL8710.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L M Bek
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - J C Berentschot
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M E Hellemons
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S C Remerie
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J van Bommel
- Department of Adult Intensive Care Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J G J V Aerts
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G M Ribbers
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - H J G van den Berg-Emons
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M H Heijenbrok-Kal
- Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Rijndam Rehabilitation, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|