National trends and regional variation of open and endovascular repair of thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms in contemporary practice

Outcomes of Thoracic and Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients with Renal Insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) and complex endovascular aneurysm repair (cEVAR) are effective and minimally invasive treatment options for preventing rupture and decreasing mortality of aortic aneurysms. Patients with renal insufficiency are prone to worse postoperative cardiovascular morbidity and mortality due to the atherosclerosis burden as well as increased levels of angiotensin II. Nonetheless, knowledge about the outcomes of aortic stent graft therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) or dialysis is scarce. This study aimed to examine outcomes after TEVAR and cEVAR in patients on CKD and dialysis.

METHODS

Utilizing data from the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database, we retrospectively evaluated patients who underwent TEVAR or cEVRA from 2010 to 2018. Patients were divided into patients with no CKD or dialysis, CKD patients, and dialysis patients. Outcomes were in-hospital stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), spinal cord ischemia (SCI), 30-day mortality, 1-year mortality, aneurysmal rupture, and reintervention. In-hospital outcomes were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analysis and 1-year outcomes were evaluated using Kaplan-Meier Survival and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 4,867 patients were included in the study, 2,694 had no CKD or dialysis, 2,047 had CKD, and 126 were on dialysis. Dialysis patients were significantly younger, and more likely to be non-White and of Hispanic/Latino origin. They were also more likely to have medical comorbidities. CKD patients had higher odds of in-hospital MI (odds ratio [OR]: 2.02, 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.43-2.86), P < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (OR: 1.56, 95% CI (1.18-2.07), P < 0.001) compared to patients with no CKD or dialysis. Dialysis patients had higher odds of 30-day mortality (OR: 3.31, 95% CI (1.73-6.35), P < 0.001). At 1 year, dialysis was associated with a higher risk of mortality (hazard ratio [HR]: 3.48, 95% CI (2.39-5.07), P < 0.001) and reintervention (HR: 1.72, 95% CI (1.001-2.94), P < 0.049). CKD was associated with a higher risk of mortality (HR: 1.45, 95% CI (1.21-1.75), P < 0.001) compared to patients with no CKD or dialysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Among patients undergoing TEVAR or cEVAR, there was no significant difference in the risk of in-hospital stroke, SCI, and 1-year aneurysmal rupture among dialysis and CKD patients compared to patients with no CKD or dialysis. However, CKD patients had twice the risk of in-hospital MI. Dialysis patients had a higher risk of 1-year reintervention. Both dialysis and CKD patients had a higher risk of 30-day and 1-year mortality.

Pilot Study to Improve Resident Experience on Vascular Surgery by Standardizing Dissemination of Operative Steps

OBJECTIVE

Many surgical residencies have passed along attendings preferences and procedural knowledge as a highly utilized but informal resource. The objective was to assess the effect of providing operative steps and attending preferences on surgical resident performance.

DESIGN

This was a prospective observational study with a survey-based design.

SETTING

We created and shared vascular surgery operative steps including institutional and attending preferences with junior residents at the Massachusetts General Hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

There were a total of 31 residents who completed a survey to assess self-perception of performance in operative knowledge and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) Milestone criteria.

RESULTS

Advice from colleagues was the most utilized resource, followed by web-based materials. Of the web-based materials, almost all residents utilized Google searches over other web-based resources designed to specifically help surgical trainees. The vascular surgery resource was used by 90% of residents more than 3 times per week to prepare for operative cases. There was significant improvement in patient positioning, instrument selection, operative field exposure, anatomy, sequence of procedure, procedure choices, and peri-operative care knowledge.

CONCLUSIONS

Development of institutional resources that specifically capture attending surgeon procedural variations can improve resident performance, encourage resident autonomy, and provide a catalog of approaches to challenging operative situations.

Phase-specific survival after endovascular versus open surgical repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has gained preference over open surgical repair (OSR) as the intervention of choice for patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTA). This study aimed to compare the outcomes of patients with DTA undergoing OSR and TEVAR with contemporary findings.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A comprehensive search of MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was conducted to identify relevant randomized controlled trials or studies utilizing propensity-score analysis or reporting risk-adjusted outcomes. The search was performed up until March 2023.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, including 4 studies using propensity-score matching and four studies reporting risk-adjusted outcomes, comprising 14,873 patients with DTA undergoing OSR (N.=10,882) and TEVAR (N.=3991). Operative mortality was similar between the two interventions (odds ratio 0.92, 95% CI 0.70-1.21, P=0.57, I2=0%). However, overall long-term mortality was significantly higher after TEVAR compared to OSR (Hazard Ratio [HR] 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.59, P=0.01, I2=0%). Phase-specific analysis revealed comparable risks of mortality within 1 year and between one and two years after interventions, while the risk of mortality was significantly higher after TEVAR compared to OSR beyond two years (HR 1.77, 95% CI, 1.19-2.63, P=0.01. I2=0%).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated comparable operative mortality between OSR and TEVAR, but higher long-term mortality associated with TEVAR in patients with DTA. The phase-specific analysis highlighted the survival advantage of OSR beyond 2 years. These findings suggest a need for reconsidering OSR indications in the management of DTA.

Open repair with latissimus muscle flap coverage for treatment of infected thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair

A male patient, 70 years of age, was evaluated for an infected thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR). After presenting with persistent fever, a positron emission tomography scan found an infected aortic stent graft. The patient underwent open repair with explantation of the infected TEVAR, extensive periaortic debridement, graft replacement with a Dacron graft, and complete coverage with a latissimus dorsi muscle flap. Tissue culture revealed Clostridium spp. He was discharged home with long-term ampicillin and sulbactam. A postoperative computed tomography scan showed no recurrence of infection. Open surgery with latissimus muscle flap coverage is an achievable option for infected TEVAR.

Early and mid-term outcomes of open thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm repair after thoracic endovascular aortic repair

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the early and mid-term outcomes of open repair in patients with thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA) after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

METHODS

This was a retrospective single center study. Data were retrospectively collected and analyzed for consecutive patients undergoing open TAAA repair (TAAAR) after TEVAR from November 2016 to June 2021. Indications for TAAAR included aneurysm progression due to endoleak, persisted false lumen perfusion, proximal/distal disease progression, and aorta rupture. The risk factor of operative mortality was analyzed by multivariable logistic regression model and the survival was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients who met the inclusion criteria for the study were identified. The mean age at TAAAR was 41 ± 12 years and 43 (68.3%) were male. Marfan syndrome (MFS) was presented in 39 patients (61.9%). 60 (95.2%) patients presented with post-dissection aneurysm and 3 (4.8%) patients with degenerative aneurysm. The extent of TAAA was Crawford I in 9 (14.3%), II in 22 (34.9%), III in 23 (36.5%), and IV in 9 (14.3%). Emergent TAAAR was done in 10 (15.9%) patients, and deep hypothermic circulatory arrest was used in 22 (34.6%). Endograft was explanted in 31 (49.2%). Operative mortality was 11 (17.5%). Stroke, paraplegia, and acute kidney failure occurred in 5 (7.9%), 7 (11.1%), and 6 (9.5%) patients, respectively. Pulmonary complications occurred in 19 (30.2%) patients. The estimated survival was 74.8 ± 4.9% at 5 years. Late reoperations were performed in 2 patients at 2.5 years and 1.3 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In this series of TAAA after TEVAR, TAAAR was related with a high risk of operative mortality and morbidity and the midterm outcomes represented a durable treatment and were respectable.

Endovascular Repair of Zone 0 Ascending Aortic Aneurysm: A Review of Current Knowledge and Developing Technology

Aortic aneurysms represent the 15th leading cause of death in men and women over 55 years of age. Where historically these lesions were all addressed via an open approach, endovascular aortic repair has entirely altered the way that surgeons approach aortic lesions. Although it was initially employed for patients who were poor surgical candidates, endovascular repair is now standard for abdominal aortic aneurysms and aneurysms in the descending thoracic aorta. Open surgery remains the gold standard for management of ascending aneurysms, in part due to the limitations portended by the anatomy of the ascending aorta, although increasing evidence suggests that endovascular approaches are feasible and may sometimes be optimal for patient outcomes. Here, we present some of the anatomical and technical challenges of the endovascular approach to these "Zone 0" aneurysms, the associated complications, and the current state of device development.

Midterm outcomes of open repair versus endovascular descending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair

Objective

The study objective was to evaluate the midterm outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair compared with open repair in patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm.

Methods

From August 1993 to February 2023, 499 patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms underwent open repair (n = 221) or thoracic endovascular aortic repair (n = 278). Of these, 120 matched pairs were identified using propensity score matching based on age, sex, chronic lung disease, stroke, coronary artery disease, diabetes, ejection fraction, dialysis, peripheral vascular disease, prior cardiac surgery, connective tissue disease, and chronic dissection. Primary outcomes were postoperative paralysis, operative mortality, reoperation, and midterm survival.

Results

After matching, the preoperative demographics and comorbidities were balanced in both groups. Intraoperatively, open repair had a lower temperature (18 °C vs 36 °C) and more patients required blood products (66% vs 8%), P < .001. Postoperatively, patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair had fewer strokes (2.5% vs 9.2%; P = .03), less dialysis (0% vs 3.3%; P = .04), and shorter length of stay (5 days vs 12 days, P < .001), but similar lower-extremity paralysis (2.5% vs 2.5%, P = 1.00) compared with open repair. Furthermore, thoracic endovascular aortic repair had higher 7-year incidence of first reoperation (16.1% vs 3.6%, P < .001) but similar operative mortality (0.8% vs 4.2%; P = .10) and 10-year survival outcome (56%; 95% CI, 43-72 vs 58%; 95% CI, 49-68; P = .55) compared with open aortic repair. The hazard ratio was 0.93 (P = .78) for thoracic endovascular aortic repair for midterm mortality and 6.87 (P < .001) for reoperation.

Conclusions

Open repair could be the first option for patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysms who were surgical candidates.

Changes in treatment patterns of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms in the United States

Background

The introduction of endovascular repair provides an alternative to traditional open repair of thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms (TAAA). Its utility is not well defined, however. Using a national database, we studied the treatment patterns and outcomes of TAAA to gain insight into its contemporary surgical practice in the United States.

Methods

Records of TAAA patients who received endovascular and open repair were retrieved from the 2002 to 2018 National Inpatient Sample database. Each cohort was stratified into 4 age groups: ≤50, 51 to 60, 61 to 70, and >70 years. Patient characteristics and in-hospital outcomes were compared between the 2 repair modalities. Temporal trends were investigated.

Results

Endovascular repair use increased steadily, whereas open repair volume remained stable until 2012, before declining by 50% by 2018. This appears to be associated with a declining number of open repairs in patients age >60 years. Patients who underwent endovascular repair were older and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (mean, 2.8 ± 1.7 vs 2.5 ± 1.5; P < .001) but lower in-hospital mortality (mean, 8.9% vs 17.1%; P < .001), shorter length of stay (mean, 10.1 ± 12.2 days vs 17.1 ± 17.4 days; P < .001), and fewer postoperative complications. A difference in mortality between open and endovascular repair was observed for patients age >60 years but not for patients age ≤60 years.

Conclusions

There has been a shift in the treatment of TAAA in the United States from open repair-dominant to endovascular repair-dominant. It has increased surgical access for older and more comorbid patients and has led to a decline in the use of open repair while lowering in-hospital mortality.

Real-world comparative claims analysis of a novel single-branched aortic stent graft device versus thoracic endograft placement with extra-anatomic debranching/revascularization in zone 2 aortic disease

Background

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) involving landing zone 2 can require extra-anatomic debranching (SR-TEVAR) to ensure left subclavian artery perfusion, resulting in increased costs. A single-branch device (Thoracic Branch Endoprosthesis [TBE], WL Gore, Flagstaff, AZ) provides a total endovascular solution. Comparative cost analysis of patients undergoing zone 2 TEVAR requiring left subclavian artery preservation with TBE versus SR-TEVAR is presented.

Methods

A single-center retrospective cost analysis was performed for aortic diseases requiring a zone 2 landing zone (TBE vs. SR-TEVAR) from 2014 to 2019. Facility charges were collected from the universal billing form UB-04 (form CMS 1450).

Results

Twenty-four patients were included in each arm. There were no significant differences in the overall mean procedural charges between the two groups: TBE, $209,736 ($57,761) vs. SR-TEVAR $209,025 ($93,943), P = 0.94. TBE resulted in reduced operating room charges ($36,849 [$8750] vs. $48,073 [$10,825], P = 0.02) and reduced intensive care unit and telemetry room charges, which did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.23 and 0.12, respectively). Device/implant charges were the primary cost driver in both groups. Charges associated with TBE were significantly higher: $105,525 ($36,137) vs. $51,605 ($31,326), P > 0.01.

Conclusions

TBE had similar overall procedural charges despite higher device/implant-related expenses and reduced facility resource utilization (lower operating room, intensive care unit, telemetry, and pharmacy charges).

Management of acute aortic syndrome with evolving individualized precision medicine solutions: Lessons learned over two decades and literature review

Background

Thoracoabdominal acute aortic syndrome is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We aim to scrutinize our evolving strategies for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) management using minimally invasive and adaptive surgical techniques over two decades.

Methods

This is a longitudinal observational study at our tertiary vascular centre from 2002 to 2021. Out of 22,349 aortic referrals, we performed 1,555 aortic interventions over twenty years. Amongst 96 presented with symptomatic aortic thoracic pathology, 71 patients had AAS. Our primary endpoint is combined aneurysm-related and cardiovascular-related mortality.

Results

There were 43 males and 28 females (5 Traumatic Aortic Transection (TAT), 8 Acute Aortic Intramural Hematoma (IMH), 27 Symptomatic Aortic Dissection (SAD) and 31 Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (TAA) post-SAD) with a mean age of 69. All the patients with AAS received optimal medical therapy (OMT), but TAT patients underwent emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Fifty-eight patients had an aortic dissection, of which 31 developed TAA. These 31 patients with SAD and TAA received OMT initially and interval surgical intervention with TEVAR or sTaged hybrId sinGle lumEn Reconstruction (TIGER). To increase our landing area, we performed a left subclavian chimney graft with TEVAR in twelve patients. The average follow-up duration was 78.2 months, and eleven patients (15.5%) had combined aneurysm and cardiovascular-related mortality. Twenty-six percentage of the patients developed endoleaks (EL), of which 15% required re-intervention for type II and III. Four patients who had paraplegia (5.7%) and developed renal failure died. None of our patients had a stroke or bowel ischaemia. Twenty patients had OMT, eight of these were patients with acute aortic hematoma, and all eight died within 30 days of presentation.

Conclusion

Acute aortic hematoma is a sinister finding, which must be closely monitored, and consideration is given to early intervention. Paraplegia and renal failure result in an increased mortality rate. TIGER technique with interval TEVAR has salvaged complex situations in young patients. Left subclavian chimney increases our landing area and abolishes SINE. Our experience shows that minimally invasive techniques could be a viable option for AAS.

Novel Approach to treating a COVID-19 positive patient with a Complex Arch and Descending Aneurysm and Dissection in whom open surgery is prohibitive

Ascending aortic and arch aneurysms are a challenging group of pathologies for surgeons. These typically require a complex open repair, including hypothermic circulatory arrest and carry a high peri-operative risk. Outcomes are best when performed in centers with significant experience and expertise. Many patients, because of co-morbidities, are at a prohibitive risk for these open surgeries. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has become the preferred treatment of most acute descending thoracic aortic pathologies.[1] However, these require strict anatomic criteria to be successful and are usually confined to the distal arch and descending thoracic aorta. There are no commercially available endovascular devices in the United States to treat this patient population with ascending or proximal arch aneurysms or dissections, especially in an urgent or emergent setting, whose anatomy does not meet criteria for standard TEVAR. We present a novel endovascular approach, including a cerebral protection strategy, to treat a complex arch aneurysm and dissection in a patient who was not a candidate for an open repair.

Stroke Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: Determinants, Short and Long Term Impact

We performed a contemporary assessment of clinical and radiographic factors of stroke after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Patients undergoing TEVAR from 2006 to 2017 were identified. We assessed clinical and radiographic data, including preoperative head and neck computed tomography, Doppler ultrasonography, and intraoperative angiography. Our primary outcome was stroke after TEVAR. Four hundred seventy-nine patients underwent TEVAR, mean age 68.1 ± 19.5 years, 52.6% male. Indications for TEVAR included aneurysms (n = 238, 49.7%) or dissections (n = 152, 31.7%). Ishimaru landing zones were Zone 2 (n = 225, 47.0%), Zone 3 (n = 151, 31.5%), or Zone 4 (n = 103, 21.5%). Stroke occurred in 3.8% (n = 18) of patients, with 1.9% (8) major events (modified Rankin Scale >3). Pathophysiology was predominantly embolic (n = 14), and occurred in posterior (n = 6), anterior (n = 6), or combined circulation (n = 4), and in the left hemisphere (n = 10) or bilateral (n = 6). Univariate analysis suggested use of lumbar drain (33.3% versus 57.2%, P = 0.04), inability to revascularize the left subclavian artery (16.7% vs 5.2%, P = 0.04) and number of implanted components (2.5 ± 1.2 vs 2.0 ± 0.97, P = 0.03) were associated with stroke. Multivariable analysis identified number of implanted components (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.17-2.67 P = 0.00) and inability to revascularize the left subclavian artery as independent predictors of stroke. Stroke was associated with a higher perioperative mortality (27.8% vs 3.9%, P < 0.01). Stroke after TEVAR is primarily embolic in nature and related to both anatomic and procedural factors. This may have important implications for device development in the era of endovascular arch repair.

Proximal aortic repair in dialysis patients: A national database analysis

OBJECTIVES

Dialysis is a well-established risk factor for morbidity and mortality after cardiovascular procedures. However, little is known regarding the outcomes of proximal aortic surgery in this high-risk cohort.

METHODS

Perioperative (in-hospital or 30-day mortality) and 10-year outcomes were analyzed for all the patients who underwent open proximal aortic repair with the diagnosis of nonruptured thoracic aortic aneurysm (aneurysm, n = 325) or type A aortic dissection (dissection, n = 461) from 1987 to 2015 using the US Renal Data System database.

RESULTS

In patients with aneurysm, perioperative mortality was 12.6%. The 10-year mortality was 81% ± 3%. Age 65 years or more (hazard ratio [HR], 1.35; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03 to 1.78; P = .03), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.01-2.82; P = .047), and Black race (HR, 1.46; 95% CI, 1.09-1.97; P = .01) were independently associated with worse 10-year mortality. In patients with dissection, perioperative mortality was 24.3% and 10-year mortality was 87.9% ± 2.2%. Age 65 years or more (HR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.19-1.86; P < .001), congestive heart failure (HR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.11-2.57; P = .004), and diabetes mellitus as the cause of dialysis (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.2-2.57; P = .004) were independently associated with worse 10-year mortality. Black race (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.6-0.92; P = .008) was associated with a better outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

We described challenging perioperative and 10-year outcomes for dialysis patients undergoing proximal aortic repair. The present study suggests the need for careful patient selection in the elective repair of proximal aortic aneurysm for dialysis-dependent patients, whereas it affirms the feasibility of emergency surgery for acute type A aortic dissections.

Left internal mammary artery access for embolization of the left subclavian artery in a patient with type II endoleak after thoracic endovascular aortic repair for a ruptured right-sided aortic arch aneurysm

A 65-year-old woman had presented with a ruptured type B intramural hematoma associated with a right-sided aortic arch aneurysm, a large Kommerell diverticulum (KD) and an aberrant left subclavian artery (LSA). She underwent total aortic arch replacement with elephant trunk, thoracic endovascular aortic repair, and LSA ligation distal to the left vertebral artery. She subsequently developed a brisk type II endoleak into the KD via retrograde flow from the left vertebral artery. Percutaneous access of the left internal mammary artery with coil embolization of the proximal LSA and KD was performed. At 5 years, computed tomography angiogram showed complete thoracic aortic remodeling without an endoleak. The results from the present case have illustrated the novel use of the left internal mammary artery as an alternative access for LSA embolization in patients with type II endoleak and limited access options.

Midterm Outcomes of Endovascular versus Open Surgical Repair of Intact Descending Thoracic Aneurysms in Patients with Connective Tissue Disorders

OBJECTIVE

Data on the efficacy of endovascular (TEVAR) vs open surgical repair for chronic aortic pathology in patients with connective tissue disorders are limited. In particular, few studies have examined outcomes of TEVAR vs. open repair for intact aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta (DTAAs) in this subset of patients beyond index hospitalization. Therefore, we investigate and five-year outcomes of TEVAR and open surgical repair of intact DTAAs in patients with known connective tissue disorders.

METHODS

Using the TriNetX Data Network, a global federated database of over 75 million patients, we conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with connective tissue disorders and intact DTAAs, treated initially with either TEVAR or open surgery. Eligible patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched for several preoperative covariates including demographics, surgical history, and comorbidities. We calculated and compared five-year cumulative incidence and hazard of death, reintervention, aortic dissection, renal failure, stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, paraplegia and limb ischemia using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We identified 55 patients treated with TEVAR and 200 treated with open surgery. After matching, we compared 46 patients in each cohort. After matching, only incidence of reintervention via endovascular approach was significantly higher among patients in the TEVAR cohort (27.1% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.009). Rates and hazards of other outcomes were higher in the TEVAR group, however differences were not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with TEVAR had numerically higher rates of adverse outcomes compared to open surgical patients, however only the difference in reintervention rate was statistically significant. Given the evolving landscape of endovascular intervention, greater-powered studies are needed to determine the safety and efficacy of TEVAR for intact DTAAs in a select subset of connective tissue disorder patients.

Characterizing endovascular aortic intervention outcomes for nonruptured aortic aneurysms by physician specialty

BACKGROUND

Evaluate patient outcomes after endovascular aortic interventions performed for nonruptured aortic aneurysms by physician specialties.

METHODS

Endovascular aortic repair (EVAR), fenestrated or branched repair (F-BEVAR), and thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) procedures were obtained from the Illinois Hospital Association Comparative Health Care and Hospital Data Reporting Services database from 2016 to 2019. Logistic and Poisson regression were used to determine outcomes by patient, physician, and hospital characteristics.

RESULTS

A total of 4,935 procedures, 3,666 (74.3%) EVAR, 567 (11.5%) F-BEVAR, and 702 (14.2%) TEVAR were performed by vascular surgeons, interventional radiologists, interventional cardiologists, and cardiac surgeons. Vascular surgeons performed interventions equally between hospital types while interventional radiologists primarily performed interventions in teaching hospitals (68.1%) and interventional cardiologists and cardiac surgeons typically performed interventions in community hospitals (91.8% and 82.1%, respectively; P < .001). No differences in inpatient mortality were noted between specialties. Patients treated by interventional radiologists had increased odds of staying in the hospital ≥8 days (odd ration [OR] 1.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19-3.19) and patients treated by interventional cardiologists had lower odds of being admitted to the intensive care unit [ICU] (OR 0.42, 95% CI 0.18-0.95).

CONCLUSION

Differences in practice patterns among specialties performing endovascular aortic aneurysm repair for nonruptured aneurysms suggest opportunities for collaboration to optimize quality of care.

Low Volume Hospitals Are Not Associated with Inferior Outcomes After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

BACKGROUND

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been used increasingly to treat complex thoracic aortic pathology. This study aimed to assess hospital volume's impact on outcomes in patients undergoing TEVAR.

STUDY DESIGN

Patients undergoing TEVAR between January 2015 and December 2019 were identified in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI) database. The participating centers were grouped into either low-volume hospitals (LVH) or high-volume hospitals (HVH). We assessed the impact of hospital volume on 30-day mortality and major postoperative complications using a multivariable logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 3,584 TEVAR patients (asymptomatic = 1,720; symptomatic/ruptured =1,864) were identified at 147 centers. The median average annual number of TEVAR cases at LVH and HVH was 6 and 17 cases, respectively. There was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between LVH and HVH (asymptomatic: 3.7% vs. 3.7%, p = 0.98; symptomatic/rupture: 9.3% vs. 7.3%, p = 0.13). After adjusting for multiple clinical and anatomical factors, being treated in LVH was not associated with increased 30-day mortality (asymptomatic: OR = 0.98, 95% CI: 0.52, 1.87, p = 0.96; symptomatic/rupture: OR = 1.15, 95%CI: 0.75, 1.77, p = 0.53) nor an increased risk of major complications, including renal, neurological, cardiac, pulmonary, and femoral artery access complication (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Using a large national database, we demonstrate that LVH is not associated with inferior TEVAR outcomes than HVH. The technical aspect of the procedure might play a role in the similarity of outcomes across the different institutional experiences.

Endovascular repair of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms-a mid-term report from the Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT)

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the short- to mid-term outcomes of descending thoracic aortic aneurysm (DTAA) repair from the Gore Global Registry for Endovascular Aortic Treatment (GREAT).

METHODS

This is a multicentre sponsored prospective observational cohort registry. The study population comprised those treated for DTAA receiving GORE thoracic aortic devices for DTAA repair between August 2010 and October 2016. Major primary outcomes were early and late survival, freedom from aorta-related mortality and freedom from aorta-related reintervention.

RESULTS

There were 180 (58.1%) males and 130 (41.9%) females: the mean age was 70 ± 11 years (range 18-92). The median maximum DTAA diameter was 60 mm (interquartile range 54-68.8). Technical success was achieved in all patients. Operative mortality, as well as immediate conversion to open repair, was never observed. At the 30-day window, mortality occurred in 4 (1.3%) patients, neurological events occurred in 4 (1.3%) patients (transient ischaemic attacks/stroke n = 3, paraplegia n = 1) and the reintervention rate was 4.5% (n = 14). Estimated survival was 95.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 92.6-97.4] at 6 months, 92.7% (95% CI 89.1-95.2) at 1 year and 57.3% (95% CI 48.5-65.1) at 5 years. Freedom from aorta-related mortality was 98.3% (95% CI 96.1-99.3) at 6 months, 98.3% (95% CI 96.1-99.3) at 1 year and 92.2% (95% CI 83.4-96.4) at 5 years. Freedom from thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR)-related reintervention at 5 years was 87.2% (95% CI 81.2-91.4).

CONCLUSIONS

TEVAR for DTAAs using GORE thoracic aortic devices is associated with a low rate of device-related reinterventions and is effective at preventing aorta-related mortality for up to 5 years of follow-up.

CLINICAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT number: NCT01658787.

SUBJECT COLLECTION

161, 164.

Outcomes of Open v. Endovascular Repair of Descending Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aortic Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Open repair is the standard of care for patients with descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms. Although effective, surgery carries a high risk of morbidity and mortality. Endovascular stent-grafts were introduced to treat these aneurysms in patients considered too high risk for open repair. Early results are promising, but later results are incompletely known. Therefore, we sought to compare short- and intermediate-term outcomes of open versus endovascular repair for these aneurysms.

METHODS

From 2000-2010, 1,053 patients underwent open (n=457) or endovascular (n=596) repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aortic aneurysms at Cleveland Clinic. To balance patient characteristics between these groups, propensity-score matching was performed, yielding 278 well-matched pairs (61% of possible pairs). Endpoints included short- and long-term outcomes.

RESULTS

In matched patients, compared with endovascular stenting, open repair achieved similar in-hospital mortality (n=23/8.3% vs n=21/7.6%, P=.8) and occurrence of paralysis and stroke (n=10/3.6% vs n=6/2.2%, P=.3), despite longer postoperative stay (median 11 vs 6 days), more dialysis-dependent acute renal failure (n=24/8.6% vs n=9/3.3%, P=.008), and prolonged ventilation (n=106/46% vs n=17/6.3%, P<.0001). Open repair resulted in better 10-year survival than endovascular repair (52% vs 33%, P<.0001), and aortic reintervention was less frequent (4% vs 21%, P<.0001). Despite a decrease in the first postoperative year, average aneurysm size did not recover to normal range after endovascular stenting.

CONCLUSIONS

Open repair of descending thoracic and thoracoabdominal aneurysms can achieve acceptable short-term outcomes with better intermediate-term outcomes than endovascular repair.

Functional performance status and risk of cardiovascular events and mortality following endovascular repair of thoracic and abdominal aortic pathology

OBJECTIVE

To characterize the association of preoperative functional performance status based on Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scoring with the risk of adverse cardiovascular events, vascular events, and mortality in patients undergoing EVAR and TEVAR.

METHODS

Retrospective review of the Society for Vascular Surgery Vascular Quality Initiative, a large, multi-center, registry database was performed. All individuals undergoing EVAR (n = 18,730) and TEVAR (n = 6595) for non-ruptured aortic pathologies between 2014 and 2018 were eligible for analysis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association of pre-procedure ECOG functional performance status on risk of in-hospital adverse cardiovascular events, vascular events, and mortality.

RESULTS

The number of operations complicated by adverse cardiovascular and vascular events was 480 (2.6%) and 190 (1.0%) for EVAR and 733 (11.1%) and 219 (3.3%) for TEVAR, respectively. There were 118 (0.6%) and 240 (3.6%) in-hospital deaths following EVAR and TEVAR, respectively. Patients with ECOG grades 3 or 4 undergoing EVAR were at increased risk of cardiovascular events (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.09, 2.41) and one-year mortality (HR = 2.62; 95% CI = 1.92, 3.57) compared to those with ECOG grade 0. Patients undergoing TEVAR with ECOG grade 3 or 4 were at increased risk for both inpatient death (OR = 2.77; 95% CI = 1.56, 4.9) and one-year mortality (HR = 3.27, 95% CI = 2.06, 5.21). ECOG status was not associated with an increased risk of adverse vascular events following either EVAR or TEVAR.

CONCLUSIONS

Poor preoperative functional status as assessed by ECOG score is associated with an increased risk of adverse postoperative cardiovascular events following EVAR and a higher mortality risk following both EVAR and TEVAR. Functional status assessment may be useful for risk stratification and determining procedural candidacy prior to EVAR and TEVAR.

Management of arch aneurysms with a single-branch thoracic endograft in zone 0

Background

We present preliminary data from a patient cohort undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair for Ishimaru zone 0 and 1 using a novel branched arch endograft.

Methods

This US multicenter early feasibility investigational device exemption clinical trial treated 9 patients with a mean age 72.8 ± 8.0 years (77.8% male). The endograft was designed with a single side branch designed to facilitate aortic coverage proximal to the innominate or left carotid artery while maintaining branch vessel patency. Pathology treated included fusiform (n = 2) or saccular (n = 7) aneurysm, with a maximum aortic diameter of 6.3 ± 0.7 cm. Treatment was into zone 0 in 8 patients, and zone 1 in 1 patient.

Results

All patients underwent initial successful first-stage supra-aortic trunk revascularization using a variety of techniques, without the occurrence of stroke. For the second thoracic endovascular aortic repair stage, median total treatment length was 20 cm. The primary end point of device delivery and branch vessel patency was achieved in 100% of patients, without 30-day mortality or spinal cord ischemia. Cerebrovascular events were observed in 2 patients through 30 days. No type I or III endoleaks were reported and all side branches were patent at 12-month imaging follow-up.

Conclusions

Endovascular repair of Ishimaru zone 0 or 1 arch aortic aneurysms can be achieved with a novel branched arch endograft. Future studies will evaluate the mid-term outcomes with this device in other pathologies and further define the occurrence of postoperative neurologic events.

Complications and Management of the Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

Endovascular treatment in thoracic aortic diseases has increased in use exponentially since Dake and colleagues first described the use of a home-made transluminal endovascular graft on 13 patients with descending thoracic aortic aneurysm at Stanford University in the early 1990s. Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) was initially developed for therapy in patients deemed unfit for open surgery. Innovations in endograft engineering design and popularization of endovascular techniques have transformed TEVAR to the predominant treatment choice in elective thoracic aortic repair. The number of TEVARs performed in the United States increased by 600% from 1998 to 2007, while the total number of thoracic aortic repairs increased by 60%. As larger multicenter trials and meta-analysis studies in the 2000s demonstrate the significant decrease in perioperative morbidity and mortality of TEVAR over open repair, TEVAR became incorporated into standard guidelines. The 2010 American consensus guidelines recommend TEVAR to be “strongly considered” when feasible for patients with degenerative or traumatic aneurysms of the descending thoracic aorta exceeding 5.5 cm, saccular aneurysms, or postoperative pseudoaneurysms. Nowadays, TEVAR is the predominant treatment for degenerative and traumatic descending thoracic aortic aneurysm repair. Although TEVAR has been shown to have decreased early morbidity and mortality compared with open surgical repair, endovascular manipulation of a diseased aorta with endovascular devices continues to have significant risks. Despite continued advancement in endovascular technique and devices since the first prospective trial examined the complications associated with TEVAR, common complications, two decades later, still include stroke, spinal cord ischemia, device failure, unintentional great vessel coverage, access site complications, and renal injury. In this article, we review common TEVAR complications with some corresponding radiographic imaging and their management.

Review of Type III Endoleaks

Endoleak remains a significant challenge to endovascular aneurysm repair, particularly as evolving techniques and devices have allowed treatment of increasingly complex aneurysm anatomy with increasing number of device components. Intervention is recommended for both type I and III endoleaks due to their risk of rupture, and endovascular techniques are the favored modality with placement of a bridging endograft over the endoleak defect. Conversion to open surgical repair remains the definitive option in cases where less invasive methods have failed or are precluded. In this article, the authors review evidence on the etiology, incidence, diagnosis, and current techniques for type III endoleak management.

Incidence and characteristics of hospitalization for proximal aortic surgery for acute syndromes and for aneurysms in the USA from 2005 to 2014

OBJECTIVES

The effectiveness of proximal thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA) surgery in preventing acute aortic syndromes, such as dissection and rupture, is unknown at the populational level. This study evaluated trends in acute aortic syndrome operation incidence relative to proximal aortic surgical volume in the USA.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample in 2005-2014 was performed. Acute aortic syndrome and TAA were identified with International Classification of Diseases, 9th edition diagnosis codes. Proximal aortic surgery was defined as the diagnosis of acute aortic syndrome or TAA with an aortic procedure and either cardioplegia, cardiopulmonary bypass or other cardiac operation. Annual rates of acute aortic syndrome surgery and proximal thoracic aneurysm surgery were adjusted for US population. Trends were evaluated using linear regression.

RESULTS

We identified 38 442 operations for acute aortic diagnoses and 74 953 operations for TAAs. Case volume for acute aortic syndromes increased from 0.93 to 1.63 per 100 000 (P = 0.001), and aneurysm surgery increased from 1.75 to 3.19 per 100 000 (P < 0.001). Patient and hospital characteristics differed between acute aortic and aneurysm operations, with black patients being most notably underrepresented in the aneurysm population (4.9% vs 17.0%, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Acute aortic syndrome operative volume increased from 2005 to 2014 despite increasing rates of proximal aortic aneurysm surgery. Patient characteristic discrepancies were observed between the 2 groups of hospitalizations, highlighting the need for continued efforts to minimize sociodemographic disparities.

Early and mid-term results of endovascular treatment of thoracic aorta diseases: a single-center experience

We conducted an analysis to assess early and mid-term outcomes of patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for type B thoracic aorta dissection, descending thoracic aneurysm, or traumatic aortic transection. From January 2016 through December 2018, twenty-seven patients (23 male, 4 female, mean age of 57 years) affected by type B dissection (n = 13 [48.2%]), thoracic aneurysm (n = 9 [33.3%]), and post-traumatic aortic isthmus rupture (n = 5 [18.5%]) were treated using TEVAR with and without left subclavian artery revascularization. All procedures were performed in a hybrid operating room using general (n = 12) or regional (n = 15) anesthesia. A combined brachial artery and bilateral femoral artery access was used in all patients. To achieve adequate proximal thoracic aorta landing zone length, coverage of the left subclavian artery with proximal endovascular plug occlusion was performed in 17 patients (62.9%); including 4 patients undergoing carotid-subclavian artery bypass before TEVAR stent-graft deployment. Primary procedural success rate was 96.3%; 1 patient had a Type Ib endoleak that was treated by distal stent graft extension. Four adverse outcomes occurred in the immediate postoperative period, including 2 cases of left upper arm acute ischemia (7.4%), ischemic stroke (3.7%), and asymptomatic iliac artery dissection (3.7%). During a mean follow-up of 18 months, no graft-related deaths or endoleak occurred. One patient developed symptomatic subclavian steal syndrome 1 month after operation and underwent a left carotid-subclavian artery bypass with symptom resolution. One patient died 6 months after TEVAR due to neoplasm. Our experience indicates TEVAR is a safe and less invasive alternative to open surgery for a spectrum of thoracic aorta diseases, especially for urgent conditions and in patients with high-risk surgical comorbidities.

Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Octogenarians and Nonagenarians

BACKGROUND

The oldest segments of the population are expanding rapidly, and the number of thoracic endovascular aortic repairs (TEVARs) performed in the elderly parallels this trend. We describe our institutional TEVAR experience in octogenarians and nonagenarians.

METHODS

All patients 80 years and older undergoing TEVAR at a single institution were reviewed using a prospectively maintained database. Baselines demographics, operative details, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Twenty-five octogenarians and nonagenarians (age, 84.8 ± 3.7 years; 64% male) underwent TEVAR between January 2014 and January 2019. The most common preoperative comorbidities were hypertension (n = 24; 96%) and tobacco use (n = 18; 72%), and the mean modified frailty index was 0.32 ± 0.17. Degenerative aneurysms constituted the majority of aortic pathologies (60%), and most patients were symptomatic (64%), with a mean maximal aortic diameter of 62.7 ± 15.6 mm. Endoleaks were noted in 3 (12%) patients. Intensive care unit length of stay was 2.0 (1.5, 3.0) days, and the total length of stay was 5.0 (3.0, 7.0) days. In-hospital mortality was 12% (n = 3), while the overall 30-day mortality was 16% (n = 4). The median follow-up was 469.0 (76.0, 586.0) days. On univariate analysis, the presence of a postoperative complication was associated with a significantly increased risk of 30-day mortality (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the inherently elevated operative risk among the elderly, this study demonstrates reasonable success rates for TEVAR in octogenarian and nonagenarian patients. In properly selected patients, advanced age alone should not be a prohibitive factor for TEVAR.

Impact of trauma center volume on major vascular injury: An analysis of the National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB)

BACKGROUND

The association of procedure volume and improved outcomes has been established with infrequently performed elective operations. However, effect of trauma center volume on outcomes in emergency surgery has not been defined. We hypothesized that high volume centers (HVC) would provide better outcomes for operative major vascular injuries (MVI) than low volume centers (LVC).

METHODS

The NTDB was queried from 2010 to 2014. Patients with MVI were identified and HVC were compared to LVC. HVC were defined as >480 patients per year with ISS≥15.

RESULTS

There were 37,125 patients with MVI, with 16,461 (44.3%) managed operatively. Of these, 15,965 (97%) underwent surgery at HVC and 496 (3%) at LVC. There was no difference in shunt utilization, however, HVC were more likely to utilize endovascular repair (31.0% vs. 21.9%, p < 0.001). Rates of death, amputation, and compartment syndrome were similar. HVC were more likely to develop pneumonia or sepsis. On logistic regression, HVC was not associated with survival (OR: 0.90, 95%CI: 0.60-1.34, p = 0.60). Variables associated with mortality for HVC and LVC included thoracic arterial injury (OR: 1.57, 95%CI: 1.27-1.94, p < 0.001), penetrating mechanism (OR:1.84, 95%CI: 1.57-2.15, p < 0.001), and open repair (OR: 1.95, 95%CI: 1.69-2.26, p < 0.001). Lower ISS (OR: 0.29, 95%CI: 0.24-0.34, p < 0.001) and higher presenting blood pressure (OR: 0.99, 95%CI: 0.99-1.00, p < 0.001) were associated with survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although LVC may have less proficiency with endovascular techniques, trauma center volume does not influence survival in emergency surgery for MVI.

National Study of Index and Readmission Mortality and Costs for Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair in Patients With Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

In the current era of value-based health care delivery, an understanding of patient populations at greatest risk for mortality, complications, and readmissions after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is warranted. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate outcomes after TEVAR for patients with varying degrees of renal dysfunction.

METHODS

All patients who underwent TEVAR from 2010 to 2015 in the Nationwide Readmissions Database were identified. These patients were further stratified into four groups: no chronic kidney disease (NCKD), chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 1 to 3 (CKD1-3), CKD 4 to 5 (CKD4-5), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis. Multivariable regression analysis was used to study index mortality, early (30 days) and intermediate (31-90 days) readmissions, costs, and length of stay. Kaplan-Meier analyses were performed to compare readmission performance among all four groups.

RESULTS

An estimated 121,046 patients underwent TEVAR with 26,653 (22.1%) being elective. Patients with ESRD comprised 2.7% of elective and 5.4% of nonelective TEVAR operations. Patients with CKD4-5 (17.8%; P = .01) and with ESRD (21.1%; P < .001), but not with CKD1-3 (14.1%; P = .12), had remarkably higher early readmission rate than the NCKD cohort (9.2%). Patients with ESRD had remarkably higher hospitalization costs than the NCKD group ($7456; 95% confidence interval, $2629-$12,283). Cardiovascular, infectious, and vascular complications were the most prevalent diagnoses on readmission, with no remarkable difference among the NCKD and CKD4-5/ESRD groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Nearly 10% of all patients with TEVAR have evidence of chronic kidney disease of varying severity. Only patients with ESRD are at risk of substantially higher odds of mortality, readmissions, index length of stay, and costs compared with the non-CKD cohort.

Endovascular Versus Open Repair of Intact Descending Thoracic Aortic Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

For the management of descending thoracic aortic aneurysms, recent evidence has suggested that outcomes of open surgical repair may surpass thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) in as early as 2 years.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the comparative effectiveness of TEVAR and open surgical repair in the treatment of intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

Using the Medicare database, a retrospective study using regression discontinuity design and propensity score matching was performed on patients with intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms who underwent TEVAR or open surgical repair between 1999 and 2010 with follow-up through 2014. Survival was assessed with restricted mean survival time. Perioperative mortality was assessed with logistic regression. Reintervention was evaluated as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Matching created comparable groups with 1,235 open surgical repair patients matched to 2,470 TEVAR patients. The odds of perioperative mortality were greater for open surgical repair: high-volume center, odds ratio (OR): 1.97 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53 to 2.61); low-volume center, OR: 3.62 (95% CI: 2.88 to 4.51). The restricted mean survival time difference favored TEVAR at 9 years, -209.2 days (95% CI: -298.7 to -119.7 days; p < 0.001) for open surgical repair. Risk of reintervention was lower for open surgical repair, hazard ratio: 0.40 (95% CI: 0.34 to 0.60; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Open surgical repair was associated with increased odds of early postoperative mortality but reduced late hazard of death. Despite the late advantage of open repair, mean survival was superior for TEVAR. TEVAR should be considered the first line for repair of intact descending thoracic aortic aneurysms in Medicare beneficiaries.

Outcomes after thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with chronic kidney disease in the Medicare population

OBJECTIVE

Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has been increasingly performed in higher-risk patients with renal failure. The objective was to compare Medicare patients with preoperative chronic kidney disease with patients with normal renal function to determine differences in postoperative survival and complications.

METHODS

From 2000 to 2014, 27,079 Medicare fee-for service patients underwent thoracic endovascular aortic repair. Patients were stratified by kidney function, and 23,375 patients (86%) had no chronic kidney disease, 2957 patients (11%) had chronic kidney disease stage I/IV, and 747 patients (3%) had end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis. Groups were then compared with determined differences in adjusted all-cause mortality and rates of postoperative complications.

RESULTS

Overall survival was significantly worse among patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis compared with patients with no chronic kidney disease (1-year survival no chronic kidney disease: 78%; chronic kidney disease I/II: 77%; chronic kidney disease III: 67%; chronic kidney disease IV: 58%; and end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis: 48%, P < .001). Mortality was significantly increased among patients with chronic kidney disease III (hazard ratio [HR], 1.29; P < .001), chronic kidney disease IV (HR, 1.74; P < .001), and end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis (HR, 2.03; P < .001). No mortality difference was found between patients with no chronic kidney disease and patients with chronic kidney disease stage I/II. At 30 days after thoracic endovascular aortic repair, sepsis was increased for patients with chronic kidney disease stage III/IV (HR, 1.7; P < .001) and end-stage renal disease or hemodialysis (HR, 2.7; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

In this elderly Medicare population undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic repair, patients with chronic kidney disease stage III, chronic kidney disease stage IV, or end-stage renal disease/hemodialysis had poor survival and increased morbidity compared with those with normal kidney function. These data may suggest that patients with chronic kidney disease stage III, chronic kidney disease stage IV, or end-stage renal disease/hemodialysis should be more cautiously evaluated for thoracic endovascular aortic repair, weighing the benefits of the procedure against the high expected mortality.

Effect of Resident Involvement on Morbidity and Mortality Following Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of resident involvement in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Although the influence of resident intraoperative involvement in several types of surgical procedures has been reported, the effect of resident participation in TEVAR is unknown. We evaluated patient outcomes in resident-involved TEVAR procedures.

METHODS

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was analyzed for TEVAR performed from 2010 to 2012. Current procedural terminology codes were used to identify adult patients (≥18 y) who underwent TEVAR. Patients were grouped into those with and without resident involvement. Descriptive and binomial logistic statistics were used to determine the effect of resident involvement on post-TEVAR outcomes. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 676 patients met inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 517 (76.5%) had residents involved. Overall mortality was 9.8%, with no significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.88). Resident involvement was not a significant predictor of any post-TEVAR complication. Postoperative pneumonia (3.5% vs 6.9%, p = 0.06), prolonged mechanical ventilation (11.8% vs 11.9%, p = 0.96), stroke (2.7% vs 5.7%, p = 0.07), urinary tract infection (3.3% vs 4.4%, p = 0.50), progressive renal insufficiency (1.2% vs 2.5%, p = 0.22), acute renal failure (4.1% vs 5.0%, p = 0.60), cardiac arrest (2.9% vs 5.0%, p = 0.20), myocardial infarction (1.7% vs 1.9%, p = 0.91), deep venous thrombosis (1.7% vs 1.3%, p = 0.67), red blood cells transfusions (29.2% vs 36.5%, p = 0.08), sepsis (2.9% vs 4.4%, p = 0.35), septic shock (1.9% vs 3.8%, p = 0.18), and unplanned reintubation (8.7% vs 9.4%, p = 0.78) were not significantly affected. Additionally, resident involvement did not significantly affect operative time (176.1 ± 122.8 min vs 180.3 ± 119.1 min, p = 0.71) and anesthesia time (282.1 ± 146.6 min vs 278.3 ± 140.5 min, p = 0.78).

CONCLUSIONS

The participation of residents in TEVAR did not significantly affect all 30-day patient outcomes. Resident involvement in TEVAR is safe and should be encouraged.

MINI ABSTRACT

This study evaluated the effect of resident participation on postoperative outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement (ACS-NSQIP) database. Results showed that resident involvement in TEVAR does not negatively affect patient outcomes.

Outcomes Following Non-operative Management of Thoracic and Thoracoabdominal Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Surgical decision making remains difficult in several patients with aneurysmal disease of the descending thoracic (DT) or thoracoabdominal (TA) aorta. Despite previous studies that have investigated aneurysms treated non-operatively using a prospective growth analysis, completeness and accuracy of follow-up were inconsistent. We aim to describe the survival and freedom from adverse aortic events in patients with DT and TA who did not undergo operative repair.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective analysis of all patients with either a descending degenerative atherosclerotic or dissection-related DT or TA aortic lesion who were treated non-operatively from April 2002 to December 2016. We studied patients who did not undergo operative repair of descending degenerative atherosclerotic or dissection-related DT or TA aortic lesion. Primary end points were overall survival and freedom from aortic-related mortality (ARM).

RESULTS

Of the 315 patients diagnosed with DT or TA disease, 56 (18%) did not undergo surgical repair. Mean aneurysm diameter was 65 mm ± 15 (range 50-120; IQR 5.4-7.15). Extent of the aortic aneurysms was DT in 36 (11%) patients and TA in 20 (6%). Median duration of follow-up was 12 months (range 1-108; IQR 3-36). Over the course of the study, 41 (73%) patients died for an overall survival rate of 53% ± 7 at 1 year (95% CI 40-65) and 23% ± 7 at 3 year (95% CI 17-42.5). Aortic-related mortality was 27% (n = 15), significantly higher in patients with aneurysms ≥ 60 mm [n = 13, (39%) vs. n = 2, (9%); P = 0.025; OR = 5.04]. Overall, estimated freedom from ARM was 81% ± 5.5 at 1 year (95% CI 68-89) and 66.5% ± 9 at 3 year (95% CI 48-81). Only TA extent was independently associated with freedom from ARM during the follow-up (P = 0.005; HR: 5.74; 95% CI 1.711-19.729).

CONCLUSIONS

Thoracoabdominal extent of the aneurysmal aortic disease is the most important predictor of ARM in unrepaired DT or TA aortic diseases. Mortality from aortic-related events was significantly more premature than mortality from non-aortic-related mortality.

Short term outcome of thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with thoracic aortic diseases

AIM AND BACKGROUND

Open surgical repair for thoracic aortic diseases is associated with a high perioperative mortality and morbidity. Most of type B aortic dissections are uncomplicated and are medically treated which carries a high mortality rate. Thoracic endovascular aortic repair is the first-line therapy for isolated aneurysms of the descending aorta and complicated type B aortic dissection. The aim of this study is to test the safety of early thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection and patients with thoracic aortic aneurysms.

METHODS

A total of 30 patients (24 men and 6 females; mean age 59 ± 8 years) with uncomplicated type B aortic dissection and descending thoracic aortic aneurysm who underwent endovascular aortic repair in National Heart Institute and Cairo University hospitals were followed up. Clinical follow-up data was done at one, three and twelve months thereafter. Clinical follow-up events included death, neurological deficits, symptoms of chronic mal-perfusion syndrome and secondary intervention. Multi-slice computed tomography was performed at three and six months after intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 30 patients, 24 patients had aortic dissection, and 6 patients had an aortic aneurysm. 7 patients underwent hybrid technique and the rest underwent the basic endovascular technique in whom success rate was 100%. Two patients developed type I endoleak, however both improved after short term follow up. The total mortality rate was 10% throughout the follow-up. Both death and endoleak occurred in subacute and chronic cases, while using TEVAR in acute AD and aneurysm showed no side effects. Early thoracic endovascular aortic repair showed better results and less complications.

CONCLUSION

Along with medical treatment, early thoracic endovascular aortic repair in uncomplicated type B aortic dissections and thoracic aortic aneurysms is associated with better outcome.

Complex endovascular treatment of intact aortic aneurysms: An analysis of health insurance claims data

Background

The complex endovascular repair of aortic aneurysms and dissections with fenestrated or branched stent grafts (FB-EVAR) remains challenging for interventional vascular surgery. To date, the evidence regarding treatment patterns and outcome measures consists of single center studies; however, it might be reasonable to validate results with multicenter real-world evidence.

Methods

Health insurance claims data from Germany’s third largest insurance provider, DAK-Gesundheit, were used to determine outcomes following FB-EVAR of non-ruptured thoracic aorta (TA) or thoracoabdominal including pararenal abdominal (TAA) aorta. The study included patients operated between January 2008 and April 2017.

Results

Included were 984 patients (18.1% female) who underwent FB-EVAR. Patients with treatment of the TA were younger (71.7 vs. 73.2 years, p < 0.001) and more often female (38.5% vs. 17.0%, p < 0.001) as compared to patients with treatment of TAA. In the TA group peripheral arterial disease was less frequent compared to the TAA group (67.3% vs. 80.4%, p = 0.036). Mortality was significantly (p < 0.001) higher following repair of the TAA compared to the TA at discharge (17.3% vs. 4.6%), at 30 days (26.9% vs. 8.2%) and at 90 days (34.6% vs. 10.1%). Patients with treatment of the TAA suffered more often from stroke as compared to the TA group (7.7% vs. 1.2%, p = 0.002).

Conclusion

In this large-scale German analysis of claims data, multicenter real-world evidence was different from single center studies regarding patient risk-factors and outcome measures. Validated multicenter registry studies could help to further investigate this topic in times of increasing procedures.