Arteriovenous grafts are associated with earlier catheter removal and fewer catheter days in the United States Renal Data System population

Arteriovenous access creation and hazards of hospitalization and death in patients starting hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Recent evidence suggests an overestimation of the benefits associated with arteriovenous (AV) fistula versus graft in certain populations. We assessed hazards of all-cause and cause-specific hospitalization and death associated with AV access type in patients who started hemodialysis with a catheter in France, overall and by subgroups of age, sex and comorbidities.

METHODS

We performed a target trial emulation including patients who initiated hemodialysis with a catheter from 2010 through 2018 and were followed by the REIN Registry. We identified first-created fistula or graft through the French national health-administrative database. We used joint frailty models to deal with recurrent hospitalizations and potential informative censoring by death, and inverse probability weighting to account for confounding.

RESULTS

From the 18 800 patients included (mean age 68 ± 15 years, 35% women), 5% underwent AV graft creation first. The weighted hazard ratio (wHR) of all-cause hospitalization associated with graft was 1.08 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 1.15], that of vascular access-related hospitalization was 1.43 (95% CI 1.32 to 1.55), and those of cardiovascular- and infection-related hospitalizations were 1.14 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.26) and 1.11 (95% CI 0.97 to 1.28), respectively. Results were consistent for most subgroups, except that the highest hazard of all-cause, cardiovascular- and infection-related hospitalizations with graft was blunted in patients with comorbidities (i.e. diabetes, wHR 1.01, 95% CI 0.93 to 1.10; 1.10, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.26; and 0.94, 95% CI 0.78 to 1.12, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients starting hemodialysis with a catheter, AV graft creation is associated with increased hazard of vascular access-related hospitalizations compared with fistula. This may not be the case for death or other causes of hospitalization.

Comparing post-maturation outcomes of arteriovenous grafts and fistulae

BACKGROUND

Though arteriovenous grafts (AVG) mature more reliably than arteriovenous fistulae (AVF) and require fewer maturation procedures (MP) to obtain functional patency, AVG are thought to have worse function after maturation. We explored differences in post-maturation outcomes between the following groups: AVF patients who did (AS-AVF) and did not (unAS-AVF) require assisted maturation and AVG patients who did (AS-AVG) and did not (unAS-AVG) require assisted maturation.

METHODS

Using the US Renal Data System (2012-2017), we retrospectively identified patients who initiated dialysis with a central venous catheter, underwent AVF or AVG placement and achieved successful two-needle cannulation. Primary patency and access abandonment after maturation were compared across groups using competing risks regression methods, generating sub-hazards ratios (sHR).

RESULTS

We identified 42,664 AVF and 12,335 AVG that met inclusion criteria. A larger proportion of AVFs required interventions: 18,408 AVF (43.2%) versus 2594 AVG (21.0%; p < 0.01). Both AS-AVG and AS-AVF patients experienced patency loss at 1 year more frequently compared with unAS-AVG (67.5% & 57.5% vs 55.2% respectively). Patency loss was lowest in unAS-AVF (38.9%). These trends were robust on adjusted analysis (unAS-AVG reference, AS-AVG sHR = 1.44, p < 0.01; AS-AVF sHR = 1.08, p < 0.01, unAS-AVF sHR = 0.67, p < 0.01). AS-AVGs were more likely to be abandoned than unAS-AVGs (11.7% unAS-AVG vs 17.2% AS-AVG). Fistulae, assisted or not, had lower unadjusted rates of 1-year abandonment than grafts (8.9% AS-AVF vs 7.3% unAS-AVF). On adjusted analysis, AVF usage was protective against abandonment (unAS-AVG, reference; AS-AVF sHR = 0.67, p < 0.01; unAS-AVF sHR = 0.59, p < 0.01) while AS-AVG was not (AS-AVG sHR = 1.32, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

unAS-AVF have the best long-term outcomes. AS-AVF lose primary patency at a higher rate than unAS-AVG. AVGs may be a better choice than AVFs if veins are marginal and likely to require assisted maturation. Further research is needed to identify anatomic and physiologic factors that affect long-term performance and influence conduit choice.

Assessing Time to Removal of Tunneled Dialysis Catheters after Arteriovenous Access Creation

BACKGROUND

Tunneled dialysis catheters (TDCs) are a temporary bridge until definitive arteriovenous (AV) access is established. Our objective was to evaluate the time to TDC removal in patients who underwent AV access creations with TDCs already in place.

METHODS

A single-center analysis of all AV access creations in patients with TDCs was performed (2014-2020). Primary outcome was time to TDC removal after access creation.

RESULTS

There were 364 AV access creations with TDCs in place. The average age was 58 years, 44% of patients were female, and 64% were Black. The median time to TDC removal was 113 days (range, 22-931 days) with 71.4% having a TDC >90 days after access creation. Patients with TDC >90 days were often older (60 vs. 54.7), had hypertension (98.1% vs. 93.3%), were diabetic (65.4% vs. 47.1%), and had longer average time to maturation (107.1 vs. 55.4 days, P < 0.001) and first access (114 vs. 59.4 days, P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that older age was associated with prolonged TDC placement (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05, P = 0.005) and prosthetic graft use was associated with shorter TDC indwelling time (OR 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.23, P ≤ 0.001). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that 87% of TDCs were removed at 1 year.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients with TDCs who underwent AV access creation had prolonged TDC placement. Prosthetic graft use was associated with shorter catheter times. Close follow-up after access placement, improving maturation times, and access type selection should be considered to shortened TDC times.

Sex disparities in hemodialysis access outcomes: A systematic review

The goal of this systematic review was to collate and summarize the current literature on hemodialysis access outcomes in females, identify differences between females and men, and provide a foundation for future research. A systematic review of the English-language literature was conducted by searching PubMed and Google Scholar for the following terms: "sex," "hemodialysis access," "arteriovenous fistula," "arteriovenous graft," and "dialysis catheter." Reference lists from the resulting articles were also evaluated to ensure that any and all relevant primary sources were identified. Studies were then screened by two independent reviewers for inclusion. Of 967 total studies, 53 ultimately met inclusion criteria. Females have lower maturation rates; have decreased rates of primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency; require more procedures per capita to achieve maturation and to maintain fistula patency; are more likely to receive dialysis via an arteriovenous graft or central venous catheter; and require a longer time and potentially more assistive invasive interventions to achieve a mature fistula. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for further research to evaluate and address the causes of these disparities. Discussion with patients undergoing hemodialysis should include these findings to improve patient education, expectations, satisfaction, and outcomes.

Early-cannulation arteriovenous grafts: Multidisciplinary learning is essential to optimize outcomes

BACKGROUND

It is likely that there will be an increasing role for early-cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ecAVG) with a wider recognition of the need to tailor vascular access to avoid futile procedures and unnecessary TCVC. However, experience of these products is not common and limited to early surgical adopters, with little information on the systemic changes and multi-disciplinary care needed to optimize outcomes. The aim of this study was to report the impact of a multi-disciplinary approach on quantifiable outcomes.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of 295 ecAVG implanted over an 8-year time-period was performed. Indicative outcomes were chosen to reflect nephrology (patient selection), nursing care (cannulation complications of infection and pseudoaneurysm) and radiology (thrombosis) on cumulative impact (functional patency) over three distinct time periods.

RESULTS

The incidence of ecAVG increased 10-fold over the three time periods. The use of ecAVG changed significantly from salvage tertiary access to TCVC avoidance and salvage of existing AVF. Nursing complications reduced markedly with significantly fewer over-cannulation episodes and pseudo-aneurysms. With an improved pro-active surveillance programme, the time to first thrombosis doubled and the risk of thrombosis halved. Ultimately this resulted in significantly improved functional patency with a risk of ecAVG loss less than one-third by the last time-period.

CONCLUSIONS

All aspects of ecAVG use require scrutiny and critical appraisal. Failure or success is not simply achieved by performing good technical surgery with an efficacious product, but by the care taken across a wide range of elements spanning case selection, implantation, use and maintenance.

VasQ U.S. pivotal study demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of an external vascular support for arteriovenous fistula creation

OBJECTIVE

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation is a commonly performed vascular operation that reports 6-month functional success rates as low as 50%. Recently, a nitinol external vascular support device, VasQ, has shown potential in studies outside the United States (U.S.) to improve AVF outcomes when implanted at creation. Here, the pivotal study results of this novel technology in treating patients in the U.S. are described.

METHODS

VasQ was implanted in 144 patients at 16 centers across the U.S. who were referred for creation of a new AVF and consented for enrollment in a 2-year, prospective, multicenter, single-arm, open-label study. Brachiocephalic (n = 129) and radiocephalic (n = 15) AVFs were analyzed. The primary endpoint was primary patency at 6 months compared against a performance goal of 55% derived from a systematic literature search. Safety endpoints included device-related events, ischemic steal, infection, aneurysm, and seroma at up to 6 months. Minimum arterial size was 2.0 mm; target veins were required to measure 2.5 to 6 mm. Key exclusion criteria were patients <18 or >80 years, those with known ipsilateral central venous occlusion, target cannulation zone venous depth greater than 8 mm, and New York Heart Association class 3 or 4.

RESULTS

Patients were 61% male, 53% White, 35% African American, and 14% Hispanic. Mean age was 60 years, and median body mass index was 30.4. Of the patients, 69% were diabetic, 66% were on dialysis at the time of creation, and 70% had a prior access surgery. At 6 months, steal was observed in 2.1%, infection in 0.7%, and no aneurysms or seromas were seen. Primary patency at 6 months was 66% (P < .021 vs performance goal). Physiological maturation was achieved in 92.4% of patients. Successful two-needle cannulation for patients that entered the study on dialysis was achieved in 88% of VasQ AVFs at a median of 56 days. Pre-dialysis patients who initiated dialysis during the study achieved two-needle cannulation in 81.6% VasQ AVFs. Interventions were required at a rate of 1.07 per patient year over the entire study period. Two-year cumulative patency was 76.6% (95% confidence interval, 67.9%-83.4%) with no statistical difference between patients requiring interventions and those that did not. No patency differences were observed between brachiocephalic and radiocephalic AVFs.

CONCLUSIONS

The U.S. pivotal study results demonstrated improved AVF outcomes and an excellent safety profile with VasQ use relative to traditional AVFs. Under the conditions of this trial, VasQ shows great promise in expeditiously and efficiently enhancing AVF functional success.

Options for Dialysis and Vascular Access Creation

End-stage kidney disease (ESKD) affects nearly 800,000 patients in the United States. The choice of peritoneal dialysis (PD) versus hemodialysis (HD) should be patient centric. An ESKD Life-Plan is crucial with the goal of creating the right access, for the right patient, at the right time, for the right reason. Complex access should be considered when straightforward access options have been exhausted. Evolving techniques such as percutaneous access for HD and PD should be further investigated. Shared decision-making and palliative care is an essential part of the care of patients with CKD and ESKD..

Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections Are Associated with Infection Recurrence in Arteriovenous Grafts Treated with Revision

Background and Objectives: This study was conducted to investigate whether Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA) infections of arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) recur more frequently than other bacterial infections following treatment with revision. Materials and Methods: Operative procedures, including total excision, subtotal excision, and revision, were performed on 60 patients to treat 65 AVG infections. Final outcomes were classified as no infection recurrence, infection recurrence, and death without prior recurrence. In the competing risk setting, the cumulative incidence was estimated using the cumulative incidence function and Gray's test, and the associations between outcomes and different variables were estimated using a subdistribution hazard (SDH) model. Results: Comparing AVG infections with and without recurrence, PA infection was not associated with a higher risk of infection recurrence (p = 0.13); however, the first operative procedure type was associated with infection recurrence (p = 0.04). AVGs with PA infection were associated with a higher total number of surgical interventions (p < 0.05) than AVGs without PA infection. Regarding the cumulative incidences of outcomes, for AVGs treated with subtotal excision or revision, the cumulative incidence of recurrent infection was 3.3-fold higher for those with PA infection than without one year after the first surgery. However, when AVGs were treated with revision alone, the cumulative incidence was 4.1-fold. After excluding AVGs treated with total excision, the SDH model was applied, obtaining a hazard ratio for infection recurrence of 16.05 (p = 0.02) for AVGs with PA infection compared with AVGs without PA infection. No other variables were significantly associated with infection recurrence. Conclusions: For subtotal resection and revision, AVGs infected with PA had a higher recurrence rate than those infected with other species. However, revision surgery may aggravate the recurrence rate.

A critical review of surgical strategies to minimise venous stenosis in arteriovenous grafts

It is inevitable that complications arising from surgical procedures are ascribed to surgical technique, and this applies to venous stenosis (VS) in arteriovenous grafts. However, despite a wide range of cellular studies, computer modelling, observational series and clinical trials, there remains uncertainty on whether surgical technique contributes to VS. This article reviews evidence from basic science, fluid dynamics and clinical data to try and rationalise the main surgical options to modify the occurrence of venous stenosis. There is sufficient data from diverse sources to make recommendations on clinical practice (size of target vein, shape of anastomosis, angle of approach, distance from venous needling, trauma to the target vein) whilst at the same time this emphasises the need to carefully report the practical aspects of surgical technique in future clinical trials.

Is the Fistula First Approach still valid?

The Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative, founded in 2003, was responsible for changing the access profile in the United States, increasing the prevalence of arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) by 50% and reducing that of arteriovenous grafts (AVGs). However, the concept that AVFs are always the best access for all patients has been challenged. Discussion points are: (1) the questionable survival benefit of AVFs over AVGs, if one takes into account the high rates of primary AVF failure; (2) the potential benefits of using AVGs for greater primary success; and (3) the questionable benefit of AVFs over AVGs in patients with shorter survival, such as the elderly. The high rate of primary failure and maturation procedures leads to prolonged use of catheters, and it is one of the weaknesses of the fistula first strategy. AVGs proved to be better than AVFs as a second access after the failure of a first AVF, and in patients with non-ideal vessels, with greater primary success and reduced catheter times. AVGs appear to have a similar survival to AVFs in patients older than 80 years, with less primary failures and interventions to promote maturation. The most recent KDOQUI guidelines suggest an individualized approach in access planning, taking into account life expectancy, comorbidities and individual vascular characteristics, with the aim of chosing adequate access for the right patient, at the right time, for the right reasons.

Arteriovenous Fistula Versus Graft Access Strategy in Older Adults Receiving Hemodialysis: A Pilot Randomized Trial

Background

It is unclear whether surgical placement of an arteriovenous (AV) fistula (AVF) confers substantial clinical benefits over an AV graft (AVG) in older adults with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We report vascular access outcomes of a pilot clinical trial.

Study Design

Pilot randomized parallel-group open-label trial.

Setting & Participants

Patients 65 years and older with ESKD and no prior AV access receiving maintenance hemodialysis through a tunneled central venous catheter referred for AV access placement by their treating nephrologist.

Intervention

Participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to surgical placement of an AVG or AVF.

Outcomes

Index AV access primary failure, successful cannulation, adjuvant interventions and infections.

Results

Of 122 older adults receiving hemodialysis and no prior AV access surgery, 24% died before (n = 18) or were too sick for (n = 11) referral for a permanent AV access. Of 46 eligible patients, 36 (78%) consented and were randomly assigned to AVG (n = 18) and AVF (n = 18) placement, of whom 13 (72%) and 16 (89%) underwent index AV access surgical placement, respectively. At a median follow-up of 321.0 days, primary AV access failure was noted in 31% in each group. The proportion of patients with successful cannulation was 62% (8 of 13) in the AVG and 50% (8 of 16) in the AVF group; median times to successful cannulation were 75.0 and 113.5 days, respectively. Endovascular procedures were recorded in 38% and 44%, and surgical reinterventions, in 23% and 25%, respectively. AV access infection was seen in 3 (23%) and 2 (13%) patients, respectively.

Limitations

Small sample size precludes statistical inference.

Conclusions

Almost one-quarter of older adults with incident ESKD and a central venous catheter as primary access were not referred for AV access placement due to medical reasons. Based on these limited results, there is little reason to favor either an AVF or AVG in this population until results from a larger randomized clinical trial become available.

Funding

Government funding to an author (Dr Murea is supported by National Institutes of Health∖National Institute on Aging grant 1R03 AG060178-01).

Trial Registration

NCT03545113.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of immediate access arteriovenous grafts versus standard grafts for hemodialysis

OBJECTIVE

Immediate-access arteriovenous grafts (IAAVGs), or early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (AVGs), are more expensive than standard grafts (sAVGs) but can be used immediately after placement, reducing the need for a tunneled dialysis catheter (TDC). We hypothesized that a decrease in TDC-related complications would make IAAVGs a cost-effective alternative to sAVGs.

METHODS

We constructed a Markov state-transition model in which patients initially received either an IAAVG or an sAVG and a TDC until graft usability; patients were followed through multiple subsequent access procedures for a 60-month time horizon. The model simulated mortality and typical graft- and TDC-related complications, with parameter estimates including probabilities, costs, and utilities derived from previous literature. A key parameter was median time to TDC removal after graft placement, which was studied under both real-world (7 days for IAAVG and 70 days for sAVG) and ideal (no TDC placed with IAAVG and 1 month for sAVG) conditions. Costs were based on current Medicare reimbursement rates and reflect a payer perspective. Both microsimulation (10,000 trials) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (10,000 samples) were performed. The willingness-to-pay threshold was set at $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY).

RESULTS

IAAVG placement is a dominant strategy under both real-world ($1201.16 less expensive and 0.03 QALY more effective) and ideal ($1457.97 less expensive and 0.03 QALY more effective) conditions. Under real-world parameters, the result was most sensitive to the time to TDC removal; IAAVGs are cost-effective if a TDC is maintained for ≥23 days after sAVG placement. The mean catheter time was lower with IAAVG (3.9 vs 8.7 months; P < .0001), as was the mean number of access-related infections (0.55 vs 0.74; P < .0001). Median survival in the model was 29 months. Overall mortality was similar between groups (76.3% vs 76.7% at 5 years; P = .33), but access-related mortality trended toward improvement with IAAVG (6.1% vs 6.8% at 5 years; P = .052).

CONCLUSIONS

The Markov decision analysis model supported our hypothesis that IAAVGs come with added initial cost but are ultimately cost-saving and more effective. This apparent benefit is due to our prediction that a decreased number of catheter days per patient would lead to a decreased number of access-related infections.

Perspectives in Individualizing Solutions for Dialysis Access

The vascular access is the lifeline for the hemodialysis patient. Previous national vascular access guidelines have emphasized placement of arteriovenous fistulas in most hemodialysis patients. However, the new Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines for vascular access, soon to be published, will focus on a patient's end-stage kidney disease "life plan" and take a patient "first" approach. One of the major themes of the new Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative guidelines is selecting the "right access, for the right patient, at the right time, for the right reason". Given the availability of new advances in biomedical technologies, techniques, and devices in the vascular access field, this shift to a more patient-centered vascular access approach presents unique opportunities to individualize the solutions and care for patients requiring a dialysis vascular access. This review article will address 3 potential areas where there is an unmet need to individualize solutions for dialysis vascular access care: (1) biological approaches to improve vascular access selection and selection of therapies, (2) vascular access care for the post-transplant patient, and (3) vascular access disparities in race, gender, and the elderly patient.

KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access: 2019 Update

The National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative (KDOQI) has provided evidence-based guidelines for hemodialysis vascular access since 1996. Since the last update in 2006, there has been a great accumulation of new evidence and sophistication in the guidelines process. The 2019 update to the KDOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for Vascular Access is a comprehensive document intended to assist multidisciplinary practitioners care for chronic kidney disease patients and their vascular access. New topics include the end-stage kidney disease "Life-Plan" and related concepts, guidance on vascular access choice, new targets for arteriovenous access (fistulas and grafts) and central venous catheters, management of specific complications, and renewed approaches to some older topics. Appraisal of the quality of the evidence was independently conducted by using a Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach, and interpretation and application followed the GRADE Evidence to Decision frameworks. As applicable, each guideline statement is accompanied by rationale/background information, a detailed justification, monitoring and evaluation guidance, implementation considerations, special discussions, and recommendations for future research.

Racial and Sex Disparities in Catheter Use and Dialysis Access in the United States Medicare Population

BACKGROUND

Despite efforts to increase arteriovenous fistula and graft use, 80% of patients in the United States start hemodialysis on a central venous catheter (CVC).

METHODS

To better understand in incident hemodialysis patients how sex and race/ethnicity are associated with time on a central venous catheter and transition to an arteriovenous fistula and graft, our observational cohort study analyzed US Renal Data System data for patients with incident ESKD aged ≥66 years who started hemodialysis on a CVC in July 2010 through 2013.

RESULTS

At 1 year, 32.7% of 74,194 patients transitioned to an arteriovenous fistula, 10.8% transitioned to an arteriovenous graft, 32.1% stayed on a CVC, and 24.5% died. Women spent a significantly longer time on a CVC than men. Compared with white patients, patients who were black, Hispanic, or of another racial/ethnicity minority spent significantly more days on a CVC. In competing risk regression, women were significantly less likely than men to transition to a fistula and more likely to transition to a graft. Compared with white patients, blacks were significantly less likely to transition to a fistula but more likely to transition to a graft, Hispanics were significantly more likely to transition to a fistula, and other races/ethnicities were significantly more likely to transition to either a fistula or a graft.

CONCLUSIONS

Female patients spend a longer time on a CVC and are less likely to transition to permanent access. Compared with white patients, minorities also spend longer time on a CVC, but are more likely to eventually transition to permanent access. Strategies to speed transition to permanent access should target groups that currently lag in this area.

A case of dissection in an ACUSEAL-modified HeRO graft

Background:

The use of the HeRO system with the early-access ACUSEAL graft avoids the need for a tunnelled dialysis catheter as a bridge for vascular access. Established complications of this system include thrombosis, graft infection, haematoma, and pseudoaneurysm formation.

Case Description:

A 72-year-old patient found to have a dissection flap at the venous cannulation point (ACUSEAL component) of a right arm HeRO graft. The ACUSEAL was replaced in theatre and subsequent duplex imaging confirmed satisfactory graft function.

Conclusion:

This case demonstrates a serious yet previously undescribed complication of cannulation of an ACUSEAL graft. The trilaminar construction of the graft may increase the likelihood of disruption of the luminal layer during repeated needling and predispose it to dissection. Given the consequences of graft failure in such patients, urgent intervention is warranted when graft dissection is suspected.

Association Between Type of Vascular Access Used in Hemodialysis Patients and Subsequent Kidney Transplant Outcomes

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Vascular access type (arteriovenous fistula [AVF] vs arteriovenous graft [AVG] vs central venous catheter [CVC]) associates with clinical outcomes in patients with end-stage kidney disease undergoing hemodialysis. Whether a similar association exists with outcomes after kidney transplantation is unknown. We hypothesized that AVGs would associate with worse outcomes, perhaps owing to persistent subclinical inflammation.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Using US registry data merged with electronic health records of a large dialysis organization (2006-2011), we selected patients receiving a first-ever kidney transplant after undergoing more than 30 days of hemodialysis.

EXPOSURE

Hemodialysis access used during the patient's last pretransplantation hemodialysis session.

OUTCOMES

Patients were followed up from kidney transplantation for all-cause mortality, kidney allograft loss from any cause, and allograft loss not from death.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Time-to-event analysis including Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox proportional hazards regression estimated cause-specific HRs and 95% CIs.

RESULTS

Among 9,291 patients who underwent kidney transplantation between 2006 and 2011, a total of 65.3% used an AVF, 20.4% used an AVG, and 14.3% used a CVC for hemodialysis before transplantation. Multivariable regression models adjusted for demographic variables, comorbid conditions, transplant characteristics, and laboratory parameters identified no independent associations between vascular access type and all-cause mortality (HRAVG, 1.13 [95% CI, 0.97-1.33]; HRCVC, 1.00 [95% CI, 0.83-1.21]). Similarly, AVG and CVC use were not independently associated with all-cause allograft loss compared with AVF use (HRAVG, 1.13 [95% CI, 1.00-1.28]; HRCVC, 1.12 [95% CI, 0.96-1.29]). CVC use was associated with 30% higher risk for allograft loss from causes other than death compared with AVF use (HRCVC, 1.30 [95% CI, 1.06-1.57]), but AVGs were not (HRAVG, 1.17 [95% CI, 0.98-1.39]).

LIMITATIONS

Nonrandomized exposure leading to potential residual confounding.

CONCLUSIONS

No association was found for AVG use before kidney transplantation with mortality, all-cause allograft loss, and allograft loss from all causes other than death, compared with AVF use. The association of CVC use with allograft loss from causes other than death requires further investigation.

Patients referred for arteriovenous fistula construction: a retrospective outcome analysis

OBJECTIVES

With lower rates of sepsis and re-interventions, arteriovenous fistula (AVF) is the preferred vascular access modality. The aim of this study is to evaluate the outcomes of patients referred for AVF construction at a single center in Cork, Ireland.

METHODS

The current study is a single-center retrospective review of all patients who underwent AVF creation between 2015 and 2017. Additionally, the kidney disease clinical patient management system was used to provide statistics on AVF use in Ireland.

RESULTS

39.3% of hemodialysis patients in Ireland use an AVF for vascular access. Regional use ranged from 50 to 20% across Irish hemodialysis centers. At Cork University Hospital, 192 AVFs were created. The population was 69.3% male (n = 133), 30.7% female (n = 59) with a mean (±SEM) age of 58.8 ± 1.03 years. 69.5% of females received a brachiocephalic AVF (BCAVF) while 13.6% had a radiocephalic AVF (RCAVF) constructed. Significance was seen when comparing gender and AVF type (p < 0.001). Fifty-four percent of the fistulae were brachiocephalic (n = 103), 33% were radiocephalic (n = 63), and 4% were brachiobasilic (n = 8). BCAVF patients (62.7 ± 1.2 years) were significantly older than patients receiving a RCAVF (54.5 ± 1.9 years, p < 0.001). A post-operative thrill or continuous flow on Doppler was present in 99% of patients (n = 190) with maturation and complication rates of 82.7% (n = 153) and 5.7% (n = 11) respectively. 69.9% of AVFs were needled for hemodialysis (n = 114).

CONCLUSIONS

AVF outcomes at this center are consistent with reported statistics in the literature. Patient age, sex, and diabetic status may influence the use of proximal AVF. AVF creation rates in Ireland are below international reported recommendations.

Maturation of arteriovenous fistulas in patients with ventricular assist devices

OBJECTIVE

Postoperative renal dysfunction necessitating hemodialysis after implantation of ventricular assist devices presents a challenge with respect to establishment of hemodialysis access. Lack of pulsatile flow has led to concerns that arteriovenous fistulas will not mature. This study aims to evaluate arteriovenous fistula as a method of hemodialysis.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent implantation of a ventricular assist device between 1988 and 2016 with a subsequent need for hemodialysis were identified. Retrospective data were collected for patients requiring hemodialysis through an arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft. Access flow rates and duration of patency are reported.

RESULTS

Sixty-four patients were identified (10 required long-term hemodialysis, 5 via arteriovenous fistula, 1 via arteriovenous graft). All six patients receiving long-term hemodialysis access were on continuous-flow ventricular assist devices. Brachiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas were performed in all arteriovenous fistula patients, and the average preoperative vein diameter was 4.1 ± 0.9 mm. On 30-day follow-up, the average flow rate was 1262 ± 643 mL/min (880-2220). In arteriovenous fistula patients, one died at 30 days, one arteriovenous fistula required ligation for steal syndrome at 5 months, and one was abandoned after 10.7 months for low flow. Of remaining fistulas, one was converted to an arteriovenous graft at 1.7 years for malfunction (with 5.3 month patency), and one remains open at 4.0 years.

CONCLUSION

Arteriovenous fistulas should be considered in selected patients with ventricular assist devices as a means of long-term hemodialysis access to avoid use of catheters. Maturation and usage of primary arteriovenous fistulas is possible despite lack of pulsatile flow.

The inside-out technique for tunneled dialysis catheter placement with central venous occlusion

The “inside-out” technique eliminates the need for subclavian or femoral catheter placement by placing a supraclavicular catheter via a percutaneous femoral vein access. Few reports of its use in vascular surgery exist. The purpose of this article is to describe our version of the technique and report results. Between 2016 and 2017, the inside-out technique was performed on eight patients. All patients had more than four prior access sites and bilateral internal jugular vein occlusion. The technical success rates were 100% with no periprocedural complications and success in achieving dialysis access. One patient required catheter replacement within 48 hours, one catheter was used as a bridge to Hemodialysis Reliable Outflow (Hemosphere, a Cryolife Inc Company, Eden Prairie, Minn) graft placement, and one patient died of sepsis unrelated to their catheter. Our data show the inside-out technique to be safe and effective, removes the need for subclavian or femoral catheter placement, and should be a component of treatment algorithms for complex dialysis patients, which is consistent with National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative recommendations.

Impact of Early Cannulation Grafts on Quality and Cost of Care for Patients With End-Stage Renal Disease

BACKGROUND

The annual cost of care associated with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) per patient on hemodialysis is approaching $100,000, with nearly $42 billion in national spend per year. Early cannulation arteriovenous grafts (ECAVGs) help decrease the use of central venous catheters (CVCs), thus potentially decreasing the cost of care. However, a formal financial analysis that also includes the cost of CVC-related complications and secondary interventions has not been completed. The purpose of this project is to evaluate the overall financial costs associated with ECAVGs on patients with ESRD during a one-year period.

METHODS

Access modality, complications, secondary interventions, hospital outcomes, and cost of care were determined for 397 sequential patients who underwent access creation between July 2014 and October 2018. A detailed financial analysis was completed, including an evaluation of implant, supplies, medications, laboratories, labor, and other direct costs. All variables were measured at the time of the index procedure, 30 days, 90 days, 180 days, 270 days, and one year.

RESULTS

There were 131 patients who underwent arteriovenous fistula (AVF) and 266 who underwent ECAVG for dialysis access. The average cost of care was $17,523 for AVF and $5,894 for ECAVG at one year (P < 0.01). Fewer CVC-related complications and secondary interventions associated with ECAVGs saved $11,630 per patient with ESRD, primarily in the form of supply costs. Fewer CVCs in the patients receiving ECAVGs led to an additional $1,083 decrease in cost associated with sepsis reduction at one year. A subsequent decrease in length of stay and ICU utilization led to an additional $2.0 million decrease in annual cost of care for patients with ESRD.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ECAVGs has significant cost savings over using an AVF and CVC for urgent-start dialysis in patients with ESRD. This cost savings is secondary to decreased CVC-related complications and fewer secondary interventions. Significant national savings are possible with appropriate use of ECAVGs in patients with ESRD.

A randomized pilot study comparing graft-first to fistula-first strategies in older patients with incident end-stage kidney disease: Clinical rationale and study design

Timely placement of an arteriovenous (AV) vascular access (native AV fistula [AVF] or prosthetic AV graft [AVG]) is necessary to limit the use of tunneled central venous catheters (TCVC) in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) treated with hemodialysis (HD). National guidelines recommend placement of AVF as the AV access of first choice in all patients to improve patient survival. The benefits of AVF over AVG are less certain in the older adults, as age-related biological changes independently modulate patient outcomes. This manuscript describes the rationale, study design and protocol for a randomized controlled pilot study of the feasibility and effects of AVG-first access placement in older adults with no prior AV access surgery. Fifty patients age ≥65 years, with incident ESKD on HD via TCVC or advanced kidney disease facing imminent HD initiation, and suitable upper extremity vasculature for initial placement of an AVF or AVG, will be randomly assigned to receive either an upper extremity AVG-first (intervention) or AVF-first (comparator) access. The study will establish feasibility of randomizing older adults to the two types of AV access surgery, evaluate relationships between measurements of preoperative physical function and vascular access development, compare vascular access outcomes between groups, and gather longitudinal assessments of upper extremity muscle strength, gait speed, performance of activities of daily living, and patient satisfaction with their vascular access and quality of life. Results will assist with the planning of a larger, multicenter trial assessing patient-centered outcomes.

Outcomes of initial hemodialysis vascular access in patients initiating dialysis with a tunneled catheter

BACKGROUND

Our aim was to determine factors that influence time to removal of tunneled hemodialysis catheter (THC), probability of repeat vascular access creation, and time to repeat vascular access.

METHODS

The Optum Clinformatics Data Mart claims database was queried from 2011 to 2017 for patients who initiated hemodialysis with a THC. Time from initial arteriovenous fistula (AVF)/graft (AVG) to THC removal and time to repeat AVF/AVG were analyzed using Cox proportional hazards. The likelihood of repeat AVF/AVG was analyzed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 8941 vascular access met the inclusion criteria: 6913 (77%) AVF and 2028 (23%) AVG. Median follow-up was 595 days among AVF patients (range, 1-2543 days) and 579 days among AVG patients (range, 1-2529 days). Patients undergoing AVF were younger, more likely to be male, of white race, and obese. Patients undergoing AVF were also slightly less likely to have diabetes, cardiac arrhythmia, congestive heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease than patients undergoing AVG. At 90 days and at 180 days after index access creation, significantly more patients who underwent index AVG had their THC removed compared with patients who underwent index AVF. By day 365, 78% of patients in both AVF and AVG had their THC removed. A total of 2550 (28.5%) patients underwent a repeat vascular access creation during the follow-up period: 30% of index AVF and 24% of index AVG. At 90 days, 180 days, and 365 days, significantly more patients in the index AVF group underwent a repeat vascular access creation than those in the index AVG group. Multivariate analysis demonstrated a significant interaction between vascular access type and age ≥70 years (P < .001) for time to THC removal, likelihood of repeat vascular access, and time to repeat vascular access. In the age <70 group, patients who underwent AVG were 60% more likely to have a shorter time to THC, had a 50.4% lower odds of repeat vascular access, and were 47% more likely to have a longer time to repeat vascular access compared with patients who underwent index AVF. In the age ≥70 group, patients who underwent AVG were 98% more likely to have a shorter time to THC removal, had 69.7% lower odds of repeat vascular access, and were 66% more likely to have a longer time to repeat vascular access.

CONCLUSIONS

Creation of AVG vs AVF significantly decreases the time to THC removal in dialysis-dependent patients, with a larger difference in patients aged ≥70 vs <70. Initial AVG was associated with lower odds of repeat vascular access and longer time to repeat vascular access. These results suggest that the dictum of "fistula first" is not appropriate for all patient populations and supports judicious use of AVG in achieving the more recent shift toward "catheter last."

The Effect of Artery and Vein Size on Forearm Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Graft Patency

Objective: Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are considered to be an alternative procedure when autogenous fistulas are not feasible. This study was conducted to establish a correlation between the inflow artery and outflow vein size and patency of AVGs.

Materials and Methods: This was a retrospective descriptive study. Data was collected from patients who had forearm AVG performed at a university hospital from January 1, 2012, to December 31, 2016. Spearman’s rho correlation test was used to identify the correlation between the artery and vein size and patency of AVG.

Results: A total of 34 patients were enrolled in this study. Forearm loop configuration was performed in 33 patients (97%), and straight configuration was performed in one patient (3%). The median size of the brachial artery was 3 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: 2, 4) and that of the vein was 3 mm (IQR: 2, 5). The overall primary patency was 74% at six months, 59% at one year, and 32% at two years. The analysis showed that the primary patency increased with the artery size, but there was a reverse correlation between vein sizes.

Conclusion: Small inflow arteries may reduce the primary patency, but small veins do not result in a poor primary patency. Our method can be applied to patients with small veins, where it is still possible to perform forearm AVGs.

Autologous arteriovenous fistula is associated with superior outcomes in elderly hemodialysis patients

BACKGROUND

The number of elderly patients with end-stage renal disease is increasing rapidly. The higher prevalence of comorbidities and shorter life expectancy in these patients make it difficult to decide on the type of vascular access (VA). We explored the optimal choice for VA in elderly hemodialysis patients.

METHODS

We included elderly patients (> 65 years) visiting our VA clinic and divided them into three groups as follows: radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula (AVF), brachiocephalic AVF, and prosthetic arteriovenous graft (AVG). The primary outcomes were VA abandonment and all-cause mortality. The secondary outcome was maturation failure (MF).

RESULTS

Of 529 patients, 61.2% were men. The mean age was 73.6 ± 6.0 years. The VA types were as follows: 49.9% radiocephalic AVF, 31.8% brachiocephalic AVF, and 18.3% AVG. Patients with an AVG tended to be older, female, and have a lower body mass index. More than half of patients (n = 302, 57.1%) started dialysis with central catheters, but the proportion of predialysis central catheter placement was not different among the VA types. Radiocephalic AVF was significantly superior to AVG in terms of VA abandonment (P = 0.005) and all-cause mortality (P < 0.001) in spite of a higher probability of MF. Brachiocephalic AVF was associated with a shorter time to the first needling and fewer interventions before maturation than radiocephalic AVF.

CONCLUSIONS

Autologous AVF was suggested as the preferred VA choice in terms of long-term outcomes in elderly patients.

Immediate-access grafts provide comparable patency to standard grafts, with fewer reinterventions and catheter-related complications

BACKGROUND

No independent comparisons, with midterm follow-up, of standard arteriovenous grafts (SAVGs) and immediate-access arteriovenous grafts (IAAVGs) exist. The goal of this study was to compare "real-world" performance of SAVGs and IAAVGs.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who underwent placement of a hemodialysis graft between November 2014 and April 2016 were retrospectively identified from the electronic medical record and Vascular Quality Initiative database at two tertiary centers. Only primary graft placements were included for analysis. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of graft implanted. Patients' comorbidities, graft configuration, operative characteristics, and follow-up were collected and analyzed with respect to primary and secondary patency. Additional outcomes included graft-related complications, time to first cannulation, time to tunneled catheter removal, catheter-related complications, and overall survival. Patency was determined from the time of the index procedure; χ², Kaplan-Meier, and Cox regression analyses were used, with the P value set as significant at < .05.

RESULTS

There were 210 grafts identified, 148 SAVGs and 62 IAAVGs. At baseline, the patients' characteristics were similar between groups, except for a greater prevalence of preoperative central venous occlusions in the IAAVG group (16.3% vs 6.8%; P < .04). Of the IAAVG group, 50 were Acuseal (W. L. Gore & Associates, Flagstaff, Ariz) and 12 were Flixene (Atrium Medical Corporation, Hudson, NH). Primary patency was similar at both 1 year (SAVG, 39.4%; IAAVG, 56.7%; P = .4) and 18 months (SAVG, 29.0%; IAAVG, 43.7%; P = .4). Secondary patency was similar at 1 year (SAVG, 50.7%; IAAVG, 52.1%; P = .73) and 18 months (SAVG, 42.3%; IAAVG, 46.3%; P = .73). Overall survival was 48% at 24 months. IAAVG patients required fewer overall additional procedures to maintain patency (mean number of procedures, 0.99 for SAVGs vs 0.61 for IAAVGs; P = .025). There was no difference in occurrence of steal syndrome (SAVG, 6.8%; IAAVG, 8.1%; P = .74) or graft infection (SAVG, 19.0%; IAAVG, 12.0%; P = .276). Seventy-five percent of all grafts were successfully cannulated, with shorter median time to first cannulation in the IAAVG group (6 days; interquartile range [IQR], 1-19 days) compared with the SAVG group (31 days; IQR, 26-47 days; P < .01). Of all pre-existing catheters, 65.75% were removed, with a shorter median time until catheter removal in the IAAVG cohort at 34 days (IQR, 22-50 days) vs 49 days (IQR, 39-67 days) in the SAVG group (P < .01). Catheter-related complications occurred less frequently in the IAAVG group (16.4% vs 2.9%; P < .045).

CONCLUSIONS

IAAVGs allow earlier cannulation and tunneled catheter removal, thereby significantly decreasing catheter-related complications. Patency and infection rates were similar between SAVGs and IAAVGs, but fewer secondary procedures were performed in IAAVGs.

Current Experience and Midterm Follow-up of Immediate-Access Arteriovenous Grafts

BACKGROUND

No independent reviews, with midterm follow-up, of current experience with immediate-access arteriovenous grafts (IAAVGs) exist. The goal of this project was to assess the real-world performance of 2 different IAAVGs over a 2-year period at a large tertiary referral center.

METHODS

Between January 2014 and April 2016, all consecutive patients who underwent placement of Acuseal (Gore) or Flixine (Maquet) IAAVGs were identified for retrospective analysis from the electronic medical record and Vascular Quality Initiative database. Primary, primary-assisted and secondary patency rates, time to first cannulation, time to tunneled catheter removal, and overall survival were recorded.

RESULTS

Forty-three patients were identified to have undergone placement of IAAVG, 31 Acuseal (72%), and 12 Flixine (28%). Of the Acuseal cohort, 7 were implanted with outflow through a HeRO catheter system (Merit Medical). Mean follow-up time was 8.4 months. Overall survival was 57.4% at 18 months. Overall primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency at 18 months were 33.36%, 34.31%, and 51.03%, respectively. Eighty three percent of grafts were successfully cannulated, and 78% of preexisting catheters were removed. Mean time to successful graft cannulation and catheter removal were 14.85 and 32.26 days, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world experience with novel arteriovenous access grafts is consistent with results from industry-sponsored studies. Early cannulation of immediate-access grafts can be successfully performed in a wide variety of patients. However, prolonged catheter dwell times persist despite increased rates of successful early-graft cannulation. Further study of methods for promoting catheter removal in this patient population is warranted.

Arteriovenous Fistula Maturation in Prevalent Hemodialysis Patients in the United States: A National Study

BACKGROUND

Arteriovenous fistulas (AVFs) are the preferred form of hemodialysis vascular access, but maturation failures occur frequently, often resulting in prolonged catheter use. We sought to characterize AVF maturation in a national sample of prevalent hemodialysis patients in the United States.

STUDY DESIGN

Nonconcurrent observational cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

Prevalent hemodialysis patients having had at least 1 new AVF placed during 2013, as identified using Medicare claims data in the US Renal Data System.

PREDICTORS

Demographics, geographic location, dialysis vintage, comorbid conditions.

OUTCOMES

Successful maturation following placement defined by subsequent use identified using monthly CROWNWeb data.

MEASUREMENTS

AVF maturation rates were compared across strata of predictors. Patients were followed up until the earliest evidence of death, AVF maturation, or the end of 2014.

RESULTS

In the study period, 45,087 new AVFs were placed in 39,820 prevalent hemodialysis patients. No evidence of use was identified for 36.2% of AVFs. Only 54.7% of AVFs were used within 4 months of placement, with maturation rates varying considerably across end-stage renal disease (ESRD) networks. Older age was associated with lower AVF maturation rates. Female sex, black race, some comorbid conditions (cardiovascular disease, peripheral artery disease, diabetes, needing assistance, or institutionalized status), dialysis vintage longer than 1 year, and catheter or arteriovenous graft use at ESRD incidence were also associated with lower rates of successful AVF maturation. In contrast, hypertension and prior AVF placement at ESRD incidence were associated with higher rates of successful AVF maturation.

LIMITATIONS

This study relies on administrative data, with monthly recording of access use.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified numerous associations between AVF maturation and patient-level factors in a recent national sample of US hemodialysis patients. After accounting for these patient factors, we observed substantial differences in AVF maturation across some ESRD networks, indicating a need for additional study of the provider, practice, and regional factors that explain AVF maturation.

Planning and evaluation for vascular access in the elderly

Vascular access is of vital importance for patients requiring dialysis therapies. AV fistulas have been endorsed by many professional societies as the access of choice, however, subsequent creation does not go without consequences. As the population ages and patients become more medically complex, access failure has become a major cause of treatment complication. For the elderly, this is especially true and there are multiple decision points that require careful reflection before an AVF is placed. This article reviews access considerations for AVF placement in the elderly population and considers the possibility that the fistula first approach to vascular access should not be an absolute.

Definitions and End Points for Interventional Studies for Arteriovenous Dialysis Access

This paper is part of the Clinical Trial Endpoints for Dialysis Vascular Access Project of the American Society of Nephrology Kidney Health Initiative. The purpose of this project is to promote research in vascular access by clarifying trial end points which would be best suited to inform decisions in those situations in which supportive clinical data are required. The focus of a portion of the project is directed toward arteriovenous access. There is a potential for interventional studies to be directed toward any of the events that may be associated with an arteriovenous access' evolution throughout its life cycle, which has been divided into five distinct phases. Each one of these has the potential for relatively unique problems. The first three of these correspond to three distinct stages of arteriovenous access development, each one of which has been characterized by objective direct and/or indirect criteria. These are characterized as: stage 1-patent arteriovenous access, stage 2-physiologically mature arteriovenous access, and stage 3-clinically functional arteriovenous access. Once the requirements of a stage 3-clinically functional arteriovenous access have been met, the fourth phase of its life cycle begins. This is the phase of sustained clinical use from which the arteriovenous access may move back and forth between it and the fifth phase, dysfunction. From this phase of its life cycle, the arteriovenous access requires a maintenance procedure to preserve or restore sustained clinical use. Using these definitions, clinical trial end points appropriate to the various phases that characterize the evolution of the arteriovenous access life cycle have been identified. It is anticipated that by using these definitions and potential end points, clinical trials can be designed that more closely correlate with the goals of the intervention and provide appropriate supportive data for clinical, regulatory, and coverage decisions.

Long-term outcomes after autogenous versus synthetic lower extremity bypass in patients on hemodialysis

BACKGROUND

Hemodialysis dependence confers unique physiologic conditions. Prior reports of outcomes after infrainguinal open bypass operations in patients on hemodialysis have been based on relatively small sample institutional series. In this study, we evaluate long-term outcomes after open bypass operations in a large contemporary population-based cohort of hemodialysis patients. We studied all hemodialysis patients who underwent infrainguinal open operation using autogenous versus prosthetic conduits in the United States Renal Data System between January 2007 and December 2011.

METHODS

Univariate methods (χ², analysis of variance) were used to compare the characteristics of the patient and type of bypass. Kaplan-Meier, univariate and multivariate logistic, and Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate 30-day postoperative outcomes as well as patency, limb salvage, and mortality in the long term.

RESULTS

There were 9,739 (autogenous: 59%, prosthetic: 49%) infrainguinal open bypass operations performed in this cohort. Of these, 4,717 (48%) were femoral-popliteal, 3,321 (34%) were femoral-tibial, and 1,701 (18%) were popliteal-tibial bypasses. Bypass operations were performed most commonly for critical limb ischemia (72%). Primary patency was 18% for both types of conduits at 5 years (P = .16). Comparing autogenous versus prosthetic conduits, primary-assisted patency was 23% vs 20% at 5 years (P = .98), while secondary patency was 30% for both conduits at 5 years (P = .05). Limb salvage was 35% vs 41% at 5 years (P < .001). Multivariable analyses demonstrated greater patency (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.28; P = .003) and limb salvage (aHR: 1.12; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.24; P = .03) for autogenous compared to prosthetic bypasses. The advantage conferred by autogenous conduits was most clinically relevant for femoral-tibial (aHR: 1.34; 95% confidence interval, 1.17-1.55; P < .001) and popliteal-tibial (aHR: 1.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-2.21; P = .014) configurations.

CONCLUSION

This large study evaluated the long-term outcomes of open bypass operations in patients on hemodialysis. The data confirm the long-term benefits of autogenous conduits compared with prosthetic conduits in this high-risk population of patients, especially for the treatment of distal lesions. Individual patient life expectancy, availability of adequate autogenous conduit options, indication for operation, level of disease, as well as potential need for future options for additional access for dialysis should be taken into consideration when deciding to construct an open bypass in a hemodialysis patient.

Fistula First Initiative: Historical Impact on Vascular Access Practice Patterns and Influence on Future Vascular Access Care

The vascular access is the lifeline for the hemodialysis patient. In the United States, the Fistula First Breakthrough Initiative (FFBI) has been influential in improving use of arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) in prevalent hemodialysis patients. Currently, prevalent AVF rates are near the goal of 66% set forth by the original FFBI. However, central venous catheter (CVC) rates remain very high in the United States in patients initiating hemodialysis, nearly exceeding 80%. A new direction of the of the FFBI has focused on strategies to reduce CVC use, and subsequently the FFBI has now been renamed the "Fistula First-Catheter Last Initiative". However, an AVF may not be the best vascular access in all hemodialysis patients, and arteriovenous grafts (AVG) and CVCs may be appropriate and the best access for a subset of hemodialysis patients. Unfortunately, there still remains very little emphasis within vascular access initiatives and guidelines directed towards evaluation of the individual patient context, specifically patients with poor long-term prognoses and short life expectancies, patients with multiple comorbidities, patients who are more likely to die than reach end stage renal disease (ESRD), and patients of elderly age with impaired physical and cognitive function. Given the complexity of medical and social issues in advanced CKD and ESRD patients, planning, selection, and placement of the most appropriate vascular access are ideally managed within a multidisciplinary setting and requires consideration of several factors including national vascular access guidelines. Thus, the evolution of the FFBI should underscore the need for multidisciplinary health teams with a major emphasis placed on "the right access for the right patient" and improving the patient's overall quality of life.

Arteriovenous Grafts: Much Maligned But in Need of Reconsideration?

There are substantial variations in arteriovenous fistula (AVF) use among hemodialysis patients in different countries, in different regions of the U.S., and even in different hemodialysis units within a single metropolitan area. These variations persist after adjustment for patient demographics and comorbidities, suggesting that practice patterns play a major role in determining the frequency of AVF use. These observations led to vascular access guidelines urging nephrologists and surgeons to increase AVF creation in patients with chronic kidney disease. Over the past 20 years, as clinicians have adopted these guidelines, the prevalence of AVF use in hemodialysis patients has increased substantially. At the same time, clinicians have recognized important limitations of an unwavering "Fistula First" approach. First, a substantial proportion of AVFs fail to mature even when routine preoperative vascular mapping is used, leading to prolonged catheter dependence. Second, certain patient subgroups are at high risk for AVF nonmaturation. Third, nonmaturing AVFs frequently require interventions to promote their maturation. Fourth, AVFs that require such interventions have shortened cumulative patency. Fifth, arteriovenous grafts (AVG) have several advantages over AVFs, including lower primary failure rates, fewer interventions prior to successful cannulation, and shorter duration of catheter dependence with its associated risk of bacteremia. All these observations have led nephrologists to propose an individualized approach to vascular access, with AVG being preferred in patients who initiate hemodialysis with a catheter, particularly if they are at high risk for AVF nonmaturation and have a relatively short life expectancy.

Cilostazol May Improve Maturation Rates and Durability of Vascular Access for Hemodialysis

Cilostazol is effective in controlling pathophysiological pathways similar or identical to those involved in nonmaturation and failure of the arteriovenous access. This case–control study examined whether cilostazol would improve maturation rates and durability of vascular access for hemodialysis. The treatment group included 33 patients who received cilostazol for ≥30 days prior to creation of a dialysis access and continued with cilostazol therapy for ≥60 days after surgery. The matched (gender, age, race, diabetes, and the year of surgery) control group included 116 patients who underwent the same procedure but did not receive cilostazol prior to and at least 3 months after surgery. Primary outcomes were maturation and, for those that matured, time of functioning access, defined as the time from the first use to irreparable failure of the access. Secondary outcomes were time to maturation, complications, and time to first complication. Study group patients were 3.8 times more likely to experience fistula maturation compared to the controls (88% vs 66%, RR = 3.8, 95% confidence interval: 1.3-11.6, P = .016). Fewer patients in the study group had complications (76% vs 92%, P = .025), and the time from construction of the fistula to the first complication was longer (345.6 ± 441 days vs 198.3 ± 185.0 days, P = .025). Time to maturation was similar in both groups (119.3 ± 62.9 days vs 100.2 ± 61.7 days, P = .2). However, once matured, time to failure was significantly longer in the treatment group (903.7 ± 543.6 vs 381.6 ± 317.2 days, P = .001). Multivariate analysis confirmed that the likelihood of maturation was significantly higher in the treatment group patients. These results suggest that dialysis access patients may benefit from preoperative and postoperative cilostazol therapy. If confirmed by a randomized trial, this treatment will have a major beneficial impact on patients dependent on a well-functioning access for their hemodialysis.

Use of a proactive duplex ultrasound protocol for hemodialysis access

OBJECTIVE

Arteriovenous fistula (AVF) creation is the preferred approach for hemodialysis access; however, the maturation of AVFs is known to be poor. We established a proactive early duplex ultrasound (DUS) surveillance protocol for evaluating AVFs before attempted access. This study determined the effect of this protocol related to improving AVF maturation.

METHODS

From 2008 to 2013, 153 patients received new upper extremity AVFs and an early DUS surveillance protocol at a single academic institution. The protocol involved an early DUS evaluation before hemodialysis cannulation of the AVF at 4 to 8 weeks after AVF creation. A positive DUS result was identified as a peak systolic velocity of >375 cm/s or a >50% stenosis on gray scale imaging, along with decreased velocity in the outflow vein. Patients with positive DUS findings underwent prophylactic endovascular or open intervention to assist with AVF maturation. Nature of secondary interventions, as well as AVF patency and maturation, were assessed. Overall clinical outcomes and fistula patency were investigated.

RESULTS

During the study period, 183 upper extremity AVFs were created in 153 patients, including 82 radiocephalic, 63 brachiocephalic, and 38 brachiobasilic AVFs. A mortality rate of 43% (n = 66) was observed in a median follow-up period of 34.5 months (interquartile range, 19.6-46.9). A total of 164 early DUS were performed at a median of 6 weeks (interquartile range, 3.4-9.6 weeks) after the initial creation. Early DUS showed nine AVFs were occluded and were excluded from further analysis. Hemodynamically significant lesions were found in 62 AVFs (40%); however, only 17 (11%) were associated with an abnormal physical examination. Positive DUS finding prompted a secondary intervention in 81% of the patients. Among those with positive early DUS findings, AVF maturation was 70% in those undergoing a secondary intervention compared with 25% in those not undergoing a prophylactic intervention (P = .011). Primary-assisted patency for AVFs with early positive and negative DUS findings were 83% and 96% at 6 months, 64% and 89% at 1 year, and 52% and 82% at 2 years, respectively (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early DUS surveillance of AVFs before initial access is reasonable to identify problematic AVFs that may not be reliably detected on clinical examination. Although DUS criteria for AVFs have yet to be universally accepted, proactive early postoperative DUS interrogation assists in the early detection of dysfunctional AVFs and improvement of fistula maturation. Despite improved patency in those with positive DUS findings who undergo prophylactic secondary intervention, overall patency remains inferior to those without an abnormality detected on early DUS imaging.

Looking Beyond "Fistula First" in the Elderly on Hemodialysis

Vascular access preparation, a pervasive challenge in hemodialysis (HD), is emerging as a multidimensional subject in geriatric nephrology. Previously published guidelines declared arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) as the preferred vascular access for all patients on HD. In this article, the benefit-risk evidence for using AVF versus an alternative access (arteriovenous graft [AVG] or tunneled central venous catheter [TCVC]) in the elderly is pondered. Compared to their younger counterparts, the elderly have significantly lower survival rates independent of the vascular access used for HD. Recent studies point to comparable dialysis survival rates between AVF and AVG or TCVC in subgroups of elderly patients, as well as lower rates of access-related infections, and lower catheter dependence after AVG compared to AVF construction in these patients. Comprehensive and longitudinal assessments that integrate comorbidities, physical function, cognitive status, and quality of life to estimate prognosis and assist with vascular access selection ought to be employed. In circumstances where patient survival is limited by comorbidities and functional status, AVF is unlikely to confer meaningful benefits compared to AVG or even TCVC in the ill elderly.