Drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus uncoated balloon angioplasty in patients with femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease

Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty for Thoracic Great Vessel Stenosis Due to Takayasu Arteritis With 1-Year Follow-up

PURPOSE

Takayasu arteritis is a large-vessel vasculitis in women of childbearing age that affects large vessels including the aorta and its main branches. Inflammation of arteries can produce lesions that lead to occlusion, stenosis, or aneurysms which can lead to complications. If signs of organ dysfunction are present, vascular intervention may be necessary.

CASE REPORT

In this article, we present a case of Takayasu arteritis with high-grade stenosis of all the great vessels of the thoracic aorta treated with drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and stenting requiring multiple follow-up interventions over a 1-year follow-up.

CONCLUSION

The DCB angioplasty is a potential endovascular treatment for thoracic great artery stenosis in Takayasu arteritis that could be further explored.

Novel Payloads to Mitigate Maladaptive Inward Arterial Remodeling in Drug-Coated Balloon Therapy

Drug-coated balloon therapy is a minimally invasive endovascular approach to treat obstructive arterial disease, with increasing utilization in the peripheral circulation due to improved outcomes as compared to alternative interventional modalities. Broader clinical use of drug-coated balloons is limited by an incomplete understanding of device- and patient-specific determinants of treatment efficacy, including late outcomes that are mediated by postinterventional maladaptive inward arterial remodeling. To address this knowledge gap, we propose a predictive mathematical model of pressure-mediated femoral artery remodeling following drug-coated balloon deployment, with account of drug-based modulation of resident vascular cell phenotype and common patient comorbidities, namely, hypertension and endothelial cell dysfunction. Our results elucidate how postinterventional arterial remodeling outcomes are altered by the delivery of a traditional anti-proliferative drug, as well as by codelivery with an anti-contractile drug. Our findings suggest that codelivery of anti-proliferative and anti-contractile drugs could improve patient outcomes following drug-coated balloon therapy, motivating further consideration of novel payloads in next-generation devices.

Use of stents with medication coating for the treatment of occlusive-stenotic lesions of the superficial femoral artery

Objective ‒ to analyze the results of endovascular revascularization of the femoropopliteal segment with drug-eluting stents. Materials and methods. Endovascular intervention was performed in 23 patients with stenotic lesions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA). Paclitaxel-eluting stents were used. There were 10 men (43.5 %), 13 women (56.5 %). The mean age of the patients was (66.0 ± 3.5) years. There were 16 (69.6 %) patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and diabetic angiopathy, and 7 (23.4 %) patients had obliterating atherosclerosis of the arteries of the lower limbs. Critical ischemia of the lower extremities was diagnosed in 18 (56.5 %) cases, intermittent claudication ‒ in 5 (21.7 %). Isolated lesions of the femoral-popliteal segment were noted in 3 (13.4 %) patients, lesions of the iliac and femoral-popliteal segments ‒ in 4 (17.4 %), lesions of the femoral-popliteal and ankle segments ‒ in 16 (69.6 %). Results. Twenty (86.6 %) scheduled procedures for stenting of the SFA were technically successful. Among postoperative complications, 3 (13.04 %) patients had puncture site hematomas that did not require surgical evacuation. In 6 (26.1 %) patients, signs of reperfusion syndrome were observed, which were treated with conservative treatment. During follow-up period (3 months), there were no cases of reocclusion or clinically significant restenosis at the stented level. In 1 (5.0 %) case, a hemodynamically significant stenosis of the SFA was observed outside the implanted stent. The patient successfully underwent angioplasty of SFA stenosis. There were no «major» amputations during follow-up period. «Small» ankle amputations were performed in 7 (35.0 %) patients with diabetic gangrene, where endovascular revascularization of the femoro-popliteal and ankle segments was the stage of surgical treatment. Conclusions. Implantation of drug-eluting stents is an effective method of endovascular revascularization in patients with SFA lesions. To compare the results of implantation of drug-eluting stents with other methods of revascularization of the lesions of the femoro-popliteal segment, it is necessary to accumulate more data and increase the duration of the follow-up period.

DRUG-ELUTING STENTS IN THE TREATMENT OF PATIENTS WITH OCCLUSIVE-STENOTIC LESIONS OF THE SUPERFICIAL FEMORAL ARTER

OBJECTIVE

The aim: To analyze the results of endovascular revascularization of the femoropopliteal segment using drug-eluting stents.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Materials and methods: Endovascular intervention was performed in 23 patients with occlusive-stenotic lesions of the superficial femoral artery (SFA). Paclitaxel-eluting stents were used. There were 16 (69.6%) patients with diabetes mellitus type 2 and diabetic angiopathy, and 7 (30.4%) patients had obliterating atherosclerosis of the arteries of the lower limbs. Critical ischemia of the lower extremities was diagnosed in 18 (78.3%) cases, and intermittent claudication - in 5 (21.7%).

RESULTS

Results: Twenty (86.6 %) scheduled procedures for stenting of the SFA were technically successful. During follow-up period (3 months), there were no cases of reocclusion or clinically significant restenosis at the stented level. There were no "major" amputations during follow -up period. "Small" ankle amputations were performed in 7 (35%) patients with diabetic gangrene.

CONCLUSION

Conclusions: Implantation of drug-eluting stents is an effective method of endovascular revascularization in patients with SFA lesions. To compare the results of implantation of drug-eluting stents with other methods of revascularization of the lesions of the femoro-popliteal segment, it is necessary to accumulate more data and increase the duration of the follow-up period.

Four-Year Patient-Level Pooled Mortality Analysis of the ILLUMENATE US Pivotal and EU Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

To perform a meta-analysis of two concordant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) examining the long-term, four-year safety profile of the Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) versus percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) for the treatment of peripheral artery disease.

METHODS

An independent, third-party, meta-analysis of homogenous, patient-level data from the ILLUMENATE Pivotal and ILLUMENATE EU RCTs was performed to assess mortality (time to death) in patients treated for symptomatic femoropopliteal disease. Kaplan Meier (KM) methodology was used to estimate hazard rates of all-cause mortality and Cox proportional hazard modeling was used to assess predictors of mortality. All serious adverse events, including deaths, were adjudicated by an independent, blinded clinical events committee (CEC).

RESULTS

In total, 589 (419 DCB; 170 PTA) patients were included in the pooled analysis of the ILLUMENATE Pivotal and ILLUMENATE EU RCTs. The median follow-up was 1735 days (IQR 1434-1829), equivalent to 4.75 years. Vital status compliance was >95% in each RCT. The total number of deaths through four years was 81/589 (13.8%); 58/419 (13.8%) in the DCB arm and 23/170 (13.5%) in the PTA arm. The one-year KM estimate of all-cause mortality was 1.9% ± 0.7% (estimate ± SE) in those treated with DCB versus 1.2 ± 0.9% in those treated with PTA. At two, three, and four years, the respective KM estimates were 6.6 ± 1.2% versus 4.9 ± 1.7%, 9.3 ± 1.4% versus 9.9 ± 2.4%, and 14.0% ± 1.7% versus 14.4% ± 2.8% (P = 0.864). There were no significant differences in CEC-adjudicated deaths between the two cohorts. In multivariate analysis, predictors of four-year mortality were age (HR, 1.048; 95% CI, 1.026 - 1.071; P < 0.0001), renal insufficiency (HR, 2.440; 95% CI, 1.566 - 3.800; P < 0.0001), and lesion length (HR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.000 - 1.008; P = 0.041). Neither paclitaxel exposure (DCB versus PTA; HR, 1.086; 95% CI, 0.709 - 1.664; P = 0.705) nor dose (mg; HR, 1.043; 95% CI, 0.971 - 1.119; P = 0.248) were predictors of all-cause mortality at four years.

CONCLUSIONS

This systematic meta-analysis of two concordant ILLUMENATE RCTs shows no difference in all-cause mortality through four-years between Stellarex DCB and PTA, confirming the acceptable, long-term safety profile of the Stellarex DCB.

Avoiding revascularization strategy versus revascularization with drug-coated balloon for the treatment of superficial femoral artery occlusive disease

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy, safety and treatment costs of superficial femoral artery revascularization (SFA) with drug-coated balloon(DCB) versus avoiding revascularization strategy for the treatment of symptomatic SFA disease.

METHODS

This retrospective single-center study reviewed 96 patients (113 limbs) with severe stenosis and occlusive SFA disease. All patients underwent either DCB(Group 1: n ​= ​55 limbs) or nonrevascularization (Group 2: n ​= ​58 limbs) between March 2015 and June 2019. The improvement of Rutherford class, walking impairment questionnaire score(WIQ), target limb reintervention, perioperative major adverse events, the catheterization laboratory cost and length of hospital stay were compared. The limb salvage and survival rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to assess the association between factors and the improvement of Rutherford category at 12 months.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time of Groups 1 and 2 was 17 and 33 months, respectively. At 12 months, the Rutherford category significantly decreased in both groups (P ​< ​0.001), with no significant difference (79.7% vs. 64.3%, P ​= ​0.074). Furthermore, multivariate analysis showed that the selected therapeutic method was not an influential factor for the improvement of Rutherford class at 12 months. The WIQ overall score as well as three subscales scores (distance, speed and stair-climbing), the survival rate, limb salvage rate and the length of stay between the two groups were comparable. The perioperative adverse events rate and catheterization laboratory cost in Group 2 was significantly lower compared to Group 1 [(34253.69 ​± ​28172.87) yuan vs. (56936.76 ​± ​41278.36) yuan, P ​= ​0.001].

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that avoiding superficial femoral artery revascularization strategy has favorable efficacy and safety outcomes compared to combining revascularization with DCB in selected patients.

The current status of drug-coated devices in lower extremity peripheral artery disease interventions

Lower limb peripheral artery disease is a leading cause of cardiovascular disease morbidity and mortality. Endovascular revascularization is often indicated to improve walking function and to prevent limb loss but restenosis in the treated vessel segment remains a concern that limits the overall effectiveness of the treatment. The most promising technique to prevent restenosis is the use of drug-coated devices, and the most common drug used to coat lower limb balloon angioplasty balloons and stents is paclitaxel. A systematic review and meta-analysis in 2018 reported a possible increase in late mortality attributable to paclitaxel-coated devices. Since then, their use has been brought into question. Here, we present an update of data focusing on the efficacy and safety of paclitaxel-coated devices in lower limb treatment applications. While paclitaxel-coated devices appear to reduce restenosis rates it is still unclear how these surrogate marker improvements translate to direct patient benefits and uncertainty remains as to whether paclitaxel-coated devices confer an increased risk of long-term mortality. Available randomized clinical data is hampered by trial heterogeneity, insufficient power, potential attrition bias and the lack of a plausible mechanistic explanation. An important step forward is that the ongoing trials that were temporarily halted due to the Katsanos et al. report have now both commenced recruitment and may ultimately resolve this clinical dilemma by virtue of their larger sample sizes. Other possible ways forward are the ongoing investigation of alternative anti-proliferative coating agents and use of new sophisticated vascular imaging techniques to more clearly identify patients at risk of restenosis already in the preoperative setting.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of drug-eluting versus uncoated balloon angioplasty for femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease: a meta-analysis

Background

This quantitative meta-analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of drug-eluting balloon (DEB) vs. uncoated balloon (UCB) in patients with femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease.

Methods

Electronic databases were searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared DEB and UCB till November 2018. The random-effects model was used for conducting pooled analyses.

Results

Seventeen RCTs with 2706 patients were included in the final meta-analysis. Patients who received DEB had higher levels of minimal luminal diameter (MLD) at 6 (WMD: 0.77; 95%CI: 0.53 to 1.02; P < 0.001) and 12 months (WMD: 1.33; 95%CI: 0.93 to 1.73; P < 0.001) than those who received UCB. DEB reduced the late lumen loss (LLL) levels after 6 (WMD: -0.57; 95%CI: − 1.07 to − 0.06; P = 0.029) and 12 months (WMD: -0.95; 95%CI: − 1.28 to − 0.62; P < 0.001). DEB was found not superior over UCB on primary patency after 6 months (RR: 1.44; 95%CI: 0.88–2.35; P = 0.149), whereas DEB increased the primary patency after 12 (RR: 1.51; 95%CI: 1.25–1.83; P < 0.001) and 24 months (RR: 1.51; 95%CI: 1.30–1.77; P < 0.001). Patients who received DEB had reduced the risk of restenosis after 6 (RR: 0.47; 95%CI: 0.33–0.67; P < 0.001) and 12 months (RR: 0.55; 95%CI: 0.35–0.85; P = 0.008). DEB reduced the risk of major adverse events after 6 (RR: 0.30; 95%CI: 0.14–0.61; P = 0.001), 12 (RR: 0.49; 95%CI: 0.32–0.76; P = 0.001) and 24 months (RR: 0.62; 95%CI: 0.41–0.92; P = 0.018).

Conclusions

DEB yielded additional benefits on MLD, LLL, primary patency, restenosis, TLR, and major adverse events than UCB in patients with femoropopliteal arterial occlusive disease.

Microbe-Derived Butyrate and Its Receptor, Free Fatty Acid Receptor 3, But Not Free Fatty Acid Receptor 2, Mitigate Neointimal Hyperplasia Susceptibility After Arterial Injury

Background

Arterial restenosis after vascular surgery is a common cause of midterm restenosis and treatment failure. Herein, we aim to investigate the role of microbe‐derived butyrate, FFAR2 (free fatty acid receptor 2), and FFAR3 (free fatty acid receptor 3) in mitigating neointimal hyperplasia development in remodeling murine arteries after injury.

Methods and Results

C57BL/6 mice treated with oral vancomycin before unilateral femoral wire injury to deplete gut microbiota had significantly diminished serum and stool butyrate and more neointimal hyperplasia development after arterial injury, which was reversed by concomitant butyrate supplementation. Deficiency of FFAR3 but not FFAR2, both receptors for butyrate, exacerbated neointimal hyperplasia development after injury. FFAR3 deficiency was also associated with delayed recovery of the endothelial layer in vivo. FFAR3 gene expression was observed in multiple peripheral arteries, and expression was increased after arterial injury. Treatment of endothelial but not vascular smooth muscle cells with the pharmacologic FFAR3 agonist 1‐methylcyclopropane carboxylate stimulated cellular migration and proliferation in scratch assays.

Conclusions

Our results support a protective role for butyrate and FFAR3 in the development of neointimal hyperplasia after arterial injury and delineate activation of the butyrate‐FFAR3 pathway as a valuable strategy for the prevention and treatment of neointimal hyperplasia.

Benefit and risk from paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Paclitaxel-coated balloons (DCB) are suitable to reduce the risk of restenosis after angioplasty of atherosclerotic femoropopliteal lesions. However, numerous types of DCBs are distinguished by drug density and coating. Conflicting evidence exists about the risk of mortality. This study sought to evaluate benefit and risk of DCB angioplasty compared to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA).

METHODS

Randomised trials published between January 1, 2005 and February 3, 2019 were identified by searching MEDLINE, CENTRAL, and Clinical.trials.gov. Studies on DCB versus POBA for the treatment of femoropopliteal artery disease were included, and those focused on in-stent restenosis or critical limb ischemia were excluded. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted to assess the main outcomes of freedom from target lesion revascularisation (FfTLR) and all-cause mortality.

FINDINGS

Of 552 identified records, 14 studies including 2504 patients were eligible. DCB significantly increased the risk of FfTLR with substantial heterogeneity (12-month: risk ratio [RR] 1·24 [95% CI 1·14-2·27], I ² = 66%; 24-month RR 1·39 [95% CI 1·39-1·52], I ² = 21%). The risk of 24-month all-cause mortality was increased after DCB (random-effects model: RR 1·53 [95% CI 0·94-2·50], p = 0·09; fixed-effect model: RR 1·74 [95% CI 1·08-2·81], p = 0·02).

INTERPRETATION

Efficacy of DCB differs substantially across studies. Effect size depends on the type of DCB, treatment strategy, and lesion complexity. The risk of 2-year all-cause mortality at 2 years was increased, but without evidence of causation.

Midterm Outcomes of Drug-Coated Balloon Angioplasty in Femoropopliteal Lesions in a Daily Practice Cohort

BACKGROUND

Most previous drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty studies used strict inclusion and exclusion criteria and therefore might not be representative for daily practice. This study was performed to evaluate the midterm outcomes of DCB angioplasty in femoropopliteal artery disease and to identify risk factors for restenosis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All patients treated with DCB angioplasty between January 2015 and September 2016 were included. Provisional stents were placed if indicated. Data were retrospectively collected from digital patient records. No exclusion criteria were applied. The primary end point was primary patency. Secondary end points were primary assisted patency, secondary patency, clinically driven target lesion revascularization (CD-TLR) and major adverse events. All end points were calculated with the Kaplan-Meier analysis. The univariable and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to identify risk factors for restenosis.

RESULTS

A total of 109 patients (113 legs) were included (45% male; mean age, 72 ± 10). The rate of critical limb ischemia was 52% and total occlusions were treated in 38%. The mean follow-up was 24 ± 13 months. Primary patency rates were 87%, 79%, and 61% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Primary assisted patency rates were 95%; 89%, and 79%; secondary patency rates were 99%, 97%, and 91%; and CD-TLR rates were 6.9%, 14.3%, and 20.6% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively. Overall mortality and major target limb amputation rates were 18% and 5% at 3 years. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that only Trans-Atlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC) D lesions were associated with restenosis (P = 0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

DCB angioplasty is an effective and safe treatment option for femoropopliteal lesions in daily practice with excellent 1- and 2-year results. The 3-year results were slightly less favorable, which may be caused by the ongoing vascular disease or a late "catch-up" phenomenon. Only TASC D lesions were associated with loss of primary patency after adjustment for confounders.

Mortality Assessment of Paclitaxel-Coated Balloons: Patient-Level Meta-Analysis of the ILLUMENATE Clinical Program at 3 Years

BACKGROUND

A recent summary-level meta-analysis comprising randomized, controlled trials (RCTs) of femoropopliteal paclitaxel-coated balloon and stent intervention identified excess late mortality in the paclitaxel-treated patients.

METHODS

We evaluated the safety of the Stellarex drug-coated balloon (DCB) for femoropopliteal artery disease with an independently performed meta-analysis of patient-level data from all patients in the Stellarex femoropopliteal clinical program. To compare mortality after DCB or uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA), we aggregated data from 2 RCTs comprising 419 patients treated with DCB and 170 patients treated with PTA. In an additional analysis, data were aggregated from 6 poolable Stellarex DCB studies (2 RCTs, 3 single-arm studies, and 1 registry). All serious adverse events including deaths were adjudicated by a blinded, third-party, independent Clinical Events Committee. Kaplan-Meier estimates in the RCTs were compared with restricted mean survival time. Predictors of death were assessed with hazard ratios (HRs) and Cox proportional hazards modeling.

RESULTS

Baseline characteristics were similar in the patients treated with DCB and PTA in the pooled RCT analysis, with the exception that the DCB cohort was younger (67.4±9.7 versus 69.4±9.4 years, P=0.02), smoked more frequently (86.6% versus 78.8%, P=0.02), and were less often treated for recurrent lesions (8.8% versus 14.7%, P=0.04). In the RCTs, patients treated with DCB had all-cause mortality rates that were not different from those of patients treated with PTA (Kaplan-Meier estimates 1.8±0.7% versus 1.3±0.9%, 6.5±1.2% versus 5.9±1.9%, and 9.3±1.5% versus 9.9±2.4% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively, P=0.86). All-cause mortality rates were similar in a 1906-patient pooled nonrandomized DCB data set (Kaplan-Meier estimates of 2.1%, 4.9%, and 7.0% at 1, 2, and 3 years, respectively). Clinical Events Committee-adjudicated causes of death were balanced between the DCB and PTA cohorts. Multivariable Cox modeling identified age (HR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.04-1.08; P<0.001), diabetes mellitus (HR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.01-2.00; P=0.04), congestive heart failure (HR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.12-3.16; P=0.02), and renal insufficiency (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.33-3.01; P<0.001) as predictors of mortality. Paclitaxel exposure was unrelated to mortality (HR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.98-1.10; P=0.23).

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality rates for patients treated with the DCB and uncoated PTA were indistinguishable over 3-year follow-up. Additional patient-level, adequately powered meta-analyses with larger RCT data sets will be needed to confirm the generalizability of these findings.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifiers: NCT02110524, NCT01858363, NCT01858428, NCT03421561, NCT01912937, NCT01927068, and NCT02769273.

Mechanical rotational thrombectomy with Rotarex system augmented with drug-eluting balloon angioplasty versus stenting for the treatment of acute thrombotic and critical limb ischaemia in the femoropopliteal segment

Introduction

Mechanical thrombectomy is an alternative to local thrombolysis for the treatment of severe ischaemia in the femoropopliteal segment, but stent implantation is usually required after this procedure. The use of drug-eluting balloons (DEBs) may overcome long-term problems associated with stents, but it remains unclear how often such a treatment is technically feasible and efficient.

Aim

This post hoc single-centre study was aimed at assessment of the feasibility, safety and efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy followed by application of DEBs.

Material and methods

Fifty-one patients, aged 69.1 ±11.6 years, were managed for acute thrombotic or chronic critical ischaemia in the femoropopliteal segment using the Rotarex device. Following mechanical thrombectomy, on condition that there was no significant residual stenosis or dissection, lesions were managed with paclitaxel-coated DEBs, which was a desired strategy (24 patients). The remaining 25 patients underwent stent implantations, which was regarded as bailout treatment. Final follow-up was scheduled 12 months after the procedure.

Results

The primary-assisted patency rate after mechanical rotational thrombectomy with additional balloon angioplasty and/or stenting was 97.1% (49 patients). The early mortality rate was 2.0% (1 patient) and the amputation rate was 4.1% (2 patients). There were no late mortalities or limb amputations at 12-month follow-up, but significant restenoses occurred in 13 (27.1%) patients. These restenoses were more frequent in patients who underwent stent implantation (45.5%) than those managed with DEBs (12.5%), and in patients managed for secondary lesions.

Conclusions

In selected patients mechanical rotational thrombectomy in the femoropopliteal segment followed by application of DEB is a safe, effective and long-lasting method of revascularisation.

Adjunctive stent use during endovascular intervention to the femoropopliteal artery with drug coated balloons: Insights from the XLPAD registry

With growing use of drug-coated balloons (DCB) for femoropopliteal (FP) artery interventions, there is limited information on rates of real-world adjunctive stent use and its association with short and long-term outcomes. We report on 225 DCB treated FP lesions in 224 patients from the Excellence in Peripheral Artery Disease (XLPAD) registry (NCT01904851) between 2014 and 2016. Cochran–Mantel–Haenszel and Wilcoxon rank sum statistics were used to compare stented (planned or ‘bail-out’) versus non-stented DCB treated lesions. Stents were implanted in 31% of FP DCB interventions. Among the 70 stents implanted, 46% were for ‘bail-out’ indications and 54% were planned. Lesions treated with stents were longer (mean 150 mm vs 100 mm; p < 0.001) and less likely to be in-stent restenosis lesions (10% vs 28%; p=0.003). Stenting was significantly more frequent in complex FP lesions, including chronic total occlusions (66% vs 34%; p < 0.001). For bail-out stenting, interwoven nitinol stents were the most common type (50%) followed by drug-eluting stents (34%) and bare-metal stents (22%). There were no differences in peri-procedural complication rates or 12-month target limb revascularization rates (18.6% vs 11.6%; p=0.162) or 12-month amputation rates (11.4% vs 11%; p=0.92) between lesions where adjunctive stenting was used versus lesions without adjunctive stenting, respectively. In conclusion, in a contemporary ‘real-world’ adjudicated multicenter US registry, adjunctive stenting was necessary in nearly a third of the lesions, primarily for the treatment of more complex FP lesions, with similar short and intermediate-term clinical outcomes compared with non-stented lesions. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01904851

Clinical Outcomes of Subintimal vs. Intraluminal Revascularization Approaches for Long Femoropopliteal Occlusions in a Korean Multicenter Retrospective Registry Cohort

BACKGROUND

There are limited data comparing the outcomes of subintimal vs. intraluminal approach in the treatment of long femoropopliteal artery occlusions. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of the subintimal approach for long femoropopliteal artery occlusions.Methods and Results:From a multicenter retrospective registry cohort, we included a total of 461 patients with 487 femoropopliteal artery occlusions classified as Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) II C/D for this analysis. We compared the immediate and mid-term outcomes of subintimal vs. intraluminal approaches. There were 228 patients with 243 limbs in the subintimal group, and 233 patients with 244 limbs in the intraluminal group. Baseline clinical and lesion characteristics were comparable between the 2 groups. The technical success rate was significantly higher in the subintimal group than in the intraluminal group (95.1% vs. 89.8%, P=0.041). The clinical primary patency (67.5% vs. 73.4% at 12 months, 54.0% vs. 61.3% at 24 months; P=0.086) and target lesion revascularization (TLR)-free survival (89.5% vs. 86.3% at 12 months, 77.6% vs. 76.0% at 24 months; P=0.710) did not differ significantly between the subintimal and the intraluminal groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In long femoropopliteal occlusions, the subintimal approach achieved a higher technical success rate and similar mid-term primary patency and TLR-free survival compared with intraluminal approach.

Revascularization of the superficial femoral artery with paclitaxel-coated balloon for claudication

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous angioplasty of the superficial femoral artery (SFA) with paclitaxel-coated balloon, intended to reduce restenosis, has been proven safe and effective in recent randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE

To assess outcome results of angioplasty of the SFA with paclitaxel-coated balloon in claudicants in real-world practice of a single center.

MATERIAL & METHODS

A continuous prospective cohort study of 53 claudicants (62 lower limbs) from January 2015 to December 2016. Study end points include primary patency, freedom from clinically driven target-lesion revascularization and symptom relief.

RESULTS

It concerns 17 women (32%) and 36 men (68%) with a mean age of 67.8 years, suffering life-style-limiting claudication. Only short to intermediate-length stenoses or occlusions (30.6%), with a mean length of 59.6 mm were selected for percutaneous angioplasty with a paclitaxel-coated balloon. Technical success was 100%. At 16 months, primary patency attained 92.0% (3 early occlusions, 2 restenoses). There were two re-interventions at 6 and 9 months, resulting in a clinically driven target lesion revascularization rate of 3.2%. At the end of the follow-up of 16 months, all but two patients (96.2%) remained symptom-free. Two patients died during follow-up (no procedure-related deaths).

CONCLUSION

Paclitaxel-coated balloon angioplasty of the SFA gives in routine clinical practice excellent midterm results, with a restenosis rate of 6.5% at 1 year. This procedure has authors' preference as first-choice technique for correction of short- and intermediate-length symptomatic stenoses of the SFA.