Outcomes of antegrade and retrograde open mesenteric bypass for acute mesenteric ischemia

A decade's experience with retrograde open mesenteric stenting for acute mesenteric ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) is an alternative to mesenteric bypass in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) with variable reported 30-day mortality rates. Large studies evaluating patient outcomes following ROMS are scarce. Our study aims to assess the results of this approach among patients presenting with AMI.

METHODS

We reviewed all the patients with AMI who were treated with ROMS (2011-2022). Patient demographics, presentation, operative details, and outcomes were analyzed. Primary end points were in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimate for 1-year mortality and primary patency loss were generated. Secondary end points included postoperative 30-day complications.

RESULTS

Between 2011 and 2022, ROMS was attempted on a total of 42 patients. The median age was 70 ± 15 years and the majority of patients were female. Pain out of proportion to the physical examination was the most common presenting symptom (n = 18, 42.9%) followed by peritonitis (n = 14, 33.4%). All patients underwent preoperative intravenous contrast computed tomography imaging. In situ thrombosis was identified as the etiology of AMI in 36 patients (85.7%). Technical success was achieved in 40 patients (95.2%). Conventional, non-hybrid operating rooms were used for the majority of cases. Revascularization of all 40 patients involved angioplasty and stenting of superior mesenteric artery. A single stent was placed in 35 patients (87.5%) and the reminder had more than one stent. Eighty percent of patients required bowel resection. A second-look laparotomy was required in 34 patients (85.0%). The mean operative time, including both the general surgery and vascular surgery portions of the index procedure, was 192 ± 57 minutes. Sepsis was the most common complication observed within 30 days, occurring in 8 patients (20.0%). In terms of mortality, 13 patients (32.5%) died during their index hospitalization, and 9 died (22.5%) within 30 days. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 1-year overall patient survival rate was 58.6%, and the primary patency rate for stents was 51.4%.

CONCLUSIONS

ROMS has an excellent technical success rate in management of AMI with lower than traditionally reported mortality rates for AMI. The dual benefits of rapid revascularization and bowel evaluation should make this surgical modality an alternative approach for treatment of AMI.

Multicentre Experience with Novel Bidirectional Double Cuffed Inner Branches for Complex Endovascular Aortic Repair

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to report the initial experience with a novel bidirectional double cuff inner branch design for incorporation of renal and mesenteric arteries in patients undergoing fenestrated and branched endovascular aortic repair (F/BEVAR).

METHODS

A retrospective review was undertaken of the experience of F/BEVAR with grafts integrating at least one bidirectional double cuffed inner branch implanted at three tertiary aortic centres between March 2022 and June 2023. All consecutive patients were included. Baseline characteristics, operative data, and follow up data were collected. Results were presented as number or median (interquartile range) unless otherwise stated.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients (10 male; median age 72 [68, 77] years) had F/BEVAR using a total of 15 bidirectional double cuffed inner branches (30 cuffs). Indications for bidirectional doubled cuffed inner branches included cranial vessel orientation or double renal arteries in four patients each, common coeliomesenteric trunk in three patients, and early renal artery bifurcation, renal artery origin from a false lumen requiring a flexible route for catheterisation, and surplus configuration in one patient each. Twenty three of the 30 cuffs were used, whereas the remaining seven cuffs were intentionally occluded with vascular plugs. Target vessel incorporation was successful in all bidirectional branches. There was one technical failure related to unsuccessful catheterisation of a left renal artery targeted through a unidirectional caudal inner branch. During a median follow up of seven months there were no instances of target vessel instability or re-interventions and two patients died of causes unrelated to the bidirectional branches.

CONCLUSION

The results of the use of bidirectional double cuff inner branches are promising, with high technical success and no short term branch related complications in this preliminary experience. This could potentially expand the applicability of branch endografting of complex endovascular aortic repairs, but long term results are still missing.

Impact of Patient and Procedural Factors on Outcomes Following Mesenteric Bypass

BACKGROUND

Mesenteric bypass (MB) for patients with acute (AMI) and chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is associated with cardiovascular (CV) and pulmonary morbidity.

METHODS

Patients with AMI and CMI from 2008 to 2019 were identified to determine independent predictors of CV (cardiac arrest, MI, DVT, and stroke) and pulmonary (pneumonia and ventilator time>48 h) morbidities in patients undergoing MB.

RESULTS

377 patients were identified. Patients with AMI had higher rates of preoperative SIRS/sepsis (28 vs 12%, P < .0001), were more likely to be ASA class 4/5 (55 vs 42%, P = .005), were more likely to require bowel resection (19 vs 3%, P < .0001), and were more likely to have vein utilized as their bypass conduit (30 vs 14%, P < .0001). There were no differences in use of aortic or iliac inflow (P = .707) nor in return to the OR (24 vs 19%, P = .282). Both postoperative sepsis (12 vs 2.6%, P = .003) and mortality (31.4% vs 9.8%, P < .0001) were significantly increased in patients with AMI. After adjusting for both patient and procedural factors, multivariable logistic regression (MLR) identified international normalized ratio (INR) (OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.56-6.40, P = .001) and chronic heart failure (CHF) (OR 5.88; 95% CI 1.15-29.97, P = .033) to be independent predictors of pulmonary morbidity, while preoperative sepsis (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.45-2.66, P < .0001) alone was predictive of CV morbidity in all patients undergoing MB.

DISCUSSION

Mesenteric bypass for mesenteric ischemia leads to high rates of morbidity and mortality, whether done in an acute or chronic setting. Preoperative sepsis, independent of AMI or CMI, predicts CV morbidity, regardless of bypass configuration or conduit, while elevated INR or underlying CHF carries a higher risk of pulmonary morbidity.

Advancements in Revascularization Strategies for Acute Mesenteric Ischemia: A Comprehensive Review

Even with modern advancements in the management of acute mesenteric ischemia over the past decade, morbidity and mortality remain high, and the best primary treatment modality is still debated amongst interventionalists. Traditionally, interventionalists have favored an open surgical approach but are now trending for endovascular interventions due to apparent reduced mortality and complications. Newer studies suggest hybrid approaches, and intestinal stroke centers may be superior to either strategy alone. This narrative review will explore the natural history of acute mesenteric ischemia with the aim of increasing interventionalist awareness of modern advancements in revascularization strategies for this devastating disease.

Current Approaches for Mesenteric Ischemia and Visceral Aneurysms

This article provides an overview of acute mesenteric ischemia, chronic mesenteric ischemia, and visceral aneurysms, with a focus on treatment. Acute mesenteric ischemia can be a challenging diagnosis. Early recognition and adequate revascularization are key to patient outcomes. Chronic mesenteric ischemia is a more insidious process, typically caused by atherosclerosis. Various options for revascularization exist, which must be tailored to each patient. Visceral aneurysms are rare and the natural history is not well defined. However, given the risk of rupture and high mortality, treatment may be complex.

Retrograde Open Celiac Stenting for Ischemic Hepatitis following Pancreaticoduodenectomy

A 74-year-old man with pancreatic cancer had undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy and subsequently developed ischemic hepatitis secondary to high-grade celiac artery stenosis. Celiac antegrade stenting via brachial artery access was unsuccessful, and open antegrade bypass would have required takedown of the pancreatic and/or biliary anastomoses for adequate exposure. Retrograde open celiac stenting was, therefore, successfully performed via the gastroduodenal artery stump. His ischemic hepatitis resolved, and he was ultimately discharged with dual antiplatelet therapy. Computed tomography angiography at 6 months demonstrated a widely patent celiac stent. Retrograde open celiac stenting via the gastroduodenal artery stump is an alternative to open bypass for celiac revascularization not amenable to percutaneous antegrade stenting in patients who have undergone pancreaticoduodenectomy.

2D-perfusion angiography for intra-procedural endovascular treatment response assessment in chronic mesenteric ischemia: a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Endovascular revascularization has become the first-line treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI). The qualitative visual analysis of digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is dependent on observer experience and prone to interpretation errors. We evaluate the feasibility of 2D-Perfusion Angiography (2D-PA) for objective, quantitative treatment response assessment in CMI.

METHODS

49 revascularizations in 39 patients with imaging based evidence of mesenteric vascular occlusive disease and clinical signs of CMI were included in this retrospective study. To assess perfusion changes by 2D-PA, DSA-series were post-processed using a dedicated, commercially available software. Regions of interest (ROI) were placed in the pre- and post-stenotic artery segment. In aorto-ostial disease, the inflow ROI was positioned at the mesenteric artery orifice. The ratios outflow to inflow ROI for peak density (PD), time to peak and area-under-the-curve (AUC) were computed and compared pre- and post-interventionally. We graded motion artifacts by means of a four-point scale. Feasibility of 2D-PA and changes of flow parameters were evaluated.

RESULTS

Motion artifacts due to a mobile vessel location beneath the diaphragm or within the mesenteric root, branch vessel superimposition and inadequate contrast enhancement at the inflow ROI during manually conducted DSA-series via selective catheters owing to steep vessel angulation, necessitated exclusion of 26 measurements from quantitative flow evaluation. The feasibility rate was 47%. In 23 technically feasible assessments, PDoutflow/PDinflow increased by 65% (p < 0.001) and AUCoutflow/AUCinflow increased by 85% (p < 0.001). The time to peak density values in the outflow ROI accelerated only minimally without reaching statistical significance. Age, BMI, target vessel (celiac trunk, SMA or IMA), stenosis location (ostial or truncal), calcification severity, plaque composition or the presence of a complex stenosis did not reach statistical significance in their distribution among the feasible and non-feasible group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to other vascular territories and indications, the feasibility of 2D-PA in mesenteric revascularization for CMI was limited. Unfavorable anatomic conditions contributed to a high rate of inconclusive 2D-PA results.

Contemporary management of acute and chronic mesenteric ischemia: 10-year experience from a multihospital healthcare system

OBJECTIVE

Endovascular and hybrid methods are being increasingly used to treat mesenteric ischemia. However, long-term outcomes and risk of symptom recurrence remain unknown. The objective of this study was to define predictors of post-operative morbidity, mortality, and patency loss in acute (AMI) or chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI).

METHODS

Inpatient and follow-up records for all patients who underwent revascularization for AMI and CMI from 2010 to 2020 at a multicenter hospital system were reviewed. Patency and mortality were evaluated with Cox regression, visualized with Kaplan-Meier curves, and compared using log rank testing. Patency was further evaluated with Fine-Gray regression utilizing death as a competing risk. Post-operative major adverse events (MAE) and 30-day mortality were evaluated with logistic regression.

RESULTS

407 patients were included; 148 AMI and 259 CMI. In AMI, 30-day mortality was 31%. Open surgery was associated with lower rates of bowel resection (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.13, 0.61). Etiology of AMI also did not change outcomes (OR 1.30, 95% CI 0.77, 2.19). Adjusted analyses indicates that a history of diabetes (OR 2.77, 95% CI 1.37, 5.61) and sepsis on presentation (OR 2.32, 95% CI 1.18, 4.58) were independently associated with increased risk of 30-day MAE. In CMI, open surgery and CKD were associated with higher MAE (OR 3.03, 95% CI 1.14, 8.05; OR 2.37, 95% CI 1.31, 4.31) while CKD (OR 3.02, 95% CI 1.10, 8.37) and inpatient status prior to revascularization (OR 2.78, 95% CI 1.01, 7.61) were associated with increased 30-day mortality. In CMI, patients in the endovascular cohort had higher rates of symptom recurrence (29% vs. 13%) with faster onset (endovascular 64 days vs. bypass 338 days).

CONCLUSIONS

AMI remains a morbid disease despite evolving revascularization techniques. An open approach should remain the gold standard as it reduces likelihood of bowel resection. In CMI, endovascular interventions have improved post-operative morbidity but result in early symptom recurrence and re-interventions. An endovascular-first approach should be standard in CMI with close surveillance.

Hospital-based Delays to Revascularization Increase Risk of Post-operative Mortality and Short Bowel Syndrome in Acute Mesenteric Ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a surgical emergency for which delays in treatment have been closely associated with high morbidity and mortality. Although the duration of ischemia as a determinant of outcomes for AMI is well known, the objective of this study was to identify hospital-based determinants of delayed revascularization and their effects on post-operative morbidity and mortality in AMI.

METHODS

All patients who underwent any surgery for acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) from a multi-center hospital system between 2010 and 2020 were divided into two groups based on timeliness of mesenteric revascularization after presentation. Early revascularization (ER) was defined as having both vascular consultation ≤ 12 hours of presentation and vascular surgery performed at the patient's initial operation. Delayed revascularization (DR) was defined as having either delays to vascular consultation or vascular surgery. A retrospective review of demographic and post-operative data was performed. Effect of DR on major post-operative outcomes including 30-day and 2-year mortality, total length of bowel resection, and development of short bowel syndrome were analyzed. Effects of delayed vascular consultation alone, delayed vascular surgery alone, no revascularization during admission, and admitting service on outcomes were also examined on sub-group analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 212 patients were analyzed. 99 patients received ER while the remaining 113 patients experienced a delay to revascularization after hospital presentation. Among the DR group, 55 (25.9%) patients had delayed vascular consultation while vascular surgery was deferred until after the initial operation in 37 (17.4%) patients. 51 (24.0%) patients were never revascularized during admission. DR was a significant predictor of 30-day (odds ratio (OR) 2.09, 95% confidence interval (CI) [1.4-4.9], P=0.03) and 2-year mortality (hazard ratio (HR) 1.55, CI [1.0-2.3], P= 0.04). DR was also independently associated with increased bowel resection length (OR 7.47, P <0.01) and post-operative short bowel syndrome (OR 2.4, P=0.03) on multivariate analyses. When examined separately on sub-group analysis, both delayed vascular consultation (OR 3.38, P=0.03) and vascular surgery (OR 4.31, P <0.01) independently increased risk of 30-day mortality. Hospital discharge after AMI without mesenteric revascularization was associated with increased risk of short bowel syndrome (OR 2.94, P <0.01) and late mortality (HR 1.60, P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Delayed vascular consultation and vascular surgery are both significant hospital-based determinants of post-operative mortality and short bowel syndrome in AMI. Timing-based management protocols which emphasize routine evaluation by a vascular surgeon and early, definitive mesenteric revascularization should be established and widely adopted for all patients with clinically suspected AMI at presentation.

Multidisciplinary management of acute mesenteric ischemia: Surgery and endovascular intervention

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a rare cause of the “acute abdomen”, characterized by impaired blood flow to the intestine. The principle of treatment is restoration of perfusion to ischemic bowel and resection of any necrotic intestine. Surgery and endovascular intervention are two complementary approaches to mesenteric ischemia. Endovascular intervention is not an alternative to the surgical approach, but it has the potential to improve the prognosis of patients with AMI when judiciously combined with a surgical approach. Due to the need for emergent treatment of patients with acute mesenteric ischemia, the treatment strategy needs to be modified for each facility. This review aims to highlight cutting-edge studies and provide reasonable treatment strategies for patients with acute mesenteric ischemia based on available evidence.

Outcomes of different acute mesenteric ischemia therapies in the last 20 years: A meta-analysis and systematic review

OBJECTIVE

Acute mesenteric ischemia is a disease with high morbidity and mortality, and it is traditionally treated with open surgery. Endovascular therapy and hybrid techniques are alternative treatments that are also currently available. We performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the outcomes of the different treatment approaches in the last 20 years.

METHODS

Studies on acute mesenteric ischemia that were indexed in PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases (from January 1, 2000, to April 1, 2021) were reviewed. All related retrospective observational studies and case series were included. A random-effects model was used to calculate pooled estimates, and the results were reported as proportions and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

In our study, a total of 2369 patients (in 39 studies) underwent endovascular, open surgery, or retrograde open mesenteric stenting. The pooled mortality estimates for open surgery, endovascular therapy, and retrograde open mesenteric stenting were 40% (95% CI, 0.33-0.47; I² = 84%), 26% (95% CI, 0.19-0.33; I² = 33%), and 32% (95% CI, 0.21-0.44; I² = 26%), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The mortality associated with open surgical treatment, endovascular therapy, and retrograde open mesenteric stenting tend to be similar in the last 20 years.

The effect of comorbidity on early clinical decision making in acute mesenteric ischemia

INTRODUCTION

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a surgical emergency with a high mortality and morbidity rate. Prompt diagnosis and early surgical management are the cornerstones of management. In certain patients, however, treatment is futile and early palliative care, lessens patient, and family distress. The aim of this study was to investigate factors, focusing on patient comorbidity, that may predict futility of treatment and hence, guide clinicians in their decision making.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Consecutive adult patients with AMI diagnosed on imaging were reviewed for demographics, comorbidity, imaging, and biochemical results.

RESULTS

Seventy patients were identified with average age of 67 (range 33 - 94). Overall hospital mortality was 72%. Patients were divided into three distinct groups, patients who recovered (27%), patients deceased despite surgical treatment (18%), and patients palliated on presentation (54%). Age was comparable between groups (61 vs. 69 vs. 69; p=.2). Length of stay was highest in the recovered group (41.6 vs. 12.3 vs. 2.8 d). Biochemically, only lactate level differed (3.1 vs. 2.3 vs. 5.3 mmol/L, p=.03). Both deceased and palliative group scored similarly but significantly higher than the recovered group in both the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) (4.2 and 5.6 vs. 3.4, p=.02) and age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) (6.7 and 8.2 vs. 5; p<.01). Other co-morbidities of atrial fibrillation (AF) and hypertension were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Raised ACCI confers poor outcomes in AMI despite surgical management. ACCI may be used to aid early decision making in AMI, predicting futility of treatment, and altering management goals to palliative comfort care.

Successful treatment of superior mesenteric artery thrombosis via preoperative interventional radiology and surgery using indocyanine green fluorescence

We report a successful case that offered a symbolic therapeutic experience of interventional radiology and surgery collaboration for superior mesenteric artery thrombosis. A 70-year-old man presented with a chief complaint of sudden abdominal pain. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography revealed superior mesenteric artery thrombosis. Interventional radiology was performed, and thrombotic occlusion was observed in the superior mesenteric artery trunk. The abdominal pain disappeared; however, after a while, the thrombus re-formed and the abdominal pain reappeared. Thus, emergency surgery was performed. Before surgery, thrombus aspiration was performed via interventional radiology as much as possible. During surgery, when the blood flow was evaluated using fluorescence with indocyanine green, a region of markedly poor blood flow was detected in the ileum, and the area was excised. The postoperative course was favorable. In this patient, it is possible that preoperative removal of the thrombus via interventional radiology minimized the ischemic area of the intestinal tract, and blood flow evaluation using indocyanine green allowed reliable excision of only the ischemic area. We believe that our case involved a treatment that exploited the advantages of both interventional radiology and surgery using indocyanine green fluorescence.

Retrograde open mesenteric stenting should be considered as the initial approach to acute mesenteric ischemia

OBJECTIVE

Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) is an alternative to traditional bypass in patients who present with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI). However, there is a paucity of data comparing outcomes of ROMS with other open surgical approaches. This study represents the largest single-institution experience with ROMS and aims to compare outcomes of ROMS with those of conventional mesenteric bypass.

METHODS

All patients who presented with AMI from 2008 to 2019 and who were treated with either ROMS or mesenteric bypass were included in the study. Patient, procedure, and outcome variables were compared. Bypass and ROMS patients were compared using univariate statistics.

RESULTS

A total of 34 patients who presented with AMI needing bypass were included in the study; 16 underwent mesenteric bypass, and 18 underwent ROMS. ROMS patients tended to be older than bypass patients and had higher rates of comorbidities. Bypass patients were more likely to have a history of chronic mesenteric symptoms (68.8% vs 27.8%; P = .019). Bypass procedures also took longer than ROMS procedures (302 vs 189 minutes; P < .01). The majority of ROMS procedures were not performed in a hybrid room (77.8%). Within 1 year, one stent thrombosed in a ROMS patient, requiring later mesenteric bypass. In the bypass group, one conduit thrombosed, ultimately resulting in perioperative death, and one bypass anastomosis stenosed, requiring angioplasty. Complication, unanticipated reintervention, and mortality rates were otherwise similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Complication, reintervention, and mortality rates after ROMS are similar to those of mesenteric bypass in the setting of AMI. Given similar postoperative outcomes and ability to perform these procedures in a conventional operating room but with significantly shorter operative times, ROMS should be considered a first-line option in acute situations when the operator is comfortable performing the procedure.

How to manage chronic mesenteric ischemia? A deliberated strategy

Chronic mesenteric ischemia is a rare and challenging clinical entity with non-specific complaints. It concerns mainly elderly patients with a diffuse atherosclerotic burden affecting other vascular beds. Most surgeons have limited experience with the management of symptomatic occlusive disease of the superior mesenteric artery or coeliac trunk. Last decades, the mesenteric revascularisation debate has also been implicated by the endovascular vogue. An endovascular-first strategy has been adopted in most centres, considering its less invasive character, with lower peri-procedural morbidity and mortality and more rapid recovery. The volume of mesenteric artery stenting has steadily increased over time. However, the long-term results of percutaneous mesenteric angioplasty and stenting are worse than those obtained with open surgery. Currently, many centres reserve open repair for cases in whom PTA failed. This extensive literature review aims to orientate decision-making and choice of revascularisation modality for chronic mesenteric ischemia, considering a significant patient heterogeneity.

Superior mesenteric artery endarterectomy for chronic mesenteric ischemia: A viable alternative in poor candidates for endovascular interventions

Background

Chronic mesenteric ischemia can be treated with either endovascular approaches or surgical revascularization. Recent data suggest that surgery leads to more durable symptom relief with similar long-term survival compared to transcatheter angioplasty. Splanchnic vessel endarterectomy has been shown to lead to longer freedom from recurrence compared to the more commonly used surgical bypass procedure.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia who were considered poor candidates for endovascular repair and therefore underwent superior mesenteric artery endarterectomy in our institution. Study period was April 2016 to April 2018.

Results

A 73-year-old female and a 69-year-old male patient fulfilled our inclusion criteria. Extensive stenosis of the celiac axis and the superior mesenteric artery was found in both patients. superior mesenteric artery endarterectomy was performed in both cases. Endarterectomy was closed using a polytetrafluoroethylene patch. Both patients are alive and symptom-free at one year postoperatively with no signs of restenosis.

Conclusions

Our institutional outcomes are in line with recent literature supporting superior mesenteric artery endarterectomy as a viable alternative to surgical bypass in patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia who are suboptimal candidates for endovascular angioplasty and stenting.